The classic offensive and defensive realism in international relations theory.



National leaders go to war when a nation or group of allied nations threaten their strategic interests. Making a string of “mathematical propositions” which fails to address the logic of the leadership directive of a Head of State/government throughout history fails to communicate any relevant information or analysis. For example the 1956 Suez War, where Britain, France, and 8 year old Israel made War upon Egypt.

The US response which threatened the stability of the fragile British pound forced both the British and French governments to stop their unilateral imperialism to seize the Suez Canal in order to dominate the balance of power in the region. Israel too forced to return the captured Sinai, which set the stage for the June 1967 War – eleven years later messiah Nasser promised to throw the Jews of Israel into the Sea! Quoting UN Charter as if they qualify as Xtian biblical verses amounts to tits on a boar hog.

The compare & contrast between the ’56 War to the ’67 War serves as concrete evidence that National leaders prioritize their nations’ national strategic interests far above and beyond the theology of UN religion. The 30 Years War pitted Protestantism of Luther and Calvinism against Rome. The slaughter of that War – unmatched till WWI! Quoting chapter and verse of the UN Charter as if you got religion simply shows your belief system that the UN serves as your God no different than JeZeus the God of both the Protestant and Catholic churches; Allah the God of Arabs & converted Muslims and the Crusades these two Gods fought one another. The barbaric JeZeus God thought Oh how quaint! Lets slaughter the Christ Killers in Germany … since we travel to conquer the holy lands.

The post WWII new God worshipped by secular nations today – the UN, simply replaces the earlier Gods worshipped by both Xtian and Arab/conquered Muslims like those two sets of Universal Gods repeatedly “war” against the local tribal god which the 12 tribes of Israel “alone” accepted at Sinai/\Horev. Replacement theology sucks eggs because it duplicates the Sin of the Golden Calf! Not the shallow reactionary and utterly simplistic טיפש פשט literalism that ערב רב – assimilated and/or intermarried Israelites bowed down to a literal golden calf. Rather that word-puke Name translations of nouns ((to quote you: “mathematically equals)) the רוח הקודש living Spirit revealed @ Sinai through the 1st Commandment and later @ Horev through the 13 Oral Torah middot “Spirits”. Noun words of this or that God(s) ≠ the revelation of the living Spirit revealed in the First Sinai commandment and again through the revelation of the Oral Torah 13 Spirit middot Spirits revealed at Horev post Golden Calf av tumah avoda zara where the ערב רב literally sought to substitute the name אלהים no different than you substitute the scriptures of the UN Charter for both the dead Gods JeZeus NT and Nakba Allah Koran!

1. Britain and France made war to dominate the Middle East as their own back yard as “Great Powers”. The response of the US President slapped both countries down as secondary States NOT comparable to the Cold War “super powers”. David Ben Gurion joined the British/French War to weaken Nasser’s Egypt – the primary threat to the continued existence of the Jewish state; whereas Jordan’s British lead and trained armies dominated the Arab world in the ’48 War, by the ’56 War the Nasser “revolution” had replaced the king of Jordan and the shining STAR wherein Arabs placed their Nazi hopes & dreams to exterminate the Jews across the Middle East; to achieve where Hitler and Chamberlain failed! President Eisenhower slapped down these secondary powers through the threat of imposing economic sanctions like brain-dead puppet of the VP “Dick”, imposed upon Saddam after 9/11 2001 and President Trump uprooted the equally Obozo the Clown treaty with the Mullahs and restored economic sanctions upon the Mullahs of Persia.

2. The worship of the UN Charter as a moral compass in international relations – compares to young children who go to bed hugging their Teddy Bear to protect and save them from the Buggy-man who often hides under the bed or inside bedroom closets! Both the League and the UN lack enforcement power; they do not possess the ability to police and investigate crimes ie detective work. The UN attempt to evade this fundamental flaw through Chapter VII “police actions” fundamentally dependent upon Great Power consent to participate as President Truman did in the Korean “police actions”. Congress post the Vietnam defeat passed the War Powers Act. And under the leadership of President Trump, Washington has slapped down the UN much like as did Ike London and Paris in 1956.

Nation States often treat the UN as their convenient whore. They ignore or manipulate its Resolutions and there’s not a damn thing the UN can do about it. Israel publicly tore up UN Resolution 3379 after its passage in that whore baiting gossip society. The UN no more Divine than JeZeus or Allah word-Names – Golden Calves. The Gulf War, Kosovo, Syria, Libya the major powers manipulated the UN like a boy arouses a virgin by stimulating her breast to convince her to open her legs. The UN has no police detective authority to enforce decrees made by the Security Council permanent 5!

Dark and Middle Ages replacement theology employed to justify antisemitism and colonialism now commonly expressed through the UN whore of New York and Geneva. Quoting the UN Charter like as did the Xtian and Arab/conquered Muslim converts to Islam do their sophomoric bible and koran corruptions of faith as false as the present day UN whose voting blocks and P5 worship Power as their God rather than the righteous pursuit of justice. Justice requires lateral common law courts to make fair restitution of damages inflicted by the powerful upon the weak. Both the religions of JeZeus and Naka Allah dead Gods. Upon this cracked and corrupt foundation stands the UN replacement theology God!

The Peace of Westphalia (1648) established the principle of state sovereignty, which is the foundation of modern international relations. It compares to the Peace achieved through the Post Napoleon Era which dominated European international relations till the rise of Communisms – the response to the Industrial Revolution which began in England just prior to the outbreak of the French Revolution which swept into power Napoleon. Bottom line: international relations – driven by power and interests, not by moral or theological propaganda frameworks; theological reductionism and literalist interpretations based upon sophomoric gossip translations from language to language compares to whispering an abstract idea in the ear of one person and that person in turn whispers what he heard into the ear of another. A chain whisper – by the end the message heard so completely different from the original – an utter joke.

Peace of Westphalia (1648) established Cuius regio, eius religio (whose realm, his religion). It didn’t solve theology; it bypassed it by prioritizing state sovereignty. It acknowledged that you cannot have peace if you are fighting over “God.” The Congress of Vienna (1815)\\Concert of Europe – maintained peace for a century not through moral preaching, but through a balance of power. When that balance broke (WWI), the moralistic Wilson’s “League of Nations” failed because it lacked the teeth of the Concert. The UN attempts to be a “moral court” without the “balance of power” backing it. It tries to legislate morality (like the Goldstone Report or various human rights councils) without having the power to enforce restitution.

The UN Charter serves merely as the “Teddy Bear” of nations whose fantasy of Superman or Spiderman etc defeats the foundation of Thucydides: “The strong do what they can and the weak suffer what they must.” The “theology” of the UN, indeed just another version of the “Golden Calf”—a shiny, dead object that nations worship when convenient, and trample when the wheel turns and they rule with power. The Melian Dialogue (416 BC) – the only “law” that has held true for 2,400 years — “The strong do what they can and the weak suffer what they must.”

Paper Hanging UN SOB – STFU

The United Nations did not formally recognize Jordanian sovereignty, but strangely enough that Women’s quilting gossip society did embrace the propaganda term “West Bank”. Post ’67 the UN emphatically embraced “West Bank” and totally erased “Samaria”. During the period of the British Mandate, for example the Peel Commission, not a single reference to the “West Bank”.

The lame excuse that “West Bank” had yet become the standard English term – as phony as a $3 bill! Post the Israeli victory over Nakba Allah, Israel determines the name Samaria not Jordan nor Arab refugee populations who rejected UN 181. The UN cease-fire armistice lines, Israel did not control the E. Jerusalem nor Samaria, Jordan’s illegal annexation of the slander name “West Bank” the UN itself condemned. Therefore the UN lacks the authority to determine or prioritize the Jordanian name over the Capital of the 10 Tribes of the First Israel kingdom!

The UN does not exist as a police and how much more so not a detective department to investigate crimes. That the name “West Bank” served the voting block anti-Israel Arab and Muslim states as well as the 5 Security Council permanent members does not validate the name switch from Biblical Samaria to post ’48 Jordanian “West Bank”.

UN terminology does not confer sovereignty. The UN cannot turn an armistice line into an internationally recognized border merely by repeatedly using “West Bank,” and the 1949 armistice agreements expressly left territorial claims unresolved; yet the great power interest driven UN SC 2334 Resolution declares “the West Bank, including E. Jerusalem as territory occupied since 1967! It declares Israeli settlements “there” having “no legal validity”. Based upon what basis precisely/exactly – other than Great Power interests?

Both Britain and France instrumental in the post War UN Resolution 242. Israel forced Britain out after its disgraceful 1939 White Paper; the language of limiting the number of Jews and where they can settle within the League “Balfour Declaration” mandate strongly resembles the language of UN 2334! Article 49(6) of the Fourth Geneva Convention directly refers to the Nazi war-crime of deporting Jews to Poland and other lands with death camps! The jump to Samaria as “occupying power” amounts to a church blood libel! Jordan deported Jews from E. Jerusalem! Jordan employed Jewish grave-stones and building materials! Article 49(6) aimed at forcible population transfers – no GA nor SC Resolution ever once applied it to Jordan after the initial condemnation.

The Hague occupation regulations exist outside of the UN. UN 2334 stands upon the gossip of UN 446 – neither of which acknowledge that the legal basis – contested; anymore than does any UN GA or SC Resolution validate “Samaria”. The International Committee of the Red Cross on the Geneva Conventions and their Additional Protocols, aimed at promoting better understanding and respect for international humanitarian law, especially after the failure of the Red Cross to visit Israeli captives post Oct7th invalidates the ICJ ruling; the ICJ only interprets what UN Resolutions mean as a over reach bureaucracy!

Israel simply not a UN protectorate territory. Just as the US won its Independence from the British Israel too expelled the British and defeated the Nakba Allah dead god. Jordan illegally occupied Samaria. Yet no GA or SC Resolution, nor the PLO Charter ever referred to it as the occupying state which effectively “controls” land through a foreign army. Wars, treaties determine borders. Israel signed treaties with both Egypt and Jordan! The silly notion that the UN determines borders through gossip Resolutions – simply brain dead stupid.

Israel a party to the Fourth Geneva Convention, based upon the language of Nazi death camps in occupied lands, it categorically rejects the perversion, the de jure applicability to the West Bank because Jordanian sovereignty never formally recognized by the UN. The PLO Charter supports this de jure applicability because the PLO in 1964 only referred to ’48 Israel as “occupied territory”. Furthermore, the Olso Accords, (which Hamas rejected), stand upon the Arafat open and repeated declarations that the PLO – the sole legitimate representative of the Palestinian people – at the 1974 Arab League summit in Rabat. The United Nations granted the PLO observer status that same year, and Arafat addressed the UN General Assembly. Cannot have your cake and eat it too. UN institutions use terminology and legal interpretations selectively, fail to address the forced population transfer by Nazi loving Arab countries during WWII and also after ’48 – starting with Jordan’s war-crimes! Israel’s effective military control after 1967 triggered occupation law, even though the final sovereignty and borders remain unsettled.

Never Again – a post Shoah oath – never to permit Goyim courts to determine the racist “Jewish Problem”. Palestine a dead name with the Roman empire. Attempts by the UN to impose or validate this name as invalid as the Hague Regulations. Arab States pro-Nazi expulsions of Jews began in 1941! Actions have consequences, Jews forced to surrender 5 times the property/lands that post ’67 acquired. Justice requires fair compensation of damages inflicted by the guilty.

Dhimmi Arab refugees did not “warm up” to the name Palestine until coward Chamberlain’s White Paper. Not till the PLO Charter in 1964 did Arafat opportunistically embrace this term (Arabs cannot naturally pronounce the P as in Balestine). What galls Arabs – the dhimmi status now stick to them post the Nakba defeat of Allah.

Eugene Rostow (a Yale law professor and former Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs), interpretation that the original intent of the Article 49(6) of the Fourth Geneva Convention – that the Convention was designed to protect people in territory under belligerent occupation by a foreign power, and that voluntary movement of Israeli citizens into territory not previously under legitimate sovereign control doesn’t constitute “deportation” or “transfer” in the Convention’s sense. UN dogmatism as dead as Poop Pius XII ratlines and Polish post war pogroms! Political declarations made by the ICJ, the ICRC, the SC and the host of block voting “experts” invalidates the 1949 Armistice Agreements which explicitly validate the lines as military – not political boundaries. Furthermore, the PA under the Oslo Accords accepted the division of Samaria into Areas A, B, and C! Therein the PA accepted Israeli security control over Area C and shared control over Area B!

Arafat initiated the Second Intifada (2000–2005) invalidated Oslo Accords. The argument that Oslo explicitly an “interim agreement” only serves as proof that post Oct7th – its as dead as a doornail. If ICJ jurisdiction – plainly limited as merely an advisory opinion that non-binding, how much more so the gross attempt by the ICC when Israel never agreed to the Rome Treaty! Post Oct 7th the ICRC = to UNWRA or UN 1701 in Lebanon.

Legal reasoning by many non-Western, non-European states who share no common border with the Jewish state – amounts to tits on a boar hog interference into the internal affairs of the Jewish state. On par with the failure/cowardice of Arab national leaders to repatriate dhimmi Arab refugee populations post ’48, ’67, and 2023! Attempts to morally denounce Israel – no different than priests coming into synagogues on shabbat to preach conversion.

The limp-dick arguments touching applicability of the Geneva Conventions to territories with disputed sovereignty coupled with the lame-vain excuses that “Great Power” balance of power interests do not dominate the permanent veto holding conflicts in the UN SC – utter clap-trap revisionist history. From China’s ‘Century of Shame’, Bismarck’s 3 little wars, British introduction of Concentration Camp war-crimes during the Boar War, and let us not forget the 1956 attempt to illegally seize the Suez canal – nation states (including 8 year old Israel) fight wars to dominate the balance of power in a disputed region! All nation states great and small struggle to improve the balance of power in a given region which best serves their strategic national interests. Reactionary news paper experts who ignore this fact – directly compare to Blood libel Xtians who supported the mobs who murdered the Jewish money lenders to which they owed money!

In 2005 my moving company supported the Begin/Sharon unilateral withdrawal from Gaza: neither Sinai nor Gaza part of modern Israel. But Post Oct 7th 2023 this abomination War has changed everything. Oslo dead. All Gazans must leave. The PM merits trust, Bibi wisely rejected PM Sharon’s the unilateral withdrawal from Gaza, he left the government coalition which forced PM Sharon to leave Lekud and form the Kedima coalition government.

Justice requires righteous judicial compensation of damages inflicted by the guilty. Jews expelled from Arab countries lost approximately 5 times the land mass of post ’67 Israel. What exactly defines why the UN = Corruption? Police investigate crimes by compiling evidence. The UN employs inflammatory rhetoric. In the example of post ’67 Israel: illegal settlements, Jewish colonial settlers, occupied West Bank etc. All Arab States rejected UN GA 181. After the fact, ie Israeli repeated victories over Nakba Allah, does not change this fundamental fact. Therefore the Big Lie: A two-state solution was always a negotiated Israeli-Palestinian compromise, not a UN imposition – simply revisionist history like UN 242.

Contrast real interstate diplomacy to the UN propaganda show where UN member states publicly walk out of the room when an Israeli PM addresses the forum. Israel forced post White Paper Britain to return its League “mandate”, yet the UN SC 242 presumes that Britain along with Dreyfus France … France who surrendered to Germany and sides unilaterally with hostile Arab states who refer to Israel as “the Zionist Entity”, who embraced Nazism in 1941 with mass violent waves of forced expulsions of Jewish populations from virtually all Arab countries even before the Jewish state declared by David Ben Gurion.

Washington referred to the Korean and Vietnam Wars as “police actions”. Yet the UN never functions in the role of “police/detective” in the traditional sense but rather promotes fake News propaganda – on the scale of Obama’s Russia-gate scandal under Ms Clinton – to unilaterally and repeatedly ad nauseam – a mirror image of Joseph Goebbels’s propaganda machine. The latter employed half-truths and emotional appeals to arouse public outrage and justify Nazi land-grab military expansions. A small step before Israel referred to an Apartheid genocide State!

The UN a block voting gossip society – GA 3379 and the SA Durban Human Rights Conference which focuses solely upon condemning Israel; its block voting compares to Oxford “debates” over propositions which condemns Israel even before the debate. The role of the UN SC houses the post WWII ‘Great Powers’ who enjoy Universal veto rights that GA member states do not possess. Institutional bias defines how the UN conducts its business. Israel forced participate in the “Western European and Others Group” (WEOG) in Europe, rather than a State in the Middle East. Arab states which unilaterally expelled Jewish populations starting in 1941 such as Iraq – the UN has never investigated nor condemned nor held accountable. Rather UNWRA invalidates a temporary refugee status to a one time Palestinian permanent refugee status and routinely employs Hamas and other Palestinian terrorists in its schools. UNWRA text books promote the propaganda of “stolen Palestinian land”.

Selective jurisdiction: If the UN were a neutral arbiter, it would have established a commission to adjudicate all population transfers resulting from the 1948 and 1967 wars. By focusing solely on one side, it creates a legal vacuum where Palestinian claims are “internationalized” and perpetual, while Jewish claims are “privatized” and ignored. This skews the negotiation baseline before talks even begin. The “WEOG” Exclusion as Institutional Apartheid – geographically Israel a Middle East country but the UN politically exiled from the Middle East Group consequent to SC veto/block voting Arab and Muslim African States alliances. As such this racism operates as a diplomatic containment of the “Zionist Crusader Entity”. Lawfare, rather than the lie of “international law”, defines the business of the UN; the Human Rights Council (HRC), Agenda Item 7 a standing order that only investigates Israel. Other countries with worse human rights records (Iran, Syria, North Korea), subject to ad hoc, easily defeated investigations.

The Big Lie and Repetition of the blood libel slander illegal settler occupation propaganda: The UN’s constant repetition of terms like “illegal settlements,” “apartheid,” and “colonialism” creates a “post-truth” environment where the label becomes the fact, regardless of the historical or legal nuance (e.g., the legal status of Judea and Samaria under the Mandate, or the security realities). The P5 veto ensures that the UN cannot act as a “police force” against powerful allies. The US vetoes, except for Obama, biased one-sided resolutions against Israel; Russia, prior to the fall of the Assad dictatorship, vetoed resolutions against Syria. UNRWA schools teach hatred or deny Israel’s right to exist. The ultimate definition of institutional failure. The Big lie ‘peacekeeping/peacebuilding arm’ of the UN – actively fueling the Middle East Wars where Arab States fundamentally deny, starting with UN 181, Jewish equal rights to achieve self determination. In closing Israel did not throw off the British mandate yoke for Britain or France or any other P5 state to dictate a two-State solution. The UN exists today as a weaponized bureaucracy; designed to reverse the outcome of the 1948 and 1967 wars through diplomacy rather than battle.

Post the Oct7th 2023 Abomination War a radical change in the balance of power across the Middle East has occurred. Anti Semitism shattered – Israel never an Apartheid State.

What defines this Torah curse? As a coin has two sides so too antisemitism. ערב רב שעאין להם יראת אלהים defines the k’vanna of the 2nd Sinai commandment as a wisdom-time oriented mitzva; practically speaking assimilated and intermarried Jews. The flip side: The envy צר עין of Goyim whose Chamberlain-cowardice soul inspires them to condemn the scape-goat Jew for all evils.

The disgrace of the one-sided UN Goldstone Report “Progressive Cause”. Can the whole World be wrong? Yes the whole World wrong again and again and again and again.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Npw5vKOYI9k



Richard Goldstone, sat on South Africa’s Constitutional Court, and as chief prosecutor of the tribunals for the former Yugoslavia and Rwanda. When confronted with the Israeli couter-response to the UN Report under his name, he did not thereafter completely repudiate the “Goldstone Report”. But he later withdrew or qualified one of its most important conclusions. The 2009 UN report, formally led by Judge Richard Goldstone, investigated the 2008–09 Gaza war. It concluded that both Israel and Hamas had committed actions that could amount to war crimes and possibly crimes against humanity. Regarding Israel, it said there was evidence that some attacks on civilians were deliberate or reflected a policy of deliberately targeting civilians.

In a 2011 Washington Post op-ed, Goldstone wrote that later Israeli investigations and additional information had changed his view. Goldstone now acknowledged: The evidence available in 2009 had been incomplete. Israeli investigations indicated that civilians were not intentionally targeted as a matter of policy. The report’s conclusion that Israel deliberately targeted civilians was no longer supported by the evidence available to him. Goldstone repudiated a central allegation about Israeli intent, but he did not formally withdraw the report as a whole. The other members of the investigative mission—Hina Jilani, Christine Chinkin, and Desmond Travers—rejected his later characterization and said the report’s findings remained valid.

The Goldstone Report not a criminal conviction yet the propaganda employed compares to the Blood libel of the Middle Ages by the Catholic Church. It attributed an inherently murderous character to Jews as a group and was not based on a genuine investigation. The report gave insufficient weight to Hamas’s conduct and the difficulty of fighting in densely populated Gaza. The UN Committee reached conclusions about Israeli intent. far stronger than the evidence justified; its language was used rhetorically to portray Israel as uniquely or inherently criminal. MSM and Jew hating institutions and commentators treated these UN allegations as though they were final judicial findings!

Goldstone’s 2011 statement reinforced that criticism by saying that later evidence did not support the report’s conclusion that Israel had deliberately targeted civilians as a matter of policy. But the other mission members of hate, rejected that Jew’s revision. The report’s political reception of that UN biased propaganda rhetoric which demonized Israel through a one-sided blood libel, analogous to UN Resolution 3379 land later SA human-rights Durban human rights investigations, and accusations of Genocide similar to the Church abomination medieval antisemitic fabrications. Goyim have no shame.