Tag: china

Political and Religious Rhetoric stinks & smells of rotten eggs.

Critical and absolutely necessary to understand how different cultures of different people shape, interpret, and understand similar literary ideas/ideals.

The Eastern Jin dynasty (东晋, Dōng Jìn) was a Chinese dynasty that lasted from 317 to 420 AD. It is considered part of the Six Dynasties period, which followed the fall of the Western Jin dynasty and was characterized by political fragmentation and cultural development in southern China. The Eastern Jin was established by the Sima family, who were descendants of the Jin dynasty’s ruling clan. After the fall of the Western Jin due to internal strife and invasions by non-Han ethnic groups, the remnants of the Jin court retreated to the south, where they established the Eastern Jin with its capital at Jiankang (present-day Nanjing).

The dynasty struggled with internal conflicts, including power struggles among aristocratic families and military leaders. Despite political instability, the Eastern Jin period was marked by significant cultural and intellectual achievements. It was a time of flourishing literature, philosophy, and art. Notable figures, such as the poet and essayist Lu Ji, emerged during this period.

The Eastern Jin saw the continued spread of Buddhism in China, which began to gain popularity among the populace. Daoism also remained influential, contributing to the spiritual and cultural life of the time. The Eastern Jin dynasty played a crucial role in the development of Chinese culture and society during a time of significant transition and upheaval.

“The Whip” (文赋九) section, Lu Ji uses the metaphor of a whip to illustrate the power of literature and the writer’s ability to influence and inspire. The whip symbolizes both control and the ability to provoke action, reflecting how literature can guide emotions and thoughts. The section highlights the importance of craftsmanship in writing, suggesting that a skilled writer can wield their words effectively to achieve their intended impact.

Just as a whip can evoke a physical response, literature can stir deep emotions in readers, prompting reflection and action as literature can influence society and individuals profoundly. The concept of writing as a form of “population control” or a means of influencing and guiding society can be found in various literary and rhetorical traditions beyond Chinese literature. Greek philosophers and rhetoricians, such as Aristotle and Plato, emphasized the power of rhetoric in shaping public opinion and guiding behavior. Aristotle, in particular, discussed the ethical responsibilities of the speaker in his work “Rhetoric,” where he argued that effective persuasion should be grounded in truth and moral integrity. Plato, in works like “Gorgias,” critiqued rhetoric for its potential to manipulate rather than enlighten, highlighting the responsibility of the orator to use their skills wisely.

In ancient Greece, particularly in philosophical circles, the relationship between a teacher and a student was often one of mentorship. Teachers like Plato and Aristotle were highly respected figures, and their teachings were foundational to the development of Western philosophy. While Plato did critique rhetoric, particularly in works like “Gorgias,” his criticisms were aimed at the ethical implications of rhetoric and its potential for manipulation rather than a direct critique of Aristotle as a person. Plato believed that rhetoric could be used for deceitful purposes and that true knowledge and philosophical inquiry were more valuable than mere persuasive speech.

The philosophical tradition encouraged debate and discussion, and it was not uncommon for students to challenge their teachers’ ideas. This dialectical method was a way to deepen understanding and refine arguments. This cultural Greek style not commonly found in Judean society. True rabbi Akiva serves as a exceptional exception. But in Judea the masoret spun around the central axis where the pupil did not openly challenge the rabbi master.

In contrast, the educational practices in ancient Judea, particularly in rabbinic traditions, often emphasized a more hierarchical relationship between the rabbi (teacher) and the student (pupil). While there was respect for the rabbi’s authority and knowledge, the structure of learning was typically more focused on the transmission of established פרדס logic and the different schools of logical middot of interpretation like that of rabbi Yishmael and rabbi Yossi Ha’Galilli. Students were generally expected to learn from their teachers without openly challenging them, as the rabbi’s role was seen as a guide to understanding sacred texts and traditions. For example rabbi Akiva’s kabbalah of פרדס logic emphasized inductive active comparisons between common law case/rule rulings compared to similar judicial case/rule precedent rulings. Herein defines common law as Judean judicial justice, built around judicial law as opposed by Greek legislative law which organized law into organized legal subjects.

Common law all about courtroom judicial definitions of law rather that bureaucratic legislative decrees from above made by authority figures who based their law upon what served best the interests of the State rather than resolve a legal dispute over damages inflicted by one citizen upon another citizen of the Republic.

In rabbinic traditions, the relationship between the rabbi and the student was indeed more hierarchical. For a rabbi to sit upon a judicial court, everything depended upon that rabbi’s order vis a vis other rabbis likewise desiring to sit as a courtroom judge. If for example a judge retired, the closest student in line to replace him, appointed as judge. Hence Judicial Judean law recognized an order of rabbinic authority whereas Greek statute law had no such cultural masoret. Judean society, common law was focused on resolving disputes between individuals based on established precedents and judicial rulings. This approach emphasized the practical application of law in the context of real-life situations and the relationships between citizens. In contrast, Greek legislative law often involved decrees made by authorities that could prioritize the interests of the state over individual justice. The rabbinic tradition was deeply rooted in religious and communal values, emphasizing the importance of ethical behavior and justice within the community. Greek philosophy, while also concerned with ethics, often approached law and governance from a more abstract and theoretical perspective, focusing on the role of reason and the state.

Following the utter destruction of Judea by the Romans following the disaster of the Bar Kokhba revolt [b] (132-136 AD), Greek legislative statute law dominated both politics and literature.

The Roman statesman and orator Cicero wrote extensively on rhetoric and the responsibilities of the speaker. In his works, such as “De Oratore,” he emphasized the importance of moral character and the ethical obligations of orators to use their skills for the common good, suggesting that rhetoric could be a tool for social order and governance.

In the 17th century, the English poet and writer John Milton expressed similar views in his writings, particularly in “Areopagitica,” where he argued for the importance of free expression and the role of literature in shaping society. Milton believed that writers had a responsibility to engage with moral and political issues, using their skills to promote truth and justice.

In the 20th century, George Orwell’s essays, particularly “Politics and the English Language,” discuss the manipulation of language and the responsibility of writers to use clear and honest language. Orwell warned against the use of language as a tool for propaganda and control, emphasizing the ethical duty of writers to resist such practices. The American novelist Toni Morrison spoke about the power of storytelling and the responsibility of writers to address social issues, particularly those related to race and identity. In her works and interviews, she highlighted the role of literature in shaping cultural narratives and influencing societal change.

In ancient China, particularly during the Eastern Jin dynasty and earlier periods, Confucianism played a significant role in shaping educational practices. Confucius emphasized the importance of literature, moral education, and the cultivation of virtue through study. The study of classical texts, poetry, and philosophy was seen as essential for personal development and moral character. Scholars were expected to engage deeply with texts, reflecting on their meanings and applying them to ethical conduct.

Chinese literature often served as a means of moral instruction and social harmony. Works like the “Analects” of Confucius and the poetry of the Tang dynasty were not only artistic expressions but also vehicles for ethical teachings. The disciplined study of literature was viewed as a way to cultivate one’s character and contribute to the well-being of society.

The Chinese literary tradition included various forms, such as poetry, essays, and historical writings. The emphasis on literary craftsmanship and the ability to convey complex ideas through elegant language was highly valued. Scholars often participated in literary competitions, which were integral to the civil service examination system, reinforcing the connection between literature, education, and governance.

Ancient Greece the dialectical method encouraged critical thinking and debate, allowing students to engage with texts and challenge established ideas. Greek rhetoric was seen as a powerful tool for persuasion and influence. The ethical responsibilities of speakers and writers were central to discussions about rhetoric, with an emphasis on truth and moral integrity. Literature, particularly in the form of drama and poetry, was used to reflect societal values, explore human nature, and provoke thought about moral dilemmas.

The rabbinic approach emphasized a hierarchical relationship between the rabbi and the student, with a focus on the transmission of established teachings based both upon inductive comparative Case/Rule rulings compared to similar precedent previous Courtroom rulings. The organization of the T’NaCH Mishna and Gemara codifications, highly edited texts which permit later students to make fixed tri-angulated syllogism deductive conclusions of reasoning – based upon the classic texts being sealed and static rigid – ideal for syllogistic deductive reasoning. T’NaCH, like the Mishna and Gemara, also a sealed text. This more ancient Hebrew literature focused upon prophetic mussar rather than Talmudic ritual halacha.

Zen Buddhism, which emphasizes direct experience and meditation, became a significant influence in Japan, particularly during the Kamakura period (1185–1333). It focuses on mindfulness, simplicity, and the nature of existence, which resonated with Japanese aesthetics and culture. Shiatsu practitioners focus on the body’s meridians and pressure points, aiming to restore balance and promote healing. The practice reflects a holistic approach to health, integrating physical, emotional, and spiritual well-being. The emphasis on mindfulness and presence in Zen practice complements the Shiatsu approach, as practitioners are encouraged to be fully aware and attentive during treatment.

Chinese Daoism has a well-developed concept of “Chi” (or “Qi”), which refers to the vital life force that flows through all living things. This concept is central to various Chinese healing practices, martial arts, and philosophical thought. In contrast, Zen Buddhism does not have a specific concept of Chi. Instead, it focuses on the nature of mind and existence, emphasizing direct experience and meditation rather than the manipulation of energy.

When Zen Buddhism was introduced to Japan, it adapted to the existing cultural and spiritual landscape, which included Shinto beliefs and practices. This adaptation led to a unique expression of Zen that differed from its Chinese roots. Confucianism, with its emphasis on social harmony, hierarchy, and moral conduct, had a profound influence on Chinese society, particularly in governance and education. However, its principles did not take hold in the same way within Japanese samurai culture. The samurai class was more influenced by Bushido, the “way of the warrior,” which emphasized loyalty, honor, and martial prowess. While there are overlaps with Confucian values, the samurai ethos was distinct and often prioritized martial values over Confucian ideals of social order and moral conduct.

The historical context of Japan, including the feudal system and the rise of the samurai, shaped the values and beliefs of warrior societies. The samurai were often more influenced by Zen Buddhism, which provided a spiritual framework that complemented their martial practices and philosophies. The influences of Zen Buddhism on practices like Shiatsu healing and the distinct cultural expressions of Japanese warrior societies illustrate the complexities of cultural exchange and adaptation. While Chinese philosophies like Daoism and Confucianism have had significant impacts in their own contexts, their principles did not always translate directly into Japanese culture, which developed its own unique interpretations and practices. This dynamic interplay between cultures highlights the richness of both Chinese and Japanese traditions.

Critical and absolutely necessary to understand how different cultures of different people shape, interpret, and understand similar literary ideas/ideals.

The Eastern Jin dynasty (东晋, Dōng Jìn) was a Chinese dynasty that lasted from 317 to 420 AD. It is considered part of the Six Dynasties period, which followed the fall of the Western Jin dynasty and was characterized by political fragmentation and cultural development in southern China. The Eastern Jin was established by the Sima family, who were descendants of the Jin dynasty’s ruling clan. After the fall of the Western Jin due to internal strife and invasions by non-Han ethnic groups, the remnants of the Jin court retreated to the south, where they established the Eastern Jin with its capital at Jiankang (present-day Nanjing).

The dynasty struggled with internal conflicts, including power struggles among aristocratic families and military leaders. Despite political instability, the Eastern Jin period was marked by significant cultural and intellectual achievements. It was a time of flourishing literature, philosophy, and art. Notable figures, such as the poet and essayist Lu Ji, emerged during this period.

The Eastern Jin saw the continued spread of Buddhism in China, which began to gain popularity among the populace. Daoism also remained influential, contributing to the spiritual and cultural life of the time. The Eastern Jin dynasty played a crucial role in the development of Chinese culture and society during a time of significant transition and upheaval.

“The Whip” (文赋九) section, Lu Ji uses the metaphor of a whip to illustrate the power of literature and the writer’s ability to influence and inspire. The whip symbolizes both control and the ability to provoke action, reflecting how literature can guide emotions and thoughts. The section highlights the importance of craftsmanship in writing, suggesting that a skilled writer can wield their words effectively to achieve their intended impact.

Just as a whip can evoke a physical response, literature can stir deep emotions in readers, prompting reflection and action as literature can influence society and individuals profoundly. The concept of writing as a form of “population control” or a means of influencing and guiding society can be found in various literary and rhetorical traditions beyond Chinese literature. Greek philosophers and rhetoricians, such as Aristotle and Plato, emphasized the power of rhetoric in shaping public opinion and guiding behavior. Aristotle, in particular, discussed the ethical responsibilities of the speaker in his work “Rhetoric,” where he argued that effective persuasion should be grounded in truth and moral integrity. Plato, in works like “Gorgias,” critiqued rhetoric for its potential to manipulate rather than enlighten, highlighting the responsibility of the orator to use their skills wisely.

In ancient Greece, particularly in philosophical circles, the relationship between a teacher and a student was often one of mentorship. Teachers like Plato and Aristotle were highly respected figures, and their teachings were foundational to the development of Western philosophy. While Plato did critique rhetoric, particularly in works like “Gorgias,” his criticisms were aimed at the ethical implications of rhetoric and its potential for manipulation rather than a direct critique of Aristotle as a person. Plato believed that rhetoric could be used for deceitful purposes and that true knowledge and philosophical inquiry were more valuable than mere persuasive speech.

The philosophical tradition encouraged debate and discussion, and it was not uncommon for students to challenge their teachers’ ideas. This dialectical method was a way to deepen understanding and refine arguments. This cultural Greek style not commonly found in Judean society. True rabbi Akiva serves as a exceptional exception. But in Judea the masoret spun around the central axis where the pupil did not openly challenge the rabbi master.

In contrast, the educational practices in ancient Judea, particularly in rabbinic traditions, often emphasized a more hierarchical relationship between the rabbi (teacher) and the student (pupil). While there was respect for the rabbi’s authority and knowledge, the structure of learning was typically more focused on the transmission of established פרדס logic and the different schools of logical middot of interpretation like that of rabbi Yishmael and rabbi Yossi Ha’Galilli. Students were generally expected to learn from their teachers without openly challenging them, as the rabbi’s role was seen as a guide to understanding sacred texts and traditions. For example rabbi Akiva’s kabbalah of פרדס logic emphasized inductive active comparisons between common law case/rule rulings compared to similar judicial case/rule precedent rulings. Herein defines common law as Judean judicial justice, built around judicial law as opposed by Greek legislative law which organized law into organized legal subjects.

Common law all about courtroom judicial definitions of law rather that bureaucratic legislative decrees from above made by authority figures who based their law upon what served best the interests of the State rather than resolve a legal dispute over damages inflicted by one citizen upon another citizen of the Republic.

In rabbinic traditions, the relationship between the rabbi and the student was indeed more hierarchical. For a rabbi to sit upon a judicial court, everything depended upon that rabbi’s order vis a vis other rabbis likewise desiring to sit as a courtroom judge. If for example a judge retired, the closest student in line to replace him, appointed as judge. Hence Judicial Judean law recognized an order of rabbinic authority whereas Greek statute law had no such cultural masoret. Judean society, common law was focused on resolving disputes between individuals based on established precedents and judicial rulings. This approach emphasized the practical application of law in the context of real-life situations and the relationships between citizens. In contrast, Greek legislative law often involved decrees made by authorities that could prioritize the interests of the state over individual justice. The rabbinic tradition was deeply rooted in religious and communal values, emphasizing the importance of ethical behavior and justice within the community. Greek philosophy, while also concerned with ethics, often approached law and governance from a more abstract and theoretical perspective, focusing on the role of reason and the state.

Following the utter destruction of Judea by the Romans following the disaster of the Bar Kokhba revolt [b] (132-136 AD), Greek legislative statute law dominated both politics and literature.

The Roman statesman and orator Cicero wrote extensively on rhetoric and the responsibilities of the speaker. In his works, such as “De Oratore,” he emphasized the importance of moral character and the ethical obligations of orators to use their skills for the common good, suggesting that rhetoric could be a tool for social order and governance.

In the 17th century, the English poet and writer John Milton expressed similar views in his writings, particularly in “Areopagitica,” where he argued for the importance of free expression and the role of literature in shaping society. Milton believed that writers had a responsibility to engage with moral and political issues, using their skills to promote truth and justice.

In the 20th century, George Orwell’s essays, particularly “Politics and the English Language,” discuss the manipulation of language and the responsibility of writers to use clear and honest language. Orwell warned against the use of language as a tool for propaganda and control, emphasizing the ethical duty of writers to resist such practices. The American novelist Toni Morrison spoke about the power of storytelling and the responsibility of writers to address social issues, particularly those related to race and identity. In her works and interviews, she highlighted the role of literature in shaping cultural narratives and influencing societal change.

In ancient China, particularly during the Eastern Jin dynasty and earlier periods, Confucianism played a significant role in shaping educational practices. Confucius emphasized the importance of literature, moral education, and the cultivation of virtue through study. The study of classical texts, poetry, and philosophy was seen as essential for personal development and moral character. Scholars were expected to engage deeply with texts, reflecting on their meanings and applying them to ethical conduct.

Chinese literature often served as a means of moral instruction and social harmony. Works like the “Analects” of Confucius and the poetry of the Tang dynasty were not only artistic expressions but also vehicles for ethical teachings. The disciplined study of literature was viewed as a way to cultivate one’s character and contribute to the well-being of society.

The Chinese literary tradition included various forms, such as poetry, essays, and historical writings. The emphasis on literary craftsmanship and the ability to convey complex ideas through elegant language was highly valued. Scholars often participated in literary competitions, which were integral to the civil service examination system, reinforcing the connection between literature, education, and governance.

Ancient Greece the dialectical method encouraged critical thinking and debate, allowing students to engage with texts and challenge established ideas. Greek rhetoric was seen as a powerful tool for persuasion and influence. The ethical responsibilities of speakers and writers were central to discussions about rhetoric, with an emphasis on truth and moral integrity. Literature, particularly in the form of drama and poetry, was used to reflect societal values, explore human nature, and provoke thought about moral dilemmas.

The rabbinic approach emphasized a hierarchical relationship between the rabbi and the student, with a focus on the transmission of established teachings based both upon inductive comparative Case/Rule rulings compared to similar precedent previous Courtroom rulings. The organization of the T’NaCH Mishna and Gemara codifications, highly edited texts which permit later students to make fixed tri-angulated syllogism deductive conclusions of reasoning – based upon the classic texts being sealed and static rigid – ideal for syllogistic deductive reasoning. T’NaCH, like the Mishna and Gemara, also a sealed text. This more ancient Hebrew literature focused upon prophetic mussar rather than Talmudic ritual halacha.

Zen Buddhism, which emphasizes direct experience and meditation, became a significant influence in Japan, particularly during the Kamakura period (1185–1333). It focuses on mindfulness, simplicity, and the nature of existence, which resonated with Japanese aesthetics and culture. Shiatsu practitioners focus on the body’s meridians and pressure points, aiming to restore balance and promote healing. The practice reflects a holistic approach to health, integrating physical, emotional, and spiritual well-being. The emphasis on mindfulness and presence in Zen practice complements the Shiatsu approach, as practitioners are encouraged to be fully aware and attentive during treatment.

Chinese Daoism has a well-developed concept of “Chi” (or “Qi”), which refers to the vital life force that flows through all living things. This concept is central to various Chinese healing practices, martial arts, and philosophical thought. In contrast, Zen Buddhism does not have a specific concept of Chi. Instead, it focuses on the nature of mind and existence, emphasizing direct experience and meditation rather than the manipulation of energy.

When Zen Buddhism was introduced to Japan, it adapted to the existing cultural and spiritual landscape, which included Shinto beliefs and practices. This adaptation led to a unique expression of Zen that differed from its Chinese roots. Confucianism, with its emphasis on social harmony, hierarchy, and moral conduct, had a profound influence on Chinese society, particularly in governance and education. However, its principles did not take hold in the same way within Japanese samurai culture. The samurai class was more influenced by Bushido, the “way of the warrior,” which emphasized loyalty, honor, and martial prowess. While there are overlaps with Confucian values, the samurai ethos was distinct and often prioritized martial values over Confucian ideals of social order and moral conduct.

The historical context of Japan, including the feudal system and the rise of the samurai, shaped the values and beliefs of warrior societies. The samurai were often more influenced by Zen Buddhism, which provided a spiritual framework that complemented their martial practices and philosophies. The influences of Zen Buddhism on practices like Shiatsu healing and the distinct cultural expressions of Japanese warrior societies illustrate the complexities of cultural exchange and adaptation. While Chinese philosophies like Daoism and Confucianism have had significant impacts in their own contexts, their principles did not always translate directly into Japanese culture, which developed its own unique interpretations and practices. This dynamic interplay between cultures highlights the richness of both Chinese and Japanese traditions.

DemoCRAP supporters bitch and moan because President Trump seeks to return and rebuild American industry. Anything in life comes with a price.

Silly paper thin shallow reactionary! In the long run, the economic impacts of these tariffs could be wide-ranging, influencing not only trade but also job markets, supply chains, and even inflation rates in the U.S. How the situation develops will depend largely on political negotiations and the willingness of both sides to find common ground.

The Dow Jones Industrial Average experienced a significant drop recently, losing around 1,300 points over two days. This decline, largely attributed to the announcement of new tariffs by President Donald Trump on imports from Canada and Mexico.

President Trump’s argument that the U.S. economy and treasury operated successfully before the establishment of the federal income tax in 1913, largely through tariffs, rooted in a historical perspective on how the U.S. government financed itself in the 18th and 19th centuries. During the 19th century, tariffs funded most of the federal government’s activities, including military expenses, infrastructure projects, and general administration. In fact, tariffs made up nearly 90% of federal revenue during some periods in the 19th century, such as the 1820s and 1830s.

Before the introduction of the income tax with the ratification of the 16th Amendment in 1913, the U.S. government primarily relied on tariffs, excise taxes, and land sales as its main sources of revenue. Tariffs, in particular, “invested” a significant portion of federal revenue. These tariffs taxes imposed on imported goods and served a dual purpose: they funded the federal government and protected American industries by making foreign goods more expensive.

Tariffs also understood as a tool for protecting domestic industries. For instance, the protective tariffs enacted in the early 19th century, designed to shield emerging American industries from foreign competition, especially from Britain. The debates over tariff policies—whether to protect industries or promote free trade—utterly central to the economic and political landscape of the time.

Trump, in his economic policies, advocated and now advocates for a return to a stronger reliance on tariffs as the way to fund the government and protect American jobs. His first administration implemented tariffs on a range of goods, especially from China, as part of a broader strategy of economic nationalism. Trump’s argument that the U.S. operated successfully without income taxes for much of its history directly tied to his current preference for protectionist economic policies.

The ongoing trade tensions and issues related to drug trafficking and gang violence have indeed strained relationships between the U.S., Canada, and Mexico. These challenges have significant impacts on various aspects of society, including public health and safety. The influx of wetback immigrants from Mexico and Canada into the U.S. has produced a crisis, not restricted to increased border security measures and political tensions.

Canada and Mexico indeed have a long history of imposing tariffs on American goods in response to various trade policies over the years. Many American car manufactures built factories in Mexico to avoid these tariffs. For instance, in response to recent tariffs imposed by the U.S., Canada announced a robust tariff package on $155 billion worth of American goods. Similarly, Mexico has also imposed do as I say but not as I do retaliatory tariffs on U.S. goods. These hostile tariffs, part of the ongoing trade tensions between the countries. They exert immediate significant impacts on agriculture and automotive industries which will cause short term rises in prices. Making American produces goods far more competitive.

Biden criticized the idea of imposing new tariffs on these countries, calling it “counterproductive” and expressing concerns about damaging relationships with close allies. Biden emphasized the importance of maintaining strong partnerships with Canada and Mexico, especially given their geographical proximity and economic ties.

One of Trump’s key economic goals in both terms of his presidency, to bring back manufacturing jobs, particularly in industries like automotive production. His new administration now pushes policies that will incentivize companies to shift production from overseas—particularly from places like Mexico and China—back to the U.S. This includes imposing tariffs on foreign-made goods, offering tax incentives, and making it more costly for companies to rely on cheaper foreign labor.

Many U.S.-based car manufacturers (like Ford and GM) have operations in Mexico, a directed consequence of Mexican tariffs imposed on American made good. Mexico enticed automotive industries to move away from America by promising cheaper labor costs. As if manufacturing cars qualifies as raw materials, while shipping these parts back to the U.S. for final assembly benefitted US interests! Re-establishing these supply chains entirely within U.S. borders, a major goal of the Trump trade war with Mexico and Canada seeks to restore. President Trump plays a long term game. Whereas Biden, by stark contrast, prioritize a short term game.

Trump often made the case that U.S. farmers have become complacent because of cheap imports that undermined domestic agriculture. He argues that cheap foreign imports—particularly from countries like Mexico—have hurt American farmers, making them less competitive and reliant on government subsidies or low-cost imports. President Trump has prioritized drastic reductions of Federal bureaucratic red-tape regulations, in favor of the restoration of the States Rights to bureaucratically regulate all trade and commerce inside each and every State of the Union.

Trump’s criticism of the corrupt Department of Agriculture, ties into his broader focus on tightening economic belts, to reduce dependency on imports, and encourage more self-reliance. A quality trait that defined the American psyche in the 19th and pre-WWII 20th Century. Trump’s “America First” approach prioritizes U.S. production over secondary foreign imports, especially agricultural products from abroad. He frequently calls for tariffs on products like Mexican tomatoes, avocados, and berries. Trump supports American farmers. His policies strives to reduce reliance on cheaper imports from competition countries. Under Biden’s Administration food prices rose through the roof! People could not afford bread and eggs. Hence buying foreign imports simply not cheaper, neither in the short or long run.

President Trump’s broader strategy often points to reduction of trade imbalances as the way to strengthen the economy. The logic behind his “America First” leadership simple: reducing reliance on foreign imports and increasing domestic production will reduce the U.S. trade deficit, thereby improving fiscal health over time.

Biden’s policies prioritized international trade, and imports (which in effect sacrificed domestic production to the gods of foreign good will) which exacerbated price instability, especially in the agricultural sector. With Trump’s “America First” agenda, his logic argues the need to encourage greater self-reliance, not just in agriculture. Avoiding reliance on cheaper foreign products – long term the only way to restore fiscal government spending and eliminate the National debt. This will increase costs in the short term, but it will ultimately, about a year, strengthen domestic agriculture and reduce long-term vulnerabilities to global market fluctuations.

President Trump places significant emphasis on reducing the U.S. trade deficit. The logic behind his leadership, that the U.S. imports far more than it exports. He views this fact as a national disgrace, and a long term detriment to the economy. By shifting the balance toward more domestic production and fewer imports, he holds that the U.S. will strengthen its economy, reduce dependence on foreign countries, and eventually improve fiscal health. Requirements to reduce the Federal debt.

President Trump views the Big Picture whereas Biden emphasized short term reactionary policies of State. Under Trump’s leadership vision, the U.S. not only benefits from job creation, but also sees a dramatic reduction in the trade deficit as the U.S. economy produces more of its own goods rather than relying on cheaper imports. The immediate impact of overweight America forced to go on a diet, and tighten its belt for a year or more, compares to training an athlete, or how a woman “suffers for beauty”.

Biden’s short term Globalist international trade policies, they compare to a person who uses credit cards and goes bankrupt due to the interest charges due to debt-borrowing. President Trump’s long term policy: if you don’t have the money in your pocket, you do not buy the products. This vision defined the American psyche during the 19th and early 20th Centuries.

Trump’s economic philosophy, rooted in restoring a self-sufficient, resilient economy that reduces reliance on foreign countries, especially adversarial nations, and mitigate vulnerabilities consequent of external shocks—such as trade wars, global financial crises, or supply chain disruptions.

Trump’s policy focuses on making industries like agriculture and manufacturing more competitive and less reliant on foreign imports. While this will cause short term price increases—such as higher costs for food or goods made with imported parts—he argues this necessity adjustment required to bring industrial production back to U.S. soil, and eventually lead to more jobs and a stronger economy.

Under Biden’s leadership, policies were often reactionary to immediate issues, such as the COVID-19 pandemic’s impact on global supply chains, inflation, and the rising costs of living. Biden’s economic strategy was about stabilizing the economy quickly—whether that meant importing cheaper goods, working with international trade agreements, or giving immediate relief to households through subsidies like forcing the American people to pay for college loans to students. Four years of Biden policies only addressed reactionary, surface-level issues. They utterly failed to confront deeper structural economic problems like the U.S. trade deficit and reliance on foreign imports, which resulted in the consequences of vulnerabilities to hostile countries.

Trump’s policies emphasizes economic discipline, akin to the tough training or personal sacrifice that pays off later. By pushing for higher domestic production and less reliance on foreign imports, he seeks to ensure the U.S. can “stand on its own two feet” economically. While this will involve some pain and restructuring—higher prices, potential job losses in the short term—it holds the vision of creating a stronger, more self-sustaining economy in the long run.

mosckerr
Trump CRASHES Dow 1300 points in 2 days

How many years of trade surpluses did the US have since the creation of the Bretton Woods system until it collapsed in 1971?

From 1870 to 1970, the United States ran persistent trade surpluses that averaged about 1.1 percent of GDP. During this period, the U.S. consistently exported more goods and services than it imported. By the early 1970s, inflation in the United States and a growing American trade deficit were undermining the value of the dollar. After Nixon collapsed Bretton Woods in favor of the OPEC petro$ monopoly. This move allowed currencies to float freely against each other, leading to significant changes in global trade dynamics. The U.S. trade balance shifted, and the country began running trade deficits.

The collapse of Bretton Woods coincided with the rise of OPEC (Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries). OPEC countries, particularly those in the Middle East consequent to the Arab oil embargo, due to the Arab alliance against Israel during the Yom Kippur War, gained significant influence consequent to their control over huge oil reserves. The use of the U.S. dollar (petrodollar) as the primary currency for oil transactions solidified the dollar’s role in global trade.

As the dollar’s value fluctuated and the U.S. faced economic challenges, the country’s trade balance shifted. The U.S. began running trade deficits, importing more than it exported. This trend has persisted in subsequent decades, shaping the modern global economy. The collapse of Bretton Woods, the rise of OPEC, and the shift from trade surpluses to deficits all played crucial roles in shaping the U.S. trade landscape.

The collapse of the Bretton Woods system and the subsequent rise of OPEC significantly altered the dynamics of international trade. The petrodollar’s dominance and the Middle East’s influence underscore how interconnected economic and geopolitical factors can be.

As for the United States returning to a gold standard, it’s a topic of ongoing debate. President-elect Donald Trump has expressed interest in the idea, and some of his advisors support it. However, reintroducing the gold standard would be a complex and challenging process. It would require significant changes to the current monetary system and could have far-reaching economic implications. While there is some support for the idea, it remains uncertain whether such a move will be pursued or implemented.

The idea of the U.S. pulling out of NATO in exchange for Russia withdrawing from Ukraine and Crimea is a complex and highly speculative scenario. The peace terms of the 1856 Crimean War, which included the Treaty of Paris, aimed to neutralize the Black Sea and diminish Russian influence in the region. Applying such historical terms to modern geopolitics would be challenging and unprecedented.

As for the U.S. returning to the gold standard, this would be a significant shift from the current fiat monetary system. The gold standard was abandoned in 1971, and reintroducing it would require substantial changes to the financial system. While some of Trump’s advisors have shown interest in the idea, it remains uncertain whether such a move would be pursued or implemented. The complexities of modern economics and the global financial system make a return to the gold standard a highly debated and contentious issue.

Identity Politics and irrational ad hominem appeals to emotional over reactions

Why Trump’s team is every bit the nightmare we feared

Trump’s 2nd term Foreign Policy

Historical demobilization processes and diplomatic appointments shape the course of nations. Whether in the aftermath of World War I or in today’s complex geopolitical landscape, thoughtful leadership remains essential.

The BRICS threat to the continued dominance of the dollar as the world currency, coupled with the huge national debt in conjunction with the almost total Federal bureaucracy corruption forces a massive downsizing of the Federal Government. Matt Whittaker serves to withdraw the US from the Nato alliance.

The BRICS nations have been increasingly assertive in challenging the dominance of the U.S. dollar as the world’s reserve currency. While the dollar has held this position since the end of World War II, recent geopolitical shifts and growing tensions between the West and Russia and China have prompted discussions about alternatives.

The process of de-dollarization—reducing reliance on the dollar in international trade and finance—is gaining momentum. BRICS countries are exploring options beyond the greenback.

Whitaker’s legal and criminal justice background may seem unconventional for this role, but his appointment reflects the administration’s priorities in global affairs.

Amid ongoing conflicts like the war in Ukraine, Whitaker’s position becomes crucial. His stance on the US withdraw from Nato, will play a crucial role in Russia agreeing to withdraw from the Ukraine and Crimea. Similar to the post war 1856 Crimean war.

Trump’s 2nd Term

Holy cannoli: Look at this list of crime families and power hubs Trump sideline …

Trump’s 2nd term Foreign Policy

Historical demobilization processes and diplomatic appointments shape the course of nations. Whether in the aftermath of World War I or in today’s complex geopolitical landscape, thoughtful leadership remains essential.

The BRICS threat to the continued dominance of the dollar as the world currency, coupled with the huge national debt in conjunction with the almost total Federal bureaucracy corruption forces a massive downsizing of the Federal Government. Matt Whittaker serves to withdraw the US from the Nato alliance.

The BRICS nations have been increasingly assertive in challenging the dominance of the U.S. dollar as the world’s reserve currency. While the dollar has held this position since the end of World War II, recent geopolitical shifts and growing tensions between the West and Russia and China have prompted discussions about alternatives.

The process of de-dollarization—reducing reliance on the dollar in international trade and finance—is gaining momentum. BRICS countries are exploring options beyond the greenback.

Whitaker’s legal and criminal justice background may seem unconventional for this role, but his appointment reflects the administration’s priorities in global affairs.

Amid ongoing conflicts like the war in Ukraine, Whitaker’s position becomes crucial. His stance on the US withdraw from Nato, will play a crucial role in Russia agreeing to withdraw from the Ukraine and Crimea. Similar to the post war 1856 Crimean war.

Trump’s wisdom that ends the Ukraine War

Should we return Crimea to Ukraine?

Trump’s 2nd term Foreign Policy

Historical demobilization processes and diplomatic appointments shape the course of nations. Whether in the aftermath of World War I or in today’s complex geopolitical landscape, thoughtful leadership remains essential.

The BRICS threat to the continued dominance of the dollar as the world currency, coupled with the huge national debt in conjunction with the almost total Federal bureaucracy corruption forces a massive downsizing of the Federal Government. Matt Whittaker serves to withdraw the US from the Nato alliance.

The BRICS nations have been increasingly assertive in challenging the dominance of the U.S. dollar as the world’s reserve currency. While the dollar has held this position since the end of World War II, recent geopolitical shifts and growing tensions between the West and Russia and China have prompted discussions about alternatives.

The process of de-dollarization—reducing reliance on the dollar in international trade and finance—is gaining momentum. BRICS countries are exploring options beyond the greenback.

Whitaker’s legal and criminal justice background may seem unconventional for this role, but his appointment reflects the administration’s priorities in global affairs.

Amid ongoing conflicts like the war in Ukraine, Whitaker’s position becomes crucial. His stance on the US withdraw from Nato, will play a crucial role in Russia agreeing to withdraw from the Ukraine and Crimea. Similar to the post war 1856 Crimean war.

Trump’s 2nd term Foreign Policy

Historical demobilization processes and diplomatic appointments shape the course of nations. Whether in the aftermath of World War I or in today’s complex geopolitical landscape, thoughtful leadership remains essential.

The BRICS threat to the continued dominance of the dollar as the world currency, coupled with the huge national debt in conjunction with the almost total Federal bureaucracy corruption forces a massive downsizing of the Federal Government. Matt Whittaker serves to withdraw the US from the Nato alliance.

The BRICS nations have been increasingly assertive in challenging the dominance of the U.S. dollar as the world’s reserve currency. While the dollar has held this position since the end of World War II, recent geopolitical shifts and growing tensions between the West and Russia and China have prompted discussions about alternatives.

The process of de-dollarization—reducing reliance on the dollar in international trade and finance—is gaining momentum. BRICS countries are exploring options beyond the greenback.

Whitaker’s legal and criminal justice background may seem unconventional for this role, but his appointment reflects the administration’s priorities in global affairs.

Amid ongoing conflicts like the war in Ukraine, Whitaker’s position becomes crucial. His stance on the US withdraw from Nato, will play a crucial role in Russia agreeing to withdraw from the Ukraine and Crimea. Similar to the post war 1856 Crimean war.

mosckerr
President-Elect Trump Names Matt Whittaker as Ambassador to NATO

Israeli Foreign Policy

https://wsvn.com/news/politics/trump-builds-out-foreign-policy-team-with-picks-of-hegseth-for-pentagon-ratcliffe-for-cia/

The Confederate Southern Boy sings: Hail to the Hell Hale Bard

The Times They Are A-Changin’. Bob Dylan, the troubadour of change, penned this folk masterpiece back in 1963, and its words still resonate today.

“Come gather ’round people, wherever you roam…”“Come writers and critics who prophesize with your pen…”“Come senators, congressmen, please heed the call…”“Come mothers and fathers throughout the land…”

Gail (Hebrew for JOY) winds fill the sails of the US ship of state. The shifting tides of US Foreign Policy,

An American politician and attorney who has held significant roles in both Congress and the intelligence community. Ratcliffe was a U.S. Representative for Texas’s 4th district from 2015 to 2020. He was known as one of the most conservative congressmen during his time in the House of Representatives.

Ratcliffe gained visibility during the first impeachment proceedings against President Donald Trump in 2019. He was an ardent defender of Trump during the impeachment hearings and actively participated in questioning witnesses. His forceful defense of the president led to memorable moments during the proceedings.

Ratcliffe famously characterized the impeachment case against Trump as the “thinnest, fastest, and weakest” in U.S. history. He argued that the evidence presented did not meet the threshold for impeachment.

When former special counsel Robert Mueller appeared before the House Judiciary Committee to testify about his investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election, Ratcliffe was one of the more ardent Republican interrogators. He forcefully questioned Mueller and criticized the report produced by the special counsel.

John Ratcliffe’s forceful defense of Trump during the impeachment proceedings left a lasting impression. His passionate questioning and unwavering support for the president contributed to the intensity of those historic hearings.

Ratcliffe also played a significant role in challenging the legitimacy of the investigations into Trump. He was particularly critical of the FBI’s Crossfire Hurricane investigation, which looked into potential connections between Trump’s campaign and Russia. Ratcliffe argued that the investigation was flawed and that the FBI had abused its surveillance powers

Ratcliffe was known for his strong stance against the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) process, which he believed was misused in the investigation of Trump campaign advisor Carter Page.
His criticisms of the FBI and the intelligence community’s handling of these investigations were a key part of his defense strategy.

Ratcliffe’s efforts to defend Trump extended beyond the impeachment hearings. As Director of National Intelligence, he declassified documents that he believed would support Trump’s claims of being unfairly targeted by the intelligence community. This move was controversial and seen by some as an attempt to politicize intelligence.

Ratcliffe’s unwavering support for Trump and his aggressive defense tactics made him a prominent figure during the impeachment proceedings and beyond. His unwavering defense of Trump during the impeachment proceedings and his criticism of investigations into Trump have solidified his reputation as a loyal ally.

As DNI, Ratcliffe played a crucial role in overseeing U.S. intelligence operations. He was involved in identifying and countering foreign interference in U.S. elections, particularly from Iran and China. His focus on national security and his hawkish stance on China align with Trump’s priorities.

Ratcliffe declassified several documents at Trump’s request, which were intended to support Trump’s claims of being unfairly targeted by the intelligence community. This move, while controversial, demonstrated Ratcliffe’s willingness to take actions that aligned with Trump’s interests. A stark contrast to Trump’s Vice President!

Ratcliffe’s public statements and actions have consistently supported Trump’s policies and positions. For example, he criticized the Biden administration’s approach to the Middle East and emphasized the importance of supporting Israel, which aligns with Trump’s foreign policy views.

John Ratcliffe has not publicly advocated for the U.S. withdrawal from NATO in exchange for Russia’s complete withdrawal from Ukraine and Crimea. His stance has generally been supportive of strong national security measures and maintaining alliances that bolster U.S. interests. Ratcliffe’s focus has been more on ensuring that NATO allies meet their defence spending commitments and addressing threats from adversaries like China and Russia.

Ratcliffe’s focus has been on ensuring that the U.S. and its allies are prepared to counter any threats and maintain stability in Europe. This approach aligns with the broader strategy of strengthening NATO’s defense posture on its eastern flank.

Would he oppose a marked shift which prioritized a Netherlands/Dutch Israeli US prioritization over the Allied NATO alliance? John Ratcliffe has not publicly expressed a stance on prioritizing a Netherlands/Dutch-Israeli-US alliance over the broader NATO alliance. His focus has generally been on maintaining strong national security measures and supporting alliances that bolster U.S. interests, including NATO.

A marked shift in prioritization over NATO would be a significant policy change that would require careful consideration of the broader implications for U.S. and global security. The idea of the U.S. withdrawing from NATO in exchange for Russia’s withdrawal from Ukraine and Crimea is complex and would have significant geopolitical implications. The “America First” policy, as advocated by President Trump, emphasizes prioritizing American interests and reducing involvement in international alliances and conflicts.

This approach aligns with the Founding Fathers’ advice to avoid entangling alliances, as expressed by both George Washington & Thomas Jefferson in his Farewell Address, where both men cautioned against permanent alliances with foreign European nations. They believed that the young nation should avoid permanent alliances to maintain its independence and avoid being drawn into foreign conflicts.

While the “America First” policy advocates for focusing on domestic issues and reducing foreign entanglements, the practical implications of such a significant shift in policy would need to be carefully considered. The benefits of maintaining strong alliances and the potential risks of withdrawing from them must be weighed against the principles of non-interventionism and national sovereignty.

The idea might align with the Founding Fathers’ advice on avoiding entangling alliances, would have to go hand in glove with closing the Federal Reserve and restoring the power of Congress ie the Gold standard. Lincolns fiat Greenback paper currency developed to answer the economic crisis of the Civil War. Never intended as a permanent fiat currency like prevails today.

The idea of returning to the gold standard and closing the Federal Reserve would represent a significant shift in U.S. economic policy. It would involve complex considerations, including the stability of the financial system, the flexibility of monetary policy, and the impact on the global economy.

The collapse of the Nixon/Saudi petrodollar OPEC monopoly and the rise of a BRICS currency indeed signal significant shifts in the global economic landscape. The petrodollar system, established in the 1970s, allowed the U.S. dollar to retain its status as the world’s primary reserve currency by ensuring that oil exports were priced in dollars.

The BRICS countries have been discussing the creation of a new currency to reduce their dependence on the U.S. dollar and to assert their economic independence. This move could potentially challenge the dominance of the dollar in international trade and finance, leading to a process known as de-dollarization.

For the U.S., this means that economic policies may need to adapt to these new realities. This could involve reassessing trade relationships, exploring new economic alliances, and potentially revisiting monetary policies to ensure stability and competitiveness in a rapidly evolving global market. The extinction of the dinosaurs, an apt comparison. Adaptation is key to survival in a changing environment.

A marked shift in prioritization over NATO would be a significant policy change that would require careful consideration of the broader implications for U.S. and global security. A nuanced exploration of shifting U.S. foreign policy, potential alignments, and foundational economic policies in relation to changing global power dynamics.

This discussion analyzes the transformation in U.S. foreign policy, strategic alliances, and economic strategies. The approach focuses on the shifting global dynamics of power, particularly how actions by influential actors like John Ratcliffe reflect broader trends. For example, Ratcliffe’s aggressive defense of President Trump during impeachment proceedings contributed to his reputation as a staunch ally of Trump. His focus on national security, support for Israel, and criticisms of multilateral diplomatic approaches align with broader shifts in U.S. policy. These shifts can potentially challenge existing frameworks like NATO, requiring careful assessment of their impact on U.S. and global security.

Economic changes, such as the rise of BRICS and the decline of the petrodollar, signal a move away from U.S. dominance in global finance. If this trend continues, it may lead the U.S. to re-evaluate monetary policies, potentially returning to systems like the gold standard to ensure economic stability in a shifting world order. The process will require adaptation to new global realities, with nations adjusting to ensure their survival amidst changes.

Israeli Foreign Policy: breaking relations with the UN-nations

Jewish Persecution throughout History Redefined

The New Balance of Power

PVV’s leader, Geert Wilders, has called for a ‘Nexit,’ but this position does not currently reflect the broader majority sentiment within Dutch society. However, other far-right leaders across Europe have congratulated Geert Wilders on his victory, emphasizing their shared anti-EU sentiments.

The Dutch political landscape has buzzed like a beehive with discussions about Nexit. After all, Brexit set a precedent, and now everyone’s eyeing the Netherlands. Geert Wilders, the far-right leader of the Party for Freedom (PVV), has been waving the Nexit banner. The Netherlands thrives on trade. Rotterdam—their colossal port—anchors their economy. A Nexit compares to the risks of unplugging the espresso machine at a busy café—it’d hurt. Unlike the UK, the Dutch love the euro. But the Dutch absolutely want less of the Brussels bureaucracy and allot fewer red tape tangles. Even the pro-European crowd agrees: EU reform way overdue.

The coronavirus pandemic and EU’s vaccination strategy has aroused a strong minority opposition lead by Geert Wilders PVV Party for Nexit. Some individuals and Opposition groups condemn the long-term effects and societal impacts of the Covid-19 mass vaccinations! Nexit opposes the box thinking of EU bureaucracies like those of the World Health Organization (WHO) bureaucrats, who lavish praise and awe for the Covid-19 mass injections of the EU populace.

Nexit taps into a broader sentiment of frustration with perceived bureaucratic overreach, both within the EU and organizations like the WHO. Geert Wilders and his supporters argue that the EU’s centralized socialist decision-making stifles national sovereignty and imposes unnecessary bureaucratic regulations. This perspective resonates with those who feel that the EU’s handling of the COVID-19 pandemic, including its vaccination strategy, a Corporate monopoly-greed-betrayal of the European peoples!

The pogroms of the early 20th century were part of a larger pattern of antisemitism in Europe, which the Amsterdam pogrom and Kristallnacht directly remembers! Understanding this context helps illuminate the long-standing vulnerabilities of Jewish communities and the historical roots of conflicts involving Israel and its anti-semitic racist enemies. The rise of groups like Hamas and Hezbollah often includes deeply antisemitic rhetoric. All Arab Israeli wars starting with the ’48 Independence War fought over the racist Nazi like Arab absolute rejection of Jews equal rights to self-determination in the Middle East. Their ideologies viewed as a continuation of historical antisemitic attitudes, which can lead to violence against Jewish communities globally.

The conflicts involving Hamas and Hezbollah, also rooted in territorial, political, and religious disputes in the Middle East. But Arab racism which categorically rejects Jewish self determination, this defines the Arab Israeli wars fought in the 20th and 21st Centuries. The historical context of antisemitism, including events like the recent Amsterdam pogrom, reflect old long standing motivations and narratives used by Nazi-like racists. The actions and ideologies of groups like Hamas and Hezbollah can significantly impact Jewish communities worldwide, influencing perceptions and experiences of Jewish safety and belonging.

Consider the connection between PM of Israel wanting to break of diplomatic relations with the UN, using UNRWA and UNIFIL as justification; coupled with the UN distortion of Israeli condemnations which perverts Chapter VI suggestions unto Chapter VII ultimatums like as found in the last UNGA condemnation of Israel, serves as the foundation of Israel’s desire to break off all diplomatic relations with the UN-nations in particular due to Israel’s rejection of the Wilson/FDR\Truman notions of a World Government by which nation states conduct international diplomacy.

PVV’s leader, Geert Wilders strongly favors and supports Nexit! Could a secret alliance between Israel and the Netherlands use the Amsterdam pogrom and the corruption of UNRWA and UNIFIL on Oct 7th, for the Netherlands to leave the EU and Israel leave the UN?

Geert Wilders, leader of the Party for Freedom (PVV), advocates for the Netherlands to exit the EU. His stance is largely driven by concerns over national sovereignty and immigration policy. If Wilders were to gain significant political power, a shift towards a more Israel-friendly foreign policy could coincide with his Nexit agenda, potentially framing it as a way to assert Dutch sovereignty against perceived international biases.

A hypothetical alliance between Israel and the Netherlands could focus on mutual interests, including security and economic cooperation, especially if both nations feel marginalized by the EU and UN. Both countries could leverage historical narratives, including the recent Amsterdam pogrom, to rally domestic support for their respective political agendas, framing their actions as protecting national interests and historical legacies.

Breaking ties with international organizations carries significant risks & repercussions for both Israel and the Netherlands, affecting trade, diplomacy, and security arrangements. Combine this with the possibility of Trump deciding to “bring the boys home” from Europe; the US leaving NATO in exchange for Russia to leave the Ukraine including Crimea. Furthermore, in light of the rise of the BRICS currency competition against the dominance of the international dollar. Trump potentially negating the Wilson establishment of the Federal Reserve and returning America to the pre-1913 gold standard commodity based currency. Thus the alignment of a US/Israel\Netherlands economic alliance replaces the 20th Century NATO/Allied alliance.

The Dutch and the British have a strong history of competition and wars. In the 17th Century, the Dutch, with their innovative joint-stock companies and merchant fleets, sailed to distant shores. They founded colonies in North America, India, and Indonesia. Their ships—those sleek fluyts—dominated the seas. The British and Dutch fought four wars; in the the Second Anglo-Dutch War in June 1667, the Dutch pulled off a daring raid on the English fleet in its home port—the Medway, a river in South East England. This humiliation of the British. One of the worst defeats in the Royal Navy’s history, and one of the worst suffered by the British military.- a never forgotten Dutch victory.

If Trump advocates in negotiations with Putin, for a withdrawal of US troops from Europe, it could signal a major pivot away from traditional US commitments, including the WWI/WWII\NATO Allied alliance. This move might frame the a way to refocus & prioritize upon domestic issues and reduce military expenditures abroad. The idea of the US leaving NATO in exchange for Russia’s withdrawal from Ukraine, including Crimea, suggests a willingness to reshape the security landscape in Europe. This could lead to a re-evaluation of military alliances and security commitments. Both the US, Israel, & the Netherlands share concerns about Iran, regional instability, and terrorism, which could serve as a foundation for a more formalized alliance.

The rise of BRICS as a counter to the US dollar could significantly alter global economic dynamics. If countries within BRICS establish a competitive currency system, it could challenge the dollar’s dominance and influence in international trade. With Saudi Arabia’s withdrawal from the Nixon era’s petro-dollar monopoly and joining BRICS, the US dollar as the world currency directly threatened and challenged.

The petrodollar system, established in the early 1970s, tied the US dollar to oil sales, requiring countries to use dollars for oil transactions. This arrangement bolstered the dollar’s status as the world’s primary reserve currency. As one of the largest oil producers, Saudi Arabia’s decision to move away from the petrodollar could undermine the dollar’s dominance. Especially if the rest of OPEC followed the Saudi leadership.

By joining BRICS, Saudi Arabia aligns itself with a coalition of emerging economies seeking to challenge Western economic hegemony. This move could facilitate trade in alternative currencies, reducing reliance on the dollar. Saudi Arabia’s membership could enhance BRICS’ credibility and economic weight, potentially leading to a more coordinated effort to create a new currency system that competes with the dollar.

A significant shift away from the dollar in global oil markets could threaten its status as the world’s primary reserve currency. This would have profound impact upon the US economy, including potential inflation and increased borrowing costs. A diminished role for the dollar could lead to a rebalancing of global power dynamics, allowing countries within BRICS to exert more influence on international affairs. The US may need to re-evaluate its foreign policy and economic strategies in response to these shifts. This could include the prioritization of the US/Israel\Netherlands alliance. Both the US and Israel both reject the model of fiat currencies which currently domination world money markets!

Saudi Arabia’s withdrawal from the petrodollar system and its alignment with BRICS represent a significant challenge to the US dollar’s status as the world’s primary reserve currency. This shift could have wide-ranging implications for global trade, economic stability, and international relations. The evolving dynamics compel\require strategic adaptations from the US and its Primary allies Israel and the Netherlands to navigate this changing landscape.

A stronger US-Israel alliance could emerge as the US scales back its commitments to NATO. This partnership might focus on shared interests in security, counterterrorism, and geopolitical stability in the Middle East. Proposals to return unto a gold standard mark a radical departure from modern monetary policy. This shift could appeal to some constituencies seeking stability and predictability in economic values but would face significant challenges in implementation. Any dramatic changes in foreign policy, especially regarding NATO and economic systems, would likely face substantial domestic and international opposition. The interplay of these factors—US foreign policy shifts, the potential realignment of alliances, economic competition from BRICS, and radical changes to the monetary system—could reshape the geopolitical landscape in profound ways.

Wilders’ advocacy for a Nexit reflects a broader wave of populism and nationalism in Europe. His focus on national sovereignty resonates with constituents frustrated by EU bureaucracy and immigration policies. The Netherlands has a strong trade-oriented economy, particularly through Rotterdam’s port. Exiting the EU could jeopardize trade agreements and economic stability, drawing parallels to the challenges faced by the UK post-Brexit.

President Trump seeks to restore States rights to bureaucratically regulate all trade and commerce within the States as defined by the Commerce Clause of the US Constitution as the basis for dismantling the corrupt Federal post Civil War bureaucracies in Washington. This “tune” enjoyed by the musical ears of both Netanyahu and Wilders’ detestation of a huge Big Brother bureaucratic socialist domination of governance. President Trump has indeed emphasized states’ rights and deregulation as key components of his policy agenda, since the Supreme Court reversed Roe vs. Wade. His approach aligns with Netanyahu and Wilders; both men harshly critical of what they perceive as overreach by corrupt bureaucratic monstrosities.

This perspective resonates with those who advocate for more localized governance and less centralized control. The common thread among these leaders, their push for greater national sovereignty and a reduction in the influence of supranational organizations and bureaucracies, like the UN. This stance particularly evident in Wilders opposition to the EU’s centralized decision-making and regulatory frameworks.

During his tenure as Finance Minister under Prime Minister Ariel Sharon, Benjamin Netanyahu likewise implemented significant economic reforms aimed at reducing the power of state bureaucratic monopolies and promoting free-market principles. His policies included privatizing state-owned companies, cutting taxes, and reducing government spending. President Trump’s Make America Great defined by sharing an identical nation strategic interest. These measures part of all three leaders broader strategy to modernize the economy and encourage private sector growth in America, the Netherlands, and Israel.