Religious טיפש פשט literalism sucks

The Pauline “original sin” of Adam such a bull shit model. Why? Torah spins around the central axis of justice/injustice. The “fruits” of knowlege of Good and Evil, validates that both Adam Cain and the 10 generation thereafter all pursued “evil”. But the term “evil” does not mean “sin” as the NT counterfeit substitutes for evil. The Pauline model of “Original Sin” and “Salvation”, exposes a fundamental perversion of the Torah’s choice-and-consequence framework, leading to theological and moral failure define av tuma avoda zara expressed by the pervert religions of Xtianity and Islam – both guilty of substituting “Nakba” Gods as the saviors of Israel in Egypt.

Evil has its consequences. The jealous brothers of Yosef sold their “brother” into slavery! This evil cause the House of Yaacov to go into Egyptian g’lut! The exact same theme as Adam and Noach! The latter cursed the first born son of Ham! The 6 against 6 blessings vs curses sworn at Sh’Cem by the 12 Tribes of Israel obeys the blessing curse Torah which Moshe commanded Yehoshua to do – upon bringing the chosen Cohen people into the land of Canaan. Herein defines the k’vanna of the Order of the Rabbeinu Tam tefillen.

JeZeus saves from sin – simply – bull shit. This foreign imported Nicene Creed g’lut caused – av tuma import; simply stated, has no portion with the first two Sinai commandments. Evil called sin by the NT fraud – a perversion on par with Brit called covenant by both counterfeit religions! Shalom, based upon the shabbat 3 meals, stands upon trust. Peace a noun has no direct connection to the trust verb. Hence peace a fraudulent translation of shalom.

Every generation of Humanity experiences the fundamental הבדלה which separates Good from Evil; where ‘fear of heaven’ serves as the foundation of good and no ‘fear of heaven’ serves as the foundation of evil. Despite the NT fraud, “JeZeus saves from sin”, this foundation of the Torah, introduced in the opening פרקים of Sefer בראשית, defines the essence of “acceptance of the yoke of the kingdom of heaven” metaphor. Despite the revisionist av tuma avoda zarah theologies and their טיפש פשט which worships their own ‘world to come’ Pie in the Sky alien narishkeit belief systems. Any judge who hears a case before his court while holding strong beliefs pro or con, as corrupt as if he had accepted a bribe.

The Talmud publicly repudiates the JeZeus prayer which prays to ‘our Father in heaven’. The mitzva of tzitzit, (the 3rd פרק of the ק”ש תפילה דאורייתא), the aggada in ברכות commands the mussar that mitzvot sanctify only brit Israel now living בעולם הזה; Jews visiting their buried dead, halacha commands – tuck your tzitzit into your pockets. The tohor\\\…///tumah prototype mirror of the Tree of Knowledge of Good & Evil; the Torah נמשל for this Torah משל, akin to two branches of one tree. This archetype blue-print the counterfeit religions totally fail to grasp; tuma does not mean “SIN”.

The foreign paradigm of “Sin” perverts the Torah connection of g’lut to tumah. Both bible and koran ignore judicial injustice which fails to make fair restitution of damages as the תקון for hatred without cause, as the av tuma middot consequences of the Torah curse of g’lut. The KJT bible perverts tuma as “unclean”. The koran fails to grasp that camel a tumah animal on par with pigs. The birth of children does not make a woman “unclean”; simply because fruitful and multiply serves as the – so to speak – first born child of all wisdom\time-oriented commandments!

The tohor-tuma vision fits hand-in-glove with the blessing/curse opening Sinai commandments which all Israel (alone) accepted at Sinai; Moshe Rabbeinu in the closing Parsha of ויקרא and repeated – in further detail – in דברים; the Parsha publicly read prior to ר”ה – these two “Crowns” of oath brit לשמה מלכות responsibility. They define prophetic mussar ברית חדש understood by rabbi Yechuda as בכל לבבך\כם in the ק”ש תפילה דאורייתא, the opening paragraph – blessing and the 2nd paragraph – cursing. Whose 3rd פרק defines this mitzva as a time-oriented commandment “sworn oath/brit”. Such a Torah oath brit absolutely & most essentially entails מלכות לשמה. A king accepts responsibility for the actions of his nation.

Actions have consequences like ripples after a stone thrown into a pond. Post the Bar Kochba revolt Rome renamed Judea to Palestine-Syria, and cast the Jewish people back unto Egypt – a לאו דוקא metaphor for av tuma g’lut. Post Shoah, both church & mosque – destroyed their ‘good name’ reputations. Their bemoaning their own g’lut consequences with ‘true Xtians or Muslims blah bhah’ excuses, screams “we do not accept the consequences of our actions, made by the generations of our faith”; we have no God because our Gods proven utterly be dead. Where was JeZeus during the Shoah of European Jewry by Xtian monsters? (Europe a self proclaimed Xtian society since Constantine!) Where was Nakba Allah during post WWII repeated attempts to throw the Jews into the Sea – to complete the Nazi Shoah in the Middle East?

Both fraud faiths NT or Koran embrace inherited guilt rather than cause and effect consequences of knowledge of Good and Evil; rational consciousness of choice, despite the dogma of ‘Free Will’, shares no part with modern Nazism notions of racial DNA models. “The fathers have eaten sour grapes, and the children’s teeth are set on edge”, that prophet’s mussar explicitly rejected. Yehezkel instructs the נמשל that all generations must confront the Havdalah, Good/Evil -understanding: the consequences of ones’ actions either sanctifies a good name reputation or destroys and profanes a good name reputation. Declarations of faith in a theologically created abracadabra Tawhid Monotheistic Universal God do not and cannot change the consequences of unjust actions through condemnations of dead generations guilty identical crimes, committed by each and every generation their after!

A person can become tuma without “sin”, ba’al keri or metzora serve as witness. In the Book of מלכים metzora folk informed the king that the Assyrian Army had fled which immediately terminated the famine within the city, consequent to the siege. The Pauline Grace/Forgiveness dynamic has no portion in Torah faith just as brit melah and Torah common law has no portion with any church or mosque rule of law or “eirene” – granted by faith in a Hercules (Man\god) savior or some Muhammad who claim himself a prophet without wisdom how the Torah defines this key term. Prophets not mystics whose visions foresee future events. Prophets not witches whose magic speaks to the dead. The Book of Daniel not included in the NaCH prophets because even tohor mysticism such as expressed through Daniel and Zohar and Ari mysticism does not qualify as נבואה

Tzitzit do not learn from any worship of wood and stone grand Temples in Jerusalem! Tzitzit, this wisdom commandment learns from the כלל of Tents established by the Mishkan “revelation”; כלל: if a person dies under a tent – all within the tent become tumah. Covering the head with the tzitzit tallit “Amidah” interprets the k’vanna of tzitzit as mussar. The wisdom commandment of tzitzit elevates all mitzvot and halachot under this Mishkan like “tent” unto wisdom/time\oriented Torah Av commandments.

The NT “JeZeus” who “saves from sin” but allows ghetto gulags, Inquisition & shoah – simply a logical contradiction on par with the Nakba defeat of Allah whose peoples religiously affirm the Nazi Shoah as their ideal. The Calvinist dotrine of ‘predetermination’ & Lutheran ‘free will’ protestant faiths as corrupt and false as Pope Pius XII watching the Nazi SS herd the Jews of Rome to the death camps … followed up by the post war Rat-lines and pogroms! The NT’s “Original Sin” and “Salvation from Sin” model of faith – a fundamental perversion of the Torah’s “Choice and Consequence” model.

The Obligation to pursue justice among our people not anything that depends upon Heaven above. Fear of Heaven – a person strives throughout life to protect the inheritance of his good name reputation. Mitzvot do not apply to any of the so-called 7 Heavens above.

Xtianity suffers from an Av tuma: God on the brain syndrome. A disease that plagues the Muslim world as well. The Book of Shoftim instructs the bitter mussar that the 12 Tribes had yet to achieve the commandment of Yovel! The precise preconditions established by the talmid of Moshe Rabbeinu in the Book of Yehoshua. This post WWII fad, which breaks the disgraced Shoah church evil name, and attempts to switch to “Yeshua” as the identical name of JeZeus. However your Hercules son of Zeus – Harry Potter – has no Yichus – no tribal inheritance. Which the father alone determines – JeZeus has no connection to the mitzva of Yovel, nor brit melah – which remembers the Avot as the sole “fathers” of the chosen Cohen People.

Sucks being so reactionary blind that you cannot see the forest through the trees…so heavenly minded that you lose all the rational ability to discern a cheap counterfeit copy. The fundamental NT problem, your apostle Paul – told you that brit melah does not qualify as a Torah commandment for Goyim. To what does this stupidity compare? We Jews say your false messiah Man/god aint a Torah commandment of Moshiach because Goyim switch a Torah commandment with Greek theology just as the Koran does not grasp that prophets command mussar which define the k’vanna of all Torah time-oriented commandments.

Why? Because the “father” of JeZeus not a Man according to all the books of the four gospels! This makes the gospels into a myth Hercules Man/god who has absolutely no “Yichus” — tribal inheritance! A truly dumb ass ooops, fundamental insane error made by the gospels framers – Harry Potter counterfeit messiah. Based upon the critical בניני אבות – Yovel and brit melah – the basic fundamental requirements, required for any Yid in all generations of the descendants of the seed of the Avot – to sanctify the mitzva of Moshiach. A Yid who does not have a brit melah has no obligation to sanctify Torah commandments any more than a House without a foundation qualifies as something more than a temporary tent! G’lut Jews observe rabbinic commandments in order to remember should they merit to move to Israel, what it means to actually do mitzvot לשמה.

An uncircumcised Jew, clearly a בדיעבד status; for example the Book of Yehoshua opens with the descendants of the Wilderness generation getting a brit melah in the land. Just as its impossible to turn a pig’s ear into a silk purse so too and how much more so make a בדיעבד into a Torah לכתחילה. The Talmud compares it to a tuma Jew who tovel’s in a mikveh while holding a dead rat in his hand. The mitzva of Pesach not applicable to Goyim because they have no brit melah. Brit melah an Av wisdom time-oriented Torah commandment. Pesach functions as the בנין אב whereby Jews learn the k’vanna wisdom of the time-oriented commandment – Yovel – tribal freedom/liberty in the land of physically conquered Canaan, based upon the בנין אב of the tuma Wilderness generation contrasted by the generation of tohor Yehoshua who strove to sanctify the mitzva of Yovel in the land.

Young David referred to Goliath as an uncircumcised Philistine! G’lut statute law halacha not the same as the Mishnaic לכתחילה of Sanhedrin courtroom common law צדק צדק תרדוף. G’lut statute law halachic codifications function only as a coping mechanism to aid Jews survive some type of Jewish identity intact under the horrors of g’lut Par’o like oppressions – blood libels forced population transfers taxation without representation pogroms … shoah. Hence the statute law Roman Senate decrees duplicates the Constitution by British Parliamentary law; where the British courts have no authority to overturn Parliament decrees of law. Assimilated Jewish halachic law codes codify the religion of Judaism in g’lut. They do not shape nor determine Sanhedrin common law courtrooms לכתחילה after the liberty of the 12 tribal yichus and the time-oriented commandment brit melah which requires the k’vanna to remember that the brit sworn to the Avot — that only they would father the chosen Cohen people. The “t’shuva” made by HaShem on Yom Kippur wherein the vow to make Moshe the father of the Cohen people proves the k’vanna of brit melah! T’shuva as different from ‘Goyim repentance’, as Moshiach – a Torah commandment – as different from the Sinai לשמה – who commands the revelation of the Torah at Sinai.

A Jew who fled from the chaos of the collapsed USSR, many of them had no brit melah. For them to observe Pesach לכתחילה rather than בדיעבד – they had to first get a brit melah. The mother determines the Jewishness of the child. The tribal yichus of the child determined alone by the father. For example, a Cohen requires that his father – not his mother – be a Cohen. This example applies straight across the yichus of all 12 tribes – the father alone determines a person’s tribal Yichus. In the current Jewish secular Jewish state where the Knesset Parliament rules as a democratically elected central government – the Torah לכתחילה which requires tribal yovel and brit melah as determined by the prophet Yehoshua Jews have yet to achieve. A Greek culturally influenced democracy does not compare to a Jewish tribal republic; anymore than does משנה תורה-judicial legislative review-compare to British statute Parliamentary laws.

The Book of Ezra ruled that the mother determines the Jewishness of all born children after Ezra commanded all Jews returning Jews to divorce their shikza wives. The case of the daughters of Tzelofchad in במדבר teaches that the fathers determine the specific tribe of the Jewish child. For example: aggada states that the Avot kept all the mitzvot. If so, then Yishmael – having a brit melah would have qualified to keep pesach along with Yitzak! However, Sarah following the brit melah of Yitzak terminated all doubt. She commanded Avraham to cast out this bondwoman together with her son – that only Yitzak would inherit the brit. What בניני אבות does Sarah’s ruling stand upon? The rejection of first born Cain’s korban. Brit melah no more a barbeque to heaven than the two sons of Aaron’s offering qualified as a wisdom time-oriented commandment. Hence both this and that rejected. The wisdom of all time-oriented commandments – a matter of the heart.

Brit melah not a biological fact; Torah commands mussar not history. As a father can annul his young daughter’s vow, so too can a baal – the vow made by his wife. A Torah oath not even G-d can annul, any more than the two legs of a right triangle – each separately – longer than the hypotenuse. The בנין אב for the distinction between a Torah oath from a תולדות vow, the difference between making a blessing from saying a praise. Blessings תולדות of שבועות. Praying תהילים only a lower שבח/praise. בראשית – ברית אש. What’s the Fire of the Brit? Torah oaths. Hence Mesechta Sanhedrin links the floods which obliterated the generation of Noach – the consequences of sworn false oaths.

G’lut Judaism bemoans the Assyrian g’lut for the inability to ascertain tribal lineages! However, the Torah employed the Goral to determine tribal yichus affixed within the land of Canaan; Assyrian g’lut does not over-ride the employment of the Goral mitzva anymore than does the yichus of a man – living in the tribe of his wife – changes the borders of that tribe – as originally established by that Goral mitzva. A dispute over how to “interpret” the Goral mitzva, like any other halacha requires a Great Sanhedrin court ruling. For example: the Goral of Gad yichus affixed to the Golan inclusive of Damascus; or the Goral of Reuven yichus affixed to Gaza.

G’lut rabbinic opinions do not possess the authority to overrule opinions made by a sitting Sanhedrin court; 1000 year old opinions do not qualify as הלכה למעשה. A modern Goral which affixes the yichus of the examples of Reuven and Gad has never existed. It would require a Sanhedrin court to issue such a Goral. The Sanhedrin Courts system not dependent upon a Cohen HaGadol nor Urim veTummin. While the Cohen HaGadol serves as the primary בנין אב for the mitzva of Moshiach from the Torah, צדק צדק תרדוף mitzva affixed to the establishment of large and small Capital Crimes Sanhedrin courtrooms.

Moshe Rabbeinu did not take Israel out of the judicial oppression of Par’o and his vertical ‘Star Courts’ in order to copy the ways of the Goyim who worship their Gods by building Great Cathedrals or Temples. Yetro clearly instructed a powerful mussar, that Moshe himself alone could never judge the entire nation with צדק. That the tribes of Reuven & Gad sat outside the land of Canaan addressed a בדיעבד situation based upon the pre-conditions Moshe placed upon these tribes to serve as the tip of the spear to assure that the other tribes inherited the land of Canaan.

Post the disaster of the Bar Kochba Revolt and the Roman expulsion and name change over to Palestine-Syria, the publication of the Mishna in 210 CE could not refer to Sanhedrin courtroom rulings of the past because throughout the בית שני period the mitzva of Yovel דאורייתא never observed. Therefore despite a Great Sanhedrin court in Jerusalem the small Sanhedrin courts and Cities of Refuge never resumed throughout the בית שני. The Great Sanhedrin could no more try Herod than the Sanhedrin in the days of Napoleon could demand that France immediately surrender to England or Russia! Yovel liberty of the 12 tribes and Sanhedrin משנה תורה legislative review – both dependent upon Jews conquering the land of Canaan, like as occurred post the 1967 Six Day War.

A brief overview interpretive analysis of ancient Jewish history. Based upon the כלל: T’NaCH and Talmudic common law command mussar neither teaches history.

The Talmud describes the P’rushim as the guardians of the Oral Traditions passed down to the Tannaim as a masoret. For example: Rabbi Akiva’s פרדס inductive logic reason called a “kabbalah”. The דאורייתא מידות: אל רחום חנון etc define the weft threads of Aggada in the Talmud – which employ the דרוש פשט, whereas the warp threads of Halacha in the Talmud – which employ the רמז סוד. Rabbinic middot include the 7 middot masoret of Hillel, the 10 middot masoret of Akiva, the 13 middot masoret of Yishmael and the 32 middot masoret of Yose HaGalili.

Masechta Shabbat links lighting the lights of Hanukkah with the shabbat candle lighting. Shabbat absolutely forbids doing acts of מלאכה, because this wisdom – defined through the 39 skills required to build the Mishkan – serves as the צד משוטפ of all time-oriented “wisdom” commandments. This latter type of Av Torah commandment differs from secondary תולדות commandments – the latter types do not require k’vanna whereas the former types do require k’vanna.

The Bavli common law commentary to the common law Mishna clearly a g’lut document – Judea no longer existed any more than post the Jewish victory in 1948 Palestine existed as a League of Nations mandate territory given to the British based upon the Balfour Declaration which the 1939 White Paper negated. Josephus wrote that prior to Hasmonean rule that the P’rushim joined together with the Maccabee revolt against the Syrian Greek empire. The ברכת המזון refers to this kingdom as רשעים because it attempted to cause Israel to forget the Torah. Which Torah does that blessing refer to? The Oral Torah.

The Tzeddukim did not limit their assimilation of Greek culture and customs to wanting to turn Jerusalem into a Greek polis City State. They embraced ancient Greek philosophy as well! The defining quality of Greek logic schools – static deductive syllogism bridge-making reasoning – which define both Plato and Aristotle logic. Therefore when lighting the lights of Hanukkah, Jews dedicate only to interpret the K’vanna of Torah commandments (time-oriented) through Oral Torah פרדס inductive logic – idea; to compare Gemara Case/Din halachic precedent to interpret different facets of the language of a specific Mishna.

The Seleucid Greeks together with their assimilated lap dogs – the Tzeddukim priests – attempted to erase, for example the court witness based New Moon calendar laws. They, like so many other ערב רב declared themselves “real Xtian believers” while all other Xtian damned to Hell to worship Satan! Everybody knows that some 1900 years after the revelation of the Torah that the Jews perverted their Torah and replaced Yitzak for Yishmael! Hence the koran sold this “bridge” to Arab and Muslim believers in the heart of the Arabian desert! The Bavli represents the ultimate triumph of the Perushim—surviving without Shlomo’s or Herod Temple that worships God and ignores the burdens of judicial justice among and between the Jewish people – dependent upon Tribal Yovel and brit melah לשמה which remembers the oath sworn to the Avot! The Word of God vs word of Man psychotic insanity directly compares to the worship of wood and stone massive cathedrals. As if Moshe Rabbeinu took Israel out of Egyptian slavery bondage to build a bankrupt series of Temples as do the Goyim worship there Gods throughout the Ages! צדק צדק תרדוף defines Torah אמונה belief in this or that or some other God(s) defines the Torah curse of assimilated avoda zarah!

The P’rushim passed the Oral Torah masoret over to the rabbis. This Oral Torah chain of masoret goes straight back to Moshe Rabbeinu. Cyrus the Great whom the prophet Isaiah called “Moshiach” – a great disappointment. While he paid for the construction of a Temple in Jerusalem, his “k’vanna” not to restore “liberty in the land to the 12 Tribes of Israel” but rather specifically loyalty of the Jews; based upon the gaping holes which the Assyrian and Babylonian kings made their kingdoms vulnerable to foreign invasions. Cyrus built a Temple and used the Tzeddukim has his lap dogs to maintain the steady transfer of wealth back to his kingdom in Persia. Herein defines the classic banana republic which enriches 2% of the populations and therein plunders that land of its wealth and resources!

Oral Torah guiding interpretation and courts, versus becoming a frozen text interpreted only through external/foreign rationalities. That latter bible and koran thumping believers collapse their Old Testament as either replaced by the ‘new covenant’ or corrupted by Jews. Goyim worship their Gods by building grand Cathedrals and block headed domed Mosques. Goyim pervert ancient Jewish “history” as their chief means to control a different narrative/God; Universal monotheism replaces the tribal god of Sinai. Belief in their Universal God defines faith rather than the pursuit of righteous justice among the 12 tribes of Israel. Goyim forever have attempted to control Torah identity – through their strict definition of messiah or prophet!

The דאורייתא מידות – form the revolving wheels of the chariot vision by the prophets. Prophets command mussar which interprets the k’vanna of these middot. The Aggadic weft threads of the Talmud/Midrashim likewise make a drosh back to NaCH kabbalah prophets! The halachic warp threads of the Talmudic “loom” employs מידות דרבנן – primarily the 7, 10, 13 middot of Hillel Akiva and Yishmael. פרדס inductive logic compares a Case/Din to similar Case/Din rulings based upon their shared similarity of middot – either דאורייתא or דרבנן; its this צד משוטף of middot who share the same – so to speak – common denominator – by which Torah sages compare בניני אבות Case\Din studies.

The צד משוטף of every mitzvah wisdom commandment learns from מעשה בראשית; hence the first blessing of the שחרית ברכות (two before and one after) twice states תמיד מעשה בראשית because the Israel portion, when the Cohonim dedicated the morning קורבן עולה read the Parsha of בראשית to validate that all time-oriented commandments learn from this essential Torah precedent! The Book of בראשית restricts the concept of Torah commandments to time-oriented concepts of faith; starting with the Creation aggadah to fruitful and multiply to brit melah to removal of the gid ha’nasheh. The צד משוטף that permits these “fraction” of Torah commandments to add together — all of them wisdom commandments. Confusing the language of “time” as if it refers to the time of day – a טיפש פשט sophomoric translation error = to those made by the NT and Koran av tuma avoda zarah.

Ezekiel’s four living creatures, Daniel’s vision of the ram and goat, Zechariah’s menorah and olive trees, Isaiah’s chariot-throne the inner machinery of the chariot that no external rationalist or Hellenist could ever analyze. Av tuma avoda zarah by definition prioritizes belief in God(s) in the Heavens above and life after death. Both Mishna and Gemara independently denounce attempts made by fools and utter idiots wherein they presume than the mind of Man can “know” the Gods! Such people the Mishna states: better they were never born and the Gemara clarifies: train your tongue to say: I do not know. Both this and that stands upon דברים – תורה לא בשמים היא. Oral Torah common law, by aligning middot compares to the two opposing sights of a rifle; this permits a “sniper” to kill a target down range. Oral Torah so to speak plants the mussar of T’NaCH prophets into the hearts of all “downstream” generations of the chosen Cohen people. The burden rest upon the Yatzir Ha-Tov heart to grow this prophetic mussar into crops of justice among and between our people.

The stop-gap g’lut codes made after the 1st Crusade(s) abomination(s) and during the ghetto gulag, Inquisition war-crimes, to what do they compare today? נטרי קרתא-LIKE religious party kapo Jews who threaten cut an alliance with Arab political parties in the coming elections in order to achieve an Arab majority in the Knesset! To demolish the Zionist dream of self-determination which achieved Israeli Independence. Shatter the status quo law & throw the Jewish state into a Civil War.

The concept of סמוכים in the Talmud

The 9th sugya of קידושין begins on dof .ו — with ת”ר and concludes on the same page with תיקו. This sugya prioritizes halachic precedents by which it “reviews” the language of the Mishna from unique witness perspectives – comparable to a Sanhedrin court who hears witness testimony on the New Moon. The framers of this sugya employ zero of these hermeneutic rules (middot). Consequently, based upon the T’NaCH precedent: when a specific sugya of NaCH has no שם השם contained within that specific sugya of NaCH prophets, then that sugya exists as a continuation of the privious NaCH sugya middot דאורייתא. The T’NaCH דאורייתא sh’itta of middot precedents the Talmud middot דרבנן likewise follow the דאורייתא middot model. Hence both T’NaCH middot דאורייתא and Talmud middot דרבנן share an אב\תולדות relationship which models the אב טהור חכמה מצוות and קום ועשה ושב ולא תעשה תולדות commandment relationships by which Torah Law qualifies as משנה תורה – common law. The previous sugya stands upon a כלל\פרט inductive logical reasoning.

The classic middot of 7, 10, 13 middot ideally suited to interpret halachic warp vertical threads. Whereas the 32 middot ideally suited to interpret the aggadic horizontal weft threads of the Talmudic text “LOOM”. Just as both T’NaCH and Siddur stand on סמוכים, so too the 9th sugya סמוך to the 8th sugya of our Gemara. A fundamental error made by the much later religious statute law halachic codifications – their arbitrary organization of halachot into religious ritual subjects uproots and destroys Talmudic judicial common law future ideal – when Jews slauhgter the Romans and reconquer Yovel liberty for the 12 Tribes and establish the Torah constitutional mandate of Sanhedrin Capital and Torts common law courtrooms.

The fundamental error made by assimilated g’lut Jewry, their av tuma avoda zara worship of other Gods, treats statute law ritual halacha as binding in and of its own right. G’lut לא לשמה Jews worship halacha as the will of God! תורה לא בשמים היא. G’lut Jews have no power nor liberty. Hence just as when David fled unto g’lut and “worshipped other Gods” so too all g’lut Jews throughout history. The basis of rabbinic סמוכים follows דאורייתא סמוכים; weigh the Ashkenazi against the Sephardi Order of פסוקי דזמרה – where סמוכים elevates a שבח unto a שם מלכות ברוכה. The precise Order of the פסוקי דזמרה not central because whether before or after the שם ומלכות blessing, סמוכים\structural juxtaposition/ transforms this lower order כמו תהלים שבח unto a שם ומלכות שבועה ברכה.

Consequently the g’lut narishkeit of davening the Siddur according to the טיפש פשט simple meaning of words as false as the assumption that a Goy can read his bible translations and understand T’NaCH common law. The latter inductive Oral Torah reason-logic learns through making comparative precedents! צדק צדק תרדוף does not correctly translate into become a Frumm religious fanatic who wears outfits of 3 centuries past! סמוכים defines the purpose of the שחרית blessings around the קריא שמע which affixes תפילה דאורייתא to תפילה דרבנן by means of סמוכים; just as do the latter blessings within the Shemone Esrei stand סמוך to the first opening blessing אלהי אברהם – מלכות. Herein explains the השם אלהינו השם in the קריא שמע. Only the revelation of the 13 tohor דאורייתא middot duplicates the k’vanna of accepting tohor middot לשמה as the ‘yoke of the kingdom of heaven’ דאורייתא תפילה שבלב.

Prof. Menachem Elon (1923-2013) sat as a justice of the Israeli Suprem Court (1977-93) and later as Deputy President (1988-93). He also served as the head of the Jewish Law Institute at Hebrew University in Jerusalem. He contrasted Case Law/Common Law (Torah She’be’al Peh) aganst Statutory Law (post-Talmudic codes like the Mishneh Torah or Shulchan Aruch).

The סמוכים works like this: היה מדבר עם האשה על עסקי גיטה וקידושיה……ת”ר הרי את אשתי… איבעיא. The 8th sugya Rabbi Yose and Rabbi Yehuda מדבר עמה על עסקי גיטה וקידושיה … understands that wisdom Torah commandments require k’vanna, just as the korban of Cain rejected together with the barbeque to heaven made by the two eldest sons of Aaron. Torah wisdom fundamentally separates the holiness of commandments similar to blessing discerned from praises.

The תיקו addresses the limitations of inductive פרט כלל logic. The 8th sugya learned the כלל – עסוקין באותו עניין – if a couple discuss קידושין, like a shidduch date and she accepts from him money without saying a word – מקודשת. The 9th sugya addresses a similar פרט question:  What if he does not remain silent, but .., מיוחדת לי, עזרתי, צלעתי, תפושתי … speaks using non-standard, ambiguous expressions?

Human speech introduces potential contradictions; any married couple will attest to this reality. While the language צלעתי, עצורתי etc meets the כלל the unconventional language rather than known standard הרי את מקודשת לי – introduces doubt as to his purpose, which lowers the זמן גרמא מצוה to a קום ועשה מצוה.

In a deductive statutory model, a word either fits a predefined definition or it does not. In the Talmudic common-law model, the court must evaluate how a reasonable listener\witness interprets the interaction. Our current sugya accepts the language of לקוחתי מהו, due to דברים כד:א – כי יקח. But all other cases of doubt raised invalid as sanctifying time-oriented commandments. Toldoth commandments and halachot stand upon hazakah presumptions but wisdom Torah commandments require בית מיחוש.

פרק א’ קידושין — סוגיה ח

This halachic sugya begins on ה: אמר שמואל בקידושין נתן לה כסף ושוה כסף and goes to the top of דף ו. שילח את עצמו. It prioritizes a basic fundamental, hence not stated fact: just as Avram swore an oath to cut a brit at the brit cut between the pieces – Sarai did not cut an oath brit there. So too in the mitzva of קידושין the obligation rests upon the man and not the woman. Hence the Torah states “כי יקח” and not שיקח את עצמו which the Mishnaic language האשה נקנית amplifies.

Reversing the syntax invalidates the legal mechanism regardless of intent. Rav Pappa asks Abaye whether Shmuel holds that ידיים שאין מוכיחות (incomplete/ambiguous statements) qualify as valid yadayim. The Gemara resolves that in Kiddushin, unless its time-oriented wisdom k’vanna requires some explicit or anchored by prior discussion (“עסוקין באותו עניין”), forbidden simply to assume syntax conclusions. It seems to me, that syntax requires some type of containment כלל; learning a specific פרט within the context of a larger paragraph or T’NaCH sugya.

Statute law violates this Oral Torah logic which interpret the k’vanna of Torah commandments. The famous Codes: Yad, Tur, & Shulkan Aruch copy the style of Roman statute law rather than the Talmudic common law sh’itta; they function as a coping mechanism.

G’lut Jewry endured extreme oppression under both church and mosque boots. Kar’o witnessed the opening of the first ghetto gulags which caused a population transfer, Jews fleed the Pope\Par’o judicial oppression to Poland and Ukraine lands.

לא לשמה גלות statute law fails to grasp לשמה משנה תורה Sanhedrin common law courts requires Yovel liberty for all 12 tribes of the Republic. Jews required to reconquer our homeland & establish לשמה – Yovel liberty for all 12 Tribes. The k’vanna of sanctifying Chag Pesach through removing חמץ from the house & brit melah! The latter time-oriented commandment separates the wheat from the chaff – Yishmael from Yitzak – the term ברית like the Name revealed in the 1st Sinai commandment never employed in the Koran. Translations of words from one culture to another – by definition a false prophet Muhammad error. Prophets command mussar only to the generations of Israel. Prophets never speak in Goyim tongues for targeted Goyim audiences. Because neither Esav nor Yishmael ever accepted the revelation of the Torah!

Since Jordan a separate country, this requires a Sanhedrin Court to designate the Yichus inheritance of the 12 Tribal borders; for example Gaza as the land of Reuven and the Golan as the land of Gad etc. Our Gemara employs the language אין כאן בית מיחוש. G’lut Jewry cannot determine tribal Yichus just as no g’lut Jew can sanctify the mitzva of Moshiach, any more than a woman dressed in men’s trousers can therein choose her sex! אין כאן בית מיחוש – no room for calculation/error or mistake here.

Nazir 2a–2b: “מהו דתימא… קמ”ל” duplicates the רבוי מיעט logic of rabbi Akiva. The language employed in that Av Mishna: כל כינויי נזירות כנזירות stands upon the יסוד of “איש איש”, “כי יפליא”, “איש כי יזיר” as they address the Nazirite vow. This בנין אב second source precedent places a limitation upon a larger assumption.

This case weighs the individual’s subjective k’vanna as primary; hence both mitzvot in this context time-oriented commandments which require k’vanna. Specifically cutting an oath brit requires taking responsibility for ones’ actions. Hence the Torah has blessing vs curse לשמה vs לא לשמה, life vs death. The cutting of a קידושין brit establishes the “nuclear” family of the Jewish people. Hence the Book of בראשית opens with stories of married couples from start to finish.

The Talmud does not stand “divorced” from the T’NaCH as the Goyim insist. The Xtians declare their NT has replaced the law; their man/God saves from sin. This addition to the expulsion of Adam blots out the din of g’lut לשמה. Muhammad’s last prophet and Jews corrupted the Torah no different from the Xtian “Old Testament” perversion.

Oral Torah interprets how the generations can make an aliya of mitzvot from תולדות commandments which do no require k’vanna to time-oriented commandments which require k’vanna לשמה. G’lut statute law halachic codes by definition לא לשמה תולדות halachot. Hence many Reshonim learn the mitzva of קידושין as a rabbinic commandment. 

The precedent קמ”ל functions as a מיעט which similarly ‘chops down the cherry tree’ that Yadayim – excluded from the מהו דתימא larger assumption. Hence, the קמ”ל prevents the ribui from devolving into lawless subjective assumption(s). Statute law codes have no such legal boundaries. Hence neither the Yad nor the Shulkan Aruch ever interpreted a baal MIshna based upon Gemara halachic precedents.

Yeshivot do not instruct their talmidim to compare & contrast כלל ופרט – כי יקח weighed against the opposing רבוי מיעוט\מהו דתימא…קמ”ל. The latter requires context to validate the nedar – תפוס בשערו; just as קידושין requires עסוקין באותו עניין.

Statute law halachic codes prioritize religious ritual observances as the substance of faith in God. Consequently, even a g’lut rebbe can sanctify the mitzva of Moshiach while in g’lut! Rambam’s egg-crate book of commandments focuses upon bi-polar תולדות מצוות. His code destroyed the warp/weft garment of T’NaCH\Talmudic common law; he usurped the name משנה תורה like JeZeus saves from sin! Impossible not to have the consequences of g’lut, without either avoda zara or hatred without cause. Hence g’lut Jewry routinely comes to Israel and declares that Israelis too live in g’lut because no messiah has built a house of wood and stone פסל- פסול. Moshe did not take Israel out of Egypt in order to build a Catholic Cathedral! 

Based upon his Guide, clear as the Sun in the Heavens on a cloudless day that the Rambam embraced the organization of Greek static deductive reasoning. He did not possess clarity how the weft Aggadic portions of the Talmud amplify and complete the warp Halachic opinions brought in the Gemara serve their “baal” Mishna. Weaving the culture and customs practiced by the chosen Cohen people לשמה requires both opposing threads; his flat two-dimensional halacha turned Torah Constitutional mandated Sanhedrin common law courts into denuded religious ritualism which has no k ‘vanna; where prophetic mussar shapes the Yatzir Tov tohor middot within the heart. 

The Jewish People bear full responsibility for the Torah curse of Amalek – understood through the ערב רב which lacked ‘יראת אלהים’, as the basis for the Golden Calf interpretation of the 2nd Sinai Commandment. The Torah curse of g’lut has its Amalek antisemitism consequences.

The Torah brit obligation of Blessing Curse defines Amalek antisemitism throughout the 2000+ years of לא לשמה cursed Jewish g’lut. Jewish assimilation to foreign cultures customs and manners, coupled with intermarriage defines the wisdom k’vanna of the 2nd Sinai commandment. Goyim simply the reactionary consequences of g’lut Jewry worshipping Av tuma avoda zarah.

When an institution claims a monopoly on ultimate truth, governance undergoes a fundamental shift. Legal status tied directly to ideological alignment. Populations divided into a caste system: orthodox (the inner circle), the tolerated/subjugated: dhimmi stateless Jewish refugees – European land restriction during an Agricultural based economy where crops produced national wealth.

The legal apparatuses designed to root out “heresy” established administrative precedents for state surveillance, ideological tribunals, and mandatory public alignment. Laid the deep cultural and institutional groundwork upon which 19th-century “scientific” racial anti-Semitism built and stands upon to this day. The failure to intervene during catastrophic moral crises often stems from cold geopolitical calculation rather than mere ignorance. While Leo Tolstoy denounced the horrific 1903 Kishinev pogrom and CS Lewis explicitly condemned Nazi racism and Hitler’s persecution of the Jews as early as 1933 in his private correspondence and published works (such as The Pilgrim’s Regress); arguing that Western civilization owed its fundamental moral concepts directly to Israel – their rebukes had little or no effect.

When secular political ideologies—such as totalitarian collectivism or radical ethno-nationalism—adopt the totalizing, non-negotiable structures of dogmatic belief, they replicate the same mechanisms of forced conformity, purging of “heretics,” and mass violence. The structure of dogmatic belief—whether religious or secular—creates a template for totalitarianism, where “heresy” (dissent or difference) justifies purification, segregation, and mass violence.

Religious institutions, when fused with state power, transform theological categories into tools of governance: Michel Foucault argued that power operates through “regimes of truth”, where institutions define what qualifies as “normal” or “deviant.” Reinhold Niebuhr held that religious absolutism, when unchecked by humility, can justify violence as “moral necessity.” Elie Wiesel stated that the Shoah, not just a failure of humanity but a failure of theology—when God’s silence was interpreted as permission for evil; effectively saying “Where was JeZeus during the Shoah or Allah during the ’48 & ’67 Nakba — Nietzsche ‘God is Dead’ philosophy which denounced the whole of both religious institutional belief in their “idol” Gods.

Both Stalinism, Nazism, and Maoism made absolute claims possessing a monopoly on truth. The Nazis converted “historical truth” unto “racial purity”, effectively defines the premise: Thought Crimes of heresy – from the Church concealing the ancient Greek polytheistic texts of philosophy to Pol Pot, Pinochet dictatorships consequent to Kissinger/Nixon great power imperialism. The modern Surveillance State simply replaces confession booths and kapo informants. Orwell’s 1984 directly addresses the concept of “thought crimes”. Dehumanized Jews as “Christ-killers” (John Chrysostom’s homilies), economic scapegoating (usury laws, guild exclusions), eschatological violence (Crusades, blood libels) etc. By these fruits produced later generations of hatred without cause.

Martin Luther’s On the Jews and Their Lies (1543), often cited as a precursor to Nazi rhetoric. Xtian anti-Judaism created a cultural template model which later morphed into Hitlers’ modern bureaucratic efficiency and pseudoscientific racism. Bolshevism, Nazism, and even post WWII UN – replicate religious structures. All had their “sacred texts, despised heretics such as Stalin’s “kulaks”, and public show trials to purge the Party! The Soviet gulag and Boar War concentration camps set the stage for Auschwitz.

The Inquisition served as a classic—purifying the body politic of “corruption” or “contagion;” similar to the Black Plague slander: “the Jews poisoned the wells”…ideological purity codes double as mechanisms for wealth extraction and state consolidation reappears whenever totalizing political systems operate without institutional checks. Religion used for power coercion, segregation, expulsions, and mass violence; forced conformity; violence framed as “truth” … Xtianity a 2000+ year thought crime against Humanity which reached apex crisis during the Inquisition, 30 Years War, and the Shoah…religious doctrine + centralized power + incentives to remove rivals + fear of revolutionary unrest against the corrupt status quo by peasants enslaved by church authorities who employed their cheap labor to build gross Cathedral abominations of church or mosque injustice against dhimmin minority populations.

Religious truth-claims repeatedly functioned as an authorized language of governance: when clergy/faith movements merged with centralized state or imperial power, theological categories used to define who belonged, who disloyal, and who could be removed—making coercion, segregation, expulsions, and mass violence easier to justify as moral necessity. The comparison to Bolshevik theology vs Menshevik and Social Revolutionaries counter “theology” smells similar to church heresy stench – such as the slaughter of French Huguenots! The war crimes of the Crusades which slaughtered almost all the Jews in Germany, coupled with the Blood-slander almost every Easter which resulted in pogroms and mass population transfers which post WWII so hardily condemns today!

Thought-Crimes against Humanity defined through church and mosque theological creeds at the point of a sword. The slaughter of Indian populations across the New World & Pacific by missionaries working with their great power Armies; which plundered South American civilizations such as the Aztec and Inca. The American First Amendment and French ‘Rights of Man’ fundamentally abhorred church + state, or missionary + empire slavery of feudal peasant populations. Citizen Rights + people living in cities rather than upon feudal villages defines the industrial revolution. Church and mosque forced conformity inquisition purity…race, expulsion/segregation, mass violence—control over the “Pravda-press”; salvation “monopoly” defines the 2000+ years of church/mosques thought crimes against Humanity.

The theology of Luther and Calvin compare to the Great Schism between the Orthodox and Catholic church – both of which claimed inheritance to the revived Roman Empire; the post WWII attempt to stamp “Palestine” upon Judea a harsh example of thought crimes against Humanity. The Shoah, the most powerful example of the Dreyfus Trial racism which infects the disease inherited by Europeans expressed through Church thought crimes. Church and Mosque religious theological fanaticism across medieval and early modern Eurasia and the colonial world, religious truth-claims repeatedly became tools of centralized power, enabling coercion of dissent, forced conformity of minorities, and conquest justified as moral necessity.

Religious institutions and imperial/state power merged, authorities used theology to delegitimize rivals and define outsiders as threats, making violence and forced conformity easier to authorize and carry out. Guilds in medieval Europe enforced by courts, armies, and property systems, belief and religious identity the primary weapons where religious doctrine functioned as an ideological weapon at the point of a sword. The annual Easter pogroms, taxation without representation, denuded Jews of all their wealth prior to forced mass population transfers England in 1290, France 1306, Germanic kingdoms; the fruits of crushing Par’o like judicial corruption and injustice produced the ghetto gulags of three Centuries duration and the mass population Jewish retreat to the Ukraine and Poland which thereafter witnessed the brutal Cossack revolts!

Neither the Dreyfus Trial nor the later Shoah occurred in a political vacuum. Attempts to declare the Shoah a Nazi crime ignores the 1939 White Paper and FDR’s closure of the Golden Medina to Jews attempts to flee. The contrast between the FDR policy and pre-WWI welcome of Jewish refugees from the Pale of Russia a day and night difference.

The Allied refusal to bomb the rail lines leading to the death camps coupled with the Red Army stopping its advance in sight of the Warsaw Ghetto revolt and the post War rat-lines and complicity of Pope Pius XII and Prostestant Luthern Church pro Nazi alignment against the Communists cannot stand exiled and excluded from the contexts of the Big Picture of European historical barbarism.

Nature/Nurture – genetics did not cause the Shoah. Rather the guilt rests upon the environmental cultural history of European and Muslim great power politics throughout the Ages passed down from generation to generations – straight from their mothers’ milk. Hannah Arendt’s banality of evil (ordinary people, indoctrinated by systems) support’s the “mother’s milk” cultural-historical conditioning metaphor.

Can faith in God be redeemed? Emphatically NO. Can Herzl’s dream of a Jewish State which righteously pursues righteous judicial justice among the Jewish people within the borders of our homeland, despite Jews being just like Goyim – only more so, define the definition of faith affixed to Sanhedrin common law Federal Courts which practice legislative review over the tribal economic autonomy and statute law Parliament in Jerusalem prosper? Emphatically YES. Why? Because this defines the vision of Zionist self determination.

My vision as a Zionist בערב תשעה באב. Torah wisdom: Everything rests upon the direction ‘k’vanna’ of ones’ agenda.  The 9th of Av g’lut Yidden mourn the destruction of the temples ect.  Israelis rejoice at the prospect of achieving Yovel liberty for the 12 Tribe Republic through Sanhedrin common law courtrooms.

At the start of my junior year at Texas A&M, dated for a semester, a Yankee Xtian from Boston. She was into disco dancing which permitted me to feel her up & Mary Baker Eddy branch of the church of Crisis. She loved Eddy’s “manual” which established rules for the mother church.

I broke up with her at the end of the semester before returning to work on the farm that following summer. Years later, weighed how Eddy’s manual contrasted with the fanaticism of “if your not a church of Crister your going to hell” theology. My grand father, Bad-Pa, warned me about as a small boy, from a Goy friend of his whom he mocked because his wife – some other type of Xtian. LOL. That g’lut comparison influenced my decision in the Winter semester to major in Russian history: specifically Soviet foreign policy between the two European Civil Wars/WWI/II.

The sh’itta of learning the philosophy of history of Dr. Dunning, directly influenced – after I made aliya to Israel – how to differentiate between g’lut Orthodox religious לא לשמה narishkeit with the need to establish the Tribal republic which crystalized in my brain following the Oct 7th 2023 Abomination War. In the early 2000s the rabbi of my rav influenced the rabbinic attempt to re-establish the Sanhedrin court system, and had me recognized as a dyan of the Sanhedrin courts. Alas the perversion of coping לא לשמה g’lut halachic statute law codes, overshadowed – even my Israeli rabbinic peers at that vain attempt unto this very day!

The idea of לא לשמה Judaism – this בדיעבד religion – a g’lut coping mechanism only; both the church and mosque sometimes permitted religious freedom. The Torah restricts its “mandate” to the obligation to establish Sanhedrin common law lateral courts with the power to impose legislative review over Tribal and Federal governments — statute laws. Hence the name of the Book of דברים also משנה תורה – which means common law; rabbi Yechuda’s 210 CE, post Bar Kotcha disaster – which caused the Romans to change Judea unto “Palestine”.

Obviously when David Ben Gurion had to name the new nation, he fundamentally rejected the extinct Roman empire name change of Palestine; especially after the Chamberlain coward betrayal – his 1939 White Paper appeasement policy. Coward Chamberlain surrendered the Czech Republic to Hitler, and the Balfour Declaration commitment – to an Arab Palestinian state within 10 years after the war! Small wonder that ’48 and ’67 Arab attempts to ‘throw the Jews into the Sea’ based upon the Nazi model and the British White Paper … 446, 2334 UN Chapter VI condemnations of the Jewish state’s equal rights to self-determination. Actions have their consequences. The Bar Kochba revolt resulted in Jewish g’lut, repeated Arab attempts to complete the Shoah of European Jewry – dhimmi Arab refugees no Arab country has ever repatriated ’64 Palestinians as citizens of Arab countries.

Post Oct 7th have prioritized the requirement of restoring tribal Yichus; affixing Gaza as the tribe of Reuven and the Golan as the Gad, as Zionist “self-determination” which Herzl prized. The Golan corresponds (broadly) to the territory Bashan in במדבר לב. Arabs like the church – addicted to blood libel slanders. Goyim in Europe love to declare the common slander which unilaterally declares Jews originated from a Jewish kingdom later conquered by Ivan the Terrible like the UN and Rome Treat ICC declares Israel guilty of genocide! Yet the Jap lover UN does not equally condemn the post Dec 7th 1941 surprise attack consequences – Dresden and Tokyo — Hiroshima & Nagasaki – as Allied ‘war crimes’!

Judah Halevi an assimilated Spanish Jew who embraced ancient Greek logic, as did the vast majority of Spanish rabbis of that so-called g’lut ‘golden age’. He authored ‘The Kuzari’, which tells the story of the king of the Khazars & his conversion to Judaism. This story, later unoriginal Jew hating Europeans, employed as the basis of their secular blood libel – that the Jewish people originally came from the Khazar “Russian” people!

The Jewish revolt against the Syrian Greeks more than a millennium earlier pitted the P’rushim against the assimilated sons of Aaron Tzeddukim. The ברכת המזון adds a Hanukkah blessing that condemns the attempt to cause the Jewish people to forget the [Oral] Torah. The Tzeddukim embraced Greek deductive static logic and abandon P’rushim פרדס inductive reasoning dynamic logic. So too the assimilated Jews of Spain likewise abandoned פרדס logic in favor of deductive Greek syllogism deductive logic. They therein perverted the Talmudic model vision of dynamic common law courts, unto static bridges of g’lut faith in HaShem. צדק צדק תרדוף not a religious belief system in any God. Post Sinai תורה לא בשמים היא, Jews tuck in our tzitzit when visiting the dead!

The B’HaG writes that lighting the lights of Hanukkah a דאורייתא מצוה. Assimilated Spanish Jew Rambam rejects this chiddush. His book of commandments restricts Torah commandments only to a literal reading of the words within the Written Torah. Despite the the למשה repetition of the Spirit Name in K’rea Shma; ONE: Written and Oral Torah לשמה. Rashi the teacher of common law scholarship on the T’NaCH and Talmud – as expressed explicitly through his grand-children ie the Baali Tosafot common law commentary on the Talmud! Rashi’s theory of p’shat on the Chumash radically differs from his dictionary like definition of difficult and abstract terms p’shat on the Talmud. Rashi post the 1st Crusade horrors feared the church priest might learn how to learn Talmudic פרדס common law middot of logic – expressed through the 7,10, 13 halachic warp and the 32 aggadic weft threads which define Talmudic literature. Therefore he limited his common law p’shat sh’itta – strictly to his Chumash commentary! The 1242 Nazi-like book burning of all the Talmud in France, coupled with the 1306 expulsion of all Jews validates the righteousness of his fears.

Assimilated Rambam limited Torah commandments to positive and negative commandments. This bi-polar logic duplicated in classic computer languages today! And the scientific method rigid box thinking which limits reality to the plain geometry 5th axiom of Euclid’s vision of the Gods on Mount Olympus – empirical evidence the only game in town. This narishkeit compares to the church absolute requirement for the Creation of the Universe in 6 days and a physical Man/God\Hercules Harry Potter messiah, Job imaginary man; the father determines the Tribal Yichus of all Jewish children. A child born to a married woman through קידושין — from some other “Father” – a bastard. Yom Kippur the t’shuva לשמה instructs a profound מאי נפקא מינא – רב חסד middah which makes a הבדלה between Torah oaths from vows like Shabbat “understands” the distinction between מלאכה from עבודה in all wisdom time-oriented commandments; Av commandments = מלאכה whereas בניני אבות toldot commandments = עבודה.

Consequently the B’HaG, by stark contrast to the טיפש פשט Rambam, understood 3 types of Torah common law “commandments; Av wisdom time-oriented commandments; this theme taught in the Creation shabbat/week story, fruitful and multiply, removing the sciatic nerve, and brit melah בראשית wisdom time-oriented commandments. Contrasted by secondary תולדות positive and negative commandments – together with Talmudic halachot. Emphasized by mesechtot שבת ובבא קמא which asks if the toldot follow after the Avot?

These latter “commandments”– “halachot” — when aggadic mussar defines the k’vanna of Oral Torah NaCH prophetic mussar, it משנה תורה amplification of Torah tohor middot אל רחום וחנון spirits within the Yatzir Ha’Tov בכל לבבך brit heart — these aggadic defined tohor middot makes an aliya of תולדות Torah commandments & Talmudic halacha into wisdom time-oriented commandments. Hence toldot commandments\halachot follow the Avot!!

Assimilated Jews who embraced the logic of the Greeks could no more know this Torah wisdom than Gospel Greek could discern the subtle day/night differences between מלאכה from עבודה. Rashi, agrees with the B’hag that visiting the sick – a Torah commandment. Assimilated Rambam, his טיפש פשט literal “orthodox” reading of his “bible” views visitation of the sick as a rabbinic mitzva. No different from Orthodox Xtianity literalism regarding the creation of the Universe in 6 days – both av tuma avoda zara. Torah commands common law through prophetic mussar NOT actual physical history; avoda zarah commands – at the edge of a sword – belief in this or that Universal monotheism! Only the 12 Tribes of Israel accept the revelation of the Torah at Sinai. Neither the bible nor koran puke counterfeit faiths once brings the שם השם לשמה spirit Name! Goyim have no portion with the Pesach Yovel; their priest often give leavened bread as the body of Crisis because it makes less crumbs.

The essence of Sanhedrin common law courts dependent upon the 12 Tribes keeping the Yovel; this Torah fundamental T’NaCH concept, which began with Yehoshua – expressed through the בנין אב Pesach\Liberty and brit melah/t’shuva which remembers the oaths sworn to the Avot! The g’lut coping mechanism of statute religious codes perverts T’NaCH\Talmudic warp/weft common law (halacha/aggada) into an utterly divorced series of simplified religious codes which fundamentally uproots gemarah halachic precedents to interpret the language of the Mishna and recently witness the public disgrace of declaring the Rebbe as Moshiach!

The post Bar Kochba renaming of Judea to Palestine means that the 210 Mishna – not written as halachic courtroom rulings of the past! The Talmud emphatically states that throughout the בית שני Jews EVER observed the Yovel דאוררייתא. Hence the Mishna and its later Gemara serve as the model by which future born Jews conquer the oath brit homelands and turn to the T’NaCH and Talmudic sealed Primary sources as the basis to rule Canaan with righteous courtroom common law justice.

The Book of Shmuel emphasizes that both anointed kings Shaul and David failed to sanctify “the king” mitzva of Moshiach – the oath sworn at Gilgal of לשמה which remembers the Yovel from Egypt לשמה as king! From the royal decree which murdered the Cohonim of Nob to death of Uriah to Shlomo recorded in מלכים, trying the capital crimes case of the two prostitutes … no different than the Court of Par’o! The common denominator between these two “kings”, Par’o & Shlomo – their vertical [Star Courts], which likewise define the injustice of British courtroom injustice which permitted impressment of American sailors condemned to 25 years of slavery, stolen from American ships on the High Seas.

Yovel דאורייתא requires liberty for all 12 tribes of the Republic/commonwealth through צדק צדק תרדוף Federal Sanhedrin courts! Proof that the statute law halachic Shulkan Aruch code served only as a pre-ghetto gulag coping mechanism; or post ghetto gulah Napoleon’s Sanhedrin Court! All g’lut messiahs false, because g’lut Jewry condemned by the Torah 2nd Sinai commandment curse – that all religious observance of the Torah לא לשמה permitted so that when Jews crush and obliterate the Romans or their replacements from off the land that we sanctify the Yovel Sanhedrin Courts Yichus freedom of the 12 tribe Republic.

The Mishna stands upon משנה תורה name for the Book of דברים. It does not refer to past tense Sanhedrin courtroom rulings but serves as a model for the time when Jews obliterate the Roman barbarians and restore Yovel to the 12 tribes of the Republic. Torah as the written Constitution of this Republic of 12 Tribes directly mandates only the Sanhedrin/city of refuges Federal Court system. בדיעבד the Torah permits a government headed by a king! The prophet Shmuel brought a Torah curse of rain in the dry season!

The oath sworn at Gilgal/the order of Rashi tefillen\remembers the t’shuva: just as the מלאך Moshe sent to Egypt to judge the Gods, so too the מלאך Yehoshua sent to Canaan to judge the Gods. On shabbat לא תעשה מלאכה emphasizes the k’vaana of shabbat as week – and not simply a day of the week.Just as the Yovel stands upon this t’shuva remembrance that the local god of Sinai the KING\1st commandment לשמה – of the chosen Cohen seed of the Avot, obligated to rule the conquered land of Canaan through the righteous pursuit of justice among our brit people wherein we dedicate fair restitution of damages inflicted by Jews upon other Jews as the tikkun to ‘hatred without cause’ av tuma avoda zara which condemns our people to the hated abhorred and despised Roman g’lut whose arrogant gall renamed our homeland to Palestine!

Why Jews must leave Europe immediately.

Puke 11:37–54 records JeZeus dining with a P’rush scholar and then giving a series of “woes” that criticize religious hypocrisy—especially a mismatch between outward observance and inward reality. Oblivious that throughout the entire 2nd Commonwealth period Jews – no different from the 1st Commonwealth period ever achieved the foundation of Torah blessings – to establish Yobel liberty throughout the Tribal Yichus of the land as sworn through the wisdom commandment brit melah – which requires the k’vanna to remember the oaths sworn to the Avot that they and they alone would father the chosen Cohen nation.

This propaganda fails to instruct time-oriented wisdom commandments which require k’vanna. Gospel Greek has no more understanding of tohor spirits than it can distinguish between מלאכה from עבודה; Yatzir Ha-Tov from Yatzir Ha-Ra from within the heart – the k’vanna of Yermia’s ברית חדש which the church perverted as NT. It makes nor has even the most simplistic awareness of the 13 Oral Torah spirit “pronouns” – אל רחום חנון ערך הפנים רב חסד ואמת etc than does the false prophet Muhammad whose Koran substitutes the disgraced son of Muhammad together with his mother back to Arabia. The Koran by replacing that rejected first born “Cain/Esav” son for Yitzak profanes בראשית\ברית אש with its own perversion of Yishmael offered at the Akadah false prophet declarations which pervert the brit sworn to the Avot – affirmed by the Day of Atonement “t’shuva of HaShem” who annulled the vow to make Moshe the father of the chosen Cohen people!

Puke 11:37–54 conceals through its lies that the P’rushim understand tohor middot spirits of the Yatzir Ha-Tov brit heart! That rabbi Akiva taught the kabbalah of the P’rushim who interpreted the understanding of the 13 middot spirits through the 13 middle blessings of the Shemone Esrei Israel davening. And affixed the first and closing 3 blessings of rabbinic tefilla to the 6 Chaggagim and Yom Tovim, making a רמז to תרי”ג מצוות! Contrast perhaps the most primary commentator of the gospel fraud – the Apostle Paul – who declared Goyim not under the law and brit melah archaic as a Torah commandment! The NT counterfeit fails to grasp that the prophet Yehoshua through the oaths (אש of ברית) of Gilgal and blessing/curse Sh’Cem – affixed the בנין אב Pesach from slavery as the יסוד of the mitza of Yovel and remembrance of the oath sworn through brit melah that the Cohen seed of the Avot would inherit the land of Canaan conquered by the Cohen people as an eternal inheritance! Paul had zero truth fidelity to the sworn brit oath made to the Avot. He despised the definition of faith as the righteous pursuit of justice among the tribes of Israel. The Greek agape has no connection whatsoever to the love of remembering the oath sworn to the Avot through the ברית – a wisdom time-oriented commandment which requires prophetic mussar interpretations of Oral Torah spirits which the church abomination emphatically denies throughout its corrupt history that terminated in the Shoah – strong proof that JeZeus as God – a dead God.

This puke perversion of condemnation perhaps best describes the g’lut mechanism established by Yosef Karo’s Shulkan Aruch. His response to the church war crime – which no European courtroom has ever condemned – the 3 Century ghetto gulag decree by Rome made prior to the Protestant revolt. Luther’s church made open alliance with Hitler just as did Pius XII made no protest against the Nazi roundup of the Jews of Rome sent to the death camps! No European court ever condemned the post War rat-lines to “Save” Nazis from justice or the Polish pogroms to prevent Jews from returning to their homes and properties!

High church both Catholic and Protestant Anglican smoke and incense define Puke 11:37-54. Priest give leavened bread as the passover lamb to their congregants because leavened bread makes “less crumbs”! No European court ever condemned the Allied alliance with the Nazis starting with the ’39 White Paper which condemned European Jewry to the destruction of 75% of its population in less than 3 years! The Allies new of the Shoah war crimes but never once bombed the rail-lines leading to the death camps. By their fruits your shall know them defines the vile perversion of Puke 11:37-54. Church Inquisition torture and mass populated transfers which followed taxation without representation define faith in JeZeus the dead God.

The fictional Harry Potter false messiah repudiated through logical implications the inner dedication of Oral Torah tohor spirits within the Yatzir Ha-Tov utterly irrelevant based upon the 2000+ year church absolute denial of the existence of the Oral Torah tohor spirits whereby Jews remember/t’shuva the Sinai First Commandment לשמה; Church slanders of curse wandering Cain – those shoes the despised church now wears because Jews to the absolute chagrin of both church and mosque have reconquered our homeland despite racist UN repeated condemnations which mirror the “intent” of the ’39 White Paper betrayal of the League Palestine ’22 Mandate!

The coward believers in their imaginary fictional Harry Potter messiah express such agape to pointing their fingers as P’rushim and publicly burning the Talmud or making blood libels to steal and plunder Jewish communities prior to enforcing forced population transfers! These moral self-righteous “believers” ignore the repeated revolts made by Goyim who despised church corruptions which culminated in the American and French revolutions which through the Church/State abomination permanently out of power through citizen rights and separation of church from State!

The gospel fraud perverts prophetic mussar into fortune teller witchcraft. Prophetic mussar defines the k’vanna of Oral Torah middot spirits which the church monsters have forever denied. Luke denies k’vanna: for example the JeZeus prayer taught to Goyim denies the revelation of the Torah at Sinai by praying to a Father in Heaven above whereas the Torah Book of דברים clearly states תורה לא בשמים היא. Paul rejects Sanhedrin courtroom justice as faith replaced by a totally undefined rhetoric of “faith”; the 5th Oral Torah spirit which has the prophetic mussar understanding of “good eye” “judge your brit people in the scales of merit”. Agape has nothing what so ever to do with the t’shuva/remembrance\ of the oaths sworn to the Avot that they alone would father the chosen Cohen people NOT Moshe and how much more so NOT a Harry Potter false messiah. Moshiach learns from Moshe anointing the House of Aaron as Moshiach! Moshiach by definition a לאו דוקא wisdom time-oriented commandment which dedicates to restore tribal yichus within the land of Canaan and the Sanhedrin common law courts through the 6 cities fo refuges small Sanhedrin courts! This acquisition of oath brit burden defines אהבה as a Torah verb.

The Puke “outward vs inward” abomination forever fails the משל\נמשל inference of logic/דיוק which the revelation of the Mishkan at Sinai instructs: Build me a Mishkan that HaShem spirits may live within YOU. Halachic mitzvot do not require k’vanna just as positive and negative Torah commandments do not require k’vanna. Both serve and duplicate the Mishkan “forms” of faith rather than the Oral Torah tohor spirits substance of faith – the tohor middot of the Yatzir Ha-Tov dominate the tumah emotions of the Yatzir Ha-Raw within the confines of the heart; this נמשל interprets the משל of Yaacov and Esav fighting for dominance while in the womb of Rivka! That Puke gospel fails to grasp Torah common law stands upon precedents. What fundamentally serves as Torah courtroom common law precedents? Positive and Negative Torah commandments and Talmudic ritual halachot which do not in and of themselves – separated and alone – have or require k’vanna. However when through Torah inductive reasoning these precedent commandments and halachot, when aligned with some other mitzva through a similar Case/Din comparison they form the משל sights of a rifle which permits the down stream generations to project “down range”. This inductive reasoning logic the Puke gospel counterfeit does not know.

Shulkan Aruch ritualism served the horrors of ghetto gulag Jewry. Jews robed of all their wealth and given the option to stink in ghetto gulag imprisonment till Napoleon washed the church abomination upon the dung heaps of history! Shulkan Aruch ritualism addressed Jewish refugee populations critical needs of the time to maintain a g’lut Jewish identity and not convert to a horrid faith abomination of av tuma avoda zarah as the church so Inquisitionally sought to impose! K’vanna defines Torah wisdom. Starting with the Creation story aggada which defines shabbat as week not day and separates like from like מלאכה from עבודה. The former a Torah wisdom k’vanna the latter a menial labor! Brit does not mean covenant just as the Hebrew verb love does not imply Greek agape.

The study of T’NaCH requires wisdom. Not theological creed belief systems.

The Book of Kings compares to Gulivers’ Travels. Satire employed to conceal derision of powerful kings. The Book of Shmuel contrasts through similar “tongue n’ cheek” the request by the Yatzir HaRa dominant spirits of tumah – the peoples’ demand for a king to bring Yovel to the 12 Tribes. Therefore, the satirical Books of Shmuel and Kings places the Av Torah wisdom mitzva – prophet – above the toldot secondary mitzva of kings. NaCH prophets enforce Sanhedrin משנה תורה rulings; the mussar of prophets interprets and re-interprets the k’vanna of justice throughout the generations –totally independent of the existence or absence of Yatzir HaRa kings of either Yechuda or Israel! Samuel and Kings – therefore not histories celebrating monarchy but prophetic mussar critiques exposing every attempt to replace divine kingship with political sovereignty. Based upon the כלל: Torah commands mussar rather than repeats historical stories and past life events!

Just as Shaul profaned the anointing to judge David together with the Cohonim of Nob – before a Sanhedrin Capital Crimes Court – such a court dependent upon the 12 Tribes of the Republic keeping the Yovel/liberty which directly learns from Moshe taking Israel out of Egyptian bondage! So too and how much more so David profaned the anointing to judge Uriah before a Sanhedrin Capital Crimes Court etc! Then came Shlomo who worshipped avoda zara from the beginning to the end of his reign as king!

Why does the Book of Kings open with the prophet Natan saving the lives of Bat Sheva and Shlomo? Later when the error (Laughing pun on heir) of Shlomo went to Sh’Cem to get anointed as moshiach … how does this story supplement the opening of the prophet Natan saving the lives of Bat Sheva and Shlomo?

Answer: Just as the prophet Natan opposed David’s tuma Yatzir to copy how Goyim universally worship their gods by building great Cathedrals so too Rehovoam likewise ignored the council given by Shlomo’s “elder advisors”. No Torah commandment to build a Temple? What then was the revelation of the Mishkan at Sinai. Torah instructs prophetic mussar through משל\נמשל methodologies which differentiates תולדות-forms from טהור רוחות-Substance. The Substance of the Mishkan, NOT the fancy tent, but rather the Spirits of לשמה; post sin of the Golden Calf משל//נמשל prophetic mussar which defines the k’vanna of the 2nd Sinai commandment … NOT the calf-tent RATHER the 13 Oral Torah middot Spirits which defines the k’vanna of the רוח הקודש spirits of לשמה First Sinai Commandment.

Now how does this NaCH Book refute the foreign gospel counterfeits? Matthew traces JeZeus’ line through David → Solomon (and through Solomon’s line specifically). While Luke traces to David, but it goes through a different intermediate line (often summarized as tracing via David’s son Nathan, not Solomon). The narishkeit of both gospel counterfeits not only contradict one another but their entire narrative of virgin birth as well. The latter profanes the Torah commandment of קידושין.

Recall that the people abandoned the oath sworn at Gilgal in the days of the prophet Yehoshua! There at that oath brit, as remembered through the Order of Parshiot organized in Rashi tefillen, this oath brit affirms that just as לשמה delivered Israel from Egyptian bondage to Yovel-liberty, so too when Israel invaded Canaan under the prophet of Yehoshua that לשמה would deliver all the kingdoms of giants and utterly destroy these kingdoms of avoda zara from off the land to permit all 12 Tribes to likewise rejoice Yovel-Liberty!

When the Book of Shmuel anoints first Shaul and later David as king this sequence supports the prophetic warning that the demand for a king which invalidated the oath sworn at Gilgal the people would later understand the error to place their trust in the strength of horses or the bow rather than the brit cut with לשמה at Sinai that לשמה rules as the KING of the 12 Tribes.

The Book of דברים\משנה תורה includes the Parshah of שופטים ושוטרים – a direct reference which ties the Levitical school of prophets to enforce Sanhedrin courtroom rulings לשמה. Hence the NaCH prophets routinely employ the language: כה אמר השם. This declaration of לשמה prophetic authority stands upon the אמונה יסוד of תורה לא בשמים היא. The justices of Sanhedrin courts known as אלהים.

The rejection of Shaul as Moshiach the Talmud amplifies by teaching that the priority of honor goes to the Talmud chakam over that of any king of Israel! Why? Because any person of bnai brit Israel can wear the crown of king! But a Torah sage 1:10,000! The mussar of the Book of Shmuel teaches the משל/\נמשל method. לשמה as KING – 1st Sinai commandment – establishes Yovel-Liberty for the 12 Tribes of Israel within and throughout the land. Herein defines the oath sworn לשמה at Sinai, and the k’vanna of the “wisdom commandment” also commonly referred to as time-oriented mitzva of Moshiach. Which both houses of Shaul and David failed to sanctify with Yovel-liberty and Sanhedrin Torah mandated Courts.

The mitzva of Moshiach constitutes as the definition of תולדות רשות מצוות. Av wisdom commandments require k’vanna. תולדות רשות mitzvot – קום ועשה ושב ולא תעשה מצוות do not require k’vanna. However, if a person – across the generations of bnai brit – sanctify a קום ועשה מצוה by affixing prophetic mussar which interprets the k’vanna of Oral Torah middot of רוח הקודש לשמה – this Torah wisdom makes an aliya of תולדות רשות commandments which do not require k’vanna unto Av tohor wisdom commandments which dedicate tohor Oral Torah רוח הקודש middot as the dominant middot of the Yatzir HaTov bnai brit heart. Herein correctly understands the prophetic mussar of Yemiah’s ברית חדש.

Tefillah דאורייתא – קריא שמע – emphatically remembers the liberty from Egyptian slavery and bondage. This t’shuva – act of remembering – sometimes translated as “return” – it stands as the יסוד foundation of the Torah mitzva known as Yovel. The prophet Yehoshua kept the Pesach and brit melah – the sign of the Yovel brit cut with Avraham that his future born Cohen seed through Yitzak would inherit and rule the land of Canaan through judicial justice – the definition of Yovel…the primary condition to sanctify the mitzva of Moshiach in the land!

The “Error/Heir” Pun: The fracture of the kingdom under Rehovoam at Sh’Cem, not merely a political failure or a simple “error” in judgment; but the direct remembered t’shuva by which Natan cursed all generations of the House of David. The crown – treated as an inherited, material possession toldot form, rather than a רוח הקודש dedication of tohor Oral Torah middot – the responsibility of the Sanhedrin to adjucate and define; and the Torah’s absolute requirement that the Moshiach both establish & sanctifies both Yovel & brit melah time-oriented commandments. The “heir” – indeed the “error.”

Just as Shlomo’s kingdom began with division and backroom deals (bypassing Adonijah), it ends with a total civil fracture at Shechem. NaCH prophets command mussar which definitively proves the בדיעבד monarchy – simply a fragile ‘house of cards’ … because the tuma Yatzir HaRa Esav within the bnai brit heart repeatedly abandons the Gilgal – Sinai brit which sanctifies לשמה\the 1st Sinai commandment – as king; as remembered by the fixed Order of the Rashi tefillen Gilgal oath brit. The prophetic mussar where the next generation error – Rahovam – travels to Sh’Cem – stands under the t’shuva of Sh’Cem; as remembered by the fixed Order of the Rabbeinu Tam tefillen. At Sh’Cem the 12 Tribes of Israel swore and answered אמן to the blessings and curses of the Torah brit. This לשמה\לא לשמה bi-polar opposite highlights the day/night difference between Yovel-liberty in the land from G’lut-oppression under foreign kings – starting with Par’o & Egypt.

Kings opens with the prophet Natan, which frames Adoniyahu’s power play to seize the throne of David – as a משיח שקר model – the main satire of the Books of both Shmuel and kings. The gospel books follow the Adoniyahu power play and attempt to seize the throne by declaring JeZeus as God. The gospel counterfeit framework, a child born outside the bond of a baal – not a divine miracle but a mamzer; barred from marrying into the Kahal.

A status that permanently excludes that individual and their descendants from the Bnai Brit chosen Cohen people. Jewish tradition fundamentally abhors the idea of Benei HaElohim narrative expressed in בראשית. The gospel Goyim propaganda – simply transplanted a pagan motif into a Jewish context, a wolf dressed in the garments of treif sheep; what do Goyim know of kosher slaughter? They called the torture and public murder of JeZeus a fit korban that saves all mankind from sin/death! Hence the treif gospel narrative stands upon the Pauline perversion – his “Original Sin of Adam” — simply a continuation where Roman authors promote Jewish civil war through their version of the “Adonijah power play” prior to the sectarian War which collapsed following the destruction of Herod’s Temple av tuma avoda zarah abomination. Duplicated by the Koran claim that Abraham bound Ishmael at Mecca rather than Isaac on Mount Moriah, they seek to bypass the entire legal framework of the Yovel and the 12 Tribes Yichus to the land of Canaan.

Prophetic mussar does not care about the gold on the walls; it cares about the widow, the orphan, the stranger, and the integrity of the Sanhedrin court. When the false prophets scream “”The Temple of Hashem, the Temple of Hashem” this perverted narishkeit compares to the Koran declaration that the Jews perverted the Torah, that some 1900 years after the revelation at Sinai – actually Avraham dedicated Yishmael at the Akadah! In Torah law, tribal Yichus-affiliation learns from Cohonim! Tribal yichus inherited solely through the Father – patrilineal descent.. The halacha set by the Court of Ezra determines that the mother determines the Jewishness of the new born child. This fundamental distinction דיוק learns straight from במדבר א:יח. Goyim lack of shame compares to the commercial: “Give it to Mikey – cus he swallows anything!

Reactionary readers who lack the skills to discern Torah common law from Goyim Statute law decrees compares to an ostrich who sticks its head into the sand. he prophet Natan cursed the house of David with an eternal plague of Civil War. Failure to validate this foundation determines where the head of the ostrich concealed. Goyim read their bibles and korans on par with shallow reactionary news papers, which a person reads and thereafter throws into the trash of Inquisitions and/or pogroms.

If Avraham dedicated Yishmael at Mecca then the whole promised land falls away. The Pauline reactionary propaganda which totally invalidates the wisdom commandment – brit melah and its direct connection to the land of Canaan as the “eternal sign of the brit” which לשמה sworn to Avraham, Yitzak, and Yaacov to father the chosen Cohen people … especially after the t’shuva made by HaShem when God erred and confused a Torah oath which requires the k’vanna that it can never become null & void with a vow which both father and baal can immediately anul. This Yom Kippur t’shuva – remembrance shares nothing with the guilt trip of Man eternally inherits the original sin of Adam – JeZeus atones for sin utter and complete narishkeit; Shlomo’s Temple directly compared to the ערלה brit of Yishmael and the korban of Cain dedicated as a positive commandment without prophetic mussar k’vanna.

Clarity of Torah learning לשמה – As the definition of faith – צדק צדק תרדוף.

Pesach serves as the basis of the mitzva of Yovel/Liberty! The prophet Yehoshua – the first Book of the NaCH Prophets through the establishment of the oaths sworn at both Gilgal and Sh’Cem – the mitzva of tefillen and its two boxes containing 4 Parshiot which the Rashi tefillen remembers the Order of brit Gilgal: Just as Moshe sent לשמה as a מלאך to judge the Gods of Paro and Egypt, the prophet Yehoshua sent לשמה as a מלאך to judge the Gods of Canaan and the Canaanite kings! The Blessing – Curse by the 6 Tribes vs 6 Tribes remembers the oath sworn at Sh’Cem which remembers the Life – Death/Blessing – Curse first two Sinai commandments upon which hinge לשמה all the rest of the revelation of both the written and oral Torah.

The Prophet Yehoshua priorities the mitzva of establishment of 3 of the 6 cities of Refuge; the last mitzva observed by Moshe Rabbeinu – the establishment of the 3 cities of Refuge on the other side of the Jordan river! And the mitzva לשמה of brit melah – the sign of the brit sworn to Avraham that his future born Cohen seed would inherit as their permanent inheritance the lands of Canaan!

But following the passing of the 1st generation who conquered the land of Canaan. The next generation worshipped avoda zarah – they assimilated and intermarried with Goyim and embraced their cultures and customs as their own! Hence the 12 tribes abandoned the Pesach model of Yovel Liberty in the Land of Israel. The Book of שופטים proves this conclusively that Israel during the times of the Judges did not observe the mitzva of Yovel.

Then comes the Book(s) of the prophet Shmuel. Where the people abandoned the brit of Gilgal – the oath wherein the 12 Tribes swore a brit cut upon the souls of the lives of their future born children לשמה that the local god of Sinai who brought Yovel to the chosen Cohen seed freed from Egyptian bondage this local god (only the 12 tribes of Israel accepted לשמה the revelation of the Torah at Sinai/Horev) would rule as לשמה king of the 12 tribes of the Republic of conquered Canaan. The prophet Shmuel called לשמה for rains to fall during the dry season as the “sign” (think brit melah) of the brit which לא לשמה Israel asked for a king to restore Yovel in the land!

Both kings Shaul and David failed to sanctify לשמה the mitzva of Moshiach to establish לשמה the Torah as the Written Constitution of the Republic of the 12 Tribes and Sanhedrin Courts as the Oral Torah לשמה authority which interprets the k’vanna of the Written Torah Constitution from generation to generation.

The Talmud clearly states that post the Bavil g’lut, starting with the generation of Ezra, that Jews never observed the mitzva לשמה of Yovel and brit melah – the sign of the brit – sworn to the Avot fathers of the chosen Cohen people! By the time rabbi Yechuda wrote the 6 Orders of his common law Mishna — based upon the 5th Book of דברים also called משנה תורה – which means “Common Law” — some 75 Years AFTER the disaster of the Bar Kochba revolt, where the Romans renamed the fully conquered province of Judea unto the Roman name of Palestine. Clearly the intent of the Romans to fully expel the Jewish people from off the conquered land of Palestine and scatter them as stateless refugee populations across the whole of the Roman empire!

G’lut Jews no different from the g’lut Jews who endured the judicial oppression of Par’o and his vertical courts of judicial oppression and corruption – Jews in g’lut slavery obviously do not keep the mitzva of Yovel – even לא לשמה! Therefore the Mishna with its even later Gemara common do not bemoan the past where Jews failed to keep Yovel and remember the k’vanna of brit melah לשמה. Rather the Mishna with its later Gemara serve as the ideal model for the time when Jews return and reconquer the oath sworn lands from the Roman barbarian invaders or their close kin the Xtians and Mu-ham-mad Injuns and restore Yovel and brit melah לשמה to the land – make the Written Torah the Constitution of the Republic of 12 Tribes and pursue righteous justice among our people לשמה.