The paired connection between the upcoming two יום טובים – ר”ה ויוה״כ
The subject of t’shuva share no common denominator with the Xtian Narishkeit of repentance for sin. T’shuva learns from the oaths sworn to the Avot that they alone would father the עולם הבא Chosen Cohen seed which would inherit the oath sworn lands of Canaan. The Sinai brit simply a blessing\curse oath alliance. Brit likewise share no common denominator with the Xtian & Muslim Narishkeit of covenant. To swear a Torah oath learns from the בנין אב precedent of ק”ש תפילה דאורייתא; a blessing צריך שם ומלכות. The תולדות מצוות from both the Written Torah and Talmudic halacha do not require כוונה. However, since משנה תורה-דברים means common law, toldot affixed as precedents to interpret the k’vanna of some other commandment or Gemarah halachot employed to interpret the 70 faces of the language of a particular & specific Mishna … this Oral Torah common law פרדס inductive logic herein defines the כוונה of both Av tohor Written Torah as well as Oral Torah halachot as wisdom-time oriented commandments. Therefore the k’vanna of t’shuva most essentially requires the prophetic mussar of “יום הזכרון” – remembering the oath לשמה swore to the Avot that they alone would father בעולם הבא the chosen Cohen nation which would through the brit-oath\alliance inherit the lands of Canaan whereby Noach cursed the first born of Ham.
The 3 קולות of the Shofar warn the generations of Israel to remember the oath sworn by Avram, Yitzak, and Yaacov at the brit cut between the pieces, the Akadah, and the inheritance of Father of the Cohen future born seed which Yitzak blessed Yaacov. These 3 קולות – tekiah, tru’ah, and sh’varim – match the ברכת כהנים and ה’ אלהינו השם which opens תפילה דאורייתא – ק”ש.
The interpretation כוונה of ק”ש – the inheritors of עולם הבא chosen Cohen peoples throughout the generations post Sinai – that לשמה או לא לשמה – the generations of Israel rule conquered Canaan צדק צדק תרדוף or return to the judicial Courts of Par’o and his corrupt vertical Star Courts whose judges and prosecuting attorneys bribed by receiving Government wages as bureaucrats. Moshe prior to his passing referred to this Sinai/Horev oath brit as Life or Death. The intent of the language ONE therefore does not refer to ‘monotheism’ (which violates the 2nd Sinai commandment), but rather the generations of the Chosen Cohen people fathered by Avraham, Yitzak, and Yaacov (the opening Shemone Esrei תפילה דרבנן blessing) likewise do t’shuva and remember the oaths by which the Avot cut the Cohen brit wherein Israel at Sinai/Horev accepted the Written\Oral Torah revelations.
The repetition of ה’ ה’ אל וכו – the revelation of the Oral Torah (replacement spirits for the שם השם לשמה) which the lips of Man cannot pronounce simply because רוח הקודש no word can express any more than the heavens, earth, or sea in any wise comparable to the שם השם לשמה רוח הקודש Sinai/Horev revelation of Av time-oriented commandments by means of just common law Sanhedrin courtroom halachic rulings which makes fair restitution of damages inflicted by an Israel upon another Israel in order to make a תקון עולם of hatred without cause consequent to Jewish assimilation and intermarriage with Goyim. Hence why the repetition\t’shuva of the שם השם in the revelation of the Oral Torah middot Spirits? The exact same כוונה of the repetition/t’shuva of the שם השם contained in the “thesis statement” שמע ישראל ה’ אלהינו ה’ אחד. The concluding word of this תפילה דבר שבלבב that Israel accepts לשמה both the written and oral Torah as ONE.
Hence the opening paragraph of this tefillen tzitzit wisdom-time oriented oath commandment embraces the blessing to rule the land with justice while the 2nd paragraph embraces the consequences of avoda zara g’lut. The 3rd paragraph links the כוונה of all wisdom-time oriented commandments or halachot learned through prophetic mussar which defines the k’vanna of those halachot as ONE Torah – the Constitution of the oath brit Cohen Republic of 12 Tribes who sanctify to rule Canaan with PeSach Yovel liberty by which the Great Sanhedrin & Cities of Refuge Sanhedrin courts – with great wisdom uproot the Yatzir HaRah tuma spirits collectively learned through the כלל of the 2nd Sinai commandment and through the פרט of hatred without cause among our people based upon the evil eye the brothers hated Yosef and sold themselves as a consequence to slavery in Egypt; the brothers judged Yosef with a bribed vertical “star court”, which forced them to lie to Yaacov their plot – that some wild animal had killed Yosef.
שמות לד:ו this Oral Torah revelation of “pronoun” רוח הקודש Spirits סמוך to לשמה discerns tohor from tuma; the latter expressed through the word substitution of אלהים for לשמה revealed in the Sinai first commandment. Mesechta Shevuot openly understands the requirement that swearing an oath requires שם ומלכות. The common אדוני rabbinic substitution – for the non scholar common man. But tefillah הדבר שבלב. Hence, based upon the 7 branches of the Menorah יום טוב ר”ה affixed to אל within the heart. Whereas יוה״כ affixed to אלהים; the name by which the ערב רב שאין להם יראת שמים proclaimed the God who brought them out of Egypt. Torah scholars can swear a Torah oath employing Oral Torah pronouns such as אל רחום וחנון etc instead of the common substitute for לשמה – Adonai.
The kabbalah of the Oral Torah revelation of Horev: ה׳ ה׳ אֵל רַחוּם וְחַנּוּן, אֶרֶךְ אַפַּיִם וְרַב־חֶסֶד וֶאֱמֶת etc., rabbi Akiva’s פרדס understanding of Oral Torah as inductive logic, just as the regalim paired – based upon Adam/Chava etc so the lights of the Menorah affixed to the 7 days of Shabbat/week. Pesach/Shevuot; ר”ה\יוה״כ; Sukkot/Shemini Atzeret — these 6 lights affixed to the opening 3 and closing 3 Shemone Esrei blessings. The central light of this נמשל of the revelation of the משל Menorah – יום שבת. As a matter of the heart a person davens ק”ש through Ya/PeSach – HaEl\Shevuot; אל – ר”ה/אלהים\יוה״כ; El Shaddai/Sukkot – Eish HaElohim/Shemini Atzeret. This fixation of the 6 surrounding blessings and the 13 middle Oral Torah middot blessings derives תרייג.
A person on יום ראשון calls יה within his heart and t’shuva/remembers the obligations of Liberty/Yovel. The sages taught that a man should make his tefillah from a מקום קבועה. The interpretation of מקום – לשמה, while קבועה – the revelation to the 13 middot with the 13 middle blessings. This defines how tefillah becomes a matter of the heart rather that simply words pronounced with the lips. The language of the Shemone Esrei compares to the forms of halacha. Whereas the כוונה elevates this blessing דרבנן to a wisdom-time oriented דאורייתא Torah oath from the heart. No different than the משל of the Mishkan revelation and the נמשל of the Shekinah. שם ומלכות transforms a תהילים שבח unto a תפילה שבועה. Hence the Shemone Esei also called Amidah because for a person to swear a Torah oath, one option to stand before a Sefer Torah. A ברכה qualifies as a תולדות of oaths. To swear a Torah oath requires the dedication of Oral Torah middot לשמה. Truth the 8th Oral Torah middah which affixes to the blessing מלך אוהב צדקה ומשפט.
No dogmatic determinations ever made on the 13 middot. Rashi p’shat explains the repetition of the שם השם as before and after the avoda zarah defined permanently through the Golden Calf. However the repetition of the שם השם within the opening p’suk of the ק”ש can have the interpretation of the revelation of the Written/Oral One Torah. Only a טיפש פשט attempts to define an unknown abstract term by repeating the same undefined term as its own definition! Hence the מלכות לשמה dedication of the 13 middle blessings affixed to the 13 Oral Torah middot defines מלכות. For example the Baali Tosafot learned that אלהי אברהם וכו raises the openly blessing of the Shemone Esrei into a ברכה. All ברכות סמוך to this opening blessing therefore also blessings, no different than the פסוקי דזמרה.
The טיפש פשט of ONE as monotheism which defines the avoda zarah of Muslim tawhid narishkeit errs precisely upon assuming one god rather than one obligation to accept the Torah revelation of Sinai/Horev as the כוונה of acceptiong the yoke of the kingdom of Heaven. Monotheism itself avoda zarah because only the 12 Tribes of Israel accepted לשמה the Torah – where justice defines faith. Avoda zarah through religious theology defines faith in word substitution God like JeZeus and Allah – the definition of the Golden Calf throughout the generations. Moshe sent to Egypt to judge לשמה the gods of Egypt; Yehoshua sent to Canaan to judge לשמה the gods of Canaan. No Torah commandment to “believe in God”. צדק צדק תרדוף defines Torah faith.
Fear God – understood as protect ones’ ‘Good Name’ reputation. Especially when it applies to scribes and rabbinic slaughter of animals. World separate ruling the land with justice from g’lut לא לשמה enduring Par’o like judicial corruption and injustice! מצרים clearly לאו דוקא for lands other than the oath sworn land inheritance. The Mishna warns directly against attempting to grapple with understanding anything above him, below him, or behind him. Understanding the nature of any God beyond the grasp of the Human mind to understand. The blessing/curse Torah revelation differentiates between ארץ ישראל from מצרים. Torah commandments understood as Av wisdom-time oriented commandments vs. תולדות בניני אבות מצוות שלא נזקוק כוונה.
The Sages interpret the כוונה of אמת as path; halacha likewise understood as path. The destiny of one man no other man can determine. That path destiny a burden that each and every man in all generations of the chosen Cohen people must determine through his actions. What separates the path of the chosen Cohen people from the Goyim who worship avoda zarah? Each generation either embraces the responsibility to establish the Yovel for all 12 Tribes of the Torah Constitutional Republic – starting with brit melah – a wisdom-time oriented commandment whose t’shuva remembers the oaths sworn to the Avot that only they would father the chosen Cohen people; hence Yehoshua did brit melah, PeSach – defined the mitzva of tefillen through the oath sworn at Gilgal (Order of Rashi tefillen) and the blessing/curse oaths at Sh’Cem (Order of Rabbeinu Tam tefillen). Wisdom-time oriented Av Torah commandments נזקוק כוונה. This “path” Yehoshua’s generation embraced but the next generation abandoned!
The Torah confines its revelation to the 12 Tribes which accepted this revelation. How Goyim worship their Gods falls outside of the Torah. How the people of India worship their Gods or the Peoples of Asia and Japan or the Indians of the Americas – this falls outside of the Torah scope. Torah does not teach physical history. The Goyim absolutely require a physical JeZeus or an Allah in heaven who rewards terrorists with 72 virgins etc. The warp/weft loom of T’NaCH mussar common law and Talmudic ritual common law does not worship the past simply because the brit not cut upon the past but the Cohen seed born in the future/עולם הבא.
Rabbi Yechuda’s Mishna bases itself (a common law codification) upon the Book of דברים also having the name משנה תורה. The Rambam’s later statute law assimilated Roman codification of statute law as halacha does not obey rabbi Yechuda’s Mishna of Case/Judgment Common law judicial rulings. Justice not determined by professing belief in some “I believe” Ego-I but rather in ruling the brit lands with justice: fair restitution of damages inflicted by Jews upon other Jews to obliterate the culture and customs of Goyim corrupt Star courts injustice from the land/avoda zara and heal the Yatzir Ha’Rah within our hearts to hate our neighbor without cause! “Neighbor” understood as our Cohen people within the conquered land of ארץ ישראל.
The מלדינים, the 9th Middle blessing, deny the revelation of the Oral Torah. Ezra’s generation rejected the converts imported by the Assyrian king to Samaria for their rejection of the Oral Torah! The Tzeddukim too rejected the Oral Torah. The false messiah gospel Roman forgery church despises the Oral Torah to this very day. The Karaim, despite at their zenith of influence supported by perhaps something like 50% of g’lut Jewry placed in permanent נדוי for their rejection of the Written Oral Torah revelation which defines the כוונה of lighting the lights of Hanukkah as a Av wisdom-time oriented commandment דאורייתא; herein explains how the B’hag learns.
Second Commandment generally by Goyim who reject the revelation of the Torah at Sinai/Horev erroneously understood as prohibiting idolatrous images and rival worship – hence the primary cause of the 30 Years War. The Golden Calf serves as proof. The calf merely a משל which requires the generations of Israel to learn the mussar נמשל – substitution of other words (such as אלהים) for the revelation of the שם השם לשמה רוח הקודש. Hence assimilation to the ways and customs how Goyim worship their Gods – such as building Grand Cathedrals of wood & stone – and intermarriage with such Goyim – such as depicted in the war against Midian.
The טיפש פשט of rote literalism utterly rejected straight from the בראשית story of Creation. Torah taught as history – in the beginning God created the Universe – this error entirely misses the major theme of the Torah – wisdom-time oriented Av commandments which requires כוונה. Torah neither a history of the past nor a theology! Torah opens with Av wisdom-time oriented commandments — flows into תולדות commandments which to not require k’vanna — and concludes that Judicial Sanhedrin common law lateral courtrooms exist as a common law legalism. Any and all attempts made by Goyim and g’lut Jewry to convert this Torah revelation as a religious belief system – Av tuma avoda zarah/Golden Calves.
Torah does not contain historical claims any more than does the Mishna with its Gemarah commentary! The Mishna penned some 70 to 75 years after the Bar Kochba disaster where the Romans slaughter perhaps 50% of the population of Judea and renamed this totally obliterated & conquered province as Syria-Palestine! The T’NaCH testifies that David failed in his Moshiach anointed as did Shaul before him to establish the Yovel for all 12 Tribes. The Talmud testifies that Yovel דאורייתא never sanctified throughout the בית שני. Torah has never as of yet to function as the Constitution of the Republic of 12 Tribes! Therefore just as Avram cut a brit to father in the future all generation of the Cohen nation so too Torah lives as a not yet achieved Yovel liberty of the 12 Tribe Republic. The Torah does make statements presented as claims about events, persons, places, and genealogical succession—for example, the Exodus, Sinai, the wilderness, and the lives of the patriarchs – Aggadah משל which requires the generations of the chosen Cohen people to make the required דיוק נמשל.
The mussar of מצרים a powerful t’shuva to remember the 2nd Sinai commandment of death/g’lut לא לשמה. Hence the tefillah דאורייתא specifically remembers the Yovel from Egypt! Learning the נמשל of prophetic mussar as the k’vanna of rote ritual commandments – herein defines the כוונה של בראשית. The word מצרים functions not as a טיפש פשט – more than a geographic place. It represents life under alien rule, corrupted judgment, assimilation, and failure to realize the Yovel liberty for all 12 Tribes of the oath brit Republic. The tefillah of ק”ש remembers Egypt through the בנין אב of Yovel as a Torah commandment לשמה.
In 1922 the League of Nations awards the Palestine Mandate to the British. 17 years later London issues the 2nd White Paper – the opposite of the original League mandate. Recommend to listen to this clip:
A quick summation of how, prior to ר”ה the need to respond with Amen when the Torah curses read prior to Yom Ha-Din on the brit. אל remembers the Yatzir of avoda zara affixed to the blessing of ישראל.
How the Torah understands wisdom-time oriented Av Torah commandments
ירמיה מט:לד-לט compares to ישעיה מה:א-ז? Based upon the basic rule: which simply requires that students of NaCH common law learn a p’suk in context of its larger sugya. (כלל פרט או פרט בלל). Bring back the captivity of Elam vs a Moshiach that worships other Gods! Mussar applies to Israel while Goyim debate over history. What connects the two strange passages? ולמלשינים אל תהי תקוה the 9th middle blessing in the Shemone Esrei Bavli siddur.
Elam’s power broken→Elam scattered→Elam’s captivity restored … a משל to Israel. Cyrus appointed→nations subdued→Babylon opened→Israel released … a נמשל to Israel. Goyim claims about history or monotheism neither has the power to erase the Sinai order. This mussar rejects later replacement theologies wherein JeZeus becomes the God of the 1st Sinai commandment and Allah together with his strict tawhid Monotheism (which fundamentally violates the 2nd Sinai commandment and Moshe sent to Egypt to judge the God’s of Egypt and Yehoshua sent to Canaan to do likewise).
Therefore the common denominator between the two obtuse passages of NaCH prophets that Israel can cut brit alliances with foreign powers. The term ברית as first expressed in בראשית requires swearing an oath alliance, like as did the Avot! The common translation of ברית unto “covenant” in both the NT and Koran forgeries uproots the actual k’vanna of the time-oriented wisdom of cutting a brit! The first mitza Israel did after crossing the Jordan in the invasion of the kingdoms of Canaan: brit melah and Pesach. Why? Both wisdom time-oriented commandments. Melah “remembers” – a reference to “t’shuva” the oaths sworn to each of the Avot that only they would father the chosen Cohen seed who would inherit the lands of Canaan. The mitzva of Pesach serves as the בנין אב precedent by which to understand the obligation to rule conquered Canaan to achieve “Liberty” for all 12 Tribes who forge a “brit” Republic through this oath sworn alliance.
The אש of the ברית/בראשית – this רמז – words within words – teaches swearing a Torah oath לשמה, as revealed as the k’vanna of the 1st Sinai commandment. The Sefer בראשית introduces the theme of wisdom time-oriented commandments. This Av type of commandment requires k’vanna while the תולדות קום ועשה ושב ולא תעשה מצוות לא צריך כוונה. Learning Torah as a common law legal system allows all generations of Israel to interpret the k’vanna of Oral Torah tohor middot revealed first to Moshe at Horev following the Golden Calf word substitution of אלהים לא לשמה av tuma avoda zarah which defines throughout the generations of the humanity of Israel among the Goyim. Torah common law which learns by means of Oral Torah logic which inductively compares judicial Case/Judgments to similar but different Case\Judgments — upon this יסוד stand both NaCH mussar and Talmudic halachic rulings as precedents to interpret the k’vanna of the language of the Mishna. This wisdom known as Talmud.
This chiddush in learning: בראשית supplies the ancestral and temporal foundations of Israel’s obligations, while the later ספרי התורה, נביאים, כתובים, משנה, and תלמוד develop those foundations into recurring legal and ethical judgments. In that sense, בראשית is not primarily a book of detailed מצוות. It establishes the world in which מצוות become intelligible: creation, human responsibility, oath, promise, seed, land, exile, return, and the consequences of choosing one’s allegiance.
The אש of בראשית Parshat נח interpreted by Mesechta Sanhedrin – the floods destroyed the world consequent to false oaths. Moshe causes לשמה to “t’shuva”/”remember” the oaths sworn to the Avot not vows that a man can annul. The rejection of Cain, Yishmael, Esav – all first born sons – centers upon the death of the two eldest sons of Aaron for offering “strange fire”, in conjunction with the rejection of the 250 Elders incense dedications! The צד משותף/common denominator wisdom-time oriented commandments require k’vanna.
Publication of the Mishna some 70 to 75 years after the Bar Kochba disaster! Rome mocked Jews by changing Judea unto Syria-Palestine. Perhaps to mock one of the fundamental strategic errors made by Genaral Bar Kochba – his failure to drive out the Roman legions from Syria. Rome became the “modern day” boat people of ancient Philistine boat-people from the Greek Islands!
Sanhedrin 57a also emphasizes the mussar of בראשית which describes the world as filled with violence. The Mesechta of Baba Kama 4 avot of damages requires making the דיוק/inference; חמס גזל ערוה אי צדק במשפט these 4. Why תם involves 3-Man Torts Courts whereas Capital Crime מועד cases require proof of k’vanna judged only by Sanhedrin courts in the Cities of Refuge and Jerusalem. Capital Crimes Courts require advanced warning. What k’vaana concerns a שור מועד the owner had prior warning that ox a dangerous animal. A man who fights with another man and causes his wife to miscarry compares to the din of שור מועד. What k’vaana concerns a שור מועד the owner had prior warning that ox a dangerous animal. If conflict resumes between the two men after the wife loses her child, this proves k’vanna.
Cyrus serves as the model of the Reshonim belief systems which learn Torah as Greek/Roman statute law by way of Greek deductive syllogism static logic formats. The Reshonim declare that the Moshiach must build the 3rd Temple. How did Jews wind up in g’lut in the first place? The story of the brothers selling Yosef and Yaacov fleeing from the wrath of Esav strong precedents. Yosef’s coat of many colors aroused the evil eye Yatzir Ha-Raw within the hearts of his brothers. Just as did Yaacov’s repeated outmaneuvers which deprived Esav from inheriting the oath brit to father the chosen Cohen people. The evil eye of the mother of Yishmael likewise accomplished a similar result! (The Koran attempt to slander Jews by its some 2000 year after the Torah declaration that really Yishmael inherits the brit status of fathering the chosen Cohen people invalidates its equally absurd notion of JeZeus as a prophet. The Koran propaganda wherein it repeats prophet as “profit” rather than understand that all T’NaCH prophets command mussar.)
What then defines the לא לשמה k’vanna of the 2nd Sinai commandment? If Jews cannot rule Canaan with righteous justice then how much more so לא לשמה cursed g’lut Jews who must endure the vertical courts where the Governments bribe the judges and prosecuting attorneys by paying their salaries! From Par’o to today all Goyim courtroom vertical “Star Courts” of corruption and injustice. פרט — G’lut לא לשמה Rambam confused the משל of the Mishkan for the נמשל of establishment of Sanhedrin common law courts צדק צדק תרדוף as the prophetic ברית חדש that תפילה – הדבר שבלב – no where comparable to JeZeus teaching fools to direct their prayers unto their Father in Heaven-תורה לא בשמים היא. The צד משותף/common denominator … No justice where lateral courts righteously restore fair restitution of damages inflicted by Jews upon Jews results in “hatred without cause” av tumah avoda zarah? Then its better to choose to worship the Gods of Europe or Islam. Rather t’shuva commands remember the blessing curse oath sworn at Sh’Cem (Rabbeinu Tam tefillen) and embrace the faith that actions have their consequences.
Britain the post ’67 Primary Enemy of the Jewish State. Why? The opposing opposites Britain contrasted by Frogs who surrendered to Hitler immediately – both failed great powers whose empires have collapsed. But the modern EU has multiple effeminate supporters who favors returning Jews to a dhimmi refugee status pre-Shoah. Goyim addicted to “Blood Libels”.
Compare and Contrast the one sided UN propaganda condemnations of Israel wherein it promotes the absurd notion that Chapter VI and GA Resolution qualify as international law! A blood libel.
War News Review :) Two Weeks Ago
An cold example of the UN women’s quilting and terrorist society and Pravda MSM propaganda. Both Nasser and the Mullahs call for the extermination of Israel.
National interests NOT an “international law” debate. “What everyone says!” Aint international law. Nothing “temporary” of British illegal occupation of Northern Ireland based upon their butt-wipe excuse of “democracy”. “Democracy” has nothing to do with diverse States, many of them dictatorships, holding a “majority/voting block in the UN. Rule #1: Hausdorff follows: whoever makes the rules determines the victor of any clash of interests.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nkHd3n1KIDU
The UN has also maintained a peacekeeping force on Cyprus since 1964 yet did nothing – like 1701 in Lebanon – when Turkey invaded Cyprus. Sweden has not denounced Turkish “occupation” of Cyprus.
Time זמן גרמא for the UN to go the way of the League of Nations
Oct 7th 2023 proved the UN 2 state solution as a cracked foundation responsible for wars rather than peace.
General Assembly Resolution 181 did not have the same legal force as a Security Council resolution, and never automatically binding simply because it concerned partition. Therefore for the UN to turn to 181 as the foundation of the Two State diplomatic framework – stands on a cracked foundation. A building contractor knows the general rule: if the foundation cracked and unstable – then the entire building must come down. A building whose original plan never fully approved or constructed, followed by decades of additions, repairs, and separate agreements describes the Jordanian nationalization of Samaria and the Allah Nakba disgrace of 1967.
The UN attempt to “internationalize” the conflict performs the opposite of peace. UNRWA serves as a precise example as does the unilateral withdrawal of UN forces out of Sinai consequent to Nassar’s oath to slaughter the Jews! UN 1701 failure in Lebanon – not a failure viewed from the Arab perspective which witnessed the withdrawal of Israeli forces from Lebanon.
The Abraham Accords post the Oct7th 2023 Abomination War not one of those 4 countries have broken off diplomatic relations with Israel. No UN condemnation of Israel can make this boast of peace success. The UN functions better as a forum for legitimacy claims than as an effective peace-maker. Its record includes failed or partial peacekeeping, politicized resolutions, and institutions that can entrench disputes.
Bilateral diplomacy—such as the Egypt–Israel and Jordan–Israel treaties, and the Abraham Accords—has achieved concrete results than the stark contrast of multilateral UN one-sided condemnations of Israel. If Chapter VI resolutions qualify as binding under international law -then why Chapter VII?
Chapter VI lacks the power of enforcement. Therefore Chapter VI does not qualify as “binding under International law”. Recommendations do not by definition equal to Ultimatums – Chapter VII. Under Article 25 and Article 48 of the UN Charter, member states are legally obligated to carry out Security Council decisions made under Chapter VII.
Chapter VII the only chapter that allows for binding sanctions, economic blockades, and the authorization of military force. Contrast 242 against 678 which authorized force against Iraq after Saddam nationalized Kuwait. And compare the ICJ to British courts. No British court can declare a law passed by Parliament as un-Constitutional. If the UN wanted to legally compel a partition or a two-state solution, it would have to pass a Chapter VII resolution. Since it hasn’t the “foundation” remains a political recommendation, not a binding legal command. The “building” stands only because states voluntarily agree to it, not because the UN forces it.
Resolution 242, when read in the context of UNGA Resolution 3236 (1974) (which followed the 1973 Yom Kippur War), creates a legal and diplomatic framework where the UNWRA “refugee problem” and “territorial integrity” clauses implicitly point to a Palestinian entity, even if the word “Palestine” – absent from 242’s text. The language “Every state in the area”, served as the spring board for GA 3236 based upon SC 338. Later UN resolutions 446. 2334 and institutional practice developed an initially open-ended framework toward that political destination.
A person does not have to see the river flow into the Sea to recognizes that rivers eventually flow into the Sea. The arrogance and corruption of great power SC imperialism coupled with block voting: for example GA 3379 – biased one sided condemnations of Israel produced the fruits of an ever increasingly racist UN two state interpretation and diplomatic framework which UN propaganda styles as “international law”. The political intent of British/French 242 – its destination became clear without the original text itself exposing great power European imperialism which Ike snubbed in their attempt to seize the Suez Canal in 1956 and therein dominate the balance of power across the Middle East and North Africa. France lost Algeria in 1961. Its economic domination and manipulation of Sahel Africa remained dominant in 1956.
Never said the post UN SC 338 GA 3236 decided all questions of statehood. Rather, that these so-called “Philistine” Arabs never declared national Independence in the 1948 War. Only Jews declared National Independence. Therefore post ’67 with the defeat of both Jordan in Samaria and Egypt in Gaza – only Israel stood as a state. ICJ only follows the trend: all rivers flow into the sea. The ICJ cannot overrule UN SC Chapter VI resolutions any more than the common law courts of Britain can declare a law passed by Parliament – Un-Constitutional.
The post 1946 UN Charter recognition of right to self-determination compares to the church dogma of the Trinity! Israel does not deny self determination. All Arab wars against Israel deny Jewish self determination. Post the Oct7th 2023 massacre Israel says Arab self determination must come from Arab lands not Israeli lands. Arabs states refusal to repatriate their refugee the first cause of the lack of dhimmi towel heads ability to achieve self determinations in Arab lands assigned for the Palestinian State. Actions have their consequences and Israelis have had quite enough of these dhimmi dune coon terrorism.
The ICJ interprets the UN GA and SC resolutions. It attempts to declare what UN “law” means. The foundation cracked metaphor argues that the ICJ relies on a “trend” (following the river) rather than a binding legal command (Chapter VII) or a historical fact (the 1948 declaration). You argue that the ICJ follows self-determination? Yet all Arab wars against Israel reject that Jews have equal rights to self-determination. Arab phraseology refers to Israel as a “Crusader State”. Who judges “Human Rights”? Post ’67 PLO terrorists replaced by Hamas terrorists never judged by any Goy Courtroom for human rights violations like using their own people in Gaza as human shields and building under UN buildings. Prohibition of permanent occupation assumes guilt upon Israel but ignores Nassers attempt to throw the Jews into the Sea.
The ICJ cannot “overrule” the lack of a 1948 state declaration is a strong legal position based on state sovereignty and formalism. Self determination does not supersede the Arab nations failure to repatriate their dhimmi towelheaded refugee populations! It takes two hands to clap. Jordan nor Egypt validates the right to self determination even for the Balestinians in Samaria and Gaza. This so utterly contrasts with the pie in the sky UN refugee issue which UNWRA corrupts and profanes. The king has no clothes as he struts naked down the street with humanity intact & dignity!
The ICJ 2024 opinion biased because it ignores the human rights violations of the Palestinians (Hamas/PA) while condemning Israel. Pay for Slay the ICJ has never condemned. Arab refusal to solve the refugee problem serves as an example of the cracked UN foundations. The voting block GA and power politics SC has never possessed the moral fiber to all a spade a spade. Nations have interests not friends; the failure of the Arab world to accept its own refugees.
The “Two-State” framework: A legal fiction that ignores the real cause of the conflict. Arab rejection of Jewish equal rights to self determination (181) and employing Arab refugees as propaganda – because not a single Arab country has willingly accepted towel headed dhimmi Arab refugees as citizens of their within other Arab countries. There’s nothing “neutral” or even “legalistic” in the bias of UN GA and SC Resolutions. Proof: the UN refuses to validate Israel as a state within the Middle East community of nations. The ICJ interprets international treaties, customary law, and UN resolutions, but it lacks independent enforcement powers and cannot create binding legal dictates where the UN Charter itself grants only recommendatory authority.