The issue: not whether every Xtian or every European bears the same personal “Cross” of responsibility for the Shoah. Rather, whether institutions that claim universal moral authority yet have repeatedly “frame Jews” as the party whose legitimacy – these Holy Authorities condemn. The issue: not collective hereditary guilt. But whether institutions that claim universal moral authority – yet repeatedly judged Jewish national existence – by standards they have not consistently applied to others. The thesis presented: the institutional church compares to the institutional UN – both have a Dreyfus Affair “Jewish Problem”. Classic late 19th Century Antisemitism characterized through institutionalized clinical-anti-social behavior, which denies equal rights to Jews. Rather than the Nazi brand of Antisemitism – inherited subrace inferiority – guilt complex insanity.

Israel withdrew from the Sinai and Gaza in 1957 as part of the post War framework and subsequent UN-linked arrangements after the 1956 crisis. U Thant “unilaterally withdrew” UNEF from Sinai at the demand of Nasser shocked Tel Aviv. Just as did the failure of UN Peace Keepers in Lebanon by 1701. Clearly UN international peacekeeping arrangements dependent upon the cooperation of host governments and limited mandates, and do not provide durable security guarantees when political conditions change. Therefore such UN interference serves only propaganda purposes – no different that church theology. The racist statement “All Europeans as Xtians share the guilt of murdering 75% of Western European Jewry.” directly compares to the UN GA Block vote of 3379 and later to UN SC 2334.

The racist declaration: “All Jews – Christ Killers” – no more absolute than the equal and opposite racism of: “All Europeans” forever guilty of the Shoah. Paul and the gospels do not override Torah. Nicene Xtology does not stand above Sinai. Any theology that blurs or cancels mitzvot as rejected as the Nietzsche philosophy which declares that God is dead. The theology of Grace which forgives antisemitism, blood libels, expulsions, censorship, and coercive power etc., on par with God is dead.

Nazism’s racial slur, that Jews are an inferior race – stands upon the church dogmatic foundation which proclaims through the authority of Caesar which established the Church as supreme, cursed Jews rejected as Cain, and the previous Gods of Greece and Rome. Post Shoah the mark of Cain now branded upon the heads of the exiled church… the church’s fruits repeated poison passed down from generation to generation comparable to DNA.

Church ‘racial hatred’ of Jews — that is why its moral authority permanently broken. The church repeatedly claimed moral truth while producing centuries of anti-Jewish harm, and its failure was one of the conditions that made the Shoah possible; no different from the moral platform assumed by the UN today. Where was JeZeus during all the many and repeated Church (Catholic and Protestant) war crimes, specifically during the Shoah wherein all Europeans as Xtians – share the guilt of murdering 75% of western European Jewry?

The gospels themselves condemn the church throughout the generations “by their fruits you shall know them”? How do church leaderships answer this direct condemnation. Vatican II retreated from church established dogma, therein proving the fallibility of the Pope which either actively or passively supported false blood libels or book burning or ghetto gulag war crimes – that define the Shoah years of Nazism as well.

Starting with the Letters of Paul which expunge Torah by blurring the distinction between court room common law from Caesar’s statute law decrees – with the language “you’re not under the law”, to the gospel “pay unto Caesar what is Caesar’s etc” – both examples negate Yovel liberty – the foundation of the mitzva of Moshiach – according to the Book of Yehoshua where the talmid of Moshe Rabbeinu crossed the Jordan and immediately kept Pesach (the chag of liberty from Egyptian slavery) and brit melah (the brit cut consequent to the brit cut between the pieces — which the apostle Paul denies as a mitzva for Goyim.), both of these two wisdom\time-oriented commandments require k’vanna. The same exact k’vanna of the Torah mitzva of Moshiach which the NT fraud totally ignores.

The NT emphatically not authoritative Torah or even on par with the Holy Writings – which close the T’NaCH. Paul and the gospels cannot override Torah, Yovel, Pesach, or brit milah or any other Torah commandment – starting in the case of the gospels with the Moshiach.

All Torah commandments hinge upon the 1st Sinai commandment which the JeZeus as God Nicene Creed clearly obviates. By the time of the Nicene Creed church antisemitism, preaching, silence, and collaboration with the Roman empire which had destroyed Judea and renamed that ‘Roman province’ to Palestine set the stage for the British White Paper of 1939 which decreed how many Jews could dwell as a fixed minority population of an Arab Palestinian state, which the British promised 10 years after the war.

The Xtian church repeatedly claimed moral authority while violating the Torah’s core demands of justice, life, and remembering the 3 oaths wherein the Avot swore a brit לשמה — which the NT/OT bible totally expunges from its texts – a direct Torah negative commandment. All of Europe embraced Xtianity, and church authorities murdered Goyim who refused to believe which ever Church dogma the ‘church of the land’ dictated. Goyim fled to the “New World” to escape inquisitional torture – like the St. Bartholomew’s Day Massacre in France in 1572; when French Catholics killed thousands of Protestant Huguenots, as a fore-runner introduction of the 30 years war.

Revisionist history attempts to condemn only the Nazis for the Shoah. The White Paper and the US policy which closed its borders to Jews seeking escape from the Nazis – combines with the steadfast refusal by either London or Washington to bomb the “known” rail-lines leading to the death camps. Or Moscow ordering a temporary stop of the Red Army, despite within vision sight of Warsaw – during the ghetto Jewish up-rising! Pope Pius XII passively permitted the SS to seize the Jews of Rome; post war the Catholic rat-lines and Polish pogroms stand as solid proof that Xtian Europe, not simply Catholics or Lutherans shared an alliance with Hitler to destroy Jews and also Communism.

The church failed. Repeatedly. Gravely. It often baptized Jewish children against the will of their parents. Church dogmatic hatred, normalized contempt, and then passively looked away when “others” marked Jews for destruction. Attempts by the guilty church, post Shoah – which claim the dead God JeZeus suffered together with the victims, not the persecutors, as empty as a dead person who has no spirit of life within them anymore. And as guilty as the Mormon church baptizing Jews after their deaths!

Historically, Xtian institutions, and many Xtians of all branch of the church, served as enablers, bystanders, and oftentimes collaborators, specifically within the deathcamps themselves. Paul, the gospels, and Nicene Christology do not cancel Torah. The claim that the church can stand above Sinai as rejected as Nietzsche’s philosophy that God is dead. The Shoah did not arise from nowhere; Xtian anti-Judaism helped prepare Europe for it. Throughout the annual blood-libels made prior to Easter, Xtians churchmen failed catastrophically and actually profited from Crusader mobs murdering entire Jewish communities across Germany, based upon slander lies, combined with anti-Jewish teaching and protection of church supremacy.

This long standing “tradition” made Europe morally dangerous for Jews, and when the Shoah came, too many churchmen proved, through their repeated opportunistic actions – that the NT a moral abomination of avoda zarah. The church cannot be defended by its own theology – if its fruits – centuries of contempt, coercion, and murder. “By their fruits you shall know them” – exactly the standard that condemns it.

The “modern” racial antisemitism (hostility based on ancestry) has morphed into the UN psychotic hatred of Jewish colonialism within the original borders of the Palestine Mandate after Britain separated Trans-Jordan from Palestine at the Jordan river and continues after Jordan renounced all claims to its 1950 UN condemned annexation of what the king of Jordan called “West Bank”. Hitlers’ “Little Red Book” as popular in Arab countries as Harry Potter in the West. Post WWII, both in ’48 & again repeated in ’67 Arab leaders publicly promised to complete the Nazi genocide. Following those two Nakba disasters the UN has repeated condemned Jewish “settlements” as illegal.

Following the Israeli Independence War victory in 1948, the UN changed the rules of refugees through the establishment of UNWRA. After Independence no UN protectorate/mandate existed. The Roman origin name Palestine as dead as the Roman empire. UN Resolution 2334 ‘illegal settlement of Palestinian lands”, simply the continuation of church NT lies. UN 2334 stands upon the White Paper of ’39 which promises an Arab Palestinian state within 10 years following the war, and therefore closely resembles the intent of the UN GA voting block which passed 3379.

The argument that post ’67, UN attempts to internationalize the conflict, presumes Jewish guilt no different than the church blood libels. All Arab states rejected pre-Israel UN 181 and thereafter lost their war to throw the Jews into the Sea. Just as Jews lost the Bar Kochba revolt and Rome renamed Judea to Palestine so too Israel won the wars – started by Arab states – in ’48 and ’67. Israel the winner of those wars give citizenship to Arab refugees. Arab states have refused to repatriate their Nakba refugee war defeated populations, despite their guilt of expelling more Jewish refugees from their countries than Arabs obeying their leaders who told them to “get out of the way”. Israel as victor and the Roman empire long since dead, names the State – including Samaria – Israel. UN attempts to impose their own version of the British White Paper disgrace stand rejected no different from the NT/OT church bible lies.

The issue is not collective hereditary guilt. The issue is whether institutions that present themselves as guardians of universal morality have repeatedly applied a different standard to Jewish national existence. What the historical Church did so through theology creed and dogma; the modern UN, likewises does through international resolutions and diplomatic frameworks. Therefore, the Church and the UN – not merely similar organizations; they represent an “evolution” of successive institutional expressions of classic antisemitism where the role of both Church and UN form one comprehensive thesis which promotes the restoration of the Roman empire’s conquered province of Palestine over Jewish self-determination wherein David Ben Gurion declared the name of the Jewish State – Israel.

Institutional “Double Standards” – The modern United Nations acts as the institutional heir to the historical Church’s anti-Jewish legacy, shifting the arena from theological supersessionism (replacing the Torah with the New Testament) to diplomatic supersessionism (attempting to replace Israeli sovereignty with international mandates). By continually attempting to internationalize the conflict and retroactively shifting refugee rules exclusively via UNRWA, the UN echoes the logic of the British White Paper of 1939: restricting Jewish self-determination to fit a pre-determined global framework. Reliance upon the UN for survival, compares to the NaCH mussar which compare to a reed that snaps when a Jew leans upon it. As empty as relying on the theological “Grace” that historically permitted or ignored centuries of anti-Semitic violence.

By treating Arab rejection of UN Resolution 181 and subsequent military Nakba-defeats as a basis for perpetual Jewish guilt, the UN functions not as an impartial arbiter of justice, but as a political weapon designed to enforce a double standard – never applied to any other victorious nation in a defensive conflict. The Church used the pulpit and the cross; the UN uses the General Assembly and the resolution. Both represent an uninterrupted historical continuum: institutions asserting a monopoly on global morality while working to undermine the legitimacy of Jewish self-determination. All Arab/Israeli wars, fought over Jewish equal rights to achieve self determination in our homeland – which aint Palestine.

Torah validates that Goyim worship other Gods in the 2nd Sinai commandment. Av tuma monotheism theologies subvert and negate this commandment subsumed into a Universal God belief system.

The prophets, specifically Isaiah mocked the worship of idols as brain dead bat-shit crazy. The stretch conclusions which the NT fraud attempts to draw, no different from Muhammad’s who declared that Allah sent prophets to all humanity and nations and those prophets spoke in the native tongues to whom they were sent – belief in a Universal God to all Humanity.

NO. Simply NO. Yona sent to g’lut Israel in the Capital of Assyria. The horrid bible corrupt translations do not understand that t’shuva specifically requires remembering the oaths sworn by the Avot wherein אל שדי- אל עליון – Divine Names – require Oral Torah common law judicial precedents to interpret the k’vanna of these Divine Names, NOT empty word-game translations. אל שדי remembers the struggle of the Avot who lived in Mishkan like tents! The Sinai revelation of the משכן centers not so much upon the external vessels but the living tohor spirits which the metaphor of those vessels remember. Hence אל שדי remembers both the Shekinah indwelling רוח הקודש spirits which indwell within the Yatzir Ha-Tov within the bnai brit heart. On Chag Sukkot Jews dedicate to remember the sacred dedications sanctified upon Chag Sukkot on every יום חמישי of the week/shabbat. Shabbat not just a single day as the Goyim literally presume, and likewise equally “presume” that they can arbitrarily change that day to יום ראשון או יום ששי.

Shabbat specifically commands NOT to do מלאכה wisdom commandments. Why? Shabbat observance during the 6 days of Chol wherein the Torah commands specifically to dedicate Torah wisdom time-oriented commandments. Hence shabbat not one day out of the week but rather the entire week = shabbat. The day of shabbat the white fire back-drop which amplifies the av Torah commandment to sanctify as sacred – av time-oriented commandments as the eternal wisdom of the Torah.

אל עליון remembers the oath brit sworn to childless Avram which commanded him to gaze upon the stars in the heavens and know – so too the number of his future born עולם הבא chosen Cohen seed. The first blessing of the Shemone Esrei contains this remembered memory אל עליון which the future born chosen Cohen seed of the Avot remember as our t’shuvah.

The av tumah translation “butchery” of אל עליון to ‘most high God’ what a total homosexual butt-fuck abomination. Torah common law (Oral Torah) cannot simply be read like a Harry Potter NT novel. All attempts to translate Torah common law – compare to declarations that the “day of rest” falls on Sunday or Friday. Declarations supporting the NT fraud fall flat because documents 1500 years after the facts – already established on the ground – do not determine squat. The dedication of the mitzva of Moshiach falls upon every man living in Israel to pursue establishment of Yovel liberty on the Pesach model established by Moshe Rabbeinu and righteous lateral (NOT VERTICAL) common law Sanhedrin courtrooms.

The NT fraud inserts false notions of “fulfill the words of the prophets” but fails to grasp that the Torah defines prophesy – as mussar commanded to all generations of the Chosen Cohen people אל עליון. Prophets simply not Universal religious messengers because the Torah does not recognize any Universal God but rather a local tribal god of the chosen Cohen offspring of the Avot who judges the foreign Gods worshipped in both Egypt and Canaan. Prophets command mussar. The specific case of Moshiach: prophetic mussar dedicates Israel to pursue righteous justice in the reconquered land of Canaan, based upon the model established by Yehoshua who kept the Pesach ie established the Yovel liberty count (time-oriented commandment) through the sign of this brit – brit melah. The NaCH Books through Shmuel define the mussar k’vanna of the mitzva of Moshiach through the opposing foil failures of both anointed kings to judge their people through Sanhedrin lateral common law courtrooms and not Par’o like vertical courtrooms like as did king Shlomo with the case of the two prostitute mothers. Justice tied to State appointed courts does not equal Yovel liberty; just as building a copy-cat Cathedral does not remember the oaths sworn by the Avot, wherein the Torah commands that they cut a brit wherein they alone would father the chosen Cohen people.

The name אל שדי remembers the good eye of the Avot who dwelt in tents rather than fancy castles or Houses of Cedar mansions. Gold and silver do not determine the chosen seed of the Cohen people; Avraham gave gifts to Yishmael and his other children. Goyim cannot buy their way into the Sinai brit faith regardless of the Pauline rant which compares Goyim to a foreign grafted branch attached to the Chosen Cohen people “Tree of Life”. Such narishkeit comparable to the gross translation of both אל שדי and אל עליון.

Shabbat = the whole week, because the prohibition of מלאכה on Shabbat, presupposes wisdom‑melacha during the six days—time‑oriented mitzvot: Torah common law in action. The NT fraud and Koran fraud of “changing the day of shabbat” – simply literalist טיפש פשט narishkeit on the scale of the literalist reading of the opening בראשית creation story – blind to the fact that this prophetic mussar introduced “time-oriented commandments” as the central theme of Torah common law/משנה תורה.

The mitzva of Moshiach simply not that a person must believe in, in order to be saved. But rather, like shabbat, a mitzvah on every man in Israel to establish Yovel liberty and lateral Sanhedrin common law Federal Court system across all 12 tribes in the land – on the Pesach model of Moshe who imposed a compound precondition upon the 2.5 tribes on the other side of the Jordan. The NT narishkeit “Fulfill the prophets words” טיפש פשט bird-brained literalism fails to grasp that all down stream (future born generation) commanded to grow this prophetic mussar within our Yatzir Ha-Tov hearts, as a Torah constitutional practice. Not to tick off בלי עם\Bil’am prophetic witchcraft predictions as if they existed as checkboxes.

Why the Torah systematically rejects both Yishmael and Esav as Av tumah/substitutes for the chosen Cohen nation in the totally conquered and subjugated land of the Canaan – the eternal Cohen Nation ברית alliance of 12 Tribes inheritance.

Bunk on 1 Corinthians 1:1-10. False translation to read the 2nd Sinai commandment as prohibition of images/idolatry – simply dishonest. The 1st Sinai commandment likewise false to imply “exclusive worship” utter nonsense. Only Israel accepts the Sinai revelation therefore the god of Sinai a local tribal god – NOT a Universal monotheistic God. אלהים אחרים in no wise implies a commandment not to venerate images! Nor does this commandment promote what the later prophets openly mocked as insanely stupid – idolatry! Corinthians language of “Lord,” “Christ” no different than the Golden Calf language of אלהים! No where in the language of either the first or second Sinai commandments any appeal for unity in any “after the fact” belief creed theologies. Such religious rhetoric compares to homosexuals declaring that the Torah permits perverted sexual relations.

The First Sinai commandment does not promote “exclusive worship”. It commands Israel to remember which god judged the Gods of Egypt and brought Israel the Yovel liberation which eternally binds all later generations to pursue judicial justice strictly within the borders of the lands sworn as the Cohen inheritance of Avraham Yitzak and Yaacov – the fathers of the Chosen Cohen people. Judaism does not view divine status reserved to anything other לשמה בארץ ישראל; which means the righteous pursuit of judicial justice which dedicates to make fair compensation of damages inflicted upon the innocent as the basis to prevent hatred without cause/avoda zarah. Judaism as developed during the Dark & Middle Ages of g’lut forced to “convert” Torah into a religious creed halacha ritualism. Religious halacha ritualism has zero to due with ruling the oath sworn Cohen lands with righteous just courts of common law. The Greek language “Christ” no different from אלהים in the av tumah worship of the Golden Calf.

Corrupt translations – all Xtian bibles – confuse mysticism for prophesy. The Book of Daniel not included in the Order of Prophets. Daniel a mystic not a prophet. The Xtian av tumah avoda zara not only worships a Man as God, but a Hercules bastard child conceived by Zeus the father! The writings of Paul closely resemble to Ancient Near Eastern practices which expressed support for images of JeZeus nailed to the cross and other similar cultic manifestations of divine presence and political legitimacy, not merely aesthetic idols.

Early Pauline titulary predates the writing of any of the later gospel counterfeits. Pauls 1 Corinthians promotes a rival cultic-political allegiance language, analogous to Israelite confessions of the deity אלהים language the ערב רב שאין להם יראת אלהים used as the name of their Golden Calf cult abomination. Monotheism rapes the 2nd Sinai commandment because no Gods of Egypt ever really judged through the 10 plagues! Furthermore, ברית, as found in ברית אש\בראשית in no shape manner or form implies equivalence to the false translation “covenant”. To cut a Torah brit requires שם – the Sinai Name revealed in the 1st Commandment, and מלכות – the tohor middot Moshe heard at Horev following the av tumah avoda zara which the Golden Calf defines as the permanent definition of translating words substituted for Divine Spirits like the Oral Torah “pronouns” אל רחום חנון etc. These 13 Oral Torah spirits a bnai brit person can dedicate a Torah sworn oath/מלכות, just as a person can be referred to by a pronoun rather than his actual name.

Why does the Torah open with בראשית ברא אלהים and not the Sinai 1st commandment Name? The avot did not know the 1st Commandment revelation Name. Avraham called upon אל שדי – for example. The avot perceived the vision of the Creator as in both the Heavens above and the Earth beneath. Post Sinai revelation the revelation לשמה teaches a chiddush: תורה לא בשמים היא. Israel has the obligation to establish Yovel liberty in the Canaan inheritance and rule this land with righteous judicial justice. Courtroom common law not a theology or creed or belief system. Courtroom common law stands upon the foundations of prior Sanhedrin judicial rulings.

Goyim never accepted the revelation of the Torah at Sinai. The two “daughter religions” pervert both JeZeus and Allah as their Golden Calf respective אלהים. The Torah opens with בראשית to introduce the main theme of Torah common law – Av wisdom commandments which the Mishna refers to as “Time-oriented commandments”. Neither the NT nor Koran has any knowledge of the Torah wisdom which the בראשית creation story opened with this introduction. Islam came more than 2000 years after the Torah revelation, its declaration that Yishmael dedicated at the Akadah – fails to discern the rejected korban dedicated by Cain! Wisdom time-oriented commandments require מלכות middot as the ברית חדש, interpretation of Yermiah’s mussar, which rabbi Yechuda Ha’Nassi interpreted בכל לבבך as Yatzir Ha-Tov dominant over the Yatzir Ha-Rah spirits which wrestled within the womb of Rivka.

Paul’s 1 Corinthians represents simply his version of a substitute God theology, no different than the later Allah substitute and the Prime Cause tuma אלהים substitute prior to the revelation of the 13 Oral Torah Divine Spirits. Early Pauline theology promotes a rival cultic-political allegiance analogous to king Shlomo’s Temple which the prophet Natan directly condemned as the manner how Goyim worship their Gods. The Torah revelation of the Sinai Mishkan distinguishes the klippah forms from the Shekinah substance whose tohor Spirits lives within the Yatzir Ha-Tov of the chosen Cohen people. Tefillah a matter of the heart and not some prayer to a Zeus father in heaven above.

The Mishna and Gemara came after the Bar Kochba disaster and Rome had already changed the name of this conquered province as Palestine rather than Judea. King David failed to establish the Yovel within the land. The rebuke of Uriah no different than the rebuke of Amalek wherein king Shaul profaned the dedication of Moshiach. None of the kings of Israel ever prioritized the pursuit of judicial common law justice; meaning liberty not a priority in any of the Tribes of Israel or Yechuda prior to the Babylonian g’lut. The Talmud openly states that the Yovel never observed throughout the בית שני period. Hence the Talmud – a vision when Jews reconquer our homeland of Canaan and rule this land through the Torah Constitutional mandated common law Sanhedrin Courts – with their hub in Jerusalem and the spokes of the Federal court wheel in the 6 or more Cities of Refuge.

The Golden Calf like the Mishkan separates klippah from substance. The substance of אלהים אחרים worship of substitute names as gods. This prophetic Av definition of avoda zarah – 2nd Sinai commandment – any attempt to replaces words of Man for tohor Spirits. Linguistic avoda zarah precedes image-avoda zarah as seen in all Catholic churchs. The Torah speaks in the language of Man; meaning Spirits expressed through word metaphors God/אל; Mercy/רחום; Grace/חנון etc. The conflict between Tohor vs Tumah spirits – a matter of the heart and not the Heavens above.

The T’NaCH defines avoda zarah through the war with Midian ie assimilation and intermarriage. Later examples of kings copying the foreign altars or Shlomo’s Cathedral and foreign wives; or Ezra’s demand that Israel divorce their foreign wives. The Golden Calf rivals in comparison to the revelation of the Mishkan. Moshe anointed the House of Aaron as Moshiach to lead the generations through korbanot the dedication of pursuit of justice within the borders of the homeland.

The vision of the Framers of the Talmud – not the g’lut assimilated statute halachic religious codes. פרדס divided into Aggadah דרוש\פשט of T’NaCH prophetic mussar which through wisdom defines the k’vanna distinctions between the spirits of the 13 Horev middot/Oral Torah. The Talmud affixes רמז/סוד to the Halachic ratio of the warp/weft common law “fraction” which stands upon the יסוד of בניני אבות-precedents. The Prophetic interpretation of Oral Torah spirits which distinguishes the k’vanna which separates אל רחום חנון etc from one another — as affixed to the 13 inside middle blessings of the Shemone Esrei like the 3 + 3 opening and closing blessing remember the dedications made on each of the Chag Yom Tov. Each and every Shabbat affixed to the annual reading of the Torah with its 54 Parshiot; where the twice repeated blessing/curse – the responsibility and accountability of each and every generations and the remaining 52 Parshiot (4 X 13) affixed to a given Oral Torah spirit לשמה.

The korban (Tefillah stands in the place of korbanot, based upon the Temple as a House of tefillah) distinguishes between the dedication of living blood from dead blood. If a person cooks liver in a pan, בדיעבד kosher to eat because this rabbinic blood not the same as the living blood thrown upon the altar. In like manner, the dedication of tohor spirits from within the Yatzir Ha-Tov heart not the same as the breath a person exhales from his lungs.

Making an aliya of mitvot elevated from תולדות commandments which do not require prophetic mussar defined Oral Torah middot, where by a person stands before a Sefer Torah or sits with his tefillen and swears to dedicate his Yatzir Ha-Tov middot to rule over his tumah Yatzir Ha-Rah middot within not just his heart but how he socially interacts with his family, friends, neighbors community and people within the borders of this the brit inheritance lands of the chosen Cohen nation. Based upon the t’shuva of remembering the judicial oppression of Par’o and Egypt as the eternal memory why our people left Egypt to conquer Canaan.

Moshe Rabbeinu summed up his Torah which makes an eternal משנה תורה-legislative review of the conflicting tohor – tumah middot spirits within the hearts of all generations of Israel. Here! Life or Death – choose LIFE. Only in the fully conquered land of Canaan does Israel stand in the shoes of King David and choose to establish Sanhedrin common law courtroom Federal Legislative Review of State and National Government statute law לשמה. Herein the way wherein the prophet Moshe envisioned his Torah to function as the Constitution of the Cohen Republic of Tribes.

Goyim treat their Gods JeZeus, now called Jeshua, they mutilate the Sinai Spirit unto Yahweh, Lord, Allah etc. The false prophet Muhammad declares that Prophets sent to all humanity speaking in the native tongues of those people who reject the revelation of the Torah at Sinai by saying Yishmael dedicated at the Akadah or other such perversions.

The first Sinai Name לשמה commands the action to remember/t’shuva the liberation from Egyptian slavery. Egypt a לאו דוקא word which applies equally across the board to all lands outside of conquered “liberated” Canaan. Yahweh = Elohim = The Golden Calf…all linguistic idols. Torah defines faith as the righteous pursuit of justice NOT a belief theology or creedal system.

Restoring Legislative Review: Neither Shaul tried David nor David tried Uriah before the Bar of a Sanhedrin Capital Crimes Court.

King Shlomo the Civil War curse the prophet Natan placed upon David for his failure to trial the capital crimes case of Uria before a Sanhedrin court! King David once he had defeated all foreign kings from off the land he should have immediately established from the Torah the mitzva of Yovel and immediately thereafter restored the Cities of Refuges with their small Sanhedrin Capital Crimes Courts. The window of opportunity of anointing a king to fight the necessary wars for all the 12 Tribes to celebrate the Yovel liberty slammed shut when שישק conquered Yerushalem and profaned the Holy of Holies by stealing the golden shields. NaCH commands mussar it does not teach history; based upon the Torat Moshe whose written Torah ideally functions as the Constitution of the republic and directly mandates Sanhedrin common law courts.

Hence the Book of Shmuel and D’ray Ymin/11:10–47 & 12:1–40 lists Uriah as one of the mighty men; and likewise Tehillem 51 makes reference to Uriah. The purpose of the Moshiach to fully conquer the land that all 12 Tribes can keep the Pesach based mitzva known as Yovel: proclaim liberty across the land; establish as the “Temple” the Federal Sanhedrin common law Court system across this land. Herein defines the mitzva of Moshiach by which the prophet Shmuel anointed first Shaul and later David; again with a Torah curse of causing it to rain during the dry season, because the oath to the Avot had already blessed their seed to conquer these lands. But the people rebelled and demanded a king to fight their wars.

How does Oral Torah common law affix/interpret 2 Shmuel 11 to David failed to try Uriah before a Sanhedrin court for capital crimes? Torah common law stands upon precedents. The precedents for this basic fundamental the vertical court of Par’o which vindicated the beating of Hebrew slaves despite Par’o orders to withhold the necessary straw required to make bricks. Yitro’s rebuke to Moshe – some say made before the revelation of the Torah, some opinion say that rebuke came after the revelation of the Torah at Sinai.

Yovel vs Pesach learns from the prophet Yehoshua. How do the generations remember the liberation from Egyptian slavery – through the mitzva of the Yovel; furthermore the precedent of acceptance of the yoke of the kingdom of heaven requires remembering Egyptian judicial oppressions. Chazal teaches that for the Yovel to apply as a Torah mitzva that all 12 tribes dwell in liberty in the land.

If so, why do most rabbinic readings of 2 Shmuel 11-12 fail to directly frame this requirement? Answer: Oral Torah which learns from prior בניני אבות a kabbalah. Torah common law not a statute law legalism. The latter persons can read law decrees codified in legal codes. Examples: of this non kabbalah assimilated Jewish scholarship, the Rambam Yad, the son of the Rosh Tur, and Karo’s commentaries on the Tur Beit Yosef with the Shulkan Aruch cliff notes.

The common law codes on Talmudic common law B’HaG, Rif, Rosh they fundamentally understand the kabbalah of common law, (Also concealed – meaning not directly mentioned. Why? Torah wisdom commandments require common law precedents – this wisdom concealed from Goyim foreigners who worship other Gods.), as did the Baali Maor commentary on the Rif and the French school of Talmudic common law – the Baali Tosafot.

Why did the RambaN so strongly dispute with the Baali Maor objections to the Rif common law code? During the Dark Ages Ashkenazi Jewry but Sephardi Jewry too (Rambam had to flee Spain or convert, the son of Ibn Ezra converted to Islam.), experienced extreme distress during the Dark Ages, when the Roman road system had collapse and people stopped almost all international trade due to the chaos and anarchy of those times. Therefore the isolated pockets of exiled Jewish communities requires a simple “so to speak” kitzer shulkan aruch to quickly inform them of Torah culture and customs.

Chazal rabbis lived during g’lut. G’lut Jewry post the codification of the Mishna (Post the Bar Kochba revolt crushing defeat where the Romans changed the name in 135 from Judea to Palestine.), and Gemara; restricted interpreting the Talmud limited only to morality and religious halachic ritual observances. Chazal – stuck in g’lut did not read the Mishna-Gemara/Talmud as a blue-print for the time when Jews would reconquer the homeland and keep the Yovel. Even the sages of the Talmud openly admit to this fact. Jews during the 2nd Commonwealth never observed the Yovel as a Torah commandment.

Sanhedrin Capital Crime Courts have jurisdiction only within the borders of the Jewish State free from foreign rule. Hence no real Sanhedrin court existed during the Babylonian Persian Greek and Roman occupations of the land. Just as the Sanhedrin court established by Napoleon a sham Sanhedrin court!

The Baali Tosafot chief criticism of Rashi’s commentary to the Chumash, his failure (post the 1st Crusades slaughter of almost all the Jews of Germany) to write a common law commentary on the Talmud. Many commentaries on Talmudic aggada as well as upon the Baali Tosafot! But not one of them, no different than the commentaries written on the Yad Rif or Rosh learns the halachot tied to a specific sugya of Gemara which reinterprets a phrase of the Mishna based upon the precedent of Halacha within the Dof (and how much more so off the Dof) of the Gemara. Rather all the commentaries treat halacha as if it stands upon its own two feet rather than as a precedent which views the language of a specific Mishna phrase viewpoint; attempting to duplicate eye witness courtroom testimony.

The kabbalah of rabbi Yishmael amplifies the 7 middot of Hillel and 10 middot of Akiva. בנין אב means precedent. Precedents apply strictly to common law courtrooms not to statute law religious decrees. The kabbalah of rabbi Akiva’s רבוי מיעט opens with a broad assumption and then restricts the din. For example the Gemara learns the opening Mishna of קידושין – אישה נקנית through the precedent of etrog. Just as an immature etrog invalid for the 4 species on Chag Sukkot, so too a young girl does not qualify as אישה. Common law (T’NaCH & Talmudic) stand upon precedents. Statute law does not stand upon precedents.

A classic proof, hence the Baali Tosafot appear to dispute the Rashi comment, where the latter said that of the 13 middot of Rabbi Yishmael – only the kal v’homer valid for g’lut Jews to use. Absurd, Rashi in his commentary to the NaCH employs a g’zrah shvah! The Baali Tosafot rebuked the טיפש פשט reading of Rashi’s commentary divorced from the context of Rav Ashi sealing the Gemara! Once the Talmud sealed, it became the fixed masoret for all generations of Israel. Hence just as the sages in both the Mishna and Gemara relied on the rabbinic kabbalah of middot so to all generations of Israel could employ a middah employed on a dof of Gemara and by means of a Kal v’homer use it to re-interpret another sugya of gemara!

The situation of David and Uriah according to Shabbat 56a and Sanhedrin 107a.: “כל האומר דוד חטא אינו אלא טועה”. Batsheva is at least a safek eshet ish, possibly already divorced on condition, which softens the accusation of full-fledged adultery. Tosafot wrestle with the details of this in Bava Metzia 59a. So already in Chazal, the legal axis is not “David skipped a Sanhedrin trial,” but “Uriah was halachically liable as a rebel, and Batsheva’s marital status was halachically complex. However the Talmud clears David but fails to address the k’vanna of the mitzva of Moshiach. Based upon the anarchy and chaos post the generation of Yeshua who conquered the land and established the Yovel through keeping Pesach and brit melah – the sign of the brit of liberty which HaShem and Avram cut at the brit of pieces, once David achieved piece in the land, then his Moshiach anointing required that he establish first the Yovel and then the Temple (not a building of wood and stone), but Federal common law courts like the spokes on a wheel as visioned by the prophets – Jerusalem as the central hub and the cities of refuge as the small sanhedrin spokes.

Hence the Book of Shmuel and D’ray Ymin/11:38 one of the mighty men; 18:17 \, and Tehillem 7,31, 32, 51. The purpose of the Moshiach to fully conquer the land that all 12 Tribes can keep the Pesach based mitzva known as Yovel: proclaim liberty across the land; establish as the “Temple” the Federal Sanhedrin common law Court system across the land. Herein defines the mitzva of Moshiach by which the prophet Shmuel anointed first Shaul and later David; again with a Torah curse of causing it to rain during the dry season.

Clearly the prophet Yermia conditioned a blessing from g’lut to keeping the Yovel. The mitzva of Moshiach a mitzva from the Torah, not the later prophets. The 13 tohor middot (“אל רחום וחנון”) in g’lut liturgy in the Jewish state institutional design which the prophet Yermia referred to as ברית חדש; to make the middot of HaShem the DNA of courts, land tenure, debt release, refuge, and royal power etc. To ensure that no din melech exists without Sanhedrin משנה תורה legislative review.

Learning NaCH as common law

Yovel defined through the opening mussar Books of NaCH

Kedesh – one of the six cities of refuge – located in the territory of the Tribe of Dan. Shimshon acted as a judge during his lifetime, but did not sit as a judge within Kedesh. Rather he served as a judge embodied to resolve the inter-state conflict between Yechuda/Shimon against Philistine dominance and oppression. This implies that while the wars remained that Israel could not keep the Yovel. This would explain why not till king David destroyed the Philistines from off the land, that Israel could only there after keep the Yovel.

Why did king Shlomo confuse building a cathedral of wood and stone rather than establish the Federal Sanhedrin court system as the Torah constitutionally בית המקדש? Confusing the priorities of constructing a Central Place of worship for the Torah mandated Sanhedrin court system – a fundamental av tuma avoda zarah. The revelation of the Mishkan at Sinai centered not on leather skins and gold plated vessels but rather תורה לא בשמים היא. תפילה הדבר שבלבב.

The prophetic mussar of Natan rebuked David over Uriah not brought before a Sanhedrin court. The mussar of the prophet Natan employed “the blood on David’s hands which caused the curse of eternal civil war within the house of David. Just as king Shlomo ignored the elder advice of Natan concerning construction of the בית המקדש so too Rehova’am placed no weight upon the advice given by Shlomo’s elder advisors.

No prophetic commandment to build a House of Cedar. A direct Torah commandment to righteously pursue justice among our people. King Shlomo did not pursue justice, he prioritized pursuing women. Torah defines faith as pursuit of justice. Avoda zarah defines faith as belief in some theological creed which shapes and defines the Gods worshipped in other societies and religions. The mitzva of Moshiach, a wisdom time-oriented positive Torah commandment to rule the conquered land of Canaan with justice. Confusing the reactionary death of Uriah with the strategic error – David’s failure, once shalom ruled in the land, to affix and establish 1. The Yovel and 2. The Federal Sanhedrin Court system.

Hence the prophetic mussar of Shoftim/Shimshon functions to show how AFTER the first generation of Israel conquered the land and established the Yovel – starting with Yehoshua keeping Pesach and brit melah – both Torah mitzvot directly linked to keeping the Yovel – and established the Six Cities of Refuges/small Sanhedrin Federal court system which ideally judge Capital Crimes cases among and between the 12 Tribes of our people.

The Talmud teaches, during the first 6 years of the wars of invasion Israel did not keep koshrut. The language 6 years לאו דוקא. Not till king David did Israel fully conquer the land of Canaan. As such assuming that king David understood the k’vanna of the mitzva of Moshiach, when he commanded Shlomo to build the בית המקדש – based upon the mussar rebuke of Natan/2nd Sinai commandment – David called upon his son to establish the Yovel and permanently affix the Sanhedrin Federal Court system of the Republic of 12 Tribes.

The av tuma avoda zara of king Shlomo, no different from the generation that ruled Israel after the generation of Yehoshua passed. King Shlomo serves as a פרט to the כלל, of Israel pursuing avoda zarah rather than righteous justice among our people within the borders of the eternal inheritance lands of the chosen Cohen people. NaCH prophets command mussar – they do not teach history. This mussar by Natan’s interpretation of the 2nd Sinai commandment equally applies to all Israelis now that our people has conquered once again the land of Canaan.

The Book of בראשית introduces Av wisdom commandments called תמיד מעשה בראשית\זימן גרמא מצוות. Avoda zarah worships the chosen God of a particular Creed/theology belief system. Justice לא בשמים היא – the revelation of the Torah at Sinai לשמה. A man does not wake up from out of the blue and the pursuit of justice burns hot in his blood. Yovel justice first and foremost domestic, within and among the society of our people. Yovel means absolutely nothing to Goyim who never came out of the judicial oppression of Egypt!

The revelation of the Mishkan at Sinai compares to fruit which has an external klippah. The בראשית mussar which rejects the korban of Cain, the identical mussar where the Fire from Heaven consumed the strange fire of the two sons of Aaron. Korbanot as a barbeque to heaven a direct Torah abomination. Korbanot as a wisdom time-oriented positive commandment which requires prophetic mussar that interprets Oral Torah middot which chazal labels as מלכות לשמה as the dedication of the Yatzir Ha-Tov spirits within the heart as Torah wisdom which chazal labels as k’vanna.

Avoda zarah – the tuma middot of the Yatzir Ha-ra within the heart – confuses form for substance. Not the revelation of the Mishkan at Sinai. But the vision that the tohor middot spirits of the שם השם breath life within the Yatzir Ha-Tov hearts of our people who live within the Yovel lands of conquered Canaan. The avoda zarah of king Shlomo prioritized the tuma klippah of constructing a House of wood and stone and despised the dedication k’vanna of Oral Torah spirits/middot within the Ya’tzir Ha-Tov hearts/לבב of our people. The spelling לבב teaches the משמע mussar that the tohor spirits of our people live within our national hearts.

The יסוד of faith stands upon יראת שמים. Av tumah avoda zarah worships Gods in the Heavens. Torah faith does not exist in the heart of any man who despises the burden of obligation to protect his ‘Good Name’ reputation. Avoda Zarah prays to Gods in the heavens to cover and conceal the sins which profane this world. Justice לשמה pursues fair restitution of damages inflicted upon others among our people.

Just as Jefferson’s ‘Bill of Rights’ apply only to citizens of the American Republic. So too and how much more so judicial justice stands upon keeping the Yovel within our homeland. Yovel as a mitzva does not apply to Goyim in any land or country across the Planet Earth. The ‘son of God’ or ‘Arab prophet’ can proclaim declarations in ancient Harry Potter books of fiction. But where was JeZeus during the Shoah? Where was Allah during the murder of Ali ibn Abi Talib … the disgrace of ’48 Nakba? Fiction stories tell a good narrative that many fervently believe. But ‘fear of heaven’ confused as ‘fear of God(s)’; goyim theologies of fiction do not prioritize Torah constitutional Sanhedrin common law courts.

Mikdash has no meaning by its ornate or ritualized ‘forms’ alone. Any more than a dead body buried in a grave has life. Sanhedrin courtroom common law breaths the Oral Torah tohor spirits, first heard at Horev on Yom Kippur, which move and inspire Men – to pursue and rule the land through justice; meaning fair compensation for damages inflicted upon our people. Natan’s rebuke over Uriah, not primarily about adultery and murder—but rather bypassing the Sanhedrin, acting as a “cult” king -oblivious to the k’vanna mitzva of moshiach. The latter always chooses architecture, aesthetics, and ritual over Yovel, Sanhedrin and mishpat justice.

The Torah blessing/curse brit absolutely and most fundamentally requires that bnai brit Man accepts responsibility for his actions in this world. Avoda zarah trumpets ideal life in the world to come. Any talk of Mikdash, geulah, or “Jewish values” without a serious project of Yovel‑rooted justice and a binding Sanhedrin‑like legal framework repeats Shlomo’s av tuma avodah zarah.

Confusing ועשו לי מקדש as Shekinah as absurd as declaring the Universe created in 6 days! The בראשית Creation aggada introduces wisdom time-oriented commandments through the משל of creation. Literally believing Genesis – a theological fabrication known as religious rhetoric.

The phrase “מי שלמד תורה שלא לשמה, סופו ללמד לשמה” a Baraita found in the Gemara of Avodah Zarah 19a. What does it mean? The Sinai Life/Death blessing\curse revolves around ruling the land with justice vs. Par’o like judicial oppression in g’lut as the k’vanna of the bi-polar דיוק separation between לשמה – לא לשמה. Rabbi Yechuda compiled his Shas Mishna in 210 CE, some 75 years after the collapse of the Bar Kachba revolt. By the time that Rabbi Yechuda published the Mishna – the name of Judea – Emperor Hadrian, around 135 CE, had already renamed that conquered province to Syria Palaestina.

By the time of Rabbi’s Mishna the Romans had already decided to expunge the land of the Jewish people like as did the Syrian Greeks whom the Hanukka benching in ברכת המזון condemns for attempting to cause Israel to forget the Torah. G’lut, based upon מצרים – לאו דוקא, therein means תורה לא לשמה. The Syrian Greeks the first to change the name of Judea unto Palestine. This fact exceptionally important because universes separate לא לשמה g’lut oppression from Sanhedrin Court justice לשמה. Sanhedrin court fundamentally and absolutely require Yovel freedom, based upon Pesach freedom, and brit melah as the sign of this brit to rule the land with justice צדק צדק תרדוף first established at the brit cut between the pieces with HaShem & Avram לשמה.

The generation of Yehoshua established the other 3 Cities of Refuge with their small Sanhedrin Capital Crimes courts. However, the next generation abandoned this Torah and worshipped avoda zara other Gods; meaning the Tribes of Israel abandoned the Federal Mishkan as Central hub of the Great Sanhedrin and cities of refuge as the spokes small Sanhedrin capital crime courts! Whenever Israel abandons the righteous pursuit of justice in the conquered land of Canaan, qualifies as av tuma avoda zara.

לא לשמה “ulterior motives” stands under the 2nd Sinai commandment of g’lut. לשמה “sake of Heaven” – dedicates the Oral Torah tohor middot אל רחום וחנון etc לשמה; herein defines Yermia’s ברית חדש and rabbi Yechuda’s בכל לבבך chiddush in ברכות; Mishna א:א which lears kre’a shma as tefillah דאורייתא in ארץ ישראל; acceptance of the yoke of the Kingdom of Heaven לשמה – the k’vanna time-oriented wisdom commandment which prioritizes tohor middot as the dominant spirits which rule the heart over av tuma “Esav – middot” — Yatzir Ha-Rah spirits of violence hatred without cause “avoda zarah”.

By the time rabbi Yechuda compiled his Shas Mishna and how much more so the Bavli Talmud sealed around 450CE, the land of Judea no longer called by that name but rather Palestine; the Roman religion of Xtianity had expunged the brit cut between the pieces and replaced it with a Harry Potter messiah “son of God”. Then the Arab caliphate slaughtered and butchered the Roman empire in the Middle East and replaced the JeZeus God downgraded to prophet with Allah. Arabs together with their Muslim converts ignore the oath brit לשמה cut between the pieces and replace Ishmael as the son dedicated to inherit the chosen Cohen status oblivious to the concept of a chosen Cohen people!

The blessing/curse opening first two commandments of Sinai serve as the basis to understand לא לשמה. Following the capture and destruction of Herod’s Temple the Romans “permitted” the establishment of a Sanhedrin in Tiberias! Akin to Napoleon’s “Sanhedrin” to give citizenship to Jews to serve as hamburger meat in his Armies! Both this and that Sanhedrin לא לשמה, simply because no Pesach/Yovel existed not in the entire history of the בית שני nor in the long g’lut which culminated in the Shoah!

Therefore, the Shas Mishna compiled by rabbi Yechuda does not compile Sanhedrin common law rulings made in the past but rather serves as a model when Jews לשמה reconquer the oath brit homelands and establish the Torah as the Constitution of the Republic of Tribes which mandates a Federal common law Sanhedrin court system when Jews rule this land keeping the Yovel.

Romulus Augustulus, the last Roman emperor, collapsed in 476CE at the boot of the Germanic barbarian Odoacer. The collapse of the Western Roman empire considered by many scholars as marking the beginning of the Dark Ages which witnessed the collapse of international travel and trade.

Virtually all European governments sought to restore the Roman empire. The name Czar of Russia directly refers to Caesar. In the West the crowning of Charlemagne as Emperor of the Romans by Pope Leo III in 800 CE symbolized a revival of the idea of a unified Xtian empire in the West, harkening back to the legacy of Rome. The Holy Roman Empire, established in the early Middle Ages, this entity likewise sought לא לשמה to restore the dead Roman empire, much like the Romans sought, like as did the dead Syrian Greek empire, to erase the memory of the Jewish name off the title of the land – formerly known as Canaan. Then in 1939 the coward Chamberlain, after betraying the Czech Republic the year previous, did the same with the Balfour Resolution and promised to establish an Arab 75% majority Palestinian state within 10 years after WWII.

Great Power 20th Century imperialism an extension of the dreams of Charlemagne and the Czar – both dead empires. Pre-’67 “neutral” England and France–Post ’67 wrote 242 in the Security Council (LBJ tied down in Vietnam), which stands on the British abomination of the ’39 White Paper which promised within 10 years after the War a 75% Arab majority Palestinian state. But both European empires as dead as Rome following the conclusive defeat of their imperial ambition’s consequent to their disastrous attempt to seize the Suez Canal in 1956. Thereafter the Sun set on both empires, reducing them to 2nd rate European powers despite their permanent seats on the UN Security Council.

Yet the UN pretends that it establishes “international law”; specifically in the matter of a Palestinian State. Despite the cold hard fact that the UN Protectorate mandate of the League of Nations “Palestine” … ceased to exist after David Ben Gurion declared – ((post the UN 181 validation by 2/3rds General Assembly validation of Jews equal rights to achieve self-determination)) – the Jewish state of Israel.

All UN attempts to re-impose the White Paper abomination, like UN 3379, 446 and 2334 null and void. The British empire dead like the Roman and Syrian Greek empires. The White Paper directly guilty for the perhaps millions of Jewish murders during the course of the Shoah. Any UN attempt to restore Roman “Palestine” – simply dead.

The phrase “מי שלמד תורה שלא לשמה, סופו ללמד לשמה” – often interpreted in idealistic religious terms, focuses upon religious educational aspects of devote Torah study. However, the Baraita stands under the shadow of Sinai. Torah justice remembers Par’o withholding straw and ordering Israelites beaten for their laziness – to meet the imposed quota of required brick production. In all g’lut lands similar judicial oppression likewise occurs, because the av model of Egypt – לאו דוקא.

Only in the oath sworn lands can Jews observe and keep mitzvot לשמה. Cursed g’lut Jews, by Torah brit, impossible for them to do mitzvot לשמה, because g’lut by definition – corrupt, oppressive, and unjust. The first Sinai commandment only sanctified when the Cohen nation rules Canaan, can our Cohen people “perhaps” public sanctify the Name. But cursed g’lut Jews do mitzvot to not forget how to do mitzvot לשמה should our generation merit to once again conquer Canaan. The model to do mitzvot לשמה directly learns from the precedent-generation of Yehoshua; that generation (unlike the cursed Wilderness generation) conquered Canaan and established all 6 cities of refuge/small Sanhedrin courts; as opposed to the next generation לא לשמה who abandoned Torah justice (recorded in all prophetic mussar) and worshipped avoda zarah.

(Makkot 24a) “אנכי” ו“לא יהיה לך” – מפי הגבורה שמענום Moshe’s entire Torah blessing/curse warning as expressed throughout Devarim 27–30 – nothing but a restated expansion of the first two Sinai commandments. “ראה נתתי לפניך היום את החיים ואת הטוב… ואת המוות ואת הרע.” (Devarim 30). The entire משנה תורה-דברים common law mandates צדק צדק תרדוף as the national application of the first two Sinai commandments.

Moshe’s Torah establishes the oath brit as remembered through the Avot t’shuva; a national as opposed to some psychological or personal religious observance – which any Jew can do in g’lut.

The mitzva of Moshiach dedicates לשמה the rule of צדק צדק תרדוף Sanhedrin common law courts. This wisdom time-oriented positive commandment requires this k’vanna of tohor middot dedications. Based upon the Av precedent, that Moshe anointed the House of Aaron; herein defines the k’vanna of this wisdom time-oriented commandment. When the prophet Shmuel anointed both the house of Shaul and later David as Moshiach. Herein defines the k’vanna, of this wisdom time-oriented commandment לשמה. When Shaul failed to slaughter the king of Amalek and David failed to stand Uriah the Hittite before the Sanhedrin bar, both men profaned the dedication of Moshiach; Shaul lost the kingdom and David too lost the kingdom – initially through civil wars and later through Babylonian g’lut.

מי שלמד תורה שלא לשמה = to a nation that keeps Torah in g’lut—under Par’o, Rome, Charlemagne, the Czars, the British Empire, the UN—where mitzvot observed and practiced without sovereignty, without Yovel, without Sanhedrin, under the shadow of foreign gods and foreign statute law decrees. Mitzvot in g’lut = שלא לשמה; by definition—restricted preservation, rehearsal, memory, the cursed aspects of the Sinai oath brit.

All the centuries of Torah שלא לשמה serve as the definition of the Torah curse of g’lut\exile. The Av tumah Yatzir Ha’Rah spirits by no means meaningless. Egypt serves as the model of t’shuva – remembering the oath sworn by each of the Avot to father the Cohen brit cut between the pieces/akadah\blessing-obligation by which Yaacov embaced the yoke to honor his father Yitzak.

Therefore, the Mishnah simply not a record of an active Oral Torah Sanhedrin judicial system—but a blueprint for future sovereignty expressed through establishment of common law courtroom law. The first “mitzvah” following reconquering ארץ ישראל, the mitzva wherein all Israeli men accept the mitzva of Moshiach as the “yoke of heaven: צדק צדק תרדוף — the dedication of the Yatzir Ha-Tov within our hearts, for all generations to swear through tefillen the oath k’vanna acceptance of the kingdom of heaven; likewise this k’vanna also sanctifies wisdom time-oriented commandment/ k’vanna — brit melah.

Go Zionism

Torah constitutional doctrine of the 2nd commandment

Prophetic mussar interprets the k’vanna of 13 Oral Torah middot Spirits which Moshe heard at Horev following the calf abomination! To do this requires common law precedents which compare a NaCH sugya with a similar but different NaCH sgya/ot which contain the exact same order of Oral Torah middot. To interpret Oral Torah wisdom spirits – the rhetoric of the NT does not teach these wisdom skills.

The NT—Paul included—does not present itself as a rabbinic legal interpreter of Mosaic Oral‑Torah middot or as engaging in NaCH sugya methodology; it operates with different “avoda zarah” categories and interpretive aims which promote not only a false messiah but JeZeus is God and dress this theology as prophesy fulfilled. The Pauline religious rhetoric flat out fails to differentiate statute law from common law. Paul and the NT do not use rabbinic sugya methodology or the formal “middot” precedent method; the NT introduces Greco‑Roman rhetorical forms, typology, & citation to foist the lie that any son of man/God can fulfill the words of the prophets – straight up avoda zara.

A crystal clear example: the concept that a married woman could conceive through “virgin birth” the son of God; Hercules serves as a classic example of this av tuma avoda zarah. Paul’s letters repudiated brit melah but ignore the bi-polar kiddushin/get commandment from the Torah which the catholic virgin birth invalidates.

The NT ignores the Torah commandment of Yibum where a man who dies without children the brother has a mitzva to marry his brothers’ wife – the story of Yechuda and Tamar. This latter example serves as evidence that just as the Torah commands divorce through get, equally so kiddushin the mitzva of transferring “title” to the baal that he will father the children of that union. In cases of divorce, get required which returns “title” back to the woman such that she can marry through kiddushin another Jew.

This Torah implied backdrop (דיוק) the gospel narratives of Mary totally perverts. Paul as a student of Rabban Gamliel would most definitely known this fundamental Torah דאורייתא fundamental. His ‘not under the law’ rhetoric likewise conceal fundamental Torah commandments! Just as speaking “tongues” has no T’NaCH precedent so too the Pauline hype “not under the law” fails to differentiate Torah commandment of the status of a bastard son!

The Pauline letters and later Gospel false messiah stories, establish an entirely new religious substitute theology belief system by which the later church introduced its NT\OT perversion as the opposite of accurate. Goyim simply do not compare to a grafted Kilayim (forbidden mixtures) as Paul suggests. Based upon the T’NaCH example of Ruth the ger tzeddick process rigorous.

This day night divergence a historical fact. Does the Harry Potter false messiah gospels expose a Roman attempt to promote Jewish civil war among the already violently divided Jewish sects prior to the outbreak of the 66 Jewish revolt? Does Paul in turn function as an agent provocateur tasked by Rabban Gamliel to infiltrate and push-away and undermine the influence of this new heretical sect by preaching circumcision not a Torah commandment for Goyim in Damascus; while preaching to Romans to come worship the Son of God king of the Jews in the city of Rome. Impossible to know. Only that the writings of Paul clearly different from the other NT writers. And in point of fact, Paul’s “method” closely resembles to that of Yechuda Maccabee in his revolt against the Syrian Greeks.

The famous Israeli spy Eli Cohen, like Paul – publicly executed. Spies by definition rely upon duplicity rather than making bold declarations to the enemy that they seek the destruction of that opposing enemy state. Consequently, there exists no physical evidence that Paul operated upon a secret agenda. Nonetheless the Pauline propaganda as codified in the NT did greatly contribute to the overthrow of the earlier Greek and Roman Gods. As such, this speculation as believable as Zeus giving birth to Hercules as a belief system.

Whereas T’NaCH serves as common law which operates independent (as humanly possible) of any and all theological belief systems; for example the Talmud never once brings the 1st commandment שם השם. The NT\OT stand upon the Greek rhetoric bedrock of sand/fuzzy logic wherein the mobs believe language as inspired even though they do not understand that “tongue” – such as practiced in all Pentecostal churches; Xtianity and later Islam – both theological belief systems by the core. Whereas the Torah faith of justice rejects “belief” as something akin to accepting a bribe.

Rome’s Achilles heel, Egypt the primary source of cheap bread. A unified Jewish revolts in Alexadria Egypt and Judea which expelled Roman legions from their home base in Syria – represented a nightmare threat to the known Roman empire.

What proves the definitive fraud of both church and mosque the “by their fruits you shall know them” slander libel taxation without representation ghetto gulag Inquisition mentality which produced the Nazi Shoah.

Torah as prophetic common law, trains the chosen Cohen people in the conquered land of Canaan to riteously pursue justice in remembrance of the judicial corruption of ancient Egyptian vertical courts which obeyed Par’o. Both NT/Islamic cult of personality belief-systems replace justice with mythical Gods not know to the Torah NaCH and Writings. Such foreign Universal God rhetoric, exercised through racial KKK – power structures, whose fruits for Am Yisrael utterly catastrophic down through the Ages. So cruel, that any attempt to dress them garments of nevu’a language, the very wolf dress in sheep garments; itself, both NT and Koran define the 2nd Sinai commandment. As such, when will Israel expunge this cancerous avoda zara from within the Jewish state? Starts with the rigid rejection of rhetoric slogans of belief in God – Jewish, Xtian, or Muslim. The righteous pursuit of justice defines the Constitutional Zionist Republic which mandates a Federal lateral common law judicial system which regulates akin to a bureaucratic regulations statute law, starting with belief in a Universal montheistic god in heaven.

Interpreting the 2nd Sinai commandment “expunging avoda zara” not limited expelling foreign Goyim churches and mosques or even synagogues! Rather expelling the very idea that the State may coerce belief at all. Tzedek, tzedek tirdof the top dog (so to speak) of Zionism/Jewish self-determination.

Torah scholarship that puts a smile upon my face

The resurrection from the dead: The rise of the Jewish state following 2000+ years of exile.

Hebrews 12:2 the ultimate substitute theology which the Roman forgers and counterfeits attempted to cause Israel to forget the Torah no different than as did the Syrian Greeks, approximately 100 years earlier! Clearly, no Xtian “believer” dressed upon in the costume of a “scholar” has ever weighed this possibility; due to the simple facts that believers hold: Don’t confuse me with the facts! I have my religion!!

The early church rewrote or reinterpreted Hebrew scripture to replace Torah with a new “substitute” religion, similar to the Seleucid attempt under Antiochus IV – a form of supersessionism — the idea that the Church replaces Israel. They loved assimilated Alexandrian Philo and the Roman Kapo Flavius Josephus. The latter’s book Antiquities 18.63–64:
“About this time there lived Jesus, a wise man, if indeed one ought to call him a man. For he was one who performed surprising deeds and was a teacher of people who accepted the truth gladly. He won over many Jews and many of the Greeks. He was the Christ. And when, upon the accusation of the principal men among us, Pilate condemned him to the cross, those who had first loved him did not cease. For he appeared to them alive again on the third day, as the divine prophets had foretold these and ten thousand other marvelous things concerning him. And the tribe of Christians, so called after him, has still to this day not disappeared.”

The priest most often accused of having forged or interpolated this paragraph – Eusebius of Caesarea (4th century); after Xtianity became the Roman Empire’s favored religion (4th century). Xtianity as the state religion of Rome censored all manuscripts; scribal alterations in monasteries could spread modified readings. The church lost this power with the 15th Century invension of the Gutenberg printing press. But even contemporary scholarship generally agree the this double D-cup insertion came via Eusebius’ quotations which later monk scribes inserted into the actual texts. In 1971, scholar Shlomo Pines highlighted a 10th-century Arabic version of the text by the historian Agapius, which lacks the overtly dogmatic Christian interpolations, suggesting a neutral original baseline text existed before Roman scribal alteration.

Xtian “tripe rhetoric\propaganda” declares – the good noise gospel: “JeZeus fulfilled the words of the prophets”! Despite never such similar language anywhere across any of the Hebrew T’NaCH sealed masoret Books; which the Church first thing, once the State religion of Rome – discarded and cast upon the dung heaps of History. Order the opening central theme of the בראשית aggadah story of creation.

The Torah ‘order’ based upon a clear פ – ס \ chapter – subchapter system which the later Books of both Prophets and Holy Writing likewise obey. This Order akin for the sace of a physical comparison to a “Fach/space-gap” — a compound term used in architecture, preservation, and building-technical contexts to describe the intentional or resulting gap between two built elements or between a building element and an adjacent space. What separates a NaCH sugya from another NaCH sugya? A space-gap.

The treif bible church translations and koran false prophet (((Neither forgery understands the Torah concept learned directly from Moshe Rabbeinu that prophets commandment mussar to all generations. Prophets do NOT foretell the future; herein separates the mystic Book of Daniel from the Books of the Prophets!))), organized around alien and utterly foreign chapter\verse substitute order or poetic stanzas.

This change of Order compounded with the insertion of word based Names of God like JeZeus or Allah. Both foreign alien counterfeit substitute religion belief in “their” Universal Monotheistic God(s) over Torah common law as faith – תורה לא בשמים היא. Changing the order of texts produces radical consequences God does not mean nor refer to Dog. ברית does not compare to covenant because the former requires שם ומלכות – meaning the oath dedication of Oral Torah middot spirits לשמה which both the church and mosque emphatically deny that such spirits even exist! אהבה does note remotely compare to agape love. משפט צדק defines justice – common law courts ruling fair compensation of damages – does not compare to Paul’s addiction to Jezeus who atones for the eternal guilt trip of Adam’s original sin. A גר צדק does not remotely resemble to a Pauline uncircumcised Philistine; despite the church and the mosque huge as Goliath!

The radical change of Shaul the talmid of Rabban Gamliel HaNassi to Paul – exceptional. Paul’s writing preandidate the gospel texts themselves. A dog without a nose, even that animal could smell the coming revolts first in Alexandria Egypt and later in Judea! The Hanukkah model of how Yechuda Maccabbee defeated and achieved victory over the Syrian Greek empire clearly both Gamliel and the generals of Rome weighed and considered. Any interpretation of ancient history which ignores this fundamental precedent – not serious scholarship.

Shaul as a talmid of Gamliel traveled to Damascus and get’s stoned! That red flag together with the “stoning of Stephen”, two primary witnesses that something stinks in Denmark! Both men according to Torah law would require a trial before a city of refuge small sanhedrin court. The Goyim manner of “stoning” a direct Torah violation! The Talmud deliniates 4 separat types of death penalty. Stone people on the street without a Capital Crimes trail, no connection to any of the 4 types of Capital Crimes death sentences.

That Paul got up and walked to Damascus on his own power strongly indicates the “stoning” a set-up which would permit him to infiltrate the Xtian camp as a fellow converted believer! In Damascus Paul preached “not under the law” “circumcision” not a commandment for Goyim. In Rome Paul preached “worship JeZeus the son of God” when Romans worshipped Caesar as “the son of God”. Both cases suggest that the intention of Paul to inject a form of Monotheism into Roman society to promote Civil War!

The Roman counterfeit of JeZeus through the gospels promotes a false messiah dogmatism aimed to promote the many and hostile sects already fighting among themselves to further splinter and divide. “Divide and conquer” a gospel famous term of reference.

The earliest gospel of Mark – written in Rome about 70 CE. This gospel profoundly suspect. Simply because the destruction of Herod’s Temple – NEWS! The killing of a criminal through cruxifiction – common/NOT NEWS. Paul as a deliberate Sanhedrin/Gamliel agent! Based upon Yechuda Makkabbee declaring his loyalty to the “real king of Syria”. Just as Yechuda sought to undermine (shatter the ethical containment force) the government of Antiochus IV, so too Paul, based upon this model sought to do the same within Rome itself.

This idea that revolution requires shattering the ethical containment force of a civilization, perhaps the “soul of the people” requires two fundamental legs to stand upon. 1) Reject the current government order. 2) Reject the religion of the current government order. Examples: the American Revolution established citizens having rights vs. serfs as slaves. The French revolution rejected both the king and the Catholic church replaced by the church of reason! The Bolshevik revolution, modeled itself after the French revolution. Lenin and Troskii both rejected the 300 year Czarist regime together with the Eastern Orthodox Church. The Nazi revolution too rejected the British French dictated peace together with its imposed democratic government. Likewise the Nazis utterly despised the church and favored the Arian ancient religions. The Iranian revolution too rejected both the Shah and western liberal values.

Bottom line: Post Shoah NEVER AGAIN. Goyim racism as expressed through both “Jewish Problem” and “Dhimmi”, terminated with the rise and establishment of the Jewish state. Where was JeZeus during the Shoah. Why has Allah suffered defeat after humiliating defeat from the Jews who rule over Arab refugee populations?

Sermon on the mount – establishes an entirely different vision of faith.

Matthew 5 sermon on the mount does not compare to T’NaCH prophetic mussar rebukes which plant within the Yatzir Ha-Tov the tohor middot expressed through social justice, direct admonition, corrective rebukes against national leaders and society in general. The religious rhetoric of the Gospels in general and the Sermon on the Mount in particular describes “the favor of God”, alas the Greek manuscript of God equally employed in avoda zarah!

The JeZeus sermon communicates a superficial concept of humility and mercy totally alien to Torah and NaCH prophets. The fourth Oral Torah middah of רחום\mercy learns from the Torah secondary commandments of slaughtering all the inhabitants of Canaan; putting to death a minor child known as stubborn and rebellious; uprooting the ערב רב assimilated and intermarried Jews which the Torah describes as “Amalek”. Based upon the prior metaphor of Yaacov and Esav wrestling in the womb of Rivka! The Mishna refers to this eternal conflict as בכל לבבך between the two opposing Yatzirot spirits within the heart. The humility of Moshe does not at all align with the JeZeus sermon on the Mount.

The moral cultivation & harvesting of defined tohor Sinai middot. Prophetic mussar directly addresses as the chief purpose of both Moshe and later prophets mussar. Social justice and accountability within the borders of the oath sworn land of conquered Canaan directly affixed to righteous Sanhedrin common law courtrooms.

The Sermon on the Mount has a completely different message; it focuses directly upon individual virtues applicable to all mankind rather than the Oral Torah tohor middot which the church publicly and openly repudiates and denies.

The T’NaCH prophets command, a stark dichotomy of blessings and curses – based on collective adherence to the contrast between the opening first two Sinai commandments. Righteous pursuit of justice (fair compensation of damages inflicted) among the bnai brit people the Torah Constitution mandates directly linked to keeping the Yovel/liberty in the conquered homeland.

The gospel language directly implies the worship of some Monotheistic Universal God. Only the 12 tribes of Israel accept the revelation of the Torah at Sinai; a tribal god revealed at Sinai who took Israel out of g’lut. All mankind never accept the revelation of the Torah at Sinai.

The word ONE in kre’a shma does not refer to some theological creed monotheistic God but rather that the “children of Israel” accept the oaths sworn by Avraham Yitzak and Yaacov by which they alone father the chosen Cohen people. Specific to the 12 tribes within the borders of Israel – blessings; specific to the 12 tribes in g’lut – cursed Egyptian like judicial oppression injustice.

The revelation of the Torah at Sinai does NOT mandate some specific theological framework as does the NT gospels. Middot defined both through spirit “substance” and commandment “forms”; a sort of ‘as above so below’ concept of time-oriented Torah wisdom commandments.

T’NaCH prophetic mussar specifically directed to all generations of Klal Yisrael. Herein the Torah itself strictly defines prophesy. Neither the NT nor Koran obey nor even resemble this fundamental criteria of nevuah.

Covenant a Goyim translation for ברית. To what does this translation – worship of words compare? To a brain surgeon cutting out a tumor while wearing 30 ounce boxing gloves. The NT Theos God applies only to the Gods of Mt. Olympus worshipped by both the ancient Greeks and Romans. Greek, Roman, NT ideas of justice directly compare to Assyrian, Babylonian, and Persian ideas.

Oral Torah רוח הקודש middot – spirits NOT words. Despite the fact that the Torah speaks in the language of Man. None the less, neither the language of NT or Koran validates the תורה לא בשמים היא מצוה לשמה. Which permanently distinguishes the revelation of the Torah from all counterfeit avoda zarah Gods. JeZeus prayed to his Zeus in Heaven!

Torah does not communicate any theological religious vision of faith in God above. Torah commands the burden of pursuing righteous courtroom justice within the borders of the oath sworn land inheritance of the chosen seed of the Avot.

T’NaCH prophets do NOT “preach” faith. Rather they serve as the police enforcers of Sanhedrin אלהים justices courtroom rulings. Prophets in this fact compare to Amoraim halachot brought as precedents to interpret a specific Misnaic language viewed from a fixed eye-witness perspective; akin to the witnesses who describe seeing the new Moon. Later NaCH prophets alway make a משנה תורה to interpret Torah commandments in order to ascertain the k’vanna of these commandments as wisdom mitzvot\time-oriented. Judicial enforcement within the jurisdiction of Sanhedrin common law courts does not remotely compare to spiritual preaching of morality; the latter directly compares to the UN and the post Shoah Popes of Rome.

How the Framers of both T’NaCH and Talmud organized both common law texts based upon the Warp/Weft of a Loom.

Make Mishlei 10:1 as the פרט‑datum, use the listed middot (binyan av mi‑katuv echad, gezerah shavah, klal‑u‑prat/prat‑u‑klal, semuchin, davar ha‑lamed me‑inyano, and kal va‑chomer) to read Ezekiel 18:21–32, Joel 2:12–14, and Hosea 6:6 together, and show how that chain supplies a determinate kavanah for one of the tohor middot (I’ll privilege “רחום וחנון / merciful‑and‑gracious” as the target middah). [Weigh through inductive comparative reasoning Ezekiel 18 (esp. 18:21–32), Joel 2:12–14, Hosea 5:8- 6:10 (esp. 6:6) and Yoel 2:1-14 (esp. 12-14). ]

Gezerah shavah shared inductive logic which compares שׂמחה/תּגונה, חיה/מות, צדק/תּשׁוּבָה. Methodologically: the middot chain permits reading a “sapiential aphorism”/”knowledge as power” – an anthropic model that prophets test, qualify, and transform into the oath brit obligations; the prophets’ sugyah then supplies the precise kavanah content for an Oral‑Torah middah (here, “רחום וחנון”), which the Gemara may incorporate as the operative intent for halakhic religious rituals.

Mishlei 10:1 furnishes the human analogy; Ezekiel/Joel/Hosea supply the prophetic mussar and hope; together they yield a determinate kavanah: t’shuva – must remember the oaths sworn by the Avot לשמה (opening verse of kre’a shma) to cut a brit as the eternal fathers of the chosen Cohen seed and invoke רחום which מגן אברהם the chosen seed of the Cohen people from being utterly destroyed at the moment of Anger for Golden Calf like avoda zara throughout the Ages and generations.

T’NaCH a common law legal system which commands mussar. Prophetic mussar stands upon “understanding” Oral Torah Horev-רוח הקודש middot k’vannot as the duty of the heart ברית חדש\מלכות לשמה. A blessing requires שם ומלכות — understood as a תולדה of the Torah oath brit sworn by each of the Avot; which permits the generations of Israel to dedicate, similar to a korban on an altar, a tohor middah as dominant within the Yatzir Ha-Tov, כנגד av tuma middot embraced by the Yatzir Ha-Ra. Herein understands the eternal Civil War struggle within the heart, as the metaphor of Yaacov and Esav wrestling within the womb of Rivka.

The 32 middot of Ha-Galilee interpret the weft – aggadic portions of Talmudic scholarship. Whereas the 7, 10, 13 middot of Hillel, Akiva, and Yishmael interpret the warp – halachic protions of the Talmud. These two opposing sets of middot, they remind me of the Stars & Bars of the Confederate war flag. Herein an attempt to summerize the sh’itta of my Rav, Aaron Nemuraskii who learned it from rabbi Shalom Elyashiv which learns both T’NaCH and later Talmud as two opposing threads in the revelation of Torah common law at Sinai.

Post the sealing of the Sha’s Bavli, the Soveraim made final editorial decisions, and the Gaonim wrote t’shuvot to questions asked how to understand religious halachic observance practices that the Talmud established throughout the g’lut – that Jews should follow. Toward the end of the Gaonim leadership of g’lut Jewry, Muslim armies conquered Spain and released the Hanukkah Civil War genie out of its imprisoned bottle.

The church about the time of the Nicene creed – supplanted the Greek/Roman Gods with their belief creed-new Universal God. Dominant, the church fathers now banned the ancient Greek writings which ruled the Greek and Roman empires through theological belief systems. Then the apostle Paul introduced this new religion, which eventually cast those old Gods upon the dung heaps of history, much like the Old Testament attempts to treat the Hebrew T’NaCH.

The Romans referred to Jews as atheists. Torah defines faith as “pursuit of righteous justice” based upon post Sinai כלל: תורה לא בשמים היא. The genius of Greek mathematics and philosophy, the Muslim conquest of Spain re-opened Jewish Civil War wounds. The kapo Tzeddukim av tumah spirits, once more rose from the dead and dominated the known world – inclusive of the Arabian empires together with the Roman church.

Rav Nemuraskii instilled within my heart a love for the B’hag, Rif, Rashi Chumash p’shat, and Baali Tosafot\Rosh common law commentaries to the Talmud. The criticism made by the Baal HaMaor upon the Rif common law code together with the B’HaG prioritization of Av Torah wisdom commandments – defined as time-oriented mitzvot served as the primary models by which we studied the Talmud together with Rashi’s common law commentary to the Chumash.

Both rabbis Elieshiev and Nemuraskii prioritized publicly teaching the Talmud as religious halacha text, common across all Yeshivot. But privately rav Nemuraskii differentiated the Talmudic model as a prophetic vision to the times when Jews terminated our g’lut and conquered our homeland once again, based on Moshe leading our people out of slavery to do the same. This Talmudic Framers “vision” totally repudiates both NT and Koran revisionist history avoda zarah. The Sages during the framing of the Bavli Gemara introduced an additional blessing to the Shemone Esrei to emphasize this basic fundamental distinction.

Later a young 18 year old Talmudic scholar harshly criticized the common law Rif code, (the Baali Maor) due to even the appearance similar to Roman statute law codes. The Talmud catagorically rejects Greek/Roman statute law legislation; Talmudic scholarship obey the culture and customs established by T’NaCH mussar common law courtrooms.

The Rambam statute law codification fully validates the Baali Maor’s criticisms made against the Rif; despite the critical need by g’lut Jewry for a simplified “Kitzur Shulchan Aruch”; centuries before the church imposed the three Century ghetto gulag war crimes upon all Western European Jewry, the evil eye of church fathers banished ancient Greek texts unto genizah ghettoes. The Muslim invasion of Spain triggered another bitter P’rushim vs Tzeddukim like Civil War.

The ‘Golden Age of Spanish Jewry’ witnessed horrific Jewish av tumah assimilation and intermarriage. Ibn Ezra’s son converted to Islam. Rambam’s statute law halchic code exploded into an international Jewish Civil War following his death.

Assimilated Spanish Jewry, lead by the Rambam and opposed by the French rabbis, the Baali Tosafot, pitted the Tannaim פרדס common law against Tzeddukim supported syllogism statute law – the dog returned to eat its own vomit – only this time g’lut Jewry embraced the T’zeddukim & they rejectioned the פרדס Oral Torah kabbalah of rabbi Akiva. Despite the fact that the Rambam himself despised the Karaim as abhorred heretics!

Greek\Roman statute law rejects outright T’NaCH/Talmudic courtroom common law just as Rambam’s code prioritized religion over the vision of a reconquered homeland wherein FREE Jews keep both Yovel and Sanhedrin common law courts – both Capital Crimes and Torts! Even the RambaN who harshly opposed the Baali Maor in his Milchimet HaShem, validated that g’lut Jewry despair simplified religious mitzvot codes; not for the sake of doing mitzvot but rather that g’lut Jews practive doing “mitzvot” … such that when they return to the conquered land of Canaan, that they will know that the pursuit of justice defines Torah faith.

עין טוב – judge your people in the scales of merit interprets the k’vanna of the middah of חנון. The middah of רב חסד, by contrast, the skill to understand and discern a matter contained within another – Like from like – such as מלאכה from עבודה. Hence the B’HaG code of Torah mitzvot employs קום ועשה and שב ולא תעשה מצוות as בניני אבות to derive the k’vanna of time-oriented wisdom commandment which require the dedication of tohor middot discerned one from the others – no different from the distinct 13 middle blessing within the chol Shemone Esrei.

Share this:

Share this:

Share this:

Share this:

Share this:

Share this:

Share this:

Share this:

Share this:

Share this: