Lateral Learning

         The 3rd sugia of our Av Mishna of הגיגה, goes from :דף ב to .ד.  As a review, the reason why this commentary refers to the opening Mishna of each opening Mishna by the term “Av”, this metaphor makes direct reference to the first ברכה of the Shemone Esri.  Lacking this opening אב ברכה all the other blessings in the Amida prayer exists on par with Tehillim prayers.  The latter lack שם ומלכות and therefore they do not possess the power of swearing a Torah oath.  All positive time oriented commandments require k’vanna.  K’vanna requires the ability to make subtle  discernments and distinctions.  To what does k’vanna compare?  Attempting to paint a facial oil portrait using a Tom Sawyer broad white wash brush.  Therefore, a Av Mishna – each opening Mishna of every Mesechta/tractate of Gemara – all the learning that follows thereafter stands upon the יסוד of this Av Mishna.  This chiddush sh’itta of learning, stands upon the Siddur – Shemone Esri as the starting fundamental imprint by which to learn Talmud.
 
         Rav Nemuraskii emphasized and repeated over and over again, if the foundation has a crack, every floor built upon such a foundation must afterwards fall into ruin up to and until the builders repair the cracked foundation.  Lateral Learning seeks to emphasize the teaching of Rav Aaron.  And the absolute necessity, and hence the  emphasis to learn the first Mishna of each and every Mesechta well.  The opening Mishna exists as the foundation upon which stands each and every Mesechta of Sha’s.  Talmudic Common Law learns by means of precedents.  Halachic codes fail to teach this most important learning priority.  How to learn what logically qualifies as a valid legal precedent – separates Gemara scholarship upon the Mishna from how current Yeshiva students learn from the halachic codes.
 
         Learning Talmud requires more than making general repetitions of what a person read on a page of Gemara.  Talmud teaches classic Common Law.  The Framers of both the Mishna and the Gemara – their scholarship serves as a future model for the re-establishment of Torah Common Law Courts – when our people receive the blessing from HaShem to reconquer the oath sworn lands.  Torah teaches spirituality applicable to the generations of klall Israel.  By contrast, the learning which codified the Talmud into codes of law, applied to times when Jews lived in cursed g’lut.  Mitzvot do not apply, they impart no holiness to Jews in g’lut.  The spirituality of merit – this holy dedication of Will – exists only when the אלהים\Judges hear the disputes among and between our brit people and separate the righteous from the wicked; to maintain the alliance which binds our people as one Cohen nation – distinct and separate from all other peoples and/or nations.  When the Torah refers to Israel as “firstborn”, this metaphor refers to the Cohen nation.
 
         Contrast the avoda zara, the Greek noise testament which perverted the k’vanna of “firstborn son” into its tuma false messiah criminal counterfeit religious Creed theological belief system.  The Arabian “prophet” Muhammad, he totally failed to distinguish between tohor and tuma; his Koran never once brings the Name of HaShem and confused the concept of ברית with the tuma Xtian avoda zara, whose ignorance did not know how to translate this most essential term – ברית.  Alliance does not mean covenant because the latter in no wise implies swearing a Torah oath in the Name of HaShem.  The noise testament never once brings the Name of HaShem.  A basic violation of the first commandment, the revelation of HaShem to the brit Cohen nation at Sinai.  בראשית … ברית אש.  The fire of a brit – swearing a Torah oath in the Name of HaShem.  This יסוד of the Torah, the tuma avoda zara “daughter religions” did not know.  Hence their replacement theologies – rather than teach the tohor oath brit faith – their avoda zara taught dogmatic Creed belief systems.  An error as distinct as the difference between tohor from tuma.  This latter basis of Cohen avodat HaShem, avoda zara does not know.
 
         Klall: a man can not cut a Torah  oath brit upon his heart and soul [the inheritance of his future born children] under conditions of tuma.  G’lut defines the conditions of tuma.  Hence Jews in g’lut, can not keep the mitzvot.  The best they can accomplish, they can freeze the Torah into codifications like a slaughter house cold freezes cattle carcasses.  Consider the k’vanna of the blessing:
אתה חונן לאדם דעת ומלמד לאנוש בינה:  חננו מאתך חכמה בינה ודעת:  ברוך אתה ה’, חונן הדעת.

How does the Torah and prophets teach the k’vanna behind this blessing?    This question defines Torah scholarship following the sealing of the Sha’s.  When Israel does not know how to pray, the land has no king.  Moshe failed to sanctify the Name HaShem, he failed to teach Israel how to pray – for water.  Torah, the Tree of Life, exudes living water.  This living water any physical source can emote from its midst – life.  Because the Spirit of HaShem lives within our hearts – that’s the foundation upon which stands Torah and mitzvot.

         The Parsha of פינחס teaches the passing of the brit faith from generation after generation after generation for ever.  The Wilderness generation lacked the merit to inherit the privilege to conquer the oath sworn unto the Avot – the brit lands.  This Parsha addressed to all the generations, the soul of the Avot, who merits to inherit the oath sworn lands?  Both Men and Women equally inherit the brit faith.  The mussar given by virtually all the prophets – HaShem never commanded worship by means of korbanot.  This fundamental openly and blatantly stands in confrontation with the korbonot dedicated from the daily burnt offerings, shabbot and new Moon korbanot, to those dedicated upon each and every Yom Tov!  HaShem no more commands human sacrifices than does the Torah command korbanot!

A korban entails a dedication of soul unto HaShem.  This “soul” [the inheritance of ones’ future born seed], the brit faith.  A sign of the brit in no manner, shape, or form equals the brit.  Confusing the sign of the brit with the brit itself compares to people who worship God and then confuse the stars as also Gods.  People who confuse the authority of Reshon scholarship and make the Talmud and T’NaCH secondary to Reshon opinions.

         What then succinctly defines the first two floors of the brit faith?  Brit Gilgal: just as did HaShem war against the Gods of Egypt, so too HaShem wars against the Gods of Canaan – the second commandment of the revelation of the Torah at Sinai.  Hence the tremendous error which our forefathers made when they asked for a king, when HaShem lives as our KING, in the days of the prophet Shm’uel.  The second floor of Torah brit faith, the sworn oath brit of Sh’Cem, Israel can only keep and observe the mitzvot in tohor.  Hence, observance of mitzvot in g’lut profanes this oath brit faith – as expressed through the Rabbeinu Tam tefillen.  Yeshivot fail to teach the tohor 13 middot as the unique logic system which permits the generations to interpret the original intent of the Framers.  The two different orders of tefillen exist as the remembrance of the oath britot sworn at Gilgal and Sh’Cem.  This brit faith serves as the summation of the Avraham oath that HaShem lives within the hearts of the Cohen nation.  Tefilla stands in the place of korbanot, Israel as the nation of Cohonim must dedicate tefillot in tohor conditions just as the placing of tefillen requires a גוף נקי.

דף ב:  מדבר ואינו שומע, שומע ואינו מדבר – חייב.  והתניא:  מדבר ואינו שומע, שומע ואינו מדבר – פטור
         This 3rd sugia resembles the Parsha explained above which confuses the order of birth of Aaron, Mariam, and Moshe, together with the doubts raised whether daughters receive a land inheritance from their father, as represented by the case of the daughters Zelophehad.  Merit to inherit the brit inheritance of the Cohen nation applies equally to both Men and Women, just as did HaShem bring redemption from g’lut oppression in the days of Moshe our Teacher unto both Men and Women.

The merit of maintaining the holiness of the sworn oaths our forefathers dedicated their hearts and souls unto HaShem as our God at GilGal and at Sh’Cem – upon this merit Men and Women stand upon the scales of Divine Judgment in each and every generation for all eternity – no exceptions.

דברים לא:  בבוא כל ישראל לראות את פני ה’ אלהיך במקום אשר יבחר תקרא את התורה הזאת נגד כל ישראל באזניהם הקהל את העם האנשים והנשים והטף וגרך אשר בשעריך למען ישמעו ולמען ילמדו ויראו את ה’ אלהיכם ושמרו לעשות את כלדברי התורה הזאת  ובניהם אשר לא ידעו ישמעו ולמדו ליראה את ה’ אלהיכם כל הימים אשר אתם חיים על האדמה אשר אתם עברים את הירדן שמה לרשתה
         Herein stands the summation of Torah faith – Fear of Heaven.  Offering korbanot as a bar BQ to Heaven profanes faith.  Just ask king Shaul.  Obedience over sacrifices.  The dedicatin of korbanot on the yom tov most essentially renews the oath brit faith which our forefathers swore at Gilgal and Sh’Cem.  Contrast the mussar of מלכים א יב:א – לג.  The difference between generation from generation.  How Yarov’am convert the terafim of Dan unto a golden calf!  Does not this lack of fear of heaven?  The mussar does not limit its rebuke only to Yarov’am.   Yarov’am directly compare to the jealousy of the brothers of Yosef when they cast him down unto a pit full of vipers which contained no water?  Contrast the mussar of the kre’a sh’ma: the tuma Yatzir lives within us in all generations.  This rebukes slaps in the face all who accept the yoke of heaven upon themselves.
Persons who confuse a korban as a mitzva in and of itself compare to

שבת פרק שני דף כב.  אמר רב כהנא דרש רב נתן בר מניומי משמיה דרבי תנחום נר של חנוכה שהניחה למעלה מכ’ אמה פסולה כסוכה וכמבוי.  דתנן במה מדליקין
From the mitzva of lighting Shabbot candles learns the mitzva of lighting Chanukah candles.  The physical lighting of candles serves as a rabbinic משל which comes to teach the דאורייתא נמשל.  The sanctity of shabbot teaches the obligation to dedicate ones heart to abide by the brit preconditions wherein Israeli allies trust one another in shalom.  Whereas the lights of Chanuka dedicate the commitment to interpret the Written Torah strictly and only through the tohor Oral Torah middot of logic – with no exceptions.

         The brain controls every part of human life: physical, intellectual, behavioral, social and emotional.  “Number Sense”, the ability of the mind to recognize subtle changes without direct knowledge that an object, either added or removed from a collection.  First year children develop intuition about numbers.  Some argue that at birth infants have some knowledge of numbers.  5 + 5 = 7 to 12, the basis for the later development of fuzzy logic.  The infant mind has the ability to create complex symbol systems: spoken and written language.  This ability permits the limits of approximations.
         Human cultures contrast with genetics: the former can change and import alien customs whereas the latter opposes change.  Memory works through the association of ideas.  Passion breeds talent.  Learning mathematics and languages, a process of assimilation.  Passion and education work well together.  Testing children should employ hidden signals, clues – which assist them to solve problems.  The education of small children should include trial and error, reward and punishment based upon B F Skinner’s conditioned response theory. 


The education of children should employ rooms having different shape designs.  Wherein the teacher makes competitions: the set of children in one shape/color designed room against the set of children in a different shape/color designed room.  An appointed day, once a week, wherein the children design the shape and color of their class rooms, requires lite movable partition walls, permitting simple geometric designs including circles and triangles.  Instructors should “grade” tests employing different scents.  According to research done by the Smell & Taste Treatment and Research Foundation, the olfactory response, has a direct link to the emotional center within the brain.  Scents have direct associations with previous life experiences.  Employing olfactory scent responses not only connects with memory-inducing mental powers, certain aromas like apples impact stress levels, even headaches.  But lavender, for example, promotes relaxation.  Whereas cinnamon can sharpen your mind.

Some argue that smelling  a whiff of cinnamon improves cognitive functions like visual-motor response, working memory and attention span.  Whereas the smell of pine can alleviate stress. The scent of vanilla perhaps improves the overall mood a person feels. The smell of fresh-cut grass promotes feelings of joy.  Citrus, on the other hand, can promote more energized feelings.  Emotional education represents the key to successful development of very young children.  Educators should focus to inhibit emotions of aggression or lack of empathy.  Antisocial behaviors, like bullying, represent the tuma Yatzir ‘big bad wolf’.

Educators should promote contact sports for aggressive children.  The aim of giving aggressive children an emotional outlet, this encourages them to develop their sense of empathy toward others.  The nature of empathy maturity involves a aggression/self-regulation ratio.  A prime foundation for parenting small children – encouraging the child to recognize and respond to the emotions of others.  Educators should encourage children to address and discuss the emotions expressed by their peers.  Development of innate self awareness – joined with “others”, represents a Prime achievement.  Staging emotion games, coupled with rewards when a child makes emotion discernment.

Young children mirror adult behaviors.  Parents need to learn how to pantomime emotional feelings and distresses.  For example: comparing upset stomach pains/gases to a balloon, grasping the stomach moaning and squeezing a balloon.  A newborn’s brain has a well-developed brainstem and midbrain, which enable it to carry out the bodily functions necessary for life.  But the sections of the brain involved in regulating emotions, language, and abstract thought develop after birth.  Brain development–the process of creating, strengthening, and discarding connections, or synapses, among brain neurons.  During the early years, children experience an incredibly fast synapse development.  Approximately 80% of brain development has occurred after three years.  But the devil lies in the details.  Stimulation functions as the basis for learning.  Passion, perhaps condenses learning limited to a single word.  During the first 3 or four yours, the learning curve of a  child’s brain compares to a sponge.

Obviously during this crucial period, ideally children should nurse from their mothers.  But even 3 months of breastfeeding boosts brain growth by 20 to 30 percent. At birth, a baby knows its mother’s voice, even perhaps while still in the womb.  The excess of synapses produced by a child’s brain in the first three years makes the brain especially responsive to external input.   During this period, the brain can “capture” experience more efficiently than it will be able to later.  At about three months, an infant’s power of recognition improves dramatically; this coincides with significant growth in the hippocampus, the limbic system within the brain, involved in forming, organizing, and storing memories.  The first year the cerebellum triples in size, the rapid development of motor skills occurs during this period.  Ideally parents should speak to the child using 10 or more languages.

Year Two: The most dramatic changes involve the brain’s language areas, which are developing more synapses and becoming more interconnected.  Referred to as the “I” and “me.” period of self awareness.  These changes correspond to a rapid spike in children’s language abilities – sometimes called the vocabulary explosion – typically occurs during this period.  Often a child’s vocabulary will quadruple between his first and second birthday.

Year Three:  Improved and consolidated, complex cognitive abilities.  At this age children have greater cognitive flexibility and better understand cause and effect.  The level of synaptic density has already peaked and begun to decline.  Positive early experiences have a huge effect and greatly improve the chances for later achievement, success, and happiness.  From here after young children begin the life struggle to integrate within society.

         What defines the vision of the Cohen Constitutional Republic?  Freedom requires wisdom, the knowledge how to employ and develop wealth within our nation.  A banana republic limits wealth to a 2% top tier elite; while its people endure foreign subjugation and poverty.  It appears to this commentator that de Gaulle, who demanded that the Eshkol government absorb an invasion from Nasser’s coalition of countries; that de Gaulle envisioned Israel as his own personal banana republic, an abomination similar to King Leopold II of Belgium.  Herein explains the sudden pre – ’67 shift of French and EU hostility to the Jewish State.

As a young new nation Israel struggles to integrate itself with the community of nations within the Middle East and North Africa.  Foreign relations sharply contrast with domestic necessities.  Government leadership can not ignore development of strategic and tactical military planning.  The US strategic interests: A)  Not to lose territory to either Mexico or Canada.  B)  Maintain and uphold the cultural dominance of its current Anglo-Protestant identity.

The Treaty of Versailles produced a tremendous impact upon the development of Nazi military planning and development.  The Nazi Luftwaffe developed no long-range capability doctrine.  The cowardice of London and Paris shocked the Nazis, had they realized that Chamberlain had such a pusillanimous backbone, German military planners would have undoubtedly developed an Air Force which had a strategic military capability.  As such, the German High Command made a crucial blunder and limited the Luftwaffe to a limited tactical role.  German aircraft developed only as support role for the Army.  The Battle of Dunkirk, together with the Battle of Britain conclusively proved this critical mistake.

Allied military planners understood that before they could invade from the English Channel, they first had to destroy the weakest link in the Nazi chain mail –  the strength of the Luftwaffe.  They had to push it as far back from the English Channel and North Sea coasts as possible.  Only by forcing, unto the extremity of their ranges, the operation of German tactical and operational air units, coupled with limiting the Luftwaffe to restricted numbers, could the Allies assure success in the coming Battle for France.

Destroying Germany’s ability to carpet bomb, achieving this war objective – American and British generals defined as the key strategy of the Allied war effort.   Allied planners viewed as their key obstacle Luftwaffe bombers.  The tactic they developed, the Allies decided to focus upon the destruction of fighter planes.  They hoped this action would induce German planners to reduce production of tactical bombers and increase production of replacement fighters. Bomber aircraft posed a far greater hazard to an Allied invasion of France than did fighters.

         To reduce the risks of Allied long range bombing missions, US and Britain manufacturers started making auxiliary fuel tanks for fighter aircraft.  This innovation, significantly contributed to and forever changed the tenor of the daytime air war over Germany.  The war in Europe sharply contrasts with the German invasion of Russia.  Russia, a 3rd world country, lacked road development some 500 km within its interior.  This historical fact strongly supports the priority of supply of food, equipment and ammunition to troops in the field.  Prewar weapon systems, during the course of a war, rapidly become obsolete.  In a future war, what role shall Aircraft carriers play?  Shall they go the way of the once mighty dreadnought?


Both Germans and Japanese manufacturing failed to innovate significant mass production improvements upon their equipment during the course of the war.  The Americans, by contrast, produced multiple generations of modified military equipment which gave a fighting edge to Allied soldiers in the field.  Contrast the modifications the Japanese made to their tanks to that the US made to its submarine torpedo.  Development of a technology which can rapidly build highways, requires the industrial capacity to mass produce lite weight flexible plastic utility roads.  The first priority in the development of any military doctrine must solve the crucial requirement: how to support and supply Armies on the ground.

During the Battle of the Mediterranean, Italy failed to increase the capacity of Tripoli and the other ports before or during the war.  The Regia Marina, like the Luftwaffe, failed to develop a proper strategic air force.  The limited capacity of the Libyan ports, best represents the flaws toward supplying troops in the field.  Rommel’s troops continually fought their battles facing critical shortages of food, fuel, and equipment.

For nations who lack the US Pacific/Atlantic buffer zone advantages, does the strategic supply and support priority supersede peacetime investments in cutting edge military innovations?   For Israel, public control over defense industries compares to a poker player who keeps his cards close to his chest.  Contrast Domestic housing, Jerusalem should hold no regulatory powers – across the country – over private property management, development and construction.

         Do Bombers remain as the most essential element of the strategic air arm?  No.  Missile technology has significantly reduced their once dominant priority.  At least till the development of Hyper-sonic bombers.  Speed, the next aviation advancement to counter emerging threats in the 21st century.  A Katyusha multiple rocket launcher delivers explosives to a target area more quickly than conventional artillery.  But the latter enjoys greater accuracy and can more quickly saturate a war zone.  Modern warfare centers upon influencing enemy manufacturing and production decisions.  The Allied success which caused German manufacturing to abandon building strategic air bomber fleets, contributed to the Allied victory, on par with and perhaps even surpassing the combined successes of Generals: Patton, Bradley, MacArthur, Montgomery, and Zhukov.

Herein concludes the learning on this the 3rd sugia of our Av Mishna of הגיגה.

 

Leave a comment