My vision as a Zionist בערב תשעה באב. Torah wisdom: Everything rests upon the direction ‘k’vanna’ of ones’ agenda.  The 9th of Av g’lut Yidden mourn the destruction of the temples ect.  Israelis rejoice at the prospect of achieving Yovel liberty for the 12 Tribe Republic through Sanhedrin common law courtrooms.

At the start of my junior year at Texas A&M, dated for a semester, a Yankee Xtian from Boston. She was into disco dancing which permitted me to feel her up & Mary Baker Eddy branch of the church of Crisis. She loved Eddy’s “manual” which established rules for the mother church.

I broke up with her at the end of the semester before returning to work on the farm that following summer. Years later, weighed how Eddy’s manual contrasted with the fanaticism of “if your not a church of Crister your going to hell” theology. My grand father, Bad-Pa, warned me about as a small boy, from a Goy friend of his whom he mocked because his wife – some other type of Xtian. LOL. That g’lut comparison influenced my decision in the Winter semester to major in Russian history: specifically Soviet foreign policy between the two European Civil Wars/WWI/II.

The sh’itta of learning the philosophy of history of Dr. Dunning, directly influenced – after I made aliya to Israel – how to differentiate between g’lut Orthodox religious לא לשמה narishkeit with the need to establish the Tribal republic which crystalized in my brain following the Oct 7th 2023 Abomination War. In the early 2000s the rabbi of my rav influenced the rabbinic attempt to re-establish the Sanhedrin court system, and had me recognized as a dyan of the Sanhedrin courts. Alas the perversion of coping לא לשמה g’lut halachic statute law codes, overshadowed – even my Israeli rabbinic peers at that vain attempt unto this very day!

The idea of לא לשמה Judaism – this בדיעבד religion – a g’lut coping mechanism only; both the church and mosque sometimes permitted religious freedom. The Torah restricts its “mandate” to the obligation to establish Sanhedrin common law lateral courts with the power to impose legislative review over Tribal and Federal governments — statute laws. Hence the name of the Book of דברים also משנה תורה – which means common law; rabbi Yechuda’s 210 CE, post Bar Kotcha disaster – which caused the Romans to change Judea unto “Palestine”.

Obviously when David Ben Gurion had to name the new nation, he fundamentally rejected the extinct Roman empire name change of Palestine; especially after the Chamberlain coward betrayal – his 1939 White Paper appeasement policy. Coward Chamberlain surrendered the Czech Republic to Hitler, and the Balfour Declaration commitment – to an Arab Palestinian state within 10 years after the war! Small wonder that ’48 and ’67 Arab attempts to ‘throw the Jews into the Sea’ based upon the Nazi model and the British White Paper … 446, 2334 UN Chapter VI condemnations of the Jewish state’s equal rights to self-determination. Actions have their consequences. The Bar Kochba revolt resulted in Jewish g’lut, repeated Arab attempts to complete the Shoah of European Jewry – dhimmi Arab refugees no Arab country has ever repatriated ’64 Palestinians as citizens of Arab countries.

Post Oct 7th have prioritized the requirement of restoring tribal Yichus; affixing Gaza as the tribe of Reuven and the Golan as the Gad, as Zionist “self-determination” which Herzl prized. The Golan corresponds (broadly) to the territory Bashan in במדבר לב. Arabs like the church – addicted to blood libel slanders. Goyim in Europe love to declare the common slander which unilaterally declares Jews originated from a Jewish kingdom later conquered by Ivan the Terrible like the UN and Rome Treat ICC declares Israel guilty of genocide! Yet the Jap lover UN does not equally condemn the post Dec 7th 1941 surprise attack consequences – Dresden and Tokyo — Hiroshima & Nagasaki – as Allied ‘war crimes’!

Judah Halevi an assimilated Spanish Jew who embraced ancient Greek logic, as did the vast majority of Spanish rabbis of that so-called g’lut ‘golden age’. He authored ‘The Kuzari’, which tells the story of the king of the Khazars & his conversion to Judaism. This story, later unoriginal Jew hating Europeans, employed as the basis of their secular blood libel – that the Jewish people originally came from the Khazar “Russian” people!

The Jewish revolt against the Syrian Greeks more than a millennium earlier pitted the P’rushim against the assimilated sons of Aaron Tzeddukim. The ברכת המזון adds a Hanukkah blessing that condemns the attempt to cause the Jewish people to forget the [Oral] Torah. The Tzeddukim embraced Greek deductive static logic and abandon P’rushim פרדס inductive reasoning dynamic logic. So too the assimilated Jews of Spain likewise abandoned פרדס logic in favor of deductive Greek syllogism deductive logic. They therein perverted the Talmudic model vision of dynamic common law courts, unto static bridges of g’lut faith in HaShem. צדק צדק תרדוף not a religious belief system in any God. Post Sinai תורה לא בשמים היא, Jews tuck in our tzitzit when visiting the dead!

The B’HaG writes that lighting the lights of Hanukkah a דאורייתא מצוה. Assimilated Spanish Jew Rambam rejects this chiddush. His book of commandments restricts Torah commandments only to a literal reading of the words within the Written Torah. Despite the the למשה repetition of the Spirit Name in K’rea Shma; ONE: Written and Oral Torah לשמה. Rashi the teacher of common law scholarship on the T’NaCH and Talmud – as expressed explicitly through his grand-children ie the Baali Tosafot common law commentary on the Talmud! Rashi’s theory of p’shat on the Chumash radically differs from his dictionary like definition of difficult and abstract terms p’shat on the Talmud. Rashi post the 1st Crusade horrors feared the church priest might learn how to learn Talmudic פרדס common law middot of logic – expressed through the 7,10, 13 halachic warp and the 32 aggadic weft threads which define Talmudic literature. Therefore he limited his common law p’shat sh’itta – strictly to his Chumash commentary! The 1242 Nazi-like book burning of all the Talmud in France, coupled with the 1306 expulsion of all Jews validates the righteousness of his fears.

Assimilated Rambam limited Torah commandments to positive and negative commandments. This bi-polar logic duplicated in classic computer languages today! And the scientific method rigid box thinking which limits reality to the plain geometry 5th axiom of Euclid’s vision of the Gods on Mount Olympus – empirical evidence the only game in town. This narishkeit compares to the church absolute requirement for the Creation of the Universe in 6 days and a physical Man/God\Hercules Harry Potter messiah, Job imaginary man; the father determines the Tribal Yichus of all Jewish children. A child born to a married woman through קידושין — from some other “Father” – a bastard. Yom Kippur the t’shuva לשמה instructs a profound מאי נפקא מינא – רב חסד middah which makes a הבדלה between Torah oaths from vows like Shabbat “understands” the distinction between מלאכה from עבודה in all wisdom time-oriented commandments; Av commandments = מלאכה whereas בניני אבות toldot commandments = עבודה.

Consequently the B’HaG, by stark contrast to the טיפש פשט Rambam, understood 3 types of Torah common law “commandments; Av wisdom time-oriented commandments; this theme taught in the Creation shabbat/week story, fruitful and multiply, removing the sciatic nerve, and brit melah בראשית wisdom time-oriented commandments. Contrasted by secondary תולדות positive and negative commandments – together with Talmudic halachot. Emphasized by mesechtot שבת ובבא קמא which asks if the toldot follow after the Avot?

These latter “commandments”– “halachot” — when aggadic mussar defines the k’vanna of Oral Torah NaCH prophetic mussar, it משנה תורה amplification of Torah tohor middot אל רחום וחנון spirits within the Yatzir Ha’Tov בכל לבבך brit heart — these aggadic defined tohor middot makes an aliya of תולדות Torah commandments & Talmudic halacha into wisdom time-oriented commandments. Hence toldot commandments\halachot follow the Avot!!

Assimilated Jews who embraced the logic of the Greeks could no more know this Torah wisdom than Gospel Greek could discern the subtle day/night differences between מלאכה from עבודה. Rashi, agrees with the B’hag that visiting the sick – a Torah commandment. Assimilated Rambam, his טיפש פשט literal “orthodox” reading of his “bible” views visitation of the sick as a rabbinic mitzva. No different from Orthodox Xtianity literalism regarding the creation of the Universe in 6 days – both av tuma avoda zara. Torah commands common law through prophetic mussar NOT actual physical history; avoda zarah commands – at the edge of a sword – belief in this or that Universal monotheism! Only the 12 Tribes of Israel accept the revelation of the Torah at Sinai. Neither the bible nor koran puke counterfeit faiths once brings the שם השם לשמה spirit Name! Goyim have no portion with the Pesach Yovel; their priest often give leavened bread as the body of Crisis because it makes less crumbs.

The essence of Sanhedrin common law courts dependent upon the 12 Tribes keeping the Yovel; this Torah fundamental T’NaCH concept, which began with Yehoshua – expressed through the בנין אב Pesach\Liberty and brit melah/t’shuva which remembers the oaths sworn to the Avot! The g’lut coping mechanism of statute religious codes perverts T’NaCH\Talmudic warp/weft common law (halacha/aggada) into an utterly divorced series of simplified religious codes which fundamentally uproots gemarah halachic precedents to interpret the language of the Mishna and recently witness the public disgrace of declaring the Rebbe as Moshiach!

The post Bar Kochba renaming of Judea to Palestine means that the 210 Mishna – not written as halachic courtroom rulings of the past! The Talmud emphatically states that throughout the בית שני Jews EVER observed the Yovel דאוררייתא. Hence the Mishna and its later Gemara serve as the model by which future born Jews conquer the oath brit homelands and turn to the T’NaCH and Talmudic sealed Primary sources as the basis to rule Canaan with righteous courtroom common law justice.

The Book of Shmuel emphasizes that both anointed kings Shaul and David failed to sanctify “the king” mitzva of Moshiach – the oath sworn at Gilgal of לשמה which remembers the Yovel from Egypt לשמה as king! From the royal decree which murdered the Cohonim of Nob to death of Uriah to Shlomo recorded in מלכים, trying the capital crimes case of the two prostitutes … no different than the Court of Par’o! The common denominator between these two “kings”, Par’o & Shlomo – their vertical [Star Courts], which likewise define the injustice of British courtroom injustice which permitted impressment of American sailors condemned to 25 years of slavery, stolen from American ships on the High Seas.

Yovel דאורייתא requires liberty for all 12 tribes of the Republic/commonwealth through צדק צדק תרדוף Federal Sanhedrin courts! Proof that the statute law halachic Shulkan Aruch code served only as a pre-ghetto gulag coping mechanism; or post ghetto gulah Napoleon’s Sanhedrin Court! All g’lut messiahs false, because g’lut Jewry condemned by the Torah 2nd Sinai commandment curse – that all religious observance of the Torah לא לשמה permitted so that when Jews crush and obliterate the Romans or their replacements from off the land that we sanctify the Yovel Sanhedrin Courts Yichus freedom of the 12 tribe Republic.

The Mishna stands upon משנה תורה name for the Book of דברים. It does not refer to past tense Sanhedrin courtroom rulings but serves as a model for the time when Jews obliterate the Roman barbarians and restore Yovel to the 12 tribes of the Republic. Torah as the written Constitution of this Republic of 12 Tribes directly mandates only the Sanhedrin/city of refuges Federal Court system. בדיעבד the Torah permits a government headed by a king! The prophet Shmuel brought a Torah curse of rain in the dry season!

The oath sworn at Gilgal/the order of Rashi tefillen\remembers the t’shuva: just as the מלאך Moshe sent to Egypt to judge the Gods, so too the מלאך Yehoshua sent to Canaan to judge the Gods. On shabbat לא תעשה מלאכה emphasizes the k’vaana of shabbat as week – and not simply a day of the week.Just as the Yovel stands upon this t’shuva remembrance that the local god of Sinai the KING\1st commandment לשמה – of the chosen Cohen seed of the Avot, obligated to rule the conquered land of Canaan through the righteous pursuit of justice among our brit people wherein we dedicate fair restitution of damages inflicted by Jews upon other Jews as the tikkun to ‘hatred without cause’ av tuma avoda zara which condemns our people to the hated abhorred and despised Roman g’lut whose arrogant gall renamed our homeland to Palestine!

Why Jews must leave Europe immediately.

Puke 11:37–54 records JeZeus dining with a P’rush scholar and then giving a series of “woes” that criticize religious hypocrisy—especially a mismatch between outward observance and inward reality. Oblivious that throughout the entire 2nd Commonwealth period Jews – no different from the 1st Commonwealth period ever achieved the foundation of Torah blessings – to establish Yobel liberty throughout the Tribal Yichus of the land as sworn through the wisdom commandment brit melah – which requires the k’vanna to remember the oaths sworn to the Avot that they and they alone would father the chosen Cohen nation.

This propaganda fails to instruct time-oriented wisdom commandments which require k’vanna. Gospel Greek has no more understanding of tohor spirits than it can distinguish between מלאכה from עבודה; Yatzir Ha-Tov from Yatzir Ha-Ra from within the heart – the k’vanna of Yermia’s ברית חדש which the church perverted as NT. It makes nor has even the most simplistic awareness of the 13 Oral Torah spirit “pronouns” – אל רחום חנון ערך הפנים רב חסד ואמת etc than does the false prophet Muhammad whose Koran substitutes the disgraced son of Muhammad together with his mother back to Arabia. The Koran by replacing that rejected first born “Cain/Esav” son for Yitzak profanes בראשית\ברית אש with its own perversion of Yishmael offered at the Akadah false prophet declarations which pervert the brit sworn to the Avot – affirmed by the Day of Atonement “t’shuva of HaShem” who annulled the vow to make Moshe the father of the chosen Cohen people!

Puke 11:37–54 conceals through its lies that the P’rushim understand tohor middot spirits of the Yatzir Ha-Tov brit heart! That rabbi Akiva taught the kabbalah of the P’rushim who interpreted the understanding of the 13 middot spirits through the 13 middle blessings of the Shemone Esrei Israel davening. And affixed the first and closing 3 blessings of rabbinic tefilla to the 6 Chaggagim and Yom Tovim, making a רמז to תרי”ג מצוות! Contrast perhaps the most primary commentator of the gospel fraud – the Apostle Paul – who declared Goyim not under the law and brit melah archaic as a Torah commandment! The NT counterfeit fails to grasp that the prophet Yehoshua through the oaths (אש of ברית) of Gilgal and blessing/curse Sh’Cem – affixed the בנין אב Pesach from slavery as the יסוד of the mitza of Yovel and remembrance of the oath sworn through brit melah that the Cohen seed of the Avot would inherit the land of Canaan conquered by the Cohen people as an eternal inheritance! Paul had zero truth fidelity to the sworn brit oath made to the Avot. He despised the definition of faith as the righteous pursuit of justice among the tribes of Israel. The Greek agape has no connection whatsoever to the love of remembering the oath sworn to the Avot through the ברית – a wisdom time-oriented commandment which requires prophetic mussar interpretations of Oral Torah spirits which the church abomination emphatically denies throughout its corrupt history that terminated in the Shoah – strong proof that JeZeus as God – a dead God.

This puke perversion of condemnation perhaps best describes the g’lut mechanism established by Yosef Karo’s Shulkan Aruch. His response to the church war crime – which no European courtroom has ever condemned – the 3 Century ghetto gulag decree by Rome made prior to the Protestant revolt. Luther’s church made open alliance with Hitler just as did Pius XII made no protest against the Nazi roundup of the Jews of Rome sent to the death camps! No European court ever condemned the post War rat-lines to “Save” Nazis from justice or the Polish pogroms to prevent Jews from returning to their homes and properties!

High church both Catholic and Protestant Anglican smoke and incense define Puke 11:37-54. Priest give leavened bread as the passover lamb to their congregants because leavened bread makes “less crumbs”! No European court ever condemned the Allied alliance with the Nazis starting with the ’39 White Paper which condemned European Jewry to the destruction of 75% of its population in less than 3 years! The Allies new of the Shoah war crimes but never once bombed the rail-lines leading to the death camps. By their fruits your shall know them defines the vile perversion of Puke 11:37-54. Church Inquisition torture and mass populated transfers which followed taxation without representation define faith in JeZeus the dead God.

The fictional Harry Potter false messiah repudiated through logical implications the inner dedication of Oral Torah tohor spirits within the Yatzir Ha-Tov utterly irrelevant based upon the 2000+ year church absolute denial of the existence of the Oral Torah tohor spirits whereby Jews remember/t’shuva the Sinai First Commandment לשמה; Church slanders of curse wandering Cain – those shoes the despised church now wears because Jews to the absolute chagrin of both church and mosque have reconquered our homeland despite racist UN repeated condemnations which mirror the “intent” of the ’39 White Paper betrayal of the League Palestine ’22 Mandate!

The coward believers in their imaginary fictional Harry Potter messiah express such agape to pointing their fingers as P’rushim and publicly burning the Talmud or making blood libels to steal and plunder Jewish communities prior to enforcing forced population transfers! These moral self-righteous “believers” ignore the repeated revolts made by Goyim who despised church corruptions which culminated in the American and French revolutions which through the Church/State abomination permanently out of power through citizen rights and separation of church from State!

The gospel fraud perverts prophetic mussar into fortune teller witchcraft. Prophetic mussar defines the k’vanna of Oral Torah middot spirits which the church monsters have forever denied. Luke denies k’vanna: for example the JeZeus prayer taught to Goyim denies the revelation of the Torah at Sinai by praying to a Father in Heaven above whereas the Torah Book of דברים clearly states תורה לא בשמים היא. Paul rejects Sanhedrin courtroom justice as faith replaced by a totally undefined rhetoric of “faith”; the 5th Oral Torah spirit which has the prophetic mussar understanding of “good eye” “judge your brit people in the scales of merit”. Agape has nothing what so ever to do with the t’shuva/remembrance\ of the oaths sworn to the Avot that they alone would father the chosen Cohen people NOT Moshe and how much more so NOT a Harry Potter false messiah. Moshiach learns from Moshe anointing the House of Aaron as Moshiach! Moshiach by definition a לאו דוקא wisdom time-oriented commandment which dedicates to restore tribal yichus within the land of Canaan and the Sanhedrin common law courts through the 6 cities fo refuges small Sanhedrin courts! This acquisition of oath brit burden defines אהבה as a Torah verb.

The Puke “outward vs inward” abomination forever fails the משל\נמשל inference of logic/דיוק which the revelation of the Mishkan at Sinai instructs: Build me a Mishkan that HaShem spirits may live within YOU. Halachic mitzvot do not require k’vanna just as positive and negative Torah commandments do not require k’vanna. Both serve and duplicate the Mishkan “forms” of faith rather than the Oral Torah tohor spirits substance of faith – the tohor middot of the Yatzir Ha-Tov dominate the tumah emotions of the Yatzir Ha-Raw within the confines of the heart; this נמשל interprets the משל of Yaacov and Esav fighting for dominance while in the womb of Rivka! That Puke gospel fails to grasp Torah common law stands upon precedents. What fundamentally serves as Torah courtroom common law precedents? Positive and Negative Torah commandments and Talmudic ritual halachot which do not in and of themselves – separated and alone – have or require k’vanna. However when through Torah inductive reasoning these precedent commandments and halachot, when aligned with some other mitzva through a similar Case/Din comparison they form the משל sights of a rifle which permits the down stream generations to project “down range”. This inductive reasoning logic the Puke gospel counterfeit does not know.

Shulkan Aruch ritualism served the horrors of ghetto gulag Jewry. Jews robed of all their wealth and given the option to stink in ghetto gulag imprisonment till Napoleon washed the church abomination upon the dung heaps of history! Shulkan Aruch ritualism addressed Jewish refugee populations critical needs of the time to maintain a g’lut Jewish identity and not convert to a horrid faith abomination of av tuma avoda zarah as the church so Inquisitionally sought to impose! K’vanna defines Torah wisdom. Starting with the Creation story aggada which defines shabbat as week not day and separates like from like מלאכה from עבודה. The former a Torah wisdom k’vanna the latter a menial labor! Brit does not mean covenant just as the Hebrew verb love does not imply Greek agape.

G’lut defines the Torah curse: לא לשמה

The 7th sugya of our Gemara which opens and closes on dof :ה implies that the mitzva of קידושין דאורייתא?  The Gemara does not definitely insist a דאורייתא mitzva, but rather treats the woman’s status as safek and applies a rabbinic stringency גט לחומרא, even though the “kiddushin” underlying that stringency isn’t fully established as Torah-certain. Essentially a gezarah-shavah conceptual linkage.   If גט דאורייתא then קידושין גם כן דאורייתא; based upon the brit cut between the pieces where childless Avram cut a brit for his עולם הבא future born Cohen people to permanently inherit the lands of Canaan.  Just as Avram childless so to the Man prior to קידושין childless.  (בראשית opens with married couples and their תולדות children.)  Hence just as Avram cut a brit upon his future born children so too the mitzva דאורייתא of קידושין.

The גט דאורייתא, why does the Torah demand? What does קידושין actually acquire? Answer: Title to the future born seed תולדות of this union. A civil divorce does not address the issue of what קידושין actually acquires? Our Gemara compares acquisition of slaves; the Torah directly addresses the union of Yechuda and Tamar when she deceived him and assumed the role of a prostitute. The brit cut between the pieces required clarification because perhaps that brit inclusive of Yishmael?! Just as Sarah determines the “Jewishness” of the child – according to Ezra, the baal determines the Yichus/Tribal status of the child; for example: the Cohen Yichus – determined by the father and not the mother. Furthermore, the mitzva of קידושין does not apply to Goyim, simply because Goyim excluded from the chosen Cohen people who accepted the Tribal God who sanctified the av commandment of Yovel in conquered Canaan – through the liberation בנין אב freedom from Egyptian slavery. What separates קידושין דאורייתא from קידושין דרבנן? The bi-polar first two Sinai commandments blessing/life\לשמה vs. curse/death\לא לשמה. Just as Sanhedrin courts – cities of refuge dependent upon the Yovel requirement for all 12 Tribes who accepted the Sh’Cem blessing/curse (Rabbeinu Tam order of tefillen) from g’lut Jewish refugees scattered as Cain-like dhimmi or Christ killers or modern day blood libel genocide of Palestinian people etc; g’lut Jewry do mitzvot under the Torah curse לא לשמה. Zionism: defined as Jewish self-determination within the borders of Canaan, therefore emphatically inclusive of the Torah command to conquer the land from the Arab and Muslims and establish the Yichus tribal status of the 12 Tribes. For example: post the Oct 7th 2023 Abomination War – to expel the Gazans and establish the Yichus of Reuven in Gaza and the Yichus of Menashe in the Golan. This would fundamentally require a functional Sanhedrin common law court system through establishment of the 6 cities of refuge inclusive of their Small Sanhedrin Capital Crimes courtrooms.  

This distinction  קידושין דאורייתא vs קידושין דרבנן – the difference between Av wisdom commandments which require k’vanna vs. תולדות בניני אבות מצוות which in and of themselves qualify as קום ועשה ושב ולא תעשה commandments which due not require Torah מלאכה wisdom which sanctifies מלכות – Oral Torah middot, defined through prophetic mussar לשמה.  This latter blessing Av commandment applies only to within the lands of conquered Canaan, based upon the 1st Sinai commandment where Egypt לאו דוקא.  

Another fundamental distinction only in conquered Canaan can the vision of Zionism achieve self-determination and make the Written Torah the Constitution of the 12 Tribes of the Republic.  Cursed g’lut Jewry לא לשמה in g’lut condemned to ברכות which instructs doing mitzvot לא לשמה to later do mitzvot לשמה.  This Gemara stands upon the Sinai contrast between the 1st and 2nd Sinai commandments.  Avoda zara a Torah curse which results in g’lut; like Adam eating from the Tree of Knowledge cast out of the garden.

Rabbinic g’lut Judaism developed the coping mechanism which copied Greek and Roman statute law to organize halacha into religious codes which totally ignores the crucial issue established by the Book of בראשית which first introduces wisdom commandments through the Aggadic mussar of the מעשה בראשית. The הבדלה, לא תעשה מלאכה בשבת differentiates time oriented commandments from toldot commandments which do not require k’vanna by teaching that shabbat inclusive of the entire week! By not doing wisdom מלאכה on the day of Shabbat a Jew dedicates to do מלאכות throughout the 6 days of shabbat! Hence the Creation story does not tell the history of the creation of the Universe but rather introduces Av wisdom commandments which require k’vanna and the primary torah legal vision on par with the Avot as the primary permanent fathers of the chosen Cohen nation. The next Books of the Torah שמות ויקרא ובמדבר introduces תולדות קום ועשה ושב ולא תעשה commandments. The Book of דברים introduces Av משנה תורה Torah mandated Sanhedrin courtroom common law-legislative review of the Tribes and Central government. All the 3 major בראשית commandments – time-oriented commandments; fruitful and multiple, removing the nerve, brit-melah – all three time-oriented Av commandments!  The latter proven by the prophet Yehoshua who sanctified brit melah before initiating the wars which obliterated the 33 kings of Canaan.  T’shuva understood as “remember”.  The mitzva of brit melah remembers the brit oath sworn to Avraham to inherit for all generations of his chosen Cohen seed the land of Canaan.  This inheritance excluded both Yishmael and Esav.

Rome based their legal codes based upon the dictates of Caesar and the Roman Senate ie Statute Law.  Just as the vertical British Star Courts justified impressment of American sailors seized from American ships on the High Seas by establishing the lateral jury system Torah common law משנה תורה mandates Sanhedrin legislative review of Tribal and Central Government statute laws during the times when the 12 Tribes rule through Yovel דאורייתא freedom through legislative review.

Time-oriented commandments directly linked to Torah wisdom ie prophetic mussar as k’vaana. T’shuva learns from the “time” when Moshe cause HaShem to make t’shuva by remembering the oaths sworn to the Avot that they and they alone would father the chosen Cohen people/nation.

In the sugya of Kidushin 5b learns from a logical inference/דיוק from inference/דיוק. A bipolar contradiction between he gave and he said vs. he gave and she said … compared to she gave she said compared to he gave and she said – מקודשת. Compare this to במסכת ראש השנה (ד. – ז.): Why did the Tanna omit the category of “months” from the Av Mishnah, despite its appearance in the Baraita? The resolution emphasizes a categorical distinction: That Mishnah deals with a defined topic (Years), so the parallel תולדות case (Months) – intentionally omitted. Rabbi Eliezer ben Rabbi Yossi HaGelili: middah #18: “A thing stated regarding one subject but not fitting for it, but fitting for another” … Understanding the text by defining its specific subject and context. There the Avi Mishna addresses “Years” not months; the Baraita emphasized Nisan as the first month, and hence intentionally omitted. The logic of this Middah in Aggadah dictates that sometimes a specific detail, written or omitted in one portion not because it is untrue, but because it is not the main subject being dealt with at that moment, and its true place is in another context. This בנין אב “inference from inference attempts to interpret the Gemara language: “If he gave and she said”, and concludes ספק קידושין; Reisha deals with his giving, Siyfa with her giving: the intermediate case falls outside the clear framework. Since we cannot determine the “subject” of the intermediate case from the words alone, it remains a doubt.

The Middah of Rabbi Yossi HaGelili that illuminates both sugyot, their methodological understanding, (whether Scripture, Mishnah, or Baraita), understood first and foremost according to the definition of its subject. Both קידושין ור”ה the attempt to infer what the האשה נקנית did not say explicitly, creates a logical contradiction – doubt; so too the omission of months which the Baraita emphasizes in mesechta Rosh HaShanna. General כלל: Forbidden to interpret silence without first clarifying the boundaries of the Mishna and Gemara focus. Comparing קידושין with ר”ה both sugyot warn the reader that an inference drawn without regard to the text’s core subject matter will inevitably collapse into contradiction or doubt.  Our 7th sugya  deliberately begins with the Torah framework and ends with a rabbinic safeguard. That framing emphasizes the relationship between דאורייתא and מדרבנן: where the Torah status qualifies as indeterminate, the Rabbis preserve the possible Torah bond by requiring a גט לחומרא in all cases of לא לשמה g’lut Jewry. 

The study of T’NaCH requires wisdom. Not theological creed belief systems.

The Book of Kings compares to Gulivers’ Travels. Satire employed to conceal derision of powerful kings. The Book of Shmuel contrasts through similar “tongue n’ cheek” the request by the Yatzir HaRa dominant spirits of tumah – the peoples’ demand for a king to bring Yovel to the 12 Tribes. Therefore, the satirical Books of Shmuel and Kings places the Av Torah wisdom mitzva – prophet – above the toldot secondary mitzva of kings. NaCH prophets enforce Sanhedrin משנה תורה rulings; the mussar of prophets interprets and re-interprets the k’vanna of justice throughout the generations –totally independent of the existence or absence of Yatzir HaRa kings of either Yechuda or Israel! Samuel and Kings – therefore not histories celebrating monarchy but prophetic mussar critiques exposing every attempt to replace divine kingship with political sovereignty. Based upon the כלל: Torah commands mussar rather than repeats historical stories and past life events!

Just as Shaul profaned the anointing to judge David together with the Cohonim of Nob – before a Sanhedrin Capital Crimes Court – such a court dependent upon the 12 Tribes of the Republic keeping the Yovel/liberty which directly learns from Moshe taking Israel out of Egyptian bondage! So too and how much more so David profaned the anointing to judge Uriah before a Sanhedrin Capital Crimes Court etc! Then came Shlomo who worshipped avoda zara from the beginning to the end of his reign as king!

Why does the Book of Kings open with the prophet Natan saving the lives of Bat Sheva and Shlomo? Later when the error (Laughing pun on heir) of Shlomo went to Sh’Cem to get anointed as moshiach … how does this story supplement the opening of the prophet Natan saving the lives of Bat Sheva and Shlomo?

Answer: Just as the prophet Natan opposed David’s tuma Yatzir to copy how Goyim universally worship their gods by building great Cathedrals so too Rehovoam likewise ignored the council given by Shlomo’s “elder advisors”. No Torah commandment to build a Temple? What then was the revelation of the Mishkan at Sinai. Torah instructs prophetic mussar through משל\נמשל methodologies which differentiates תולדות-forms from טהור רוחות-Substance. The Substance of the Mishkan, NOT the fancy tent, but rather the Spirits of לשמה; post sin of the Golden Calf משל//נמשל prophetic mussar which defines the k’vanna of the 2nd Sinai commandment … NOT the calf-tent RATHER the 13 Oral Torah middot Spirits which defines the k’vanna of the רוח הקודש spirits of לשמה First Sinai Commandment.

Now how does this NaCH Book refute the foreign gospel counterfeits? Matthew traces JeZeus’ line through David → Solomon (and through Solomon’s line specifically). While Luke traces to David, but it goes through a different intermediate line (often summarized as tracing via David’s son Nathan, not Solomon). The narishkeit of both gospel counterfeits not only contradict one another but their entire narrative of virgin birth as well. The latter profanes the Torah commandment of קידושין.

Recall that the people abandoned the oath sworn at Gilgal in the days of the prophet Yehoshua! There at that oath brit, as remembered through the Order of Parshiot organized in Rashi tefillen, this oath brit affirms that just as לשמה delivered Israel from Egyptian bondage to Yovel-liberty, so too when Israel invaded Canaan under the prophet of Yehoshua that לשמה would deliver all the kingdoms of giants and utterly destroy these kingdoms of avoda zara from off the land to permit all 12 Tribes to likewise rejoice Yovel-Liberty!

When the Book of Shmuel anoints first Shaul and later David as king this sequence supports the prophetic warning that the demand for a king which invalidated the oath sworn at Gilgal the people would later understand the error to place their trust in the strength of horses or the bow rather than the brit cut with לשמה at Sinai that לשמה rules as the KING of the 12 Tribes.

The Book of דברים\משנה תורה includes the Parshah of שופטים ושוטרים – a direct reference which ties the Levitical school of prophets to enforce Sanhedrin courtroom rulings לשמה. Hence the NaCH prophets routinely employ the language: כה אמר השם. This declaration of לשמה prophetic authority stands upon the אמונה יסוד of תורה לא בשמים היא. The justices of Sanhedrin courts known as אלהים.

The rejection of Shaul as Moshiach the Talmud amplifies by teaching that the priority of honor goes to the Talmud chakam over that of any king of Israel! Why? Because any person of bnai brit Israel can wear the crown of king! But a Torah sage 1:10,000! The mussar of the Book of Shmuel teaches the משל/\נמשל method. לשמה as KING – 1st Sinai commandment – establishes Yovel-Liberty for the 12 Tribes of Israel within and throughout the land. Herein defines the oath sworn לשמה at Sinai, and the k’vanna of the “wisdom commandment” also commonly referred to as time-oriented mitzva of Moshiach. Which both houses of Shaul and David failed to sanctify with Yovel-liberty and Sanhedrin Torah mandated Courts.

The mitzva of Moshiach constitutes as the definition of תולדות רשות מצוות. Av wisdom commandments require k’vanna. תולדות רשות mitzvot – קום ועשה ושב ולא תעשה מצוות do not require k’vanna. However, if a person – across the generations of bnai brit – sanctify a קום ועשה מצוה by affixing prophetic mussar which interprets the k’vanna of Oral Torah middot of רוח הקודש לשמה – this Torah wisdom makes an aliya of תולדות רשות commandments which do not require k’vanna unto Av tohor wisdom commandments which dedicate tohor Oral Torah רוח הקודש middot as the dominant middot of the Yatzir HaTov bnai brit heart. Herein correctly understands the prophetic mussar of Yemiah’s ברית חדש.

Tefillah דאורייתא – קריא שמע – emphatically remembers the liberty from Egyptian slavery and bondage. This t’shuva – act of remembering – sometimes translated as “return” – it stands as the יסוד foundation of the Torah mitzva known as Yovel. The prophet Yehoshua kept the Pesach and brit melah – the sign of the Yovel brit cut with Avraham that his future born Cohen seed through Yitzak would inherit and rule the land of Canaan through judicial justice – the definition of Yovel…the primary condition to sanctify the mitzva of Moshiach in the land!

The “Error/Heir” Pun: The fracture of the kingdom under Rehovoam at Sh’Cem, not merely a political failure or a simple “error” in judgment; but the direct remembered t’shuva by which Natan cursed all generations of the House of David. The crown – treated as an inherited, material possession toldot form, rather than a רוח הקודש dedication of tohor Oral Torah middot – the responsibility of the Sanhedrin to adjucate and define; and the Torah’s absolute requirement that the Moshiach both establish & sanctifies both Yovel & brit melah time-oriented commandments. The “heir” – indeed the “error.”

Just as Shlomo’s kingdom began with division and backroom deals (bypassing Adonijah), it ends with a total civil fracture at Shechem. NaCH prophets command mussar which definitively proves the בדיעבד monarchy – simply a fragile ‘house of cards’ … because the tuma Yatzir HaRa Esav within the bnai brit heart repeatedly abandons the Gilgal – Sinai brit which sanctifies לשמה\the 1st Sinai commandment – as king; as remembered by the fixed Order of the Rashi tefillen Gilgal oath brit. The prophetic mussar where the next generation error – Rahovam – travels to Sh’Cem – stands under the t’shuva of Sh’Cem; as remembered by the fixed Order of the Rabbeinu Tam tefillen. At Sh’Cem the 12 Tribes of Israel swore and answered אמן to the blessings and curses of the Torah brit. This לשמה\לא לשמה bi-polar opposite highlights the day/night difference between Yovel-liberty in the land from G’lut-oppression under foreign kings – starting with Par’o & Egypt.

Kings opens with the prophet Natan, which frames Adoniyahu’s power play to seize the throne of David – as a משיח שקר model – the main satire of the Books of both Shmuel and kings. The gospel books follow the Adoniyahu power play and attempt to seize the throne by declaring JeZeus as God. The gospel counterfeit framework, a child born outside the bond of a baal – not a divine miracle but a mamzer; barred from marrying into the Kahal.

A status that permanently excludes that individual and their descendants from the Bnai Brit chosen Cohen people. Jewish tradition fundamentally abhors the idea of Benei HaElohim narrative expressed in בראשית. The gospel Goyim propaganda – simply transplanted a pagan motif into a Jewish context, a wolf dressed in the garments of treif sheep; what do Goyim know of kosher slaughter? They called the torture and public murder of JeZeus a fit korban that saves all mankind from sin/death! Hence the treif gospel narrative stands upon the Pauline perversion – his “Original Sin of Adam” — simply a continuation where Roman authors promote Jewish civil war through their version of the “Adonijah power play” prior to the sectarian War which collapsed following the destruction of Herod’s Temple av tuma avoda zarah abomination. Duplicated by the Koran claim that Abraham bound Ishmael at Mecca rather than Isaac on Mount Moriah, they seek to bypass the entire legal framework of the Yovel and the 12 Tribes Yichus to the land of Canaan.

Prophetic mussar does not care about the gold on the walls; it cares about the widow, the orphan, the stranger, and the integrity of the Sanhedrin court. When the false prophets scream “”The Temple of Hashem, the Temple of Hashem” this perverted narishkeit compares to the Koran declaration that the Jews perverted the Torah, that some 1900 years after the revelation at Sinai – actually Avraham dedicated Yishmael at the Akadah! In Torah law, tribal Yichus-affiliation learns from Cohonim! Tribal yichus inherited solely through the Father – patrilineal descent.. The halacha set by the Court of Ezra determines that the mother determines the Jewishness of the new born child. This fundamental distinction דיוק learns straight from במדבר א:יח. Goyim lack of shame compares to the commercial: “Give it to Mikey – cus he swallows anything!

Reactionary readers who lack the skills to discern Torah common law from Goyim Statute law decrees compares to an ostrich who sticks its head into the sand. he prophet Natan cursed the house of David with an eternal plague of Civil War. Failure to validate this foundation determines where the head of the ostrich concealed. Goyim read their bibles and korans on par with shallow reactionary news papers, which a person reads and thereafter throws into the trash of Inquisitions and/or pogroms.

If Avraham dedicated Yishmael at Mecca then the whole promised land falls away. The Pauline reactionary propaganda which totally invalidates the wisdom commandment – brit melah and its direct connection to the land of Canaan as the “eternal sign of the brit” which לשמה sworn to Avraham, Yitzak, and Yaacov to father the chosen Cohen people … especially after the t’shuva made by HaShem when God erred and confused a Torah oath which requires the k’vanna that it can never become null & void with a vow which both father and baal can immediately anul. This Yom Kippur t’shuva – remembrance shares nothing with the guilt trip of Man eternally inherits the original sin of Adam – JeZeus atones for sin utter and complete narishkeit; Shlomo’s Temple directly compared to the ערלה brit of Yishmael and the korban of Cain dedicated as a positive commandment without prophetic mussar k’vanna.

An Israeli perspective: Torah not a religious text. G’lut Jewry established Judaism as religious halacha applies as much as UN statute law decrees. The Orthodox view of Zionism in pre-Shoah Europe directly compares to the Wilderness Generation who preferred religious g’lut over the obligations to rule the conquered lands of Canaan with judicial common law justice exercised through Sanhedrin courts. The Wilderness Generation directly compares to the ערב רב שאין להם יראת אלהים who worshipped the Golden Calf. The Torah commandment to make eternal war against Amalek, understood as kapo assimilated and intermarried Jews who bring through their worship of strange cultures and customs this direct Torah curse throughout the generations. The Torah curse of antisemitism defines the k’vanna of the mitzva of Amalek.


If Israel has the right to self-determination like any other country UN member state? Then should Israel post the Oct 7th Abomination War expel all Arab Gazans uprooted off of Gaza and establish this conquered land as the borders of the Tribe of Reuven, and the ’67 conquered Golan as the lands of the Tribe of Menashe. Based upon the principle of self-determination and Nakba consequences of Arabs starting and losing wars of extermination (throw the Jews into the Sea) and rejection prior to the first & second Independence Wars of Israeli Independence expel all PA Palestinians from Samaria in order to divide Israel into autonomous Tribes who bureaucratically regulate all trade within the borders of their own Tribes.

UN 2625 2023 carries the smell of hostile political agendas marked by UN 242 which while it does not explicitly declare “Palestinian” lands such as later 446 & 2334, serves as the foundation of UN racist condemnations of Israel which has permanently destroyed the good name reputation of the UN as objective. Despite later repealing UN 3379, this voting block passed resolution likewise justifies the hypocrisy of Security Council ‘great powers’, specifically England and France’s imperialism to seize the Suez Canal from Nasser in the 1956 War of failed great power States; together with the post WWII political agenda where the Allied victors made a mass population transfer of native born Prussian and Czech German populations and permitted both Poland and Russia to annex Prussia divided between themselves.

The propaganda notion that “Palestinians” have equal rights to achieve self-determination serves as UN propaganda. The Roman empire long ago conquered by early Arab Caliphate. That Caliphate likewise conquered and destroy no different from the defunct Roman empire. European imperialism defined by the Czar of Russia who styled himself “Caesar” and the early Western Charlemagne (also known as Charles the Great or Carolus Magnus) was the King of the Franks from 768, King of the Lombards from 774, and the first Emperor of the Romans in the West, crowned on Christmas Day in 800, supports the French early 18th Century cartographers, who sold maps of the Middle East to bankrupt ‘Sick Man of Europe’ Ottoman Pasha – which inserted Palestine as the ‘great power’ name for Ottoman ‘Greater Syria’.

Post WWI where the secret Sykes-Picot treaty (President Wilson rejected all secret great power “treaties”.) carved up the defunct Ottoman empire like these two ‘great powers’ radically changed the borders of the defunct Austria-Hungry empire! The League of Nations Palestine mandate, despite its recognition of all inhabitants living within the borders of “Palestine”, the League together with its ‘Palestine Mandate’ – died prior to the outbreak of WWII. The British White Paper absolutely invalidated the British Balfour Declaration obligations which served as the back-bone spine of that “Palestine Mandate”. Arab universal rejection of 181 and infamous 3 NO’s post Nakba crushing defeats in the June War of ’67 too has its consequences.

Post the ’48 Arab Nakba defeat to complete the Nazi genocide of Jews, coupled with the mass deportation of virtually all Jews in all Arab lands the UN ceased having any Mandate/Protectorate sovereignty over any “Palestinian territories” simply because Israel the name of the Jewish state – fundamentally rejects the Roman empire renaming of our country to “Palestine”. The propaganda narishkeit “establishe principles of modern international law and human rights”, a fig leaf which conceals the naked aggression of ‘Great Power’ partitions of India Korea Vietnam and Kuwaite gutted from Iraq. History records that the ‘Victors Right the history books’ and determine international borders of nations.

The Peace of Paris (1815), often called the Second Treaty of Paris, was the definitive peace settlement signed on November 20, 1815, following Napoleon Bonaparte’s final defeat at the Battle of Waterloo and his second abdication. It marked the end of the Napoleonic Wars and reshaped the geopolitical landscape of Europe, building upon the earlier Congress of Vienna (1814–1815). Notions of post WWII unilateral declarations which ever so conveniently ignore the history of European imperialism/colonialism Israel totally rejects.

The complicity of both UN unilateral decisions to immediately withdraw its “peace keeping” forces from Sinai, radical repeated attempts to dictate the borders of an Arab Palestine despite the cold fact that Palestine ceased to exist in 1948; the UN excluding Britain and Pakistan (the product of British 2-State imperialism) the only UN countries which recognized Jordan’s illegal annexation of Samaria; Britain in 1923 separated Trans-Jordan from the territories of its Palestine Mandate at the Jordan River! The UN Roman-style attempt to expunge the name Samaria from political debate and discussions proves its lack of objectivity. The Trump 1.0 Abraham Accords repudiated the Obama promoted 2334 condemnation of Israel’s “illegal occupation of Palestine”; so conveniently brushed over (like the name Samaria) the PLO 1964 charter which did not view Samaria or Gaza as “occupied territory”.

Trump 2.0 Gaza Peace Board excludes England, France, Russia, and the UN. UN “international law” a paper tiger pie in the sky Roman Empire attempt to rename Judea unto Palestine. The Arab God Allah defeated across the board and utterly humiliated-Nakba. Restoration of the tribal republic of Israel the Torah constitutional vision of Moshiach. The T’NaCH & Talmud explicitly states this vision by proving the failure of both Houses of Shaul and David to establish both Yovel – the sign of the Avraham brit-melah k’vanna – acquisition of tribal liberty of all 12 Tribes of the Republic/commonwealth. Failure across the UN to validate this fundamental facts of Jewish autonomy permanently invalidate the UN “international law” as “objective”. The UN block voting and great power Security Council imperialism ie Quartet compares to a ‘whore in church on Sunday’ who has no shame.

Clearly the post Pious XII post war ‘Rat-lines’ and Polish pogroms has its consequences. Despite the decline of Xtianity across Europe post Shoah absolutely destroyed the good name reputation of the church coupled with a long history of pogroms and forced population transfers and judicial “Inquisition” injustice combined with repeated taxation without representation and three Century ghetto gulag imprisonment of Jews, despite Vatican II, the interests of Rome favor making Jerusalem an “international city”.

One of the Torah commandment (פרט) the mitzva of Moshiach has nothing whatsoever to do with early or late false messiah movements by Goyim and Jews living in cursed Goyim lands. Why “cursed”? The entire Torah stands according to the closing instructions of Moshe Rabbeinu upon Life Death Blessing Curse 1st and 2nd Commandments which Moshe commanded Yehoshua to establish the six כנגד six tribal blessing-curse at Sh’Cem as remembered/t’shuva through the order of the Rabbeinu Tam tefillen. Self-determination: the top priority of all pie in the sky “international law” – absurd notion which assumes that nation states compare to ships sailing through “international waters”? Like JeZeus or Allah express the k’vanna of the 1st Sinai commandment!

Self-determination means that each and every nation determines its strategic national interests. Third party States who share no immediate international borders their opinions while valid compare to Americans criticizing Russian or Chinese laws! No UN unilaterally declared the 1 child Maoist decree and a violation of “international law”. No UN unilaterally declared that the Roe vs. Wade Supreme Court decision violated the Commerce Clause of the US Constitution which empowers State bureaucratic regulatory autonomy over all intra-state trade within any State of the US Republic.

UN attempts to equate Palestinian equal rights to achieve self-determination sweep under the rug that Arabs rejected UN 181, the Nakba crushing defeat of both Allah and JeZeus as Messiah God, never existed a Arab Palestinian state – no Arab Palestinian currency or Capital despite UN Resolution 2334! Just as Jews expelled by Romans following the disaster of the Bar Kochba Revolt, this rule of law equally applies to Arabs who made a mass population transfer of Byzantine Europeans from Roman Palestine; this rule of law equally applies to 3 NO’s Arab dhimmi refugee populations who have a long history of terrorism – such as the Munich massacre and Entebbe.

Israel does NOT deny self-determination of dhimmi refugee populations who post ’64 style themselves a ‘Palestinians’ – despite their inability to pronounce the letter P! Post ’48 Israel repatriated more Jews expelled from Arab countries than dhimmi Nakba defeated Allah believers from the borders of ’48 Israel. Arabs have many countries and vast lands. Just as Jews through the Balfour Declaration began the process of self-determination, the burden of establishment of an Arab Palestinian state must come from lands given to these dhimmi Arab refugees by one or more of Arab countries. Dhimmi Arab refugees the burden of repatriating these Arab displaced refugees no Arab or Muslim country has yet to do. Cries about “Apartheid Israel’ bogus propaganda in the face that Israel has given citizenship to ’48 Arabs while no Arab state as agreed to repatriate dhimmi Arab refugee populations. Its really a “put up or shut up” reality.

The slander of ‘tribal fiefdoms’, clearly does not apply to the States of the American Union. Therefore, since no UN Resolution condemns the 1846 seizure of Mexican lands, its has no “international law” precedent to pretend that a new sheriff in town nonsense that minor states do not and cannot apply the same set of “laws” imposed upon them by ‘great power’ nations in the past. Just as the rule: ‘maintain the balance of power in the region’ defined the defunct British empire foreign policy; post Oct 7th 2023 Israel likewise seeks to minimize the influence of European colonialism in its international affairs to shape and influence the balance of power across the Middle East and North Africa.

Just as ‘manifest destiny’ shaped US 19th Century strategic interests post Shoah Israel has its own version of ‘manifest destiny’. The post Shoah establishment of the UN does not unilaterally negate the whole of Human history. This Wilsonian vision of international diplomacy compares to Catholic church dogmatism and the infallibility of the Pope!

Utterly not at all relevant the size of the country of Israel! Or that Israel as an independent country currently confronts hostile neighbors. This latter fig leaf seeks to hide that Israel has treaty relations with Egypt and Jordan! The Assad dictatorship uprooted and destroyed together with the Israeli demand that its troops will occupy Lebanon till the Lebanese Army expels permanently – a possible population transfer of Hezbollah Arabs to Iran. Only Israel through diplomacy and alliances determines its international borders. Foreign state imperialism which unilaterally declares a Palestinian state within East Jerusalem and all Samaria and Gaza – utter nonsense.

A Torah constitutional republic not confused with the Church false messiah lies which have dominated European colonialism with ‘its good news’ convert the world to become “democracies” jargon. Islam, its Nakba Allah god – as dead as JeZeus in Europe. No ‘International Court’ established through a Rome Agreement which invalidates Jewish self-determination “NEVER AGAIN’ to permit Goyim to racially judge their “Jewish problem” post Shoah.

The Torah mitzva of Moshiach stands upon the vision of Yovel liberty, the k’vanna of the wisdom commandment of brit melah which remembers the oaths sworn to the Avot to cause their chosen Cohen seed to inherit the lands of Canaan, in order to dedicate to rule the 12 Tribes of the Republic through משנה תורה Legislative Review of all Tribal statute laws – to rule the Republic with justice which makes fair compensation of damages inflicted by bnai brit upon bnai brit. The UN as false as the JeZeus and Shabbetai Tzvi\Yaacov Frank, Rebbe g’lut Moshiach. Self determination requires restoration of the 12 Tribes within the borders of the Torah Constitutional Republic of States.

Any attempt to pervert Torah into a biblical theological avoda zara an abomination on the Order of Oct 7th 2023! G’lut Reshonim, based upon the horrid barbaric conditions imposed upon them by “Injun Empires”, forced to restrict Torah to theological religious arguments in order to prevent the barbaric church and mosque to permit “their” token Jews to stay for a generation or two within the borders of their lands! G’lut Jews by Talmudic definition cannot pursue justice among our people לשמה. All attempts by outside governments to “preach their international law good news” to Israel qualifies as a Capital Crime of avoda zara if and when Israeli self-determination restores the 3rd Republic. The imperialist argument: “Cost of Isolation” false flat with the United States precedent established in the New World!

No different from framing the revelation of the Torah at Sinai as a “Divine Act”. The Book of D’varim clearly states תורה לא בשמים היא. The righteous pursuit of justice among and between the Cohen national Republic only proves that this Republic an atheist לשמה republic – based upon Cohen Levi Israel division of crops to t’ruma maaser chol. Clearl chol does not mean profane but rather “Israel”. Religious theology shares no common denominator with Constitutional Torah common law legalism. Goyim revisionist history which imported conquered Goyim into the captured Samaria kingdom by Assyria, the Roman renaming of Judea to Palestine, and UN Revisionist history which attempts to equate an never existent Arab Palestinian State with Israel — all stand on the same imperialism by great power states to impose ghetto gulag borders upon hated and despised Jews. Just as a Torah Constitutional Republic bases its lateral common law courts upon prior judicial precedents, Israel demands the same from the post WWII establishment of the UN! Just that simple.

The UN NEVER GRANTED self-determination to Jews in the betrayed British White Paper mandate. UN Resolution 181 recognized Jewish equal rights to achieve self-determination ie the objective of Herzl’s political Zionism. But “granted self-determination to Israel” a gross blood libel comparable to the church blood libel slanders used to justify pogroms and war crime ghetto gulags. From 242 to 2334 which foist the foreign power imperialism styled as “international law” ignores the neutral status of the UN during the ’48 and ’67 attempts to throw the Jews into the Sea! UN actions have consequences no different than how church injustice and war crimes functioned as the basis of the Shoah.

The UN no more “created Israel” any more than the world “created in Six Days”. The latter introduces wisdom commandments which require k’vanna – known as time-oriented commandments. Time-oriented commandments not confused by silly טיפש פשט literalism of words! This primary type of Torah common law separates Torah wisdom from Goyim wisdom akin to פרדס inductive logic day & night different than static syllogism deductive logic. Algebra or Plain geometry poles apart from Calculus and Hyperbolic geometry. Torah judicial common law courts share nothing with statute law decrees issued from UN member states.

By launching a war to “throw the Jews into the sea” in 1948 and rejecting partition, the Arab coalition fundamentally shattered the legal framework of the British Mandate. In common law, if one party repudiates a contract and attempts to murder the other party, they cannot later sue for the enforcement of that same contract’s terms. The United States established its entire continent-wide republic through the expansion of its borders, lateral state trade rights (the Commerce Clause), and the displacement of hostile populations. No international court has ever successfully retroactively invalidated the legal borders of the United States.

By this standard of global precedent, Israel’s demand to secure its frontiers post-October 7th, free from the interference of non-bordering “third-party states” (like European nations or UN voting blocks), a simple straightforward application of the same rules of survival and self-determination used by every major global power in history. Relying on the UN to validate Jewish self-determination – like asking a thief to validate your deed of ownership. True self-determination means rebuilding the internal, lateral legal structures of the Jewish people on their own soil, applying Torah common law to the modern state, and letting the geopolitical chips fall where they may.

“International law” built on State strategic interests. Not State consent, treaties and customary practices. No “international law” built on State strategic interests. Not State consent, treaties and customary practices. Israel did not sign the Rome Treaty which “created” the ICC court! The ICC attempt to void this fact because the PA signed the Rome Treaty compares to Texas or California or New York signing the Rome treaty.  Under the Oslo Accords (specifically the Israeli-Palestinian Interim Agreement), the PA – explicitly denied criminal jurisdiction over Israeli citizens. If the PA never had the legal right to prosecute Israelis under the bilateral agreements that created it, it cannot thereafter delegate a non-existent right to a court in The Hague.

Israel did not win its national Independence only to surrender it to global governance. The UN replacement of the Roman church attempt to internationalize Jerusalem stands on par with the British White Paper/UN Resolution 2334. Torah – never intended as a g’lut “religious text” for private worship. But rather as a Constitution which mandates a Tribal Republic and Sanhedrin Legislative Review of all Tribal statute laws. The g’lut coping mechanism: “religionization” of the Torah address g’lut realities only – the loss of sovereignty, turning a system of governance into a system of belief.

Clarity of Torah learning לשמה – As the definition of faith – צדק צדק תרדוף.

Pesach serves as the basis of the mitzva of Yovel/Liberty! The prophet Yehoshua – the first Book of the NaCH Prophets through the establishment of the oaths sworn at both Gilgal and Sh’Cem – the mitzva of tefillen and its two boxes containing 4 Parshiot which the Rashi tefillen remembers the Order of brit Gilgal: Just as Moshe sent לשמה as a מלאך to judge the Gods of Paro and Egypt, the prophet Yehoshua sent לשמה as a מלאך to judge the Gods of Canaan and the Canaanite kings! The Blessing – Curse by the 6 Tribes vs 6 Tribes remembers the oath sworn at Sh’Cem which remembers the Life – Death/Blessing – Curse first two Sinai commandments upon which hinge לשמה all the rest of the revelation of both the written and oral Torah.

The Prophet Yehoshua priorities the mitzva of establishment of 3 of the 6 cities of Refuge; the last mitzva observed by Moshe Rabbeinu – the establishment of the 3 cities of Refuge on the other side of the Jordan river! And the mitzva לשמה of brit melah – the sign of the brit sworn to Avraham that his future born Cohen seed would inherit as their permanent inheritance the lands of Canaan!

But following the passing of the 1st generation who conquered the land of Canaan. The next generation worshipped avoda zarah – they assimilated and intermarried with Goyim and embraced their cultures and customs as their own! Hence the 12 tribes abandoned the Pesach model of Yovel Liberty in the Land of Israel. The Book of שופטים proves this conclusively that Israel during the times of the Judges did not observe the mitzva of Yovel.

Then comes the Book(s) of the prophet Shmuel. Where the people abandoned the brit of Gilgal – the oath wherein the 12 Tribes swore a brit cut upon the souls of the lives of their future born children לשמה that the local god of Sinai who brought Yovel to the chosen Cohen seed freed from Egyptian bondage this local god (only the 12 tribes of Israel accepted לשמה the revelation of the Torah at Sinai/Horev) would rule as לשמה king of the 12 tribes of the Republic of conquered Canaan. The prophet Shmuel called לשמה for rains to fall during the dry season as the “sign” (think brit melah) of the brit which לא לשמה Israel asked for a king to restore Yovel in the land!

Both kings Shaul and David failed to sanctify לשמה the mitzva of Moshiach to establish לשמה the Torah as the Written Constitution of the Republic of the 12 Tribes and Sanhedrin Courts as the Oral Torah לשמה authority which interprets the k’vanna of the Written Torah Constitution from generation to generation.

The Talmud clearly states that post the Bavil g’lut, starting with the generation of Ezra, that Jews never observed the mitzva לשמה of Yovel and brit melah – the sign of the brit – sworn to the Avot fathers of the chosen Cohen people! By the time rabbi Yechuda wrote the 6 Orders of his common law Mishna — based upon the 5th Book of דברים also called משנה תורה – which means “Common Law” — some 75 Years AFTER the disaster of the Bar Kochba revolt, where the Romans renamed the fully conquered province of Judea unto the Roman name of Palestine. Clearly the intent of the Romans to fully expel the Jewish people from off the conquered land of Palestine and scatter them as stateless refugee populations across the whole of the Roman empire!

G’lut Jews no different from the g’lut Jews who endured the judicial oppression of Par’o and his vertical courts of judicial oppression and corruption – Jews in g’lut slavery obviously do not keep the mitzva of Yovel – even לא לשמה! Therefore the Mishna with its even later Gemara common do not bemoan the past where Jews failed to keep Yovel and remember the k’vanna of brit melah לשמה. Rather the Mishna with its later Gemara serve as the ideal model for the time when Jews return and reconquer the oath sworn lands from the Roman barbarian invaders or their close kin the Xtians and Mu-ham-mad Injuns and restore Yovel and brit melah לשמה to the land – make the Written Torah the Constitution of the Republic of 12 Tribes and pursue righteous justice among our people לשמה.

Why does the Book of Shmuel anoint Shaul as king? Shaul clearly not the right king. The Book of Shmuel not a history book. The people erred when they asked for a king. Hence the prophet called upon the rains to fall as a sign to the people of their error, to ask for a king when the oath brit of Gilgal cut a brit that HaShem lives as king of bnai brit 12 Tribes; the Order of the Rashi tefillen “remembers” the oath sworn at Gilgal.

The Torah mandates specifically Sanhedrin courts. Moshe never anointed as King. Yehoshua never anointed as King. דברים יז serves as a precedent for the time when the Yatzir Ha-Raw dominates the hearts of the people. Both David and how much more so Shlomo ignored the rules established in דברים. T’NaCH commands mussar for the generations it emphatically does not teach history. The Talmud prioritizes the honor of a Torah sage over that of a king! Based upon Shaul as king and still later the Hashmonaim Cohen kings, anyone can replace Herod! But a talmid chakham 1:10,000. Shmuel warned the people that they would later regret their request for a king! Civil War defines all the kings of Yechuda and Israel!

Prophetic mussar – both כלל ופרט – aint about David in 1 Shmuel פרק יח, he’s not the king! The mussar focuses upon Shaul’s failure to try David before a Sanhedrin court. Later when David became king he too would duplicate this exact חלול השם of king Shaul! The mitzva\purpose of Moshiach, as defined by both Moshe and Yehoshua who both prioritized לשמה establishment of the cities of refuse – ie Small Sanhedrin Courts. Sanhedrin common law courts upon what do they hinge upon 12 Tribes keeping the Yovel as a דאורייתא מצוה לשמה.

Why the language חלול השם? Neither House anointed as Moshiach sanctified the Torah commandment לשמה. NaCH prophets command mussar to all generations of bnai brit. Torah does not “look back” at history the way false prophets do. Torah, a post Sinai revelation, does not worship any God in any of the so called 7 Heaven above, as do av tuma avoda zara religious theologies and dogmatic decrees dictate to all their believers. Torah – the revelation of the faith of Torah mandated common law Sanhedrin “federal” courts. Only the 12 Tribes from Yaacov stood and accepted the revelation of the Torah at Sinai/Horev.

After the fact av tumah avoda zara – the so called ‘Sister Religion’ 1400 to 1900 years gap of separation – where the former despite not being under the Law insists that their Man\God the God of Sinai; the later tawhid Allah too absolutely insists the Allah the revelation of the 1st Sinai commandment; tawhid Monotheism fundamentally a חלול השם of the 2nd Sinai commandment. Both Moshe and Yehoshua sent as מלאכים to judge the Gods of both Egypt and Canaan. The mitzva of Moshiach לשמה, a Torah מלאכה commandment.

The Book of Shmuel סמוך to Shoftim & Yehoshua; no different to the Order of the Siddur. NaCH prophetic books learn from one another through בניני אבות common law precedents. The foundation of the NaCH prophets – the Book of Yehoshua. The prophet – like unto Moshe – completed the Torah commandment to establish the 6 cities of refuge! Keeping Pesach – from which learns the Torah commandment of Yovel; and brit melah – the sign of the brit. Which brit? The oath sworn to the Avot when they sojourned in the land as often despised refugees! Chag Pesach remembers the brit of liberation from Egyptian slavery.

G’lut Jewry, after the Romans renamed conquered Judea unto Palestine, while enduring the horrors of our return back to Egypt (לאו דוקא), even before the Bar Kochba disaster, post destruction of Herod’s Cathedral abomination, the Romans permitted Jews to build a “Sanhedrin” in Yavneh! But that Sanhedrin no different from the Sanhedrin which Napoleon permitted! Speculation over the mitzva of Moshiach has produced wild belief systems of theology! Especially following the Cossack revolt against Poland.

Despite יוחנן בן זכאי and other Tannaim, rabbi Yechuda’s Mishna codified after the Romans had decided to cast the Jewish people as exiles upon the dung heaps of history. Hence the Tannaim scholars follow the model set by the NaCH prophets! The codifications of both Mishna and Gemara do not worship the past but serve as a model for the future based upon the NaCH prophets starting with the Book of Yehoshua. Torah simply not hostage to Goyim sovereignty—the Oral Law becomes the “how to” wisdom—to survive the Torah curse of g’lut. NaCH prophets provide the precedents for later Tannaim and Amoraim scholarship as codified in both the Talmud and Siddur.

False prophet and false messiah a product of g’lut Torah curses. When the people asked for a Moshiach in Shmuel, it rained during the dry season! The mussar of the rain in the wrong time and places the Talmud interprets as a Torah curse. G’lut defines keeping mitzvot לא לשמה because the oath brit sworn to the Avot most essentially entails Liberty from Goyim rule like the model of Egypt AND justice among and between our people within the borders of conquered Canaan.

The Talmud: doing mitzvot לא לשמה to later doing mitzvot לשמה, as interpreted by RambaN’s commentary to the Chumash ויקרא יח:כה builds on the בנין אב of דברין יא:יז. Hק separates גלות Jewish communities from Jewish communities in גאולה. He writes that Jews do mitzvot in g’lut to remember how to do mitzvot in the Land. Moshe brought Israel out of Egypt to conquer and rule Canaan with justice. צדק צדק תרדוף.

The sealed NaCH Books of Prophets compare to the oath sworn at Gilgal – remembered through the Order of Rashi’s tefillen and the Order of the Siddur/Shemone Esrei. The Yerushalmi Talmud teaches that more than 247 prophets occupied in writing the Shemone Esrei. What mussar does this Gemara teach? Prophets function as the שטרים of the Sanhedrin שפטים, the k’vanna of דברים טז:יח. Prophets interpret the k’vanna of time-oriented commandments. Goyim do not determine Torah law they do not define abstract Torah terms, they have no portion in the world to come; meaning no connection to the brit that the seed of Avram would number as the stars of the sky. Avraham sent away Yishmael; to his other non brit seed – he sent them away with gifts. Only Yitzak inherited the oath brit faith of his father Avraham. Only Yitzak swore the oath of being a father to the chosen Cohen seed at the Akedah. Yitzak caused Yaacov – not Esav – to inherit “title” Av of the chosen Cohen people.

Tiqqun Ha’Olam understanding the k’vanna of time-oriented wisdom commandments. First — must “sell the idea” and let the chips fall where destiny determines.

Premise: Revolutions occur when when the people of the land reject both Monarch and the state religion. The models of the American, French, Bolshevik, Nazi, Maoist gang of four, Pol Pot and 1979 Iranian revolution cast both king and the state “religion” upon the dung-heaps of history. To permanently break a vertical system, the population has to simultaneously lose faith in the ruler’s muscle and the priest’s magic – as did Moshe and Aaron when they faced down Par’o. Clearly the most brittle pillar, which a Shimshon strength can break: g’lut Judaism. G’lut Judaism worships Shulkan Aruch לא לשמה halachot which do not require k’vanna לשמה. In Israeli society today the tectonic plate which threatens Civil War a secular religious divide wherein the latter assumes they hold all the cards, they have a monopoly upon the Torah!

Yovel learns from liberty from Egyptian slavery. Despite king David bringing peace to the land he failed to judge Uriah in a Sanhedrin court of law as likewise failed king Shaul to judge David and King Shlomo to judge Yerovam the later first king of Israel. The dynasty of both Davidic and Israel kings failed to keep the Yovel as the basis for the 12 tribes to establish the Federal Sanhedrin Courts which the prophet Natan understood as the real בית המקדש rather than David and Shlomo’s copy-cat Cathedrals which bankrupt national treasuries in all Goyim lands throughout history.

The Sages sealed the T’NaCH, Talmud, Siddur, masoret. This gives all generations of Israel the same level starting field to pursue justice in our oath brit home land. As the NaCH prophets command mussar to all generations living in the future/O’lam Ha’bah so too and how much more so Torat Moshe! This forward facing vision of faith absolutely different from av tuma avoda zarah religions whose theologies declare the nature of the Gods as 1. Monotheistic and 2. In the heavens above; either A) sitting upon the right and of the Father or B) enjoying 72 virgins.

The Mishna denounces God speculations. Those who “believe” in that which lies above them, or behind them, or below them – better that such persons’ never even born! After the fact religions, established more than 1000 or even 2000 years after the revelation of the Torah at Sinai – there revisionist history theologies never retroactively accepted the Sinai revelation for them to later declares who or what defines the mitzva of Moshiach or prophet. The church rejection of brit melah and the mosque rejection of Avraham Yitzak and Yaacov as the fathers of the chosen Cohen people who inherit the lands of Canaan as an eternal inheritance, no forced conversions at the point of a sword change their revisionist history substitute theologies for the Torah revelation at Sinai – which only the 12 Tribes of Israel accepted.

Prior to the establishment of Yovel and brit melah preconditions for Sanhedrin common law courts ie בית המקדש, the purpose of the Mishna\Gemara/Talmud does not and never has laid out the past, but rather the mussar vision of the future! While some Tannaim sages in the Yerushalmi debated whether king David established conquered Damascus as a City of Refuges with a small Sanhedrin court, all Sages of both Mishna and Gemarah agree that during the entire history of the בית שני Jews never observed Yovel דאורייתא.

The popular mythology swirling around the Moshiach that he builds the 3rd Temple – stands on par with the Chabbad Rebbe being the Moshiach! Torah in g’lut exemplifies לא לשמה, and the rebbe never made aliya to Israel. Just as the britot of Gilgal and Sh’Cem shape the Order of Parshiot within Tefillen (the latter like a Sefer Torah in the matter of oaths), so too and how much more so the prophet Yehoshua defined the conditions of the mitzva of Moshiach through establishment of Yovel, brit melah – the sign of the brit, and establishment of all the small Sanhedrin courts through the minimum 6 Cities of Refuge.

While the Tannaim sages divided over David, the Book of Sh’muel condemns David over the פרט of Uriah just as Shaul condemned over not killing the Amalek king! Neither man forced criminals to stand before a Sanhedrin court. Hence based upon this reading of the Book of Shmuel, no king of Yechuda or Israel ever sanctified the mitzva of Moshiach. Therefore both T’NaCH & Talmudic common law commands prophetic mussar to all O’lam Ha’bah generations and never mourns the past where previous generations likewises failed to rule the land with righteous justice!

Yovel learns from liberty from Egyptian slavery. Despite king David bringing peace to the land he failed to judge Uriah in a Sanhedrin court of law as likewise failed king Shaul to judge David and King Shlomo to judge Yerovam the later first king of Israel. The dynasty of both Davidic and Israel kings failed to keep the Yovel as the basis for the 12 tribes to establish the Federal Sanhedrin Courts which the prophet Natan understood as the real בית המקדש rather than David and Shlomo’s copy-cat Cathedrals which bankrupt national treasuries in all Goyim lands throughout history.

The Sages sealed the T’NaCH, Talmud, Siddur, masoret. This gives all generations of Israel the same level starting field to pursue justice in our oath brit home land. As the NaCH prophets command mussar to all generations living in the future/O’lam Ha’bah so too and how much more so Torat Moshe! This forward facing vision of faith absolutely different from av tuma avoda zarah religions whose theologies declare the nature of the Gods as 1. Monotheistic and 2. In the heavens above; either A) sitting upon the right and of the Father or B) enjoying 72 virgins.

The Mishna denounces God speculations. Those who “believe” in that which lies above them, or behind them, or below them – better that such persons’ never even born! After the fact religions, established more than 1000 or even 2000 years after the revelation of the Torah at Sinai – there revisionist history theologies never retroactively accepted the Sinai revelation for them to later declares who or what defines the mitzva of Moshiach or prophet. The church rejection of brit melah and the mosque rejection of Avraham Yitzak and Yaacov as the fathers of the chosen Cohen people who inherit the lands of Canaan as an eternal inheritance, no forced conversions at the point of a sword change their revisionist history substitute theologies for the Torah revelation at Sinai – which only the 12 Tribes of Israel accepted.

Prior to the establishment of Yovel and brit melah preconditions for Sanhedrin common law courts ie בית המקדש, the purpose of the Mishna\Gemara/Talmud does not and never has laid out the past, but rather the mussar vision of the future! While some Tannaim sages in the Yerushalmi debated whether king David established conquered Damascus as a City of Refuges with a small Sanhedrin court, all Sages of both Mishna and Gemarah agree that during the entire history of the בית שני Jews never observed Yovel דאורייתא.

The popular mythology swirling around the Moshiach that he builds the 3rd Temple – stands on par with the Chabbad Rebbe being the Moshiach! Torah in g’lut exemplifies לא לשמה, and the rebbe never made aliya to Israel. Just as the britot of Gilgal and Sh’Cem shape the Order of Parshiot within Tefillen (the latter like a Sefer Torah in the matter of oaths), so too and how much more so the prophet Yehoshua defined the conditions of the mitzva of Moshiach through establishment of Yovel, brit melah – the sign of the brit, and establishment of all the small Sanhedrin courts through the minimum 6 Cities of Refuge.

While the Tannaim sages divided over David, the Book of Sh’muel condemns David over the פרט of Uriah just as Shaul condemned over not killing the Amalek king! Neither man forced criminals to stand before a Sanhedrin court. Hence based upon this reading of the Book of Shmuel, no king of Yechuda or Israel ever sanctified the mitzva of Moshiach. Therefore both T’NaCH & Talmudic common law commands prophetic mussar to all O’lam Ha’bah generations and never mourns the past where previous generations likewise failed to rule the land with righteous justice!

Never compare as a hard fast כלל T’NaCH\Talmudic common law with other Goyim common law legalism. The model of Goyim courtroom law stands upon the “vertical” court of Par’o – who validated the command made by Par’o to beat Hebrew slaves over their “guilt” of laziness. The eternal model for the later ever repeating blood libels justifications employed to attack and kill Jews. The prophetic mussar vision of Talmudic משנה תורה common law Sanhedrin courts starkly contrasts against British common law courts; akin to the kabbalistic ‘black fire on white fire’ of the RambaN’s introduction to his Chumash commentary! British courts (common law or otherwise) simply cannot abrogate a law passed by Parliament. Because the British Parliament when it passes a new law – herein defines the unwritten Constitution of England.

Quite impossible to rule the lands of Canaan without politics. The absurd notion that religion divorced from politics ignores the Civil War which define the Church split as well as the Sunni Shiite split. The Torah aggadic story of בראשית which describes pre-creation as ‘chaos and anarchy’. The משל describes the realities of Civil War; a Torah curse placed upon the house of David by the prophet Natan!

Torah according to Moshe Rabbeinu prior to his passing Life or Death\Blessing or Curse//לשמה או לא לשמה. G’lut Jews no different from the g’lut Wilderness Generation! Reshonim established Judaism as a religious coping mechanism confronted with the Jewish return back to Egyptian slavery! Obviously the term Egypt – a לאו דוקא משל. No different than the “blowing out the Hanukkah candles משל-מוסר. Hanukka remembers the Tzeddukim working together with the Syrian Greeks to cause Israel to forget the “Oral Torah” ie פרדס. The Rambam and the assimilated rabbis of the Golden Age of Spain – their assimilation to the Greek syllogism model of logic no different than the error of the Tzeddukim a 1000 years previous!

G’lut Judaism worships as holy Shlomo’s Temple! It fails to learn the tongue N’ cheek satire of מלכים referring to Shlomo as ‘the wisest of men’. Such box thinking duplicates the Man/God church and prophets sent to all Goyim and speak in the native tongues of Goyim, despite Goyim never accepting either of the first or 2nd Sinai commandments. The term ירידות הדורות falsely understood that the earlier generations closer to the actual masoret than later generations. Such a g’lut inferiority complex ignores the counter interpretation of “ripple effect” or “domino effect”; when Shlomo worshipped avoda zara by building his Cathedral, how was this act any different from another king of Yechuda admiring a Syrian altar and coping the design of that altar?

Faith defined as the righteous pursuit of justice radically differs from faith as belief in some Universal God who lives in the Heavens above! That g’lut Judaism corrupts the revelation of the Mishkan – on par with the golden calf; such block-headed טיפש פשט non-thinking ignores ברית חדש of Yermiahu and בכל לבבך\כם of Rabbi Yechuda. The Yatzir Ha-Tov houses the Shekinah Oral Torah middot Spirits. Because post Sinai תורה לא בשמים היא.

Korbanot a wisdom commandment which requires k’vanna. Cain, the two son of Aaron dedicated a קום ועשה korban that failed to make the require aliya of toldoth mitzvot to time-oriented mitzvot. No different that the 250 princes who sided with Korach’s revolt! Korbanot only as a toldoth mitzva qualifies as making a barbeque to heaven! G’lut Jewry views the Shoah as a mystery! Akin to the mystery of the Xtian triune God or Muslim tawhid Allah!

The Talmud instructs that the world created for bnai brit Israel! Meaning we bear the yoke of the kingdom of heaven – responsibility for either the blessing לשמה or curse g’lut לא לשמה. Jewish assimilation and intermarriage avoda zara results in the Torah curse brought on as a consequence of ערב רב kapo assimilated and intermarried Jews שאין להם יראת שמים — herein defines the k’vanna of the wisdom commandment of Amalek for all generations of Israel bnai brit. The buck stops with bnai brit Israel because only we accept the revelation of the Torah at Sinai. The mitzva of Moshiach a wisdom commandment applicable to all Jews in all generations who live in the oath sworn lands and therefore possess the blessing to do mitzvot לשמה. Just as Shabbat a time-oriented commandment for all Israel – no different the mitzva of Moshiach!

What fundamentally separates Torah & Talmud from av tuma avoda zara “daughter religions”? The latter declare belief in their theologies of God. While the former limits “faith” to the establishment of Sanhdrin court within the borders of ארץ ישראל when the 12 Tribes count the years of liberty-Yovel. Which to date: has yet to ever occur. Sugya intergrity קידושין – the 6th sugya: 5a to 5b. שתקנה

This sugya makes a משנה תורה – t’shuva which learns Rabbi Akiva’s רבוי מיעט. While the רבוי מיעט not in and off itself a general הוויה אמינא וקמ״ל process – its operates and accomplishes the same result. Therefore practically speaking the “tap code” of הווא אמינא … קמ”ל, since it functionally duplicates the rabbinic middah of רבוי מיעט therefore our sugya in under examination a 4th midda and not simply 3 middot!  It transforms from a simple three-part refutation into a highly sophisticated, four-tiered grid of inductive legal reasoning.

The immediate functional result of the Kal V’Chomer. It operates as an inductive Ribuy, conceptually widening the boundaries of the Mishnah’s original matrix to bring an unlisted, 4th mode of entry (Chuppah) into the legal domain of Kinyan – קמ”ל. The logic of the Kal V’Chomer expansive like the הווא אמינא\רבוי.

The precedent בנין אב functions like a fractional “common denominator” wherein the Mishna language equates acquisition of “Title” to the נפש עולם הבא of the woman based upon the Torah בנין אב brit cut between the pieces where Avram cut a brit upon his future born seed (עולם הבא).

The prophetic mussar of the Torah rejects the Nazi racism which modern racists call DNA after Jewish scientists made this discovery in 1953! Any person can convert and embrace the Sinai revelation of Torah common law justice – and many Goyim in point of fact have done just that. Post Shoah where European antisemites slaughtered 75% of Western European Jewry in less than 3 years – this team effort depended upon the British White Paper which influenced the decision of Washington to not duplicate its Good Eye policy of permitting Jewish refugees expelled from the collapsing Czarist empire into the United States at the turn of the 20th Century!

The Nazi “inferior race” racism post Shoah antisemites now employ DNA as a fig leaf to cover their diseased minds. By treating the expansive logic of the Kal V’Chomer as an operational Ribuy, and the restrictive Tzad HaShaveh as a structural Miuat, a scholar can map the middot “finger-print” of this 6th sugya of קידושין and through detective sleuth work compare this “fingerprint” to other Similar sugyot across the Sha’s Bavli and Yerushalmi. משנה תורה-common law stands upon the יסוד of precedents.

When a Gemara 6th sugya turns back upon itself 2nd sugya, this “drosh” makes a depth analysis of rabbinic middot language. This depth analysis of rabbinic middot, like as explained above permits down stream generations to make a שד השווה to other related גזרה שווה sugyot across the Sha’s.

The editors of the Vilna Sha’s, their wisdom employs the * to achieve this inductive reasoning which compares different sugyot (always and forever chained to interpret the language/phrase of a specific Mishna), and then expands this צד השווה common denominator גזרה שווה language.

The precedent search to different sugyot compares the language of one specific Mishna to other specific Mishnaot! The first * common denominator following .ג (second sugya), compares the language of our Av Mishah to the thesis statement: 10a איבעיא להו ביאה נשואין עושה או אירוסין עושה? The language נפקא מינה the rabbinic understanding of רוב חסד – the Torah middah of discernment or understanding which compares like from like – akin to the mitzva of separating t’ruma, ma’asser, chol\Israel. (Chol not common or profane. Rather House of Aaron, Levi, and Israel’s portion inheritance to the oath sworn lands.) The common false translation which views the 6 day of Chol as separate from Shabbat, another example of טיפש פשט “box thinking”\”idiot box” “boob tube” “programming/brain-washing”.

The actual צד השווה on dof 10b., and this sugya terminates on 11a. When the common law commentary Baali Tosafot jumps off the dof in search of a common law precedent, the simplest way to understand the wisdom of the grand-children of Rashi; understand … each and every sugya of Gemara exceptionally structured and highly edited. In this sense a sugya of Gemara compares to the 13 lines which defines a sonnet of poetry! Not that a Gemara sugya – a sonnet טיפש פשט stupidity. Rather for the poet to structure a sonnet requires a refined Order and structure, so too each and every sugya of the Talmud; where the sugya exists as the כלל and the line which interests the Baali Tosafot to make a precedent analysis of its dof of Gemara – serves as the פרט/צד השווה. A simple syllogism theory holds that each sugya opens and closes with a similar thesis statement; the shortest distance between two points – a straight line or sh’itta. Hence the precedent specific which the Baali Tosafot brings must rest along this sh’itta line of thought. Viewing the sugya as a fixed static “line” of reasoning contrasts directly with the dynamic essence of פרדס inductive reasoning.

A sugya of Gemara likewise resembles to a blue-print which a building contractor requires to construct a 3 dimensional building; engineers – except perhaps in Japan – do not design their buildings to move or sway. Modern skyscrapers did not exist in that day and Age. Torah courtroom law, the Talmud communicates a עולם הבא future vision when Yovel and brit melah serve as the יסוד of Sanhedrin courtroom justice. Hence Talmudic scholarship attempts to duplicate how different eye-witnesses see, for example, the New Moon. Based upon their fixed but different location perspectives. Hence a blue-print requires a Front, Top, Side views! Reading the Mishna and how much more so the T’NaCH from a literal reading of words טיפש פשט compares to the church inquisition “trial” (what a joke), of 1633 which condemned Galileo for rejecting Aristotle theory of heliocentrism – the Sun revolves around the Earth. Church dogma worshipped the rediscovered ancient Greek philosophers almost on par with their dogma which believes in a Harry Potter fictional messiah.

Copernicus published De revolutionibus but had the arrogant gall to die in 1543 before Rome could murder him for the sin of heresy! Church dogmatism shaped hatred against Jews till the 2nd Vatican Council formally repudiated the post War Polish pogroms and rat-lines consequences of Pope Pius XII alliance (like the Lutheran church) with Hitler against Communism.

While neither Plato or Aristotle taught ‘Flat Earth’. Cosmas Indicopleustes (6th century) proposed a flat universe/world in his ‘Christian Topography’ and argued against spherical (and moving heavenly) models. But his influence played a marginal – even nonexistent – role in the heresy trial of Galileo. This digression attempts to show that reading Talmudic common law texts without a ‘good-eye’ to inductive\dynamic comparative precedents, as reactionary as Rambam and Karo’s statute law religious codes – written to cope with the darkest ages of Human moral depravity and barbarism which culminated in the ‘evil-eye’ – Shoah & Arab ’48 and ’67 – repeated attempts to exterminate the Jewish people; great power imperialism efforts to restore the Roman empire colonialism which renamed conquered Judea to Palestine – the British ’39 White Paper and UN SC Resolution 446 – 2334 march the defiled Nazi ‘Goose Step’ in harmony together.

גופא: The next sugya precedent to compare its Mishnaic phrase through the fixed perspective of a sugya of Gemara פרט-כלל — mesechta Ketubot 57b to 58a. The Mishna clause הגיע זמן לאו נישאו. The Gemara sugya opens with אמר עולא and ends with מסר והלך. The next * גזרה שווה jumps to קידושין כא. פרט. This sugya כלל begins on dof 20a ת”ר and terminates on 21b – ברציעה. This sugya – Aggadic, so comparing the similar relationship between the halachic 7, 10, 13 middot to the Aggadic 32 middot — their overlap merits close observation. The central question which of these sugyot most resembles our rabbinic middot fingerprint?

Kiddushin 10a – 11a — איבעיא להו ביאה נשואין עושה או אירוסין עושה — Chuppa functions comparable to a house – private domain. Whereas אירוסין, in the time of the Gemara – the woman arranged her “house” prior to affixing a shared domain with her chatan/groom-to-be under the chuppa. Hence the woman referred to as בית. Ketubot 57b – 58a — הגיע זמן ולא נישאו – דתנן: נותנין לבתולה שנים עשר חודש

If  the agreed-upon time for marriage arrives and the wedding has not occurred, the woman begins eating terumah at her father-in-law’s expense. The Gemara opens with Ulla and tracks the mechanics down to מסר והלך. Ulla’s thesis, the Gemara attempts to extend the boundaries ‘terumah rights דאורייתא’ determined through false logical assumptions through a צד השווה regarding the domains of responsibility where the chatan replaces the father to דאורייתא annul a vow made by his wife.

The kal v’chomer argues that if a עבד עברי possible to sell to a Goy; the “owner” should likewise possess the power to sell himself. But this middah of logic fails to weigh the reason of theft, which caused the case עבד עברי – does not at all resemble to the case of קידושין. The 6 months window which permits a father to marry his daughter prior to losing this authority – when she reaches the age of בגרת – shares no common ground with an עבד עברי.

Despite both sugyot employing kal v’chomer, Ribuy, Tzad HaShave, Miuat sequences, this similarity accentuates the fundamental differences which separates the mitzva דאורייתא of קידושין – גט from עבד עברי slaves. While slaves can eat t’ruma, they simply do not compare to acquisition of future born children to sanctify from generation to generation the oath sworn brit of the Cohen seed never going extinct like as do great and powerful empires (like the British and USSR) by means of the Torah wisdom time-oriented commandments which the Chuppa symbolizes. The chosen Cohen brit inheritance to conquer the lands of Canaan לשמה the essence of the first Sinai commandment. Israel did not attain liberty from g’lut Egypt to duplicate that g’lut slavery in the brit lands of Canaan. Yovel frees the עבד עברי רציעה.

Its my sincere hope that my digression which addresses Zionism causes the Talmud to breath and live post Shoah. Every sugya possesses an internal sequence of inductive legal operations—a “middot fingerprint.” By identifying that fingerprint, one can compare sugyot through precedent. Herein explains why Baali Tosafot learn a sh’itta which links particular passages across Sha’s Bavli Yerushalmi; reconstructs post sealing of the Sha’s the editorial architecture of the Bavli. The Savora’im – roughly 500 to 625 CE after the death of Ravina II 499 CE.

These scholars credited with arranging & editing the final text of the Bavli, perhaps akin to the printed Vilna Shas. Their contribution to achieve the Talmud as we have it today – represents a totally different Age – day & night different from rather isolated Reshonim communites shell shocked by the Crusades and overshadowed by the wholescale embrace of ancient Greek philosophers by both Muslims and Xtian civilizations. Reshonim struggled with assimilation. Ibn Ezra’s son, for example, converted to Islam. Based upon the harsh criticism of the RambaN מלחמת השם which denounced the Baali Maor rebuke to codifing the Talmud into halachic codes – assimilated to Greek philosophy rabbis “blew out the Hanukkah candles” and organized religious statute law halachic codes – written (at best) as a temporary g’lut coping mechanism. This approach treats the Gemara’s הווה אמינא–קמ”ל dialectic as functionally equivalent to the expansive and restrictive dynamics of רבי עקיבא’s ריבוי ומיעוט, thereby revealing a deeper layer of sugya integrity.

Time to compare the Boris & Natasha – Cold War – Bullwinkle J. Moose show. The Rambam confuses קטנה + 1 יום which the Gemara ( (Niddah 44b, Ketubot 39a) states that “a girl UNDER three – like a hole in a wall,” implying the hymen regenerates. 3 years and 1 day and older: She remains a קטנה – excluded from the mitzva of קידושין. If seduced or raped she loses her legal status of virginity (in matters of “Ketubah” and motzi shem ra).

Just as a bnai brit cannot sell himself to be an עבד עברי so too a קטנה cannot sell herself as האשה. Kiddushin 13b “A Ketana who betroths herself… is a kidushin of shogeg.” D’varim כד:א – לא יקח, despite the immediate subject addresses ערבה, chazal learns the acquisition of her soul acquired by another and not herself! The דיוק of the mitzva of קידושין learns from the Torah obligation of גט – wherein the ex returns title to her nefesh O’lam Habah back to the possession of the woman; permitting her to do קידושין with a man more worthy. The mitzva of קידושין – a wisdom time-oriented commandment which requires k’vanna. This Torah mitzva stands upon the בנין אב of childless Avram cutting the brit between the pieces.

הלכות תרומות פ”ו — ישראלית שנשאת לכהן אפילו קטנה בת ג’ שמים ויום אחד תאכל בתרומה וחזה ושוק. ודין תורה שתאכל משנתארסה שהרי היא קנינו. אבל אסרו חכמים שתאכל עד שתכנס לחופה גזירה שמא תאכיל תרומה לאביה ולאחיה כשהיא ארוסה בבית אביה. Natasha has absolutely no idea the source for this halachic ruling. His speculation fails to correct the fundamental error made by the Rambam wherein he divorced a Gemara halacha precedent interpretation of the language phase of a specific Mishna. Furthermore, Karo duplicated the Rambam error in his Shulkan Aruch code. His Beit Yosef super commentary to the Tur followed the statute law break made upon the Rosh common law code by further codifying Reshonim opinion rather than the Gemara common law precedent interpretations of the k’vanna of the language of a specific Mishna.

The Mishna a product of the post Bar Kochba Revolt disaster where the Romans changed the name of the conquered province to Palestine. The error of assuming that the Talmud records religious traditions rather than serves as a model guide for the time when Jews expunge the Roman name of Palestine from the land and establish wisdom time oriented commandments of both Yovel and brit melah – based upon the precedent of Yehoshua who conquered 33 kings of Canaan. The Talmud vision does not eye the past any more than rabbi Akiva wept, but rather laughed when a fox exited from Herod’s Temple abomination; the Romans themselves held: better to be a dog than a family member of Herod’s house! G’lut Jewry follow the Rambam waiting for the Moshiach, similar to the sages who wept at the sight of the fox.

Not the Egel HaZahav משל but the שם אלהים נמשל which directly repudiates both JeZeus and Allah as one God with the first Sinai commandment. The ברכת המזון serves as a strong precedent: only once in the third blessing which opens with the midda דאורייתא – רחם (The k’vanna of this middah learns from the commandment to obliterate all the Goyim nations in Canaan, kill the stubborn and rebellious child, war against the ערב רב Amalek שאין להם יראת אלהים.

Mercy does not compare to pity anymore than t’shuva compares to repentance or brit compares to covenant. The 4th Oral Torah midda spirit רחום separates blessing from curse life from death. Permitting Canaanites to remain in the land, or taking pity upon the minor stubborn and rebellious son, or assimilation to foreign cultures and customs – based upon the war with Midian directly results in av tuma avoda zara defiling the land. Hence pity shares no more a connection with mercy than קידושין applies to a קטנה. The benching only once (in the 3rd paragraph) excludes אלהינו from השם אלהינו. The t’shuva k’vanna of this blessing remembers the sin of the Golden Calf which did just that error. Herein explains the k’vanna of why the 3rd paragraph opens with רחם נא prior to השם אלהינו. Benching a wisdom time-oriented commandment which requires a ‘good eye’ which discerns subtle distinctions as understanding/בינה.