The strong objections made by classic Talmudic Judaism against Xtian avoda zarah.

Ernst Bloch über die Musik als praeludium vitae aeternae (Das Prinzip Hoffnung): “Dieser Engelsgesang wird die Erlösten des Herrn aufnehmen und umgeben, also ist jede irdische Musik, die ihre Inspiration aus diesem Oben nimmt, für Augustin eine offene Himmelstür, eben ein „praeludium vitae aeternae, ut a corporeis ad incorporea transeamus“ (de musica VI, 2). Musik sollte nun erst völlig von den Zusammenhängen der himmlischen und menschlichen Harmonie handeln; vom Paradies herab senkt sie sich zur musica mundana, der kosmischen Harmonie, dann zur musica humana, der Harmonie von Leib und Seele, und kehrt zum Paradies zurück.”

This dude if not mistaken converted to Xtianity. Ernst Bloch, one of the key figures associated with the famous “Frankfurt School of Social Research”. Why should traditional Jewry despise Bloch’s opinions concerning music? My personal objections which absolutely reject Bloch’s perversion: Jewish Xtian converts have almost always produced trouble, horrible disasters for Jews in Europe. The 1242 burning of the Talmud in Paris France, serves as but one example of abomination. The result of a Jewish convert demanding that the Talmud slandered JeZeus.

The classic Talmudic rabbinic opposition and the rejection of Bloch’s theories as “tumah avoda zarah” (ritual impurity and idolatry), points to the tension between Bloch’s vision of music as a metaphysical tool for spiritual connection and the rabbinic tradition’s rigorous guidelines about religious purity and the avoidance of foreign or non-Jewish spiritual practices. The classical Talmudic opposition to Bloch reflects a fundamental difference in how spirituality, music, and metaphysical concepts are understood and practiced within the frameworks of Talmudic Judaism versus Bloch’s philosophical vision. The emphasis on legal observance, communal identity, and avoidance of foreign influences is central to this rejection.

Talmudic Judaism maintains a highly structured and cautious approach to religious expression and spirituality. The focus is often on legalistic observance of commandments (mitzvot) and ethical actions within the framework of Jewish law (halakhah), rather than speculative metaphysical or transcendental ideas, especially those borrowed from non-Jewish sources like Christian theology.

The classical Talmudic tradition—which is rooted in a very practical and legalistic approach to faith—would likely reject Bloch’s concept of music as a bridge to a divine and eternal realm, primarily because such a notion seems to involve elements of avoda zarah. In the Talmudic view, spirituality and connection to God are not mediated by abstract philosophical systems or artistic experiences, but through the observance of divine commandments and the study of sacred texts like the Torah and Talmud. The idea of using music as a spiritual vehicle to access higher realms or to prepare for “eternal life” would not align with the rabbinic understanding of worship and the purity of spiritual practice.

In traditional Jewish thought, anything that introduces non-Jewish metaphysical concepts—like the idea of “cosmic harmony” or music as an intermediary to divine salvation—could be considered tumah avoda zarah (impurity, idolatry). This is because Jewish law strictly prohibits the adoption of foreign religious practices or ideas that might dilute or contradict the worship of the one, indivisible God. While the Talmudic tradition acknowledges the significance of music in certain contexts (such as the use of the shofar or the singing of psalms), music itself is not viewed as a transcendent tool that connects the listener to divine harmony in the way Bloch proposes.

Music in Jewish tradition plays an important role, but its significance is primarily linked to ritual observance and prayer, not as a mystical or metaphysical means of transcendence. For example, the shofar on Rosh Hashanah, or the melodies sung during the Shabbat and Yom Kippur services, are meant to help bring a person closer to God through worship and repentance, but they are not viewed as a mystical force that connects humanity to divine truths beyond the concrete world of Jewish law and ritual.

This is starkly different from Bloch’s view, where music has a universal, cosmic significance that transcends individual religious traditions. For Bloch, music is not merely a tool for religious worship but a metaphysical instrument that reflects the broader “unseen” dimensions of reality—something eternal, spiritual, and universal.

There is a significant tension between the mysticism of thinkers like Bloch, who see art and music as metaphysical pathways to understanding the divine, and the Talmudic tradition, which emphasizes legal purity, the observance of commandments, and textual study as the primary means of connecting to God. Jewish spirituality is traditionally grounded in law and communal practice, rather than in individual mystical or philosophical experiences, especially ones drawn from non-Jewish traditions.

Jewish mysticism (e.g., Kabbalah) does explore spiritual dimensions and the connection between the material and the divine, but it does so within the framework of Jewish law and tradition. Mystical practices like those found in Kabbalah or Hasidism might incorporate music in a way that elevates the soul toward a greater understanding of God, but the focus remains on the observance of commandments and devotion to God through the sworn oaths by the Avot embraced by the generations of the Jewish people—not the kind of universal, abstract, and potentially syncretistic worldview Bloch presents.

The classic Talmudic opposition to Ernst Bloch’s theories, particularly regarding his ideas of music as a metaphysical gateway to the divine, arises because Bloch’s worldview contrasts sharply with the Jewish theological and philosophical tradition. Talmudic Judaism emphasizes the observance of specific commandments and the study of sacred texts as the primary means of spiritual elevation, while Bloch’s philosophy presents music as a transcendental force capable of bridging temporal human existence with an eternal, divine reality.

From the Talmudic perspective, non-Jewish metaphysical concepts like those found in Bloch’s Christian-influenced philosophy would be viewed with suspicion, if not outright rejection, as potentially leading to avoda zarah that distract from the unique, mutually oath brit sworn תמיד מעשה בראשית relationship between God and the Jewish people. Thus, Bloch’s ideas would likely be seen as incompatible with the Talmudic understanding of worship, divine law, and the role of art in Jewish spirituality.

Jewish Response to the Av Tuma New Testament Avoda Zarah Fraud.

https://christianpure.com/es/learn/difference-old-testament-tanakh/

How did the letters written by the Apostle Paul expose the concealed intent of an agent provocateur? Specifically, how did his letters both undermine the Roman Pantheon of Gods and Xtianity itself?

Paul’s letters both challenged the Roman pantheon by promoting monotheism and critiquing idolatry and emperor worship, while also sometimes undermining early Christian thought, especially in his approach to Jewish faith concept of pursuit of judicial justice.

The letters written by the Apostle Paul represent a significant part of early Christian literature, and while they primarily serve to spread and clarify Christian teachings. Also aspects of Paul’s writings seen as challenging both the Roman Pantheon and elements of early Christianity itself.

The Roman Empire’s religious system was polytheistic, worshiping a wide range of gods, based upon the Greek model. Paul’s letters, promoted monotheism — as central to Christian faith. For example, in 1 Corinthians 8:4-6, Paul acknowledges that many people in the surrounding culture believe in many gods, but for Christians, “there is but one God, the Father, from whom all things came.” This contrasts sharply with Roman polytheism, where each god or goddess had a particular domain of influence (such as Jupiter, Mars, Venus, etc.).

Paul consistently warned against idolatry, urging his followers to avoid worshiping statues and images of gods, a practice common in Roman religion. In 1 Corinthians 10:14, he writes, “Therefore, my dear friends, flee from idolatry.” He uses strong language to describe the futility of idol worship, which directly undermines Roman religious practices that were centered around the Pantheon of gods.

The Greek term idolatry lacks the power of the Hebrew term avoda zarah. An idol represents a limitation to both physical history, wherein Xtian theology absolutely requires a historical physical Jesus and a fundamental limitation to 3 dimensions. The Hebrew concept of avoda zarah has no such limitations. Contrast Euclid’s 5th Axiom of Geometry, and the Scientific method, who “idolatry”, limits reality to empirical physical evidence. Hence the ancient Greek Gods viewed a Giant Bearded Men and Women on Mt. Olympus. Paul’s replacement theology revisionist history of the Torah revelation at Sinai, falsely translates idolatry for avoda zarah. Paul fails to grasp the 1st and 2nd Commandments of the Sinai revelation. A failure on par with Muhammad’s replacement of Allah over the שם השם. A Av tumah avoda zarah equal to the sin of the Golden Calf!

Paul’s theological construct of a passive spiritual Moshiach, as opposed to a Bar Kokhba military Moshiach introduced a radical shift away from the Moshe model who travelled to Egypt, despite Paul’s presentation of a liberation theology freed from judicial justice – despite the judicial oppression of the court of Par’o in the matter of straw withheld and Israelite brick quotas. Paul’s replacement theology compares the Pantheon of Roman Gods with Caesar as the Son of God, compares to the mystic Book of Daniel whose vision sees the Gods of Babylon as standing upon feet of clay.

Paul’s letters aware of both the Pesach story of Egypt liberation and Daniel’s mysticism of ‘End of Days’, viewed in the surrounding contexts of the approaching General Jewish revolt in both Judea and Alexandria Egypt; his passive Moshiach theology greatly contributed to Alexandrian Jews not joining the revolt made by the Judean Jews. That military Moshiach failed to coordinate a Judean and Alexandrian Jewish revolt joined together at the hip. Bar Kokhba actually failed to conquer Damascus and throw the Roman legions out of Syria, Paul’s liberation substitute theology likewise failed to ignite a Roman Civil War and rebellion against Caesar as the Son of God, prior to the Great Jewish revolt in 66CE.

Clearly, because Paul’s letters, written in Greek, his target audience, he aimed to persuade Goyim rather than Jews to embrace his substitute theology that replaced the sworn oath of the eternal chosen Cohen people; based upon the Divine T’shuva made on Yom Kippur where HaShem rejected making of the seed of Moshe the chosen Cohen poeple. Paul’s replacement theology rejects the Yom Kippur t’shuva made by HaShem. His anti circumcision, anti-chosen Cohen people stance while in Damascus supports this premise that Paul as an Agent Provocateur sought to engage the heretical belief in Jesus messiah theology, which had succeeded in enticing some Jews in Judea and many more Jews in Alexandria Egypt, through his anti-circumcision theology preached in Damascus. After travelling to Rome, Paul’s liberation theology switched priorities to Jesus as the Son of God, messiah king of the Jews theology, which undermined Caesar as the son of god. The Roman Empire viewed the emperor as a god or a divine figure, and Roman religion was deeply interwoven with imperial politics.

Paul, however, in places like Romans 13, speaks about submission to earthly authorities but emphasizes that the ultimate authority lies with God alone. His monotheistic theology fails to grasp that Monotheism violates the 2nd Sinai Commandment of the revelation of the Torah at Sinai. This can be seen as a subtle challenge to the emperor’s divine status, which was an essential part of Roman religious practice. Paul’s Greek letters failed to emphasize the first and second Sinai commandments, utterly essential as viewed from Traditional Judaism. Paul’s replacement theology emphasizes the Name of Jesus and totally abandons the Yod Hey Vav Hey Holy Spirit Name, which breathes as a Spirit and not a word, revealed in the first Sinai commandment. The opening verses of the gospel of John fails to discern this subtle distinction between the revelation of the Spirit Name and the Sin of the Golden Calf – translating the Spirit Name unto word translations.

One of the key replacement theological debates in early Christianity, the relationship between faith and works. Paul – a strong advocate for salvation through faith, as seen in Ephesians 2:8-9 (“For it is by grace you have been saved, through faith—and this is not from yourselves, it is the gift of God—not by works, so that no one can boast”). This replacement theology subverted the Torah concept of faith which prioritizes the righteous pursuit of judicial common law justice, based upon Torah precedents, which dedicates as holy, a fair restoration of damages inflicted by Party A upon Party B, as the definition of Torah faith in the sworn oath brit alliance of the chosen Cohen people. A fundamental shift in the concept of faith, which Paul’s liberation theology denigrates to – not by works, so that no one can boast.

Paul’s ‘Salvation by Grace’ likewise undermined the revelation at Horev of the 13 tohor middot, grace being the 5th middah/attribute of the revelation of the Oral Torah. His replacement theology completely ignored rabbi Akiva’s פרדס/Pardes logical interpretation of the revelation of the Oral Torah at Horev.

Paul’s letters made subtle omissions to key Torah concepts. Paul’s writings, especially in Romans 9-11, as grappling with the question of whether the Jewish people were still chosen by God. Yet all his letters fails to validate that the chosen Cohen people of Avraham, Yitzak and Yaacov, the eternal life of the seed of the Avot defines the oath sworn alliance at the brit cut between the pieces, where HaShem swore to cause this chosen Cohen people to eternally inherit the Promised Land, and that the Spirit Name of Yod Hey Vav Hey breathes within the Yatzir Tov of the bnai brit Cohen peoples’ hearts.

Paul’s argument that Gentiles could be part of God’s promise without fully converting to Judaism through practices like circumcision, and notion of ‘adopted’ Goyim utterly switch the narrative away from Ger Tzaddik – who accepts all the Torah commandments, to a perverted prioritization, that Jews too, can embrace the triune God of Xtianity; where the Holy Spirit ceases to exist as wisdom how to pronounce the Yod Hey Vav Hey revelation of the 1st Sinai commandment…the greatest of all Torah commandments; do the bnai brit chosen Cohen people do mitzvot לשמה yes or no? Unto Goyim preaching the Good News gospels unto the lost and cursed Jews!

Paul’s letters both challenged the Roman pantheon by promoting monotheism and critiquing idolatry and emperor worship, while also they equally undermined early Christian thought, especially in his approach to T’NaCH and Talmudic common law and the prioritization of Judicial Sanhedrin courtroom justice as the Torah definition of faith. The Apostle Paul, as an Agent Provocateur not only did his theology dismantle belief in Caesar as the son of God, king of the Jews, it equally sought to uproot and replace Torah common law judicial legislative review and prophetic mussar.
_____________________________________________________________________________

A response made to Holley

Holly I absolutely validate the skewed false reading made by Xtians like yourself. Paul most definitely a Jewish secret agent sent to promote Civil War in Rome, and undermine the crazy messianic pacifist movement among the Jewish people.

The whole tripe revisionist history of “Saved” religious propaganda totally ignores Yom Kippur.

[[[In Genesis 3:15, after Adam and Eve’s fall into sin in the Garden of Eden, God speaks to the serpent (representing Satan) and says: “And I will put enmity between you and the woman, and between your offspring and hers; he will crush your head, and you will strike his heel.” This verse is interpreted by many Xtians as the first messianic prophecy — a prediction of the coming of Jesus Christ, who would ultimately defeat Satan and sin.]]]

Utter nonsense. Xtians do not have the least bit of a clue how the Torah defines the key term “prophet”. LOL Religious revisionist history sucks. The story of the expulsion of Adam from the Garden introduces the Central Torah theme of G’lut/Exile, which plays throughout the Written Torah!!! Paul’s “original sin” rhetoric employed to justify belief in JeZeus saving from sin nonsense.

Torah common law which means משנה תורה in Hebrew. Honestly your sophomoric translations of your silly bible – utterly pathetic. Common law shares no common ground with Statute law. Yet Paul’s declarations of political rhetoric “Goyim you’re not under the Law” fails to make any distinction from something that’s day vs night different from one another. Isaiah the prophet called this religious rhetoric: Cursed the person who calls Day Night and Night Day!

The Mitzva of Moshiach an Oral Torah interpretation of the Written Torah! Torah common law stands upon precedents. In Hebrew precedent means בנין אב. Church religious rhetoric propaganda never once in all its bloody history ever asked: “What Torah mitzva serves as the foundational precedent for the Oral Torah mitzva of Moshiach?” A fundamental basic question that no Church propaganda ever asked in 2000+ years!!!! Sucks being lied to by your own people.

[[[The Prophet Isaiah prophesied of what you call a ‘passive’ Messiah (Is 52-53).]]] Bunk. Moshe commands Blessing or Curse; Life or Death. Life – judicial righteous justice in the oath sworn lands. Death – judicial oppression comparable to the Court of Par’o who withheld straw yet ordered the vicious beating of Israelite slaves! This concept of Death known as g’lut or exile. Like as told in the story of the expulsion of Adam from the Garden, Noach in the Ark, the future unborn seed of Avram in an unknown land; the suffering of Egyptian slavery in Egypt, and the 40 year exile in the Wilderness. A clear undeniable Torah theme that plays out in all the first four Books of the Written Torah. No Spin required.

Your Genesis 3:15 a religious spin that promotes Xtianity. Torah common law not a religious belief system like your religion of avoda zarah.

רוח הקודש which your silly religion translates into Holy Spirit Trinity nonsense, refers to the Name Yod Hey Vav Hay that your silly bible never once includes. Translating the “Holy Spirit” Name of HaShem to words like Lord or Allah etc duplicates the Sin of the Golden Calf.

40 Days after the revelation of the Torah at Sinai only persons who make a טיפש פשט/bird brained literal reading of the words of the Written Torah. The Torah speaks in the language of Man. Meaning the Torah instructs by means of משל\נמשל Metaphor/interpretation. The language Golden Calf, a Torah משל metaphor!!!! What’s the prophetic mussar applicable to all generations? The נמשל\interpretation אלהים/Gods. Any attempt to translate the Yod Hey Vav Hey unto words, herein defines the Sin of the Golden Calf throughout the generations. Be those Gods: Lord or Allah or Yahweh or Jehovah, all these Gods = to the sin of the Golden Calf. Your bible silly translations, they worship other Gods. Just that simple.

Holly Goyim do not determine Torah mitzvot. Not shabbat observance nor messiah. Goyim never accepted the revelation of the Torah at Sinai. Your religion rapes both the first and second Torah commandments. In equal manner the church makes no distinction between the different Hebrew verbs מלאכה ועבודה.

After Israel accepted these first Two Torah commandments at Sinai, because many of Israel approached unto their wives in the past 3 days, prior to the revelation of the Torah at Sinai, Israel feared that they would surely die. This stubbornness would repeat itself 10 times culminating in the slander made by the spies sent by Moshe to search the oath sworn lands. Another major Torah theme that your bible commentators totally ignore! Religious spin amounts to propaganda revisionist history!

Moshe went up the Mount and only after the sin of the Golden Calf, did Moshe teach the rest of the Torah!!! What about the so called 10 Commandments? Answer: Torah common law stands upon precedents. The 10 commandment משל teaches the 10 plagues נמשל. A Torah commandment to “remember” the exodus from Egyptian judicial injustice. The Torah defines faith as: Justice Justice pursue. Your new testament religious rhetoric propaganda replacement theology has belief in JeZeus replace pursuit of judicial justice among our own people within the borders of the oath sworn promised lands! Replacement theology utterly insidious, subtly harmful or deceitful, often spreading or causing damage gradually and in a way not immediately noticeable.

[[[Daniel was a prophet of the One true God, and his prophecies are not mysticism.]]] Bunk. The Hebrew T’NaCH divided into 3 divisions: Torah, Prophets, Holy Writings. The Book of Daniel placed in the Order of Holy Writings.

Goyim have not the slightest clue of the relationship of the Holy Writings to the Prophets serves as the model for the similar relationship between the Gemara to the Mishna. Holly, Goyim – they simply do not determine Jewish cultures and customs any more than Jews determine the culture and customs practiced by non Jewish societies. An obvious truth like the nose on your face. Absolutely no religious spin in this statement. Utter arrogance then for Goyim to pretend that they determine how the organization of the T’NaCH, which their revisionist history calls “old testament”, shapes Jewish customs and culture throughout Jewish history. “Odd Testament” a classic example of Xtian religious spin propaganda rhetoric. Spin employs subtle perversions in order to deceive the minds of sheeple.

You read your new testament totally divorced from the history and times of the people that lived when they wrote. You make the surface simple reactionary reading that the people wrote without political satire. Comparable to the Book of Kings describing king Shlomo as “the wisest of all Men”! King Shlomo worshipped avoda zarah and caused the nation to collapse into Civil War from which the First Republic never recovered! The Book of Kings utterly despises and abhors king Shlomo!!!! Construction of his assimilated copying of Goyim culture and customs, does not replace the establishment of Great and Small Sanhedrin’s of common law Federal courtrooms!

The Russian revolutionaries of the late 19th Century had to conceal their revolutionary ideals by employing משל metaphors. Similar to Orwell’s ‘Animal Farm’; or Jonathan Swift’s Gulliver’s Travels. You read your bible much like children to hear the tales of Gulliver, Lilliput and Brobdingnag; oblivious to the satire which mocks France vs England!

[[[After a time when the Jews rejected the truth, they were partially blinded.]]] You writings duplicate the bitterness of Luther. After he realized the Jewish people did not buy his religious spin propaganda he turned and wrote the book: “The Jews and their lies”. You’re absolutely no different than Martin Luther.

Another example of religious spin rhetoric propaganda bull shit. [[[Paul doesn’t ‘fail to grasp’ anything. He was a Pharisee, a learned pupil of Gamaliel, a Benjamite, a Roman citizen — he was more knowledgeable, (I’d venture a guess), than anyone alive today. He was a chosen vessel of God.]]] You know absolutely nothing of Rabban Gamliel instructionn of Oral Torah common law; your religion absolutely denies the existence of the Oral Torah! Your claims concerning Paul – Pie in the Sky utterly bogus.

An example of religious spin: [[Holy Spirit]]], this משל refers to the נמשל of Yod Hey Vav Hey revealed in the 1st Sinai commandment, the greatest commandment in the whole of the Torah revelation.

Another example of religious spin [[[144k chosen from the Tribes of Israel.]]] based upon your Book of Revelations mysticism. Confusing mysticism for prophesy a diviant insidious perversion.

Another example of religious propaganda rhetoric spin. [[[The children of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob are His chosen people. Chosen for what? The service of God, the promises, the Covenants, the adoption, the oracles of God. They failed, but God has not cast away His people.]]] The translation covenant fails to express the meaning of brit. A Torah brit requires שם ומלכות concepts that go way beyond your ability to grasps how to swear a Torah oath alliance. At the oath alliance of the brit between the pieces – this brit established the eternal inheritance of the chosen Cohen people ruling the oath sworn promised land with righteous judicial justice. The Pauline rhetoric propaganda glossed over the essential fundamentals of Torah faith. A very insidious religious spin. You clearly fail to grasp that a Jew sent by Rabban Gamliel had a hostile political agenda against Rome and Caesar! Your reading of your new testament compares to children listening to the stories of Gulliver’s Travels. Wake up and smell the coffee.

You’re no different from the mobs who scream Palestine and illegal West Bank occupation! Mandate Palestine ceased to exist in 1948 when Israel won its first War of Independence. The Jordanian “West Bank” ceased to exist when Jordan surrendered to Israel following the June 1967 War. A lot of politically ignorant irrational fools run amok in frenzied anti Israel demonstrations held across the US and Western Europe. Apartheid forever separates mob rule from righteous judicial justice. Apartheid in this context completely different than that of South African Apartheid!!! Another example of spin.

Holly a fundamental rift separates Traditional Judaism from Conservative and Reform Judaisms. The latter views the T’NaCH and Talmud as historical Jewish documents. Whereas the Traditional Judaism interprets T’NaCH and the Aggada within the Talmud as prophetic mussar and the interpretation of prophetic mussar respectively.

Your new testament never once addresses the subject of prophetic mussar! This insidious perversion of classic T’NaCH literature, your description of the Old Testament, subtly deceitful.

Another example of spin. [[[Humble yourself to Him. God resists the proud.]]] The Torah employs the verb humility when it describes Moshe. Yet your surface reading only amounts to religious rhetoric propaganda. Humility defined as strict observance of honesty, even when: to ones’ own hurt or disgrace! Humble yourself. Remove the beam out of your own eye before attempting to remove the splinter from my eye.

Another example of spin [[[Paul loved, JeZeus loved]]] You have not the slightest clue how the Torah defines the word “love”. Impossible to employ an undefined term, to define itself. Just that simple. Your silly church fathers had to turn to Greek ‘agape’ to define the term “love”, how utterly pathetic.

Another example of spin: [[[gave His life for you, the blood of bulls and goats cannot take away sin]]] The arrogance of Xtianity has no shame. The Torah concept of korbanot/sacrifices has nothing what so ever to do with offering a barbeque unto heaven. This prostitution of the Torah, what an utter disgrace. Only matched by the story of the Romans beating JeZeus to a bloody pulp and the church declaring it as a perfect unblemished sacrifice. Ya simply cannot make up the gross perversion made by shameless Gospel Books.

Another example of tuma religious Avoda zara spin. [[[No one has ever been justified by the law. Because we are not justified by the law does not mean we are not to maintain good works (Mizvot as you mentioned) – Titus 3:8.]]]. Judicial justice has nothing to do with justifications. Justice compels the guilty to make fair compensation of damages inflicted upon the victims. Titus 3:8 both insidious and deceitful.

[[[You speak of the Spirit name. How could you be called by His name if it was never meant to be spoken?]]] A fair question, the first real question ever asked from you to me. Torah commonn law stands upon the foundation of precedents.

What distinguishes the t’shuva (repentance, a insidious and deceitful false translation) made on Chag Rosh Hashanah from the t’shuva made upon Chag Yom Kippur? A fundamental and basic question of Yiddishkeit. The Neshama Spirit Name of אל dedicates/sanctifies through swearing a Torah oath, based upon the oath dedications sanctified during korbanot offerings on the altar, the face of the Neshama which remembers “יום הזכרון” the Torah rebuke – the sin of the Golden Calf.

On Yom Kippur the Cohen Ha’Gadol pronounces the Yod Hay Vav Hay! Hence the mesechta of Rosh Hashanah introduces the precedent of blowing the shofar. The three notes, t’keah, tr’uah, and sh’varim serve as a משל which teaches the נמשל of the chosen Cohen peoples’ commitment to keep and honor time oriented, positive and negative commandments, as exemplified in the lives of Avraham, Yitzak, and Yaacov. Blowing the shofar not words but the dedication of the spirit of the Neshama אל.

The t’shuva of Chag Yom Kippur, remembers the t’shuva made by HaShem which for ever annuls the vow declaration to make of the seed of Moshe Rabbeinu the chosen Cohen people. The t’shuva of Yom Kippur denounces the Pauline revisionist history and substitute theology. The notion that adopted Goyim determine the narrative of Jewish culture and traditions. Jews the chosen Cohen people. Jews discern between tohor and tumah middot which Goyim totally ignore, as they eat their treif animal flesh.

Goyim never once ask: Why does Jewish ritual slaughter of animals, not concern itself with cutting the artery and vein that go to the brain? Had they had the slightest inkling of korbanot, Goyim would know that a Cohen MUST cut the artery and vein going to the brain. Why?

Common butchery of animals does not require this sacrficial strengency because local butchers do not sanctify living blood thrown upon an altar. What’s the נמשל of this משל? Answer: the dedication of souls/living blood.

Yom Kippur dedicates the soul called Chyyah/אלהים. This kabbalah the church neither determines, and how much more so, the church does not know.

Another example of spin. [[[I do seriously pray for you.]]] Holly prayer does not accurately translate the Hebrew verb “tefillah”. Your notion of Prayer more resembles your quote (How blessed are all who take refuge in him. (Ps 2)). Tefillah by stark contrast requires שם ומלכות, a group of concepts to which you have not the slightest clue. Translating these abstract concepts to Name and Kingship as absurd as declaring that a physical historical man exists as God.

The Torah responds to the new testament fraud.

Not of Abraham: A Primer on Talmudic Judaism (Part 1)

How did the letters written by the Apostle Paul expose the concealed intent of an agent provocateur? Specifically, how did his letters both undermine the Roman Pantheon of Gods and Xtianity itself?

Paul’s letters both challenged the Roman pantheon by promoting monotheism and critiquing idolatry and emperor worship, while also sometimes undermining early Christian thought, especially in his approach to Jewish faith concept of pursuit of judicial justice.

The letters written by the Apostle Paul represent a significant part of early Christian literature, and while they primarily serve to spread and clarify Christian teachings. Also aspects of Paul’s writings seen as challenging both the Roman Pantheon and elements of early Christianity itself.

The Roman Empire’s religious system was polytheistic, worshiping a wide range of gods, based upon the Greek model. Paul’s letters, promoted monotheism — as central to Christian faith. For example, in 1 Corinthians 8:4-6, Paul acknowledges that many people in the surrounding culture believe in many gods, but for Christians, “there is but one God, the Father, from whom all things came.” This contrasts sharply with Roman polytheism, where each god or goddess had a particular domain of influence (such as Jupiter, Mars, Venus, etc.).

Paul consistently warned against idolatry, urging his followers to avoid worshiping statues and images of gods, a practice common in Roman religion. In 1 Corinthians 10:14, he writes, “Therefore, my dear friends, flee from idolatry.” He uses strong language to describe the futility of idol worship, which directly undermines Roman religious practices that were centered around the Pantheon of gods.

The Greek term idolatry lacks the power of the Hebrew term avoda zarah. An idol represents a limitation to both physical history, wherein Xtian theology absolutely requires a historical physical Jesus and a fundamental limitation to 3 dimensions. The Hebrew concept of avoda zarah has no such limitations. Contrast Euclid’s 5th Axiom of Geometry, and the Scientific method, who “idolatry”, limits reality to empirical physical evidence. Hence the ancient Greek Gods viewed a Giant Bearded Men and Women on Mt. Olympus. Paul’s replacement theology revisionist history of the Torah revelation at Sinai, falsely translates idolatry for avoda zarah. Paul fails to grasp the 1st and 2nd Commandments of the Sinai revelation. A failure on par with Muhammad’s replacement of Allah over the שם השם. A Av tumah avoda zarah equal to the sin of the Golden Calf!

Paul’s theological construct of a passive spiritual Moshiach, as opposed to a Bar Kokhba military Moshiach introduced a radical shift away from the Moshe model who travelled to Egypt, despite Paul’s presentation of a liberation theology freed from judicial justice – despite the judicial oppression of the court of Par’o in the matter of straw withheld and Israelite brick quotas. Paul’s replacement theology compares the Pantheon of Roman Gods with Caesar as the Son of God, compares to the mystic Book of Daniel whose vision sees the Gods of Babylon as standing upon feet of clay.

Paul’s letters aware of both the Pesach story of Egypt liberation and Daniel’s mysticism of ‘End of Days’, viewed in the surrounding contexts of the approaching General Jewish revolt in both Judea and Alexandria Egypt; his passive Moshiach theology greatly contributed to Alexandrian Jews not joining the revolt made by the Judean Jews. That military Moshiach failed to coordinate a Judean and Alexandrian Jewish revolt joined together at the hip. Bar Kokhba actually failed to conquer Damascus and throw the Roman legions out of Syria, Paul’s liberation substitute theology likewise failed to ignite a Roman Civil War and rebellion against Caesar as the Son of God, prior to the Great Jewish revolt in 66CE.

Clearly, because Paul’s letters, written in Greek, his target audience, he aimed to persuade Goyim rather than Jews to embrace his substitute theology that replaced the sworn oath of the eternal chosen Cohen people; based upon the Divine T’shuva made on Yom Kippur where HaShem rejected making of the seed of Moshe the chosen Cohen poeple. Paul’s replacement theology rejects the Yom Kippur t’shuva made by HaShem. His anti circumcision, anti-chosen Cohen people stance while in Damascus supports this premise that Paul as an Agent Provocateur sought to engage the heretical belief in Jesus messiah theology, which had succeeded in enticing some Jews in Judea and many more Jews in Alexandria Egypt, through his anti-circumcision theology preached in Damascus. After travelling to Rome, Paul’s liberation theology switched priorities to Jesus as the Son of God, messiah king of the Jews theology, which undermined Caesar as the son of god. The Roman Empire viewed the emperor as a god or a divine figure, and Roman religion was deeply interwoven with imperial politics.

Paul, however, in places like Romans 13, speaks about submission to earthly authorities but emphasizes that the ultimate authority lies with God alone. His monotheistic theology fails to grasp that Monotheism violates the 2nd Sinai Commandment of the revelation of the Torah at Sinai. This can be seen as a subtle challenge to the emperor’s divine status, which was an essential part of Roman religious practice. Paul’s Greek letters failed to emphasize the first and second Sinai commandments, utterly essential as viewed from Traditional Judaism. Paul’s replacement theology emphasizes the Name of Jesus and totally abandons the Yod Hey Vav Hey Holy Spirit Name, which breathes as a Spirit and not a word, revealed in the first Sinai commandment. The opening verses of the gospel of John fails to discern this subtle distinction between the revelation of the Spirit Name and the Sin of the Golden Calf – translating the Spirit Name unto word translations.

One of the key replacement theological debates in early Christianity, the relationship between faith and works. Paul – a strong advocate for salvation through faith, as seen in Ephesians 2:8-9 (“For it is by grace you have been saved, through faith—and this is not from yourselves, it is the gift of God—not by works, so that no one can boast”). This replacement theology subverted the Torah concept of faith which prioritizes the righteous pursuit of judicial common law justice, based upon Torah precedents, which dedicates as holy, a fair restoration of damages inflicted by Party A upon Party B, as the definition of Torah faith in the sworn oath brit alliance of the chosen Cohen people. A fundamental shift in the concept of faith, which Paul’s liberation theology denigrates to – not by works, so that no one can boast.

Paul’s ‘Salvation by Grace’ likewise undermined the revelation at Horev of the 13 tohor middot, grace being the 5th middah/attribute of the revelation of the Oral Torah. His replacement theology completely ignored rabbi Akiva’s פרדס/Pardes logical interpretation of the revelation of the Oral Torah at Horev.

Paul’s letters made subtle omissions to key Torah concepts. Paul’s writings, especially in Romans 9-11, as grappling with the question of whether the Jewish people were still chosen by God. Yet all his letters fails to validate that the chosen Cohen people of Avraham, Yitzak and Yaacov, the eternal life of the seed of the Avot defines the oath sworn alliance at the brit cut between the pieces, where HaShem swore to cause this chosen Cohen people to eternally inherit the Promised Land, and that the Spirit Name of Yod Hey Vav Hey breathes within the Yatzir Tov of the bnai brit Cohen peoples’ hearts.

Paul’s argument that Gentiles could be part of God’s promise without fully converting to Judaism through practices like circumcision, and notion of ‘adopted’ Goyim utterly switch the narrative away from Ger Tzaddik – who accepts all the Torah commandments, to a perverted prioritization, that Jews too, can embrace the triune God of Xtianity; where the Holy Spirit ceases to exist as wisdom how to pronounce the Yod Hey Vav Hey revelation of the 1st Sinai commandment…the greatest of all Torah commandments; do the bnai brit chosen Cohen people do mitzvot לשמה yes or no? Unto Goyim preaching the Good News gospels unto the lost and cursed Jews!

Paul’s letters both challenged the Roman pantheon by promoting monotheism and critiquing idolatry and emperor worship, while also they equally undermined early Christian thought, especially in his approach to T’NaCH and Talmudic common law and the prioritization of Judicial Sanhedrin courtroom justice as the Torah definition of faith. The Apostle Paul, as an Agent Provocateur not only did his theology dismantle belief in Caesar as the son of God, king of the Jews, it equally sought to uproot and replace Torah common law judicial legislative review and prophetic mussar.

A tiny bit of Torah learning as Chag Pesach approaches. Why the Torah commands to remove all חמץ prior to the redemption of g’lut Egyptian slavery and court of Par’o, his judicial oppression of Israel.

To understand how the משנה תורה sugya of D’varim 21:18-21, required to learn this sugya in context of previous precedent sugyot content – Torah common law. The previous Parsha of שופטים, quite amazingly ends with ססס rather than פפפ. This sugya in question, stands in the shadow of the opening sugya of Parshat תצא. The concept of intermarriage with Goyim. The Torah refers to this type of child as ערב רב. Recall that the Torah commands to utterly destroy Amalek. The mussar given to Israel that the ערב רב, that assimilated Jews do not fear אלוהים. The consequence of deciding to produce an ערב רב family … the birth of the בן סורר ומורה איננו שמע בקול אביו ובקול אמו ויסרו אתו ולא ישמע אליהם

Rashi, it seems to me, goes off on a tangent by attempting to define and specify the crimes the child must do to qualify as a crime worthy of standing before a small Sanhedrin Capital Crime court of 23 justices. But it seems to me that this משנה תורה sugya requires both a Written Torah comparative precedent (Torah law a common law legalism) and a prophetic NaCH 2nd witness.

A precedent sugya by which to grasp this Torah prophetic mussar, בראשית ה:לב-ו:ד. This sugya speaks of the birth of the sons of Noach compared to how non brit Goyim produced children. The Torah calls the latter children as אנשי השם. But clearly this רמז\hint refers to the disgrace guilt, that these children filled the world with great evil; that these children pursued after their tuma middot Yatzir Ha’ra. Herein constitutes an exact precedent by which to interpret the sugya of the stubborn and rebellious son.

This precedent teaches that the din of the rebellious son, makes a רמז to the prophet ירמיה whose mussar addresses the din of g’lut. A precedent sugya ירמיה ד:כב-כו. The prophet here goes hand in glove, its prophetic mussar, clearly defines the k’vanna of the Torah sugya addressed through the משנה תורה prophetic mussar. Israel came out of Egypt to pursue righteous judicial justice where the Sanhedrin courts make fair compensation of damages inflicted by Party A upon Party B among our oath brit allied people.

Clearly this prophetic mussar, radically different in content from the Rashi p’shat which makes the absurd attempt to define the crimes committed by the stubborn and rebellious son. Rashi fails to address the ערב רב assimilation and intermarriage with Goyim which defines the k’vanna of the 2nd Sinai commandment not to worship other Gods.

Blessing or Curse. Jews observe our oath alliance brit faith to pursue righteous judicial justice within our Homeland, or Jews suffer total destruction at the hands of cruel enemies. Our people, as a direct consequence of being a stubborn and rebellous “son”, forced to endure bitter bitter g’lut. It seems to me that Rashi’s commentary totally missed the k’vanna of the sugya of the stubborn and rebellious son.

mosckerr
The Wayward Son (Deuteronomy 21-23)

Revisionist history stinks of propaganda rhetoric, ‘Political Warfare’, which seeks to isolate and separates Israel from all other nations. The UN ‘international community/international law’ bogus condemnations of Israel attempts to treat Israel as a rogue nation, separated from all other nations who fight a war, like the Russian/Ukraine war. China and Korea have actively aided Russia as has the US and NATO currently aid Ukraine. Yet all Israeli wars, the bogus UN ‘international community/international law’ condemns Israel of ‘war crimes to genocide’ totally divorced from all other wars fought throughout history! Why? Revisionist history seeks to deny that Israel, a nation-part of the community of nations in the Middle East. The UN-nations Apartheid policy excludes Israel as a nation of the Middle East. No other nation within the UN treated with this utter racism. UN-nations promotes the revisionist history that Israel did not win its two wars of Independence fought in 1948 and 1967. Rather UN-nations foists the revisionist history propaganda rhetoric that Israel remains a UN protectorate territory of the UN. Political warfare defines the strategic policy decisions of all Arab wars to throw the Jews into the Sea. Arab racism embraces Nazism, which fundamentally denies the Zionist vision, which stands upon the 1917 Balfour Resolution, that the Jewish people have equal rights to strive for and achieve ”’SELF-DETERMINATION”’ in the Middle East. Arab revisionist history wars continually to treat Jews as an inferior race. The UN General Assembly condemned Israel and declared: Zionism is Racism!

Ex-British Commander DESTROYS the ‘Genocide’ Lie About Gaza with PROOF – YouTube

The inherent Contradictions of Romantisim

Icebergs Moving Beneath Us-A Quote And A Link To Isaiah Berlin

Romanticism today? Dominant models? Absolute wisdom? Disappearance of Vice and Folly? Rational Order avoided of an incomprehensible world the incapable differences between Greek and ancient Hebrew civilizations. Mythical giants of bearded Gods that control Man. Vast changes have occurred, a Pacific Ocean that separates Ancient civilizations from Modern society.

Romanticism a permanent state of Mind? Utterly absurd. Human development dynamic not static. Catastrophic events and the explosion of genius forces Mankind throughout the Ages to improvise and change. Rousseau, the father of Romanticism – his ‘Social Contract’ sparked the French Revolution and the human barbarity which ensued. No such thing as Universal knowledge. Great upheavals pit knowledge vs. irrational emotions.

1760 – 1830 a great break in humanity occurred – the rise of Democracy and citizenship overthrew classic feudalism and an agriculturally based economies. Later replaced by the Industrial revolution and the mass population transfer from rural farms to urban cities. Prior to this human landslide the 30 Year War where Europeans slaughtered one another – only matched by WWI.

Muhammad, another example of genius producing a human earthquake. Hegel and Marx more modern human Earthquakes that shattered society, which introduced Socialism and class warfare. .Human consciousness continually shifts and changes. Human progress: one step forward and two steps in retreat.

The noun ‘peace’ does not correctly translates to the verb ‘shalom’. The latter stands upon ‘trust’. The former by contrast simple political and religious rhetoric propaganda by which tyrrants herd sheeple populations. Like Obama’s political slogan of “change” which enticed Americans between 2008 – 2016. Another example of political rhetoric, Bush’s ‘New World Order’. All revolutions produce there equal and opposite counter-revolutions. An example: the political dispute between Hillery Clinton vs. Donald Trump in the 2016 Presidential elections.

Why do corrupt DemoCRAPS slander and libel Mr. Musk? Why do these public criminals denounce Musk’s efforts to stop Washington Bureaucratic fraud to the American people? Many public officials in Congress implicated for insider trading. Specifically Nancy Pelosi’s corruption, blatantly obvious.

Elon Musk exposes why Democrats don’t want ‘waste and fraud’ to be turned off – YouTube

Social Security payments to 150 year old dead Americans. Vast Federal bureaucracy ignores the politically appointed people. Bureaucracies do not implement President Trump’s policies. 92% of bureaucratic employees voted for Kamala Harris. Mr. Musk’s tech support teach employs about 100 people. A 2 Trillion dollar deficit. Mr. Musk declares he does not want the Federal Government going bankrupt. His goal seeks to save 1 Trillion dollars to the US treasury. 20 million dead people on the Social Security books. That’s a lot of fraudulent money. Entitlement spending a huge Federal fraud. Democraps don’t want the waste and fraud cut off because its a huge magnet which attracts illegal immigrants importation of voters. California does not require voter ID.