The Book of Kings compares to Gulivers’ Travels. Satire employed to conceal derision of powerful kings. The Book of Shmuel contrasts through similar “tongue n’ cheek” the request by the Yatzir HaRa dominant spirits of tumah – the peoples’ demand for a king to bring Yovel to the 12 Tribes. Therefore, the satirical Books of Shmuel and Kings places the Av Torah wisdom mitzva – prophet – above the toldot secondary mitzva of kings. NaCH prophets enforce Sanhedrin משנה תורה rulings; the mussar of prophets interprets and re-interprets the k’vanna of justice throughout the generations –totally independent of the existence or absence of Yatzir HaRa kings of either Yechuda or Israel! Samuel and Kings – therefore not histories celebrating monarchy but prophetic mussar critiques exposing every attempt to replace divine kingship with political sovereignty. Based upon the כלל: Torah commands mussar rather than repeats historical stories and past life events!

Just as Shaul profaned the anointing to judge David together with the Cohonim of Nob – before a Sanhedrin Capital Crimes Court – such a court dependent upon the 12 Tribes of the Republic keeping the Yovel/liberty which directly learns from Moshe taking Israel out of Egyptian bondage! So too and how much more so David profaned the anointing to judge Uriah before a Sanhedrin Capital Crimes Court etc! Then came Shlomo who worshipped avoda zara from the beginning to the end of his reign as king!

Why does the Book of Kings open with the prophet Natan saving the lives of Bat Sheva and Shlomo? Later when the error (Laughing pun on heir) of Shlomo went to Sh’Cem to get anointed as moshiach … how does this story supplement the opening of the prophet Natan saving the lives of Bat Sheva and Shlomo?

Answer: Just as the prophet Natan opposed David’s tuma Yatzir to copy how Goyim universally worship their gods by building great Cathedrals so too Rehovoam likewise ignored the council given by Shlomo’s “elder advisors”. No Torah commandment to build a Temple? What then was the revelation of the Mishkan at Sinai. Torah instructs prophetic mussar through משל\נמשל methodologies which differentiates תולדות-forms from טהור רוחות-Substance. The Substance of the Mishkan, NOT the fancy tent, but rather the Spirits of לשמה; post sin of the Golden Calf משל//נמשל prophetic mussar which defines the k’vanna of the 2nd Sinai commandment … NOT the calf-tent RATHER the 13 Oral Torah middot Spirits which defines the k’vanna of the רוח הקודש spirits of לשמה First Sinai Commandment.

Now how does this NaCH Book refute the foreign gospel counterfeits? Matthew traces JeZeus’ line through David → Solomon (and through Solomon’s line specifically). While Luke traces to David, but it goes through a different intermediate line (often summarized as tracing via David’s son Nathan, not Solomon). The narishkeit of both gospel counterfeits not only contradict one another but their entire narrative of virgin birth as well. The latter profanes the Torah commandment of קידושין.

Recall that the people abandoned the oath sworn at Gilgal in the days of the prophet Yehoshua! There at that oath brit, as remembered through the Order of Parshiot organized in Rashi tefillen, this oath brit affirms that just as לשמה delivered Israel from Egyptian bondage to Yovel-liberty, so too when Israel invaded Canaan under the prophet of Yehoshua that לשמה would deliver all the kingdoms of giants and utterly destroy these kingdoms of avoda zara from off the land to permit all 12 Tribes to likewise rejoice Yovel-Liberty!

When the Book of Shmuel anoints first Shaul and later David as king this sequence supports the prophetic warning that the demand for a king which invalidated the oath sworn at Gilgal the people would later understand the error to place their trust in the strength of horses or the bow rather than the brit cut with לשמה at Sinai that לשמה rules as the KING of the 12 Tribes.

The Book of דברים\משנה תורה includes the Parshah of שופטים ושוטרים – a direct reference which ties the Levitical school of prophets to enforce Sanhedrin courtroom rulings לשמה. Hence the NaCH prophets routinely employ the language: כה אמר השם. This declaration of לשמה prophetic authority stands upon the אמונה יסוד of תורה לא בשמים היא. The justices of Sanhedrin courts known as אלהים.

The rejection of Shaul as Moshiach the Talmud amplifies by teaching that the priority of honor goes to the Talmud chakam over that of any king of Israel! Why? Because any person of bnai brit Israel can wear the crown of king! But a Torah sage 1:10,000! The mussar of the Book of Shmuel teaches the משל/\נמשל method. לשמה as KING – 1st Sinai commandment – establishes Yovel-Liberty for the 12 Tribes of Israel within and throughout the land. Herein defines the oath sworn לשמה at Sinai, and the k’vanna of the “wisdom commandment” also commonly referred to as time-oriented mitzva of Moshiach. Which both houses of Shaul and David failed to sanctify with Yovel-liberty and Sanhedrin Torah mandated Courts.

The mitzva of Moshiach constitutes as the definition of תולדות רשות מצוות. Av wisdom commandments require k’vanna. תולדות רשות mitzvot – קום ועשה ושב ולא תעשה מצוות do not require k’vanna. However, if a person – across the generations of bnai brit – sanctify a קום ועשה מצוה by affixing prophetic mussar which interprets the k’vanna of Oral Torah middot of רוח הקודש לשמה – this Torah wisdom makes an aliya of תולדות רשות commandments which do not require k’vanna unto Av tohor wisdom commandments which dedicate tohor Oral Torah רוח הקודש middot as the dominant middot of the Yatzir HaTov bnai brit heart. Herein correctly understands the prophetic mussar of Yemiah’s ברית חדש.

Tefillah דאורייתא – קריא שמע – emphatically remembers the liberty from Egyptian slavery and bondage. This t’shuva – act of remembering – sometimes translated as “return” – it stands as the יסוד foundation of the Torah mitzva known as Yovel. The prophet Yehoshua kept the Pesach and brit melah – the sign of the Yovel brit cut with Avraham that his future born Cohen seed through Yitzak would inherit and rule the land of Canaan through judicial justice – the definition of Yovel…the primary condition to sanctify the mitzva of Moshiach in the land!

The “Error/Heir” Pun: The fracture of the kingdom under Rehovoam at Sh’Cem, not merely a political failure or a simple “error” in judgment; but the direct remembered t’shuva by which Natan cursed all generations of the House of David. The crown – treated as an inherited, material possession toldot form, rather than a רוח הקודש dedication of tohor Oral Torah middot – the responsibility of the Sanhedrin to adjucate and define; and the Torah’s absolute requirement that the Moshiach both establish & sanctifies both Yovel & brit melah time-oriented commandments. The “heir” – indeed the “error.”

Just as Shlomo’s kingdom began with division and backroom deals (bypassing Adonijah), it ends with a total civil fracture at Shechem. NaCH prophets command mussar which definitively proves the בדיעבד monarchy – simply a fragile ‘house of cards’ … because the tuma Yatzir HaRa Esav within the bnai brit heart repeatedly abandons the Gilgal – Sinai brit which sanctifies לשמה\the 1st Sinai commandment – as king; as remembered by the fixed Order of the Rashi tefillen Gilgal oath brit. The prophetic mussar where the next generation error – Rahovam – travels to Sh’Cem – stands under the t’shuva of Sh’Cem; as remembered by the fixed Order of the Rabbeinu Tam tefillen. At Sh’Cem the 12 Tribes of Israel swore and answered אמן to the blessings and curses of the Torah brit. This לשמה\לא לשמה bi-polar opposite highlights the day/night difference between Yovel-liberty in the land from G’lut-oppression under foreign kings – starting with Par’o & Egypt.

Kings opens with the prophet Natan, which frames Adoniyahu’s power play to seize the throne of David – as a משיח שקר model – the main satire of the Books of both Shmuel and kings. The gospel books follow the Adoniyahu power play and attempt to seize the throne by declaring JeZeus as God. The gospel counterfeit framework, a child born outside the bond of a baal – not a divine miracle but a mamzer; barred from marrying into the Kahal.

A status that permanently excludes that individual and their descendants from the Bnai Brit chosen Cohen people. Jewish tradition fundamentally abhors the idea of Benei HaElohim narrative expressed in בראשית. The gospel Goyim propaganda – simply transplanted a pagan motif into a Jewish context, a wolf dressed in the garments of treif sheep; what do Goyim know of kosher slaughter? They called the torture and public murder of JeZeus a fit korban that saves all mankind from sin/death! Hence the treif gospel narrative stands upon the Pauline perversion – his “Original Sin of Adam” — simply a continuation where Roman authors promote Jewish civil war through their version of the “Adonijah power play” prior to the sectarian War which collapsed following the destruction of Herod’s Temple av tuma avoda zarah abomination. Duplicated by the Koran claim that Abraham bound Ishmael at Mecca rather than Isaac on Mount Moriah, they seek to bypass the entire legal framework of the Yovel and the 12 Tribes Yichus to the land of Canaan.

Prophetic mussar does not care about the gold on the walls; it cares about the widow, the orphan, the stranger, and the integrity of the Sanhedrin court. When the false prophets scream “”The Temple of Hashem, the Temple of Hashem” this perverted narishkeit compares to the Koran declaration that the Jews perverted the Torah, that some 1900 years after the revelation at Sinai – actually Avraham dedicated Yishmael at the Akadah! In Torah law, tribal Yichus-affiliation learns from Cohonim! Tribal yichus inherited solely through the Father – patrilineal descent.. The halacha set by the Court of Ezra determines that the mother determines the Jewishness of the new born child. This fundamental distinction דיוק learns straight from במדבר א:יח. Goyim lack of shame compares to the commercial: “Give it to Mikey – cus he swallows anything!

Reactionary readers who lack the skills to discern Torah common law from Goyim Statute law decrees compares to an ostrich who sticks its head into the sand. he prophet Natan cursed the house of David with an eternal plague of Civil War. Failure to validate this foundation determines where the head of the ostrich concealed. Goyim read their bibles and korans on par with shallow reactionary news papers, which a person reads and thereafter throws into the trash of Inquisitions and/or pogroms.

If Avraham dedicated Yishmael at Mecca then the whole promised land falls away. The Pauline reactionary propaganda which totally invalidates the wisdom commandment – brit melah and its direct connection to the land of Canaan as the “eternal sign of the brit” which לשמה sworn to Avraham, Yitzak, and Yaacov to father the chosen Cohen people … especially after the t’shuva made by HaShem when God erred and confused a Torah oath which requires the k’vanna that it can never become null & void with a vow which both father and baal can immediately anul. This Yom Kippur t’shuva – remembrance shares nothing with the guilt trip of Man eternally inherits the original sin of Adam – JeZeus atones for sin utter and complete narishkeit; Shlomo’s Temple directly compared to the ערלה brit of Yishmael and the korban of Cain dedicated as a positive commandment without prophetic mussar k’vanna.

Pesach serves as the basis of the mitzva of Yovel/Liberty! The prophet Yehoshua – the first Book of the NaCH Prophets through the establishment of the oaths sworn at both Gilgal and Sh’Cem – the mitzva of tefillen and its two boxes containing 4 Parshiot which the Rashi tefillen remembers the Order of brit Gilgal: Just as Moshe sent לשמה as a מלאך to judge the Gods of Paro and Egypt, the prophet Yehoshua sent לשמה as a מלאך to judge the Gods of Canaan and the Canaanite kings! The Blessing – Curse by the 6 Tribes vs 6 Tribes remembers the oath sworn at Sh’Cem which remembers the Life – Death/Blessing – Curse first two Sinai commandments upon which hinge לשמה all the rest of the revelation of both the written and oral Torah.

The Prophet Yehoshua priorities the mitzva of establishment of 3 of the 6 cities of Refuge; the last mitzva observed by Moshe Rabbeinu – the establishment of the 3 cities of Refuge on the other side of the Jordan river! And the mitzva לשמה of brit melah – the sign of the brit sworn to Avraham that his future born Cohen seed would inherit as their permanent inheritance the lands of Canaan!

But following the passing of the 1st generation who conquered the land of Canaan. The next generation worshipped avoda zarah – they assimilated and intermarried with Goyim and embraced their cultures and customs as their own! Hence the 12 tribes abandoned the Pesach model of Yovel Liberty in the Land of Israel. The Book of שופטים proves this conclusively that Israel during the times of the Judges did not observe the mitzva of Yovel.

Then comes the Book(s) of the prophet Shmuel. Where the people abandoned the brit of Gilgal – the oath wherein the 12 Tribes swore a brit cut upon the souls of the lives of their future born children לשמה that the local god of Sinai who brought Yovel to the chosen Cohen seed freed from Egyptian bondage this local god (only the 12 tribes of Israel accepted לשמה the revelation of the Torah at Sinai/Horev) would rule as לשמה king of the 12 tribes of the Republic of conquered Canaan. The prophet Shmuel called לשמה for rains to fall during the dry season as the “sign” (think brit melah) of the brit which לא לשמה Israel asked for a king to restore Yovel in the land!

Both kings Shaul and David failed to sanctify לשמה the mitzva of Moshiach to establish לשמה the Torah as the Written Constitution of the Republic of the 12 Tribes and Sanhedrin Courts as the Oral Torah לשמה authority which interprets the k’vanna of the Written Torah Constitution from generation to generation.

The Talmud clearly states that post the Bavil g’lut, starting with the generation of Ezra, that Jews never observed the mitzva לשמה of Yovel and brit melah – the sign of the brit – sworn to the Avot fathers of the chosen Cohen people! By the time rabbi Yechuda wrote the 6 Orders of his common law Mishna — based upon the 5th Book of דברים also called משנה תורה – which means “Common Law” — some 75 Years AFTER the disaster of the Bar Kochba revolt, where the Romans renamed the fully conquered province of Judea unto the Roman name of Palestine. Clearly the intent of the Romans to fully expel the Jewish people from off the conquered land of Palestine and scatter them as stateless refugee populations across the whole of the Roman empire!

G’lut Jews no different from the g’lut Jews who endured the judicial oppression of Par’o and his vertical courts of judicial oppression and corruption – Jews in g’lut slavery obviously do not keep the mitzva of Yovel – even לא לשמה! Therefore the Mishna with its even later Gemara common do not bemoan the past where Jews failed to keep Yovel and remember the k’vanna of brit melah לשמה. Rather the Mishna with its later Gemara serve as the ideal model for the time when Jews return and reconquer the oath sworn lands from the Roman barbarian invaders or their close kin the Xtians and Mu-ham-mad Injuns and restore Yovel and brit melah לשמה to the land – make the Written Torah the Constitution of the Republic of 12 Tribes and pursue righteous justice among our people לשמה.

The Torah mandates specifically Sanhedrin courts. Moshe never anointed as King. Yehoshua never anointed as King. דברים יז serves as a precedent for the time when the Yatzir Ha-Raw dominates the hearts of the people. Both David and how much more so Shlomo ignored the rules established in דברים. T’NaCH commands mussar for the generations it emphatically does not teach history. The Talmud prioritizes the honor of a Torah sage over that of a king! Based upon Shaul as king and still later the Hashmonaim Cohen kings, anyone can replace Herod! But a talmid chakham 1:10,000. Shmuel warned the people that they would later regret their request for a king! Civil War defines all the kings of Yechuda and Israel!

Prophetic mussar – both כלל ופרט – aint about David in 1 Shmuel פרק יח, he’s not the king! The mussar focuses upon Shaul’s failure to try David before a Sanhedrin court. Later when David became king he too would duplicate this exact חלול השם of king Shaul! The mitzva\purpose of Moshiach, as defined by both Moshe and Yehoshua who both prioritized לשמה establishment of the cities of refuse – ie Small Sanhedrin Courts. Sanhedrin common law courts upon what do they hinge upon 12 Tribes keeping the Yovel as a דאורייתא מצוה לשמה.

Why the language חלול השם? Neither House anointed as Moshiach sanctified the Torah commandment לשמה. NaCH prophets command mussar to all generations of bnai brit. Torah does not “look back” at history the way false prophets do. Torah, a post Sinai revelation, does not worship any God in any of the so called 7 Heaven above, as do av tuma avoda zara religious theologies and dogmatic decrees dictate to all their believers. Torah – the revelation of the faith of Torah mandated common law Sanhedrin “federal” courts. Only the 12 Tribes from Yaacov stood and accepted the revelation of the Torah at Sinai/Horev.

After the fact av tumah avoda zara – the so called ‘Sister Religion’ 1400 to 1900 years gap of separation – where the former despite not being under the Law insists that their Man\God the God of Sinai; the later tawhid Allah too absolutely insists the Allah the revelation of the 1st Sinai commandment; tawhid Monotheism fundamentally a חלול השם of the 2nd Sinai commandment. Both Moshe and Yehoshua sent as מלאכים to judge the Gods of both Egypt and Canaan. The mitzva of Moshiach לשמה, a Torah מלאכה commandment.

The Book of Shmuel סמוך to Shoftim & Yehoshua; no different to the Order of the Siddur. NaCH prophetic books learn from one another through בניני אבות common law precedents. The foundation of the NaCH prophets – the Book of Yehoshua. The prophet – like unto Moshe – completed the Torah commandment to establish the 6 cities of refuge! Keeping Pesach – from which learns the Torah commandment of Yovel; and brit melah – the sign of the brit. Which brit? The oath sworn to the Avot when they sojourned in the land as often despised refugees! Chag Pesach remembers the brit of liberation from Egyptian slavery.

G’lut Jewry, after the Romans renamed conquered Judea unto Palestine, while enduring the horrors of our return back to Egypt (לאו דוקא), even before the Bar Kochba disaster, post destruction of Herod’s Cathedral abomination, the Romans permitted Jews to build a “Sanhedrin” in Yavneh! But that Sanhedrin no different from the Sanhedrin which Napoleon permitted! Speculation over the mitzva of Moshiach has produced wild belief systems of theology! Especially following the Cossack revolt against Poland.

Despite יוחנן בן זכאי and other Tannaim, rabbi Yechuda’s Mishna codified after the Romans had decided to cast the Jewish people as exiles upon the dung heaps of history. Hence the Tannaim scholars follow the model set by the NaCH prophets! The codifications of both Mishna and Gemara do not worship the past but serve as a model for the future based upon the NaCH prophets starting with the Book of Yehoshua. Torah simply not hostage to Goyim sovereignty—the Oral Law becomes the “how to” wisdom—to survive the Torah curse of g’lut. NaCH prophets provide the precedents for later Tannaim and Amoraim scholarship as codified in both the Talmud and Siddur.

False prophet and false messiah a product of g’lut Torah curses. When the people asked for a Moshiach in Shmuel, it rained during the dry season! The mussar of the rain in the wrong time and places the Talmud interprets as a Torah curse. G’lut defines keeping mitzvot לא לשמה because the oath brit sworn to the Avot most essentially entails Liberty from Goyim rule like the model of Egypt AND justice among and between our people within the borders of conquered Canaan.

The Talmud: doing mitzvot לא לשמה to later doing mitzvot לשמה, as interpreted by RambaN’s commentary to the Chumash ויקרא יח:כה builds on the בנין אב of דברין יא:יז. Hק separates גלות Jewish communities from Jewish communities in גאולה. He writes that Jews do mitzvot in g’lut to remember how to do mitzvot in the Land. Moshe brought Israel out of Egypt to conquer and rule Canaan with justice. צדק צדק תרדוף.

The sealed NaCH Books of Prophets compare to the oath sworn at Gilgal – remembered through the Order of Rashi’s tefillen and the Order of the Siddur/Shemone Esrei. The Yerushalmi Talmud teaches that more than 247 prophets occupied in writing the Shemone Esrei. What mussar does this Gemara teach? Prophets function as the שטרים of the Sanhedrin שפטים, the k’vanna of דברים טז:יח. Prophets interpret the k’vanna of time-oriented commandments. Goyim do not determine Torah law they do not define abstract Torah terms, they have no portion in the world to come; meaning no connection to the brit that the seed of Avram would number as the stars of the sky. Avraham sent away Yishmael; to his other non brit seed – he sent them away with gifts. Only Yitzak inherited the oath brit faith of his father Avraham. Only Yitzak swore the oath of being a father to the chosen Cohen seed at the Akedah. Yitzak caused Yaacov – not Esav – to inherit “title” Av of the chosen Cohen people.

Premise: Revolutions occur when when the people of the land reject both Monarch and the state religion. The models of the American, French, Bolshevik, Nazi, Maoist gang of four, Pol Pot and 1979 Iranian revolution cast both king and the state “religion” upon the dung-heaps of history. To permanently break a vertical system, the population has to simultaneously lose faith in the ruler’s muscle and the priest’s magic – as did Moshe and Aaron when they faced down Par’o. Clearly the most brittle pillar, which a Shimshon strength can break: g’lut Judaism. G’lut Judaism worships Shulkan Aruch לא לשמה halachot which do not require k’vanna לשמה. In Israeli society today the tectonic plate which threatens Civil War a secular religious divide wherein the latter assumes they hold all the cards, they have a monopoly upon the Torah!

Yovel learns from liberty from Egyptian slavery. Despite king David bringing peace to the land he failed to judge Uriah in a Sanhedrin court of law as likewise failed king Shaul to judge David and King Shlomo to judge Yerovam the later first king of Israel. The dynasty of both Davidic and Israel kings failed to keep the Yovel as the basis for the 12 tribes to establish the Federal Sanhedrin Courts which the prophet Natan understood as the real בית המקדש rather than David and Shlomo’s copy-cat Cathedrals which bankrupt national treasuries in all Goyim lands throughout history.

The Sages sealed the T’NaCH, Talmud, Siddur, masoret. This gives all generations of Israel the same level starting field to pursue justice in our oath brit home land. As the NaCH prophets command mussar to all generations living in the future/O’lam Ha’bah so too and how much more so Torat Moshe! This forward facing vision of faith absolutely different from av tuma avoda zarah religions whose theologies declare the nature of the Gods as 1. Monotheistic and 2. In the heavens above; either A) sitting upon the right and of the Father or B) enjoying 72 virgins.

The Mishna denounces God speculations. Those who “believe” in that which lies above them, or behind them, or below them – better that such persons’ never even born! After the fact religions, established more than 1000 or even 2000 years after the revelation of the Torah at Sinai – there revisionist history theologies never retroactively accepted the Sinai revelation for them to later declares who or what defines the mitzva of Moshiach or prophet. The church rejection of brit melah and the mosque rejection of Avraham Yitzak and Yaacov as the fathers of the chosen Cohen people who inherit the lands of Canaan as an eternal inheritance, no forced conversions at the point of a sword change their revisionist history substitute theologies for the Torah revelation at Sinai – which only the 12 Tribes of Israel accepted.

Prior to the establishment of Yovel and brit melah preconditions for Sanhedrin common law courts ie בית המקדש, the purpose of the Mishna\Gemara/Talmud does not and never has laid out the past, but rather the mussar vision of the future! While some Tannaim sages in the Yerushalmi debated whether king David established conquered Damascus as a City of Refuges with a small Sanhedrin court, all Sages of both Mishna and Gemarah agree that during the entire history of the בית שני Jews never observed Yovel דאורייתא.

The popular mythology swirling around the Moshiach that he builds the 3rd Temple – stands on par with the Chabbad Rebbe being the Moshiach! Torah in g’lut exemplifies לא לשמה, and the rebbe never made aliya to Israel. Just as the britot of Gilgal and Sh’Cem shape the Order of Parshiot within Tefillen (the latter like a Sefer Torah in the matter of oaths), so too and how much more so the prophet Yehoshua defined the conditions of the mitzva of Moshiach through establishment of Yovel, brit melah – the sign of the brit, and establishment of all the small Sanhedrin courts through the minimum 6 Cities of Refuge.

While the Tannaim sages divided over David, the Book of Sh’muel condemns David over the פרט of Uriah just as Shaul condemned over not killing the Amalek king! Neither man forced criminals to stand before a Sanhedrin court. Hence based upon this reading of the Book of Shmuel, no king of Yechuda or Israel ever sanctified the mitzva of Moshiach. Therefore both T’NaCH & Talmudic common law commands prophetic mussar to all O’lam Ha’bah generations and never mourns the past where previous generations likewises failed to rule the land with righteous justice!

Yovel learns from liberty from Egyptian slavery. Despite king David bringing peace to the land he failed to judge Uriah in a Sanhedrin court of law as likewise failed king Shaul to judge David and King Shlomo to judge Yerovam the later first king of Israel. The dynasty of both Davidic and Israel kings failed to keep the Yovel as the basis for the 12 tribes to establish the Federal Sanhedrin Courts which the prophet Natan understood as the real בית המקדש rather than David and Shlomo’s copy-cat Cathedrals which bankrupt national treasuries in all Goyim lands throughout history.

The Sages sealed the T’NaCH, Talmud, Siddur, masoret. This gives all generations of Israel the same level starting field to pursue justice in our oath brit home land. As the NaCH prophets command mussar to all generations living in the future/O’lam Ha’bah so too and how much more so Torat Moshe! This forward facing vision of faith absolutely different from av tuma avoda zarah religions whose theologies declare the nature of the Gods as 1. Monotheistic and 2. In the heavens above; either A) sitting upon the right and of the Father or B) enjoying 72 virgins.

The Mishna denounces God speculations. Those who “believe” in that which lies above them, or behind them, or below them – better that such persons’ never even born! After the fact religions, established more than 1000 or even 2000 years after the revelation of the Torah at Sinai – there revisionist history theologies never retroactively accepted the Sinai revelation for them to later declares who or what defines the mitzva of Moshiach or prophet. The church rejection of brit melah and the mosque rejection of Avraham Yitzak and Yaacov as the fathers of the chosen Cohen people who inherit the lands of Canaan as an eternal inheritance, no forced conversions at the point of a sword change their revisionist history substitute theologies for the Torah revelation at Sinai – which only the 12 Tribes of Israel accepted.

Prior to the establishment of Yovel and brit melah preconditions for Sanhedrin common law courts ie בית המקדש, the purpose of the Mishna\Gemara/Talmud does not and never has laid out the past, but rather the mussar vision of the future! While some Tannaim sages in the Yerushalmi debated whether king David established conquered Damascus as a City of Refuges with a small Sanhedrin court, all Sages of both Mishna and Gemarah agree that during the entire history of the בית שני Jews never observed Yovel דאורייתא.

The popular mythology swirling around the Moshiach that he builds the 3rd Temple – stands on par with the Chabbad Rebbe being the Moshiach! Torah in g’lut exemplifies לא לשמה, and the rebbe never made aliya to Israel. Just as the britot of Gilgal and Sh’Cem shape the Order of Parshiot within Tefillen (the latter like a Sefer Torah in the matter of oaths), so too and how much more so the prophet Yehoshua defined the conditions of the mitzva of Moshiach through establishment of Yovel, brit melah – the sign of the brit, and establishment of all the small Sanhedrin courts through the minimum 6 Cities of Refuge.

While the Tannaim sages divided over David, the Book of Sh’muel condemns David over the פרט of Uriah just as Shaul condemned over not killing the Amalek king! Neither man forced criminals to stand before a Sanhedrin court. Hence based upon this reading of the Book of Shmuel, no king of Yechuda or Israel ever sanctified the mitzva of Moshiach. Therefore both T’NaCH & Talmudic common law commands prophetic mussar to all O’lam Ha’bah generations and never mourns the past where previous generations likewise failed to rule the land with righteous justice!

Never compare as a hard fast כלל T’NaCH\Talmudic common law with other Goyim common law legalism. The model of Goyim courtroom law stands upon the “vertical” court of Par’o – who validated the command made by Par’o to beat Hebrew slaves over their “guilt” of laziness. The eternal model for the later ever repeating blood libels justifications employed to attack and kill Jews. The prophetic mussar vision of Talmudic משנה תורה common law Sanhedrin courts starkly contrasts against British common law courts; akin to the kabbalistic ‘black fire on white fire’ of the RambaN’s introduction to his Chumash commentary! British courts (common law or otherwise) simply cannot abrogate a law passed by Parliament. Because the British Parliament when it passes a new law – herein defines the unwritten Constitution of England.

Quite impossible to rule the lands of Canaan without politics. The absurd notion that religion divorced from politics ignores the Civil War which define the Church split as well as the Sunni Shiite split. The Torah aggadic story of בראשית which describes pre-creation as ‘chaos and anarchy’. The משל describes the realities of Civil War; a Torah curse placed upon the house of David by the prophet Natan!

Torah according to Moshe Rabbeinu prior to his passing Life or Death\Blessing or Curse//לשמה או לא לשמה. G’lut Jews no different from the g’lut Wilderness Generation! Reshonim established Judaism as a religious coping mechanism confronted with the Jewish return back to Egyptian slavery! Obviously the term Egypt – a לאו דוקא משל. No different than the “blowing out the Hanukkah candles משל-מוסר. Hanukka remembers the Tzeddukim working together with the Syrian Greeks to cause Israel to forget the “Oral Torah” ie פרדס. The Rambam and the assimilated rabbis of the Golden Age of Spain – their assimilation to the Greek syllogism model of logic no different than the error of the Tzeddukim a 1000 years previous!

G’lut Judaism worships as holy Shlomo’s Temple! It fails to learn the tongue N’ cheek satire of מלכים referring to Shlomo as ‘the wisest of men’. Such box thinking duplicates the Man/God church and prophets sent to all Goyim and speak in the native tongues of Goyim, despite Goyim never accepting either of the first or 2nd Sinai commandments. The term ירידות הדורות falsely understood that the earlier generations closer to the actual masoret than later generations. Such a g’lut inferiority complex ignores the counter interpretation of “ripple effect” or “domino effect”; when Shlomo worshipped avoda zara by building his Cathedral, how was this act any different from another king of Yechuda admiring a Syrian altar and coping the design of that altar?

Faith defined as the righteous pursuit of justice radically differs from faith as belief in some Universal God who lives in the Heavens above! That g’lut Judaism corrupts the revelation of the Mishkan – on par with the golden calf; such block-headed טיפש פשט non-thinking ignores ברית חדש of Yermiahu and בכל לבבך\כם of Rabbi Yechuda. The Yatzir Ha-Tov houses the Shekinah Oral Torah middot Spirits. Because post Sinai תורה לא בשמים היא.

Korbanot a wisdom commandment which requires k’vanna. Cain, the two son of Aaron dedicated a קום ועשה korban that failed to make the require aliya of toldoth mitzvot to time-oriented mitzvot. No different that the 250 princes who sided with Korach’s revolt! Korbanot only as a toldoth mitzva qualifies as making a barbeque to heaven! G’lut Jewry views the Shoah as a mystery! Akin to the mystery of the Xtian triune God or Muslim tawhid Allah!

The Talmud instructs that the world created for bnai brit Israel! Meaning we bear the yoke of the kingdom of heaven – responsibility for either the blessing לשמה or curse g’lut לא לשמה. Jewish assimilation and intermarriage avoda zara results in the Torah curse brought on as a consequence of ערב רב kapo assimilated and intermarried Jews שאין להם יראת שמים — herein defines the k’vanna of the wisdom commandment of Amalek for all generations of Israel bnai brit. The buck stops with bnai brit Israel because only we accept the revelation of the Torah at Sinai. The mitzva of Moshiach a wisdom commandment applicable to all Jews in all generations who live in the oath sworn lands and therefore possess the blessing to do mitzvot לשמה. Just as Shabbat a time-oriented commandment for all Israel – no different the mitzva of Moshiach!

Torah justice: The system demands functional, fair, adversarial courtrooms. It rejects the passive, purely theoretical posture of galut theological Judaism. Justice begins with the sanctification of the time-oriented commandment Yovel and the wisdom of brit melah as the eternal “sign of the brit” – a active, land-dependent legal responsibility. This dual Constitutional anchor – of the oath brit alliance – eternally creates, akin to the creation of a מלאך, the chosen Cohen people who inherit the land of Canaan – dini nafshot requires at least two witnesses. The definition of modern Zionism – right to self determination – the vision of Herzl to combat European ANTI-SEMITIC racial insanity commonly framed by these great Apes who share a 98.7% genome genetic match with humans, as Europe’s “Jewish Problem”.

Addressing the subject of דברים פרק כט – the Sh’Cem blessings by 6 Tribes and curses by 6 Tribes brit — under the shadow of the first two Sinai commandments which ALL Israel accepted prior to Moshe receiving the rest of the Written Torah and all the Oral Torah revelations thereafter.

This Sh’Cem brit, which Yehoshua cut over-looks the borders of Canaan, similar to the cities of refuge – small Sanhedrin courts. A brit Israel forced to flee and stand trial before a Small Sanhedrin court, if that court ruled that the death – accidental, the person had to live within the borders of that city of refuge till the Cohen Ha-Gadol passed. Hence, the cities of refuge qualify as g’lut refugee camps for bnai brit Israel, based upon the 3 cities of refuge established by Moshe on the other side of the Jordan river.

Its “under the shadow” of this oath alliance brit which the Order of the Rabbeinu Tam {[Kadesh] [Ve-Haya Ki Yeviacha] [Ve-Haya Im Shamoa] [Shema]} tefillen calls upon the generations of Israel to remember. Hence the Order of parshiot a completely different order from Rashi tefillen {[Kadesh] [Ve-Haya Ki Yeviacha] [Shema] [Ve-Haya Im Shamoa]}.

The latter “under the shadow” of Gilgal, wherein Israel swear the oath brit which Moshe cut: just as HaShem sent Moshe to Egypt as a BRIT מלאך to judge the Gods of Egypt; HaShem sent Yehoshua to Canaan as a BRIT מלאך to judge the Gods of Canaan. As the “Giant” Par’o fell, so too the “Giant” kings of Canaan would fall. This BRIT of Gilgal declares the מלכות of HaShem as the God of Israel.

The Order of Rashi tefillen “remembers”/”t’shuva” the brit cut at Gilgal. The Order of the same four parshiot of the Rabbeinu Tam tefillen “remembers”/”t’shuva” the brit cut at Sh’Cem; specifically the defication of the Oral Torah tohor spirits to rule the lands through just Sanhedrin common law courts. Justice: upon Justice hinges the blessing/curse direction of the Torah birt. Common Law courtroom justice NOT theological interpretations of religious Orthodox g’lut Judaism which has dominated Jewish culture and custom for 2000+ years!

Common law courts stand upon the יסוד of earlier judicial courtroom rulings ie precedents which bear inductive logical similarities to the Case currently heard before the Court – through the arguments and counter arguments made between the Prosecutor vs. Defense; hence all Torts courts must have no less than 3 justices – 2 serve the Prosecutor/Defense requirements of common law courts. The כלל: precedents brought by the Prosecutor – not applicable as Defense precedents – פשיטה. This bi-polar judicial system defines Torah common law: as expressed through all disputes between the classic model – Hillel vs. Shammai; and also the difficulty/answer “style” of Talmudic Gemara learning of each and every specific Mishna. Hence the decision to organize halacha into religious codes while it addresses the needs of g’lut Jewry during the Dark Ages and ghetto gulag slavery period – clearly a לא לשמה coping mechanism need which responds to Jewish isolation among crude barbaric civilizations where justice mirrors the court of Par’o during the days prior to Moshe & Aaron taking Israel out of Egyptian slavery.

Prophetic mussar addresses the consequences of the Torah curse of g’lut. King David as Moshiach the death of Uriah defines David’s fallen booth, just as assuredly as king Shaul’s failure to obey the commandment of Shmuel the prophet (Who serves as the enforcer of the Sanhedrin court – in theory; שפטים ושוטרים.), in slaughtering Amalek together with its king and all its av tumah property such as animals. King Shaul, the first anointed Moshiach by Shmuel, erred in the exact same was as did the 2 sons of Aaron who offered up ‘strange fire’ and died (Aaron and his house Moshe anointed as Moshiach; Pinchas in the war against Midian the Talmud refers to as משיח מלחמה), and Cain. The Capital Crime of perverting korbanot unto only קום ועשה and not קום ועשה זמן גרמא commandments.

Torah defines “FAITH” through צדק צדק תרדוף. Neither King Shaul nor King David obeyed the precedent first set by the prophet Yehoshua – Keep the Pesach to set the Yovel foundation of Liberty and sanctify brit melah as the sign of the brit sworn to Avram at the brit cut between the pieces. Both men failed to bring “shalom to the land” through the establishment of the Institutions of the Great/Small Sanhedrin Federal common law court system where the “Mishkan” (משל) permanently teaches the (נמשל) k’vanna that the spirit of HaShem’s tohor middot live within the hearts of the chosen Cohen nation, according to the mussar of the prophet Yermia’s ברית חדש.

All NaCH Meshiachim have failed to sanctify the Torah commandment of Moshiach – to establish the Yovel and faith: the Federal Sanhedrin court system/בית המקדש – משל. The prophet Natan rebuked David for confusing building a copy-cat Cathedral house of avoda zara with the Torah obligation to establish justice through Sanhedrin courtrooms within the borders of conquered Canaan. From Isaiah’s king Cyrus, to Shmuel’s king Shaul and David; to post Babylonian g’lut of Bar Kochba and JeZeus and Sabbatai Zevi and Yaacov Frank and even last Chabad rebbe – all false messiahs.

The Book of Shmuel specifically addresses the mitzva of Moshiach based upon the Book of Yehoshua and Book of Shofim where Yovel liberty did not prevail in the land and the people worshipped the Gods of Canaan.

All Torah commandments dependent upon the first Sinai commandment. Isaiah’s moshiach reference to king Cyrus the Great clearly only a משל. Torah commandments do not apply to Goyim who worship other Gods.

The closing blessing curse brit of Moshe stands upon the first two Sinai commandments. G’lut Jews live under the Torah 2nd commandment curse. When David fled from Shaul unto g’lut he too validate this Torah first commandment vision: “I have been forced to worship other Gods”. G’lut Jews living in curse g’lut “Egypt” (לאו דוקא) cannot obey Torah faith לשמה. Hence the Talmud instructs better to do mitzvot לא לשמה – to later do mitzvot לשמה. Failure to discern the contrast between blessing/Canaan\Yovel from the curse\g’lut-slavery. The fundamental proof that the NT a false messiah book of avoda zarah.

Torah common law/משנה תורה NOT Roman statute law. The Talmud states just as clearly as does the NaCH that the Yovel never kept as a Torah דאורייתא commandment. The kingdom of Yechuda “tabernacle fell” when the king of Yechuda failed to keep the Yovel. The Book of Yermia teaches this clearly – like the Sun on a cloudless summer day.

Attempts to change the clear Nach texts therefore “highly non-tranditional theological framework which ignores Moshe Rabbeinu building 3 of the 6 Cities of Refuge/Small Sanhedrin courts and Yehoshua doing the same! Torah rejects the av tuma avoda zarah which worships a God in the Heavens! The Book of D’varim explicitly states: תורה לא בשמים היא.

Torah faith – צדק צדק תרדוף – clearly never observed not in king David’s life (He failed to judge Uriah before a Sanhedrin court!) and equally clear no Non Jew can sanctify the mitzva of Moshiach in foreign countries. The oath brit lands sworn to the Avot as specific as the lands promised to both Moav Ammon and Esav. Observance of Torah commandments in Egypt (לאו דוקא) by definition according to all the Reshonim לא לשמה. No king of David or the 10 Tribes of Israel in Samaria ever once established the Written Torah as the constitution of the Republic which mandates Sanhedrin courts based upon the judicial oppression of Paro’s court in Egypt and the rebuke of Yetro Moshe his son-in-law.

Torah neither a theology nor a religion. Moshe validated Tribal land and rights. RambaN ויקרא יח:כה wrote in his Chumash commentary that mitzvot observed in g’lut only a “remembrance” for the time when Jews can observe mitzvot לשמה in ארץ ישראל. G’lut has its consequences. Just as the Oct 7th 2023 surprise attack upon Israel by UNWRA and Hamas resulted in the total destruction of Gaza no different from the 1000 plane fire-bombing of Japanese and German cities consequent to the Nazi invasion of Poland.

The Book of Acts, in Koine Greek. The Greek word “cleansed” not remotely the same as the Hebrew word tohor. Just as מלאכה different from עבודה. But Koine Greek lacks the nuance to distinguish the two different Hebrew verbs. The Greek word ἐκαθάρισεν (ekatharisen, from katharizō) in Acts 11:10 does not have a single, one-to-one equivalent that perfectly captures the full spectrum of the two distinct Hebrew concepts of “tohor” as it relates to “work” as expressed through the Torah. The Hebrew טהור stands upon the foundation of the Oral Torah 13 “tohor” middot which Moshe heard at Horev on Yom Kippur – 40 days after the sin of the Golden Calf. The revelation of “Oral Torah” pronouns of the שם השם revealed in the 1st Sinai commandment. This Spirit revelation the Avot did not know. The sanctification of shabbat לא תעשה מלאכה – this wisdom stands on the foundation of tohor spirits holy to HaShem.

Just as the כלל second Sinai commandment defined through the פרט of the Golden Calf; so too טמא רוחות define the ערב רב שאין להם יראת אלהים. Viewed from this Torah perspective, the limitations of the Koine Greek in Acts 11:10 – indeed significant.

Acts 11:10 fails to address the struggle between the Yatrir Ha-Tov\Yatzir Ha-Rah (how Rabbi Yechuda in the Mishna of ברכות interprets בכל לבבך as the prophet Yerami’s ברית חדש). The Greek ἐκαθάρισεν often implies a removal of dirt or a general purification; perhaps similar to how modern Hebrew today refers to refined olive oil as טהור. But modern Hebrew as different from Biblical Hebrew as Koine Greek.

In this framework, the “cleansing” in Acts 11 is not just a removal of dirt but a re-alignment of the assimilated & intermarried Egyptian Erev Rav that came out of Egypt and declared themselves as “grafted” on to the chosen Cohen nation. The Greek koinoō (to make common) fails to distinguish between Chol (Israel) and Tamei (profane), perverting through a false translation the nuanced understanding which distinguishes the middot which struggle for dominance within the prophetic ברית חדש heart.

The Greek koinos blurs these, treating the Erev Rav as merely “common” rather than addressing the fundamental Av Tum’ah middot which define their alien Esav Yetzer HaRa. It fails to grasp the eternal struggle expressed through the struggle between Yaacov and Esav in the womb of Rivka. טיפש פשט literal translations as idiotic as the literalist viewpoint that the Universe created in 6 days.

Acts 11:10 perverts the prophetic ברית חדש into the NT diseased whore prostitute; ערב רב “Jews” defines the Torah curse of Amalek throughout the generations, commonly referred to today as antisemitism – first coined during the period of the Dreyfus Trials. Katharizō implies a physical or general removal of dirt. It treats purity as a static condition. Rather than a dynamic Torah spiritual struggle. By using this word, the text erases the 13 Middot and the specific Oral revelation that defines true Tahor middot — through T’NaCH,Talmudic, Midrashim, and Siddur scholarship. Hence the church abomination has always and forever denied the revelation of the Oral Torah at Horev.

The Greek κοινός (koinos) and κοινοῦ (koinou), on par with how “covenant” (as expressed through both the NT & Koran.) perverts ברית. The latter requires swearing a Torah oath (שם ומלכות) within the borders of Canaan, based upon the prophet Yehoshua’s definition of tefillen through the oaths sworn first at Gilgal and then at Sh’Cem. The Order of Rashi tefillen – remembers/t’shuva\ the oath sworn at Gilgal; the Order of Rabeinu Tam tefillen – remembers\t’shuva/ the oath sworn at Sh’Cem. Both stand upon the יסוד Blessing & Curse oaths affixed to two opposing mounts through שם ומכלות sworn oaths.

The Greek text of Acts 11:10, not merely a translation error, but a theological rupture that severed the connection to the Shem HaShem and the Middot-מלכות, replacing the dynamic struggle of the Brit with a static, “idiotic” literalism that facilitates the Erev Rav – Amalek curse. Greek κοινός (koinos) fails to distinguish between חֹל and טמא. The ערב רב – Amalek eternal Torah curse – the Prime Torah precedent which further defines the פרט of the Golden Calf av tuma avoda zara – 2nd Sinai commandment. The Greek diatheke(covenant) introduces a statute static decree which totally negates the oaths sworn by the Avot and the Oath HaShem in his brit turn swore back separately to each of the Avot.

The Order of Rashi tefillen remembers – As HaShem sent Moshe as his מלאך to judge the Gods of Egypt, so too HaShem sent Yehoshua as his מלאך to judge the Gods of Canaan. The Order of Rabeinu Tam tefillen remembers the oath, ((as again expressed through lighting the Hanukkah lights)), only to interpret the k’vanna of time-oriented wisdom commandments through the Oral Torah tohor spirit middot; which chazal has clarified as פרדס – expressed through the rabbinic middot of 7 Hillel, 10 Akiva, 13 Yishmael, vs 32 HaGalil. In that Jewish Civil War the Tzeddukim together with the Greeks sought to cause Israel to forget the Oral Torah. The Tzeddukim assimilated ערב רב, like the Wilderness generation – both have no portion in the World to Come.

The 6 Divine Names Ya/Pesach Ha’El/Shevuoth El/ר”ה, Elohim/Yom Kippur, El Shaddai/Sukkot and Eish Ha’Elohim\Shemini Atzeret + Shabbat = the 6 days of Chol where Israel sanctifies time oriented mitzvot wisdom and shabbat – called Shalom – where Israel dedicates not to do wisdom acts of מלאכה – based upon תמיד מעשה בראשית, the eternal creation of the chosen Cohen people through sanctification of Torah wisdom time-oriented commandments on Shabbat – meaning the “week” of Creation.

The Greek ἐκαθάρισεν (ekatharisen), therefore – a reductive translation that fails to capture the metaphysical depth of טהור…the Yatzir Ha’Tov alignment of 13 middot of mercy – understood as blessing & curse as defined by the first two Sinai commandments; as affixed within the 13 middle blessings of the Shemone Esrei tefillah דרבנן. The Greek text ignores this duality, offering a single “cleansing” that bypasses the blessing curse oaths which mark the borders of the Cohen nation from the Goyim. In short, the Greek text of Acts 11:10 – a theological revisionist history g’lut Av tuma avoda zarah JeZeus false messiah catastrophe.