From Parchment to Power: A Post-1948 Jewish Counter-Theology

Luke 24 narrative sets the scene: “on the road”, with two disciples disillusioned and confused, mourning what they believe is Jesus and his failed redemption of Israel. This parallels the emotional and spiritual disarray Jews felt after the destruction of Herod’s Temple in 70 CE—how Herod’s murder of his family and betrayal of the Jewish people due to Roman seductions of power, had caused the mystical Shekhinah to withdraw from dwelling within the Yatzir Tov of the Jewish people.

Luke’s Gospel, written after 70 CE!!! In a world where Jews wrestled with the consequences of the recent revolt against Rome that had turned Confederate defeat – south. Many religious “orthodox” Jews struggled to comprehend Jewish survival without Herod’s Temple. In this context, Luke offers a replacement substitute theology, but instead of a Herod “Temple avoda zara”, this revisionist gospel narrative switches to the new god Jesus; rather than make its focus upon the actual and totally real destruction of Jerusalem, and Jewish slaves sold across the Roman empire unto g’lut/exile – the gospel narrative sets a religious rhetoric of: Salvation of all Mankind from the eternal curse of Original Sin.

Emmaus, geographically not far away from Jerusalem. As such these fictional characters, literally symbolically walking away from Herod’s Temple which lays in ashes. The “Lord is risen indeed” a משל to the restoration of an independent Jewish state in Judea? Hence Luke 24 bears a striking resemblance to the despair felt by Jews over the recent Roman victory. No. Not a chance in Hell that such an interpretation holds water. Rather the gospel narrative serves as a classic switch & bait. The gospel language ignores real Jewish anguish. The Roman censors, promotes a fraud forgery, which aimed to deceive the embittered Jewish people in Judea. Similar to how 19th Century Russian revolutionaries concealed their ambitions to overthrow the government of the Czar by employing a pastoral language to conceal their revolutionary plans from the Czar secret police. This theological pivot mirrors how Rabbinic Judaism, in its own right reacted to the hostile Roman propaganda rhetoric wherein it redirected the Jewish soul toward halakhah, prayer, and Torah learning. The Roman Luke religious rhetoric propaganda offers a rival answer: the Church, the Gospel, and the Eucharist.

Luke’s Gospel, then, simply not actually spiritual—this mythical fiction depicts refined and subtle revisionist history. It repackages the post-revolt Jewish defeat unto a new imperial cult of the ‘resurrected savior’. Why? Viewed from a Roman strategic interest perspective, Roman propaganda had strong reason to fear a second major Jewish revolt. Hence the story of the Gospels served their interests to promote a passive Moshiach who echoes Greek and Roman mythologies where the messiah rises from the grave and lives again as god. The purpose or intent of this fictional revisionist history, to drive a wedge between the Jews of Alexandria Egypt and the Jews of Judea! To prevent a united revolt of these two critical Jewish population centers united, making a war against Rome in order to expel the Romans from Egypt Judea and Syria.

The Gospels read from this vantage perspective makes a lot of sense because Rabbinic Judaism channeled loss in the 66-70 War into halakhic creativity and Torah scholarship; the writing of the Mishna in 210 CE and the Gemara in 450 CE both documents testifies as two key witnesses to this historical fact that Jewish strategic interests do not reflect Roman imperial strategic interests.

Jesus not as a fulfillment of Jewish prophecy, but as a deliberate fabrication, molded to resemble Greco-Roman dying-and-rising gods (Dionysus, Osiris, Romulus) in order to defuse Messianic nationalism, based upon the Torah model of Moshe Rabbeinu. This “resurrected god” Jesus-figure, crafted to drive a wedge between Judean Jews and the large, intellectually powerful Jewish community in Alexandria – especially shrewd. Alexandria, with its deeply Hellenized but still Torah-committed Jewish population, had historically maintained intense ties to Jerusalem, even constructing its own version of the Temple (the Leontopolis temple). A unified Jewish uprising from both Egypt and Judea could have devastated Roman control across three strategic provinces: Judea, Egypt, and Syria.

What better way to prevent such an alliance than to introduce a theological virus—one that calls Jews to abandon national resistance in favor of spiritualized surrender, to replace Torah-driven oath brit resistance, with mystical “salvation,” and to reinterpret defeat as “divine plan”? Hence the student of Rabban Gamliel – Paul of Tarsus – introduced a anti-venom to the Roman snake bite poison. In Damascus he had succeeded to infiltrate a liberal reform messiah Jewish community, seize leadership of this kapo movement and declare that Torah law, specifically circumcision, no longer applied. His theology closely resembles that of both Sabbatai Zevi, followed by Jacob Frank. These later false messiah movements didn’t just challenge rabbinic authority—they flipped the halakhic framework on its head, invoking kabbalistic cosmology to justify transgression as redemption.

Where Roman Xtianity spiritualized and abandoned the brit; Rabbinic Judaism intensified it—channeling both our defeat & grief unto halakhah, t’shuvah, communal accountability, and eventually codifying the Mishnah and Gemara. Preserving Jewish sovereignty through legal-cultural resilience rather than physical resistance. Talmudic common law serves as the ideal model for the future-time, when Jews defeat the Roman enemy, drive its Legions from our land and restore lateral common law Courtrooms across the Tribal States of the larger Republic. The comparison of the theology of the Apostle Paule to the 1666 “prophet Natan”, and his prophesies which interpreted Sabbatai Zevi’s strange bi-polar behavior, bears close examination.

This post 1948 and 1967 Israeli victory over the Nakba defeated Arab armies, this current interpretation views the Gospels as Roman propaganda employed to shape and fashion the Golden Calf early Xtianity. It contrasts to the historical and spiritual genius of Rabbinic Judaism: its acts, (as opposed to the Pauline Book of Acts) of national defiance wrapped in legal common law logic פרדס creativity. By highlighting how the Gospels served Roman strategic interests—neutralizing Messianic hope, by replacing it with mystical passivity-this interpretation endeavors to explain the intent of the Framers of the Gospels and New Testament.

The stark contrast exposed by and through publication of the Talmud, so day and night different from that of the Gospels and new testament! The Talmud as both resistance literature and constitutional blueprint for a future sovereign republic of Israel – nothing short of prophetic. Where Rome tried to crush Jewish sovereignty through the sword, Rabbinic sages transformed parchment into the new battlefield. Torah she’b’al peh became our underground, our lifeline, our refusal to vanish; it shaped and determines the culture and customs practiced by the Jewish people to this very day. The Mishnah and Gemara while dressed as simply religious texts—in point of fact, they function as the blueprints of continuity, preparing for the day when beit din justice, tribal sovereignty, and brit-based society rises from the dead.

The church now rots in exile, waiting for the 2nd Coming of Jesus, while Jews defeat our European and Arab enemies in open warfare. Post the 2nd Israeli Independence War of June 1967, Israel dominates the balance of power in the Middle East while Britain and France can but look on and vainly attempt to offer UN 242 pathetic suggestions; please Jews return back to the Shoah borders of 1948 and abandon Jerusalem has your Capital.

Xtianity, as established through the Gospels and new testament, forged the “NEW” Roman Empire’s “theological virus” designed to dismantle Jewish unity and resistance. This interpretation merits & deserves more visibility. Obviously Jews having the church sword at our throats throughout the Dark and Middle Ages, could never publicly challenge the Gospel narrative prior to the 1948 resurrection from the dead of the Jewish state. But facts remain facts, instinctively the Church hated, despised and sought to burn and destroy the Talmud throughout the Middle Ages. Post American and French revolutions, and culminated with Israel winning its second Independence War in 1967, to the absolute chagrin of both London and Paris, now Israelis can openly denounce, dispute, and destroy the church monopoly over the new testament narrative.

Israelis argue that the Roman gospel propaganda reframes Jesus not as a culmination of Jewish hope, but as a Roman counter-insurgency tactic, a synthetic messiah designed to pacify, divide, and Hellenize.

A post Shoah & post-1948 Jewish counter-theology that unflinchingly reclaims the right to challenge the Gospels—not just as theological missteps, but as weapons of imperial control, deployed against Jewish sovereignty and prophetic resistance. The contrast drawn between the Talmud as a constitutional memory vs. the Roman gospels – as imperial mythology – cuts directly to the heart of centuries of polemics, persecution, and erasure.

This Israeli interpretation explores the new testament not as some spiritual continuation of the Hebrew T’NaCH but as a Roman instrument of theological pacification—a deliberate imperial fabrication meant to defuse Jewish resistance, divide Jewish unity across the empire, and overwrite the פרדס four-part inductive logic kabbalah introduced by rabbi Akiva. This unique logic system stands totally apart and separated from Aristotle’s three-part deductive syllogism of logic. Rabbi Akiva’s logic sh’itta, simply stated in a single word – dynamic. Whereas Aristotle’s logic methodology – frozen fossilized and static. Courts of Common law cannot make “one size fits all” judicial rulings for all Cases “Heard” (Oral Torah) before their Courts. Roman statute law legislative and bureaucratic red-tape decrees, possess neither ears nor wisdom to weigh the groins of the common man.

Xtianity perverts the Hebrew T’NaCH unto a Roman instrument of theological pacification—a deliberate imperial fabrication meant to defuse Jewish resistance, divide Jewish unity across the empire, and overwrite the oath brit dynamic logic which permits Jews to improvise and adjust to meet the challenges faced by each and every generation. Utterly impossible for the statute law Shulkan Aruch to serve as a model for lateral Sanhedrin common law court rooms. Law codes that organize judicial rulings into simplified egg-crate legal subjects, such inferior deductive logic simply impossible to employ this static way of thinking to base judicial ruling upon making precedent case comparisons. This Hellenized substitute revisionist history which perverts Harry Potter like gospel books of fiction unto the born again Son of God, an utter Torah abomination of avoda zara.

Rabbinic Judaism, through the Mishnah and Talmud, forged a constitutional counter-insurgency—resisting the Roman empire through halakhah, oral פרדס tradition, and the dream of restored judicial lateral common law court sovereignty. From Par’o Court in Egypt to the ICC Rome Treaty court in the Hague, no static logic statute law court has ever ruled with justice. The British Star Courts which legalized British impressment of American sailors on the open High Seas serves as witness to this fact.

Rome’s Theological Strategy: Jesus modeled not on Moshe or David but on Osiris, Dionysus, and Romulus. The Gospels as just another “Golden Calf” mythology, seeks to replace the 40 days missing Moshe Rabbeinu with a Golden Calf replacement, who thereafter returns Israel back to Egyptian slavery or Vatican Rome. The Emmaus Road, as allegory for post-Temple despair, re-narrated to seduce Jews toward passivity and convert unto Xtianity.

Roman fear of Jewish unity between Alexandria and Jerusalem, a valid threat. Egypt served as the bread-basket for the populations in the city of Rome. The Government of Rome fed & pacified this unruly home population. Something akin to the separation between the nation of Italy from Vatican Rome today. Loss of access to the grains grown in Egypt, such a disaster probably would have caused the Roman empire to collapse upon itself. Hence the Roman framers of the new testament developed a religious rhetoric that enhanced divide and conquer. A theological virus injected, akin to biological warfare, to prevent Judea making a political alliance together with the Jews of Alexandria Egypt.

The Church fathers likewise insisted upon absolute control over the bible narratives. They openly discouraged the common man of Europe to read the bible translations which the church priests edited to meet their narrow, self serving, egocentric interests. Recall that it took the invasion of Spain by Arab armies to re-discovered the ancient Greek texts which so utterly dominated the ancient world. The lights of Hanukkah serve as a witness, that the competition between Greek vs Torah logic exploded into a Jewish Civil War.

Torah simply not, at least ideally a religion, but it functions as national constitutional law. This idea the church fathers completely and totally censored. They demanded that the Torah mirror the church cencorship which restricted their bible perversions unto only a religious belief in the Gods. The same holds true with halacha as an expession of the expanded infrastructure of Av tohor time oriented Torah commandments which require prophetic mussar as their k’vanna; the purpose of the Aggada within the Talmud serves this precise purpose in Torah T’NaCH scholarship. Know as תמיד מעשה בראשית, time oriented mitzvot create the Universe from nothing. Meaning doing tohor time oriented Av commandment of the Torah or Talmud possess the power to change the curse of Bil’aam unto a blessing; Esau approached Yaacov with a massive Army having 400 Officers! Yet Esau kissed Yaacov rather than plunged a sword into his heart. The mitzva of the Gid HaNasheh (sciatic nerve), serves as an eternal witness of the kabbalah of tohor time oriented Av Torah commandments which require prophetic mussar as their most essential k’vanna dedication of the ritual act of removing the sciatic nerve to make the thigh kosher for Jewish halachic consumption.

In search of the efes salvific Easter Egg.

The T’NaKH, resurrection non existent, personal resurrection a foreign Greek or Roman mythology. The only reference in the whole of the Torah for such a brain dead stupid myth, the משל of the oath sworn between the pieces wherein old Sarah and Avram told their bodies would rise from the dead and produce children in their old age. Ezekiel 37 “Valley of dry bones” merely a משל which teaches the mussar that Israel in g’lut – like as in the days of ancient Egypt – would “rise from the dead” and the Jewish nation in Judea would live again as a free nation in the Middle East. Daniel 12:2 mysticism serves as a commentary to Ezekiel 37.

John (the client of a prostitute) 20 merely exists as a mythological perversion of the T’NaCH, which seeks to substitute Xtian believers as the “new chosen Cohen people/not nation. The T’NaKH contains no precedent for individual resurrection as a theological claim. John’s gospel—especially chapter 20—isn’t just a myth. It’s a Greco-Roman literary appropriation of Jewish symbols, repackaged to serve a super-sessionist agenda. Empty tombs, gardener deities, death-and-rebirth motifs, and female witness figures are all common in Hellenistic mystery cults (e.g., Dionysus, Osiris, Adonis). Mary Magdalene, cast as the first witness, is framed like a cultic initiate recognizing the divine epiphany—straight out of pagan salvific theater.

There’s a long pagan tradition of personal resurrection, often linked to fertility cycles, divine kingship, or mystery cult initiations. The Greco-Roman world was saturated with myths of dying-and-rising gods or mortals. Dionysus is killed (in some versions by Titans), dismembered, and then resurrected by his father Zeus. Mystery cults of Dionysus emphasized death, rebirth, and personal salvation through initiation. A very clear parallel to the later Xtian spiritual narrative. Osiris, murdered by his brother Set, chopped into pieces, then reassembled and resurrected by his wife Isis. Osiris becomes king of the underworld, and a symbol of personal resurrection for believers in Egyptian and later Hellenistic-Egyptian cults. Osiris’ cult was imported into Greco-Roman religion—Isis-Osiris-Serapis worship was especially popular in 1st-century Egypt and Rome.

Romulus disappears in a storm and is later resurrected/assumed into heaven as the god Quirinus; Divine ruler who does not stay dead—instead, he ascends and becomes a deity of the Roman state; similar to the idea of Jesus “ascending” to become Lord.

John 20 and 1 Corinthians 15—absorbs and retools all these elements, like Dionysus and Osiris, or like the myth of Romulus. This isn’t prophecy fulfilled—it’s myth recycled, now retrofitted with Hebrew names and places, but completely foreign to T’NaCH literature.

The Jews love/hate relationship with Pesach and Easter

Some Videos to Have in Mind for Passover

Given the profound theological distortions and centuries of bloodshed carried out in the name of the “resurrected Christ”—especially the horrors committed during Easter and Holy Week—How should a Jew respond to Happy Easter from a Goy, especially the bloody history of blood libels, pogroms, taxation without representation, forced ghetto imprisonment for 3 Centuries, and forced expulsions from virtually all Xtian nations of Europe – the mother of Xtianity?

As an atheist – praise HaShem, I do not believe in your new God Jesus the Son of God, trinity belief system. It seems to me that all religious rhetoric belief systems stand upon theology and Creeds, and possess absolutely no wisdom what so ever. Hence both Xtianity and Islam forced to import ancient Greek wisdom of logic because their personal belief in this, that, or those Gods – failed to prioritize wisdom. The Torah by contrast teaches according to the kabbalah of rabbi Akiva’s פרדס inductive logic format – the wisdom of Oral Torah common law.

The Torah does not require belief in any god, the way Christianity or Islam does. It requires allegiance to our oath brit contractual obligations, fidelity to justice, and the pursuit of chochmah (wisdom) through structured interpretation and judicial legal discernment. That’s a completely different paradigm. As an atheist—praise HaShem, a very Talmudic turn of phrase, almost like saying: “I reject your idol, and in doing so I uphold the Name.” Torah has space for this kind of irony. “The Name” (HaShem) – a spirit and not a word metaphor or Rubic’s cube puzzle. The revelation of the Name in the first commandment at Sinai, shares absolutely zero common ground with an theological/creed based idolatry “belief object”—Torah a legal common law judicial legal system of law, defined by the sworn oath brit terms, Like a living-blood-sealed treaty carved into stone, by the Avot: Avraham, Yitzak, and Yaacov.

Henceforth known as the brit (alliance). The Torah simply not a metaphysical abstraction as the Nicene Creed or Muslim Universal conversion by simply declaring belief in Allah and Mumammad as the Final prophet, any more than the prophet of the Church of the Latter Day Saints and their Holy Book substitute theology, in any way shape or form resembles the revelation at Sinai and Horev. This common thread links the attempts made by the new testament, koran and book of Mormon to supplant all earlier, specifically T’NaCH scriptures. The latter targets, like the rear and front sights of a sniper rifle, only the tiny Jewish audience. Whereas the fraudulent old testament/new testament bible, koran and morman holy books make an appeal to all Mankind. The Talmud teaches in mesechta avoda zarah that all Mankind other than the Chosen Cohen People reject to this day the revelation of the Torah at Sinai and Horev.

Herein, this response represents the classic standard Jewish response to “Happy Easter”, based upon Jewish inter-actions with the European church abomination. Unlike the peoples who reject the revelation of the Torah at Sinai, the Talmud understands the 2nd Sinai commandment: Not to worship other Gods, with the interpretation of: A – Do not assimilate nor embrace the cultures and customs of any people or society which rejects the revelation of the Torah at Sinai. For example when king Shlomo built his first Temple, because he based this vision upon non Jewish cultures and customs, like the Catholic church, for example, builds great Cathedrals which took generations to complete those huge static dinosaur fossilized beastly constructions.
Rather than establish Sanhedrin lateral common law Federal courtrooms, Shlomo judged the Capital Crimes Case of the two prostitutes before his private Paro like, Monarch dominated and controlled vertical courtroom, where the State pays the salaries of the Judges and Prosecuting Attorney. Hence the First Temple in Jerusalem defines the Xtian translation of the 2nd Sinai commandment – “idolatry”. B. Do not intermarry with these foreign alien people who reject the revelation of the Torah oath brit remembrance cut at Sinai and Horev. Again king Shlomo serves as the objective model for this negative interpretation of the meaning of the 2nd Sinai commandment. The Book of Ezra serve as a support to the mussar rebuke taught in the Prophetic Book of Kings. Comparable to how the Gemara functions as a commentary to the Mishna.

This wisdom stands as the eternal foundation of everything: Torah simply not a religion—rather its serves, directly comparable to the 1789 US constitution, a judicial covenant sworn by the Avot and ratified at Sinai and Horev which established the first Commonwealth of the Israelite Republic. Its פרדס logic – contractual, not mystical. Its sacredness lies not in “what one believes,” but in how one lives in fidelity to a sworn brit—a legal-political alliance sealed with mutual oath allliance(s) – something like the NATO alliance established after WWII. How do Jews dedicate their “world to come” behavior with our wives, family, neighbors, and people in the future as the definition of our t’shuva to honor the oath brit alliance faith throughout all generations the Jewish people live on this Earth. The metaphor “World to Come” does not refer to life after death, but how a man contracts to marry a woman with the obligation to instruct his future born children to honor the oath alliance faith\contract commitments.

Unlike Christianity (which demands acceptance of the Nicene Creed) or Islam (which requires the Shahada), Torah demands: the righteous pursuit of judicial justice which honestly dedicates – like a korban on the altar – to restore fair compensation of damages inflicted by Party A upon Party B among the chosen Cohen people throughout the generations. “As an atheist – praise HaShem”, this phrase encapsules Talmudic inductive reasoning. It echoes Moshe breaking the tablets—not out of disbelief, but out of fidelity to the brit terms violated when the “mixed multitudes” (assimilated and inter-married Jews) attempted to make the Golden Calf a substitute for Moshe Rabbeinu. Chag Yom Kippur (Day of Atonement) utterly rejects all substitute theologies, like as encorporated in the theologyies of Xtianity, Islam, and Mormonism. On Yom Kippur, HaShem sanctified t’shuva rather than “repentance”. HaShem annulled the vow, to make of Moshe the chosen Cohen people which would have profaned the oath sworn with the Avot, specifically the oath first sworn to Avram at the brit cut between the pieces.

I do not subscribe to your new gods or universalizing metaphysics. My allegiance only to the brit sworn at Sinai—to the Name לשמה. This foundation of all Av tohor time oriented commandment k’vanna, simply not a belief, and specifically belief in any cult of personality or object. The spirit of justice breathing in the hearts of a chosen people bound to the terms of the oath brit contractual alliance.

Impossible for the Johnny Come Lately replacement Holy Books, which prioritize Xtian creedal salvation or Islam’s conversion formula; these foreign theologies share no common ground with the oath brit alliance which applies strictly and only to the Jewish people and how we behave and interact among ourselves, throughout the generations we independently rule and govern the oath promised land. Obedience to the oath alliance contracts has nothing to do with DNA or racial Race theories, so popular during the 20th Century and post Shoah shallow reactionary racist morons.

HaShem simply NOT a theological idea – and neither Jesus nor Muhammad has the power or authority to change this simple fact; any more than the two legs of a right triangle – any one of them longer than the length of the hypotenuse leg of that right triangle; any more than anything observed in the Seas, Heavens, or Earth comparable to HaShem – the God of Israel alone. This Name lives within the Yatriz HaTov within the bnai-brit Cohen peoples’ hearts, not in some heavenly throne room or philosophical abstraction. Creedal theologies turn “God” into a thing you believe in, a noun. The Torah presents HaShem as a verb—a living oath alliance contract which judges the hearts of the chosen Cohen people in all generations – equally.

The Talmud, not a theology book. Rather it reflects as record of legal case/rule argument precedents, a debate between the prosecutor and defense attorneys before the 3rd judge of a Torts Court, inductive dialectic of logic, and interpretation of the intent of the Framers of both the T’NaCH and Talmud visions of Mitzvot and Halacha.

Talmud teaches in tractate Avodah Zarah that the nations of the world rejected the brit at Sinai. Hence the universalizing books—the New Testament, Koran, Book of Mormon—must create substitute theologies aimed at global appeal, because they lack brit-based legitimacy. These texts override, supplant, and erase the specificity of the original brit by asserting new revelations—all of which are detached from oath law and legal testimony. All of which violate the Torah negative commandment not to Add or Subtract from this Torah.

Every one of these super-sessionist texts seeks universality, which the Torah totally rejects without any question or doubt. The Torah oath brit cut with Israel, (the chosen Cohen people) and not mankind. The nations were offered Torah, but they rejected it—as per midrash and tractate Avodah Zarah. Therefore, these later texts construct a counter-Torah. The New Testament: salvation by blood of a Roman-executed man/son of God. The Koran: denies Jewish oath brit contract cut with all future born children of Avraham, Yitzak and Yaacov. Both the Church fathers and Muslim shieks call Jews accursed, hated by either God the Father or Allah in Heaven. Book of Mormon: absurd American-based fantasy of divine destiny, with fabricated Semitic claims. Each of these attempts not only fail to uphold the brit—they declare war on it. Therefore all three foreign counterfeit religions define the intent of the 2nd Sinai commandment – Not to worship other Gods.

Herein, this response represents a standard Jewish response to “Happy Easter”. Unlike the peoples who reject the revelation of the Torah at Sinai, the Talmud understands the 2nd Sinai commandment: Not to worship other Gods, with the interpretation of: A – Do not assimilate nor embrace the cultures and customs of any people or society which rejects the revelation of the Torah at Sinai. For example when king Shlomo built his first Temple, because he based this vision upon non Jewish cultures and customs, the Catholic church builds great Cathedrals which took generations to complete on structure, rather than establish Sanhedrin lateral common law Federal courtrooms! Hence the First Temple in Jerusalem qualifies as “idolatry”. B. Do not intermarry with these alien people who reject the revelation of the Torah oath brit remembrance cut at Sinai and Horev. Again king Shlomo serves as the model of this negative interpretation of the meaning of the 2nd Sinai commandment.

This is the foundation of everything: Torah is not a religion—it is a national constitution, a judicial covenant sworn by the Avot and ratified at Sinai and Horev. Its logic is contractual, not mystical. Its sacredness lies not in “what one believes,” but in how one lives in fidelity to a sworn brit—a legal-political alliance sealed with mutual oath allliance(s) – something like the NATO alliance established after WWII.

Unlike Christianity (which demands acceptance of the Nicene Creed) or Islam (which requires the Shahada), Torah demands: the righteous pursuit of judicial justice which honestly restores fair compensation of damages inflicted by Party A upon Party B among the chosen Cohen people throughout the generations. “As an atheist – praise HaShem”, this phrase encapsules Talmudic inductive reasoning. It echoes Moshe breaking the tablets—not out of disbelief, but out of fidelity to the brit violated when the “mixed multitudes” (assimilated and inter-married Jews) attempted to make the Golden Calf a substitute for Moshe Rabbeinu. Chag Yom Kippur (Day of Atonement) rejects substitute theology. HaShem made t’shuva and annulled the vow to make of Moshe the chosen Cohen people which would have profaned the oath sworn with the Avot, specifically the oath first sworn to Avram at the brit cut between the pieces.

I do not subscribe to your new gods or universalizing metaphysics. My allegiance is to the brit sworn at Sinai—to the Name, which is not a belief object but the spirit of justice breathing in the hearts of a chosen people bound to the terms of the oath brit contractual alliance. Impossible as the Johnny Come Lately replacement Holy Books which prioritize creedal salvation or Islam’s conversion formula. These foreign theologies share no common ground with the oath brit alliance which applies strictly and only to the Jewish people and how we behave and interact among ourselves. Obedience to the oath alliance contracts has nothing to do with DNA or racial Race theories.

HaShem simply NOT a theological idea – any more than anything observed in the Seas, Heavens, or Earth comparable to HaShem – the God of Israel alone. This Name lives within the Yatriz HaTov within the bnai-brit Cohen peoples’ hearts, not in some heavenly throne room or philosophical abstraction. Creedal theologies turn “God” into a thing you believe in, a noun. The Torah presents HaShem as a verb—a living oath alliance contract which judges the hearts of the chosen Cohen people in all generations – equally.

Every one of these super-sessionist texts preaches universality, which the Torah totally rejects without any question or doubt. The Torah oath brit cut with Israel, (the chosen Cohen people) and not mankind. The nations, offered the Torah, but they rejected it—as per midrash and tractate Avodah Zarah. Therefore, these ‘later day saints’ texts construct a counter-Torah. The New Testament: salvation by blood of a Roman-executed Hercules son of God. The Koran: denies Jewish oath brit contract cut with all future born children of Avraham, Yitzak and Yaacov. Both the Church fathers and Muslim Sheiks call Jews accursed, hated by either God the Father or Allah in Heaven. Book of Mormon: that utterly absurd American-based fantasy of divine destiny, with fabricated Semitic claims, comparable to the Chicago Black Hebrews Xtians who came to Israel in the 1960s. Each of these attempts, not only fail to uphold the brit—they declare war on it. Therefore all three foreign counterfeit religions define the intent of the 2nd Sinai commandment – Not to worship other Gods.

“As an atheist, praise HaShem”—captures that paradoxical brilliance found in Talmudic reasoning: not belief, but allegiance; not metaphysics, but brit; not salvation, but justice. The Jewish people never received justice: not from the courts of Par’o, nor any court of Europe including the ICC or ICJ, nor any court in Islamic lands – ever. Goyim religions of avoda zarah prioritize belief over judicial wisdom. Only after the vertical Star Courts of the British Crown legalized impressment of American sailors on the High Seas, did the Founding Fathers institutionalize a lateral Jury system of law. Torah stands as the only non-theological, non-creedal path—a national legal-political constitution built not on universal abstractions focused upon cults of personality and God mythologies, but upon concrete obligations to a specific people through an oath alliance with the purpose to rule the Promised land with trust and shalom among the chosen Cohen people. Torah common law simply does not compare to foreign fiction stories like Harry Potter or Nancy Drew. The purpose of judicial justice, simply simple to understand: to restore a broke trust among our People within the oath sworn Promised land.

Xtianity, Islam, and Mormonism, not simply “different religions,” but reactionary projects—constructed precisely because the nations rejected the brit and had to manufacture alternate paths to the Torah Constitutional Republic within the borders of the Promised Land. The lip service these foreign religions give to respect the “Holy Land”, proven by the simple fact that no Xtian, Arab, Turkish Muslim ever established a Palestinian independent State ever in human history. Only the Jewish people ever built an independent Jewish state on multiple occasion within the borders of the Promised Land. Avoda zara, its Av tuma attempts to pervert Jewish just rulership of the Promised land unto mythical and esoteric religions as their disguised camouflage which conceals their lack of wisdom.

The 2nd commandment, this national anti-assimilation clause—rather than a metaphysical prohibition—both halakhic and historically grounded. Shlomo’s First Temple interpreted as another prime example of idolatry, on par with the sin of the Golden Calf. This perhaps radical interpretation yet easily supportable view based upon similar Torah common law precedents, especially in contrast to the later obsession with architectural grandeur (e.g., Catholic cathedrals) over legal restoration (e.g., Sanhedrin courtrooms). Combined with his gross opulance of accumulated vast wealth and foreign wives – both direct Torah violations!

Torah = national brit by mutual sworn oath, not belief. Xtianity = creedal faith, with a long history of hoarding fabulous wealth inequalities. Islam = universal conversion, more of the same; Islam stuck in a Feudal model of Lord/peasant relationships to this very day. Mormonism = a mythological Harry Potter substitute of fiction, comparable to the Church of Scientology. The famous “Do not add or subtract” command in Devarim becomes a polemic weapon here—one that slices through any claim to new testaments, final prophets, or American scriptures. NATO as a legal-political metaphor for the brit alliance—it’s not about who “believes in democracy,” but about binding treaties and mutual obligations, and shared National and Inter-national strategic objectives.

Framing the Torah as a brit-based constitutional legal system—rather than a metaphysical religion—re-centers the Jewish people not as just another but far smaller religious “faith community,” but as a sovereign legal-political nation with a judiciary-bound ethic, a contractually governed land, and inter-generational obligations among Cohanim, Zera Yisrael, and converts who accept the terms of the brit as law, rather than religious theology.

The 2nd commandment as a national prohibition against assimilation and intermarriage, especially when held up against the rabbinic midrashim on Parashat Yitro and the Gemara in Avodah Zarah. It flips the script on “universalism” and reframes the conversation entirely: instead of Judaism being “narrow,” it is specific—rooted in oath law and Sanhedrin courts common law; especially when held up against the rabbinic midrashim on Parashat Yitro and the Gemara in Avodah Zarah. The 2nd Sinai commandment flips the script on “universalism” and reframes the conversation entirely: the chosen Cohen people, who alone accept the revelation of the Torah at Sinai and the Oral Torah at Horev 40 days after the Sin of the Golden Calf.

Consider the halachic mitzvot of Shabbat and Kashrut as specific examples of the contractual oath alliance terms of the “brit treaty”. Perhaps comparable to the Balfour Declaration of 1917 which serves as the foundation of modern Zionism today; meaning Jews equal rights to achieve self-determination in the Middle East. Shabbat fundamentally requires that the chosen Cohen people discern the fundamental distinctions with separates work from work: מלאכה from עבודה. The Rabbeinu Tam tefillen remembers the oath sworn by Yehoshua and Israel when entering Canaan to conquer the kingdoms of the land. At Sh’Cem the chosen Cohen people commit to honor the contract, not to interpret Torah law — other than viewed through the lenses of Horev Oral Torah middot logic methodologies. The rabbinic mitzva of lighting the lights of Hanukah likewise expresses this exact intent.

Mapping Torah onto a constitutional model that’s grounded in oath-bound specificity, not metaphysical abstractions or cults of personality nonsense. In this light, “religion” as a category becomes utterly irrelevant—Torah does not exist nor functions as a religious spiritual experience, nor as an explosion of intense private feeling as if it compared to a sexual orgasm or Xtian “passion”, rather the Torah serves as the Constitution of the national Republic. Just that simple and nothing more.

The specific examples of Shabbat and Kashrut used to gage the depth of treaty stipulations—they’re not “rituals”, as latter-day statute halachic fossilized codes which emphasize religious piety, but legal-demonstrative affirmations of national identity and brit fidelity. Same with Rabbeinu Tam tefillin—not about mysticism, but about loyal testimony to the oath sworn at Shechem which reaffirms the oath brit sworn at Horev. Every mitzvah in the Torah, functions as an act of juridical allegiance, not belief-based, static bound fossilized devotion devotion to halachic ritual observances. The metaphor to the he Balfour Declaration—it attempts to parallel how modern Zionism mirrors ancient brit logic: political self-determination based on sworn obligations, not belief systems. In both cases, it’s about territory, contract, and national law—not ideology. The Churchill and Chamberlain White Papers by stark contrast prioritized British imperial strategic interests lie the Church and Mosque place religion upon a pedestal and worship it.

Every mitzvah becomes an act of juridical allegiance, not belief-based devotion. Torah stands not as a metaphysical religion but as the foundational constitutional document of a legal-political nation bound by public law, mutual obligation, and historical mussar remembered oaths. All generations of Jews have a Torah mitzva obligation to remember the oaths sworn by both the Avot and our forefathers. The act of remembering the specific details of these sworn oaths, this act of remembrance defines the k’vanna of all Torah time oriented tohor Av commandments. This Torah wisdom permits all toldot positive and negative commandments from the Torah and hall halachot from the Talmud to make the regal aliyah and transform into Av tohor time oriented commandments which possess the power תמיד מעשה בראשית to turn curses into blessings and make a new creation, comparable to the Jewish state in 1948 and again in 1967.

A Jewish response to “Happy Easter”

EASTER SUNDAY: SILENT FILMS ABOUT JESUS CHRIST

As an atheist – praise HaShem, I do not believe in your new God Jesus the Son of God trinity belief system. It seems to me that all religious rhetoric belief systems stand upon theology and Creeds and possess no wisdom what so ever. Hence both Xtianity and Islam had to import ancient Greek wisdom of logic because their personal belief in this or that Gods failed to prioritize wisdom. The Torah by contrast teaches according to the kabbalah of rabbi Akiva’s פרדס inductive logic format – wisdom.

The Torah does not require belief in a god the way Christianity or Islam does. It requires allegiance to a brit, fidelity to justice, and the pursuit of chochmah (wisdom) through structured interpretation and legal discernment. That’s a completely different paradigm. As an atheist—praise HaShem. a very Talmudic turn of phrase, almost like saying: “I reject your idol, and in doing so I uphold the Name.” Torah has space for this kind of irony. “The Name” (HaShem) – a spirit and not a word metaphor or Rubic’s cube, shares absolutely zero common ground with an theological/creed based idolatry “belief object”—Torah a legal common law judicial legal system of law, defined by the sworn oath brit terms sworn by the Avot: Avraham, Yitzak, and Yaacov.

Henceforth known as the brit (alliance). The Torah simply not a metaphysical abstraction as the Nicene Creed or Muslim Universal conversion by simply declaring belief in Allah and Mumammad as the Final prophet, any more than the prophet of the Church of the Latter Day Saints and their Holy Book substitute theology. This common thread links the attempts made by the new testament, koran and book of Mormon to supplant all earlier specifically T’NaCH scriptures. The latter aims only at a tiny Jewish audience whereas the old testament/new testament bible, koran and morman holy books make an appeal to all Mankind. The Talmud teaches in mesechta avoda zarah that all Mankind other than the Chosen Cohen People reject to this day the revelation of the Torah at Sinai and Horev.

Unlike Christianity (which demands acceptance of the Nicene Creed) or Islam (which requires the Shahada), Torah demands: the righteous pursuit of judicial justice which honestly restores fair compensation of damages inflicted by Party A upon Party B among the chosen Cohen people throughout the generations. “As an atheist – praise HaShem”, this phrase encapsules Talmudic inductive reasoning. It echoes Moshe breaking the tablets—not out of disbelief, but out of fidelity to the brit violated when the “mixed multitudes” (assimilated and inter-married Jews) attempted to make the Golden Calf a substitute for Moshe Rabbeinu. Chag Yom Kippur (Day of Atonement) rejects substitute theology. HaShem made t’shuva and annulled the vow to make of Moshe the chosen Cohen people which would have profaned the oath sworn with the Avot, specifically the oath first sworn to Avram at the brit cut between the pieces.

The 2nd commandment as a national anti-assimilation clause—rather than a metaphysical prohibition—is both halakhic and historically grounded. Shlomo’s First Temple as idolatry is a radical but supportable view, especially in contrast to the later obsession with architectural grandeur (e.g., Catholic cathedrals) over legal restoration (e.g., Sanhedrin courtrooms).

Torah = national brit by mutual sworn oath, not belief. Xtianity = creedal faith. Islam = universal conversion. Mormonism = mythological substitute. The famous “Do not add or subtract” command in Devarim becomes a polemic weapon here—one that slices through any claim to new testaments, final prophets, or American scriptures. NATO as a legal-political metaphor for the brit alliance—it’s not about who “believes in democracy,” but about binding treaties and mutual obligations.

Framing the Torah as a brit-based constitutional legal system—rather than a metaphysical religion—re-centers the Jewish people not as a “faith community,” but as a sovereign legal-political nation with a judiciary-bound ethic, a contractually governed land, and intergenerational obligations among Cohanim, Zera Yisrael, and converts who accept the terms of the brit as law, not theology.

The 2nd commandment as a national prohibition against assimilation and intermarriage, especially when held up against the rabbinic midrashim on Parashat Yitro and the Gemara in Avodah Zarah. It flips the script on “universalism” and reframes the conversation entirely: instead of Judaism being “narrow,” it is specific—rooted in oath law and Sanhedrin courts common law: especially when held up against the rabbinic midrashim on Parashat Yitro and the Gemara in Avodah Zarah. The 2nd Sinai commandment flips the script on “universalism” and reframes the conversation entirely: instead of Judaism being “narrow,” it is specific—rooted in oath common law legalism and the chosen Cohen people who alone accept the revelation of the Torah at Sinai and the Oral Torah at Horev 40 days after the Sin of the Golden Calf.

Shabbat fundamentally requires that the chosen Cohen people discern the fundamental distinctions with separates work from work: מלאכה from עבודה. The Rabbeinu Tam tefillen remembers the oath sworn by Yehoshua and Israel when entering Canaan to conquer the kingdoms of the land at Sh’Cem. That the chosen Cohen people commit to honor the contract not to interpret Torah law other than viewed through the lenses of Horev Oral Torah middot logic methodologies. The rabbinic mitzva of lighting the lights of Hanukah likewise expresses this exact intent.

Mapping Torah onto a constitutional model that’s grounded in oath-bound specificity, not metaphysical abstraction. In that light, “religion” as a category becomes irrelevant—Torah is not about spirituality as a private feeling, but about national law as public fidelity.

Shabbat and Kashrut to treaty stipulations—they’re not “rituals” for piety’s sake, but legal-demonstrative affirmations of national identity and brit fidelity. Same with Rabbeinu Tam tefillin—it’s not about mysticism, but about loyal testimony to the oath sworn at Shechem and reaffirmed at Horev. Every mitzvah then functions as an act of juridical allegiance, not belief-based devotion. The metaphor of the he Balfour Declaration—it parallels how modern Zionism mirrors ancient brit logic: political self-determination based on sworn obligations, not belief systems. In both cases, it’s about territory, contract, and national law—not ideology.

From Brit to Blasphemy: How Galatians 3:13 Subverts the Sinai Oath brit with replacement theologies later echoed by the Muslim koran.

Both this and that ignore the responsibility to impose Government rule that establishes ‘National Justice’. Both av tuma religions of avoda zarah prioritize alien Greek and Roman Imperial Metaphysics as the primary vision, which their followers emphatically embrace as truth.

A profound rupture between Torah oath brit Blessing vs. Curse. Where the chosen Cohen people either live and rule the Promised land with righteous judicial common law justice … or … due to returning back to Egypt, wherein Israeli leaders duplicate the injustice of Par’o, who withheld straw – and his courts justified the beating of Israelite slaves. When the Promised land becomes full of oppression, theft, incest, and judicial perversion of justice: an exact duplication of the Israelite slavery in Egypt, then the Torah curse of g’lut exiles Israel unto foreign lands that likewise do oppression, theft, incest, and judicial perversion of justice.

Paul’s Substitution Theology (Galatians 3:13), reinterprets the Torah “curse” of g’lut/exile: as sin and guilt transferred from humanity to Jesus. He redefines the t’shuva solution, not as national return (t’shuvah, brit renewal, prophetic mussar — but as a one-time cosmic transaction—a metaphysical sin-substitution achieved through the crucifixion of Christ. The Torah context – no longer Israel’s oath brit cohen history, but rather a universalized anthropology: “all have sinned,” and all must be redeemed through faith in the crucified Christ (see Gal. 3:28).

This Hellenistic-legal concept of guilt and atonement bypasses the oath brit sworn at Sinai. The משל\נמשל Mishkan-korbanot\Sanhedrin common law court-rooms pursuit of righteous judicial justice. Wherein the leaders of the chosen Cohen people strive to make fair compensation of damages inflicted by Party A upon Party B. Paul’s universal “one size fits all” Original Sin uproots the chosen oath brit Cohen people, the children of Avraham, Yitzak, and Yaacov. His replacement theology condemns the Caine-Jews, these eternal Christ-Killers; condemned to wander as cursed stateless refugees with no country of our own, enforced by church oppression, theft, sexual perversion, such as baptizing Jewish children against the will of their parents, and judicial and economic injustice.

Paul universalizes “sin” as the human incurable condition doomed to eternal damnation, without the “salvation” belief in the Christ-crucifixion ‘Good News’. Roman torture … the Gospel flips and makes it into a reformed righteous event! Paul and later Augustine — not the prophets, not Sinai, not the brit — these ‘latter day saints’ introduced the perverted ‘salvation from Original Sin guilt’. The Torah concept of national exile as a Torah curse, a intrinsic Torah theme expressed through the oath brit faith, seeks to inspire t’shuva and ultimately g’eulah redemption – based upon the model of Moshiach Moshe, who brought Israel out of Egyptian slavery.

The legal פרדס inductive logic of Torah (mishpat), replaced by faith in both Christ & Greek deductive logic alone (Galatians 2:16); the Torah dynamic of interpreting subtle distinctions between cases, מאי נפקא מינא, heard before the Courts to determine fair compensation of damages in each and every different case, replaced by and with a static one size fits all – believers go to heaven and sit with Jesus and unbelievers burn and rot in the depths of Hell tortured by Satan for eternity.

The New Testament framers substitute righteous justice, this most basic requirement: the living chosen cohen peoples’ generations continuum either choose to accept or reject. Replacement theologies superimpose belief in life in the world to come, eternal life in Paradise Heaven. Muhammad redefined this perversion that abandons judicial justice in this world with 71 virgins in the world to come, utter Pie in the Sky ‘chicken little’ fairy tale nonsense. Galatian 2:16 rejects the obligation to rule the Promised land with righteous justice, replaced by faith in Jesus as the Son of God. Muhammad later replace this new unheard of new testament “scripture” with his koran: latter day saints “scripture”, which makes him the star of the show. These Latter-Day Saints new scripture revelations, make it crucial for Man to believe in these theologically constructed God or last prophet, Heaven or Hell bi-polar insanity theologies.

The framers of the New Testament declare that the crucified Christ became the redemption for Adam’s Original Sin. This curse, the exile from the Garden of Eden, unto belief in the World to Come of Jesus or sexual paradise. The church fathers transposed their ‘Original Sin’ guilt upon the hated and despised Jewish refugees in Europe, despised for their crime of being the chosen Cohen nation. But even if Jews converted to Xtianity, the Inquisition proved that the burning of Xtian hatred for Jews reaches no limits. Cursed Jews – a race rejected by God, guilty of killing Christ, fit for torture, exile and humiliation. Church theology favored forced baptism, medieval pogroms, ghettos, blood libels, which culminated in the Shoah slaughter of 75% of European Jewry in less than three years.

This shift of the New Testament framers replacement theologies–it emerges organically from Paul’s decoupling of the oath brit sworn by the Avot and remembered – as the inheritance of all generations of Jews – who likewise swear these Avot oaths sworn within the Yatzir Ha’Tov within our hearts, when we da’aven tefillah (a mitzva from the Torah) – kre’a shma. Both Xtianity and Islam today despise detest and abhor the re-establishment of the Jewish state of Israel within the borders of Judea. UN Resolution 3379: Zionism is Racism detests the Balfour Declaration of 1917 or that 2/3rds of the UN member states in 1947 voted their approval of Jewish equal rights to achieve self-determination as a nation state in the Middle East. The UN to this day maintains its racist Apartheid policy of rejecting Israel as a member of the Middle East voting block of nations!

The New Testament framers, specifically Paul, collapses all complexity of justice where Torah common law weighs each case heard before Sanhedrin courts into a perverted faith in Jesus or eternal burning in Hell type of Jesus Frankenstein monster; human suffering, no longer rectified in courts with justice, but spiritually bypassed via faith in a crucified savior, and life in a world to come paradise.

The New Testament framer replace Hellenistic metaphysics, prioritized over the Torah requirement that faith needs as an absolute minimum the righteous pursuit of judicial justice, within the borders of Judea. Muhammad serves as an echo rather than a tikkun correction of the basic fundamental flaws exposed by the tuma theology espoused by the new testament framers av tuma avoda zarah.

Both the new testament and koran reject Israel as a nation, with its unique concepts of oath brit, rooted in land, language, common law, and Jewish lineage, and T’NaCH and Talmudic established culture and customs traditions. Both sets of replacement theologies vainly re-imagines revelation as a final top-down declaration, displacing the generational oral-dialogical tradition established by both Sinai and Horev revelations.

These ‘Latter-Day Saints’ bi-polar insane theologies, they simplify belief unto their newly established and declared Gods as: Believe or burn. Follow the last prophet or be lost. Oppress the Jew scapegoat or be condemned. Such Av tuma avoda zarah theologies obliterates the Torah vision of justice in this world.

Another example of praying to the God of Mars in heaven, James 1:5 in the new testament fraud.

Clearly the new testament forgery has a completely different take on the meaning of wisdom. Torah “wisdom”, based upon the four part inductive logic of rabbi Akiva’s פרדס logic system, bears absolutely no resemblance what so ever to Aristotles’ 3 part syllogism of deductive logic. The two systems of logic as different than a cat from a mouse.

According to the logic developed by rabbi Yishmael, to communicate something more that tuma religious rhetoric propaganda requires both כלל ופרט. The introduction of the idea of “wisdom”, clearly a general idea, based upon the night and day distinctions which separate פרדס inductive logic from syllogism deductive logic.

James religious rhetoric propaganda only introduces the general idea of “wisdom” but brings absolutely no qualifying particulars to define the k’vanna of its meaning. Lacking qualifying particulars the general term “wisdom” exists merely as eye-candy, like throwing in a baited hook into a pond hoping to catch a fish. James God, based upon the error of monotheism which violates the 2nd Sinai commandment, his rhetoric propaganda forces the fuzzy logic of the audience to assume that his God one in the same with the God of Sinai.

A cracked foundation from the get-go. New Testament propagandists and later church “authorities” failed to discern the Torah mitzvot precedents wherein the חכמה of Oral Torah defines the mitzva of Moshiach.

The church fathers deny this חכמה of Oral Torah yet claim that wisdom non brit Goyim can learn Oral Torah wisdom simply by asking for it?! If James’s epistle, read through a post-brit, Christianized lens—especially in light of his association with early Messianic sectarianism—then even this invitation to wisdom becomes subtly redirected; it prioritizes a pacifist Moshiach rather than a warrior Moshiach – like Moshe Rabbeinu in Egypt. Furthermore, Oral Torah wisdom not only abandoned and replaced by ancient Greek wisdom which sports a completely different sets of logic formats, the Gospels loses all bonds to the oath brit cut upon the soul of Israel at Sinai, the Sanhedrin, the beit midrash, or the korbanot dedications which serve as the foundational precedents for the Oral Torah mitzva of Moshiach.

Instead, the new testament forgery becomes a personal, internal, mystical endowment—part of a broader movement to dissolve the national Torah-halachic framework into some totally alien universal spiritualism. The wisdom of Torah logic (כלל – פרט) as defined by two great Torah scholars: rabbi Akiva and rabbi Yishmael, a non bnai brit Goy, who rejects the revelation of the Torah at Sinai, such a person could hope to acquire Oral Torah Horev revelation of wisdom? About as likely as a fish can sing an Opera! James 1:25 which attempts to frame “law of liberty”, a rhetoric non defined unknown term, hence forth also qualifies as yet another glaring example of new testament replacement theology.

Clearly the Epistle of James shares no grafted roots, a totally alien weed attempting to grow in the Garden of the Oral Torah Horev revelation of the 13 tohor middot. James religious Greek rhetoric promises only hazy and vague spiritual eye-candy promises, totally incapable of accomplishing. Hence the Epistle of James stands upon the foundations of a flat out lie.
The revelation of the Oral Torah logic system compares to the professional athlete acquires the wisdom of his skills as he hones trains for competition. During all the forced Xtian debates against Jews during the Middle Ages, the church fathers, cowards and frauds, limited any and all debates – basically demanding if Jews had sex with their mothers recently! A fat lazy over-weight couch-potato Monk could no more compete with an Olympic athlete than a fish could sing opera.

James 1:25’s so-called “law of liberty” (νόμον τῆς ἐλευθερίας), undefined and suspiciously rhetorical. It reads like Obama’s promise of “Change”! Liberty, as a Torah mitzva directly associated with the Yoval freeing of slaves. James foisted Pie in the Sky notion of liberty, far more akin to Hellenistic concepts of logos or Stoic ethics than to Torah mitzvot, halacha or Midrashic interpretation upon Talmudic aggadic stories which attempt to interpret T’NaCH prophetic mussar, with an eye to weave this prophetic mussar as the k’vanna of observing halachic mitzvot, as well as positive and negative commandments elevated and raised to Av tohor time oriented commandments from the Torah.

Hence James reflects a tits on a boar hog replacement theology! James has more nuance that the crude Pauline epistles. But both seek to drain the Torah of its oath brit-rooted Oral Torah time oriented revelation of Av tohor commandments … despite referring to HaShem as “father in heaven”. The oath sworn at this brit cut between the pieces by Avram, that the Spirit Name of HaShem breaths within the 7 menorah souls contained within the Yatzir Ha’Tov inside the heart of all chosen Cohen people. The foreign alien religious tripe of treif rhetoric from James compares to Jesus teaching his disciples to pray to some alien Mars God in Heaven!

How Hebrews 9:6-12 duplicates the Av Tuma sin of the Golden Calf

4th Day of the Omer, the dedication to remove the חמץ of Av tuma avoda zarah from within the tuma Yatzir Ha’Ra within our hearts. How new testament Paul’s – Hebrews 9: 6-12 duplicates the Sin of the Golden Calf

HaShem is not a man that He should lie (Numbers 23:19). The brit is not a metaphor. It is an oath-bound alliance, sealed with the Nefesh soul contained within living blood, upheld by divine t’shuva, and renewed in every korban offered by the sons of Aaron. To cancel that brit amounts to the denial of the character of HaShem Himself; to replace Moshe Rabbeinu with a foreign mediator, ultimately defines the Sin of the Golden Calf and Hebrews 9: 6-10 which repeats the sin of the Calf—not just in deed, but in theology.

Hebrews 9:6–10, traditionally read in Xtian theology as a critique of the korbanot system—framing it as ineffective, obsolete, and merely symbolic. In this interpretation, the daily offerings and Yom Kippur rituals, reduced to shadows, paving the way for a universalized, spiritual priesthood centered on Christ. This reading not only distorts the purpose of korbanot—it severs them from the oath brit framework that defines Israel’s unique Chosen Cohen identity. The Pauline religious rhetoric restricts korbanot relegated to making a barbeque unto Heaven.

The Pauline frameworks of guilt and substitution (e.g., Hebrews 9:12: “not by the blood of goats and calves, but by His own blood…”). This substitute theology expressed in Hebrews ignores HaShem’s own t’shuva which defines the k’vanna of every Yom Kippur. Paul’s Av tuma religious rhetoric replaced his Original Sin guilt and repentance thesis of the fall of Adam, which requires the Jesus resurrection from the dead to atone for the guilt of the Original Sin made by Adam. Yom Kippur testifies to the oath brit faithfulness of HaShem together with His chosen Cohen People. HaShem not a Man that he should lie. The Pauline Hebrews 9:10 seeks to superimpose a Church Christ-centered priesthood – effectively canceling Israel’s oath brit Cohen status established at the brit cut between the pieces; where Christ replaces Israel as the holy Moshiach.

The Golden Calf originally reflects this av tuma theme of substitute theology, wherein the ערב רב of Israel demanded to make the Golden Calf a visible mediator to replace Moshe. Both the sin of the Golden Calf and Hebrews 9:6-10 seek to install an abstract, foreign model of nearness. Thus Hebrews 9 attempts to repackage the Divine Cohen services which eternally dedicate the Cohen House of Moshiach into the image of this new replacement foreign God Jesus mediator.

Torah brit faith, simply not metaphor as the book of Hebrews pretends. Rather this oath-bound alliance, sealed with the nefesh—the soul contained within the living blood collected from the cut throat of a korban animal whose beating heart pumps this living blood, thrown upon the altar. Israel swears an oath which requires שם ומלכות\blowing the Divine Spirit Name from within the Yatzir Ha’Tov within the heart together with a dedicated Oral Torah Horev revelation middah/attribute, designated and sanctified to adjust how a Jew socially interacts with his people in the future—upheld not by guilt or appeasement, but by the Divine t’shuva of loyalty itself, as expressed every Yom Kippur; every Shabbat Jews remember the tohor time oriented commandment which forever distinguishes the difference between מלאכה from עבודה.

This Shabbat rededication of the righteous pursuit of justice, as expressed through every korban dedicated, herein serves as the foundation of the mitzva of Moshiach, by the sons of Aaron whom Moshe originally anointed with oil. Just as the sons of Aaron anoint all korbanot dedicated upon the altar with oil. This anointing dedication through oil, it affirms the consecrated role of Am Yisrael as HaShem’s chosen Cohen nation, the Moshiach in all generations. To annul this oath brit utterly profanes the halachot of Shevuot. Such av tuma behavior simply denies the very character of the Chosen Cohen nation and its avodat HaShem through all generations as the anointed Moshiach. To replace Moshe Rabbeinu—the appointed lawgiver and oath brit mediator—with a foreign figure – not a kosher innovation. Rather it exposes the tuma of repeating the sin of the Golden Calf, not just in deed but in theology.

How John 13:34 perverts and justifies homosexuality

Intermarriage with the specific of Canaanites – equally applies to all Goyim who do not accept the revelation of the Torah at Sinai. I bring the Book of Ezra as proof. Many early Church Fathers used John 13:34 to claim a supersessionist “new law”, replacing the Torah’s commandments with a simplified ethic of love. Yet ironically, the very idea of loving one’s neighbor—and even one’s enemy. An utter perversion of the oath brit alliance among the chosen Cohen people who accept the revelation of the Torah at Sinai. Ezra 9–10, post-exile, shows the seriousness of intermarriage with foreign women—because it represents a breach of kedushah and brit, meaning: spiritual allegiance and oath brit fidelity. The Church Fathers (e.g., Justin Martyr, Origen, Chrysostom) weaponized verses like John 13:34 to argue that a new “spiritual” law of love had replaced the “old legalistic” Torah—especially the halakhic boundaries that safeguarded Jewish identity and fidelity to the brit.

Jesus introduced, according to these vile animals, “Love is enough!” A Greek ideal—abstract, universal, de-politicized—divorced from the concrete legal-communal substitutional theology. Love, defined by Torah, defined through the Torah precedent of marriage requires that a man love his wife by acquiring title to her world to come souls. Meaning the children, the product of this union. Based upon the precedent of the brit cut between the pieces whereby Avram had no children and cut a brit over the first born chosen Cohen people. This concept of the chosen Cohen people understands the intent of the prohibition to marry with Goyim who do not accept the revelation of the Torah at Sinai.

Xtian supersessionist theology gutted the concept of brit: Shalom became personal inner peace, not oath alliance to pursue fair justice – compensation of damages inflicted by Party A to Party B among our chosen Cohen people within the borders of the oath sworn promised land.
The Xtian pervert theologians corrupted emunah unto belief in Jesus as the son of God and belief in God as a triune mystery of Monotheism. The Torah defines emunah as the righteous pursuit of justice among our people. The Xtian pervert theologians corrupted ‘ahavah’ unto generic love, rather than the Torah brit-bound hesed based upon the oath brit foundation precedent of the oath cut between the pieces.

The Xtian pervert theologians know absolutely nothing of Torah common law which stands upon the foundation of Torah precedents – both positive and negative commandments.
In doing so, the Church replaced the Torah’s vision of a holy people bound in legal, ethical, and national allegiance to Hashem, with a mystical, universalized ethic that denied the enduring chosenness of Israel and the centrality of Sinai. John 13:34, obliterated the Torah common law faith to pursue justice among and between the chosen Cohen people who accept the revelation of the Torah at Sinai in the face of the Goyim “darkness” who reject this light unto the nations.

The Xtian theologian perverts abhor the oath-bound brit alliance which forever discerns between emotional short term vows from remembering from generation to generation the oaths sworn by the Avot by which they cut the brit which permanently established the oath brit Cohen people. Hence the mitzva precedent of the captured woman through war. Whereby the Torah commands that she cut off all her hair and par her nails etc for no less than one month before the Israeli permitted to marry her! Why? Torah marriage cuts an oath brit alliance between man and wife and not a emotional vow which can be easily annulled based upon the Torah precedent which permits the Father or Husband to annul the vows made by either young daughters or wives!

John 13:34 not just evil theology, it perverts marriage unto the metaphor of permitted homosexuality. The chosen Am-segulah (treasured nation) refers directly to the Sinai first-born Cohen people. The Goyim reject to this day the revelation of Torah common law!

The Xtian theologian perverts sought power, hence they slept in the same bed as the Governments which ruled Xtian lands. The American and French Revolutions separated Church from State and cast these Xtian whores to the dogs to sleep with. All agricultural based economies require slave labor. This has absolutely nothing to do with the bankrupt theology of the church great whore of Babylon.

When categories established by Torah law—male/female, Israel/goy, slave/free—are collapsed by when new testament replacement theology which abhors Torah common law and specific Torah abominations such as homosexuality and men and women confusion of genders and clothes. Galatians 3:28 doesn’t just dissolve the legal structure of the Torah, but opens the door to ideological chaos—Same-sex marriage (“There is no male and female”); Gender fluidity and trans ideology; Erasure of Jewish national identity (e.g. no “Jew or Greek”); Social anarchy in place of legal status (no “slave or free”). In many liberal Christian and post-Christian circles, Galatians 3:28 has become the banner verse for LGBTQ+ inclusion, often cited directly to undermine Torah prohibitions in Leviticus 18 and 20. Paul’s statement is interpreted as saying: All categories are now irrelevant in Christ.

Paul’s doctrine, and the super-sessionist theology it spawned, does not merely disagree with Torah—it declares war on Torah categories. Shalom perverted into inner peace, not the righteous pursuit of judicial justice which strives to make fair restitution of damages inflicted by Party A upon Party B. His replacement theology abhors the post Gold Calf Day of Atonement where HaShem first revealed the revelation of the Oral Torah – which the church rejects. Galatians 3:28 is not just heresy—it is the theological root of modern moral collapse.

It dismantles the sacred distinctions that uphold holiness, family, justice, and national brit identity. It replaces Torah law with a boundaryless mysticism that justifies everything from homosexuality to gender nihilism to the erasure of Jewish nationhood.

This verse is often cited to support a universalist theology—that all human beings are one, created by God, and therefore equal and interchangeable. Viewed in the context of Paul’s theology, especially in Acts and Galatians, this verse becomes part of a larger Pauline strategy to undermine: Israel’s distinct chosen Cohen oath brit status, the chosenness of the Jewish people. The Torah’s territorial inheritance laws, and the culture and customs established by halakhic and the idea that only within the borders of the Promised lands to Jews possess the wisdom to keep and remember the oaths sworn by the Avot לשמה, from generation to generation.

Paul’s replacement theology perverts the oath brit alliance to that of a temporary vow, which his perverted theology attempts to annul through the new testament. The Torah establishes the vision that the nations inherit distinct national cultural and customs inheritances. Distinct languages, lands and destinies (Genesis 10-11). The essential concept of Israel’s national identity as a people relies upon and defined by the promised lands which Arab nationalism absolutely rejects. Deuteronomy 32:8 (LXX): “When the Most High gave the nations their inheritance, when he separated the sons of Adam, he set boundaries of the peoples according to the number of the sons of God.” Deuteronomy 7:6: “You are a people holy to Hashem… a chosen people from all the peoples on the face of the earth.” Paul’s replacement theology, like Arab hatred of Zionism which bases itself upon the 1917 Balfour Declaration wherein first Britain and later 2\3rd of all UN member states recognized Jewish equal rights to achieve self-determination within the borders of a distinct Middle Eastern nation.

His replacement theology abomination of shared human origin which collapses national distinctions cultures and customs, like modern Arab racist nationalism rejects Jewish national sanctity. Paul’s Acts 17:26 (universal origin) with Galatians 3:28 (category collapse) replacement theology destroys the chosen Cohen people of Israel; dissolves the laws of inheritance and land; undermines the Oral Torah halakhic requirements concerning intermarriage with Goyim and promotes modern Wokeism that emphasize awareness of social injustices and systemic inequalities, particularly related to race and identity. It is often viewed critically by some as being overly doctrinaire or insincere in its approach to social issues. Acts 17:26 is the philosophical foundation for Christian universalism.

It sounds innocent—but in Pauline context, it’s a soft prelude to the hard abolition of Israel’s unique brit. It paves the way for the erasure of identity, the rejection of Oral Torah Talmudic common law judicial lateral courts.

Paul’s 1 Corinthians 7:39 (KJV): Formula: “Only in the Lord” — Coded Supersessionist Halakhah? Paul doesn’t outright reject the binding nature of marriage—but it’s loaded with subtle replacement theology logic. Torah marriage flatly not just a temporary transitional vow–but rather an oath brit, contractual alliance with family generations and national implications. Governed by halakhic precedent, rooted in Exodus 22, Deuteronomy 24, and the Oral Torah. Validated by witnesses, contract (ketubah), and understood as part of a nation’s framework of kedushah and inheritance. Paul substitutes this with a subjective spiritual criterion: his “Only in the Lord.”, directly implies – Marry a fellow believer in Christ. It’s not about cutting an oath brit alliance—rather replaced by a shared belief in Xtian faith that declares Jesus as God.

This “Only in the Lord” phrase, exist as the key supersessionist pivot of Pauling propaganda. It nullifies the Torah -brit based marital framework model, replaces halakhic structure with doctrinal allegiance to the church abomination. And renders Torah marmital law as obsolete for “believers”. Ewwwwww! It detaches marriage from the promised land, nation, and halackhic authority. Sets the foundation for spiritual intermarriage theology – a direct violation of Torah common law; leading to full Goyim-Xtian identity formation apart from Israel. If one can marry “in the Lord”, then one need not marry “in the nation”. If faith in the belief of Jesus as God replaces Israel as the chosen Cohen nation, then the new covenant has replaced the oath brit cut between the pieces with Avram.

Paul’s “Only in the Lord” is not a neutral phrase. It functions as a Trojan horse for an entire redefinition of marriage: no longer a national covenant rooted in generational Torah obligations, but a private, spiritualized union under Church doctrine.

Xtianity, especially in its Pauline and post-Constantinian forms, intentionally dissolves ethnic, legal, and national distinctions. This is central to its theology. Galatians 3:28 – “There is neither Jew nor Greek… male and female… all are one in Christ.” This replacement theology erased halakhic distinctions, promotes spiritual unity over ethnic/national differences. Recasts marriage as a personal vow like sacrament, which replaces the oath sworn to remember dedication which any and all brit alliances fundamentally requires.

Liberal Protestant thoughts concerning marriage emphasize: romantic love and personal choice; Xtian values of inclusivity; detachment from ancestry, tribe, nation, or land. The Torah oath NOT vow, brit relationship cut between man and wife binds Jews to Torah Constitutional Law, tohorat ha’beit requirements for the woman to visit a mikveh prior to sexual activity; and the standards of keeping tohor & tuma distinctions like kosher foods etc. A man commits that he will educate his future born children in the oath brit faith – not to worship other Gods through intermarriage and assimilation which embraces Goyim cultures and customs.

Xtianity’s doctrine of spiritual unity and its deconstruction of Torah-based national distinctions directly laid the groundwork for both the theological legitimation and cultural normalization of interracial marriage. It treats distinctions—whether between Israel and the nations, or male and female—as obstacles to spiritual truth, not as sacred boundaries tied to divine law and oath brit consciously remembered dedications passed down from generation to generations just as DNA. From Augustine to modern liberal Protestants, modern issues like Wokeism and identity dissolution directly consequential to the Pauline doctrines of utter abomination.

“Only in the lard” totally unique to Xtianity. “Only in the lard” totally unique to Xtianity. It’s a theological phrase that doesn’t exist in Torah, halakhah, or any Jewish learning on the Torah. 1 Corinthians 7:39 a total Xtian new testament new religion of avoda zarah Av tuma. This phrase is nowhere in Tanakh. Paul creates a new criterion: shared belief in “the Lord” (i.e., Jesus).

The Xtian church does not define faith compliance any more than the Nicene Creed defines Monotheism. Monotheism rapes the 2nd Sinai commandment. This new testament perversion marks a supersessionist turn: marriage is no longer a national-legal act, but a spiritual-sacramental one. “Only in the Lord” = Trojan Horse. It reflects a super-sessionist marriage ethics; it perverts the negative commandment of “cross-dressing” between Males and Females; it lies totally outside of the customs and cultures of the Jewish people.

Furthermore, it establishes a faith-based “intermarriage” theology. A spiritual identity, which replaces ethnic-national boundaries as the Torah fundamentally and absolutely commands. Prior to the establishment of the Jewish Republic of the 12 Tribes the Torah commanded the negative commandment not to marry between Jewish Tribes! This horrid abomination serves as justification for assimilation unto universalist Xtian structures. From “Only in the Lord” to Modern Abominations … Xtian approval of interfaith/interracial marriages; same-sex marriage under the banner of “shared love in the Lord”; trans marriages and gender deconstruction as “inclusive theology”.

From ghetto walls to gas chambers, “By their fruits you shall know them”— Jesus’ own words condemns the tree that claimed to grow from the root of the chosen Cohen nation which Paul declared Xtians as a graft to this Tree. The fruit of Xtianity utter poison, the culmination of theological poison.

Germany was a Lutheran nation. The Vatican signed a Concordat with Hitler. The Catholic Church blessed Nazi flags, and baptized perpetrators. The Protestant churches in Germany developed a theology of “Dejudaizing” Xtianity. Xtian anti-Judaism became racial antisemitism—but it started in pulpits, not politics.

The British White Paper (1939): Effectively sealed Europe’s Jews into a death zone, blocking aliyah to Eretz Yisrael. Not one major church authority condemned it. FDR’s administration turned away ships carrying Jewish refugees. Where were the bishops? The pastors? The popes? Silent. No call to bomb Auschwitz or the railways…Xtian theology had already written the Jews out of the covenant.

Today’s South African legal attack on Israel at the Hague is a blood libel with a UN suit and tie. Yet again, the churches are silent, or worse—supportive of the lie. World Council of Churches? Silent. Mainline Protestantism? Often openly anti-Israel. Catholic voices? Muted or muddled, more concerned with interfaith optics than justice. This continues the same pattern: Christendom aligns with empires, betrays the Jews, and offers theological cover to the murderers. Revelation’s image of the Great Whore riding the beast—but this time it’s Rome on the back of political empire, intoxicated with the blood of the saints and martyrs of the Torah. Xtianity slept with kings—and their offspring were inquisitions, expulsions, and Auschwitz.

This Ephesians 5:25–28 passage—on the surface poetic, lofty, and seemingly elevating marriage—is in fact deeply super-sessionist, and functionally replaces the Torah mitzva of kiddushin. This worthless Xtological abstraction amounts to the value of tits on a boar hog when the piglets cry for milk! Torah mitzva of kiddushin rooted in precedent of the sworn oath made at the brit between the pieces which eternally established the chosen Cohen nation – born into the future/O’lam Ha’Bah!

Halakhic boundaries interpreted through the Oral Torah define and understand the mitzva of kiddushin within Mesechta Kiddushin of the Talmud. The Torah requires mikveh, which is about ritual purity in relation to the woman’s cycle and the marital household—a national law rooted in Genesis–Deuteronomy. Paul’s version? No mikveh, no Torah. The cleansing comes by “the word”—meaning his gospel, his doctrine—a mystical metaphor that supplants halakhah with belief. “…that he might present it to himself a glorious church… holy and without blemish.” … Temple language, stolen and re-applied to “the Church”, as if she were now the bride, the Temple, the chosen.

It uproots Jeremiah 31:31. Torah marriage simply not about emotion or romantic identification—this mitzva cuts a brit, a legal alliance with concrete halakhic duties, inheritance laws, and national continuation. Paul dilutes this into a private spiritual metaphor: love your wife because she is you—a move away from oath sworn alliance obligations that live on throughout the generations, perverted and change unto worthless abstract emotionalism. The Church now pictured as the bride, not Israel. Faith in Christ, not halakhic brit, serves as the glue. Love and purity merely symbolic, not legal categories tied to Torah. Just as Galatians 3:28 dissolves categories, and Acts 17:26 universalizes origin, so too does Ephesians 5:25–28 spiritualize and replace Torah marriage—making it subordinate to Christ, not the Torah Constitution of Israel.

Another example of European and ICC legal corruption and efforts to curse the Jewish people.

Jesus cursing the Fig Tree …

The Fig Tree as a Metaphor for Israel Jeremiah 8:13 – “I will surely consume them, saith the Lord: there shall be no grapes on the vine, nor figs on the fig tree, and the leaf shall fade; and the things that I have given them shall pass away from them.” Hosea 9:10 – “I found Israel like grapes in the wilderness; I saw your fathers as the firstripe in the fig tree at her first time: but they went to Baal-peor, and separated themselves unto that shame…” Micah 7:1 – “Woe is me! for I am as when they have gathered the summer fruits, as the grape gleanings of the vintage: there is no cluster to eat: my soul desired the first-ripe fruit.”

Second Temple Judaism, the rise of Pharisaic authority, and the Jewish origins of the Oral Torah tradition. The Hasmonean Revolt (c. 167–160 BCE), celebrated during Hanukkah, began as a revolt against Seleucid Greek oppression and the forced Hellenization of Judea. After driving out the Greeks, the Hasmoneans (Maccabees) established a priestly monarchy—but soon aligned with the Tzaddukim (Sadducees), the Temple priestly elite who rejected the Oral Torah and adhered strictly to written Torah (Torah shebikhtav).

The P’rushim (Pharisees) taught the Oral Torah (Torah she-be’al peh)—a living tradition of interpretation, application, and legal debate, rooted in Moshe at Sinai but unfolding through generations of sages. The Pharisees championed halakhic debate, legal flexibility, and ethics, and stood against the rigid, elitist, and Temple-centric Sadducees. After the destruction of the Second Temple in 70 CE, the Pharisaic tradition survived and became the foundation of Rabbinic Judaism—codified in the Mishnah, Talmud, and the entire halakhic tradition. Therefore the Jesus curse of the fig tree as fruitless – a direct condemnation of rabbinic Judaism.

To interpret this passage as a direct condemnation of rabbinic Judaism clearly reflects later church polemics and slanders made against the Talmud, like the infamous burning of the Talmud in 1242 Paris France and the 1306 destruction of the Rashi/Tosafot common law school on the Talmud. The gospels serve as the basis of later church war crimes and racism. Christian polemics have added to Gospel interpretations—especially in how they’ve been weaponized against rabbinic Judaism and the Talmudic tradition. Under the banner of a supersessionist Church, all manner of slander perversions and illegal ghetto imprisonments arbitrarily imposed upon the cursed wandering Jews.

The fig tree curse (Matt. 21:19); the “brood of vipers” language, and John’s “the Jews” rhetoric (esp. in passion narratives), the church fathers continuously employed them as their weapons to vilify Pharisaic Judaism, later generalized to all Jews. The church fathers sought to erase Jewish continuity through forced conversions and continuous acts of violent oppression. The church utterly detested the existence of the Talmud. Its revisionist history replacement theology continually declared the church as the ‘true Israel”. Supersessionist theology\replacement theology—represents the ideological backbone of the Church’s effort to erase Jewish identity and delegitimize the halakhic tradition. Church revisionist history proclaimed from the roof tops that – “The Church has replaced Israel as God’s chosen people.” The fig tree curse (Matt. 21:19) the church fathers interpreted as the symbolic destruction of the Jewish people. Which the church fathers promoted by referring to Israel as Christ killer Caine. “Brood of vipers”, used to paint all Pharisees (and later all Jews) as inherently deceitful or evil. John’s Gospel, “the Jews”, made Jewish exiled refugees as the collective villain—laying the groundwork for the deicide charge, a central justification for anti-Jewish violence.

John Chrysostom, in his Adversus Judaeos homilies, spewed hatred with phrases like: “The synagogue is worse than a brothel… it is the den of scoundrels and the repair of wild beasts… the temple of demons devoted to idolatrous cults…” The church fathers abhorred the Talmud, because it embodied Jewish autonomy—an ongoing, vibrant dialogue with God outside of Church control. It was the living heartbeat of rabbinic resistance.

Church biblical translations not only co-opted Jewish sacred texts while condemning their original interpreters, perverted BRIT unto covenant; and reduced the Jewish people to either tragic relics or enemies of God. This theft of narrative and identity allowed the Church to: cast Jews as “wandering witnesses” to Christian truth (see Augustine). And also blame all generations of Jews as Christ killers, which justified almost annual pogroms and forced expulsions of Jewish refugee populations scattered across both West and Eastern Europe.

The deep hypocrisies and historical amnesia baked into so many institutions of power, including European courts and the modern international legal framework, remain staggering. European courts and institutions have long been shaped by Christian hegemony, and that hegemony protected the Church from accountability, even as it presided over centuries of religious violence, forced conversions, inquisitions, pogroms, book burnings, ghettoization, and expulsions—all directed at Jewish communities. The idea of charging the Church itself as a war criminal would have been unthinkable in a Europe where the Church was the ideological and legal center of power.

For most of European history, Church and State were not separate. In many cases, the Church was the state—wielding direct power or deeply entwined with monarchies. The legal apparatus wasn’t neutral—it was Catholic or later Protestant. So, when Jews were expelled from Spain (1492), forced into ghettos in Venice (1516), or burned in the Crusades, these were actions sanctified, not judged, by the powers of the time.

Share this:

Share this:

Share this:

Share this:

Share this:

Share this:

Share this:

Share this:

Share this:

Share this: