BushII invasion of Iraq. He argued that the U.S. needed to remove Saddam Hussein.

Colonel Lawrence Wilkerson served as the Chief of Staff to Secretary of State Colin Powell during the lead-up to the Iraq War.

Assimilated Jeffrey Sachs, who married a non Jewish woman – the two primary conditions by which the T’NaCH and Talmud define 2nd Sinai commandment – avoda zara – framed U.S. strategies in WWII, including the bombings of Dresden and Tokyo, within a context of total war where large-scale civilian casualties justified as “regrettable but necessary”. In stark contrast, Sachs condemns Israel’s military actions following the October 7, 2023 surprise attack massacre of over 1200 Israelis murdered in one day and two year torture of Israeli hostages held in Hamas tunnels as a violation of “international law”, where he unilaterally decided that Israel deliberately targeted civilians.

War News: Coming Attractions Kurdistan Republic

War News: Remember: Assimilated and intermarried NY Jews who screamed: Not in our Name,,, From the River to the Sea Palestine will be free? NewsX an Indian news channel, the questioned reporter refers to the Gaza war of Oct7th as a genocide war. It’s important to report hostile anti-Israel opinions to weigh pro-US Israel press reports; another person who voices opposition to the war with Iran, whose rhetoric fails to weigh “blow-back” to the 1979 hostage crisis which destroyed the Carter Administration’s attempt for a 2nd term. Who likewise totally ignores the hate rhetoric of Great Satan/Little Satan – Tucker Carlson. The public requires both opinions to reach their own conclusions. Consider this comparison Carlson 2026:Jane Fonda 1972. People’s War strategy primarily developed by Mao Zedong and adapted by Ho Chi Minh. This strategy prioritizes stoking the fires of civil unrest & social upheaval within the enemy power rather than direct military confrontation. This approach seeks to destabilize the occupying force by undermining its social and political foundation.

The Xtian ‘Word of God’ has no portion with Sinai

The בראשית Divine Names אל שדי אלהים אל וכו stand apart from the revelation of the שם השם לשמה revealed in the first Sinai commandment. Hence the Avot did not “know HaShem”. The Mishkan פרט teaches a profound משל which requires the generations to make the דיוק נמשל. The kabbalah-שכנה refers to rabbi Yechuda’s Yatzir Ha-Tov in his kre’a shma interpretation לבבך\כם; consistent with the dedication of Horev spirits/middot 13 followed up by Talmud Yerushalmi/Bavli middot 7 Hillel, 10 Akiva, 13 Yishmael affixed to interpreting Gemara common law halachic precedents and HaGallil 32 middot/aggada – to re-interpret (משנה תורה) the language of the Mishna which Gemara common law serves to interpret as a mirror of courtroom witnesses who testify based upon their given “fixed” perspectives. Akin to the front-top-side views of a blue print.

The theological abomination of Monotheism perverts the reality that each nation unique, because each nation worships its own national God. The 30 Year War a strong precedent. A T’NaCH source precedent, the permanent split between the kingdoms of Yechuda and Yisroel serve witness before the אלהים court. First the kingdom of Israel assimilated and embraced alien cultures and customs and abandoned the Oral Torah which serves to define the culture, customs, social practices which define the identity of the chosen Cohen people. Then Yechuda also worshiped other National Gods by embracing foreign cultures customs and forgetting and abandoning the revelation of the god of Sinai. Hanukkah serves witness. The Rambam serves as a prime example of how assimilation and intermarriage define the k’vanna of the 2nd Sinai commandment. Herein explains the failure of Reshonim scholarship to inspire Israel to conquer our homelands, based upon the model of Moshe Rabbeinu.

Mesechta Avoda Zarah specifically instructs that only Israel accepts the Torah. Hence the דיוק – the god of Sinai only a local tribal god. Clearly the god who delivered Israel out of Egypt not confused with the Gods of Egypt. בראשית ברא אלהים introduces Av tohor wisdom commandments taught through the משל of the world created in six days. The נמשל introduces time-oriented Av Torah commandments which require k’vanna & creates the chosen Cohen people in all generations through the sanctification of time-oriented wisdom commandments. Hence Torah commands mussar, the definition of prophetic wisdom. Torah does not teach history. T’NaCH & Talmud, Siddur & Midrashim establish the culture, customs, practices and identities of the chosen Cohen people. Just that simple, no fancy dancing.

The god of Israel judged the Egyptian Gods. The Av tuma witchcraft which declares: as above so below – rejects the Revelation of the Torah first Sinai commandment: השם לא בשמים היא; the god of Israel post Sinai vs. the Gods of Egypt serve as the eternal הבדלה that differentiates the revelation of רוח הקודש מידות which quicken and cause the Yatzir Ha-Tov to live & breath. Herein defines the k’vaana of Oral Torah common law Court-room justice as the substance of the revelation of the Torah at Sinai. The Goyim world contrast-view reads their Bible or Koran — Egypt’s Gods either false or subordinate inferior Gods, who do not actually exist at all. Hence their Av tuma avoda zara promotes the theology known as Monotheism. Goyim never accepted the Blessing/Curse brit of Sinai. Just as Goyim aliens do not determine the k’vanna of the mitzva of Moshiach so too Goyim theology does not determine the god of Israel.

The curse of g’lut: Jews lose the skill required to do mitzvot לשמה – based upon the first Sinai commandment – Egypt לאו דוקא. The temple of Shlomo – av tuma avoda zara made by a fool. The Book of Kings makes a דיוק satire by referring to Shlomo as the “wisest of all men”. The god of Israel binds only Israel because only Israel accepts the revelation of the Torah at Sinai. Assimilated Rambam, another ‘latter day’ Mormon-like fool; he embraced the Arab tawhid and ruled that Jews could daven in Arab mosques, and his Guide philosophy based upon Aristotle rather than פרדס logic; that Allah the same god of Sinai – despite the cold hard fact that Goyim, specifically Muhammad, reject the revelation of the Torah at Sinai. Prophets never sent דוקא to Goyim; both Moshe and Yona sent to lands not included in the oath sworn to the Avot as the inheritance of their Cohen seed to cause g’lut Israel to remember the brit and do t’shuva. The Pauline ‘original sin’ replacement theology perverted the introduction of the Torah curse/theme of g’lut\exile and substitutes – the belief system, messiah Jesus God saves from sin.

The Nicene Creed which equates Jesus as God, perhaps the strongest proof; international law a myth of propaganda morality, not a binding authority. Political conflicts throughout history falsely classified by some as a failure of diplomacy. But casting this political rhetoric upon the dust bin of history together with the NT & Koran, political conflicts express a natural clash of sovereign “Gods.” Restated: A nation‑state — a functional “God.” Theological Universal Monotheism\tawhid, often called “international law” by UN member states who oppose Israel, attempt to override national sovereignty through Religio-political rhetoric. But history provokes-proves that nations create their own sacred narratives, “Word of God”. Universal monotheism directly resembles Great Power imperialism. The revelation of the Torah at Sinai establishes faith as judicial Sanhedrin court justice limited to the bnai brit people alone.

Other nations never bound to the 7 mitvot other than Gere Toshav living within the borders of the Cohen brit republic. Why? These mitzvot make a required הבדלה which separates ger toshav from na’creeim. The Talmud always remains within the judicial boundaries which the Written Torah written Constitution determines. Post sealing of the Shas Bavli all opinions made by scholars compare to US Supreme Court rulings which later Courts can overturn.

The Blessing/Curse Torah oath brit faith never presumes any conclusion that g’lut applies to HaShem as its applies to Israel, based upon the contrast between the בראשית Divine Names from the first Sinai Name. Any reading that attempts to teach this metaphor – if taken literally – merely a טיפש פשט. The sophomoric Bible mistranslations and Koran serve as witness. For example: among the Reshonim, only Rambam ruled halacha from aggadic sources. His Universal Monotheistic God permits Jews to daven in av tuma avoda zara Mosques.

That later Goyim, such as Hobbs, Schmitt, or modern nationalism “influenced” by the Torah, (the Founding Fathers of the American Republic serve as witness), does not invert this Torah “Nation-State as Functional God” as post Talmudic; based upon the Torah premise: the chicken created and later laid eggs. Church rejection of the פרדס Oral Torah combined with their Jesus God NT theology – invalidates its literalist reading of the Creation story. Just as Muhammad’s equal redefinition of prophets as persons sent to all nations invalidates the revelation of the Torah first commandment. Allah simply a Golden Calf word substitution.

Rambam’s universalist Noahide framework only a philosophical systematization; it does not appear explicitly in the Talmud or Tanakh as a normative precedent. Hilchot Melachim 8–10, expresses a foreign philosophy — a Greek-influenced natural law perspective. The Talmud does not frame Goyim as bound by any such universal natural law – in a systematic, Greek-like sense. Rambam abstracts from Talmudic rulings unto a universal ethical schema — a philosophical move, that created a new Judaism religion. There is no canonical Talmudic or Tanakh precedent for universalist moral obligations like Rambam “God” imposes through his Roman-like statute law religious codification. Oral Torah logic employed by Sanhedrin justices to interpret law based upon precedents. The lights of the P’rushim hanukkah serve as witness that assimilation to Greek culture and deductive reasoning causes Israel to forget the Torah.

T’NaCH prophetic sources such as found Isaiah 13-14, 40-48 directed toward the failure of Israel to do t’shuva and remember the Sinai oath brit. Never to Goyim – who to this very moment in time do not accept this Sinai oath brit blessing\curse-Life/Death judicial justice-g’lut oppression faith obligation. Yonah sent to Nineveh, serves witness. Repentance made by Goyim shares nothing with the Torah mitzva of t’shuva. Because t’shuva centers upon remembering the oaths sworn by our fore-fathers; repentance refers to regret made over personal sins – based upon the Pauline theology-doctrine: Original Sin. The “repentance” made by the king of Assyria – only an Indian Summer. Goyim not delivered from Egyptian slavery, therefore Goyim incapable of remembering the oaths sworn by the Avot to cut the time-oriented Torah brit which creates the chosen Cohen people throughout the generations.

The בראשית “Creation story” introduces Av time oriented wisdom commandments. בראשית does not introduce something other than the revelation of the Torah at Sinai judicial common law. Based upon the כלל that a opening “Thesis Statement” followed by “particulars which validate” the thesis statement through specific particulars כלל-פרט.

The Bavli aggada -does – mention Noahide categories, but not as a system, any more than the Creation story instructs that the Universe created in some silly טיפש פשט literalist reactionary reading. D’varim defines two types of Goyim in the brit oath-land inheritance of the chosen Cohen people. Mesechta Sanhedrin aggada address ger toshav and mesechta Baba Kama halacha – Nacreeim. Talmud does not ever refer to Goyim in foreign lands as having to obey the 7 mitzvot bnai noach. Why? Because Goyim never accept to this day the revelation of the Torah – inclusive of the Book בראשית.

Mesechta Avoda Zara and Chullin teach that a Hebrew Goy slave – a ger toshav. Another proof: Orpha decided to return to her Moavite family. The דיוק clear, she returned to Moav and abandoned keeping the 7 mitzvot bnai noach. Ruth by contrast, returned to Israel and serves as the model of the mitzva ger tzeddik.

[If] every nation establishes its own god, such as did Casear, and Mao; and HaShem breaths tohor middot – only the Oral Torah god of Israel – when we rule our homeland with righteous judicial common law courtroom justice — [then] What status of divine justice operates outside this Sinai brit? Each people by making their own Gods, as either Heads of State or theological belief systems etc. The Code of Hammurabi – approximately 600 to 800 years older than the commonly accepted date for the Sinai revelation after the liberation of the Israelites from Egypt, serves as witness. History testifies that throughout human history national leaders have assumed the role of God of their people/kingdom. Sinai does not sit atop of any universal pyramid. Rather the revelation of the Torah at Sinai — a different “mountain” entirely.

Mesechta Avoda Zarah specifically instructs that only Israel accepts the Torah. Hence the דיוק – the god of Sinai only a local tribal god. Clearly the god who delivered Israel out of Egypt not the God of Egypt. בראשית ברא אלהים introduces Av tohor wisdom commandments taught through the משל of the world created in six days. The נמשל introduces time-oriented Av Torah commandments which creates the chosen Cohen people in all generations through the sanctification of time-oriented commandments. Hence Torah commands mussar. Torah does not teach history. T’NaCH & Talmud, Siddur & Midrashim establish the culture, customs, practices and identities of the chosen Cohen people. Just that simple, no fancy dancing.

The god of Israel judged the Egyptian Gods. The Av tuma witchcraft which declares: as above so below – rejects the Revelation of the Torah first Sinai commandment: השם לא בשמים היא; the god of Israel post Sinai vs. the Gods of Egypt serve as the eternal הבדלב that differentiates the revelation of רוח הקודש מידות which quicken and cause the Yatzir Ha-Tov to live & breath. Herein defines the k’vaana of Oral Torah common law Court-room justice as the substance of the revelation of the Torah at Sinai. The Goyim world contrast-view reads their Bible or Koran as Egypt’s Gods either false or subordinate inferior Gods, who do not actually exist at all. Hence their Av tuma avoda zara promotes the theology known as Monotheism. Goyim never accepted the Blessing/Curse brit of Sinai. Just as Goyim aliens do not determine the k’vanna of the mitzva of Moshiach so too Goyim do not determine the god of Israel.

The curse of g’lut: Jews do not do mitzvot לשמה – based upon the first Sinai commandment – Egypt לאו דוקא. The temple of Shlomo – av tuma avoda zara made by a fool. The Book of Kings makes satire by referring to Shlomo as the “wisest of all men”. The god of Israel binds only Israel because only Israel accepts the revelation of the Torah at Sinai. Assimilated Rambam, another latter day fool, embraced the Arab tawhid and ruled that Jews could daven in Arab mosques; that Allah the same god of Sinai – despite the cold hard fact that Goyim, specifically Muhammad, reject the revelation of the Torah at Sinai. Prophets never sent דוקא to Goyim; both Moshe and Yona sent to lands not included in the oath sworn to the Avot as the inheritance of their Cohen seed to cause g’lut Israel to remember the brit and do t’shuva.

The Nicene Creed which equates Jesus as God, perhaps the strongest proof; international law a myth of propaganda morality, not a binding authority. Political conflicts throughout history falsely classified by some as a failure of diplomacy. But casting this political rhetoric upon the dust bin of history, political conflicts express a natural clash of sovereign “Gods.” Restated: A nation‑state — a functional “God.” Theological Universal Monotheism\tawhid, often called “international law” by UN member states who oppose Israel, attempt to override national sovereignty through religio/political rhetoric. But history provokes-proves that nations create their own sacred narratives. Universal monotheism directly resembles Great Power imperialism. The revelation of the Torah at Sinai establishes faith as judicial Sanhedrin court justice limited to the bnai brit people alone.

Other nations never bound to the 7 mitvot other than Ger Toshav. Why? These mitzvot make a required הבדלה which separates ger toshav from na’creeim. The Talmud always remains within the judicial boundaries which the Written Torah determines. Post sealing of the Shas Bavli all opinions made by scholars compare to US Supreme Court rulings which later Courts can overturn.

The Blessing/Curse Torah oath brit faith never presumes any conclusion that g’lut applies to HaShem as its applies to Israel. Any reading that attempts to teach this metaphor – if taken literally – merely a טיפש פשט. For example: among the Reshonim, only Rambam ruled halacha from aggadic sources. His Universal Monotheistic God permits Jews to daven in av tuma avoda zara Mosques.

That later Goyim, such as Hobbs, Schmitt, or modern nationalism “influenced” by the Torah does not invert this Torah “Nation-State as Functional God” as post Talmudic. Based upon the Torah premise: the chicken created and later laid eggs. Church rejection of the פרדס Oral Torah combined with their Jesus God invalidates its literalist reading of the Creation story. Just as Muhammad’s equal redefinition of prophets as persons sent to all nations invalidates the revelation of the Torah first commandment. Allah simply a Golden Calf word substitution.

Rambam’s universalist Noahide framework only a philosophical systematization, and it does not appear explicitly in the Talmud or Tanakh as a normative precedent. Hilchot Melachim 8–10, expresses a foreign philosophy — a Greek-influenced natural law perspective. The Talmud does not frame non-Jews as bound by a universal law in a systematic, Greek-like sense. Rambam abstracts from Talmudic rulings to a universal ethical schema — a philosophical move. There is no canonical Talmudic or Tanakh precedent for universalist moral obligations like Rambam imposes.

T’NaCH prophetic sources such as found Isaiah 13-14, 40-48 directed toward the failure of Israel to do t’shuva and remember the Sinai oath brit. Never to Goyim who never accepted this Sinai oath brit obligation. Same applies to Yonah sent to Nineveh. Repentance made by Goyim shares nothing with the Torah mitzva of t’shuva. Because t’shuva centers upon remembering the oaths sworn by our fore-fathers; repentance refers to regret made over personal sins; based upon the Pauline theology/doctrine: Original Sin.
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________

Ukraine has captured more territory than Russia has taken in recent months, particularly during February 2026, highlighting a shift in momentum. However, these figures vary by source, with some analysts noting that winter conditions and troop morale play significant roles.

U.S. government social media post regarding the death of activist Quentin Deranque during political clashes in Lyon, France has limited the access of U.S. Ambassador Charles Kushner to senior officials. His death has sparked significant outrage in France, leading to accusations and heightened tensions between political factions, particularly between far-left and far-right groups. The recent diplomatic spat involving Charles Kushner, the U.S. Ambassador to France, revolves around his failure to attend a summons from the French Foreign Ministry concerning the comments made by the U.S. in the wake of the tragic death of Quentin Deranque, a 23 year old far-right activist who suffered a suffered a fatal brain injury. In the aftermath, eleven suspects have been detained, with several under investigation for murder. Among those arrested were two parliamentary aides linked to La France Insoumise (LFI), a significant left-wing political party in France. Raphaël Arnault, a party member, faced significant backlash due to his connections to groups blamed for the violence. Despite being forewarned about the protest, local police failed to prevent or even timely respond to this political murder. This failure raises serious concerns about public safety and the police’s ability to manage politically charged situations.

Spain’s political landscape with the US, terminated after Prime Minister, Pedro Sanchez refusal to support U.S. military actions in Iran, and denounced U.S. intervention in Venezuela. Spanish officials have voiced their “concerns” about the consequences of Sanchez’s defiance, including possible restrictions on Spanish shipping to the U.S. stemming from the refusal to allow weapon transport for Israel.

Trump’s “America First” policy aligns with Washington’s ideals by advocating for reduced military engagements abroad and questioning the utility of longstanding alliances with European nations, particularly Britain, France and Spain. The Trump Administration during its first term highly critical of NATO countries funding structures, framing NATO allies’ lack of investment as a drain on U.S. resources.

The Gaza Board of Peace excludes England France and the UN and Spain. But includes regional players like Israel, Saudi Arabia, and Egypt, aiming for a “balanced” approach without traditional Western intermediaries. Trump’s “America First” policy aligns with Washington’s ideals by advocating for reduced military engagements abroad and questioning the utility of longstanding alliances with European nations, particularly Britain, France and Spain. The Trump Administration during its first term highly critical of NATO countries funding structures, framing NATO allies’ lack of investment as a drain on U.S. resources.

President Trump’s foreign policy echoes strategies reminiscent of those instituted by President Dwight D. Eisenhower following the Suez Crisis of 1956. This reflects a significant historical context regarding U.S. relations with European powers and the Middle East. The establishment of NATO in 1949 was a direct outcome of Truman’s support for European nations. No critic of Eisenhower ever once referred to his slap to both London and France as ‘Great Powers’ in Middle East diplomacy commonly referred to as ‘sharing the balance of power’ as US pre WWII Isolationism. Truman’s pivot, prioritized containing communism over long-term decolonization, fostering global disillusionment with U.S. foreign policy.

The original British empire policy coined as “maintaining the balance of power” in a region of interest, emerged as the US rejection of European colonialism and imperialism throughout history. FDR publicly denounced Paris colonialism in Vietnam. Alas Truman rejected this FDR anti-colonial policy and employed US ships to return the French back to Vietnam. That failure of leadership resulted in the Korean and Vietnam wars – a horrible disaster for the American people.

Truman’s abandonment of FDR’s anti-colonial stance exemplifies a critical failure of leadership, where short-term geopolitical interests overshadowed the long-term implications of supporting colonial powers. This pivot fostered continued conflict and disillusionment with U.S. foreign policy. President Trump seeks to make America Great Again, not based upon a Hoover isolation policy but rather a rejection of past Presidential incompetence and betrayal of the American manifest destiny vision first established by the Framers who established the American Republic and not the American Democracy as developed post Civil War. Dismantling the Federal bureaucracies and returning State economic autonomy back to the States as first laid down by the Commerce Clause of the US Constitution and Jefferson’s 10 Amendment, will this policy define Trump 2.0?

Will Trump 2.0 restrict all bills presented in either Houses of Congress to maintain the priority status that Congress persons in Washington serve as “ambassadors” of State legislatures. Only State Legislatures can introduces bills to their Congressional representatives sitting in Congress. Outlawing Corporate lobbies which currently dominate the Federal legislative process. Restricting corporate lobbying to the States would greatly enhance the prestige of State legislative governments. Limiting corporate lobbies to the states, acknowledges Washington DC not a separate state within the Union Republic. Openly rejects the false notion that frames Corporations as people. The Bill of Rights extends only to citizens but not business corporations.

As the Trump SC over-ruled Roe vs. Wade so too and how much more so may this Court negate the Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission (2010) perversion. This Obamo-watch abomination stands upon several Post Civil War judgments which began with the notion that States do not have the Right to secede from the Union, and then elevated the privileges of Robber Baron monopolies. The 2010 Supreme Court ruling equates corporate political spending with free speech. However, based upon the simple principle: Guns do not kill, it takes a person to pull the trigger — business corporate interests do not qualify as people any more than guns kill.

Adam Shit Lied. No different than Senator Joseph McCarthy & inside traitor Nancy Pelosi. Start in the 20th minute.

A Now or Never “window of opportunity” favorable for the partition of Iraq and Iran to establish an Independent Kurdish State

Kurdish Independence a now or never proposition. Russia tied down in Ukraine. China occupied with Taiwan and Japan + facing a domestic economic meltdown similar to Japan’s lost generation. The collapse of the Islamic revolution in Iran with a US/Israeli victory presents the best opportunity to partition Iran into an Independent Kurdish state.

A US and Israel in the region could weaken Iranian influence, potentially emboldening Kurdish movements in Iraq into a unified Kurdish Republic partitioned from these two States. The proposition of Kurdish independence as a “now or never” opportunity quite compelling.

The Kurds stand today as the largest stateless nation post WWI. Iraqi Kurdistan already has a recognized autonomous region with its own institutions. Rojava in northern Syria has had de facto self‑rule, though under constant military and diplomatic pressure. External arming of Kurdish groups in Iran is already being discussed. A unified Kurdish Republic carved from Iraq + Iran a best case scenario: a clean, US/Israel‑backed partition into a large, unified Kurdish state.

The collapse of the USSR in 1991 and the hostility of the EU during President Trump’s first term, coupled by attempts by Pelosi and Biden to bring the Ukraine into the Nato alliance opens the possibility that President Trump might strike a deal to pull the US out of Nato in return for Putin’s support for an Independent Kurdish state.

Long-standing defense treaties started under the Wilson government in the past Century. The ‘Art of the Deal’ where Russia would recognize an Independent Kurdish state in Iraq and Iran partitioned based upon the precedents of Poland partitioned. Long standing Arab/Muslim terrorism has its consequences. A new Independent Kurdish Republic would not sit directly upon any Russian border.

Iraq and Iran failed states with years of internal anarchy and political chaos following the 1st and 2nd Gulf Wars. The initial partition of Iraq and Iran would leave a buffer zone between it and the borders of Turkey. Turkey did not fight the current Israel/US war with Islamic Iran. Consequently this partition does not concern nor involves Turkey. This partition no different than the British partition which established the Independence of Kuwait. That partition deprived Iraq access to the Sea.

The comparison between U.S. membership in NATO and treaties with Indian Nations throughout the 19th century highlights important similarities in the legal framework by which the United States engages with international and domestic agreements. Article 5 of the NATO treaty commits members to collective defense, meaning an attack on one member is considered an attack on all. Post collapse of the USSR in 1991 terminates NATO based upon the collapse of the Warsaw Pact.

Treaties made with Indian Nations similar to NATO treaties, these agreements. The precedent of the US Supreme Court vs Andrew Jackson ‘Trail of Tears’ stands. An international treaty does not compare to the basic law of the US Constitution. Despite the concept of treaties addressed in Article VI of the Constitution, the American Civil War determined in the case of the Commerce Clause also part of the US Constitution, that the Federal Government could regulate intra-state trade and commerce. The classic example: the SC Roe vs Wade ruling.

Political branches can break treaties when they no longer serve strategic US interests. Only revisionist history classifies Indian nations as ‘domestic agreements’. Only later with the virtual extermination of the Indian tribes did these treaties become classified as ‘domestic agreements’.

Trump 2.0 stands upon the foundation that foreign diplomacy operates on deception. European states failure to meet their required obligations to maintain the NATO alliance in good faith, also has undermined that post WWII treaty establishe by the Truman Administration. The Nato treaty does not compare to the 10 Commandments carved in stone.

Nato a post WWII treaty that exists merely as water under the bridge. The founding Fathers opposed making entangling alliances with Europe. Native nations only treated as “domestic dependents nations” to support the US manifest destiny declarations. Indian state prior to the conquest of from Sea to Sea had their own militaries, economies, and alliances no different than do the European states – despite joining or leaving the EU alliance – today. For example: the US and Britain had a strong alliance during the two European Civil Wars euphanistically called WWI & WWII. The Soviet victory over the Nazis refers to that war as ‘the Great Patriotic War’!

Trump Derangement Syndrome started with Russia-gate and the inside traitor Nancy Pelosi attempts to impeach the President. But a lot of water has flown under the bridge following the two assassination attempts upon the life of Trump. Trump 2016 faced a divided GOP with a very strong Neo Con “opposition”. Trump 2.0 leads the GOP. Power and interest ultimately decide whether Treaties endure or collapse. The U.S. has a long history of breaking solemn commitments when it chooses. Bottom line: post WWI the Allies failed to establish Kurdish Independence.