The so-called Xtian “pentecost” shares nothing, no common ground with Chag Shevuoth – 50 days after Pesach. Goyim turn to later prophets such as Isaiah. Their theology divorces later prophets from the Torah Constitutional common law. All later prophets mussar interprets the intent of Torah commandments. Avoda zara by definition fails to understand this most basic Torah fundamental. The Torah event of Pesach I bring as a precedent to prove the assertion which condemns avoda zara to death. Only Jews commanded at Sinai to remember Pesach. Contrast the NT apostle Paul, his theology blurred the central theme of the exile\g’lut of Adam from the Garden replaced by his “original sin” justification for his messiah “pie in the sky” religious rhetoric nonsense. Moshiach not dedicated to cleanse sin, but rather to establish justice within the confines of the borders of the lands of Canaan – ruled by the Cohen people.

Xtian rhetoric of repentance for sin shares no common ground nor any common denominator with t’shuva. The precedent where Moshe reminded HaShem to remember the oaths sworn to the Avot that they alone would father the Chosen Cohen people. On Yom Kippur HaShem made t’shuva and annulled his vow to destroy the sons of the Avot and replace them with the seed of Moshe! The 49 days prior to Shevuoth, Jews commanded to count the Omer. Why? Xtianity just another false god no different than Allah. Counting the Omer learns directly from removing חמץ prior to Pesach. Again why? The Book of Sh’mot and the closing Book of D’varim of the Written Torah both refer to Amalek. Sh’mot 17:9 and D’varim 25:18.

The apostle Paul rhetoric declares in Galatians 3:23-25: faith in JeZeus replaces the law. In Romans 6:14 his ‘original sin of Adam’ concept supersedes the priority of grace over secondary law. But the Torah theme of Blessing/Curse 1st and 2nd Sinai commandments, Paul’s theological rhetoric clearly rejects. The Torah curse of exile, first introduced in the Creation story of Adam expelled from the Garden, the floods of Noach, the dispersal of the Tower of Babel, the exile of Avram’s future born Cohen seed to a land not their own, the descent of Yaacov and his sons to Egypt and their ensuing slavery by Par’o. Together with their liberation on Pesach, Paul’s religious sin:grace supersessionism fulfillment theology rhetoric replaces. But the Paul’s theology rhetoric equally compares to: Americans not under Russian law – either!

The 5th Book of the Torah has a second name משנה תורה, which means “common law”. Roman law by contrast, a “statute law” legislative legal system – NOT a “common law” judicial system. For example: British courts operate on principles of “common law”. Meaning, England unlike the US has no written Constitution. Laws passed by Parliament define the British Constitution! Hence British common law courts do not have a Constitutional mandate from Parliament to declare statute laws passed by Parliament as “unconstitutional”.

The Written Torah Constitution of the 12 tribes who make up the Israelite Republic of conquered Canaan, mandates Sanhedrin common law Capital Crimes and Torts courts. Common law judicial law under the Mandate of the Torah Written Constitution, has the power of “legislative review”. Meaning that the Great Sanhedrin common law court can not only declare a law decreed by any of the tribal-States of the Republic-unconstitutional, but the Great Sanhedrin can re-write the unconstitutional law passed by a tribal authority “State government”, such that this “statute law” decree, now obeys how the Great Sanhedrin courts interprets the intent of the Written Torah. This same legislative review equally applies to “statute laws” imposed by the Central Government/king as well!

Torah common law shares a common denominator with British common law courtrooms in that both legal systems fundamentally and absolutely stand upon previous common law courtroom rulings which share a direct similarity to the current case heard before the court. For example: a murder case heard 50 years earlier NOT a valid precedent for a petty theft case heard before a Torah Torts court today! A comparison of precedent Cases requires some shared connection or similarity between the Cases. A murder case and a petty theft case – simply not similar enough – due to the difference between a Capital Crime vs a Torts damage crime.

Therefore an example of two similar cases: the verses which address the precedent of Amalek in Sh’mot and D’varim. Sh’mot states that Amalek made war upon Israel as a place called Refadim. While D’varim adds “they did not possess fear of Elohim”. D’varim read out of context, but as a precedent for the verse in Sh’mot. D’varim implies that Amalek did not possess ‘fear of Elohim’. But the Book of D’varim, which means Mishna Torah-common law, serves as a precedent (בנין אב) to re-interpret the intent of the verse in the Book of Sh’mot! Neither Esav nor the scion of Esav/Amalek ever accepted the Torah at Sinai. Therefore ‘fear of Elohim’ ie the 2nd Sinai commandment, clearly does not and cannot apply to Amalek. Rather, this lack of fear of Elohim can only apply to the mixed multitude that came out of Egypt/ערב רב.

This same ערב רב stood at Sinai and declared their acceptance of the Torah. But 40 days later worshipped the Golden Calf which they called אלהים. The eternal commandment to war against Amalek, therefore refers not to a physical scion of Esav, but rather to the assimilated and intermarried Jews/ערב רב who bring the curse of Amalek/antisemitism upon all generations of Jews throughout the Ages. Herein a clear example of how Torah common law makes a Mishna Torah – legislative review of the Torah itself!

A similar example: the Torah commandment to remove all חמץ prior to Pesach. Compares to the Torah commandment to count the Omer after Pesach for 49 days – similar cases! Now lets examine the case of Amalek with the case of removing all חמץ\counting the Omer. Just as חמץ carries the din of כרת, so too the ערב רב carries the din of כרת. Rabbi Akiva refers to the Wilderness Generation as not having a portion in the World to Come – כרת. Why? Just as the ערב רב worshipped the Golden Calf-אלהים. so too the Wilderness Generation rebelled and refused to conquer the oath sworn land inheritance – Canaan – sworn as the land inheritance of Avram future born – world to come – chosen Cohen seed.

Hence the intent of counting the Omer compares to removing all חמץ from ones’ house prior to Chag Pesach! The ערב רב did not accept the Torah revelation at Sinai and therefore the ערב רב has no brit inheritance in the World to Come. Therefore the intent of counting the Omer, to remove the tuma Yatzir ערב רב as the dominant spirit which “wrestles against Yaacov in the womb of Rivka”, within the heart; heart spelled in tefillah from the Torah לבבך\כם as a Torah precedent. Rabbi Yechuda understood the repetition of the letter ב as the difference between the Yatzir Ha’Tov vs. the Yatzir Ha’Ra.

Herein an example how Torah common law makes a Mishna Torah-Legislative Review which interprets Written Torah commandments into prophetic mussar applicable to all generations of the Jewish people. Goyim not under – anymore than Americans under Russian law. Neither their NT nor Koran ever once refers to the 1st Sinai commandment לשמה. Both foreign religious books worship other 2nd Commandment Gods. The latter Gods declared as Universal Monotheistic. Monotheism by definition violates the 2nd Sinai commandment. Moshe sent to Egypt as the מלאך of HaShem in this world, to judge the Gods of Egypt through the 10 plagues and splitting of the Sea of Reeds. Furthermore, the Talmud openly and repeatedly states that only Israel – not Esav or Yishmael – accepted the Torah of HaShem in this world at Sinai. The case of JeZeus prayer to his Father in Heaven proves conclusively that JeZeus did not comprehend the tefillah commandment of kre’a shma – acceptance of the Yoke of the Kingdom of Heaven.

The yoke of the Kingdom of Heaven – תורה לשמה לא בשמים היא. Never once does the religions which worship other Gods bring the 1st Sinai Commandment Name. Rather like the Golden Calf substitutes אלהים for the First Commandment Name, which dwells in the hearts/Mishkan of the Chosen Cohen People who accepted alone לשמה this local tribal god, so too and how much more so the God substitutes of JeZeus and Allah Golden Calves.

The removal of chametz prior to Pesach does not “symbolize” removal of pride and sin”. Rather the tuma spirits which define the Yatzir Ha’Ra within the hearts of all generations of Israel forever and to all eternity. Acceptance of the Torah at Sinai learns through the precedents of the judicial oppression of the Court of Par’o who withheld straw and ordered the beatings of Israelite slaves for their failure to meet their daily quota of bricks. Coupled with the story of Yitro, Moshe’s father-in-law who rebuked him, that he himself alone could not judge all the cases of damages suffered among the Israelite people. The Book of D’varim precedent צדק צדק תרדוף links the righteous pursuit of fair compensation of damages through the Courts as the intent of FAITH! Israel came out of Egypt to conquer Canaan with the Faith to rule this land with righteous common law courts. These courts dedicated to pursue justice among our people.

Amalek cannot have “fear of Elohim” any more than can European Xtians during the Shoah – where was JeZeus? Or post WWII Arabs and Muslims who invaded Israel on the same day that David Ben Gurion named the new country with their proclaimed intent to complete the Nazi Shoah and throw the Jews into the Sea. Following the Arab defeats, the collapse of their declared intent to exterminate all Jews in Israel; this Nakba – where was Allah? Amalek simply does not exist as a metaphor for either Xtians or Arabs or Muslims. Amalek the commandment for Jews not to assimilate and marry Goyim on threat of Torah curses destroying Jews like as did the plagues which destroyed Par’o and Egypt together with the destruction of the Gods worshipped by the kings of Canaan.

The Sinai revelation, as expressed through the Mishkan – separates between substance and form – primary vs. secondary. Its not the forms of the Mishkan and later Soloman Temple but rather substance – that the tohor spirits רוח הקודש, revealed after the sin of the Golden Calf, ה’ ה’ אל רחום וחנון etc., that these tohor spirits dominate the tuma ערב רב spirits which define the clash between opposing tohor vs tuma – spirits within the heart. The classic examples of tuma spirits evil eye, evil tongue, and making a barbeque to heaven by way of sacrifices – as did the two sons of Aaron who died. Cain’s offering likewise rejected. The substance of Torah commandments fundamentally requires wisdom. This wisdom defines the k’vanna which time-oriented Torah commandments require. ‘Form commandments’ – positive and negative commandment – do not require k’vanna. Rather these ‘Form commandments’ function as precedents which permits all generations of the chosen Cohen people to make a legislative review of ‘Form commandments’ elevated unto wisdom time-oriented commandments…