The EU’s continued reliance on the two-state formula – looks less like a great power’s strategy than a policy sustained despite its diminishing influence. Hostile EU imperialism propaganda interprets Jewish sovereignty as expansionism while giving insufficient weight to Jewish self-determination, Arab rejectionism, Israel’s security concerns, and examples of Israeli territorial compromise, first initiated by PM Begins Camp David Accords with President Sadat’s Egypt.

The EU’s struggle to act as a consequential geopolitical power in the Middle East and North Africa constrained by the horrid barbaric and utterly vile reputation European nation states have post Shoah. The EU simply not a super-power – period. Despite Britain and France part of the UN P-5, post the 1956 War no further proof required that neither nation compares to the great European empires which dominated the balance of power across all regions of the World before two successive European Civil Wars permanently destroyed the great power status of both collapsed empires; no different than the post Shoah dead JeZeus God and the Nakba Allah dead God. The good name reputations of both Britain & France permanently cast upon the dung heaps of history like the ancient Assyrian and Babylonian dead empires.

Europeans propaganda denounces competing visions for sharing the land between Israelis and Palestinians. A crude revisionist history which ignores the basic fact that Israel won its two wars of Independence in 1948 and again in 1967. Rhetoric of egalitarian visions of morality and equal rights and coexistence revisionist history. Ignores the Arab revolt of 1936 which caused the coward Chamberlain to commit England to an Arab Palestinian state within 10 years after the coming war load of utter and complete rubbish. Its rhetoric egalitarian nonsense narishkeit blindly appeals to denial of forced population transfers of some 900,000 dhimmi Jewish 2nd class populations from Arab countries. That post the Nakba Allah defeat of Hamas Gaza Israel intends to make a forced population transfer of 100% all Gazans expelled to Syria and Iraq. Gazans elected Hamas in the 2006 general election and therefore they rejected the Oslo Accords. Hamas received more popular support than did Hitler’s Party in the election of 1933 Federal elections.

The post Yom Kippur War witnessed the victory of Begin as the PM of Israel in 1977. Begin returned the Sinai to Egypt to achieve a historic peace treaty with Sadat’s Egypt. Attempts by European imperialism which rejects, since the ’39 White Paper Jewish equal rights to achieve self determination in the Middle East; all Arab Israeli wars – including the Oct 7th 2023 Gaza war – fought over Arab rejection that dhimmi Jews have equal rights to achieve self determination within the borders of post ’67 Israel. Revisionist history ignores the fact that Nakba Allah Arabs lost their wars to throw the Jews into the Sea and sanctify the Nazi vision of a world cleansed of dhimmi sub-human Jews. The EU propaganda rhetoric conceals its pro Arab oil addiction.

Zionist self-determination means that Jews cast the Roman abomination of Syria-Palestine wherein the Byzantine empire expanded Palestine unto Trans-Jordan upon the dung heaps of history. Palestine a dead name and the UN or the EU can no more resurrect that dead name than JeZeus their dead God can cause believers of EU morality to once again believe that JeZeus the God of Sinai. Zionist self-determination stands upon the Torah Constitutional mandate which designates the “Yichus” of the 12 Tribal lands within the Republic and authorizes lateral common law Sanhedrin courts authorized through this Torah Constitution to conduct legislative review over any statute law imposed by Tribal heads upon all intra-Tribe Yichus members as the Yovel liberty of Justice within the oath sworn Tribal Republic. The EU denies Jewish equal rights to self determination no different than to their oil rich Arab allies.

Moshe Rabbeinu interpreted the distinction between the 1st and 2nd Sinai commandments as Life vs Death. In line with the בראשית משל of Tree of Life\Wisdom and Tree of Knowledge. Meaning לשמה first commandment vs לא לשמה g’lut 2nd commandment. Theology by definition bound to religion. Just as the US Constitution not a religious document so too the Torah.

Yes exiled Jews for 2000 + years have “converted” Torah into a religion. But now that Jews have reconquered our homelands, the perspective of exiled Jews in foreign lands as despised as Shoah survivors prior to the Eichmann trail…”why did you passively walk into the gas chambers as sheep!?” Only the 12 Tribes of Israel stood at Sinai/Horev and accept to this day the revelation of the Torah. Hence the God of Israel a tribal local God not similar to Islam’s Tawhid Universal Monotheism! Such substitute theology religious fanatism violates the 2nd Sinai commandment.

The EU’s insistence on imposing a secular “two-state solution” effectively forces the Jewish state to treat its enemies as equals rather than demanding they accept the basic Noahide condition for coexistence: recognition of the other’s right to exist. It denies the “Torah Constitution” the ability to enforce its own boundaries. 7 mitzvot Bnai Noach (((can’t be more religious than the Pope – משל) the Torah refers to two types of Goyim living in the Torah constitutional republic of 12 tribes. A) the Gere Toshav B) the Nokhri. A) Mesechta Sanhedrin addresses through the משל aggada story of the 7 mitzvot bnai Noach. B) Mesechta Baba Kama addresses through the משל of the Canaani whose ox gores pays full damages while the ox of an Israel which gores a Canaani – exempt from damages.

The Aggadic source for the 7 mitzvot NOT universal to all nations and peoples because violation of the 7 gere toshav commandments qualifies as a Capital Crime judged by Sanhedrin Courts whose jurisdiction restricted only to ארץ ישראל. The Rambam narishkeit error wherein he transforms an Aggadic gemara which learns k’vanna to Halachic ritualism, proof that his statute law halachot false across the board. Why? The Gemara a common law legalism which brings halachic precedents to interpret a specific Mishna Primary Source viewed from a fixed perspective akin to witness testimony of the New Moon judged! The Rambam statute law code shattered the Gemara’s משנה תורה reinterpretation of the language of a specific Mishna b/c he failed to link the halachic ruling to the specific Mishna as does the Rif Rosh common law codifications of the Talmud.

Actions Have Consequences. The Oct 7th surprise attack has exposed Europe as a tits on a boar hog alliance. Wars and more wars the common denominator fought consequent to European imperialism history of “Two State Final Solutions” for both Israel & India.

A brief history of Imperialism’s famous “Two-State Solution” dictate. The cases of Norway and Sweden, Czechoslovakia, and Malaysia and Singapore are instructive. In 1905, Norway thrust into union with Sweden following the Napoleonic era turned to the ballot to bolt from the Swedish federation. Post WWI, partition of the Austro-Hungarian Empire the Czechs and Slovaks union, fractured as the Communist Block collapsed. Singapore’s breakup with Malaysia – after independence from the British jackboot Malaya, Sabah and Sarawak in 1963 … racial tensions exploded into ethnic riots. Two years into the union Malaysia’s parliament annulled that political union of convenience – akin to Nasser’s alliance with Syria and Jordan.

Notice how emphatically the British barbarians reject the break-up of Great Britain and Spain rejects the Independence of Catalonian and Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. Contrast how hard the P-5 SC roared their support and applause for the Oslo Two State Solution; the 1993 White House ceremony where PLO leader Yasser Arafat and Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin validated a two-State solution; punctuated by a dozen Palestinian terrorist attacks on the streets of Israel, the assassination of Rabin, and the twenty-nine Palestinians in Hebron! Talks between Ehud Olmert and Mohammed Abbas exposed the sham propaganda of the Oslo Pie in the Sky two state solution. Mohammed Abbas behaved as if Nakba Allah dhimmi Arabs won the Six Day War!

Britain’s tactics of divide and conquer, partition of India created huge instability, the East and West Pakistan; East Pakistan became independent Bangladesh after the 1971 war. This dominate the balance of power British imperialism sparked dramatic sectarian violence and ethnic cleansing as millions of fearful Muslims and Hindus sought safe haven in the new kindred nations. Despite the lingering dispute over Kashmir that spawned multiple wars over decades, the direct consequences of that divide and conquer partition policy.

Until the current Hamas-like surprise attack at Pearl Harbor – Oct 7th 2023 massacre – Israel’s IDF victories highly restricted due to UN and Great Power politics. For example Russia, Sri Lanka, Nigeria, France in Algeria and Vietnam; the latter loser replaced by US who likewise suffered defeat. Sri Lankan Civil War: UN estimated 80,000–100,000 people were killed. The Nigerian Civil War (Biafra War) (1967–1970): estimates range from about 500,000 to 3 million deaths, many caused by starvation and disease during the war. Yet none received the condemnations declared repeatedly over and again by the UN bureaucraps upon Israel.

Brutal warfare conducted through extensive wars, such as the Ukraine invasion by Russia, have slaughtered vast multitudes of civilian populations. Each unleashed crushing military campaigns to bring Chechen, Tamil, Biafran and Confederate rebels into the fold. Yet the Hamas/UNWRA surprise attack on the closing day of Sukkot — Israel condemned as guilty of war crimes and genocide?!

A Nakba Day – currently being observed in many places, fueled by the media, including public broadcasters, who promote “one hand clapping” propaganda rhetoric aimed at giving the public a “hard-on” wherein they think with their penis rather than their brains. Words such as “expulsion” and “ethnic cleansing” – accusation of genocide—a claim refuted but cannot be driven from people’s minds. Akin to the slander “the Jews poisoned the wells” denounced by the Pope of those Dark Ages – as false! Hardly anyone mentions that Nakba Day has existed only since 2004, more than 50 years after the war, that followed immediately after the founding of the state of Israel — first introduced by Yasser Arafat. Arabic-speaking observers such as my eldest daughter, saw through his propaganda immediately. None the less Nakba Day awarded Arafat an effective tool for undermining the legitimacy of the state of Israel.

Hardly anyone mentions that the ’48 Nakba Allah defeat-catastrophe, not only accompanied by an attack on the newly founded Jewish state from all sides, because the UN partition plan all Arab countries violently and vocally rejected, but that the Arab embracing Hiter’s extermination dream also affected at least as many Jews, if not more, in the surrounding Arab states. Dhimmi Jews murdered, dispossessed, expelled, or forced to flee to save their lives. Jewish families may also have among their possessions, the odd key to a house from long ago, wrapped in nostalgic memories.

The difference: Israel integrated the refugees—nearly a million of them—despite the harsh conditions at the time. Under Jordan and Egypt, which occupied Judea and Samaria and Gaza for years, Arab refugees had no chance to improve their lot. On the contrary, everything was done to keep their status unchanged; they were exploited as a means of keeping hatred of Israel alive and making it grow, as was their number. Jewish synagogues in E. Jerusalem destroyed. Jordan used Jewish tombstone as building materials.

The ’48 War of Independence an international invasion lead by the Jordanian British trained Army. Like as in all war, terrible things happened. Many Arabs left their homes because Arab leaders had urged them to do so. Their own Sheiks told that once the problem of Israel exterminated, they could return. It would take only days or weeks. Arabs who listened and believed their own leaders made a great mistake to listen, because Israel won the war – it had neither started nor sought.

Ignorant brainwashed youth condemn Israel with fervor that the evil white colonialists drove the Arabs from their homes and stole their land. They “believe” – akin to a religious mantra – that “Palestine” has always existed as a country. They have no idea of the actual historical facts: that the entire region called Palestine and inhabited by Xtians, Muslims, and Jews, under the Romans, the Byzantines, the Arabs, the Ottoman Muslims, and the British empire. Not to mention that archaeological finds and place names suggest that the area clearly predominantly inhabited by Jews even earlier which the Koran acknowledges.

In some circles, Israel is openly denied the right to exist. The Sky is Falling Green Party now openly embraces the UN 3379 canard: Zionism is Racism! This Oct 7th Gaza war has become the Jewish state’s absolute rejection of Europe’s repeated suppression of its historical attempts to dominate the balance of power in the Middle East and North Africa – a duplication of church and mosque revisionist history which insists that JeZeus and Nakba Allah dead Gods the ONE God of Sinai. Both religions reject the Torah mandate of Sanhedrin common law courts who impose courtroom legislative review over the statute laws passed by the 12 Tribal Yichus States; as the fundamental requirement of Yovel liberty within the borders of the lands sworn to Avraham Yitzak and Yaacov as the inheritance of their chosen Cohen people; the Torah k’vanna known as the mitzva of Moshiach.

Yvonne Owens, PhD please please please consider this criticism and improve your scholarship discipline.

The Garden of Eden as Armageddon’s Ground Zero

PhD does not conceal gossip slander anymore than Church blood libels/pogroms sanctify the church from their evil reputations of guilty war crimes against humanity. Luther’s church supported Hitler and Poop Pius XII idolly watched as as the SS gathered the Jews of Rome!

A scholar of literature should not make sophomoric declarations based upon translations! Primary Sources a skill which ideally separates the wisdom of PhD scholarship from young high school and college students who read translations. What major theme does the expulsion of Adam from Eden introduce? Confusing בראשית with the last book of the NT written – utter nonsense. Justin Martyr’s Dialogue with Trypho chapter 81, usually dated to about 155–160 CE, often treated as the earliest surviving, identifiable reference to Revelation: Justin says that “a certain man with us, whose name was John” prophesied that believers would live for a thousand years in Jerusalem. That closely matches Revelation chapter 20. This revisionist history mixes texts written some 1550 years after the fact! No different from the Koran approaching 2000 years after the fact which replaces Nakba Allah with the Spirit revealed in the 1st Sinai commandment that no word can express!

Referring to the President of the US during a war as “mental illness” when LBJ engaged US troops some 60,000 killed based upon a false flag Gulf of Tonkin lie which when pressed LBJ admitted later “perhaps whales”! Really shows a serious lack of context discipline.

Learning Parshat בראשית ונח together

What distinguishes רחום from חמל? Confusing the two separate verbs as bad as the NT Greek failure to differentiate a – מאי נפקא מינא – רב חסד – day vs night distinction between מלאכה from עבודה, which ritually addicted observant Jews also blithely ignore! Understanding requires development of the skill to discern like from like! For example the distinctions between t’ruma, ma’asar, and chol! Israel hardly a “profane” טיפש פשט. Parshat נח סמוך לבראשית. Just as the Siddur stands upon the בסיס of סמוכים to separate and distinguish between T’hellim which do not require k’vanna/שבח from blessings which נזקוק כוונה – שם ומלכות.

The essential Torah wisdom kabballah theme, סמוך to the דברים\משנה תורה ratio. Why the טיפש פשט beginning vs end question – invalid? What does משנה תורה mean? Weigh on the scales of judgment the Yad codification of halacha of called Mishna Torah; against rabbi Yechuda Ha’Nasi’s משנה – common law Case/Din – codification which stands upon בניני אבות precedents of courtroom “Common Law”?

If you affix משנה תורה to the post sealing of the Shas – Yad, then the revelation of the Torah at Sinai/Horev introduces a Judaic religion. If you answer the Book of דברים the basis for the Mishna, then משנה תורה mandates faith defined through צדק צדק תרדוף, as the obligation to establish the Torah as the Constitution of the 12 Tribal Republic sworn “alliance/brit”, which most essentially requires Yovel liberty for the 12 Tribes who militarily conquer the land; Sanhedrin common law courts possess the Torah Constitutional mandate: power of Legislative review over tribal “statute laws”! The latter possibility qualifies as a huge מאי נפקא מינא … רב חסד distinction; comparable in difference to Life vs Death לשמה בארץ ישראל vs לא לשמה בגלוט; distinction which separates blessings from curses ruling the land with justice requires the כוונה wisdom\מלאכה of the courts making fair restitution of damages inflicted by bnai brit upon bnai brit. Such a wisdom-time oriented commandment clearly distinct like oil & water from toldot positive and negative religious ritual commandments which do not require k’vaana in g’lut.

Actions have consequences. The worship of 2nd Commandment avoda zarah learns from a דיוק made upon the opening Av Mishna of Baba Kama – 4 catagories of damages that really through logical דיוק includes 8; the obvious four tam damages and the דיוק k’vanna 4 מועד damages. Parshat בראשית סומך לנח serves to emphasize the wisdom k’vanna of the Av Torah theme which separates Av commandments from Toldot commandments as a מאי נפקא מינא – רב חסד distinction; as דברים defines משנה תורה based upon the premise that the sages sealed the T’NaCH Mishna Gemara Siddur from toldot later g’lut statute law halachic religious codifications which have assimilated and embraced the culture of Roman and Greek statute law and philosophy of syllogism static deductive logic, prioritized above the kabbalah פרדס in conjunction with how the 7, 10, 13 rabbinic middot interpret Talmudic warp halachic sugyot and the 32 middot interpret the weft aggadic sugyot based upon respect of the כלל sugya integrity. The statute halachic g’lut לא לשמה codes uproot and obliterate, and therein they blow out the lights of Hanukkah! Jews forget the Oral Torah judicial common law replaced with static statutory religious codes.

The skill to read a blue print, this wisdom permits a building contractor to envision from a two dimensional sheet of paper a three dimensional idea… Front\Top/Side views זה לא כזה וזה לא כזה. The kabbalah of פרדס inductive logic expresses a tohor dynamic way of interpreting, based upon בניני אבות precedents, brought by the different sugyot of Gemara, the essentially to discern כוונה of the language of the Mishna – based upon a fixed perspective; akin to how the Courts judge the testimony of witnesses on the New Moon, likewise distinguishes the testimony of witnesses based upon their unique fixed perspectives.

Contrast the g’lut לא לשמה assimilated statute law religious codifications: 1. They uproot the halachic precedent from how it interprets the language of a precise & very specific Mishna. The Rambam and Shulkan Aruch codes fail to bring the precise Mishna Primary Source. The כסף משנה limited its commentary to the Yad to essentially bringing some speculative Gemara source for the halachic ruling. It never made any attempt to re-interpret the intent of the Mishna viewed through the perspective of that halacha. 2. The codes do not respect sugya integrity any more than does modern Dof Yomi. Chabad encourages a reading of the Yad independent of the Talmud as Rambam suggested in his introduction. A consequent of this error, Chabad believers of the rebbe as moshiach, confuse the obligation of Moshiach as also applicable to לא לשמה g’lut Jewry.

The consequences of assimilation and intermarriage defines the meaning of the 2nd Sinai commandment. As בראשית contrasts the opposing Trees so too the opening Sinai commandments. As does Parshat נח amplify the g’lut of Adam as a central Torah theme that ספר דברים interprets [משנה תורה] the difference between the opening first two commandments which the Talmud instructs כלל ישראל accepted prior to demanding that Moshe receive the rest of the Torah post the Golden Calf משל\נמשל Av precedent of the 2nd Sinai commandment; likewise this “style”, comparable to the distinction between רחום from חמל – the womb vs a chelem child. Rabbi Yechuda publicly acknowledges the בכל לבבך as the struggle between opposing Yatzirot within the heart. Courtroom Common law stands upon the יסוד of precedents, whereas Roman Senate statute law stands upon appeals to cults of personality akin to Mao’s Little Red Book, and the apocryphal story of Stalin’s “pitiful” chicken.

Obviously the precedents brought a Torts court prosecutor\Shammai different from the precedents brought by the justice defense attorney/Hillel in any lateral common law 3 judge court. The role of the 3rd justice, he serves to resolve any תיקו wherein both prosecutor and defense fail to persuade the other of the merits of their precedents brought before any common law Torts court. The fundamental distinction between Sanhedrin and Torts courts, beside the obvious Capital Crimes vs Damages; Torts courts have a mandate to operate in g’lut whereas Sanhedrin courts only within the borders of ארץ ישראל. For example, post Shoah NEVER AGAIN oath rejects Goyim courtroom imperialism to impose their opinions upon the “Jewish Problem”, based upon the corruption of the court of Par’o in the days of Moshe and Aaron.

The NaCH opens with how the prophet interprets the African origin word טוטפות through observance of Pesach-Yoval and brit melah precedents, later expressed through the Gilgal vs Sh’Cem oaths which distinguish between the Orders of Rashi and Rabbeinu Tam tefillen by understanding the רשות מצוה of tefillah ערבית; the חצי קדיש separation with distinguishes דאוריייתא קריא שמע ערבית from דאורייתא קריא שמע שחרית by means of Rabbeinu Tam’s Order of tefillen which interprets the famous dispute wherein Rabban Gamliel got fired as the Nassi of the Court, which the Pesach Haggadah recalls. פלג המנחה remains day not night. Hence a person can place Rabbeinu Tam tefillen and has רשות to affix the ק”ש ערבית to the מנחה shemone esrei; and the shemone esrei ערבית to the ק״ש שעל המיטה. Wisdom-time oriented commandments require k’vanna based upon the בנין אב which makes a מאי נפקא מינא – רב חסד distinction between מלאכה from עבודה where מלאכה constitutes as skilled labor wisdom. Hence shabbat an example, based upon מעשה בראשית, means week not simply the last day of the week as Protestant Seventh-day Adventists insist. On the Six Days of Shabbat bnai brit in ארץ ישראל sanctify wisdom-time oriented commandments לשמה; T’NaCH prophetic mussar Aggada\Gemara defines the Horev 13 Oral Torah middot דאורייתא – דבר שבלב מצוות שנזקוק כוונה meaning מלכות לשמה as expressed through the halacha of rabbi Yochanon in ברכות. Wherein a blessing stands distinct from saying Tehillim in that blessings qualify as a toldah of sworn oaths. Another name for Shemone Esrei – Amidah serves as a רמז learned from the Talmud that a person can either Stand before a Sefer Torah or sit and swear a Torah oath by means of his tefillen.

Clearly, discernment separates static religious rhetoric readings of flat biblical story texts from judicial common law which stands upon the foundation of competitive precedents which produce Majority vs. Minority judicial opinions of justice – fair restitution of damages as Torah faith תורה לא בשמים היא; the key aspect of Yovel liberty for all 12 Tribal Yichus established within the land. Equally clear, the vision of the anointing of both kings Shaul and David moshiach both failed to achieve Yovel liberty through משנה תורה Sanhedrin courts. The failure to judge the Cohonim of Nov, and Uriah before the Great Sanhedrin, likewise duplicated by king Shlomo who failed to judge the Capital Crimes case of the two prostitutes before a small Sanhedrin court and his confusion wherein he ruled Jerusalem function as a city of refuge. The Torah and NaCH understand the 2nd Sinai commandment through the negative precedents of not enquiring how Goyim worship their Gods/assimilation and the war against Midian post the tribal chief of Shemon marrying a Midianite woman. King Shlomo worshipped avoda zarah at the beginning of his reign, when like his son at Sh’Cem, he failed to heed the prophetic mussar which Natan rebuked king David. Pursuit of assimilation of the cultures and customs practiced by Goyim, king Shlomo prioritized the treif desire to build grand Temple Cathedrals rather than judge the Capital Crimes case of the two prostitutes before a full Sanhedrin courtroom; and confusing Yerushalem as one of the Cities of Refuge!

Hence the precedents for רחום, the commandments to kill the people of Canaan, the drunk rebellious child, and the death decree inclusive of Dathan and Abiram children; these precedents arouse Anger which the Torah explicitly remembers through the 10 tests by which Israel aroused through the spies, the din of g’lut. Remembering the 10 plagues of Egypt through the 10 anger tests defines the k’vanna of the Oral Torah middah נצר חסד לאלפים, affixed to the 9th middle blessing of the 3-13- 3\תרי”ג blessing – ולמלשינים אל תהיתקוה – wherein Israel pleads that the tohor attribute of יראת שמים protect our people from the curse of denying the Oral Torah Horev revelation of middot/מלכות, which distinguishes blessings of justice through Sanhedrin courts in the land from cursed Goyim vertical bribed courts, enslaved to a hostile agenda like the courts of Par’o; follow the money, when the State pays the salaries of the justices herein defines bribe. Goyim worship of avoda zarah because they reject the revelation of Sinai/Horev. The lights of Chanukkah have the k’vanna which remembers the ancient Greeks who attempted to deceive Israel to forget the Oral Torah. Expressed over and again through their ever repeated denial of the Oral Torah Horev revelation. The Shomronim, the Tzeddukkim, Xtianity and Islam, the Karaim and the charem placed upon Spinoza followed by Shabbetai Tzvi together with his prophet Natan from Gaza, and Yaacov Frank. The latter false messiah av tuma avoda zara duplicates the Apostle Paul likewise rejected the דאורייתא Moshiach commandment: sanctify Yovel liberty through Great Sanhedrin courts designation of the Tribal Yichus within the borders of ארץ ישראל Torah constitutional republic/commonwealth as the prophetic mussar of brit melah.

The middah of רחום affixed to the womb of Rivka wherein the Yatzir Ha-Tov wrestles with the Yatzir Ha-Raw. Pity merely a reactionary, at best chelem baby-like empathy over the sorry plight of others currently in distress. Whereas רחום the 4th Oral Torah middah affixed to גואל ישראל links redemption to attribute of יראת שמים mussar, interpreted as ‘mastery of a good name reputation’. Hence both ritual slaughter and Torah scholars & scribes require this essential basic attribute of emotional maturity and development. Contrast the disqualification of the Jewish apikoros in mesechta Chullin which clearly does not depend upon either his skills or knowledge of the subject: how to technically ritually kill an animal. Hence רחום סמוך לחנון wherein חנון understood as עיין טוב, which the apikoros lacks.

Just as Yom Kippur separates the ודוי said over the goat thrown of the cliff to נשא עון ופשע וחטאה from the ודוי dedication of the living blood sprinkled before the פרוכת\כפור separates the distinction between a ודוי דאורייתא מן ודוי דרבנן. Hence the Shemone Esrei lacks a rabbinic ודוי and its permitted to add in שמע קולינו this toldot confession of sins which starkly contrasts with the dedication to pursue justice among our people as the Cohen national inheritors of the brit sworn to the Avot which the 3rd through 9th middot amplify לשמה the first שם השם whereas the 10th – 12th middot magnify the repetition of the שם השם לא לשמה g’lut Jewry as the דיוק made upon the closing middah absolutely requires: ונקה as learned through the month of Elul; as the shofar לשמה separates tohor middot spirits blown from the Yatzir Ha’Tov from wind blown from the lungs; toldot commandments which do not require k’vanna, but serve as external vessels like the Mishkan’s relationship with the Shekinah.

Israeli grievances against the UN in General and the ICJ in particular; as expressed through a long history of Goyim lynching mobs hate crimes.

The ICJ opinion compares to the Slander: “the Jews poisoned the Wells” but did not call for the murder of Jewish communities across Europe! England now started a trend wherein its supports the Arab League boycott, adopted in 1945 – limited to “occupied Judea and Samaria”. The mob screams of Genocide etc. a fabricated charge like as the Protocols of the Elders of Zion! This comparison of similar cases far close than the two precedents which the ICJ majority attempts to prosecute Israel over the charge of war crimes!

In legal terms, occupation generally concerns a foreign power exercising effective authority over territory without the sovereign’s consent—not merely foreign troops being present under an agreed mission. How then can the UN or European countries denounce Israeli rule over Yechuda and Shomron as illegal? No single binding Case precedent comparable to Israel’s right to self-defense in the June 1967 War. The ICJ’s majority opinion represents merely an advisory opinion. SA in Namibia does not compare, nor the case of Mauritius in 1965 to Jordan’s alliance with Nasser to ‘throw the Jews into the Sea’. That Israeli war of self defense represents the 2nd Israeli Independence Wars!

Utter narishkeit to argue that Nasser’s war objectives simply political rhetoric to arouse Arab mobs! Post Oct 7th 2023 massacre proves that Arab hate more than simple poo poo rhetoric. The ICJ ’24 fart, legally unsound because its mandate and analysis did not adequately account for the defensive circumstances post Shoah Israelis confronted in 1967. Its conclusions directly compare to the fraud of UN 3379 – supported by the Green Party in England today, and 2334 express as the opposite of a Chapter VI “suggestion”.

Just as the ICJ has no actual precedent to stand upon which compares – even remotely to the Case of the 1967 War where Israel defended itself from foreign invasion so too and how much more so the debased Labor PM in London who openly declares Israel guilty of “ethnic cleansing” and “genocide” with no evidence other than slander. Minority opinions within the ICJ, identified the majority opinion qualifies as a move from unlawful policies—such as annexation and thwarting self-determination—to the unlawfulness of the entire continued presence as contested and insufficiently explained.

But the courts in point of fact have not determined “genocide”. Hence to mention this term stam amounts to slander, it hints in the gossip minds of the reactionary press that Israel has in point of fact guilty under the equally vague distortion “international law”. That crime in Samaria made by “settler terrorists” but violence in England merely violence! Talmudic common law states unequivocally that the precedents of the prosecutor cannot serve as the precedents of the defense attorney.

The ICJ ruling ignored the 1967 defensive right to self defense basis of Israel’s victory over Nakba Allah through the agents of that dead God of Egypt Syria and Jordan. Instead it pretended it had a mandate to rule upon the legal consequences of Arab states absolution rejection of Jewish self determination made famous through the post War 3 No’s! This too the court’s diseased Myopia ignored, together with Nakba Allah Arab states absolute refusal to repatriate their own refugee populations. Instead the bigoted ICJ court limited its scope of vision to addressing the legal consequences of Israel – absolutely divorced from all contending Arab interests responsible for initiating the 1967 War in the first place.

Art. 65 of the ICJ Statute; the July 2024 Wall opinion carries no enforcement mechanism, and Security Council referral (Art. 94(2)) blocked by the US veto. The Mauritius reference in the majority rests on UN GA Res. 2066 (1965), which recorded the UK’s undertaking to end administration — a consent-based fact absent for Jordan in 1967. That distinction appears in Judge Nolte’s opposition. Judges Sebutinde and Abraham both faulted the majority for carving out only the occupation question while ignoring title, security imperatives, and prior Arab obligations. SC Res. 2334 was adopted under Chapter VI, so it constitutes as a hortatory opinion not “international law”. South Africa v. Israel – at the merits stage; the Jan 2024 order found only a plausible risk triggering provisional measures — not a finding of genocide. Using the word as established fact not simply legally unsupported but rather rabble rousing mob slander.

West Bank and Palestine legally irrelevant to this analysis. Israeli self determination rejects the name Palestine and Nakba Allah defeat in both wars – started by that dead god through its Arab agents – invalidates in UN revisionist history to equate dhimmi Arab refugee populations on par and equal status as the nation state of Israel. Judea and Samaria the heart of the first and second Jewish commonwealths. Understandable that Europeans no grossed out and shamed by their post Shoah “by their fruits you shall know them” – dead God JeZeus. But that does not altar the fact that for 2000+ years Europeans through the barbarity of their Crusader war crimes and ghetto gulags, that Europeans validated the Old Testament bible as their “Word of God”.

The case of Oct 7th 2023 post the Oslo unilateral withdrawal from Gaza proves conclusively that the Gaza majority which voted in Hamas – who rejected the Oslo Accords – that they too rejected the Oslo Accords.