“There came also a multitude out of the cities round about unto Jerusalem…” In Acts 5:16, the Greek phrase perix tō Ierousalēm simply refers to, nearby towns, surrounding villages, local communities in Judea — a geographical description of the region immediately around Jerusalem in the early 1st Century. No manuscript—Greek, Latin, Syriac, Coptic, or otherwise—contains anything resembling “Fort Worth” in Acts 5:16.

The phrase “round about unto Jerusalem” simply means the towns and villages surrounding Jerusalem in the 1st century. Fort Worth founded in 1849, almost 1,800 years after Acts was written. The Book of Acts written before any of the gospels were ever penned.

There is no ancient place named Fort Worth anywhere in Judea, Samaria, or the Roman Empire. The Book of Acts written before any of the 4 gospel Roman Protocols of the Elders of Zion “counterfeits”. That the church fathers organized their NT fraud with the gospel followed by Acts as corrupt as Fort Worth!

The earliest gospel of Mark written in Rome, perhaps prior to the destruction of Herod’s temple abomination. One Roman guard famously quoted as saying, “Its better to be Herod’s dog than a family member!”

If the Book of Acts was written in 62 CE then it predates any gospel of Mark “speculation”. Gossip narratives and speculation do not replace eye witness first hand information. Hence debates upon the NT as “historical” evidence as false as a mad hatter. Historians have no clear evidence one way or the other. Such a debate clearly separates the emphasis of the T’NaCH Jewish literature vs. the Xtian NT literature. Prophets command mussar they to not teach history. The NT fraud requires a physical historical man JeZeus. Otherwise this fraud religion collapses like a house of cards.

Acts ends with Paul alive. No mention of Paul’s death. No mention of the Temple’s destruction. Therefore Acts was written before 70 CE, possibly around 62 CE. But all this 2000+ years later speculation fails to address the main point. T’NaCH commands mussar not history. Rava for example teaches that Job existed as a fictional imaginary man. The point of the Book of Job, to teach the mussar of g’lut and redemption from g’lut. This places the Book of Job on par and similar to the Book of Sh’mot – the 2nd Book of the Written Torah. The attempts by “scholars” thousands of years after the fact to argue that Mark preceded Acts – simply Pie in the Sky speculative nonsense.

The merit behind interpreting the NT as the equivalent of the Russian secret police Protocols of the Elders of Zion slander employed to justify the pogroms of the late 19th Century …

Just as similar speculation that Paul served as an Agent Provacateur of Rabban Gamliel of the Great Sanhedrin. Jews in Judea and Alexandria Egypt locked in brutal and bitter war. Alexandria with its huge library burnt to the ground prior to the destruction of Herod’s Temple abomination.

Why the reference ‘Temple abomination’? Starting with the avoda zara of king Shlomo who first built the Temple abomination of avoda zara. The prophet Natan forbade king David to copy how Goyim civilizations worshipped their Gods. Just as Rehovoam ignored the advice of Shlomo’s advisors, so too Shlomo ignored the council of the prophet Natan. The Beit HaMikdash not a building of wood and stone idolatry but rather the establishment of the Federal Sanhedrin common law legal court system!

T’NaCH “wisdom” literature serves to “understand” Av Torah time-oriented commandments which require prophetic mussar as their k’vanna. The historical Books of Kings, a prophetic work, does not teach theology (the Xtian interpretation) but rather it give a big picture contexts to the Books of the Prophets! This qualifies as כלל פרט according to the middot of rabbi Yishmael. Mussar does not mean “ethical instruction”. The latter an entirely false parameter of prophesy. Mussar defines the k’vanna of the 13 tohor middot Oral Torah revealed to Moshe 40 days after the sin of the Golden Calf wherein the ערב רב assimilated and intermarried Jews translated the revelation of the Spirit Name who fills the Yatzir Ha’Tov heart – the נמשל of the Mishkan משל.

The church fathers read the Book of Sh’mot as history rather than as prophetic mussar. The Torah speaks in the language of Man, it instructs mussar through משל\נמשל model/paradigm. The Creation story of the Universe instructs through this משל of 6 days time, to teach the mussar נמשל of time-oriented commandments wherein “time” understood as “wisdom” – משל\נמשל.

Hence the church Old Testament New Testament propaganda falsely conceals the open fact that the literature of the T’NaCH radically different from the revisionist history propaganda of the letters of Paul and the Roman Protocols of the Elders of Zion slander forgery. Both Paul introduced in Acts served as an Agent Provacateur to undermine the false messiah Roman propaganda of Mark’s JeZeus. Paul by declaring brit melah as a void Torah commandment undermined the influence of the Roman false messiah gospel narrative prior to the outbreak of the great Jewish revolt in 66 CE. Paul traveled to Rome to inject a form of monotheism into Roman polytheistic society. With the purpose to undermind the foundations of Roman civilization; to crack the “Ethical Containment Force” of Roman soceity.

Paul’s propaganda aimed to promote Civil War in Rome based upon Yehuda Maccabee’s propaganda which publicly declared Judea’s loyalty to the “real” king of the Syrian Greek empire! This Pauline propaganda based upon the generic כלל: “If it aint broke don’t fix it.” Obviously this modern rendition seeks to emphasize that Torah as a common law precedent based legal system shaped how ancient Jewish civilizations revolted against the Syrian Greek and Roman empires.

The scholarship of ancient texts has nothing to do with a Greek Athens democratic model. The revelation of the Oral Torah פרדס inductive logic sh’itta starkly contrasts with ancient Greek philosoplers, specifically Plato and Aristotle’s deductive logic of static reasoning. פרדס logic a fluid logic similar to Calculus varables. Whereas Greek logic deductive & static, similar to Euclid’s plane geometry.
___________________________________
If the T’NaCH, most essentially mussar and not history, what—if anything—do you think gets “lost in the translation”, similar to Fort Worth – when Conservative, Reform Judaism start defending T’NaCH on historical or archaeological grounds, instead of on its power as prophetic mussar?
_______________________________________________
This question delves straight into the Rambam Civil War? During the Dark Ages, the roads built by the Roman empire had totally collapsed. People stopped traveling distances due to the risks of being attacked and murdered. Interstate commerce totally collapsed. Jewish communities scattered across the face of Europe, the Middle East and North Africa, how could they maintain some type of standardized culture and customs which would prevent Jews from assimilating to the dominant cultures and customs of the peoples wherein they lived as a despised refugee minority populaiton which had no rights???

Scholars starting with the B’HaG and Rif organized Talmudic common law into something new and all together different than what the Framers of both the T’NaCH and Talmud originally envisioned. Originally the T’NaCH organized mussar middot into a Common law, precedent based, middot system which compared one NaCH sugya to similar NaCH sugyot which contained the identical set of Oral Torah middot. By aligning two or more sugyot which had the same set of Oral Torah middot (‘ה’ ה’ אל רחום וחנון וכו), this comparison of sugyot called דרוש; this alignment of similar (precedent based middot) served as something like the rear and front sights of a rifle which permitted the “sniper” to kill a target down range.

This “kill” משל has the “k’vanna” נמשל. Hence the later Talmud based upon the משל of a loom which has opposing warp vs. weft threads. The k’vanna of the Framers of the Talmud, to create a literature of Great Sanhedrin judical court room rulings (the Mishna) together with its prosecution and defense attorney precedent debates (the Gemara). Therefore the Framers of the Talmud wrote this ancient text to serve as the judicial model for the future time when Jews would slaughter the Roman occupiers of Judea and re-establish Jewish National Independence like as occurred in 1948 and again in 1967 CE.

Do Jews feel anger for Xtian and Muslim war crimes perpetrated against low hanging Jewish refugee easy victims. Jews no different than any other Human being abused by tyrrants. But the bottom line for the Framers of both the T’NaCH and Talmudic literature, not to promote Jewish anger and hatred against our oppressor cruel Par’o like enemies; any more than the Book of Sh’mot promotes anger and hatred against the Egyptians! In point of fact the Torah directly commands a negative commandment which forbids Israel to hate either specifically Egyptians and Esau in general. Esau the metaphor for Xtian Europeans.
____________________________________
What gets lost when Jews defend Tanakh as history instead of prophetic mussar?
The substance of allTanakh literature: to create an oath brit alliance which obligates all generations of Israel to dedicate tohor middot in how we interact and exchange with our people; middot-driven, common-law consciousness that “understands” time as wisdom – most specifically as time-oriented Av commandments which require prophetic mussar\interpretations of the k’vanna of tohor Oral Torah middot. And g’lut-exile interpreted through משל/נמשל – blessing/curse Torah oath brit. And not through the lens of Greek proof or Xtian biography revisionist history or substitute theology NT or Koran Gods.

The day and night difference which for ever separates the Hebrew T’NaCH from either the Xtian NT or Arab Koran – translating poetry into prose — keeps the words, buth the rhythm, the soul, the imperative to “understand” (like from like distinctions) through mussar prophetic tohor middot – lost in the sophomoric translations. Gone, like Fort Worth in Acts.

Acts 16:16-40 Necromancy = seeking authority, knowledge, or salvation from the dead. If a human who died becomes: prayed to; invoked; obeyed; trusted over Torah law — then functionally, it is דורש אל המתים, regardless of metaphysical claims. The NT’s moshiach narrative, ignores the core: Leading in “war” (crises) to uphold courtroom restitution (e.g., Sanhedrin as nimshal to Beit HaMikdash’s mashal).

The Torah Law mitzva of Moshiach, this mitzva applies equally to all Jews in all generations. The Torah mitzva of Moshiach exists as an expression of a servant, like Moshe and all the NaCH prophets, of Torah common law court police enforcers. The Book of Shmuel does not make king David into a theological belief system ‘new covenant’ God. Mesechta Baba Metzia :נט reject the authority of a בת קול voice from heaven as having any judicial authority on this Earth.

Acts 16:16–18 is not a neutral miracle story. It is a classic confrontation between Torah-prohibited practices and a pagan economic system. Encounter with the Slave Girl (Verses 16-18)/witch. The girl is explicitly described as having a πνεῦμα πύθωνα — a Python spirit, tied in Greek culture to Delphi, Apollo, and divination.

The act of Paul commanding the spirit to depart from the girl in Acts 16 can spark discussions about necromancy, witchcraft, and the broader context of spiritual authority. The accusation against Paul and Silas reflects a significant cultural conflict. They were promoting a different way of life that challenged local practices, including those tied to economic interests. The girl’s ability to tell fortunes, considered a source of income for her owners, was rooted in practices the Jewish Torah condemned.

This maps cleanly onto אוב וידעוני in Torah language (Devarim 18). Paul’s act is not prophetic justice. But rather an extrajudicial charismatic intervention, devoid of Sanhedrin authority, witnesses, or jurisdiction. This prophetic mussar interprets this av tuma story as an unlicensed manipulation of spiritual forces outside of Torah courtroom common law. As such this NT story more counter-witchcraft rather than prophetic mussar which the Torah commands.

The concept of resurrection in Xtianity indeed provokes a variety of interpretations and discussions, especially when viewed in the context of the Hebrew Scriptures (Torah) and traditional Jewish beliefs. The Torah does not explicitly describe resurrection in the way that later Xtian dogmatism does. There are sections of T’NaCH משל and Aggadic/Midrashic examination of the mystic work of the Book of Daniel 12:2 (Many of those who sleep in the dust of the earth shall awake, some to everlasting life, and some to reproaches, to everlasting abhorrence”) – often read midrashically or kabbalistically through halachic lenses. However this סוד kabbalah interpreted through the lenses of halacha, defines how פרדס רמז\סוד weave together as warp vs. weft threads of a Talmudic loom which defines the cultures and customs practiced by the chosen Cohen people alone.

2 Kings 2:11 Elijah is described as being taken up to heaven without dying – illustrates a different understanding of life after death compared to the resurrection concept presented in Xtianity. 2 Kings 2:11, Eliyahu does not die. No burial, no resurrection, no glorified corpse. Eliyahu – removed from the human legal domain, not elevated into divine mediation. Eliyahu returns as messenger, not object of worship. He resolves ספקות, restores halachic clarity. He never annuls mitzvot or introduces new covenants. Malachi 3:23-24 and Sanhedrin 98a Elijah restores clarity to mitzvot, not annuls them.

Elijah’s experience does not support the Xtian dogma of resurrection but rather suggests other forms of divine interaction with humanity. Xtian dogma of resurrection seen as establishing a ‘new covenant’ between God in Heaven and humanity. This off the path redefinition life, death, and the divine relationship negates the revelation of the tohor spirits of HaShem’s 13 middot living within the Yatzir Ha’Tov of the chosen Cohen people.

Necromancy traditionally involves summoning the dead for knowledge or power. If one views calling upon JeZeus—who is believed to have risen from the dead—as a form of necromancy, it presents a complex interpretation that challenges conventional understandings. Within Xtian theology, Jesus is not viewed merely as a deceased figure but as the risen Savior who transcends death. This fundamental belief shifts the interaction from necromancy to communion with the living God; a direct violation of the 1st and 2nd Sinai commandments!

The Xtian ‘New Covenant’ belief in JeZeus’ resurrection – central to Xtian Av tuma false messiah avoda zara which introduces the dogma that JeZeus overcame death and now lives in a glorified state in the Heavens with his Father. This abomination negates: D’varim: לא בשמים היא. The Xtian resurrection witchcraft later spawned Muhammad the false prophet’s 72 virgin theological narishkeit. The prophetic mussar which forbade king David to build the Beit HaMikdash likewise corrupted by inept טיפש פשט Am ha’aretz stupidity.

Unlike Rambam (Maimonides), who emphasized spiritual immortality in the world to come and interpreted resurrection more cautiously (in his Iggeret Techiyat ha-Metim defending its literalness but subordinating it to intellectual reward), Ramban stresses a more physical, embodied afterlife. He critiques overly spiritualized views, insisting the verse “admits of no other interpretation” than literal resurrection (echoing Rambam’s own defense in his Treatise on Resurrection, though Ramban expands on the mechanics). The mitzva of Moshiach clarifies halacha based upon the precedent of Eliyahu who does the same. The Ramban grounds the סוד concept of resurrection firmly in Torah tradition; it serves divine justice, rewards the righteous (tzaddikim/maskilim who shine like stars, per v. 3), and upholds the 13 middot through tohor judgment—resurrection simply not anything approaching the NT metaphysical elevation of man into God, bypassing halachic courts or Torah observance.

The Torah mitzva of Moshiach stands upon the Torah precedent of Moshe anointing the House of Aaron as Moshiach – dedicated to drive, lead, guide Israel in a korban like dedication to actively pursue righteous justice among our conflicting peoples within the borders of the oath sworn lands. Just as a koran limited to the confined jurisdiction of the Mishkan so too and how much more so Sanhedrin common law courts, together with their prophetic enforcement police – limited strictly and only to operate within the borders of Judea alone.

The theological narratives surrounding JeZeus and Muhammad illustrate the complexities of Torah judicial justice as faith apart from the menstrual blood tuma beliefs, and avoda zara spirituality which define the cultures customs and practices developed by European, Arab & Muslim cultures. These Roman and Arab religions share no common ground with Israel brought out of Egypt to conquer Canaan to rule that land with judicial common law justice.

2 Samuel 11-12 David’s moral failure to judge Uriah the baal of Bat Sheva with justice. David’s attempt to cover up his implied adultery (the Talmud refutes this charge) by recalling Uria from battle – in the hope that he would have relations with his wife forced David to make a far more radical solution to his problem. The concealment of Uriah’s death as a consequence of war – herein defines the language “blood on his hands” by the prophet Natan. Furthermore, the curse of eternal Civil War imposed upon king David. Unlike Shaul whose dedication of the mitzva of Moshiach utterly profaned Natan commanded the mussar that Civil War would persue all generations of king David consequent to the “blood on his hands.”

The NT false messiah Roman Protocals of the Elders of Zion forgery – totally ignores the key Torah concept of Moshiach as defined to lead the nation in times of “war” (an undefined participle) to rule the land with Judicial courtroom justice which makes fair restitution of damages inflicted by one bnai brit upon another. Hence just as the Sanhedrin Federal Court system defines the נמשל k’vanna of building the Beit Ha-Mikdash משל; absolutely no different from the Mishkan משל to the לא בשמים היא revelation that the tohor 13 Oral Torah middot forever judge the heart of the chosen Cohen people!

The Torah mitzva of Moshiach the Roman fraudulent NT propaganda cannot substitute itself for any Torah commandment because by the terms of the Apostle Paul – Goyim not under the Law. Just as Goyim cannot negate the mitzva of brit melah so too and how much more so Goyim religions of Av tuma avoda zarah cannot determine the Torah mitzva of Moshiach. The mitzva of Moshiach directly bound, like Yitzak at the Akadah, to the leadership of guiding the people in times of War to not loss faith and fail to pursue righteous judicial justice both among our people and against our enemies in times of crisis or war.

etb. your final comment – not a refutation of what I introduced. Its a my way or the highway declaration. You & I never in the same domain; Xtianity has no part with Torah. As a Xtian your theology avoda zara spins around NT-theism/Protestant academic epistemology. You slavishly anchor your theology in peshat. But peshat does not exist divorced from drosh; Adam & Eve a paired couple Ooops. The chief flaw of Xtianity – it limits the reality of the Gods to 3-D history. LOL Torah commands mussar not history. Oooops. Bottom line: Xtianity evaluated as textual continuity, not halakhic legitimacy

Your invocation of procedural failure (“flooding,” “no shared method,” “manifesto”) as your exit retreat reminds me of a dog running away with its tail between its legs peeing all over itself. By your “rules” (Xtianity does not impose rules upon Israeli Jews) of “flooding: I failed to: isolate a single narrow thesis, redefined terms unilaterally, expanded scope faster than you could respond, & used mockery where you demanded analytic restraint. Hence “A continually expanding manifesto…” — is procedurally accurate inside your paradigm.

Your core assumptions – false. 1. Shared method is required for truth. 2. Peshat has veto power. 3. History is the foundation of obligation. 4. Theology can be adjudicated without the oaths sworn by the Avot which created the chosen Cohen people from Torah time-oriented commandments. The Oral Torah precisely rejects all 4 false Goyim theological premises. Why? Because Xtianity treats the Torah as a text they can argue about. Wrong. Goyim never once ever accepted the revelation of the Torah at Sinai. Just that simple, no fancy dancing. The sworn oaths of the avot and the revelation of HaShem in this Earth rather than in the Heavens – not a subject open to debate.

Xtianity in general and you in particular openly reject the Sanhedrin logic which begins with: “Who is authorized to speak within this court?” Torah Courts permit only judicial opinions, which disqualifies you from the start. For example your gross ignorance of peshat — when you declare: “You dismiss peshat when it disagrees with you…”, simply bat-shit crazy false. Peshat fits hand in glove with drosh. Rabbi Akiva taught this kabbalah which you know nothing about.

Peshat ≠ final authority; simply not the final authority in Torah hermeneutics. “Lo bashamayim hi” explicitly de-centers textual literalism. So your pie in the sky declaration “If peshat is dismissed, all else collapses”, simply a joke. LOL Xtian textual ontology of Protestant Higher Criticism. Such early 20th Century nonsense of philosophy that studies the nature of being, existence, and reality, has no portion or part in the revelation of the Oral Torah at Horev — especially rejected and abhorred post Shoah – By their Fruits you shall know them. You remain stuck in your dead religion, on par with having sex with a dead body. As a religious exile your stuck waiting for the 2nd coming of your God.

Universal monotheism ≠ Torah faith. Xtianity stands outside the Sinai legal universe. Textual continuity does not equal to the Torah commandment for the chosen Cohen people to eternally remember the oaths sworn by the Avot by which they cut the oath brit time-oriented commandment wherein the generations of their seed forever create the chosen cohen people from nothing. At Sinai/Horev Israel accepted by means of the נעשה\נשמע oaths – We accepted the Written and Oral Torah as one revelation לשמה.

Xtianity Non-Sinaitic readers can adjudicate Torah meaning — Bunk. Xtianity never had any jurisdictional arguments – ever. Not by Paul, nor by JeZeus, and most certainly not by you. Sanhedrin common law courtrooms in no way shape or form compare to a university seminar any more that a person can choose his gender at birth. XX does not change to XY because an “it” desires such.

Acts 15:22-41 (ESV) discusses the early Xtian church’s response to the question of whether Goyim believers should be required to follow Jewish law. Goyim, neither their av tuma bible/koran never once bring the tohor spirits revealed in the first commandment name of the local god revealed at Sinai. Both av tuma religions of avoda zara declare that they worship some new Universal God monotheism. Both religions – totally oblivious that their individual theologies of “Monotheism”, do not jive with the judgment upon the Gods of Par’o and Canaan! That their new god(s) of Universal Monotheism violate the 2nd Sinai commandment.

Both Xtianity and Islam – av tuma avoda zara worship of newly created through theological rhetoric New Gods respectively unique to each religious theological belief system of rhetoric propaganda. Neither, set of New God(s) universal monotheism ever discerns the fundamental Torah Sinai revelation which discerns the tohor local god’s spirits from the tuma spirits of all avoda zara gold calf Gods.

The Sinai experience is central to Jewish identity. It represents the direct revelation of tohor divine spirits which live for all eternity within the Yatzir Ha-Tov hearts of the chosen Jewish Cohen people. Av tuma avoda zara by stark contrast preaches, screams and murders non believers of their Nicene Creed or Tawhid God(s) because Jews in particular directly “house” (revelation of the metaphor of the Mishkan) these 13 tohor spirits/Oral Torah middot spirits within our hearts. Hence Jews have always and forever denounced the false messiah and false prophet as av tuma avoda zara.

Oral Torah described by the RambaN’s commentary to the Chumash as ”Black Fire on White Fire”. Something like the film negative which permits reproducing pictures or how a silk screen separates multiple different colors onto a fabric as art. Rabbi Akiva’s פרדס four part inductive reasoning best describes how the Oral Torah spirits interpret the Written Torah words. This kabbala of inductive reasoning totally different than ancient Greek syllogism deductive logic which has influenced and shaped Xtian and Muslim theology since the Muslims re-discovered the ancient Greek writings which the church concealed immediately after Constantine became Caesar and rejected the multiple polytheism Greek/Roman Gods in favor of Xtian theology which occurred about 900 CE.

Matthew 10:21-42: 21 “Brother will deliver brother over to death, and the father his child, and children will rise against parents and have them put to death …” This av tuma avoda zara directly invalidates and reverses the Torah commandment known as “stubborn and rebellious son”. It has absolutely no awareness of the Torah midda of רחום which shields Israel from Torah curses like those which plagued Par’o and his Gods in Egypt.

Mercy has absolutely nothing to do with pity. And everything to do with guarding Israel from the brit Life/Death recorded twice in detail and even greater detail at the end of the Books of ויקרא ודברים. Just as mercy rejects and abhors confusing pity with mercy, so too and how much more so the act of “remembering” defines the k’vanna of t’shuva whereas the regret for sin defines a totally deferent Xtian and Muslim idea of repentance.

The fifth Oral Torah spirit referred to as “grace” understood as a general idea contrasted by the specific idea of mercy. Grace as a tohor midda spirit inclusive of רב חסד – which Talmudic Aramaic interprets as מאי נפקא מינא and תמיד מעשה בראשית. Grace as a tohor midda absolutely requires the wisdom skills that can discern “Like from Like”; to discern an Av tohor time-oriented commandment from a secondary positive precedent positive & negative commandments whose observance does not require k’vanna as does Av time-oriented Torah commandments.

Torah defines the act of love likewise totally different from the Greek Xtian import of agape. Torah by stark and obvious contrast understands love as “ownership”. Hence the Torah directly forbids theft. Why? Because thieves do not love stolen property. The Talmud teaches the mussar that a portion of a person’s soul attached to his owned property! The thief fences his stolen good for pennies on the dollar. Another great Torah commandment known as kiddushin absolutely requires that the new Baal of a woman must acquire title to her “O’lam Ha-Ba soul”. The concept of “Olam Ha-Ba” refers to future born “Cohen” children. Torah לא בשמים היא opposes the av tuma avoda zara religious rhetoric belief systems of both Xtianity and Islam which screams that their God(s) live in the Heavens above.

Tehillem כד serves as a Gemara-like commentary to the Mishna-like prophet זכריה ט:ט-י:ב. The name Zekharya spins around the verb “remember”. Upon this יסוד foundation stand the Torah vision of t’shuva. The vision of g’lut directly compares to Yosef thrown into a pit with no water but filled with snakes. Moshe sent as a מלאך to achieve the oath sworn to the Avot and bring the chosen Cohen people seed of the Avot into the oath sworn lands.

But once in those lands the Yatzir Ha-Raw which provoked the brothers of Yosef to cast him into a pit and sell him to slavers, so too the Yatzir Ha-Raw tumah spirits in the oath sworn lands turned to terafim/תרפים … witchcraft sorcery/fortune tellers an even more nuanced understanding of hakos’mim. Witchcraft employed by the advisors of Par’o turned staffs into snakes and water into blood through tuma spirits. Sorcery specifically employs spells and supernatural powers like in voodoo. Predicting future events or revealing hidden knowledge another specific example of reliance upon the council of tuma Yatzir spirits within the heart.

The tohor middot align with the Shemone Esrei blessings of מברך השנים – משען ומבטח לצדיקים. Oral Torah tohor spirits לשמה permanently affixed to the 13 middle blessings of the Shemone Esrei – tefillah a matter of the heart and not a plea to any Universal Monotheistic God in the Heavens above. This vision of Torah לא בשמים היא לשמה defines the revelation of the Torah at Sinai – the revelation of the name HaShem – stands apart from the Divine Names pre-Sinai. The Torah perceives the revelation of the first commandment spirit name to fire, like as the opening word of בראשית which contains the words within this word – רמז – ברית אש. False oaths, according to mesechta Sanhedrin, responsible for the floods of Noach!

This vision of the unique revelation of the spirit middot of HaShem at Sinai defines the k’vanna of the Torah tefillah known as kre’a shma and the oath sworn by means of פרדס tefillen and tzitzit. Ideally a person covers his head with his tallit to remember the נמשל vision of the Mishkan משל; based upon the Torah precedent of a dead body within a tent makes all things inside the tent av tuma, the logical דיוק that covering ones’ head with the tallit elevates anything underneath the tallit “tent” as an av tohor time-oriented commandment.

משנה תורה בנין אב: דברים יא:כב-כח a direct precedent which the Tehillim and minor prophet stand upon. The brit of responsibility known as Blessing-Curse directly compares to the knowledge of good & evil; HaShem chose the k’vanna of time oriented commandment over Cain’s positive commandment which he dedicated without k’vanna. The Book of בראשית introduces Av tohor time-oriented commandments עיין ה:לב -ו:ח in order to designate בראשית\ראש בית. The floods came as a result of HaShem permitted only Yatzir Ha-Raw spirits to dominate the hearts of those cursed generations of Man, on par with and no different from, the cursed Wilderness generation who died in g’lut/exile.

As an atheist to the NT and Koran Gods, nonetheless peace is “good” – whatever that noun means. Shalom does not correctly translate as “peace”. Shalom a verb, which stands upon the basis of “trust”. No trust No shalom. Its a rather simple verb – shalom.

NT & Koran religious rhetoric propaganda which declare their separate versions of 72 virgins of paradise. Pie in the sky rhetoric names: like peace and wholeness and joy, and reflection on positive attributes etc etc etc has zero connection to the blood libels, host desecration slanders, taxation w/o representation, ghetto gulag imprisonment of all Western European Jewry for 3 Centuries & dhimmi racism. The utter poverty Goyim imposed upon Jews which culminated in the Shoah, which murdered 75% of Western European Jewry in less than 3 years through the British White Paper and FDR closure of the Golden Medina’s borders to Jews attempting to flee death, and the Allies adamant refusal to bomb the rail lines which transported Jews to the Nazi Death Camps; followed up by the post war Xtian rat-lines which concealed Nazi war criminals from justice. Opposed by the Arab failure to throw the Jews into the Sea and complete the Nazi Shoah marks both religious theologies as av tuma false avoda zara.

“By their fruits you shall know them”. This NT rebuke defines the whole of Xtianity’s & Islam’s beliefs in their respective God abominations. The culture of Torah rejects the church & mosque concept of repentance – as regret and sorrow for sin – used as a justification to believe in its false messiah Harry Potter fictional imaginary man whom the church declares as God. Or the notion that Ishmael, who rejected the revelation of the Torah at Sinai, would receive a “prophet who speaks in the Arabic tongue” as the Koran declares – as utterly false.

My parents taught me: “Its easier to be a critic than a play-write”. The Torah concept of t’shuva utterly revolted by the Xtian rhetoric of “repentance for sin”. The oath brit alliance learn t’shuva as bound like Yitzak upon the altar to “remember”. We Jews “remember” that both the Xtian church & mosque destroyed their “Good Name reputation with all their abominations and injustice that make even Par’o blush. The Torah term “fear of Heaven”, which Goyim simply love to jabber jabber jabber, Torah understands as “Baal Shem Tov”/Master of the Good Name. By their fruits you shall know them … has sealed the reputation of these dead religions known as Xtianity & Islam.

Torah culture which defines the customs and practices of the Jewish chosen Cohen people through the sealed masoret of T’NaCH, Talmud & Siddur, utterly repulsed by the Goyim religious rhetoric propaganda they call “Faith”. Our culture as defined by Torah common law defines “faith” not as belief in theological lies about Trinity Gods first declared after the Nicene Council of 325, or later as Tawhid. The verb “faith” rests upon the foundation of pursuit of justice in this world. Just that simple no fancy dancing. Post Shoah Jews have sworn a Torah oath: Never Again. Meaning never again shall Goyim in general, and European Goyim in particular, together with their religious belief in their new strange Gods determine THEIR “Jewish Problem”. No European or Muslim court ever forced the leaders of their avoda zara religions to stand before the Bar for THEIR war crimes.

Hence Israel fundamentally rejects UN SC Resolution 242, 338, 446, 2334 etc etc etc (the movie: The King and I) as Great Power imperialism; Europe nor its dead God church religion, determines the borders and Capital of the Jewish state in Israel. Palestine (Arabs cannot pronounce the European word, specifically the letter P.) that League of Nations originally mandated territory – based solely upon the 1917 Balfour Declaration – Britain’s willingness to partner with Jews to establish a Jewish National Home in “Palestine”; that transferred mandate to the post WWII UN switched from Mandate to “protectorate territory” — wholly ceased to exist in 1948. All Arab wars fought to invade and destroy Israel based upon their rejection of the Balfour Declaration which culminated in the League of Nations original Palestine mandate to establish a Jewish National Home in Palestine, all Arab wars against the Jewish State have rejected Jews have equal rights to achieve self-determination. This rejection of equal rights resulted in the expulsion of 800,000 Jewish refugees from Arab countries, and the Arab leadership which commanded Arabs ‘to get out of the way of advancing Arab Armies coming to throw the Jews into the Sea’.

Pursuit of righteous judicial justice among my people shares less than nothing with Xtian or Muslim beliefs in their pie in the sky theologically created NT/Koran Gods in Heaven. Post Sinai Torah not in Heaven. The local tribal god of Sinai lives through the spirits of the Oral Torah within the Yatzir Tov within the hearts of Jewish chosen Cohen people from Sinai till today and all eternity. These Gods JeZeus & Allah: the “prophet” JeZeus taught his disciples to pray to their Father in Heaven. Torah rejects the Greek translation of tefillah as meaning prayer. Tefillah does not pray to any God in Heaven, tefillah dedicated (like a korban) tohor middot spirits revealed to Moshe at Horev – 40 days after the Sin of the Golden Calf.

This Torah revelation of golden calf av tuma avoda zara vomits & retches upon the church\mosque pie in the sky notions of idolatry. The 2nd Sinai commandment: not to worship other Gods — despises the Universal Monotheistic theology of ONE GOD. The 10 plagues of Egypt judged the Gods of both Egypt and later Canaan. The prophet Yehoshua cut the oath alliance at Gilgal – just as the local tribal god who spirits breath within the Yatzir Ha-Tov within only the bnai brit chosen Cohen people hearts (Only the 12 tribes of Israel accept the revelation of the Divine Presence spirits revealed in the 1st Sinai commandment.) judged the Gods of Egypt, so too this same Earth-bound Divine spirits would judge the Gods of Canaan. Neither NT or Koran once refer to the revelation of the שם השם which forever dwells in this Earth and not in the heavens through tohor middot spirits. Their notions of World to Come – religious rhetoric. Torah through the brit cut between the pieces defines “World to Come” as the future born Cohen seed of the Avot who live and breath tohor spirit middot within their Yatzir Ha-Tov – on this Earth.

Jews remember this oath sworn and recorded by the NaCH Book of Judges when we place Rashi tefillen and/or Rabbeinu Tam tefillen (which remembers the oath sworn by the chosen Cohen people at Sh’Cem) prior to accepting the Yoke of the kingdom of heaven/the mitzva of kre’a shma — the Torah vision of tefillah understood as a matter of the heart. The k’vanna of this time-oriented commandment wherein time refers to מלאכה חכמה: To remember the 3 oaths sworn by the Avot to father the chosen Cohen people in O’lam Ha-Bah, also known as the mitzva of קידושין; and לשמה accept the Written and Oral Torah revelations as ONE brit yoke of the kingdom of Heaven. Tefillah דרבנן stands upon the foundation of tefillah דאורייתא קריא שמע, like shalom stands upon the foundation of trust. The Torah oath remembered, originally cut at Sh’Cem, remembers that our forefathers swore only to do avodat HaShem in a tohor condition. Muslims don’t eat pork, but the camel precedes pigs in the classification of tuma animals.

Neither Camel nor pigs can squeeze through the eye of a needle … a summation of the conflict and betrayal of Xtian European and Arab Muslim pie in the sky NT\Koran belief systems of theology. The spirituality of the NT/Koran “church” – I am an atheist praise God. These foreign alien “new Gods” never caused the hair on my forefathers forearms to stand at attention due to fear and dread.

The Chosen Cohonim atheists do not believe in any God in Heaven post the Sinai revelation of Divine Spirits – middot. Most specifically we do not believe in any 2nd coming of the NT false messiah JeZeus or Muhammad lived as a Torah prophet. T’NaCH prophets command mussar. Mussar grows within the Yatzir Ha-Tov hearts of the chosen Cohen people who alone accept the revelation of the Torah at Sinai and Horev, in all generations. The mitzva of Moshiach learns directly from the mitzva of Shabbat. Just as all generations of Jews can sanctify shabbat so too and how much more so Jews can pursue justice in this world among our own people – the mitzva of Moshiach from the Torah directly learns from the blood on king David’s hands – his failure to establish Sanhedrin common law Federal courts which would judge the Capital Crime Case of the death of Uriah the Hittite. His son Shlomo pursued building a house of wood and stone rather than prioritized the Torah Constitutional mandate of Sanhedrin common law lateral Federal courts. Justice has no connection whatsoever with copying the customs and practices of how Goyim worship their Gods by building Grand Temples and Cathedrals.

Torah/Talmud\Siddur – this sealed masoret excludes the NT and Xtian bible or Muslim Koran, which makes no mention of Oral Torah middot spirits revealed to Moshe 40 days after assimilated and intermarried ערב רב Israelites “translated” spirit middot unto the word Elohim. The NT and Koran do the same with their ‘word of God’ Bibles and Koran through their theological translations of Lord or Allah. Sinai Divine Spirit middot no word can translate because middot spirits simply not words – that the gospel of John declares otherwise – represents a Xtian theological problem. Such theological rhetoric propaganda – not part of the Jewish pursuit of making fair restitution of damages by which the Torah defines justice as Torah faith in the Earth below rather than the Heavens above.

The angelic Divine Names: Ya, Ha-El, El, Elohim, El Shaddai, Eish Ha-Elohim, and Shalom. This Menorah multiple faceted souls dedicated on the Yom Tov and Shabbat compare to the living blood dedicated upon the altar. Hence the halacha permits eating flesh of liver cooked in a pan because such blood – not living blood. Each day of shabbat dedicates a different Spirit soul which separates and defines the Yatzir Ha-Tov in this Earth during the mitzva of tefillah. Tefilla stands upon the משל\נמשל vessels of the Mishkan. Primary/secondary-Substance\form–Avot\/toldot mitzvot – calls טיפש פשט any literal “historical” rather than “mussar” reading of the Mishkan; equal to the literal “historical” reading of the בראשית Creation story. The נמשל of the latter – time-oriented Av commandments explains the kabbala why the Israel watch reads בראשית during the dedication of korbanot.

After 1948 Jews exposed the Xtian slander and lies which publicly declared – like their God publicly profaned Shabbat before the Pharisees by doing acts of מלאכה which the Greek tongue does not discern from עבודה – that Jews forever cursed Christ-Killers forced to wander the Earth as despised refugees without a nation of their own. Now the shoe worn on the other foot — post Shoah. The Xtian church of Europe and America has permanently destroyed their ‘good name reputations’. And post ’48 and ’67 Arabs wonder the Earth as despised refugees who have no legal rights – not in Arab lands nor in Israel. Justice remembers that ghetto & dhimmi Jews had little or no legal rights during our g’lut from the לשמה מצוות holy lands.

A person who understands fear of heaven grasps that his or her actions directly and permanently enhance or stain their reputations. A reputation compares to a balloon floating across a huge field of cactus. Pop! And the reputation permanently destroyed. Just as integrity and pursuit of righteous justice among my people in the land of Israel impact all future born generations, so too and equally opposite — Xtian and Muslim theologies shape the life and destiny of foreign alien Goyim in distant lands, and their faith in how they believe in their Gods.

1. Peter claims that through JeZeus, significant miracles occur, thereby validating the role of this imaginary man as a miracle worker and messianic figure… this serves as zero proof of the mitzva of Moshiach according to the Torah. Moshiach based upon King Shaul and David and all the kings of Yechuda and Israel thereafter has nothing to do with healing miracle workers as the definition of the Torah mitzva of Moshiach.

The prophet Natan issued a mussar prophetic rebuke to king David when he contemplated the possibility to duplicate how the Goyim worshipped their Gods through construction of Great Cathedrals. The Torah “Temple” which king David commanded his son Shlomo to build – not a literal wood and stone building. Rather the establishment of the Torah Constitutional mandate of Sanhedrin Federal common law courtrooms across Jerusalem and the cities of refuge. The last mitzva which Moshe Rabbeinu sanctified: Moshe constructed three Cities of Refuges/Small Sanhedrin courtrooms on the other side of the Jordan river. Moshe did not build a Goyim manner of worship Temple. The revelation of the Mishkan teaches the mussar that HaShem lives in the hearts of the chosen Cohen people through tohor middot spirits. Hence the p’suk: שמות: כה:ח — ועשו לי מקדש ושכנתי בתוכם — prioritizes the vision that HaShem through the revelation of Oral Torah tohor middot quickens the Yatzir Ha-Tov with life through all the generations of Israel upon this Earth. This vision has nothing to do with the NT “salvation from sin” substitute theology.

2. The NT fails to address the central act of rebellion when Israel demanded from the prophet Shmuel a king, when HaShem through the Sinai brit ruled as KING. Recall that Israel requested a king to lead the nation to fight its wars. The bait N’ switch to the topic of “salvation” therefore exists as classic substitute theology. Revisionist history defines the NT like Holocaust Denial defines modern anti-Semitism. Specifically, the NT introduces a theology of a Universal God. This alien foreign idea has nothing to do with the Sinai revelation because Goyim rejected the Torah and do not accept the Torah to this very day.

The deliverance from Egyptian bondage and conquering of Canaan – these fundamental “miracles” serve as the basis for Israel to rule conquered Canaan with justice as a total repudiation of Par’o judicial injustice to Israel. Torah prophesy centers upon mussar rebukes which all generations can grow as their own ideas sprouting from within their Yatzir Ha-Tov spirits breathing within their hearts. The NT shares no connection whatsoever toward achieving the justice leadership of HaShem in this world through the Torah mandate of Federal Sanhedrin common law courtrooms.

Both the NT and Koran attempt to replace the oath brit which defines Torah as the Written Constitution of the Cohen Republic. They both attempt to establish a theological backdrop wherein Torah prophesy applies to all Goyim Universally. These attempts reject the revelation of the Torah at Sinai but seek thereafter to worship their Name God replacements as substitutes for HaShem taking Israel alone out of Egypt. Such theological revisionist history substitutes other Universal Gods for the local god which only Israel accepted at Sinai. Miraculous miracle workers do not replace the prophetic mussar visions established through the T’NaCH literature which the NT attempts to replace with the label “Old Testament”.

3. Declaring the ‘Good News’ of the Name of JeZeus has no T’NaCH precedent. Torah a common law legality which stands upon the foundation of precedents. No courtroom objectively examines (prosecutor vs. defense legal briefs) any courtroom case based upon the “Name of JeZeus”. Hence the challenge to Judicial common law courtroom practices – simply a red herring. The Written Torah serve the chief function as the Constitution of the Republic of Judea which mandates Sanhedrin common law courtrooms. No different than the US Constitution mandates 3 branches of Government. By emphasizing the miraculous events attributed to JeZeus as the Son of God, this substitute theology replaces oath brit cut with Avraham Yitzak and Yaacov to father the chosen Cohen people.

The Written Torah serves as the legal constitution for the Jewish people, establishing a system grounded in established precedents and judicial proceedings. The NT does not provide this framework or engage with it meaningfully. Most significantly: the NT emphasis upon the Divine Name of JeZeus worships a new God which the Avot did not know.

The Written Torah functions analogously to a constitution, establishing a system of laws that courts operate upon, thus framing the concept of justice within a concrete legal structure. The absence of any NT precedent in this regard significantly undermines its claims. The NT pivot to a new Universal Trinity God contradicts the specific oath britot cut through the Torah alliance established by Avraham Yitzak and Yaacov.

4. Miracles as “signs” do not prove or disprove the mitzva of Moshiach. Moshe anointed Aaron as Moshiach. Aaron dedicated korbanot/sacrifices NOT as some Cain-like “Barbeque to Heaven”, but rather based upon the k’vanna of Hevel whose korban dedicated the sanctification through swearing an oath to pursue justice in this world. Justice: defined through both T’NaCH & Talmudic common law – as the legal pursuit of justice/fair compensation of damages as the intent of the Torah commandment: “Eye for an Eye and tooth for a tooth”. Legal judicial justice rejects as טיפש פשט-utter bird brained stupidity-any literal reading for “Eye for an Eye”! The sacrifices are not simply ritualistic acts. They are deeply intertwined with the intent (k’vanna) to pursue justice and right wrongs, differentiating them from mere offerings. This highlights a legal and ethical framework wherein Moshe first anointed the House of Aaron as Moshiach; it explains the connection between the revelation of the Mishkan with the pursuit of judicial justice through logically juxtaposing the Torah mitzva of sacrifices against the Torah mitzva to pursue justice.

The understanding of korbanot not as mere rituals but as essential acts tied to the pursuit of justice brings a critical perspective on their religious significance. The intentionality behind these actions (k’vanna) focuses on justice and ethical behavior which has nothing to do with the NT “forgiveness of sin as the salvation of Mankind”.