Classic Italian city-State diplomacy in no wise resembled “league of nations” or a universal moral authority to guarantee its existence. Security maintained and upheld through shifting alliances, military deterrence, and the creation of hard facts on the ground. The Italian states constantly fought to keep external empires (the French, the Holy Roman Empire) from dictating their internal borders.

Post ’67 European interventions, expressed through the UN placing or removing its troops at a whim like as happened prior to the amazing Israel victory. Specifically 242,338,446,2334 resemble the 1939 White Paper which called for the establishment of a Palestinian state in 10 years following the war. Viewed from a geopolitical and historical standpoint, both the 1939 White Paper and the lineage of UNSC resolutions (242, 338, 446, 2334) incest screwing cousins; same DNA, different generation.! Elite-driven “great powers” attempt to dominate the balance of power in the Middle East – like France and Britain did when both Capitals attempted to seize control of the Suez Canal in 1956.

The MacDonald White Paper – a disgusting throw the Jews under the bus betrayal, which gang banged the Balfour Declaration and directly contributed to FDR’s similar war-time closure of US borders to Jewish refugee populations condemned to brutal torture and death. None of the Allied victors ever once made the slightest attempt to bomb the rail lines leading to the death camps. Furthermore, the UN never tried Poop Eugenio Pacelli for war crimes. The Vatican did not denounce the slaughter of Rome’s Jews, did not publicly denounce the pogroms and death camps, made alliance with Nazi Germany like as did the Protestant Lutheran church! Post war the rat-lines to hide Nazi war-criminals from justice and the pogroms in Poland. The buck of responsibility stops with the Pope and the heads of Protestant churches – all of whom remained silent throughout the war.

Post‑1967, the UN–European apparatus becomes the new pulpit of religious fanaticism. This new church preaches “international law”, imposing two-state solutions which always fail: India\Pakistan, the two Koreas, the two Vietnams etc. The UN treats the “original sin” of Israel/small satan defined as Jewish sovereignty beyond the Green Line! NEVER AGAIN rejects that Europe decides what is “legal” for their inherited racial insanity which Europe calls “their Jewish problem” that requires a European “Final Solution”.

David Ben Gurion declared war against London following the White Paper abomination. The Irgun and Lehi together with the Haganah forced the British to return their League Palestine mandate back to the UN. Palestine ceased to exist in 1948. Goyim in far away lands do not determine the name of the Jewish state. Israel not a Protectorate of the UN not today not ever. Goyim do not possess any “international law” to limit Jewish sovereignty over our ancestral homelands. Jews not the poodle on a leashe, not of Europe nor of Arabs.

White Paper land restrictions directly resemble to “illegal occupied territory” despite the cold hard fact that the PLO 1964 Charter only condemned ’48 Israel as “occupied territory”! The White Paper 10-Year Independent State: It explicitly envisioned the creation of a Arab-majority independent Arab Palestinian state within ten years, entirely subverting the goal of Jewish self-determination. All Arab-Israeli wars fought over the Arab rejection that dhimmi Jews have the right to self-determination.

UNR 242 introduced the formula of “land for peace” and the “inadmissibility of the acquisition of territory by war.” Despite Prussia being carved up and divided between the Soviets and Poland! British illegal settlements in North Ireland; Frances seizure post WWI of Alyse Lorraine from the Germans. Just as the 1939 White Paper attempted to freeze the borders of Jewish growth pre-WWII, 242 utilized by international powers to establish that the 1949 Armistice Lines (the Green Line) as the absolute legal ceiling of Jewish territorial sovereignty.

Resolution 446 (1979): Explicitly declared that Israel’s policy of establishing settlements in the Palestinian and other Arab territories occupied since 1967 has “no legal validity” and constitutes a serious obstruction to achieving a comprehensive peace. This resolution “assumes” the existence of a Palestinian state which later the UN GA and SC resolutions, akin to a whore in church, without shame publicly declared; as if a UN declaration establishes international law! This directly mirrors the land-purchase restrictions of the 1939 White Paper. Where the British said Jews could not buy land in Zone A or B of the Mandate.

UN 2334 declares that any Jewish presence beyond the 1949 lines – a violation of international law. The underlying philosophy of foreign interventionism-imperialism becomes as clear as the Sun on a cloudless summer day! (1) The underlying philosophy of foreign interventionism becomes obvious to all who have any objectivity. The imposition of a two-state solution based strictly on the 1947/1949 paradigms. European-backed UN apparatus acting under the guise of international law. Just as the Jewish underground movements (Irgun, Lehi, and eventually the Haganah) realized after 1939 that British imperial law was an existential threat to survival—leading to a revolt against the Mandatory power—the post-1967 reality forced a similar realization regarding Catholic/UN dogmas.

The international community’s insistence on treating the 1949 armistice lines as permanent borders functions exactly like the 1939 White Paper: an attempt by external global empires (then Britain, now the Western/UN bloc) to manage a indigenous conflict by placing an artificial ceiling on Jewish sovereignty. Independent Jewish sovereignty – not on probation anymore. The problem of dhimmi Arab refugees – not an Israeli problem. Israel gave citizenship to its Arab minority population. Not a single Arab or Muslim country has ever intergrated dhimmi Arab refugee populations and extended citizenship to them. The Oct 7th Gaza refugee crisis serves as check-mate proof to this fact.

By keeping these dhimmi Arab refugee populations in a permanent state of statelessness inside generational refugee camps, the regional powers and the UN created a self-perpetuating demographic weapon. The October 7th crisis and its aftermath underscore that the refusal of regional neighbors to integrate these populations – not a failure of logistics – but a deliberate geopolitical strategy designed to maintain an unresolved existential challenge to Jewish sovereignty.

Theodor Herzl wrote in “Der Judenstaat”: “The Jewish question is a national question, and to solve it we must establish a home for the Jewish people.” … Jews have equal rights to achieve self determination in our own country. To do this Jews must partner with a great power who likewise endorse a Jewish state…”We shall need the patronage of a great power; and if we can secure that, we can realize our purpose. We must therefore appeal to the great powers of the world, and we must address ourselves to the Jewish question in these terms.”

The White Paper explicitly framed its goal as preventing Palestine from becoming a Jewish state and ensuring an Arab majority in any independent Palestine that would emerge post war. Its deliberate restrictions on Jewish immigration to mandate Palestine, based upon the European racism which directly and indirectly contributed to the slaughter of 75% of Western European Jewry proves Herzl’s estimation of Europe’s racial insanity toward Jews. The Iran–Israel war, to state it plainly: not new. Rather, simply the modern extension of the same struggle over Jewish self‑determination that Herzl identified in the 1890s and that the region has fought over ever since.

Chamberlain’s White Paper serves as the basis for the European attempt to declare and validate a Palestinian state today; the White Paper explicitly stated this goal: “the establishment within 10 years of an independent Palestine State”. London favored the establishment of an Arab majority, which would rule Palestine; Chamberlain repeated the Czech betrayal, and limited Jewish immigration capped at 75,000 over five years (April 1939–April 1944) and further immigration requiring Arab consent.

The White Paper’s restrictions deliberately imposed – at the moment when Nazi Germany and fascist Europe were carrying out the systematic murder of approximately six million Jews (75 % of Western European Jewry). The paper was issued while the Shoah – already under way, and while Britain itself – still neutral in the European war against the Jews. Its framers chose to freeze Jewish immigration at a level that would prevent the Jewish population from ever reaching majority status in a future independent Palestine.

The policy was rooted in the same 19th–20th-century European political and demographic anxieties that had already produced racial antisemitism (the “Jewish Question” as a perceived racial/cultural threat). The White Paper’s language of “absorptive capacity,” “economic conditions,” and constitutional guarantees of Arab majority rule echoed the same underlying worldview that had justified pogroms, expulsions, and later the Nuremberg Laws. It was not a sudden invention of the 1930s; it was the logical culmination of the Mandate’s earlier pro-immigration framework having produced the very demographic shift the White Paper now blocked. Herzl’s entire project rested on the recognition that European societies were racially and culturally “insane” toward Jews; Zionism represents his prescription for a rational exit from that European-Shoah-guilt insanity.

The post ’48 Nakba narrative, not a neutral “national trauma story”. Nakba bemoaned the Arab failed war of annihilation to destroy the Jewish community in the territory of the defunct British mandate. The term “Palestine” reintroduced consequent to the ‘Sick Man of Europe’s’ economic bankruptcy, did Sultans hire cheaper French cartographers in the 18th Century; that European ‘great power’ reintroduced Palestine upon Ottoman maps of the Middle East. Prior to that time no Ottoman map listed “Greater Syria” as Palestine nor Istanbul as Constantinople.

After the Battle of Yarmouk (636 CE) Arab forces defeated the Byzantine field army and took control of much of the Levant. The territory became part of the rapidly expanding Rashidun (and later Umayyad) Caliphate and administered as the Jund Dimashq, Jund Filastin, Jund al-Urdunn; “wilāya/walayāt” (provinces), a separate term used in different periods. Jund al-Urdunn: first instituted under the Rashidun Caliphate (reorganization under Caliph ʿUmar, c. 639). Jund Filastin: organized soon after the Muslim conquest in the 630s — established during the Rashidun period and continued under the Umayyads. Jund Dimashq: likewise created during the early (Rashidun) reorganizations after the conquest and continued under the Umayyad administration. Modern scholarly syntheses conclude the ajnad framework – established by the Rashidun reorganization (traditionally attributed to ʿUmar c. 18 AH / 639 CE) and consolidated under the Umayyads. Modern scholarly syntheses conclude the ajnad framework – established by the Rashidun reorganization and consolidated under the Umayyads.

Throughout the years of the British colonial-mandate, Arabs fundamentally rejected the Balfour Declaration to establish a Jewish national home in Palestine. The post ’48 Nakba narrative, not a neutral “national trauma story”. Nakba bemoaned the Arab failed war of annihilation to destroy the Jewish community in the territory of the defunct British colonial-mandate. No great power Ottoman map listed “Greater Syria” as Palestine nor Istanbul as Constantinople.

Throughout the years of the British mandate, Arabs fundamentally rejected the Balfour Declaration to establish a Jewish national home in Palestine. Nakba – not “we lost our homes” but “we lost the war which we launched to prevent Jewish self-determination in Palestine. Nakba not free-floating “national trauma” as UNWRA propaganda depicts.

Historically there exists a regional concept of Filastin in early Islamic and later periods. But never sovereign Arab “Palestinian nation-state” as UN propaganda votes which condemn Israeli violations of “international law” harp and sing as if the UN exists as a heavenly voice. European cartography re‑standardized “Palestine” as a territorial label, which later became the basis for post ’67 UN fart: which bemoans the crimes of Israeli “occupied territories”. While its Resolution 3379 ignores the PLO Charter of ’64 which denounces only ’48 Israel as “occupied territories”.

Herzl stated that the Jewish question – fundamentally a national one. He advocated for a homeland, based upon the inherited European racism; that only through Jewish self-determination can Jew overcome racial inherited European hatred.

He emphasized that achieving this goal requires the support of a great power. The term “Palestine” – reintroduced on Ottoman maps due to changes in regional governance and economic Ottoman bankruptcy, Ben Gurion rejected when he named the new nation Israel. Prior to WWI, the region – commonly referred to in the context of “Greater Syria” without the designation of “Palestine.” This change reflects the evolving geopolitical landscape of this region.

Throughout the British Mandate period, Arab opposition to the Balfour Declaration highlighted a rejection of the notion of a Jewish homeland, arguing that their struggle emphatically fought against Jewish self-determination. Therefore the term Nakba – not simply characterized through the UN propaganda distortion as – simply as a loss of homes. Rather, the fallout consequences of a failed war; specifically aimed at preventing Jewish self-determination. These facts fundamentally reject UN attempts to inject revisionist history which fundamentally denies the right of Israel as a nation state to determine its own international borders with other Arab states, specifically with Egypt, Jordan, Syria, and Lebanon.

European permanent Security Council members repeatedly publicly declare: “That Israel has the right to self defense”. But they equally declare that the UN has the right to declare a “Palestinian State”; which they demand come from East Jerusalem, Samaria, and Gaza. Neither the Security Council members nor the General Assembly states possess the might of “international law” – despite their obtuse propaganda otherwise – to determine the borders of the Jewish State nor create the borders of a Palestinian state. Wars throughout history, Poland for example, shape and determine the borders of nation-states.

Consequent to the Bar Kochba Revolt (132-136 CE) the Romans forcibly expelled Jews from Judea and renamed the conquered territory Palaestina, a term derived from “Philistine” – to permanently destroy the Jewish nation state of Judea; which achieved national Independence celebrated and remembered through the mitzva of lighting the Hanukkah lights. The consequence of this Jewish defeat – Jews endured a stateless refugee status till post Shoah! Today Arab refugees who fled from Judea, and Arab refugee populations captured by the IDF post ’67, no different from post Bar Kochba Jews.

UN resolutions simply political, not some pie in the sky divine law decreed from Mt. Olympus. No GA vote or SC statement has the inherent power to fix Israel’s borders or magically conjure a Palestinian state. Attempts to do so, they directly compare to UN GA Resolution 3379 or UN SC Resolution 2334. UN moral theater does not determine the international borders of the Jewish State of Israel. The UN did not “create” Israel. Israel like the American Revolution won its national Independence against colonial British imperialism and French pre-’67 perfidy – through war. Attempts by the UN to recognize a “Palestinian State” simply the hallow echo chamber of Rome renaming Judea Palaestina.

Herzl’s answer to the Jewish question—a sovereign Jewish state backed by great‑power recognition—remains a legitimate national solution. Arab rejection of that solution, the 1948 war, the Nakba narrative, and all of subsequent UN/European condemnations which denounce Israel’s illegal occupation of Palestine. Such stinking backside noise directly smells like long, sophisticated UN attempt to undo Herzl’s solution; to re‑cast a war against Jewish self‑determination as pure victimhood, to retro‑invent a sovereign “Palestine” that never existed, and to deny Israel the same right every other nation has had—to let history, war, and nation-states treaty agreements determine its borders. Not by external powers repeating Rome’s old trick with new legal language, and pretending that Palestine as a UN Protectorate territory ceased to exist in 1948 – which categorizes the backside stench made by both the ICJ and the ICC.

Zionism a response to pogroms, exclusion, and the collapse of Jewish emancipation in Europe; a legitimate national movement grounded in Herzl’s analysis of Jewish self‑determination and inherited Goyim racism. “Palestine” as a sovereign Arab nation-state never existed. European cartographers standardized the term “Palestine” in the 18th-19th centuries which reflected European great power interests which later carved up the Ottoman empire between England and France. Despite Arab sources Filastin, never a sovereign Palestinian state ever in Arab and Muslim history. The Nakba narrative today stands as a politically constructed propaganda; no UN resolutions can dictate Israel’s borders or undo the outcome of any Israeli war victory – fought since the Independence war.

During colonial British mandate the 1936–39 Arab Revolt fought explicitly against the establishment of any Zionist-entity in colonial British Palestine. The popular Arab propaganda of Nakba today – simply propaganda lies – it fails to acknowledge the some 850,000 Jewish refugees forcibly expelled from all Arab countries after the Arab Nakba defeat in 1948. This UN propaganda which routinely catagorically slanders 3379 Israel – pretends that Chapter VI recommendations = to Chapter VII ultimatums like issued to North Korea.

The Israeli 1949 Armistice lines shaped by war, not by UN fiat. The push for a Palestinian state is political, not legal. The propaganda which condemns Israel breaking “international law” simple a fart and nothing more. The UN aint the Pope. Post Shoah the UN failed to try Pius XII for war crimes which include the post war rat-lines and pogroms in Catholic Poland. Furthermore the church criminal slanders which culminated in the Shoah totally undermine the church and the UN as vicar from heaven moral authorities.

The modern “Palestinian national identity” is a result of 20th-century political developments, particularly in response to Zionism and British rule. While not a pre-1948 sovereign state, the Arab population in the region developed a distinct national consciousness. Most international bodies and historians view the current conflict not as a fight over a lost ancient state, but as a clash between two national movements (Zionism and Palestinian nationalism) over the same land.

The problem with this smelly revisionist history, Arabs lost their repeated attempts to throw the Jews into the Sea. Actions have their consequences. The repeated Arab defeats to duplicate the ways of Hitler, Chamberlain and Pius XII definitively proves that Arafat’s ’64 PLO “Balestinians”, never merited the “mandate from heaven” to rule as an Independent nation – not in past Arab/Muslim Ages nor today. Just as Jews post Bar Kochba lost our national Independence following that disastrous “Nakba” defeat; how much more so Arab refugees who never ruled Muslim Ottoman Greater Syria as an independence nation – post ’48 lost all claims to self determination claims. No different than post WWI & WWII Germany who lost all claims to Prussia as Germanic self determination.

The attempt repeatedly made by post ’67 UN Resolutions (242, 338, 446, 2334) to make a טיפש פשט limitation to “the conflict as indeed a clash between two nationalist movements” what an utter farce! Iran some 1000 miles distant from Israel. Hezbollah Shiites in Lebanon have no connection what so ever with Arab Sunni refugee populations within the borders of the Jewish State. Post Shoah “NEVER AGAIN”, means that mentally deranged racists shall never again decide for the Jews their racist versions of their “FINAL SOLUTIONS”.

For nearly 2,000 years of exile (since the destruction of the Second Temple in 70 CE), this phrase L’shanah haba’ah b’Yerushalayim, spoken by Jews in every corner of the globe, from Spain to Persia to the Americas. It served as a constant reminder that the Jewish people had not abandoned their claim to the land, nor had they assimilated into the lands where they lived as minorities. The fact that this prayer survived the horrors of g’lut and recited every Pesach by millions who had never seen the city, proof that Jews never surrendered our Torah oath brit inheritance, which explicitly excluded both Yishmael and Esav. The 1948 establishment of the State of Israel and the reunification of Jerusalem in 1967, viewed by Jews as the historical fulfillment of this centuries-old Torah brit oath.

The post war Israeli victory starting in ’48 … after the fact couch potato quarterbacks … they do not determine Israeli identity. Britain returned the mandate after the Irgun blew up British headquarters in the King David Hotel. France lost WWII and thereafter its colonial empire in both Vietnam and Algeria disintegrated. The De Gaulle reversal of the French military alliance, just prior to the expected Nasser obliteration of the Jewish state definitively proved Herzl’s analysis as correct.

Trump 1.0 Abraham Accords rejects as hog-wash the notion of clash between two national movements with deep historical roots, both claiming legitimacy over the same land. Israeli strategic foreign policy seeks to integrate Israel into the community of nations of the Middle East and North Africa. Arab refugee populations and the failure of Arab and Muslim state to repatriate their refugee populations – an Arab/Muslim problem NOT an Israeli problem. Israel eventually gave ’48 Arabs Israeli citizenship. UN Resolution 194 does not apply across the board to as yet unfought Arab Israeli wars like 1967! That PA criticized the Accords does not amount to squat; that treaty cut with nation states and not minority populations scattered across the Planet Earth.

Zionism means Jewish self‑determination — not UN tutelage. After Oct 7, Israel will not outsource its security to the same international system that failed the Jewish people for a century. A Trump‑aligned, Abraham‑Accords‑based Gaza Peace Board restores regional agency, prioritizes demilitarization, and ends the fiction that Gaza reconstruction must be supervised by institutions that have proven morally compromised and operationally ineffective.

The Gaza Peace Board: a lean, security‑first, regionally controlled implementation mechanism created to replace UN systems judged morally compromised, operationally ineffective, and politically biased.  This foundation expands Trump‑era Abraham Accords architecture which binds regional partners to Israeli security and reconstruction priorities.

Why & how the Gaza Peace Board replaces UN failed multilateralism. The Trump Gaza Peace Board serves as the foundation for Trump 2.0 Avraham Accords. A lean, security‑focused, regionally controlled implementation mechanism that prioritizes rapid reconstruction, verifiable demilitarization, and operational control of Gaza. While managing — not inviting — formal UN/European authority. European imperial and mandate legacies remembered; who can forget the White Paper of both Churchill and later Chamberlain? How much more so the post war UN SC Resolutions 242, 338, 446, 2334 which equal in repugnance to UN 3379 racism. England and France cannot in all Pope-like piousness declare their “neutrality” before the war and thereafter attempt to impose a rejected 181 Two State Solution after the Arab total defeat in 1967.

UN bodies consistently treat Gaza and Jordan’s UN 1950 condemned “West Bank” as “occupied Palestinian territory. Despite the cold hard fact which rejects this UN Revisionist history – the 1964 PLO Charter condemned only ’48 Israel as “occupied territory”. This UN over-reach serves as permanent proof why Israel rejects UN or European participation in the Gaza Peace Board.

Israel argues that France/UK lack moral standing and push preconceived narratives that frustrate Israeli security priorities. Israel’s rationale for viewing British/French/Russian/UN involvement as biased/failing primarily due to their arrogance. Therefore Israel favors the Gaza Peace Board as a key tool to publicize that the Jewish state not a UN Protectorate and that Palestine ceased to exist back in 1948.

Perceived historical bias: Longstanding memories of European imperial intervention and post‑mandate diplomacy fuel belief that European states push narratives inimical to Israeli security and sovereignty. Repeated UN‑mandated missions (UNRWA, UNIFIL, UNSC resolutions) utterly and totally ineffective at preventing militant rearmament or operational complicity. UN Resolution 1060 which unilaterally collapsed the second Nasser commanded “OUT”. The Red Cross never once visited stolen Israeli hostages in the entire two year + period of the Gaza Abomination War. EU/UK legal‑diplomatic tools (resolutions, funding conditionality, ICC referrals) pretense of a viable Palestinian state, such ineffective rhetoric failed to prevent militant rearmament or operational complicity; viewed as politicized instruments that constrain Israeli security options.

Russia’s UN role viewed as opportunistic (veto diplomacy, influence‑seeking), undermining coherent enforcement. UN mechanisms function on voting blocks which exclude Israel; or as attempts by the despised European arrogance which assumes that it operates as a Great Power determinator of the balance of power in the region – when it emphatically does not. France lost WWII. Britain ceased to exist as a player in the region after it returned the 1922 League of Nations mandate back to the UN prior to Israel’s total defeat of 5 to 7 Arab Armies – in 1948 and repeated again in 1967.

UN Special Rapporteurs argue the pretense that the Gaza reconstruction must be Palestinian-led, as if Palestine exists as an independent state rather than a post 1964 PLO terrorist platform. The UN condemns Israel for Gaza’s destruction after the Oct 7th UNWRA Hamas Islamic Jihad slaughter of over 1200 Israelis. That self-determination equally applies to Arab refugee populations AFTER two failed wars to complete the Nazi Shoah and throw the Jews into the Sea. The UN pretense that it determines the borders of Israel and its Capital as false as Palestine exists as a nation.

Just as Jewish self-determination collapsed after the Bar Kochba revolt in 135CE for 2000+ years, so too post the Israeli unilateral withdraw from Gaza in 2005 followed by repeated revolts by the elected Hamas government of Gaza results in the loss of Arab refugee self-determination within the borders of the post 1967 Jewish state together with its recaptured territories.

Post Oct7th 2023 the UN imperialism expressed through the ICJ genocide slander followed by the Brussels ICC pretense that recognizes a Palestinian state and therefore unilaterally presumes that it has jurisdiction in Samaria and Gaza have removed both courts as treif – especially after the Shoah where no European court forced Pious XII to stand trial for complicity in Nazi War Crimes. And the Israeli oath: “NEVER AGAIN”. Herzl identified European anti Jewish racism as incurable. The only Jewish response to this treif racism known as “the Jewish Problem”, or among Arab countries as “dhimmi”, for Jews to establish the Yoval freedom of ruling own homeland, and establishing our own courts of justice. Herein defines Zionism today.

‘Israel, What Went Wrong’: Omer Bartov on genocide in Palestine

Revisionist history has a old bastard pedigree. From the NT to the Koran to Arafat Philistine Palestinians. Evil people love to employ lies and slander to govern the masses – classic Greek rhetoric.


Chag Shevuoth 46th day of the Omer – struggling to remove tuma middot from within the Yatzir Ha’Ra of the hearts of my people. The counting of the Omer accomplished through the שם מ”ב and the Divine soul Name האל, initially dedicated when we burn the חמץ prior to Pesach; but culminates upon the dedication of the soul Name האל upon Chag Shevuath – tefillah a matter of dedication of tohor middot within the heart – תורה לא בשמים הוא. Torah scholarship distinguishes the רוח הקודש thirteen middot Spirits “pronouns” of the 1st Commandment לא בשמים הוא Name which breathes the spirit of life into the chosen Cohen people whenever we do wisdom commandments known as time-oriented mitzvot; which Moshe Rabbeinu heard orally at Horev. As contrasted by the much later rabbinic פרדס inductive logic which relies upon warp/weft middot: the 7 Yovel middot, 10 judicial justice middot, and 13 pursuit of righteousness middot – halacha thread vs. the 32 Aggadic middot – woven into the halachic precedents which the Amoraim sages brought to interpret the language of some specific Home Mishna – which the Gemara views from different fixed “witness” perspectives. Jewish common law a courtroom legalism. As opposed and contrasted by Greek and Roman fiat statute law (cult of personality) legislative decrees, issued by authorities on High – as if from Heaven itself. Later such ‘Royal Fiat’ called the ‘Divine Right of Kings’, which the Magna Carta originally challenged and the American and French revolutions permanently uprooted.

Contrast revisionist history, which as a hard rule, behaves like a pig; that presents its cloven feet, and declares itself kosher. A more specific example: the public display of a bastard pedigree, presented through the ‘Son of God’ metaphor. From the NT to the Koran to Arafat Philistine Palestinians – Evil power hungry people love to employ lies and slander to govern the clueless masses – herein defines classic Greek rhetoric. The Romans developed Greek rhetoric by maintaining cheap bread prices in Rome to conceal the corruption and debauchery of the court of Caesar!

No serious historian says “the United States was created in 1776,” because nations – founded, declared, or achieve independence, not “created” as if by divine fiat mythology; akin to Romans sucking the tits of a mamma wolf. [Nakba: the humiliation of failing to stop the creation of Israel] False. God creates. Israel won its national independence by winning a war. France in 1789 established as their Constitution ‘The Rights of Man’. The ensuing general European wars that followed express the rejection of Monarchy governments to the revolutionary French democracy. The modern state of Greece likewise defeated the Ottoman Turks, as likewise did Muhammad Ali of Egypt! India had developed vibrant economy, until British imperialism raped that land; all the while – employing the rhetoric of calling conquered India – the Crown Jewel of the British empire! To state otherwise = revisionist history.

[The collapse of Arab political society] False; never in all Human history a Palestinian state. Arabs who fled League Mandated territories labelled “Palestine”, followed by the loss of the war which 5 to 7 Arab states started, has consequences. Once these refugees – who never embraced the British Palestine Mandate throughout 1923 to 1948 – fled, they lost all claims to 1948 Israel. The PLO 1964 Charter states openly that only ’48 Israel “occupied territory”. Later post ’67 attempts by the UN Security Council to pass off the illegal Jordanian West Bank as the legitimate lands of a Palestinian state – likewise revisionist history. In 1950 only England and Pakistan validated the Jordanian nationalization “West Bank” as part of Trans-Jordan “East Bank”; all other UN members condemned Jordans annexation of Samaria as illegal. Post ’67 UN fiat decrees like 242, 338, 446, 2334 etc promote the abracadabra rhetoric that the “West Bank” “illegal occupied territory”. England severed Trans-Jordan from its Palestine Mandated territories at the Jordan river in 1923.

Arab propaganda which compares “the Zionist entity” to Mideaval Chrusader states – another utter distortion of facts and history. [Later dominant Palestinian meaning (especially post‑1960s)] Imposing later revisionist history conclusions upon earlier historical facts – utterly false. Nakba for it to apply to Arab refugees must equally apply to the greater number of Jewish refugees expelled from almost all Arab countries in 1948. Arab revisionist propaganda does NOT extend Nakba to Jewish ’48 refugees. Therefore post-1960s a blagard-lie to foist Nakba upon post defeat Arab refugee populations. If for no other reason that such propaganda conceals the even greater disgraces perpetuated by UNWRA and all Arab states – which promotes the bait & switch Nakba onto Arab refugees and conceals the failure of all Arab states to repatriate their refugee populations!

Kapo Israeli revisionist historians – a curse of the ערב רב since Israelites left Egypt. My question centers upon Omer Bartov, why this man accepts patent Arab propaganda as anything other than a bald faced lie? Bartov’s reasoning is not theological, not Zionist, and not rooted in the political history of the Mandate. His entire intellectual world comes from genocide studies, ethnic violence, and comparative nationalism.

Bartov attempts to compare the Arab attempt to throw the Jews into the Sea in 1948 and again later in 1967 with the blagard-slander of ‘Zionist Ethnic cleansing’! Such false comparisons to Galicia, Volhynia, the Balkans, Anatolia, Rwanda, Bosnia – actual autrocities of ‘Ethnic cleansing’ – to the post ’48 plight of Arab refugees amounts to political porn. Why?

Israel openly accepted the Peel Commission of 1936 which contributed to the British sponsored UN 181, where two-thirds of all UN member states recognized Jews equal rights to achieve self determination as originally envisioned by the Balfour Declaration\Palestine mandate of 1922. Compound the fact, the declared Arab intent to complete the Nazi genocide of Jews permanently removes any and all comparison, made by Bartov with these distant other Goyim massacres of Goyim. Proof for this fact: Israel gave Israeli citizenship to ’48 Arabs. No Arab state has ever repatriated the ’48 and later ’67 Arab refugee populations.

Bartov reaches conclusions based upon shallow superficial reactionary comparisons; akin to the ICJ condemnation of Israel for war crimes post the Oct 7th 2023 slaughter of some 1200 Israelis perpetuated by Hamas, Islamic Jihad, and UNWRA criminals. His emotional empathetic reactions to Arab displaced refugees taken completely out of context to larger Jewish displaced refugee populations during the same period of time! One hand clapping produces only the lies of sound. ’48 Arab refugees never existed in the fabled numbers of “hundreds of thousands”! This UNWRA revisionist history utterly false. A lie equal to, the UN false pretense of a permanent Palestine Mandate – to this very day! Had the Arabs won their war of extermination how would Bartov frame that as “history”? Post war ’48 Arabs did NOT experience “ethnic cleansing”. That’s a blood libel host desecration Jews poisoned the wells lie. Such a lie, compares to condemning the US dropping bombs on Tokyo for the ‘war crime’ of Japan’s surprise attack on Pearl Harbor!

Bartov looks at 1948 almost only through the lens of “what happened to Arafat’s Pie in the Sky ‘Palestinians’,” and not “what the ’48 war exposed”. Arab states steadfast rejection that dhimmi Jews have equal rights to achieve self-determination in their own homeland! This Arab revisionist history lie. stands upon the foundation of the Koran itself; which about 2000 years after the revelation of the Torah at Sinai, its false prophet Muhammad fundamentally rejected; the Koran declares that Jews lied and replaced Yitzak for Yishmael at the Akadah; Arabs lie straight from their mothers’ milk! Benny Morris, Yoav Gelber, Anita Shapira – the burden rests upon them to prove that “several hundred thousand Arab refugees” in 1948 some how created out of the blue hocus pocus witchcraft!

More Jewish villages depopulated in Arab countries than Arab villages depopulated on orders from their own military leadership! Bartov’s shallow reactionary one-hand clapping bs duplicates to thousands of years after the fact NT and Koran revisionist substitute history/theology. His historical analysis compares to Stalin’s expunging the contributions of Leon Troskii in order to seize the helm of Lenin’s ‘Dictatorship of the Proletariat’.

Chag Shevuoth 46th day of the Omer – struggling to remove tuma middot from within the Yatzir Ha’Ra of the hearts of my people. The counting of the Omer accomplished through the שם מ”ב and the Divine soul Name האל, initially dedicated when we burn the חמץ prior to Pesach; but culminates upon the dedication of the soul Name האל upon Chag Shevuath – tefillah a matter of dedication of tohor middot within the heart – תורה לא בשמים הוא. Torah scholarship distinguishes the רוח הקודש thirteen middot Spirits “pronouns” of the 1st Commandment לא בשמים הוא Name which breathes the spirit of life into the chosen Cohen people whenever we do wisdom commandments known as time-oriented mitzvot; which Moshe Rabbeinu heard orally at Horev. As contrasted by the much later rabbinic פרדס inductive logic which relies upon warp/weft middot: the 7 Yovel middot, 10 judicial justice middot, and 13 pursuit of righteousness middot – halacha thread vs. the 32 Aggadic middot – woven into the halachic precedents which the Amoraim sages brought to interpret the language of some specific Home Mishna – which the Gemara views from different fixed “witness” perspectives. Jewish common law a courtroom legalism. As opposed and contrasted by Greek and Roman fiat statute law (cult of personality) legislative decrees, issued by authorities on High – as if from Heaven itself. Later such ‘Royal Fiat’ called the ‘Divine Right of Kings’, which the Magna Carta originally challenged and the American and French revolutions permanently uprooted.

Contrast revisionist history, which as a hard rule, behaves like a pig; that presents its cloven feet, and declares itself kosher. A more specific example: the public display of a bastard pedigree, presented through the ‘Son of God’ metaphor. From the NT to the Koran to Arafat Philistine Palestinians – Evil power hungry people love to employ lies and slander to govern the clueless masses – herein defines classic Greek rhetoric. The Romans developed Greek rhetoric by maintaining cheap bread prices in Rome to conceal the corruption and debauchery of the court of Caesar!

No serious historian says “the United States was created in 1776,” because nations – founded, declared, or achieve independence, not “created” as if by divine fiat mythology; akin to Romans sucking the tits of a mamma wolf. [Nakba: the humiliation of failing to stop the creation of Israel] False. God creates. Israel won its national independence by winning a war. France in 1789 established as their Constitution ‘The Rights of Man’. The ensuing general European wars that followed express the rejection of Monarchy governments to the revolutionary French democracy. The modern state of Greece likewise defeated the Ottoman Turks, as likewise did Muhammad Ali of Egypt! India had developed vibrant economy, until British imperialism raped that land; all the while – employing the rhetoric of calling conquered India – the Crown Jewel of the British empire! To state otherwise = revisionist history.

[The collapse of Arab political society] False; never in all Human history a Palestinian state. Arabs who fled League Mandated territories labelled “Palestine”, followed by the loss of the war which 5 to 7 Arab states started, has consequences. Once these refugees – who never embraced the British Palestine Mandate throughout 1923 to 1948 – fled, they lost all claims to 1948 Israel. The PLO 1964 Charter states openly that only ’48 Israel “occupied territory”. Later post ’67 attempts by the UN Security Council to pass off the illegal Jordanian West Bank as the legitimate lands of a Palestinian state – likewise revisionist history. In 1950 only England and Pakistan validated the Jordanian nationalization “West Bank” as part of Trans-Jordan “East Bank”; all other UN members condemned Jordans annexation of Samaria as illegal. Post ’67 UN fiat decrees like 242, 338, 446, 2334 etc promote the abracadabra rhetoric that the “West Bank” “illegal occupied territory”. England severed Trans-Jordan from its Palestine Mandated territories at the Jordan river in 1923.

Arab propaganda which compares “the Zionist entity” to Mideaval Chrusader states – another utter distortion of facts and history. [Later dominant Palestinian meaning (especially post‑1960s)] Imposing later revisionist history conclusions upon earlier historical facts – utterly false. Nakba for it to apply to Arab refugees must equally apply to the greater number of Jewish refugees expelled from almost all Arab countries in 1948. Arab revisionist propaganda does NOT extend Nakba to Jewish ’48 refugees. Therefore post-1960s a blagard-lie to foist Nakba upon post defeat Arab refugee populations. If for no other reason that such propaganda conceals the even greater disgraces perpetuated by UNWRA and all Arab states – which promotes the bait & switch Nakba onto Arab refugees and conceals the failure of all Arab states to repatriate their refugee populations!

Kapo Israeli revisionist historians – a curse of the ערב רב since Israelites left Egypt. My question centers upon Omer Bartov, why this man accepts patent Arab propaganda as anything other than a bald faced lie? Bartov’s reasoning is not theological, not Zionist, and not rooted in the political history of the Mandate. His entire intellectual world comes from genocide studies, ethnic violence, and comparative nationalism.

Bartov attempts to compare the Arab attempt to throw the Jews into the Sea in 1948 and again later in 1967 with the blagard-slander of ‘Zionist Ethnic cleansing’! Such false comparisons to Galicia, Volhynia, the Balkans, Anatolia, Rwanda, Bosnia – actual autrocities of ‘Ethnic cleansing’ – to the post ’48 plight of Arab refugees amounts to political porn. Why?

Israel openly accepted the Peel Commission of 1936 which contributed to the British sponsored UN 181, where two-thirds of all UN member states recognized Jews equal rights to achieve self determination as originally envisioned by the Balfour Declaration\Palestine mandate of 1922. Compound the fact, the declared Arab intent to complete the Nazi genocide of Jews permanently removes any and all comparison, made by Bartov with these distant other Goyim massacres of Goyim. Proof for this fact: Israel gave Israeli citizenship to ’48 Arabs. No Arab state has ever repatriated the ’48 and later ’67 Arab refugee populations.

Bartov reaches conclusions based upon shallow superficial reactionary comparisons; akin to the ICJ condemnation of Israel for war crimes post the Oct 7th 2023 slaughter of some 1200 Israelis perpetuated by Hamas, Islamic Jihad, and UNWRA criminals. His emotional empathetic reactions to Arab displaced refugees taken completely out of context to larger Jewish displaced refugee populations during the same period of time! One hand clapping produces only the lies of sound. ’48 Arab refugees never existed in the fabled numbers of “hundreds of thousands”! This UNWRA revisionist history utterly false. A lie equal to, the UN false pretense of a permanent Palestine Mandate – to this very day! Had the Arabs won their war of extermination how would Bartov frame that as “history”? Post war ’48 Arabs did NOT experience “ethnic cleansing”. That’s a blood libel host desecration Jews poisoned the wells lie. Such a lie, compares to condemning the US dropping bombs on Tokyo for the ‘war crime’ of Japan’s surprise attack on Pearl Harbor!

Bartov looks at 1948 almost only through the lens of “what happened to Arafat’s Pie in the Sky ‘Palestinians’,” and not “what the ’48 war exposed”. Arab states steadfast rejection that dhimmi Jews have equal rights to achieve self-determination in their own homeland! This Arab revisionist history lie. stands upon the foundation of the Koran itself; which about 2000 years after the revelation of the Torah at Sinai, its false prophet Muhammad fundamentally rejected; the Koran declares that Jews lied and replaced Yitzak for Yishmael at the Akadah; Arabs lie straight from their mothers’ milk! Benny Morris, Yoav Gelber, Anita Shapira – the burden rests upon them to prove that “several hundred thousand Arab refugees” in 1948 some how created out of the blue hocus pocus witchcraft!

More Jewish villages depopulated in Arab countries than Arab villages depopulated on orders from their own military leadership! Bartov’s shallow reactionary one-hand clapping bs duplicates to thousands of years after the fact NT and Koran revisionist substitute history/theology. His historical analysis compares to Stalin’s expunging the contributions of Leon Troskii in order to seize the helm of Lenin’s ‘Dictatorship of the Proletariat’.

Contrast the Oct7th Abomination War of 2023 with its Gaza Peace Board,,, to the Israel’s alliance against Iran today. All previous wars foreign powers ALLWAYS INTERVENED. Neither the US nor Israel signed the Rome Agreement which established the ICC in Brussels. Yet the ICC declared it has jurisdiction over Israel?! Bunk. Post Shoah – the systematic murder of 75% of Western European Jewry – Israelis swore an oath: NEVER AGAIN.

Clearly, many ערב רב self hating Jews embrace Palestine. Not in our Name NY Jews made a terrible stink. Clearly these, assimilated and intermarried ערב רב kapo Jews – do not know this oath. For 2000+ years Jewish refugee populations scattered across the Middle East, North Africa, and Europe/Russia referred as “Christ Killers” … “the Jewish Problem”. Post Shoah, the oath NEVER AGAIN — would foreign peoples determine “FINAL SOLUTIONS”, for their inherit racist slander of Jews.

Since the June ’67 War where Nasser publicly swore that this time around, the Arabs would cleanse the Nakba ’48 disgrace, and throw the Jews into the Sea to honor & duplicate the Nazi Shoah in the Middle East. De Gaulle of France the key ally of Israel (not the US); just prior to the ’67 war, De Gaulle broke his alliance with Israel. Keep this in context because PM Chamberlain’s 1939 White Paper shattered the 1917 Balfour Agreement. Israelis starting with the Jewish leader in mandate Palestine Ben Gurion viewed this European betrayal, as Britain’s war against the Jews. Yet both “neutral” pre war ’67 France and England … post war attempted to determine the international borders of the Jewish state. As IF Israel remained a mandate protectorate of the UN. Palestine ceased to exist as a UN protectorate territory in 1948. But revisionist history can change historical facts, like the NT and Koran both did with the Hebrew T’NaCH.

Recall the British proposed UN 181 ‘Two state solution’? 1. All Arab states rejected it. 2. It was a General Assembly resolution where 2/3rd of all UN members recognized Jewish equal rights to achieve self determination. 3. Not till 1964 did Yasser Arafat embrace the name “Palestine”. His 1964 PLO Charter called 1948 Israel ‘occupied territory’. NOT the territory which Jordan illegally nationalized and called “West Bank”; in 1950 all UN member states except Britian and its “Two State Solution ally” Pakistan, condemned Jordans annexation of Samaria as illegal. Compound this hypocrisy with 1923 Britain separating “Trans-Jordan” from its 1922 Palestine Mandate – at the Jordan river!

Arafat’s PLO Charter did not refer to Egypt Gaza as “occupied territory”. People who think Arab states and Israel represent “the problem” of Middle East peace – utterly ignorant of Great Power politics! Arab refugee populations today no different from Jewish refugee populations post the Bar Kochba revolt in 135 CE! The issue of “world war” bogus nonsense political rhetoric employed to justify ‘great power intervention’. Europe’s WWI & II – most essentially a Civil War; look at the EU Union today and the post WWII Allied vs Warsaw Pact alliances.

In 1956 England and France attempted to seize the Suez Canal from Nasser’s Egypt. Both Stalin and IKE informed both 2nd rate powers to get the hell out of the Middle East. Post ’67 with LBJ tied down in Vietnam, England and France seized the opportunity to restore their ‘Great Power’ status in Middle East politics. The language of 242 implies the existence of a Palestine State! Palestine – French cartographers introduced “Palestine” into Ottoman “sick man of Europe” maps in the 19th Century.

Arab Caliphate defeated the Byzantine Empire @ the Battle of Yarmouk in 636 CE. Since the collapse of the Roman empire to the 19th Century French maps, no Arab or Muslim power ever once referred to Palestine. Arabs cannot even pronounce the letter P in Palestine! Wake up and smell the coffee.

Trump – “The Art of the Deal”: Iran requires rebuilding. Export your processed Uranium to the US in exchange for ending the war. This hypothetical scenario reflects a blend of economic strategy, diplomatic engagement, and complex negotiations. Each element would require careful consideration of global reactions and the intricate balance of power in the region.

Leverage: Utilizing the strengths of one party to gain concessions from the other. Win-Win Solutions: The principle that both parties should benefit from the deal to ensure sustainability and cooperation. Economic Sanctions Impact: Iran has faced extensive sanctions that have hampered its economy and infrastructure. Rebuilding efforts would focus on improving essential services, economic stability, and international relations. Financial support and infrastructure development could be strong incentives for Iran to comply with peace terms.

Case in coincidence: “According to the decision of the Supreme Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation, Vladimir Putin, a ceasefire is declared on May 8–9, 2026,” the statement from the ministry said. The Russian Ministry of Defense expects Ukraine to “follow this example.” Meanwhile, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy announced a separate ceasefire beginning on May 5-6, 2026.

The language of “sin”, such as 1 Timothy 5:20, as false as an adult attempting to behave like a new born babe in diapers! The “sin” spin off of Paul’s ‘Original Sin’ perversion of the Creation story of Adam expelled from the Garden of Eden purposely distorts the main theme of the Blessing/Curse Torah brit. From the Aggadah of Adam’s expulsion to the floods of Noach to the Tower of Bavel dispersion of Man-Kind, to the refugee status of the Avot who fled from Babylon to the land of Canaan, to the sons of Israel enslaved by Par’o and Egypt to the Wilderness generation who died in exile – forbidden to conquer the oath sworn land inheritance of the brit chosen Cohen people/inclusive all the 12 Tribes of Israel – one Torah theme stands clear —– g’lut exile as the Torah curse for judicial injustice by courts of law.

Paul’s employment of “SIN” used to justify the theology JeZeus the Son of God, Harry Potter like, fictional mysticism. The language of Moshe at the end of the Book of D’varim closes with Life-Death choose LIFE. To what does this prophetic mussar refer? To צדק צדק תרדוף – justice justice pursue – based upon the mussar received by Yitro, when he witnessed Moshe judge the damage disputes among his people by himself alone. The Torah mandate of Sanhedrin common law courtrooms stands day & night different from all other legal courtroom law throughout all Human History.

Compare the English common law judicial courts together with the American judicial system. All courtroom law addresses the subject of damages inflicted upon others. English common law courts cannot declare a law passed by Parliament as “unconstitutional”. The US Supreme court can declare statute laws imposed by Congress and the President as “unconstitutional”. Britain has no written Constitution, all laws passed by Parliament define the Constitution of Britain. America has a written Constitution, therefore the SC can declare a statute law passed by both Congress and the President – as unconstitutional.

The Written Torah theoretically serves as the written Constitution of the 12 Tribes of the Republic, conquered by the prophet Yehoshua following the passing of Moshe. The Book of D’varim has a second name: משנה תורה, which means “Common law\Legislative Review”. The 6 Orders of Rabbi Yechuda HaNassi Mishna, codifies the judicial rulings of post Herod Temple destruction by Titus. But in point of fact, no Sanhedrin court in actuality ever ruled Judea under foreign rule and occupation. The Talmud implies this cold fact with a back-hand reference that Jews during the whole of the בית שני never kept the Yovel. The Yovel fundamentally requires National Independence/self-determination.

In like manner stand the Sanhedrin common law federal court system in substance rather than form. Napoleon, for example, established a Sanhedrin court in Paris. But substance does not equal or even remotely resembles propaganda “FORMS” of deception. No Jewish self-determination in the oath sworn land of conquered Canaan, No Yovel and how much more so No Sanhedrin Federal common law courts. Hence the codification of the Mishna (based upon the 2nd name for the Book of D’varim), and its later Gemara common law halachic study of precedents which separate different Mishnaic cases, merely a vision of how the Sages ‘dreamed’ of Federal common law court system in the Independent Jewish State; the vision of post Herzl present day Zionism!

Zionism as embraced by Israelis living right now, has yet to restore the Torah as the Written Constitution of the 12 tribes of the Republic of conquered Canaan; any more than Arafat’s lie of ‘Greater Israel’ inclusive of many Arab countries – Arabs who never – to this very day accept the Torah Sanhedrin Constitutional mandate from Sinai. The reference within the Torah to the metaphor “sin” refers to “damages inflicted upon others among our brit/allied-people”.

The NT Universal God of “Father in Heaven” invalidates the revelation of the Torah at Sinai which contrasts the Avot vision of אל שדי, אלהים as a God of the Heavens & the Earth, with the Sinai revelation of השם – תורה לא בשמים היא. The Gospel JeZeus prayer to his Father in Heaven, shares no part, portion, or soul, with the tefillah from the Torah – kre’a shma. Kre’a shma embraces the yoke of tohor middot to achieve justice among our people through common law Sanhedrin courts strictly and only within the defined borders of the land of Canaan — as the Yoke of the Kingdom of Heaven.

Arafat’s “Greater Israel” blood libel/host desecration\Christ Killer/Jews poisoned the wells – lie – no different than the fictional JeZeus’s prayer unto his father in Heaven. Zionism today, actually quite similar to: the vision of Mishna & Gemara, post the Roman obliteration and g’lut of Jews expelled in mass from Judea. UN Resolution 3379 a slander on par with Arab rejection of the Balfour/League of Nations “Palestine Mandate” – as applicable today to Pie in the Sky “Palestinians”. Not till 1964 did Arabs embrace the title “Palestinian”. The PLO Charter referred to 1948 Israel as “occupied territory” NOT Jordans “west bank” nor Egypt’s “gaza”. During the period of the British League of Nations 1922 “mandate”, only Jews referred to themselves as “Palestinians”.

The Edict of Thessalonica under Emperor Theodosius I in 380 CE established Xtianity as the State religion of the Roman empire. Germanic chieftain Odoacer killed the last Roman emperor in 476 CE. The collapse of Rome represents the traditional date marking the fall of the Western Roman Empire. David Ben-Gurion’s proclamation of the State of Israel effectively terminated the UN Protectorate of the League of Nations Palestine Mandate. Prior to this post WWII UN Resolution 181, where a 2/3rd UN General Assembly majority validated Jews equal rights to achieve self-determination in the Middle East land of British Palestine”, coupled with the surrender by Britain of their League Mandate back to the UN directly compares to the fall of Rome, in foreign great state determination of the name of the region of Judea as “Palestine”.

At the Battle of Yarmouk (636CE) the Rashidun Caliphate, led by Khalid ibn al-Walid, conquered Syria/Byzantine Palestine. Following the success in the Levant, the Arabs, under the command of Amr ibn al-As, invaded and captured Egypt. This conquest marked the transition of Egypt from Byzantine – to Arab governance over dhimmi Xtians and Jews, further expanding the influence of the Rashidun Caliphate. Following the success in the Levant, the Arabs, under the command of Amr ibn al-As, invaded and captured Egypt. This conquest marked the transition of Egypt from Byzantine to Arab governance over dhimmi Xtians and Jews, further expanding the influence of the Rashidun Caliphate.

The transition from an Arab Empire to a Muslim Empire governance – generally associated with the establishment of the Umayyad Caliphate, which began in 661 CE. This new Caliphate marked a pivotal shift, where the governing authority first explicitly defined as “Islamic”, rather than Arabic. While the Rashidun Caliphate (632–661 CE) was characterized primarily by Arab leadership, the Umayyads expanded their reach beyond Arab identity, incorporating diverse populations within their empire, which increasingly included non-Arabs who converted to Islam.

Not till the 19th Century did the Ottoman ‘Sick Man of Europe’ hire French Cartographers to draft maps of Greater Syria, which reintroduced the Roman name “Palestine” to the region. This subtle French insertion ‘Palestine’, marked a significant shift in how both England and France eyed the Middle East; paving the way for future claims and imperial ambitions following World War I, especially after the anarchist Social Revolutionaries overthrew the Czar of Russia. Had Czarist Russia not collapsed, it would have, like as did both Britain & France, taken for its portion of the dissected Ottoman empire – Istanbul its Capital City; and without doubt restored the name Constantinople under the Flag of Mother Russia.

The employment of the term “Palestine” by the post WWI established League of Nations, revived the historical European ‘Great Power’ imperialism, extinct since Roman times; especially coupled with the fact that repeated Muslim victories had brutally humiliated and crushed European imperialist appetites, especially following the Xtian Crusade disasters. This League of Nations reintroduction of “Palestine”, played a crucial role in shaping the geopolitical narrative and aspirations of European powers in their quest for territorial expansion and control over the Middle East. Post WWII however, both empires exhausted and bankrupt.

The 1956 Suez Canal Crisis witnessed the Cold War dominance of President Eisenhower and Secretary Stalin. Both London and Paris as 1st World Powers started to collapse even before their combined disastrous failure to seize the Suez Canal. The French colonial loss of both Vietnam on May 7, 1954, and Algerian Independence. This latter brutal 8 year Independence war terminated on July 5, 1962. Britain had already lost the crown jewels of its empire, with both Jewish “Palestinians”, blowing up British Head Quarters within the King David hotel, which forced London to surrender and return its League of Nations mandate back to the UN. This catastrophe, coupled with National Indian Independence – the Sun set upon the British empire.

Today Israelis stand and remember “Yom Ha-Shoah”. We Israelis renew the post Shoah oath “Never Again”. We remember the ping-ball custom, practiced by both European and Arab societies, to arbitrarily “solve” their racist “Jewish Problem” throughout the Ages – “Never Again”. The Nazi ‘inferior race’, Arab racism denies Jewish equal rights to achieve כוח ריבוני-Political Independents as an Independent Jewish State in the Middle East. Pre-war White Papers coupled with post war British forced encampments of Jewish refugee survivors, returned to Germany or Cyprus – further amplifies the Israeli post Shoah oath of “NEVER AGAIN” which Yom HaShoah remembers. Both European and Arab/Muslim ‘good name’ reputations shattered with the ’48 forced expulsions of Jews from Arab countries, combined with all Arab states refusal to repatriate their refugee on par with how Israel repatriates Jewish refugee populations. Not a single Arab country has agreed to accept Gazan refugee populations who want to leave destroy Gaza and become “citizens” in other countries. Diplomacy among nations classically entails cutting a political alliance. Such a political alliance stands upon mutually shared trust and interests. The UN spectacularly fails in building on ‘trust’; UN Resolution 1701 serves as a strong proof long before UNWRA joined Hamas on Oct 7th 2023.

The capacity for Jewish self-defense and political independence – defines modern Zionism. Israel “recaptured” Samaria from Jordan in the 1967 Six-Day War. After 1948 “Palestine” ceased to exist. Jordan, named its illegal – according to the UN condemnation – “occupation” of its “West Bank”; only Pakistan and Britain recognized the Jordanian nationalization of its “West Bank”. Never once from 1948 – 67 did Jordan validate a “Palestine” of its illegally occupied “West Bank”. The UN did not pass a single resolution titled “Condemnation of Jordan,” it refused to recognize the annexation. Even Yasser Arafat’s PLO Charter did not view Jordan’s illegal occupation of its ’48 “West Bank” as “occupied Palestine”. In international law, non‑recognition of an annexation is the mechanism for declaring it invalid. No different from the UN rejection of Indonesia’s ‘East Timor’, Turkey’s ‘Northern Cyprus’, Russia’s ‘Crimea’. The PLO Charter of 1964 likewise did not view Egyptian rule over Gaza as “occupied Palestinian territory”. The collective UN position was unmistakably that Jordan had no sovereignty over the West Bank; but starting with the purposely vague language of 242 “territories occupied in the recent [1967] conflict”, perfectly clarified by 2334 the UN declares sovereignty to Palestine; despite the cold hard fact that Israel – not a protectorate mandate territory and that Arab Israeli wars determine its borders! Therefore, the post‑1967 terminology is a political invention, not a continuation of pre‑1967 legal reality.

But post ’67, BBC propaganda screamed “occupied Palestinian territories” – inclusive of both Samaria and Gaza! Britain had no mandate, and therefore no legal claim to make this condemnation of Israel. The same equally applies to the UN through its 242 “all States” propaganda; which serve as the foundation for UN condemnations of Israeli “illegal” settlements of “Palestinian lands”; UN 2334 and the UN open recognition of the “Palestinian State” – proof of propaganda. Never in all human recorded history has their ever existed a “land of Palestine” – not under Ottoman or Arab empires.

The characterization of land as “occupied Palestinian territories” by both the UN and BBC and French propaganda evokes strong reactions, particularly among those who view this language as delegitimizing Israel’s claims, primarily based upon the 1923 British establishment of Trans-Jordan bordering “Israel” at the Jordan river. The application and interpretation of resolutions, such as UN Resolution 242, initiated to “international claims”/”competing narratives” by foreign outside States regarding “land rights and statehood” with a pro Arab bias which fundamentally rejects dhimmi Jews equal rights to achieve self-determination in the Middle East post the 1917 Balfour Declaration which served as the basis for the League division of Lebanon and Syria awarded to France and Palestine, Trans-Jordan awarded to Britain – based upon the secret accords known today as Sykes-Picot.

No Israeli-Palestinian “conflict” exists in reality because post the declaration of Jewish national Independence in 1948 the UN “protectorate” over “Palestine” ceased to exist. No different than this mandate ceased to exist as a “British mandate territory” officially ended after it turned that “mandate territory” back to the UN in 1948. From that moment on the British Crown had no more say in the determination of Israeli Independence than it does to determine the Capital of Austin Texas. This equally applies to the post WWII established UN.

Post-1948, no separate national entity represented as “Palestine” in international law or governance, particularly under Jordanian control of its illegally occupied West Bank and Egyptian control of Gaza – until 1967. The phrase “recaptured” to describe Israel’s actions during the 1967 Six-Day War reflects a perspective that emphasizes a historical and religious connection to the land. This contrasts with views that describe the action as an occupation of land that was already controlled by Jordan — which the UN itself condemned as illegal in 1950.

UN Resolution 242 and consecutive resolutions employed as Foreign State imperialism propaganda rhetoric which seeks peace. War the result of all British two state solutions! India/Pakistan, Iraq\Kuwait, and two Koreas and two Vietnams glaring examples of ‘great power’ foreign national interests imposed upon “conquered” lands. Great Power international “diplomacy” – the British labelled as “maintaining the balance of power” – which suited British [לאו דווקא] strategic interests.

The UN’s later recognition of a Palestinian state a further attempt to rewrite historical claims and narratives that do not acknowledge the complexities of sovereignty and self-determination in the context of this region. The framing of successful Israel national Independence by media outlets – such as the BBC and other organizations – have promoted wars not peace. Shalom requires “trust”, peace simply a propaganda “label” of rhetoric. The success of Allied propaganda during WWI which unilaterally declared the Germans as “the Hun barbarians at the gates” produced profound effects on public perception. Critics argue – propaganda rhetoric language that injects “occupation”, aligns with Arab narratives which switched the term Nakba from Arab disastrous military defeat unto Arab stateless Palestinian refugees. No Arab country has yet to end or terminate the refugee status which UNWRA promotes and serves this particular political foreign ‘Great Power States’ imperialist agendas.

Propaganda that Israel repeatedly violates “international law”, simply another gross example of UN Great Power manipulations expressed through BBC and MSM propaganda arms of foreign states attempts to ‘control the narrative’ through words. Israel as an independent nation – its international borders determined through wars and the diplomacy its establishes with regional state powers. Neither the Parliament of London or any other distant foreign power determines where Israel establishes its Capital much less its international borders with other nation states which share common borders.

From 1948-67 no recognized sovereign “Palestine” in international law. Jordan and Egypt did not treat their respective areas as “Palestine,” and the UN did not recognize their sovereignty there. Therefore, the later phrase “occupied Palestinian territories” — not a continuation of pre‑1967 legal language, but a post‑1967 political construction.

UN SC 242 (1967) inserts the phrase “withdrawal of Israeli armed forces from territories occupied in the recent conflict,” not “all the territories” and not “Palestinian territories”; UN SC 2334 (2016) morphs into “occupied Palestinian territory, including East Jerusalem,” and labels Israeli settlements there as having “no legal validity.” This effectively retrofits a Palestinian sovereignty claim onto areas that, pre‑1967, had no recognized Palestinian state and no recognized Jordanian/Egyptian sovereignty either. 2334 and the UN’s recognition of “Palestine” as a non‑member observer state (2012) represent a political re‑narration, not a neutral continuation of Mandate‑era law.

Post‑1967 BBC usage of “occupied Palestinian territories” mirrors the UN’s later terminology, not the earlier legal reality. Britain, having ended its Mandate in 1948, has no legal standing to define Israel’s borders or capital, yet its media and diplomacy still act as if they are arbiters of legitimacy; a continuation of Great Power narrative control—the same mentality that carved up the region under Sykes–Picot and Mandate arrangements. Language like “occupation,” “illegal settlements,” “Palestinian territories” is not neutral description; it’s weaponized vocabulary that encodes a particular political and historical judgment.

The Abraham Accords invalidates European Middle East politics. In strict legal terms, the Middle East and North African conflict, while acknowledging both terrorist violence with its consequential suffering consequence domino-effect/impact, in strict legal terms, this ongoing-conflict most basically pits Israel against neighboring Arab states rather than Arab nationalist Palestinian nationalist movements. While the Romans renamed Judea unto Palestine, the Roman empire long since dead. The Arab empire uprooted the Roman empire – hook, line, and sinker. Therefore 19th Century French maps sold to the ‘sick man of Europe’, as empty as the deceased Ottoman empire. No different from the dead League of Nations “Palestine mandate”, and the dead British, French, Nazi, and USSR communist empires; their world order no long exists – even the flies not interested in the dry bones of their corps. The League of Nations, and how much more so the post WWII UN have no power to create pre‑existing sovereign “Palestine”. Despite the UN or Britain\French propaganda, continuous retroactive attempts to resurrect – like Jesus on the 3rd day – this dead Roman corpse from its grave.

UNRWA and its permanent Arab refugee status of both ’48 and ’67 Arabs who sought to complete the Nazi Shoah by throwing the Jews into the Sea, such propaganda rhetoric – employed as a deliberate political tool, not a humanitarian necessity—sustaining statelessness to maintain a grievance narrative whose evil intent exploded on Oct 7th 2023 when UNWRA officials participated together with Hamas and Islamic Jihad terrorists in the massacre of 1200 or more Israelis; coupled with the Red Cross refusal to visit for some two years the captured Israeli hostages held under barbaric conditions. The League “Palestine Mandate” stood upon the foundation of the Balfour Declaration. Post ’67 UN declarations changed the goal-posts. Immediately after the declaration of Israeli Independence, the UN had no protectorate over “Palestine”; anymore than did Britain after it returned the League mandate back to the UN.

The post‑Shoah European narrative toward Israel reflects a convergence of Arab dhimmi attitudes toward Jews, Christian supersessionist theology, and Great Power political interests. This convergence has produced a persistent bias that frames Jewish sovereignty as an anomaly to be corrected rather than a legitimate expression of national self‑determination. The language of “occupation,” “illegal settlements,” and “Palestinian territories” is not a continuation of pre‑1967 legal reality but a political vocabulary constructed after the Six‑Day War, retroactively projecting sovereignty onto a territory that—between 1948 and 1967—neither Jordan nor Egypt treated as “Palestine,” and which the UN itself refused to recognize as belonging to either state.

The Abraham Accords further expose the obsolescence of European frameworks, demonstrating that regional peace emerges from regional actors—not from external powers imposing narratives rooted in outdated colonial assumptions. The UN’s and European states’ continued use of “occupied Palestinian territories” reflects not legal continuity but political reinvention, shaped by post‑colonial guilt, theological inheritance, and geopolitical interests.

Power politics affects which situations are pursued and how strongly. The UN does not repeatedly condemn Turkey’s acquisition of Cyprus, or Russia’s nationalization of Crimea. Its continued employment of “West Bank” in fact supports the illegal Jordanian nationalization of Samaria. Therefore, the swarm of UN condemnations of Israeli “illegal occupation of Palestinian territory” – wholly invalid.

The weakness of the UN system proves itself to exist as but a fig leaf which conceals ‘great power imperialism’. ‘West Bank’ treated as a geographic descriptor tied to current diplomatic frameworks, simply UN legal jargon propaganda which raises red-flags concerning the “neutrality” of the UN; placed on par with the corrupt UNWRA post Oct 7th 2023 and the failure of the Red Cross to visit the captured Israeli hostages for the entire two years torture.

Selective enforcement ⇒ the UN’s determinations – wholly invalid; starting with the Korean War which directly violated the US Constitution and directly led to the Vietnam War – totally invalidates the UN as a legal body. These fundamental, most basic contradictions, not minor or petty “debates”. But rather the Institutional failure and total collapse of the UN legal doctrine. The combination of selective enforcement, bloc politics, and evolving terminology undermines the perceived neutrality of UN determinations – among Israeli has destroyed all “trust” and we equate the UN on par with the dead League of Nations.

This idea that “A rule can remain legally valid even if applied inconsistently” serves as a despicable example of “Do as I say but not as I do”. In legal practice the UN treats “West Bank” as a current operational/geographic term that recognizes a Palestinian state! This blatant hypocrisy – “contradictions + political bias ⇒ total collapse of UN legal doctrine, Israelis view as part of the Yom HaShoah “NEVER AGAIN” oath that perpetuated the “Jewish Problem” Nazi “Final Solution”. No UN condemnations ever over Nassers and other Arab leaders repeated attempts to throw the Jews into the Sea.

Legal forums often dismiss Israeli self-determination “outright”. What else is new? Starting with the famous 3 No’s Arab state absolutely reject the “claims” made by Zionist Crusaders that dhimmi Jews share equal rights to achieve Independent self-determination in the Middle East; even in a land about the size of the State of New Jersey! UN post ’67 politics reflects a NT ‘nation divided against itself cannot stand’ Roman imperialism; especially as viewed from the perspective that the Apostle Paul served as Rabban Gamliel’s agent provocateur injected into Xtian circles to undermine the influence of this false messiah notion by declaring circumcision null and void – similar to Reform Judaism. And travelling to Rome and declaring JeZeus as Lord savior son of God when polytheistic Roman theology recognized Caesar as the son of God!

The language which Britain and France “inserted” into UN 242 of “inadmissibility of the acquisition of territory by war” and the “need to work for a just and lasting peace in which every State in the area can live in security”, the resolution intentionally ambiguous. The English version does not say “all the territories,” while the French version does – a red herring. Why? There never existed in all recorded Human history an Arab Palestinian state. Therefore the post UN Condemnation of Jordans’ annexation of its “West Bank”, which 242 now affixes to an imaginary Palestinian state – utter bogus.

Compare that UN SC 242 propaganda to the current slander of Alex Jones: From “Lone Warrior” to “Nuclear Madness”. The Democrap talking point that perverted President Trump’s steadfast refusal for the Mullah regime in Iran, even before President Reagan replaced Jimmy Carter. The latter’s attempt to employ helicopters to insert special forces troops to free US embassy hostages the Mullah fanatics seized, during a desert wind storm – made with the coming Presidential elections in mind rather than the safety of US personnel. This self-centered shift of priorities exploded Carter’s re-election bid. In the same manner, Alex Jones too, post the Court-Case which closed him in particular and his InfoWars studio down due to his inflammatory touching the 2012 Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting which horrified the nation roughly 6 months in Obama’s 2nd term as President.

Alex Jones repeatedly claimed that the 2012 shooting – staged and that the parents merely Hollywood like actors. In like manner he now condemns President Trump’s war rhetoric “total eradication”, to general genocide of the Iranian people rather than the total war removal of the fanatic Mullahs and their drive to attain nuclear weapons by which to attack the Great and Small Satan’s.

UN Resolution 242 does not concern global conflicts but rather its language “inserts” the post UN repeated condemnations of Israel touching occupied Palestinian lands! 242 does not concern global conflicts but rather its language “inserts” the post UN repeated condemnations of Israel touching occupied Palestinian lands! This UN slander ie European imperialism took advantage of LBJ involvement in the Vietnam War to re-insert Britain and France as great power brokers who themselves determine the balance of power in the Middle East. The 1922 League “Palestine Mandate” based upon 19th Century French maps which the “Sick Man of Europe” acquired which labelled Ottoman Greater-Syria as “Palestine”, coupled with the post WWI British/French division of Sykes-Picot which which devied or apportioned the spoils of the corpse of the Ottoman empire divided up between the two remaining standing Allied empires in Europe including Russia.

UN 242 propaganda changed the original Palestine League mandate to include an Arab Palestinian state which all Arab states themselves universally rejected in Britain language of UN General Assembly 181. 19th Century European colonial aspirations and maps, redefined territorial boundaries in ways that served great power domination of the balance of power in any given region. British division of Iraq separated from a warm water port in Kuwait and the division of India into two warring nations serve as examples to understand European “interests” to insert their dictates into the Middle East. Absolutely no different from the latest slander “internationalist Democrats in Congress” employ the war rhetoric “total eradication”, as to all Iranians rather than limited to the Mullah communist dictators who themselves seek nuclear destruction of the Great and small Satan’s.

Post the ’56 Suez crisis IKE terminated the great power status of both London and Paris. Prior to the 2nd Shoah – according to the declared statements of Nasser himself; who promised to rectify the Arab Nakba disgrace! Nakba, not the post ’67 humiliating Arab defeat which switched the narrative to the poor Palestinians peoples scattered into the winds. But rather the ’48 Arab disgrace the invading Arab states failure to throw the Jews into the Sea – Nakba!

Therefore UN 242, with LBJ’s butt exposed in Vietnam, London & Paris attempted to re-insert their domination in determining the balance of power in the Middle East which IKE utterly negated. UN 242 fits in harmony with Truman’s “containment policy”, and the British empire’s policy of maintaining the balance of power/England as top dog\ resemble one another’s national interests.

France surrendered to the Nazis after 6 months of actual army on army fighting. So their ‘great power’ status has never recovered from their Nakba defeat. Post ’56 London had to brown-nose Washington. However, the Trump Era Washington, while it has “yet” to pull out of NATO, the stink of the NATO corpse in the air. The Trump political rhetoric that describes NATO as a “Paper Tiger” plays well with giving Putin a face saving out of the Nakba Ukraine war. International politics, while it resembles poker – far more nuanced and complex.

UN 242: language ambiguity did not “invent” a Palestinian state. But it most certainly serves as the concealed foundation by which all post 242 UN condemnations of Israeli settlements which culminated in Obama’s 2334 which prioritized London and Paris’s efforts to dominate the balance of power in the Middle East strategic interests! Openly clashes with Trump 1.0 Abraham Accords, recognition of Jerusalem and the Golan as part of Israel’s international permanent Capital and borders and Trump 2.0 Gaza Peace Board which excludes Russia, Britain, the UN, and Frog quartet as great power players in the Middle East. The stench of the dead NATO alliance – EU hostility to US economic dominance within EU economies.

The UN employs the rhetoric of “peace” no different than how Chamberlain did after he personally betrayed the Czech Republic in 1938. Political rhetoric whores “peace” which its lies employ as merely a sweet perfume “noun” that has no teeth. Shalom by stark and obvious contrast a verb that stands upon the foundation of “Trust”. No trust No Shalom. Just that simple.

For example: The entire history of European and Arab empires have played the back and forth – something like tennis – the “Jewish problem”. Post Shoah ’48 Israel’s have sworn a formal Torah oath: “NEVER AGAIN”. Meaning, Israelis reject foreign power dictates which determine “Final Solutions” for their bogus racist “Jewish Problems”.