Israel argues that Article 25 strictly applies to Chapter VII UN SC Resolutions. The Nambia ICJ case supports the premise that when a rogue nation like SA rapes its mandate, actions have consequences. Political opportunism/imperialism invalidates any and all awarded mandate/protectorates.

What Article 25 says: Member states “agree to accept and carry out” the Security Council’s decisions in accordance with the Charter. The “core point” – as it applies to Israel: the rogue Chamberlain White Paper invalidated the League Palestine mandate; closing the gates of Palestine to Jewish refugees greatly contributed to the Shoah. The illegality of White House imperialism invalidated their mandate; Ben Gurion stated we will war against the British as if there were no Nazis.

In practice, the binding nature most clearly attaches to Security Council action under Chapter VII, because by definition “it” authorizes compulsory measures enforced by a UN Security Council Army – like as happened in Korea. The attempt to extend Article 25 to Chapter VI due to the language of Article 25 does not state “only Chapter VII” amounts to a “Liberal stretch” akin to the language distinction between British/US 242 from French 242!

Chapter VI, the Security Council’s role, largely recommendatory/peaceful settlement (e.g., Article 36–38 processes). Those actions generally not framed as binding “decisions” in the same way Chapter VII measures; otherwise no real distinction exists between a lower Chapter VI to a higher Chapter VII UN warning to the rogue state rebuked by the Security Council.

Chapter VII obviously Article 25 binds member states to accept and carry out “decisions” of the Security Council “in accordance with the Charter.” It does not say “only Chapter VII.” So the proposition “Article 25 applies strictly and only to Chapter VII” an conservative interpretation whereas your liberal looser interpretation demands that Article 25 applies to Chapter VI UN SC Resolutions as well.

Bunk. Bring a precedent where Security Council members affixed Article 25 to any other country other than Israel? The ICJ directly linked to the UN; specifically The Namibia advisory opinion (1971) is the centerpiece for your argument that Article 25 extends beyond Chapter VII.

The Security Council asked for an advisory opinion on the legal consequences for States of South Africa’s continued presence in Namibia despite Security Council Resolution 276 (1970). The operative point is that the Court’s focus is what other states must do in response to that situation, not whether Chapter VII labels particular measures. The advisory opinion’s “center of gravity”, the Court’s conclusion that South Africa’s continued administration/acts were illegal; specifically the UN General Assembly decided that the Mandate for South West Africa had terminated, and that South Africa had no further right to administer the territory. Israel argues the same point precisely: The British ’39 White Paper terminated the British mandate of Palestine; the moment when David Ben Gurion named the Jewish state Israel and the Arabs suffered their Nakba defeat of Allah the UN’s mandate of Palestine terminated. This is the “termination of the Mandate” premise that makes South Africa’s continued administration unauthorized. (The ICJ summarizes this background in the case description.)

UN Security Council [Resolution 276 (1970)] The Security Council explicitly declared the continued presence/administration by South African authorities to be illegal and stated that all acts taken after termination of the Mandate – illegal and invalid. Resolution 276 in the case of Nambia valid not that it qualifies as a Chapter VII ultimatum. But rather that 276 depends on the mandate termination – hence Israel argues that the UN’s mandate over Palestine terminated.

Britain turned its mandate back to the UN. The moment that David Ben Gurion named the new nation Israel, the UN mandate over Palestine ceased to exist. Not till the British White Paper did Arab opportunism in 1964 embrace Palestine because the White paper promised an Arab Palestinian state 10 years after the war enjoying a 2/3rds Arab majority population; the White Paper represents a single state perversion of the League mandate of 1922. Israel an independent nation. Palestine a protectorate territory. Hence when Jordan and Egypt ruled Samaria and Gaza respectively, they did so without a UN Palestine mandate.

From 1948 to June 1967 no UN Resolution condemned either Egypt in Gaza and Jordan in Samaria for violating the UN Palestine Mandate. The UN Palestine Mandate had technically expired by the time the Arab states captured and administered these territories. Once Britain withdrew, the Mandate ceased to exist. The “UN Mandate” did not exist for Egypt or Jordan to “violate” in the same legal sense that South Africa was violating a living mandate in Namibia. Cannot violate a contract that has already been terminated. Therefore, the UN did not issue resolutions claiming Egypt or Jordan were “breaching the Mandate” because the Mandate was no longer in force.

Jordan formally annexed the West Bank in April 1950. The UN never passed a resolution declaring this annexation illegal or void. The Arab League later recognized Jordan’s annexation of the West Bank. The UN simply refused to recognize it, but it did not issue a binding Article 25 resolution declaring the administration “illegal” in the way Resolution 276 did for South West Africa. The 1967 War serves as the “final settlement” independent of the UN because the UN hand no protectorate mandate over Samaria and Gaza. The UN did not condemn Egypt for “violating the mandate” because, again, the mandate had ended. The UN focused on the armistice lines and the refugee issue. Egypt was treated as a belligerent power that had captured territory, not as a “mandate violator.”

In 1948 Israel terminated permanently the UN protectorate of Palestine through its national Independence victory over the British lead Arab Armies. Utterly not relevant that the UN did not formally declare an end to its protectorate – flat out Israel not a UN mandate territory. Neither Jordan nor Egypt compare to the rogue nations of Britain and South Africa. The UN’s silence on the illegality of their administration (while refusing to recognize their sovereignty) leaves the status of those territories as “disputed” rather than “illegal mandate violation.” But Oct 7th 2023 wherein the UNWRA and Hamas and Islamic Jihad slaughtered over 1200 Israelis on the last day of the Chag has terminated the Oslo attempt to peacefully settle up with Arabs who worship Hitler as their Allah/Nakba.

The White Paper appeasement policy – deviation debauchery – reflects the cowardice absolute dread of War embraced by PM Chamberlain and fools like him. Appeasement allowed Hitler to seize all of the Czech Republic to achieve “Peace in our time” narishkeit political rhetoric. Which resulted in the explosion of WWII when Hitler invaded Poland based upon a similar agreement with Stalin.

The British government, fearing that alienating Arab oil producers and allies would jeopardize the war effort against Nazi Germany, chose to appease the Arab leadership (the Mufti of Jerusalem and others) by restricting Jewish immigration, even after Kristallnach clear as crystal warned of coming attractions. By allowing the persecution of Jews in Europe to continue and by restricting Jewish refuge in Palestine, Britain effectively abandoned its humanitarian obligations under the Mandate.

“Peace for our time” a clear psycho delusion which resulted in the highest death toll in a single war perhaps in the annuls of all Human history. The 1939 White Paper limited Jewish immigration to Palestine to 75,000 over five years, with a promise to establish a 66% Arab majority in Palestine! Did the White Paper contribute to other nations decision, like the US, to restrict their borders to Jewish refugees?

The Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact (August 1939), a non-aggression treaty between Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union did Hitler assume that England would back down because Stalin likewise made a similar appeasement to avoid war? The Great Powers clearly prioritized short-term stability over long-term justice. Evil actions have their consequences. The League awarded the mandate based upon the Balfour Declaration. Chamberlain despised the mandate like Charles de Gaulle switched and shattered his pro Israel alliance unto a pro Arab alliance.

Appeasement of Arab nationalism highlights a consistent pattern of British imperial failure: the belief that concessions would bring peace, when in reality, they often empowered aggressors and undermined justice. Therefore, as clear as the Sun in the Sky that the British mandate of Palestine under the stewardship of a coward like Chamberlain while the League (in chaos on the verge of total collapse) did not revoke the mandate, clearly Israel’s Independence victory over the Nakba Allah – through an act of war DID invalidate the dead league of nations mandate.

The “FRAME JOB” White Paper as clear as the crack in Chamberlain’s ass previously seen in the Evian Conference of 1938, where 32 nations increased their quotas significantly to permit Jewish refugees any haven! Great Powers sway minor States policy decisions. Post Oct7th no Arab or Muslim country opened their borders to permit Gazan refugees haven. The cowardice of political opportunism a consistent plague from generation to generation to generation.

The Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact NOT a tactical move by Stalin to buy time and avoid a two-front war. Though this narishkeit, promoted in standardized history texts, says otherwise. Stalin shocked by the immediate fall of “coward” France. Based upon Hitlers’ book written in prison, if Britain likewise surrendered to the barbaric Huns, then the USSR would be alone, like a sheep separated from the flock. Therefore Stalin in point of fact, invited Hitler to attack the USSR to impose upon the Hun barbarians a two-front war which Hitler condemned as the Prime Cause of Imperial Germany’s defeat in WWI. The Soviet annexations of June 1940—specifically the occupation of Bessarabia and Northern Bukovina—placed Red Army forces directly adjacent to Romania’s Ploiești oil fields, creating a strategic vulnerability that accelerated Adolf Hitler’s decision to launch Operation Barbarossa.

Stalin prior to the Allied invasion of Normandy continually demanded from the US and Britain that they open the 2nd front! After the surrender at Stalingrad, the Nazi’s slowly went in retreat, the pressure of the Allies opening a second front not on Stalin but FDR and Churchill because the determination of the victors of war would determine what Nazi lands would fall under the shadow (Eastern Block nations) post WWII.

Hence the standard “history” codified in texts which depicts Stalin as a similar fool as Chamberlain and de Gaulle utterly false. Stalin stood in the shadow of the collapse of the 3 Century (about the same length as the Pope’s ghetto gulags which Napoleon obliterated) Czarist autocracy; based upon the consequences of the defeat in the war with Japan which forced the Czar to conceed the Duma; the WWI defeat swept the Czar upon the dung heaps of history. Stalin, a cold blooded psycho-path mass murderer on the order of Mao, sacrificed millions of Russians to cause the people of the USSR to realize that Stalin though responsible through his collectivization programs which obliterated the kulaks of the Ukraine and other rural communities across the USSR, that Hitler would slaughter the inferior race Slavs as he did the Jews.

The British failure to stand firm in Poland (after guaranteeing its borders) was the final blow to the idea that “appeasement works.” The same logic applied to Palestine: the White Paper was an attempt to “buy peace” with Arab leaders, but it only empowered the Mufti of Jerusalem and the Arab nationalist movement to demand more, while leaving the Jews defenseless.

The UN did not “terminate” the Mandate in a way that created a new sovereign entity. Instead, the UN recognized the de facto reality that Britain could no longer administer the territory. When Israel declared independence on May 14, 1948, and immediately fought a war of survival against Arab armies, it effectively dissolved the Mandate by force of arms. The Arab states (Egypt, Jordan, Syria, etc.) did not invade to “restore the Mandate”; they invaded to destroy the Jewish state.

Israel’s victory over Nakba Allah meant that the original League mandate no longer the governing framework. The armistice lines (1949) and not the UN the protectorate over Palestine stood till the Israeli victory over Nakba Allah repeated itself in 1967. UN 242 revisionist history – invalid. The UN protectorate of Palestine obliterated by the reality of wars. No UN Chapter VI Resolution or ICJ ruling can create a protectorate which the State of Israel does not recognize. Foreign nations never impose borders upon other peoples or societies as did Great Power imperialism which defines the disgrace of the British empire across China’s Century of Shame!

The core tenet of historical justice: evil actions have consequences. Chamberlain’s Legacy sacrificed the lives of 6 million Jews to avoid a conflict with Arab leaders. De Gaulle’s Legacy sacrificed the possibility of a peaceful settlement with Israel to secure French influence in the Arab world. Both coward pigs followed the same logic: Stability > Justice. The Jewish people alone forced to fight for their survival without the protection of the “Great Powers.” Therefore no “Great Powers” has a mandate to unilaterally dictate peace terms to Israel.

The study of “international law” requires comparing “international precedents”. Roe vs Wade regulated the abortion industry across all 50 States. This violated the right to bureaucratically regulate intra-State trade within each and every State. The abortion business a multi billion dollar trade! Roe vs Wade falsely, hence it was later over-ruled, limited the 14th Amendment. But women did not receive the right to vote till the 20th Century. Women’s rights do not determine the Commerce Clause of the US Constitution! The attempt to limit debate to the 14th Amendment compares to the ICJ’s attempt to expand Article 25 to Chapter VI Resolutions; it compares to Lincoln’s rejection of Jeffersonian democracy and the Articles of Confederation which permits the States the right to join or leave the Union.

Under the 10th Amendment, states hold general police powers to regulate health, safety, morals, and intra-state commerce. Under Article I, Section 8 (the Commerce Clause), the federal government regulates interstate commerce. When a business operates across state lines—or engages in activity that substantially affects national commerce—federal authority or constitutional standard-setting can apply.

In Roe v. Wade (1973), the Supreme Court based its ruling on the 14th Amendment’s Due Process Clause (the right to privacy), treating healthcare access as a fundamental individual right rather than an economic trade issue. In Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization (2022), the Court overruled Roe, returning the authority to regulate or prohibit abortion to individual state legislatures and Congress.

Under the UN Charter, Chapter VII resolutions are universally recognized as binding enforcement actions, whereas Chapter VI resolutions focus on the peaceful settlement of disputes and are generally considered non-binding recommendations. States that UN members agree to accept and carry out decisions of the Security Council. Debate persists in international legal circles regarding whether Article 25 applies strictly to Chapter VII or extends to certain Chapter VI decisions (e.g., the ICJ’s 1971 Namibia Advisory Opinion). Drawing a parallel between expanding 14th Amendment privacy protections and expanding Chapter VI binding authority highlights a common critique in legal theory: judges or international bodies exceeding explicit textual mandates to broaden their jurisdiction.

During the Civil War, Abraham Lincoln argued that the Union was perpetual and that no state had a constitutional right to secede unilateral. The Supreme Court affirmed this in Texas v. White (1869), ruling that the United States is “an indestructible Union, composed of indestructible States.” This therefore duplicates the attempt by ICJ bureaucraps to expand Article 25 from strictly Chapter VII to include Chapter VI Resolutions. 

Still another precedent: the substitute theology of both the church and mosque which attempts to superimpose JeZeus as God or Muhammad as the last prophet when neither the nt fraud nor koran fraud ever defined the critical term commandment “God is not a man” or the T’NaCH k’vanna of prophet. The ICJ’s Namibia cased hinged upon SA a rogue state directly compares to Britain a rogue state. The 1939 White Paper defines a fundamental breach of the Mandate’s core obligations (similar to South Africa’s apartheid policies or refusal to withdraw), effectively making Britain a “rogue state” that invalidated its own stewardship. Consequently, when Israel fought for independence, it wasn’t just fighting for a new state; it was acting against an illegitimate administrator whose authority had already evaporated due to its own violations.

Britain, like South Africa, violated the core tenets of its mandate, thereby losing its legal standing. The ICJ ruled that South Africa’s administration was illegal because it violated the spirit and purpose of the mandate (specifically by refusing to prepare the territory for independence and imposing apartheid). The Court stated that South Africa had no right to continue administering a territory it was obligated to prepare for self-determination.

By unilaterally restricting Jewish immigration (violating the Balfour Declaration and the Mandate’s Article 6) and promising an Arab state (violating the promise of a Jewish National Home), Britain breached its fiduciary duty. Britain’s breach (White Paper), actions have consequences, so fundamental that it terminated the mandate de jure (in law) even before Britain physically withdrew in 1948.

Gandhi similarly argued Britain leave India after the Jallianwala Bagh massacre (1919), where around 1,500 people were killed. Post Oct 7th 2023 the Arabs of Gaza must likewise leave. Utterly not relevant that the UN failed to formally terminate the British mandate; such a vain argument places the cart before the horse. If the Administering Power exists as a Hitler, Stalin, Mao “Rogue UN protectorate State”, then the mandate – void ab initio (void from the beginning of the breach) or void ipso facto. In this scenario, the UN does not need a Chapter VII resolution to “terminate” it; the termination is a legal fact resulting from the breach. The mandate already void due to Britain’s “rogue” White Paper, then UN resolutions (like 242) that treat the post-1948 situation as a “disputed territory” under a continuing UN framework – based on a false premise. The “mandate” didn’t exist to be violated by Israel; it had already died by British hand. “You cannot enforce a contract that one party has already fundamentally broken.”

Did other states treat Britain as a “rogue” power? Simply an invalid question. The US bears its guilt for the Shoah just as do all nations who closed their borders to Jewish refugees in 1938. Currently UN law, compares to Church dogma which declared before Poop Pius XII, the Poop was infallible when he speaks ex cathedra, generally requires a formal act (like a UN resolution) to terminate a mandate, rather than relying on the breach itself to void it automatically. The Namibia case relied on the UN formally terminating the mandate first, it compares to the church heliocentric (Sun-centered) 1616 model, wherein the church condemned Galileo for his violation of church dogma.

The failure of the newly “baptized” UN to terminate the British mandate like it later did with Namibia-resolution 2145 directly compares to the psycho European collective insanity which has passed from generation to generation which Europeans referred to as “their Jewish problem”. A mandate violated by a rogue power – dead, even if the UN hasn’t buried it yet.

Therefore UN Resolution 242 (which assumes a “disputed territory” under a continuing UN framework), indeed based on a “false premise.” The territory never “under UN mandate” not post 1948 Israeli Independence and how much more so post the 6 Day defeat of the dead Nakba Allah – because the mandate had already died. The White Paper represents a “Jallianwala Bagh” of the Palestinian mandate. British betrayal of the fiduciary duty; Israel had no obligation to accept a “UN framework” for Palestine in 1948 because the mandate was already void. Just as church dogma did not stop the Earth from orbiting the Sun, the UN’s failure to terminate the mandate does not stop the mandate from being void due to Britain’s breach. If the “UN framework” – void, then the “right of return” (based on UN resolutions) also void. Torah commands prophetic mussar NOT history. The UN “positivist” international law invalid because T’NaCH and Talmudic common law stands upon the k’vanna of prophetic mussar rather than dictates of static history.

The UN Resolution 194 “right of return”, a political tool used by the UN to maintain the “false premise” of a continuing mandate. Simply stated that resolution has no moral or legal right under natural law. The Torah does not recognize a “right of return” for those who reject the k’vanna of the land (e.g., the Arab invasion of 1948). The “right of return” simply a human invention, not a divine command. The UN’s “positivist” law static statute law ignores the moral reality of Britain’s breach and Israel’s right to self-determination. UN Resolution 242 based on a false premise (the Mandate was still in force). The “right of return” is legally baseless because the Mandate did not exist. The UN women’s quilting and terrorist society … stitch N’ bitch, morally bankrupt.

Post the Oct 7th Abomination War

Might makes right (war determines borders), ancient sovereignty (Judea/Samaria) supersedes modern international law, and moral forfeiture (due to war or religious persecution) negates current rights. Explain to me how post the Nakba defeat in the 1967 War of Allah and Arabs wherein Jordan later publicly annexed Samaria and East Jerusalem, when Jordan had no claims to Samaria how this proves that Jews illegally occupy stolen Arab lands?

West Bank. the term Jordan used when it illegally annexed those seized West Bank lands. UN 2334 amounts to complete and total bull shit because its not the place of any UN body (General Assembly or Security Council) to declare lands “not Jewish” within British Palestine mandate territories. Foreign nations do not determine the borders of Israel, not the US nor the Russians, and definitely not the British French or any other European State post WWII. 2334 falsely negates terra nullius (no man’s land); no UN SC Resolution has the power to transfer lands unilaterally from the historic kingdom of Samaria to Arab invaders who expelled the Roman barbarians; just as the Roman name Palestion-Syria as dead as a door-nail post the fall of Rome and Constantinople.

Regardless of the Arab number of Arab share croppers, Ottoman law restricted ownership of land only to Ottoman Muslims. UN 2334 unilaterally insists the land as “occupied Balestinian territory” when the PLO Charter of 1964 only refers to ’48 Israel as “occupied Balestinian territory”. 2334 arrogance declares itself more religious than the Pope! Jordan’s annexation of Samaria a direct refutation of the language of 242! Balestinians lost all claims to Samaria and East Jerusalem and Gaza when they gave their support to throw the Jews into the Sea in ’48 and again in ’67; just as Gazan surrendered all rights to an independent state post the Oct 7th 2023 defeat.

Wars determine international borders the UN does not determine international borders. Proof Jordan annexed Samaria and called it “West Bank”, and the UN did nothing but a Chapter VI condemnation. Had the UN any spine or teeth it would have condemn Jordan with a Chapter VII ultimatum to withdraw. Balestinian self-determination ceased to exist post the ’48 Nakba defeat of Allah and Arab international coalition to throw the Jews into the Sea.

Jews lost our rights to Judea following the disasters of two revolts against the Romans. Arabs lost all claims to Judea after Turkish “Muslims” conquered the collapsed Arab Abbasid caliphate obliterated by the Mongol invasion led by Hulagu Khan in 1258 CE. Some 16 years after the Rome and France committed the war crime of burning all the Talmudic manuscripts in Paris.

The post – 1945 canard UN Charter represents a pie in the sky what I I I egoism of post war great powers dreams. The “World” does not make diplomacy between nations. Nation states make diplomacy with other Nation state allies. The post WWII UN Charter only a post war trauma and not actual reality akin to Martin Luther King’s “I have a dream” speech before FBI assassins put a bullet in his brain. UN 2334 models itself after ‘the Homosexual Peace in our Time’ 1939 White Paper.

The chief flaw of 242: the land recently occupied by Israel belongs to the Balestinian people ignores the fact that all Arab countries expelled Jewish refugees who had lived there for over a 1000 years! Expel these dhimmi Arabs and let them live in the stolen properties of the Jews unilaterally expelled from Arab countries. The concept of self-determination for the Balestinian people – a central pillar of the international consensus. Arab and Muslim states can cut a Balestinian state out of the hide of once of their countries. Losers of repeated wars to throw the Jews into the Sea do not dictate terms to the victors over Allah.

UN Pervert History.

According to Yale University the Avalon Project (Yale Law School) text: Winston Churchill as Secretary of State for the Colonies issued the 1922 “Churchill White Paper” mainly to calm the escalating crisis in Mandatory Palestine and to reframe how Britain interpreted the Balfour Declaration—especially around Jewish immigration and political development—without abandoning Britain’s obligations under it. The paper said tensions were driven by Arabs and Jews reading the Declaration too “literally” or too broadly, then it set out a policy approach: (1) support the idea of a Jewish national home, but (2) prevent it from turning into a wholly Jewish state, and (3) limit Jewish immigration to what the country could absorb economically. It also aimed to slow or manage political change via staged self-government rather than a sudden shift that would provoke instability.

The separation between Trans-Jordan from Palestine “East of the Jordan” in 1922/23. East of Jordan … Iraq and Kuwait separated by the British and given over as their own mandate territories at the time of the Palestinian mandate in 1922, lands included in the League Mandated lands awarded to London post WWI. The League of Nations Mandate in article 25 allowed the mandatory power, with League consent, to exclude the territory east of the Jordan from the provisions of the mandate meant to enable the Jewish national home in “Palestine” west of the Jordan. “…postpone or withhold application of such provisions of the mandate as it may consider inapplicable to the existing local conditions in the territories referred to…” This specifically applied to the territories east of the Jordan River. The name “Transjordan” (meaning “across the Jordan”), the political designation applied to that specific territory once Britain exercised this exclusion power and established the Emirate of Transjordan in 1921/1922. This distinction both fundamental and crucial, for understanding how the “Jewish national home” provisions – legally restricted to the area west of the river, while the area east was administered separately under Arab leadership.

Article 25 set a policy/legal treatment during 1922–1948. As such it does not qualify as a modern UN characterization. However, London’s recognition of Jordan’s annexation of Samaria/west bank validates this annexation by the king as inclusive of the Trans-Jordan mandate. Post Nakba total defeat of Allah together with the 5 to 7 Arab invading Armies, Jordan nationalized the West Bank; the UN today refers to the West Bank in UN SC 446 & 2334 as Arab Palestinian lands; this בדיעבד validates the Peel commision which the Arabs universally rejected. London then sought, and obtained the League’s approval of a memorandum applying that exclusion to Trans-Jordan, effectively giving it an Arab legal/political regime from the western part.

Coward Chamberlain’s post Arab Revolt 1929-39 White Paper then attempted to establish an Arab 2/3rds majority population in Palestine and an Arab Palestinian state within 10 year after WWII. This did not obliterate Article 25, which the League of Nations originally agreed; post Arab Hebron revolt which lasted 10 years, clearly proved that Arabs and Jews did not fight a “Civil War” in 1948. As certain revisionist history “Voldemort” historian(s) claim. Nothing “civil” during the following the 1921 Jaffa riots!

The ’39 White Paper’s core immigration/staging structure limited Jewish immigration and also tied any further immigration to Arab consent, plus a political timetable for the future Arab Palestinian state. It clearly imposed strict limitations – unilaterally upon the Jews of Europe which the British navy strictly enforced. Hence David Ben Gurion viewed the 2nd White Paper as an act of war on par with the Nazis! Post WWII millions of Jewish immigrants the nation of Israel has absorbed.

Mandatory Palestine, never an independent nation, but merely a League Mandate territory, administered under the British; as Lebanon and Syria administered under the French. A “civil war” typically implies a struggle between rival groups within an existing sovereign state for control of the government. Hence at best the pre-declaration of Independence ‘Yishuv Arab conflict’ either a war to secede from dhimmi Arab status or a war status-quo Arab domination over dhimmi minority populations. The British – never “neutral”. London only protected its strategic interests and sought to maintain a balance of power (with itself perched on top shitting upon the peoples’ beneath) in the Middle East.

The Avalon Project text explicitly says tensions exploaded due to Arabs’ “exaggerated interpretations” of the Balfour Declaration and blood libels which denounced Zionist racists agendas: later manifested in UN GA 3379; this appeasement policy declared: the “Jewish national home” would not mean Palestine would become wholly Jewish; that Jewish immigration must not exceed the “country’s economic capacity to absorb arrivals”.

Hence prior to the British return of the Palestine Mandate back to the UN as their “Protectorate territory”, London proposed UN GA 181. The Jews of Palestine agreed to the terms of UN 181. All Arab countries together with the Arabs living in mandate Palestine rejected UN GA 181. This does not “prove” London’s hostility to an Independent Jewish state. Britain, however, based upon its illegal attempt to seize the Suez Canal in ’56, had ‘Great Power – balance of power’ strategic interests in the region. Hence London trained the Jordanian Army and ensured it had sufficient arms, at least in Arab minds, to throw the Jews into the Sea and complete the holy work of Hitler and the Nazis. The British Opium Wars serve as a precedent by which Yerushalem absolutely distrusts, and have no confidence in London – post Shoah.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yh3g2cSrcG8

The 1937 Peel Commission recommended the partition of Palestine. Both Israeli revisionist leadership and Arabs rejected the partition plan. According to the 1937 Peel Commission, impossible to solve under the existing Mandate, based primarily upon the 1917 Balfour Agreement. It proposed a partition which would separate Jewish and Arab areas, with a continuation of over-all British domination and/or administration. Contrast the ’39 Chamberlain appeasement of the Arab revolt! It did not adopt partition and instead announced a new policy framework: Britain would not implement partition, instead London laid out harsh limits on Jewish immigration and promised an Arab 2/3rd majority Arab\Syrian-Arab nationalist political order – majority state some 10 years after the war.

The plan was never implemented, partly due to Arab rejection of a rape of their rights to the entire land and the Arab revolt which broke out the previous year. The revisionist history which refers to the Arab Israeli ’48 War as a Civil War – simply bat shit crazy. The direct invasion by 5 Arab armies; secondary powers which included Jordan, Egypt, Syria, Iraq and Lebanon. Such shallow reactionary revisionist history ‘blood libel’ slander which refers to this first Israeli Independence war as a ‘Civil War’; which limit the Arab Israeli conflict to Arabs vs. Jews fundamentally ignores the involvement of not simply English and French strategic involvement but Soviet/Czech strategic interests to shape the Middle East – later known as the Cold War.

The primary threat to the existence of the Jewish state comes directly from the Syria-Palestine London and Paris axis. The Nazi Shoah far exceeds & overshadows dhimmi Arab racial-guilt/racism. None the less Arab leaders to this day approve of the objectives of Hitler. Ignorance of the actual international-war against the Jews; ignores the black fire\white fire – active vs passive – (((Sanhedrin 72a))) opposition to the rise of a free Jewish state in the Middle East by insane European racists who love the Jew as their eternal scapegoat.

Such a shallow grasp of history made famous by Israeli “New Historians” Benny Morris or Ilan Pappé, fatally ignores the involvement of both English and French strategic involvement in the Middle East and across the world. There slander conceals the cold fact that all Arab/Israeli “pawn wars” exist as proxy battlefields fought between Great Power interests. The training of the Arab Legion by British officers (like General Glubb) simply a documented fact. Morris less kapo than Pappé, while he acknowledges foreign intervention he does not prioritize foreign intervention. Till the Oct 7th 2023 Abomination War all Arab Israeli wars forced into premature cease fires by alien great power interests.

Their New History contrasts with Herzl, Jabotinsky ‘Revisionist Historians’ – the founders of Zionism defined as Jewish equal rights to achieve self-determination: the Balfour Declaration. These so-called “New Historians”, kapo self-hating Jews refer to Zionism as a myth. Nothing “Civil” touching the 1936-39 Arab revolt. Nothing “Civil” touching the steadfast Arab refusal to repatriate their Arab refugee populations! Its not that these dhimmi Arabs could not “occupy” the properties of Jewish refugees cast out of Arab countries in far larger numbers.

Cloaked through UN Resolutions which hide Western powers as co-conspirators in the destruction of the Jewish national home. The primary threat to the existence of the Jewish state comes directly from London and Paris. Great Power repeated attempt to colonize and dominate the states across the Middle East condemns Western imperialism across Africa and China and includes the west imposition of the government of the Shah of Iran in the 1953 CIA & MI6 lap-dog coup which overthrew the democratically elected Mossadegh government like as did CIA overthrew the democratically elected Salvador Allende replaced by the war criminal Augusto Pinochet. No UN GA or SA condemned this great power imperialism.

From the 1922 Churchill White Paper and 1939 Chamberlain White Paper to the training of the Arab Legion (Transjordan), Britain actively worked to limit Jewish immigration and prevent a strong Jewish state, prioritizing Arab alliances and control of the Suez Canal. France often aligned with British interests in the Levant, supporting Arab nationalism to maintain influence, and later providing arms to Arab states. UN Resolutions obscure their hostile roles to the continuation of the Jewish state. From the British recognition of Samaria as Jordanian state lands to 242 and all SC anti-Israel resolutions written thereafter.

The clause: Daraus folgt jedoch weder ein späterer israelischer Souveränitätsanspruch auf das Westjordanland noch eine nachträgliche völkerrechtliche „Validierung“ der jordanischen Annexion von 1950. False. That the UN employs the term “West Bank” and not Samaria proves that 76 years after the illegal Jordanian action that today a different set of realities holds place. UN 242 not the same language as UN 2334. The League failed due to a combination of structural weaknesses and the collective inaction of major powers over two decades. The League was critically weakened from the start because the United States never joined. Later, key members like Germany (withdrew 1933), Japan (withdrew 1933), and Italy (withdrew 1937) left the organization, destroying its universality and authority. The League had no standing army, the UN in all Chapter VI resolutions has no standing army. The League formally ceased operations in 1946, having failed to prevent World War II due to these systemic issues rather than the actions of a single individual or nation.

Why all the block voting one-sided UN Resolutions which condemn Israeli settlements in Samaria and Gaza – simply a sack of shit?

International Law did not simply poof appear Abracadabra out of the blue. Modern diplomacy “diplomatic relations and embassies” started with the Italian states (Renaissance Venice and others) prior to the unification of Italy in the 1860s! Post War Waterloo – Treaty of Paris: the product of Congress of Vienna and the Vienna settlement system, just as important than the creation of the UN post WWII because its stands upon the Magna Carta and 1648 Peace of Westphalia. Whereas the UN primarily stands upon Wilson’s last peace-point! Despite the US never joining the League because the Senate under the leadership of Senator Long opposed that treaty.

“Treaty”, the UN too a “treaty”, no different than the “Treaty of Paris in 1815!!! The UN did not invent international obligations; rather simply, the UN just another major treaty-based framework like earlier settlements. The UN itself, a treaty-based framework. It did not invent international obligations; its post WWII “creation”, simply a new institutional layer, like icing on a cake, on top of older treaty settlement traditions—much like the major postwar settlements that came before it.

Propaganda such as UN 2334 declares pre-existing Arab Palestinian borders and therefore the 4th Geneva Convention: the principle of uti possidetis (preserving existing borders) to a specific, prolonged conflict, an utter sack of shit! Palestine ceased to exist the moment Israel declared its National Independence. Uti Possidetis used primarily in decolonization contexts (e.g., Africa in the 1960s, South America in the 19th century) to say that newly independent states should inherit the administrative borders they had under the colonial power to prevent chaos.

The post war UN 242 promotes the canard prohibition of the acquisition of territory by war! What a load of shit. This revisionist history ignores Alsace–Lorraine, British illegal settlements in Ireland, and the robbing of Prussia post WWII – together with its forced mass population transfers of 10s of millions of German natives inhabitants of Prussia, Czech, and Hungry much like Nakba distorts the plight of post war Arab refugees and ignores the far greater number of Jewish exiles expelled by force from Arab countries post the defeat of Allah and Arabs.

UN 2334 claims: preventing the transfer of an occupying power’s civilian population into territory that is legally “occupied” because the previous sovereign status – disputed. Disputed by whom? Not the original PLO Charter! Nor the 1950 UN condemnation of Jordan annexation of Samaria! Nor the 1923 British separation of Trans-Jordan from its “Palestine mandate” land at the Jordan river. Palestine ceased to exist with the fall of the Roman empire! That Czar means Caesar a psychotic European insanity.

Its simply not the place of the UN to view the Nakba defeat of Allah and Arabs post ’67 as creating a new “occupied territory” status. What extinguished the previous inhabitants rights in Samaria as opposed to Arab ’48 citizenship in Israel? The repeated Arab demand, like a dog returning to eat its own vomit, to throw the Jews into the Sea! Herein, defines Oct 7th 2023 and Yerusalem demand that Hamas and UNWRA have to go. No different than President Trump who declares today that the Mullahs of Iran cannot attain nuclear weapons.

The Geneva Convention Article 49, Paragraph 6: Explicitly states: “The Occupying Power shall not deport or transfer parts of its own civilian population into the territory it occupies.” Jordan post ’48 the Occupying Power of Samaria and Egypt the Occupying Power of Gaza. The UN 1950 condemnation of Jordan’s “West Bank” annexation, even the king of Jordan has repudiated! Israel not a UN protectorate territory post ’48. The UN has no authority to declare Samaria and Gaza as “occupied” lands! Regardless of the judicial fraud of the ICJ and ICC nonsense.

Post Shoah Israel swore a oath “NEVER AGAIN” only Jewish courts shall judge Israelis. The “courts” of Europe and Islamic lands amount to a tits on a boar hog hoax on the order of the British Star Courts and the Courts of Par’o in the days of Moshe & Aaron! Dhimmi Arab refugee populations LOST their right to self determination after all Arab states Nakba of Allah and repeated defeats in wars – they started to complete the Nazi genocide of Jews! Furthermore, Arab states have unilaterally failed to repatriate their dhimmi Arab refugees like as did Israel’s 850,000 Jewish refuges expelled from Arab countries in 1948.

The total UN block voting great power domination which permitted defeated France to sit as a permanent member with veto powers as corrupt as a whore in church who promotes Sunday SALE prices! Post ’67 Nakba: both Allah and Arabs totally defeated. UN 242 compares to the post war Arab 3 NO’s – both as dead as a door-nail like belief in JeZeus in European Capitals today! No middle ground for “throw the Jews into the Sea” dhimmi ’67 Arab refugees. Just like no middle ground for UNWRA and Hamas post the Oct 7th 2023 Abomination War.

The UN does not dictate the international law narrative. The rights of dhimmi Arab refugees never repatriated by any Arab country proves the UNWRA as a total abomination. Post ’64 Palestinians as dhimmi refugee populations have no rights in any Arab or Muslim country – all of whom reject the obligation to repatriate Arab refugees! The load of shit that the UN pretend that Israel obligated to do what no Arab country has ever done, proves the UN simply a sack of block voting great power domination of the balance of power in the Middle East sack of shit.

An Israeli perspective: Torah not a religious text. G’lut Jewry established Judaism as religious halacha applies as much as UN statute law decrees. The Orthodox view of Zionism in pre-Shoah Europe directly compares to the Wilderness Generation who preferred religious g’lut over the obligations to rule the conquered lands of Canaan with judicial common law justice exercised through Sanhedrin courts. The Wilderness Generation directly compares to the ערב רב שאין להם יראת אלהים who worshipped the Golden Calf. The Torah commandment to make eternal war against Amalek, understood as kapo assimilated and intermarried Jews who bring through their worship of strange cultures and customs this direct Torah curse throughout the generations. The Torah curse of antisemitism defines the k’vanna of the mitzva of Amalek.


If Israel has the right to self-determination like any other country UN member state? Then should Israel post the Oct 7th Abomination War expel all Arab Gazans uprooted off of Gaza and establish this conquered land as the borders of the Tribe of Reuven, and the ’67 conquered Golan as the lands of the Tribe of Menashe. Based upon the principle of self-determination and Nakba consequences of Arabs starting and losing wars of extermination (throw the Jews into the Sea) and rejection prior to the first & second Independence Wars of Israeli Independence expel all PA Palestinians from Samaria in order to divide Israel into autonomous Tribes who bureaucratically regulate all trade within the borders of their own Tribes.

UN 2625 2023 carries the smell of hostile political agendas marked by UN 242 which while it does not explicitly declare “Palestinian” lands such as later 446 & 2334, serves as the foundation of UN racist condemnations of Israel which has permanently destroyed the good name reputation of the UN as objective. Despite later repealing UN 3379, this voting block passed resolution likewise justifies the hypocrisy of Security Council ‘great powers’, specifically England and France’s imperialism to seize the Suez Canal from Nasser in the 1956 War of failed great power States; together with the post WWII political agenda where the Allied victors made a mass population transfer of native born Prussian and Czech German populations and permitted both Poland and Russia to annex Prussia divided between themselves.

The propaganda notion that “Palestinians” have equal rights to achieve self-determination serves as UN propaganda. The Roman empire long ago conquered by early Arab Caliphate. That Caliphate likewise conquered and destroy no different from the defunct Roman empire. European imperialism defined by the Czar of Russia who styled himself “Caesar” and the early Western Charlemagne (also known as Charles the Great or Carolus Magnus) was the King of the Franks from 768, King of the Lombards from 774, and the first Emperor of the Romans in the West, crowned on Christmas Day in 800, supports the French early 18th Century cartographers, who sold maps of the Middle East to bankrupt ‘Sick Man of Europe’ Ottoman Pasha – which inserted Palestine as the ‘great power’ name for Ottoman ‘Greater Syria’.

Post WWI where the secret Sykes-Picot treaty (President Wilson rejected all secret great power “treaties”.) carved up the defunct Ottoman empire like these two ‘great powers’ radically changed the borders of the defunct Austria-Hungry empire! The League of Nations Palestine mandate, despite its recognition of all inhabitants living within the borders of “Palestine”, the League together with its ‘Palestine Mandate’ – died prior to the outbreak of WWII. The British White Paper absolutely invalidated the British Balfour Declaration obligations which served as the back-bone spine of that “Palestine Mandate”. Arab universal rejection of 181 and infamous 3 NO’s post Nakba crushing defeats in the June War of ’67 too has its consequences.

Post the ’48 Arab Nakba defeat to complete the Nazi genocide of Jews, coupled with the mass deportation of virtually all Jews in all Arab lands the UN ceased having any Mandate/Protectorate sovereignty over any “Palestinian territories” simply because Israel the name of the Jewish state – fundamentally rejects the Roman empire renaming of our country to “Palestine”. The propaganda narishkeit “establishe principles of modern international law and human rights”, a fig leaf which conceals the naked aggression of ‘Great Power’ partitions of India Korea Vietnam and Kuwaite gutted from Iraq. History records that the ‘Victors Right the history books’ and determine international borders of nations.

The Peace of Paris (1815), often called the Second Treaty of Paris, was the definitive peace settlement signed on November 20, 1815, following Napoleon Bonaparte’s final defeat at the Battle of Waterloo and his second abdication. It marked the end of the Napoleonic Wars and reshaped the geopolitical landscape of Europe, building upon the earlier Congress of Vienna (1814–1815). Notions of post WWII unilateral declarations which ever so conveniently ignore the history of European imperialism/colonialism Israel totally rejects.

The complicity of both UN unilateral decisions to immediately withdraw its “peace keeping” forces from Sinai, radical repeated attempts to dictate the borders of an Arab Palestine despite the cold fact that Palestine ceased to exist in 1948; the UN excluding Britain and Pakistan (the product of British 2-State imperialism) the only UN countries which recognized Jordan’s illegal annexation of Samaria; Britain in 1923 separated Trans-Jordan from the territories of its Palestine Mandate at the Jordan River! The UN Roman-style attempt to expunge the name Samaria from political debate and discussions proves its lack of objectivity. The Trump 1.0 Abraham Accords repudiated the Obama promoted 2334 condemnation of Israel’s “illegal occupation of Palestine”; so conveniently brushed over (like the name Samaria) the PLO 1964 charter which did not view Samaria or Gaza as “occupied territory”.

Trump 2.0 Gaza Peace Board excludes England, France, Russia, and the UN. UN “international law” a paper tiger pie in the sky Roman Empire attempt to rename Judea unto Palestine. The Arab God Allah defeated across the board and utterly humiliated-Nakba. Restoration of the tribal republic of Israel the Torah constitutional vision of Moshiach. The T’NaCH & Talmud explicitly states this vision by proving the failure of both Houses of Shaul and David to establish both Yovel – the sign of the Avraham brit-melah k’vanna – acquisition of tribal liberty of all 12 Tribes of the Republic/commonwealth. Failure across the UN to validate this fundamental facts of Jewish autonomy permanently invalidate the UN “international law” as “objective”. The UN block voting and great power Security Council imperialism ie Quartet compares to a ‘whore in church on Sunday’ who has no shame.

Clearly the post Pious XII post war ‘Rat-lines’ and Polish pogroms has its consequences. Despite the decline of Xtianity across Europe post Shoah absolutely destroyed the good name reputation of the church coupled with a long history of pogroms and forced population transfers and judicial “Inquisition” injustice combined with repeated taxation without representation and three Century ghetto gulag imprisonment of Jews, despite Vatican II, the interests of Rome favor making Jerusalem an “international city”.

One of the Torah commandment (פרט) the mitzva of Moshiach has nothing whatsoever to do with early or late false messiah movements by Goyim and Jews living in cursed Goyim lands. Why “cursed”? The entire Torah stands according to the closing instructions of Moshe Rabbeinu upon Life Death Blessing Curse 1st and 2nd Commandments which Moshe commanded Yehoshua to establish the six כנגד six tribal blessing-curse at Sh’Cem as remembered/t’shuva through the order of the Rabbeinu Tam tefillen. Self-determination: the top priority of all pie in the sky “international law” – absurd notion which assumes that nation states compare to ships sailing through “international waters”? Like JeZeus or Allah express the k’vanna of the 1st Sinai commandment!

Self-determination means that each and every nation determines its strategic national interests. Third party States who share no immediate international borders their opinions while valid compare to Americans criticizing Russian or Chinese laws! No UN unilaterally declared the 1 child Maoist decree and a violation of “international law”. No UN unilaterally declared that the Roe vs. Wade Supreme Court decision violated the Commerce Clause of the US Constitution which empowers State bureaucratic regulatory autonomy over all intra-state trade within any State of the US Republic.

UN attempts to equate Palestinian equal rights to achieve self-determination sweep under the rug that Arabs rejected UN 181, the Nakba crushing defeat of both Allah and JeZeus as Messiah God, never existed a Arab Palestinian state – no Arab Palestinian currency or Capital despite UN Resolution 2334! Just as Jews expelled by Romans following the disaster of the Bar Kochba Revolt, this rule of law equally applies to Arabs who made a mass population transfer of Byzantine Europeans from Roman Palestine; this rule of law equally applies to 3 NO’s Arab dhimmi refugee populations who have a long history of terrorism – such as the Munich massacre and Entebbe.

Israel does NOT deny self-determination of dhimmi refugee populations who post ’64 style themselves a ‘Palestinians’ – despite their inability to pronounce the letter P! Post ’48 Israel repatriated more Jews expelled from Arab countries than dhimmi Nakba defeated Allah believers from the borders of ’48 Israel. Arabs have many countries and vast lands. Just as Jews through the Balfour Declaration began the process of self-determination, the burden of establishment of an Arab Palestinian state must come from lands given to these dhimmi Arab refugees by one or more of Arab countries. Dhimmi Arab refugees the burden of repatriating these Arab displaced refugees no Arab or Muslim country has yet to do. Cries about “Apartheid Israel’ bogus propaganda in the face that Israel has given citizenship to ’48 Arabs while no Arab state as agreed to repatriate dhimmi Arab refugee populations. Its really a “put up or shut up” reality.

The slander of ‘tribal fiefdoms’, clearly does not apply to the States of the American Union. Therefore, since no UN Resolution condemns the 1846 seizure of Mexican lands, its has no “international law” precedent to pretend that a new sheriff in town nonsense that minor states do not and cannot apply the same set of “laws” imposed upon them by ‘great power’ nations in the past. Just as the rule: ‘maintain the balance of power in the region’ defined the defunct British empire foreign policy; post Oct 7th 2023 Israel likewise seeks to minimize the influence of European colonialism in its international affairs to shape and influence the balance of power across the Middle East and North Africa.

Just as ‘manifest destiny’ shaped US 19th Century strategic interests post Shoah Israel has its own version of ‘manifest destiny’. The post Shoah establishment of the UN does not unilaterally negate the whole of Human history. This Wilsonian vision of international diplomacy compares to Catholic church dogmatism and the infallibility of the Pope!

Utterly not at all relevant the size of the country of Israel! Or that Israel as an independent country currently confronts hostile neighbors. This latter fig leaf seeks to hide that Israel has treaty relations with Egypt and Jordan! The Assad dictatorship uprooted and destroyed together with the Israeli demand that its troops will occupy Lebanon till the Lebanese Army expels permanently – a possible population transfer of Hezbollah Arabs to Iran. Only Israel through diplomacy and alliances determines its international borders. Foreign state imperialism which unilaterally declares a Palestinian state within East Jerusalem and all Samaria and Gaza – utter nonsense.

A Torah constitutional republic not confused with the Church false messiah lies which have dominated European colonialism with ‘its good news’ convert the world to become “democracies” jargon. Islam, its Nakba Allah god – as dead as JeZeus in Europe. No ‘International Court’ established through a Rome Agreement which invalidates Jewish self-determination “NEVER AGAIN’ to permit Goyim to racially judge their “Jewish problem” post Shoah.

The Torah mitzva of Moshiach stands upon the vision of Yovel liberty, the k’vanna of the wisdom commandment of brit melah which remembers the oaths sworn to the Avot to cause their chosen Cohen seed to inherit the lands of Canaan, in order to dedicate to rule the 12 Tribes of the Republic through משנה תורה Legislative Review of all Tribal statute laws – to rule the Republic with justice which makes fair compensation of damages inflicted by bnai brit upon bnai brit. The UN as false as the JeZeus and Shabbetai Tzvi\Yaacov Frank, Rebbe g’lut Moshiach. Self determination requires restoration of the 12 Tribes within the borders of the Torah Constitutional Republic of States.

Any attempt to pervert Torah into a biblical theological avoda zara an abomination on the Order of Oct 7th 2023! G’lut Reshonim, based upon the horrid barbaric conditions imposed upon them by “Injun Empires”, forced to restrict Torah to theological religious arguments in order to prevent the barbaric church and mosque to permit “their” token Jews to stay for a generation or two within the borders of their lands! G’lut Jews by Talmudic definition cannot pursue justice among our people לשמה. All attempts by outside governments to “preach their international law good news” to Israel qualifies as a Capital Crime of avoda zara if and when Israeli self-determination restores the 3rd Republic. The imperialist argument: “Cost of Isolation” false flat with the United States precedent established in the New World!

No different from framing the revelation of the Torah at Sinai as a “Divine Act”. The Book of D’varim clearly states תורה לא בשמים היא. The righteous pursuit of justice among and between the Cohen national Republic only proves that this Republic an atheist לשמה republic – based upon Cohen Levi Israel division of crops to t’ruma maaser chol. Clearl chol does not mean profane but rather “Israel”. Religious theology shares no common denominator with Constitutional Torah common law legalism. Goyim revisionist history which imported conquered Goyim into the captured Samaria kingdom by Assyria, the Roman renaming of Judea to Palestine, and UN Revisionist history which attempts to equate an never existent Arab Palestinian State with Israel — all stand on the same imperialism by great power states to impose ghetto gulag borders upon hated and despised Jews. Just as a Torah Constitutional Republic bases its lateral common law courts upon prior judicial precedents, Israel demands the same from the post WWII establishment of the UN! Just that simple.

The UN NEVER GRANTED self-determination to Jews in the betrayed British White Paper mandate. UN Resolution 181 recognized Jewish equal rights to achieve self-determination ie the objective of Herzl’s political Zionism. But “granted self-determination to Israel” a gross blood libel comparable to the church blood libel slanders used to justify pogroms and war crime ghetto gulags. From 242 to 2334 which foist the foreign power imperialism styled as “international law” ignores the neutral status of the UN during the ’48 and ’67 attempts to throw the Jews into the Sea! UN actions have consequences no different than how church injustice and war crimes functioned as the basis of the Shoah.

The UN no more “created Israel” any more than the world “created in Six Days”. The latter introduces wisdom commandments which require k’vanna – known as time-oriented commandments. Time-oriented commandments not confused by silly טיפש פשט literalism of words! This primary type of Torah common law separates Torah wisdom from Goyim wisdom akin to פרדס inductive logic day & night different than static syllogism deductive logic. Algebra or Plain geometry poles apart from Calculus and Hyperbolic geometry. Torah judicial common law courts share nothing with statute law decrees issued from UN member states.

By launching a war to “throw the Jews into the sea” in 1948 and rejecting partition, the Arab coalition fundamentally shattered the legal framework of the British Mandate. In common law, if one party repudiates a contract and attempts to murder the other party, they cannot later sue for the enforcement of that same contract’s terms. The United States established its entire continent-wide republic through the expansion of its borders, lateral state trade rights (the Commerce Clause), and the displacement of hostile populations. No international court has ever successfully retroactively invalidated the legal borders of the United States.

By this standard of global precedent, Israel’s demand to secure its frontiers post-October 7th, free from the interference of non-bordering “third-party states” (like European nations or UN voting blocks), a simple straightforward application of the same rules of survival and self-determination used by every major global power in history. Relying on the UN to validate Jewish self-determination – like asking a thief to validate your deed of ownership. True self-determination means rebuilding the internal, lateral legal structures of the Jewish people on their own soil, applying Torah common law to the modern state, and letting the geopolitical chips fall where they may.

“International law” built on State strategic interests. Not State consent, treaties and customary practices. No “international law” built on State strategic interests. Not State consent, treaties and customary practices. Israel did not sign the Rome Treaty which “created” the ICC court! The ICC attempt to void this fact because the PA signed the Rome Treaty compares to Texas or California or New York signing the Rome treaty.  Under the Oslo Accords (specifically the Israeli-Palestinian Interim Agreement), the PA – explicitly denied criminal jurisdiction over Israeli citizens. If the PA never had the legal right to prosecute Israelis under the bilateral agreements that created it, it cannot thereafter delegate a non-existent right to a court in The Hague.

Israel did not win its national Independence only to surrender it to global governance. The UN replacement of the Roman church attempt to internationalize Jerusalem stands on par with the British White Paper/UN Resolution 2334. Torah – never intended as a g’lut “religious text” for private worship. But rather as a Constitution which mandates a Tribal Republic and Sanhedrin Legislative Review of all Tribal statute laws. The g’lut coping mechanism: “religionization” of the Torah address g’lut realities only – the loss of sovereignty, turning a system of governance into a system of belief.

The diplomatic position of the Jewish State – according to ME – :)))

Propaganda: England, France, Russia and the UN proclaim that Israel has the right to self defense. But these imperialist powers support the Arab opinion that Jews do not have the right to self-determination. Proof: Israel won the Nakba wars of 1948 and 1967 yet post ’67 the UN Security Council passed UN 242! Thereafter UN Resolutions 446 and 2334 condemn Israeli illegal settlement of ‘occupied Palestinian territories’. The Roman empire a dead empire. Jews defeated the Nakba Arabs! Israel aint Palestine. The UN attempt to impose the slander of “Occupied Palestinian Territories’, a propaganda lie.

Its not the place of foreign country UN members, many of whom do not even hold diplomatic relations with Israel to impose the name of the Dead Roman empires’ given name to Judea after the defeat of the Bar Kochba revolt in 135 CE. David Ben Gurion named the new Jewish state – Israel. The UN condemned Jordan’s annexation of Samaria as illegal in 1950. Yet the UN after the June 1967 War refers to Samaria by the Jordanian name “West Bank” as occupied Palestinian territory, despite the 1964 PLO Charter which referred only to 1948 Israel as “occupied territory”! Therefore, all post 1967 June War UN Resolutions promote the 1939 White Paper; they seek to restrict where Jews can settle in E. Jerusalem, and Samaria, based upon the blantant lie wherein block voting UN countries pass UN GA 3379 (later repealed), which condemns Israel for its right to achieve self determination in the territories of British mandate Palestine based upon the British separation of Trans-Jordan at the Jordan River; Samaria part of the League of Nations “Palestine Mandated territories” to establish a Jewish National Home based upon the 1917 Balfour Declaration which the 1939 White Paper clearly defrauded and repudiated! Therefore the UN post the June 1967 War have openly rejected the State of Israel’s rights to self-determination within the borders of the League of Nations Palestine mandated territories.

The focus of UN resolutions on post 1967 Nakba Arab defeat, compare to one hand clapping. UN Resolution 446 & 2334 openly condemns Israeli settlements in Samaria & E. Jerusalem as “illegal”. This one sided condemnation denies the equal rights of the Jewish state to self determination. The racist UN imperialism ignores the language of the original League of Nations mandate Palestine when it declares an Arab Palestinian state! Never in all recorded history has there ever existed an Arab Palestinian state. UN revisionist history which condemns Israel for its “illegal occupation of an Arab Palestinian State” – therein denies Israel – the victor of both ’48 and ’67 defensive wars – wherein Arab leaders promised to throw the Jews into the Sea – the UN unilaterally rejects Israel equal rights to achieve self determination within the borders of the original Palestine mandate framed through the language of the League of Nations.

All Arab – Israeli war fought over the steadfast refusal of racist Arab countries who deny that dhimmi Jews have equal rights to achieve self determination within the borders of the League of Nations Palestine Mandated territories. The racist UN revisionist history ignores the cold hard fact that all Arab states rejected UN 181. The League of Nations Mandate did call for a Jewish national home, but it also did not create a sovereign Jewish state with fixed borders. The 1948 first Independence war did not create fixed borders either! The PLO Charter did not condemn in 1964 Jordan’s “west bank” nor Egypts “Gaza”. The Nakba defeat in 1967 Israel ruled the lands specified through the League of Nations and Britain’s Trans-Jordan the international borders of the Jewish state won through war. The language of UN 242 racist presumption that Samaria “occupied territory” – as defined through UN 446 and 2334 proves that the UN racism rejects Israel’s equal rights to achieve self-determination within the borders framed by the League of Nations and the establishment of Trans-Jordan at the border of the Jordan river.

The UN post June War focus upon “the West Bank” as illegal occupied territory – presumes that the UN internationalization of Arab Israeli wars determines the borders of the Jewish state! This racism emphatically compares to the Jim Crow law of American apartheid post WWII which Dr. King and Malcolm X opposed and defeated. The UN does not have any mandate over “Palestine” after David Ben Gurion declared Israeli Independence in 1948. Why? Palestine as a League of Nations mandate territory ceased to exist; no different than when barbarians conquered the Western Roman empire that the Roman name “Palestine” ceased to exist. The UN insistence upon the name “Palestine” seeks to invalidate Jewish self determination which named the State Israel.

The status of Samaria: The UN condemnation of Jordan annexation of their so-called “West Bank”, simply not within the authority of the UN to validate after the Arab Nakba – as disputed territory. The UN does not dispute the post WWII division of Prussia between Russia and Poland. That international diplomacy employs the term “palestine” does not determine the name of the region any more than post the 1846 Mexican American War did Mexico shape or determine the final borders of all the future states which the American army captured. When Jews lost their Bar Kochba revolt against the Romans, Caesar called the region Palestine. Israel crushed the Arab armies in both their Nakba defeats in ’48, and ’67. Attempt to impose revisionist history – a do as I say but not as I do hypocrisy simply invalid and void.

Modern “international law” no more determines the name of the Jewish state as Israel than it does the dead Roman empire name of Palestine. Any outside power which attempts to superimpose a name which Ben Gurion rejected therein despises Jewish equal rights – as defined through the Balfour Declaration – to achieve self determination. The final border map of the Jewish state not determined by some pie in the sky “international law” narishkeit propaganda. Wars and treaties signed by Israel Egypt, Jordan and possibly 27\06\26 Lebanon determine the border of the Jewish state – herein determines Jewish self-determination. No different than Prussia post WWII divided between Poland and Russia.

Israel’s international borders come from negotiated settlements, facts on the ground of military victories, and the UN does not enter into these diplomatic resolutions made between nation states which share a common border. Post ’67 UN decrees attempt to intervene into Israeli strategic interests. UN revisionist history no different than Church revisionist history which proclaims itself as the New Israel! Never in all human history has there, even for a single day, existed a independent Arab Palestinian state. UN voting blocks do not determine Israeli international borders. The Jordanian “West Bank” ceased to exist following the Nakba ’67 Jordanian surrender. Just as the Roman empire collapse terminated the name Palestine. Attempts to restore the Roman empire, such as Czar/Caesar or the Holy Rome Empire in 800CE as dead as the Roman empire itself.

The ‘west bank’ ceased to exist with the Jordanian Nakba defeat just as Constantinople ceased to exist when the Ottomans made Istanbul their Capital. Israel changed the UN condemned Jordanian “west bank” back to Samaria. The territory did not disappear, as as did the Roman empire. Jews rule Samaria not the dead Roman empire. That the UN and most states with an agenda still use “West Bank” means as much to Israeli self determination as Americans voicing opposition to Russian policies in the current Ukraine war!

International recognition of borders, settlements, and the legal framing of the territory compares to the abomination of Chamberlains betrayal of the Czech Republic in 1938 and its puke White Paper in 1939. Munich, a direct great-power handoff of a sovereign state’s territory; the 1939 White Paper, a British policy reversing parts of the Mandate – no different from the UN revisionist history of UN Resolution 446 and 2334. The UN dog chasing its tail Fourth Geneva Convention – Article 49(6) – has nothing to do with the Arab repeated attempts to complete the Nazi genocide of Jews! The UN “law of occupation” follows the Arab racism which emphatically rejects Jews equal rights to achieve self determination in the Middle East.

Just as the UN did not condemn the Allied imposed forced population transfer of native German populations in Prussia, it cannot thereafter pretend that it can impose Article 49(6) upon Israel after the Nakba defeat to throw the Jews into the sea in ’67. Attempts to make revisionist history which pretends that Israel post ’67 and Prussia post WWII must stand upon different scales of judgment — utter and complete narishkeit.

Prussia was a postwar defeat and territorial settlement imposed by the victors; post ’67 the UN imposed a cease fire which prevented Israel doing the same to the Nakba Arabs! All Arab Israeli wars have experience international outside interference. Any attempt to deny this fundamental historic fact constitutes as revisionist history. Israel’s peace with Egypt, Jordan, the Abraham Accords determines its borders. Not imperialistic revisionist history UN GA 3379 narishkeit of UN SC (Chapter VI) declaration which condemn Israeli illegal settlements!

President Trump’s Abraham Accords came in conjunction with Washington recognition of Isrsael’s Capital of Jerusalem in 2017 and recognition of the Golan Heights as Israeli land in 2019! This negated and uprooted UN 2334, in favor of Israel making peace with Arab and Muslim nation states and relegated the dhimmi stateless Arab refugee “1964 Palestinians” as secondary to achieve stability in the Middle East. Post the Oct7th 2023 Abomination War the Trump Gaza Board of Peace excludes Russia, France, Britain, the EU and the UN. Hence the Trump Administration rejects Obama’s UN 2334 just as and equal to Obama treaty with Iran.

Post ’48 Arabs received Israeli citizenship. No Arab country as repatriated its dhimmi Arab Nakba refugees! Who respects the League of Nations Palestine mandate and who despises this mandate? The UN Partition Plan was recommendatory, not binding. UN 446 and 2334 pretend a “binding condemnation of Israel”. Jordan’s 1950 annexation of the West Bank was recognized only by Britain and Pakistan. The 1949 lines were temporary armistice lines, not borders; post Nakba crushing defeat of Allah the dead God in 1967 -became the baseline for later negotiations.

Israel did not give citizenship to post PLO charter Palestinians as given to post ’48 Arabs. It placed the recapture Samarian territories under military law. Attempts to declare military law post PLO terrorism as a “hostile army” revisionist propaganda. Judea and Samaria the heart and soul of the Judean and Israel kingdoms. UN Resolutions (chapter VI) 446 and 2334 employ “occupation” as a moral judgment as if the UN equal the dead Xtian churches in Europe!

Simply not the place of pre-war neutral England and Paris betrayal of their alliance with Israel to later “impose” post Israeli victory the language not “all the territories”. Any more that the SC POPE to declare the settlements have “no legal validity”; the West Bank is “occupied Palestinian territory”. Narishkeit! Never an Arab Palestinian state in all Human history.

Post WWII the Allies transferred some 18 million Germans and transferred Prussia (the heart and soul of the 2nd Germanic empire) to Poland and Russia. The name “Palestine” reintroduced by French mapmakers due to the fact that the “Sick Man of Europe” bankrupt. Post WWI League of Nations dominated by its creaters the allies who won the war. The US did not join the League of Nations because the US Senate refused to ratify Wilson’s treaty obligations.

Just as Italy, Jordan and Pakistan did not exist in antiquity, so too and how much more so Judea the name till the Bar Kochba revolt disaster! Not the place for foreign states to attempt to determine Israeli strategic interests and diplomacy because to do so invalidates Israel’s right to self determination.

The fraud post 1945, the UN Charter prohibit acquiring territory by war. Post WWII Poland Russia and the Czech republic acquired territory through the Nazi defeat. The fraud of “international law” utter propaganda. Israel not a ship floating in the sea of international waters.

Jordanian occupation of Samaria imposed authority of a foreign army according to the UN 1950 condemnation. By 1964 the establishment of the PLO changed the post war ’67 Arab refugee populations into terrorist supporters. Hence Israel did not nationalize ’67 Samaria because it refused to give citizenship to dhimmi Arab refugee terrorists. The post‑1945 norm codified after those Allied decisions seeks to impose one set of rules for great power domination of the Middle East – as if London and Paris won the ’56 War and succeffully seized control of the Suez Canal; and a different set of rules for the peasant States of the Middle East.

The unification of both Italy and Germany post the US Civil War witnessed permanent changes to their international borders post both WWI and WWII. Arab terrorism has its consequences. The fictional post ’64 Palestinians, especially after the Oct 7th 2023 Abomination surprise attack have lost the mandate form heaven. Arab countries have to establish a Palestinian state from within their own borders. Israel catagorically rejects a Palestinian state cut out of the hide of its own rule. Nakba Arab disasters have their consequences. UN biased block voting cannot abra kadabra make these crimes magically disappear and condemn Israel guilty of genocide!

Legally, post Shoah Israelis reject foreign courts to determine European racisim known as “the Jewish problem”. Israel rejected based upon the Torah oath “NEVER AGAIN” not to sign the Rome Treaty. Israel rejects post the White Paper abomination any European imperialism known as “Two-state solution”… divide and conquer. Israel rejects the British division of India and Pakistan. Israel rejects the British division of Iraq and Kuwait. Israel rejects the post war Allied division of Korea and Vietnam. Foreign states do not determine the legality of Israeli strategic interests any more than does the UN determine the strategic interests of the two great power the US or Russia.

Post the Bar Kochba disaster Rome imposed collective punishment upon the Jewish survivors. Post the Oct7th Abomination Nakba victory over Hamas, Hezbollah, Assad, and the Mullahs of Iran the victors dictate the terms of unconditional surrender not the wanna be European 2nd rate powers who lost their attempt to dominate the balance of power across the Middle East when they failed to seize control of the Suez Canal in 1956; had they won that war – the UN would have become mute because of their veto in the Security Council.

The argument that civilians are not responsible for terrorism as flat chested as a grown woman wearing a AA bra! Gazans elected Hamas and rejoiced handing out candy and sweets immediately after Oct 7th. The US bombed civilian populations in Dresden and Tokyo and dropped two atomic bombs when Japanese civilian populations had nothing to do with the Pearl Harbor surprise attack on Dec7th 1941. Millions of Germans lived in Prussia and the Czech Republic for generations, what’s good for the goose good for the gander. The Arab ’48, and ’67 – throw the Jews into the Sea = total war. Actions have their consequences. Revisionist history just a bald face lie. Post 1964 Palestinian political opportunism cannot come at the cost of Jewish self-determination and repeated Arab Nakba defeats.

Post WWII Germans in Prussia – the heart of the 2nd Germanic empire prior to their WWI defeat their civillian did in point of fact lost their legal status as civilians. Just as foreign states do not determine the borders of Israel while sitting in the UN so too and how much more so international law does not compare to the BC AD mythology of the Xtian churches!

Time for Israel to conduct diplomacy originally established between Italian city-states rather than the post Shoah UN puke international law/Universal God.

Classic Italian city-State diplomacy in no wise resembled “league of nations” or a universal moral authority to guarantee its existence. Security maintained and upheld through shifting alliances, military deterrence, and the creation of hard facts on the ground. The Italian states constantly fought to keep external empires (the French, the Holy Roman Empire) from dictating their internal borders.

Post ’67 European interventions, expressed through the UN placing or removing its troops at a whim like as happened prior to the amazing Israel victory. Specifically 242,338,446,2334 resemble the 1939 White Paper which called for the establishment of a Palestinian state in 10 years following the war. Viewed from a geopolitical and historical standpoint, both the 1939 White Paper and the lineage of UNSC resolutions (242, 338, 446, 2334) incest screwing cousins; same DNA, different generation.! Elite-driven “great powers” attempt to dominate the balance of power in the Middle East – like France and Britain did when both Capitals attempted to seize control of the Suez Canal in 1956.

The MacDonald White Paper – a disgusting throw the Jews under the bus betrayal, which gang banged the Balfour Declaration and directly contributed to FDR’s similar war-time closure of US borders to Jewish refugee populations condemned to brutal torture and death. None of the Allied victors ever once made the slightest attempt to bomb the rail lines leading to the death camps. Furthermore, the UN never tried Poop Eugenio Pacelli for war crimes. The Vatican did not denounce the slaughter of Rome’s Jews, did not publicly denounce the pogroms and death camps, made alliance with Nazi Germany like as did the Protestant Lutheran church! Post war the rat-lines to hide Nazi war-criminals from justice and the pogroms in Poland. The buck of responsibility stops with the Pope and the heads of Protestant churches – all of whom remained silent throughout the war.

Post‑1967, the UN–European apparatus becomes the new pulpit of religious fanaticism. This new church preaches “international law”, imposing two-state solutions which always fail: India\Pakistan, the two Koreas, the two Vietnams etc. The UN treats the “original sin” of Israel/small satan defined as Jewish sovereignty beyond the Green Line! NEVER AGAIN rejects that Europe decides what is “legal” for their inherited racial insanity which Europe calls “their Jewish problem” that requires a European “Final Solution”.

David Ben Gurion declared war against London following the White Paper abomination. The Irgun and Lehi together with the Haganah forced the British to return their League Palestine mandate back to the UN. Palestine ceased to exist in 1948. Goyim in far away lands do not determine the name of the Jewish state. Israel not a Protectorate of the UN not today not ever. Goyim do not possess any “international law” to limit Jewish sovereignty over our ancestral homelands. Jews not the poodle on a leashe, not of Europe nor of Arabs.

White Paper land restrictions directly resemble to “illegal occupied territory” despite the cold hard fact that the PLO 1964 Charter only condemned ’48 Israel as “occupied territory”! The White Paper 10-Year Independent State: It explicitly envisioned the creation of a Arab-majority independent Arab Palestinian state within ten years, entirely subverting the goal of Jewish self-determination. All Arab-Israeli wars fought over the Arab rejection that dhimmi Jews have the right to self-determination.

UNR 242 introduced the formula of “land for peace” and the “inadmissibility of the acquisition of territory by war.” Despite Prussia being carved up and divided between the Soviets and Poland! British illegal settlements in North Ireland; Frances seizure post WWI of Alyse Lorraine from the Germans. Just as the 1939 White Paper attempted to freeze the borders of Jewish growth pre-WWII, 242 utilized by international powers to establish that the 1949 Armistice Lines (the Green Line) as the absolute legal ceiling of Jewish territorial sovereignty.

Resolution 446 (1979): Explicitly declared that Israel’s policy of establishing settlements in the Palestinian and other Arab territories occupied since 1967 has “no legal validity” and constitutes a serious obstruction to achieving a comprehensive peace. This resolution “assumes” the existence of a Palestinian state which later the UN GA and SC resolutions, akin to a whore in church, without shame publicly declared; as if a UN declaration establishes international law! This directly mirrors the land-purchase restrictions of the 1939 White Paper. Where the British said Jews could not buy land in Zone A or B of the Mandate.

UN 2334 declares that any Jewish presence beyond the 1949 lines – a violation of international law. The underlying philosophy of foreign interventionism-imperialism becomes as clear as the Sun on a cloudless summer day! (1) The underlying philosophy of foreign interventionism becomes obvious to all who have any objectivity. The imposition of a two-state solution based strictly on the 1947/1949 paradigms. European-backed UN apparatus acting under the guise of international law. Just as the Jewish underground movements (Irgun, Lehi, and eventually the Haganah) realized after 1939 that British imperial law was an existential threat to survival—leading to a revolt against the Mandatory power—the post-1967 reality forced a similar realization regarding Catholic/UN dogmas.

The international community’s insistence on treating the 1949 armistice lines as permanent borders functions exactly like the 1939 White Paper: an attempt by external global empires (then Britain, now the Western/UN bloc) to manage a indigenous conflict by placing an artificial ceiling on Jewish sovereignty. Independent Jewish sovereignty – not on probation anymore. The problem of dhimmi Arab refugees – not an Israeli problem. Israel gave citizenship to its Arab minority population. Not a single Arab or Muslim country has ever intergrated dhimmi Arab refugee populations and extended citizenship to them. The Oct 7th Gaza refugee crisis serves as check-mate proof to this fact.

By keeping these dhimmi Arab refugee populations in a permanent state of statelessness inside generational refugee camps, the regional powers and the UN created a self-perpetuating demographic weapon. The October 7th crisis and its aftermath underscore that the refusal of regional neighbors to integrate these populations – not a failure of logistics – but a deliberate geopolitical strategy designed to maintain an unresolved existential challenge to Jewish sovereignty.

Putting the current Iran war into context … Iran’s war today – not an isolated eruption; but the latest phase of a century‑long struggle over Jewish sovereignty in the Middle East. Zionism, not a romantic project; but rather a response to existential threat repeatedly exposed by church and mosque inherited racial criminal insanity. The UN today continues this tradition where external powers have long repeatedly attempted to engineer the demographic and political fate of Jews. Iran adopts and amplifies this narrative, positioning itself as the champion of “resistance” to Zionism. Tehran’s ideology fuses Shi’a revolutionary theology with the older Arab rejectionist line: Israel is a colonial imposition that must be undone. After the fall of Nasserism and the decline of pan‑Arabism, the Islamic Republic of Iran positioned itself as the central patron of anti‑Israel forces.

Theodor Herzl wrote in “Der Judenstaat”: “The Jewish question is a national question, and to solve it we must establish a home for the Jewish people.” … Jews have equal rights to achieve self determination in our own country. To do this Jews must partner with a great power who likewise endorse a Jewish state…”We shall need the patronage of a great power; and if we can secure that, we can realize our purpose. We must therefore appeal to the great powers of the world, and we must address ourselves to the Jewish question in these terms.”

The White Paper explicitly framed its goal as preventing Palestine from becoming a Jewish state and ensuring an Arab majority in any independent Palestine that would emerge post war. Its deliberate restrictions on Jewish immigration to mandate Palestine, based upon the European racism which directly and indirectly contributed to the slaughter of 75% of Western European Jewry proves Herzl’s estimation of Europe’s racial insanity toward Jews. The Iran–Israel war, to state it plainly: not new. Rather, simply the modern extension of the same struggle over Jewish self‑determination that Herzl identified in the 1890s and that the region has fought over ever since.

Chamberlain’s White Paper serves as the basis for the European attempt to declare and validate a Palestinian state today; the White Paper explicitly stated this goal: “the establishment within 10 years of an independent Palestine State”. London favored the establishment of an Arab majority, which would rule Palestine; Chamberlain repeated the Czech betrayal, and limited Jewish immigration capped at 75,000 over five years (April 1939–April 1944) and further immigration requiring Arab consent.

The White Paper’s restrictions deliberately imposed – at the moment when Nazi Germany and fascist Europe were carrying out the systematic murder of approximately six million Jews (75 % of Western European Jewry). The paper was issued while the Shoah – already under way, and while Britain itself – still neutral in the European war against the Jews. Its framers chose to freeze Jewish immigration at a level that would prevent the Jewish population from ever reaching majority status in a future independent Palestine.

The policy was rooted in the same 19th–20th-century European political and demographic anxieties that had already produced racial antisemitism (the “Jewish Question” as a perceived racial/cultural threat). The White Paper’s language of “absorptive capacity,” “economic conditions,” and constitutional guarantees of Arab majority rule echoed the same underlying worldview that had justified pogroms, expulsions, and later the Nuremberg Laws. It was not a sudden invention of the 1930s; it was the logical culmination of the Mandate’s earlier pro-immigration framework having produced the very demographic shift the White Paper now blocked. Herzl’s entire project rested on the recognition that European societies were racially and culturally “insane” toward Jews; Zionism represents his prescription for a rational exit from that European-Shoah-guilt insanity.

The post ’48 Nakba narrative, not a neutral “national trauma story”. Nakba bemoaned the Arab failed war of annihilation to destroy the Jewish community in the territory of the defunct British mandate. The term “Palestine” reintroduced consequent to the ‘Sick Man of Europe’s’ economic bankruptcy, did Sultans hire cheaper French cartographers in the 18th Century; that European ‘great power’ reintroduced Palestine upon Ottoman maps of the Middle East. Prior to that time no Ottoman map listed “Greater Syria” as Palestine nor Istanbul as Constantinople.

After the Battle of Yarmouk (636 CE) Arab forces defeated the Byzantine field army and took control of much of the Levant. The territory became part of the rapidly expanding Rashidun (and later Umayyad) Caliphate and administered as the Jund Dimashq, Jund Filastin, Jund al-Urdunn; “wilāya/walayāt” (provinces), a separate term used in different periods. Jund al-Urdunn: first instituted under the Rashidun Caliphate (reorganization under Caliph ʿUmar, c. 639). Jund Filastin: organized soon after the Muslim conquest in the 630s — established during the Rashidun period and continued under the Umayyads. Jund Dimashq: likewise created during the early (Rashidun) reorganizations after the conquest and continued under the Umayyad administration. Modern scholarly syntheses conclude the ajnad framework – established by the Rashidun reorganization (traditionally attributed to ʿUmar c. 18 AH / 639 CE) and consolidated under the Umayyads. Modern scholarly syntheses conclude the ajnad framework – established by the Rashidun reorganization and consolidated under the Umayyads.

Throughout the years of the British colonial-mandate, Arabs fundamentally rejected the Balfour Declaration to establish a Jewish national home in Palestine. The post ’48 Nakba narrative, not a neutral “national trauma story”. Nakba bemoaned the Arab failed war of annihilation to destroy the Jewish community in the territory of the defunct British colonial-mandate. No great power Ottoman map listed “Greater Syria” as Palestine nor Istanbul as Constantinople.

Throughout the years of the British mandate, Arabs fundamentally rejected the Balfour Declaration to establish a Jewish national home in Palestine. Nakba – not “we lost our homes” but “we lost the war which we launched to prevent Jewish self-determination in Palestine. Nakba not free-floating “national trauma” as UNWRA propaganda depicts.

Historically there exists a regional concept of Filastin in early Islamic and later periods. But never sovereign Arab “Palestinian nation-state” as UN propaganda votes which condemn Israeli violations of “international law” harp and sing as if the UN exists as a heavenly voice. European cartography re‑standardized “Palestine” as a territorial label, which later became the basis for post ’67 UN fart: which bemoans the crimes of Israeli “occupied territories”. While its Resolution 3379 ignores the PLO Charter of ’64 which denounces only ’48 Israel as “occupied territories”.

Herzl stated that the Jewish question – fundamentally a national one. He advocated for a homeland, based upon the inherited European racism; that only through Jewish self-determination can Jew overcome racial inherited European hatred.

He emphasized that achieving this goal requires the support of a great power. The term “Palestine” – reintroduced on Ottoman maps due to changes in regional governance and economic Ottoman bankruptcy, Ben Gurion rejected when he named the new nation Israel. Prior to WWI, the region – commonly referred to in the context of “Greater Syria” without the designation of “Palestine.” This change reflects the evolving geopolitical landscape of this region.

Throughout the British Mandate period, Arab opposition to the Balfour Declaration highlighted a rejection of the notion of a Jewish homeland, arguing that their struggle emphatically fought against Jewish self-determination. Therefore the term Nakba – not simply characterized through the UN propaganda distortion as – simply as a loss of homes. Rather, the fallout consequences of a failed war; specifically aimed at preventing Jewish self-determination. These facts fundamentally reject UN attempts to inject revisionist history which fundamentally denies the right of Israel as a nation state to determine its own international borders with other Arab states, specifically with Egypt, Jordan, Syria, and Lebanon.

European permanent Security Council members repeatedly publicly declare: “That Israel has the right to self defense”. But they equally declare that the UN has the right to declare a “Palestinian State”; which they demand come from East Jerusalem, Samaria, and Gaza. Neither the Security Council members nor the General Assembly states possess the might of “international law” – despite their obtuse propaganda otherwise – to determine the borders of the Jewish State nor create the borders of a Palestinian state. Wars throughout history, Poland for example, shape and determine the borders of nation-states.

Consequent to the Bar Kochba Revolt (132-136 CE) the Romans forcibly expelled Jews from Judea and renamed the conquered territory Palaestina, a term derived from “Philistine” – to permanently destroy the Jewish nation state of Judea; which achieved national Independence celebrated and remembered through the mitzva of lighting the Hanukkah lights. The consequence of this Jewish defeat – Jews endured a stateless refugee status till post Shoah! Today Arab refugees who fled from Judea, and Arab refugee populations captured by the IDF post ’67, no different from post Bar Kochba Jews.

UN resolutions simply political, not some pie in the sky divine law decreed from Mt. Olympus. No GA vote or SC statement has the inherent power to fix Israel’s borders or magically conjure a Palestinian state. Attempts to do so, they directly compare to UN GA Resolution 3379 or UN SC Resolution 2334. UN moral theater does not determine the international borders of the Jewish State of Israel. The UN did not “create” Israel. Israel like the American Revolution won its national Independence against colonial British imperialism and French pre-’67 perfidy – through war. Attempts by the UN to recognize a “Palestinian State” simply the hallow echo chamber of Rome renaming Judea Palaestina.

Herzl’s answer to the Jewish question—a sovereign Jewish state backed by great‑power recognition—remains a legitimate national solution. Arab rejection of that solution, the 1948 war, the Nakba narrative, and all of subsequent UN/European condemnations which denounce Israel’s illegal occupation of Palestine. Such stinking backside noise directly smells like long, sophisticated UN attempt to undo Herzl’s solution; to re‑cast a war against Jewish self‑determination as pure victimhood, to retro‑invent a sovereign “Palestine” that never existed, and to deny Israel the same right every other nation has had—to let history, war, and nation-states treaty agreements determine its borders. Not by external powers repeating Rome’s old trick with new legal language, and pretending that Palestine as a UN Protectorate territory ceased to exist in 1948 – which categorizes the backside stench made by both the ICJ and the ICC.

Zionism a response to pogroms, exclusion, and the collapse of Jewish emancipation in Europe; a legitimate national movement grounded in Herzl’s analysis of Jewish self‑determination and inherited Goyim racism. “Palestine” as a sovereign Arab nation-state never existed. European cartographers standardized the term “Palestine” in the 18th-19th centuries which reflected European great power interests which later carved up the Ottoman empire between England and France. Despite Arab sources Filastin, never a sovereign Palestinian state ever in Arab and Muslim history. The Nakba narrative today stands as a politically constructed propaganda; no UN resolutions can dictate Israel’s borders or undo the outcome of any Israeli war victory – fought since the Independence war.

During colonial British mandate the 1936–39 Arab Revolt fought explicitly against the establishment of any Zionist-entity in colonial British Palestine. The popular Arab propaganda of Nakba today – simply propaganda lies – it fails to acknowledge the some 850,000 Jewish refugees forcibly expelled from all Arab countries after the Arab Nakba defeat in 1948. This UN propaganda which routinely catagorically slanders 3379 Israel – pretends that Chapter VI recommendations = to Chapter VII ultimatums like issued to North Korea.

The Israeli 1949 Armistice lines shaped by war, not by UN fiat. The push for a Palestinian state is political, not legal. The propaganda which condemns Israel breaking “international law” simple a fart and nothing more. The UN aint the Pope. Post Shoah the UN failed to try Pius XII for war crimes which include the post war rat-lines and pogroms in Catholic Poland. Furthermore the church criminal slanders which culminated in the Shoah totally undermine the church and the UN as vicar from heaven moral authorities.

The modern “Palestinian national identity” is a result of 20th-century political developments, particularly in response to Zionism and British rule. While not a pre-1948 sovereign state, the Arab population in the region developed a distinct national consciousness. Most international bodies and historians view the current conflict not as a fight over a lost ancient state, but as a clash between two national movements (Zionism and Palestinian nationalism) over the same land.

The problem with this smelly revisionist history, Arabs lost their repeated attempts to throw the Jews into the Sea. Actions have their consequences. The repeated Arab defeats to duplicate the ways of Hitler, Chamberlain and Pius XII definitively proves that Arafat’s ’64 PLO “Balestinians”, never merited the “mandate from heaven” to rule as an Independent nation – not in past Arab/Muslim Ages nor today. Just as Jews post Bar Kochba lost our national Independence following that disastrous “Nakba” defeat; how much more so Arab refugees who never ruled Muslim Ottoman Greater Syria as an independence nation – post ’48 lost all claims to self determination claims. No different than post WWI & WWII Germany who lost all claims to Prussia as Germanic self determination.

The attempt repeatedly made by post ’67 UN Resolutions (242, 338, 446, 2334) to make a טיפש פשט limitation to “the conflict as indeed a clash between two nationalist movements” what an utter farce! Iran some 1000 miles distant from Israel. Hezbollah Shiites in Lebanon have no connection what so ever with Arab Sunni refugee populations within the borders of the Jewish State. Post Shoah “NEVER AGAIN”, means that mentally deranged racists shall never again decide for the Jews their racist versions of their “FINAL SOLUTIONS”.

For nearly 2,000 years of exile (since the destruction of the Second Temple in 70 CE), this phrase L’shanah haba’ah b’Yerushalayim, spoken by Jews in every corner of the globe, from Spain to Persia to the Americas. It served as a constant reminder that the Jewish people had not abandoned their claim to the land, nor had they assimilated into the lands where they lived as minorities. The fact that this prayer survived the horrors of g’lut and recited every Pesach by millions who had never seen the city, proof that Jews never surrendered our Torah oath brit inheritance, which explicitly excluded both Yishmael and Esav. The 1948 establishment of the State of Israel and the reunification of Jerusalem in 1967, viewed by Jews as the historical fulfillment of this centuries-old Torah brit oath.

The post war Israeli victory starting in ’48 … after the fact couch potato quarterbacks … they do not determine Israeli identity. Britain returned the mandate after the Irgun blew up British headquarters in the King David Hotel. France lost WWII and thereafter its colonial empire in both Vietnam and Algeria disintegrated. The De Gaulle reversal of the French military alliance, just prior to the expected Nasser obliteration of the Jewish state definitively proved Herzl’s analysis as correct.

Trump 1.0 Abraham Accords rejects as hog-wash the notion of clash between two national movements with deep historical roots, both claiming legitimacy over the same land. Israeli strategic foreign policy seeks to integrate Israel into the community of nations of the Middle East and North Africa. Arab refugee populations and the failure of Arab and Muslim state to repatriate their refugee populations – an Arab/Muslim problem NOT an Israeli problem. Israel eventually gave ’48 Arabs Israeli citizenship. UN Resolution 194 does not apply across the board to as yet unfought Arab Israeli wars like 1967! That PA criticized the Accords does not amount to squat; that treaty cut with nation states and not minority populations scattered across the Planet Earth.

America First – to prevent Chinese blackmail over Rare Earth minerals – Trump horse trading skills and his permanent heading of the Gaza Peace Board.

Zionism means Jewish self‑determination — not UN tutelage. After Oct 7, Israel will not outsource its security to the same international system that failed the Jewish people for a century. A Trump‑aligned, Abraham‑Accords‑based Gaza Peace Board restores regional agency, prioritizes demilitarization, and ends the fiction that Gaza reconstruction must be supervised by institutions that have proven morally compromised and operationally ineffective.

The Gaza Peace Board: a lean, security‑first, regionally controlled implementation mechanism created to replace UN systems judged morally compromised, operationally ineffective, and politically biased.  This foundation expands Trump‑era Abraham Accords architecture which binds regional partners to Israeli security and reconstruction priorities.

Why & how the Gaza Peace Board replaces UN failed multilateralism. The Trump Gaza Peace Board serves as the foundation for Trump 2.0 Avraham Accords. A lean, security‑focused, regionally controlled implementation mechanism that prioritizes rapid reconstruction, verifiable demilitarization, and operational control of Gaza. While managing — not inviting — formal UN/European authority. European imperial and mandate legacies remembered; who can forget the White Paper of both Churchill and later Chamberlain? How much more so the post war UN SC Resolutions 242, 338, 446, 2334 which equal in repugnance to UN 3379 racism. England and France cannot in all Pope-like piousness declare their “neutrality” before the war and thereafter attempt to impose a rejected 181 Two State Solution after the Arab total defeat in 1967.

UN bodies consistently treat Gaza and Jordan’s UN 1950 condemned “West Bank” as “occupied Palestinian territory. Despite the cold hard fact which rejects this UN Revisionist history – the 1964 PLO Charter condemned only ’48 Israel as “occupied territory”. This UN over-reach serves as permanent proof why Israel rejects UN or European participation in the Gaza Peace Board.

Israel argues that France/UK lack moral standing and push preconceived narratives that frustrate Israeli security priorities. Israel’s rationale for viewing British/French/Russian/UN involvement as biased/failing primarily due to their arrogance. Therefore Israel favors the Gaza Peace Board as a key tool to publicize that the Jewish state not a UN Protectorate and that Palestine ceased to exist back in 1948.

Perceived historical bias: Longstanding memories of European imperial intervention and post‑mandate diplomacy fuel belief that European states push narratives inimical to Israeli security and sovereignty. Repeated UN‑mandated missions (UNRWA, UNIFIL, UNSC resolutions) utterly and totally ineffective at preventing militant rearmament or operational complicity. UN Resolution 1060 which unilaterally collapsed the second Nasser commanded “OUT”. The Red Cross never once visited stolen Israeli hostages in the entire two year + period of the Gaza Abomination War. EU/UK legal‑diplomatic tools (resolutions, funding conditionality, ICC referrals) pretense of a viable Palestinian state, such ineffective rhetoric failed to prevent militant rearmament or operational complicity; viewed as politicized instruments that constrain Israeli security options.

Russia’s UN role viewed as opportunistic (veto diplomacy, influence‑seeking), undermining coherent enforcement. UN mechanisms function on voting blocks which exclude Israel; or as attempts by the despised European arrogance which assumes that it operates as a Great Power determinator of the balance of power in the region – when it emphatically does not. France lost WWII. Britain ceased to exist as a player in the region after it returned the 1922 League of Nations mandate back to the UN prior to Israel’s total defeat of 5 to 7 Arab Armies – in 1948 and repeated again in 1967.

UN Special Rapporteurs argue the pretense that the Gaza reconstruction must be Palestinian-led, as if Palestine exists as an independent state rather than a post 1964 PLO terrorist platform. The UN condemns Israel for Gaza’s destruction after the Oct 7th UNWRA Hamas Islamic Jihad slaughter of over 1200 Israelis. That self-determination equally applies to Arab refugee populations AFTER two failed wars to complete the Nazi Shoah and throw the Jews into the Sea. The UN pretense that it determines the borders of Israel and its Capital as false as Palestine exists as a nation.

Just as Jewish self-determination collapsed after the Bar Kochba revolt in 135CE for 2000+ years, so too post the Israeli unilateral withdraw from Gaza in 2005 followed by repeated revolts by the elected Hamas government of Gaza results in the loss of Arab refugee self-determination within the borders of the post 1967 Jewish state together with its recaptured territories.

Post Oct7th 2023 the UN imperialism expressed through the ICJ genocide slander followed by the Brussels ICC pretense that recognizes a Palestinian state and therefore unilaterally presumes that it has jurisdiction in Samaria and Gaza have removed both courts as treif – especially after the Shoah where no European court forced Pious XII to stand trial for complicity in Nazi War Crimes. And the Israeli oath: “NEVER AGAIN”. Herzl identified European anti Jewish racism as incurable. The only Jewish response to this treif racism known as “the Jewish Problem”, or among Arab countries as “dhimmi”, for Jews to establish the Yoval freedom of ruling own homeland, and establishing our own courts of justice. Herein defines Zionism today.

Yo Bartov you got genocide on the brain.

Revisionist history has a old bastard pedigree. From the NT to the Koran to Arafat Philistine Palestinians. Evil people love to employ lies and slander to govern the masses – classic Greek rhetoric.


Chag Shevuoth 46th day of the Omer – struggling to remove tuma middot from within the Yatzir Ha’Ra of the hearts of my people. The counting of the Omer accomplished through the שם מ”ב and the Divine soul Name האל, initially dedicated when we burn the חמץ prior to Pesach; but culminates upon the dedication of the soul Name האל upon Chag Shevuath – tefillah a matter of dedication of tohor middot within the heart – תורה לא בשמים הוא. Torah scholarship distinguishes the רוח הקודש thirteen middot Spirits “pronouns” of the 1st Commandment לא בשמים הוא Name which breathes the spirit of life into the chosen Cohen people whenever we do wisdom commandments known as time-oriented mitzvot; which Moshe Rabbeinu heard orally at Horev. As contrasted by the much later rabbinic פרדס inductive logic which relies upon warp/weft middot: the 7 Yovel middot, 10 judicial justice middot, and 13 pursuit of righteousness middot – halacha thread vs. the 32 Aggadic middot – woven into the halachic precedents which the Amoraim sages brought to interpret the language of some specific Home Mishna – which the Gemara views from different fixed “witness” perspectives. Jewish common law a courtroom legalism. As opposed and contrasted by Greek and Roman fiat statute law (cult of personality) legislative decrees, issued by authorities on High – as if from Heaven itself. Later such ‘Royal Fiat’ called the ‘Divine Right of Kings’, which the Magna Carta originally challenged and the American and French revolutions permanently uprooted.

Contrast revisionist history, which as a hard rule, behaves like a pig; that presents its cloven feet, and declares itself kosher. A more specific example: the public display of a bastard pedigree, presented through the ‘Son of God’ metaphor. From the NT to the Koran to Arafat Philistine Palestinians – Evil power hungry people love to employ lies and slander to govern the clueless masses – herein defines classic Greek rhetoric. The Romans developed Greek rhetoric by maintaining cheap bread prices in Rome to conceal the corruption and debauchery of the court of Caesar!

No serious historian says “the United States was created in 1776,” because nations – founded, declared, or achieve independence, not “created” as if by divine fiat mythology; akin to Romans sucking the tits of a mamma wolf. [Nakba: the humiliation of failing to stop the creation of Israel] False. God creates. Israel won its national independence by winning a war. France in 1789 established as their Constitution ‘The Rights of Man’. The ensuing general European wars that followed express the rejection of Monarchy governments to the revolutionary French democracy. The modern state of Greece likewise defeated the Ottoman Turks, as likewise did Muhammad Ali of Egypt! India had developed vibrant economy, until British imperialism raped that land; all the while – employing the rhetoric of calling conquered India – the Crown Jewel of the British empire! To state otherwise = revisionist history.

[The collapse of Arab political society] False; never in all Human history a Palestinian state. Arabs who fled League Mandated territories labelled “Palestine”, followed by the loss of the war which 5 to 7 Arab states started, has consequences. Once these refugees – who never embraced the British Palestine Mandate throughout 1923 to 1948 – fled, they lost all claims to 1948 Israel. The PLO 1964 Charter states openly that only ’48 Israel “occupied territory”. Later post ’67 attempts by the UN Security Council to pass off the illegal Jordanian West Bank as the legitimate lands of a Palestinian state – likewise revisionist history. In 1950 only England and Pakistan validated the Jordanian nationalization “West Bank” as part of Trans-Jordan “East Bank”; all other UN members condemned Jordans annexation of Samaria as illegal. Post ’67 UN fiat decrees like 242, 338, 446, 2334 etc promote the abracadabra rhetoric that the “West Bank” “illegal occupied territory”. England severed Trans-Jordan from its Palestine Mandated territories at the Jordan river in 1923.

Arab propaganda which compares “the Zionist entity” to Mideaval Chrusader states – another utter distortion of facts and history. [Later dominant Palestinian meaning (especially post‑1960s)] Imposing later revisionist history conclusions upon earlier historical facts – utterly false. Nakba for it to apply to Arab refugees must equally apply to the greater number of Jewish refugees expelled from almost all Arab countries in 1948. Arab revisionist propaganda does NOT extend Nakba to Jewish ’48 refugees. Therefore post-1960s a blagard-lie to foist Nakba upon post defeat Arab refugee populations. If for no other reason that such propaganda conceals the even greater disgraces perpetuated by UNWRA and all Arab states – which promotes the bait & switch Nakba onto Arab refugees and conceals the failure of all Arab states to repatriate their refugee populations!

Kapo Israeli revisionist historians – a curse of the ערב רב since Israelites left Egypt. My question centers upon Omer Bartov, why this man accepts patent Arab propaganda as anything other than a bald faced lie? Bartov’s reasoning is not theological, not Zionist, and not rooted in the political history of the Mandate. His entire intellectual world comes from genocide studies, ethnic violence, and comparative nationalism.

Bartov attempts to compare the Arab attempt to throw the Jews into the Sea in 1948 and again later in 1967 with the blagard-slander of ‘Zionist Ethnic cleansing’! Such false comparisons to Galicia, Volhynia, the Balkans, Anatolia, Rwanda, Bosnia – actual autrocities of ‘Ethnic cleansing’ – to the post ’48 plight of Arab refugees amounts to political porn. Why?

Israel openly accepted the Peel Commission of 1936 which contributed to the British sponsored UN 181, where two-thirds of all UN member states recognized Jews equal rights to achieve self determination as originally envisioned by the Balfour Declaration\Palestine mandate of 1922. Compound the fact, the declared Arab intent to complete the Nazi genocide of Jews permanently removes any and all comparison, made by Bartov with these distant other Goyim massacres of Goyim. Proof for this fact: Israel gave Israeli citizenship to ’48 Arabs. No Arab state has ever repatriated the ’48 and later ’67 Arab refugee populations.

Bartov reaches conclusions based upon shallow superficial reactionary comparisons; akin to the ICJ condemnation of Israel for war crimes post the Oct 7th 2023 slaughter of some 1200 Israelis perpetuated by Hamas, Islamic Jihad, and UNWRA criminals. His emotional empathetic reactions to Arab displaced refugees taken completely out of context to larger Jewish displaced refugee populations during the same period of time! One hand clapping produces only the lies of sound. ’48 Arab refugees never existed in the fabled numbers of “hundreds of thousands”! This UNWRA revisionist history utterly false. A lie equal to, the UN false pretense of a permanent Palestine Mandate – to this very day! Had the Arabs won their war of extermination how would Bartov frame that as “history”? Post war ’48 Arabs did NOT experience “ethnic cleansing”. That’s a blood libel host desecration Jews poisoned the wells lie. Such a lie, compares to condemning the US dropping bombs on Tokyo for the ‘war crime’ of Japan’s surprise attack on Pearl Harbor!

Bartov looks at 1948 almost only through the lens of “what happened to Arafat’s Pie in the Sky ‘Palestinians’,” and not “what the ’48 war exposed”. Arab states steadfast rejection that dhimmi Jews have equal rights to achieve self-determination in their own homeland! This Arab revisionist history lie. stands upon the foundation of the Koran itself; which about 2000 years after the revelation of the Torah at Sinai, its false prophet Muhammad fundamentally rejected; the Koran declares that Jews lied and replaced Yitzak for Yishmael at the Akadah; Arabs lie straight from their mothers’ milk! Benny Morris, Yoav Gelber, Anita Shapira – the burden rests upon them to prove that “several hundred thousand Arab refugees” in 1948 some how created out of the blue hocus pocus witchcraft!

More Jewish villages depopulated in Arab countries than Arab villages depopulated on orders from their own military leadership! Bartov’s shallow reactionary one-hand clapping bs duplicates to thousands of years after the fact NT and Koran revisionist substitute history/theology. His historical analysis compares to Stalin’s expunging the contributions of Leon Troskii in order to seize the helm of Lenin’s ‘Dictatorship of the Proletariat’.