Learning Parshat בראשית ונח together

What distinguishes רחום from חמל? Confusing the two separate verbs as bad as the NT Greek failure to differentiate a – מאי נפקא מינא – רב חסד – day vs night distinction between מלאכה from עבודה, which ritually addicted observant Jews also blithely ignore! Understanding requires development of the skill to discern like from like! For example the distinctions between t’ruma, ma’asar, and chol! Israel hardly a “profane” טיפש פשט. Parshat נח סמוך לבראשית. Just as the Siddur stands upon the בסיס of סמוכים to separate and distinguish between T’hellim which do not require k’vanna/שבח from blessings which נזקוק כוונה – שם ומלכות.

The essential Torah wisdom kabballah theme, סמוך to the דברים\משנה תורה ratio. Why the טיפש פשט beginning vs end question – invalid? What does משנה תורה mean? Weigh on the scales of judgment the Yad codification of halacha of called Mishna Torah; against rabbi Yechuda Ha’Nasi’s משנה – common law Case/Din – codification which stands upon בניני אבות precedents of courtroom “Common Law”?

If you affix משנה תורה to the post sealing of the Shas – Yad, then the revelation of the Torah at Sinai/Horev introduces a Judaic religion. If you answer the Book of דברים the basis for the Mishna, then משנה תורה mandates faith defined through צדק צדק תרדוף, as the obligation to establish the Torah as the Constitution of the 12 Tribal Republic sworn “alliance/brit”, which most essentially requires Yovel liberty for the 12 Tribes who militarily conquer the land; Sanhedrin common law courts possess the Torah Constitutional mandate: power of Legislative review over tribal “statute laws”! The latter possibility qualifies as a huge מאי נפקא מינא … רב חסד distinction; comparable in difference to Life vs Death לשמה בארץ ישראל vs לא לשמה בגלוט; distinction which separates blessings from curses ruling the land with justice requires the כוונה wisdom\מלאכה of the courts making fair restitution of damages inflicted by bnai brit upon bnai brit. Such a wisdom-time oriented commandment clearly distinct like oil & water from toldot positive and negative religious ritual commandments which do not require k’vaana in g’lut.

Actions have consequences. The worship of 2nd Commandment avoda zarah learns from a דיוק made upon the opening Av Mishna of Baba Kama – 4 catagories of damages that really through logical דיוק includes 8; the obvious four tam damages and the דיוק k’vanna 4 מועד damages. Parshat בראשית סומך לנח serves to emphasize the wisdom k’vanna of the Av Torah theme which separates Av commandments from Toldot commandments as a מאי נפקא מינא – רב חסד distinction; as דברים defines משנה תורה based upon the premise that the sages sealed the T’NaCH Mishna Gemara Siddur from toldot later g’lut statute law halachic religious codifications which have assimilated and embraced the culture of Roman and Greek statute law and philosophy of syllogism static deductive logic, prioritized above the kabbalah פרדס in conjunction with how the 7, 10, 13 rabbinic middot interpret Talmudic warp halachic sugyot and the 32 middot interpret the weft aggadic sugyot based upon respect of the כלל sugya integrity. The statute halachic g’lut לא לשמה codes uproot and obliterate, and therein they blow out the lights of Hanukkah! Jews forget the Oral Torah judicial common law replaced with static statutory religious codes.

The skill to read a blue print, this wisdom permits a building contractor to envision from a two dimensional sheet of paper a three dimensional idea… Front\Top/Side views זה לא כזה וזה לא כזה. The kabbalah of פרדס inductive logic expresses a tohor dynamic way of interpreting, based upon בניני אבות precedents, brought by the different sugyot of Gemara, the essentially to discern כוונה of the language of the Mishna – based upon a fixed perspective; akin to how the Courts judge the testimony of witnesses on the New Moon, likewise distinguishes the testimony of witnesses based upon their unique fixed perspectives.

Contrast the g’lut לא לשמה assimilated statute law religious codifications: 1. They uproot the halachic precedent from how it interprets the language of a precise & very specific Mishna. The Rambam and Shulkan Aruch codes fail to bring the precise Mishna Primary Source. The כסף משנה limited its commentary to the Yad to essentially bringing some speculative Gemara source for the halachic ruling. It never made any attempt to re-interpret the intent of the Mishna viewed through the perspective of that halacha. 2. The codes do not respect sugya integrity any more than does modern Dof Yomi. Chabad encourages a reading of the Yad independent of the Talmud as Rambam suggested in his introduction. A consequent of this error, Chabad believers of the rebbe as moshiach, confuse the obligation of Moshiach as also applicable to לא לשמה g’lut Jewry.

The consequences of assimilation and intermarriage defines the meaning of the 2nd Sinai commandment. As בראשית contrasts the opposing Trees so too the opening Sinai commandments. As does Parshat נח amplify the g’lut of Adam as a central Torah theme that ספר דברים interprets [משנה תורה] the difference between the opening first two commandments which the Talmud instructs כלל ישראל accepted prior to demanding that Moshe receive the rest of the Torah post the Golden Calf משל\נמשל Av precedent of the 2nd Sinai commandment; likewise this “style”, comparable to the distinction between רחום from חמל – the womb vs a chelem child. Rabbi Yechuda publicly acknowledges the בכל לבבך as the struggle between opposing Yatzirot within the heart. Courtroom Common law stands upon the יסוד of precedents, whereas Roman Senate statute law stands upon appeals to cults of personality akin to Mao’s Little Red Book, and the apocryphal story of Stalin’s “pitiful” chicken.

Obviously the precedents brought a Torts court prosecutor\Shammai different from the precedents brought by the justice defense attorney/Hillel in any lateral common law 3 judge court. The role of the 3rd justice, he serves to resolve any תיקו wherein both prosecutor and defense fail to persuade the other of the merits of their precedents brought before any common law Torts court. The fundamental distinction between Sanhedrin and Torts courts, beside the obvious Capital Crimes vs Damages; Torts courts have a mandate to operate in g’lut whereas Sanhedrin courts only within the borders of ארץ ישראל. For example, post Shoah NEVER AGAIN oath rejects Goyim courtroom imperialism to impose their opinions upon the “Jewish Problem”, based upon the corruption of the court of Par’o in the days of Moshe and Aaron.

The NaCH opens with how the prophet interprets the African origin word טוטפות through observance of Pesach-Yoval and brit melah precedents, later expressed through the Gilgal vs Sh’Cem oaths which distinguish between the Orders of Rashi and Rabbeinu Tam tefillen by understanding the רשות מצוה of tefillah ערבית; the חצי קדיש separation with distinguishes דאוריייתא קריא שמע ערבית from דאורייתא קריא שמע שחרית by means of Rabbeinu Tam’s Order of tefillen which interprets the famous dispute wherein Rabban Gamliel got fired as the Nassi of the Court, which the Pesach Haggadah recalls. פלג המנחה remains day not night. Hence a person can place Rabbeinu Tam tefillen and has רשות to affix the ק”ש ערבית to the מנחה shemone esrei; and the shemone esrei ערבית to the ק״ש שעל המיטה. Wisdom-time oriented commandments require k’vanna based upon the בנין אב which makes a מאי נפקא מינא – רב חסד distinction between מלאכה from עבודה where מלאכה constitutes as skilled labor wisdom. Hence shabbat an example, based upon מעשה בראשית, means week not simply the last day of the week as Protestant Seventh-day Adventists insist. On the Six Days of Shabbat bnai brit in ארץ ישראל sanctify wisdom-time oriented commandments לשמה; T’NaCH prophetic mussar Aggada\Gemara defines the Horev 13 Oral Torah middot דאורייתא – דבר שבלב מצוות שנזקוק כוונה meaning מלכות לשמה as expressed through the halacha of rabbi Yochanon in ברכות. Wherein a blessing stands distinct from saying Tehillim in that blessings qualify as a toldah of sworn oaths. Another name for Shemone Esrei – Amidah serves as a רמז learned from the Talmud that a person can either Stand before a Sefer Torah or sit and swear a Torah oath by means of his tefillen.

Clearly, discernment separates static religious rhetoric readings of flat biblical story texts from judicial common law which stands upon the foundation of competitive precedents which produce Majority vs. Minority judicial opinions of justice – fair restitution of damages as Torah faith תורה לא בשמים היא; the key aspect of Yovel liberty for all 12 Tribal Yichus established within the land. Equally clear, the vision of the anointing of both kings Shaul and David moshiach both failed to achieve Yovel liberty through משנה תורה Sanhedrin courts. The failure to judge the Cohonim of Nov, and Uriah before the Great Sanhedrin, likewise duplicated by king Shlomo who failed to judge the Capital Crimes case of the two prostitutes before a small Sanhedrin court and his confusion wherein he ruled Jerusalem function as a city of refuge. The Torah and NaCH understand the 2nd Sinai commandment through the negative precedents of not enquiring how Goyim worship their Gods/assimilation and the war against Midian post the tribal chief of Shemon marrying a Midianite woman. King Shlomo worshipped avoda zarah at the beginning of his reign, when like his son at Sh’Cem, he failed to heed the prophetic mussar which Natan rebuked king David. Pursuit of assimilation of the cultures and customs practiced by Goyim, king Shlomo prioritized the treif desire to build grand Temple Cathedrals rather than judge the Capital Crimes case of the two prostitutes before a full Sanhedrin courtroom; and confusing Yerushalem as one of the Cities of Refuge!

Hence the precedents for רחום, the commandments to kill the people of Canaan, the drunk rebellious child, and the death decree inclusive of Dathan and Abiram children; these precedents arouse Anger which the Torah explicitly remembers through the 10 tests by which Israel aroused through the spies, the din of g’lut. Remembering the 10 plagues of Egypt through the 10 anger tests defines the k’vanna of the Oral Torah middah נצר חסד לאלפים, affixed to the 9th middle blessing of the 3-13- 3\תרי”ג blessing – ולמלשינים אל תהיתקוה – wherein Israel pleads that the tohor attribute of יראת שמים protect our people from the curse of denying the Oral Torah Horev revelation of middot/מלכות, which distinguishes blessings of justice through Sanhedrin courts in the land from cursed Goyim vertical bribed courts, enslaved to a hostile agenda like the courts of Par’o; follow the money, when the State pays the salaries of the justices herein defines bribe. Goyim worship of avoda zarah because they reject the revelation of Sinai/Horev. The lights of Chanukkah have the k’vanna which remembers the ancient Greeks who attempted to deceive Israel to forget the Oral Torah. Expressed over and again through their ever repeated denial of the Oral Torah Horev revelation. The Shomronim, the Tzeddukkim, Xtianity and Islam, the Karaim and the charem placed upon Spinoza followed by Shabbetai Tzvi together with his prophet Natan from Gaza, and Yaacov Frank. The latter false messiah av tuma avoda zara duplicates the Apostle Paul likewise rejected the דאורייתא Moshiach commandment: sanctify Yovel liberty through Great Sanhedrin courts designation of the Tribal Yichus within the borders of ארץ ישראל Torah constitutional republic/commonwealth as the prophetic mussar of brit melah.

The middah of רחום affixed to the womb of Rivka wherein the Yatzir Ha-Tov wrestles with the Yatzir Ha-Raw. Pity merely a reactionary, at best chelem baby-like empathy over the sorry plight of others currently in distress. Whereas רחום the 4th Oral Torah middah affixed to גואל ישראל links redemption to attribute of יראת שמים mussar, interpreted as ‘mastery of a good name reputation’. Hence both ritual slaughter and Torah scholars & scribes require this essential basic attribute of emotional maturity and development. Contrast the disqualification of the Jewish apikoros in mesechta Chullin which clearly does not depend upon either his skills or knowledge of the subject: how to technically ritually kill an animal. Hence רחום סמוך לחנון wherein חנון understood as עיין טוב, which the apikoros lacks.

Just as Yom Kippur separates the ודוי said over the goat thrown of the cliff to נשא עון ופשע וחטאה from the ודוי dedication of the living blood sprinkled before the פרוכת\כפור separates the distinction between a ודוי דאורייתא מן ודוי דרבנן. Hence the Shemone Esrei lacks a rabbinic ודוי and its permitted to add in שמע קולינו this toldot confession of sins which starkly contrasts with the dedication to pursue justice among our people as the Cohen national inheritors of the brit sworn to the Avot which the 3rd through 9th middot amplify לשמה the first שם השם whereas the 10th – 12th middot magnify the repetition of the שם השם לא לשמה g’lut Jewry as the דיוק made upon the closing middah absolutely requires: ונקה as learned through the month of Elul; as the shofar לשמה separates tohor middot spirits blown from the Yatzir Ha’Tov from wind blown from the lungs; toldot commandments which do not require k’vanna, but serve as external vessels like the Mishkan’s relationship with the Shekinah.

Israeli grievances against the UN in General and the ICJ in particular; as expressed through a long history of Goyim lynching mobs hate crimes.

The ICJ opinion compares to the Slander: “the Jews poisoned the Wells” but did not call for the murder of Jewish communities across Europe! England now started a trend wherein its supports the Arab League boycott, adopted in 1945 – limited to “occupied Judea and Samaria”. The mob screams of Genocide etc. a fabricated charge like as the Protocols of the Elders of Zion! This comparison of similar cases far close than the two precedents which the ICJ majority attempts to prosecute Israel over the charge of war crimes!

In legal terms, occupation generally concerns a foreign power exercising effective authority over territory without the sovereign’s consent—not merely foreign troops being present under an agreed mission. How then can the UN or European countries denounce Israeli rule over Yechuda and Shomron as illegal? No single binding Case precedent comparable to Israel’s right to self-defense in the June 1967 War. The ICJ’s majority opinion represents merely an advisory opinion. SA in Namibia does not compare, nor the case of Mauritius in 1965 to Jordan’s alliance with Nasser to ‘throw the Jews into the Sea’. That Israeli war of self defense represents the 2nd Israeli Independence Wars!

Utter narishkeit to argue that Nasser’s war objectives simply political rhetoric to arouse Arab mobs! Post Oct 7th 2023 massacre proves that Arab hate more than simple poo poo rhetoric. The ICJ ’24 fart, legally unsound because its mandate and analysis did not adequately account for the defensive circumstances post Shoah Israelis confronted in 1967. Its conclusions directly compare to the fraud of UN 3379 – supported by the Green Party in England today, and 2334 express as the opposite of a Chapter VI “suggestion”.

Just as the ICJ has no actual precedent to stand upon which compares – even remotely to the Case of the 1967 War where Israel defended itself from foreign invasion so too and how much more so the debased Labor PM in London who openly declares Israel guilty of “ethnic cleansing” and “genocide” with no evidence other than slander. Minority opinions within the ICJ, identified the majority opinion qualifies as a move from unlawful policies—such as annexation and thwarting self-determination—to the unlawfulness of the entire continued presence as contested and insufficiently explained.

But the courts in point of fact have not determined “genocide”. Hence to mention this term stam amounts to slander, it hints in the gossip minds of the reactionary press that Israel has in point of fact guilty under the equally vague distortion “international law”. That crime in Samaria made by “settler terrorists” but violence in England merely violence! Talmudic common law states unequivocally that the precedents of the prosecutor cannot serve as the precedents of the defense attorney.

The ICJ ruling ignored the 1967 defensive right to self defense basis of Israel’s victory over Nakba Allah through the agents of that dead God of Egypt Syria and Jordan. Instead it pretended it had a mandate to rule upon the legal consequences of Arab states absolution rejection of Jewish self determination made famous through the post War 3 No’s! This too the court’s diseased Myopia ignored, together with Nakba Allah Arab states absolute refusal to repatriate their own refugee populations. Instead the bigoted ICJ court limited its scope of vision to addressing the legal consequences of Israel – absolutely divorced from all contending Arab interests responsible for initiating the 1967 War in the first place.

Art. 65 of the ICJ Statute; the July 2024 Wall opinion carries no enforcement mechanism, and Security Council referral (Art. 94(2)) blocked by the US veto. The Mauritius reference in the majority rests on UN GA Res. 2066 (1965), which recorded the UK’s undertaking to end administration — a consent-based fact absent for Jordan in 1967. That distinction appears in Judge Nolte’s opposition. Judges Sebutinde and Abraham both faulted the majority for carving out only the occupation question while ignoring title, security imperatives, and prior Arab obligations. SC Res. 2334 was adopted under Chapter VI, so it constitutes as a hortatory opinion not “international law”. South Africa v. Israel – at the merits stage; the Jan 2024 order found only a plausible risk triggering provisional measures — not a finding of genocide. Using the word as established fact not simply legally unsupported but rather rabble rousing mob slander.

West Bank and Palestine legally irrelevant to this analysis. Israeli self determination rejects the name Palestine and Nakba Allah defeat in both wars – started by that dead god through its Arab agents – invalidates in UN revisionist history to equate dhimmi Arab refugee populations on par and equal status as the nation state of Israel. Judea and Samaria the heart of the first and second Jewish commonwealths. Understandable that Europeans no grossed out and shamed by their post Shoah “by their fruits you shall know them” – dead God JeZeus. But that does not altar the fact that for 2000+ years Europeans through the barbarity of their Crusader war crimes and ghetto gulags, that Europeans validated the Old Testament bible as their “Word of God”.

The case of Oct 7th 2023 post the Oslo unilateral withdrawal from Gaza proves conclusively that the Gaza majority which voted in Hamas – who rejected the Oslo Accords – that they too rejected the Oslo Accords.

S. Africa accused Israel of genocide in Gaza and London condemns Israeli settlers of “ethnic cleansing” in Yechuda & Shomron…

If Israel made a free Kurdistan including Istanbul and northern Syria a priority, that would go far beyond supporting Kurdish self-determination. It would imply redrawing the borders of Turkey and Syria—and Istanbul is a major Turkish city, not generally treated as part of a plausible Kurdish state. That framing would likely be seen in Ankara as an existential territorial threat, not simply support for Kurdish rights.

Yet the Europeans make a free Palestine with a divided Berlin-like Jerusalem and that’s perfectly normal and fine. LOL What a joke. The language and recent British boycott of Israeli made products made in E. Yerushalim and Shomron based upon UN 446 and 2334 dictate language, hardly qualifies as a “negotiated deplomacy” akin to the Oslo Accords. Neither the UN nor Europe neutral objective but rather racist and biased against Jews…

A States’-Rights Reading of American History

Libertarian / states’-rights reading of American history: A real tradition of thought, not a fringe one: Calhoun, the 1896 Populists, Rothbard, and Ron Paul all walk some version of this road. Madison in Federalist 10 defines a pure democracy as a society of few citizens governing themselves directly, and says such democracies “have ever exhibited spectacles of turbulence and contention.” The word Democracy appears essentially nowhere in the Declaration or Constitution; “republic” the operative term (Art. IV §4 guarantees each state a republican form of government). Washington, Adams, and others used “democracy” pejoratively. The Bill of Rights – written against concentrated power, and the original design had Senators chosen by state legislatures, specifically so the Senate represented states as governments, not populations.

1913 really, a hinge year: Federal Reserve Act, 16th Amendment (income tax), 17th Amendment (direct election). Deflation after 1865 genuinely crushed debtors — farmers especially — the direct ancestor William Jennings Bryan’s “Cross of Gold” speech. Jefferson in Paris when Madison drafted the Bill of Rights. Gibbons v. Ogden (1824) already read “among the several states” expansively, and Justice Marshall, not a states’-rights theorist as Madison & Jefferson. The Commerce Clause – partly written because interstate tariffs under the Articles effectively strangled trade. The Interstate Commerce Act aimed at the Robber Barons – weakly. Akin to how Teddy Roosevelt’s anti-trust law, by means of a logical inference, “permitted” the Government to “establish” government approved monopolies such as the 3rd Central Bank and later the Military Industrial Complex. Bottom line: before 1913 the federal government had no direct grab on individual income and no permanent bureaucratic revenue apparatus; after, it did.

The Interstate Commerce Act aimed at the Robber Barons – akin to how Teddy’s anti-trust laws “permitted” the Government – by the above mentioned logical inference – to “establish” government approved monopolies such as the 3rd Central Bank and later the Military Industrial Complex. Madison argued in Federalist 62 – the Senate a body of the states-as-governments, per the Connecticut Compromise. The 17th Amendment genuinely removed the original intent of the Framer of the Constitution. The Supreme Court should rule that amendment compares directly to Prohibition and the later invalidation of Roe vs. Wade.

The States of the Union forged a Republic. The word “democracy” so emphasized and adored post Civil War, never once employed in the Declaration of Independence nor either the first or second Constitutions of the United States. The Declaration refers to government deriving its powers from “the consent of the governed,” and the Constitution begins “We the People.” A clear interpretation — based upon the bill of Rights in contrast to the 1789 French Rights of Man prioritizes citizens over the rights of feudal lords. Napoleon needed soldiers, hence he included even Jews as citizens.

The influence of 17th and 18th Century philosophers interpreted distinctly different by two completely different cultures and societies of revolutionary America vs revolutionary France. Akin to the original NT Greek manuscripts – “total blindness” to the fundamental distinctions between מלאכה vs. עבודה in shabbat observance. The former a Torah wisdom which dictates prophetic mussar as the k’vanna/intent required by all wisdom-time oriented Av commandments such as in the specific shabbat commandment. The latter static and fixed limited to concrete actions rather than internal matters of the heart.

The Declaration refers to government deriving its powers from “the consent of the governed,” and the Constitution begins “We the People.” A clear interpretation — based upon the bill of Rights in stark contrast with the 1789 French Rights of Man: The latter, explicitly universal and anti-feudal, abolishing Caste system – privilege by feudal ownership of estates together with their serfs; whereas the former frames the Republic’s relationship between the States vs the Central Government. Issue of individual liberty not emphasized based upon the limited voting franchise restricted to land owning men. The Framers of the Constitution lived on the cusp of the Industrial Revolution. Virtually all agricultural based economies throughout human history have required cheap labor, due to farming being labor intensive. Pre-Lincoln’s War, Senator Calhoun retrojection defended the institution of Southern slavery.

However, ‘the hand writing on the wall’, obvious to all who had eyes that see. Czarist Russia after the 1856 Crimean War defeat, reached the identical conclusion, that for Russia to remain a ‘Great Power’ it too had to follow the examples set by England, France and Germany and the United States. Contrast the Crimean War with the 1956 Suez Canal Crisis where both Britain and France ceased as ‘Great Powers’, due to their diminished industrial capacities when compared to the bi-polar super-powers, which pitted the US against the USSR.

The Commerce Clause together with the 10th Amendment served as the vision of freedom for the States of the Republic to manage and regulate through “State(s) Rights” all intra-State trade and commerce. Likewise, the other 9 Amendments of the Bill of Rights too policed the Federal and State governments from political “over-reach” by setting limits on the new federal government which now established an additional Executive Branch, which the Articles did not mandate.

This second Constitution gave Congress power to [bureaucratically] regulate inter-State commerce. Post Lincolns’ War restoration of the Republic, both Parties in Congress passed the Inter-State Commerce Act. Madison\Jefferson’s Bill of Rights clearly feared a strong “king-like” Executive Branch that it, along with the other two mandated branches of the Government might abuse their powers and authority such as “divine right of kings” or Big Brother carpet bagger bureaucrats which defined Czarist Autacracy and post Lincoln’s War America. The contrast of the 2nd US Constitution to the later French Revolution which witnessed the rise of Napoleon – a clear rejection of democracy – proved the fears of the Bill of Rights as meritorious.

While the Interstate Commerce Act of 1887 had bi-partisan support in Congress, it came AFTER the Radical Republicans restricted Lincolns’ ‘Greenback’ fiat money by some 25%. This economic stupidity concentrated wealth and effectively contributed to the rise of the ‘Robber-Barons’, whose monopolies, starting with the railroads, would shape post Civil War America.

The Citizens United political expression recognizes corporate rights to spend on political speech, while the SAVE America Act, generally speaking – seeks stricter eligibility and identification requirements for citizens voters, based upon the premise that the Bill of Rights most essentially serve to protect citizens of America rather than peoples’ who enter the country illegally. Peoples living in other lands come under the laws of those lands not the laws of America. Just as American citizens their rights to vote in other democratic national elections equally restricted. Citizens United recognizes the 1st Amendment as inclusive of certain corporate political spending. The Save America Act stated aim – tighter citizenship-documentation and voter-ID requirements

Mitt Romney said “Corporations are people, my friend” at the Iowa State Fair on August 11, 2011, during his campaign for the 2012 Republican presidential nomination. He based this response upon Citizens United v. FEC (2010). Candidates elected receive huge “donations” which defines the corruption of “democracy” over defeated Confederate States-Rights. The 17th Amendment to stripped State legislators from appointing Senators to Washington combined with the 1937 expansive Commerce Clause reading, set the stage for the SC Roe vs Wade ruling.

NLRB v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. (1937) the Court pivots from “Direct” to “indirect” effects. Before 1937, the Court (the Lochner era Court) held that manufacturing and production were local activities, strictly outside Congress’s power. Only the actual exchange of goods across state lines was “interstate commerce.” The National Labor Relations Board ordered Jones & Laughlin Steel to stop unfair labor practices. Steel argued that labor relations were local manufacturing, not interstate commerce. If the effect on interstate commerce is indirect, Congress cannot regulate it; based upon the Schechter Poultry and Carter v. Carter Coal Co. precedent. In 1937 the Court shifted the test from “Is the activity itself commerce?” to “Does the activity substantially affect commerce?” The consequences of this ruling: Labor relations, wages, and hours—previously off-limits—now federalized because they exist as “burdens on” commerce.

United States v. Darby (1941) overturned the Hammer v. Dagenhart and Cementing the “Substantial Effect” Test. In Hammer v. Dagenhart (1918), the Court had struck down a federal ban on child labor goods, distinguishing between the “evil” (child labor) and the “goods” (commerce). It said Congress couldn’t regulate local labor conditions just because the resulting goods moved across state lines. In 1941 the Court unanimously overruled Hammer v. Dagenhart. Justice Stone (who had dissented in Hammer) wrote that the power to regulate commerce “is the power to prescribe the rule by which commerce is to be governed.” Darby kicked the hinges off the 10th Amendment. The Court declared that Congress can exercise its commerce power to prohibit the movement of any article in interstate commerce that it deems harmful to the public welfare; federal bureaucratic regulation of local production standards (wages/hours), fully constitutional because regulating the goods shipped interstate implicitly regulated the labor that made them.

Wickard v. Filburn (1942) – the final nail into the coffin. If Darby federalized labor, Wickard federalized everything, including pure self-consumption, this in-effect buried “local” non-commercial distinctions. Roscoe Filburn grew wheat on his own farm in Ohio, exceeding his allotment under the Agricultural Adjustment Act. The excess wheat he fed to his own poultry and used for his own family’s consumption – purely local, non-commercial activity. Justice Jackson wrote that even if Filburn’s activity is local and not commercial, if it is economic in nature, and if the aggregate of such activities by thousands of farmers substantially affects the supply and price of wheat in interstate commerce, then Congress can regulate it. The distinction between “interstate” and “intrastate” commerce, and between “production” and “commerce,” was erased. Almost any human activity with an economic dimension became subject to federal control.

This undercuts the framers intention to establish Constitutional checks and balances to shape the 3 mandated branches of Government and their priority relationship with the States of the Republic. The post WWII National Debt primarily reflected caused by the Federal Government became the largest employer of Americans than private industry.

Therefore the 20th Century revolving door between bureaucracies and Corporate monopolies – a clear incest abomination. Madison argued in Federalist 62, which describes the Senate a body of the states-as-governments, per the Connecticut Compromise. The 17th Amendment genuinely removed the original intent of the Framer of the Constitution and like Roe vs Wade the Supreme Court should weigh this Amendment on par with the Prohibition Amendment.

Post Civil War, about $44 million in greenbacks withdrawn before Congress ended the Contraction Act’s redemption program in February 1868. The Public Credit Act of 1869, a separate later measure concerning repayment of Civil War bondholders The later Specie Resumption Act of 1875 set redemption in gold for 1879 and renewed the contraction debate. Compare this policy of “economic stupidity” to the Federally established monopoly which determine the interest charged on money by all banking institutions; the Fed under FDR it likewise duplicated the same “economic stupidity” post collapse of Wall Street in 1929, Hoover’s depression.

This “dog returns to eat its own vomit” error effectively contributed to the negation of the Homestead Act of 1862, corporate monopolies acquisition of properties who paid pennies on the dollar for the bankrupted farm lands. Described aptly in the story: “The Grapes of Wrath”. This novel portrays the horrors suffered by tenant farmers driven from Oklahoma by drought and foreclosures; & their exploitation and the harsh conditions these “refugees” endured in California. A virtual replay of Andrew Jackson’s trail of tears – karma has its consequences.

That same year Wilson radically changed the US experiment and abandoned the advice by the Founding Fathers wherein he duplicated European Central Banking monopoly traditions, that same year the Federal Government abandon tariffs as the main tool to raise money in favor of taxation through the bureaucracy of the IRS\16th Amendment, and passage of the 17th Amendment which stripped the Constitutional power mandated to the States to send Senators as “ministers of the States” to Washington.

This Amendment ignored the warning issued in the Federalist Papers that democracy requires an educated public. State legislators watched their appointed Senators whom they sent to Washington with the “educated eyes” of a predatory hawk; the general public more bread and potatoes reactionary in nature. Hence election of Representative every two years while Senators every 6 years. The general election of Senators has aroused the call for term limits; perhaps a Senators too should stand for election no different from Representatives.

While the Feds Board of Governors a federal agency appointed by the President and confirmed by the Senate, once in power the Fed operates independent from Government over-view no different than most regulatory laws the eyes of Congress never debate. J.P. Morgan & Co. made huge loans to England and France; in 1917 the Fed extended roughly $2.3 billion in credits to the Allies. When Wilson declared war on Germany, the threat of the consequences of declaring war upon England and France stood as the darkest shadow – that both countries would negate their obligations to pay the loans, like as did the Bolshevik Russia after they seized power.

J.P. Morgan died in 1913. None the less his banking interests greatly influenced the 1910 Jekyll Island planning meeting for the establishment of the 3rd Central Bank; a group including Senator Nelson Aldrich and prominent financiers drafted the banking-reform Aldrich Plan that influenced the later Federal Reserve. John Jacob Astor IV opposed the Aldrich Plan, his tragic death on the Titanic compares to the damned Yankees winning the Civil War in scope; as did passage of the 17th Amendment in 1913.

The land consolidation and mechanization, initiated by FDR’s socialist policies driven by tractor economics and later USDA production policy committed Washington to pay huge farming subsidies to the “Industrial Revolution” of farming industries.

A myopic senior European diplomat warned that Israel is “isolated and alone,” facing a potential “tsunami of sanctions” if current policies continue, with several nations recalling ambassadors and restricting diplomatic access.  Blind Man’s Bluff, the Israeli victories across the Middle East has radically changed the ‘balance of power’ across this region at the loss to European strategic interests!

This anonymous EU Official opposes Israeli settlement expansion and ignores the Ham-ass and His-bullah defeats, the collapse of Assad, and most definitely the America First Foreign Policy which now dominates Oil-trade across the world. International alliances have radically changed post the Oct 7th Abomination War. European Governments attempt to provoke a crisis in relations just prior to Israeli national elections and Congressional Mid-term elections, not simply attempts to “challenge” the New Status-Quo in the Middle East and North Africa. Alas for Western Europe EU – no partner in that alliance qualifies as a ‘Great Power’.

Attempts to justify the clash of interests between shifting alliances, specifically the slow dismantling of the UN due to its bribed block voting evil eye toward the Jewish state, coupled with the prospect that multiple Arab and Muslim countries joining the Abraham Accords. Equally clear, EU strategic pro-Arab anti-Israel interests would suffer a rabid insanity if Israel imposed a forced population transfer of all Gazans to Syria and Iraq. Should Israel do such a policy clearly the EU-Israel Association Agreement, specifically Article 2: respect for human rights has radically changed since the Oct 7th massacre. Post Shoah Israel rejects the Nazi-like Moral superiority of European diplomacy. Democracy not the same thing as a Republic of 12 Tribal States. Israeli self-determination/Zionism\ views with great favor the establishment of the Yichus of the Tribe of Reuven affixed to the territory of Gaza – based upon the premise established by the Romans post the Bar Kochba slaughter – to the victor goes the spoils.

Israel did not fight and win TWO National Independence Wars – one in 1948 and again in 1967, for hostile European courtrooms to pretend they have the right to judge Israelis post Shoah. The same applies to the UN. Israel did not throw off the yoke of Chamberlains’ moral depravity White Paper, to be dictated where Jews can work and live in Judea & Samaria. Zionism which prioritize Yovel liberty for the 12 tribal Republic defines Israeli self-determination. Restoration of the Written Torah as the Constitution of this Republic mandates lateral Sanhedrin common law courts commanded with משנה תורה-Legislative Review over the established Yichus of the 12 Tribes which the Great Sanhedrin designates. Jews born in a specific tribal land take the Yichus of that Tribe.

Europeans post Shoah know that their JeZeus God – dead. Just as Arabs and Muslims approach this dawn of awareness once Israel makes a forced population transfer of Nakba Allah Gazans from Israel. Nations have interests and attempts to appeal to the equally dead UN Charter, compares to water flowing off the back of a duck. Article 49 of the Fourth Geneva Convention, apart from narrow, temporary evacuation circumstances; ignores that some 25% of Germanic Prussia awarded as spoils of war to Poland and Russia. The Shoah did not come as an unheard of shock. In Herzl’s day French antisemitism sought to exclude Jews as citizens of France! The fall of the Byzantine empire killed the earlier post Bar Kachba western empires’ attempt to blot out the memory of the Jewish people from off the oath sworn lands. Arabs in Israel cannot even pronounce the European word Palestine! Perhaps the bard Bob Dylan said it best: “The times they are a’change’n”; or the #1 Hit from the Monkey’s – “We’re the young generations and we have something to say.”

The forced population transfer of almost 1 million Jews which started in Iraq in 1941 neither “orderly nor humane”. The reality of forced population transfers defines human history. Slavery qualifies as a forced population transfer! Life or Death ultimatums to convert resulted in forced population transfers. The lie of the United Nations as the dawn of a new day amount to total bull shit. The Dreyfus Affair disgraced French antisemites and their attempt to negate Jewish citizenship in France collapsed. Hitler picked up the fallen baton and permanently exposed the Av tumah avoda zara the inherited from generation to generation evil eye toward Jews.

Bottom line an Independent Republic of 12 Tribes who know Yovel liberty by means of Sanhedrin courts who make fair restitution of damages inflicted by yichus members intra & inter-tribal defines the Torah constitution of justice: צדק צדק תרדוף. An no outside “authority” can say boo otherwise. The internal affairs of Israel’s self determined Republic of Tribes – none of their business nor concern. Herein defines how post the Oct 7th Abomination War as radically changed the balance of power across the Middle East and North Africa.

Traditionally when the strategic national interests of one nation clash with other nations wars ensue. The French revolution overthrew the Monarchy system of government not only in France but across Europe. The Magna Carta challenged and repudiated “over time” the premise of Divine Right of Kings. So too and how much more so the re-establishment of the Torah Constitutional Tribal Republic post the Oct 7th Abomination War.

Prior to the unification of Italy late in the 19th Century, Italian City-State diplomacy shaped how nations conducted international through alliances. But even before that chiddush by Italian City-States all Israeli Republics conducted their Foreign Relations by cutting alliances. The term ברית means alliance NOT covenant. All kings of both Yechuda and Israel either through wisdom or folly cut alliances with foreign governments as did Avram Yitzak and Yaacov in their lifetimes as told in the בראשית aggadah. Therefore War and Treaty alliances cut between allies and or defeated peoples – the Assyrian king made a forced population transfer of the elite taken from the conquered kingdom of Samaria-Israel. Herein this T’NaCH mussar instructs the model of how the Zionist Republic shall conduct its strategic Foreign Affairs.

Both the NT and Koran translate ברית as meaning covenant because both promoted as their primary agenda belief-system theologies/dogma with prioritized the religion of JeZeus as God, or Allah as the One tawhid Universal God. But the confusion starts with the Apostle Paul, his writings preceded the Gospels! His declaration “not under the law” together with “original sin of Adam” compares to how Natan of Gaza served as the “prophet” of Sabbatai Zevi.

The NT uses the Greek diathēkē. The flaw of reliance upon strategic terms by means of substitution of translations as Primary Sources, in this case the Septuagint – this compares to making a chain wherein a person whispers @#$ into the ear of a person and he does the same with the next etc., down stream the meaning changes. Translations qualify as sophomoric scholarship, PhD scholars rely upon Primary Original Sources. For example: “not under the law” fails to differentiate T’NaCH/Talmudic judicial common law from Roman Senate statute laws; the two legal systems radically different one from the other.

Jews returning from Babylonian g’lut spoke Aramaic. Hence the Aramaic Targum – there exist several – takes priority over the Septuagint. For the simple reason that Aramaic, as in the targum Onkelos something like a 95% word for word translation. Septuagint Greek culturallly far more alien and distant. For example: מלאכה vs. עבודה the Greek translation fails to distinguish. The categorically prior argument collapses with the Order of the letters of Paul to the 4 gospels. Same holds true with which came first the chicken or the egg false presumptions. Onkelos a convert known to rabbi Yechuda – the author of the Mishna. His Targum respected by the Reshonim scholars whereas the Septuagint the church embraced.