Category: Uncategorized

Due to a critical reaction to the last post, have attempted to address this Xtian knee-jerk reaction

LOL shallow reactionary sophomoric translations suck.

Psalms 58: 1-8, 10 does not compare to Moshe struggling with his own Yatzir Ha’Ra together with the survivors of the Wilderness generations who both endured death and exile from the oath sworn lands of Canaan. The mitzva of Yovel and the pursuit of justice go hand in glove. Only in conquered Canaan where a free Independent Israelite nation rules the land can there exist “justice”. Even in the land of Canaan, whenever foreign kingdoms conquer the land and rule it, neither the Yovel כלל or the Justice פרט apply.

Goyim never accepted the Torah vision of justice at Sinai. Hence despite their “Courts of Law”, just as the Court of Par’o validated beating Israelite slaves for their failure to meet their daily quota of brick production so to all the Goyim courts throughout history ever once forced either the Church or Mosque to stand before the Bar and address their violent war crimes.

Psalm 59: 1-4, 9, 17 communicates emotional themes during times of peril. Numbers 20 re-introduces the Central “Curse” theme of the Torah – g’lut. G’lut as the negative Torah key theme opens with the expulsion of Adam from the garden, the exile of Noach in the Ark, the scattering of the people who built the Tower of Bavel, the destruction of Sodom, the exile of the sons of Yaacov to Egypt and the ensuing slavery that followed thereafter. Numbers 20, reintroduces this, the Central negative Torah theme of g’lut; which comes from the Evil Inclination known as ערב רב who came out of Egypt and reject – to this day – the revelation of the Torah at Sinai.  The ערב רב by Torah definition: אין להם יראת אלהים.  These assimilated and intermarried Jews – no different from Goyim – who likewises reject and do not accept the revelation of the Torah at Sinai לשמה – the first and Greatest Sinai commandment which defines the whole of the revelation of the Torah.  ערב רב and Goyim have no brit inheritance not to the Avot as the fathers of the chosen Cohen people nor to the land inheritance given to the chosen Cohen people – the brit descendants of the Avot.
_______________________________________
_______________________________________
Your foreign book of James fails.  Written some 1500 years after the revelation of the Torah at Sinai, it shares no connection to the Torah because Goyim never accepted the Torah at Sinai revelation.  Plus, the book of James addresses Goyim concepts of spirituality — not Jewish visions of Sanhedrin courtroom common law justice.  Your apostle Paul fails to distinguish Torah common law judicial justice from Greek & Roman statute law decrees.   T’NaCH Prophets, follow and compare to Moshe as a Torah prophet.  Aaron and his House anointed Moshiach, whereas Moshe through Torah prophetic mussar serve as the model for later prophets who functioned as the chief enforcers of Sanhedrin courtroom judicial rulings of justice. The foreign idea that prophets predict the future, and therein “fulfill Torah commandments”, confuses witchcraft with prophesy. Torah prophets command mussar to all living generations of the chosen Cohen people.  Bil’aam predicted the future as the definition of his foreign prophesy.

Hence the NT jargon of “fulfilling the words of the prophets” as off as Muhammad’s declaration that prophets sent to all Goyim and spoke in the tongue of these Goyim – who reject the revelation of the Torah at Sinai. The Koran, for example, declares that the Jews changed the Torah and replaced Yitzak for Yishmael at the Akadah. However, the Koran fails to show this theme where HaShem choses his Cohen people, rather than first born birth! The concept recorded twice in the opening kre’a shma blessing תמיד מעשה בראשית, understood that wisdom commandments “create” the chosen Cohen people rather than race.  The “human race” shares a 98.7% genome match with Apes.  Starting with Cain, through the rejection of Esav and even the first born of Israel! The still later Koran and the NT, both fail to distinguish: that korbanot exist as Torah time-oriented commandments which require k’vanna – based upon the rejection of Cain’s positive commandment and acceptance of Hevel’s wisdom commandment!

This fundamental Shabbat/Chol distinction both alien spiritualities universally fail to discern the distinction between Primary wisdom Torah commandments from secondary positive and negative Torah commandments – which serve as precedents to derives the k’vanna of wisdom commandments. Its the latter wisdom commandments which obey the Creation story whose משל metaphor of creation in 6 days – introduces the subject of wisdom time-oriented Primary Torah commandments.  The Torah commands not to do מלאכה – create מלאכים – on shabbat.  The Torah דיוק\inference, that the 6 days of Chol/shabbat dedicate wisdom time-oriented Primary commandments and on the last day of the week (also called shabbat, like all Torah commandments wisdom vs positive & negative secondary precedents – equally called “commandments”).
______________________________________________________
______________________________________________________

My response critically engages with your interpretation – utterly oblivious to the Jewish perspective of T’NaCH and Talmudic texts. My response denounces the fraud of church “justice”. Pretending that Xtian harmony prevails over Torah faith of justice in this world through Torah courts of common law represents a complete and total disconnect.

Your article addresses a specific NT gospel interpretation regarding the healing of a blind man (or men) as described in the Gospels of Matthew, Mark, and Luke. The argument centers around potential contradictions in the accounts and explores the notion of whether these apparent discrepancies truly indicate a contradiction or if they can be harmonized. You emphasize the need for careful examination of the texts and posits that the existence of two Jerichos offers a plausible resolution to the alleged contradictions.

My article which you erased as out of hand, presents a more critical and dismissive tone regarding biblical translations and interpretations. It asserts the inadequacies of all Goyim made translations. It chooses as examples Tehillem נח,נט and contrasts how the Goyim biblical translations and the NT book of James fail to grasp the basic Torah curse theme of exile. The T’NaCH division into 3 parts: the Holy Writings which contain the 150 Tehillem as a subset, serves as a commentary to the Books of the Prophets rather than a direct commentary to the Written Torah. This fundamental of T’NaCH scholarship duplicated by the Mishna/Gemarah similar division which make up the Talmud. How much more so the New Testament has no real connection to the Torah.

By the time most if not all NT books written, the T’NaCH literature of mussar common law already sealed. The Mishna and Gemara follow the T’NaCH model and also sealed. The Mishna in 210 CE and the Bavli in approximately 450 CE. By the time of the 325 Nicene Creed, the Romans had pretty much murdered or expelled the Jewish population of Judea and renamed the Roman province “Palestine”. The Talmud mirrors the NaCH Books of prophetic mussar in that the codification of both Mishna and Gemara – the latter written in g’lut Bavil (hence the name Babylonian Talmud).

The Mishna, composed after the Bar Kochba revolt of 135CE! Therefore while the style of both Mishna and Gemara – common law, they set the standard for the time when Jews reconquer the brit Homeland. Yes during the Middle Ages Jewish Reshonim scholars established the g’lut religion of Judaism based upon the Talmud. But this much later development – done to address the Jewish people’s “self identity” culture to prevent Jewish assimilation to dominant foreign cultures and customs!

Just as Yovel requires an Independent Jewish Republic/State so too and how much more so, the Torah “faith” obligation to rule the oath sworn lands with Sanhedrin common law courts of justice! Never during the 450 years Jews returned from the Babylonian exile did Jews ever sanctify the mitzva of Yovel and actual Sanhedrin courts! Napoleon established a Sanhedrin court, no different than did the Romans. Make an examination of Kings David and Shlomo did they establish Federal Sanhedrin courts or did they confuse building a Grand Cathedral/Temple. The prophet Natan issued harsh mussar to king David not to copy the ways of the Goyim! The language ‘blood on your hands’ directly refers to the failure of king David to judge Uriah with justice.

The mitzva of Moshiach, no different than the mitzva of Shabbat! Both time-oriented commandments which require k’vanna. All generations of Jewish males can sanctify the mitzva of Moshiach. Moshe first anointed the House of Aaron as Moshiach. Shmuel anointed both Shaul and David as Moshiach. Later prophets would anoint even kings of Israel as Moshiach – like as Elisha anointed Yehu in מלכים ב.

The NT stands totally divorced from T’NaCH common law faith. Its foreign idea that only its God-man lives as the chosen messiah – so utterly foreign and alien to the T’NaCH literature which employs prophetic mussar as the k’vanna of all time oriented Torah commandments! All generations of Israel have the choice to accept or reject the vision-revelation of Torah common law. King Shlomo clearly preferred his own courts over the establishment of the Torah Sanhedrin Federal court system. Herod’s Temple simply no different than King Shlomo’s in that it prioritized architecture over Federal Sanhedrin courtroom justice common law. Your gospels all “mock” both king Herod and Sanhedrin courts! Your God JeZeus did not understand the difference between time oriented commandments from secondary positive & negative precedent commandments!

Just as JeZeus – dismissive, critical, and polemical so too my response which you chose to erase. The Greek of the Gospels makes no distinction between מלאכה from עבודה. Hence your God did not understand that Shabbat observance qualifies as “the definition” of time oriented commandments through the absence of actively doing time oriented Torah wisdom commandments on that day! The gospels stands upon the foundation of translations! It totally fails to address the key Torah theme of exile; which the earlier Apostle Paul capitalized upon with his “Original Sin” justification for messiah JeZeus. (The letters of Paul written before the gospel of Mark.) As JeZeus despise the P’rushim (Greek translation: Pharisees) so too later church doctrine and dogma despises the Hebrew T’NaCH – replacing it with their corrupt “old testament”.

Frankly, you’re correct that the one shares no common ground with the other. This succinctly represents a modern Jewish/Israeli response to the NT fraud. Yes you can erase it but this strongly supports the divide which proves the Pauline “grafted” notion as utterly false.

LOL shallow reactionary sophomoric translations suck.

Don’t Do It. Let it Go! (Numbers 20; Psalm 58-59; James 3)

Psalms 58: 1-8, 10 does not compare to Moshe struggling with his own Yatzir Ha’Ra together with the survivors of the Wilderness generations who both endured death and exile from the oath sworn lands of Canaan. The mitzva of Yovel and the pursuit of justice go hand in glove. Only in conquered Canaan where a free Independent Israelite nation rules the land can there exist “justice”. Even in the land of Canaan, whenever foreign kingdoms conquer the land and rule it, neither the Yovel כלל or the Justice פרט apply.

Goyim never accepted the Torah vision of justice at Sinai. Hence despite their “Courts of Law”, just as the Court of Par’o validated beating Israelite slaves for their failure to meet their daily quota of brick production so to all the Goyim courts throughout history ever once forced either the Church or Mosque to stand before the Bar and address their violent war crimes.

Psalm 59: 1-4, 9, 17 communicates emotional themes during times of peril. Numbers 20 re-introduces the Central “Curse” theme of the Torah – g’lut. G’lut as the negative Torah key theme opens with the expulsion of Adam from the garden, the exile of Noach in the Ark, the scattering of the people who built the Tower of Bavel, the destruction of Sodom, the exile of the sons of Yaacov to Egypt and the ensuing slavery that followed thereafter. Numbers 20, reintroduces this, the Central negative Torah theme of g’lut; which comes from the Evil Inclination known as ערב רב who came out of Egypt and reject – to this day – the revelation of the Torah at Sinai. The ערב רב by Torah definition: אין להם יראת אלהים. These assimilated and intermarried Jews – no different from Goyim – who likewises reject and do not accept the revelation of the Torah at Sinai לשמה – the first and Greatest Sinai commandment which defines the whole of the revelation of the Torah. ערב רב and Goyim have no brit inheritance not to the Avot as the fathers of the chosen Cohen people nor to the land inheritance given to the chosen Cohen people – the brit descendants of the Avot.
_______________________________________
_______________________________________
Your foreign book of James fails. Written some 1500 years after the revelation of the Torah at Sinai, it shares no connection to the Torah because Goyim never accepted the Torah at Sinai revelation. Plus, the book of James addresses Goyim concepts of spirituality — not Jewish visions of Sanhedrin courtroom common law justice. Your apostle Paul fails to distinguish Torah common law judicial justice from Greek & Roman statute law decrees. T’NaCH Prophets, follow and compare to Moshe as a Torah prophet. Aaron and his House anointed Moshiach, whereas Moshe through Torah prophetic mussar serve as the model for later prophets who functioned as the chief enforcers of Sanhedrin courtroom judicial rulings of justice. The foreign idea that prophets predict the future, and therein “fulfill Torah commandments”, confuses witchcraft with prophesy. Torah prophets command mussar to all living generations of the chosen Cohen people. Bil’aam predicted the future as the definition of his foreign prophesy.

Hence the NT jargon of “fulfilling the words of the prophets” as off as Muhammad’s declaration that prophets sent to all Goyim and spoke in the tongue of these Goyim – who reject the revelation of the Torah at Sinai. The Koran, for example, declares that the Jews changed the Torah and replaced Yitzak for Yishmael at the Akadah. However, the Koran fails to show this theme where HaShem choses his Cohen people, rather than first born birth! The concept recorded twice in the opening kre’a shma blessing תמיד מעשה בראשית, understood that wisdom commandments “create” the chosen Cohen people rather than race. The “human race” shares a 98.7% genome match with Apes. Starting with Cain, through the rejection of Esav and even the first born of Israel! The still later Koran and the NT, both fail to distinguish: that korbanot exist as Torah time-oriented commandments which require k’vanna – based upon the rejection of Cain’s positive commandment and acceptance of Hevel’s wisdom commandment!

This fundamental Shabbat/Chol distinction both alien spiritualities universally fail to discern the distinction between Primary wisdom Torah commandments from secondary positive and negative Torah commandments – which serve as precedents to derives the k’vanna of wisdom commandments. Its the latter wisdom commandments which obey the Creation story whose משל metaphor of creation in 6 days – introduces the subject of wisdom time-oriented Primary Torah commandments. The Torah commands not to do מלאכה – create מלאכים – on shabbat. The Torah דיוק\inference, that the 6 days of Chol/shabbat dedicate wisdom time-oriented Primary commandments and on the last day of the week (also called shabbat, like all Torah commandments wisdom vs positive & negative secondary precedents – equally called “commandments”).

Rabid Xtianity promotes mental insanity. Hatred against Jews never really ended, simply changed Nazi SS costumes unto ICC judicial robes.

Into the Arms of Jesus

Poop Pius XII guilt of Shoah and post war “rat-lines”. The SS gathered the Jews of Rome without so much as a peep of protest from the Poop. The buck stops with the Poop. The post war rat-lines decisively proves the Gospel rebuke: “By their fruits you shall know them.” Poop Pius XII did not publicly protest against the deportations of Jews from Rome and Europe throughout the war years. Protestant and Protestant reformers who equally proved the bankruptcy of their religion.

Martin Luther 1543 text On the Jews and Their Lies, calls for brutal measures against Jews such as gathering all Jews into their synagogues and burning them. John Calvin silent on Church blood libels which resulted in pogroms and ghettoes; no difference from Leo Tolstoy, the author of “War and Peace” – his silence during the brutal Russian pogroms which forced millions of Jews to flee Czarist Russia and caused the survivors to support Socialist revolution. Huldrych Zwingli’s “morality” lived in complete harmony and peace during the period of church racist war crimes.

Herzl determined that European Jew-hating racism, an “inherited social disease” mental European insanity passed down from generation to generation. The only “cure” for Jews to establish their own Jewish state. The notion that antisemitism is an inherited social disease speaks to ongoing cultural and societal prejudices that persist across both the UN and UNRWA today – post Oct7th 2023. Followed up by the ICC blood libel genocide slander.

Why Tucker Carlson sucks.

Tucker Carlson’s interview with U.S. Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee included several pointed and controversial questions about Jews, Jewish identity, and the legitimacy of Jewish claims to the land of Israel. The most significant themes fall into two categories: genetic legitimacy and historical/ethnic authenticity. 1. He questioned whether Jews — including Netanyahu — are “really” descended from ancient Israelites. Israelis should undergo genetic testing to determine who is truly descended from Abraham. Jewish identity might not reflect actual descent from biblical Israelites, implying that some Jews — especially Ashkenazi Jews — may not be “real” Jews in a historical sense. This line of questioning directly invoked the Khazar theory, a long‑discredited idea claiming Ashkenazi Jews descend from a medieval Turkic tribe rather than ancient Israelites. This theory is widely recognized as a staple of antisemitic rhetoric. 2. He singled out Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu as an “illegitimate” Jew. He said Netanyahu “has no deed” and that his ancestors “weren’t from here within recorded history.” This again tied into the idea that Ashkenazi Jews are not truly indigenous to the region. 3. He questioned the historic ties of the Jewish population to the land of Israel. n his broader commentary around the interview, Carlson: Questioned the Jewish people’s historical connection to the land. Suggested Israel’s right to exist was uncertain or invalid. These claims were presented alongside other statements widely criticized as invoking antisemitic tropes.

Carlson’s framing echoed several well‑known antisemitic narratives: That Jewish identity is fraudulent or manufactured. That Ashkenazi Jews are “foreign” to the Middle East. That Jewish belonging depends on blood purity or genetic lineage. That Jewish political legitimacy must be proven biologically. Jewish communities, scholars, and multiple news outlets noted that Judaism has always included converts, diaspora communities, and complex ethnic histories, making Carlson’s genetic framing both inaccurate and inflammatory.

moshe kerr
Response to Doug Wilson’s recent video “How We Got Here” against Tucker Carlson and Candace Wilson

To appreciate this Trump diplomacy requires context.

Contrast the Oct7th Abomination War of 2023 with its Gaza Peace Board,,, to the Israel’s alliance against Iran today. All previous wars foreign powers ALLWAYS INTERVENED. Neither the US nor Israel signed the Rome Agreement which established the ICC in Brussels. Yet the ICC declared it has jurisdiction over Israel?! Bunk. Post Shoah – the systematic murder of 75% of Western European Jewry – Israelis swore an oath: NEVER AGAIN.

Clearly, many ערב רב self hating Jews embrace Palestine. Not in our Name NY Jews made a terrible stink. Clearly these, assimilated and intermarried ערב רב kapo Jews – do not know this oath. For 2000+ years Jewish refugee populations scattered across the Middle East, North Africa, and Europe/Russia referred as “Christ Killers” … “the Jewish Problem”. Post Shoah, the oath NEVER AGAIN — would foreign peoples determine “FINAL SOLUTIONS”, for their inherit racist slander of Jews.

Since the June ’67 War where Nasser publicly swore that this time around, the Arabs would cleanse the Nakba ’48 disgrace, and throw the Jews into the Sea to honor & duplicate the Nazi Shoah in the Middle East. De Gaulle of France the key ally of Israel (not the US); just prior to the ’67 war, De Gaulle broke his alliance with Israel. Keep this in context because PM Chamberlain’s 1939 White Paper shattered the 1917 Balfour Agreement. Israelis starting with the Jewish leader in mandate Palestine Ben Gurion viewed this European betrayal, as Britain’s war against the Jews. Yet both “neutral” pre war ’67 France and England … post war attempted to determine the international borders of the Jewish state. As IF Israel remained a mandate protectorate of the UN. Palestine ceased to exist as a UN protectorate territory in 1948. But revisionist history can change historical facts, like the NT and Koran both did with the Hebrew T’NaCH.

Recall the British proposed UN 181 ‘Two state solution’? 1. All Arab states rejected it. 2. It was a General Assembly resolution where 2/3rd of all UN members recognized Jewish equal rights to achieve self determination. 3. Not till 1964 did Yasser Arafat embrace the name “Palestine”. His 1964 PLO Charter called 1948 Israel ‘occupied territory’. NOT the territory which Jordan illegally nationalized and called “West Bank”; in 1950 all UN member states except Britian and its “Two State Solution ally” Pakistan, condemned Jordans annexation of Samaria as illegal. Compound this hypocrisy with 1923 Britain separating “Trans-Jordan” from its 1922 Palestine Mandate – at the Jordan river!

Arafat’s PLO Charter did not refer to Egypt Gaza as “occupied territory”. People who think Arab states and Israel represent “the problem” of Middle East peace – utterly ignorant of Great Power politics! Arab refugee populations today no different from Jewish refugee populations post the Bar Kochba revolt in 135 CE! The issue of “world war” bogus nonsense political rhetoric employed to justify ‘great power intervention’. Europe’s WWI & II – most essentially a Civil War; look at the EU Union today and the post WWII Allied vs Warsaw Pact alliances.

In 1956 England and France attempted to seize the Suez Canal from Nasser’s Egypt. Both Stalin and IKE informed both 2nd rate powers to get the hell out of the Middle East. Post ’67 with LBJ tied down in Vietnam, England and France seized the opportunity to restore their ‘Great Power’ status in Middle East politics. The language of 242 implies the existence of a Palestine State! Palestine – French cartographers introduced “Palestine” into Ottoman “sick man of Europe” maps in the 19th Century.

Arab Caliphate defeated the Byzantine Empire @ the Battle of Yarmouk in 636 CE. Since the collapse of the Roman empire to the 19th Century French maps, no Arab or Muslim power ever once referred to Palestine. Arabs cannot even pronounce the letter P in Palestine! Wake up and smell the coffee.

Trump – “The Art of the Deal”: Iran requires rebuilding. Export your processed Uranium to the US in exchange for ending the war. This hypothetical scenario reflects a blend of economic strategy, diplomatic engagement, and complex negotiations. Each element would require careful consideration of global reactions and the intricate balance of power in the region.

Leverage: Utilizing the strengths of one party to gain concessions from the other. Win-Win Solutions: The principle that both parties should benefit from the deal to ensure sustainability and cooperation. Economic Sanctions Impact: Iran has faced extensive sanctions that have hampered its economy and infrastructure. Rebuilding efforts would focus on improving essential services, economic stability, and international relations. Financial support and infrastructure development could be strong incentives for Iran to comply with peace terms.

Case in coincidence: “According to the decision of the Supreme Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation, Vladimir Putin, a ceasefire is declared on May 8–9, 2026,” the statement from the ministry said. The Russian Ministry of Defense expects Ukraine to “follow this example.” Meanwhile, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy announced a separate ceasefire beginning on May 5-6, 2026.

Trump – “The Art of the Deal”: Iran requires rebuilding. Export your processed Uranium to the US in exchange for ending the war. This hypothetical scenario reflects a blend of economic strategy, diplomatic engagement, and complex negotiations. Each element would require careful consideration of global reactions and the intricate balance of power in the region.

Leverage: Utilizing the strengths of one party to gain concessions from the other. Win-Win Solutions: The principle that both parties should benefit from the deal to ensure sustainability and cooperation. Economic Sanctions Impact: Iran has faced extensive sanctions that have hampered its economy and infrastructure. Rebuilding efforts would focus on improving essential services, economic stability, and international relations. Financial support and infrastructure development could be strong incentives for Iran to comply with peace terms.

Case in coincidence: “According to the decision of the Supreme Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation, Vladimir Putin, a ceasefire is declared on May 8–9, 2026,” the statement from the ministry said. The Russian Ministry of Defense expects Ukraine to “follow this example.” Meanwhile, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy announced a separate ceasefire beginning on May 5-6, 2026.