Paper Hanging UN SOB – STFU

The United Nations did not formally recognize Jordanian sovereignty, but strangely enough that Women’s quilting gossip society did embrace the propaganda term “West Bank”. Post ’67 the UN emphatically embraced “West Bank” and totally erased “Samaria”. During the period of the British Mandate, for example the Peel Commission, not a single reference to the “West Bank”.

The lame excuse that “West Bank” had yet become the standard English term – as phony as a $3 bill! Post the Israeli victory over Nakba Allah, Israel determines the name Samaria not Jordan nor Arab refugee populations who rejected UN 181. The UN cease-fire armistice lines, Israel did not control the E. Jerusalem nor Samaria, Jordan’s illegal annexation of the slander name “West Bank” the UN itself condemned. Therefore the UN lacks the authority to determine or prioritize the Jordanian name over the Capital of the 10 Tribes of the First Israel kingdom!

The UN does not exist as a police and how much more so not a detective department to investigate crimes. That the name “West Bank” served the voting block anti-Israel Arab and Muslim states as well as the 5 Security Council permanent members does not validate the name switch from Biblical Samaria to post ’48 Jordanian “West Bank”.

UN terminology does not confer sovereignty. The UN cannot turn an armistice line into an internationally recognized border merely by repeatedly using “West Bank,” and the 1949 armistice agreements expressly left territorial claims unresolved; yet the great power interest driven UN SC 2334 Resolution declares “the West Bank, including E. Jerusalem as territory occupied since 1967! It declares Israeli settlements “there” having “no legal validity”. Based upon what basis precisely/exactly – other than Great Power interests?

Both Britain and France instrumental in the post War UN Resolution 242. Israel forced Britain out after its disgraceful 1939 White Paper; the language of limiting the number of Jews and where they can settle within the League “Balfour Declaration” mandate strongly resembles the language of UN 2334! Article 49(6) of the Fourth Geneva Convention directly refers to the Nazi war-crime of deporting Jews to Poland and other lands with death camps! The jump to Samaria as “occupying power” amounts to a church blood libel! Jordan deported Jews from E. Jerusalem! Jordan employed Jewish grave-stones and building materials! Article 49(6) aimed at forcible population transfers – no GA nor SC Resolution ever once applied it to Jordan after the initial condemnation.

The Hague occupation regulations exist outside of the UN. UN 2334 stands upon the gossip of UN 446 – neither of which acknowledge that the legal basis – contested; anymore than does any UN GA or SC Resolution validate “Samaria”. The International Committee of the Red Cross on the Geneva Conventions and their Additional Protocols, aimed at promoting better understanding and respect for international humanitarian law, especially after the failure of the Red Cross to visit Israeli captives post Oct7th invalidates the ICJ ruling; the ICJ only interprets what UN Resolutions mean as a over reach bureaucracy!

Israel simply not a UN protectorate territory. Just as the US won its Independence from the British Israel too expelled the British and defeated the Nakba Allah dead god. Jordan illegally occupied Samaria. Yet no GA or SC Resolution, nor the PLO Charter ever referred to it as the occupying state which effectively “controls” land through a foreign army. Wars, treaties determine borders. Israel signed treaties with both Egypt and Jordan! The silly notion that the UN determines borders through gossip Resolutions – simply brain dead stupid.

Israel a party to the Fourth Geneva Convention, based upon the language of Nazi death camps in occupied lands, it categorically rejects the perversion, the de jure applicability to the West Bank because Jordanian sovereignty never formally recognized by the UN. The PLO Charter supports this de jure applicability because the PLO in 1964 only referred to ’48 Israel as “occupied territory”. Furthermore, the Olso Accords, (which Hamas rejected), stand upon the Arafat open and repeated declarations that the PLO – the sole legitimate representative of the Palestinian people – at the 1974 Arab League summit in Rabat. The United Nations granted the PLO observer status that same year, and Arafat addressed the UN General Assembly. Cannot have your cake and eat it too. UN institutions use terminology and legal interpretations selectively, fail to address the forced population transfer by Nazi loving Arab countries during WWII and also after ’48 – starting with Jordan’s war-crimes! Israel’s effective military control after 1967 triggered occupation law, even though the final sovereignty and borders remain unsettled.

Never Again – a post Shoah oath – never to permit Goyim courts to determine the racist “Jewish Problem”. Palestine a dead name with the Roman empire. Attempts by the UN to impose or validate this name as invalid as the Hague Regulations. Arab States pro-Nazi expulsions of Jews began in 1941! Actions have consequences, Jews forced to surrender 5 times the property/lands that post ’67 acquired. Justice requires fair compensation of damages inflicted by the guilty.

Dhimmi Arab refugees did not “warm up” to the name Palestine until coward Chamberlain’s White Paper. Not till the PLO Charter in 1964 did Arafat opportunistically embrace this term (Arabs cannot naturally pronounce the P as in Balestine). What galls Arabs – the dhimmi status now stick to them post the Nakba defeat of Allah.

Eugene Rostow (a Yale law professor and former Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs), interpretation that the original intent of the Article 49(6) of the Fourth Geneva Convention – that the Convention was designed to protect people in territory under belligerent occupation by a foreign power, and that voluntary movement of Israeli citizens into territory not previously under legitimate sovereign control doesn’t constitute “deportation” or “transfer” in the Convention’s sense. UN dogmatism as dead as Poop Pius XII ratlines and Polish post war pogroms! Political declarations made by the ICJ, the ICRC, the SC and the host of block voting “experts” invalidates the 1949 Armistice Agreements which explicitly validate the lines as military – not political boundaries. Furthermore, the PA under the Oslo Accords accepted the division of Samaria into Areas A, B, and C! Therein the PA accepted Israeli security control over Area C and shared control over Area B!

Arafat initiated the Second Intifada (2000–2005) invalidated Oslo Accords. The argument that Oslo explicitly an “interim agreement” only serves as proof that post Oct7th – its as dead as a doornail. If ICJ jurisdiction – plainly limited as merely an advisory opinion that non-binding, how much more so the gross attempt by the ICC when Israel never agreed to the Rome Treaty! Post Oct 7th the ICRC = to UNWRA or UN 1701 in Lebanon.

Legal reasoning by many non-Western, non-European states who share no common border with the Jewish state – amounts to tits on a boar hog interference into the internal affairs of the Jewish state. On par with the failure/cowardice of Arab national leaders to repatriate dhimmi Arab refugee populations post ’48, ’67, and 2023! Attempts to morally denounce Israel – no different than priests coming into synagogues on shabbat to preach conversion.

The limp-dick arguments touching applicability of the Geneva Conventions to territories with disputed sovereignty coupled with the lame-vain excuses that “Great Power” balance of power interests do not dominate the permanent veto holding conflicts in the UN SC – utter clap-trap revisionist history. From China’s ‘Century of Shame’, Bismarck’s 3 little wars, British introduction of Concentration Camp war-crimes during the Boar War, and let us not forget the 1956 attempt to illegally seize the Suez canal – nation states (including 8 year old Israel) fight wars to dominate the balance of power in a disputed region! All nation states great and small struggle to improve the balance of power in a given region which best serves their strategic national interests. Reactionary news paper experts who ignore this fact – directly compare to Blood libel Xtians who supported the mobs who murdered the Jewish money lenders to which they owed money!

In 2005 my moving company supported the Begin/Sharon unilateral withdrawal from Gaza: neither Sinai nor Gaza part of modern Israel. But Post Oct 7th 2023 this abomination War has changed everything. Oslo dead. All Gazans must leave. The PM merits trust, Bibi wisely rejected PM Sharon’s the unilateral withdrawal from Gaza, he left the government coalition which forced PM Sharon to leave Lekud and form the Kedima coalition government.

Justice requires righteous judicial compensation of damages inflicted by the guilty. Jews expelled from Arab countries lost approximately 5 times the land mass of post ’67 Israel. What exactly defines why the UN = Corruption? Police investigate crimes by compiling evidence. The UN employs inflammatory rhetoric. In the example of post ’67 Israel: illegal settlements, Jewish colonial settlers, occupied West Bank etc. All Arab States rejected UN GA 181. After the fact, ie Israeli repeated victories over Nakba Allah, does not change this fundamental fact. Therefore the Big Lie: A two-state solution was always a negotiated Israeli-Palestinian compromise, not a UN imposition – simply revisionist history like UN 242.

Contrast real interstate diplomacy to the UN propaganda show where UN member states publicly walk out of the room when an Israeli PM addresses the forum. Israel forced post White Paper Britain to return its League “mandate”, yet the UN SC 242 presumes that Britain along with Dreyfus France … France who surrendered to Germany and sides unilaterally with hostile Arab states who refer to Israel as “the Zionist Entity”, who embraced Nazism in 1941 with mass violent waves of forced expulsions of Jewish populations from virtually all Arab countries even before the Jewish state declared by David Ben Gurion.

Washington referred to the Korean and Vietnam Wars as “police actions”. Yet the UN never functions in the role of “police/detective” in the traditional sense but rather promotes fake News propaganda – on the scale of Obama’s Russia-gate scandal under Ms Clinton – to unilaterally and repeatedly ad nauseam – a mirror image of Joseph Goebbels’s propaganda machine. The latter employed half-truths and emotional appeals to arouse public outrage and justify Nazi land-grab military expansions. A small step before Israel referred to an Apartheid genocide State!

The UN a block voting gossip society – GA 3379 and the SA Durban Human Rights Conference which focuses solely upon condemning Israel; its block voting compares to Oxford “debates” over propositions which condemns Israel even before the debate. The role of the UN SC houses the post WWII ‘Great Powers’ who enjoy Universal veto rights that GA member states do not possess. Institutional bias defines how the UN conducts its business. Israel forced participate in the “Western European and Others Group” (WEOG) in Europe, rather than a State in the Middle East. Arab states which unilaterally expelled Jewish populations starting in 1941 such as Iraq – the UN has never investigated nor condemned nor held accountable. Rather UNWRA invalidates a temporary refugee status to a one time Palestinian permanent refugee status and routinely employs Hamas and other Palestinian terrorists in its schools. UNWRA text books promote the propaganda of “stolen Palestinian land”.

Selective jurisdiction: If the UN were a neutral arbiter, it would have established a commission to adjudicate all population transfers resulting from the 1948 and 1967 wars. By focusing solely on one side, it creates a legal vacuum where Palestinian claims are “internationalized” and perpetual, while Jewish claims are “privatized” and ignored. This skews the negotiation baseline before talks even begin. The “WEOG” Exclusion as Institutional Apartheid – geographically Israel a Middle East country but the UN politically exiled from the Middle East Group consequent to SC veto/block voting Arab and Muslim African States alliances. As such this racism operates as a diplomatic containment of the “Zionist Crusader Entity”. Lawfare, rather than the lie of “international law”, defines the business of the UN; the Human Rights Council (HRC), Agenda Item 7 a standing order that only investigates Israel. Other countries with worse human rights records (Iran, Syria, North Korea), subject to ad hoc, easily defeated investigations.

The Big Lie and Repetition of the blood libel slander illegal settler occupation propaganda: The UN’s constant repetition of terms like “illegal settlements,” “apartheid,” and “colonialism” creates a “post-truth” environment where the label becomes the fact, regardless of the historical or legal nuance (e.g., the legal status of Judea and Samaria under the Mandate, or the security realities). The P5 veto ensures that the UN cannot act as a “police force” against powerful allies. The US vetoes, except for Obama, biased one-sided resolutions against Israel; Russia, prior to the fall of the Assad dictatorship, vetoed resolutions against Syria. UNRWA schools teach hatred or deny Israel’s right to exist. The ultimate definition of institutional failure. The Big lie ‘peacekeeping/peacebuilding arm’ of the UN – actively fueling the Middle East Wars where Arab States fundamentally deny, starting with UN 181, Jewish equal rights to achieve self determination. In closing Israel did not throw off the British mandate yoke for Britain or France or any other P5 state to dictate a two-State solution. The UN exists today as a weaponized bureaucracy; designed to reverse the outcome of the 1948 and 1967 wars through diplomacy rather than battle.

Post the Oct7th 2023 Abomination War a radical change in the balance of power across the Middle East has occurred. Anti Semitism shattered – Israel never an Apartheid State.

What defines this Torah curse? As a coin has two sides so too antisemitism. ערב רב שעאין להם יראת אלהים defines the k’vanna of the 2nd Sinai commandment as a wisdom-time oriented mitzva; practically speaking assimilated and intermarried Jews. The flip side: The envy צר עין of Goyim whose Chamberlain-cowardice soul inspires them to condemn the scape-goat Jew for all evils.

The disgrace of the one-sided UN Goldstone Report “Progressive Cause”. Can the whole World be wrong? Yes the whole World wrong again and again and again and again.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Npw5vKOYI9k



Richard Goldstone, sat on South Africa’s Constitutional Court, and as chief prosecutor of the tribunals for the former Yugoslavia and Rwanda. When confronted with the Israeli couter-response to the UN Report under his name, he did not thereafter completely repudiate the “Goldstone Report”. But he later withdrew or qualified one of its most important conclusions. The 2009 UN report, formally led by Judge Richard Goldstone, investigated the 2008–09 Gaza war. It concluded that both Israel and Hamas had committed actions that could amount to war crimes and possibly crimes against humanity. Regarding Israel, it said there was evidence that some attacks on civilians were deliberate or reflected a policy of deliberately targeting civilians.

In a 2011 Washington Post op-ed, Goldstone wrote that later Israeli investigations and additional information had changed his view. Goldstone now acknowledged: The evidence available in 2009 had been incomplete. Israeli investigations indicated that civilians were not intentionally targeted as a matter of policy. The report’s conclusion that Israel deliberately targeted civilians was no longer supported by the evidence available to him. Goldstone repudiated a central allegation about Israeli intent, but he did not formally withdraw the report as a whole. The other members of the investigative mission—Hina Jilani, Christine Chinkin, and Desmond Travers—rejected his later characterization and said the report’s findings remained valid.

The Goldstone Report not a criminal conviction yet the propaganda employed compares to the Blood libel of the Middle Ages by the Catholic Church. It attributed an inherently murderous character to Jews as a group and was not based on a genuine investigation. The report gave insufficient weight to Hamas’s conduct and the difficulty of fighting in densely populated Gaza. The UN Committee reached conclusions about Israeli intent. far stronger than the evidence justified; its language was used rhetorically to portray Israel as uniquely or inherently criminal. MSM and Jew hating institutions and commentators treated these UN allegations as though they were final judicial findings!

Goldstone’s 2011 statement reinforced that criticism by saying that later evidence did not support the report’s conclusion that Israel had deliberately targeted civilians as a matter of policy. But the other mission members of hate, rejected that Jew’s revision. The report’s political reception of that UN biased propaganda rhetoric which demonized Israel through a one-sided blood libel, analogous to UN Resolution 3379 land later SA human-rights Durban human rights investigations, and accusations of Genocide similar to the Church abomination medieval antisemitic fabrications. Goyim have no shame.

Alfred Hitchcock was involved as a “treatment advisor” for the documentary titled “German Concentration Camps Factual Survey,” which included footage of Nazi death camps filmed by Allied forces in 1945. However, the film was shelved by the British government and not released to the public until many decades later.

The horror of the camps caused an impact that influenced his movie making career.

The Mullahs launched 13 missiles – 3 fell into the Jordan desert “Sea” and 10 shot down. IDF\Shabak captures ASS of “FBI” of Ham-ASS in Gaza City. Post Oct 7th 2023 a New ERA a ר”ה blessing: Establish the Tribe of Reuven whose Yichus inclusive all of Gaza; expel the Arabs to Syria-Palestine.

More Japanese pilots killed attacking the US on Dec7th 1941 than US soldiers fighting to prevent the Mullah becoming another rogue North Korea! Post Shoah Israelis define: Once “burned” Twice weary. Shakespeare perhaps best describes the bitter anger, also known as revenge – as a dish best served cold.

War has its consequences. Post WWII Prussia the heart and Soul of the Second Germanic Empire under the Kaiser — some 13 to 18 million Germans expelled and the land divided between Poland and Russia. Post the Oct7th Abomination War Israeli self-determination ideally shall establish the Yichus of the 12 Tribes of the Republic. Gaza renamed Reuven! The Gazans deported to Syria-Palestine: the Roman name! LOL Since when do Arabs qualify as extinct Romans from Italy? Post Oct 7th Israel having given the dhimmi rag headed dune coons autonomy in both Gaza and Area A in Samaria in 2005 has absolutely no intention to behave like a dog and eat its own vomit! All Gaza refugee Arab populations must leave Gaza and move to Syria – Palestine.

Ham-ASS Nazism totally defeated in Gaza. The self determination of the Jewish state to establish the Yichus borders of the Tribe of Reuven and all of the other Tribes – to restore the classic Republic of Israel. The failure of Arab countries to repatriate their refugee populations an utter disgrace. Israel, obviously prepared to assist the resettlement of Arab refugees to Syria Palestine like as did the post War US helped rebuild Europe! The precedent of a mass population transfer … some 7 million Syrian refugees live in Turkey. Gazans freely chose to elect Ham-ASS in the only free elections in 2006. The Arafat claim made in the Oslo Accords that the PLO served as the sole representative of the Balestinian people – a lie on par with Yishmael rather than Yitzak the father of the chosen Cohen people. The huge population transfer of German populations directly aided by the Marshall Plan! Arab states unilateral expulsion of 900,000 Jewish refugees in 1948 has its consequences. The British justification of the puke 2nd White Paper which declared the land could not economically hold but a severly restricted number of Jewish European refugees a lie on par with Hitlers’ Fascism.

The 1948 Arab states’ actions against ~850,000–900,000 Jews were a deliberate, state-directed expulsion campaign that included property seizures, massacres (e.g., in Aleppo, Tripoli, etc.), forced marches (e.g., from Iraq), bank account freezes, citizenship revocation and more! That mass population transfer coordinated to erase the Jewish presence from the Arab world. The Arab League’s 1948 resolution (as reported by its own officials) encouraged or tolerated it. The 1948 Arab expulsions – a textbook case of ethnic cleansing on the scale of the Holocaust, committed by Arab governments against their own Jewish populations.

Ramaswamy’s foreign policy framework, often characterized as “America First realism,” prioritizes strict non-interventionism, national self-reliance, and reducing U.S. entanglements abroad. Based on his public statements, an administration under his command would likely navigate a scenario involving the displacement or transfer of Palestinian populations through several core principles: He has explicitly argued that neighboring Arab nations bear the primary responsibility for absorbing Palestinian refugees. During his 2024 campaign, he stated that the broader Arab and Islamic world should integrate Palestinians into their territories rather than expecting Israel or the Western coalition to negotiate statehood frameworks within the region. Under this rationale, he would likely treat a mass movement of populations into Syria or surrounding Arab countries as a regional issue for Middle Eastern states to manage independently.

Rather than deploying American military force, introducing economic sanctions, or mediating peace negotiations, a Ramaswamy administration would likely refrain from directly intervening to block or actively manage such actions. His platform emphasizes minimizing U.S. diplomatic pressure on allied nations regarding their internal defense decisions, provided those actions do not draw American forces into broader military conflicts.

Ramaswamy consistently criticizes international governing bodies, including the United Nations, human rights commissions, and international legal institutions. He would likely dismiss warnings or resolutions issued by international courts or the UN regarding violations of international law (such as the Fourth Geneva Convention) as overreach by globalist institutions, keeping American diplomatic machinery clear of international enforcement efforts.

Ramaswamy’s economic doctrine strongly opposes foreign aid expenditures. As such, he would oppose using American taxpayer dollars to fund the infrastructure, transportation, or long-term resettlement costs associated with moving civilian populations into neighboring regions. Ramaswamy advocates for expanding bilateral economic and security agreements between Israel and surrounding Arab states (which he has dubbed “Abraham Accords 2.0”). His primary interest in the region centers on economic normalization and establishing a coalition or regional economic alliance between the nations of the Middle East and North Africa.