Throughout the year after we say the opening p’suk of ק”ש תפילה דאורייתא Israel has the established custom to whisper ברוך שם כבוד מלכותו לעוךם ועד. But on Yom Kippur the custom practiced by the Cohen nation to cry aloud ‘ברוך שם כבוד וכו. Before the דם חיי sprinkled 7 times before the פרכת, (the k’vanna of Yom Kippur) which starkly contrasts with the goat dedicated to עזאזל; the serving Cohen makes a private ודוי for himself and his House, which duplicates the ודוי wherein the scapegoat to עזאזל bears the guilt of the Cohen nation as a whole.
The 2nd sugya on this 3rd פרק Mishna, frames a מחלקת between rabbi Meir and the Sages. But the critical observation and logical דיוק screams off the dof of :לו comparable to ברוך שם כבוד … The עצם language of the Shemone Esrei lacks any ודוי what so ever. The 3rd Middle Blessing סלח לנו – emphatically aligns with the 3rd middah of the Horev revelation אל — the rebuke wherein the מלאך whom Yaakov wrestled prior to meeting his brother Esav who approached with an Army, according to the Targum of Uziel, numbered 400 Officers! The name ישראל defines the k’vanna of all prophetic prophesies. Prophets command mussar and the seed of Yaacov “grews from generation to generation by remembering prophetic mussar rebukes within our Yatzir Ha’Tov hearts.” The name ישראל defines the entirety of all T’NaCH, Talmudic, Midrash, and Siddur spirituality in that one Name change made by a מלאך.
The Book of בראשית for the first time introduces the wisdom-time oriented commandment of sending מלאכים as an act of War. Yaacov sent a מלאך to his brother and לשמה sent Moshe as a מלאך to judge the Gods worshipped by Par’o and Egypt. This critical Torah theme defines the k’vanna of the blessing of ברכת כהנים – through the active pursuit of sanctifying wisdom-time oriented commandments that Israel prevails over our hostile enemies as did the Avot by means of wisdom “commandments” – the Avot mitzvot of the Torah revelation at Sinai – these commandments require the k’vanna לשמה – a sanctity of קידושה infinitely higher than תולדות קום ועשה ושב ולא תעשה מצוות which do not by rote definition have any k’vanna.
However through משנה תורה — בניני אבות a toldot secondary commandment can become an Av wisdom-time oriented commandment; this applies from the toldot commandments contained within the Constitutional Torah text and the Oral Torah codification of common law halachot by means of Aggadic or Midrashic drosh back to T’NaCH בניני אבות mussar אל etc. precedents of T’NaCH common law.
The dispute between rabbi Meir and the Sages – a יחיד כנגד רבים – dispute. This kind of dispute the Germara brings as a precedent to interpret the language of the Mishna viewed from a fixed perspective. The Mishna has depth which requires פרדס inductive reason to correctly interpret its intent. No different from the 5th Book of the Torah makes a sugya legislative review משנה תורה upon other בניני אבות similar sugyot throughout the other 4 Books of the Torah who share a defined Oral Torah middot מכנה משותף required to add fractions.
The distinction between the 10-12 ודוי middot from the closing 13th middah – the distinction מאי נפקא מינא – an Aramaic Gemarah term which makes the critical הבדלה (((A verb independent from motza’ei Shabbat; this latter wisdom-time oriented commandment makes a t’rumah from chol distinction between מלאכה vs. עבודה.))),,,[רב חסד] — wisdom which discerns לשמה\חיים from לא לשמה/גלוט מות.
Compare פרק ראשון ר”ה: בר”ה כל באי עולם עוברין לפניו כבני מרון שנאמר (תהילים לג) היצר יחד לבם המבין אל כל מעשיהם. כנגד פרק שלישי – כל השפרות כשרים חוץ משל פרה The בנין אב which interprets the opening Mishna the distinction between the righteous vs wicked vs a bit of both this and that. The latter type of Jews Yom Kippur seals the din – לפי שאין קטגור נעשה סנגור. Hence the בניני אבות applicable to the Tzaddik not applicable to the wicked. The same ruling equally applies to the distinction between the two goats. Hence Yom Kippur prioritizes the דאורייתא מידות\confession which starts with the distinction from לשמה blessed to לשמה cursed — חיים כנגד מות — ארץ ישראל כנגד גלות.
Talmudic judicial common law learns by means of precedents. The דם חיי sprinkled upon the פרכת\/כפרה the middot of לשמה לשמה … נצר חסד לאלפים whereas the ודוי places upon the head of the scapegoat, which a person can add within the blessing שמע קולינו, the rabbinic ודוי established by David Daniel and Ezra. The language of the rabbinic confession excluded from the Shemon Esrei like similar the requirement to sanctify a blessing-oath which requires שם ומלכות not found in the opening blessing! Learning requires that the generations of Israel make the logical דיוק; which the kabbalah of RambaN called White Fire and Black Fire in the introduction of his commentary to the Chumash.
As תהילים employed in the פסוקי דזמרה elevated to the קידושה of a blessing through the ברוך שאמר והיה העולם which “rhetorically” employs שם ומלכות. However rote reading words in the Siddur amounts to a טיפש פשט. Impossible to define an unknow abstract term by using the same term to define itself any more than making ad hominem personal attacks ie Blood libels\unilateral declarations of Jew guilt/\ qualifies as anything other than slander, libel, evil eye, לשון הרע tumah middot spirits which emote from the Yatzir HaRah within the heart.
The 13th Oral Torah middah has an עין טוב and only declares during the Month of Elul the tohor conclusion. However the din of the wicked equally implied by making the required דיוק. The sages prefer – חטאתי עויתי פשעתי because Jews most essentially existed in g’lut. תעשה תפילתך במקום קבוע where מקום understood as a רמז to השם entails affixing the 13 middle blessings to the 13 Horev middot. Hence the blessing ולמלדינים אל תהי תקוה, this blessing affixes to the wicked such as the Shomronim, the Tzeddukim, the Jews who embrace JeZeus as moshiach, the karaim, and Islam – all of whom declare themselves as the true faith and all of whom rejected the revelation of the Oral Torah middot together with wisdom-time oriented Av commandments which תמיד מעשה בראשית create from nothing מלאכים tohor Jews who rule the conquered land of Canaan send to judge the Gods worshipped by the Goyim.
Category: Uncategorized
When will Arabs take responsibility for their actions? Starting with PA: Pay for Slay … Arab terrorism stands upon the foundation of slander.
Moral Cowards England and France & the socialist mayor of New York specifically
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e5oQgIt8JeM Argentine
‘Arrogant Parasites’: President Javier Milei TORCHES ‘Useless’ UN. He sharply criticized the UN at the General Assembly, arguing that it has failed to uphold its own resolutions on the Falkland Islands, known in Argentina as the Malvinas. He challenged British-licensed oil development in the disputed area and pledged to avoid preventive regulation of artificial intelligence.
The Balfour Declaration the crowning achievement of Herzl’s “Political Zionism”. The coward British 1939 shattered the Palestine Mandate. M. Begin lead the charge and blew up the British central military headquarters in Jerusalem at the King David Hotel and the spineless immoral bastards fled – they returned the Mandate back to the UN.
We have discuss 181 & 194 in depth. “1 + 1 = 2 applies in international law as well”,,, a completely unsupported empty declaration; a empty bottle of coke does not compare in value to an unopened bottle of coke. The UN gossip society a vain empty society of lies. Likewise we have already addressed the 4th Geneva Convention in depth. As have we discussed the basis of international law rests solidly upon State strategic alliances with other nation-states, Treaties and Wars. No sense repeating this over again.
Human dignity is not an equation in which the suffering of one person legitimizes the suffering of another. Pie in the sky rhetoric. Hindu idea of Karma says otherwise. The Hindu Gods far more living than the dead Gods worshipped by the barbarians living in Europe and Muslim countries. Europeans – their blood history of oppression and genocide – they do not have the good name reputation to impose a definition of Justice upon Israeli who post Shoah swore the Oath NEVER AGAIN. The Justice of Par’o = to the justice of both Europe and Islam — Church & Mosque ideas of justice stink = both sets of barbarian cowards condemn Israel of genocide post the Oct7th 2023 massacre whose ratio of murdered Israelis to our population compares to some 16 – 9/11s.
פרוכת המבדילה בין הקודש ובין קודש הקודשים
An example of why Israelis like myself view the UN and European “Jewish Problem” racism — ICC Court as nothing other than vile shit.
Hitler’s Muslim Allies: German Army and Waffen-SS Islamic Volunteers 1941–1945 is a 2025 military-history book by Antonio J. Muñoz, published by Frontline Books. It is 256 pages and focuses on Muslim volunteers who served Nazi Germany during World War II. Germany recruited Muslim volunteers from the Balkans, North Africa, the Middle East, the Caucasus, and Muslim regions of the Soviet Union. Arab volunteers who joined German Army units between 1941 and 1945: the Bosnian Muslim 13th Waffen Mountain Division of the SS, commonly known as Handschar, including its recruitment, combat history, and dissolution. Nazi Germany pursued Muslim cooperation for strategic reasons and recruited tens of thousands of Muslims. The book, investigates the specialized military study, particularly useful for readers interested in unit organization, recruitment, uniforms, and lesser-known campaigns. A useful companion work is David Motadel’s Islam and Nazi Germany’s War, which provides a broader political and institutional history of Nazi efforts to cultivate alliances with Muslim populations and leaders.
The Farhud pogrom, a two-day pogrom in Baghdad on June 1–2, 1941, during which pro-Axis Iraqi forces, nationalist militants, and mobs killed roughly 128–180 Jews, injured hundreds, raped women, and looted or damaged around 1,500 Jewish homes and businesses. A clear political and ideological alignment between Iraq’s pro-German faction and some of Hitler’s objectives. Rashid Ali al-Gaylani’s April 1941 coup sought Axis support to remove British influence. His government was backed by pro-German army officers, while the former Mufti of Jerusalem, Amin al-Husseini, helped promote anti-British and antisemitic propaganda. Nazi propaganda had already been disseminated in Iraq, including Arabic broadcasts and an Arabic version of Mein Kampf. The Farhud pogrom, nevertheless marked a major turning point.
It severely damaged Iraqi Jews’ sense of security, and further discriminatory measures followed after 1941. The mass departure of Iraqi Jews occurred mainly later, especially in 1950–1951, rather than through a single forced transfer in 1941. Determining whether the Farhud should be classified as part of the Holocaust remains debated, partly because it occurred outside Nazi-occupied Europe. The core subject of Nazi Germany’s war against Jews – genocide in its most systematic form. While the recruitment of Muslim volunteers (as discussed in Muñoz’s book) was a strategic military and propaganda effort, it was secondary to the Nazi regime’s primary ideological goal: the annihilation of the Jewish people. Hitler’s ideology, outlined in Mein Kampf, viewed Jews as an existential racial threat; not merely anti-Semitism but a belief in racial hygiene that demanded the physical elimination of Jews.
By 1941–1942, Nazi policy shifted from persecution and forced emigration to systematic mass murder. This resulted in the establishment of extermination camps (such as Auschwitz-Birkenau, Treblinka, and Sobibor) where Jews from across Europe were murdered using industrial methods (gas chambers). The scope of this genocide, not limited only to Jews. Roma, disabled persons, Soviet POWs, deformed or mentally ill and political opponents and whom ever the Nazis perceived as a threat to the purity of the German race included. The Farhud (June 1–2, 1941) pogrom in Baghdad directly compares to the Nazi-organized pogrom against Jews in Germany, Austria, and the Sudetenland on November 9–10, 1938 – Kristallnacht.
It contrasts with the later attempts by 5 Arab Armies in 1948 and by the Nasser coalition in 1967 to complete the Nazi Shoah. Although the Nazis did not directly carry out the Farhud, they actively worked to foster anti-Jewish sentiment in the Middle East to undermine British colonial influence. The Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, who fled to Berlin in 1941, collaborated closely with the Nazi regime. He participated in anti-Jewish propaganda broadcasts and helped recruit Muslim SS volunteers (such as the Handschar Division). Nazi agents distributed anti-Jewish literature (including an Arabic translation of Mein Kampf) and used radio broadcasts to incite hatred against Jews and Jews in British-Palestine. This propaganda helped create an environment where events like the Farhud pogrom could occur.
Alliance (the actual definition of the Torah word ברית) as detailed in Muñoz’s book often included facilitating anti-Jewish violence, later crystalized into an attempt to “throw the Jews into the Sea” which Israeli victories prevented in the two National Independence War which so offends the British and European divide and conquer two state solution. Post Nakba Allah Arab defeats wherein revisionist history attempts to conceal the consequences of “what if the Arabs Armies prevailed in either ’48 or ’67 Wars?” With unilateral declarations which deny Arab intent linked to the recent Shoah contrasts with the UN and ICJ and ICC attempts to condemn Israel for the crime of genocide – revisionist history and blood libel Apartheid slander – which share a common foundation with British/French UN 242 revisionist history.
Benny Morris: The Birth of the Palestinian Refugee Problem, 1947–1949. Challenges the post ’48 traditional narrative concerning the Arab refugee problem consequent to the Nakba Allah defeat. Arab socialism became enhanced when secular Arabs perceived Nakba Allah as a dead God. However, Morrris – his later development – recognizes that the expulsion of dhimmi Arabs never made in a vacuum. Arab state refusal to repatriate dhimmi Arab refugees remains a constant as seen through the Oct 7th Abomination war.
Kapo Ilan Pappé, a classic Jew hater. His opinions promote a Arab agenda like as do virtually all UN Resolutions. Critics, including Morris, argue that his political commitments sometimes shape his selection and interpretation of evidence. Avi Shlaim: A classic New Historian and revisionist scholar. His work challenged conventional accounts of Israel’s relations with Jordan and the Arab states, particularly the idea that Israel consistently sought peace while Arab leaders uniformly rejected it.
Eugene Rogan: A historian of the modern Middle East, especially the Arab provinces of the Ottoman Empire and the Arab experience of World War I. He is sometimes grouped with revisionist or critical scholarship because of his attention to Arab perspectives, but he is not usually classified as one of the core Israeli New Historians in the same way as Morris, Shlaim, and kapo Pappé. Post Shoah Israelis do not simply poo poo “throw the Jews into the Sea” as do Popes Priests & Goyim guilty of the Shoah by ignoring these crimes. The UN gossip voting blocks together with Russia’s strong alliance with Assad Syria. That powerful nations oppose the rise of Israeli international influence in shaping the balance of power across the Middle East – consistent with classic international politics throughout Human history.
What defines “genocide”? Answer: Poland.
When weighing Xtian war crimes against humanity and comparing Muslim war crimes against humanity FALSE to make a shallow two dimensional Newspaper-like reactionary learning of history of crimes DIVORCED from the earlier generations of that “criminal generation” compared primarily with earlier generations of that same people in earlier generations. People have cultural habits which share a “ratio” with past and similar ‘errors of wickedness’. Clearly the Shoah crime committed by the generation of European barbarians shares a ratio relationship with the barbarity of the Crusades Inquisitions etc etc etc. The guilt of one generations NOT limited to only ONE generation.
The same ratio comparison of generations crimes against humanity applies equally to ALL PEOPLES in ALL generations. This Torah vision applies directly to the 10 times that Israel “tested” our commitment to the Torah which culminated in the decree that the generation who stood at Sinai. The 11th chapter of the Mishna Sanhedrin records a prosecutor/defense dispute between rabbi Eliezer and rabbi Akiva his greatest talmid. In Baba Batra the oven of Rabbi Eliezer where he called a Bat-Kol from heaven as proof of his ruling that the debated oven was kosher. The sages place him into נידוי because post Sinai תורה לא בשמים היא. Rabbi Akiva argues that the Wilderness generation אין להם חלק בעולם הבא; meaning the failure of this 10th “TEST” separated that generation from the generation which conquered Canaan through the leadership of the prophet Yehoshua the talmid of Moshe Rabbeinu.
עולם הבא an Oral Torah interpretation of the k’vanna of the brit cut between the pieces. Clearly Goyim av tumah avoda zarah theologies which prioritize faith belief in their theologically created and defined Gods have completely divergent different and otherwise ideas touching their belief in the world to come. Fundamentally Torah common law not a belief system; justice – fair restitution of damages inflicted by the guilty upon the Jewish victims among our brit people alliance between the 12 Tribes defines our vision of faith which day and night differs from Yovel liberty for the 12 Tribes achieved through the faith of justice from cursed g’lut Jewry (based upon the Wilderness generation precedent) incapable of doing Yovel liberty through Sanhedrin courtroom rulings which restore fair restitution of damages as the ideal tiqqun how to “HEAL” hatred without cause among and between our Peoples and Tribes!
Howdy Gamma Hans just laid the s’chach fer the Sukkah. Whoooooooooop!! 36 diné כרת . Mishnah Keritot 1:1 lists 36 transgressions carrying liability for karet.
Karet cuts a bnai brit person off from the chosen Cohen seed fathered by Avraham Yitzak and Yaacov. O’lam Ha’bah refers to the brit Avram swore between the pieces wherein the Torah learns the vision of brit O’lam Ha’Bah; hence this brit does not apply to any Goyim. A טיפש פשט literally ass-u-me(s) Cohen restricted to the House of Aaron. As tefillah stands in the stead of korbanot and an obligation upon the entire house of Israel so too the “Cohen nation”/”O’lam Ha’Ba applicable only to the 12 Tribes of Israel who accept to this day the revelation of the Torah at Sinai.
“כרת הברית requires an oath alliance lishmah” defines the k’vanna of the 1st Sinai commandment applicable only to the 12 Tribes within the borders of the oath sworn land inheritance. G’lut Jewry suffers the din of כרת in g’lut — they lose the wisdom to do mitzvot לשמה because Egypt – referred to in the 1st Sinai commandment – לאו דוקא.
The din of 39 lashes atones for the curse of karet; a Torah wisdom pertaining to the oath לשמה the Avot swore to Father the chosen Cohen people. Hence the expression כרת ברית you quoted only a טיפש פשט attempts to restrict this fundamental wisdom/abstract time-oriented Av commandment with a simple word translation “to cut/make a covenant”. The כרת הברית requires the Torah obligation to swear an oath alliance לשמה . Swearing a Torah oath לא לשמה amounts to avoda zarah. La’van swore an oath in the Name of his Gods when he and Yaacov swore an oath alliance which his descendent Bil’aam profaned when the king of Moav hired him to curse Israel.
Yosef Karo, living in the Cohen inherited brit land, supported the Safed attempt to renew semikhah, to restore Sanhedrin judicial authority to make possible the application of laws—including malkot—whose halakhic function includes atonement in cases otherwise liable to karet.
Hebrew University does not have a reputation for producing profound Torah scholars. A Hebrew University scholar did produce a major, original commentary on the Talmud comparable in ambition and detailed engagement with earlier commentators: David Weiss Halivni’s Mekorot u-Mesorot; however, his learning failed to teach how פרדס together with the 7 middot of Hillel, 10 middot of Akiva, 13 middot of Yishmael, and 32 middot of Ha’Galilee interpret the warp/weft ratio of halachacha כנגד aggadah employed to define the culture and customs together with the T’NaCH prophetic mussar required to make an aliya of toldot mitzvot which do not require k’vanna to Av tohor wisdom-time oriented commandments first introduced as the most important Torah theme of משנה תורה\common law.
T’NaCH commands mussar common law k’vannot which the O’lam ha’Bah generations grow this אל mussar rebuke within their Yatzir Ha’Tov hearts. Hence the מלאך named Yaacov ישראל ‘servant of the rebuke’. Yitzak validated the blessing given to Yaacov through his deception, however based upon the blessing he gave to Esav, he sternly rebuked Yaacov. Impossible for Goyim to grow prophetic mussar within their hearts because they assume Torah prophets served as witches who predict the future, as expressed repeatedly throughout the counterfeit gospels ‘fulfilled the words of the prophets’.
Yom Kippur סמוך to Chag Sukkot מלאכה a Torah wisdom which creates through oaths sworn לשמה – possible only in the borders of the oath sworn land inheritance of the chosen Cohen people, the כפרה of the sealing of יום הזכרון distinguishes the ‘living blood’ of the goat brought within the פרכת\כפר from the splattered blood of the goat עון פשע וחטא of the goat cast off the cliff. The Shemone Esrei does not include the ודוי דרבנן anywhere within the עצם language of this תפילה דרבנן because the ודוי דאורייתא makes a fundamental הבדלה which separates and distinguishes between the ודוי sworn upon the דם חי of the korban brought before the פרכת from the blood of the goat cast off the cliff; a separation\gulf as wide as tohor from tuma.
Chag Sukkot most essentially learns from the laying of S’chach. The בנין אב Torah precedent learns from the אוהל/tent of the Mishkan Sinai revelation. The wisdom-time oriented commandments/תמיד מעשה בראשית create מלאכים which the Cohen nation can send to make war against the enemies of Israel. Moshe Rabbeinu sent as a מלאך unto Egypt to judge the Gods of Par’o; Yehoshua crosses the river Jordan as a מלאך to judge the Gods worshipped by the kingdoms of Canaan. Wisdom-time oriented commandments only sanctify the House of Israel because only the 12 Tribes accept the revelation of the Torah at Sinai.
The k’vanna of shaking the 4 species in 6 dimensional directions while standing under the “Tent” of created by the s’chach duplicates the כסוי בה of the mitzva of tzitzit; the נשמל of the Mishkan Sinai revelation of prophetic mussar teaches that standing under the “tent” of the Mishkan לאו דוקא, makes an aliya of תולדות מצוות which do not require k’vanna to Av tohor wisdom-time oriented commandments which absolutely require כוונה.
U.S. President Donald Trump meets Middle East leaders at the United Nations, and an Israeli Response. In the 1960s, Britain separated the Chagos Islands from Mauritius and forcibly removed the Chagossian population to make way for the UK base. In 2019, the International Court of Justice said Britain’s continued administration of the islands was unlawful.
Never simply: Talk to the HAND. As an Israeli notice how Jordan promotes British interests contrasted by that of the United States. The Talmud always opens with the minority opinion prior to the majority opinion. António Guterres is Portuguese, he promotes the hostility of French & British interests who prioritizes Obama internationalism vs national independence of nations. Contrast the impotence of climate change sky is falling with Nation State freedom: “Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness”. Illegal aliens not protected by the Bill of Rights. The American Revolution shattered the British empire in the New World. Followed up by the Monroe Doctrine which Israel applies to the Middle East and North Africa. From 1954 to 1962, France fought to retain Algeria as part of the French empire. The FLN insurgency, the Battle of Algiers, and systematic torture became the defining symbols of a war France won militarily but lost politically—a wound that fractured French society and defined postcolonial violence. Britain’s ‘two state solution’ has always produced war NOT peace: Britain divided India from Pakistan; Korea and Vietnam likewise divided – and war ensued. UN Chapter VII violates the Constitution of the United States.
Again wish to express my appreciation to Gamma Hans
Should … outa … pie in the sky speculations smell like fresh laid dog shit with powerful fire-crackers stuck in those poops ready to explode when young children and immature irrational teenagers emotionally walk by within range. Carter’s book Palestine: Peace Not Apartheid page 190 “Utilizing their political and military dominance, they are imposing a system of partial withdrawal, encapsulation, and apartheid on the Muslim and Christian citizens of the occupied territories. The driving purpose for the forced separation of the two peoples is unlike that in South Africa—not racism, but the acquisition of land. There has been a determined and remarkably effective effort to isolate settlers from Palestinians…” UN Charter’s prohibition on acquiring territory by force, a constitutive legal fiction, dolled up as “international law”.
The modern ‘blood libel’ analogy goes far beyond the specific slander aimed at Jews in the Middle Ages. But the hatred then and today a constant as proven through repeated riots across the US and European Universities after Oct7th 2023 massacre of Israelis. Any attempt to pigeon-hole “Blood libel” limited to the criminal European church’s whose post Shoah reputation – Dead as a doornail – conceals a hostile UN agenda against Israel.
Substantial evidence for the charge that parts of the UN system, specifically UNWRA schools and text-books, have treated Israel exceptionally. For example, one tally reports that the General Assembly adopted 14 resolutions focused on Israel in 2023, compared with eight focused on the rest of the world, and another reports 17 on Israel versus seven on all other countries in 2024.
The League of Nations was established after World War I through the Treaty of Versailles in1920. The United Nations was created during and immediately after World War II, with the UN Charter signed in 1945. The post–World War I settlement imposed severe terms on Germany: territorial losses, military restrictions, reparations, demilitarization of the Rhineland, and the controversial “war guilt” clause. These conditions fostered humiliation, resentment, economic and political instability, and helped the Nazis gain support. The “settlement” also created weaknesses that the League of Nations could not overcome—especially the absence of the United States.
Great Power interests compare by analogy to Apartheid South Africa. League and UN Bias toward maintaining a Roman/Byzantine Palestine sharply contrasts with all the African countries who have cast off European colonialist names and renamed their countries. No African country has kept any name impose upon them by the Romans/Byzantine empires – yet the demand to keep “Palestine” a shining contradiction.
After the Muslim conquest, Arabic-speaking governments used the related term Filastin. Its boundaries and political meaning changed repeatedly, but the name remained in geographic and religious use. Arab nations lost the wars of ’48 and ’67 yet the UN promotes “West Bank” over Israeli Samaria. Hogwash declarations which poo poo the UN’s preference as primarily legal and diplomatic rather than archaeological – amounts to revisionist history based upon 3379 and 2334 precedents — neither Resolution qualifies as neutral. Jordan in 1948 captured East Jerusalem and Samaria during the war. The armistice merely formalized the ceasefire line. Jordan defeated in ’67, yet the block head UN continues the “West Bank” which erases “Samaria”!
The 2334 language of “no legal validity”, that legal interpretation of sovereignty, occupation and Jewish settlements stands in stark opposition to Jordan’s 1948-67 which the UN indifference effectively recognized as legitimate sovereignty, as did the 1964 PLO charter! Only “Britain and Pakistan” refused to denounce Jordan’s annexation. The 1956 War conclusively proved that both London and Paris – their long imperialist empire traditions directly influenced the post ’67 242 Resolution. To argue that ‘West Bank’ as illegal occupied territory in point of fact serves the known imperialist interests of London and Paris, based upon the 1939 White Paper. The Chamberlain betrayal compares to limiting “Blood Libel” to the criminal church hundreds of years in the past! British imperial self-serving interests defines its concentration camps established in the Boer War and Jallianwala Bagh India massacre.
While Arab states condemned Jordan’s annexation in 1950, the UN member states never thereafter pursued this UN condemnation with further condemnations. This ‘Blood Libel’ analogy calls the UN, as an institution – dominated by the Great Powers – a lie. Wherein the UN portrayed through propaganda as neutral. Asymmetry of attention and condemnation defines it as a gossip society, rather than a legitimate neutral body ideal for nations to conduct diplomacy.
The narrow point of “Blood Libel” restricted to the evil dead Church — fails to recognize that UN 3379 & 2334 precedents emphatically do not speak the language of diplomacy. This analogy, that an institution presenting itself as an impartial authority can use morally loaded language while selectively applying scrutiny. Resolution 3379 did not speak in neutral diplomatic terms: it characterized Zionism itself as racism. Resolution 2334, framed in legal language, but “no legal validity” also a categorical political judgment, not merely a descriptive geographic label. Their language therefore supports the argument that UN discourse can transform contested political positions into supposedly objective moral or legal conclusions.
The choice of language: West Bank over Samaria qualifies as a UN Trojan Horse. The P-5 all prioritize strategic control/dominance over the balance of power in any given region of the world. The precedent of the ’56 Suez Crisis tersely summarizes their their lack of concern for the lives of “inferior” peoples, compares to slave ships throwing their slaves into the Sea when threatened by hostile naval boarding. Subjective primary interests shaped their delegates narratives whom London & Paris send to the UN. Obviously Obama starkly contrasts with the America First interests of President Trump. The UN may be a forum for diplomacy, but its record does not justify treating its language as presumptively neutral or its enforcement as consistently principled.
Torah common law/משנה תורה on the reading of Yom Kippur employs the language of משח concerning the House of Aaron. The NaCH and Talmud absolutely require Yovel freedom for the 12 Tribes and Sanhedrin משנה תורה legislative review over the statute laws passed by the 12 Tribes of the Republic. David never established Sanhedrin common law over the 12 Tribes. Aaron and his House anointed as “moshiach” to dedicate through the משל of korbanot צדק צדק תרדוף – Sanhedrin common law courtroom justice which sanctifies fair restitution of damages as the basis of Moshe taking Israel out of Egypt and purpose for Yehoshua conquering the land of Canaan. Moshiach has a Torah primary source in Moshe anointing the House of Aaron. The Dead Sea Scrolls (e.g., Community Rule 9:11) anticipate a Priest-Messiah superior to a King-Messiah. Attempts to validate the NT through Goyim who reject the revelation of the Torah proves zero. JeZeus had no Tribal Yichus based upon the gospel contradictions of pregnancy to another out of wedlock; a Greek Zeus father of Hercules precedent.
The fundamental flaw in the Rambam’s statute law King as “Judge” not a “Legislator” Hilchot Melachim 3:1 & 3:10… the Torah only directly mandates Sanhedrin courts. The subject of “king” a בדיעבד subject when it addresses copying the ways, customs and manners of the Goyim. The Yom Kippur Torah reading states this explicitly. Hilchot Melachim 1:4 falsely declares appointing a king as a positive commandment. דברים יז:טה makes the request for a king, according to Rashi as asking for a tyrant! Also שמואל א ח:ז clearly a Torah curse, comparable to the rains falling in the wrong season! The mitzva of Moshiach learns from מעשה בראשית the Av mussar theme of the entire Torah. בראשית introduces the נמשל of wisdom-time oriented commandments through the משל of Creation. Contrast the NT which violates this essential prophetic mussar, by teaching of a historical man rather than mussar applicable to all generations of Israel, as expressed through the burden: A) to establish Yovel liberty for the 12 Tribes of the Republic “through” צדק צדק תרדוף” judicial justice – the k’vanna of the mitzva of Moshiach.
