What do you call a Heatwave in Antarctica?

What are the arguments for and against disbanding the United Nations?

Against disbanding the UN-Nations. Disbanding this vile corrupt piece of shit alas would force the community of nations to take responsibility to prevent and manage conflicts limited to their immediate border nations. Disbanding this utterly disgusting abomination would remove a public forum where international mobs could pervert diplomacy. Like as did the bureaucrats of England France and Germany who boycotted the Israeli PM’s speech before the full General Assembly.

Disbanding this stinky pile of shit UN-nations would force transnational problems, meaning the spread of economic, political, and cultural processes beyond national borders. As if nations cannot establish economic alliances with other nations?! Disbanding this voodoo UN-nations pretend World Government to regulate and manage living conditions, education, and gender equality worldwide LOL. As if nation states do not have the mandate of their own people to do these exact responsibilities?!

Disbanding the UN-nations abhorrent corruption in the Security Council where nations like France, who lost WWII, pretend that they qualify as a Great Power in World politics. Or the insane notion that nations states base their international strategic foreign policies upon what a plurality of folks whose nations do not even hold diplomatic relations with one another should determine the strategic foreign policies of nation states simply because the number of nations sitting in the Security Council has increased from 5 to 15 permanent Security Council seats!

Disbanding the UN-nations vomit puke of bureaucrapic inefficiency, political divisions, and the arrogant veto power wielded by permanent members of the Security Council who face down the screaming lynch mobs in the name of sacred “democracy”. The idea that Global Challenges collectively based upon emotional mob majority of international opinions – utterly absurd.

Issues like climate change, pandemics, and poverty have plagued Mankind long before Wilson’s post WWI League of Nations. Senator Long rightly opposed this notion that foreign nations should behave like dogs and sniff the butts of other nations. The government of a civilization, when confronted by an international problem, even crisis can agree to work together with other governments of foreign nations to manage these problems. The very idea that 193 nations can hold a consensus on how best to pick their noses – utterly absurd. Nation-States form economic and military alliances for the purpose to mutually address the need to establish a common consensus between themselves.

Disbanding the UN-nations Socialism whose political rhetoric propaganda labels as: collective efforts toward peace … essential to cut this bs and flush it down the toilet. Global cooperation has never existed in the whole of Human history. The stench of the pie in the sky lies that some UN-nations could accomplish the absurd by propaganda and political rhetoric – simply criminal behaviour.

The UN-nations poop in matters of Trade, development programs, or humanitarian aid – just a joke. The United States is the largest single provider of humanitarian assistance worldwide. The notion of global cooperation – just empty rhetoric propaganda on par with television evangelists who raise criminal amounts of money for themselves! The UN-nations does nothing for “global stability” and other such pie in the sky propaganda rhetoric.

That which is crooked can never be made straight. The idea of reforming the UN-nations compares to Male Masturbation for that man to make himself pregnant. The idea of efforts to improve transparency, accountability, and efficiency an utter contradiction in the face of totally unaccountable bureaucraps who only want to keep their cushy jobs. Why the UN-nations should not be immediately disbanded and treated as a used menstruating bloody rag? Simply have no reasonable answer.

On the Fence

What are the arguments for and against disbanding the United Nations?

Against disbanding the UN-Nations. Disbanding this vile corrupt piece of shit alas would force the community of nations to take responsibility to prevent and manage conflicts limited to their immediate border nations. Disbanding this utterly disgusting abomination would remove a public forum where international mobs could pervert diplomacy. Like as did the bureaucrats of England France and Germany who boycotted the Israeli PM’s speech before the full General Assembly.

Disbanding this stinky pile of shit UN-nations would force transnational problems, meaning the spread of economic, political, and cultural processes beyond national borders. As if nations cannot establish economic alliances with other nations?! Disbanding this voodoo UN-nations pretend World Government to regulate and manage living conditions, education, and gender equality worldwide LOL. As if nation states do not have the mandate of their own people to do these exact responsibilities?!

Disbanding the UN-nations abhorrent corruption in the Security Council where nations like France, who lost WWII, pretend that they qualify as a Great Power in World politics. Or the insane notion that nations states base their international strategic foreign policies upon what a plurality of folks whose nations do not even hold diplomatic relations with one another should determine the strategic foreign policies of nation states simply because the number of nations sitting in the Security Council has increased from 5 to 15 permanent Security Council seats!

Disbanding the UN-nations vomit puke of bureaucrapic inefficiency, political divisions, and the arrogant veto power wielded by permanent members of the Security Council who face down the screaming lynch mobs in the name of sacred “democracy”. The idea that Global Challenges collectively based upon emotional mob majority of international opinions – utterly absurd.

Issues like climate change, pandemics, and poverty have plagued Mankind long before Wilson’s post WWI League of Nations. Senator Long rightly opposed this notion that foreign nations should behave like dogs and sniff the butts of other nations. The government of a civilization, when confronted by an international problem, even crisis can agree to work together with other governments of foreign nations to manage these problems. The very idea that 193 nations can hold a consensus on how best to pick their noses – utterly absurd. Nation-States form economic and military alliances for the purpose to mutually address the need to establish a common consensus between themselves.

Disbanding the UN-nations Socialism whose political rhetoric propaganda labels as: collective efforts toward peace … essential to cut this bs and flush it down the toilet. Global cooperation has never existed in the whole of Human history. The stench of the pie in the sky lies that some UN-nations could accomplish the absurd by propaganda and political rhetoric – simply criminal behaviour.

The UN-nations poop in matters of Trade, development programs, or humanitarian aid – just a joke. The United States is the largest single provider of humanitarian assistance worldwide. The notion of global cooperation – just empty rhetoric propaganda on par with television evangelists who raise criminal amounts of money for themselves! The UN-nations does nothing for “global stability” and other such pie in the sky propaganda rhetoric.

That which is crooked can never be made straight. The idea of reforming the UN-nations compares to Male Masturbation for that man to make himself pregnant. The idea of efforts to improve transparency, accountability, and efficiency an utter contradiction in the face of totally unaccountable bureaucraps who only want to keep their cushy jobs. Why the UN-nations should not be immediately disbanded and treated as a used menstruating bloody rag? Simply have no reasonable answer.

Good People Doing Good Things — Skip!

What are the arguments for and against disbanding the United Nations?

Against disbanding the UN-Nations. Disbanding this vile corrupt piece of shit alas would force the community of nations to take responsibility to prevent and manage conflicts limited to their immediate border nations. Disbanding this utterly disgusting abomination would remove a public forum where international mobs could pervert diplomacy. Like as did the bureaucrats of England France and Germany who boycotted the Israeli PM’s speech before the full General Assembly.

Disbanding this stinky pile of shit UN-nations would force transnational problems, meaning the spread of economic, political, and cultural processes beyond national borders. As if nations cannot establish economic alliances with other nations?! Disbanding this voodoo UN-nations pretend World Government to regulate and manage living conditions, education, and gender equality worldwide LOL. As if nation states do not have the mandate of their own people to do these exact responsibilities?!

Disbanding the UN-nations abhorrent corruption in the Security Council where nations like France, who lost WWII, pretend that they qualify as a Great Power in World politics. Or the insane notion that nations states base their international strategic foreign policies upon what a plurality of folks whose nations do not even hold diplomatic relations with one another should determine the strategic foreign policies of nation states simply because the number of nations sitting in the Security Council has increased from 5 to 15 permanent Security Council seats!

Disbanding the UN-nations vomit puke of bureaucrapic inefficiency, political divisions, and the arrogant veto power wielded by permanent members of the Security Council who face down the screaming lynch mobs in the name of sacred “democracy”. The idea that Global Challenges collectively based upon emotional mob majority of international opinions – utterly absurd.

Issues like climate change, pandemics, and poverty have plagued Mankind long before Wilson’s post WWI League of Nations. Senator Long rightly opposed this notion that foreign nations should behave like dogs and sniff the butts of other nations. The government of a civilization, when confronted by an international problem, even crisis can agree to work together with other governments of foreign nations to manage these problems. The very idea that 193 nations can hold a consensus on how best to pick their noses – utterly absurd. Nation-States form economic and military alliances for the purpose to mutually address the need to establish a common consensus between themselves.

Disbanding the UN-nations Socialism whose political rhetoric propaganda labels as: collective efforts toward peace … essential to cut this bs and flush it down the toilet. Global cooperation has never existed in the whole of Human history. The stench of the pie in the sky lies that some UN-nations could accomplish the absurd by propaganda and political rhetoric – simply criminal behaviour.

The UN-nations poop in matters of Trade, development programs, or humanitarian aid – just a joke. The United States is the largest single provider of humanitarian assistance worldwide. The notion of global cooperation – just empty rhetoric propaganda on par with television evangelists who raise criminal amounts of money for themselves! The UN-nations does nothing for “global stability” and other such pie in the sky propaganda rhetoric.

That which is crooked can never be made straight. The idea of reforming the UN-nations compares to Male Masturbation for that man to make himself pregnant. The idea of efforts to improve transparency, accountability, and efficiency an utter contradiction in the face of totally unaccountable bureaucraps who only want to keep their cushy jobs. Why the UN-nations should not be immediately disbanded and treated as a used menstruating bloody rag? Simply have no reasonable answer.

Alex Salmond R.I.P.

What are the arguments for and against disbanding the United Nations?

Against disbanding the UN-Nations. Disbanding this vile corrupt piece of shit alas would force the community of nations to take responsibility to prevent and manage conflicts limited to their immediate border nations. Disbanding this utterly disgusting abomination would remove a public forum where international mobs could pervert diplomacy. Like as did the bureaucrats of England France and Germany who boycotted the Israeli PM’s speech before the full General Assembly.

Disbanding this stinky pile of shit UN-nations would force transnational problems, meaning the spread of economic, political, and cultural processes beyond national borders. As if nations cannot establish economic alliances with other nations?! Disbanding this voodoo UN-nations pretend World Government to regulate and manage living conditions, education, and gender equality worldwide LOL. As if nation states do not have the mandate of their own people to do these exact responsibilities?!

Disbanding the UN-nations abhorrent corruption in the Security Council where nations like France, who lost WWII, pretend that they qualify as a Great Power in World politics. Or the insane notion that nations states base their international strategic foreign policies upon what a plurality of folks whose nations do not even hold diplomatic relations with one another should determine the strategic foreign policies of nation states simply because the number of nations sitting in the Security Council has increased from 5 to 15 permanent Security Council seats!

Disbanding the UN-nations vomit puke of bureaucrapic inefficiency, political divisions, and the arrogant veto power wielded by permanent members of the Security Council who face down the screaming lynch mobs in the name of sacred “democracy”. The idea that Global Challenges collectively based upon emotional mob majority of international opinions – utterly absurd.

Issues like climate change, pandemics, and poverty have plagued Mankind long before Wilson’s post WWI League of Nations. Senator Long rightly opposed this notion that foreign nations should behave like dogs and sniff the butts of other nations. The government of a civilization, when confronted by an international problem, even crisis can agree to work together with other governments of foreign nations to manage these problems. The very idea that 193 nations can hold a consensus on how best to pick their noses – utterly absurd. Nation-States form economic and military alliances for the purpose to mutually address the need to establish a common consensus between themselves.

Disbanding the UN-nations Socialism whose political rhetoric propaganda labels as: collective efforts toward peace … essential to cut this bs and flush it down the toilet. Global cooperation has never existed in the whole of Human history. The stench of the pie in the sky lies that some UN-nations could accomplish the absurd by propaganda and political rhetoric – simply criminal behaviour.

The UN-nations poop in matters of Trade, development programs, or humanitarian aid – just a joke. The United States is the largest single provider of humanitarian assistance worldwide. The notion of global cooperation – just empty rhetoric propaganda on par with television evangelists who raise criminal amounts of money for themselves! The UN-nations does nothing for “global stability” and other such pie in the sky propaganda rhetoric.

That which is crooked can never be made straight. The idea of reforming the UN-nations compares to Male Masturbation for that man to make himself pregnant. The idea of efforts to improve transparency, accountability, and efficiency an utter contradiction in the face of totally unaccountable bureaucraps who only want to keep their cushy jobs. Why the UN-nations should not be immediately disbanded and treated as a used menstruating bloody rag? Simply have no reasonable answer.

EDITORIAL – Nothing stays the same in the wonderful world of politics

What are the arguments for and against disbanding the United Nations?

Against disbanding the UN-Nations. Disbanding this vile corrupt piece of shit alas would force the community of nations to take responsibility to prevent and manage conflicts limited to their immediate border nations. Disbanding this utterly disgusting abomination would remove a public forum where international mobs could pervert diplomacy. Like as did the bureaucrats of England France and Germany who boycotted the Israeli PM’s speech before the full General Assembly.

Disbanding this stinky pile of shit UN-nations would force transnational problems, meaning the spread of economic, political, and cultural processes beyond national borders. As if nations cannot establish economic alliances with other nations?! Disbanding this voodoo UN-nations pretend World Government to regulate and manage living conditions, education, and gender equality worldwide LOL. As if nation states do not have the mandate of their own people to do these exact responsibilities?!

Disbanding the UN-nations abhorrent corruption in the Security Council where nations like France, who lost WWII, pretend that they qualify as a Great Power in World politics. Or the insane notion that nations states base their international strategic foreign policies upon what a plurality of folks whose nations do not even hold diplomatic relations with one another should determine the strategic foreign policies of nation states simply because the number of nations sitting in the Security Council has increased from 5 to 15 permanent Security Council seats!

Disbanding the UN-nations vomit puke of bureaucrapic inefficiency, political divisions, and the arrogant veto power wielded by permanent members of the Security Council who face down the screaming lynch mobs in the name of sacred “democracy”. The idea that Global Challenges collectively based upon emotional mob majority of international opinions – utterly absurd.

Issues like climate change, pandemics, and poverty have plagued Mankind long before Wilson’s post WWI League of Nations. Senator Long rightly opposed this notion that foreign nations should behave like dogs and sniff the butts of other nations. The government of a civilization, when confronted by an international problem, even crisis can agree to work together with other governments of foreign nations to manage these problems. The very idea that 193 nations can hold a consensus on how best to pick their noses – utterly absurd. Nation-States form economic and military alliances for the purpose to mutually address the need to establish a common consensus between themselves.

Disbanding the UN-nations Socialism whose political rhetoric propaganda labels as: collective efforts toward peace … essential to cut this bs and flush it down the toilet. Global cooperation has never existed in the whole of Human history. The stench of the pie in the sky lies that some UN-nations could accomplish the absurd by propaganda and political rhetoric – simply criminal behaviour.

The UN-nations poop in matters of Trade, development programs, or humanitarian aid – just a joke. The United States is the largest single provider of humanitarian assistance worldwide. The notion of global cooperation – just empty rhetoric propaganda on par with television evangelists who raise criminal amounts of money for themselves! The UN-nations does nothing for “global stability” and other such pie in the sky propaganda rhetoric.

That which is crooked can never be made straight. The idea of reforming the UN-nations compares to Male Masturbation for that man to make himself pregnant. The idea of efforts to improve transparency, accountability, and efficiency an utter contradiction in the face of totally unaccountable bureaucraps who only want to keep their cushy jobs. Why the UN-nations should not be immediately disbanded and treated as a used menstruating bloody rag? Simply have no reasonable answer.

secrets of ussr’s polygon nuclear test site

What are the arguments for and against disbanding the United Nations?

Against disbanding the UN-Nations. Disbanding this vile corrupt piece of shit alas would force the community of nations to take responsibility to prevent and manage conflicts limited to their immediate border nations. Disbanding this utterly disgusting abomination would remove a public forum where international mobs could pervert diplomacy. Like as did the bureaucrats of England France and Germany who boycotted the Israeli PM’s speech before the full General Assembly.

Disbanding this stinky pile of shit UN-nations would force transnational problems, meaning the spread of economic, political, and cultural processes beyond national borders. As if nations cannot establish economic alliances with other nations?! Disbanding this voodoo UN-nations pretend World Government to regulate and manage living conditions, education, and gender equality worldwide LOL. As if nation states do not have the mandate of their own people to do these exact responsibilities?!

Disbanding the UN-nations abhorrent corruption in the Security Council where nations like France, who lost WWII, pretend that they qualify as a Great Power in World politics. Or the insane notion that nations states base their international strategic foreign policies upon what a plurality of folks whose nations do not even hold diplomatic relations with one another should determine the strategic foreign policies of nation states simply because the number of nations sitting in the Security Council has increased from 5 to 15 permanent Security Council seats!

Disbanding the UN-nations vomit puke of bureaucrapic inefficiency, political divisions, and the arrogant veto power wielded by permanent members of the Security Council who face down the screaming lynch mobs in the name of sacred “democracy”. The idea that Global Challenges collectively based upon emotional mob majority of international opinions – utterly absurd.

Issues like climate change, pandemics, and poverty have plagued Mankind long before Wilson’s post WWI League of Nations. Senator Long rightly opposed this notion that foreign nations should behave like dogs and sniff the butts of other nations. The government of a civilization, when confronted by an international problem, even crisis can agree to work together with other governments of foreign nations to manage these problems. The very idea that 193 nations can hold a consensus on how best to pick their noses – utterly absurd. Nation-States form economic and military alliances for the purpose to mutually address the need to establish a common consensus between themselves.

Disbanding the UN-nations Socialism whose political rhetoric propaganda labels as: collective efforts toward peace … essential to cut this bs and flush it down the toilet. Global cooperation has never existed in the whole of Human history. The stench of the pie in the sky lies that some UN-nations could accomplish the absurd by propaganda and political rhetoric – simply criminal behaviour.

The UN-nations poop in matters of Trade, development programs, or humanitarian aid – just a joke. The United States is the largest single provider of humanitarian assistance worldwide. The notion of global cooperation – just empty rhetoric propaganda on par with television evangelists who raise criminal amounts of money for themselves! The UN-nations does nothing for “global stability” and other such pie in the sky propaganda rhetoric.

That which is crooked can never be made straight. The idea of reforming the UN-nations compares to Male Masturbation for that man to make himself pregnant. The idea of efforts to improve transparency, accountability, and efficiency an utter contradiction in the face of totally unaccountable bureaucraps who only want to keep their cushy jobs. Why the UN-nations should not be immediately disbanded and treated as a used menstruating bloody rag? Simply have no reasonable answer.

My Literary Journey Continues – Books #9 of 2024

What are the arguments for and against disbanding the United Nations?

Against disbanding the UN-Nations. Disbanding this vile corrupt piece of shit alas would force the community of nations to take responsibility to prevent and manage conflicts limited to their immediate border nations. Disbanding this utterly disgusting abomination would remove a public forum where international mobs could pervert diplomacy. Like as did the bureaucrats of England France and Germany who boycotted the Israeli PM’s speech before the full General Assembly.

Disbanding this stinky pile of shit UN-nations would force transnational problems, meaning the spread of economic, political, and cultural processes beyond national borders. As if nations cannot establish economic alliances with other nations?! Disbanding this voodoo UN-nations pretend World Government to regulate and manage living conditions, education, and gender equality worldwide LOL. As if nation states do not have the mandate of their own people to do these exact responsibilities?!

Disbanding the UN-nations abhorrent corruption in the Security Council where nations like France, who lost WWII, pretend that they qualify as a Great Power in World politics. Or the insane notion that nations states base their international strategic foreign policies upon what a plurality of folks whose nations do not even hold diplomatic relations with one another should determine the strategic foreign policies of nation states simply because the number of nations sitting in the Security Council has increased from 5 to 15 permanent Security Council seats!

Disbanding the UN-nations vomit puke of bureaucrapic inefficiency, political divisions, and the arrogant veto power wielded by permanent members of the Security Council who face down the screaming lynch mobs in the name of sacred “democracy”. The idea that Global Challenges collectively based upon emotional mob majority of international opinions – utterly absurd.

Issues like climate change, pandemics, and poverty have plagued Mankind long before Wilson’s post WWI League of Nations. Senator Long rightly opposed this notion that foreign nations should behave like dogs and sniff the butts of other nations. The government of a civilization, when confronted by an international problem, even crisis can agree to work together with other governments of foreign nations to manage these problems. The very idea that 193 nations can hold a consensus on how best to pick their noses – utterly absurd. Nation-States form economic and military alliances for the purpose to mutually address the need to establish a common consensus between themselves.

Disbanding the UN-nations Socialism whose political rhetoric propaganda labels as: collective efforts toward peace … essential to cut this bs and flush it down the toilet. Global cooperation has never existed in the whole of Human history. The stench of the pie in the sky lies that some UN-nations could accomplish the absurd by propaganda and political rhetoric – simply criminal behaviour.

The UN-nations poop in matters of Trade, development programs, or humanitarian aid – just a joke. The United States is the largest single provider of humanitarian assistance worldwide. The notion of global cooperation – just empty rhetoric propaganda on par with television evangelists who raise criminal amounts of money for themselves! The UN-nations does nothing for “global stability” and other such pie in the sky propaganda rhetoric.

That which is crooked can never be made straight. The idea of reforming the UN-nations compares to Male Masturbation for that man to make himself pregnant. The idea of efforts to improve transparency, accountability, and efficiency an utter contradiction in the face of totally unaccountable bureaucraps who only want to keep their cushy jobs. Why the UN-nations should not be immediately disbanded and treated as a used menstruating bloody rag? Simply have no reasonable answer.

The Atrocities of Being Right

What are the arguments for and against disbanding the United Nations?

Against disbanding the UN-Nations. Disbanding this vile corrupt piece of shit alas would force the community of nations to take responsibility to prevent and manage conflicts limited to their immediate border nations. Disbanding this utterly disgusting abomination would remove a public forum where international mobs could pervert diplomacy. Like as did the bureaucrats of England France and Germany who boycotted the Israeli PM’s speech before the full General Assembly.

Disbanding this stinky pile of shit UN-nations would force transnational problems, meaning the spread of economic, political, and cultural processes beyond national borders. As if nations cannot establish economic alliances with other nations?! Disbanding this voodoo UN-nations pretend World Government to regulate and manage living conditions, education, and gender equality worldwide LOL. As if nation states do not have the mandate of their own people to do these exact responsibilities?!

Disbanding the UN-nations abhorrent corruption in the Security Council where nations like France, who lost WWII, pretend that they qualify as a Great Power in World politics. Or the insane notion that nations states base their international strategic foreign policies upon what a plurality of folks whose nations do not even hold diplomatic relations with one another should determine the strategic foreign policies of nation states simply because the number of nations sitting in the Security Council has increased from 5 to 15 permanent Security Council seats!

Disbanding the UN-nations vomit puke of bureaucrapic inefficiency, political divisions, and the arrogant veto power wielded by permanent members of the Security Council who face down the screaming lynch mobs in the name of sacred “democracy”. The idea that Global Challenges collectively based upon emotional mob majority of international opinions – utterly absurd.

Issues like climate change, pandemics, and poverty have plagued Mankind long before Wilson’s post WWI League of Nations. Senator Long rightly opposed this notion that foreign nations should behave like dogs and sniff the butts of other nations. The government of a civilization, when confronted by an international problem, even crisis can agree to work together with other governments of foreign nations to manage these problems. The very idea that 193 nations can hold a consensus on how best to pick their noses – utterly absurd. Nation-States form economic and military alliances for the purpose to mutually address the need to establish a common consensus between themselves.

Disbanding the UN-nations Socialism whose political rhetoric propaganda labels as: collective efforts toward peace … essential to cut this bs and flush it down the toilet. Global cooperation has never existed in the whole of Human history. The stench of the pie in the sky lies that some UN-nations could accomplish the absurd by propaganda and political rhetoric – simply criminal behaviour.

The UN-nations poop in matters of Trade, development programs, or humanitarian aid – just a joke. The United States is the largest single provider of humanitarian assistance worldwide. The notion of global cooperation – just empty rhetoric propaganda on par with television evangelists who raise criminal amounts of money for themselves! The UN-nations does nothing for “global stability” and other such pie in the sky propaganda rhetoric.

That which is crooked can never be made straight. The idea of reforming the UN-nations compares to Male Masturbation for that man to make himself pregnant. The idea of efforts to improve transparency, accountability, and efficiency an utter contradiction in the face of totally unaccountable bureaucraps who only want to keep their cushy jobs. Why the UN-nations should not be immediately disbanded and treated as a used menstruating bloody rag? Simply have no reasonable answer.

The surreal (but truthful) influence of Putin [and Russia] on European and world politics.

What are the arguments for and against disbanding the United Nations?

Against disbanding the UN-Nations. Disbanding this vile corrupt piece of shit alas would force the community of nations to take responsibility to prevent and manage conflicts limited to their immediate border nations. Disbanding this utterly disgusting abomination would remove a public forum where international mobs could pervert diplomacy. Like as did the bureaucrats of England France and Germany who boycotted the Israeli PM’s speech before the full General Assembly.

Disbanding this stinky pile of shit UN-nations would force transnational problems, meaning the spread of economic, political, and cultural processes beyond national borders. As if nations cannot establish economic alliances with other nations?! Disbanding this voodoo UN-nations pretend World Government to regulate and manage living conditions, education, and gender equality worldwide LOL. As if nation states do not have the mandate of their own people to do these exact responsibilities?!

Disbanding the UN-nations abhorrent corruption in the Security Council where nations like France, who lost WWII, pretend that they qualify as a Great Power in World politics. Or the insane notion that nations states base their international strategic foreign policies upon what a plurality of folks whose nations do not even hold diplomatic relations with one another should determine the strategic foreign policies of nation states simply because the number of nations sitting in the Security Council has increased from 5 to 15 permanent Security Council seats!

Disbanding the UN-nations vomit puke of bureaucrapic inefficiency, political divisions, and the arrogant veto power wielded by permanent members of the Security Council who face down the screaming lynch mobs in the name of sacred “democracy”. The idea that Global Challenges collectively based upon emotional mob majority of international opinions – utterly absurd.

Issues like climate change, pandemics, and poverty have plagued Mankind long before Wilson’s post WWI League of Nations. Senator Long rightly opposed this notion that foreign nations should behave like dogs and sniff the butts of other nations. The government of a civilization, when confronted by an international problem, even crisis can agree to work together with other governments of foreign nations to manage these problems. The very idea that 193 nations can hold a consensus on how best to pick their noses – utterly absurd. Nation-States form economic and military alliances for the purpose to mutually address the need to establish a common consensus between themselves.

Disbanding the UN-nations Socialism whose political rhetoric propaganda labels as: collective efforts toward peace … essential to cut this bs and flush it down the toilet. Global cooperation has never existed in the whole of Human history. The stench of the pie in the sky lies that some UN-nations could accomplish the absurd by propaganda and political rhetoric – simply criminal behaviour.

The UN-nations poop in matters of Trade, development programs, or humanitarian aid – just a joke. The United States is the largest single provider of humanitarian assistance worldwide. The notion of global cooperation – just empty rhetoric propaganda on par with television evangelists who raise criminal amounts of money for themselves! The UN-nations does nothing for “global stability” and other such pie in the sky propaganda rhetoric.

That which is crooked can never be made straight. The idea of reforming the UN-nations compares to Male Masturbation for that man to make himself pregnant. The idea of efforts to improve transparency, accountability, and efficiency an utter contradiction in the face of totally unaccountable bureaucraps who only want to keep their cushy jobs. Why the UN-nations should not be immediately disbanded and treated as a used menstruating bloody rag? Simply have no reasonable answer.

Militarism and Genocide in Gaza: The Bloody Signature of Western Decline

What are the arguments for and against disbanding the United Nations?

Against disbanding the UN-Nations. Disbanding this vile corrupt piece of shit alas would force the community of nations to take responsibility to prevent and manage conflicts limited to their immediate border nations. Disbanding this utterly disgusting abomination would remove a public forum where international mobs could pervert diplomacy. Like as did the bureaucrats of England France and Germany who boycotted the Israeli PM’s speech before the full General Assembly.

Disbanding this stinky pile of shit UN-nations would force transnational problems, meaning the spread of economic, political, and cultural processes beyond national borders. As if nations cannot establish economic alliances with other nations?! Disbanding this voodoo UN-nations pretend World Government to regulate and manage living conditions, education, and gender equality worldwide LOL. As if nation states do not have the mandate of their own people to do these exact responsibilities?!

Disbanding the UN-nations abhorrent corruption in the Security Council where nations like France, who lost WWII, pretend that they qualify as a Great Power in World politics. Or the insane notion that nations states base their international strategic foreign policies upon what a plurality of folks whose nations do not even hold diplomatic relations with one another should determine the strategic foreign policies of nation states simply because the number of nations sitting in the Security Council has increased from 5 to 15 permanent Security Council seats!

Disbanding the UN-nations vomit puke of bureaucrapic inefficiency, political divisions, and the arrogant veto power wielded by permanent members of the Security Council who face down the screaming lynch mobs in the name of sacred “democracy”. The idea that Global Challenges collectively based upon emotional mob majority of international opinions – utterly absurd.

Issues like climate change, pandemics, and poverty have plagued Mankind long before Wilson’s post WWI League of Nations. Senator Long rightly opposed this notion that foreign nations should behave like dogs and sniff the butts of other nations. The government of a civilization, when confronted by an international problem, even crisis can agree to work together with other governments of foreign nations to manage these problems. The very idea that 193 nations can hold a consensus on how best to pick their noses – utterly absurd. Nation-States form economic and military alliances for the purpose to mutually address the need to establish a common consensus between themselves.

Disbanding the UN-nations Socialism whose political rhetoric propaganda labels as: collective efforts toward peace … essential to cut this bs and flush it down the toilet. Global cooperation has never existed in the whole of Human history. The stench of the pie in the sky lies that some UN-nations could accomplish the absurd by propaganda and political rhetoric – simply criminal behaviour.

The UN-nations poop in matters of Trade, development programs, or humanitarian aid – just a joke. The United States is the largest single provider of humanitarian assistance worldwide. The notion of global cooperation – just empty rhetoric propaganda on par with television evangelists who raise criminal amounts of money for themselves! The UN-nations does nothing for “global stability” and other such pie in the sky propaganda rhetoric.

That which is crooked can never be made straight. The idea of reforming the UN-nations compares to Male Masturbation for that man to make himself pregnant. The idea of efforts to improve transparency, accountability, and efficiency an utter contradiction in the face of totally unaccountable bureaucraps who only want to keep their cushy jobs. Why the UN-nations should not be immediately disbanded and treated as a used menstruating bloody rag? Simply have no reasonable answer.