Thank You Nitay. The Libtard left an absolute joke … and completely out of power. Based upon the mastery of English I assume that Haviv Rettig Gur and Hussein Abubakr Mansour are American Arab/Muslim Americans. As an Israeli/American – made aliya to Israel in 1991 – its interesting to listen to American Muslims views, how they perceive the Libtard of crazy left-wing Americans, educated by Universities to interpret reality based upon outrage and subjectivization of issues.
Rational logic which split Jews against Jews during the Middle Ages/Reshonim scholars of Jewish elite the “Civil War” which pitted inductive logic established by the Tannaim and Amoraim Framers of the Talmud and Midrashim vs. the rediscovered Greek deductive logic originally developed by Socrates Plato and Aristotle. This Jewish Reshonim Civil War pitted the French Common law school of inductive reasoning against the Rambam/Sephardi school of deductive reasoning.
It seems that what these two American Muslims address – the gulf which separates Left-wing intellectual subjectivism pitted against traditional/conservative deductive reasoning which dominated University education until perhaps the re-establishment of the Jewish State, starting in 1948; but really flowery post the June 1967 Six Day War.
Why did the fortress of traditional University deductive reasoning education in Western Europe suddenly switch to prioritization of subjective emotional half-truth propaganda reasoning. Joseph Goebbels was highly intelligent and educated Man. Yet his propaganda mastery controlled the political narrative till Allied bombers and Armies led by Russian and American Generals Zhukov, Patton & Bradley utterly Gazafied Nazi Germany.
It seems to me that the British and French “defeat” in the 1956 attempt to seize the Suez Canal by these to Western European States; the “defeat” of European ‘Great Power Imperialism’ to dominate the sphere of Western Influence over all the States of the Middle East by seizing the Suez — this not only cemented the bi-polar US – USSR Cold War by demoting both defeated in WWII France and post War Britain to second tier powers. Then came the shock of the June 1967 War wherein France “betrayed” its alliance with Israel and Britain declared its “neutrality”; yet post War both States (LBJ tied down in Vietnam) irrationally attempted to force a “New Set of Rules upon Israel/revisionist History” by pretending that the Arabs nations won that disastrous War for all Arab rejection of Jews equal rights to achieve self-determination in the Middle East as originally expressed in the 1917 Balfour Declaration – 1922 League of Nations Palestine Mandate to establish a Jewish National Home in Palestine. ((Boy that last sentence a mouthful.))
Subjective irrational revisionist history ignores the fact that the Ottoman Empire never referred to Greater Syria as Palestine other than in European made maps. The Ottoman Empire – known as “the Sick Man of Europe” in the 19th Century could not afford its own cartographers. Arabs to this day cannot pronounce the letter P in the European word “Palestine”. The Western Universities “supported” the British/French revisionist history known as UN Resolution 242, which ignores the fact that Russia and Poland “occupy” Prussia to this very day! That the moment David Ben Gurion declared National Independence and Israel thereafter won the 1948 first Independence War … that the League of Nation name “Palestine” ceased to exist. Universities ignore that all Arab states rejected the Peel Commission of 1936 which directly led to UN GA Resolution 181 in 1947. All Arab states absolutely rejected the European Two State Solution Model.
Yet subjective revisionist history as promoted by Universities arbitrarily promotes the Two State Solution! Palestine as a UN Protectorate territory ceased to exist in 1948. Arafat’s opportunist propaganda wherein he named the Palestine Liberation Army (PLO) in 1964, revived this forgotten Name; had Ben Gurion named the new Jewish State “Palestine” obviously their would be no “Palestinians” today.
The next level University revisionist history: Beyond Palestine and two state solutions 181 pretense that Israel today remains a Protectorate Territory “created” by the UN itself rather than an Independent nation who twice won its National Independence in two Arab Wars of genocide; Nasser swore that the Arabs in 1967 would throw the Jews into the Sea. And within Israel, the Israeli government ordered the digging of mass graves expecting an absolute massacre of the Israeli population by Egypt Syrian and Jordanian Armies! Therefore the next level of University revisionist history subjectivism – it ignores the fact that Arabs lost those Wars and became permanent refugee populations without a country of their own. Never existed an Arab Palestine in all recorded history. Yet the University protests proclaim: From the River to the Sea Palestine will be free”.
Revisionist history by definition subjective. This makes revisionist history as taught by University Professors propaganda on the Order of Joseph Georbels of Nazi Germany. Propaganda by its essence and nature; by its “Race” according to the language employed by Nazi propaganda, promotes emotional outrage rather than deductive rational reasoning which dominated University Education programs prior to the 2nd Tier “Great Power” status of Western European degraded powers. Revisionist history by definition rejects that post WWII US and USSR sat at the top of the heap of Great Powers.
mosckerr
Category: Uncategorized
Breaking News: Fanatic Iran has fallen: The Evil Witch is DEAD.
Russia Down-graded its Diplomatic Relations With Israel
Russia has voiced its concerns over the recent actions of the Trump administration, specifically regarding the capture of Nicolás Maduro in Venezuela. The regime change in Venezuela evokes mixed reactions, with some in Russia characterizing it as “armed aggression” against a sovereign nation. Following the U.S. military actions leading to the capture of Nicolás Maduro in Venezuela, Russia has reacted sharply, escalating tensions not only with the U.S. but also with other nations, notably Israel.
The diplomatic strain between Russia and Israel, following the U.S. military actions in Venezuela resulting in Nicolás Maduro’s capture, can be connected through several interlinked factors: Perception of U.S. Aggression; Strategic Alliances; Geopolitical Realignment following the Israeli victory in the Oct 7th 2023 Abomination War which radically changed the balance of power for European States like Russia, England, and France across the Middle East unto the Horn of Africa.
Russia characterizes the U.S. military actions in Venezuela as “armed aggression,” framing it as part of a broader pattern of Western imperialism. This perception exacerbates Russia’s dissatisfaction with U.S. foreign policy and influences its relations with other nations aligned with the U.S., such as Israel. The ease of the US victory invasion sharply contrasts with the Ukraine War and the Israeli 12 War victory over Iran after the collapse of the Assad government in Syria.
By severing diplomatic ties with Israel, Russia seeks to fortify bonds with nations that espouse a similar anti-Western agenda. This consolidation of partnerships serves to promote a unified front against perceived U.S. hegemony, creating conditions for increased cooperation with other nations that resist U.S. influence.
mosckerr
The study of Talmud – requires recognition that these legal texts – both layered and exceptionally dense, which requires the skills to “read between the lines”. Have sat on explaining how Tannaim middot derive the intent of halachic precedents within the halachic portions of the Talmud. In the Aggadic portions of the Talmud and Midrashim a completely different set of middot define the k’vanna of prophetic mussar which the Aggadic portions of the Talmud explore.
קידושין (משנה תורה) סוגיה ב – אב משנה
The study of Talmud, a discipline which compares and contrasts different sets of logical middot. Upon this fundamental יסוד defines both T’NaCH and Talmudic common law systems. So far this week have contrasted how foreign alien Goyim read their scriptures; exposing how completely different Goyim view and understand their scriptures as “the word of God” as opposed to the vastly inferior idea of “word of Man”.
The Talmud and T’NaCH as judicial common law, has a vast gulf separation between Xtian fiction and Islamic poetry literature which both cultures declare as “sacred scripture”. Jewish common law never comes “from Heaven” as does Goyim scripture avoda zara. T’NaCH prophets with their Holy Writings (Gemara) commentaries examine how mussar defines the k’vanna of the Yatzir Ha’Tov within the bnai brit hearts. Aggadah together with its Midrashic reference sources, both based upon the T’NaCH; how prophetic mussar transforms rote halachic ritualism unto Avot time-oriented commandments of the Torah which require k’vanna.
The halachic portions of the Talmud make a משנה תורה-common law-legislative review employing halachot as precedents to re-interpret the language of the Sanhedrin courtroom judicial rulings codified within the 6 Orders of the Mishna. The righteous pursuit of justice defines “Faith” as the definition of Talmudic scholarship. A Grand Canyon separation between how Goyim worship their “word of God scriptures”.
Therefore for modern day Jews, struggling with assimilation to the dominant Goyim cultures and customs, and perhaps intermarried with alien Goyim who reject the revelation of the Torah at Sinai, learning Talmud requires tremendous patience because it requires stepping outside the box of Greek deductive logic, freeing their minds from the “Word of God” cage Zoology; sinful Man condemned to Hell but either saved by a fictional messiah or warned in Arabic by some last prophet – Arabs being the last people on this Earth to receive their warning prophet.
The Framers of the Talmud already lived in g’lut/exile. There vision: to establish the Model of a Sanhedrin judicial court system which would serve as the basis, the foundation – for the time when Jews fought successful wars and reconquered our banished homelands from Goyim occupiers. Both the Mishna and the Gemara/Talmud – post disaster Bar Kokhba revolt against Roman rule (132–136 CE); post 70 CE destruction of Herod Temple ‘fairy-tale nostalgia’.
The prophet Natan’s mussar rejected king David’s assimilated fantacy to build a “House of Cedar” for God avoda zara; not because that David had “blood on his hands” – Israel anointed him king to fight their wars! The Talmud defines avoda zara as A) assimilation and B) intermarriage. Av tuma avoda zara defines “blood on his hands”, according to how the Talmud understands the 2nd Sinai commandment.
Grasping the layered nature of both T’NaCH and Talmudic common law essentially requires stepping away from the skewed perspectives of foreign cultures and customs wherein g’lut Jewry lives. T’NaCH and Talmudic common law endeavors to shape and define Jewish (chosen Cohen people) culture, customs and practices which maintains the integral Jewish identity “drop” which has fallen into the far larger ocean of Goyim societies and civilizations – all of which reject the revelation of the Torah at Sinai – to this very day.
The Siddur shapes the 6 “Orders” of the Mishna – words within words/רמז. The כלל always applies in Talmudic scholarship: First Order, then Speed. Scholarship must first discern which set of basic middot define the substance of a particular Gemara sugya. The first two sugyot rely heavily upon rabbi Akiva’s רבוי מיעט middah to determine that a young child not “acquired” through קידושין through כספ שטר וביאה; this the second sugya excludes (קמ”ל) chuppa as the first sugya excluded small children. Middot function as the critical most important building blocks upon which פרדס inductive logic stands. Just that simple, no fancy dance’n. Yet the Reshonim commentaries virtually all failed to acknowledge this most essential top-priority of Talmudic transcription of Oral Torah 13 middot & Tannaim middot — unto the “written word” of T’NaCH and Talmudic common law!
The righteous pursuit of judicial common law justice which strives to restore fair compensation of damages inflicted simply does not exist in Goyim avoda zara which defines faith as belief in some theologically established creed dictated belief system which “define” their Gods. T’NaCH and Talmud teach: defining the nature of the Gods beyond the Human “pay scale”. In short: the theology of Monotheism (daughter religions), an utter Torah abomination due to the arrogance of the Yatzir Ha’Raw, which prioritizes the worship of some newly – theologically created – God, over & above the righteous pursuit of justice among and between any given set of people/nations as the meaning & definition of faith.
The righteous pursuit of justice – “Words of Man” and not “words of God”. The Torah commandment to remember the slavery of Egypt, best summarized by the corrupt court of Par’o whose command withheld the essential straw required to make bricks and whose Court condemned Israelites for their failure to meet Par’o quota tale of production; learned in conjunction with Yitro’s mussar rebuke to Moshe Rabbeinu when he alone judged the disputes over damages between the Jewish people who came out of Egypt. Israel did not come out of Egypt to worship the “word of God”, but rather to physically invade conquer Canaan and rule this land with righteous judicial justice.
Torah “faith” established a completely different judicial set of priorities based upon the Tower of Babel. The latter understood as the critical mussar which addresses: How does a human civilization collapse? The answer: ‘Diverse languages’, a טיפש פשט ignorance of Torah prophetic mussar. Rather a conflict of interests wherein Man despises contractual agreements made. Herein understands the mussar of ‘diverse languages’.
For example: the modern Torah oath “Never Again”. Jews cannot dictate that we shall “Never Again” rule our homelands with a Herod like injustice. Rather, that Europeans societies in particular shall “Never Again” decide their “Jewish Problem” with their own unilateral dictates. Hence Israelis reject UN Resolutions 242, 338, 446, 2334 etc etc etc. European and post ’48 and ’67 Arabs have no ‘Fear of Heaven’. The latter repeatedly sought to complete the Nazi genocide of the Jews across the Middle East. Both corrupt religions of avoda zara have permanently destroyed their “Good Name Reputations”; on par and similar to how the nations of Canaan equally destroyed their “Good Name Reputations” through their criminal judicial injustice. Therefore the idea of “Fear of Heaven”, stands upon the foundation of the collapse of the Tower of Babel Torah prophetic mussar rebuke.
With this summation, shall now examine – based upon the midda רבוי מיעט of פרט – בראשית כג:יג, and how a precedent search comparison defines the k’vanna of the exclusion of Chuppah which this sugya currently addresses. The study of law, not a religious belief system but rather a ‘be here now’ application of prophetic mussar to Jewish day to day lives throughout the generations, times, and Eras. The rabbis of Conservative/Historical Judaism missed this most basic of fundamental, on par with off the דרך Orthodox rabbinic Judaism which fails to educate in Yeshiva the difference between common law from statute law. Each generation of Jews living compares to a new floor in the construction of the Jewish civilization which contrasts with the Tower of Babel collapse — as exemplified by the recent Fall of the Nazi, French, British, and USSR empires.
The sugya of Parshat חיי שרה – כג: א-כ. Learning in context perhaps describes rabbi Yishmael’s midda of פרט כלל או כלל פרט. Bottom line: the different middot systems of Torah and rabbinic common law compare to the straw required to make brick in Egypt. Rav Nemuraskii repeatedly emphasized: if the foundation cracked, then the entire building must come down. The statute law codes made by the Rambam, Tur, and Shulkan Aruch serve as examples of a cracked foundation; in no way, shape, manner, or form do they qualify as “Oral Torah”.
The years of the life of Sarah, our mother, duplicates the number of Republics within the Persian empire. The king Cyrus the Great ordered the construction of the 2nd assimilated Jewish Cathedral as the basis of the restoration of the Jewish return to Judea. By stark contrast the rabbis of the Talmud prioritized Sanhedrin rule as the basis of the restoration of the Jewish return to Judea. The Shomronim\Canaani, Tzeddukim, Karaim, Rambam all invalidated the dedication of the lights of Chanukkah – the miracle of the restoration of Jewish National Sanhedrin Legislative Review Independence. The 13 Oral Torah Horev middot and Tannaim halachic middot “building-blocks”, by absolute juxtaposition – opposition: sanctify and validate the k’vanna of the mitzva to light the lights of Chanukkah to advertise the miracle of Jewish National Freedom which restores Sanhedrin common law Legislative Review Independence.
The acquisition of burial land for Sarah our mother, serves as an eternal building block foundation upon which stands all generations of Israelis building a civilization within the borders of the lands of Canaan. The mitzva of קידושין as both a Torah and Talmudic precedent stands upon this bedrock יסוד.
This opening sugya of חיי שרה directly linked to the two previous פ chapters of Parshat וירא which address Akadat Yitzak and the family of Rivka our mother. The Akadah established Yitzak as the chosen heir of the Cohen brit seed of Avraham as establish at the oath brit alliance – brit between the pieces. The dedication of Yitzak, placed upon the altar, not some barbeque unto Heaven טיפש פשט made by the Koran in in Surah Al-Saffat (37:102-107), but rather the sanctification of Yitzak as the dedicated father of the chosen Cohen people.
The Koran prioritizes “obedience and submission” as faith to Allah’s Will. The Torah prophetic mussar instructs the dedication, based upon the Torah precedent of korbanot, called “עבודת השם”. The time-oriented commandment Akadah established Yitzak as the father of the chosen seed of Avraham the father of the Cohen people. The Koran “obenience and submission” substitute theology completely changed the Torah Central theme; no different than the NT revisionist history which replaced JeZeus for the Chosen Cohen children of the Avot.
The Akadah represents the logical consequences of the oath sworn between the pieces that the future born chosen seed of Avram would father the Chosen Cohen people. Therefore its not the “sacrifice” which defines the mitzva of עבודת השם – the טיפש פשט reached by the Koran fraud, which fails to address the Central Torah theme – the building of the chosen Cohen people through the מלאכה חכמה שהוא נקרא עבודת השם. Herein defines the k’vanna of this time-oriented prophetic mussar Torah aggada.
All Korbanot dedications stand upon the common law יסוד of the Akada dedication of Yitzak as the chosen seed of Avraham, which like Cain & Esau both rejected as the chosen Cohen seed of Avraham. Therefore the Koran fraud fails to either submit or obey the Torah oath brit cut between the pieces which establishes Avraham as the father of the chosen Cohen people.
ויאמר בי נשבעתי נאם ה’ כי יען אשר עשית את הדבר הזה ולא חשכת את בנך את יחידך כי ברך אברכך והרבה ארבה את זרעך ככוכבי השמים וכחול אשר על שפת הים ורש זרעך את שער איביו.
כלל: Law precedes text. Avoda Zara – statues law, metaphysics, & theology. Aggadah interprets Nevuah, to shape kavvanah; aggada does not to replace halacha. Halakha functions through precedent which re-interpret the language of the Mishna, viewed from a completely different perspective, simply not fossil statute law religious dictates made by cults of personality. The Sanhedrin, not some assimilated foreign Cathedral-Temple, but rather the substance or constitutional heart of Israel. Confusing substance with form amounts to טיפש פשט.
Roman law deductive logic does not replace פרדס inductive common law jurisprudence. Kiddushin does not begin with romance, mysticism, or ritual; it begins with קניין—because marriage in Torah – a legal acquisition of obligations, not a sacrament. Classic Rabbi Akiva: 1) Define the legal object. 2) Exclude improper cases. 3) Only then build the rule. Chuppah does not create kinyan; Chuppah, a consequence of kiddushin, not its cause. Korbanot sanctify avodat Hashem – time-oriented commandments, not appeasement. Torah sanctifies human legislative authority. Torah does not come from Heaven but from Torah sages who have dedicated their tohor middot\Yatzir Ha’Tov within their hearts.
A בנין אב interpretation of the בראשית aggada: דברים ב:לא-ג:ב. The mitzva of קידושין establishes an inheritance just as does the conquering of the nations of Canaan. Translating the שם השם to Golden Calf “word translations” violates: לא תשא את שם השם אלהיך לשוא. Like as similarly does causing ones’ children to embrace and follow the cultures and customs practiced by foreign aliens who reject and despise the revelation of the Torah at Sinai. Directly based upon the commandment to totally obliterate the nations of Canaan. The eternal k’vanna inheritance of the mitzva of קידושין.
Placing the blessing upon הר גרזים and the curse upon הר עיבל, the summation of the first two Sinai commandments, upon which hang – like a mountain by a hair – all other Torah commandments.
כי אם אל המקום אשר יבחר ה’ אלהיכם מכל שבטיכם לשום את שמו שם לשכנו תדרשו ובאת שמה
This p’suk understood as Sanhedrin courtroom common law justice and not some cult like building made from wood and stone. The latter compares to making permanent tatoo marks upon ones’ flesh, comparable to eating tuma and treif animal flesh.
The mitzva of קידושין compares to Jews observing Chag Pesach. This Chag not applicable to Goyim anymore than קידושין. The removal of חמץ – the destruction of avoda zara within our hearts through the dedication of the Divine Name האל. Impossible to become tohor by entering a mikva while holding a dead rat; cannot accept the revelation of the Torah at Sinai while worshipping alien Gods. In like manner justice depends upon wisdom, not what a person personally believes. Israel requires righteous judicial justice-cities of refuge. Synagogues simply icing on the cake. Xtianity and Islam directly compare to the מיעט of עמוני ומואבי, excluded from the Jewish people.
As a man has an obligation to honor and build the dignity of his wife and children, this obligation extends to giving tzedakah to the poor, widows, orphans etc among our bnai brit extended family. Why do “strangers”, especially the poor or distressed merit such respect? Because poverty does not prevent Jews from doing mitzvot. Even Moshe Rabbeinu himself excluded from entering the land due to mocking the poor and weak of Torah faith among our people; when Moshe’s satire challenged, if he or Aaron, bring water out of the rock. Comparable to plagues which afflicted Egypt. This error, it forgets the humility of Sinai; wherein the Torah reveals a local god rather than a Great monotheistic Universal God.
A NaCH precedent: ישעיה יז:א-יח:ז. Hear the mussar of our prophet, the Torah curse of the Tower of Babel applies equally to all man-kind, including the nation of Israel. Who endures g’lut on multiple occasions consequent to our pride and arrogance; tuma middot which our Yatzir Ha’Raw breaths from within our hearts…
Understanding Torah language by contrasting Torah with av tuma avoda zara abominations.
The language “before God … and the Father” introduces a duality that the First Sinai commandment does not tolerate. Therefore this line of NT reasoning utterly and totally false no different than the Nicene Creed Triune Gods Monotheism theology. This NT attempt to differentiate between the Gospels Father and Son God duality fits into line with the Persian Zoasterian theology which also defines their “monotheism” as a duality of Gods.
The language of the Sinai first commandment introduces the Spirit Name – that’s not a word. The Nicene Creed theology hence introduced “Holy Spirit” in their triune God speculations. The language of the Sinai second commandment validates that Goyim worships other Gods. Because only the 12 Tribes of Israel accept the revelation of the Torah at Sinai, by definition Goyim worship the 2nd Sinai negative commandment of “other Gods”. Hence the Xtian Muslim theological speculations which both call “Monotheism” violates all the commandments of the Torah. Because all the rest of the Torah commandments subsumed within the opening first two Sinai commandments.
Furthermore, the Torah specifically reject theological debates upon some theoretical “God-Head”. Tawhid, literally “to unite” or “to make one”, refers to the principle of monotheism in Islam. This Islamic creed belief system, like the Nicene Creed, and bi-polar Zoroaster Gods of Light & Darkness — all equally a Torah av tuma abomination of avoda zara.
The first Sinai commandment abhors a strict monotheism. Only Israel accepted the Torah at Sinai. Therefore the god of Israel a local tribal god. Not a Monotheistic Universal God as all three religious mentioned above, their theological creeds dictate. Furthermore the language “pure” in James 1:27 does not correctly translate to the Hebrew tohor. The NT “pure” — a state of being free from any contamination, mixture, or impurities, representing an unaltered or unadulterated form of a substance or quality. Tohor: by stark contrast directly refers to the 13 Horev spirits Orally “breathed” unto Moshe.
“Pure Olive Oil” in no way, shape, manner or form compares to the Spirits of the Oral Torah revelation of אל, רחום, וחנון וכו. Just as Lord, Son, Holy Spirit, or Allah “words” do not in any wise compare to the Spirit of the שם השם לשמה רוח הקודש. Impossible to communicate any spoken word to the Divine Presence Spirit Name revealed during the first Sinai commandment.
The Torah “faith”: pursuit of righteous judicial justice among and between the chosen Cohen people within the borders of the oath sworn inheritance land of the chosen (as opposed by the unchosen) seed of the Avot, likewise shares no common denominator ground foundation with the NT theology which defines faith as “belief” in the Father/Son bi-polar God. Any more than the Muslim Allah, or 101 names or titles of Zoroastrian bi-polar Gods.
Furthermore, prior to the Babylonian exile the NaCH prophets forbade sticking names upon Angels. Book of Judges 13 where an Angel apppeared to Manoah and his wife. When asked by Manoah the name of the Angel, the Angel refused to reveal his name because it served only as a messenger and nothing more. After the Persians permitted Israel to rebuild Judea, only then did the NaCH latter prophets permitted names assigned to Angels. This indulgence, strictly forbidden by prophets prior to the first exile, understood through the error of attempts made by the NT counterfeit to affix to some foreign align God – Father/Son duality.
The top priority insistence that strict Monotheism, a cardinal creed in both Xtianity and Islam – an utter Torah abomination. The 2nd Sinai commandment “”””validates”””” Goyim belief in other Gods. Just that simple. No fancy dance’n. The first Sinai commandment does NOT introduce the false notion of some singular, unambiguous monotheism, EMPHATICALLY NOT articulated in the First Commandment.
The “indulgence” of affixing names to Angels made by the 2nd Temple prophets exposes Jewish avoda zara assimilation to the culture practiced in the land of Babylon during the 70 year exile. This tuma of applying names to Angels justified the NT attempts to apply Father\Son names to the God of Israel. If Joe – not the same person as Bob, the insistence the the Name of Joe not get confused with the name of Bob — simply not “MONOTHEISM”.
The revelation of the Torah at Sinai eternally emphasizes the revelation of judicial common law obeyed לשמה and NOT this or that Name for the Sinai first commandment god – dressed up in the theology of Monotheism. An utterly false notion to argue that the NT shifted away from strict Torah monotheistic purity – because the Torah clear as the Sun in the Sky does not command belief in any form of Monotheism.
The insistence on strict monotheism and the accompanying critiques of other religious practices – the Torah absolutely abhors. Obedience to rule Canaan with judicial justice day and night different than belief in conflicting theologies of Monotheism.
The Divine Presence Name does not assert any singular God but rather a small tribal god of the 12 Tribes of Israel. The 10 plagues of Egypt judged the Gods worshipped by Par’o and the Egyptians. The theology of monotheism ignores both this clear fact as well as the prophetic struggle with avoda zara throughout the later NaCH literature. Israel came out of Egypt to rule Canaan with justice. Israel did not come out of Egypt to impose its court system of justice upon Goyim nations. רוח הקודש טהור strictly and only refers to the 13 middot of the Oral Torah which Moshe “smelled”, something like different flowers in bloom, at Horev. Just as words fail to accurately describe shades of colors, how much more so words totally collapse to describe Divine Spirits such as אל רחום וחנון etc.
Goyim worship their Monotheistic God theology creeds as they so see fit – gezunte heit, may it bring them health, happiness, and success. But to mix and confuse Torah judicial faith with Goyim Monotheism – this compares to how the Creator mixed and confused all the languages spoken by Man. Which forced Mankind from building their Tower of Babel.
The revelation of the Torah at Sinai does not condemn how other how religious identities become established, formed through their unique language, history, and cultural exchange. The Koran declares that prophets sent to warn all nations; that these prophets spoke the language of the people these prophets sent to warn. This notion directly compares to the absurdity of the Nicene Creed Trinity belief system; only Israel accepted the Torah at Sinai – prophets sent only to Israel not to other nations. Prophets command mussar.
Yonah sent to Assyria not to address the king of Assyria but to cause all future born generations of Israel to remember\t’shuva the judicial injustice practiced by the kings of Israel throughout their reigns over Samaria. The king of Assyria took the 10 tribes out of Samaria and scattered them across vast range expanse of that empire.
Propaganda defined as “half-truth”. In religious contexts, Xtianity by definition both twists and manipulates the original Torah concept of faith to fit hostile Roman agendas.
“He committed no sin, and no deceit was found in his mouth.” According to the author of this Book which promotes belief in an alien messiah idea expanded to include a new theology of God. Such a declaration proves nothing. The 23 line in the alien foreign ordered presentation of Goyim myth theology – compares to the 5th Amendment in the US Constitution. 1 Peter seeks to validate the Xtian belief in JeZeus as the definitive Torah definition of the mitzva of Messiah; yet the NT portrayal of this alien concept of messiah as both divine and fully human – has no Torah foundation. It promotes the Roman ideal of a “counterfeit” Messiah to divide Jews and hasten the Roman destruction of Judea, which it re-christened as “Palestine”.
The NT propaganda never once addresses how Oral Torah defines this Torah commandment. Rather it declares that Goyim – “not under the law”, starting with circumcision. It declares Goyim amazingly grafted upon the Jewish brit faith! Oblivious that a gere tzeddik must accept all Torah commandments which the NT flagrantly rejects. The NT propaganda half-truth fails to discern between Oral Torah common judicial courtroom legalism as Torah law, confused with Roman Senate statute law decrees – which have no foundation in judicial courtroom common law having the Constitutional Torah mandate of ‘Legislative Review’ over government statute law decrees.
The comparison between how Torah common law functions vs. how Roman Statute law decrees impose law upon serf/peasant populations who have no political or social rights. Most fundamentally, the Roman NT invalidates the Torah mitzva of gere tzeddik; it declares Goyim can graft themselves to the Torah oath alliance through belief in some alien false messiah which Goyim propaganda declares as God.Torah common law shares no common ground with fraudulent NT theology. The righteous pursuit of judicial justice shares no common ground with belief in a foreign defined messiah and new God. Judaism does not view the Moshiach as “framed” in Xtian theology as some 2nd like coming alien clap-trap. The mitzva of Moshiach, like all other Torah commandments – all Jews in all generations possess the freedom to righteously pursue judicial Sanhedrin common law courtroom justice which strives to make fair compensations to damages inflicted. Just as the mitzva of Shabbat not confused as the revelation of God, so too and how much more so the mitzva of Moshiach.
mosckerr
Brussel Bureaucraps need to suck on a pacifier.
The issue at hand centers on the implications and capabilities of the AI tool Grok, rather than direct actions taken by Elon Musk. The AI operates based on algorithms that analyze vast datasets, which may include non-consensual or inappropriate content.
This nonsense compares to arresting the owner of a gun shop for selling guns later used in robberies! The thieves the criminals not the gun store who has a Constitutional right to sell guns. Gun shop owners, generally not held accountable for how their products – used, provided they comply with regulations and sell to legally eligible purchasers. Yet EU long standing hostility directed against Musk permits gross hypocrisy.
Therefore the question raised: Is this EU action against only Grok AI or all AI which have similar capabilities? The EU’s action appears to primarily target technologies like Grok due to their specific capabilities of generating harmful content, rather than issuing a blanket action against all AI systems with similar functions!!!! The EU hostility against Musk the issue. The attack on Grok AI simply hides EU anti-Musk hostility.
The idea that the EU’s actions against Grok might be influenced by long-standing tensions with Musk – a noteworthy perspective. Musk’s high-profile persona often attracts scrutiny, which could color regulatory responses. This perceived hostility may lead to concerns that independent evaluation of technologies, overshadowed by personal biases against Musk by EU bureaucrats.
This latter issue – not that Grok might possess porn like capabilities, as the reactionary Japan Times “Head Lines”. The EU Court action absurd, let Brussels impose a statute law rather than turn to the courts to harass Musk specifically. The EU’s scrutiny appears to specifically target Grok’s capabilities to generate harmful or inappropriate content rather than adopting a universal stance against all AI systems. This fundamentally raises questions about the motivations behind such EU courts scrutiny.
Bureaucratic regulatory measures perceived as personally biased against Musk industries – the propaganda which attempts to blacken Musk’s reputation with charges of child pornography. Potential crime does not equal to actual crime. Advocating for legislation rather than court action to tackle issues related to AI technology would provide clearer, more consistent guidelines for developers and users alike. It can also avoid the appearance of harassment. If the EU continues with specific court actions seen as targeting individuals rather than implementing broader regulations, it creates an atmosphere of uncertainty within the AI industry. Developers may feel hesitant to innovate due to fear of sudden legal challenges.
Hence the call of “Bull shit”. This Head Line fails to address a more structured legal framework that avoids individual targeting, ensuring that regulations – based on ethical considerations rather than personal biases.
mosckerr
Israel Honors President Trump
A rebuttal of both Xtianity and Islam as av tuma avoda zara. This essay, not a juridical brief but a prophetic-polemical indictment written from within post-Shoah Jewish rage.
Both religions reframe the “Promised Land”. The Torah sworn oath brit alliance wherein the people of Israel as opposed to the avoda zarah Trinity Gods of Xtianity or the strict Universal monotheistic God Allah, taught throughout the Koran, never once refers to the oath sworn to the Avot concerning them being the fathers of the Chosen Cohen People. The Koran replaces Yishmael for Yitzak at the Akadah. The NT Protocols of the Elders of Zion forgery (Roman fraud) in point of fact substitutes JeZeus and replaces both the Avot as the fathers of the Chosen Cohen people as it likewise does the brit faith of ruling the “Promised Land, sworn only to the Cohen seed of the Avot”, which by definition excludes both Yishmael and Esau as inheritors of the “Promised Land”.
The cultural differences between Europeans and Arab/Muslim Islamic societies radically different from the cultures and customs which define the chosen Cohen people. These cultural differences and priorities can produce a Terminological overload without hierarchy! Subjects like: Promised Land; Chosen Cohen people; NT forgery;Avoda zarah; Sanhedrin judicial review; Moshiach; Shabbat; Galut; Toldot mitzvot; Middot systems; Pauline theology; Nicene creed can quite easily spin the heads of a general reading audience much like a top!
My emotional outbursts post Shoah slaughter of 75% of Western European Jewry likewise has critical flaws. Phrases like: “NT Protocols of the Elders of Zion”; “Roman forgery fraud”; “JeZeus”; “rifle scope” clearly modeled after the colorful language of General Patton rather than the pius language of Orthodox “off the דרך” Judaism. My argument that g’lut Jews cannot do mitzvot לשמה perhaps as offensive as “Protocols of the Elders of Zion NT forgery! However post the Rambam Civil War switch N bait – to the model of Greek/Roman statute law and the absolute absence of any criticism of Reshonim fundamental errors, specifically the effort to explain the T’NaCH and Talmud limited only to פשט in modern Yeshiva education – utterly galls me; comparable to stuffing down large amounts of raw horse-radish as if running a 40 yard sprint.
The addiction to rabbinic box thinking which limits the Torah to religious ritual law while totally oblivious to the opposite viewpoint which views the Torah revelation as most essentially oaths expressed through av tohor time oriented Torah commandments. The Temple משל understood through the lense of Sanhedrin common law courtrooms נמשל – as wide a gap as JeZeus as a false messiah to Goyim religious audiences. The box thinking which limits the 2nd Sinai commandments to Catholic statute saints – again simply טיפש פשט narishkeit. Av tuma 2nd Sinai commandment avoda zara, most essentially defined through בניני אבות negative commandment precedents which prohibit Jewish assimilation and intermarriage with Goyim.
The cultural gulf between Cultural Zionist Jews like myself from Hertzl’s political Zionism also presents a wide chasm of thought. Unlike deductive reasoning פרדס inductive logic, as a rule compares two or more completely different cases which requires the reader to make synaptic jump. Dynamic logic more complex than static deductive logic.
To do this all at once … clearly difficult for the general reading audience to swallow. The introduction of the Oral Torah Mitzva of Moshiach so radically strange to European Goyim forever addicted to the dogmatism of waiting for the second coming of JeZeus. The idea that the mitzva of Moshiach absolutely no different from observance of any other Torah commandment – likewise a shock to the system. The Oral Torah Mitzva of Moshiach understood as the dedication to pursue righteous judicial justice within the sworn borders of conquered Canaan, especially religious off the דרך Orthodox Jews have never heard about, much less considered. On par with the Written Torah as the Constitution of the Israeli Republic of restored 12 Tribes!
Xtians and Arab/Muslims fed the propaganda that their religions exist as the daughter religions of Judaism but now hearing that this particular Cultural Zionist Jew as av tuma avoda zara on par with the worship of Baal, will not these post Shoah foreign alien outsiders not justifiably declare my ideas as a “substitute oath” viewed from a narrow Jewish perspective? The god of Israel a local tribal god competing with other Gods to rule the Yatzirot opposing spirits within the heart; rather than some grand vision promoted Xtianity and Islam’s Universal Monotheism God which Goyim declares lives in the Heavens above. Such drastic differences like faith defined as the righteous pursuit of judicial court-room justice rather than belief in this or that or some other theology belief system God!
General Patton always insulted the enemy. Post Shoah British/French, & Arab adamant perfidy where Arab\Muslims demand that post Shoah Jews exist as dhimmi second class people; their Three No’s steadfast refusal to recognize Herzl’s Balfour Declaration/League of Nations Palestine mandate to establish a Jewish national home in Palestine; equally matched by the UN perfidy which refuses to recognize Israel as an independent nation in the Middle East; and pretends that Israel exists in the shadow of Palestine when the League of Nations mandate/UN Protectorate totally ceased to exist in 1948. Where a hostile UN coalition of States assume that they have the right to declare Palestine an Independent nation but condemn Israel’s recognition of Horn of Africa Somaliland as an Independent State.
________________________________________________
________________________________________________
Juridical vs. Hermeneutic – the Torah category of the chosen Cohen people defines the k’vanna of the entire Torah story of Israel. Torah, constituted by the wisdom of time-oriented commandments with require k’vanna, not NT nor Koran narratives. The Torah category of Am Yisrael as a chosen Cohan people determines the k’vanna of the entire Torah corpus of these Av tohor commandments. Torah simply not some Gospel or Koran story, that generates meaning after the fact.
Torah exists as a juridical constitutional mandate for the authority of Sanhedrin lateral common law courts to rule the land of Canaan. The Torah oath entails that Israel cut the Torah brit by means of this sworn oath of נעשה ונשמע, (Remembering the oath which the Avot swore to originally cut the brit which creates the chosen Cohen people from nothing.), which compares to the post Shoah oath of “Never Again”. This Torah oath binds Israel to establish common law courtrooms across the land of Canaan. The brit mandates courts, not creeds. Establishment of lateral Sanhedrin common-law (צדק צדק תרדוף) the k’vanna of נעשה ונשבע and not construction of some grand Solomon Temple or JeZeus false messiah substitute theology.
The latter utterly false because the mitzva of Moshiach like the mitzva of Shabbat equally applies to all Jews in all generations. The Mitzva of Moshiach – the dedication to pursue righteous judicial justice within the borders of the oath sworn lands; based upon the remembrance of Moshe standing before the court of Par’o over the failure to meet a quota of bricks and Yitro’s rebuke to Moshe to establish Sanhedrin courts. This revelation of judicial Legislative Review Sanhedrin Courtroom dominance over statute laws passed by any king or legislature. The Torah vision viewed as the Constitution of the Republic. Herein defines doing mitzvot לשמה within the land of Canaan.
G’lut/exile – in effect Jews return to the slavery of Egypt. Meaning Jews in g’lut cannot do this time-oriented commandment לשמה. “Time” understood as wisdom of מלאכה based upon the mitzva of Shabbat. Because the first Sinai commandment defines the revelation of HaShem as having taken Israel out of Egypt. Hence g’lut Jews cannot ever do mitzvot לשמה according to the terms of the 1st Sinai commandment.
Secondary toldot commandments function as legal Torah precedents which aid in understanding deeper prophetic mussar in both the Torah and NaCH Books. Toldot mitzvot as legal common law judicial precedents (not moral stories); Aggadic stories never confused with Halachic mitzvot despite the perversion of the Rambam’s 7 mitzvot bnai noach. Torah common law stands upon precedents rather than decrees. The Torah views Goyim living in the land as either Gere Toshav residents or Canaani Shomronim counterfeit Jews — refugee populations who have no judicial rights within the borders of Judea.
The Talmud employs different sets of warp-weft middot. The Aggada employs the 13 middot Order which Moshe heard at Horev; whereas the Halachic portions employ the middot established by the 10 middot of rabbi Akiva, the 13 middot of rabbi Yishmael and the 32 middot of rabbi Yossi Ha’Galilee as the basic fundamental tools to understand and interpret the kabbalah of how פרדס exists as the revelation of the Oral Torah at Horev following the sin of the Golden Calf.
Israel left Egypt to conquer Canaan. To rule this land with righteous Sanhedrin common law courtroom justice with the Torah mandated power of legislative review affixed and assigned to the Sanhedrin courts; to over-watch any and all statute laws imposed by Jewish governments. The Sanhedrin peoples’ Courts obligated with over-view powers. Authorized to even re-write any and all statute laws passed by the rule of elite kings or rich and powerful Legislatures within the borders of the Republic. A Torah sage 1:10,000. Whereas all Israel worthy of sanctifying the mitzva of Moshiach!
The difference between judicial peoples’ common law vs government “arristocratic” elite “dynasties” statute law, compares to the warp/weft threads of a loom. Within and throughout the T’NaCH & Talmud, these two sets of “threads” — expressed through the contrast between halacha from aggadah.
The elite statute government decree-law, it determines the תולדות secondary formal ritual actions placed upon the people-halacha. While the latter – commn law peoples’ courts – determines the wisdom-intent of prophetic T’NaCH אב מצוות זמן גרמא מלאכה mussar; the primary role or function as the determinant of the k’vanna wherein the chosen Cohen people dedicate the Yatzir Ha’Tov within our hearts לשמה; as long as the blessing of living within the borders of the Promised land shines like the Sun. Both the rote ritual and the זמן גרמא כוונה – directly applicable to both the T’NaCH and the Talmud.
The Sanhedrin common law legal system a lateral or non governmental peoples’ lateral common law – like plowing a field. Whereas Government arristocratic elite statute law – a vertical legal system, where the government imposes law from the Top down upon the people – like salaries paid by the State to Judges and prosecuting attorneys. Hence the vision of the primary loom metaphor and the strictly ordered legal language of both the halacha and aggada, which defines the Talmud.
The “Promised Land” the eternal inheritance of the chosen Cohen people alone because only Israel accepted the Torah at Sinai. The av tuma avoda zarah theologies of both Xtianity and Islam – an absolute Torah abomination on par with the worship of Baal. Name names to their new Gods but never once even refer to the 1st Sinai commandment. The NT Protocols of the Elders of Zion Roman forgery depicts Jews as direct participants in the teachings and events surrounding JeZeus. For instance, gospel parables often include Jewish figures, and also Canaani Shomron Samarians (e.g., the Good Samaritan). Reference to the Pharisees and Sadducees rejection of JeZeus as the messiah savior of all mankind, marks Jewish Oral Torah tradition as “the hostile Christ killer enemy”.
The inclusion of Pharisee “failures” serves something like sights or a scope on a rifle, thereafter throughout the Ages of Jewish g’lut. The NT aims to appeal directly to Goyim reading audiences rather than understand Oral Torah common law. But the facts remain unchanged to this day, Goyim reject the revelation of the Written and Oral Torah and strive to replace it with their own theologically concocted theology and creeds, which require belief in Universal Monotheistic Gods.
The Talmud teaches that not only did the Goyim reject the revelation of the Torah but that the god of Israel a local tribal god. The Torah describes court justices who hear a Case before their Court, having predetermined “beliefs” as a corrupt bride judge. The Talmud abhors the coward justices who failed to impose the death penalty upon Herod due to their dread fear of the רשע.
The NT does not view faith as judicial righteousness but rather as belief in the Nicene Creed theological Trinity belief system. Paul’s letters serve as excellent examples of substitute theology; fall of Man vs. the central Torah blessing/curse theme of g’lut-exile. However the much later written Gospels, promotes as its central theme that Jewish leaders reject JeZeus as messiah. This results in the establishment of a new covenant through JeZeus.
_____________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________
In conclusion: Torah defines Israel as a covenantal–juridical people constituted by a sworn oath (brit), whose purpose is to establish land-based common-law courts; Christianity and Islam dissolve this oath into narrative belief and universal theology, thereby committing avodah zarah at the level of “covenantal” structure. Brit does not correctly translate as “covenant”.
Perhaps as mentioned above my mockery of Goyim “daughter religions” muddles the waters of my arguments. I do not know, the reading audience themselves must decide. This paper argues 5 basic “Chumash” points: A) brit sworn oaths prioritized above secondary narratives based upon Halacha & Aggada which shape the Talmud. In point of fact both necessary and critical. B) land = judicial independence rather than theological belief systems which thrive Universally in all lands and countries. C) Common law Courts – not theological Creeds. D) Aggada-Halacha = the warp/weft loom wherein woven the culture and customs of the chosen Cohen people. E) Theological Creed belief dictates/dogmatism substitute and replace the obligation of the mitzva of Moshiach to pursue righteous judicial justice within the borders of the oath sworn land “contract” with the chosen Cohen people; consequently substitute theology/revisionist history amounts to av tuma avoda zara.
The complexity of inter-cultural traditions among peoples compares to viewing a slide of bacteria culture under a microscope. Avot vs. Ishmael; Trinity vs. tawhid vs. local god; Rambam vs. Tosafists;
Sanhedrin vs. statute law; Shoah trauma; UN perfidy; Pauline theology & Nicene creed;
Herzl vs. Cultural Zionism etc etc directly compares to the description of the Creation of chaos and anarchy!
The polemical language undermines juridical standing; but am willing to accept this because this paper addresses general theme topics rather than specific T’NaCH Talmudic textual analysis. For 2000+ years Goyim demanded Jews debate them with our hands tied behind our backs! Post Shoah both Xtianity and Islam rot in the pig-stye of exile; Xtianity a dead religion in Europe and Islam moans under the yoke of now being dhimmi despised refugee populations who have little or no rights.
Furthermore, this paper qualifies only as a something like the 1898 Émile Zola “J’Accuse” rather than a juridical critique. Courts do not argue by mockery, but political satire does. This broad-page does not entertain any pretension that its compares to a judge who hears a case before his court while holding prior animus.
G’lut Jews cannot do mitzva לשמה, the RambaN in his commentary to the Chumash makes this argument! The blessings and curses of the Torah serve as metaphors to the ruling the land with justice vs existing in g’lut slavery. The failure of the pre-Shoah rabbis to encourage European Jewry to make Aliya exploded in their faces with the 1939 White Paper and FDR follow-up which sealed the borders of the Golden Medina to Jews seeking to flee from the Nazi barbarians. The rebuke of rabbi Akiva toward the din of the Wilderness generation seems applicable!
The object of this paper to express an emotional catharsis over the Shoah obliteration of my people. But it condemns both Jews and Goyim across the board for this destruction of a Good name reputation for Orthodox Judaism, Xtianity and Islam. Post the Oct7th 2023 Abomination War, the Israeli two year victory and Bibi’s recognition of Somaliland at the chagrin of Turkey, Europe and almost all the UN nations who condemned Israel for genocide — an absolute g’shmeyach. Impossible to truly feel this g’shmeyach oblivious of Jewish anger against a biased UN and ICC prigs.
Conflict Resolution 