If the NT fraud reduced to a single verse, how does that verse define the soul of the church to make ‘blood libel’ accusations that did not end with the shoah but continue with the Oct7th massacre on the last day of Chag Sukkot and UN ICJ and ICC blood libel slanders?

No evidence forgiveness works or is granted by belief. Promising forgiveness through belief alone undermines moral responsibility. Repentance has no connection with t’shuva. T’shuva directly affixed to the consequences of the Av tuma avoda zarah Golden Calf worshipped by the ערב רב שאין להם יראת שמים; Moshe forced HaShem to “remember” the oaths sworn to the Avot. Consequently on Yom Kippur HaShem made t’shuva and annulled the vow to make Moshe the father of the chosen Cohen people.

Mesechta Yoma rabbi Meir vs the sages who bring NaCH sources against the ודוי made by Moshe Rabbeinu in the Torah! How did the NaCH and even more so the majority of Tannaim sages rule against Moshe’s ודוי and the halacha follow their opinion? Answer – in all rabbinic matters the majority decides the halacha. Therefore the language of Moshe’s ודוי in the Torah – a rabbinic ודוי no different from the majority opinion of a different order of how to make a ודוי דרבנן. What then defines a ודוי דאורייתא? The dedication (מלכות) of Oral Torah middot (pronoun) רוח הקודש spirits within the Yatzir Ha’Tov within the heart. Hence the sages teach that tefillah ‘a matter of the heart’. The Oral Torah which Moshe heard on Yom Kippur defines the tohor middot: as ה’ ה’ אל רחום וחנון etc.

Xtian repentance in no wise remotely compares to t’shuva as defined by the Torah. Forgiveness, simply a pie in the sky feel good word substitute. No different than JeZeus is God or covenant means brit. ‘Believes in him’ and ‘forgiveness’ totally undefined terms of Xtian religious rhetoric. The definition of avoda zara perhaps best defined through theological belief systems. Torah defines faith as צדק צדק תרדוף. Justice requires objectivity. Belief – by definition subjective; it centers all around the Ego-I. Torah common law justice fundamentally NOT a belief system. Common law stands upon prior judicial courtroom precedents; not theological creed belief decrees like the Nicene Council. Acts 10:43 simply noise from the lower parts of the anatomy.

No evidence forgiveness works or is granted by belief. Promising forgiveness through belief alone undermines moral responsibility. Repentance has no connection with t’shuva. T’shuva directly affixed to the consequences of the Av tuma avoda zarah Golden Calf worshipped by the ערב רב שאין להם יראת שמים; Moshe forced HaShem to “remember” the oaths sworn to the Avot. Consequently on Yom Kippur HaShem made t’shuva and annulled the vow to make Moshe the father of the chosen Cohen people.

Mesechta Yoma rabbi Meir vs the sages who bring NaCH sources against the ודוי made by Moshe Rabbeinu in the Torah! How did the NaCH and even more so the majority of Tannaim sages rule against Moshe’s ודוי and the halacha follow their opinion? Answer – in all rabbinic matters the majority decides the halacha. Therefore the language of Moshe’s ודוי in the Torah – a rabbinic ודוי no different from the majority opinion of a different order of how to make a ודוי דרבנן. What then defines a ודוי דאורייתא? The dedication (מלכות) of Oral Torah middot (pronoun) רוח הקודש spirits within the Yatzir Ha’Tov within the heart. Hence the sages teach that tefillah ‘a matter of the heart’. The Oral Torah which Moshe heard on Yom Kippur defines the tohor middot: as ה’ ה’ אל רחום וחנון etc.

Xtian repentance in no wise remotely compares to t’shuva as defined by the Torah. Forgiveness, simply a pie in the sky feel good word substitute. No different than JeZeus is God or covenant means brit. ‘Believes in him’ and ‘forgiveness’ totally undefined terms of Xtian religious rhetoric. The definition of avoda zara perhaps best defined through theological belief systems. Torah defines faith as צדק צדק תרדוף. Justice requires objectivity. Belief – by definition subjective; it centers all around the Ego-I. Torah common law justice fundamentally NOT a belief system. Common law stands upon prior judicial courtroom precedents; not theological creed belief decrees like the Nicene Council. Acts 10:43 simply noise from the lower parts of the anatomy; if “all the prophets” really point to Jesus, then those who don’t accept that reading—Jews—can be cast as obstinate, blind, or guilty Christ-killers who bear the eternal mark of Cain. Acts 10:43 as the theological DNA that allows the church (and later, the mosque in its own way) to redefine Israel’s story, claim its prophets, and then accuse Israel of monstrous crimes when Jews refuse that redefinition.

Acts 10:43 defines the soul of the church, based upon how the Torah defines soul. The precedent – brit cut between the pieces wherein an oath alliance sworn between partners wherein the Torah defines the “soul of Avram” through all his future born chosen Cohen seed who eternally inherit the lands of Canaan. Soul does not refer to present tense because Avram at the time of that oath alliance brit – childless. Therefore it seems to me that Acts 10:43 defines the soul of the church and mosque abominations of av tuma avoda zarah because blood libels\לשון הרע define the behavior of the church in all generations.

This narrative involving Peter and Cornelius does not invoke the Avot in general or Avraham in particular. Its tumah soteriology theology, [“All the prophets testify about him” claims that the entire Tanakh in point of fact really all about Jesus. That’s a classic supersessionist move: Israel’s story is reinterpreted as prelude to the church.], completely and totally alien to the NaCH prophets. Hence its declaration utterly false on par with Muhammad another false prophet. Both abominations promote anti‑Jewish supersessionist theologies.

The Torah directly condemns false prophets, the gospel JeZeus converted by the Nicene Council into a God and unto a prophet by the Koran – both false books fail to define Prophet from the Torah. Neither Esav nor Yismael accept the revelation of the Torah at Sinai. Both employ “covenant” when that foreign term distorts brit as an oath alliance which requires שם ומלכות. The 1st commandment Sinai Name never once recognized not in the NT nor in the Koran. מלכות the code word for Oral Torah middot – which the church fathers throughout their history have publicly denied. Hence the confusion between t’shuva and repentance.

If brit is gutted, then t’shuva is gutted, and justice becomes secondary to belief. From there, it’s not a big leap to supersessionism: Esav and Yishmael claim the language of covenant while rejecting the actual revelation at Sinai and the Oral Torah that defines מלכות. Torah’s insistence on צדק צדק תרדוף and on t’shuva bound to brit – a direct challenge to any system that promises cheap grace while enabling deep injustice from generation to generation to generation.

The effectiveness of UN peacekeeping missions in the Middle East, specifically contrasting UNIFIL’s performance in Lebanon with the earlier UNEF mission in Sinai and its perceived similarities to UNRWA. UNIFIL, like the 1956 UNEF force, lacks the teeth to remain when a host nation or powerful actor demands its departure—touches on the fundamental limitations of UN mandates. UN Secretary-General at the time, U Thant, immediately withdrew UNEF I as if Abdel Nasser determined its mandate, and directly contributed to the outbreak of the June ’67 War; no different from the ’39 White Paper directly contributed to the Nazi Shoah.

UNIFIL’s Mandate and Limitations shares this vulnerability but operates under a different, yet equally constrained, mandate. UNIFIL has historically avoided direct confrontation with Hezbollah. UNIFIL has effectively allowed Hezbollah to build up its arsenal right under its nose, similar to how UNEF was seen as powerless to stop Egyptian rearmament or military movements before 1967. The comparison to UNRWA often made in political discourse because both are criticized for operating in areas where they are accused of enabling non-state armed groups (Hezbollah in Lebanon, Hamas in Gaza).

That the UN through UNRWA allowed Hamas to operate within its facilities and has failed to prevent the group’s rise in Gaza, effectively becoming a substitute for governance that allows Hamas to focus on military buildup. UNIFIL likewise duplicated the disgrace of UNWRA in Gaza. Both allowed Hezbollah and Hamas to operate within its patrolled domains right under their noses. Hence the analogy to the 1956 Sinai withdrawal apt and relevant like comparing church blood libels to Oct7th UN blood libels of genocide!

How does a person catch a fish? Political & Religious propaganda slander works on the exact same principle, they too place worms upon hooks.


The Foundation of the UN predominant Xtian & Muslim voting block nations – propaganda efforts to recognize a Palestinian State – an utter fraud. The genesis scream-out by the UN voting blocks, the EU or African non-aligned nations for example, which post 1967 ad infinitum repeatedly bemoan Israel’s gross violation of “international law” and illegally occupy Palestinian lands & territories – began with the British 1939 Chamberlain White Paper whose Arab appeasement policy followed the betrayal of the Czech Republic.

The White Paper sodomized the terms and obligations which London originally agreed to accept, terms imposed by League of Nations. That contract, whose terms London accepted openly embrace the 1917 Balfour Declaration. The Balfour Declaration defines Herzl’s Political Zionism; which established the Mandate-Protectorate of Palestine – to restore a Jewish National Home\self-determination.

London imperialism, based upon its paidika boy favorite imperialism, sought to permanently rule the League Palestine Mandate as a colony. The 1936-39 Arab revolt forced the coward Chamberlain to adjust British Middle East policy. Post WWII, for example, London attempted to seize the Suez Canal from Nasser’s Egypt; based upon the classic British imperialism to dominate the balance of power in any given region of the world.

London imposed a opium trade monopoly and initiated the Century of Shame upon China. Secretary of State under Lincoln defeated this standard over-used “card” of London. William H. Seward sent two opposing diplomatic notes to PM Palmerston and Foreign Secretary Lord Russel. Based upon the known fact that the two men hated and despised one another. The Yankee blockade of Confederate ports presented a real problem for London.

The genesis of the Industrial Revolution started in Britain late in the 18th century – prior to the Napoleonic wars. Technological development in textile industry mechanization & manufacturing (spinning jenny, water frame, power loom), steam power, iron production, and factory organization caused England to abandon an agricultural based economy; Britain the first country to make slavery illegal, which agricultural based economies like Confederate America absolutely required.

Lancashire’s textile districts, despite the invention by Eli Whitney in the United States (1793) of the cotton gin – which made even short-staple cotton feasible – still heavily dependent on Confederate cotton in 1861–63 (the “Cotton Famine” caused severe unemployment and political pressure). Substitutes (Egypt, India) existed but could not immediately match volume, quality, or supply logistics fast enough to calm British industry.

The Seward stratagem, he dispatched diplomatic notes to Palmerston informing London that Washington would permit Britain to acquire Southern cotton through Mexico. Yet another opposing note sent to Foreign Minister Lord Russel declared: any British attempt to break the Union blockade of Confederate ports through Mexico, Washington would consider as an actus belli\\act of War.

The consequences of this stratagem: it shamed PM Palmerston, not only when Russel waved his diplomatic note before Parliament, but contributed to the failure of the Palmerston government to intervene in Bismarck’s 3 little wars which unified imperial Germany and radically changed the balance of power in Europe! Likewise the 1956 War permanently negated the great power status of both London and Paris in the Middle East.

Voting blocks shape UN political decisions. For example GA 3379 or UN SC Resolutions 446 and 2334, all contributed to forge the basis by which the UN GA later recognized an Arab Palestinian state; Palestine received upgraded UN status in 2012 (GA resolution 67/19) as a non‑member observer state. Which many states propaganda offices treat as de‑facto recognition of statehood. Despite the cold hard fact: never an independent Arab Palestinian state ever historically existed. The British White Paper corrupt foundation declared just prior to the outbreak of WWII, the British intent to establish an Arab 2/3rd majority Palestinian state within 10 years after WWII.

UNSC condemnations of Israeli illegal occupation through settler settlements simply do not in and of themselves “create” statehood. But rather demonize Israel and project propaganda which tremendously increased pressure on Israel to surrender to the will of the UN.

UN Security Council condemnations (e.g., Res. 446, Res. 2334) and General Assembly actions (e.g., GA 67/19) exist only as political instruments of propaganda. Chapter VI condemnations have no enforcement teeth. Chapter VI therefore compares to GA condemnations and\or declarations. Only Korean War Chapter VII ultimatums, empower UN military enforcement. Hence Res. 446, & 2334 exist on par with GA propaganda declarations, and serve as the continuation of British White Paper Jewish Shoah guilt which witnessed the obliteration of 75% of Western European Jewry in less than three years!

The UN did not “discover” a Palestinian state; it manufactured one on the ruins of a British betrayal, Arab rejectionism, and European guilt over Jewish blood it did not save. The modern UN language of “illegal occupation of Palestinian land” is not some timeless legal truth—it’s the political afterlife of the 1939 White Paper, a British act of imperial self‑interest and guilt management that betrayed the Mandate, rewrote the legal frame, and then got laundered into UN rhetoric by voting blocs with their own agendas.

Declarations\\accusations DO NOT equal judicial proof anymore than Xtian ‘blood libels’. Sykes Picot served as the medium for Arab independence for many subsequent Arab states. The Palestine mandate predicated upon the Balfour Declaration. Israel post Independence, gave citizenship to its’ ’48 Arabs! The current UN recognition of Palestine without shame – a political maneuver. Readers! Ask yourself, how then does this pig’s ear transform into a silk purse without fraud dolled up as “international law” … No different from the ICC which unilaterally declares Bibi a war criminal! Israel did not sign the Rome Agreement?

Comparing the 1939 White Paper to UN 446 passed by Carter whose book slandered Israel as Apartheid! UN 2334 voted with the aid of Obama. All three, explicit expressions of UN GA Resolution 3379 – Zionism is Racism; which the UN later annulled under President Bush – the bane of Saddam in Kuwait. “High Contracting Parties” post WWII legalese (legal language has been used as a political weapon) whereby UN official sought used the 4th Geneva Convention (1949) upon Israel as a badge of shame. The UN declares that Israelis do not have the right to rule territory originally declared by the League of Nations as “Palestine Mandate”, but “UN international law dictates” where and who live within the borders of Israel; a similar legalese first introduced by Chamberlain’s White Paper abomination.

When Neville Chamberlain’s government issued the 1939 White Paper, they used the mask of British administrative law to effectively nullify the Mandate. By capping Jewish immigration and restricting land sales, they didn’t just break a promise—they used bureaucratic decrees to freeze Jews out of their own recognized national home right when they needed it most.

The UN has essentially adopted this exact same tactic. By passing resolutions like 446 and 2334, the UN claims the authority to dictate who can live & where; treating Judea, Samaria, and East Jerusalem as “occupied” rather than recognizing the deep historical and legal continuity stemming from the original Mandate. The Fourth Geneva Convention, written in the immediate shadow of WWII to prevent brutal, aggressive regimes from depopulating countries, conducting forced deportations, and systematically destroying native populations (as the Nazis did across Europe). When UN bodies and international courts invoke the language of the “High Contracting Parties” against Israel, they steal a “convention” originally designed to prevent forced, aggressive population transfers and use it to sodomize Jews who choose to live, build homes, and buy land in their ancestral heartland – the UN and international courts now condemn Israeli guilt as equal to Nazi like war crime.

When Jimmy Carter wrote Peace Not Apartheid, or when the Obama administration allowed Resolution 2334 to pass by withholding a U.S. veto, the tuma spirit of UN 3379 dominated their Yatzir Ha-Rah. They treated the Jewish state’s defensive positions and historical claims – not as a matter of survival or legitimate common law rights – but as an inherent Palestinian injustice that the international community has the ‘Divine-Right of Kings’ to micromanage. The UN behaves as a global parliament, rewriting its own rules to fit prevailing geopolitical voting block alignments; while treating Israel’s foundational legal rights under the Mandate as if they can be erased comparable to how post Bar Kochba Rome erased Judea.

Resolutions 446 and 2334 ignores the core principle of legal continuity (found in Article 80 of the UN Charter, often called the “Jewish People’s Clause,” which preserved all rights granted under the League of Nations Mandates) and instead attempts to legislate Jews out of their heartland by bureaucratic fiat. By treating the Jewish presence in Shiloh, Hebron, or Jerusalem as a “flagrant violation” akin to the darkest crimes of the 20th century, international bodies strip the convention of its moral anchor, transforming a tool of human rights into a political badge of shame.

Israel currently rides an emotional rollercoaster ride. The war starting with the Oct 7th Abomination War/12 Day War\ fought to destroy Iran’s ability to make a nuclear bomb has exhausted the Israeli public. Regime change Trump never promoted as the main reason for the current Iran Hormuz war. The US blockade of Hormuz forced the Mullahs to negotiate. This in no way compares to Obozo’s multi-billion dollar bribes to the Mullahs. President Trump has a strong reputation among Israelis. From US recognition of Jerusalem to the dismantling of the UN 242 two state “White Paper” … Obozo’s 2334 – Zionism is Racism 3379. The dust has yet to settle in this 100 day + war. But, the Mullah fanatic regimes seems close to the Arab Spring which killed Libya’s Muammar Gaddafi. Chill. Judge the President in merit rather than guilt!

DemonCRAP Trump Derangement Syndrome – puke. It compares to a parent forced to change the soiled diapers of a baby. It compares to a young boy or girl who cannot control their bladder at night and wet their beds! The U.S. under Trump did take a maximum‑pressure approach to Iran. The U.S. did not officially declare regime change as its policy. Obozo appeasement JCPOA treaty compares to Chamberlains betrayal of the Balfour Declaration with his White Paper which promised a Arab 75% majority Palestinian State in 10 years … UN Resolution 2334! Bottom Line: YOU HAVE TO LOOK AT THE BIG PICTURE.

The presented opinion does not seek to win over deranged insane Demoncraps. It seeks to calm Israeli nerves and hightened suspicions. Israeli priorities: Jerusalem recognition, Golan recognition, Abraham Accords, UN 2334 pushback, Maximum pressure on Iran. President Trump prioritized in this war against Iran neutralizing Iran’s nuclear capability, not regime change. Ron Paul described the 1979 hostage crisis as “blow-back”. Trump’s maximum pressure crippled Iran’s economy, Eliminated Soleimani, amazingly strengthened US-Israel alliance alignment; emphatically rebuked the EU British failure in NATO. Signaled zero tolerance for an Iranian North Korea nuclear breakout.

Israel struck Iranian nuclear/military sites (Natanz, etc.), assassinating leaders and damaging capabilities. Iran retaliated with hundreds of missiles/drones. The US joined with strikes on deeper sites like Fordow, then helped broker a June 24, 2025 ceasefire (Trump called it a “victory for everybody” and labeled the conflict the “12-Day War”). It was brief but “inconclusive” on long-term gains; Iran claims some sites survived.

The war’s core centered upon destroying Iran’s nuclear breakout abilities and degrading its military/proxy network—specifically Lebanon—aligning with Israel’s and US security priorities. Trump authorized US involvement but publicly framed the goal as nuclear neutralization, not toppling the regime (echoing his earlier “no regime change” statements). This fits the “maximum pressure” pattern: sanctions crippled Iran’s economy, Soleimani was eliminated in 2020, and the strategy repeatedly signaled “zero tolerance” for a nuclear Iran (a North Korea-style threat).

Iran’s 60% enriched uranium stockpile largely survived. The war exposed limits—Tehran’s retaliation caused civilian hits, and it didn’t end proxy wars or create the promised internal collapse. US imposed a naval blockade on Iranian ports (April 2026 onward) amid the ongoing war (which resumed after the 2025 ceasefire). Iran partially restricted Hormuz shipping (25% of global oil). Trump explicitly linked the pressure to forcing talks: the June 14, 2026 agreement ends fighting across fronts, reopens the Strait of Hormuz, lifts the blockade, and includes a framework for nuclear limits/inspections in exchange for sanctions relief (signing expected ~June 19). Ships are reportedly moving; Trump called it “let the oil flow” and a “great settlement.”

The blockade created economic pain that compelled negotiations, much like maximum pressure’s intent. It echoed historical US leverage (e.g., past tanker issues) without full invasion. No official Trump policy document declared “regime change” as primary; focus remained nuclear/missile curbs.

Learning NaCH as common law

Yovel defined through the opening mussar Books of NaCH

Kedesh – one of the six cities of refuge – located in the territory of the Tribe of Dan. Shimshon acted as a judge during his lifetime, but did not sit as a judge within Kedesh. Rather he served as a judge embodied to resolve the inter-state conflict between Yechuda/Shimon against Philistine dominance and oppression. This implies that while the wars remained that Israel could not keep the Yovel. This would explain why not till king David destroyed the Philistines from off the land, that Israel could only there after keep the Yovel.

Why did king Shlomo confuse building a cathedral of wood and stone rather than establish the Federal Sanhedrin court system as the Torah constitutionally בית המקדש? Confusing the priorities of constructing a Central Place of worship for the Torah mandated Sanhedrin court system – a fundamental av tuma avoda zarah. The revelation of the Mishkan at Sinai centered not on leather skins and gold plated vessels but rather תורה לא בשמים היא. תפילה הדבר שבלבב.

The prophetic mussar of Natan rebuked David over Uriah not brought before a Sanhedrin court. The mussar of the prophet Natan employed “the blood on David’s hands which caused the curse of eternal civil war within the house of David. Just as king Shlomo ignored the elder advice of Natan concerning construction of the בית המקדש so too Rehova’am placed no weight upon the advice given by Shlomo’s elder advisors.

No prophetic commandment to build a House of Cedar. A direct Torah commandment to righteously pursue justice among our people. King Shlomo did not pursue justice, he prioritized pursuing women. Torah defines faith as pursuit of justice. Avoda zarah defines faith as belief in some theological creed which shapes and defines the Gods worshipped in other societies and religions. The mitzva of Moshiach, a wisdom time-oriented positive Torah commandment to rule the conquered land of Canaan with justice. Confusing the reactionary death of Uriah with the strategic error – David’s failure, once shalom ruled in the land, to affix and establish 1. The Yovel and 2. The Federal Sanhedrin Court system.

Hence the prophetic mussar of Shoftim/Shimshon functions to show how AFTER the first generation of Israel conquered the land and established the Yovel – starting with Yehoshua keeping Pesach and brit melah – both Torah mitzvot directly linked to keeping the Yovel – and established the Six Cities of Refuges/small Sanhedrin Federal court system which ideally judge Capital Crimes cases among and between the 12 Tribes of our people.

The Talmud teaches, during the first 6 years of the wars of invasion Israel did not keep koshrut. The language 6 years לאו דוקא. Not till king David did Israel fully conquer the land of Canaan. As such assuming that king David understood the k’vanna of the mitzva of Moshiach, when he commanded Shlomo to build the בית המקדש – based upon the mussar rebuke of Natan/2nd Sinai commandment – David called upon his son to establish the Yovel and permanently affix the Sanhedrin Federal Court system of the Republic of 12 Tribes.

The av tuma avoda zara of king Shlomo, no different from the generation that ruled Israel after the generation of Yehoshua passed. King Shlomo serves as a פרט to the כלל, of Israel pursuing avoda zarah rather than righteous justice among our people within the borders of the eternal inheritance lands of the chosen Cohen people. NaCH prophets command mussar – they do not teach history. This mussar by Natan’s interpretation of the 2nd Sinai commandment equally applies to all Israelis now that our people has conquered once again the land of Canaan.

The Book of בראשית introduces Av wisdom commandments called תמיד מעשה בראשית\זימן גרמא מצוות. Avoda zarah worships the chosen God of a particular Creed/theology belief system. Justice לא בשמים היא – the revelation of the Torah at Sinai לשמה. A man does not wake up from out of the blue and the pursuit of justice burns hot in his blood. Yovel justice first and foremost domestic, within and among the society of our people. Yovel means absolutely nothing to Goyim who never came out of the judicial oppression of Egypt!

The revelation of the Mishkan at Sinai compares to fruit which has an external klippah. The בראשית mussar which rejects the korban of Cain, the identical mussar where the Fire from Heaven consumed the strange fire of the two sons of Aaron. Korbanot as a barbeque to heaven a direct Torah abomination. Korbanot as a wisdom time-oriented positive commandment which requires prophetic mussar that interprets Oral Torah middot which chazal labels as מלכות לשמה as the dedication of the Yatzir Ha-Tov spirits within the heart as Torah wisdom which chazal labels as k’vanna.

Avoda zarah – the tuma middot of the Yatzir Ha-ra within the heart – confuses form for substance. Not the revelation of the Mishkan at Sinai. But the vision that the tohor middot spirits of the שם השם breath life within the Yatzir Ha-Tov hearts of our people who live within the Yovel lands of conquered Canaan. The avoda zarah of king Shlomo prioritized the tuma klippah of constructing a House of wood and stone and despised the dedication k’vanna of Oral Torah spirits/middot within the Ya’tzir Ha-Tov hearts/לבב of our people. The spelling לבב teaches the משמע mussar that the tohor spirits of our people live within our national hearts.

The יסוד of faith stands upon יראת שמים. Av tumah avoda zarah worships Gods in the Heavens. Torah faith does not exist in the heart of any man who despises the burden of obligation to protect his ‘Good Name’ reputation. Avoda Zarah prays to Gods in the heavens to cover and conceal the sins which profane this world. Justice לשמה pursues fair restitution of damages inflicted upon others among our people.

Just as Jefferson’s ‘Bill of Rights’ apply only to citizens of the American Republic. So too and how much more so judicial justice stands upon keeping the Yovel within our homeland. Yovel as a mitzva does not apply to Goyim in any land or country across the Planet Earth. The ‘son of God’ or ‘Arab prophet’ can proclaim declarations in ancient Harry Potter books of fiction. But where was JeZeus during the Shoah? Where was Allah during the murder of Ali ibn Abi Talib … the disgrace of ’48 Nakba? Fiction stories tell a good narrative that many fervently believe. But ‘fear of heaven’ confused as ‘fear of God(s)’; goyim theologies of fiction do not prioritize Torah constitutional Sanhedrin common law courts.

Mikdash has no meaning by its ornate or ritualized ‘forms’ alone. Any more than a dead body buried in a grave has life. Sanhedrin courtroom common law breaths the Oral Torah tohor spirits, first heard at Horev on Yom Kippur, which move and inspire Men – to pursue and rule the land through justice; meaning fair compensation for damages inflicted upon our people. Natan’s rebuke over Uriah, not primarily about adultery and murder—but rather bypassing the Sanhedrin, acting as a “cult” king -oblivious to the k’vanna mitzva of moshiach. The latter always chooses architecture, aesthetics, and ritual over Yovel, Sanhedrin and mishpat justice.

The Torah blessing/curse brit absolutely and most fundamentally requires that bnai brit Man accepts responsibility for his actions in this world. Avoda zarah trumpets ideal life in the world to come. Any talk of Mikdash, geulah, or “Jewish values” without a serious project of Yovel‑rooted justice and a binding Sanhedrin‑like legal framework repeats Shlomo’s av tuma avodah zarah.

Confusing ועשו לי מקדש as Shekinah as absurd as declaring the Universe created in 6 days! The בראשית Creation aggada introduces wisdom time-oriented commandments through the משל of creation. Literally believing Genesis – a theological fabrication known as religious rhetoric.

The phrase “מי שלמד תורה שלא לשמה, סופו ללמד לשמה” a Baraita found in the Gemara of Avodah Zarah 19a. What does it mean? The Sinai Life/Death blessing\curse revolves around ruling the land with justice vs. Par’o like judicial oppression in g’lut as the k’vanna of the bi-polar דיוק separation between לשמה – לא לשמה. Rabbi Yechuda compiled his Shas Mishna in 210 CE, some 75 years after the collapse of the Bar Kachba revolt. By the time that Rabbi Yechuda published the Mishna – the name of Judea – Emperor Hadrian, around 135 CE, had already renamed that conquered province to Syria Palaestina.

By the time of Rabbi’s Mishna the Romans had already decided to expunge the land of the Jewish people like as did the Syrian Greeks whom the Hanukka benching in ברכת המזון condemns for attempting to cause Israel to forget the Torah. G’lut, based upon מצרים – לאו דוקא, therein means תורה לא לשמה. The Syrian Greeks the first to change the name of Judea unto Palestine. This fact exceptionally important because universes separate לא לשמה g’lut oppression from Sanhedrin Court justice לשמה. Sanhedrin court fundamentally and absolutely require Yovel freedom, based upon Pesach freedom, and brit melah as the sign of this brit to rule the land with justice צדק צדק תרדוף first established at the brit cut between the pieces with HaShem & Avram לשמה.

The generation of Yehoshua established the other 3 Cities of Refuge with their small Sanhedrin Capital Crimes courts. However, the next generation abandoned this Torah and worshipped avoda zara other Gods; meaning the Tribes of Israel abandoned the Federal Mishkan as Central hub of the Great Sanhedrin and cities of refuge as the spokes small Sanhedrin capital crime courts! Whenever Israel abandons the righteous pursuit of justice in the conquered land of Canaan, qualifies as av tuma avoda zara.

לא לשמה “ulterior motives” stands under the 2nd Sinai commandment of g’lut. לשמה “sake of Heaven” – dedicates the Oral Torah tohor middot אל רחום וחנון etc לשמה; herein defines Yermia’s ברית חדש and rabbi Yechuda’s בכל לבבך chiddush in ברכות; Mishna א:א which lears kre’a shma as tefillah דאורייתא in ארץ ישראל; acceptance of the yoke of the Kingdom of Heaven לשמה – the k’vanna time-oriented wisdom commandment which prioritizes tohor middot as the dominant spirits which rule the heart over av tuma “Esav – middot” — Yatzir Ha-Rah spirits of violence hatred without cause “avoda zarah”.

By the time rabbi Yechuda compiled his Shas Mishna and how much more so the Bavli Talmud sealed around 450CE, the land of Judea no longer called by that name but rather Palestine; the Roman religion of Xtianity had expunged the brit cut between the pieces and replaced it with a Harry Potter messiah “son of God”. Then the Arab caliphate slaughtered and butchered the Roman empire in the Middle East and replaced the JeZeus God downgraded to prophet with Allah. Arabs together with their Muslim converts ignore the oath brit לשמה cut between the pieces and replace Ishmael as the son dedicated to inherit the chosen Cohen status oblivious to the concept of a chosen Cohen people!

The blessing/curse opening first two commandments of Sinai serve as the basis to understand לא לשמה. Following the capture and destruction of Herod’s Temple the Romans “permitted” the establishment of a Sanhedrin in Tiberias! Akin to Napoleon’s “Sanhedrin” to give citizenship to Jews to serve as hamburger meat in his Armies! Both this and that Sanhedrin לא לשמה, simply because no Pesach/Yovel existed not in the entire history of the בית שני nor in the long g’lut which culminated in the Shoah!

Therefore, the Shas Mishna compiled by rabbi Yechuda does not compile Sanhedrin common law rulings made in the past but rather serves as a model when Jews לשמה reconquer the oath brit homelands and establish the Torah as the Constitution of the Republic of Tribes which mandates a Federal common law Sanhedrin court system when Jews rule this land keeping the Yovel.

Romulus Augustulus, the last Roman emperor, collapsed in 476CE at the boot of the Germanic barbarian Odoacer. The collapse of the Western Roman empire considered by many scholars as marking the beginning of the Dark Ages which witnessed the collapse of international travel and trade.

Virtually all European governments sought to restore the Roman empire. The name Czar of Russia directly refers to Caesar. In the West the crowning of Charlemagne as Emperor of the Romans by Pope Leo III in 800 CE symbolized a revival of the idea of a unified Xtian empire in the West, harkening back to the legacy of Rome. The Holy Roman Empire, established in the early Middle Ages, this entity likewise sought לא לשמה to restore the dead Roman empire, much like the Romans sought, like as did the dead Syrian Greek empire, to erase the memory of the Jewish name off the title of the land – formerly known as Canaan. Then in 1939 the coward Chamberlain, after betraying the Czech Republic the year previous, did the same with the Balfour Resolution and promised to establish an Arab 75% majority Palestinian state within 10 years after WWII.

Great Power 20th Century imperialism an extension of the dreams of Charlemagne and the Czar – both dead empires. Pre-’67 “neutral” England and France–Post ’67 wrote 242 in the Security Council (LBJ tied down in Vietnam), which stands on the British abomination of the ’39 White Paper which promised within 10 years after the War a 75% Arab majority Palestinian state. But both European empires as dead as Rome following the conclusive defeat of their imperial ambition’s consequent to their disastrous attempt to seize the Suez Canal in 1956. Thereafter the Sun set on both empires, reducing them to 2nd rate European powers despite their permanent seats on the UN Security Council.

Yet the UN pretends that it establishes “international law”; specifically in the matter of a Palestinian State. Despite the cold hard fact that the UN Protectorate mandate of the League of Nations “Palestine” … ceased to exist after David Ben Gurion declared – ((post the UN 181 validation by 2/3rds General Assembly validation of Jews equal rights to achieve self-determination)) – the Jewish state of Israel.

All UN attempts to re-impose the White Paper abomination, like UN 3379, 446 and 2334 null and void. The British empire dead like the Roman and Syrian Greek empires. The White Paper directly guilty for the perhaps millions of Jewish murders during the course of the Shoah. Any UN attempt to restore Roman “Palestine” – simply dead.

The phrase “מי שלמד תורה שלא לשמה, סופו ללמד לשמה” – often interpreted in idealistic religious terms, focuses upon religious educational aspects of devote Torah study. However, the Baraita stands under the shadow of Sinai. Torah justice remembers Par’o withholding straw and ordering Israelites beaten for their laziness – to meet the imposed quota of required brick production. In all g’lut lands similar judicial oppression likewise occurs, because the av model of Egypt – לאו דוקא.

Only in the oath sworn lands can Jews observe and keep mitzvot לשמה. Cursed g’lut Jews, by Torah brit, impossible for them to do mitzvot לשמה, because g’lut by definition – corrupt, oppressive, and unjust. The first Sinai commandment only sanctified when the Cohen nation rules Canaan, can our Cohen people “perhaps” public sanctify the Name. But cursed g’lut Jews do mitzvot to not forget how to do mitzvot לשמה should our generation merit to once again conquer Canaan. The model to do mitzvot לשמה directly learns from the precedent-generation of Yehoshua; that generation (unlike the cursed Wilderness generation) conquered Canaan and established all 6 cities of refuge/small Sanhedrin courts; as opposed to the next generation לא לשמה who abandoned Torah justice (recorded in all prophetic mussar) and worshipped avoda zarah.

(Makkot 24a) “אנכי” ו“לא יהיה לך” – מפי הגבורה שמענום Moshe’s entire Torah blessing/curse warning as expressed throughout Devarim 27–30 – nothing but a restated expansion of the first two Sinai commandments. “ראה נתתי לפניך היום את החיים ואת הטוב… ואת המוות ואת הרע.” (Devarim 30). The entire משנה תורה-דברים common law mandates צדק צדק תרדוף as the national application of the first two Sinai commandments.

Moshe’s Torah establishes the oath brit as remembered through the Avot t’shuva; a national as opposed to some psychological or personal religious observance – which any Jew can do in g’lut.

The mitzva of Moshiach dedicates לשמה the rule of צדק צדק תרדוף Sanhedrin common law courts. This wisdom time-oriented positive commandment requires this k’vanna of tohor middot dedications. Based upon the Av precedent, that Moshe anointed the House of Aaron; herein defines the k’vanna of this wisdom time-oriented commandment. When the prophet Shmuel anointed both the house of Shaul and later David as Moshiach. Herein defines the k’vanna, of this wisdom time-oriented commandment לשמה. When Shaul failed to slaughter the king of Amalek and David failed to stand Uriah the Hittite before the Sanhedrin bar, both men profaned the dedication of Moshiach; Shaul lost the kingdom and David too lost the kingdom – initially through civil wars and later through Babylonian g’lut.

מי שלמד תורה שלא לשמה = to a nation that keeps Torah in g’lut—under Par’o, Rome, Charlemagne, the Czars, the British Empire, the UN—where mitzvot observed and practiced without sovereignty, without Yovel, without Sanhedrin, under the shadow of foreign gods and foreign statute law decrees. Mitzvot in g’lut = שלא לשמה; by definition—restricted preservation, rehearsal, memory, the cursed aspects of the Sinai oath brit.

All the centuries of Torah שלא לשמה serve as the definition of the Torah curse of g’lut\exile. The Av tumah Yatzir Ha’Rah spirits by no means meaningless. Egypt serves as the model of t’shuva – remembering the oath sworn by each of the Avot to father the Cohen brit cut between the pieces/akadah\blessing-obligation by which Yaacov embaced the yoke to honor his father Yitzak.

Therefore, the Mishnah simply not a record of an active Oral Torah Sanhedrin judicial system—but a blueprint for future sovereignty expressed through establishment of common law courtroom law. The first “mitzvah” following reconquering ארץ ישראל, the mitzva wherein all Israeli men accept the mitzva of Moshiach as the “yoke of heaven: צדק צדק תרדוף — the dedication of the Yatzir Ha-Tov within our hearts, for all generations to swear through tefillen the oath k’vanna acceptance of the kingdom of heaven; likewise this k’vanna also sanctifies wisdom time-oriented commandment/ k’vanna — brit melah.

Go Zionism

Torah constitutional doctrine of the 2nd commandment

Prophetic mussar interprets the k’vanna of 13 Oral Torah middot Spirits which Moshe heard at Horev following the calf abomination! To do this requires common law precedents which compare a NaCH sugya with a similar but different NaCH sgya/ot which contain the exact same order of Oral Torah middot. To interpret Oral Torah wisdom spirits – the rhetoric of the NT does not teach these wisdom skills.

The NT—Paul included—does not present itself as a rabbinic legal interpreter of Mosaic Oral‑Torah middot or as engaging in NaCH sugya methodology; it operates with different “avoda zarah” categories and interpretive aims which promote not only a false messiah but JeZeus is God and dress this theology as prophesy fulfilled. The Pauline religious rhetoric flat out fails to differentiate statute law from common law. Paul and the NT do not use rabbinic sugya methodology or the formal “middot” precedent method; the NT introduces Greco‑Roman rhetorical forms, typology, & citation to foist the lie that any son of man/God can fulfill the words of the prophets – straight up avoda zara.

A crystal clear example: the concept that a married woman could conceive through “virgin birth” the son of God; Hercules serves as a classic example of this av tuma avoda zarah. Paul’s letters repudiated brit melah but ignore the bi-polar kiddushin/get commandment from the Torah which the catholic virgin birth invalidates.

The NT ignores the Torah commandment of Yibum where a man who dies without children the brother has a mitzva to marry his brothers’ wife – the story of Yechuda and Tamar. This latter example serves as evidence that just as the Torah commands divorce through get, equally so kiddushin the mitzva of transferring “title” to the baal that he will father the children of that union. In cases of divorce, get required which returns “title” back to the woman such that she can marry through kiddushin another Jew.

This Torah implied backdrop (דיוק) the gospel narratives of Mary totally perverts. Paul as a student of Rabban Gamliel would most definitely known this fundamental Torah דאורייתא fundamental. His ‘not under the law’ rhetoric likewise conceal fundamental Torah commandments! Just as speaking “tongues” has no T’NaCH precedent so too the Pauline hype “not under the law” fails to differentiate Torah commandment of the status of a bastard son!

The Pauline letters and later Gospel false messiah stories, establish an entirely new religious substitute theology belief system by which the later church introduced its NT\OT perversion as the opposite of accurate. Goyim simply do not compare to a grafted Kilayim (forbidden mixtures) as Paul suggests. Based upon the T’NaCH example of Ruth the ger tzeddick process rigorous.

This day night divergence a historical fact. Does the Harry Potter false messiah gospels expose a Roman attempt to promote Jewish civil war among the already violently divided Jewish sects prior to the outbreak of the 66 Jewish revolt? Does Paul in turn function as an agent provocateur tasked by Rabban Gamliel to infiltrate and push-away and undermine the influence of this new heretical sect by preaching circumcision not a Torah commandment for Goyim in Damascus; while preaching to Romans to come worship the Son of God king of the Jews in the city of Rome. Impossible to know. Only that the writings of Paul clearly different from the other NT writers. And in point of fact, Paul’s “method” closely resembles to that of Yechuda Maccabee in his revolt against the Syrian Greeks.

The famous Israeli spy Eli Cohen, like Paul – publicly executed. Spies by definition rely upon duplicity rather than making bold declarations to the enemy that they seek the destruction of that opposing enemy state. Consequently, there exists no physical evidence that Paul operated upon a secret agenda. Nonetheless the Pauline propaganda as codified in the NT did greatly contribute to the overthrow of the earlier Greek and Roman Gods. As such, this speculation as believable as Zeus giving birth to Hercules as a belief system.

Whereas T’NaCH serves as common law which operates independent (as humanly possible) of any and all theological belief systems; for example the Talmud never once brings the 1st commandment שם השם. The NT\OT stand upon the Greek rhetoric bedrock of sand/fuzzy logic wherein the mobs believe language as inspired even though they do not understand that “tongue” – such as practiced in all Pentecostal churches; Xtianity and later Islam – both theological belief systems by the core. Whereas the Torah faith of justice rejects “belief” as something akin to accepting a bribe.

Rome’s Achilles heel, Egypt the primary source of cheap bread. A unified Jewish revolts in Alexadria Egypt and Judea which expelled Roman legions from their home base in Syria – represented a nightmare threat to the known Roman empire.

What proves the definitive fraud of both church and mosque the “by their fruits you shall know them” slander libel taxation without representation ghetto gulag Inquisition mentality which produced the Nazi Shoah.

Torah as prophetic common law, trains the chosen Cohen people in the conquered land of Canaan to riteously pursue justice in remembrance of the judicial corruption of ancient Egyptian vertical courts which obeyed Par’o. Both NT/Islamic cult of personality belief-systems replace justice with mythical Gods not know to the Torah NaCH and Writings. Such foreign Universal God rhetoric, exercised through racial KKK – power structures, whose fruits for Am Yisrael utterly catastrophic down through the Ages. So cruel, that any attempt to dress them garments of nevu’a language, the very wolf dress in sheep garments; itself, both NT and Koran define the 2nd Sinai commandment. As such, when will Israel expunge this cancerous avoda zara from within the Jewish state? Starts with the rigid rejection of rhetoric slogans of belief in God – Jewish, Xtian, or Muslim. The righteous pursuit of justice defines the Constitutional Zionist Republic which mandates a Federal lateral common law judicial system which regulates akin to a bureaucratic regulations statute law, starting with belief in a Universal montheistic god in heaven.

Interpreting the 2nd Sinai commandment “expunging avoda zara” not limited expelling foreign Goyim churches and mosques or even synagogues! Rather expelling the very idea that the State may coerce belief at all. Tzedek, tzedek tirdof the top dog (so to speak) of Zionism/Jewish self-determination.

Time for Israel to conduct diplomacy originally established between Italian city-states rather than the post Shoah UN puke international law/Universal God.

Classic Italian city-State diplomacy in no wise resembled “league of nations” or a universal moral authority to guarantee its existence. Security maintained and upheld through shifting alliances, military deterrence, and the creation of hard facts on the ground. The Italian states constantly fought to keep external empires (the French, the Holy Roman Empire) from dictating their internal borders.

Post ’67 European interventions, expressed through the UN placing or removing its troops at a whim like as happened prior to the amazing Israel victory. Specifically 242,338,446,2334 resemble the 1939 White Paper which called for the establishment of a Palestinian state in 10 years following the war. Viewed from a geopolitical and historical standpoint, both the 1939 White Paper and the lineage of UNSC resolutions (242, 338, 446, 2334) incest screwing cousins; same DNA, different generation.! Elite-driven “great powers” attempt to dominate the balance of power in the Middle East – like France and Britain did when both Capitals attempted to seize control of the Suez Canal in 1956.

The MacDonald White Paper – a disgusting throw the Jews under the bus betrayal, which gang banged the Balfour Declaration and directly contributed to FDR’s similar war-time closure of US borders to Jewish refugee populations condemned to brutal torture and death. None of the Allied victors ever once made the slightest attempt to bomb the rail lines leading to the death camps. Furthermore, the UN never tried Poop Eugenio Pacelli for war crimes. The Vatican did not denounce the slaughter of Rome’s Jews, did not publicly denounce the pogroms and death camps, made alliance with Nazi Germany like as did the Protestant Lutheran church! Post war the rat-lines to hide Nazi war-criminals from justice and the pogroms in Poland. The buck of responsibility stops with the Pope and the heads of Protestant churches – all of whom remained silent throughout the war.

Post‑1967, the UN–European apparatus becomes the new pulpit of religious fanaticism. This new church preaches “international law”, imposing two-state solutions which always fail: India\Pakistan, the two Koreas, the two Vietnams etc. The UN treats the “original sin” of Israel/small satan defined as Jewish sovereignty beyond the Green Line! NEVER AGAIN rejects that Europe decides what is “legal” for their inherited racial insanity which Europe calls “their Jewish problem” that requires a European “Final Solution”.

David Ben Gurion declared war against London following the White Paper abomination. The Irgun and Lehi together with the Haganah forced the British to return their League Palestine mandate back to the UN. Palestine ceased to exist in 1948. Goyim in far away lands do not determine the name of the Jewish state. Israel not a Protectorate of the UN not today not ever. Goyim do not possess any “international law” to limit Jewish sovereignty over our ancestral homelands. Jews not the poodle on a leashe, not of Europe nor of Arabs.

White Paper land restrictions directly resemble to “illegal occupied territory” despite the cold hard fact that the PLO 1964 Charter only condemned ’48 Israel as “occupied territory”! The White Paper 10-Year Independent State: It explicitly envisioned the creation of a Arab-majority independent Arab Palestinian state within ten years, entirely subverting the goal of Jewish self-determination. All Arab-Israeli wars fought over the Arab rejection that dhimmi Jews have the right to self-determination.

UNR 242 introduced the formula of “land for peace” and the “inadmissibility of the acquisition of territory by war.” Despite Prussia being carved up and divided between the Soviets and Poland! British illegal settlements in North Ireland; Frances seizure post WWI of Alyse Lorraine from the Germans. Just as the 1939 White Paper attempted to freeze the borders of Jewish growth pre-WWII, 242 utilized by international powers to establish that the 1949 Armistice Lines (the Green Line) as the absolute legal ceiling of Jewish territorial sovereignty.

Resolution 446 (1979): Explicitly declared that Israel’s policy of establishing settlements in the Palestinian and other Arab territories occupied since 1967 has “no legal validity” and constitutes a serious obstruction to achieving a comprehensive peace. This resolution “assumes” the existence of a Palestinian state which later the UN GA and SC resolutions, akin to a whore in church, without shame publicly declared; as if a UN declaration establishes international law! This directly mirrors the land-purchase restrictions of the 1939 White Paper. Where the British said Jews could not buy land in Zone A or B of the Mandate.

UN 2334 declares that any Jewish presence beyond the 1949 lines – a violation of international law. The underlying philosophy of foreign interventionism-imperialism becomes as clear as the Sun on a cloudless summer day! (1) The underlying philosophy of foreign interventionism becomes obvious to all who have any objectivity. The imposition of a two-state solution based strictly on the 1947/1949 paradigms. European-backed UN apparatus acting under the guise of international law. Just as the Jewish underground movements (Irgun, Lehi, and eventually the Haganah) realized after 1939 that British imperial law was an existential threat to survival—leading to a revolt against the Mandatory power—the post-1967 reality forced a similar realization regarding Catholic/UN dogmas.

The international community’s insistence on treating the 1949 armistice lines as permanent borders functions exactly like the 1939 White Paper: an attempt by external global empires (then Britain, now the Western/UN bloc) to manage a indigenous conflict by placing an artificial ceiling on Jewish sovereignty. Independent Jewish sovereignty – not on probation anymore. The problem of dhimmi Arab refugees – not an Israeli problem. Israel gave citizenship to its Arab minority population. Not a single Arab or Muslim country has ever intergrated dhimmi Arab refugee populations and extended citizenship to them. The Oct 7th Gaza refugee crisis serves as check-mate proof to this fact.

By keeping these dhimmi Arab refugee populations in a permanent state of statelessness inside generational refugee camps, the regional powers and the UN created a self-perpetuating demographic weapon. The October 7th crisis and its aftermath underscore that the refusal of regional neighbors to integrate these populations – not a failure of logistics – but a deliberate geopolitical strategy designed to maintain an unresolved existential challenge to Jewish sovereignty.

Torah scholarship that puts a smile upon my face

The resurrection from the dead: The rise of the Jewish state following 2000+ years of exile.

Hebrews 12:2 the ultimate substitute theology which the Roman forgers and counterfeits attempted to cause Israel to forget the Torah no different than as did the Syrian Greeks, approximately 100 years earlier! Clearly, no Xtian “believer” dressed upon in the costume of a “scholar” has ever weighed this possibility; due to the simple facts that believers hold: Don’t confuse me with the facts! I have my religion!!

The early church rewrote or reinterpreted Hebrew scripture to replace Torah with a new “substitute” religion, similar to the Seleucid attempt under Antiochus IV – a form of supersessionism — the idea that the Church replaces Israel. They loved assimilated Alexandrian Philo and the Roman Kapo Flavius Josephus. The latter’s book Antiquities 18.63–64:
“About this time there lived Jesus, a wise man, if indeed one ought to call him a man. For he was one who performed surprising deeds and was a teacher of people who accepted the truth gladly. He won over many Jews and many of the Greeks. He was the Christ. And when, upon the accusation of the principal men among us, Pilate condemned him to the cross, those who had first loved him did not cease. For he appeared to them alive again on the third day, as the divine prophets had foretold these and ten thousand other marvelous things concerning him. And the tribe of Christians, so called after him, has still to this day not disappeared.”

The priest most often accused of having forged or interpolated this paragraph – Eusebius of Caesarea (4th century); after Xtianity became the Roman Empire’s favored religion (4th century). Xtianity as the state religion of Rome censored all manuscripts; scribal alterations in monasteries could spread modified readings. The church lost this power with the 15th Century invension of the Gutenberg printing press. But even contemporary scholarship generally agree the this double D-cup insertion came via Eusebius’ quotations which later monk scribes inserted into the actual texts. In 1971, scholar Shlomo Pines highlighted a 10th-century Arabic version of the text by the historian Agapius, which lacks the overtly dogmatic Christian interpolations, suggesting a neutral original baseline text existed before Roman scribal alteration.

Xtian “tripe rhetoric\propaganda” declares – the good noise gospel: “JeZeus fulfilled the words of the prophets”! Despite never such similar language anywhere across any of the Hebrew T’NaCH sealed masoret Books; which the Church first thing, once the State religion of Rome – discarded and cast upon the dung heaps of History. Order the opening central theme of the בראשית aggadah story of creation.

The Torah ‘order’ based upon a clear פ – ס \ chapter – subchapter system which the later Books of both Prophets and Holy Writing likewise obey. This Order akin for the sace of a physical comparison to a “Fach/space-gap” — a compound term used in architecture, preservation, and building-technical contexts to describe the intentional or resulting gap between two built elements or between a building element and an adjacent space. What separates a NaCH sugya from another NaCH sugya? A space-gap.

The treif bible church translations and koran false prophet (((Neither forgery understands the Torah concept learned directly from Moshe Rabbeinu that prophets commandment mussar to all generations. Prophets do NOT foretell the future; herein separates the mystic Book of Daniel from the Books of the Prophets!))), organized around alien and utterly foreign chapter\verse substitute order or poetic stanzas.

This change of Order compounded with the insertion of word based Names of God like JeZeus or Allah. Both foreign alien counterfeit substitute religion belief in “their” Universal Monotheistic God(s) over Torah common law as faith – תורה לא בשמים היא. Changing the order of texts produces radical consequences God does not mean nor refer to Dog. ברית does not compare to covenant because the former requires שם ומלכות – meaning the oath dedication of Oral Torah middot spirits לשמה which both the church and mosque emphatically deny that such spirits even exist! אהבה does note remotely compare to agape love. משפט צדק defines justice – common law courts ruling fair compensation of damages – does not compare to Paul’s addiction to Jezeus who atones for the eternal guilt trip of Adam’s original sin. A גר צדק does not remotely resemble to a Pauline uncircumcised Philistine; despite the church and the mosque huge as Goliath!

The radical change of Shaul the talmid of Rabban Gamliel HaNassi to Paul – exceptional. Paul’s writing preandidate the gospel texts themselves. A dog without a nose, even that animal could smell the coming revolts first in Alexandria Egypt and later in Judea! The Hanukkah model of how Yechuda Maccabbee defeated and achieved victory over the Syrian Greek empire clearly both Gamliel and the generals of Rome weighed and considered. Any interpretation of ancient history which ignores this fundamental precedent – not serious scholarship.

Shaul as a talmid of Gamliel traveled to Damascus and get’s stoned! That red flag together with the “stoning of Stephen”, two primary witnesses that something stinks in Denmark! Both men according to Torah law would require a trial before a city of refuge small sanhedrin court. The Goyim manner of “stoning” a direct Torah violation! The Talmud deliniates 4 separat types of death penalty. Stone people on the street without a Capital Crimes trail, no connection to any of the 4 types of Capital Crimes death sentences.

That Paul got up and walked to Damascus on his own power strongly indicates the “stoning” a set-up which would permit him to infiltrate the Xtian camp as a fellow converted believer! In Damascus Paul preached “not under the law” “circumcision” not a commandment for Goyim. In Rome Paul preached “worship JeZeus the son of God” when Romans worshipped Caesar as “the son of God”. Both cases suggest that the intention of Paul to inject a form of Monotheism into Roman society to promote Civil War!

The Roman counterfeit of JeZeus through the gospels promotes a false messiah dogmatism aimed to promote the many and hostile sects already fighting among themselves to further splinter and divide. “Divide and conquer” a gospel famous term of reference.

The earliest gospel of Mark – written in Rome about 70 CE. This gospel profoundly suspect. Simply because the destruction of Herod’s Temple – NEWS! The killing of a criminal through cruxifiction – common/NOT NEWS. Paul as a deliberate Sanhedrin/Gamliel agent! Based upon Yechuda Makkabbee declaring his loyalty to the “real king of Syria”. Just as Yechuda sought to undermine (shatter the ethical containment force) the government of Antiochus IV, so too Paul, based upon this model sought to do the same within Rome itself.

This idea that revolution requires shattering the ethical containment force of a civilization, perhaps the “soul of the people” requires two fundamental legs to stand upon. 1) Reject the current government order. 2) Reject the religion of the current government order. Examples: the American Revolution established citizens having rights vs. serfs as slaves. The French revolution rejected both the king and the Catholic church replaced by the church of reason! The Bolshevik revolution, modeled itself after the French revolution. Lenin and Troskii both rejected the 300 year Czarist regime together with the Eastern Orthodox Church. The Nazi revolution too rejected the British French dictated peace together with its imposed democratic government. Likewise the Nazis utterly despised the church and favored the Arian ancient religions. The Iranian revolution too rejected both the Shah and western liberal values.

Bottom line: Post Shoah NEVER AGAIN. Goyim racism as expressed through both “Jewish Problem” and “Dhimmi”, terminated with the rise and establishment of the Jewish state. Where was JeZeus during the Shoah. Why has Allah suffered defeat after humiliating defeat from the Jews who rule over Arab refugee populations?