Learning Parshat בראשית ונח together

What distinguishes רחום from חמל? Confusing the two separate verbs as bad as the NT Greek failure to differentiate a – מאי נפקא מינא – רב חסד – day vs night distinction between מלאכה from עבודה, which ritually addicted observant Jews also blithely ignore! Understanding requires development of the skill to discern like from like! For example the distinctions between t’ruma, ma’asar, and chol! Israel hardly a “profane” טיפש פשט. Parshat נח סמוך לבראשית. Just as the Siddur stands upon the בסיס of סמוכים to separate and distinguish between T’hellim which do not require k’vanna/שבח from blessings which נזקוק כוונה – שם ומלכות.

The essential Torah wisdom kabballah theme, סמוך to the דברים\משנה תורה ratio. Why the טיפש פשט beginning vs end question – invalid? What does משנה תורה mean? Weigh on the scales of judgment the Yad codification of halacha of called Mishna Torah; against rabbi Yechuda Ha’Nasi’s משנה – common law Case/Din – codification which stands upon בניני אבות precedents of courtroom “Common Law”?

If you affix משנה תורה to the post sealing of the Shas – Yad, then the revelation of the Torah at Sinai/Horev introduces a Judaic religion. If you answer the Book of דברים the basis for the Mishna, then משנה תורה mandates faith defined through צדק צדק תרדוף, as the obligation to establish the Torah as the Constitution of the 12 Tribal Republic sworn “alliance/brit”, which most essentially requires Yovel liberty for the 12 Tribes who militarily conquer the land; Sanhedrin common law courts possess the Torah Constitutional mandate: power of Legislative review over tribal “statute laws”! The latter possibility qualifies as a huge מאי נפקא מינא … רב חסד distinction; comparable in difference to Life vs Death לשמה בארץ ישראל vs לא לשמה בגלוט; distinction which separates blessings from curses ruling the land with justice requires the כוונה wisdom\מלאכה of the courts making fair restitution of damages inflicted by bnai brit upon bnai brit. Such a wisdom-time oriented commandment clearly distinct like oil & water from toldot positive and negative religious ritual commandments which do not require k’vaana in g’lut.

Actions have consequences. The worship of 2nd Commandment avoda zarah learns from a דיוק made upon the opening Av Mishna of Baba Kama – 4 catagories of damages that really through logical דיוק includes 8; the obvious four tam damages and the דיוק k’vanna 4 מועד damages. Parshat בראשית סומך לנח serves to emphasize the wisdom k’vanna of the Av Torah theme which separates Av commandments from Toldot commandments as a מאי נפקא מינא – רב חסד distinction; as דברים defines משנה תורה based upon the premise that the sages sealed the T’NaCH Mishna Gemara Siddur from toldot later g’lut statute law halachic religious codifications which have assimilated and embraced the culture of Roman and Greek statute law and philosophy of syllogism static deductive logic, prioritized above the kabbalah פרדס in conjunction with how the 7, 10, 13 rabbinic middot interpret Talmudic warp halachic sugyot and the 32 middot interpret the weft aggadic sugyot based upon respect of the כלל sugya integrity. The statute halachic g’lut לא לשמה codes uproot and obliterate, and therein they blow out the lights of Hanukkah! Jews forget the Oral Torah judicial common law replaced with static statutory religious codes.

The skill to read a blue print, this wisdom permits a building contractor to envision from a two dimensional sheet of paper a three dimensional idea… Front\Top/Side views זה לא כזה וזה לא כזה. The kabbalah of פרדס inductive logic expresses a tohor dynamic way of interpreting, based upon בניני אבות precedents, brought by the different sugyot of Gemara, the essentially to discern כוונה of the language of the Mishna – based upon a fixed perspective; akin to how the Courts judge the testimony of witnesses on the New Moon, likewise distinguishes the testimony of witnesses based upon their unique fixed perspectives.

Contrast the g’lut לא לשמה assimilated statute law religious codifications: 1. They uproot the halachic precedent from how it interprets the language of a precise & very specific Mishna. The Rambam and Shulkan Aruch codes fail to bring the precise Mishna Primary Source. The כסף משנה limited its commentary to the Yad to essentially bringing some speculative Gemara source for the halachic ruling. It never made any attempt to re-interpret the intent of the Mishna viewed through the perspective of that halacha. 2. The codes do not respect sugya integrity any more than does modern Dof Yomi. Chabad encourages a reading of the Yad independent of the Talmud as Rambam suggested in his introduction. A consequent of this error, Chabad believers of the rebbe as moshiach, confuse the obligation of Moshiach as also applicable to לא לשמה g’lut Jewry.

The consequences of assimilation and intermarriage defines the meaning of the 2nd Sinai commandment. As בראשית contrasts the opposing Trees so too the opening Sinai commandments. As does Parshat נח amplify the g’lut of Adam as a central Torah theme that ספר דברים interprets [משנה תורה] the difference between the opening first two commandments which the Talmud instructs כלל ישראל accepted prior to demanding that Moshe receive the rest of the Torah post the Golden Calf משל\נמשל Av precedent of the 2nd Sinai commandment; likewise this “style”, comparable to the distinction between רחום from חמל – the womb vs a chelem child. Rabbi Yechuda publicly acknowledges the בכל לבבך as the struggle between opposing Yatzirot within the heart. Courtroom Common law stands upon the יסוד of precedents, whereas Roman Senate statute law stands upon appeals to cults of personality akin to Mao’s Little Red Book, and the apocryphal story of Stalin’s “pitiful” chicken.

Obviously the precedents brought a Torts court prosecutor\Shammai different from the precedents brought by the justice defense attorney/Hillel in any lateral common law 3 judge court. The role of the 3rd justice, he serves to resolve any תיקו wherein both prosecutor and defense fail to persuade the other of the merits of their precedents brought before any common law Torts court. The fundamental distinction between Sanhedrin and Torts courts, beside the obvious Capital Crimes vs Damages; Torts courts have a mandate to operate in g’lut whereas Sanhedrin courts only within the borders of ארץ ישראל. For example, post Shoah NEVER AGAIN oath rejects Goyim courtroom imperialism to impose their opinions upon the “Jewish Problem”, based upon the corruption of the court of Par’o in the days of Moshe and Aaron.

The NaCH opens with how the prophet interprets the African origin word טוטפות through observance of Pesach-Yoval and brit melah precedents, later expressed through the Gilgal vs Sh’Cem oaths which distinguish between the Orders of Rashi and Rabbeinu Tam tefillen by understanding the רשות מצוה of tefillah ערבית; the חצי קדיש separation with distinguishes דאוריייתא קריא שמע ערבית from דאורייתא קריא שמע שחרית by means of Rabbeinu Tam’s Order of tefillen which interprets the famous dispute wherein Rabban Gamliel got fired as the Nassi of the Court, which the Pesach Haggadah recalls. פלג המנחה remains day not night. Hence a person can place Rabbeinu Tam tefillen and has רשות to affix the ק”ש ערבית to the מנחה shemone esrei; and the shemone esrei ערבית to the ק״ש שעל המיטה. Wisdom-time oriented commandments require k’vanna based upon the בנין אב which makes a מאי נפקא מינא – רב חסד distinction between מלאכה from עבודה where מלאכה constitutes as skilled labor wisdom. Hence shabbat an example, based upon מעשה בראשית, means week not simply the last day of the week as Protestant Seventh-day Adventists insist. On the Six Days of Shabbat bnai brit in ארץ ישראל sanctify wisdom-time oriented commandments לשמה; T’NaCH prophetic mussar Aggada\Gemara defines the Horev 13 Oral Torah middot דאורייתא – דבר שבלב מצוות שנזקוק כוונה meaning מלכות לשמה as expressed through the halacha of rabbi Yochanon in ברכות. Wherein a blessing stands distinct from saying Tehillim in that blessings qualify as a toldah of sworn oaths. Another name for Shemone Esrei – Amidah serves as a רמז learned from the Talmud that a person can either Stand before a Sefer Torah or sit and swear a Torah oath by means of his tefillen.

Clearly, discernment separates static religious rhetoric readings of flat biblical story texts from judicial common law which stands upon the foundation of competitive precedents which produce Majority vs. Minority judicial opinions of justice – fair restitution of damages as Torah faith תורה לא בשמים היא; the key aspect of Yovel liberty for all 12 Tribal Yichus established within the land. Equally clear, the vision of the anointing of both kings Shaul and David moshiach both failed to achieve Yovel liberty through משנה תורה Sanhedrin courts. The failure to judge the Cohonim of Nov, and Uriah before the Great Sanhedrin, likewise duplicated by king Shlomo who failed to judge the Capital Crimes case of the two prostitutes before a small Sanhedrin court and his confusion wherein he ruled Jerusalem function as a city of refuge. The Torah and NaCH understand the 2nd Sinai commandment through the negative precedents of not enquiring how Goyim worship their Gods/assimilation and the war against Midian post the tribal chief of Shemon marrying a Midianite woman. King Shlomo worshipped avoda zarah at the beginning of his reign, when like his son at Sh’Cem, he failed to heed the prophetic mussar which Natan rebuked king David. Pursuit of assimilation of the cultures and customs practiced by Goyim, king Shlomo prioritized the treif desire to build grand Temple Cathedrals rather than judge the Capital Crimes case of the two prostitutes before a full Sanhedrin courtroom; and confusing Yerushalem as one of the Cities of Refuge!

Hence the precedents for רחום, the commandments to kill the people of Canaan, the drunk rebellious child, and the death decree inclusive of Dathan and Abiram children; these precedents arouse Anger which the Torah explicitly remembers through the 10 tests by which Israel aroused through the spies, the din of g’lut. Remembering the 10 plagues of Egypt through the 10 anger tests defines the k’vanna of the Oral Torah middah נצר חסד לאלפים, affixed to the 9th middle blessing of the 3-13- 3\תרי”ג blessing – ולמלשינים אל תהיתקוה – wherein Israel pleads that the tohor attribute of יראת שמים protect our people from the curse of denying the Oral Torah Horev revelation of middot/מלכות, which distinguishes blessings of justice through Sanhedrin courts in the land from cursed Goyim vertical bribed courts, enslaved to a hostile agenda like the courts of Par’o; follow the money, when the State pays the salaries of the justices herein defines bribe. Goyim worship of avoda zarah because they reject the revelation of Sinai/Horev. The lights of Chanukkah have the k’vanna which remembers the ancient Greeks who attempted to deceive Israel to forget the Oral Torah. Expressed over and again through their ever repeated denial of the Oral Torah Horev revelation. The Shomronim, the Tzeddukkim, Xtianity and Islam, the Karaim and the charem placed upon Spinoza followed by Shabbetai Tzvi together with his prophet Natan from Gaza, and Yaacov Frank. The latter false messiah av tuma avoda zara duplicates the Apostle Paul likewise rejected the דאורייתא Moshiach commandment: sanctify Yovel liberty through Great Sanhedrin courts designation of the Tribal Yichus within the borders of ארץ ישראל Torah constitutional republic/commonwealth as the prophetic mussar of brit melah.

The middah of רחום affixed to the womb of Rivka wherein the Yatzir Ha-Tov wrestles with the Yatzir Ha-Raw. Pity merely a reactionary, at best chelem baby-like empathy over the sorry plight of others currently in distress. Whereas רחום the 4th Oral Torah middah affixed to גואל ישראל links redemption to attribute of יראת שמים mussar, interpreted as ‘mastery of a good name reputation’. Hence both ritual slaughter and Torah scholars & scribes require this essential basic attribute of emotional maturity and development. Contrast the disqualification of the Jewish apikoros in mesechta Chullin which clearly does not depend upon either his skills or knowledge of the subject: how to technically ritually kill an animal. Hence רחום סמוך לחנון wherein חנון understood as עיין טוב, which the apikoros lacks.

Just as Yom Kippur separates the ודוי said over the goat thrown of the cliff to נשא עון ופשע וחטאה from the ודוי dedication of the living blood sprinkled before the פרוכת\כפור separates the distinction between a ודוי דאורייתא מן ודוי דרבנן. Hence the Shemone Esrei lacks a rabbinic ודוי and its permitted to add in שמע קולינו this toldot confession of sins which starkly contrasts with the dedication to pursue justice among our people as the Cohen national inheritors of the brit sworn to the Avot which the 3rd through 9th middot amplify לשמה the first שם השם whereas the 10th – 12th middot magnify the repetition of the שם השם לא לשמה g’lut Jewry as the דיוק made upon the closing middah absolutely requires: ונקה as learned through the month of Elul; as the shofar לשמה separates tohor middot spirits blown from the Yatzir Ha’Tov from wind blown from the lungs; toldot commandments which do not require k’vanna, but serve as external vessels like the Mishkan’s relationship with the Shekinah.

Understanding the k’vanna which all wisdom-time oriented Torah commandments fundamentally require to distinguish a matter of the heart from ritual actions that religious g’lut Jews do like reading words as rote child immaturity. Ritualism no more qualifies as wisdom of the Torah than Cain or the two eldest sons of Aaron who confused ritualized making a barbeque to heaven as equal to sanctifying wisdom-time oriented Av Commandments from the brit Torah faith to pursue just restitution of damages among our people when we rule the oath sworn lands: establish Yovel liberty for the 12 tribe/Republic as the k’vanna of doing brit melah upon all male children born inside the oath sworn land inheritance of the seed fathered by the Avot.

To understand through Torah wisdom the k’vanna of wisdom-time oriented commandments as introduced in the wisdom wherein the Genesis story of creation instructs through משל\נמשל logical דיוקים. What does acquisition of a woman through קידושין actually acquire? A Jewish woman does not compare to a slave or a whore acquired through money, trade, or sex ie Yachuda & Tamar! The wisdom-time oriented commandment of קידושין “makes t’shuva” by remembering the oath sworn between the pieces wherein childless Avram cut a permanent oath brit/alliance – based upon the 1st commandment of the Torah/fruitful and multiply\, to father the chosen Cohen nation encompassing all 12 Tribes of Israel who accept the Torah revelation at Sinai in all future born ie O’lam HaBah/stars in the heavens; hence קידושין – the wisdom of acquiring Title to the future born seed this woman and baal produce.

For example: Why the Torah din of maamzer? This din applies only to קידושין. No קידושין no maamzerim. Goyim do not do קידושין therefore maamzerim do not apply to their seed. If a woman becomes pregnant from another Man after making קידושין the child born to that illicit union a maamzer – just that simple. Hence it serves as proof that קידושין the baal acquires title to the Nefesh O’lam Ha’bah souls born consequent to this marital union. קידושין does not apply to Goyim because Goyim not the chosen Cohen brit-oath seed sworn to Avraham Yitzak and Yaacov. Torah wisdom-time oriented commandments require k’vanna. When a man does קידושין based upon these בניני אבות herein defines the required k’vaana of the wisdom-time oriented commandment קידושין.

Reading a Mishna through a טיפש פשט literalism fails to differentiate wisdom-time oriented commandments from positive and negative commandments. The latter “secondary commandments” do not in and of themselves require k’vanna. Not so any Av wisdom-time oriented commandment which absolutely must have prophetic mussar as its “duty of the heart” k’vanna.

Torah a common law legalism ie משנה תורה|דברים which stands upon בניני אבות|precedents! Shallow reactionary religious statute law reading of texts fails to discern Torah judicial common law “k’vanna/intent” from Goyim legislative statute law decrees. ספר בראשית opens with the Creation aggadah and introduces the Central theme of כל התורה כולה – Av wisdom-time oriented commandments. Proof: לא תעשה מלאכה בשבת. What מאי נפקא מינא discernment of judgment separates the k’vanna of מלאכה from עבודה? Failure to discern this fundamental distinction between two similar verbs proves a fundamental lack of understanding! Shabbat not one day but rather inclusive of the entire WEEK. אסור to do מלאכה on the closing day of the week, in order to dedicate and sanctify doing מלאכה during the 6 days of the Shabbat/week. Herein the mitzva of Shabbat as introduced in the בראשית aggada serves as the required הבדלה of understanding which differentiates like from like required to sanctify all wisdom-time oriented commandments throughout the Torah and inclusive of Talmudic mitzvot according to the B’HaG!

Wisdom-time oriented commandments, based upon the 1st Sinai לשמה – life – commandment – only sanctified within the borders of the oath sworn lands. Cursed g’lut Jewry the 2nd Sinai commandment understood as לא לשמה – death. The 1st Sinai commandment! Who brought you out of Egypt! Egypt a לאו דוקא term! Any land outside of the borders sworn to the Avot as the eternal inheritance of their chosen Cohen seed = g’lut.

All g’lut Jewish opinions on the Torah a לא לשמה curse of Egyptian slavery! Just as Par’o court never tried criminal Par’o for criminal damages against Israelites so too all the Goyim courtrooms throughout history not different. Post exile g’lut Jewry does not compare to Israelis ruling the oath sworn lands today. Why? Justice justice pursue as faith – the obligation from the Torah for Sanhedrin courts dedicated to pursue fair restitution of damages inflicted as the tiqqun for ‘hatred without cause’ Av tumah avoda zarah among our people – only applicable where Sanhedrin common law courtrooms have jurisdiction. Sanhedrin Courts have no legal jurisdiction in g’lut lands any more than Goyim living in foreign lands liable to the death penalty for violation of the 7 laws bnai noach! Mesechta Sanhedrin aggadah which introduces the so-called 7 mitzvot bnai noach refers to gere toshav in the times when Israelites establish Yovel liberty for all 12 Tribes yichus within the borders of the Jewish state/Republic! The Talmud openly states that Yovel דאורייתא never achieved throughout the 2nd Republic/commonwealth! More King David failed in the matter of Uriah to establish Yovel liberty for the 12 Tribes by judging Capital Crimes Cases before Sanhedrin courts as Moshe and Yehoshua revealed their Av k’vanna when they both established the Small Sanhedrin Cities of Refuge!

Moshe Rabbeinu said I give you life and death, therefore choose life. This makes a משנה תורה interpretation of k’vanna which separates the tohor לשמה first Sinai commandment from the Av tumah לא לשמה second Sinai commandment. Torah a common law legal system. The 5th Book of דברים|משנה תורה reinterprets through the life/death language the k’vanna of the 1st and 2nd Sinai commandments. Why? Because the Talmud states that Israel at Sinai only accepted the revelation of the first two Sinai commandments prior to demanding from Moshe that he receive the rest of the Torah.

Both Mesechta Shabbat and Baba Kama ask the question: Do the Toldot follow the Avot? Based upon the distinction between Av wisdom-time oriented commandments introduced in מעשה בראשית from תולדות secondary positive and negative Torah commandments which do not require k’vanna … but if learned through the wisdom of משנה תורה can discern through בינה the prophetic mussar which defines from the Torah and prophets the k’vanna of all wisdom-time oriented commandments for Israelis ruling the oath sworn lands which the chosen Cohen nation fathered by the Avot inherit which לשמה swore to the Avot.

Incorrect to treat the Torah as a philosophical analogy simply because the Hanukkah lights dedicate a נדוי rejection of Greek philosophy as the basis wherein Israel forgets the [Oral] Torah as defined through the revelation of the 13 middot at Horev ה’ ה’ אל רחום וחנון ect and interpreted through the Tannaim kabbalah of פרדס and the rabbinic middot of 7, 10, 13, and 32 warp weft sh’ittot applicable to halacha vs aggadita wherein the 32 middot interpret the mussar of aggadic droshes upon T’NaCH Primary Sources and the 7, 10, 13 middot interpret, akin to different witnesses to the New Moon whose views determined from their fixed perspective much a like a blue print has a Front Side Top viewpoints!

A capital crimes trial requires no less than two witnesses. Why? Because two or more witnesses make a prophetic “depth analysis” akin to the 2 sites of a rifle permits a person to shoot accurately down range. Prophetic mussar applies equally to all “down range” generations of the chosen brit Cohen nation – 12 Tribes of Israel. Yonah read through a flat טיפש פשט sent to the king who took the 10 tribes of Israel and uprooted them replaced by the abhorrent Shomronim goyim – according to the Book of Ezra who excluded them from joining the nation to sanctify mitzvot! T’shuva defined through Rosh HaShanna יום הזכרון and sealed wherein the living blood of brought before the פרכת from the treif blood of the goat cast off cliff נשא עון פשע וחטא. Hence the Shemone Esrei has no rabbinic ודוי because wisdom-time oriented commandments require making הבדלות distinctions to define their k’vanna!

The Talmud learns t’shuva as remembering that only the Avot, not Moshe Rabbeinu or any other johnny come lately such as the near 2000 year separation from the Koran declaration that Yishmael a father due to Avraham dedicating him at the Akedah! Shomronim introduced their substitute theology wherein their Torah differs from the Torah of Israel, no different from the NT and Koran fraud books.

As storing books often employs “book ends” so to the case between Rosh HaShanna and Yom Kippur, Pesach/counting of the Omer\Shevuoth, and Sukkot/Shemeni Atzaret. סלח לנו אבינו כי חטאנו does not qualify as a rabbinic ודוי because the Talmud instruct that a person has רשות to included the rabbinic ודוי as defined in mesechta Yoma – the dispute between rabbi Meir vs the Sages – in שמע קולינו.

The name of ר”ה … יום הזכרון. What do Jews לשמה remember? The oath sworn to the Avot, that they alone would father the Cohen nation. If the greater party to the brit alliance swore a Torah oath לשמה the lesser party in their turn does not likewise swear a Torah oath לשמה. The generation of Israel called on יום הזכרון to remember the oaths which the Avot separately swore לשמה to father the chosen Cohen nation to all eternity. Goyim have no portion, according to the Talmud to the world to come. Specifically Goyim who A) reject the revelation of the Torah at Sinai B) whose Shomronim substitute theologies replace in the case of the NT JeZeus as the God of the 1st Sinai commandment and Koran Yishmael with Yitzak at the Akadah and Allah with the revelation of the לשמה רוח הקודש with their golden calf Allah word – no different from the substitution made by the ערב רב who referred to their Golden Calf משל as אלו אלהים etc., have no portion in the world to come.

The blowing of the Shofar requires spirits blown from the Yatzir Ha’Tov from within the heart and not breath from the lungs. Blowing the Shofar a wisdom, hence its permitted even on shabbat for children to learn how to blow the shofar. עבודה not a wisdom, just that simple – this distinction separates the sanctification of shabbat which requires k’vanna from toldot cmmandments which do not require k’vanna. Error to say that ritual halacha determines the k’vanna of mitzvot! Aggadic sources of T’NaCH and Talmud define through a dosh\p’shat axis the k’vanna of ritual halachic mitzvot. Halachic mitzvot compare to the form of the Mishkan while prophetic T’NaCH\aggadic mussar k’vanna serves as the substance of the Shekinah. The mitzva of tefillah a matter of the heart, specifically the dedication of tohor middot within the Yatzir Ha’Tov as opposed to the tuma middot spirits which identify the Yatzir Ha’rah.

Torah has the Written and the Oral Torah. No where did the Greeks burn the written Torah like as did the French king in 1242 in Paris! Hence based upon the inductive wisdom of פרדס logic which defines the Oral Torah as codified throughout the Talmud, the Greeks attempted to cause Israel to forget the Oral Torah inductive logic. This substitution theology likewise expressed through the Shomronim, the Tzeddukim who denied the Oral Torah – allies of the Syrian Greeks; the Xtian church who denies the Oral Torah; the Karaim who likewise reject the Oral Torah and the Mohammadians who replace Yishmael as the Av of all Muslim peoples in direct violation of Sarah’s commandment that Yishmael would not inherit the brit faith. Brit never found in the Koran nor the NT! Covenant a false translation of brit because just as a blessing requires שם ומלכות meaning לשמה and Oral Torah middot revealed first to Moshe at Horev following the sin of the Golden Calf.

Sanhedrin 90b & Gittin 60b explicitly distinguishes between Torah Shebichtav and Torah Shebe’al Peh. The Greek decree\gezeirah, banned the teaching and study like as later decreed the Romans. By banning the method of derivation (the 7/10/13/32 middot), they forced Israel to rely on static texts, which is the definition of Hellenization. 1 Maccabees 2:17 mentions the priestly aristocracy collaborating with Antiochus. The Khazars/Karaim rejected the Talmud and heavily relied upon a literal טיפש פשט as ideal. Xtianity replaces the Oral Torah with Dogma/Nicene Creeds; NT substitute theology errs in its bogus lie of fulfilling the Torah yet fails to preserve its Oral Torah lineage of judicial justice as the definition of faith.

The Koran does not contain the Brit of Sinai; it claims to restore it. But it denies the Oral transmission of the Sinaitic revelation. Without the Oral Torah, the Brit becomes a dead letter. The Greeks understood this: if you kill the Oral, you kill the Brit. The Greeks tried to bypass the Oral, demanding a static belief-worship of Gods in the Heavens above. The common thread between Civil War internal enemies and Foreign attempts to conquer Israel – both this and that deny the Oral Torah. Hence the dedication of the lights of Hanukkah sanctifies akin to shabbat the victory of Inductive\dynamic inductive Oral Torah logic over deductive static and dogmatic Written-decrees only static logic ie appeals to higher authorities illogic.

Mussar does not follow greek/geek static syllogism logic. Mussar a Yatrir spirit grown within the heart. The false syllogism logic of proving or disproving utterly false. For example: the legal precedents brought by the Prosecutor, not the same as the legal precedents brought by the defense attorney. Jewish torts courts have a minimum of 3 judges. One serves as the prosecutor, the 2nd as defense, and if a tayku occurs – where neither the opposing legal brief – merit, convinces the others legal brief precedents, then in this tayku situation the 3rd judge of the court rules one way or the other. I will remember the brit with Yaacov, the brit with Yitzak and the brit with Avraham. The 3 … 3 Opening and closing blessings remember the Avot in the order of Avraham Yitzak Yaacov vs. Yaacov Yitzak and Avraham akin to the closing Parek of ויקרא and the reverse Order of the letters in the Musof Amidah of Shabbat.

The Oral Torah 4th tohor middah רחום affixed to the Middle blessing גואל ישראל based upon the Order of 3 + 13 + 3 blessings … when Israel makes war upon Amalek/ערב רב שאין להם יראת אלהים in all generations, shows no pity for the ben sorer u-Moreh, and slaughter through genocide all inhabitants of Canaan – this רחום shields מגן אברהם the nation from Torah curses. Hence רחום shares nothing with pity any more than t’shuva to alien avoda zarah – repentance! Datan and Abiram seed died similar to the stubborn and rebellious son!

On the 5th Day of the Chag moed — a clarification resultant of Gamma Hans excellent questions

As explained previously, the codification of the Mishna in 200, some say 210 CE roughly 75 years after the absolute disastrous defeat of Bar Kochba, where Rome renamed the conquered province Syria-Palestine. The Gemara sealed by Rav Ashi & Ravina in about 450 in Iraq; further editions made by the Sovariim scholars till about 600 CE! As such both the Mishna and Bavli Gemara more resemble Herzl’s “Jewish State”. No Yovel liberty for the 12 Tribe ever existed “historically”. Both king Shaul slaughtered the Kohonim of Nov as did king David ordered the death of Uriah – WITHOUT a Sanhedrin Capital Crimes trial. Hence neither king ever established Federal Sanhedrin common law legislative review of any and all statute law passed by Tribal authorities and/or the king of Jerusalem over a united 12 Tribe Republic.

Torah common law in essence interpretive rather than historical! When Herzl wrote his definitive work of political Zionism, Jews had endured almost 2000 years of g’lut! Hence the same equally applies to the authorship of both the Mishna and Bavli Gemara! From beginning to end – post Shoah Israeli National Independence – both the Bavli Talmud and Herzl’s ‘The Jewish State’ do NOT refer to history but rather encompass an interpretive vision of the Jewish state in the future.

As the T’NaCH engages in the history of kings, its foolish to assume that the T’NaCH primarily concerns historiography. T’NaCH prophets command mussar applicable to all generations of Bnai Brit Cohonim nationals ie the 12 Tribal yichus directly referenced in both the Torah and Book of Yehoshua. Confusing a secondary “detail” for the primary “k’vanna” amounts to confusion. Foreign invasions proved conclusively that prior to the people asking for a king in the Book of Shmuel, that the 12 tribes collectively as a whole ever enjoyed Yovel liberty based upon Moshe taking all Israel out of Egyptian slavery precedent.

History serves as contexts to make a depth analysis interpretation. The Mongols destroyed the Abbasid Caliphate in Iraq in 1258, the king of France and Pope ordered the public burning of all Talmudic manuscripts within France in 1242 under Louis IX. The interpretation of history: both the Muslims and Jews, so to speak ‘Circled their Wagons’. Prior to the disaster to both separate societies: Muslim wisdom and knowledge served as the light and model to the rest of the primitive & barbaric European countries – stuck in the Dark Ages.

After Rabbeinu Yonah realized that he had duplicated the exact same error as did the brothers dynastic dispute wherein the Romans occupied Jerusalem and appointed Herod ‘their’ king on that throne; Rabbeinu Yonah requested permission to burn Maimonidean works. Rabbinic g’lut Orthodoxy – unlike the P’rushim לשמה legalism – they thereafter embraced Greek schools of logic as kosher and therein blew out the Hanukkah lights. Despite assimilation to Greek culture, philosophy and logic – being a pig. Akin to Muhammad’s koran declared camels – clean! Furthermore, Rabbeinu Yonah profaned his public vow to visit the grave of Rambam.

Almost all later Talmudic commentaries written AFTER Rabbeinu Yonah invalidated his נידוי, [[[the most notable exceptions being the Rosh common law codification of the Talmud and such as Hasdai Crescas Or Hashem]]], the public burning of all Talmud manuscripts from France and the later expulsion of all Jews from France in 1306, virtually ceased all opposition to Jews learning and copying Greek philosophical schools of logic – a direct Torah negative commandment which interprets Egypt and Canaan as לאו דוקא.

The T’NaCH historical narratives serve as instruments of mussar, the oath brit sworn to and by the Avot defines t’shuva memory! Torah as a Constitutional document – NOT – a g’lut religious faith in some theologically constructed theology, such as Islam’s Tawhid Monotheism narishkeit. תורה לא בשמים היא the essential responsibility to rule the conquered land of Canaan through Sanhedrin common law legislative review of Tribal statute laws and some undefined Torah rhetoric “king” inclusive under the Torah Constitutional mandate which establishes משנה תורה courtroom authority has never yet occurred in any generation of the Jewish people to date.

Day 4 of the Days of T’shuva Awe: Can these dry bones live? Remember 1969 Beatles #1 Hit, and originally thought it – a song about Jude/Jews. Later as a aggie at A&M developed the theory of revolution as: shattering the ethical containment force/soul of a civilization; based upon the French, Russian, Nazi, and Iranian rejection of not only the leader of the State but the religion embraced by those States.

Rav Saadia HaGaon (c. 882–942) perhaps one of the first Gaonim scholars actively embraced ancient Greek philosophy. The Arab conquest of much of Iberia traditionally began in 711, Saadia lived mainly in Egypt and Babylonia, within the Abbasid intellectual world. Greek works—including Aristotle, Plato, Euclid, Galen, and others—earlier re-discovered translated into Arabic, through the Abbasid translation movement, especially from the eighth through tenth centuries. His Rav Saadia HaGaon unlike Rambam, never a “straightforward” Aristotelian philosopher.

The conquest of much of Iberia began in 711, Saadia lived mainly in Egypt and Babylonia, within the Abbasid intellectual world. Greek works—including Aristotle, Plato, Euclid, Galen, and others—already translated into Arabic through the Abbasid translation movement, especially from the eighth through tenth centuries. His Book Kitāb al-Amānāt wa-l-Iʿtiqādāt, known in Hebrew as Sefer ha-Emunot ve-ha-Deʿot (The Book of Beliefs and Opinions), completed in the 930s, draws especially on Islamic kalām, particularly Muʿtazilite theology. Greek philosophy would later dominate virtually all “Golden Age” Spanish Reshonim thinkers such as Rambam and Ibn Eza, Isaac Israeli, Solomon ibn Gabirol, Judah Halevi.

These later Spanish Reshonim assimilated these ancient Greek ideas of deductive logic similar to how the Tzzeddukim adopted the ideas of making Jerusalem into a Greek city-state. Assimilation into ancient Greek cultures transformed the leaders of Spanish Jewry. The rediscovered Greek philosophical tradition became a major intellectual force in that euphemistic Jewish Golden Age medieval Spain.

The Talmud interprets the 2nd Sinai commandment, based upon other Torah commandment precedents, as do not assimilate and follow the customs manners or cultural traditions practiced by Goyim societies. This כלל defined through the פרט wherein the head of the Tribe of Shimon paraded past Moshe and Aaron with his Midianite wife; Ezra would demand that returning Jews from g’lut Bavil divorce their foreign wives.

The rediscovery of ancient Greek philosophy and logic reopened the Jewish “Civil War” known as Hanukkah some 1000 years earlier. Every Hanukkah, Jews remember in ועל הנסים Bencher: כשעמדה מלכות יון הרשעה על עמך ישראל להשכיחם תורתך. This phrase requires scholarship. Its vast scope includes the assimilated Tzeddukim who supported the rejection of the Oral Torah inductive logic system replaced by the Greek deductive logic formats, no different from the Shomronim who Ezra despised. The Syrian Greek empire sought to turn Jerusalem into a City-State.

Cyrus the Great paid from his own treasury for Ezra’s generations to build a “Temple” in Jerusalem. Ezra excluded the Assyrian Shomronim replacement populations; which the Mishna and Gemara of mesechta Baba Kama refers to all peoples’ who refer to themselves as the “real Israelites”, but who reject the revelation of the Oral Torah logic, later codified through פרדס inductive reasoning which defines all of Talmudic and Midrashic literature, under the general term Canaanites – a restatement of the Torah language “strangers”
דברים טה:כא – לגר אשר בשעריך תתננה ואכלה, או מכר לנכרי. The Talmud in this sense directly compares to the late 19th Century Russian socialist revolutionaries who had to conceal their radical political writings in an attempt to avoid Czar bureaucratic censors and/or secret police.

The Romans did not like this distinction wherein the Canaani had no social or legal rights to sue Israel for damages. Most superficial “historians” attribute the Hanukkah war to Antiochus IV and his supporters who favored Greek Hellenization of Judea. And ignore the long traditions started by Cyrus the Great as employing Banana Republic priests/Tzeddukim as the 2% fabulously wealthy caretakers who collected taxes from the impoverished conquered population of Judea. They “passover” the strategic necessity of building a Jewish temple as the means to collect taxes and ship resources of Judea back to Persia.

Some 1000 years later the reintroduction of Greek philosophy reopened the wounds of the Hanukkah civil war which pitted the P’rushim against the assimilated Tzeddukim who like the later church “denied” the existence of the Oral Torah פרדס logic kabbalah as later codified in the Talmud and Midrashim as the Horev revelation of 13 tohor middot Spirits.

During the Hasmonean period, almost immediately after declaring themselves as king, they broke their alliance with the P’rushim and cut an alliance with the Tzeddukim which initiated a civil war. The Hasmonean dynasty ruled for about 110 years before the Romans installed Herod. By some accounts a Century of their rule, Civil War fought between the P’rushim and Tzeddukim.

The Tzeddukim died as a class after the destruction of the 2nd Temple by the Romans. The church concealed the ancient Greek writings after Constantine converted to their faith and became emperor of Rome. Both the Western and Eastern church authorities viewed the Greek writings which dominated Roman polytheism culture as hostile. Renaissance scholars gained additional Greek manuscripts through Byzantine contacts, especially after, (with some minor exceptions), the fall of Constantinople in 1453. The concealment of those Greek ideas, together with the fall of Rome conquered by Germanic Tribes initiated the period known as the “Dark Ages”; akin to the three Century church imposed Ghetto Gulags upon the Jewish people. The rediscovery of the concealed Greek philosophies directly compares to the awe of Jews after Napoleon freed them from their Ghetto gulags.

The conquest of Spain by Arab armies, impacted the Western church something like a title wave hits the beaches. The ancient Greek texts no longer threatened the dominance of the church. Greek writings now read only secondary to the Bible itself! Xtian churchmen such as Augustine, Boethius, John Philoponus, Thomas Aquinas, and many Byzantine scholars now actively engaged in Greek philosophy. The expression “Dark Ages” recognizes the collapse of the Roman road system and collapse of international trade. The American and French revolutions introduced the distinction between serf vs. citizens. The British introduced the Industrial revolution which transferred the primary wealth producing capabilities of a nation from rural serf/lord communes to Cities – which in its own right caused a huge population transfer akin to Stalin’s wars against the kulaks of the Ukraine.

Saadia Gaon represents an early Jewish effort to employ rational argument in the restructured priority of “Jewish g’lut survival theology”. His scholarship obviously not identical to the Hellenistic crisis commemorated by Hanukkah. Instead it raised a related question, specifically how to address the Karaim rejection of the Oral Torah! How can g’lut Jews encounter an intellectually powerful external culture without surrendering Torah as the ultimate source of our Torah brit identity of Constitutional authority which mandates lateral Sanhedrin common law courts to rule the 12 Tribal Republic through legislative review over all Tribal and King statute laws?

Saadia’s sh’itta/methodology, compares to the Xtian word “converted”. He made “theology” the handmaiden of Torah common law – since no Sanhedrin courts can exist in g’lut! He employed סברה\reasoning/rationale as his היגיון logic. שכל\sechel – discernment skills which require the wisdom to separate like from like. For example wisdom-time oriented commandments which require k’vanna from תולדות/secondary commandments – both positive and negative – which do not require k’vanna but rather serve as precedents to employ sechel to interpret Oral Torah middot spirits as the dedication of halachic actions raised to דאורייתא מצוות.

His Kitāb al-Amānāt wa-l-Iʿtiqādāt employed Greek philosophy as a tool of his apologetics employed against the Karaim who rejected the Oral Torah as did the Shomronim and Pauline Church – all of which placed in the category of מלשינים. He clearly prioritized פרדס inductive logic over foreign deductive logic. The Rambam just the opposite, his code worthless to understand how the Gemara employs vastly different halachic precedent rulings as the chief tool to re-interpret the k’vanna of the language of the Mishna based upon a halachic fixed “witness” perspective; akin to the 3 views of a blue print.

Saadia, without Sanhedrin courts leaned upon Greek logic to support Jewish g’lut beliefs in “tradition”. Tradition which stands upon the kabbalah foundations of פרדס & the rabbinic middot “traditions” taught by Hillel, Akiva, Yishmael and HaGallilee. Sadducees rejected the Oral Law and the Resurrection of the Dead (concepts heavily tied to the emerging Rabbinic/Messianic theology). The dominant medieval Karaite position seems to have been closer to belief in a future resurrection, clearly influenced by Xtian and Muslim theologies. A study of Karaite theology notes that Karaites could affirm roughly twelve and a half of Maimonides’ thirteen principles, with the major exception being the authority of the Oral Law; akin to Rav Shach description of Chabad as “the closest religion to Judaism”.

The Xtian Bible affirms Daniel as a prophet. The Hebrew T’NaCH and Talmud mesechta Megillah openly states Daniel, not a prophet. Confusing a mystic with a prophet compares to prioritizing Greek deductive logic over Hebrew inductive logic – as did the Rambam. The concept of Moshiach applicable to all Jews in all generations who live in the oath brit land; based upon Moshe & Yehoshua prioritization of establishment of the Small Sanhedrin Capital Crimes Courts in the 6 Cities of Refuge and Brit melah which remembers the Avot alone (Yom Kippur t’shuva) as the fathers of the Cohen national Republic of 12 Tribes. Herein defines the mitzva of Moshiach from the Torah and also the resurrection of the dead. The latter linked directly to the first Torah commandment “be fruitful and multiply” as it applies to childless Avram who cut the brit between the pieces on this specific “future” condition being met by his O’lam Ha’Bah Cohen seed.

While the Hellenized Jews of the Second Temple period (like Josephus or Philo) used Greek philosophy to explain Judaism to the Gentiles (who specifically downplay the particularism of Torah common law courts as the only Constitutionally mandated basis of government rule of law), Saadia employed Greek philosophy to wall off Judaism from the Karaites. He obviously rejected the Tzeddukim attempt to make Jerusalem a Greek polis; the Babylonian Talmud served as the model for the future Jewish rule of Canaan through righteous judicial justice; as such only the T’NaCH/Talmud\Siddur sealed masoret exists as the valid interpretation of the Sinai constitution.

G’lut a Torah 2nd commandment curse. G’lut Jews by definition could not obey the Torah לשמה anymore than g’lut Israelites enslaved under Par’o and his corrupt vertical “Star Courts”! G’lut Jewry limited to Shi’ur Koma (the legal arguments) and the Psak (rulings). The Karaites, living in the same Islamic world, were adopting the “text-only” fundamentalism which defines both Classic Xtianity and Islam which Israelis like myself refer to as טיפש פשט.

The Rambam too rejected the Aristotelian doctrine of an eternal universe and defended creation in time. His טיפש פשט failed to grasp that the בראשית creation story/משל introduces the major Torah theme נמשל of wisdom-time oriented commandments! His code, interpreted through his bi-polar book of commandments fails to grasp the Av basis of Common law courts as wisdom-time oriented commandments based upon the foundational precedent of the Creation story which introduces the “thesis statement” of Torah Constitutional common law.

The error of reading the Torah as a history book as absurd as a Hercules man\God wherein Zeus rapes a married woman! Or the gospel narishkeit which declares that JeZeus fulfilled the words of the prophets! Mussar defines Torah prophesy just as the Jewish people has yet to establish a Torah Constitutional Republic of 12 Tribes – Yovel learns from remembering the oath sworn to the Avot “melah” and Pesach as remembered/t’shuva in the דאורייתא תפילה ק”ש. The 7th Middle Blessing of the Shemon Esrei remembers the redemption from slavery as רב חדס discernment – expressed in Talmudic Aramaic as מאי נפקא מינא?

Classic Diaspora (Galut) scholarship – inherently defensive or “assimilated,” whereas post-Shoah Israeli scholarship offers a different paradigm; a recognized historiographical debate, often associated with the “Canaanite” movement or the critique of the “Diaspora Negation” (Shlilat HaGalut) in early Zionism. Galut religious Judaism, the goal of statute halacha rotated around the central axis of preservation and boundary maintenance. The religious statute law became simplified & stable to assist g’lut Jewry to survive hostile assimilations; akin to a hostile corporate take-over of competition – environment. This created a “defensive” religious belief systems, which attempted to clearly define what Jewish theologians promoted as kosher belief in a Monotheistic God.

Post-1948 Israeli scholarship (e.g., the work of scholars like Yehezkel Kaufmann or later Menachem Elon, often prioritized the restoration of Jewish Constitutional common law as a national-constitutional system.), rather than religious ritual slavery obedience. The focus shifts from “how do we survive?” to “how do we govern?” The Herzl Jewish State nationalist model more resembles the NaCH mussar common law/\Talmudic-Midrashim common law which employs Gemara halachot as בניני אבות to interpret the language of the Mishna based upon a fixed perspective akin to how witnesses to the New Moon views-points differ from one another.

The style between the two sets of realities – radically changes. T’NaCH/Aggada-Talmudic halacha common law Court rulings, case-based: argumentative which weighs the precedents brought by the prosecutor with the counter precedents brought by the defense. This decentralized (((Vaguely like English Common Law but more like the post Star Courts American introduction of the lateral jury system. No English court has the authority to challenge a law passed by Parliament because Parliamentary statute laws define the British Constitution.))). The ghetto Shulchan Aruch halachic code permanently manifested the Rambam’s statutory and centralized (akin to Roman/Napoleonic Code). Israeli thought resembles to the original Reform post ghetto condemnation of Judaism as archaic laws. Ruling the land with righteous judicial legislative review, absolutely as a must, requires a revival the פרדס prophetic mussar vision – dialectical energy expressed through both the sealed T’NaCH & Talmud, to address modern statecraft. Whereas Galut Orthodoxy erroneously prioritizes the certainty of these religious statute-law Codes, akin to how the Wilderness Generation of Moshe cowardly refused to invade Canaan due to their faithless fear of giants in the land!

The trajectories of German philosophers goes from the realities of an Agricultural based economic system to an Industrial based economic system. Marx’s urban proletariat theory clearly contrasted by Bakunin’s Anarchist Mir peasant agricultural visions of socialism. Just as Mao’s theories of socialism likewise focused upon peasant realities which defined Chinese culture in the 20th Century. Nietzsche/Schopenhauer influenced the aesthetic and elitist aspects of Fascism (the Will to Power, the Übermensch). Bakunin, his social anarchism, inherently anti-statist and anti-nationalist. The evolution of the SRs to a federalist multiple state, later USSR Republic reality – structurally opposite to the Totalitarian State of Nazism. Herein an attempt to understand the reasons for Hitlers’ absolute hatred of ‘inferior race’ Slavic communism. The failure of liberal/bourgeois rationalism (Kant) led to both the irrationalism of Fascism and the agrarian populism of the SRs, despite the fact that these two branches of philosophy diverged violently.

Post Shoah Israelis view the Yad Chazaka as a revolutionary coping mechanism. It abandoned the vision of future O’lam Habah “Sanhedrin courts”, which stand upon the foundation of Yovel liberty for all 12 Tribes restored; its “replacement theology” created a religious “Civil Code” for g’lut Jewry. This “modern” Enlightenment-adjacent – made religious statute law far more accessible to the common man; it sacrificed akin to JeZeus on the cross, the פרדס middot of Sanhedrin common law as a vision applicable — when Jews slaughter the Romans and restore the Torah Constitutional Republic\Moshiach.

The 19th Century Reform leadership of Geiger or Holdheim viewed these static codes as utterly archaic dead remnants of ghetto g’lut. They openly called Berlin as their “New Jerusalem”! G’lut Reform Judaism, like Karaite rejects Oral Torah common law.

The classic offensive and defensive realism in international relations theory.



National leaders go to war when a nation or group of allied nations threaten their strategic interests. Making a string of “mathematical propositions” which fails to address the logic of the leadership directive of a Head of State/government throughout history fails to communicate any relevant information or analysis. For example the 1956 Suez War, where Britain, France, and 8 year old Israel made War upon Egypt.

The US response which threatened the stability of the fragile British pound forced both the British and French governments to stop their unilateral imperialism to seize the Suez Canal in order to dominate the balance of power in the region. Israel too forced to return the captured Sinai, which set the stage for the June 1967 War – eleven years later messiah Nasser promised to throw the Jews of Israel into the Sea! Quoting UN Charter as if they qualify as Xtian biblical verses amounts to tits on a boar hog.

The compare & contrast between the ’56 War to the ’67 War serves as concrete evidence that National leaders prioritize their nations’ national strategic interests far above and beyond the theology of UN religion. The 30 Years War pitted Protestantism of Luther and Calvinism against Rome. The slaughter of that War – unmatched till WWI! Quoting chapter and verse of the UN Charter as if you got religion simply shows your belief system that the UN serves as your God no different than JeZeus the God of both the Protestant and Catholic churches; Allah the God of Arabs & converted Muslims and the Crusades these two Gods fought one another. The barbaric JeZeus God thought Oh how quaint! Lets slaughter the Christ Killers in Germany … since we travel to conquer the holy lands.

The post WWII new God worshipped by secular nations today – the UN, simply replaces the earlier Gods worshipped by both Xtian and Arab/conquered Muslims like those two sets of Universal Gods repeatedly “war” against the local tribal god which the 12 tribes of Israel “alone” accepted at Sinai/\Horev. Replacement theology sucks eggs because it duplicates the Sin of the Golden Calf! Not the shallow reactionary and utterly simplistic טיפש פשט literalism that ערב רב – assimilated and/or intermarried Israelites bowed down to a literal golden calf. Rather that word-puke Name translations of nouns ((to quote you: “mathematically equals)) the רוח הקודש living Spirit revealed @ Sinai through the 1st Commandment and later @ Horev through the 13 Oral Torah middot “Spirits”. Noun words of this or that God(s) ≠ the revelation of the living Spirit revealed in the First Sinai commandment and again through the revelation of the Oral Torah 13 Spirit middot Spirits revealed at Horev post Golden Calf av tumah avoda zara where the ערב רב literally sought to substitute the name אלהים no different than you substitute the scriptures of the UN Charter for both the dead Gods JeZeus NT and Nakba Allah Koran!

1. Britain and France made war to dominate the Middle East as their own back yard as “Great Powers”. The response of the US President slapped both countries down as secondary States NOT comparable to the Cold War “super powers”. David Ben Gurion joined the British/French War to weaken Nasser’s Egypt – the primary threat to the continued existence of the Jewish state; whereas Jordan’s British lead and trained armies dominated the Arab world in the ’48 War, by the ’56 War the Nasser “revolution” had replaced the king of Jordan and the shining STAR wherein Arabs placed their Nazi hopes & dreams to exterminate the Jews across the Middle East; to achieve where Hitler and Chamberlain failed! President Eisenhower slapped down these secondary powers through the threat of imposing economic sanctions like brain-dead puppet of the VP “Dick”, imposed upon Saddam after 9/11 2001 and President Trump uprooted the equally Obozo the Clown treaty with the Mullahs and restored economic sanctions upon the Mullahs of Persia.

2. The worship of the UN Charter as a moral compass in international relations – compares to young children who go to bed hugging their Teddy Bear to protect and save them from the Buggy-man who often hides under the bed or inside bedroom closets! Both the League and the UN lack enforcement power; they do not possess the ability to police and investigate crimes ie detective work. The UN attempt to evade this fundamental flaw through Chapter VII “police actions” fundamentally dependent upon Great Power consent to participate as President Truman did in the Korean “police actions”. Congress post the Vietnam defeat passed the War Powers Act. And under the leadership of President Trump, Washington has slapped down the UN much like as did Ike London and Paris in 1956.

Nation States often treat the UN as their convenient whore. They ignore or manipulate its Resolutions and there’s not a damn thing the UN can do about it. Israel publicly tore up UN Resolution 3379 after its passage in that whore baiting gossip society. The UN no more Divine than JeZeus or Allah word-Names – Golden Calves. The Gulf War, Kosovo, Syria, Libya the major powers manipulated the UN like a boy arouses a virgin by stimulating her breast to convince her to open her legs. The UN has no police detective authority to enforce decrees made by the Security Council permanent 5!

Dark and Middle Ages replacement theology employed to justify antisemitism and colonialism now commonly expressed through the UN whore of New York and Geneva. Quoting the UN Charter like as did the Xtian and Arab/conquered Muslim converts to Islam do their sophomoric bible and koran corruptions of faith as false as the present day UN whose voting blocks and P5 worship Power as their God rather than the righteous pursuit of justice. Justice requires lateral common law courts to make fair restitution of damages inflicted by the powerful upon the weak. Both the religions of JeZeus and Naka Allah dead Gods. Upon this cracked and corrupt foundation stands the UN replacement theology God!

The Peace of Westphalia (1648) established the principle of state sovereignty, which is the foundation of modern international relations. It compares to the Peace achieved through the Post Napoleon Era which dominated European international relations till the rise of Communisms – the response to the Industrial Revolution which began in England just prior to the outbreak of the French Revolution which swept into power Napoleon. Bottom line: international relations – driven by power and interests, not by moral or theological propaganda frameworks; theological reductionism and literalist interpretations based upon sophomoric gossip translations from language to language compares to whispering an abstract idea in the ear of one person and that person in turn whispers what he heard into the ear of another. A chain whisper – by the end the message heard so completely different from the original – an utter joke.

Peace of Westphalia (1648) established Cuius regio, eius religio (whose realm, his religion). It didn’t solve theology; it bypassed it by prioritizing state sovereignty. It acknowledged that you cannot have peace if you are fighting over “God.” The Congress of Vienna (1815)\\Concert of Europe – maintained peace for a century not through moral preaching, but through a balance of power. When that balance broke (WWI), the moralistic Wilson’s “League of Nations” failed because it lacked the teeth of the Concert. The UN attempts to be a “moral court” without the “balance of power” backing it. It tries to legislate morality (like the Goldstone Report or various human rights councils) without having the power to enforce restitution.

The UN Charter serves merely as the “Teddy Bear” of nations whose fantasy of Superman or Spiderman etc defeats the foundation of Thucydides: “The strong do what they can and the weak suffer what they must.” The “theology” of the UN, indeed just another version of the “Golden Calf”—a shiny, dead object that nations worship when convenient, and trample when the wheel turns and they rule with power. The Melian Dialogue (416 BC) – the only “law” that has held true for 2,400 years — “The strong do what they can and the weak suffer what they must.”

Again wish to thank Gamma Hans whose pro UN opinions has compelled a rational response rather than emotion packed propaganda political rhetoric.



We agree that Torah common law pre-dates British common law by thousands of years! Just as American common law courtrooms. The difference between British common law courtrooms and States common law courts … Parliamentary statute law defines the Constitution of Britain. Whereas the US has a Written Constitution which functions as a codified Basic Law of the US. Torah common law courts more resemble the much later US model rather than the Walpole version of British Constitutional law and courts.

Bunk on the UN fraud of block voting and great power imperialism. Both invalidate the creation of the UN to serve as a forum for diplomacy. The notion that the UN a World government which determines international law a total joke/fraud.

Israelis never throughout our long history as a people have never stated nor even implied we possess a monopoly on truth as have the jack ass Xtian church and Muslim mosque. We say that Jewish self determination expressed through the mandate of Torah common law Sanhedrin courts who maintain Yovel freedom for the 12 Tribes of Israel within the borders of conquered Canaan defines the Torah “Constitutional Mandate” which establishes lateral Federal and Levi Sanhedrin courts from Jerusalem to the 6 or more Cities of Refuge.

Torah mandated Sanhedrin Courts serve as the Capital Crimes Federal Courts whereas lower courts of Torts – 3 man courts jurisdiction – apply equally to Tribes of Israel and Jews in g’lut. Have repeated over and again that Torah commands mussar not history. Your attempts to demand history rather than mussar reflect a foreign monopoly of box rigid thinking. Goyim have their own legal systems. More power to them. Israel has yet to achieve the vision of self determination which stands upon the two legs of Yovel and brit melah as the prophet Yehoshua originally established prior to establishment of the 3 Cities of Refuges small Sanhedrin courts on the other side of the Jordan river as recorded in the first NaCH Book of prophetic mussar.

  1. Torah law and British common law should not be equated because they arise from different legal traditions.
  2. Israel’s non-membership in the Rome Statute by the explicit terms of the Oslo Accords eliminate ICC jurisdiction concerning the PA. Hamas who never agreed to the Oslo Accords and flat out rejects Oslo the ICC cannot declare Hamas as part of the PA since Hamas won the general elections in Gaza and violently expelled the PA from Gaza. Palestine ceased to exist as a UN protectorate the instant that Ben Gurion declared Independence and named the new nation Israel. No different than the US independence on July 4th 1776 from England.

    France’s permanent Security Council seat does not depend on Israeli recognition; it derives from the UN Charter. This does not change the cold fact that France behaved like a dog and surrendered to the Nazis virtually immediately. Attempts by the post Shoah ICC try to invalidate the disgrace of Shoah guilt by declaring that Goyim have legal jurisdiction to try Israelis. This invalidates the post Shoah oath – NEVER AGAIN.
  3. The UN obviously fallible based upon the stated flaw fundamental realities of block voting and great power arrogance.
  4. Torah commands mussar not history. Demands of Universal God A or Universal God B a long standing Goyim attempt to impose their monopoly upon peoples and nations. Torah truth – Goyim do not know how the Torah defines the 8 middah of the Oral Torah; the “path of truth” – righteous justice which makes fair restitution of damanges inflicted by Jews upon other Jews within the jurisdiction of the 12 tribe Republic. Goyim truth simply not the path taken by Torah self determination/Zionism any more than Par’o vertical courts in the days of Moshe and Aaron.

Israeli self determination to achieve Yovel liberty and restore the 12 Tribal Republic has nothing to do with the UN. Attempts by foreign states to dictate terms to Jewish self determination utter hog wash. Especially treif UN voting blocks and European & Russian fraud great powers attempts to dominate the balance of power held between the community of nations of the Middle East and North Africa. When Russia converts Istanbul back to Constantinople by UN decree only then can the UN likewise demand that Jews have no rights to achieve our destiny of Yovel liberty for the restored 12 Tribes of Israel.

French imperialism post WWI an abomination on par with British imperialism in China and across the Planet Earth. The British guilty of establishing Concentration Camps in the Boar War! Mussar rather than history not a theological box thinking static deduction. Mussar defines T’NaCH prophesy which both the Goyim Universal God religions have always invalidated. Hence what’s good for the goose good for the gander.

Yovel has nothing to do with religious beliefs any more than Herzl’s “Jewish State” a religious text! Any more than Vichy alliance with Hitler’s Nazis makes France a saint. Attempts to declare Poop Pius XII a saint only prove the despicable cowardice of European barbarians. Does the SC UN veto serves as proof – that the UN as a whole treif? No. But to date seeing the USSR boycotted the Korean Chapter VII SC vote, a error never again repeated, the confusion mad/made by the ICJ to expand Chapter VI Resolutions as on par with Chapter VII reflects how bureaucracies continually grow into Big Brother Governments.

Proof that Israel not alone in mocking “binding Charter obligations”? Name a single country expelled from the UN member status for ignoring these pie in the sky declarations of the post WWII past. SC Chapter VI decisions like 242 – 2334 all treif. Even post Obozo the Clown … 45 & 47th Presidents have invalidate the trash of the Obozo shoe shine boy in the White House, and replaced “its” incompetence with the Abraham Accords!

Repeated attempts to insist that mussar represents a theological rather than prophetic Torah definition of how prophets serve as the police enforcement arm of Sanhedrin courts – over and again attempt to impose a foreign perversion of T’NaCH as a religion based upon theology rather than the vision of Sanhedrin courtroom justice that remains the ideal of the revelation of the Torah at Sinai which only the 12 Tribes accepted. Attempts to pigeon hole “restoration of the twelve tribe Republic” as religious-nationalism proves that Goyim can’t think out of their boxed in static logic patterns. Oral Torah common law stands upon פרדס inductive logic not Greek syllogism deductive logic.

The Jewish state prioritizes brit-alliances and private diplomacy conducted with allies; over the gossip society of the UN which promotes block voting of foreign states interference in the internal affairs of other nations. The post Oct 7th 2023 massacre of Israelis on the last day of a Jewish Chag wherein the UN and ICC slander Israel as guilty of war crimes proves that the UN gossip society an utter abomination. Israel thumbs our noses at the UN and dares that incompetent gossip society to expel the Jewish State from the UN. To quote Eastwood: “Go ahead make my day – PUNK”.

The Torah concept of Yovel separates slavery to Goyim courts like the Par’o Torah example. Liberty for Israelites – to establish Courts of righteous justice which make fair restitution of damages: inflicted by Jews upon other Jews — the tiqqun of hatred without cause. The UN chatter box gossip Women’s Quilting & Terrorist Society prioritizes an eternal UNWRA Balestinian refugee status and right of return; rather than ever condemn the failure of all Arab countries Vichy Nazi\Muff Mufti duplication of Nazism; their refusal to repatriate their dhimmi refugee populations. Like the post Shoah disgrace of Spain who invites Jews back to that despicable European land. Israeli right of return, in fact awarded citizenship to the almost 1 million Jewish refugees violently expelled from Arab countries after the Nakab defeat of Allah and 5 Arab Armies and British/French attempts to re-establish a great power mandate over the Middle East.

Bottom line: Jewish self-determination, understood through Torah, Yovel, Sanhedrin justice, and restoration of the twelve-tribe polity, simply not dependent on UN approval. UN attempts to subordinated Jewish self determination to politically compromised international institutions reflects the revisionist history which denies that Israel won its TWO Independence Wars of ’48 & ’67. To the victors go the spoils; also known as Israeli ‘Manifest Destiny’ – from the river to the Sea’ the Republic of 12 Tribes shall rule the land through righteous justice-Yovel.

This premise requires proof: [Daraus folgt jedoch nicht automatisch, dass diese Normen heute die positive Rechtsordnung zwischen souveränen Staaten bilden.] Dhimmi Arab refugees not a State. Never has ever existed an Arab Balestinian state. [Art. 1 Abs. 2 nennt ausdrücklich die Selbstbestimmung der Völker.] All Arab wars against Israel center upon Arab rejection of Article 1(2) – yet the UN only condemns Israel?! What’s good for the goose Good for the Gander. Now that Syria in a state of anarchy, Israel needs to export all dhimmi ’67 Arab refugee populations to Syria, seeing that the Romans originally coined Syrian-Palestine!

Palestine ceased to exist in 1948. UN attempts to declare it remains as false as Arafat’s PLO charter of 1964; which only declares ’48 Israel as “occupied territory”. To say the comparison of Israeli Independence does not stand upon the similar precedent of American Independence – as to simplistic … easier to be a critic than a playwright dramatist than a post Shoah Jew. Jordan “acquired” the West Bank through force and Egypt acquired Gaza through force. Prussia acquired through force split between Poland and Russia today. These proof emphatically reject British-Frogs UN 242 “prohibition against acquiring territory by force”. Post 6 Day War UN gossip – 242 – falls flat on its face when confronted by the Khartoum Arab League: No peace with Israel; No recognition of Israel; No negotiations with Israel. The Women’s Quilting and Terrorist Society – Stitch N’ Bitch – their Resolutions simply gusts of 3379 farts in the wind.

Prophetic mussar does not stand upon history anymore that Avram who had no children but who cut a Oath Alliance to father – in the future – the chosen Cohen nation. This nation aint Xtianity or Islam religious theological bull shit. The language of גר לא תונה ולא תלחצנו, כי גרים הייתם בארץ מצרים, this p’suk refers to the Ger Toshav when the 12 Tribes rejoice in Liberty through Sanhedrin lateral common law courts. This has yet to actually “historically” to happen; any more than Herzl’s “The Jewish State” happened in his lifetime! Jews in the barbaric g’lut lands of Egypt (לאו דוקא) in the past 2000+ years of our g’lut among Europeans and Muslims never received judicial righteous justice from any Goy court of Law any more than when the ancient Israelites – the ‘Star-Courts’ of Par’o – sanctified “impressment” through illegal slavery on the High Seas/International Waters! Goyim have never accepted the Torah. Therefore Goyim cannot employ Torah translations to rebuke Israel to heel and roll over and play dead like a trained dog. Goyim simply not under the Law according to the Apostle Paul.

Dhimmi Arab dune coon-towel heads cannot even pronounce the P in the Roman word Palestine! Israel a tiny desert land about the size of New Jersey. Arab and Muslim countries include a land mass bigger than the United States. Goyim evil eye toward Israel reflects a gospel ‘Divide and Rule’ bull shit. Pakistan, Korea, Vietnam and Saddam’s attempt to nationalize Kuwait but ejected by the post 9\11 False flag attack wherein Cheney and his dog on a leash Bush (wag your tail) justified not only the disastrous invasions of Iraq but Afghanistan and who also imposed the Patriot Act upon the American people which negated to a very large degree the Bill of Rights. (Whom Bush famously declared: Don’t quote me the Constitution, its just a God damn piece of paper.) That child molester Bush (President Clinton – also know as the fuck between the Bush’s) promised “NO Nation Building”! Government rhetoric amounts to bull shit and so does UN morality.

I want to thank Gamma Hans for our on going discussions why the UN – a bloody rag. His objections has caused me to publish to other very intelligent Goyim believers why the NT and Koran equally bloody rags.

Alabastersky greetings

As a Zionist, consider myself an atheist praise G-d. The theology bull shit of g’lut and Goyim does not interest me any more than Goyim attempting to inform Israelis of their own living history. Simply a crock of shit for Goyim in distant lands to read translations and pretend themselves experts on subjects as alien to them personally as living on the Planet Mars!

The German Gamma Hans continually demands “nuance”. Yet he quotes 17b of מגילה, divorced from its Mishna – hardly qualifies as “nuance”; but more like bobbing for apples in a barrel. The Gemara sugya – the first study of precedents to learn a depth analysis of הקורא את המגילה למפרע, לא יצא. קראהּ על פה, קראהּ תרגום, בכל לשון, לא יצא.

This first sugya a kabbalah sugya which prioritizes the 32 middot of inductive reasoning through precedent study of Rabbi Yossi Haglili – a third generation Tana, and one of the Sages of Yavneh following the Roman destruction of Herod Temple abomination. His reliance upon Chat AI only can translate words. Common law requires learning through precedents. Had he observed the Mishna which the first sugya of Gemara introduces inductive precedent comparisons to make a depth analysis of this specific Mishna – directly defines how to regard a translation to some other language.

Hence “Similarly problematic is the claim that Xtianity and Islam etc” A) they rely solely upon translations and B) Both openly deny the Oral Torah masoret! 7th Century CE measured from Ezra and the Men of the Great Assembly over a 1000 years distanct! By the Hebrew year of 2448 Jewish masoret places the event of the Sinai revelation. The Jewish count usually aligns the Ezra’s arrival about the Hebrew year of 3408. In the traditional Jewish timeline, this aligns with roughly 358 BCE (though secular history often places Artaxerxes I later, around 458 BCE, the traditional count shortens the Persian period). The timeline of 350–400 years after the First Temple’s destruction (traditionally dated to 3338 / 422 BCE in the Jewish calendar, though secular history says 586 BCE), consistent with the traditional view that the Second Temple stood for roughly 420 years. Hence approximately 900 to 1000 years.

The first word of the Torah בראשית contains ברית אש. What’s the Fire of the Brit? The 2nd Parsha of ספר בראשית — נח. Mesechta Sanhedrin learns the cause of the floods to sworn false oaths. ברית understood as “alliance”; the 12 Tribes forged a brit alliance to establish the 1st Republic. In similar vein the United States and the USSR — both Republics as were the ancient Greek Islands! To swear a Torah brit requires שם ומלכות based upon the precedent of blessings (a תולדות of oaths). His reliance upon Greek deductive logic rejected by the lights of Hanukkah.

Mishnah Megillah 2:1, because the opening sugya develops the Mishnah’s rule that reading the Megillah למפרע (“out of order”) does not fulfill the obligation, and that reading it orally, in translation, or in another language may likewise fail to fulfill it. The Mishnah – therefore part of the interpretive precedent, not merely background. His “shock” that the church abomination counterfeit detests the Oral Torah codified in the Talmud does not stand before the 1242 public burning of all Talmud hand-written manuscripts across France!

The wisdom of פרדס he does not have any education therein. The Bereshit–brit esh observation introduced aint a letter-based derash but rather a רמז – words within words! Like ראש בית ב’ ראשית which the Vulgate Latin and later vulgar Protestant bible translations totally ignore. Furthermore Aramaic very close to Hebrew. The Targum Onkelos if you don’t know the Hebrew word a person can count the Aramaic word for word 1:1 precision. The Greek and Latin language do not resemble Hebrew Aramaic any more than JeZeus has Yichus or the Goy Muhammad a prophet. Xtianity’s rejection of rabbinic culture and custom started way back with the letters of Paul which predate the Gospels themselves!

The cultures and customs of Greece and Rome share nothing with Hebrew culture and customs. Agape “love” does not mean the love contained within the language of קריא שמע, any more than the translation of covenant implies even remotely the oath alliance obligations of cutting a brit as a wisdom time-oriented Torah commandment.

Constitutional Common law courts

What’s the major Torah theme that connects all NaCH Books? You have never even asked this basic fundamental question! Specifically how the NaCH flows from Yehoshua to Shoftim to Shmuel to M’lachim then to the major and minor prophets! Pathetic shallow reactionary reading does not amount to squat. How the Books of the Holy Writings starting with T’hillem etc refines and therein adjusts and interprets the k’vanna of NaCH prophets. This fundamental basis defines the relationship between the Mishna and the later Gemara.

The flow from Yehoshua through M’lachim to the Prophets – not merely a history of rising and falling kingdoms. The mussar theme instructs a continuous common law/legalism understood as the k’vanna of Yovel and brit melah זמן גרמא מצוות. This critical “nuance” both forgery NT and Koran “religions” pervert judicial common law courts unto theological religious belief systems.

Sanhedrin common law legalism rejects Greek logic formats due to their rigid deductive syllogism reasoning. Chag Hanukkah the P’rushim (The teachers of the Oral Torah masoret passed down to the rabbis, as expressed & codified in the Talmud; the nuance of the Talmud – that inductive logic, the nature of fluid dynamic reasoning defines the k’vanna of Oral Torah.), dedicated to only interpret the k’vanna of Torah זמן גרמא מצוות through the logic of Oral Torah reasoning!

Observance of Torah commandments לשמה defined as the pursuit of justice among our people. Justice has nothing to do with theological religious belief systems. The latter defines statute law codes established by Rambam and Karo in g’lut. The former’s statute law halachic code published after the massacre of German Jews by the crusaders and the latter’s statute law halachic code published prior to Western European Jewry forced into ghetto gulags for 3 Centuries.

According to the “path” the interpretation of אמת/eighth Oral Torah middah, זמן גרמא מצוות define the k’vanna of ברית אש\בראשית/ based upon the interpretation of the aggada of בראשית as introducing the Torah vision of אב זמן גרמא מצוות ותולדות קום ועשה ושב ולא תעשה מצוות. Where the toldot Torah commandments function as בניני אבות to “understand” (Discern like from like – such as t’ruma for the Cohonim to 10th dedicated to Levi and Chol dedicated to Israel.), the k’vanna of all זמן גרמא מצוות. Yovel a Torah commandment no g’lut Jew can keep. The Books of the NaCH & Holy Writings teach the theme that all the generations of the 1st Republic failed to keep the Yovel!

Hence the relationship of the Holy Writings to the NaCH prophets duplicated by the replica relationship between the Mishna and Gemara. The Book of דברים\משנה תורה introduces Torah as “common law/legislative review through the Sanhedrin court system”. Hence the Mishna – written some 75 years after the disaster of the Bar Kochba revolts where Rome renamed Judea unto Palestine-Syria directly compares to the k’vanna of Herzl’s Jewish State. Just as the latter does not bemoan the past so too the former; the Mishna and its later “holy writings” Gemara serves as the model vision when Israel rules Canaan and the nation lives through judicial justice wherein the Sanhedrin courts make fair restitution of damages inflicted by Jews upon Jews and terminates “hatred without cause” which the Talmud equates with Av tumah avoda zarah/Golden Calf.

T’shuva does not mean regret/repentance but rather the burden/obligation to remember the oaths sworn by the Avot wherein they cut the Torah brit of they alone as the Avot of the brit chosen people. The “shallow” reactionary bible reading made by sophomoric translations makes the gross error teaching bible as a linear history of moral decline which describes the plight of all mankind as “Original Sin of Adam”! A perversion only equaled by Goyim Legislatures validating that homosexuals have equal rights.

Why the Yeshiva education system stinks.

Made aliya back in ’91.  Called myself an atheist – praise HaShem, even while living in Oklahoma.  My family about 7 generations of lawyers & judges.  I personally despise the Yeshiva whose sh’itta of education made famous by Reshonim g’lut Jewry, employed to instruct Jewish children in Israel today.  Just as the mitzva of Shabbat requires making הבדלה which differentiates between מלאכה from עבודה so too and how much more so study and teaching of Torah requires making הבדלה which separates Common law from Statute law.  Alas, Yeshivah students which have crossed my path never taught that Shabbat means week, not the 7th Day of the week, as 7th day Adventists falsely teach!  

The Torah opens with מעשה בראשית – Yeshiva educated Jews never ask WHY?  Its simply not an issue of translating words from Hebrew\Aramaic to English.  The Rambam, his Yad-code basically translated the complex Hebrew Aramaic Talmud unto Hebrew – based upon the language of the Mishna.  The Steinsaltz talmud and Art Scroll translations follow the path set by that Reshon.  The impact upon the Torah world of the Rambam “translations” of Halacha into a simplified Hebrew most probably saved the language of Hebrew from going the way of Catholic Latin – a dead language. But his statute law code turned post Bar Kachba Mishnaic courtroom common law ideal for the future time when Jews conquer the Homeland and restore the pursuit of justice as our Sinai faith unto a static set of halachic religious laws – a belief system – in this sense: no different from Xtian and Islamic theologies.

The times for the Reshonim, cursed g’lut Jewry – exceptionally harsh.  The Romans scattered Jewry following the Bar Kochba revolt to the 4 winds of the empire.  Goyim barbarians in all cursed g’lut lands both Xtiandom and Islamic – like Spain, made forced conversions, forced population transfers akin to the ’48 Jews thrown out of all Arab countries!  The Reshonim scholars confronted harsh realities on the ground; Jewish settlements tiny & scattered and people during the period, where the Roman road system had collapsed, the Dark Ages, rarely traveled.  Spanish Jews – Rambam and Ibn Ezra, the latter fled for his life – from Spain, his son converted to Islam.  While the former too fled from the anarchy and chaos of the collapsing Islamic civilization unto Egypt; his brother drowned at sea!

Why did the Torah open with בראשית?  That Sefer has few Torah commandments: fruitful and multiply, brit melah, gid hanasheh, the טיפש פשט big 3!  But most commentators fail to grasp, (akin to the apostle Paul) that the Torah instructs prophetic mussar through repeated themes.  As most reform or conservative rabbis utterly numb. The Hebrew Siddur – an unrecognized Primary Source for Talmudic and Midrashic scholarship!  This sefer builds upon סמוכים, which requires a discerning eye.  The Siddur stands upon Sefer בראשית; it opens with תמיד מעשה בראשית – twice repeated in the first blessing for the שחרית קריא שמע.  That critical phrase answers the opening question of this paragraph.  The creation aggadah introduces the theme of Torah “wisdom” known as זמן גרמא מצוות. Shabbat as week distinguishes between לא תעשה מלאכה from תעשה מלאכה through k’vanna.

The bi-polar Rambam ספר המצוות in its טיפש פשט literalism, divides Torah commandments to positive and negative camps.  The B’hag by stark contrast, his introduction discerns between Av from toldot commandments; like both mesechta Shabbat and Baba Kama ask the question  התולדות הולכים אחרי אבות? Just as quality scholarship separates between Primary from Secondary sources – a Ph”D from a bachelor degree. The Sages distinguished between Torah from NaCH from Writings … Mishna from Gemara, so too and how much more so down stream generations of Yiddishkeit likewise required to respect this masoret of scholarship. The B’HaG recognized T’NaCH\Talmudic common law. The Rambam’s statute law effectively blew out the lights of Hanukka; wherein the P’rushim defeated the assimilated ערב רב Tzeddukim. Perhaps based upon the בנין אב of blowing the shofar; this mitzva of blowing the Shofar – a חכמה – the Rif made the chiddush that a person could blow the Shofar on shabbat before his Court!

The term מלאכה refers to Av Torah commandments – time-oriented commandments – which require k’vanna. Toldot commandments and halachot learned separately – as does the statute law code of the Rambam and the Shulkan Aruch – do not require k’vanna. For example: What constitutes as תפילה דאורייתא vs. תפילה דרבנן also ודוי דאורייתא vs ודוי דרבנן? The Rambam harshly criticized in his Introduction שרש ראשון the B’HaG who ruled תפילה דאורייתא! Yet in Rambam’s 5th positive commandment, he too ruled tefillah a mitzva from the Torah! B’HaG learned Hanukkah, a mitzva from the Torah which the Rambam likewise considered absurd. How did the last of the Gaonim scholars “confuse” rabbinic commandments? The Talmud refers to Hannuka מחובר and the Baali Tosafot refers to קריאת שמע likewise as מחובר. The Av Torah זמן גרמא מצוות – מחובר.

The Baali Tosafot refers to the mitzva of ק”ש as מחובר; meaning time-oriented commandments. The B’HaG refers to the lighting the lights of Hanukkah as a מצוה דאורייתא; meaning זמן גרמא מצוות. The statute codes by contrast err and interpret through a טיפש פשט “time” understood in the literal sense. חכמה defined as זמן גרמא מצוות – חמובר. Whereas תולדות מצוות לא צריך כוונה… זמן גרמא מצוות מחובר לחכמה מן התורה. Just as Shabbat means “week” and not a day in a week, so too and how much more so בראשית introduces the theme of זמן גרמא מצוות as Av tohor commandments and not the World created in 6 days טיפש פשט.

The זמן גרמא only a משל which requires making the logical דיוק נמשל. Not literally “time as in watch”, but Torah wisdom as the נמשל of the משל of זמן גרמא מצוות. Hence to both the B’HaG and the Baali Tosafot: where the Baali Tosafot refers to the mitzva of ק”ש as מחובר; meaning time-oriented commandments. The B’HaG refers to the lighting the lights of Hanukkah as a מצוה דאורייתא; meaning זמן גרמא מצוות. The statute codes by contrast err and interpret through a טיפש פשט “time”, understood in the sophomoric – literal sense. חכמה defined as זמן גרמא מצוות – חמובר. Whereas תולדות מצוות לא צריך כוונה… זמן גרמא מצוות מחובר לחכמה מן התורה. The Av בנין אב for all זמן גרמא מצוות … תמיד מעשה בראשית. Sefer בראשית opens with the Central Torah theme of Av tohor time-oriented commandments. Whereas the Books of שמות ויקרא ובמדבר instruct בניני אבות תולדות מצוות. As these secondary commandments – when attached by means of inductive פרדס inductive reason logic to other similar Case/Din rulings (both in the literature of the T’NaCH prophetic mussar and Talmud ritual halacha) this חכמה compares to the two sights of a rifle which permits the prophets to “shoot” their mussar to all generations of the Chosen Cohen People. Herein defines the warp/weft halachic-aggadic relationship which permits the generations of Israel to make aliya from g’lut toldot commandments to Av tohor זמן גרמא מצוות בארץ ישראל.

The זמן גרמא only a משל which requires making the logical דיוק נמשל. Not literally “time as in watch”, but Torah wisdom as the נמשל of the משל of all זמן גרמא מצוות. Hence the B’HaG and Baali Tosafot, specifically the Rabbeinu Tam most likely, מחובר…חכמה “joined/attached” to that חכמה מן התורה which requires k’vanna. Translating the term עדיף\מחובר misses the point all together. This term refers to the distinction between Av Torah commandments – which require k’vanna from toldot commandments which do not require k’vanna. Hence תפילה דאורייתא that’s ק”ש. The Siddur through סמוכים affixes ק”ש to Shemone Esrei דרבנן.

Brought this example as a proof that T’NaCH and Talmud BOTH command common law legalism which learn through judicial precedents. Translating simply misses the boat and qualifies as a לא לשמה Torah curse, based upon the בנין אב of the 1st Sinai commandment. G’lut Jews cannot keep the Yovel – impossible; no different from the slaves beaten by order of Par’o vertical courtrooms (Star Courts which justified impressment of American sailors seized by British warships on the High Seas). G’lut Yidden got religion through the statute halachic codifications.

Only in Israel can Jews sanctify צדק צדק תרדוף; prior to the Oct 7th 2023 Abomination War, Israelis confronted a judicial crisis! Can Israel achieve self-determination and affix the 12 Tribes to the re-conquered lands of Canaan and therein re-establish our Constitutional Republic wherein the Torah mandates only Federal Sanhedrin courts which possess the mandate to rules the Tribal “legislatures” and Knesset Central Government statute laws through משנה תורה-Legislative Review?

Religious טיפש פשט literalism sucks

The Pauline “original sin” of Adam such a bull shit model. Why? Torah spins around the central axis of justice/injustice. The “fruits” of knowlege of Good and Evil, validates that both Adam Cain and the 10 generation thereafter all pursued “evil”. But the term “evil” does not mean “sin” as the NT counterfeit substitutes for evil. The Pauline model of “Original Sin” and “Salvation”, exposes a fundamental perversion of the Torah’s choice-and-consequence framework, leading to theological and moral failure define av tuma avoda zara expressed by the pervert religions of Xtianity and Islam – both guilty of substituting “Nakba” Gods as the saviors of Israel in Egypt.

Evil has its consequences. The jealous brothers of Yosef sold their “brother” into slavery! This evil cause the House of Yaacov to go into Egyptian g’lut! The exact same theme as Adam and Noach! The latter cursed the first born son of Ham! The 6 against 6 blessings vs curses sworn at Sh’Cem by the 12 Tribes of Israel obeys the blessing curse Torah which Moshe commanded Yehoshua to do – upon bringing the chosen Cohen people into the land of Canaan. Herein defines the k’vanna of the Order of the Rabbeinu Tam tefillen.

JeZeus saves from sin – simply – bull shit. This foreign imported Nicene Creed g’lut caused – av tuma import; simply stated, has no portion with the first two Sinai commandments. Evil called sin by the NT fraud – a perversion on par with Brit called covenant by both counterfeit religions! Shalom, based upon the shabbat 3 meals, stands upon trust. Peace a noun has no direct connection to the trust verb. Hence peace a fraudulent translation of shalom.

Every generation of Humanity experiences the fundamental הבדלה which separates Good from Evil; where ‘fear of heaven’ serves as the foundation of good and no ‘fear of heaven’ serves as the foundation of evil. Despite the NT fraud, “JeZeus saves from sin”, this foundation of the Torah, introduced in the opening פרקים of Sefer בראשית, defines the essence of “acceptance of the yoke of the kingdom of heaven” metaphor. Despite the revisionist av tuma avoda zarah theologies and their טיפש פשט which worships their own ‘world to come’ Pie in the Sky alien narishkeit belief systems. Any judge who hears a case before his court while holding strong beliefs pro or con, as corrupt as if he had accepted a bribe.

The Talmud publicly repudiates the JeZeus prayer which prays to ‘our Father in heaven’. The mitzva of tzitzit, (the 3rd פרק of the ק”ש תפילה דאורייתא), the aggada in ברכות commands the mussar that mitzvot sanctify only brit Israel now living בעולם הזה; Jews visiting their buried dead, halacha commands – tuck your tzitzit into your pockets. The tohor\\\…///tumah prototype mirror of the Tree of Knowledge of Good & Evil; the Torah נמשל for this Torah משל, akin to two branches of one tree. This archetype blue-print the counterfeit religions totally fail to grasp; tuma does not mean “SIN”.

The foreign paradigm of “Sin” perverts the Torah connection of g’lut to tumah. Both bible and koran ignore judicial injustice which fails to make fair restitution of damages as the תקון for hatred without cause, as the av tuma middot consequences of the Torah curse of g’lut. The KJT bible perverts tuma as “unclean”. The koran fails to grasp that camel a tumah animal on par with pigs. The birth of children does not make a woman “unclean”; simply because fruitful and multiply serves as the – so to speak – first born child of all wisdom\time-oriented commandments!

The tohor-tuma vision fits hand-in-glove with the blessing/curse opening Sinai commandments which all Israel (alone) accepted at Sinai; Moshe Rabbeinu in the closing Parsha of ויקרא and repeated – in further detail – in דברים; the Parsha publicly read prior to ר”ה – these two “Crowns” of oath brit לשמה מלכות responsibility. They define prophetic mussar ברית חדש understood by rabbi Yechuda as בכל לבבך\כם in the ק”ש תפילה דאורייתא, the opening paragraph – blessing and the 2nd paragraph – cursing. Whose 3rd פרק defines this mitzva as a time-oriented commandment “sworn oath/brit”. Such a Torah oath brit absolutely & most essentially entails מלכות לשמה. A king accepts responsibility for the actions of his nation.

Actions have consequences like ripples after a stone thrown into a pond. Post the Bar Kochba revolt Rome renamed Judea to Palestine-Syria, and cast the Jewish people back unto Egypt – a לאו דוקא metaphor for av tuma g’lut. Post Shoah, both church & mosque – destroyed their ‘good name’ reputations. Their bemoaning their own g’lut consequences with ‘true Xtians or Muslims blah bhah’ excuses, screams “we do not accept the consequences of our actions, made by the generations of our faith”; we have no God because our Gods proven utterly be dead. Where was JeZeus during the Shoah of European Jewry by Xtian monsters? (Europe a self proclaimed Xtian society since Constantine!) Where was Nakba Allah during post WWII repeated attempts to throw the Jews into the Sea – to complete the Nazi Shoah in the Middle East?

Both fraud faiths NT or Koran embrace inherited guilt rather than cause and effect consequences of knowledge of Good and Evil; rational consciousness of choice, despite the dogma of ‘Free Will’, shares no part with modern Nazism notions of racial DNA models. “The fathers have eaten sour grapes, and the children’s teeth are set on edge”, that prophet’s mussar explicitly rejected. Yehezkel instructs the נמשל that all generations must confront the Havdalah, Good/Evil -understanding: the consequences of ones’ actions either sanctifies a good name reputation or destroys and profanes a good name reputation. Declarations of faith in a theologically created abracadabra Tawhid Monotheistic Universal God do not and cannot change the consequences of unjust actions through condemnations of dead generations guilty identical crimes, committed by each and every generation their after!

A person can become tuma without “sin”, ba’al keri or metzora serve as witness. In the Book of מלכים metzora folk informed the king that the Assyrian Army had fled which immediately terminated the famine within the city, consequent to the siege. The Pauline Grace/Forgiveness dynamic has no portion in Torah faith just as brit melah and Torah common law has no portion with any church or mosque rule of law or “eirene” – granted by faith in a Hercules (Man\god) savior or some Muhammad who claim himself a prophet without wisdom how the Torah defines this key term. Prophets not mystics whose visions foresee future events. Prophets not witches whose magic speaks to the dead. The Book of Daniel not included in the NaCH prophets because even tohor mysticism such as expressed through Daniel and Zohar and Ari mysticism does not qualify as נבואה

Tzitzit do not learn from any worship of wood and stone grand Temples in Jerusalem! Tzitzit, this wisdom commandment learns from the כלל of Tents established by the Mishkan “revelation”; כלל: if a person dies under a tent – all within the tent become tumah. Covering the head with the tzitzit tallit “Amidah” interprets the k’vanna of tzitzit as mussar. The wisdom commandment of tzitzit elevates all mitzvot and halachot under this Mishkan like “tent” unto wisdom/time\oriented Torah Av commandments.

The NT “JeZeus” who “saves from sin” but allows ghetto gulags, Inquisition & shoah – simply a logical contradiction on par with the Nakba defeat of Allah whose peoples religiously affirm the Nazi Shoah as their ideal. The Calvinist dotrine of ‘predetermination’ & Lutheran ‘free will’ protestant faiths as corrupt and false as Pope Pius XII watching the Nazi SS herd the Jews of Rome to the death camps … followed up by the post war Rat-lines and pogroms! The NT’s “Original Sin” and “Salvation from Sin” model of faith – a fundamental perversion of the Torah’s “Choice and Consequence” model.