Trump & Bibi masterly conceal US and Israeli war aims and objectives. Sun Tzu’s principles in Art of War, all about camouflage and deception. Subterfuge, misrepresentation, and cunning guile PsyOps define the Art of War and/or President Trump’s — Art of the Deal.

Misleading the enemy through feints, misinformation, and creating false impressions which run cover for US/Israeli intentions goes hand in glove with understanding your enemy. Publication of the enemy’s strategies – true intentions or capabilities plays into adaptability and strategic planning. War-time propaganda makes public statements that obscure real military objectives to achieve the key tactical need for “surprise” or “Shock & Awe”. Understanding human psychology – vital in negotiations; allowing skilled negotiators to influence outcomes effectively. The parallels drawn between military strategy and business negotiations highlight the complexities and nuances involved in both arenas.

War PsyOps force the enemy to lose sleep over speculation, fear and plant within their hearts the need to surrender immediately. The 15 point surrender terms – a master-stroke.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zf_YsycfnOg

Fear of the Lord fails to communicate יראת שמים why? Torah common law not read, but rather it stands upon making comparative logical inductive-reasoned precedents. The translation: ‘Fear of Heaven’, totally confuses the revelation at Sinai, from how early prophets – like those found in the Book of בראשית, understood the Creator as told in the opening creation Aggadic story. Abraham did not know the revelation of Sinai Divine Name! So what distinguishes the Divine Names אל שדי, אלהים, & אל ect, from the first Sinai commandment Divine Name? This question a person who develops יראת שמים immediately asks.

The pre-Sinai prophetic revelation understood that HaShem fills the Heavens and the Earth. Whereas the mystic concept Shekinah, bases itself upon the “revelation” of the Mishkan at Sinai; the mystic idea of Shekinah communicates the post Sinai vision that the 1s Commandment Divine Presence – lives only within the Yatzir HaTov hearts of the “chosen” bnai brit Cohen people. Herein the k’vanna of בכל לבבך\כם intent as learned by rabbi Yechuda’s interpretation of tefillah דאורייתא, and also by תורה לא בשמים היא in the Talmud. The term יראת שמים most essentially learns from the catastrophes, such as the Bar Kochba false messiah and Shabbetai Tzvi\Yacov Frank false messiah disasters; contrasted by the rise of Hasidism initiated by rebbe Israel ben Eliezer/Baal Shem Tov. The affectionate title awarded to this rebbe implies that his ‘good name’ reputation stands unto this very day.

The 2nd Sinai commandment does not say do not worship “idols”. Sophomoric translations imported to understand abstract Hebrew terms – compare to placing a screen door on a submarine. Never such a thing as virgin birth in the T’NaCH and specifically not in the Prophetic Book of Isaiah. Errors shape and define theologies. Both Martin Luther’s Protestant and John Calvin’s impact upon the theology developed by Zwingli of Zurich down the road — kicked the can of protestant theology down the road to not only the 30 Years War, but worse – support by the vast majority of its German ‘believers’ to kiss and embrace the Nazi war insanity – to exterminate the Jews. The good name reputation of Xtianity in general and German Protestantism in particular now rots in exile waiting for the 2nd coming of JeZeus to heal its shattered reputations.

The 2nd Sinai commandment does not say do not worship “idols”. Never such a thing as virgin birth in the T’NaCH and specifically not in the Prophetic Book of Isaiah. Errors shape and define theologies. Both Martin Luther’s Protestant and John Calvin’s theologies, their impact upon the theology developed by Zwingli of Zurich — down the road — kicked the can of theological avoda zarah, that through its support, by a vast majority of its members in German and countries allied with the German anti-communist war effort, specifically Pope Pius XII to likewise support the Nazi war to exterminate the Jews. Where was JeZeus during the Shoah; “by their fruits you shall know them”.

The translation “You shall not make for yourself a graven image”, false. אלהים אחרים does not mean “other gods”, as the literal טיפש פשט biblical translations dictate. Just as Isaiah 7:14 “the virgin shall conceive” does not convert “almah” – which refers to a young girl, aged between 12 to 12.5 years of age – also called נערה, unto the Greek mythology where Zeus rapes a married woman and conceives Hercules.

The Hebrew “אלהים אחרים” does not base itself upon עצב/pesel – idol, but remembers the Gods of Egypt and the future invasion of Canaan wherein the Gods of Canaan would fall under the God of Israel curse. Acceptance of the yoke of the kingdom of Heaven “metaphor” directly refers to remember the g’lut oppression of Egypt. Goyim never came out of g’lut Egypt, nor stood at Sinai, they never to this very day accepted this tribal god; neither the NT nor Koran ever once brings the revelation of the 1st Commandment Divine Name. But instead worship אלהים אחרים Golden Calf word translations. Clearly JeZeus did not grasp the central foundation of the Sinai revelation; because the revelation of the first Commandment of Sinai – this Divine Name – a Spirit and not a word – lives within the heart, based upon the Mishkan Torah precedent model. Confusing a glorified tent and a gold covered Ark for the “Shekinah” — Divine Presence spirit — as false as confusing moms apple pie with vinegar.

Chag Pesach approaches. Consider a real Jewish example — fully understand that Goyim not Jewish and that the Apostle Paul’s idea of grafting false, based upon their complete and total ignorance of the T’NaCH. Shall introduce two separate lines of rational reasoning:

ONE

The switch from T’NaCH\Talmudic/Midrashic common law to assimilated Roman Statute Law during the Dark and Middle Ages of Goyim barbarism, anarchy and chaos — compares to the similar impact that the movable type printing press — likewise shapes and determines statute law — religious off the דרך halacha — to this very day. The Talmud refers this species of moral disaster — also to a known ירידות הדורות—domino effect upon later down-stream generations.

My Kollel rav, rabbi Eliezer Wolfson from Jerusalem passed in 2025. He showed me a hand-written Baali Tosafot manuscript which differs from the Baali Tosofot commentary printed in the Vilna Shas. The latter writes מותר גניבת גוים whereas his hand written manuscript מותר גבינת גוים. The shift from discussing theft to cheese has important halachic implications, affecting the permissibility of various foods depending on their origin and preparation methods. In the 8th פרק daf 116b–117a of mesechta Chulllen, the Rif poskined that once a ruminant consumed something, it became פרשא בעלמא. Rashi disputed with the Rif ruling. But based upon the בכתב יד of rabbi Eliezer Wolfson, the Baali Tosafot appears to supported the ruling made the Rif posok halacha.

Israeli dairy rations — built around availability, not ideal nutrition. Corn in general — nutritionally smoother, but not economically dominant. Corn — imported and expensive. The “switch” before Pesach — from a wheat‑based diet to a corn‑based diet — the former — a mixed ration that includes some wheat by‑products added to that cattle feed ration. While the latter attempts to eliminate all possible chametz sources. Israel’s dairy industry relies heavily on: wheat silage, wheat bran, gluten feed, local by‑products (citrus pulp, brewers’ grains, etc.), and imported corn grain and corn silage.

Wheat silage involves moisture required to achieve fermentation. The most desirable fermentation occurs when silage has a moisture level of 55 to 70 percent, with 60 to 65 percent considered optimum. If silage — ensiled at lower than recommended moisture levels, it may undergo incomplete fermentation or be subject to heat damage and protein breakdown.

The Israeli milk industry does not use corn all year due to its higher expense. Many European countries rely on imported GMO feed for livestock, including from the U.S., because non-GMO alternatives quite often more expensive or unavailable at scale. If Israeli dairies fed a Pesach—style ration all year, milk prices would rise significantly. The Pesach ration, a temporary, more expensive, less efficient formulation used only because halacha requires it.

Corn starch ferments more slowly, very good for rumen stability, but wheat by‑products add fiber, protein, and digestible energy at low cost. Israeli cows fed TMR (total mixed ration) designed to balance rumen pH, so the risks of wheat more managed. The Pesach ration represents a halachic workaround, not a nutritional upgrade. The industry would never choose the Pesach ration year‑round because it costs more, depends on imported ingredients, reduces flexibility in ration formulation, and removes valuable, cheap, local feed sources. Hence the Pesach ration — less economical, not more. Corn, therefore used before Pesach because its non-chametz and safe from a kashrut standpoint. But nutritionally and economically, the normal mixed ration (with some wheat by‑products) far superior for the rest of the year.

The Israeli dairy industry does not switch feed because of the Rif–Rashi debate at all — even if the Rif + Tosafot would permit digested chametz. The issue ““Does digestion turn chametz into פרשא בעלמא?” not the reason for the rabbinic requirement to switch to corn prior to Pesach. Rather — a Jew may not own chametz during Pesach, due to the Torah כרת curse. Despite chametz eaten by a cow becomes halachically irrelevant, and even if the milk is unquestionably permitted … the feed itself remains chametz! And Israeli dairy farms — almost all of which are Jewish‑owned — cannot legally or halachically own chametz on Pesach. The mashbirim (feed suppliers) cannot produce chametz feed for Jewish farms during Pesach. Chag Pesach directly impacts the entire supply chain. Nonetheless, if the Baalei Tosafot indeed support the Rif’s principle, that digestion nullifies the issur, then milk from cows fed chametz would qualify as halachically kosher; cheese made from such milk would also permitted. The entire gevinat akum discussion shifts, and many modern kashrut stringencies become unnecessary.

Two

Fundamental distinctions which radically change the intent and interpretation of Torah as a political foundation/Constitution vs the religions established through Biblical and Koran counterfeits. Goyim never accept to this day the revelation of the Torah at Sinai. They do not thereafter dictate any Torah commandment. Not Moshiach nor who or what qualifies as a prophet. Daniel a mystic not a prophet. Oral Torah — by definition — interprets the k’vanna of wisdom commandments\time-oriented mitzvot.

Jewish Halacha despite Middle Ages assimilation to Greek logic philosophies — which in effect negated the Chanukkah lights — halacha contained within the Gemara “commentary” to a specific Mishna — serves as courtroom witnesses, who testify; based upon observance of the Mishnaic case viewed from different perspectives. Halacha after the Roman exile of Jews from Judea “converted” into religious law — with rabbinic decisors (geonim, rishonim, acharonim) who fill the function of spiritual-legal guides whose rulings regulated communal religious existence in cursed g’lut. Halacha of this much later statute law assimilated codes, copied Roman law, much like the bible influenced by the printing press.

Despite these codes, imposed by decisor “authorities” such as Rambam or Karo, halacha simply not religious law. But remains precedent—based, by which witnesses testify concerning a Case heard before a Sanhedrin common law courtroom — viewed from different perspectives. A living human being shares no comparison to a mirror reflection or photograph of that person stored in a vault for hundreds of years. Still another example: The Cathedral copy-cat Temple built by king Shlomo merely a “photograph” of the Torah commandment צדק צדק תרדוף — which serves as the foundation of judicial common law courtrooms mandated by the Torah written Constitution. As determined by a Torah precedent: Moshe’s establishment of 3 Cities of Refuge with their small Sanhedrin courts.

If you take the time to learn the Hebrew T’NaCH you will see the day vs night difference between the Hebrew T’NaCH which the Xtian bible has replaced. For example: how a person organizes ideas changes what that person understands. Take the “Order” of — GOD vs dog. The Xtian bible translations did just that with their institution of Chapter & Verse organization, which replaced the Hebrew sugya/sub-chapter Order. Something akin to Grover Cleveland’s decision to abandon all original US President advice from Washington — Madison — father of the US Constitution — inclusive of Andrew Jacksons’ free banking rejection of European Central Banking.

Yes, today even the Hebrew T’NaCH also modified through printers — to include Xtian chapter and verses! But within the Torah scrolls & Hebrew T’NaCH, remain odd gap/spaces scattered throughout all that literature. Starting with the 5 Books of the Torah scrolls read on shabbat and organized around an internal פ & ס. These two Hebrew letters interpreted to refer to “sugyah” — sub-chapter and “Parech” — chapter. The printed Hebrew T’NaCH — originally likewise organized in hand written manuscripts prior to the printing press movable type 1455 invention – employ easily observable gaps which separate one sub-chapter from another. The printing press invention directly impacted the 1611 KJB together with the Catholic Bibles. Just as did the chapter system, developed early in the 13th century by Archbishop Stephen Langton 1205-1227. The verse system introduced in the 16th century — Santes Pagnino produced a versed Latin Bible in 1551.

The Catholic bibles based upon Latin translations. They include deuterocanonical books whom Ezra and other post destruction of the 2nd Temple, Tannaim Era survivors excluded from the Hebrew T’NaCH literature. King Cyrus of Persia, whom the prophetic Book Isaiah refers to as “moshiach”, permitted Jews to return back to Judea after our 70 year Babylonian exile ordeal. The Catholic/Protestant 30 Years War terminated in 1648. Martin Luther moved the Catholic deuterocanonical books to an “Apocrypha” section in his 1534 German bible.

William Tyndale executed in 1536. Convicted of Lutheran heresy—mainly for his Protestant theological writings (e.g., justification by faith, denial of transubstantiation) and related polemics; his English Bible translation viewed as a direct challenge Lutheran Church authority. Strangled at the stake, then his body was burned. The Lutheran church sided with Hitlers’ Nazism. Nonetheless Tyndale’s translations omitted some deuterocanonical books prior to his betrayal and State murder. John Calvin treated them as separate and apart from “Scripture”. The 1611 King James Bible reflects that Protestant tradition and relied heavily on Tyndale, the Geneva Bible, and the Bishops’ Bible.

A substantial portion of German society—including many Protestants and Catholics—backed or accommodated the Nazi regime, especially in the 1930s, motivated by nationalism, anti‑communism, fear, and the regime’s social/order promises. Major church bodies made compromises (e.g., the Protestant Reich Church movement, concordats and local accommodations by Catholic bishops). Anti‑Jewish violence did not end in 1945—notable examples like the 1946 Kielce pogrom in Poland show continued lethal antisemitism and communal breakdown after the war. Moral accountability for mass support remains a valid and widely held judgment against all biblical translations, based upon the language of the gospels themselves: “by their fruits you shall know them”. Where was Jesus during Xtian war crimes throughout history from the Crusades to the blood libels to pogroms to mass expulsions to ghetto gulags etc?

Jewish Halacha despite Middle Ages assimilation to Greek logic philosophies – which in effect negated the Chanukkah lights – halacha contained within the Gemara “commentary” to a specific Mishna – serves as courtroom witnesses who testify based upon observance of the Mishnaic case viewed from different perspectives. Halacha after the Roman exile of Jews from Judea “converted” into religious law – with rabbinic decisors (geonim, rishonim, acharonim) who fill the function of spiritual-legal guides whose rulings regulated communal religious existence in cursed g’lut. Halacha of this much later statute law assimilated codes, copied Roman law, much like the bible influenced by the printing press.

Despite these codes, imposed by decisor “authorities” such as Rambam or Karo, halacha simply not religious law. But remains precedents by which witnesses testify a Case heard before a Sanhedrin common law courtroom, viewed from different perspectives. A living human being shares no comparison to a mirror reflection or photograph of that person stored in a vault for hundreds of years. Still another example: The Cathedral copy-cat Temple built by king Shlomo merely a “photograph” of the Torah commandment צדק צדק תרדוף – which serves as the foundation of judicial common law courtrooms mandated by the Torah written Constitution. As determined by a Torah precedent: Moshe’s establishment of 3 Cities of Refuge with their small Sanhedrin courts.

If you take the time to learn the Hebrew T’NaCH you will see the day vs night difference between the Hebrew T’NaCH which the Xtian bible has replaced. For example: how a person organizes ideas changes what that person understands. Take the “Order” of – GOD vs dog. The Xtian bible translations did just that with their institution of Chapter & Verse organization which replaced the Hebrew sugya/sub-chapter Order. Something akin to Grover Cleveland’s decision to abandon all original US President advice from Washington – Madison – father of the US Constitution – inclusive of Andrew Jacksons’ free banking rejection of European Central Banking.

Yes, today even the Hebrew T’NaCH also modified through printers – to include Xtian chapter and verses! But within the Torah scrolls & Hebrew T’NaCH, remain odd gap/spaces scattered throughout all that literature. Starting with the 5 Books of the Torah scrolls read on shabbat and organized around an internal פ & ס. These two Hebrew letters refer to “sugyah” – sub-chapter and “Parech” – chapter. The printed Hebrew T’NaCH – originally likewise organized in hand written manuscripts prior to the printing press movable type 1455 invention – employ easily observable gaps which separate one sub-chapter from another. The printing press invention directly impacted the 1611 KJB together with the Catholic Bibles. Just as did the chapter system, developed early in the 13th century by Archbishop Stephen Langton 1205-1227. The verse system introduced in the 16th century – Santes Pagnino produced a versed Latin Bible in 1551.

The Catholic bibles based upon Latin translations. They include deuterocanonical books whom Ezra and other post destruction of the 2nd Temple, Tannaim Era survivors excluded from the Hebrew T’NaCH literature. King Cyrus of Persia, whom the prophetic Book Isaiah refers to as “moshiach”, permitted Jews to return back to Judea after our 70 year Babylonian exile ordeal. The Catholic/Protestant 30 Years War terminated in 1648. Martin Luther moved the Catholic deuterocanonical books to an “Apocrypha” section in his 1534 German bible.

William Tyndale executed in 1536. Convicted of Lutheran heresy—mainly for his Protestant theological writings (e.g., justification by faith, denial of transubstantiation) and related polemics; his English Bible translation viewed as a direct challenge Lutheran Church authority. Strangled at the stake, then his body was burned. The Lutheran church sided with Hitlers’ Nazism. Nonetheless his translations omitted some deuterocanonical books prior to his betrayal and State murder. John Calvin treated them as separate and apart from “Scripture”. The 1611 King James Bible reflects that Protestant tradition and relied heavily on Tyndale, the Geneva Bible, and the Bishops’ Bible.

A substantial portion of German society—including many Protestants and Catholics—backed or accommodated the Nazi regime, especially in the 1930s, motivated by nationalism, anti‑communism, fear, and the regime’s social/order promises. Major church bodies made compromises (e.g., the Protestant Reich Church movement, concordats and local accommodations by Catholic bishops). Anti‑Jewish violence did not end in 1945—notable examples like the 1946 Kielce pogrom in Poland show continued lethal antisemitism and communal breakdown after the war. Moral accountability for mass support remains a valid and widely held judgment against all biblical translations, based upon the language of the gospels themselves: “by their fruits you shall know them”. Where was Jesus during Xtian war crimes throughout history from the Crusades to the blood libels to pogroms to mass expulsions to ghetto gulags etc?

Process (how Sinai unfolded) – Two-stage revelation: God spoke the first two “dibrot” aloud; after that Israel asked Moses to receive the rest and transmit it (Exodus narrative as read by rabbinic tradition). Oral transmission of the 13 tohor רוח הקודש spirit interpretation of the first commandment שם השם as the בטול idea of תורה לא בשמים היא revelation of the Torah at Sinai. Legal common law middot such as introduced by Hillel and other Tannaim serves as the יסוד by which the generations interpret the k’vanna of the revelation of the 13 Tohor Oral Torah middot at Horev.

The Torah does not invalidate the existence of other Gods; not the Gods of Egypt, Canaan, nor the Gods in later NaCH prophetic mussar. NaCH prophets do mock Gods limited to wood & stone. The Book of satire Kings mocks king Shlomo “as the wisest of all men” for his ignoring the mussar of the prophet Natan who commanded king David not to copy architectural constructs of how Goyim worship their Gods through Cathedral-like constructions. Rather the model of the Mishkan understood by the precedent of Moshe Rabbeinu’s last mitzva before he passed from this Earth – the Small Sanhedrin Capital Crimes Courts which define all the cities of refuge.

The 2nd stage of the revelation of the Torah at Sinai followed the sin of the Golden Calf – substitute theology which declared that אלהים (who occupies both the Heavens and the Earth) brought Israel out of Egypt. This substitute theology denies the בטול revelation of the שם השם לשמה – לא בשמים היא revelation that the רוח הקודש Oral Torah spirits live within the Yatzir Ha’Tov hearts of the chosen Cohen people when and only when we rule the oath brit land inheritance. The Torah revelation consists of two parts: Blessing/Life vs. Curse\Death-G’lut. Based upon the language of the 1st Sinai commandment “Egypt” לאו דוקא; all Goyim lands of g’lut – Jews live – just as no Sanhedrin or Yovel freedom for them so too no other Torah commandments apply other than to do t’shuva and remember – Israel came out of Egypt to conquer and rule Canaan with Sanhedrin courtroom common law justice.

No where, for example, does the Torah address the God worshipped in India and Asian countries. The brit of Gilgal/order of Rashi tefillen contrasts with the brit of Sh’Cem\order of Rabbeinu Tam tefillen. The oath sworn at Gilgal: just as HaShem judged the Gods of Egypt, so too HaShem will judge the Gods of Canaan. Just as Moshe a prophet so too Yehoshua a Torah prophet. Monotheism as a theology violates the 2nd Sinai commandment because if the Islamic Tawhid accurate then the 2nd commandment in vain. But the chicken always precedes the egg; Muhammad did not accept the revelation of the Torah at Sinai, his replacement theology substitutes Allah like as did the Golden Calf did with אלהים and the NT does with some “Father” in Heaven.

Monotheism, especially as framed by the נדוי Rambam assimilates to the foreign idea of ONE UNIVERSAL GOD. This false avoda zara assimilation validates Jews davening inside Mosques! It declares the Aggada of mesechta Sanhedrin touching the 7 mitzvot applicable to gere toshav to all “bnai noach Goyim in all lands! Mesechta Avoda Zara and in many other places throughout Sha’s teach that only Israel accepts the revelation of the Torah at Sinai. Therefore the שם השם לשמה by definition בטול, limited and restricted to the status of a local tribal god and not the foreign align Universal ONE God theology of alien foreign religious belief systems.

In like manner the mitzva of Moshiach not limited to some God/Man in the past as Xtian avoda zara attempts to dictate. Rather Torah common law stands upon the יסוד which requires בניני אבות-precedents. The NT worship of avoda zarah – other Gods – rejects the revelation of Oral Torah common law. It rejects Moshe anointing the House of Aaron as Moshiach despite the Talmud reference to Pinchas as משיח מלחמה or the NaCH reference to king Cyrus as משיח.

Goyim, by definition reject the revelation of the Torah at Sinai\Horev, therefore Goyim worship other Gods. Impossible for Goyim who reject the revelation of the Torah to thereafter dictate Torah mitzvot such as does the NT attempt with its false messiah paradigm and as does the Koran with its false definition of prophets sent to all Goyim paradigm. King Shlomo no different than his son at Sh’Cem. Just as Shlomo began his avoda zara “Civil War” curse imposed by the Natan curse following the David Bat Sheva injustice shown to her husband; Aaron dedicated by Moshe as Moshiach to sanctify through korbanot the dedication to rule the land of Canaan with judicial Sanhedrin common law justice. So too Rechavam ignored the elder advisors of king Shlomo just as young king Shlomo initiated building a Temple Cathedral avoda zara rather than establish the Federal Sanhedrin courts as the case of the two prostitutes proves.

How legal common law jurisprudence Sanhedrin texts differ from alien religious texts. The latter viewed across European and Arab beliefs in their respective Gods, and interpreted by warring Xtian communities, like for example the 30 Years War and Sunni vs Shiite communities, like the Iraq Iran war, and how religious belief systems shape societal dynamics among Goyim. Sanhedrin common law views fervent belief as a Av tuma avoda zara midda, comparable to a judge accepting a bribe.

The Gospels (both accepted and rejected) and gnostic stories, completely and totally alien to the Torah vision of “commandments”. The commandment of Moshiach, according to the Torah a ‘wisdom commandment’, commonly referred to as a positive time-oriented mitzva in Talmudic literature. Classic other examples of this Torah Av commandment: Shabbat, tefillah, and kiddushin: all time-oriented commandments require “k’vanna”. Furthermore, both gospel and gnostic non Jewish counterfeits – they all utterly separates the Torah commandment of Moshiach – a wisdom mitzva. Torah wisdom no one generations holds a lock and key monopoly upon. This fundamental distinction separates Torah common law from Goyim belief systems whose theologies and creeds create their own set of Gods.

ALL Torah commandments obligate ALL bnai brit, in ALL generations, because ALL wisdom time-oriented commandments function as the essence of the revelation of the Torah at Sinai. Hence the 4 questions on Pesach Night contrasts the righteous vs wicked child – where the latter rejects the idea that all generations of Israel stand and accept the Torah at Sinai, as the k’vanna of the kre’a shma tefillah known as acceptance of the Yoke of Heaven – which remembers the specific oaths sworn by the Avot to father the chosen Cohen people.

The bankrupt gospel fraud revisionist history fiction-story projects: a time long since past, when a Hercules son of God born to a ‘virgin girl’, (Which completely ignores the Torah negative commandments against of adultery and bastard children – permanently excluded from the Cohen chosen people.), and has no actual reality in all Human history. The gospel story more similar to the horror series first introduced by H.G. Wells – The Invisible Man.

Jews do not wait for the Moshiach, Torah defines faith as the righteous pursuit of judicial justice – fair compensation of damages inflicted. The messiah has come idea, imposed and accepted by g’lut Jews, by Xtians in their outrage that Jews have always and forever said: the gospel narrative utter and complete Roman propaganda. The gospels originally written in Goyim Greek – not Hebrew or Aramaic. Goyim unto today, do not read the T’NaCH in its original Hebrew and Aramaic/Book of Daniel\. The Goyim bible confuses the mysticism of the Book of Daniel with prophesy. The Hebrew T’NaCH (divided into 3 sections: Torah, Prophets, and Holy Writings), the Book of Daniel placed in the Holy Writings together with Tehillem/Psalms!

Goyim belief system religions never inquired how the gospel or koran narratives of prophesy, aligns with the Torah “tumah” idea of witchcraft. The latter predicts the future and necromancy. Whereas the Torah defines prophesy as a person (Man or Woman – such as D’vorah) who commands mussar. The mussar of D’vora to Barak, that a woman would receive the credit for killing the villain Sisera!

The bible counterfeit declares Daniel a prophet, by which the NT framers much much later fervently proclaim: the book of Revelation – a prophetic book. The Talmud, Mesechta M’gillah – openly states Daniel not a prophet. And the Zohar like Daniel, written in Aramaic, supports the Talmud; because it contrasts the NaCH prophets against Daniel’s mysticism. Xtianity nor Islam recognize the Torah centrality of mussar. This basic fact proves that Goyim religions worship other Gods. And ignore the simple fact that only Israel stood and accepted the Torah at Sinai.

For 2000+ years the false prophet bible counterfeit, which prioritizes its New Testament as having fulfilled its ‘Old Testament’, followed up by the even later koran – which recognizes JeZeus as a Torah prophet along with Muhammad. Xtianity waits for the 2nd Coming of JeZues, as does certain sects of Shiites wait for their savior. This mysticism viewed as a ‘believable’ Xtian prophesy based upon the mystic book of Revelations! It stands on par with the koran fraud which declares that prophets sent to all Peoples and those prophets speak the tongues of the peoples sent thereto. This latter koran declaration fundamentally rejects the revelation of the Torah at Sinai. Both bible and koran never bring the revelation of the Shekinah of Hashem who dwells within the Yatzir Ha-Tov of the chosen Cohen brit seed of Avraham Yitzak and Yaacov; which the Day of Atonement confirms by the t’shuva made by HaShem that only the Avot and not Moshe would father the chosen Cohen seed.

Bottom line: Acceptance of the Torah at Sinai – Based upon both the T’NaCH\Talmudic sealed masoret – Israel accepts the Torah to function as the legal Constitution of the Bnai Brit Republic of 12 Tribes. This Torah written Constitution mandates the Federal and Tribal courts though the Great Sanhedrin Court (which Torah metaphor describes as Mishkan) and the Small Sanhedrin capital crimes courts located in the peripheral ‘Cities of Refuge’. This distinctions implies a further fundamental between Capital Crimes Sanhedrin courts vs 3-Man Torts courts. The latter courts perhaps possible to establish them outside the borders of the oath sworn Cohen land inheritance.

Torts courts abroad superficially supports the Rambam posok halacha that ‘bnai noach’ not limited to gere toshav. Alas this assimilated nacree/Shomron, particularly as defined in Mesechtot Baba Kama, Avoda Zara and the additional blessing to the Shemone Esrei, this cursed like Spinoza-Karaim-like Kapo, succeeded to blow out the lights of Hannukah for generations. Consequent to his ירידות הדורות/domino effect\ which perverted T’NaCH\Talmudic judicial common law unto Roman statute law; no different than the modern day g’lut Orthodox, who declare – with a straight face – in all seriousness – that Israelis also remain in g’lut. Those fanatic religious fools, no different from the arrogant Cursed Abraham Geiger who declared Berlin as Reforms’ ‘New Jerusalem’……

The 3rd sugya starts דף ג: תנן בכסף: מנ”ל and concludes on דף ד. אימא דידה הוו צריכה…. Just as Shabbat requires separating 6 days of מלאכה from 1 day forbidden to do מלאכה, so too קידושין as a מלאכה wisdom commandment. האב זכאי בבתו – בקטנותה ובנערותה but not a בוגרת, a daughter 12.5 years and older. Boris Badenov and Natasha Fatale, their statute halachic יד, וכסף משנה codes fail to learn Gemara halachot as משנה תורה precedents with the purpose to review the language of the “Home Mishna”. They erroneously presume that Gemara halachot stand upon their own two feet; just as Boris’s ספר המצוות limits Torah commandments to two basic categories. Their religious halachic codifications negate Talmudic courtroom common law as THE priority of the Framers of both Mishna and Gemara. Both “perverts” fail to grasp the k’vanna of האשה נקנית excludes not only תינוקות בנות but בוגרת as well.
_________________________________________________

This 3rd sugya learned through the middot of rabbi Yossi HaGallili; learned as an Av Agaddic and Tolda Halacha sugya. Therefore the middot of Hillel, Akiva, and Yishmael while present, my sh’itta focuses only upon rabbi Yossi’s Agaddic middot. My chief criticism made against the Gaonim and Reshonim scholarship upon the sealed masoret Shas Bavli, their failure to prioritize the fundamental basics of Torah common law – interpretation of middot sequence as the foundation of making a tiqqun upon the Yatzir Ha-Tov Oral Torah spirits within the oath brit hearts of the Chosen Cohen people through out the generations. Torah observance must not confuse the klippah/forms of faith with the substance of faith; the dedication of tohor middot whereby the Cohen people pursue justice among our people — within the jurisdiction of Sanhedrin common law courtrooms.

During the years of my youth in Texas and Oklahoma often mocked religious folk (both Xtians and Jews), that as an atheist praise God – despised their religious conservatism. Where was God during the Shoah, this question plagued me as a student at Texas A&M. When evangelicals knocked upon my door would push them off with where was your God Jesus; how long will you harp about your belief in his 2nd coming? Put up or shut up. Religion of all stripes – conservative maintenance of the status quo – Bunk.

בטל to me means reducing my masturbation Ego I. Religion begins and ends with “I believe etc etc etc”. Its false to argue or contemplate upon matters which my mind cannot grasp – like Gods. As a student of Bolshevik foreign policy between the two World Wars\European Civil Wars/, the “Jewish Problem” issue became affixed to “NEVER AGAIN”. Hence the Quartet attempts to resolve their latest “version” of their Jewish Problem and impose their “Final Solution” – divide the Jewish state into warring Islands of Arab Israeli conflicts “managed” by foreign Great Power Gods, as disgusting to me as breakfast with out spiced pork sausage! Humor to me: burning down mangers and laughing at silly conservative religious folk – of all stripes and colors. The prior to moving to Israel in 1991, first time I asked a Muslim believer where the word ברית in the Koran laughing told them to go eat camel flesh. Only a few laughed together with me, even my wife rarely laughs at my jokes.

The theme that shaped my research at Texas A&M the idea that each nation state – unique. Because each people has their own “ethical containment force”, my idea of God. Only Israel accepts the revelation of the Torah at Sinai. Hence the tits on a boar hog theology of Monotheism directly resembles Lewis Carroll’s Mad Hatter. The “Art of War”, which determined my sh’itta of learning T’NaCH and Talmud today: kill the g’lut Gods of all belief system theologies; shattering the trust in these theological created Gods whose very existence depends upon: words ie gospels, poetry ie koran, and the sword ie great power politics domination of the balance of power — my vision of revolution.

Torah defines the essence of “faith”, not as belief in God(s) [The plural form – nails scratching down a chalk-board – to religious monotheists.], but – the pursuit of judicial common law righteous compensation of damages inflicted by Jews upon other Jews – within the borders of the oath sworn lands. Faith in cursed g’lut – by definition cannot exist. Herein defines the 1st and 2nd Sinai commandments. My response to the Holocaust survivor who introduced me to the question: “I was in Auschwitz, where was God?”

Torah wisdom transforms בניני אבות\precedents: קום ועשה ושב ולא תעשה מצוות – which do not require k’vanna – unto time-oriented commandments – the latter – which by definition require k’vanna. All Torah mitzvot and Talmudic halachot – possible to make an aliya of them unto wisdom time-oriented Av commandments. Av commandments require prophetic mussar which dedicates tohor Oral Torah middot as the מלכות of all Torah blessings לשמה. The term: לשמה stands upon the precedent of ר”ה תשובה – remembering the sin of the Golden Calf wherein HaShem threatened to treat the oaths sworn to the Avot as vows that later can be annulled. Herein defines the theology of both Xtianity and Islam – the continuation of the sin of the Golden Calf throughout the Ages. T’shuva requires that Jews remember the oaths sworn by the Avot by which they cut a brit with HaShem to father the Cohen people. T’shuva requires that Jews remember the oaths נעשה ונשמע to accept the Written and Oral Torah Sinai revelations. The precondition of swearing a blessing לשמה, requires a t’shuva which remembers the required הבדלה which separates t’ruma from chol; air blown from the lungs from tohor spirits dedicated from within the Yatzir Ha-Tov heart Shekinah.

Therefore t’shuva rejects the alien Av tuma spirit that a man must repent for his sins. This Xtian and Muslim Av tuma avoda zara has directly impacted assimilated and intermarried and religious Jews – as expressed through the tedious and repetitious מחזור יום כפור ודוי. The rabbinic ודוי language not included in the עצם language of the Shemone Esrei. Confusing a ודוי דרבנן with a ודוי דאורייתא the same as distracted unfocused immaturity which distorts k’lippa with fruit produced by the same tree; the Pauline doctrine of ‘original sin’ dominates Xtian and Muslim notions of repentance. Oral Torah interprets the expulsion of Adam from the Garden as the introduction of g’lut as the Av Torah curse. Foreign substitute Monotheism religions reject taking responsibility for their repeated War-Crime committed throughout history. Post Shoah Arabs modeled their Wars to throw the Jews into the Sea upon the Nazi Shoah. Only Israel accepts the interpretation of the first two Sinai commandments as: Life vs Death, Blessing vs. Curse. The Book of Job amplifies this fundamental Torah acceptance. True understanding of Monotheism = Av tuma avoda zara; Job by at least one Amora – an imaginary man; Job viewed by all as a non Jew.

Torah faith in ארץ ישראל therefore rejects statute law halachic codes and Greek syllogism deductive logic as being equal to a bloody menstrual rag; no different than going to the mikveh while holding a dead rat. The challenge which addresses all generations of Israelis today: can we restore the Written Torah as the Constitution of the 12 Tribes of our Republic which mandates Sanhedrin common law courts throughout the restored Cities of Refuge whereby this Constitution makes the required הבדלה which separates Capital Crimes Courts from Torts Courts. Torah serves not as Av tuma ‘Divine Law’, but rather as the Constitutional mandate for תורה לא בשמים היא. Acceptance of the oath brit sworn at Sinai means that Jews in ארץ ישראל cling to our responsibility that upon justice hinges upon the Life/Death-Blessing\Curse responsibility for how we socially interact with our family, friends, neighbors, and bnai brit citizens within our civilization. Torah rejects the Av tuma spirit that laws derived from sacred texts. The vision of this Torah faith understands “יראת שמים” interpreted through the lenses of “בעל שם טוב” – understood not as affixed to an individual any more than the mitzva of Moshiach not “nailed” to a single individual. But rather that bnai brit Israel has responsibility to maintain their ‘Good Name Reputations’ among our bnai brit alliance allies; starting with the הבדלה between oaths vs vows.

The location of ארץ ישראל, open to invasion from all sides. Domestic politics shapes strategic Foreign Policy alliances with key non Jewish partner countries. This vision applies the Talmudic idea of gere toshav internal Israeli legal residence unto Goyim allies abroad. The foundation with any alliance – which by strict definition excludes Shoah European States classified under the Esav/Moav curse of “NEVER AGAIN” – that Israel cuts alliances with nation states based upon the יסוד of “pursuit of justice”. The commandment to war against Amalek interpreted as directly applicable to the ערב רב אין להם בושת פנים. Antisemitism the direct result of traitor “kapo” Jews who forsake the Torah/Talmud defined culture and customs observed by the Cohen people in ארץ ישראל, and who intermarry with Goyim – like as occurred in the days of Moshe when Pinchas killed a רשע. Responsibility for the Shoah and Amalek key conditions the Jewish people accept the “Yoke of the Kingdom of Heaven”; based upon the בנין אב of the Wilderness generation’s refusal to conquer the oath sworn brit land inheritance amplified by Weizmann’s 1937 plea: “Jews of the World where are you?”

This 3rd sugya an Aggadic thread of the Talmudic loom. Shall therefore prioritize the study of T’NACH Primary sources listed within as פרט precedents learned within their כלל sugya, based upon the Siddur which Orders tefillah through organized blessings; with an eye upon how this Shemone Esrei Order learns the Oral Torah middot affixed to this sugya of Gemara.

אמר רב יהודה אמר רב דאמר קרא (שמות כא) ויצאה חנם אין כסף. אין כסף לאדון זה אבל יש כסף לאדון אחר. ומאן ניהו? אב … ואימא הכי השתא אביה מקבל קידושיה דכתיב (דברים כב) את בתי נתתי לאיש הזה. ואיהי שקלה כספא? ואימא ה”מ קטנה דלית לה יד לקבל קידושין אבל נערה דאית לה יד לקבל קידושין תקדיש איהי נפשה ותשקול כספא. אמר קרא (במדבר ל) בנעוריה תית אביה כל שבח נעורם לאביה. ואלא הא דאמר רב הונא אמר רב, מנין שמעשה הבת לאב? שנאמר (שמות כא) וכי ימכור איש את בתו לאמה. מה אמה מעשה ידיה לרבה אף בת נמ מעשה ידיה לאבה תיפוק ליה מבנעוריה בית אביה, אלא בהפרת נדרים הוא דכתיב הא נמי בהפרת נדרים הוא דכתיב וכתבת נילף מיניה ממונא מאיסורא לא ילפינן, וכי תימא נילף מקנסא ממונא מקנסא לא ילפינן. וכ”ת נילף מבושת ופגם. שאני בושת ופגם דאבוה שייך בגוייהו אלא מסתברא דכי קא ממעט יציאה דכוותא קא ממעט

This complex set of arguments contains its external k’lippa shells and its internal prophetic mussar. G’lut communities lack the ability to learn לשמה (for the sake of common law justice), based upon the 1st Sinai commandment and the בנין אב curse imposed upon the Wilderness generation. Just as the latter cursed to die in g’lut and not conquer the oath brit lands so too the former enfeebled, measure for measure, eye for an eye. G’lut communities have forgotten the Oral Torah based upon the ברכת המזון blessing for Hanukkah. Actions have their consequences.

Previously, in both the first two sugyot, compared halacha with halacha from other sugyot from the Sha’s Bavli. In my own private learning extended the 7, 10, 13 rabbinic middot halachic search unto the Sha’s Yerushalmi. In similar fashion as the Talmud compares precedents from different sugyot, based upon a גזרה שוו צד משותף\common denominator/, in similar manner prophetic mussar learns by comparing similar middot precedents, akin to the front/top\side views of a blue-print … the different witnesses giving testimony based upon their different perspectives. The abomination of statute halachic codes totally ignores nullifies and obliviates this key יסוד of T’NaCH & Talmudic courtroom common law. The most egregious king of the Reshonim, the Rambam. His Order of halacha into neat and trim egg-crate subject matter stands as the essence of Roman statute law legalism.

Where his Guide based upon the exposed “bark” of Greek/Arabic philosophy of Aristotle. The substance of his profane Av tuma avoda zara expressed through his arrogant choice to arrange halacha into Roman code-subject matter. Small wonder that the medieval church codifiers of Papal dogmatism too embraced the re-discovered Greek philosophy as their new lover. ירמיהו ג:ו-י serves as a profound prophetic rebuke to the generations.

Our Gemara opens with שמות כא:יא this Parsha משפטים attached at the hip to the closing sugya of יתרו – כ:יט. The opening פרק משפטים – כא:א – כז. The Siddur prioritizes “Order”. This kabbalah serves as the basis, how to correctly learn Chumash as common law rather than Reshonim טיפש פשט. That Parshat יתרו joined at the hip with Parshat משפטים, this strengthen the sh’itta of יש סמוכים בכל התורה כולה.

The closing sugya of יתרו affixed by my sh’itta of learning to the אות ה’ של שם השם לשמה. The grammar לשמה prioritized over לשמו, to teach the סוד kabbalah of Shekinah. רחום similar to the 7th midda רב חסד based upon its similarity to מאי נפקא מינא. The midda of רחום by the way my sh’itta learns – based upon the precedents to uproot the nations of Canaan from the land; to kill the stubborn and rebellious child; remembering the obligation to make eternal war against Amalek\ערב רב Jews who despise their Jewish cultural inheritance and/or intermarry with Goyim; the two blessing\curse Crowns of the Torah which separate ruling the land with justice and enduring atheism\אפיקורוס. Hedonism defined as which emphasized the idea of pleasure, not just in a contemporary context of physical delights, but as a broader understanding of a good life that includes wisdom, friendship, and the absence of suffering.

The midda of רחום dedicates this tohor spirit from within the depths of the Yatzir Ha’Tov as expressed through the Shemone Esrei blessing: ראה בענינו, וריבה ריבנו, וגאלנו מהרה למען שמך, כי גואל חזק אתה: ברוך אתה ה’ גואל ישראל. This blessing stands סמוך to רופא חולי עמו ישראל. This עין טוב midda heals the Jewish people from the tuma Yatzir עיין רע. The midda of רחום dedicates this tohor spirit unto our soul/family and people.

Parshat משפטים – justice most fundamentally depends upon an עיין טוב. An attempt to nail down tohor spirits with words compares to the difficulty to describe shades of different colors with words. Words compare to a person suffering from a disease. Blowing the shofar on ר”ה requires lung power, but the mitzva of blowing the shofar resides in the spirit of the midda אל which remembers the Torah תוכחה where the kapo Jewish ערב רב translated the שם השם לשמה to the word אלהים – אתם ראיתם כי מן השמים דברתי אמכם. Prior to the revelation of the Torah at Sinai אל שדי, אלהים, אל Divine visions in the Heavens, where מלאכים communicated the brit faith within the camps of the Avot. But after Sinai: תורה לא בשמים היא. Hence tefillah a matter of the heart and not the Heavens. רחום pleads that the Jewish people pursue justice among ourselves and therein live in peace within our homeland. The עיין רע – translating the לשמה brit of living middot tohor spirits within the Yatzir Ha-Tov/Shekinah unto the “word of God” אלהים golden calf av tuma avoda zara – match only in its utter profanity by making Roman statute law have dominion over Sanhedrin common law.

This Parsha opens with the central thesis state theme of עבד עברי, which makes a Day vs Night הבדלה similar to shabbat from chol. The disgrace upon a man who prefers slavery over freedom: והגישו אדניו אל האלהים … ורצע אדניו את אזנו במרצע. The mitzva of קידושין does not degrade the dignity of a woman to that of a slave nor a whore – both commonly acquired through money. A man does not “love” that which he does not own. A man acquires the נפש עולם הבא of his wife, based upon the בנין אב of childless Avram who acquired the O’lam Ha’bah souls of his future born Cohen seed – through all generations unto eternity. The mitzva of גט serves as witness; the גט returns the divorced woman’s נפש עולם הבא back to her own “domain”.

Now weigh the implications of: ואם שלש אלה לא יעשה לה ויצאה חנם אין כסף. The window of נערה open for a short period before she matures into a בוגרת. Therefore the interpretation למפריע compels the man to compensate the father despite the נערה now having turned unto a בוגרת? What qualifies as the רוב חסד מאי נפקא מינא? The din of עגונה/chained woman. If למפריע applies to the father, then למפריע equally applies to the power of the courts to annul the קידושין when the רשע refuses to honor the conditions of his sworn oath, made before two kosher witnesses and a minyan of men to sanctify the mitzva of קידושין. A navi בנין אב: ירמיה יא:טו-יז. A כלל\פרט, just as Israel as as a nation can go unto g’lut, so too and how much more so the רשע who refuses to return the נפש עולם הבא back to the domain of his ex-wife. The בנין אב for this: ger tzeddick. Just as a ger tzeddick a new creation; a רשע placed in the ban of נידוי – like the Rambam and Spinoza – a new creation.

Our Mishna האשה נקנית compares to the extremes of a bell graph. It excludes both קטנה ובודרת. Only the middle band, the נערה, fits the halachic/aggadic definition of “אשה” in the sugya. The קטנה our Gemara compares to an immature etrog fruit. The בוגרת to outside the fathers’ domain. However if a man threatens the dignity of his daughter he can demand that the courts respect the Father/daughter family relationship. The halachic category “אשה” not simply biological, but rather bnai brit family. Just as Jews not טיפש פשט “racial” (All can convert and become Jewish.), but bnai brit family. The father’s rights Torah wisdom bound through the mitzva of time-oriented קידושין.

Herman Ridderbos (1909–2007) a prominent Dutch theologian and biblical scholar known for his significant contributions to Reformed theology and New Testament studies. Particularly noted for his works on Pauline theology and eschatology, exploring themes such as the kingdom of God and the role of JeZeus-Christ in salvation. But he hardly qualifies as a philologist. A biased theologian lacking expertise in Hebrew and Aramaic compares to a BS degree vs. a Doctorate degree. He did not specialize in textual criticism, historical war crime guilt of the Xtian church; or even 2nd Temple Jurisprudence.

Specifically, his revisionist theology failed to address the issue that the writings of Paul predate all the Gospel books! Attempts to declare that Mark predates Paul’s letters – a shallow maintain the status quo revisionist history speculation. The book of Mark written in Rome following the destruction of Herod’s Temple. Protestant “Higher Criticism” only applicable to invalidating T’NaCH Primary sources. Small wonder that this “school” collapsed early in the 20th Century, about the time of his birth.

He fails to go beyond the simple shallow literal reactionary reading of Paul’s letters, and address the serious issue that some Jewish scholars argue that Paul served as a spy agent provocateur of Nassi Rabban Gamliel. A don’t confuse me with the facts, I have my religion – nonsense. The “stoning” of both Stephen and Paul violated the pharisee halacha! Paul stoned outside the borders of Judea, the Capital Crimes Sanhedrin courts had no legal jurisdiction outside of Judea!!! The Book of Acts contradicts itself on this very score! It denounces Phariseeic law, yet validates the stoning on the road to Damascus as an event acceptable as ‘formal halachic’ executions. That’s a serious error that he failed to catch.

This disciplinary gap, it skews all theological belief system apologetics from Paul till today. Ridderbos’ canonical-theological –not historical-developmental — contradicts Church requirements whose theological dogmatism promotes the historical existence of JeZeus. The church new religion totally ignores the Torah priority of mussar over history. The possibility that Paul’s stoning – staged!

He infiltrated the budding Xtian movement – traveled to Damascus and alienated Jewish support for this alien false messiah heresy; which completely ignores the mitzva of Moshiach as no different than any other wisdom Torah commandment. Specifically that all Jews in all generations can sanctify this mitzva just as they can the wisdom commandment of Shabbat. Paul’s theology which declared circumcision no longer a Torah mitzva, violates the negative commandment against adding or subtracting Torah commandments. This theology the later Gospel narratives rejected when their fictional Harry Potter messiah declared his purpose – to fulfill Torah commandments; not add or subtract Torah commandments.

He failed to separate and distinguish Torah common law from Roman statute law. A day vs night difference. Courtroom judicial review over Legislative statute law the writings of Paul concealed. This absolute fundamental distinction totally invalidated when he broadly declared to Goyim, “You are not under the Law”. Of course Goyim not under the Law! Goyim to this day never accepted the Torah revelation at Sinai. Torah common law stands upon the authority of the Oral Torah logic system – the פרדס kabbalah which shapes the entire Shas Talmud, to interpret the k’vanna of mitzvot/commandments. The post NT church denies interpretation of k’vanna as the definition of Torah wisdom commandments which require k’vanna.

Proof that Paul acted as a spy “wolf dressed in sheep clothing” Romans 6:14 where he introduces his “theology” substitutionism, and obliviates Torah common law. Substitute theology defines the writings of Paul: for example: the notion of Goyim “grafted” likewise obliviates the mitzva of ger tzeddik. Proof that Paul served to create a new av tuma avoda zara religion – the direct definition of the 2nd Sinai commandment Torah curse. Rather than promote the Torah obligation of “pursuit of Judicial justice” as faith, Pauline substitute theology prioritized belief in JeZeus. Regardless that JeZeus no more provable in “the historical-method sense”, than the Hanukkah revolt against the Syrian Greek empire – based upon the Torah curse 2nd Sinai commandment.

Paul as recorded in Acts 27-28, then traveled to Rome and declared “Jesus the king of the Jews; Jesus the Son of God” when Romans believed that Caesar was “the Son of God”!!! This theology-propaganda totally ignored by Ridderbos. Xtians today, similar to their rejection of Oral Torah inductive logic “interpretations” as the purpose of all Law time-oriented commandments; they likewise insist that only “Modern” scholarship compares the Pauline “Jesus son of God” to the “Caesar son of God”. Hanukkah pre-dates the NT by a Century or more. Yehuda Maccabee waged his rebellion against the Greek Syrian king by swearing the loyalty of Judea to the authority of the “real” king of Syria. Paul as a student of Rabban Gamliel would have known this basic post sealing of the T’NaCH mussar. To obliviate this fact, strongly supports the conclusion that Paul sought to inject a Monotheism belief system into the body politic of Polytheistic Roman society – something like a virus invades a healthy cell. Torah warfare actively entails both blessing and curses. Prior to the great Jewish revolt against the Romans, the Jewish spy sent to Rome to curse the Roman civilization based upon the precedent of Yechuda Maccabbee.

Every nation who abandons their belief systems in their Gods – dies. It happened among the Assyrians, the Babylonians the Persians the Roman empire after it converted to Xtian monotheism, etc etc etc. This an irrefutable historical fact; while historians can and do debate the prime causes for the fall of empires, its interesting that both British and Soviet empires collapsed post Shoah. Where was Jesus?

The EU makes no reference to Xtianity, when it attempted to write its own Constitution. The church belief system views Jesus as a physical man. But Ridderbos theology failed to discern that Torah common law stands upon prophetic mussar, rather than relies upon actual history – like as emphatically does the church. Torah stands upon the foundation that each generation has its day under the Sun. Proof: the sages halachicly sealed the T’NaCH, Talmud, and Siddur – giving all generations an identical masoret playing field!

This basis-condition of classic ancient warfare – to destroy and kill the Gods of enemy nations – expressed in the judgement of the Gods of Egypt and the obliteration of Par’o Army drowned in the Sea of Reeds; followed by the judgment of the Gods of Canaan or also the attempt of Bil’aam to curse Israel to intermarry and assimilate – the Torah definition of the 2nd Sinai commandment. Ridderbos failure to critique this most basic fundamental flaw in Acts.

Instead his theology skewed the NT ‘as reliable church history’; not as a tendentious text with huge legal incoherencies. This truth did not concern nor interest him in the least. Any more than did C S Lewis address the Shoah: Xtian guilt of 2000+ years of war crimes which culminated in “by their fruits you shall know them” – Shoah church guilt/rat-lines and post war pogroms. Leo Tolstoy (1828–1910) failed to condemn the Russian pogroms – another bitter fruit of the Xtian dead religion. Where was Jesus during all the Church war crimes against humanity which resulted in the death of 10s of millions? Ridderbos treats “Son of God” almost entirely as a dogmatic category, not as a subversive imperial counter-claim.

E.P. Sanders (in Jesus and Judaism and The Historical Figure of Jesus) fails to discern the fundamental difference of how Torah defines the key term “prophet” from how the NT re-interprets it as no different than witchcraft. Witches predict the future which the Gospels describe as “fulfill the words of the prophets”. T’NaCH and Talmudic Aggada and later Midrash interpret “prophet” as a person who commands mussar.

The agnostic American historian Bart Ehrman confuses Daniel mysticism-apocalyptic interpretations made upon prophetic mussar (akin to how the Gemara interprets the language of the Mishna), but fails to grasp that all Holy Writings of the Hebrew T’NaCH serve primarily as Gemara-like commentaries to Prophet Mishna-like Primary sources. He failed to grasp that the framers of the Talmud based their Mishna/Gemara Av/tolda relationship upon the Prophet\Holy Writings relationship.

That he grasped the NT as a substitute fraud bears merit. But he did not understand that Torah faith does not spin around the central axis of belief in some monotheistic god as Xtianity and Islam demand. פרדס not a Reshonim institution. The entire foundation of how the Framers of both T’NaCH and Talmud organized these separate Books of Common law jurisprudence stand on the foundation of פרדס as taught by the P’rushim to rabbi Akiva. Aggadic sources function as the weft while Halachic source function as the warp threads by which the sages shape and determine the identity of the chosen Cohen people.

Talmudic common law stands as the model for re-established Courts when Jews reconquer our homeland. That Reshonim “converted” it to meet the crisis of g’lut during the Dark Ages does not stand today now that Jews have reconquered our homeland and struggle to restore the Torah as the Constitution of the Republic which mandates common law Sanhedrin courts. Theology plays no part nor role in Torah common law.

Rambam no different that the Apostle Paul or Arab Muhammad. Talmud sealed. Rambam can no more unseal the Talmud than can JeZeus or MuHammad. The Talmud serves as the basis Jewish culture and customs which define the Chosen Cohen identity in cursed Goyim lands of exile. But no Sanhedrin court ever existed outside of ארץ ישראל. Small Sanhedrin Capital Crimes Courts most essentially can function on the borders of ארץ ישראל as determined by Moshe Rabbeinu himself. Galut Jews “baptized” their assimilated need to have a religion like the Goyim. The Rambam code of statute law as much an abomination as Paul’s your not under the law declaration.

O’lam HaBa does not relate to messianic era. Avram cut the brit between the pieces when his future born seed only existed in “O’lam HaBa”, no different than a man makes קידושין and acquires the O’lam Ha’Ba soul of his wife! Both refer to the children born into the future – O’lam HaBa.

The word translation Lord = the word translation אלהים/Golden Calf. Therefore this bible translation av tuma avoda zara. The Hebrew רוח הקודש falsely translated at the Nicene Council as “holy spirit”= the tuma of a false prophet who seeks to pervert the hearts of the Chosen Cohen People. The revelation of the 1st commandment Sinai Spirit Name defines the k’vanna of רוח הקודש. The Hebrew word אלהים (Elohim) can denote various forms of divinity, which often leads to interpretational 2nd Sinai commandment avoda zarah.


The first Sinai revelation commandment rejects av tuma avoda zara known by both church and mosque as Monotheism. Each nation state/Goyim establishes their own God. Hence the Torah in בראשית immediately after the g’lut/exile of Adam the Torah differentiates between Goyim-nations from the Avot who father the chosen Cohen people for all eternity through the wisdom commandments known as tohor time-oriented mitzvot. Only Israel stood accepted and received the revelation of Torah common law at Sinai. Goyim by definition often elevate their own kings as the Gods which they worship. The NaCH repeatedly refers to this avoda zara as Baal or Moloch etc. Post sealing of the T’NaCH by the Men of the Great Assembly headed by Ezra. the approximately 1000 year time difference between the Koran’s av tuma Tawhid Monotheism creed of faith in Allah.


Allah no different from the earlier Gods worshipped by other nations. Therefore the Torah opens with בראשית ברא אלהים; definitive proof that the Torah does not recognize the alien theology of Monotheism. The first Book of the Torah בראשית introduces multiple Divine Names, אל שדי, אלהים, אל, האל etc. What separates these Divine Names from the revelation the 1st Commandment שם השם לשמה?


The Talmud defines “understanding” as the wisdom skill which possesses the power to discern like from like. A Torah commandment which serves as a precedent, the t’ruma given to the Cohen the tithe given to Levi and the chol (common crop) portion fixed to Israel. What separates “Most Holy” from “Holy” in the Mishkan? Still another precedent example of the need to develop the skill wisdom of understanding. Impossible to do wisdom commandments (also known as time-oriented mitzvot) without understanding the meaning of k’vanna. No word translation – such as “intent” – can define this key common law term.


Why? משנה תורה-common law-stands upon the foundation of בנין אב-precedent. Word translations such as John 1:1 decree a statute law perversion. Statute law no more common law than “Word” = רוח הקודש. Pre-Sinai Divine Names not the same as Post Sinai 1st Commandment revelation. Just as HaShem rejected the korban of Cain, for its lack of k’vanna which all wisdom commandments/korbanot require, so too and how much more so the בראשית vision of God in heaven vs the Mishkan revelation that the שם השם לשמה lives only within the Yatzir Ha-Tov hearts of the Chosen seed of the Avot. No Pauline grafting theology has the power to change the simple fact that Goyim simply have no portion with the Chosen Cohen seed of the Avot. The Koran substitutes Yishmael for Yitzak at the Akadah. This compares to the Pauline grafting fraud.

The בראשית Divine Names אל שדי אלהים אל וכו stand apart from the revelation of the שם השם לשמה revealed in the first Sinai commandment. Hence the Avot did not “know HaShem”. The Mishkan פרט teaches a profound משל which requires the generations to make the דיוק נמשל. The kabbalah-שכנה refers to rabbi Yechuda’s Yatzir Ha-Tov in his kre’a shma interpretation לבבך\כם; consistent with the dedication of Horev spirits/middot 13 followed up by Talmud Yerushalmi/Bavli middot 7 Hillel, 10 Akiva, 13 Yishmael affixed to interpreting Gemara common law halachic precedents and HaGallil 32 middot/aggada – to re-interpret (משנה תורה) the language of the Mishna which Gemara common law serves to interpret as a mirror of courtroom witnesses who testify based upon their given “fixed” perspectives. Akin to the front-top-side views of a blue print.

The theological abomination of Monotheism perverts the reality that each nation unique, because each nation worships its own national God. The 30 Year War a strong precedent. A T’NaCH source precedent, the permanent split between the kingdoms of Yechuda and Yisroel serve witness before the אלהים court. First the kingdom of Israel assimilated and embraced alien cultures and customs and abandoned the Oral Torah which serves to define the culture, customs, social practices which define the identity of the chosen Cohen people. Then Yechuda also worshiped other National Gods by embracing foreign cultures customs and forgetting and abandoning the revelation of the god of Sinai. Hanukkah serves witness. The Rambam serves as a prime example of how assimilation and intermarriage define the k’vanna of the 2nd Sinai commandment. Herein explains the failure of Reshonim scholarship to inspire Israel to conquer our homelands, based upon the model of Moshe Rabbeinu.

Mesechta Avoda Zarah specifically instructs that only Israel accepts the Torah. Hence the דיוק – the god of Sinai only a local tribal god. Clearly the god who delivered Israel out of Egypt not confused with the Gods of Egypt. בראשית ברא אלהים introduces Av tohor wisdom commandments taught through the משל of the world created in six days. The נמשל introduces time-oriented Av Torah commandments which require k’vanna & creates the chosen Cohen people in all generations through the sanctification of time-oriented wisdom commandments. Hence Torah commands mussar, the definition of prophetic wisdom. Torah does not teach history. T’NaCH & Talmud, Siddur & Midrashim establish the culture, customs, practices and identities of the chosen Cohen people. Just that simple, no fancy dancing.

The god of Israel judged the Egyptian Gods. The Av tuma witchcraft which declares: as above so below – rejects the Revelation of the Torah first Sinai commandment: השם לא בשמים היא; the god of Israel post Sinai vs. the Gods of Egypt serve as the eternal הבדלה that differentiates the revelation of רוח הקודש מידות which quicken and cause the Yatzir Ha-Tov to live & breath. Herein defines the k’vaana of Oral Torah common law Court-room justice as the substance of the revelation of the Torah at Sinai. The Goyim world contrast-view reads their Bible or Koran — Egypt’s Gods either false or subordinate inferior Gods, who do not actually exist at all. Hence their Av tuma avoda zara promotes the theology known as Monotheism. Goyim never accepted the Blessing/Curse brit of Sinai. Just as Goyim aliens do not determine the k’vanna of the mitzva of Moshiach so too Goyim theology does not determine the god of Israel.

The curse of g’lut: Jews lose the skill required to do mitzvot לשמה – based upon the first Sinai commandment – Egypt לאו דוקא. The temple of Shlomo – av tuma avoda zara made by a fool. The Book of Kings makes a דיוק satire by referring to Shlomo as the “wisest of all men”. The god of Israel binds only Israel because only Israel accepts the revelation of the Torah at Sinai. Assimilated Rambam, another ‘latter day’ Mormon-like fool; he embraced the Arab tawhid and ruled that Jews could daven in Arab mosques, and his Guide philosophy based upon Aristotle rather than פרדס logic; that Allah the same god of Sinai – despite the cold hard fact that Goyim, specifically Muhammad, reject the revelation of the Torah at Sinai. Prophets never sent דוקא to Goyim; both Moshe and Yona sent to lands not included in the oath sworn to the Avot as the inheritance of their Cohen seed to cause g’lut Israel to remember the brit and do t’shuva. The Pauline ‘original sin’ replacement theology perverted the introduction of the Torah curse/theme of g’lut\exile and substitutes – the belief system, messiah Jesus God saves from sin.

The Nicene Creed which equates Jesus as God, perhaps the strongest proof; international law a myth of propaganda morality, not a binding authority. Political conflicts throughout history falsely classified by some as a failure of diplomacy. But casting this political rhetoric upon the dust bin of history together with the NT & Koran, political conflicts express a natural clash of sovereign “Gods.” Restated: A nation‑state — a functional “God.” Theological Universal Monotheism\tawhid, often called “international law” by UN member states who oppose Israel, attempt to override national sovereignty through Religio-political rhetoric. But history provokes-proves that nations create their own sacred narratives, “Word of God”. Universal monotheism directly resembles Great Power imperialism. The revelation of the Torah at Sinai establishes faith as judicial Sanhedrin court justice limited to the bnai brit people alone.

Other nations never bound to the 7 mitvot other than Gere Toshav living within the borders of the Cohen brit republic. Why? These mitzvot make a required הבדלה which separates ger toshav from na’creeim. The Talmud always remains within the judicial boundaries which the Written Torah written Constitution determines. Post sealing of the Shas Bavli all opinions made by scholars compare to US Supreme Court rulings which later Courts can overturn.

The Blessing/Curse Torah oath brit faith never presumes any conclusion that g’lut applies to HaShem as its applies to Israel, based upon the contrast between the בראשית Divine Names from the first Sinai Name. Any reading that attempts to teach this metaphor – if taken literally – merely a טיפש פשט. The sophomoric Bible mistranslations and Koran serve as witness. For example: among the Reshonim, only Rambam ruled halacha from aggadic sources. His Universal Monotheistic God permits Jews to daven in av tuma avoda zara Mosques.

That later Goyim, such as Hobbs, Schmitt, or modern nationalism “influenced” by the Torah, (the Founding Fathers of the American Republic serve as witness), does not invert this Torah “Nation-State as Functional God” as post Talmudic; based upon the Torah premise: the chicken created and later laid eggs. Church rejection of the פרדס Oral Torah combined with their Jesus God NT theology – invalidates its literalist reading of the Creation story. Just as Muhammad’s equal redefinition of prophets as persons sent to all nations invalidates the revelation of the Torah first commandment. Allah simply a Golden Calf word substitution.

Rambam’s universalist Noahide framework only a philosophical systematization; it does not appear explicitly in the Talmud or Tanakh as a normative precedent. Hilchot Melachim 8–10, expresses a foreign philosophy — a Greek-influenced natural law perspective. The Talmud does not frame Goyim as bound by any such universal natural law – in a systematic, Greek-like sense. Rambam abstracts from Talmudic rulings unto a universal ethical schema — a philosophical move, that created a new Judaism religion. There is no canonical Talmudic or Tanakh precedent for universalist moral obligations like Rambam “God” imposes through his Roman-like statute law religious codification. Oral Torah logic employed by Sanhedrin justices to interpret law based upon precedents. The lights of the P’rushim hanukkah serve as witness that assimilation to Greek culture and deductive reasoning causes Israel to forget the Torah.

T’NaCH prophetic sources such as found Isaiah 13-14, 40-48 directed toward the failure of Israel to do t’shuva and remember the Sinai oath brit. Never to Goyim – who to this very moment in time do not accept this Sinai oath brit blessing\curse-Life/Death judicial justice-g’lut oppression faith obligation. Yonah sent to Nineveh, serves witness. Repentance made by Goyim shares nothing with the Torah mitzva of t’shuva. Because t’shuva centers upon remembering the oaths sworn by our fore-fathers; repentance refers to regret made over personal sins – based upon the Pauline theology-doctrine: Original Sin. The “repentance” made by the king of Assyria – only an Indian Summer. Goyim not delivered from Egyptian slavery, therefore Goyim incapable of remembering the oaths sworn by the Avot to cut the time-oriented Torah brit which creates the chosen Cohen people throughout the generations.

The בראשית “Creation story” introduces Av time oriented wisdom commandments. בראשית does not introduce something other than the revelation of the Torah at Sinai judicial common law. Based upon the כלל that a opening “Thesis Statement” followed by “particulars which validate” the thesis statement through specific particulars כלל-פרט.

The Bavli aggada -does – mention Noahide categories, but not as a system, any more than the Creation story instructs that the Universe created in some silly טיפש פשט literalist reactionary reading. D’varim defines two types of Goyim in the brit oath-land inheritance of the chosen Cohen people. Mesechta Sanhedrin aggada address ger toshav and mesechta Baba Kama halacha – Nacreeim. Talmud does not ever refer to Goyim in foreign lands as having to obey the 7 mitzvot bnai noach. Why? Because Goyim never accept to this day the revelation of the Torah – inclusive of the Book בראשית.

Mesechta Avoda Zara and Chullin teach that a Hebrew Goy slave – a ger toshav. Another proof: Orpha decided to return to her Moavite family. The דיוק clear, she returned to Moav and abandoned keeping the 7 mitzvot bnai noach. Ruth by contrast, returned to Israel and serves as the model of the mitzva ger tzeddik.

[If] every nation establishes its own god, such as did Casear, and Mao; and HaShem breaths tohor middot – only the Oral Torah god of Israel – when we rule our homeland with righteous judicial common law courtroom justice — [then] What status of divine justice operates outside this Sinai brit? Each people by making their own Gods, as either Heads of State or theological belief systems etc. The Code of Hammurabi – approximately 600 to 800 years older than the commonly accepted date for the Sinai revelation after the liberation of the Israelites from Egypt, serves as witness. History testifies that throughout human history national leaders have assumed the role of God of their people/kingdom. Sinai does not sit atop of any universal pyramid. Rather the revelation of the Torah at Sinai — a different “mountain” entirely.