Tag: palestine

The bureaucratic Sovietization of the UN, proof of its decline and ultimate collapse. This produces policy paralysis, hypocrisy, and ultimately loss of legitimacy. The UN increasingly resembles the League of Nations—procedurally busy, morally loud, strategically irrelevant. Bottom line: Victory through war defines international borders.

Vietnam stands in the shadow of Soviet defeats in the 1967 and ’73 Arab Israeli wars, viewed from the perspective of 2026; Nasser qualifies as a Soviet client state where Sadat expelled Soviet advisors before the war. US imperialism in Vietnam treated S. Vietnam as a banana republic. Unlike Korea, US strategy intimidated by the threat of Soviet or Chinese intervention failed to invade and conquer North Vietnam like MacArthur did in North Korea.

Furthermore the corruption of the Military Industrial Complex “monopoly” and entrenched bureaucratization of Washington after LBJ/assassination of Kennedy starkly contrasts with post WWII Truman’s Korean imperialism – Containment policy and Marshal Plan. The Sovietization of Washington as a bureaucratic super-state which dominated the 50 States of the Republic mirrors Soviet bureaucratic big brother domination of the states of the USSR.

The USSR’s apparatchik system or LBJ’s micromanaged Vietnam quagmire, prioritize ideological posturing over pragmatic outcomes, leading to institutional decay. The UN’s trajectory indeed mirrors the League of Nations’ impotence, failing to enforce norms equitably and risking obsolescence in a multipolar world where power realities (e.g., Crimea’s annexation or Golan recognitions) override rhetoric.

The former perhaps best exemplified in US support for the British & French UN Resolution 242 and 338 which sought to restrict and limit the growing Israeli weight in determining the balance of power across the Middle East; both England & France sought to negate their great power defeat in the disastrous 1956 Suez Crisis which reduced both countries to second tier powers during the Cold War.

Containment, caused the US to become the Police Force of the Planet; especially after Truman invaded Korea without a Congressional declaration of war. Truman did not micromanage the Korean conflict, at least not until he overruled MacArthur’s demand to employ atomic bombs against China. LBJ ran the Vietnam war from air conditioned offices in Washington DC. The US defeat in Vietnam came directly because Westmoreland only wasted smoke compared to general MacArthur. Two completely different breeds of generals. Westmoreland a bureaucrat while MacArthur a warrior. LBJ’s micromanagement and UN fact-finding missions share the same DNA.

Furthermore, at Camp David PM Begin curtly inform Carter that Israel was not a banana republic! Carter never forgave Begin for this rebuke which called the spade of US imperialism in the Middle East – a spade. UN 242 expresses the strategic interests of European and US/USSR Great Powers rather than the 6 Day War. Russia and Poland occupy captured Prussia to this day. Post WWII the Allies made a forced German population transfer from both Prussia and the Czech Republic! This totally contradicts the false rhetoric of UN 242. And no UN condemnation for France’s Versailles spoils or Britain’s treaty-imposed divisions, yet relentless framing of Israel’s post-1967 gains as “inadmissible.” This hypocrisy fuels 2026 debates, where Crimea’s status quo persists amid global outrage, underscoring victors’ justice.

In point of fact both Begin and Sharon governments agreed with “withdrawal from territories” 242 premise to achieve peace. Begin withdrew Israel from the captured Sinai and Sharon withdrew, post Oslo Accords, Israeli domination of Gaza. The latter effectively established a “Palestinian state”(s) in Gaza and Palestinian autonomy in Area 1 of Samaria. 242’s “inadmissibility of acquisition of territory by war” clashes with Allied actions—expelling 12-14 million Germans from East Prussia (now Polish/Russian Kaliningrad), Sudetenland (Czech), and other areas in 1945-1950, with millions more dying enroute. Russia/Poland retain those lands, redrawn at Potsdam/Yalta without referendums. (some estimates reach 14–16 million total across Central/Eastern Europe). Deaths during flight, expulsions, internment, disease, and violence ranged from over 500,000 (conservative figures) to 2 million or more (higher scholarly estimates), with causes including malnutrition, exposure, and targeted killings.

These territories – redrawn without referendums, and Russia/Poland retain them today—Kaliningrad as a Russian exclave, former German lands in Poland integrated post-1945. This was “victors’ justice”: Allies sanctioned mass population transfers to create ethnically homogeneous states and prevent future irredentism, echoing the same acquisition-by-force logic 242 later condemned. In 2026, parallels are frequently drawn to Russia’s 2014 Crimea annexation (widely condemned) or Israel’s Golan control (U.S.-recognized in 2019 under Trump), underscoring how norms bend to power dynamics.

UN 242 etc etc etc completely ignores the British “occupation” of Northern Ireland. Or the French “occupation” of Alsace-Lorraine which France captured following WWI. These double standards—victors’ justice vs. post-colonial restraint—undermines 242’s political rhetoric. This critique echoed in 2026 discussions of Crimea (2014 annexation). It illustrates how “rules-based order” bends to power realities.

Still the UN continues to pretend that Israel remains a protectorate territory with its many condemnations and attempts to slander Israel post the Oct7th Abomination War as a Apartheid Genocide State. European States refuse to validate Israel’s decision to make Jerusalem its Capital. They refuse to weigh the post Shoah Jewish oath: “NEVER AGAIN”; Europeans shall never again impose “solutions” for “their” Jewish problem. The refusal to weigh “Never Again” in policy—dismissing Jewish self-determination post-Holocaust—manifests in non-recognition of Jerusalem as capital or Israel’s Middle Eastern regional grouping. Arab states’ exclusionary tactics (blocking Israel from Asia-Pacific UN bodies since 1949) perpetuate this “Apartheid Policy racism,” unmatched for any other member.

The UN adamantly refuses to recognize Israel as a country of the Middle East. No other UN member country treated with such Apartheid Policy racism-exclusion. This alone undermines the UN’s claim to neutrality. Only Trump has recognized Jerusalem the Golan and Area C of Samaria as part of the Israeli victory through wars international borders. Britain and France hold lingering grudges from the ’56 Suez where the Cold War super powers reduced these former great state powers to US dependents.

The UN compares to a whore-house where nation state(s) coalitions substitute strategic state national interests with soap box preaching morality which views Israel as a Colonial Crusader State. UN Resolution 242 (and broader UN frameworks) selectively enforces principles like territorial integrity while overlooking historical precedents involving European powers. From the vantage of January 18, 2026—amidst the ongoing Gaza truce fallout and heightened global scrutiny of Israel’s actions—these double standards appear even more pronounced, fueling debates over whether the “rules-based order” is little more than a facade for great-power realpolitik. Critics, including Israeli officials and pro-Israel advocates, often frame the UN as an institution where moral posturing conceals strategic alliances, with Israel bearing the brunt of disproportionate condemnation.

Alsace-Lorraine, annexed under the 1919 Treaty of Versailles. Despite local German-speaking populations and cultural ties to Germany, no comprehensive referendum was held—only limited plebiscites in adjacent areas like the Saar. France integrated it as a spoils-of-war gain, redrawing borders to punish Germany and bolster its security. In interwar discourse, British and Irish press often viewed it as a Franco-German internal matter, with little international outcry over “occupation.” Today, it’s fully French territory, unchallenged by UN resolutions, contrasting sharply with 242’s rhetoric applied to Israel’s post-1967 gains.

The 1921 partition of Ireland, formalized by the Anglo-Irish Treaty, created Northern Ireland as part of the UK amid civil unrest and without a island-wide referendum. Unionist majorities in the North opted to remain British, but nationalist grievances persist, viewing it as an imposed division. The UN has never framed this as an unlawful “occupation” under resolutions like 242, despite parallels in ethnic division and territorial claims. French perspectives on the Northern Ireland peace process (e.g., Good Friday Agreement) highlight transnational hypocrisy, where European powers evade the scrutiny applied to non-Western conflicts. In 2026 discussions, this is likened to Crimea’s 2014 annexation—condemned globally—while Northern Ireland’s status quo endures without comparable UN intervention.

The UN Human Rights Office’s January 2026 report chronicles “intensification of decades of severe racial discrimination” in the West Bank, explicitly warning of apartheid under international law. Similarly, the Independent International Commission of Inquiry (September 2025) declared Israel’s actions in Gaza as genocide, citing mass killings, starvation, and erasure. The UN hypocrisy directly compares to new generations of born again Xtian totally oblivious to the 2000+ years of Church war crimes against Humanity which culminated in the European systematic slaughter of 75% of Western European Jewry. The UN declaration of Israeli “genocide” directly compares to Holocaust Denial, where the UN-Church stands on a soap box and preaches blood libels against Jews. The Oct7th Abomination War does not remotely compare to the war crimes of the Shoah.

UN 242 etc etc etc represents European ‘great powers’ attempts to impose a two state ‘Final Solution’. Israel simply not a UN protectorate territory. Palestine ceased to exist in 1948. England separated Trans-Jordan from its Palestine mandate territories at the Jordan river. The UN condemned Jordans’ nationalization of Samaria in 1950. Arafat’s PLO Charter of 1964 referred only to 1948 Israel as occupied territory – not Samaria or Gaza as occupied territory! Had Ben Gurion named the new Jewish state Palestine in 1948, the opportunist rhetoric of the displaced “Palestinian people” would never have existed! The Nakba of 800,000 Jews expelled from Arab countries surpasses the 650 Arab refugees who fled from Israeli/Palestine in 1948.

European States do not determine the international borders of the Jewish state nor where it establishes it Capital! East Jerusalem as “occupied” serves only their great power interests to dominate the balance of power across the Middle East by dismembering Israel much like the 19th Century great powers did to China. UN ‘groupy clicks’ totally ignore Israel’s 1980 Basic Law declaring it the undivided capital.

The UN does not classify Israel in the Middle East/Asia-Pacific group due to longstanding exclusion by Arab states. All Arab Israeli War fought over the fanatic classification of Jews as dhimmi second class inferior race politics; Arab have always rejected the Balfour Declaration which resulted in the 1922 League of Nations Palestine Mandate to establish a Jewish National Home in the Middle East. All Arab UN member states voted against UN Resolution 181 wherein 33 or 2/3rds of all UN member states validated Jews equal rights to achieve self-determination. The UN groupy-clicks voted for UN 3379 – Zionism is Racism.

Only under Trump did the US recognize Jerusalem (2017, embassy move 2018), Golan Heights sovereignty (2019, captured 1967, annexed 1981), and propose Area C annexation in his 2020 plan affirmed “victory through wars” borders, openly reject and contradict Russian, EU – UN norms. Britain and France’s grudges from the 1956 Suez Crisis—where US/USSR pressure humbled them—persist in their Middle East imperialist policies; fundamentally aligning against Israeli war victories in order to reclaim their degraded & lost influence in determining the balance of power in this region. The EU delusions of grandeur utterly shocked by the Israeli victories in the ’48 & ’67 Two Israeli Wars of Independence. The guilt of the Shoah has besmirched the good name reputation of Europe and made the church a dead religion across those lands.

These UN dynamics mirror the bureaucratic “Sovietization” which greatly contributed to the collapse of the USSR and the defeat of the US in Vietnam. Only the future knows if the UN shall go the way of the League of Nations. Both failed institutions centralize moralizing over pragmatic strategy, restraining actors like Israel while ignoring parallels in Korea or Middle East client states. In 2026, with Gaza’s truce fragile and Crimea analogies fresh, the “rules-based order” bends predictably to power. Which element—perhaps UNRWA alliance with Hamas on Oct 7th scandals or European hypocrisy—merits deeper exploration?!

Rational Logic vs. Defeatist Revionist History

Thank You Nitay. The Libtard left an absolute joke … and completely out of power. Based upon the mastery of English I assume that Haviv Rettig Gur and Hussein Abubakr Mansour are American Arab/Muslim Americans. As an Israeli/American – made aliya to Israel in 1991 – its interesting to listen to American Muslims views, how they perceive the Libtard of crazy left-wing Americans, educated by Universities to interpret reality based upon outrage and subjectivization of issues.

Rational logic which split Jews against Jews during the Middle Ages/Reshonim scholars of Jewish elite the “Civil War” which pitted inductive logic established by the Tannaim and Amoraim Framers of the Talmud and Midrashim vs. the rediscovered Greek deductive logic originally developed by Socrates Plato and Aristotle. This Jewish Reshonim Civil War pitted the French Common law school of inductive reasoning against the Rambam/Sephardi school of deductive reasoning.

It seems that what these two American Muslims address – the gulf which separates Left-wing intellectual subjectivism pitted against traditional/conservative deductive reasoning which dominated University education until perhaps the re-establishment of the Jewish State, starting in 1948; but really flowery post the June 1967 Six Day War.

Why did the fortress of traditional University deductive reasoning education in Western Europe suddenly switch to prioritization of subjective emotional half-truth propaganda reasoning. Joseph Goebbels was highly intelligent and educated Man. Yet his propaganda mastery controlled the political narrative till Allied bombers and Armies led by Russian and American Generals Zhukov, Patton & Bradley utterly Gazafied Nazi Germany.

It seems to me that the British and French “defeat” in the 1956 attempt to seize the Suez Canal by these to Western European States; the “defeat” of European ‘Great Power Imperialism’ to dominate the sphere of Western Influence over all the States of the Middle East by seizing the Suez — this not only cemented the bi-polar US – USSR Cold War by demoting both defeated in WWII France and post War Britain to second tier powers. Then came the shock of the June 1967 War wherein France “betrayed” its alliance with Israel and Britain declared its “neutrality”; yet post War both States (LBJ tied down in Vietnam) irrationally attempted to force a “New Set of Rules upon Israel/revisionist History” by pretending that the Arabs nations won that disastrous War for all Arab rejection of Jews equal rights to achieve self-determination in the Middle East as originally expressed in the 1917 Balfour Declaration – 1922 League of Nations Palestine Mandate to establish a Jewish National Home in Palestine. ((Boy that last sentence a mouthful.))

Subjective irrational revisionist history ignores the fact that the Ottoman Empire never referred to Greater Syria as Palestine other than in European made maps. The Ottoman Empire – known as “the Sick Man of Europe” in the 19th Century could not afford its own cartographers. Arabs to this day cannot pronounce the letter P in the European word “Palestine”. The Western Universities “supported” the British/French revisionist history known as UN Resolution 242, which ignores the fact that Russia and Poland “occupy” Prussia to this very day! That the moment David Ben Gurion declared National Independence and Israel thereafter won the 1948 first Independence War … that the League of Nation name “Palestine” ceased to exist. Universities ignore that all Arab states rejected the Peel Commission of 1936 which directly led to UN GA Resolution 181 in 1947. All Arab states absolutely rejected the European Two State Solution Model.

Yet subjective revisionist history as promoted by Universities arbitrarily promotes the Two State Solution! Palestine as a UN Protectorate territory ceased to exist in 1948. Arafat’s opportunist propaganda wherein he named the Palestine Liberation Army (PLO) in 1964, revived this forgotten Name; had Ben Gurion named the new Jewish State “Palestine” obviously their would be no “Palestinians” today.

The next level University revisionist history: Beyond Palestine and two state solutions 181 pretense that Israel today remains a Protectorate Territory “created” by the UN itself rather than an Independent nation who twice won its National Independence in two Arab Wars of genocide; Nasser swore that the Arabs in 1967 would throw the Jews into the Sea. And within Israel, the Israeli government ordered the digging of mass graves expecting an absolute massacre of the Israeli population by Egypt Syrian and Jordanian Armies! Therefore the next level of University revisionist history subjectivism – it ignores the fact that Arabs lost those Wars and became permanent refugee populations without a country of their own. Never existed an Arab Palestine in all recorded history. Yet the University protests proclaim: From the River to the Sea Palestine will be free”.

Revisionist history by definition subjective. This makes revisionist history as taught by University Professors propaganda on the Order of Joseph Georbels of Nazi Germany. Propaganda by its essence and nature; by its “Race” according to the language employed by Nazi propaganda, promotes emotional outrage rather than deductive rational reasoning which dominated University Education programs prior to the 2nd Tier “Great Power” status of Western European degraded powers. Revisionist history by definition rejects that post WWII US and USSR sat at the top of the heap of Great Powers.

mosckerr

https://spinstrangenesscharm.wordpress.com/2026/01/09/wokeism-l-and-r-as-internal-status-competition-and-meanwhile-in-iran/

Arabs learn to lie cheat and steal straight from their mothers’ milk

The 7 October 2023 slaughter of 1200 to 1300 Israelis in one day and the jubilation of Gazans who stole and hid Israeli captives for 2 years, those horrific attacks utterly refute the ignorance of Israeli grace which the Sharon government in 2005 unilaterally withdrew from Gaza to award a Gaza Oslo Accord Palestinian state.

The revisionist history of this pro-Palestinian pie in the sky narishkeit barely acknowledges the 7 October attacks at all. Instead, it treats Hamas as a legitimate “resistance” movement and frames any attempt to disarm it as imperial aggression. It portrays the proposed International Stabilization Force (ISF) as a tool for U.S.–Israeli domination; the ISF is not peacekeeping but “outsourced occupation.” Arab and Muslim states are being pressured or bribed to participate. The real goal is eliminating Hamas and other armed groups.

It suggests that the U.S. and Israel are divided on tactics, not goals. Its propaganda claims that Israel wants total disarmament before any force enters Gaza. While the U.S. wants a phased approach to avoid regional backlash.

It frames Hamas’s disarmament as illegitimate unless a Palestinian state is created. The half-truth propaganda argues that Hamas should only consider disarmament if statehood is guaranteed. While it totally ignores the 2005 unilateral Israeli withdrawal from Gaza! This propaganda: ignores the Oct7th massacre, ignores the hostages, ignores the sexual violence, ignores the indiscriminate killing of civilians, and then argues that Hamas deserves political concessions…

Inversely its one hand clapping noise declares: Hamas is “resistance,” not a terrorist organization. Israel is the sole aggressor. International intervention is inherently colonial. Palestinian armed groups are entitled to remain armed.

What the article doesn’t address: No acknowledgment of the Oct 7 atrocities. No mention of Israeli civilian suffering or hostage families. No recognition that Hamas embeds itself among civilians, creating humanitarian disasters. No discussion of Hamas’s charter, ideology, or long-term goals. No acknowledgment that many Palestinians themselves oppose Hamas.

This twisted Nazi like propaganda which erases or minimizes the 7 October 2023 massacre; ignores the unilateral Israeli withdrawal from Gaza in 2005, and then argues Hamas and “resistance” are entitled to political rewards and international protection simply not an actual analysis — it is propaganda and revisionist history. Hamas is designated a terrorist organization by the EU, U.S., UK, Canada, and others, and its founding charter and practice include armed struggle, rejection of Israel’s legitimacy, and systemic attacks on civilians.

This pro-Palestinian has the right to criticize Israeli policy, question U.S. strategy, or debate the wisdom of any future multinational force in Gaza. Those are all legitimate arguments. But when an article skips from “occupation” to “resistance” without passing through 7 October, treats Hamas as a misunderstood actor entitled to keep its weapons, and calls attempts to disarm it “colonial,” it is not seeking justice. It is rewriting history to reward the perpetrators of one of the worst massacres of Jews since the Holocaust.

mosckerr
Trump’s Gaza plan: A foreign force to finish the job

The Reformation did not liberate Europe from the Church; it exported the Church’s theological hatred and intolerance into multiple competing sects which promoted Supersessionism, Demonization of Jews, Replacement theology, and Sanctification of violence for ideological purity.

Calvin’s Letter to Bullinger, About Luther, on 25 November 1544

In a letter to Bullinger, dated November 25, 1544, he adjured him to treat the great man, meaning Luther, with respect. A lot of good that letter had! Both Calvin and Luther together with the Poop of Rome all directly contributed to the 30 year war blood bath. The theological absolutism of Xtianity became the political absolutism of the modern European nation-state.

The Thirty Years’ War (1618-1648), a political earthquake. This devastating conflict in Europe, involving numerous states and religious factions. Indeed, the theological and political tensions fostered by figures like Calvin, Luther, and the Papacy played significant roles in its escalation. The Protestant Reformation, led by Calvin and Luther, splintered Xtianity in Europe. This division created deep-rooted animosities that fueled the 30 years Civil War between Protestant and Catholic states.

Only the WWI and WWII Civil Wars slaughtered such a gross and disgusting blood bath. The Catholic Church, being a central institution during this period, sought to maintain its power against the growing Protestant movements. Actions taken by the Papacy often intensified the conflict. Religious Intolerance branded Europe just like as did Nazi racism. This inherited, perhaps genetic intolerance, perpetuated by leaders across Europe. Proved and validated: scratch a European and find a barbarian; 2023–2024: Europe slanders Israel and enables pogrom mobs on University Campuses while pretending moral authority.

Calvin and Luther contributed to the intense hatred, matched only by the Nazi hatred of Jews! Their legacies directly responsible for the 30 years war where Xtianity as a religion proved itself as worthless tits on a boar hog avoda zarah. UN Hypocrisy as the Direct Inheritance of European Xtian Super-sessionist Ideology. Palestinian Nationalism as a Post-1964 European-Framed Gospel mythology!

Calvin and Luther did play roles in shaping the religious landscape of Europe. The context in which they worked, marked by significant corruption within and across the church Av tuma avoda zarah. Goyim throughout European history – utterly barbaric in their violence. The Crusades stand out as but just one example of this Dead God religion, an expression of the nadir of the barbaric animal soul of European sub-human man. Europe Has No Moral Standing Over Israel.

The violence witnessed in the Thirty Years’ War, the World Wars, and other conflicts certainly reflect a human propensity for brutality, especially when ideologies at stake. The capacity for intolerance and hatred has shadowed many aspects of human history, leading to tragic outcomes. Herzl wrote his “Jewish State” because he argued that Europeans, impossible for them to heal themselves from their anti-Semitism cancer infected minds.

Europeans utterly addicted to ideology in shaping human behavior and societal structures. Honest discourse and acknowledgment of past atrocities immediately flies out the window whenever mob Jew hating protests condemn Jews. The disgrace of Europe during the anti-Jewish Oct 7th massacre by Hamas, Islamic Jihad and UNWRA stands proves that Europeans memory of their past crimes “forgotten” in their Holocaust Denial where the ICC assumes it has jurisdiction over Israel despite Israel’s rejection of the Rome Accords!

The slander accusations which call Israel a genocide state matched only by the violence of Nazi inferior race propaganda that reached a pre-War cracindo during the pogrom “Night of Shattered Glass”. Long-standing struggles with intolerance and hatred define the corrupt European soul. The Thirty Years’ War illustrates how religious divisions, combined with political ambitions, lead to catastrophic violence and suffering, with devastating impacts on civilian populations. The persistent presence of anti-Semitism in European history reflects deep-seated biases that have manifested in various forms of violence and discrimination.

UN accusations of genocide, despite the UNWRA participation in the Oct 7th massacre, never presented by the reactionary propaganda MSM press as accusations – but rather as cold proven facts. This reality proves the mental insanity that Europeans pass down from generation to generation. The Palestinian “Passion Play” over made up imaginary facts. Palestine ceased to exist as a UN protectorate territory the instant Ben Gurion declared Jewish national independence in 1948. Goyim hatred of Jews who defeated Arab Armies – dedicated to throw the Jews into the Sea and fulfill like Jesus did the words of the prophets, the Nazi Shoah across Europe; despite the PLO charter explicitly declaring that only ’48 Israel qualified as “Occupied Territories”, the UN declared post ’67 that Samaria and Gaza as “Occupied Territories”. Yet Goyim mental insanity fails to catch the UN lie.

The empty platitude: An honest and thorough examination of the past is essential for creating a more tolerant future. Tits on a boar hog empty drum noise. Recognizing the role ideologies play in shaping societies and the harm they can cause, this the diseased minds of European governments simply cannot do. Not in the days of Calvin and Luther and not today. The common denominator which ties all European society together … their cold dead religion of Xtianity’s rabid hatred of Jews.

Post WWII Jews say Never Again. Meaning Never Again shall European governments dictate any other “solution” for “the Jewish problem” post Shoah. Israel’s response to UN Resolutions 242, 338, 446, 2334 etc … NEVER AGAIN. The longstanding strains of anti-Semitism in Europe, indeed intertwined with historical events, creating cycles of prejudice that Europeans – without fail – always ignore or minimize every time that mobs rage across European cities. This persistent hatred has roots in religious, economic, and social contexts. UN accusations and resolutions reflect broader political agendas of biased assessment of reality, leading to distorted perceptions and narratives. Israel has washed its hands of Europe like Pontius Pilate washed his hands over the false messiah JeZeus. Jews, post Shoah, no longer accept responsibility for Blood Libels, or poisoning the wells etc.

Anti-Semitism in Europe has no cure other than Jews breaking all diplomatic relations with European governments as possible allies in international relations. The instances of mob behavior and anti-Semitic sentiment in cities across Europe reveal a consistent repeated pattern of Jewish hatred and historical biases, specifically that Ottoman Greater Syria never referred to by the name Palestine other than in European made maps which the “Sick Man of Europe” bought and acquired after Napoleon.

The role of the UN, a betrayal of the Balfour Declaration/League of Nation Palestine Mandate to establish a Jewish National Home in Palestine. UN revisionist history which promotes the Arafat lie that Arabs lived as Philistine boat-people who originally invaded Gaza from the Greek Islands, yet fails to confront the inconvenient fact that Arab people never originated from European countries. Ignored that not till 1964 did Arab propaganda opportunistically embrace the name Palestine! Yet amazingly European and Arab propaganda promotes the lie that Jews occupy Palestine mandate lands of Samaria despite England’s separation of the Palestine Mandate territory from Trans-Jordan at the Jordan River in 1923.

The reference to “Palestine” in historical contexts reflects colonial influences rather than indigenous identity. The narrative that Arab identity shifted around the name “Palestine” post-1964 a political maneuvering that utterly distorts and perverts history. This revisionist history denies the Balfour Declaration and the League Palestine Mandate and substitutes UN 3379 Zionism is Racism slander only matched by the recent Israel commits genocide slander.

The persistence of anti-Semitic actions and sentiments in Europe, a cyclical and deeply rooted mental insanity, invariably ignored or minimized by those in power for the entire Easter period passion play. European Xtians prioritize “I am saved” stupidity which they drum into the heads of their fellow believers to remain oblivious to their blood soaked, cruel and puke history as a people. Anti-Semiticism morphed into Colonialism and later into imperialism. Dominant European states addicted to ruling the roost of the balance of power across the major regions of the Planet Earth.

After the fact, Spanish sincere apologies for expelling the Jews from Spain in 1492 compare to a screen door on a submarine German sorrow over the slaughter of 75% of Western European Jewry and Rome’s most sincere remorse over the post WWII Nazi Rat lines or Poland’s anti-Jewish pogroms! Europeans lie, just that simple. They do not possess a shred of human sincerity simply because as soon as the immediate disgrace of their inhumanity to man gets passed over through the passage of time, European behave like dogs who return and eat their own vomit again and again and again.

The complexities of Jewish identity, historical narratives, and the struggles against Amalek/anti-Semitism resonate deeply in contemporary discourse. Propaganda narratives around “Palestine”, influenced by colonial European motivations emphasizes the impact of power dynamics in shaping identity and historical memory. The idea of post-1964 Arab identity being a political maneuver underscores the contested nature of history in this context.

Hostile pro Arab narratives touching “Palestine”, in essence seek to deny both the Balfour Declaration and the League of Nations Palestine as the establishment of a Jewish National Home. All Arab wars fought, including the 1948 Independence War, the Arab rejection that dhimmi refugee Jews have equal rights to achieve self determination in the Middle East. UN Resolution 3379 – Zionism is Racism, and current chants: From the River to the Sea Palestine will be Free reject the European red herring “Land for Peace”. Arafat offered East Jerusalem and 98% of Samaria and Gaza as a Palestinian State. Hamas took over a Gaza independent state and immediately made repeated wars that culminated in the Oct7th Abomination 2023 War.

The British French propaganda expressed in post ’67 UN Resolution 242 exposed as revisionist history. Russia and Poland occupy Prussia to this day! The Allies made a forced 14 to 20 million population transfer of Germans living for generations in Prussia and the Czech Republic. The Indian/Pakistan mass population transfer Britain and other Western Powers praised to achieve “peace”. Such revisionist history never to this day denounced as a blaggard lie. European imperialist vs. Israel follow the rule: Do as I say but not as I do.

The latest blood libel

What does the Sudan massacres have to due with either the UAE or Israel. Blood Libel Slanders all about death rather than life. People who blindly and immediatel believe stories of death wherein Jews are blamed for completely unsubstantiated crimes against humanity, expose the tuma nature of their evil eye and spirits.

The latest Av tuma avoda zara Blood Libel Slander

What does the Sudan massacres have to due with either the UAE or Israel. Blood Libel Slanders all about death rather than life. People who blindly and immediately believe stories of death wherein Jews are blamed for completely unsubstantiated crimes against humanity, expose the tuma nature of their evil eye and spirits.

___________________________________________________________
Richard Falk

agorichardfalk.wordpress.com

“”Decontextualization of October 7 produces a distorted imagery of good and evil. Without taking account of the oppressive occupation of Gaza that preceded and the excessive response that followed the Hamas-led attack are both integral to moral judgment. Without context a condemnation of October 7 becomes a private form of state propaganda. This is especially true given the ambiguity surrounding the attack consisting of ignored, repeated warnings, incomprehensible failings of Israel’s surveillance
capabilities.”
_____________________________________________________________

How has Sudan thrown its support to the RSF? The Rapid Support Forces (RSF) – a paramilitary group in Sudan, originally formed from the Janjaweed militia, known for its involvement in the Darfur conflict. The RSF has emerged as a significant force in Sudan’s ongoing civil war, which began in April 2023, primarily fighting against the Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF).

What does the Sudan massacres have to due with either the UAE or Israel? Reports have confirmed that UK military equipment, originally sold to the UAE, has been found in the possession of the RSF. Analysts suggest that the UAE has vested interests in Sudan, particularly in mining and security, and views the RSF as a crucial ally in pursuing these objectives. In early 2025, Sudan initiated a case against the UAE at the International Court of Justice for alleged complicity in genocide, citing support provided to the RSF during the ongoing conflict.

Israel through the US President Trump Abraham Accords has engaging in normalization talks with various Arab states, including the UAE. The dynamics in Sudan could impact Israel’s relationships with these nations and their approaches to regional stability. The consequences of UAE recognition of Israel and signing a peace treaty, Israel may face international scrutiny regarding its position on the conflict, especially as reports of human rights violations and ethnic cleansing emerge from Sudan? This irrational slander makes no sense.

Israeli diplomatic engagement with Arab states sparks a cursed Blood Libel Richard Falk lie. Potential shifts in regional dynamics consequent to Israel and Arab countries joining an expanded Abraham Accords blamed for political chaos and anarchy in Africa? This Richard Falk blood libel seeks to arouse the need for scrutiny over humanitarian impacts in Sudan like he unilaterally declares the guilt of Israel for the Oct 7th 2023 massacre of 1300 Israelis by Hamas, Islamic Jihad, and the UNWRA! The Red Cross never made any attempt what so ever to carry out their mandate and visit Israeli stolen hostages held in underground tunnels for years! Richard Falk early in the war promoted the slander that an Israeli missile struck an Arab hospital killing 500 people.

The revisionist dhimmi Arab history, notice that it totally ignores European arrogance that Britain & France remain great powers in the Middle East. Contrast European imperialist arrogance between the ’56 vs. the ’67 Wars! Smug Limeys and Frogs attempt to steal the Suez Canal vs. Neutral Europe post war dictates UN SC Resolution 242 “Two State Solution Chapter VII Dictate imposed upon the despised by Europe Jewish state. However post Shoah Jews swore a Torah oath: NEVER AGAIN; meaning Europe shall NEVER AGAIN dictate any other “Solution” after the Shoah. Israel remembers London’s betrayal of the Balfour Declaration partnership with its consistent sacrifice of Jews upon the altar of London’s imperialist strategic interests through passage of TWO White Papers which triggered that FDR closed the borders of the US which sealed the total destruction of European Jewry, 75% of all Jews slaughtered by European barbarians in less than 3 years.

European revisionist history sucks. The Arabs not the actual enemies of Israel, though clearly not friends of the Jewish state — not enemies comparable to the European barbarians. The second You Tube clip likewise fails, less so but still fails, to address the elephant in the china closet!!!! Peace simply a rhetoric propaganda NOUN! Peace not a verb like Shalom which stands upon the foundation of TRUST. Post Shoah NEVER AGAIN Jews do not trust European barbarians, especially their cursed smug arrogance which behaves with no Shame.

Europe merits no trust no shalom period. Israeli strategic foreign policy interests center upon integration of the Jewish state into the Middle East and North Africa. The propaganda noise repeated over and again Israel/Arab War & Conflict – a canard ruse. PM Begin coldly informed Carter@Camp-David that Israel – Not a banana republic of the US. Israel fundamentally rejects the propaganda that an imaginary “Quartet” determines the international borders and the Capital City of the Jewish State.

Then came the 2016 election of President Trump, the Great Man and American leader! His US foreign policy in the Middle East rejected the European Chapter “VII” dictate of a 2 state solution as the only way to achieve peace in the Middle East propaganda canard lie. President Trump rejected the betrayal of Obozo Obama’s UN SC Resolution 2443 as being on par with UN GA Resolution 3379 – both an utter abomination and complete revisionist history fabrication fraud which denies the Balfour Declaration and the 1922 League of Nations “Palestine Mandate” to establish a Jewish National Home in the Middle East … the definition of classic political Zionism of Herzl.

Therefore, the opinion expressed in the 2nd You Tube clip: “They telling them to try again” utter bull shit! Who qualifies as “they”? The UN talking puppet? No. The “They” telling them to try again – the European barbarians, the same civilization guilty of the Shoah. NEVER AGAIN – shall European States dictate to Israel any “European Solution” following their “FINAL SOLUTION” – which witnessed both the now defunct British empire and the United States close their borders to Jews attempting to flee from European barbarians. The Allies absolutely refused to bomb the rail-lines leading to the Nazi Death-Camps! Stalin stopped the advance of the Red Army on the borders of Warsaw and permitted the Nazi SS to Jewish Warsaw Rebellion.

This second You Tube clip, declares that Jews always accept the two state solution imposed upon Jews by our European barbaric enemies. The 1936 Peel Commission served as the basis for the British sponsored UN Resolution 181 wherein 2/3rds of all UN members recognized the Jewish equal rights to achieve self-determination in the Middle East.

Jews, post Shoah despise and abhor the dhimmi Jewish status among Arab society. But Jewish g’lut life in Arab civilizations in no wise compares to the Xtian ghetto gulah 3 Century War crimes! The mass forced population transfers that European countries expelled Jewish refugee populations over and again. The German and British taxation without representation which defines the Middle Ages European policy of enforced injustice upon Jewish refugees – hands down – far more repulsive and utterly vile compared to the Arab dhimmi status of Jews during that barbaric Age, which produced the fruits of the Shoah centuries later.

Post the Oct 7th 2023 Abomination War

Israel’s recent diplomatic posture reflects a sharp pivot away from traditional UN frameworks — particularly Resolutions 242 and 338 — and toward the Abraham Accords as its preferred basis for regional peace.

Rejection of UN Resolutions 242 & 338: These resolutions have long underpinned the two-state solution framework, supported by the UN, EU, and Arab League. They directly violate direct negotiations between Israel and Arab states in favor of revisionist history which declares that Israel remains a UN Protectorate territory ruled by international committee ie UN Resolutions.

The Abraham Accords represent a complete break from land-for-peace diplomacy. Israeli diplomacy prioritizes that Arab countries must fundamentally validate the objective of Zionism: Jewish equal rights to achieve self-determination as the 1922 League of Nations Palestine Mandate and the 1948 UN Resolution 181, including the 2/3rds majority of Member states, this UN Resolution permanently rejects any further UN attempt to impose diplomatic solutions through UN Committee Proxy. Israeli Independence fundamentally rejects any UN diplomatic role in determination of Israeli strategic and tactical diplomatic decisions.

The Abraham Accords, signed in 2020 with UAE, Bahrain, Morocco, and Sudan: prioritizes a central focus upon economic, security, and diplomatic normalization without requiring territorial concessions. Clear proof that shalom – quite possible without UN mediation or Palestinian dhimmy Arab non State preconditions. Arabs lost the 1948 and 1967 Wars. Full Stop. No revisionist history of these cold hard facts permitted. UN Resolutions 242, 338 etc represent UN Revisionist history which pretends that Israel lost these two wars to the Arab states hostile rejection of Zionism, as expressed in UN Resolution 3379: Zionism is Racism, and the infamous  Khartoum Resolution 3 No’s.

Israel has increasingly criticized European states — especially London and Paris — for treating it as if it remained under a colonial UN mandate status, implying a lack of sovereignty. Furthermore, the long term objective of the Abraham Peace Accords: that a majority of Arab countries across the Middle East and North Africa recognize Israel, with the Primary objective of forcing the UN itself to publicly recognize Israel as a country within the Middle East community of Nations. Israel rejects the UN Apartheid policy which excludes Israel as a member State of the Middle East voting block of nations within the UN itself.

UN Resolutions which calls for recognitin of Palestinian statehood furthermore violates the Oslo Accords. Israel a fully sovereign nation, not subject to UN trusteeship. European pressure, specifically addressed through EU participation in UN SC & GA Resolution “committee votes”, Israel interprets as “Colonial-style interference.

Post the Oct 7th 2023 Abomination War, the ‘Game Over’ Israeli response to the recent UN GA vote supported by former West European or Nato allied states which demanded that Israel terminate its “unlawful presence” in Palestinian territories ignores the PLO 1964 Charter which did not refer to “occupied territories” as inclusive of either the Jordanian West Bank or the Egyptian Gaza. Therefore UN 242 & 338 rewrites and ignores the PLO charter of Yasser Arafat’s PLO while it recognizes the Oslo PA as an Indepedent Palestinian State!

Israeli diplomatic doctrine openly rejects the legacy of UN-imposed frameworks and repositions the Abraham Accords as the legitimate foundation for shalom. Shalom, unlike the noun Peace, a verb which requires trust. Peace as a noun only promotes the slight of hand propaganda rhetoric and nothing of real substance.

UN Resolutions 242 & 338, historically central to the two-state solution, viewed by Israel as tools of revisionist diplomacy that undermine its sovereignty. They falsely imply, Israel lost the 1948 and 1967 wars and remains under international trusteeship — a notion Israel categorically rejects.

Israel interprets these resolutions as relics of a UN system that seeks to impose outcomes via committee votes rather than direct negotiation. As such, they maintain UN Apartheid policies which adamentaly refuse to validate Zionism established through the League of Nations 1922 Palestine Mandate, based upon the Balfour Declaration signed between Israel and Britain. Since the British defeat in the 1956 War, Britain lost its status as a Great Power. Both Britain and France should not sit on the UN Secority Council as permanent members with veto powers. France lost WWII.

Israel requires direct face to face negotiations with any and all Arab Countries, based upon the latter’s recognition of political Zionism: Jewish equal rights to achieve self-determination in the Middle East and North Africa.

Arab states must recognize Jewish self-determination as rooted in the 1922 League of Nations Mandate and UN Resolution 181 (1947). Full regional integration of Israel into the Middle East diplomatic bloc, forcing UN recognition of Israel as a legitimate regional Middle East State actor.

All UN Resolutions demanding Israel withdraw from “unlawful presence” in Palestinian territories are seen as illegitimate. Israel’s “Game Over” response signals a final break with European and UN diplomatic frameworks.

London, Paris, and EU allies are accused of treating Israel as a UN mandate territory, perpetuating colonial-style interference. UN recognition of Palestinian statehood bypasses the Oslo framework, which requires bilateral negotiation.

PLO Charter (1964): Did not claim West Bank or Gaza — undermining the historical basis for current UN territorial claims made against Israel. UN Resolution 3379: “Zionism is Racism” (revoked in 1991) remains a symbolic grievance in Israeli diplomatic memory. ‘Game Over’ – Israel demands that Britain and France lose their Great Power status as permanent UN Security Council members with veto powers. British/EU imperialism\colonialism, Israel categorically rejects. England betrayed the League of Nations Palestine Mandate trust when it passed the White Paper in 1939. France lost WWII, and both countries lost the 1956 Suez War. Solid proof that neither country qualifies as a great power. Furthermore Israel as a nuclear power, based upon UN hostility to the existence of political Zionism and the Jewish state, requires permanent member status on the Security Council inclusive of veto powers.

According to Rambam’s statute legal perversion of the Talmud, there exists 8 rungs in charity. The highest is when you help a man to help himself. Utter BUNK

In Ketubot 50a–52b, Bava Batra 8b–9a, and Peah 1:1, the emphasis is on sustaining mishpachah (the family unit) and communal equilibrium, not on abstract virtue-signaling generosity. Rambam’s eight madregot of tzedakah (Hilchot Matnot Aniyim 10:7–14) canonized into Roman statute law an utter perversion. bears primary legal responsibility to ensure his household’s economic and spiritual wholeness. Only once that brit-level duty is fulfilled does communal tzedakah arise as a function of din, not piety.

Charity starts with the family building up the children to achieve their destiny potential. All other charity secondary to this according to the Talmud. Talmudic common-law (Mishnah/Gemara; practical halakhic sugyot): treats tzedakah and the obligations to the poor as legal duties embedded in family, agricultural, and communal law (pe’ah, leket, shikcha, obligations to support dependents; limits on how much one may give so as not to impoverish oneself; communal distribution systems). Representative texts: Ketubot 50a (limits/support obligations), Bava Batra 8b (communal trusteeship / distribution and priorities), Mishnah Peah 1:1 (institutional obligations).

Rambam: writes a normative ethical taxonomy of “better/worse” modes of giving (a guide to virtue). This is a philosophical ordering. Talmud: organizes obligations through concrete rules, institutions, precedent and adjudication. The Talmud’s concern is who is legally obligated, how much, and through what mechanism (family duty, communal funds, agricultural gifts), not ranking the moral purity of different acts in abstraction. See Peah 1:1 and Bava Batra 8b for institutional obligations.

Talmudic rule: the primary obligation is to secure one’s household. Gemara: one may not impoverish himself; there is a limit (classical reading: ~20% of assets) and first duty is toward family/children. Ketubot 50a is the locus for limits and household responsibility.

Rambam’s presentation: His eight-step ladder is silent about the legal limits and the priority-rule in many of its theses — because it focuses on how to give rather than who must be supported first. See Rambam, Matnot Aniyim ch.7–10. Divergence: readers who take Rambam’s ladder as the operating legal standard may understate the Talmud’s binding rule: charity does not begin by impoverishing your family; sustaining the family is primary law (not merely “a higher spiritual rung”).

פאה לקט שכחה — the Talmud contains numerous institutional mechanisms, (obligatory agricultural provisions), communal pushka and appointed trustees, shared distribution responsibilities. Rambam’s ladder: emphasizes the individual act (anonymous gift, cheerfully given, giving before asked, etc.), and thus frames the mitzvah in private ethical terms. That individualizing move can obscure the Talmud’s systemic mechanisms meant to ensure minimums for the needy as a matter of communal justice and public law.

Talmud: certainly values preserving dignity, and there are halakhic protections that aim to avoid humiliating the poor; but the Talmud’s solutions are often practical (arrangements in distribution, deputized agents, institutional allocations) rather than a single abstract ranking. The Talmud’s emphasis is prevention of public humiliation through how institutions operate (cf. Bava Batra discussions of distribution).

Rambam elevates a moral metric (anonymity) as a permanent ranking principle; the Talmud treats dignity as one factor among many that must be balanced with legal duties, priority rules, and communal needs.

While the Talmud clearly favors measures that restore livelihood (the spirit is present in many places), its corpus structures specific legal provisions (estate, inheritance, communal support, mechanisms for distribution, thresholds) rather than a single teleological ranking. Moreover, for many recipients (widows, orphans, those deprived of property rights), the law provides obligatory communal support — not merely advice to “help them become self-sufficient.” See Peah and related Mishnaic laws that make certain support compulsory.

Rambam universalizes the ideal of self-sufficiency as the apex; the Talmud ensures social minima by legal mechanisms even where self-sufficiency isn’t immediately attainable. Talmud: offers many case-based precedents that settle conflicts (how much to allocate from communal funds, who must be supported, who may be removed from rolls, etc.). These precedents produce concrete obligations and contested adjudications in beit din. Bava Batra and Ketubot contain numerous such adjudicative materials. Rambam’s ladder cannot replace the Talmud’s case law when adjudicating disputes about distribution, percentage limits, or family rights.

Talmud (Ketubot 50a): sets legal limits and treats household support as central — practical legal guardrails to prevent self-impoverishment. Rambam (Matnot Aniyim ch.10): ranks modes of giving ethically but does not replace the jurisprudential rule about limiting one’s donations to preserve household obligations.

Rambam: codifies communal apparatus elsewhere (ch.9) but his eight-step presentation reads primarily as an ethical ladder for the individual — this can be read to underplay the fully juridical, institutional nature of tzedakah as the Talmud treats it. Talmud / practice: communal funds, appointed trustees, and agricultural obligations (pe’ah/leket) are legal institutions for redistribution — the law builds structures so charity is guaranteed and dignified. See Peah 1:1 and the institutional material reflected in Bava Batra.

European revisionist history crap attempts to re-write the Hamas total defeat in the Oct 7th Abomination War

A two year war started by Hamas and lost by Hamas. Nothing “secret”. “Silent occupation and exploitation – utter rubbish! Israel withdrew from Gaza in 2005. The next year the people of Gaza elected Hamas as their Government. Your revisionist history an utter vomit disgrace. What Ronny P. Sasmita writes – nothing but revisionist history. Hamas has lost this war. Its rule over Gaza – OVER. In 2006 Israel granted Gaza independence. Post the Gaza Abomination War Independence will not again be given as an Israeli gift. Unlike the previous conflicts Hamas initiated, the UN did not impose a cease fire in this war – which Hamas has totally lost. President Trump comes to Israel on the Israeli calendar when Hamas attacked Israel on Oct 7th 2023 on the 8th Day of Chag Sukkot know as Shemini Atzeret. Trump hopes to expand the Abraham Accords to include many other Arab countries who recognize the Jewish state with a Peace Treaty. If a majority of Arab States recognize Israel this will force the disgraced UN to include Israel within the Middle East region of States. This revisionist history of “occupation” a disgraceful lie. In 1964 when Arafat the opportunist embraced the name “Palestine”. Palestine as a UN mandate territory ceased to exist in 1948. During the British Palestine Mandate 1922 to 1947 Arabs of the region refused to refer to themselves as “Palestinians”. Why? Because the League of Nations awarded the Palestine Mandate to the British based upon the 1917 Balfour Declaration wherein Britain obligated itself to establish a Jewish national home in the Middle East. All Arab Israeli wars ever fought since 1948 fought over Arab refusal to recognize Jews equal rights to achieve self-determination in the Middle East. The post June War of 1967 … 3 No’s of Khartoum prove conclusively that Arabs states till Sadat refused to recognize Israel’s equal rights to self-determination in the Middle East. Basem Naim speaks Pie in the Sky revisionist history as well. Never existed a Palestinian State, despite the UN revisionist history otherwise. Europe has no say whatsoever in determining the borders of Israel or its National Capital in the whole of Jerusalem. Jared Kushner established the Abraham Accords during President Trump’s first term as President of the US. Stateless dhimmy Arab refugees have no rights. Stop with the revisionist history.

The UN participation in the Oct 7th massacre and the UN slander of Israeli genocide in Gaza has its consequences.

PM Netanyahu publicly supported the idea of annexing parts of the West Bank, particularly in the context of Trump’s peace plan. He viewed the plan as an opportunity to solidify Israeli claims to certain territories. While Netanyahu expressed support for annexation, he also made statements indicating that any moves would be contingent upon negotiations and the broader context of peace talks. He often framed the annexation as part of a larger strategy to ensure Israel’s security and sovereignty.

PM Netanyahu had to balance his support for annexation with the need to maintain relations with Arab leaders and the international community. He often emphasized that Israel would seek to maintain peace and stability in the region. In various speeches and interviews, Netanyahu reiterated his commitment to Israeli sovereignty over the West Bank while also acknowledging the importance of dialogue with Arab nations. Overall, PM Netanyahu’s response to President Trump, characterized by a mix of assertiveness regarding Israeli territorial claims and a diplomatic approach to maintain relations with Arab leaders, reflecting the complexities of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

PM Benjamin Netanyahu has expressed intentions to increase the population of Israeli settlements in Netanyahu’s government has consistently supported the expansion of settlements in Samaria. This plan aligns with his broader strategy to strengthen Israeli presence in the region; plans to build new housing units and infrastructure to accommodate a growing population. The push for settlement expansion has received backing from right-wing political factions within Israel, which view the settlements as a vital part of Israel’s security and historical claims to the land.

The goal to double the population in these settlements reflects a long-term vision to solidify Israeli claims to the territory and alter the demographic balance in the region. If President Trump and PM Netanyahu achieve a mass population transfer of all Gazans deported abroad to primarily other Arab countries. And the PA in Area A of the Oslo Accords continues its pay-4-slay policies. PM Netanyu has not excluded the possibility of making a mass population transfer of all Arabs in Areas A &B in Samaria to Gaza.

The idea of a mass population transfer of Gazans to other Arab countries, as well as the potential transfer of Arabs in Areas A and B of Samaria to Gaza, this legal opinion bases itself upon the precedent of the mass population transfer of Germans from the Czech Republic and Prussia. The latter territory awarded post WWII to both Poland and Russia. If the allies post WWII could make a population transfer of this nature and also England promoted a mass population transfer of Indian and Muslims from what became the two countries of India and Pakistan, then legally Israel has the right post Oct 7th, to likewise enforce a mass population transfer of dhimmi Arabs removed from Samaria to Gaza.

The Allied victor states justified the expulsion of Germans from various Eastern European countries as necessary for peace and stability. The partition of British India in 1947 led to one of the largest mass migrations in history, with millions of people moving across newly drawn borders based on religious identity. All Arab/Israeli Wars based upon Arab refusal to recognize the main Zionist opinion that Jews have equal rights to achieve self-determination in the Middle East. Therefore Israel has equal plans not to recognize the rights of Palestinians to achieve self-determination within the borders of the Jewish State.

The historical precedents mentioned above must apply equally straight across the board. Israel simple does not accept European hypocrisy over this issue. UN condemnation of Israel only proves that this worthless international gossip group merits no respect. The historical precedents mentioned above must apply equally straight across the board. Israel simple does not accept European hypocrisy over this issue.

NEVER AGAIN means that no European country or voting block shall ever again dictate Not the Shoah nor Auschwitz borders as expressed by the popular propaganda of the false UN 242 Two-State Solution dictate. Israel reminds the UN that this Resolution like 338, 446, and 2334 similar biased UN Resolutions – all resemble UN Resolution 3379: Zionism is Racism. Never Again means that no European state or coalition of States shall ever again dictate a “Two-State Solution” upon the Jewish people of Israel. That Peace between Arab and Israeli countries only achieved through direct face to face negotiations. Israel absolutely rejects the neutrality of the UN just as it likewise does England and France.