The tribal local god of Sinai

First Sinai commandment makes the הבדלה between the revelation of the Sinai פרט — שם השם לשמה from the כלל – שמות שנקראו Avram/ham Yitzak, Yaacov and his sons which “imply” the larger כלל of שמים וארץ.

The stark contrast of Sinai – תורה לא בשמים היא to the Divine Names upon which the Avot called to their ברית אלהים comparable to shabbat to chol.

Specifically as it applies to justice: צדק צדק תרדוף, the concept of אמונה לשמה which restricts the Torah revelation of faith to Sanhedrin common law Federal courts likewise restricted to an Independent Jewish state within the borders of conquered Canaan.

Av tuma עבודה זרה\Jewish assimilation to the cultural practices and customs, how Goyim worship their Gods coupled with intermarriage with such Goyim – defined throughout both the Torah and NaCH literature, this fundamental “revelation” of the 2nd Sinai commandment rejects the Goyim “puke” of idolatry restricted to both “Universal monotheism” which perverts the word “ONE” in kre’a shma to either a tawhid Muslim universal monotheism or a Xtian Nicene Creed universal monotheism.

After the fact, Universal monotheism theologies and creeds, hence rapes the 2nd Sinai commandment – comparable to Dina the daughter of Yaacov. If – for no other reason – than that both Yishmael and Esav rejected to the revelation of the Torah at Sinai – both historically and today; since only the 12 tribes of the Avot, (the chosen Cohen people) stood at Sinai and conquered Canaan – the sole inheritance of these chosen Cohen people, therefore as a consequence the revelation of the פרט שם השהם לשמה, confined to a local tribal god. Hence both bible and koran worship Golden Calf word translations, no deferent from Necromancy.

Next Sinai revelation – the Mishkan. This “revelation” likewise teaches a משל\נמשל – כלל/פרט spirits of Oral Torah middot. Where the שם השם לשמה not only restricted to the land of Canaan, but according to how rabbi Yechuda taught בכל לבבך of קריא שמע, and the kabbalah of the Ari, to a tzimtzum contained within the Mishkan\Yatzir Ha-Tov tohor middot as clearly defined through the post Golden Calf משל\נמשל where the ערב רב – שאין להם יראת אלהים, according to how the Zohar learns the specific mitzva of Amalek/anti-semitism throughout the generations — how those “Amakek JUES” worshipped their Christ killing Golden Calf – word translations. No different from gospel of John’s opening verse.

Next the Sinai revelation – Moshiach: Moshe anointed the House of Aaron to dedicate oath sworn brit korbanot, All Sinai korbanot dedicate Israel to keep the faith of justice, this oath brit alone – within the confines of conquered Canaan – to pursue this oath brit faith Cohen peoples’ alliance through the כלל — צדק צדק תרדוף as defined through its פרט — the failure of king David to pursue justice in the matter of Uriah.

The Book of Shmuel repeatedly over and again repeats this one flaw of moshiach king David. Hence this פרט serves to define the כלל; Moshe anointed the House of Aaron Moshiach\korban. The Talmud refers to Pinchas – in the war against Midian – as משח מלחמה.

The general term Moshiach, the prophet Isaiah likewise applied to the Persian king Cyrus. Hence this noun moshiach requires a verb. Specifically, a dedicated Sinai commandment korbon; to serve as the grammatic – required verb משח\anointed to complete the idea.

The Torah Book ויקרא, hence distinguishes between tohor and tuma – to further clarify through verb spirits rather than noun words – the meaning of משח\anointing as the defining quality of the Oral Torah revelation of 13 tohor spirit/middot. The נמשל which defines the revelation of the 1st Sinai שם השם לשמה. The mitzva of Sinai tefillah – kre’a shma – acceptance of the yoke of the kingdom of heaven, as the revelation of tohor spirits – the verbs which affix the שם השם לשמה within the Yatzir Ha-Tov hearts of the Cohen people who rule the land of Canaan.

Mesechta ברכות, rabbi Yochanon instructs: to “swear” a ברכה (apart from saying Tehillem prayers), requires שם ומלכות. The term מלכות – understood as tohor Oral Torah verb middot – revealed to Moshe 40 days after the sin of the Golden Calf on Yom Kippur.

תַזְרִיעַ מְּצֹרָע

Toilet paper and the Catholic Poop — The Nato alliance has collapsed.

While U.S. law may block a formal exit, experts warn Trump could still weaken NATO from within. With Europe now exploring a future without America, the real question is: is NATO already beginning to fracture? The US selling oil to the world while 85% of Iran’s commerce, strangled by the blockade. Currently the US navy targets ships linked to Iran, other commercial traffic permitted to trade. Iran restricted to ‘House Arrest’. The Mullah or whoever remains alive, closely monitors the flow of navel traffic on the waterway – confined to the shores of its coastline.

The Mullah government has a horrible history. It employs its own version of ‘secret police’ which engages with major civil unrest through violent lethal force. Several waves of crackdowns over the decades, the scale of “thousands” of deaths – specifically associated with three major periods: 1. The 1988 Mass Executions 2. “Bloody November” (2019) 3. The 2025–2026 Uprising. Late December 2025 a massive wave of protests erupted. That revolt quickly escalated into the deadliest period of repression in the Islamic Republic’s history. 3,117 deaths Iran’s Supreme Council of National Security acknowledged on January 21, 2026. But various human rights organizations challenge the death toll and range it from 4,500 to 36,500 people.

A UN Special Rapporteur noted that multiple sources indicated that 7,015 confirmed deaths confirmed & documented as of February 15, 2026. At least 6,508 identified as protesters and including minors. Additionally, reports have emerged suggesting tens of thousands may have been killed, hidden through obfuscation by the Iranian authorities, such as secret burials and restrictions on information dissemination due to internet shutdowns. Albanese’s use of terms like “genocide” to describe the Israeli war in Gaza has blackened the reputation of the UN. Her Hamas based “genocide” accusations, resulted in a greatly reduced UN credibility to the Gaza-Israeli war.

Both the UN and Brussels ICC have had their feathers plucked in this current Iran war. Neither gossip column significantly read anymore. Trump Derangement Syndrome democrats similarly love to gossip and chit chat about the current American Poop. Separation of Church and State equals in their warped Nancy Pelosi inside traitor minds – to negating the 2nd Amendment. The Catholic Church rife with sex scandals by priests. Perhaps this Poop, being an American, should run for the 14th Congressional District abdicated by sex plagued Swalwell.

England, France, Germany & Spain – Guilty – then and today. Guilt for their “partnership” that supports the Arab/South African ‘blood libel’ evil-eye spin-interpretation of the Oct7th massacre of over 1200 Israelis murdered on the last day of Chag Sukkot, slaughtered by Hamas, Islamic Jihad and UNWRA, which both the hateful UN and ICC thereafter make the spin interpretation which condemns Israel of Gaza Genocide!

Why? Guilt not a black & white issue. Guilt perhaps linked to European “racial DNA” hatred of Jews; their judicial “partnership”, that generally resembles to a Par’o-like courtroom Inquisition injustice, down through the Ages; in particular, that supports the Arab/South African ‘blood libel’ evil-eye spin-interpretation of the Oct7th massacre of over 1200 Israelis murdered on the last day of Chag Sukkot. Slaughtered by Hamas, Islamic Jihad and UNWRA, which both the hateful UN and European ICC thereafter make the spin interpretation, grotesquely similar to dark ages blood libels employed by Goyim, in debt to Jewish money lenders, who promoted Easter pogroms – and thereby negated their debt owed to those Christ-killer Jews. The UN and ICC demand that Israel stand trial for war crimes! This genocide charge effectively shifts guilt onto scape-goat Jews, a form of Holocaust denial! Another example: In the ’67 War, Nasser publicly declared his intent to “throw the Jews into the Sea”. Egypt’s hostile actions and the failure of the UN to maintain forces in the Sinai, this paper argues, negates UN post war authority to impose UN 242 upon Israel, as further specified in all later UN Condemnations of Israel. Based upon 242 which serves as their foundation – they too have no legal validity anymore than General Assembly 3379. Why? Pre-war “neutral” London and Paris compare to whores sitting in church on Sundays.

UN Chapter VI resolutions concerning a non existent “Palestine Mandate” learn from the negation of the British – to shape and determine the terms of its Palestine mandate of 1922 – AFTER it surrendered that mandate back to the UN. So too the UN surrendered the Palestine – 1922 mandate – the instant AFTER Ben Gurion declared Jewish National Independence, and AFTER Israel won its first Independence War.

NEVER AGAIN shall the post Shoah Jewish state of Israel permit Europeans to “decide” that they have some ‘superior race’ moral platform to condemn Jews with their av tuma projectionsim – racist – “Jewish Problem” … “Final Solution”. Bunk on the British French UN Security Council 242 … 2334 revisionist history that stands upon the grave of church substitute theology. Bunk on the UN spin interpretation which switched the League “Palestine Mandate” based upon the Balfour Declaration, to a mandate dedicated to establish a Arab Palestinian state. The UN lost its League established Palestine mandate the instant that David Ben Gurion declared the name of the Jewish State as Israel. The spin lies of “international law” do not determine the international borders of the Jewish state post the collapse of the UN protectorate of Palestine.

The League of Nations effectively ceased to function as a governing body before World War II, particularly during events like the Japanese invasion of Manchuria and the Italian invasion of Ethiopia exposed its inability to prevent aggression fundamentally undermined its credibility – no different from the immediate abandonment of its peace keeping forces in the Sinai. Despite UNWRA, who maintains the perversion of eternal Palestinian refugees to this very day. UNWRA guilt on Oct 7th 2023 directly compares to the Manchuria and Ethiopia League feebleness – UN peace keeping forces immediate withdrawal from Sinai, as if Nasser “determines” when the UN peace keeping forces, post the ’56 Israeli unilateral return of Sinai back to the Egyptians, the intent of the international compact obligations of the UN sent to the Sinai to guard against invasion by either state – Israel or Egypt! The collapse of the UN, on the day that it immediately withdrew its peace keeping forces from Sinai – terminated Israel’s vote of confidence in the UN as a whole. Because Nassar swore that Arabs would erase their Nakba ’48 disgrace, and throw the Jews into the Sea. Stand proud together with victorious Hitler who committed Europeans, specifically Pope Pius XII to exterminate the Jews in the West’s war against communism.

April 26, 2026 remembers Yom Ha’atzmaut/Independence Day. From that day hence no UN protectorate mandate continued to exist, despite the purposely vague language of post ’67 UN SC 242! The language “all States” the spin evil eye UN interpretations switch their defunct “protectorate” over unto the imaginary Palestinian people, which the PLO Charter did not embrace till May 28, 1964. The day Egyptian born in Cairo – Yasser Arafat, Qatar born Mahmoud Abbas and others adopted that infamous terrorist charter.

Jordanian illegally nationalized Samaria – according to the 1950 UN universal condemnation of its nationalization by the king of Jordan; excluding ’39 White Paper British, and their 2 State solution Pakistan who approved Jordan’s nationalization of Samaria. And DFLP Nayef Hawatmeh born in Jordan, while he did not author the PLO charter – that the Palestine National Council adapted – primarily under his leadership. After Jordan lost the June 6 1967 War, the UN to this day maintains the Jordanian imposed label “West Bank”, out of its perverted substitute theology agenda that these “occupied territories” exist as the designated part of “Palestinian lands” ie UN Resolution 446,452,465, 476, 478, 799, and the butt of Obama’s 2334 condemnation of Israel’s illegal settlements.

The Fourth Geneva Convention – designed to protect civilian populations “during times of war and occupation”. Israel has raised reservations regarding certain articles of that convention, particularly in the context of the application of international law which 446 interprets as applicable to the ’67 “re-captured territories”. The Arab propaganda of ‘Greater Israel’ exposed as a ‘blood libel’ lie. The twice Israeli return of captured Sinai and the Sharon unilateral withdrawal from Gaza – as proof evidence otherwise. The spin made by UN 446, that Israel illegally occupies Samaria, stands upon the foundation of British/French imperialism lies – the language of 242 – which calls for withdrawal of Israeli armed forces from territories occupied in the recent ’67 conflict and emphasizes the need for peace based on the withdrawal of these forces. Both England and France declared their “neutrality” prior to the expected Arab obliteration of the Jewish State! Post the Israeli victory, for these “neutral powers” to impose 242 upon Israel – utterly absurd. Comparable to a court who’s judge’s daughter raped by the criminal standing before the Father – judge – of the victim.

This 446 spin interpretation negates Israeli claims to Samaria based upon 1. British separation of Trans-Jordan at the Jordan river. 2. The kingdom of the 10 Tribes of Israel with its Capital of Samaria pre-dates the post Muhammad claims to this land. 3. UN 338 (post Yom Kippur War) spins the assumption that UN 242 valid – despite its unilateral sweeping Israeli claims to Samaria “under the rug”; the assumption that Britain & France or any State not directly involved in that War have the legal authority to unilaterally dictate pro Arab terms to the victorious Israelis. Therefore UN 446, its spin interpretive precedent 4th Geneva Convention – wholly invalid; political rhetoric propaganda made by a UN that pretends it possesses an obligation to protect a Palestine mandate that no longer exists – utter nonsense. If for no other reason than the Universal Arab rejection of 1. The 1936 Peel Commission and 2. UN GA 181, written by the British no-less, which calls for and “suggests” a two state solution. Furthermore, no UN Resolution has ever condemned post ’67 – the famous ‘Three NO’s’. Arab absolute rejection of the Balfour-’22 League mandate, which defines Herzl’s political zionist agenda for Jews to achieve self determination in the Middle East, because of the genetic insanity of European hatred of Jews has no cure, other than that Jews re-establish our own Jewish state. UN 3379 denounced Zionism as Racism!

Legally the Suez crisis revolves around the use of force by Security Council States with a veto — which violated the UN Charter. Yet both Britain and France continue to sit as ‘Great Power’ permanent Security Council “deciders”. With leadership comes accountability. President Truman called it: “The Buck Stops Here”. This Rule of Accountability, equally extends to the UN invalidation of its Charter when Nasser’s troops sent to the Sinai and the servile UN withdrawal. Therefore just and Britain and France demoted from ‘great power’ status so too the UN no different than the League of Nations. Both the Suez Crisis and Nasser’s actions illustrate how international law, particularly the UN Charter, can be interpreted in complex ways, which resemble church substitution theologies. The responses from the international community post ’67, highlight evolving power structures and the ongoing debate about sovereignty, the use of force, and the effectiveness of multilateral organizations like the UN. The fraud of 1701 stands as witness.

Post WWI England and France only gave lip service to Wilson’s 13th point of ‘self-determination’; they prioritized their colonial ambitions. Wilson’s 14th point … Senator Lodge, the Chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, personally led the Senate revolt against the Treaty of Versailles in Washington. That America never joined the League of Nations serves as a strong precedent that the UN has no “mandate” to substitute itself for classic diplomatic alliances through shared embassies among allies – first developed by Italian City-State diplomacy, as the basis by which competing nation states “impose” international law as did the British navy after the Dutch lost their 3rd War that determined the dominance of the English navy on the High Seas, coupled with the 1588 defeat of the Spanish Armada.

Political failure, in domestic politics creates legal invalidity. Ruling political parties, loss general elections, forces that Party to go into the opposition; this defines democracy. Why should the UN be any different, especially when it pretends that nations who don’t even recognize Israel, that these nations have the democratic right to publicly condemn Israel. The absurdity of this notion compares to people in America throwing hate upon Putin for invading the Ukraine. UN failure → loss of Charter authority stands upon the collapse of the League prior to WWII; based upon the fundamental objections raised by Henry Cabot Lodge which rejected the notion that the League could replace classic diplomatic relations cut between allies.

Lincoln designated Confederate States akin to counties within a State. This degraded states to institutions within the larger Union. The Union of the Republic, according to Lincoln, despite the Articles of Confederation – where States voluntarily joined the Union on the pre-condition that those same States could later choose to leave the Union; Lincoln unilaterally negated this Jefferson mandated Constitutional agreement. Lincoln split hairs between States in rebellion from regions within the Union in insurrection. Thomas Jefferson and other Founding Fathers advocated for a compact theory of the Union, suggesting states had the right to withdraw. Lincoln’s stance effectively rejected this interpretation, viewing the Union as permanent and indivisible.

Yet the UN substitute theology cause it to behave as it exists as a World Government, a utterly false idea of the purpose of the UN Charter. The collapse of the League constitutes as a “vote of no confidence” in the UN. International Law directly means “Law on the High Seas”, inclusive of treaties, conventions, and customs governing relations. But when the ICC formed, consequent to the Rome Agreement, attempts to judge Israel on genocide charges, its pretense of “international law” proved that court a legal fraud. This UN and ICC substitute theology of “international law” which serves key Great Power – Security member states with a veto (France lost WWII, just as did Germany and Japan.) a fraud perversion of the UN Charter – this negates the classic establishment of diplomatic relations between national alliances, first established by Italian City-State diplomacy. Just as 242 ignores the post WWII separation of Prussia divided between Russia and Poland, and the British “occupation” of Northern Ireland.

Bottom line: Arabs States, including their “despised” refugee populations otherwise known as UNWRA Palestinians, lost the ’48 and ’67 Wars wherein Arabs made the public dedication to commit genocide, and throw the Jews into the Sea. Just as Jews lost their revolts against the Romans and endured exile till 1948, this same identical rule now applies to Arab stateless refugees scattered across the Middle East and North Africa – measure for measure, eye for an eye, justice applied equally to both Jews and Goyim.

When Chief Justice Marshal ruled the forced transfer of Cherokee Nation from Florida to Oklahoma illegal, President Jackson made the famous quote: “John Marshall has made his decision; now let him enforce it.” At stake in this stand-off, does the Supreme Court possess the Constitutional mandate of legislative review? Jackson won, the Supreme Court has never attempted to expand its Constitutional mandate to include legislative review. The 3rd Branch of the Federal Government limited to declaring laws passed by the other two Branches as “unconstitutional”. Legislative review the Court under Marshal attempted to impose how the other two Branches of government “interpret law”. In like manner the UN does not dictate how other nations interpret its Charter. Specifically the language of 242 does not invalidate the forced population transfer of Arab refugee populations based upon the ’48 Arab expulsion of Jewish populations which the UN categorically ignored in UN 3379. And all the many European expulsions of Jewish refugee populations after their governments imposed taxation without representation, plundered the Jews of their wealth and property and then ordered their expulsion.

Law without enforcement – not truly binding, based upon the Torah שפטים ושתרים. Israel did not sign the Rome Treaty. Post Shoah oath “Never Again” – just as the court of Par’o unjust so to all Goyim courts unjust. Herein separates the Torah blessing/curse oath brit which defines the Sinai revelation. Goyim courts by definition not just, because Torah justice limited to the Cohen lands of conquered Canaan. No Goyim nation ever accepted the revelation of the Torah at Sinai which defines faith as righteous pursuit of judicial justice in the conquered lands of Canaan. The Talmud instructs that the floods in the days of Noach did not reach Canaan. Sanhedrin courts have no jurisdiction outside of the oath lands of Cohen inheritance and likewise justice demands that the ICC jurisdiction limited to parties who signed the Rome treaty. Therefore, this paper argues in favor of Henry Cabot Lodges raised objections to the US joining the League of Nations.

This paper employs flaws which attempt to emphasize a talking-points rather than presume a false reality. 1. It erodes the UN legally, by weakening its authority politically. 2. “Racial DNA hatred” frames Goyim under the exact unjust Nazi hate-fires that burned Jews in the ovens – used as a language tool to emphasize historical institutional antisemitism, the theological legacy (replacement theology), and modern anti-Israel demonization employed by unethical yellow journalism to this very day. 3. Total invalidation of the UN rhetoric – does not up-root the UN treaties, recognized by most countries. The UN’s credibility and neutrality on Israel compares to used toilet paper flushed down the toilet; the UN itself did this with Resolution 3379. 4. The perception of UNWRA as corrupt erodes the reputation of the UN as a whole, as does UN 1701. 5. That modern international law (post-WWII) rejects population expulsion as a norm, does not change historical facts on the ground. But rather promotes great power strategic objectives which pretend that imperial colonial powers still dictate the rules of international politics. 6. International Law – by definition political. No different than intra-State domestic politics. International law regarding Israel is not neutral law—it is a politicized reinterpretation built on unstable foundations (Mandate collapse, 242 ambiguity, enforcement failure), and therefore lacks binding moral authority over a sovereign Jewish state formed through defensive war and historical right.

Hitler’s strategic withdraw from the League, based upon his rejection of the Versailles peace imposed by Britain and France upon defeated Germany imposed arms restrictions and “victor states oversight”. In no way shape or form compares to Israel restricting diplomatic diplomacy through classic shared embassy alliance relationships. This classic form of diplomacy better serves Israeli strategic interests. Israel through its actions rejects and repudiates the Arafat propaganda of “Greater Israel”.

Granted the UN Charter corrects the fundamental League flaw of enforcement power. But Israel challenges the moral authority of “Great Power colonial imperialism”. Granted today such past history – not the current fashion. But leaving the UN would not negate the strategic needs of the Jewish state to maintain a dense network of international coordination. The very term brit as found in בראשית-ברית אש understands that the physical geographic location of the Jewish state requires cutting alliances. Israeli diplomacy stands upon טוב מיעט ממיעט טוב. This fundamentally rejects the UN block-voting “democratic” condemnations of Israel which defines the UN as corrupt, in the opinion of this paper.

Israel simply cannot afford an isolationist foreign policy which defined post WWI America. But neither does its strategic interests permits foreign nations – all of whom have their own strategic interests – to dictate terms to the Jewish State – like UN 242 and all ensuing UN condemnations of Israel attempts to impose – as if they qualified as Chapter VII decrees. Furthermore, that State representatives publicly walkout of the forum when an Israeli representative speaks, this insult requires a counter Israeli response. International discourse often runs on symbolism, not precision. Withdrawal from international institutions reflects a breakdown of political trust—not necessarily a rejection of law itself. International law regarding Israel is not neutral—it is shaped by political coalitions, selective enforcement, and historical inconsistencies. Therefore, its application should be critically examined rather than treated as morally binding by default.

An Israeli perspective of Arab dhimmi racism and its impact on the post Shoah guilty European bias which hates the continued existence of Jews; as expressed through classic church/new Israel replacement theology; Romans 10:12–13 – “For there is no distinction between Jew and Greek, since the same Lord of all is rich to all who call on him. For everyone who calls on the name of the Lord will be saved.” Tawhid & Nicene “Monotheism”, both theology creed belief systems violate both the first and second Sinai commandments. A fundamental distinction separates the chosen Cohen seed of Avraham Yitzak and Yaacov from either Yishmael or Esav — only Israel accepts the local tribal god of Israel. Universal monotheism unilaterally declares prophets sent to all nations and Goyim grafted on to the chosen Cohen inheritance.

Today Israelis stand and remember “Yom Ha-Shoah”. We Israelis renew the post Shoah oath “Never Again”. We remember the ping-ball custom, practiced by both European and Arab societies, to arbitrarily “solve” their racist “Jewish Problem” throughout the Ages – “Never Again”. The Nazi ‘inferior race’, Arab racism denies Jewish equal rights to achieve כוח ריבוני-Political Independents as an Independent Jewish State in the Middle East. Pre-war White Papers coupled with post war British forced encampments of Jewish refugee survivors, returned to Germany or Cyprus – further amplifies the Israeli post Shoah oath of “NEVER AGAIN” which Yom HaShoah remembers. Both European and Arab/Muslim ‘good name’ reputations shattered with the ’48 forced expulsions of Jews from Arab countries, combined with all Arab states refusal to repatriate their refugee on par with how Israel repatriates Jewish refugee populations. Not a single Arab country has agreed to accept Gazan refugee populations who want to leave destroy Gaza and become “citizens” in other countries. Diplomacy among nations classically entails cutting a political alliance. Such a political alliance stands upon mutually shared trust and interests. The UN spectacularly fails in building on ‘trust’; UN Resolution 1701 serves as a strong proof long before UNWRA joined Hamas on Oct 7th 2023.

The capacity for Jewish self-defense and political independence – defines modern Zionism. Israel “recaptured” Samaria from Jordan in the 1967 Six-Day War. After 1948 “Palestine” ceased to exist. Jordan, named its illegal – according to the UN condemnation – “occupation” of its “West Bank”; only Pakistan and Britain recognized the Jordanian nationalization of its “West Bank”. Never once from 1948 – 67 did Jordan validate a “Palestine” of its illegally occupied “West Bank”. The UN did not pass a single resolution titled “Condemnation of Jordan,” it refused to recognize the annexation. Even Yasser Arafat’s PLO Charter did not view Jordan’s illegal occupation of its ’48 “West Bank” as “occupied Palestine”. In international law, non‑recognition of an annexation is the mechanism for declaring it invalid. No different from the UN rejection of Indonesia’s ‘East Timor’, Turkey’s ‘Northern Cyprus’, Russia’s ‘Crimea’. The PLO Charter of 1964 likewise did not view Egyptian rule over Gaza as “occupied Palestinian territory”. The collective UN position was unmistakably that Jordan had no sovereignty over the West Bank; but starting with the purposely vague language of 242 “territories occupied in the recent [1967] conflict”, perfectly clarified by 2334 the UN declares sovereignty to Palestine; despite the cold hard fact that Israel – not a protectorate mandate territory and that Arab Israeli wars determine its borders! Therefore, the post‑1967 terminology is a political invention, not a continuation of pre‑1967 legal reality.

But post ’67, BBC propaganda screamed “occupied Palestinian territories” – inclusive of both Samaria and Gaza! Britain had no mandate, and therefore no legal claim to make this condemnation of Israel. The same equally applies to the UN through its 242 “all States” propaganda; which serve as the foundation for UN condemnations of Israeli “illegal” settlements of “Palestinian lands”; UN 2334 and the UN open recognition of the “Palestinian State” – proof of propaganda. Never in all human recorded history has their ever existed a “land of Palestine” – not under Ottoman or Arab empires.

The characterization of land as “occupied Palestinian territories” by both the UN and BBC and French propaganda evokes strong reactions, particularly among those who view this language as delegitimizing Israel’s claims, primarily based upon the 1923 British establishment of Trans-Jordan bordering “Israel” at the Jordan river. The application and interpretation of resolutions, such as UN Resolution 242, initiated to “international claims”/”competing narratives” by foreign outside States regarding “land rights and statehood” with a pro Arab bias which fundamentally rejects dhimmi Jews equal rights to achieve self-determination in the Middle East post the 1917 Balfour Declaration which served as the basis for the League division of Lebanon and Syria awarded to France and Palestine, Trans-Jordan awarded to Britain – based upon the secret accords known today as Sykes-Picot.

No Israeli-Palestinian “conflict” exists in reality because post the declaration of Jewish national Independence in 1948 the UN “protectorate” over “Palestine” ceased to exist. No different than this mandate ceased to exist as a “British mandate territory” officially ended after it turned that “mandate territory” back to the UN in 1948. From that moment on the British Crown had no more say in the determination of Israeli Independence than it does to determine the Capital of Austin Texas. This equally applies to the post WWII established UN.

Post-1948, no separate national entity represented as “Palestine” in international law or governance, particularly under Jordanian control of its illegally occupied West Bank and Egyptian control of Gaza – until 1967. The phrase “recaptured” to describe Israel’s actions during the 1967 Six-Day War reflects a perspective that emphasizes a historical and religious connection to the land. This contrasts with views that describe the action as an occupation of land that was already controlled by Jordan — which the UN itself condemned as illegal in 1950.

UN Resolution 242 and consecutive resolutions employed as Foreign State imperialism propaganda rhetoric which seeks peace. War the result of all British two state solutions! India/Pakistan, Iraq\Kuwait, and two Koreas and two Vietnams glaring examples of ‘great power’ foreign national interests imposed upon “conquered” lands. Great Power international “diplomacy” – the British labelled as “maintaining the balance of power” – which suited British [לאו דווקא] strategic interests.

The UN’s later recognition of a Palestinian state a further attempt to rewrite historical claims and narratives that do not acknowledge the complexities of sovereignty and self-determination in the context of this region. The framing of successful Israel national Independence by media outlets – such as the BBC and other organizations – have promoted wars not peace. Shalom requires “trust”, peace simply a propaganda “label” of rhetoric. The success of Allied propaganda during WWI which unilaterally declared the Germans as “the Hun barbarians at the gates” produced profound effects on public perception. Critics argue – propaganda rhetoric language that injects “occupation”, aligns with Arab narratives which switched the term Nakba from Arab disastrous military defeat unto Arab stateless Palestinian refugees. No Arab country has yet to end or terminate the refugee status which UNWRA promotes and serves this particular political foreign ‘Great Power States’ imperialist agendas.

Propaganda that Israel repeatedly violates “international law”, simply another gross example of UN Great Power manipulations expressed through BBC and MSM propaganda arms of foreign states attempts to ‘control the narrative’ through words. Israel as an independent nation – its international borders determined through wars and the diplomacy its establishes with regional state powers. Neither the Parliament of London or any other distant foreign power determines where Israel establishes its Capital much less its international borders with other nation states which share common borders.

From 1948-67 no recognized sovereign “Palestine” in international law. Jordan and Egypt did not treat their respective areas as “Palestine,” and the UN did not recognize their sovereignty there. Therefore, the later phrase “occupied Palestinian territories” — not a continuation of pre‑1967 legal language, but a post‑1967 political construction.

UN SC 242 (1967) inserts the phrase “withdrawal of Israeli armed forces from territories occupied in the recent conflict,” not “all the territories” and not “Palestinian territories”; UN SC 2334 (2016) morphs into “occupied Palestinian territory, including East Jerusalem,” and labels Israeli settlements there as having “no legal validity.” This effectively retrofits a Palestinian sovereignty claim onto areas that, pre‑1967, had no recognized Palestinian state and no recognized Jordanian/Egyptian sovereignty either. 2334 and the UN’s recognition of “Palestine” as a non‑member observer state (2012) represent a political re‑narration, not a neutral continuation of Mandate‑era law.

Post‑1967 BBC usage of “occupied Palestinian territories” mirrors the UN’s later terminology, not the earlier legal reality. Britain, having ended its Mandate in 1948, has no legal standing to define Israel’s borders or capital, yet its media and diplomacy still act as if they are arbiters of legitimacy; a continuation of Great Power narrative control—the same mentality that carved up the region under Sykes–Picot and Mandate arrangements. Language like “occupation,” “illegal settlements,” “Palestinian territories” is not neutral description; it’s weaponized vocabulary that encodes a particular political and historical judgment.

The Abraham Accords invalidates European Middle East politics. In strict legal terms, the Middle East and North African conflict, while acknowledging both terrorist violence with its consequential suffering consequence domino-effect/impact, in strict legal terms, this ongoing-conflict most basically pits Israel against neighboring Arab states rather than Arab nationalist Palestinian nationalist movements. While the Romans renamed Judea unto Palestine, the Roman empire long since dead. The Arab empire uprooted the Roman empire – hook, line, and sinker. Therefore 19th Century French maps sold to the ‘sick man of Europe’, as empty as the deceased Ottoman empire. No different from the dead League of Nations “Palestine mandate”, and the dead British, French, Nazi, and USSR communist empires; their world order no long exists – even the flies not interested in the dry bones of their corps. The League of Nations, and how much more so the post WWII UN have no power to create pre‑existing sovereign “Palestine”. Despite the UN or Britain\French propaganda, continuous retroactive attempts to resurrect – like Jesus on the 3rd day – this dead Roman corpse from its grave.

UNRWA and its permanent Arab refugee status of both ’48 and ’67 Arabs who sought to complete the Nazi Shoah by throwing the Jews into the Sea, such propaganda rhetoric – employed as a deliberate political tool, not a humanitarian necessity—sustaining statelessness to maintain a grievance narrative whose evil intent exploded on Oct 7th 2023 when UNWRA officials participated together with Hamas and Islamic Jihad terrorists in the massacre of 1200 or more Israelis; coupled with the Red Cross refusal to visit for some two years the captured Israeli hostages held under barbaric conditions. The League “Palestine Mandate” stood upon the foundation of the Balfour Declaration. Post ’67 UN declarations changed the goal-posts. Immediately after the declaration of Israeli Independence, the UN had no protectorate over “Palestine”; anymore than did Britain after it returned the League mandate back to the UN.

The post‑Shoah European narrative toward Israel reflects a convergence of Arab dhimmi attitudes toward Jews, Christian supersessionist theology, and Great Power political interests. This convergence has produced a persistent bias that frames Jewish sovereignty as an anomaly to be corrected rather than a legitimate expression of national self‑determination. The language of “occupation,” “illegal settlements,” and “Palestinian territories” is not a continuation of pre‑1967 legal reality but a political vocabulary constructed after the Six‑Day War, retroactively projecting sovereignty onto a territory that—between 1948 and 1967—neither Jordan nor Egypt treated as “Palestine,” and which the UN itself refused to recognize as belonging to either state.

The Abraham Accords further expose the obsolescence of European frameworks, demonstrating that regional peace emerges from regional actors—not from external powers imposing narratives rooted in outdated colonial assumptions. The UN’s and European states’ continued use of “occupied Palestinian territories” reflects not legal continuity but political reinvention, shaped by post‑colonial guilt, theological inheritance, and geopolitical interests.

Power politics affects which situations are pursued and how strongly. The UN does not repeatedly condemn Turkey’s acquisition of Cyprus, or Russia’s nationalization of Crimea. Its continued employment of “West Bank” in fact supports the illegal Jordanian nationalization of Samaria. Therefore, the swarm of UN condemnations of Israeli “illegal occupation of Palestinian territory” – wholly invalid.

The weakness of the UN system proves itself to exist as but a fig leaf which conceals ‘great power imperialism’. ‘West Bank’ treated as a geographic descriptor tied to current diplomatic frameworks, simply UN legal jargon propaganda which raises red-flags concerning the “neutrality” of the UN; placed on par with the corrupt UNWRA post Oct 7th 2023 and the failure of the Red Cross to visit the captured Israeli hostages for the entire two years torture.

Selective enforcement ⇒ the UN’s determinations – wholly invalid; starting with the Korean War which directly violated the US Constitution and directly led to the Vietnam War – totally invalidates the UN as a legal body. These fundamental, most basic contradictions, not minor or petty “debates”. But rather the Institutional failure and total collapse of the UN legal doctrine. The combination of selective enforcement, bloc politics, and evolving terminology undermines the perceived neutrality of UN determinations – among Israeli has destroyed all “trust” and we equate the UN on par with the dead League of Nations.

This idea that “A rule can remain legally valid even if applied inconsistently” serves as a despicable example of “Do as I say but not as I do”. In legal practice the UN treats “West Bank” as a current operational/geographic term that recognizes a Palestinian state! This blatant hypocrisy – “contradictions + political bias ⇒ total collapse of UN legal doctrine, Israelis view as part of the Yom HaShoah “NEVER AGAIN” oath that perpetuated the “Jewish Problem” Nazi “Final Solution”. No UN condemnations ever over Nassers and other Arab leaders repeated attempts to throw the Jews into the Sea.

Legal forums often dismiss Israeli self-determination “outright”. What else is new? Starting with the famous 3 No’s Arab state absolutely reject the “claims” made by Zionist Crusaders that dhimmi Jews share equal rights to achieve Independent self-determination in the Middle East; even in a land about the size of the State of New Jersey! UN post ’67 politics reflects a NT ‘nation divided against itself cannot stand’ Roman imperialism; especially as viewed from the perspective that the Apostle Paul served as Rabban Gamliel’s agent provocateur injected into Xtian circles to undermine the influence of this false messiah notion by declaring circumcision null and void – similar to Reform Judaism. And travelling to Rome and declaring JeZeus as Lord savior son of God when polytheistic Roman theology recognized Caesar as the son of God!

Middle East Eye,CNN Fake News etc: Tucker & Haberman reveals how Netanyahu pushed Trump to hit Iran

Blood libel, historically, refers to false allegations against Jews, particularly the accusation that Jews kidnapped and murdered Christian children to use their blood in rituals. This form of anti-Semitism has deep roots, with various instances tracing back centuries, often serving as a catalyst for violence against Jewish communities. In contemporary discourse, accusations akin to blood libel resurface in various forms, often targeting Jewish individuals or leaders.

A recent example discussed involves claims suggesting that Benjamin Netanyahu (Bibi) effectively controls former President Donald Trump. This narrative plays into long-standing anti-Semitic tropes about Jewish manipulation and control, particularly in Western politics. The allegation that Netanyahu controls Trump can be seen as a modern incarnation of blood libel, suggesting nefarious intent behind political alliances. This reflects broader themes in anti-Semitic rhetoric where Jewish influence is portrayed as overwhelmingly powerful and sinister.

The evolution of blood libel accusations—from horrific historical claims to modern political smears—illustrates a persistent thread of anti-Semitism. Both the historical and contemporary instances demonstrate the need for vigilance and active engagement against such rhetoric. Understanding these narratives is crucial for fostering dialogue and combating anti-Semitism today.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HjTg6aDeCmY
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PfzUDseVWpY

President Trump lays out his single demand upon the Mullahs, and its not about expelling the Mullahs from power. “Blow Back” cuts in both directions! Remember the “Blow Back” which caused the 1980 American Hostage crisis. Patriotic Americans remember. The treason press loves to misquote: “A whole civilization will die tonight”, while its America hating propaganda half-truth Pravda press – despises: ‘God Bless the great people of Iran”. This treason, causes me to remember: the pogroms across US Universities, following the Oct7th 2023 massacre of 1200 Israelis – by Hamas, Islamic Jihad, and UNWRA.

Well it seems, though bombs have yet to fall, that the war with Iran shall resume. Personally the weight of these wars – starting with the Oct 7th Abomination War – quite exhausting.

When Yidden face adversity we often tend to turn to the foundations of our national identity.  Unlike the Arab Koran and the Xtian NT/OT-Bible, the Hebrew T’NaCH has a completely different set of priorities which fundamentally changes how the Hebrew read, learned and interpreted.  For the Sages recorded in the sealed Masoret of the Shas Talmud the greatest commandment of the Torah – upon which all other Torah commandments hang like a huge mountain hanging from a single hair – the 1st Sinai Commandment.  Upon this single revelation, all other Torah commandments hinge upon – does a person keep these other commandments in the רוח הקודש Horev revelation of the 13 tohor Spirit revelation – how to accept the 1st Sinai commandment לשמה?

How to correctly understand the 2nd Sinai commandment … interpreted specifically how it contrasts with the 1st Sinai commandment.

שמות כ:ב, that entire verse defines the 1st Sinai positive commandment. Which distinguishes the revelation of the Name שם השם (which I purposely do not write) from all other Divine Name references made in the Book of בראשית. These latter Divine Names, Avraham, for example, called upon אל שדי and did not know the שם השם. Meaning the prophets in the Book of בראשית called upon “their” God – who filled both the Heavens and the Earth. The revelation of the Torah at Sinai in the 1st Sinai commandment – the revelation that the שם השם, first and foremost a Spirit and not a word. The sin of the Golden Calf employs the word אלהים. Thereafter Moshe returned and fasted another 40 days and nights and received the revelation that the שם השם — a רוח הקןדש and not a word; furthermore this שם השם – radically differs from all the Divine Names which the Avot called upon in the Book of בראשית in that תורה לא בשמים היא. Herein defines the crux of the revelation of the Torah at Sinai לשמה. This Hebrew term לשמה, does not mean “for its own sake”. Rather that the Horev 13 tohor spirits אל רחום וחנון etc these spirits NOT words which the lips can pronounce. But rather spirit which dwell, as in the משל of the Mishkan where the Spirits of HaShem לשמה dwell within that structure as the נמשל revelation of השם — לא בשמים היא; meaning the revelation of the Torah לשמה, by definition excludes God in the Heavens above. For example: when a Jew visits a tomb, he tucks in his tzitzit because mitzvot do not apply to the World to Come.

Whereas שמות ג-ו. The verse שמות כ:ז serves as the most distinct fundamental contrast between doing all Torah mitzvot thereafter לשמה – the first commandment; from the 2nd negative commandment which this general negative commandment through the specific verb תשתחוה which most essentially means “do not believe” expressed through the “metaphor” – bow down. All av tuma avoda zarah theologies, creeds and/or belief systems most fundamentally require a stated belief in “other Gods”. The first commandment הוצאתיך ממצרים מבית עבדים stands upon the משנה תורה\common law/ precedent of the oath sworn at the brit of pieces. בראשית טו:יג — ויאמר לאברם ידע תדע כי גר יהיה זרעך בארץ לא להם ועבדו אותם וענו אותם ארבע מאות שנה. What makes this interesting, Israel was but 210 years in Egypt not four hundred years. חז”ל interprets the time difference to the Egyptian g’lut from the birth of Yitzak. Despite Yitzak never leaving the land of Canaan, Yitzak lived under the authority of foreign kings, no different from the post Babylonian exile where Judea existed as a ”banana republic” under the Persians, the Greek empires, both in Egypt and in Syria, and also by the Roman empire. The Talmud instructs that throughout the entire 2nd Temple period, Jews did not ever once keep the Yovel – the 50th year of freedom – declared throughout the land of Judea. Why?

This declaration of Freedom fundamentally requires that Jews rule Judea as a free Independent nation! Hence the “g’lut” described at the brit cut between the pieces states 400 years, because starting with the birth of Yitzak “freedom” which requires that an Independent Great Sanhedrin Court in Jerusalem makes this Yovel declaration did not exist. During the approximately 110 years of Hashmonaim kings who ruled Judea following the successful revolt against the Syrian Greek empire, political and social anarchy, chaos, and Civil Wars defined this entire period. Herein explains how the Talmud instructs that during the entire period of the 2nd Temple, a span of about 450 years, Jews never once sanctified the mitzvah of the Yovel.

Both the Nicene Creed and the conversion to being a Muslim center on a theological belief that a person must “buy” to be either a Xtian or Muslim. Hence “belief” functions as the יסוד of all av tuma avoda zara. The Talmud interprets the 2nd Sinai commandment specifically through 1. Assimilation and 2. Intermarriage.

Examples of these two יסודות of av tuma avoda zarah: Penchas killing the head of the tribe of Shimon, the war against Midian where Balaam advised seducing Israel with wine and women; from here the חז”ל made Goyim wine forbidden to drink together with eating Goyim made bread. King Sholomo foreign wives – directly linked to his avoda zara. Ezra’s demand that Jews returning from Babylonian exile with foreign wives must divorce these women. Also when Jews built the 2nd Temple they rejected the assistance of the Shomronim imported by the Assyrian empire to replace the populations of the 10 Tribes with foreign alien conquered people who eventually “converted” to the God of the land out of fear for lions.

Another contrast to the distinction between 400 and 210 years, the manner that the Reshonim scholars interpreted אנכי ה’ אלהיך, as the mitzva to know (לדעת) that there is one God. That He is the sole source of existence and authority. And that He is personally connected to (“…אשר הוצאתיך”) Israel alone. Only the 12 Tribes of Israel accepted the Torah at Sinai; Esav rejected the Torah – do not murder. And Yishmael rejected the Torah – do not steal. If a ger tzeddik refuses even one Torah commandment, the court which weighs his New Creation status rejects him or her. This fundamentally rejects the Pauline NT ‘grafted’ as utter nonsense.

Another fundamental component of av tuma avoda zara – its belief system theologies or creeds etc seek to insert a substitutional belief system which the Torah fundamentally rejects. The Primary source מכילתא instructs acceptance of מלכות שמים, specifically as expressed in the tefilla from the Torah mitzvah of קריא שמע, which rabbi Yochanon extended to all sworn blessings contrasted by שבח Tehillem “praises”. The latter lacks שם ומלכות.

The mitzvah of kre’a shma, like shabbat, or Moshiach – all wisdom Torah commandments which require k’vanna. This latter abstract term, understood as the dedication of one or more of the 13 Oral Torah “spirits” which define the שם השם לשמה revealed in the first Sinai commandment. רוח הקודש not words, like the word אלהים which the ערב רב שאין להם יראת אלהים called the Golden Calf. Time-oriented commandments the purpose of observance of “ALL” Torah and Talmudic commandments and mitzvot – according to how the B’HaG learns. Contrast the Sefer HaMitzvot of assimilated Rambam whose book compares to storing eggs by the dozen; he restricts all the תרי”ג mitzvot limited to positive and negative commandments which do not require the wisdom which dedicates a Oral Torah spirit as defined through Torah and NaCH prophetic mussar.

Virtually all rabbinic Jewish authorities throughout the ‘Golden Age’ Spain, duplicated the infidelity of the T’zeddukim as defined through the Hanukkah lights. Rambam serves as the exposed example. But assimilation and intermarriage defined the curse of the 2nd Sinai commandment which resulted in Jewish Civil Wars and forced expulsions from virtually all European countries; specifically England, France, the German kingdom, Spain, and the late 19th Century Czarist mass expulsion of Jews from Russia prior to the Bolshevik revolution.

Assimilated Rambam replaced the inductive logic kabbalah of Rabbis Hillel, Akiva, Yishmael – which interprets Halacha; and Yossi HaGalil’s “32 Middot” which interprets Aggada — all collectively included under the umbrella known as פרדס inductive reasoning which defines the revelation of the 13 tohor middot of Horev post sin of the Golden Calf abomination. The Rambam organized his Yad halachic code in the same manner he did his Sefer HaMitzvot – into rigid Greek philosophy deductive syllogism logic. This fundamentally profanes דברים יב:ל,לא — do not ask how Goyim worship their Gods that I may do likewise. Roman statute laws – decreed by government authorities do not compare nor resemble judicial rulings which have the power to re-interpret (Legislative Review) all laws imposed by kings, Senates or other cult of personality authorities – Caesar for example embraced the idea that he lived as the son of God.

Yet assimilated Rambam organized his Yad which directly duplicated the method of both Greek and Roman statute law! Rambam failed to understand that Gemara halachot contained within a specific sugya of Gemara, חז”ל brought as בניני אבות precedents – akin to different witnesses unique perspectives – of a specific Mishnaic judicial ruling. The Rambam’s replacement theology, arbitrarily organized, based upon Greek logic, Gemara halachot independent of the Mishna – a fundamental error. Halachot from the Gemara do not stand upon their own feet any more than Reshonim comments made upon the Talmud. Once the Talmud sealed – this Primary Source – forever separated from temporary Reshonim or thereafter secondary or tertiary sources.

Reshonim opinions do not and cannot permanently define sealed masoret primary sources. Reshonim by definition existed in cursed g’lut. The language מצרים based upon the above mentioned 400 years in a foreign land – לאו דוקא. G’lut Jews – as slaves – cannot do mitzvot לשמה. Therefore the temporary need that g’lut Jewry experienced at the height of the barbaric Dark Ages does not apply to the Independent Jewish state achieved post the ’48 and ’67 Wars of National Independence. Anymore than the UN has a mandate to determine the borders of a Palestinian state after David Ben Gurion declared the national Independence of Israel.

The מדרש which references (ספרי / מכילתא traditions about עשו וישמעאל), it seems to me directly invalidates any and all belief systems whose theologies promote a Monotheistic Universal God, which the assimilated Rambam openly embraced with both his minority Reshon interpretation of 7 mitzvot applicable to all Goyim in all lands together with his permission that Jews can daven tefillah in Mosques. The god of Israel only the 12 tribes accepted. But even that, according to rabbi Akiva’s interpretation that the Wilderness Generation has no portion in the World to Come. Therefore the god of Israel, a local tribal god and not a Monotheistic Universal God which the theologies of both church and mosque worship. In like manner, בראשית-ברית אש means oath alliance sworn לשמה. This interpretation of the סודות of the word בראשית (a Pardes logic), does not mean “covenant” anymore than the word ONE in the opening verse of kre’a shma refers to Monotheism.

The language שם ומלכות does not refer to acceptance of any “king”. Rather the burden to direct the Yatzir Ha’tov tohor middot to rule the Yatzir Ha’ra middot within the heart – as rabbi Yechuda defines בכל לבבך within the language of kreat shma. כונה a wisdom commandment stands separate from the toldot positive and negative Torah commandments which do not require k’vanna.

Post the Rambam induced – his משנה תורה – Tzedukim Civil War wherein they sought to convert Jerusalem into a Greek polis, all Reshonim and later rabbinic authorities wrote their commentaries upon the halachic codes, not limited to the כסף משנה statute law commentary but inclusive of all commentaries written on the common law codes of the B’HaG, Rif, Rosh, and Baalei Tosafot – following the ירידות הדורות-Rambam “domino effect” where in later rabbinic authorities confuse T’NaCH/Talmudic\Midrashim common law which learns from פרדס logic precedents to the alien imported statute law codes which pretend that Gemara and later Reshonim opinions – like as define both the Tur and Beit Yosef commentaries – determine religious halachic decrees.

The framers of the Mishna and Gemara wrote their works as a model when Jews reconquered the homelands from the Roman barbarians and achieved an Independent Jewish Sanhedrin common law court system which alone possesses the power to declare the Yovel. Even the RambaN in his famous commentary to the Chumas teaches that g’lut Jews cannot keep Torah mitzvot! Glut Jews observe these mitzvot so they do not forget what it means to establish the chosen Cohen society in the reconquered land of Canaan.

“מלך העולם” (standard ברכה language) compares to the twice repeated תמיד מעשה בראשית in the opening שחרית kria shema blessings. The term מלאכה close to מלאכים referenced within this first blessing. The wisdom creation story משל requires the Pardes דיוק which makes the required נמשל; wisdom commandment/time-oriented commandments create from nothing (יש מאין) the chosen Cohen people. This interpretation of the purpose for all wisdom Av time-oriented commandments fundamentally rejects the Goyim notion which continually slanders Jews as an inferior race – made famous by the לאו דווקא Nazi barbarians.

The טיפש פשט literalism that God created the world in 6 days and rested upon the 7th: 1. fails to discern wisdom commandments/time-oriented commandments (like as did the Rambam Sefer HaMitzvot code). 2. That is the “רוחהקודש” k’vanna of these mitzvot which תמיד מעשה בראשית creates the chosen Cohen seed of the Avot from generation to generation. The revelation of the Torah at Sinai, inclusive of the Book of בראשית. The טיפש פשט that reads the Torah in a historical chronological order fails to grasp that the revelation of judicial common law stands upon Pardes/middot precedents, and therefore has no fixed order. For example: the twice repeated עשרת הדברות – in point of fact never commanded in this rigid Code of Hammurabi format.

Following the revelation of the 2nd Sinai commandment Israel feared for their lives and demanded that Moshe make the aliya and receive the rest of the Torah! Why does the Torah then repeat the עזרת דבורות? Torah common law stands upon the יסוד of precedents! The עזרת דבורות “remember” the 10 plagues whereby the god of Israel judged the Gods of both Egypt and later Canaan in the days of Yehoshua the prophet.

In like manner assimilated Rambam stands virtually alone, even among Rishonim sources, when he poskins halacha from Aggadic sources like his 7 mitzvot bnei noach narishkeit. Goyim never accepted the Torah revelation at Sinai. Violation of the 7 mitzvot – the Talmud classifies as a Capital Crime. Only a Sanhedrin court can judge capital crimes. The jurisdiction of Sanhedrin courts limited, no different than the Yovel, to within the borders of an Independent Jewish state in the land of Canaan. Therefore the 7 mitzvot bnai noach referred to in masechet Sanhedrin can only refer to gere toshav which the Torah distinguishes from na’cree/Canaani\Shomronim.

G’lut Jews by definition cannot grasp Pardes middot. The Reshonim Universally failed to affix דרוש\פשט to Aggadic sources in the Shas and רמז/סוד to the halachic portions of the Shas. The local god of Israel limited only to Israel because Moshe sent as a מלאך to Egypt based upon HaShem who remembered the oaths sworn to the Avot. The chosen Cohen seed learns directly from Sarah who commanded Avraham to cast out the bondwoman and her son, that only Yitzak would inherit the Cohen brit faith. Neither the NT nor Koran once brings the word ברית. Covenant does not mean brit. Because to swear a Torah oath requires שם ומלכות and neither books of avoda zara ever bring רוח הקודש Name but rather sin of Golden Calf word translations. The opening verse of the gospel of John – and the word is God. Utterly false to declare: The נמשל never removes God from being בורא ומלך על כל העולם. No man can grasp the Divine anymore that any ant can comprehend human civilizations! The Mishna teaches this in a strong warning: those who contemplate matters “above them”, “beneath them”, or “behind them” – better that, such persons never born.

“גלות Jews cannot grasp פרדס” … just as slaves cannot own property, based upon remembering the slavery of Par’o and Egypt. Rabbi Akiva, Yishmael lived under Roman tyranny occupation. This Tannaic Masoret of Pardes serves to amplify the k’vanna of the 13 tohor רוח הקודש middot of Horev – following the sin of the Golden Calf.

Rashi serves as witness. His Chumash commentary validates Torah common law through his blending of דרוש\פשט. He lived during the Xtian obliteration of the Jews of Germany on their way to duplicate that same obliteration of Jews under Arab rule during the 1st Crusades. Therefore, he limited his Talmudic commentary primarily to a dictionary-like definition of obscure terms. This forced his grandchildren – the Baali Tosafot – to correct his commentary to the Talmud. Rashi feared, as the later public burning of the Talmud in Paris 1242 proved the Goyim’s hatred of Jews. He therefore wrote his Talmudic commentary which concealed the Aggadic דרוש\פשט axis of Pardes inductive logic limited to his Chumash commentary to prevent the church barbarians from discovering how to learn Talmudic common law.

The God of Israel always local. Elie Wiesel “Where was God” throughout the Shoah. Equally applies to where was JeZeus during the Shoah or where was Allah during the Nakba of both ’48 and ’67 Arab defeats which failed to throw the Jews into the Sea and accomplish the Nazi Shoah in the Middle East. The Torah limits “אמונה” strictly and only to צדק צדק תרדוף – based upon the oppression of the court of Par’o who withheld the necessary straw but condemned the Hebrew slaves for their laziness. No Goyim court, not the court of Par’o or the court in any g’lut Goyim lands ever once force the church or mosque authorities to stand trial for genocide or war crime as did the ICC which Israel never signed the Rome Agreement yet nonetheless attempted to impose its jurisdiction and declare the Israeli PM a war criminal post the Oct7th 2023 UNWRA & Hamas massacree of over 1300 Jews and the Red Cross failure to even once visit stolen Israelis held in torture tunnels for 2 years!

The error “God is never geographically limited”, fails to account for the Cohen lands of Canaan, which limits the inheritance of the chosen Cohen seed of the Avot. דברים לו:יח – הסתר פנים restricted to the Life\Death – Blessing/Curse interpretation of the first two Sinai commandments. Ruling the land of Canaan with judicial justice which makes fair restitution of damages inflicted by Jews upon other Jews to restore the brit alliance among our people which stands shalom upon the יסוד of trust … clearly limited like the example of the Yovel.

“צדק צדק תרדוף” the most essential defining comprehension of Torah and NaCH prophetic mussar of faith. This utterly contradicts the NT alien import of belief in a Roman messiah as god concept. Or the Koran notion that prophets sent to all nations who never accepted the Torah at Sinai; starting with the Koran replacement of Yishmael for Yitzak at the akedah. Bnai Brit common law courts have the Torah faith obligation to pursue righteous justice among our brit allied people.

The בראשית comprehension of מלוא כל הרץ כבודו — לה’ הארץ ומלואה learns from the precedent of the flood of Noach. The floods did not reach the oath-sworn lands of Canaan. צדק defines the obligation of the oath brit faith within the Cohen inheritance lands of Canaan. Goyim courts do not compare or resemble Sanhedrin courts. The latter common law courts with the Torah constitutional mandate to make משנה תורה-legislative review of any and all laws imposed by the 12 Tribal governments of the Republic and/or the Central government/king in Jerusalem. These courts – “lateral courts”. Goyim courts, vertical courts; where the State pays the salaries of the Judges and prosecuting attorneys. The Torah refers to this latter court system through the negative commandment which prohibits judges from accepting bribes. Torah Sanhedrin courts, limited strictly and only to the Independent Cohen nation within conquered Canaan.