Fear of the Lord fails to communicate יראת שמים why? Torah common law not read, but rather it stands upon making comparative logical inductive-reasoned precedents. The translation: ‘Fear of Heaven’, totally confuses the revelation at Sinai, from how early prophets – like those found in the Book of בראשית, understood the Creator as told in the opening creation Aggadic story. Abraham did not know the revelation of Sinai Divine Name! So what distinguishes the Divine Names אל שדי, אלהים, & אל ect, from the first Sinai commandment Divine Name? This question a person who develops יראת שמים immediately asks.

The pre-Sinai prophetic revelation understood that HaShem fills the Heavens and the Earth. Whereas the mystic concept Shekinah, bases itself upon the “revelation” of the Mishkan at Sinai; the mystic idea of Shekinah communicates the post Sinai vision that the 1s Commandment Divine Presence – lives only within the Yatzir HaTov hearts of the “chosen” bnai brit Cohen people. Herein the k’vanna of בכל לבבך\כם intent as learned by rabbi Yechuda’s interpretation of tefillah דאורייתא, and also by תורה לא בשמים היא in the Talmud. The term יראת שמים most essentially learns from the catastrophes, such as the Bar Kochba false messiah and Shabbetai Tzvi\Yacov Frank false messiah disasters; contrasted by the rise of Hasidism initiated by rebbe Israel ben Eliezer/Baal Shem Tov. The affectionate title awarded to this rebbe implies that his ‘good name’ reputation stands unto this very day.

The 2nd Sinai commandment does not say do not worship “idols”. Sophomoric translations imported to understand abstract Hebrew terms – compare to placing a screen door on a submarine. Never such a thing as virgin birth in the T’NaCH and specifically not in the Prophetic Book of Isaiah. Errors shape and define theologies. Both Martin Luther’s Protestant and John Calvin’s impact upon the theology developed by Zwingli of Zurich down the road — kicked the can of protestant theology down the road to not only the 30 Years War, but worse – support by the vast majority of its German ‘believers’ to kiss and embrace the Nazi war insanity – to exterminate the Jews. The good name reputation of Xtianity in general and German Protestantism in particular now rots in exile waiting for the 2nd coming of JeZeus to heal its shattered reputations.

The 2nd Sinai commandment does not say do not worship “idols”. Never such a thing as virgin birth in the T’NaCH and specifically not in the Prophetic Book of Isaiah. Errors shape and define theologies. Both Martin Luther’s Protestant and John Calvin’s theologies, their impact upon the theology developed by Zwingli of Zurich — down the road — kicked the can of theological avoda zarah, that through its support, by a vast majority of its members in German and countries allied with the German anti-communist war effort, specifically Pope Pius XII to likewise support the Nazi war to exterminate the Jews. Where was JeZeus during the Shoah; “by their fruits you shall know them”.

The translation “You shall not make for yourself a graven image”, false. אלהים אחרים does not mean “other gods”, as the literal טיפש פשט biblical translations dictate. Just as Isaiah 7:14 “the virgin shall conceive” does not convert “almah” – which refers to a young girl, aged between 12 to 12.5 years of age – also called נערה, unto the Greek mythology where Zeus rapes a married woman and conceives Hercules.

The Hebrew “אלהים אחרים” does not base itself upon עצב/pesel – idol, but remembers the Gods of Egypt and the future invasion of Canaan wherein the Gods of Canaan would fall under the God of Israel curse. Acceptance of the yoke of the kingdom of Heaven “metaphor” directly refers to remember the g’lut oppression of Egypt. Goyim never came out of g’lut Egypt, nor stood at Sinai, they never to this very day accepted this tribal god; neither the NT nor Koran ever once brings the revelation of the 1st Commandment Divine Name. But instead worship אלהים אחרים Golden Calf word translations. Clearly JeZeus did not grasp the central foundation of the Sinai revelation; because the revelation of the first Commandment of Sinai – this Divine Name – a Spirit and not a word – lives within the heart, based upon the Mishkan Torah precedent model. Confusing a glorified tent and a gold covered Ark for the “Shekinah” — Divine Presence spirit — as false as confusing moms apple pie with vinegar.

Chag Pesach approaches. Consider a real Jewish example — fully understand that Goyim not Jewish and that the Apostle Paul’s idea of grafting false, based upon their complete and total ignorance of the T’NaCH. Shall introduce two separate lines of rational reasoning:

ONE

The switch from T’NaCH\Talmudic/Midrashic common law to assimilated Roman Statute Law during the Dark and Middle Ages of Goyim barbarism, anarchy and chaos — compares to the similar impact that the movable type printing press — likewise shapes and determines statute law — religious off the דרך halacha — to this very day. The Talmud refers this species of moral disaster — also to a known ירידות הדורות—domino effect upon later down-stream generations.

My Kollel rav, rabbi Eliezer Wolfson from Jerusalem passed in 2025. He showed me a hand-written Baali Tosafot manuscript which differs from the Baali Tosofot commentary printed in the Vilna Shas. The latter writes מותר גניבת גוים whereas his hand written manuscript מותר גבינת גוים. The shift from discussing theft to cheese has important halachic implications, affecting the permissibility of various foods depending on their origin and preparation methods. In the 8th פרק daf 116b–117a of mesechta Chulllen, the Rif poskined that once a ruminant consumed something, it became פרשא בעלמא. Rashi disputed with the Rif ruling. But based upon the בכתב יד of rabbi Eliezer Wolfson, the Baali Tosafot appears to supported the ruling made the Rif posok halacha.

Israeli dairy rations — built around availability, not ideal nutrition. Corn in general — nutritionally smoother, but not economically dominant. Corn — imported and expensive. The “switch” before Pesach — from a wheat‑based diet to a corn‑based diet — the former — a mixed ration that includes some wheat by‑products added to that cattle feed ration. While the latter attempts to eliminate all possible chametz sources. Israel’s dairy industry relies heavily on: wheat silage, wheat bran, gluten feed, local by‑products (citrus pulp, brewers’ grains, etc.), and imported corn grain and corn silage.

Wheat silage involves moisture required to achieve fermentation. The most desirable fermentation occurs when silage has a moisture level of 55 to 70 percent, with 60 to 65 percent considered optimum. If silage — ensiled at lower than recommended moisture levels, it may undergo incomplete fermentation or be subject to heat damage and protein breakdown.

The Israeli milk industry does not use corn all year due to its higher expense. Many European countries rely on imported GMO feed for livestock, including from the U.S., because non-GMO alternatives quite often more expensive or unavailable at scale. If Israeli dairies fed a Pesach—style ration all year, milk prices would rise significantly. The Pesach ration, a temporary, more expensive, less efficient formulation used only because halacha requires it.

Corn starch ferments more slowly, very good for rumen stability, but wheat by‑products add fiber, protein, and digestible energy at low cost. Israeli cows fed TMR (total mixed ration) designed to balance rumen pH, so the risks of wheat more managed. The Pesach ration represents a halachic workaround, not a nutritional upgrade. The industry would never choose the Pesach ration year‑round because it costs more, depends on imported ingredients, reduces flexibility in ration formulation, and removes valuable, cheap, local feed sources. Hence the Pesach ration — less economical, not more. Corn, therefore used before Pesach because its non-chametz and safe from a kashrut standpoint. But nutritionally and economically, the normal mixed ration (with some wheat by‑products) far superior for the rest of the year.

The Israeli dairy industry does not switch feed because of the Rif–Rashi debate at all — even if the Rif + Tosafot would permit digested chametz. The issue ““Does digestion turn chametz into פרשא בעלמא?” not the reason for the rabbinic requirement to switch to corn prior to Pesach. Rather — a Jew may not own chametz during Pesach, due to the Torah כרת curse. Despite chametz eaten by a cow becomes halachically irrelevant, and even if the milk is unquestionably permitted … the feed itself remains chametz! And Israeli dairy farms — almost all of which are Jewish‑owned — cannot legally or halachically own chametz on Pesach. The mashbirim (feed suppliers) cannot produce chametz feed for Jewish farms during Pesach. Chag Pesach directly impacts the entire supply chain. Nonetheless, if the Baalei Tosafot indeed support the Rif’s principle, that digestion nullifies the issur, then milk from cows fed chametz would qualify as halachically kosher; cheese made from such milk would also permitted. The entire gevinat akum discussion shifts, and many modern kashrut stringencies become unnecessary.

Two

Fundamental distinctions which radically change the intent and interpretation of Torah as a political foundation/Constitution vs the religions established through Biblical and Koran counterfeits. Goyim never accept to this day the revelation of the Torah at Sinai. They do not thereafter dictate any Torah commandment. Not Moshiach nor who or what qualifies as a prophet. Daniel a mystic not a prophet. Oral Torah — by definition — interprets the k’vanna of wisdom commandments\time-oriented mitzvot.

Jewish Halacha despite Middle Ages assimilation to Greek logic philosophies — which in effect negated the Chanukkah lights — halacha contained within the Gemara “commentary” to a specific Mishna — serves as courtroom witnesses, who testify; based upon observance of the Mishnaic case viewed from different perspectives. Halacha after the Roman exile of Jews from Judea “converted” into religious law — with rabbinic decisors (geonim, rishonim, acharonim) who fill the function of spiritual-legal guides whose rulings regulated communal religious existence in cursed g’lut. Halacha of this much later statute law assimilated codes, copied Roman law, much like the bible influenced by the printing press.

Despite these codes, imposed by decisor “authorities” such as Rambam or Karo, halacha simply not religious law. But remains precedent—based, by which witnesses testify concerning a Case heard before a Sanhedrin common law courtroom — viewed from different perspectives. A living human being shares no comparison to a mirror reflection or photograph of that person stored in a vault for hundreds of years. Still another example: The Cathedral copy-cat Temple built by king Shlomo merely a “photograph” of the Torah commandment צדק צדק תרדוף — which serves as the foundation of judicial common law courtrooms mandated by the Torah written Constitution. As determined by a Torah precedent: Moshe’s establishment of 3 Cities of Refuge with their small Sanhedrin courts.

If you take the time to learn the Hebrew T’NaCH you will see the day vs night difference between the Hebrew T’NaCH which the Xtian bible has replaced. For example: how a person organizes ideas changes what that person understands. Take the “Order” of — GOD vs dog. The Xtian bible translations did just that with their institution of Chapter & Verse organization, which replaced the Hebrew sugya/sub-chapter Order. Something akin to Grover Cleveland’s decision to abandon all original US President advice from Washington — Madison — father of the US Constitution — inclusive of Andrew Jacksons’ free banking rejection of European Central Banking.

Yes, today even the Hebrew T’NaCH also modified through printers — to include Xtian chapter and verses! But within the Torah scrolls & Hebrew T’NaCH, remain odd gap/spaces scattered throughout all that literature. Starting with the 5 Books of the Torah scrolls read on shabbat and organized around an internal פ & ס. These two Hebrew letters interpreted to refer to “sugyah” — sub-chapter and “Parech” — chapter. The printed Hebrew T’NaCH — originally likewise organized in hand written manuscripts prior to the printing press movable type 1455 invention – employ easily observable gaps which separate one sub-chapter from another. The printing press invention directly impacted the 1611 KJB together with the Catholic Bibles. Just as did the chapter system, developed early in the 13th century by Archbishop Stephen Langton 1205-1227. The verse system introduced in the 16th century — Santes Pagnino produced a versed Latin Bible in 1551.

The Catholic bibles based upon Latin translations. They include deuterocanonical books whom Ezra and other post destruction of the 2nd Temple, Tannaim Era survivors excluded from the Hebrew T’NaCH literature. King Cyrus of Persia, whom the prophetic Book Isaiah refers to as “moshiach”, permitted Jews to return back to Judea after our 70 year Babylonian exile ordeal. The Catholic/Protestant 30 Years War terminated in 1648. Martin Luther moved the Catholic deuterocanonical books to an “Apocrypha” section in his 1534 German bible.

William Tyndale executed in 1536. Convicted of Lutheran heresy—mainly for his Protestant theological writings (e.g., justification by faith, denial of transubstantiation) and related polemics; his English Bible translation viewed as a direct challenge Lutheran Church authority. Strangled at the stake, then his body was burned. The Lutheran church sided with Hitlers’ Nazism. Nonetheless Tyndale’s translations omitted some deuterocanonical books prior to his betrayal and State murder. John Calvin treated them as separate and apart from “Scripture”. The 1611 King James Bible reflects that Protestant tradition and relied heavily on Tyndale, the Geneva Bible, and the Bishops’ Bible.

A substantial portion of German society—including many Protestants and Catholics—backed or accommodated the Nazi regime, especially in the 1930s, motivated by nationalism, anti‑communism, fear, and the regime’s social/order promises. Major church bodies made compromises (e.g., the Protestant Reich Church movement, concordats and local accommodations by Catholic bishops). Anti‑Jewish violence did not end in 1945—notable examples like the 1946 Kielce pogrom in Poland show continued lethal antisemitism and communal breakdown after the war. Moral accountability for mass support remains a valid and widely held judgment against all biblical translations, based upon the language of the gospels themselves: “by their fruits you shall know them”. Where was Jesus during Xtian war crimes throughout history from the Crusades to the blood libels to pogroms to mass expulsions to ghetto gulags etc?

Jewish Halacha despite Middle Ages assimilation to Greek logic philosophies – which in effect negated the Chanukkah lights – halacha contained within the Gemara “commentary” to a specific Mishna – serves as courtroom witnesses who testify based upon observance of the Mishnaic case viewed from different perspectives. Halacha after the Roman exile of Jews from Judea “converted” into religious law – with rabbinic decisors (geonim, rishonim, acharonim) who fill the function of spiritual-legal guides whose rulings regulated communal religious existence in cursed g’lut. Halacha of this much later statute law assimilated codes, copied Roman law, much like the bible influenced by the printing press.

Despite these codes, imposed by decisor “authorities” such as Rambam or Karo, halacha simply not religious law. But remains precedents by which witnesses testify a Case heard before a Sanhedrin common law courtroom, viewed from different perspectives. A living human being shares no comparison to a mirror reflection or photograph of that person stored in a vault for hundreds of years. Still another example: The Cathedral copy-cat Temple built by king Shlomo merely a “photograph” of the Torah commandment צדק צדק תרדוף – which serves as the foundation of judicial common law courtrooms mandated by the Torah written Constitution. As determined by a Torah precedent: Moshe’s establishment of 3 Cities of Refuge with their small Sanhedrin courts.

If you take the time to learn the Hebrew T’NaCH you will see the day vs night difference between the Hebrew T’NaCH which the Xtian bible has replaced. For example: how a person organizes ideas changes what that person understands. Take the “Order” of – GOD vs dog. The Xtian bible translations did just that with their institution of Chapter & Verse organization which replaced the Hebrew sugya/sub-chapter Order. Something akin to Grover Cleveland’s decision to abandon all original US President advice from Washington – Madison – father of the US Constitution – inclusive of Andrew Jacksons’ free banking rejection of European Central Banking.

Yes, today even the Hebrew T’NaCH also modified through printers – to include Xtian chapter and verses! But within the Torah scrolls & Hebrew T’NaCH, remain odd gap/spaces scattered throughout all that literature. Starting with the 5 Books of the Torah scrolls read on shabbat and organized around an internal פ & ס. These two Hebrew letters refer to “sugyah” – sub-chapter and “Parech” – chapter. The printed Hebrew T’NaCH – originally likewise organized in hand written manuscripts prior to the printing press movable type 1455 invention – employ easily observable gaps which separate one sub-chapter from another. The printing press invention directly impacted the 1611 KJB together with the Catholic Bibles. Just as did the chapter system, developed early in the 13th century by Archbishop Stephen Langton 1205-1227. The verse system introduced in the 16th century – Santes Pagnino produced a versed Latin Bible in 1551.

The Catholic bibles based upon Latin translations. They include deuterocanonical books whom Ezra and other post destruction of the 2nd Temple, Tannaim Era survivors excluded from the Hebrew T’NaCH literature. King Cyrus of Persia, whom the prophetic Book Isaiah refers to as “moshiach”, permitted Jews to return back to Judea after our 70 year Babylonian exile ordeal. The Catholic/Protestant 30 Years War terminated in 1648. Martin Luther moved the Catholic deuterocanonical books to an “Apocrypha” section in his 1534 German bible.

William Tyndale executed in 1536. Convicted of Lutheran heresy—mainly for his Protestant theological writings (e.g., justification by faith, denial of transubstantiation) and related polemics; his English Bible translation viewed as a direct challenge Lutheran Church authority. Strangled at the stake, then his body was burned. The Lutheran church sided with Hitlers’ Nazism. Nonetheless his translations omitted some deuterocanonical books prior to his betrayal and State murder. John Calvin treated them as separate and apart from “Scripture”. The 1611 King James Bible reflects that Protestant tradition and relied heavily on Tyndale, the Geneva Bible, and the Bishops’ Bible.

A substantial portion of German society—including many Protestants and Catholics—backed or accommodated the Nazi regime, especially in the 1930s, motivated by nationalism, anti‑communism, fear, and the regime’s social/order promises. Major church bodies made compromises (e.g., the Protestant Reich Church movement, concordats and local accommodations by Catholic bishops). Anti‑Jewish violence did not end in 1945—notable examples like the 1946 Kielce pogrom in Poland show continued lethal antisemitism and communal breakdown after the war. Moral accountability for mass support remains a valid and widely held judgment against all biblical translations, based upon the language of the gospels themselves: “by their fruits you shall know them”. Where was Jesus during Xtian war crimes throughout history from the Crusades to the blood libels to pogroms to mass expulsions to ghetto gulags etc?

Process (how Sinai unfolded) – Two-stage revelation: God spoke the first two “dibrot” aloud; after that Israel asked Moses to receive the rest and transmit it (Exodus narrative as read by rabbinic tradition). Oral transmission of the 13 tohor רוח הקודש spirit interpretation of the first commandment שם השם as the בטול idea of תורה לא בשמים היא revelation of the Torah at Sinai. Legal common law middot such as introduced by Hillel and other Tannaim serves as the יסוד by which the generations interpret the k’vanna of the revelation of the 13 Tohor Oral Torah middot at Horev.

The Torah does not invalidate the existence of other Gods; not the Gods of Egypt, Canaan, nor the Gods in later NaCH prophetic mussar. NaCH prophets do mock Gods limited to wood & stone. The Book of satire Kings mocks king Shlomo “as the wisest of all men” for his ignoring the mussar of the prophet Natan who commanded king David not to copy architectural constructs of how Goyim worship their Gods through Cathedral-like constructions. Rather the model of the Mishkan understood by the precedent of Moshe Rabbeinu’s last mitzva before he passed from this Earth – the Small Sanhedrin Capital Crimes Courts which define all the cities of refuge.

The 2nd stage of the revelation of the Torah at Sinai followed the sin of the Golden Calf – substitute theology which declared that אלהים (who occupies both the Heavens and the Earth) brought Israel out of Egypt. This substitute theology denies the בטול revelation of the שם השם לשמה – לא בשמים היא revelation that the רוח הקודש Oral Torah spirits live within the Yatzir Ha’Tov hearts of the chosen Cohen people when and only when we rule the oath brit land inheritance. The Torah revelation consists of two parts: Blessing/Life vs. Curse\Death-G’lut. Based upon the language of the 1st Sinai commandment “Egypt” לאו דוקא; all Goyim lands of g’lut – Jews live – just as no Sanhedrin or Yovel freedom for them so too no other Torah commandments apply other than to do t’shuva and remember – Israel came out of Egypt to conquer and rule Canaan with Sanhedrin courtroom common law justice.

No where, for example, does the Torah address the God worshipped in India and Asian countries. The brit of Gilgal/order of Rashi tefillen contrasts with the brit of Sh’Cem\order of Rabbeinu Tam tefillen. The oath sworn at Gilgal: just as HaShem judged the Gods of Egypt, so too HaShem will judge the Gods of Canaan. Just as Moshe a prophet so too Yehoshua a Torah prophet. Monotheism as a theology violates the 2nd Sinai commandment because if the Islamic Tawhid accurate then the 2nd commandment in vain. But the chicken always precedes the egg; Muhammad did not accept the revelation of the Torah at Sinai, his replacement theology substitutes Allah like as did the Golden Calf did with אלהים and the NT does with some “Father” in Heaven.

Monotheism, especially as framed by the נדוי Rambam assimilates to the foreign idea of ONE UNIVERSAL GOD. This false avoda zara assimilation validates Jews davening inside Mosques! It declares the Aggada of mesechta Sanhedrin touching the 7 mitzvot applicable to gere toshav to all “bnai noach Goyim in all lands! Mesechta Avoda Zara and in many other places throughout Sha’s teach that only Israel accepts the revelation of the Torah at Sinai. Therefore the שם השם לשמה by definition בטול, limited and restricted to the status of a local tribal god and not the foreign align Universal ONE God theology of alien foreign religious belief systems.

In like manner the mitzva of Moshiach not limited to some God/Man in the past as Xtian avoda zara attempts to dictate. Rather Torah common law stands upon the יסוד which requires בניני אבות-precedents. The NT worship of avoda zarah – other Gods – rejects the revelation of Oral Torah common law. It rejects Moshe anointing the House of Aaron as Moshiach despite the Talmud reference to Pinchas as משיח מלחמה or the NaCH reference to king Cyrus as משיח.

Goyim, by definition reject the revelation of the Torah at Sinai\Horev, therefore Goyim worship other Gods. Impossible for Goyim who reject the revelation of the Torah to thereafter dictate Torah mitzvot such as does the NT attempt with its false messiah paradigm and as does the Koran with its false definition of prophets sent to all Goyim paradigm. King Shlomo no different than his son at Sh’Cem. Just as Shlomo began his avoda zara “Civil War” curse imposed by the Natan curse following the David Bat Sheva injustice shown to her husband; Aaron dedicated by Moshe as Moshiach to sanctify through korbanot the dedication to rule the land of Canaan with judicial Sanhedrin common law justice. So too Rechavam ignored the elder advisors of king Shlomo just as young king Shlomo initiated building a Temple Cathedral avoda zara rather than establish the Federal Sanhedrin courts as the case of the two prostitutes proves.