Mesechta Avoda Zarah specifically instructs that only Israel accepts the Torah. Hence the דיוק – the god of Sinai only a local tribal god. Clearly the god who delivered Israel out of Egypt not the God of Egypt. בראשית ברא אלהים introduces Av tohor wisdom commandments taught through the משל of the world created in six days. The נמשל introduces time-oriented Av Torah commandments which creates the chosen Cohen people in all generations through the sanctification of time-oriented commandments. Hence Torah commands mussar. Torah does not teach history. T’NaCH & Talmud, Siddur & Midrashim establish the culture, customs, practices and identities of the chosen Cohen people. Just that simple, no fancy dancing.

The god of Israel judged the Egyptian Gods. The concept of as above so below. The god of Israel vs. the Gods of Egypt serve as the eternal model of a Court-room trial. The Goyim world view which reads their Bible or Koran as Egypt’s Gods either false or subordinate means nothing. Goyim never accepted the Blessing/Curse brit of Sinai. Just as Goyim aliens do not determine the k’vanna of the mitzva of Moshiach so too Goyim do not determine the god of Israel.

The curse of g’lut: Jews do not do mitzvot לשמה – based upon the first Sinai commandment. Egypt לאו דוקא. The temple of Shlomo – av tuma avoda zara made by a fool. The Book of Kings makes satire by referring to Shlomo as the “wisest of all men”. The god of Israel binds only Israel because only Israel accepts the revelation of the Torah at Sinai.

The Nicene Creed which equates Jesus as God, perhaps the strongest proof; international law a myth of propaganda morality, not a binding authority. Political conflicts throughout history falsely classified by some as a failure of diplomacy. But casting this political rhetoric upon the dust bin of history, political conflicts express a natural clash of sovereign “Gods.” Restated: A nation‑state — a functional “God.” Theological Universal Monotheism\tawhid, often called “international law” by UN member states who oppose Israel, attempt to override national sovereignty through religio/political rhetoric. But history provokes-proves that nations create their own sacred narratives. Universal monotheism directly resembles Great Power imperialism. The revelation of the Torah at Sinai establishes faith as judicial Sanhedrin court justice limited to the bnai brit people alone.

Other nations never bound to the 7 mitvot other than Ger Toshav. Why? These mitzvot make a required הבדלה which separates ger toshav from na’creeim. The Talmud always remains within the judicial boundaries which the Written Torah determines. Post sealing of the Shas Bavli all opinions made by scholars compare to US Supreme Court rulings which later Courts can overturn.

The Blessing/Curse Torah oath brit faith never presumes any conclusion that g’lut applies to HaShem as its applies to Israel. Any reading that attempts to teach this metaphor – it taken literally – merely a טיפש פשט. For example: among the Reshonim, only Rambam ruled halacha from aggadic sources. His Universal Monotheistic God permits Jews to daven in av tuma avoda zara Mosques.

That later Goyim, such as Hobbs, Schmitt, or modern nationalism “influenced” by the Torah does not invert this Torah “Nation-State as Functional God” as post Talmudic. Based upon the Torah premise: the chicken created and later laid eggs. Church rejection of the פרדס Oral Torah combined with their Jesus God invalidates its literalist reading of the Creation story. Just as Muhammad’s equal redefinition of prophets as persons sent to all nations invalidates the revelation of the Torah first commandment. Allah simply a Golden Calf word substitution.

Rambam’s universalist Noahide framework only a philosophical systematization, and it does not appear explicitly in the Talmud or Tanakh as a normative precedent. Hilchot Melachim 8–10, expresses a foreign philosophy — a Greek-influenced natural law perspective. The Talmud does not frame non-Jews as bound by a universal law in a systematic, Greek-like sense. Rambam abstracts from Talmudic rulings to a universal ethical schema — a philosophical move. There is no canonical Talmudic or Tanakh precedent for universalist moral obligations like Rambam imposes.

T’NaCH prophetic sources such as found Isaiah 13-14, 40-48 directed toward the failure of Israel to do t’shuva and remember the Sinai oath brit. Never to Goyim who never accepted this Sinai oath brit obligation. Same applies to Yonah sent to Nineveh. Repentance made by Goyim shares nothing with the Torah mitzva of t’shuva. Because t’shuva centers upon remembering the oaths sworn by our fore-fathers; repentance refers to regret made over personal sins.
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________

Ukraine has captured more territory than Russia has taken in recent months, particularly during February 2026, highlighting a shift in momentum. However, these figures vary by source, with some analysts noting that winter conditions and troop morale play significant roles.

U.S. government social media post regarding the death of activist Quentin Deranque during political clashes in Lyon, France has limited the access of U.S. Ambassador Charles Kushner to senior officials. His death has sparked significant outrage in France, leading to accusations and heightened tensions between political factions, particularly between far-left and far-right groups. The recent diplomatic spat involving Charles Kushner, the U.S. Ambassador to France, revolves around his failure to attend a summons from the French Foreign Ministry concerning the comments made by the U.S. in the wake of the tragic death of Quentin Deranque, a 23 year old far-right activist who suffered a suffered a fatal brain injury. In the aftermath, eleven suspects have been detained, with several under investigation for murder. Among those arrested were two parliamentary aides linked to La France Insoumise (LFI), a significant left-wing political party in France. Raphaël Arnault, a party member, faced significant backlash due to his connections to groups blamed for the violence. Despite being forewarned about the protest, local police failed to prevent or even timely respond to this political murder. This failure raises serious concerns about public safety and the police’s ability to manage politically charged situations.

Spain’s political landscape with the US, terminated after Prime Minister, Pedro Sanchez refusal to support U.S. military actions in Iran, and denounced U.S. intervention in Venezuela. Spanish officials have voiced their “concerns” about the consequences of Sanchez’s defiance, including possible restrictions on Spanish shipping to the U.S. stemming from the refusal to allow weapon transport for Israel.

Trump’s “America First” policy aligns with Washington’s ideals by advocating for reduced military engagements abroad and questioning the utility of longstanding alliances with European nations, particularly Britain, France and Spain. The Trump Administration during its first term highly critical of NATO countries funding structures, framing NATO allies’ lack of investment as a drain on U.S. resources.

The Gaza Board of Peace excludes England France and the UN and Spain. But includes regional players like Israel, Saudi Arabia, and Egypt, aiming for a “balanced” approach without traditional Western intermediaries. Trump’s “America First” policy aligns with Washington’s ideals by advocating for reduced military engagements abroad and questioning the utility of longstanding alliances with European nations, particularly Britain, France and Spain. The Trump Administration during its first term highly critical of NATO countries funding structures, framing NATO allies’ lack of investment as a drain on U.S. resources.

President Trump’s foreign policy echoes strategies reminiscent of those instituted by President Dwight D. Eisenhower following the Suez Crisis of 1956. This reflects a significant historical context regarding U.S. relations with European powers and the Middle East. The establishment of NATO in 1949 was a direct outcome of Truman’s support for European nations. No critic of Eisenhower ever once referred to his slap to both London and France as ‘Great Powers’ in Middle East diplomacy commonly referred to as ‘sharing the balance of power’ as US pre WWII Isolationism. Truman’s pivot, prioritized containing communism over long-term decolonization, fostering global disillusionment with U.S. foreign policy.

The original British empire policy coined as “maintaining the balance of power” in a region of interest, emerged as the US rejection of European colonialism and imperialism throughout history. FDR publicly denounced Paris colonialism in Vietnam. Alas Truman rejected this FDR anti-colonial policy and employed US ships to return the French back to Vietnam. That failure of leadership resulted in the Korean and Vietnam wars – a horrible disaster for the American people.

Truman’s abandonment of FDR’s anti-colonial stance exemplifies a critical failure of leadership, where short-term geopolitical interests overshadowed the long-term implications of supporting colonial powers. This pivot fostered continued conflict and disillusionment with U.S. foreign policy. President Trump seeks to make America Great Again, not based upon a Hoover isolation policy but rather a rejection of past Presidential incompetence and betrayal of the American manifest destiny vision first established by the Framers who established the American Republic and not the American Democracy as developed post Civil War. Dismantling the Federal bureaucracies and returning State economic autonomy back to the States as first laid down by the Commerce Clause of the US Constitution and Jefferson’s 10 Amendment, will this policy define Trump 2.0?

Will Trump 2.0 restrict all bills presented in either Houses of Congress to maintain the priority status that Congress persons in Washington serve as “ambassadors” of State legislatures. Only State Legislatures can introduces bills to their Congressional representatives sitting in Congress. Outlawing Corporate lobbies which currently dominate the Federal legislative process. Restricting corporate lobbying to the States would greatly enhance the prestige of State legislative governments. Limiting corporate lobbies to the states, acknowledges Washington DC not a separate state within the Union Republic. Openly rejects the false notion that frames Corporations as people. The Bill of Rights extends only to citizens but not business corporations.

As the Trump SC over-ruled Roe vs. Wade so too and how much more so may this Court negate the Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission (2010) perversion. This Obamo-watch abomination stands upon several Post Civil War judgments which began with the notion that States do not have the Right to secede from the Union, and then elevated the privileges of Robber Baron monopolies. The 2010 Supreme Court ruling equates corporate political spending with free speech. However, based upon the simple principle: Guns do not kill, it takes a person to pull the trigger — business corporate interests do not qualify as people any more than guns kill.

Turkey has strongly condemned the recent military actions taken by the United States and Israel against Iran. President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan publicly criticized the strikes launched on February 28, 2026, expressing his sorrow over the loss of Iran’s Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei and emphasizing Turkey’s desire for a diplomatic resolution instead of escalation.

The Megillah the only Book in the literature of the T’NaCH that has no שם השם. The Vilna Gaon (Gra) taught the word המלך functions as a word within a word רמז of the שם השם. How? The yetzer ha-rah “blackens the faces” of Israel (Megillah 11a). Post Sinai the Shekina רוח הקודש שם השם לשמה lives within the Yatzir Ha-Tov Hearts by means of dedicated/korban tohor middot Spirits.

Opposed by tuma middot spirits as expressed through the דיוק Yatzir ha-rah; the word המלך has the same numerical value as המן, just as the טיפש פשט of המלך refers to Achashverosh. The עיין טוב מידה של חנון – Mordechai, opposed by the Evil Eye of המן, these opposing “enemies” – express the Torah commandment to war against Amalek as an eternal commandment. This Torah middah dedication of חנון by way of עיין טוב vs. עיין רע – succinctly defines the opposing tuma Yatzir spirit – within the bnai brit hearts.

Therefore the word המלך understood as a wisdom commandment which understands (possesses the skill required to discern like from like) the tohor spirit middah of חנון – עיין טוב juxtaposed to צר עיין tuma middah spirit of לשון הרע. Herein defines the time-oriented mitzva of Purim דאורייתא which sanctifies the spirit tohor middah of חנון as the k’vanna of המלך and abhors the tuma direction of המן likewise within our hearts.

Who stands as the “hidden sage”? The Rabbi Shimon Kayyara\\B’HaG, author of Halachot Gedolot instructs a radical chiddush understanding — that the תרי”ג mitzvot inclusive of rabbinic commandments, when a scholar affixes Prophetic mussar defined tohor middot as the k’vanna of halachot – this elevates Talmudic mitzvot unto Av tohor Torah commandments. In this specific case the 5th Oral Torah middah of חנון interpreted to mean: עיין טוב.

The common denominator of the B’HaG chiddush: making an aliya of positive commandments which lack k’vanna to wisdom commandments which absolutely require the dedication of tohor middot spirits from within the Yatzir Tov heart. The Sefer Ha’Mitzvot of the Rambam/המן reads the Torah through a צר עיין טיפש פשט – comparable to how Xtian literalists fervently believe the World created in 6 days. The Rambam derided the B’HaG mitzva of tefillah as דאורייתא yet his 5th positive commandment rules Shemone Esrei a mitzva from the Torah. The opening Mishna/Gemara of ברכות instructs that קריא שמע הוא תפילה דאורייתא. The Rambam has no shame.

For instance, a rabbinic halacha like mishloach manot on Purim becomes elevated when its kavanah as a wisdom commandment sanctifies the tohor middah חנון עיין טוב. Just as korbanot a wisdom commandment so too tefillah a wisdom commandment. Just as korbanot requires שם ומלכות in order to swear a Torah oath so too tefillah requires שם ומלכות to swear a Torah oath. תרי”ג מצוות לאו דוקא. A korban without k’vaana no different than Cain’s korban. K’vaana – the wisdom of sanctifying tohor Oral Torah middot which Moshe Rabbeinu heard at Horev. The wisdom of Talmud study of entact sugyot begins with an עיין טוב which discerns the middot D’rabbanon sequence as akin to a morse code concealed communication – similar to the wisdom to read a Sefer Torah which has no sans trop (cantillation) indicators.

Rabbi Gamliel attributed with the Order of :ברכת המזון – עיין ברכות מח. This blessing – instituted by Rabban Gamliel and the sages of Yavneh following the Bar Kochba revolt’s aftermath, specifically commemorating the miracle where the bodies of the martyrs of ביתר did not decompose despite years of exposure, allowing proper burial. The forth blessing דרבנן if a wisdom commandment which dedicates a tohor middah Oral Torah spirit לשמה, another example that mitzvot דרבנן can become mitzvot דאורייתא. Rabbinic middot stand on the foundation of Oral Torah middot. They elevate reading books to the study of logical middot organization as the means to communicate “Oral Torah”.

The USS Liberty incident remains one of the most contentious episodes in US-Israeli history. The attack resulted in the tragic loss of 34 American lives and injuries to 171 others, which is inherently condemnable regardless of intent. The USS Liberty was not officially a CIA spy ship, but it was a naval technical research ship operated by the United States Navy. It was involved in gathering intelligence, including signals intelligence (SIGINT). The USS Liberty was a US Navy technical research ship (AGTR-5) equipped for signals intelligence (SIGINT) collection, not officially a CIA vessel but operating under the National Security Agency’s direction for electronic eavesdropping. On June 8, 1967—during the height of the Six-Day War between Israel and a coalition of Arab states (Egypt, Jordan, and Syria)—Israeli Air Force jets and torpedo boats attacked the ship off the Sinai Peninsula. The assault lasted about an hour, involving strafing, napalm, and torpedoes.

Israel immediately apologized, paid $3.3 million in compensation to families of the deceased and $3.5 million for injuries (equivalent to about $50 million today), and the US government accepted this as a tragic error. No evidence from these probes supported deliberate intent to target a US ally. However, survivors and some analysts have long disputed this, alleging it was intentional—perhaps to prevent the US from intercepting Israeli communications or to draw America into the war against Egypt. The presence of Soviet intelligence vessels in the area, capable of intercepting signals, heightened Israeli concerns that any US-collected data might indirectly aid Arab forces. The Liberty incident was a one-off event, not a prolonged war.

Prior to the out break of the June war, France served as the main military supplier of the Israeli military? President Charles de Gaulle decided to break the military alliance with Israel primarily due to a combination of geopolitical, strategic, and ideological factors that evolved during the early to mid-1960s. The comparison of Lyndon B. Johnson’s predicament during the Vietnam War to Vladimir Putin’s situation in Ukraine highlights significant parallels in terms of military engagement, political challenges, and international ramifications.

Both Tucker Carlson and Candace Owens have recently highlighted the Liberty attack in ways that frame it as intentional and evidence of Israeli betrayal or undue influence over the US, often in broader critiques of US aid to Israel. These discussions occurred well after their births (Carlson in 1969, Owens in 1989), so they’re engaging with history retrospectively.

Owens interviewed USS Liberty survivor Phil Tourney on her show, calling the attack “demonic” and the US political response a “stain on American history.” She emphasized alleged cover-ups and Israeli deceit, linking it to broader conspiracies about Israeli control over the US (e.g., suggesting Israel was involved in JFK’s assassination or had foreknowledge of 9/11). Her episode garnered millions of views, and she’s reshared it on anniversaries and Veterans Day. Debunkings argue she promotes falsehoods and one-sided narratives, ignoring evidence of mistaken identity.

In podcasts, videos, and social media, Carlson has described the attack as “clearly targeted on purpose” by Israel, questioning why it’s “shameful” or forbidden to discuss it openly. He dedicated significant airtime to it, endorsing conspiracy theories (e.g., a “false flag” to frame Egypt) and calling it “evil.” He tied it to modern US-Israel relations, suggesting Americans “put up with” such actions from a supported ally. Fact-checks have labeled his claims as misinformation, noting they contradict official findings.

The perception of the United States as an ally by Israeli leadership during the USS Liberty incident quite complex, influenced by historical events and the context of the Six-Day War. Previous U.S. Pressure: In 1956, during the Suez Crisis, the Eisenhower Administration pressured Israel to withdraw from the Sinai Peninsula after its military victory over Egypt. This creates a backdrop of mistrust, as Israel may have felt that U.S. intervention could undermine its military objectives and security interests.

Their rhetoric often portrays Israel as an ungrateful or manipulative ally, emphasizing “betrayal” without fully contextualizing Israel’s wartime desperation or the US’s own intelligence activities. By the time of the Six-Day War, Israel was concerned about the military buildup of Arab states, particularly Egypt. The environment was charged, with Israel perceiving immediate threats to its existence. The USS Liberty was attacked by Israeli forces on June 8, 1967. During the USS Liberty attack, some Israeli leaders may have viewed the U.S. less as an ally and more as a potential threat, particularly if they believed U.S. intelligence was enabling Egypt to mount a strategic counter against Israeli forces.

The presence of a Soviet spy ship capable of intercepting communications further complicated the situation. Israel might have been concerned that U.S. intelligence would be relayed to Egypt, jeopardizing their military operations. With Nasser’s declared military objective to “throw the Jews into the Sea”, post Shoah Israel perhaps feared the U.S. as a potential adversary in that specific moment, rather than as a supportive ally. Both ignore survivor testimonies or wartime fog of war complexities. Israel’s actions in 1967 were shaped by genuine threats, based upon the Israeli government digging mass graves due to their fear of another human disaster. In point of fact, the June war qualifies as the 2nd Israeli Independence War. Had Israel suffered a similar defeat Jews have no doubts that the Arabs would have joyfully slaughtered Jewish populations.

While the official name remains the Six-Day War, this framing mass Jewish genocide resonates in historical discourse as a second existential battle for statehood, following the 1948 War of Independence. For instance, some analyses describe it as a “miracle” that averted another similar Shoah disaster, with Israelis digging graves “just in case of catastrophe” while racing to develop defensive measures. Post Oct 7th 2023 likewise evoked mass Jewish Shoah trauma. Akin to Russia’s trauma of being invaded twice through the plains of the Ukraine by Napoleon and Hitler.

The comparison between Tucker Carlson’s condemnation of the USS Liberty incident and the historical “Christ Killer” slander against Jews has significant implications, particularly in the realms of rhetoric, historical context, and perceptions of betrayal. Before the war, Israel’s military reliance on France and its unique geopolitical context shaped its strategies. Carlson’s perspective might invoke a sense of betrayal by not recognizing the complexities of Israel’s earlier reliance on different alliances. Carlson seems to frame Israel as having betrayed the U.S. without accounting for the nuanced historical relationship between the two nations before the Six-Day War. His characterization therefore grossly oversimplify Israel’s security environment and the evolution of its foreign relations.

Christ Killer Slander: This slander has historically been tied to harmful stereotypes and scapegoating of the Jewish community, contributing to centuries of anti-Semitism. Carlson’s condemnation, while not directly anti-Semitic, might invoke a narrative that engages with themes of betrayal and loyalty, potentially feeding into lingering prejudices. By equating Israel’s actions during the USS Liberty incident as a failure\betrayal of the US “ally”, Carlson’s rhetoric resonates with historical antisemitic tropes that slanders Jews – such as the slander Jews poisoned the wells; Jews murder Xtian babies and use their blood to bake matza; or the Czar secret police publication of the “Protocols of the Elders of Zion” forgery used to justify brutal pogroms which forced millions of Jews to flee Russia and Eastern Europe.