How the Torah understands wisdom-time oriented Av Torah commandments
ירמיה מט:לד-לט compares to ישעיה מה:א-ז? Based upon the basic rule: which simply requires that students of NaCH common law learn a p’suk in context of its larger sugya. (כלל פרט או פרט בלל). Bring back the captivity of Elam vs a Moshiach that worships other Gods! Mussar applies to Israel while Goyim debate over history. What connects the two strange passages? ולמלשינים אל תהי תקוה the 9th middle blessing in the Shemone Esrei Bavli siddur.
Elam’s power broken→Elam scattered→Elam’s captivity restored … a משל to Israel. Cyrus appointed→nations subdued→Babylon opened→Israel released … a נמשל to Israel. Goyim claims about history or monotheism neither has the power to erase the Sinai order. This mussar rejects later replacement theologies wherein JeZeus becomes the God of the 1st Sinai commandment and Allah together with his strict tawhid Monotheism (which fundamentally violates the 2nd Sinai commandment and Moshe sent to Egypt to judge the God’s of Egypt and Yehoshua sent to Canaan to do likewise).
Therefore the common denominator between the two obtuse passages of NaCH prophets that Israel can cut brit alliances with foreign powers. The term ברית as first expressed in בראשית requires swearing an oath alliance, like as did the Avot! The common translation of ברית unto “covenant” in both the NT and Koran forgeries uproots the actual k’vanna of the time-oriented wisdom of cutting a brit! The first mitza Israel did after crossing the Jordan in the invasion of the kingdoms of Canaan: brit melah and Pesach. Why? Both wisdom time-oriented commandments. Melah “remembers” – a reference to “t’shuva” the oaths sworn to each of the Avot that only they would father the chosen Cohen seed who would inherit the lands of Canaan. The mitzva of Pesach serves as the בנין אב precedent by which to understand the obligation to rule conquered Canaan to achieve “Liberty” for all 12 Tribes who forge a “brit” Republic through this oath sworn alliance.
The אש of the ברית/בראשית – this רמז – words within words – teaches swearing a Torah oath לשמה, as revealed as the k’vanna of the 1st Sinai commandment. The Sefer בראשית introduces the theme of wisdom time-oriented commandments. This Av type of commandment requires k’vanna while the תולדות קום ועשה ושב ולא תעשה מצוות לא צריך כוונה. Learning Torah as a common law legal system allows all generations of Israel to interpret the k’vanna of Oral Torah tohor middot revealed first to Moshe at Horev following the Golden Calf word substitution of אלהים לא לשמה av tuma avoda zarah which defines throughout the generations of the humanity of Israel among the Goyim. Torah common law which learns by means of Oral Torah logic which inductively compares judicial Case/Judgments to similar but different Case\Judgments — upon this יסוד stand both NaCH mussar and Talmudic halachic rulings as precedents to interpret the k’vanna of the language of the Mishna. This wisdom known as Talmud.
This chiddush in learning: בראשית supplies the ancestral and temporal foundations of Israel’s obligations, while the later ספרי התורה, נביאים, כתובים, משנה, and תלמוד develop those foundations into recurring legal and ethical judgments. In that sense, בראשית is not primarily a book of detailed מצוות. It establishes the world in which מצוות become intelligible: creation, human responsibility, oath, promise, seed, land, exile, return, and the consequences of choosing one’s allegiance.
The אש of בראשית Parshat נח interpreted by Mesechta Sanhedrin – the floods destroyed the world consequent to false oaths. Moshe causes לשמה to “t’shuva”/”remember” the oaths sworn to the Avot not vows that a man can annul. The rejection of Cain, Yishmael, Esav – all first born sons – centers upon the death of the two eldest sons of Aaron for offering “strange fire”, in conjunction with the rejection of the 250 Elders incense dedications! The צד משותף/common denominator wisdom-time oriented commandments require k’vanna.
Publication of the Mishna some 70 to 75 years after the Bar Kochba disaster! Rome mocked Jews by changing Judea unto Syria-Palestine. Perhaps to mock one of the fundamental strategic errors made by Genaral Bar Kochba – his failure to drive out the Roman legions from Syria. Rome became the “modern day” boat people of ancient Philistine boat-people from the Greek Islands!
Sanhedrin 57a also emphasizes the mussar of בראשית which describes the world as filled with violence. The Mesechta of Baba Kama 4 avot of damages requires making the דיוק/inference; חמס גזל ערוה אי צדק במשפט these 4. Why תם involves 3-Man Torts Courts whereas Capital Crime מועד cases require proof of k’vanna judged only by Sanhedrin courts in the Cities of Refuge and Jerusalem. Capital Crimes Courts require advanced warning. What k’vaana concerns a שור מועד the owner had prior warning that ox a dangerous animal. A man who fights with another man and causes his wife to miscarry compares to the din of שור מועד. What k’vaana concerns a שור מועד the owner had prior warning that ox a dangerous animal. If conflict resumes between the two men after the wife loses her child, this proves k’vanna.
Cyrus serves as the model of the Reshonim belief systems which learn Torah as Greek/Roman statute law by way of Greek deductive syllogism static logic formats. The Reshonim declare that the Moshiach must build the 3rd Temple. How did Jews wind up in g’lut in the first place? The story of the brothers selling Yosef and Yaacov fleeing from the wrath of Esav strong precedents. Yosef’s coat of many colors aroused the evil eye Yatzir Ha-Raw within the hearts of his brothers. Just as did Yaacov’s repeated outmaneuvers which deprived Esav from inheriting the oath brit to father the chosen Cohen people. The evil eye of the mother of Yishmael likewise accomplished a similar result! (The Koran attempt to slander Jews by its some 2000 year after the Torah declaration that really Yishmael inherits the brit status of fathering the chosen Cohen people invalidates its equally absurd notion of JeZeus as a prophet. The Koran propaganda wherein it repeats prophet as “profit” rather than understand that all T’NaCH prophets command mussar.)
What then defines the לא לשמה k’vanna of the 2nd Sinai commandment? If Jews cannot rule Canaan with righteous justice then how much more so לא לשמה cursed g’lut Jews who must endure the vertical courts where the Governments bribe the judges and prosecuting attorneys by paying their salaries! From Par’o to today all Goyim courtroom vertical “Star Courts” of corruption and injustice. פרט — G’lut לא לשמה Rambam confused the משל of the Mishkan for the נמשל of establishment of Sanhedrin common law courts צדק צדק תרדוף as the prophetic ברית חדש that תפילה – הדבר שבלב – no where comparable to JeZeus teaching fools to direct their prayers unto their Father in Heaven-תורה לא בשמים היא. The צד משותף/common denominator … No justice where lateral courts righteously restore fair restitution of damages inflicted by Jews upon Jews results in “hatred without cause” av tumah avoda zarah? Then its better to choose to worship the Gods of Europe or Islam. Rather t’shuva commands remember the blessing curse oath sworn at Sh’Cem (Rabbeinu Tam tefillen) and embrace the faith that actions have their consequences.