UNWRA buildings turned into a museum to remember the Oct 7th Abomination war which UNWRA participated together with Hamas and Islamic Jihad. Arab nations can refuse to repatriate their refugees but Israel shall no long permit the UNWRA established inherited refugee status passed down from generation to generation. The disgrace of Oct7th Israel merits remembrance, on par with the pre-State Shoah. Specifically the oath “NEVER AGAIN”. For 2000+ years Goyim courts of law failed to hold church and mosque accountable for their war crime guilt. The oath “NEVER AGAIN” shall any Goyim court of law – judge the inherited Goyim racism commonly known in Goyim parlance as “the JEWISH PROPBLEM”, to serve their evil eye designs.

Yo Bartov you got genocide on the brain.

Revisionist history has a old bastard pedigree. From the NT to the Koran to Arafat Philistine Palestinians. Evil people love to employ lies and slander to govern the masses – classic Greek rhetoric.


Chag Shevuoth 46th day of the Omer – struggling to remove tuma middot from within the Yatzir Ha’Ra of the hearts of my people. The counting of the Omer accomplished through the שם מ”ב and the Divine soul Name האל, initially dedicated when we burn the חמץ prior to Pesach; but culminates upon the dedication of the soul Name האל upon Chag Shevuath – tefillah a matter of dedication of tohor middot within the heart – תורה לא בשמים הוא. Torah scholarship distinguishes the רוח הקודש thirteen middot Spirits “pronouns” of the 1st Commandment לא בשמים הוא Name which breathes the spirit of life into the chosen Cohen people whenever we do wisdom commandments known as time-oriented mitzvot; which Moshe Rabbeinu heard orally at Horev. As contrasted by the much later rabbinic פרדס inductive logic which relies upon warp/weft middot: the 7 Yovel middot, 10 judicial justice middot, and 13 pursuit of righteousness middot – halacha thread vs. the 32 Aggadic middot – woven into the halachic precedents which the Amoraim sages brought to interpret the language of some specific Home Mishna – which the Gemara views from different fixed “witness” perspectives. Jewish common law a courtroom legalism. As opposed and contrasted by Greek and Roman fiat statute law (cult of personality) legislative decrees, issued by authorities on High – as if from Heaven itself. Later such ‘Royal Fiat’ called the ‘Divine Right of Kings’, which the Magna Carta originally challenged and the American and French revolutions permanently uprooted.

Contrast revisionist history, which as a hard rule, behaves like a pig; that presents its cloven feet, and declares itself kosher. A more specific example: the public display of a bastard pedigree, presented through the ‘Son of God’ metaphor. From the NT to the Koran to Arafat Philistine Palestinians – Evil power hungry people love to employ lies and slander to govern the clueless masses – herein defines classic Greek rhetoric. The Romans developed Greek rhetoric by maintaining cheap bread prices in Rome to conceal the corruption and debauchery of the court of Caesar!

No serious historian says “the United States was created in 1776,” because nations – founded, declared, or achieve independence, not “created” as if by divine fiat mythology; akin to Romans sucking the tits of a mamma wolf. [Nakba: the humiliation of failing to stop the creation of Israel] False. God creates. Israel won its national independence by winning a war. France in 1789 established as their Constitution ‘The Rights of Man’. The ensuing general European wars that followed express the rejection of Monarchy governments to the revolutionary French democracy. The modern state of Greece likewise defeated the Ottoman Turks, as likewise did Muhammad Ali of Egypt! India had developed vibrant economy, until British imperialism raped that land; all the while – employing the rhetoric of calling conquered India – the Crown Jewel of the British empire! To state otherwise = revisionist history.

[The collapse of Arab political society] False; never in all Human history a Palestinian state. Arabs who fled League Mandated territories labelled “Palestine”, followed by the loss of the war which 5 to 7 Arab states started, has consequences. Once these refugees – who never embraced the British Palestine Mandate throughout 1923 to 1948 – fled, they lost all claims to 1948 Israel. The PLO 1964 Charter states openly that only ’48 Israel “occupied territory”. Later post ’67 attempts by the UN Security Council to pass off the illegal Jordanian West Bank as the legitimate lands of a Palestinian state – likewise revisionist history. In 1950 only England and Pakistan validated the Jordanian nationalization “West Bank” as part of Trans-Jordan “East Bank”; all other UN members condemned Jordans annexation of Samaria as illegal. Post ’67 UN fiat decrees like 242, 338, 446, 2334 etc promote the abracadabra rhetoric that the “West Bank” “illegal occupied territory”. England severed Trans-Jordan from its Palestine Mandated territories at the Jordan river in 1923.

Arab propaganda which compares “the Zionist entity” to Mideaval Chrusader states – another utter distortion of facts and history. [Later dominant Palestinian meaning (especially post‑1960s)] Imposing later revisionist history conclusions upon earlier historical facts – utterly false. Nakba for it to apply to Arab refugees must equally apply to the greater number of Jewish refugees expelled from almost all Arab countries in 1948. Arab revisionist propaganda does NOT extend Nakba to Jewish ’48 refugees. Therefore post-1960s a blagard-lie to foist Nakba upon post defeat Arab refugee populations. If for no other reason that such propaganda conceals the even greater disgraces perpetuated by UNWRA and all Arab states – which promotes the bait & switch Nakba onto Arab refugees and conceals the failure of all Arab states to repatriate their refugee populations!

Kapo Israeli revisionist historians – a curse of the ערב רב since Israelites left Egypt. My question centers upon Omer Bartov, why this man accepts patent Arab propaganda as anything other than a bald faced lie? Bartov’s reasoning is not theological, not Zionist, and not rooted in the political history of the Mandate. His entire intellectual world comes from genocide studies, ethnic violence, and comparative nationalism.

Bartov attempts to compare the Arab attempt to throw the Jews into the Sea in 1948 and again later in 1967 with the blagard-slander of ‘Zionist Ethnic cleansing’! Such false comparisons to Galicia, Volhynia, the Balkans, Anatolia, Rwanda, Bosnia – actual autrocities of ‘Ethnic cleansing’ – to the post ’48 plight of Arab refugees amounts to political porn. Why?

Israel openly accepted the Peel Commission of 1936 which contributed to the British sponsored UN 181, where two-thirds of all UN member states recognized Jews equal rights to achieve self determination as originally envisioned by the Balfour Declaration\Palestine mandate of 1922. Compound the fact, the declared Arab intent to complete the Nazi genocide of Jews permanently removes any and all comparison, made by Bartov with these distant other Goyim massacres of Goyim. Proof for this fact: Israel gave Israeli citizenship to ’48 Arabs. No Arab state has ever repatriated the ’48 and later ’67 Arab refugee populations.

Bartov reaches conclusions based upon shallow superficial reactionary comparisons; akin to the ICJ condemnation of Israel for war crimes post the Oct 7th 2023 slaughter of some 1200 Israelis perpetuated by Hamas, Islamic Jihad, and UNWRA criminals. His emotional empathetic reactions to Arab displaced refugees taken completely out of context to larger Jewish displaced refugee populations during the same period of time! One hand clapping produces only the lies of sound. ’48 Arab refugees never existed in the fabled numbers of “hundreds of thousands”! This UNWRA revisionist history utterly false. A lie equal to, the UN false pretense of a permanent Palestine Mandate – to this very day! Had the Arabs won their war of extermination how would Bartov frame that as “history”? Post war ’48 Arabs did NOT experience “ethnic cleansing”. That’s a blood libel host desecration Jews poisoned the wells lie. Such a lie, compares to condemning the US dropping bombs on Tokyo for the ‘war crime’ of Japan’s surprise attack on Pearl Harbor!

Bartov looks at 1948 almost only through the lens of “what happened to Arafat’s Pie in the Sky ‘Palestinians’,” and not “what the ’48 war exposed”. Arab states steadfast rejection that dhimmi Jews have equal rights to achieve self-determination in their own homeland! This Arab revisionist history lie. stands upon the foundation of the Koran itself; which about 2000 years after the revelation of the Torah at Sinai, its false prophet Muhammad fundamentally rejected; the Koran declares that Jews lied and replaced Yitzak for Yishmael at the Akadah; Arabs lie straight from their mothers’ milk! Benny Morris, Yoav Gelber, Anita Shapira – the burden rests upon them to prove that “several hundred thousand Arab refugees” in 1948 some how created out of the blue hocus pocus witchcraft!

More Jewish villages depopulated in Arab countries than Arab villages depopulated on orders from their own military leadership! Bartov’s shallow reactionary one-hand clapping bs duplicates to thousands of years after the fact NT and Koran revisionist substitute history/theology. His historical analysis compares to Stalin’s expunging the contributions of Leon Troskii in order to seize the helm of Lenin’s ‘Dictatorship of the Proletariat’.

Revisionist history has a old bastard pedigree. From the NT to the Koran to Arafat Philistine Palestinians. Evil people love to employ lies and slander to govern the masses – classic Greek rhetoric.

Chag Shevuoth 46th day of the Omer – struggling to remove tuma middot from within the Yatzir Ha’Ra of the hearts of my people. The counting of the Omer accomplished through the שם מ”ב and the Divine soul Name האל, initially dedicated when we burn the חמץ prior to Pesach; but culminates upon the dedication of the soul Name האל upon Chag Shevuath – tefillah a matter of dedication of tohor middot within the heart – תורה לא בשמים הוא. Torah scholarship distinguishes the רוח הקודש thirteen middot Spirits “pronouns” of the 1st Commandment לא בשמים הוא Name which breathes the spirit of life into the chosen Cohen people whenever we do wisdom commandments known as time-oriented mitzvot; which Moshe Rabbeinu heard orally at Horev. As contrasted by the much later rabbinic פרדס inductive logic which relies upon warp/weft middot: the 7 Yovel middot, 10 judicial justice middot, and 13 pursuit of righteousness middot – halacha thread vs. the 32 Aggadic middot – woven into the halachic precedents which the Amoraim sages brought to interpret the language of some specific Home Mishna – which the Gemara views from different fixed “witness” perspectives. Jewish common law a courtroom legalism. As opposed and contrasted by Greek and Roman fiat statute law (cult of personality) legislative decrees, issued by authorities on High – as if from Heaven itself. Later such ‘Royal Fiat’ called the ‘Divine Right of Kings’, which the Magna Carta originally challenged and the American and French revolutions permanently uprooted.

Contrast revisionist history, which as a hard rule, behaves like a pig; that presents its cloven feet, and declares itself kosher. A more specific example: the public display of a bastard pedigree, presented through the ‘Son of God’ metaphor. From the NT to the Koran to Arafat Philistine Palestinians – Evil power hungry people love to employ lies and slander to govern the clueless masses – herein defines classic Greek rhetoric. The Romans developed Greek rhetoric by maintaining cheap bread prices in Rome to conceal the corruption and debauchery of the court of Caesar!

No serious historian says “the United States was created in 1776,” because nations – founded, declared, or achieve independence, not “created” as if by divine fiat mythology; akin to Romans sucking the tits of a mamma wolf. [Nakba: the humiliation of failing to stop the creation of Israel] False. God creates. Israel won its national independence by winning a war. France in 1789 established as their Constitution ‘The Rights of Man’. The ensuing general European wars that followed express the rejection of Monarchy governments to the revolutionary French democracy. The modern state of Greece likewise defeated the Ottoman Turks, as likewise did Muhammad Ali of Egypt! India had developed vibrant economy, until British imperialism raped that land; all the while – employing the rhetoric of calling conquered India – the Crown Jewel of the British empire! To state otherwise = revisionist history.

[The collapse of Arab political society] False; never in all Human history a Palestinian state. Arabs who fled League Mandated territories labelled “Palestine”, followed by the loss of the war which 5 to 7 Arab states started, has consequences. Once these refugees – who never embraced the British Palestine Mandate throughout 1923 to 1948 – fled, they lost all claims to 1948 Israel. The PLO 1964 Charter states openly that only ’48 Israel “occupied territory”. Later post ’67 attempts by the UN Security Council to pass off the illegal Jordanian West Bank as the legitimate lands of a Palestinian state – likewise revisionist history. In 1950 only England and Pakistan validated the Jordanian nationalization “West Bank” as part of Trans-Jordan “East Bank”; all other UN members condemned Jordans annexation of Samaria as illegal. Post ’67 UN fiat decrees like 242, 338, 446, 2334 etc promote the abracadabra rhetoric that the “West Bank” “illegal occupied territory”. England severed Trans-Jordan from its Palestine Mandated territories at the Jordan river in 1923.

Arab propaganda which compares “the Zionist entity” to Mideaval Chrusader states – another utter distortion of facts and history. [Later dominant Palestinian meaning (especially post‑1960s)] Imposing later revisionist history conclusions upon earlier historical facts – utterly false. Nakba for it to apply to Arab refugees must equally apply to the greater number of Jewish refugees expelled from almost all Arab countries in 1948. Arab revisionist propaganda does NOT extend Nakba to Jewish ’48 refugees. Therefore post-1960s a blagard-lie to foist Nakba upon post defeat Arab refugee populations. If for no other reason that such propaganda conceals the even greater disgraces perpetuated by UNWRA and all Arab states – which promotes the bait & switch Nakba onto Arab refugees and conceals the failure of all Arab states to repatriate their refugee populations!

Kapo Israeli revisionist historians – a curse of the ערב רב since Israelites left Egypt. My question centers upon Omer Bartov, why this man accepts patent Arab propaganda as anything other than a bald faced lie? Bartov’s reasoning is not theological, not Zionist, and not rooted in the political history of the Mandate. His entire intellectual world comes from genocide studies, ethnic violence, and comparative nationalism.

Bartov attempts to compare the Arab attempt to throw the Jews into the Sea in 1948 and again later in 1967 with the blagard-slander of ‘Zionist Ethnic cleansing’! Such false comparisons to Galicia, Volhynia, the Balkans, Anatolia, Rwanda, Bosnia – actual autrocities of ‘Ethnic cleansing’ – to the post ’48 plight of Arab refugees amounts to political porn. Why?

Israel openly accepted the Peel Commission of 1936 which contributed to the British sponsored UN 181, where two-thirds of all UN member states recognized Jews equal rights to achieve self determination as originally envisioned by the Balfour Declaration\Palestine mandate of 1922. Compound the fact, the declared Arab intent to complete the Nazi genocide of Jews permanently removes any and all comparison, made by Bartov with these distant other Goyim massacres of Goyim. Proof for this fact: Israel gave Israeli citizenship to ’48 Arabs. No Arab state has ever repatriated the ’48 and later ’67 Arab refugee populations.

Bartov reaches conclusions based upon shallow superficial reactionary comparisons; akin to the ICJ condemnation of Israel for war crimes post the Oct 7th 2023 slaughter of some 1200 Israelis perpetuated by Hamas, Islamic Jihad, and UNWRA criminals. His emotional empathetic reactions to Arab displaced refugees taken completely out of context to larger Jewish displaced refugee populations during the same period of time! One hand clapping produces only the lies of sound. ’48 Arab refugees never existed in the fabled numbers of “hundreds of thousands”! This UNWRA revisionist history utterly false. A lie equal to, the UN false pretense of a permanent Palestine Mandate – to this very day! Had the Arabs won their war of extermination how would Bartov frame that as “history”? Post war ’48 Arabs did NOT experience “ethnic cleansing”. That’s a blood libel host desecration Jews poisoned the wells lie. Such a lie, compares to condemning the US dropping bombs on Tokyo for the ‘war crime’ of Japan’s surprise attack on Pearl Harbor!

Bartov looks at 1948 almost only through the lens of “what happened to Arafat’s Pie in the Sky ‘Palestinians’,” and not “what the ’48 war exposed”. Arab states steadfast rejection that dhimmi Jews have equal rights to achieve self-determination in their own homeland! This Arab revisionist history lie. stands upon the foundation of the Koran itself; which about 2000 years after the revelation of the Torah at Sinai, its false prophet Muhammad fundamentally rejected; the Koran declares that Jews lied and replaced Yitzak for Yishmael at the Akadah; Arabs lie straight from their mothers’ milk! Benny Morris, Yoav Gelber, Anita Shapira – the burden rests upon them to prove that “several hundred thousand Arab refugees” in 1948 some how created out of the blue hocus pocus witchcraft!

More Jewish villages depopulated in Arab countries than Arab villages depopulated on orders from their own military leadership! Bartov’s shallow reactionary one-hand clapping bs duplicates to thousands of years after the fact NT and Koran revisionist substitute history/theology. His historical analysis compares to Stalin’s expunging the contributions of Leon Troskii in order to seize the helm of Lenin’s ‘Dictatorship of the Proletariat’.

PM Israel repeats again what he said repeatedly before Congress 40:00 minute mark – both America and Israel interests, best served by weaning Israel from the US military aid. In context of the current Iran War, Bibi’s premise: that Israel functions as the model partner-ally on the foundation of the Gaza Peace Plan. A stronger modern alliance, in conjunction with key other Middle East and North African States, based upon critical trade routes.

Contrast the right wing opposition to Trump’s partnership alliance with Israel, coupled with the closure of the NATO alliance which clearly failed in the current Iran war. Both Greenland and several African countries hold large, potentially competitive rare-earth deposits that could reduce reliance on China over time. Africa has some nearer-term producing projects; Greenland currently has no commercial Rare Earth Elements mines. New mines outside China will have limited impact unless parallel investment builds midstream/refining capacity. Greenland and Africa depends on large, coordinated investments in mining, processing, infrastructure.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gL2jFwZ16xo

Kelly despises the Bibi vision of being a “partner” rather than a “babe on the tit”. Kelly declares that Trump – “bored with this war”. This a personal interjected opinion – not expressed, much less repressed in the 60 minute interview. Kelly pretends that Bibi called the shots … its Trump’s fault! Iran “has done it!” Done what? Kelly skeptical of Israeli intelligence which she applauds its skills, because it serves her skewed propaganda narrative. Kelly calls this war the worst loss in American history! She jumps off the interview on tangent points not contained within the interview at all. Opinion simply not NEWS.

Why Jews view the NT as both criminal av tuma avoda zara worship of other Gods.

Matthew’s Gospel 28:16–20 employs a Hellenistic Greek verb proskuneō (προσκυνέω) – that has no Hebrew verb equivalent throughout the T’NaCH; this verb employed for actions of bowing, prostration, homage, and cultic worship; it carries strong pagan/imperial associations in Greek and Roman contexts (including emperor cult). Biblical Hebrew for obvious av tuma avoda zarah 2nd Sinai commandment reasons, rejects usage of such a verb.

The Torah, by stark contrast, refers to shabbat through the verb מלאכה. To Greek culture and customs this verb as foreign and alien to them as proskuneō (προσκυνέω) to P’rushim and Rabbinic legal traditions. The original Greek of Matthew’s gospel introduced proskuneō, like the later church dogma emphasized this foreign verb in conjunction with another alien term agape – an avoda zara “strange fire” nuance, implied in cultic worship – as in the case of the death of the two sons of Aaron. The Greek and Roman cultures applied this verb to the worship of their Gods. The Romans worshipped Caesar as a God.

Classical Greek lacks a single term that carries the identical legal-ritual field and halakhic technicality of melakhah – employed as both Torah & later rabbinic/Halachic discourses that define time-oriented commandments as wisdom mitzvot. This subtle nuanced verb many assimilated Reshonim who embraced Greek culture and customs from the Tzeddukim during the Hanukkah revolt; to Spanish assimilated Reshonim rabbis who actively and publicly embraced Greek culture and customs. The Rambam serves as a specific particular example of this disgrace. His statute halachic code, failed to differentiate time oriented commandments as requiring מלאכה from positive and negative commandments which do not require k’vanna. Contrast the Gaon B’HaG whose code of Torah commandments has 3 basic mitzvot categories whereas the Rambam has only two.

(Koine) Greek translated agape (ἀγάπη) as love. This Greek translation fails to interpret correctly the Hebrew verb of ואהבת – as found in the Torah tefillah known as קריא שמע – the latter does not interpret love anything approaching to the Koin Hellenistic term agape (ἀγάπη). ואהבת – this verb phrase stands upon the Torah precedent, the negative commandment – not to steal. A man does not “love” that which he does not own; Jewish marriages – halachically classified as קידושין – require that the Man acquire Title to the soul of his wife; the future born children this marital union shall produce. Hence when a Man divorces his ex-wife, the Torah commands a positive commandment to write a get of divorce and place this get, which returns & restores ownership of her birth bearing Title back to “soul” domain. Title to future born children, herein defines what a man “acquires” through the mitzva of קידושין. The concept of “domains” likewise defines the wisdom of מלאכה in observance of Shabbat another great time-oriented Torah commandment.

Still another cultural distinction which Koine Greek NT translations fail to discern: שלום does not correctly translate into peace. eirēnē (εἰρήνη) a noun whereas שלום a noun-verb combination that stands upon בטחון. Shalom closely tied to בטחון(security/confidence); for example a Jew – as a rule – keeps shabbat by inviting trusted family & guests into his home to eat the 3 shabbat meals together. Another example where Koine Greeks falls flat, ברית does not correctly translate as diathēkē (διαθήκη). To swear a Torah oath requires שם ומלכות, a concept totally alien to the NT; διαθήκη (diathēkē) in the New Testament Greek does not inherently convey the same connotations of a sworn oath or the dedication required by Oral Torah traditions integral in the Hebrew understanding of ברית.

How this Israeli citizen views the Talmud as a Zionist secular Jew

The Mishna model employs Case/Din as its judicial sh’itta of “common law”. Torah a common law mussar methodology. A Goy, regardless of the generation born, never accepted the revelation of the first or second Sinai commandments which Israel did with נעשה ונשמע. Israel never received the rest of the Torah until Moshe came down from Sinai the 2nd time after Yom Kippur where HaShem annulled his vow and made t’shuva (HaShem remembered” the oaths sworn to the Avot that they and only they would father the chosen Cohen people).

Therefore Goyim in all generations reject Leviticus 22:32 because they by the 2nd Sinai commandment worship other Gods. Deuteronomy 22:2–3 deals with bnai brit allies, not foreign Goyim enemies in times of war. Deut. 16:18; 17:14–20 – when David became king he married multiple wives; his son Shlomo worshipped avoda zarah consequent to his assimilation and foreign wives! Both men failed to establish the Sanhedrin Federal Courts which include the Cities of Refuge. Shlomo exiled his own teacher who cursed David as he fled from the Avshalom revolt! Yerushalem – should have served as the “Hub” of the Great Sanhedrin – and not as the small Sanhedrin Federal “spokes” wheel – cities of refuge. Proof that neither king David or Shlomo established the Torah constitutional mandate of Sanhedrin common law courts! Hence the specific of “blood on his hands” Natan rebuked king David’s failure to judge Uriah through Sanhedrin courts.

Lev. 19:16 לשון הרע does not apply to Goyim. Goyim reject the revelation of the Torah. Torah לא בשמים היא. Goyim absolutely reject judicial justice as their faith. The Goyim NT/Koran – both not under the law anymore than the Philistines!

1 Sam 17:26 contained within the larger sugya of 17:26- 33 Young David holds Goyim in utter contempt. Shall Jews today hold post Shoah Xtians and Muslims in equal contempt? The Rambam heretic abandoned Oral Torah פרדס inductive reasoning and attempted to cause Israel to forget the Oral Torah interpretive logic in favor of assimilated Greek/Arabic syllogism deductive logic. The avoda zara of the Rambam embraced the foreign alien av tuma avoda zarah of some Universal Monotheistic God; he validated that Jews could dav’en in Mosques and his 7 mitzvot bnai noach perverted 7 mitzvot ger toshav unto applicable unto all Goyim. Utter nonsense. Among the Reshonim he stands alone in ruling halacha from aggadic sources!

Pikuach nefesh and communal duty learns from Exodus 23:7. The story of young David and the over-reaction by his older brother reached the ear of king Shaul who had already failed to kill the Amalek king and therefore the prophet Shmuel had already secretly anointed David as Moshiach. Eliab exposed the tuma midda of צר עיין toward his younger brother David. Alien statute law follows the logical foible of appealing to authority. Hence the Torah constitutional mandate of Sanhedrin courts empowers the Great Sanhedrin court “legislative review”. Which “Elohim” commanded the prophet Shmuel to anoint David as king? Based upon the כלל — תורה לא בשמים היא? Hence Shmuel as a prophet of the Sanhedrin court obeyed the ruling of the Sanhedrin אלהים and anointed David as Moshiach and rejected Shaul as Moshiach.

“Kolot u’Lapidim” — a metaphor combining two images: “voices” (kolot) represent noise, opinions, ideas, or vocal testimonies; “torches” (lapidim) represent light, attention, drama, or emotional flare-ups. Together it suggests an outpouring of voices that illuminate or ignite attention — a loud, attention-grabbing clamor that sparks emotional or public reaction.

The Reshonim such as both Rambam and later Kuzari both embraced as did the earlier Tzeddukim – Greek logic preferred over פרדס inductive logic. Early 16th Century Sforno serves as an example of ירידות הדורות, the domino effect of forgetting the Oral Torah as established in the Hanukkah blessing in ברכת המזון. Furthermore, ברית does not correctly translate into covenant. The latter term employed throughout the NT & Koran falls flat. A brit alliance requires שם ומלכות; the רוח הקודש Name of the 1st Sinai commandment and dedication of specific Oral Torah middot אל רחום וחנון etc. Hence the middle blessing of the Shemone Esrei affix the 13 blessing to these specific Oral Torah middot revealed to Moshe on Yom Kippur after the sin of the Golden Calf. The 13 middot function as pronouns to the רוח הקודש first commandment Name.

ונקדשתי בתוך בני ישראל – ויקרא כב:לב stands upon swearing Torah oaths during all korbanot dedications. This verse instructs the mussar נמשל of the Mishkan משל. Just as toldot blessing require שם ומלכות how much more so to dedicate any korban לשמה requires שם ומלכות. The alien utterly foreign pollution that confuses brit with covenant totally and completely false.

Goyim not automatically ‘enemies’. Antisemitism learns from the eternal commandment to war against Amalek. The language of D’varim amplifes the language of Sh’mot. Goyim by definition do not possess יראת אלהים because they worship other Gods – the 2nd Sinai commandment. Therefore the Zohar applies the lack of יראת אלהים to the ערב רב who came out of Egypt with Moshe! Esav as a people no different from the Philistines as a people. Both this and that nations became extinct. Hence יראת אלהים defines the k’vanna of the 2nd Sinai commandment. Jews who worship avoda zarah through assimilation and intermarriage – אין להם יראת אלהים … the eternal Torah curse of Amalek throughout the generations.

Prophets command mussar in order to enforce Sanhedrin court room rulings. תורה לא בשמים היא. Sanhedrin 2a, states that a king a prophet can anoint as Moshiach without the presence of the Sanhedrin, specifically in instances where no designated heir lives. However, both prophets and Sanhedrin courts only exist when Israel keeps the Yovel freedom commandment. During the whole of the בית שני Jews never observed neither Yovel nor prophets once Jews realized that Cyrus built the Temple in the days of Ezra to rule Judea as a banana republic. Even Rambam acknowledges the pre-condition of Yovel. Because Jewish political independence ie king, absolutely requires Jewish sovereignty.

Furthermore, the Talmud debates who merit greater respect 1. a king or 2. a Torah sage? The Talmud rules that a Torah sage merits greater respect because a person who learns לשמה one in 10,000 whereas any Jew, even a forced convert like Herod can rule as a king!

Arakhin 15b Talmudic judicial common law does not apply not to Xtians as taught by the apostle Paul nor to Muslims which deny the Avot as the fathers of the chosen Cohen people. Clearly the blood libels and host desecration slanders prove that Goyim morality views לשון הרע not as one of the prime causes of the g’lut of the Wilderness generations caused consequent to the spies report of giants in the land. In Hilchot Lashon Hara, rabbi Yisrael Meir Kagan writes that it is not necessarily forbidden for Jews to speak lashon hara about Goyim! Perhaps based upon a Baali Tosafot manuscript which writes מותר גניבת גוי. The Ramban does not explicitly state that lashon hara applies to Goy. The language of these rabbis supports a “universal moral standard”, despite the cold fact that only Israel accepted the Torah revelation at Sinai. HaShem a local tribal god, not a Monotheistic Universal God. Monotheism by definition violates the 2nd Sinai commandment.

Sanhedrin 56-60: This Aggadic passage outlines the Seven Noahide Laws, associating them with righteousness for only the ger toshav because only when the Yovel operates Jews can establish and operate Capital Crimes Sanhedrin courts. The Torah establishes ger toshav and nacree in the Book of D’varim. Baba Kama affixes nacree which it called Canaani which referred to the rejection of the Shomronim which Ezra rejected to assist in building king Cyrus’s Temple. Tosefta Avodah Zarah 9 the status of gere toshav goyim. Midrash Bereishit Rabbah 16 elaborates on the moral imperatives for humanity which the Goyim dispersed following the tower of babel and Sodom clearly rejected. Ramban on Bereishit 34 did not dispute with Rambam’s universal ethics fraud. Proof of the domino effect which the sages describe as ירידות הדורות. The Meiri wrote his commentary to the Talmud on the same year that all British Jews expelled from England in 1290!

Torah prophets follow the model of Moshe Rabbeinu. Moshe sat as the Nasi of the Great Sanhedrin court. National destiny – the brit of blessings vs curses: the first two Sinai commandments.

The casuistic nature of the Mishnah allows for flexibility and adaptability in legal reasoning, enabling the application of Jewish law to a wide range of real-life situations. It signifies a methodology where halacha derived from particular Mishnaic case studies, fostering a required depth analysis of Mishnaic language based upon Gemara halachic precedents. Prophets cannot create halakha (Shabbat 104a, Bava Metzia 59b). All nations heard the revelation (Mechilta, Shemot 20). But only Israel accepted the Sinai revelation. Sinai was a cosmic event, not tribal (Ramban, Kuzari, Sforno). This interpretation reflects a broader, philosophical understanding rather than a strictly textual analysis from the Talmud. And since “philosphy” an imported Greek assimilation, by definition invalid regardless of the stature of the assimilated Reshon authority.

Later opinion made by Jewish authorities concerning Goyim falls outside of the jurisdiction of g’lut rabbis to determine. G’lut Jewish refugees often enjoyed no legal or even social rights. The Chafetz Chaim, for example, died the same year that Hitler voted in as Chancellor! The second Sinai commandments do not employ the language “do not worship intermediaries”. The language of the 2nd Commandment stands upon the precedent of the 10 plagues which judged the Gods of Egypt.

The medieval Karaite anti-philosophical polemic indeed generally rejected Greek philosophy, particularly the ideas of Plato and Aristotle, across the board. They maintained that reliance on rationalist philosophy diverges from a faithful interpretation of the Hebrew Scriptures. Their stance reflects the commitment to scriptural authority and their disapproval of all Greek philosophical speculations. Herein separates the Karaites from the earlier Tzeddukim, where the latter emphatically embraced like obedient kapo Jews Greek tenets of philosophy and logic. This Karaim resemble the Tzeddukim in their obtuse literalism of reading the language of Torah as Divine rather than the Constitution which mandates משנה תורה legislative review through פרדס Oral Torah inductive reasoning. Both כרת societies rejected the revelation of the 13 Oral Torah middot spirits revealed at Horev – just as did the Rambam statute halacha – organized on the model of Greek and Roman statute law.

The Rif, two generations before the Rambam. Just as the Creation story introduces the concept of Torah wisdom commandments/time-oriented mitzvot rather than the actual creation of the Universe. Torah commands mussar it does not dictate history. Hence a reading of NaCH prophets as history rather than mussar misses the boat on par with how Goyim read their Genesis translation of the Creation!

Amalek = only assimilated and intermarried Jews; the fundamental k’vanna of the 2nd Sinai commandment not to worship other Gods. ירידות הדורות learns from the curse of Civil Wars Natan placed upon the kingdom of David when he profaned his Moshiach anointing in the matter of Uriah and the establishment of Federal Sanhedrin court system/בית המקדש. King Shlomo clearly ignored the prophetic mussar of Natan just as did his son, who chose to listen to his young buck advisors at Sh’Cem.

Brit does not mean covenant just as T’shuva does not mean repentance for sin.

T’shuva remembers the oath sworn to the Avot they they alone would father the chosen Cohen people. The brit cut with the Avot: 1. They alone would father the chosen Cohen People. 2. The chosen Cohen People would forever inherit the oath sworn land of Canaan. Korach did not rebel against either basis of the brit cut with the Avot by HaShem.

Korach’s rebellion rejected the leadership of Moshe and Aaron. No different than the much later NT and Koran rejected the prophetic mussar of Moshe and Aaron. Historic/Conservative and Reform Judaism likewise reject the prophetic mussar foundation of the Torah as well. Korach and his 250 “leaders” rejected Moshe’s Sanhedrin court of 71.

Just as in the rebellion lead by the ערב רב antisemites murdered the entire Sanhedrin which Moshe established prior to his aliya unto Har Sinai, so too Korach’s rebellion likewise rejected the 2nd Great Sanhedrin; just as the ערב רב threatened to kill Aaron so too Korach threatened to kill Moshe and Aaron. The 2nd Sinai commandment centers upon ערב רב Israelites worship of other Gods. His rebellion against the leadership of Moshe and Aaron negated the מלאך status of Moshe sent to Egypt – together with Aaron – by HaShem, to take Israel out of g’lut and bring them to the oath sworn land of Canaan.

The ערב רב just as לשון הרע וגאווה the dominant tuma spirits which promoted rage and hatred by which רשעים slaughtered the first Great Sanhedrin which Yitro rebuked Moshe to establish, so too the Wilderness generation in the day of Korach still clung to the domination of tuma middot rather than tohor middot – the Horev revelation of the Oral Torah. Therefore post the revelation of the Oral Torah at Horev, Korach in point of fact rejected the Oral Torah, together with the doomed/cursed Wilderness Generation!

This Torah mussar defines the av tuma avoda zara of the Assyrian imported Shomronim who converted out of fear of lions, the Tzeddukim, Karaites, rabbinic statute law which replaced Oral Torah פרדס inductive logic for Greek syllogism deductive logic as expressed through statute halachic religious codes! Yovel and Sanhedrin lateral common law courts of Capital Crimes and Torts fundamentally require that the chosen Cohen People rule the oath sworn land of Canaan. Just as Israel rebelled against Moshe and Aaron, the heads of the Great Sanhedrin and attempted to conquer Canaan – with no tohor middah obligation to rule conquered Canaan with righteous judicial justice – no different than the kings of the 10 tribes of Israel – so too Korach and his 250 sought to replace the Great Sanhedrin Court with a different judicial system.

This central Torah theme, likewise taught through the death of the two eldest sons of Aaron for offering “strange fire”. How does the Torah define “strange fire”? The korban of Cain serves as the basis by which HaShem reject the premise that the seed of the Avot determined through birth – first born son. Hevel’s korban accepted because that korban dedicated wisdom time-oriented Av commandments as קדוש קדושים. Time oriented wisdom commandments defines the k’vannah of the Aggadic creation story. The dedication of Torah wisdom as the “heart” k’vannah of Torah commandments separates the lower/secondary commandments which serves as precedents which elevates commandments which do not require k’vanna from Av commandments which do require k’vanna.

This כוונה בסיסי makes an eternal separation between קדוש discerned from קדוש קדושים. The משל model of the Mishkan instructs this mussar as does Rabbi Yechuda’s interpretation of בכל לבבך\כם of tefillah דאורייתא – קריא שמע. The vision to conquer Canaan and rule this land with righteous Sanhedrin common law defines the mussar rebuke of Natan against David. Where the latter’s Yatzir Ha’Ra evil eye jealously sought to copy and duplicate how Goyim worship their Gods. The mussar of “blood on his hands” directly rebukes David’s failure to judge Uriah through a Sanhedrin courtroom rather than rely upon a רשע general to do his dirty work.

T’NaCH commands mussar. T’NaCH not a history book. The mussar of prophetic mussar separates tohor middot from tumah middot which dominates the heart. Specific details throughout the Ages, compares to the facets of a diamond. Each witness testifies based upon his limited perspective. The Front, Side, Top views of a blue print look radically different from one another but together they permit the contractor to see a three dimensional vision from a two dimensional sheet of paper. The k’vannah of kre’a shma – to accept the yoke of the kingdom of Heaven, stands upon the basis: תורה לא בשמים היא. This foundation, like the oaths sworn to the Avot does not change like a woman’s fashion of dress.

Just as HaShem does not change from Spirit to words, so too the 13 Oral Torah middot does not change the “pronoun” רוחה קודש unto profane words. The 13 Horev Oral Torah middot – not “rules of interpretation”. The latter rabbinic middot of Hillel, Akiva, Yishmael, and Ha’Galil function as “rules of interpretation of Mishna and Gemara sugyot. The Oral Torah middot spirits, either they or tuma spirit rule the heart.

This Torah vision shares no common ground with the later Protestant notion of “Free Will”. The struggle of Yaacov vs. Esav in the womb of Rivka has nothing whatsoever to do with Calvinism! To swear a Torah blessing requires שם ומלכות, just as does cutting a Torah oath brit with the Avot! The word ONE in the opening verse of kre’a shma shares no portion with the Universal monotheism av tuma avoda zara preached by both Xtianity and Islam. A bnai brit Cohen accepts the oaths sworn by the Avot as ONE with his dedication to walk before HaShem and be Holy.

Talmud – the study by which abstract tohor middot attain a k’vanna which a Cohen can dedicate most holy to HaShem – as expressed through the medium of Sanhedrin common law court judicial rulings as understood through the discipline of Gemara halachic precedents which re-interpret the language of a specific Mishna viewed from different halachic precedent perspectives.