What’s the fuss…tell me what’s happening :))) JeZeus Crisis Super Star…ערב ר”ה יום הזכרון Jews remember: Actions have consequences: judicial oppression condemned by NaCH prophets. Belief in theologically created טיפש פשט אלוהים learns from prophetic mussar which mocks cutting down trees for warmth and cooking food, and using the rest of the wood to carve an idol. Rambam in his Guide taught: the more you can say not what is G-d etc. Not idols nor two Temples defines the 2nd Sinai commandment.


The crisis between Israel vs British prior to יום הדין על הברית centers upon who sits atop the balance of power in the Middle East. The EU serf – Paris – now surprise surprise – that frog jumps and supports the British 1939 White Paper. The LIE that Israel and London “always strong allies” Pie in the Sky rhetoric propaganda.

The absurd idea that London determines where Jews live in Samaria – merits nothing more than a flip of the middle finger bird. Allies – the United States – have a history during the Russian barbaric pogroms during the nadir of Czarist autocracy; European yellow-cowards, comparable to the star of David, Jews forced to wear. Church slander and blood libels – their own gospels denounce: by their fruits you shall know them.

Talking Points repeated over and over again and again and again and again, they duplicate Nazi propaganda – employed to justify Hitler’s imperialism to invade Poland. Interruptions and talking over – not respect – rather Joseph Goebbels propaganda. CNN talking over President Trump to promote Obama/Clinton\Pelosi attempts to criminally impeach – reflect like a mirror – British repeated propaganda empire imperialism which collapsed their empire.

Post the 1939 White Paper – Appeasement Chamberlain – limies today have no place in the Middle East. Just as the Monroe Doctrine set the Washington precedent which rejects British as well as European domination of the New World; the Zionist Manifest Destiny dedicates to re-establishes the Torah Constitutional Republic of 12 Tribes — who alone accept the local God of Sinai; the still voice rather than the booming Universal – av tumah vanity; differing theologies of monotheism God(s); which Eliyahu the prophet discerned after a 40 day fast.

Jews commanded remember ערב ר”ה the oaths sworn by the Avot – that they alone – despite revisionist history otherwise – would Father the chosen Cohen People – as our eternal goal post of t’shuva during the month of Elul. Yom Kippur “remembers” the לשמה humility, the t’shuva רוח which annulled the vow to make Moshe the Father of the chosen Cohen people and confuse a Torah oath with a Torah vow. These two יום טוב pairs, follow the PaSach/Yovel – Shevuot acceptance of the Written and Oral Torah revelations at Sinai and Horev.

Contrast the tumah, the corrupt MSM press: which lacked the spine to challenge Arafat; the UN permitted him to address the UN GA while sporting a pistol! Press reporters never talked over Yasser Arafat as he spoke bald faced lies.
London, this current fight, too remembers… As Ike exposed post WWII Britain as a 2nd class ‘Power’ in ’56, Israel hopes to duplicate and repeat this rebuke – to determine the balance of power ratio -in the Middle East – among competing Nation state powers. Its the hope of Zionism to remember, the brutal mass deportation of Jewish refugee populations in 1290, consequent of the king’s statute law decree: taxation w/o representation. Which pauperized g’lut Jews. Thereafter the king decreed the forced mass-population transfer — refugee Jews expelled from England till the Square Head revolution of Cromwell permitted our people to return.

The Jewish people have a clear memory…we name it – Jewish assimilation and intermarriage with Goyim the First Cause consequence of our guilt\slavery – the k’vanna of the 2nd Sinai commandment. T’shuva requires the responsibility to accept the oath brit of Torah curses at Sh’Cem – the Order of Rabbeinu Tam tefillen. Goyim, their agape-love often quotes self hating kapo ערב רב Jews, who themselves – אין להם יראת אלהים. Goyim despise the required bravery – to accept Torah brit curses with equal zeal together with Torah blessings.

Hence only the 12 Tribes accept to this Day the revelation of the Torah לשמה; the mitzva of Moshiach requires that Zionists restore the Yichus of the Tribal “Liberty” within the borders of the oath sworn lands, together with the Torah mandate of righteous Sanhedrin common law lateral courts; herein defines the mitzva of the Cities of Refuge, established by both Moshe Rabbeinu and Yehoshua – together with brit melah – the k’vanna of this mitzva לשמה, wisdom-time oriented commandment, obeyed by Avraham, in his zenith years of his life. Brit melah a wisdom-time oriented commandment wherein Avraham cut a oath alliance לשמה to father the Chosen Cohen nation which eternally inherits Canaan. As the land of Canaan small, so too the local god of Israel.

These לא לשמה Jewish exiles… 2nd Sinai commandment Not in Our Name rapists — ערב רב שאין להם יראת אלהים – Amalek Yidden; av tumah avoda zarah – responsible for the destruction of our good name reputations – which arouse the Shoah Torah curse to rain down upon our people like the 10 plagues which destroyed Egypt…. and likewise this coward guilt mussar taught through the Mishnaic repetition this theme expressed through the faithless Wilderness Generation who confused and obeyed their tuma Yatzir Ha’Rah; “Esav” preferred g’lut to the obligatory burden to inherit the oath brit Cohen people rule these lands through Sanhedrin lateral common law legislative review of statute law decrees made by Tribal Heads and also National statute law decrees which emanate from the Capital Yerushalim.

To establish the Torah as the Written Constitution of the 12 Tribe Republic. The Torah does NOT mandate a Moshiach, as Goyim bald-faced NT lies declare. Covenant NOT comparable to the Torah oath sworn at Gilgal (Order of Rashi tefillen). Moshe Rabbeinu, sent as a מלאך to Egypt, to judge the Gods of Par’o and Egypt. So too – likewise – Yehoshua a מלאך sent to Canaan to judge those Gods. The mitzva of shabbat “remembers” the wisdom-time oriented tohor Spirits breathed into קום ועשה ושב ולא תעשה מצוות שלא צריך כוונה which sanctifies wisdom-time oriented Av commandments distinguished through בניני אבות\precedents – תולדות secondary Torah precedents, which makes שבת הבדלה discernment between two unique verbs: מלאכה כנגד עבודה.

The vision of Torah mandated משנה תורה\common law/ judicial courts – to pursue righteous justice; to sanctify the pursuit of fair compensation of damages (eye for an eye) the courts compel Jews pay to other Jews. Justice the tiqqun for Hatred without Cause – the destroyer of our people throughout the generations and times and Eras. Goyim emotional hatred of Jews throughout the Ages – a consistent unchanging G’lut Torah curse – arouses ערב ר”ה the t’shuva to remember the oaths sworn by the Avot. Hence tekiah tru’ah and sh’varim remember the oaths sworn by Avram Yitzak and Yaacov. ק”ש דאורייתא סמוך לאלהי אבראהם אלהי יצחק ואלהי יעקב —- תפילה דרבנן סמוך לתפילה דאורייתא.

To swear a Torah brit oath requires מלכות לשמה; the dedication of the 13 tohor Oral Torah spirits (רוח הקודש) as “king” affixed to the 13 middle blessings contained within the sealed Shemone Esrei. This ר”ה, we Israelis remember the trail of tears, path of horrors imposed by Goyim upon exiled Jewish refugee populations, that a Torah blessing (Constitutional Torah mandate which commands only Sanhedrin common law courts together with the PeSach liberty Yovel in order to establish the required Yi’chus of each of the 12 Tribes within the borders of ’67 Israel – from the river to the Sea.

NT a lie because it fails to discern Moshiach as a torah commandment. The Torah common law judicial system stands upon precedents. The precedent for Moshiach – Moshe anointed with oil the House of Aaron as well as the Mishkan. During the war with Midian, the Talmud clarifies that Pinchas as משיח מלחמה.

The Talmud describes hatred without cause as the First Cause of the destruction of the 2nd Commonwealth. Hence self-hating Jews not a slur. The טיפש פשט literal reading of Amalek in דברים — אין להם יראת אלהים simply cannot apply to Amalek a scion of Esav, but rather to the ערב רב. Assimilation the Torah directly commands: do not ask how Goyim worship their Gods; intermarriage the Book of Ezra directly addresses. Hence avoda zarah – the 2nd Sinai commandment understood through these two primary Torah precedents of common law wisdom.

The Torah commands: do not add nor subtract from this Torah. The NT lie does just that, it relies on NaCH sources such as the Book of Shmuel rather than Torah Primary Sources. The NT lie makes the false claim that its messiah “fulfills the words of the prophets”. False. NaCH prophets command mussar – applicable to all generations equally. The notion “fulfilled” treats prophetic mussar as a past tense history rather than a future tense equally applicable for all generations of the Cohen people to grow this mussar comparable to a crop within their Yatzir HaTov hearts.

Rabbi Yechuda understands the ק”ש בכל לבבך\כם as the distinction נמשל which discerns the משל of Yaacov vs Esav wrestling within the womb of Rivka. Another proof: The revelation of the Mishkan – a משל whose נמשל – the Shekinah within the heart. Still another proof, Torah does not instruct theology but serves as the Constitutional ideal built upon the obligation to separate judicial injustice under Par’o and Egypt to the Constitutional mandate to rule Canaan with justice; meaning common law courtrooms strive and pursue rulings which make fair compensation of damages inflicted by Jews upon Jews. Hence self-hating Jews directly references to assimilated and intermarried Jews who abandon the Torah obligations to pursue justice limited strictly to the lands sworn to the Avot. Esav never accepts the revelation of the Torah at Sinai, despite asked if he would accept the Torah. Asav answered with the question, what does this Torah command? Do not murder. Hence he and Yishmael rejected the Torah. Yishmael rejected the command: Do not steal.

Common law precedents required to make the aliya which separates toldot commandments from Av commandments. Mesechtot Shabbat and Baba Kama asks the question: Do the toldot follow the Avot? Torah the revelation of a unique common law legalism. The NT and Koran both pervert this revelation into a theological belief system. Common law rejects “belief” as the basis of faith through the Torah precedent which forbids judges accepting bribes.

Common law not a modern analogy. The Book of דברים has the second Name משנה תורה. The Mishna written some 70 years after the Bar Kotchba revolt. The Talmud state explicitly that the Yovel never kept דאורייתא. Both king Shaul with the priests of Nov and David with Uria and Shlomo with the Capital Crime two prostitutes all failed to establish the Sanhedrin courts as the בית המקדש. Wood and Stone idols never equal to the Shekinah within the Yatzir HaTov hearts.

Yoma 9b refers to hatred without cause. This Gemara stands on the Sh’Cem curses sworn: the Order of the Rabbeinu Tam tefillen. Moshe Rabbeinu closed the Torah with the reference to life vs death which contrasts doing mitzvot לשמה within the borders of the lands sworn to the Avot as an eternal inheritance or לא לשמה g’lut Jews. The RambaN instructs that Jews in g’lut do not do mitzvot לשמה. This would violate the 1st commandment because all lands outside of Canaan – sworn to the Avot – examples of Egypt! The revelation of the Mishkan at Sinai – this משל requires making a logical דיוק inference – Shekinah.

The Order of the Rashi tefillen stands upon the precedent of Gilgal whereas the Order of the Rabbeinu Tam tefillen stands upon the precedent of Sh’Cem. Mesechta מנחות the famous debate between rabbi Rava and rabbi Yochanon (if i remember correctly) whether a person makes a single blessing or two blessings. Mesechta brakot the Av Mishna brings the Rashi Tosafot dispute over 3 stars or פלג המנחה. This Mishna compares to the dispute of תפילת ערבית רשות או חיוב. Where rabbi Yehoshua rules that it qualifies as both. The Siddur based upon סמוכים. But the ק”ש in שחרית flows directly into the Shemone Esrei whereas תפילת ערבית has a separation by means of a חצי קדיש.

The morning תפילה דאורייתא – affixes to the blessing of Rashi order of Gilgal wherein לשמה sent both Moshe and equally sent Yehoshua as a מלאך to judge the Gods of Egypt and Canaan. Rabbeinu Tam פלג המנחה ruling – b/c its still day, a person has רשות to place tefillen and affix the ק”ש תפילה דאורייתא to מנחה which has no ק”ש; and the תפילה דרבנן ערבית affixed to the ק”ש המיטה.

Dynamic inductive reasoning, פרדס affixed to the warp\weft loom threads of the Talmud halacha vs. aggadic texts; דרוש \פשט affixed to the Aggada which interprets prophetic mussar while רמז/סוד affixed to the halachic portions. Talmud weaves the fabric of Jewish culture and customs for the generations. The Prophet Yehoshua had to interpret the k’vanna of טטפות. The opening paragraph ושננתם – Gilgal whereas the second paragraph ולמדתם the Sh’Cem curses. The third paragraph introduces tzitzit which stands upon the Mishkan/tent precedent; if a person dies within a tent all within that tent become av tumah. The דיוק of tzitzit – if a person obeys כסוי בה this “tent” permits a Man to do wisdom time oriented commandments independent of time but dependent upon k’vanna. Tefillin as a wisdom-time oriented commandments like a Sefer Torah in the צד משותף of swearing a Torah oath!

The word טטפות a g’lut term, not a Hebrew word. The opening paragraph ושננתם – Gilgal whereas the second paragraph ולמדתם the Sh’Cem curses. The third paragraph introduces tzitzit which stands upon the Mishkan/tent precedent; if a person dies within a tent all within that tent become av tumah. The דיוק of tzitzit – if a person obeys כסוי בה this “tent” permits a Man to do wisdom-time oriented commandments independent of time, but dependent upon k’vanna. Tefillin as a wisdom-time oriented commandments like a Sefer Torah share the צד משותף of swearing oath!

Again wish to thank and acknowledge Gamma Hans. The ICC and UN positions rely on a legal framework that bypasses bilateral treaty obligations (Oslo) and historical ambiguities (PLO charter revisions, Armistice lines). 446 & 2334 – political instruments that treat disputed final-status issues (borders, sovereignty) as settled law, contrary to the “nothing is agreed until everything is agreed” principle of the Oslo Accords. International law ultimately rests on state consent and enforcement power, not majority votes.

The ICC stands upon nation states agreeing to the Rome treaty alliance. Israel rejects the Rome treaty alliance as does America and Russia. Therefore how does the ICC promote a slander against the PM of Israel of war crimes? It falsely claims jurisdiction over Gaza in violation of the signed Oslo treaty which rejects this possibility. What precedent (the ICC a law court) does it stand upon?

The “Lotus” Case (PCIJ, 1927). Based upon what exact signed Treaty by both France and Turkey authorizes this ruling? No treaty authorized the ruling. No Governing Treaty Existed existed, yet the ICC equates the PM with Hamas? The 1926 Brussels Collision Convention, which would have addressed this exact issue, had been drafted but was not yet in force and neither state had ratified it.

This revisionist history compares to the 1964 PLO Charter which only denounces Israel for its illegal occupation of ’48 Palestine against the 1968 PLO revised Charter which condemns Israel for the illegal occupation of Samaria and Gaza as well as ’48 Israel! The Lotus ruling about state-to-state relations in a treaty vacuum. The PCIJ did not ask whether a treaty body could assert jurisdiction over a non-consenting state’s nationals. The Court’s holding rests entirely on the sovereign equality of states and the absence of a prohibitive norm. Never in all the history of Humans living on this Earth a Arab Palestinian state: no currency no Capital. Yet 446 and especially 2334 LIE and presume the matter a closed & sealed subject! The UN therein, in conjunction with the ICC promotes a blood libel slander against post ’67 Israel.

The ICC’s territorial jurisdiction theory over non-party nationals lacks genuine pre-1998 judicial precedent. Judicial Law requires precedents. The ICC and the UN LIE. Neither 446 not 2334 a closed undisputed conclusion. Just as ICC jurisdiction over Israel and Hamas lacks a valid legal precedent. It is a legal innovation built on treaty text and state-sovereignty analogies, not on prior rulings by a comparable tribunal. The objections from the US, Israel, and Russia are not merely political posturing; they identify a real gap in the precedential foundation.

The judicial and UN rhetoric hogwash pretends the UN has authority to declare where Jews can settle as if Jews exist as gulag ghetto or dhimmi Jews prior to Israeli Independence. Attempts to define an abstract word, the color blue for example by stating blue is blue – a dog chasing its tail false logic. A precedent must exist as a prior judicial ruling that the ICC argues as comparable to Article 12(2)(a) of the Rome Statute. Defining a undefined word or term with the identical word or term constitutes as rhetoric bull shit.

Both the UN 446,2334 and the ICC falsely assume Israel guilty of war crimes, based upon the ICC arrest warrant for the PM of Israel, based upon the slander that post ’67 Nakba slaughter of Allah by IDF forces settle the dispute like Chamberlain’s White Paper “settled” the League Mandate by promising a 2/3rds Arab majority Palestinian State. The false logic in both cases feed off one another. London and 11 other countries have no shame and unilaterally condemn Israeli settlements! These governments pretend they, like the UN and ICC possess a moral mandate over despised Jews!

UN SC 446 & 2334 treat a disputed issue as settled! The Oslo PA not a country. The ICC declaration illegal. Treaties determine international law. Senator Long lead the charge to reject the League of Nations treaty. Post the Vietnam War defeat Congress passed the War Powers Act which made illegal Truman’s ‘Police Action in Korea’ without Congressional consent. The PLO’s 1968 revision cannot establish Palestinian sovereignty or retroactively redefine the 1964 position; likewise, an ICC assertion of jurisdiction cannot by itself bind a non-party state where the Rome Statute’s jurisdictional basis totally absent.

UN 446 and 2334 accept the revisionist history the PLO disclaimed sovereignty over the West Bank and Gaza; after 1967, it revised its territorial claim and began treating those areas as occupied Palestinian territory. The 1964 PLO Charter defines – according to the PLO leader Arafat what constitutes as “Occupied Palestinian Territory”. Post ’48 Samaria and East Jerusalem not the sovereign territory of a recognized Palestinian state before 1967. The 1949 armistice lines — not permanent borders — final sovereignty must a treaty settlement comparable to the treaties signed by both Egypt, Jordan and the Abraham Accords. Hence any attempt for foreign States – such as London to impose a forced Two State Solution directly resembles European Apartheid racism known throughout history as “the Jewish Problem” wherein the church and mosque declared Jews Christ-killer Cursed Cain or dhimmi inferior status. Post Shoah Israel rejects through the sworn oath NEVER AGAIN that the court of Par’o shall decree condemnations of Jews while the State withholds all straw!

Ghetto gulags, pogroms host desecration and blood libel slanders forced population transfers, church kidnapping of Jewish babies and baptizing them, Inquisition war crimes, public burning of all hand written manuscripts of the Talmud in Paris France, the 1941 Iraq Nazi alliance which exponentially expanded upon the Kristallnacht pogrom and culminated in the Arab invasion of ’48 and ’67 to throw the Jews into the Sea. Clearly neither the UN nor ICC possess the sanity of holding a moral mandate over Israel.

Gamma Hans you provided attempts to legitimize the UN, ICC, and ICJ positions by framing them as neutral, historical, or administrative facts while obscuring the fundamental legal and political contradictions that render their current actions regarding Israel invalid for “10 reasons”.

1. The “Historical Document” Fallacy (Resolution 181) A resolution that was never implemented and was rejected by the intended beneficiaries (the Arab leadership) has no binding legal force today. It was a recommendation, not a treaty. To treat it as a foundational legal reality is to rewrite history. The “state” it proposed for Arabs was never established; the “state” for Jews was established against the grain of the recommendation. The current legal reality is not built on a dead 1947 recommendation but on the actual wars, armistice lines, and subsequent treaties (or lack thereof) that followed. You cannot build a living legal claim on a dead, rejected proposal. The “significance” of Resolution 181 is purely political theater, not legal precedent.

2. The “Statehood” Illusion (UNGA 67/19) granted “observer state” status, affirming a right to self-determination. “Observer status” is not statehood. It is a diplomatic courtesy, not a legal determination of sovereignty. The UN General Assembly (a political body) cannot confer statehood on a territory that lacks defined borders, a sovereign government, or effective control. The Oslo Accords (1993-1995) explicitly deferred the question of statehood to “final status negotiations.” By declaring Palestine a “state” via a UN vote, the UN is unilaterally overriding the Oslo Accords, effectively nullifying a treaty signed by the PLO and Israel. Self-determination does not grant a right to a state on any land. It requires a defined territory and a people. The text admits there was “no sovereign state” before 1948, yet tries to use “self-determination” to justify a state now on land that was never a distinct sovereign entity. This is circular logic: “We are a people because we have a state; we have a state because we are a people.”

3. The UNRWA “Genetic” Deception tries to defend UNRWA’s definition of refugees as an “administrative basis” rather than a biological inheritance. This is a semantic dodge. By registering descendants of refugees indefinitely (unlike the UNHCR, which closes cases upon resettlement or citizenship), UNRWA creates a permanent, hereditary class of refugees. This is not “administrative”; it is a political tool to perpetuate the conflict and deny the Jewish right of return to the land. Gamma Hans you claim this doesn’t decide “final legal resolution.” Yet, the UN uses this inflated, permanent refugee count to demand a “right of return” that would demographic-swamp Israel. This is not humanitarian aid; it is a political weapon designed to destroy the Jewish character of the state.

4. The PLO vs. Hamas False Equivalence, the attempt(s) to soften the PLO by highlighting the 1993 letters while condemning Hamas separately. The 1993 Oslo letters were a political maneuver that granted legitimacy to the PLO, but they did not end the conflict. The PLO Charter was not fully changed in a way that legally nullified calls for Israel’s destruction until 1998, and even then, the implementation was dubious. The PLO and Hamas share the same fundamental goal: the destruction of Israel. The PLO’s “recognition” of Israel was a tactical shift, not a moral conversion. The text’s attempt to separate them legally is a distraction. If the PLO’s “statehood” claim is based on the same territory and the same right to resist (which includes armed struggle in the PLO charter until recently), then the distinction is moot. The UN treats the PLO as a “state representative” while ignoring that the PLO’s own charter historically called for the liberation of all of Palestine, including pre-1967 Israel.

5. The “Humanitarian Law” Double Standard Hamas’s crimes do not justify collective punishment of Palestinians. This is a half-truth. While collective punishment is indeed illegal, the UN and ICC ignores the primary cause of the war. Hamas’s crimes (the October 7 massacre) were not isolated acts; they were the result of a strategy of using the civilian population as human shields and embedding military infrastructure in civilian areas. The UN and ICC consistently apply a double standard: they treat Israel’s defensive actions as “disproportionate” while ignoring the deliberate use of civilians as shields by Hamas. By treating the conflict as a symmetrical war between two “states” (which it is not), the UN and ICC implicitly legitimize Hamas’s terrorist tactics as a form of “resistance” and Israel’s defense as “aggression.” The Dhimmi Argument – to describe Palestinians is a rhetorical reversal. In reality, the UN and ICC have treated the Israeli population as if they were a “Dhimmi” class—subject to constant, unilateral judgment and moral condemnation for defending themselves against a genocidal enemy.

6. The “Precedent” Lie (The Core Legal Flaw) … the UN and ICC are acting on established legal principles. There is no legal precedent for the ICC to assert jurisdiction over a non-party state (Israel) based on a “state” (Palestine) that was created by a UN vote, not by a treaty or effective control. The Oslo Accords explicitly stated that jurisdiction over Israelis would remain with Israel. The ICC’s claim to jurisdiction is a direct violation of the Oslo Accords, a treaty that both parties signed. The ICC is trying to create a precedent where a UN vote creates a “state” capable of delegating jurisdiction to an international court, bypassing the need for actual sovereignty. This is legal innovation, not established law. It is the “blue is blue” fallacy: “Palestine is a state because the UN says so; the UN says so because Palestine is a state.” The “nonsense” is the attempt to treat a political conflict as a legal dispute where the UN and ICC can impose a solution that violates the treaties and sovereignty of the parties involved. The “history” they cite is not a legal foundation; it is a political weapon used to delegitimize the Jewish state.

7. The Fiction of Universal International Law, Gamma Hans repeatedly over and again you declare that international law rests on treaties and is independent of religion. This is a naive misunderstanding of power dynamics. International law is only as strong as the consent of the sovereigns. If the US, Israel, and Russia have not ratified the Rome Statute, the ICC’s “universal” international law is non-existent for them. The ICC is not a “world police force” standing above sovereign states, but an instrument that only applies to members. Your argument ignores that international courts (ICC/ICJ) are not independent judiciaries, but political organs dominated by states that are hostile to Israel. The “validity” of the law here is being conflated with the “moralizing” of the law. If 100+ states sit on the UN Human Rights Council that includes dictatorships, their “law” is not law, but a political power play.

8. The UN Charter and Article 25 Error: You repeatedly cite Article 25 of the UN Charter (“Members agree to accept and carry out the decisions of the Security Council”) to suggest binding force. A classic apologetic trick. The US holds a veto. This means the Security Council cannot pass binding resolutions against Israel that contradict the will of its protector. Chapter VI vs. VII: Resolutions like 2334 were adopted under Chapter VI (peaceful settlement of disputes). These are not binding. The text pretends they are laws. They are political recommendations. The Security Council does not act according to “law,” but geopolitical interests. The fact that Israel is condemned while Iran, Syria, or Hamas go unpunished proves that this is not about “rule of law,” but political isolation.

9. The Lodge Comparison and Sovereignty, you incorrectly claim US withdrawal from the League of Nations was “no proof against the existence of an international legal order.” The US Senate understood that a supranational organization erodes national sovereignty. The rejection of the League of Nations was a conscious decision for sovereignty against the “international community.” Israel (and the US) are doing exactly what the Senate did in 1919: Refusing to submit to a supra-national authority that questions their right to exist or their borders. The false attempt to declare a nation state decision to rejection of a treaty and frame it as a “violation of law” absurd. President Trump rejected Obama’s treaty with Iran. Treaties do not compare to the so-called 10 commandments; nation states change alliances, Britain’s public slander of Israeli settlements proves this without doubt.

“Never Again” and the Unique to the Shoah. Attempts to declare this Israeli oath as Universal applicability compares to Tawhid Allah monotheism; despite the 2nd Sinai commandment. The Shoah does not apply not to Europeans nor to Arabs nor to Muslims. UN false moral blackmail directly compares to equating Oct 7th a consequence to pre-existent Israeli war-crimes! Never Again stands on the foundation of Par’o judicial bribed judges which validate oppression of tortured Israelite slaves. Post Shoah Israelis reject bribed corrupt Goyim moral masters. Just that simple. As the revelation of השם לשמה no Goy knows how to pronounce, so too the Shoah does not apply to nations guilty of Shoah war crimes repeated over and again from generation to generation with a consistency. The notion that Hamas/PLO who openly call for the destruction of Israel, that the post Shoah oath applies equally to them betrays the victims of the Shoah. Israel has the right to prioritize its existence above all else because history has shown that the “international community” abandons the Jews.

“Love Your Neighbor” as a Weapon Against the State – the Ultimate Hypocrisy, comparable as the demand that JeZeus is the messiah or Nakba Allah one God. Hamas preaches the murder of Jews. The UN and ICC treat Hamas as a “resistance movement” and Israel as an “occupier.” The Torah commands Israel to slaughter the peoples’ kingdoms of Canaan. Hence “neighbor” refers only to bnai brit Cohonim and Ger Toshav temporary residents who have the right to sue Israel before a court and demand fair restitution of damages. The other type of Goy which the Torah address, the NaCree which Baba Kama cryptically refers to as Canaanim, this despised Goy who declares himself as the true Israel as did the Shomronim, the Karaim, the Xtians and Arab\Muslims – they have no political rights within the Jewish state. Palestinians in Arab and Muslim lands have no rights – UNWRA insures this injustice in order to perpetuate the claim ‘right of return’. This farce compares to the Spanish government offering back citizenship to Jewish descendants of the 1492 war crime. Followed up with the horrid Inquisition war crimes equally ignored and swept under the rug.

10 The ICJ Advisory Opinion Scam (July 2024), presented as proof of Palestinian self-determination and the illegality of the occupation by a chamber that codified the Palestinian narrative as “law” without even addressing Israel’s security needs (rocket attacks, Hamas terror) as a justifying ground for occupation or security zones. Self-determination and Israel’s security are “not logically incompatible.” In practice, creating a “Palestinian state” on the 1967 borders (as implied by the ICJ) is logically incompatible with Israel’s survival, as it destroys strategic depth and makes Jerusalem (the capital) divisible. The ICJ ignores the reality of terror, nor does it acknowledge that all Arab wars against the ‘Zionist Entity’ openly repudiates dhimmi Jews have equal rights to achieve self determination; Arab states prior to Israeli Independence guilty of war crimes against Jewish refugee populations.

The Saudi Turk Pak “nato” almost immediately proven – a bluff. Post the Oct 7th Abomination War, shattered the balance of power in the Middle East, the chaos “dust” has yet to settle. Both London and Paris hope to restore their fallen star ‘great power’ status which collapsed in 1956. The pre-Oct7th “Gazan ‘refugee status'” mirrors the Algeria Morocco refugee crisis.

Turkey if admitted to the European Union, the Middle Eastern balance of power would probably shift toward a stronger Turkey–EU strategic axis. This and only this would give London’s attack on “Israeli Settlements” — teeth. Based upon the current realities of the current US-Israeli partnership to prevent the Mullahs from achieving a nuke. Impossible for the EU to pass a policy comparable to the British Chamberlain-like ’39 Appeasement Policy which first destroyed the Czech Republic and then sealed the mass murder of European Jewry, on par with the Allied refusal to bomb the rail lines that transported Jews to their deaths. That White Paper serves as the foundation of racist “Jewish Problem” which restricted Jews where they could live or what they could trade in business no different from the policies of the medieval guilds.

As the church made Jewish ownership of land illegal – lest Jews acquire Xtians as slaves; so too Chamberlain decreed Arab consent to Jewish immigration and restricted land purchases – not limited to post ’67 captured Israeli territories. The history of European “Christ Killer” “Jewish Problem” racism defines the whole of European and Arab history starting with (for Arabs) Muhammad’s “Luther” Banu Qurayza slaughter of the Jews in Medina to Iraq’s 1941 exponentially worse Kristallnacht . Granted that Xtian anti-Talmud morphed into modern Dreyfus Affair racial antisemitism which aroused Herzl’s Political Zionism; but mass population forced Jewish transfers from State to State, Crusader slaughter of almost all Jewish refugees across the German kingdoms, colonial restrictions etc clearly aroused an equally violent Arab nationalist and Islamist evil eye directed at Jewish dhimmi refugee populations within Spain – prior to the Xtain expulsion of Muslim rule and thereafter the forced population transfer of Jews/Inquisition as authoritarian church-state persecutions which the Nazis perfected.

[[[Never again collective guilt, never again disenfranchisement—and never a political order in which human dignity depends on ethnicity, religion, or birthplace.]]] This distortion of the post Shoah Israeli oath Never Again – totally corrupt and false. Just as the vertical court of Par’o compares to the vile British vertical corrupt and paid/bribed judges who justified impressment of American sailors stolen from American ships on the High Seas (International Waters) so too the post Shoah Never Again sworn oath has nothing to do with Goyim dignity dependent upon ethnicity, religion or birthplace but everything to do with Jews rejection of bribed by their governments Goyim “Star Courts” to ever again rule upon their insane racism – “Jewish Problem” post Shoah Israeli Independence.

News of GOP Mid-Term Convention: Democratic Senator John Fetterman of Pennsylvania speaks! American Political theatre today reminds me of the pre-Civil War abolitionist vs. States Rights politics. :))) Alas no declaration to terminate Wilsons’ creation of the Central Bank and IRS bureaucraps prior to WWI. But John Brown’s body lies a molding in the grave … remember Charlie Kirk.

Hossein Shariatmadari, editor-in-chief of Iran’s hardline Kayhan newspaper, accused former presidents Hassan Rouhani and Mohammad Khatami of advocating “surrender” to the US and Israel by calling for an honorable end to the ongoing war.  Shariatmadari demanded that Iran’s judicial and security authorities investigate both men, alleging their statements were driven by a “common and deeply suspicious source” aligned with American objectives.

https://www.iranintl.com/en/202609084321


The editor-in-chief of Iran’s hardline Kayhan newspaper called on Iran’s judicial and security authorities to investigate former presidents Hassan Rouhani and Mohammad Khatami over their recent remarks about ending the war.

Hossein Shariatmadari accused them of substituting war for what he called Iran’s defense and portraying surrender to the United States and Israel as an “honorable peace.”

“The real meaning of Mr. Rouhani’s position is abandoning the defense and surrendering the country to the United States and Israel,” he wrote, citing Rouhani’s call for the public to decide whether Iran should continue fighting.

He similarly accused Khatami of attempting to “present surrender to the United States and the Zionist regime as an ‘honorable peace’” after the former president advocated compromise to safeguard Iran’s interests and future.

Shariatmadari said their statements had a “common and deeply suspicious source” and aligned with US objectives.

“Judicial and security institutions must not pass over this easily,” he wrote. “When an error is repeated, it is a line, not an error.”

A short history of British Crown illegal occupation of Ireland, Malvinas, and attempts to force Jews of Israel into ghetto gulags as did the Pope for three Centuries, comparable to the British rape of India.

The Tudor conquest-imperialism, especially the Nine Years’ War (1594–1603): probably tens of thousands of Irish soldiers and civilians died. Much larger numbers died from famine and disease caused by the war. The figures are too uncertain to identify a Catholic total. Confederate and Cromwellian wars (1641–1653): perhaps 200,000 or more people in Ireland died overall, including combatants, civilians, famine victims, and those killed in massacres. Most Irish Catholic military resistance occurred in this period, but the Catholic deaths cannot be separated confidently from the total. The 1798 rebellion: estimates commonly place total deaths—rebels, government forces, and civilians—at roughly 10,000–30,000, with most rebel and civilian victims Catholic or Catholic-background, though again the classification is not precise. The War of Independence (1919–1921): roughly 500–700 IRA volunteers were killed, alongside hundreds of civilians and members of the Crown forces. Most IRA volunteers came from the Catholic nationalist population, but this was a struggle for Irish independence rather than a direct attempt to prevent Northern Ireland’s creation.

No single moment when the Irish people unanimously accepted the Protestant illegal occupation of Northern Ireland. The Anglo-Irish Treaty established the Irish Free State and allowed Northern Ireland to opt out. The Dáil narrowly ratified the Treaty, effectively accepting that partition would continue temporarily. This helped trigger the Irish Civil War, because anti-Treaty republicans rejected the settlement. 1937: Ireland’s new constitution still claimed sovereignty over the whole island, so partition remained officially disputed. 1937: Ireland’s new constitution still claimed sovereignty over the whole island, so partition remained officially disputed.

Ireland – a large inhabited country subjected to conquest, colonization, and eventually partition. The Falklands/Malvinas a territorial sovereignty dispute between Argentina and the United Kingdom. Yet London condemns post Oct7th 2023 Israeli settlements as criminal simply because London, post the 1939 White Paper, declares East Jerusalem and Samaria as illegal settlements! England and its Allied alliance condemns Israel of illegally occupying Samaria which it styles as “West Bank” – only Britain and Pakistan (a Two State solution creation) approved of Jordan’s illegal annexation of Jordan’s annexed “West Bank” in 1950.

Argentina calls the “Malvinas” a colonial possession. It argues that Britain displaced an Argentine presence in 1833 and replaced it with a settler population, making the dispute closer to a colonial or settlement question which Britain denies. A genuine political and moral inconsistency argument: Argentina’s counterargument British hypocrisy disguises the fact that Britain itself established and preserved a settler population after removing Argentine officials in 1833. Britain “approved” the forced mass population transfer of Jews in Iraq in 1941, its White Paper sought to impose Jewish ghetto settlement of post ’67 Israeli lands. Its ’39 White Paper UN 2334 attempt to establish where Jewish minority populations can live within an Arab majority dominated country.

The Plantations (particularly in Ulster), explicit attempts to alter the demographics and religion of the country to ensure political control. The 17th-century Plantation of Ulster served as a foundational blueprint for British imperial strategies, combining state-directed land confiscation, demographic engineering, and social segregation – Apartheid. It displaced and impoverished the despise lower class populations of the land, its feudalism forced them into tenant labor under strict religious and legal restrictions. English and Scottish Protestants granted land conditionally on building fortified “bawns” and excluding native Irish. Likewise French Algeria (1830–1962) Code de l’Indigénat – wholesale confiscation of communal (habous) lands. Subjugated under a separate legal system without full civil rights unless they renounced Islamic personal status. European settlers granted confiscated fertile lands along the Mediterranean coast to secure French annexations.

South Africa (17-20th C.) introduced the Dutch East India Company land grants, followed by the Natives Land Act (1913). Restricted the natives to designated reserves (later Bantustans), creating a regulated labor supply for settler farms and mines. The Afrikaner (Boer) and British settlers occupied interior agricultural lands, enforcing strict racial hierarchy and labor control. The Crown or colonial government declared indigenous land “vacant” or “forfeited” through legal pretexts—such as rebellion, non-cultivation, or refusal of loyalty oaths—and reallocated it to loyal subjects. Replacing or diluting native populations with loyal settler communities served to establish borderlands, prevent uprisings, and secure territorial claims without relying solely on standing armies.

Settler-colonial regimes consistently created dual legal structures: one set of rights for the settler population to encourage immigration, and restrictive codes for the indigenous population to limit political power and land ownership. British & French strategic ‘Great Power’ interests displaced and impoverished the despise lower class populations of the land, its feudalism forced them into tenant labor under strict religious and legal restrictions. English and Scottish Protestants granted land conditionally on building fortified “bawns” and excluding native Irish. Likewise French Algeria (1830–1962) Code de l’Indigénat and wholesale confiscation of communal (habous) lands. Subjugated under a separate legal system without full civil rights unless they renounced Islamic personal status. European settlers granted confiscated fertile lands along the Mediterranean coast to secure French annexations.

The UN decolonization framework usually prioritizes territorial integrity over the self-determination of settler populations (as seen in Western Sahara) – the UK prioritizes prioritizes the self-determination of the settlers in its “West Bank” Malvinas! And the UN has totally ignored this blatant contradiction. Hence the slander “illegal occupation” so popular in MSM propaganda organs strictly applied to enemies of the British/French narratives of restoring their ‘great power’ destroyed reputations – rather than obey any consistent legal standard.

Viewed form the Confederate perspective Agricultural based rural population economies vs. Industrial city based population economies defines the States’ Rights Israel (Commerce Clause/10th Amendment) better than the emotion packed slavery issue. Based upon the fact that after Russia’s defeat in the Crimean War the Czar freed the serfs and committed Russia to play catch-up and industrialize its economy. This sums up the Stalin policies as well as post Mao Chinese modern communism. 

Confederate leaders such as John C. Calhoun often emphasized that slavery permitted in the Bible. Prior to the Industrial revolution all societies operated on an Agricultural acquisition of wealth, and therefore required slavery. The American revolution of 1776 preceded the Industrial revolution! Britain the first industrial city based economy consequently the first country to outlaw slavery, despite the established serf\lord relationship in its colonies.

The UN prioritizes the self-determination of the 3,000+ British-descended settlers over Argentina’s claim of territorial integrity. The UN prioritizes the territorial integrity of the “Palestinian” claim over the self-determination of the Israeli settler population of over 700,000 Israelis, even though these “Manifest Destiny” settlers – a demographic reality similar to the Falkland Islanders! UN 2334 – supported by Obama – simply a continuation of the 1939 White Paper Appeasement policy which resulted in the slaughter of some 80 million people across the Planet! The restricted application of Geneva Convention IV – politically motivated – the UK and its 2nd class allies consistently attempt to defame Israel while ignoring similar actions of Russia in Crimea, China in Tebet/Zinjiang, and the UK abominations repeated over and again similar to the devastation of the American Indian genocide.

UN Resolution 1514 and subsequent resolutions, prioritizes the self-determination of colonized peoples over the rights of settler populations. British/Jordan\ “Falklands case” a major exception, where the settler population’s right to self-determination — explicitly protected. The UN has consistently rejected the self-determination of the Moroccan settlers in Western Sahara, prioritizing the Sahrawi people’s right to self-determination. This – the standard that should, in theory, apply to Samaria and East Jerusalem. The UN treats the “Jordan” West Bank as “occupied territory” with all Israeli settlements unilaterally declared illegal. Despite the demographic reality of Israeli ‘Manifest Destiny’. The UN likewise supports and defends the British\Jordan “Falklands” precedent – where British settlers’ self-determination – protected. The UK’s history of settler colonialism in Ireland and the Falklands, combined with its current support for the “illegal occupation” narrative in the West Bank, creates a significant power politics propaganda LIE, that undermines the credibility of the international legal framework.

The attempt by self proclaimed “Friends of Israel” so reminds me of Trump 1.0 Fake News MSM.

The above News cast 11 hours ago!!! ABC and CNN frequently presented the investigation through a frame compatible with Democratic leadership’s messaging. The Democratic treason agenda which “condemned” President Trump over צר עיין slander which included false claims obstruction of justice, the appointment and work of special counsel Robert Mueller, the Clinton Steele dossier and other FBI and CIA fabricated intelligence claims, contact between Trump associates with Russians and Russian interference in the 2016 elections! The key talking points of the Democrapic leadership of Obama, Pelosi, Nadler, Schiff, Waters & Clinton which promoted TWO biased Democrapic corrupt attempts to impeach President Trump…

The post Oct 7th ‘ethnic cleansing by Israeli settlers’ Blood Libel צר עיין condemns Jews for building up our re-conquered nation – surprise surprise includes Shoah Poland & Ireland. The fake news propaganda matches

Joseph Goebbels lies justifications for the invasion of Poland. Nazi propaganda claimed that German minorities in Poland were being abused, attacked, or forcibly “Polonized.” These allegations were greatly exaggerated or fabricated. Goebbels circulated stories of murders and attacks against Germans, including the so-called “Bloody Sunday” events in Bydgoszcz. The scale and meaning of these incidents were distorted to provoke outrage. On August 31, 1939, the SS staged a fake Polish attack on a German radio station. Germany presented it as proof that Poland had attacked first, creating a pretext for invasion. Goebbels described Poland as irrational, militaristic, and unwilling to negotiate, while presenting Hitler as a leader seeking only to reunite Germans and restore justice. Beneath these immediate claims was the Nazi goal of territorial expansion, including the acquisition of land for Lebensraum and the subjugation of Polish people.

Notice how this women interrupts and preaches. She admits that her declarations “statements” and not questions! Her declarations of condemnations compares to the “Oxford debates” and coward Chamberlain’s 1939 White Paper prior to the Nazi Shoah.