Talmud a common law legal system which requires the wisdom of פרדס logic which permits the generations to interpret its precedent halachic rulings to make a “legislative review” of Mishnaic language intent. The Framers of the Talmud did not sit with ease at the idea of teaching the wisdom of rabbi Akivas פרדס logic to women. Most societies, and definitely during the framing of the Talmud, women live their lives subservient to their Man. For a woman to possess the skills required to bring a halacha from a Yerushalmi source to make a ‘Legislative Review” which re-interprets through making a depth analysis of the language of the Bavli Talmud; something like the skills required which aligns the rear and front sights of a rifle to shoot a target down range with close accuracy! A woman in possession of this tremendous skill-set, it would spin the heads of rabbis like a top on a string!
Women in possession of such kabbalah Torah wisdom would compare to nudist women parading into the Shul on Shabbat and insisting to read the Sefer Torah themselves! Such an event would cause a scandal. Therefore, its not a matter that women cannot study the Talmud, they most certainly can. The central issue, especially concerning women among men, the middah of צנועה. For women to publicly expose their skill-set that they know how to correctly read a Sefer Torah, this would humiliate almost all Jewish men – who lack these fundamental skills! Something like a janitor who reveals his vast knowledge skill-set publicly in front of his boss. The boss who obviously lacks the superior education displayed by his janitor employee, would not feel humiliated?!
That janitor would most probably find himself out of a job and most probably black-listed! Rabbi Meir’s wife, and over 1000 years later Rashi’s daughters educated in the Talmud, and they placed the mitzva of tefillen, and did time oriented commandments with k’vanna! Clearly its permitted for women to privately learn Talmud, especially they possess a talent to learn and grasp this wisdom. However, modesty an essential tohor middah applicable to both Men & Women, but expressed in different ways. The Torah directly forbids women or men wearing the clothes traditionally worn by the other sex.
Young students today traditionally study Talmud in Yeshiva. Women and Men learn our masoret in different and separate institutions. If a woman studies Talmud in a Seminary such scholarship applauded and respected by both men and women! Some women learn Talmud better than men. But a wise woman, in possession of this skill-set, would never publicly up-stage men in a public setting. It would violate the tohor middah of modesty. Something like going to the mikveh for ritually purification while holding a dead rat.
Absurd question. The correct way to learn halacha: employ the halachic opinions as expressed in a sugya of Gemara as legal precedents to re-interpret the faceted language of the Home Mishna which the Gemara comments upon. Halacha, despite the popular religious codes from the erroneous Rambam Tur and Shulkan Aruch statute codifications of religious law; the latter follow Greek and Roman statute law, which organizes legal rulings into ice-tray like legal rulings, organized into specific subject matters. Actual common law halacha, like as found within the commentary of Rabbeinu Tam, the Rif, B’hag, & Rosh codifications, such posok halachic rulings have no feet of their own!
Talmudic common law employs the halachot within the Gemara, they function and serve as legal common law precedents towards re-interpreting or making a “legislative review” upon the different and multiple language-facets contained within the word-construction of the Home Mishna, which the Gemara common law halachic precedents serve. Gemara common law halachic precedents, they make a משנה תורה wisdom of learning; something like the front, top, side views of a blueprint permits a building contractor to see a 3 dimensional idea from a 2 dimensional blue-print.
T’NaCH: Torah, Prophets, & Writings: these Av common law system which the Talmudic common law legal system models itself – therefrom! As a loom has its warp/weft opposing threads, the Talmud has its halacha vs aggada. Any garment woven from a loom, if someone removes either the warp or weft base threads, the garment ceases to exist. T’NaCH does not teach history. Rather T’NaCH prophets command mussar. Why? T’NaCH prophetic mussar grows as a rebuke “within the hearts” of the chosen Cohen people; the mitzva of tefillah – a matter of the heart. While the Siddur has fixed the standardized kre’a shma and tefillah, the Jew davens T’NaCH inspired prophetic mussar which rebukes from within our hearts, like a worm grows within an apple. Herein a succinct summation of the Siddur intent k’vanna; so too the Gemara common law toldot halachic precedents, they likewise re-interpret the language intent/k’vanna of their Av mitzvot Mishna Primary source.
All generations the chosen Cohen seed of Avraham, we compare to the stars in the heavens for the multitude of our continuous generations. Jewish folk which comprise these generations just as we can sanctify shabbat by making the required הדבלה which discerns between forbidden מלאכה from forbidden עבודה, we likewise sanctify the intent of the mitzva of Moshiach, through our pursuit of righteous judicial justice among our people, within the borders of the oath sworn brit lands, in each and every generation. This vision of faith far different than the false gospel narrative Protocols of the Elders of Zion forgery.
Impossible to study the Aggada of T’NaCH prophetic mussar, to weave this prophetic mussar as the k’vanna of observance of toldot secondary sources Gemara halacha; to makes this common law “legislative review” which re-interprets the intent of the multi-faceted faces contained within the language of each and every Case/Rule common law Av Mishna. A pun employs a word which has two or more meanings. The Mishnaic language contains layers of interpretive pun-like language! For example the Gemara itself states explicitly: 70 faces to the Torah!
The haredim learn halacha as if it exists as a טיפש פשט. The silly fundamentalist Xtians likewise read the Creation story, the Book of בראשית. These religious fanatics, they read their bible translations, oblivious to the fact that the Latin translators & all later translations – utterly incompetent. Herein understands the Hebrew term ירידות הדורות, which refers to the domino effect fundamental errors made by earlier generations have upon later, down stream generations. Xtians open their bible translations and read these טיפש פשט bibles with utter stupidity. They learn the משל word בראשית, limited to a literal face value read. בראשית, ברית אש, ראש בית, ב’ רשאית! The Torah speaks in the language of Man. Torah instruction employs a משל\נמשל style which requires the student to make logical דיוקים/inferences. Comparable to Hegel’s critique of Aristotle’s syllogism of deductive logic.
Modern day fools scream from the Irish Parliament, they piously declare – post the Oct 7th Abomination War in Gaza — “genocide”! This urban warfare conflict the IDF has the lowest ratio of soldiers:civilian casualties in the history of modern warfare! Impossible to rationally communicate with a fascist, who has decided from his mothers’ milk, that Jews poisoned the wells, and employ murdered Xtian baby blood to bake matza bread for Passover!
Catholic antisemitism defines the tumah mitzva yoke burden upon all generations of bnai brit Israel, the commandment – expunge the remembrance of Amalek from under the heavens! The racism of the ICC no different from that of the Popes during the Dark Ages. No European Court ever attempted to force the Pope, or any Xtian leader, to stand before the BAR to answer for war-crimes charges.
Martin Luther screamed from his pulpit: gather the exiled Jew refugees into their synagogues and burn those buildings upon them; this racist Nazi like propaganda, served as a model for Hitler. It fomented violent pogroms among faithful church followers! Emotionally enraged mobs attacked unarmed and vastly outnumbered Jewish minority populations! Racial violence consumed Jewish refugees as low laying fruits, much as did KKK mobs lynched Niggers from trees in post Civil War America.
This post Rome Treaty birthed ICC court, likewise has no shame. Israel rejected the Rome Treaty. Yet this ICC treaty established international European Court, assumes some imaginary moral mandate, despite the cold fact that Israel never made any alliance with the Rome Treaty which established this “court“; these possessed demon infested Judges believe they own some imaginary mandate which permits them to demand Israeli leaders and Head of State stand before their BAR, to answer ICC condemnations; blood libel accusations of genocide in the Arab initiated Oct 7th slaughter of 1200 Jews and 250 stolen hostages!
Such hogwash compares to a Japanese Court demanding Roosevelt stand before it; רשע answer for your War Crimes against Humanity. Your guilt for dropping two atomic bombs, consequent to the Pearl Harbor Japanese surprise attack on Dec 7th 1941. A day that lives in Infamy!
According to my humble Knowledge of Judaism, the Midrash is a commentary while the Talmud is a book of laws. Both are written by humans
On the other hand, the Torah according to Islam is the word of God,
The Tanakh or The Hebrew Bible is the old testament which contains the Torah and other books revealed to the Hebrew prophets by God
For your Question, Which is closest to the Quran?
Well Obviously the Torah and anything revealed by God like the Psalms of David, but as some of us know the recent discoveries in Nagi Hammadi and the dead sea scrolls have shown the Bible to contain alterations and changes to the word of God.
Bunk. The koran a fraud whoreship of avoda zarah. The first Sinai commandment does not translate into the word Allah. Allah as a word translation of the Divine Presence Spirit compares to the word אלהים – the word translation of the Golden Calf!!
Torah faith defined as the pursuit of righteous judicial justice which through courtroom rulings makes fair compensation of damages inflicted by Party A upon Party B. Just that simple.
The Av tuma koran avoda zarah preaches theology and belief in One God/monotheism. This rapes the 2nd Sinai commandment! Hence the koran Av tuma avoda zarah rejects the revelation of the Torah at Sinai.
The so called prophet Muhammad, just insane – like his name implies – rabid cow pig. Cows – moo and ham comes from hogs. Arabs refuse to eat pork but consume camel flesh. LOL
How does the Torah define the key term: prophet? The koran religious rhetoric writes “prophet” throughout its poetical work. Never once does this propaganda ever define the term “prophet” from T’NaCH Primary Sources. Insane to assume Muhammad a prophet when that fool did not know the T’NaCH definition of the term. But don’t feel bad, the Protocols of the Elders of Zion gospel Roman forgery likewise did not know how the Torah defines the term “prophet”. Can’t make this humor up!
The Nagi Hammadi texts, written in Coptic, reveal a different side of early Christianity. Gnostic gospels, apocryphal writings, and mystical teachings emerge from the sands. This has nothing what so ever to do with the T’NaCH masoret and everything to do with the Arab/Muslim revisionist history – like the narishkeit that Avraham, tested by sacrificing Yishmael. What a load of horse shit.
The Dead Sea Scrolls: These Hebrew and Aramaic texts—some biblical, some not—date back to the Second Temple period. They include fragments of the T’NaCH, apocalyptic visions, and community rules.
Translations, scribes’ errors, theological debates—all have shaped the evolution of the T’NaCH. Different manuscript versions, textual variants, and theological lenses have influenced its interpretation. For example different manuscripts of the Baali Tosafot commentary to the Talmud during the early Middle Ages. Did the Tosafot write גניבה או גבינה? Two different hand written manuscripts record a scribal error.
Human error defines the humanity of Man. Just that simple. Now Arabs and Muslims whose faith worships the one god Allah (This theology rapes the 2nd Sinai commandments which the koran obviously does not accept.), Human error forbidden to occur. But the Torah faith, as defined by the righteous pursuit of judicial justice which make fair restitution of damages inflicted by Party A upon Party B, Human error accepted as the reality of the Humanity of Man on this Earth.
Torah functions as a Constitutional document, this makes it primarily a political and not religious Primary Source. Talmud serves as the model of the restoration of Sanhedrin lateral common law courtrooms when the Jewish people re-conquer our homelands following the Roman g’lut.
The kabbalah taught by Rabbi Akiva’s פרדס logic system defines the revelation of the Oral Torah 13 tohor middot at Horev 40 days after the sin of the Golden Calf. This Oral Torah logic system in no wise compares nor resembles the Greek syllogism of deductive logic. The struggle between the two opposing logic formats culminated in both the Hanukkah lights Civil War followed later by the Rambam Yad Civil War. His statute law code perverted T’NaCH/Talmudic common law. Yeshiva revisionist history which ignores this Civil War – an utter coward disgrace.
The statute law Shulkan Aruch written when the Catholic Jews forced Western Jewry into War Crime Ghetto cages for 3 Centuries. Its a tits on a boar hog stop gap solution to the abomination of Goyim who forced mass Jewish population transfers from country to country during this barbaric period which culminated in the Shoah!
Moshe travelled down to Egypt with the purpose of HaShem to judge the Gods worshipped by Par’o and the Egyptian people. The oath brit cut at Gilgal Yehoshua, the k’vanna of Rashi tefillen, cut an oath brit that HaShem would bless the national invasion of Canaan by the 12 Tribes of Israel to judge the Gods worshipped by the multiple and many kings of Canaanite City States, just as occurred in the days of Moshe in Egypt.
Torah as further re-defined in the 5th closing Book of the Written Torah: “משנה תורה”. Rabbi Yechuda Ha’Nassi of the Great Sanhedrin and author of the 6 volume משנה, based his Oral Torah compilation of Common law upon the 5th Book משנה תורה. The style employed by the Mishna: Case/Rule – this represents a Common law legalism. The style of the Gemara – the Primary Source commentary made upon the Misha employs a style of Difficulty/Answer or prosecutor/defence.
Hence the Gemara brings and adjudicates the different interpretations of the multifaceted language of the Mishna by means of debating the degree of closeness different judicial rulings of halacha applicable in the determination of the (front/top\side blueprint) possible legal interpretations of the intent of the language of each and every Mishna which the Gemara attempts to judge its k’vanna by means of bringing similar precedent Case/Law rulings. The Reshon Rabbeinu Tam criticized the comments made by his Grandfather Rashi, specifically on the fact that the Rashi commentary functioned primarily as a word/term dictionary rather than a common law commentary which reflect the true nature of Rabbi Yechuda’s understanding of the re-interpretation of the Torah, also known as “legislative review”, through its משנה תורה Book of דברים upon the four preceding Books of the Written Torah.
Is the “Dreyfus Affair”, just a cheap publicity stunt? Why should Israel presume that a political alliance with Australia ever existed?
Australia maintained a neutral stance during the 1967 Six-Day War and the 1973 Yom Kippur War. Australia supported post wars UN Resolutions 242 and 338 written by British and French imperialism in the Middle East! Demands that Israel return to its ’48 Armistice battle lines amounts to revisionist history and supports EU imperialism in the Middle East which seeks to force Israel to return to a weak political pawn controlled by Great Power strategic interests; as if Israel exists as a UN pre-Independence War protectorate territory of the UN-nations.
UN – Nations political rhetoric propaganda that its interference in determination of Israeli strategic national interests, waving its bogus flag “promote peace”, simply conceals foreign great power efforts which reject the radical change in the balance of power in the Middle East, the result of Israeli military victories.
Calls for withdrawal of Israeli armed forces from “territories occupied during the wars” – an utter fraud great power hat trick deception! The so called UN – Nations “efforts to find a peaceful solution” amounts to excuses by thieves to rob the Jewish state of its national security having defendable international borders.
Australia has never condemned the UN – Nations. Israel accuses the UN – Nations of establishing their own policy Apartheid against Israel; which singles out Israel as the only member which the UN – Nations flatly refuses to recognize as a nation state within the region of the Middle East. This Apartheid racism has forced Israel to piggy-back as a temporary EU member in order that Israel might chair UN – Nations committees.
Israel’s unique Apartheid status within the United Nations, its ghetto treatment as a “contentious” member state, more than simply “highly problematic”. It exemplifies a racist policy of apartheid — at least in a political and diplomatic sense. This issue isn’t about the exclusive separation of Israel as the only state to face ‘contentious relationships’ in the UN, but about the specific, consistent, and highly political manner in which Israel forced to endure unjust and unequal abuse from other states, particularly in terms of its right to participate in key roles as a full member of the Middle Eastern community, and have its sovereign status respected. No other nation has the so called “International Community” challenged the validity of its National Capital.
Israel’s treatment since it joined the UN as a member nation in 1949, forced to stomach the disgrace within this biased organization; its consistent exclusion from certain roles and responsibilities. From the beginning of its existence, Israel has faced opposition from a large portion of the Arab world and Muslim-majority countries that have refused to recognize it as a legitimate state. These states, both in the UN General Assembly and in other UN bodies, have blocked Israel’s participation in various forums, committees, and initiatives. While other countries with controversial political situations still find ways to take leadership positions, Israel has had to fight for recognition and equality in the system.
In the UN system, countries – grouped by regions – when it comes to selecting committee chairs or positions of power, like seats in the Security Council or the Human Rights Council. The Middle East the only region in the World which excludes Israel as country of that region, as part of that region. Arab states reject the Zionist entity as a Crusader State. Not because of Israel’s geographic location or lack of a right to participate, but due to their political opposition, their refusal to accept a permanent Jewish dhimmi status, and refuse to surrender as absurd that Jews have equal rights to achieve self-determination in the Middle East. Hence Arab and Muslim voting blocks in the UN refer to Israel as the Zionist entity! This kind of Apartheid exclusion doesn’t happen with any other member state. Even states with complex geopolitical situations, like North Korea or Syria, are still granted the right to participate in committees, vote, and hold leadership positions within UN frameworks.
Israel a “full member” of the UN. Regardless of this fact, Israel banned to chair any UN committees, until it became more formally associated with European Union bloc. This exclusion, not based on performance or any objective criteria of competence, but solely rooted in the persistent political and ideological Apartheid policy of opposition by Arab and Muslim voting blocks that dominate the UN. No other country in the UN endures such political Apartheid exclusion from leadership roles, so blatant and consistent. Yet no ally of the Jewish state has denounced this obvious UN, Dreyfus Affair racism.
Israel flat-out rejects post its 2 Wars of Independence, ’48 and ’67 to establish the “Green Line” as its permanent international borders. Israel simply not a UN protectorate territory. The Quartet 2-State solution stinks of Nazi ‘Final Solution’. Post Shoah Europe does not shape nor influence Israeli strategic interests; Israel condemns to this day the British cowardly 1939 White Paper betrayal which influenced FDR to close the borders of America to Jews attempting to escape from Hitler’s genocide.
Diplomacy involves finding common ground, and Israel shares no common ground not with the EU nor with Australia. Imposition of political revisionism favors returning Israel to indefensible borders and the Quartet powers dominating the Middle East. Twice Arab leaders threatened, both in ’48 and ’67, to complete the Nazi genocide and throw the Jews into the Sea. Failure by UN – Nations Resolutions to address this cold-hard fact invalidates the neutrality of the UN, just as pre-Wars British and French neutrality but post-Wars British and French overbearing attempts to dictate peace terms based upon the presumption that Arab states won both wars.
The term “apartheid” has been used by some critics of Israel to describe its treatment of Palestinians, especially in the West Bank and Gaza Strip. However, Israel vehemently rejects this characterization, arguing that it provides full civil rights to its Arab citizens (who make up about 20% of the population).
Guilty European and Arab states have forged an alliance which projects and promotes and attempts to foist their repeated attempts of Jewish genocide upon the Jews themselves. This trash propaganda directly compares to the slander “the Jews poisoned the wells”, and Church “Blood Libels” repeated prior to every Easter for a millennium or more! Jews carry the scares and trauma of European and Arab barbarism whereby dhimmi Jewish refugee populations had no political or social rights.
The propaganda of “apartheid” in the context of Israel’s treatment of Palestinians is part of a broader international debate on the legitimacy of the occupation and the viability of a two-state solution. This trash-talk compares to the WWI Allies slander of Germany, calling the German People “The Huns”. These criminal lies produced the fruits of Adolf Hitler!
The British ’39 White Paper betrayed the Balfour Declaration. Just that simple. Israel’s refusal to accept the international community’s proposed solutions (such as the two-state solution or pre-1967 borders) perceived as a rejection of the same international forces that failed to protect the Jewish people throughout 2000+ years, which culminated in the Shoah and the Allies refusal to bomb the rail-lines leading to Auschwitz!
That Australia recognizes Jerusalem as the Capital of the Jewish state, only exposes the pimp/whore relationship between it and the US. President Trump exercised tremendous leadership and moral courage to move the US embassy to Jerusalem. That PM Morrison basks in the huge shadow cast by President Trump, while much appreciated, Australia has shown no national backbone in forging a political and economic alliance with Israel.
Calls for Israel to return to pre-1967 borders or to accept a two-state solution an abomination to Israelis. Given the repeated existential Arab threats/wars, such biased posturing by “friendly nations”, with friends like these, who needs enemies. Israel’s rejection of the Green Line as its permanent border expresses Israeli diplomacy which requires security, not dependent on international guarantees but on realities which its military strength achieved.
Mandate Palestine ceased to exist in 1948. The UN condemned Jordan’s annexation of Samaria as illegal in 1950. Jordan never established a Palestinian state between 1950 to 1967. The propaganda of post war ’67 of the “West Bank” as bogus as the 1964 Arafat call for the Palestinian State!
Is the “Dreyfus Affair”, just a cheap publicity stunt? Why should Israel presume that a political alliance with Australia ever existed?
Australia maintained a neutral stance during the 1967 Six-Day War and the 1973 Yom Kippur War. Australia supported post wars UN Resolutions 242 and 338 written by British and French imperialism in the Middle East! Demands that Israel return to its ’48 Armistice battle lines amounts to revisionist history and supports EU imperialism in the Middle East which seeks to force Israel to return to a weak political pawn controlled by Great Power strategic interests; as if Israel exists as a UN pre-Independence War protectorate territory of the UN-nations.
UN – Nations political rhetoric propaganda that its interference in determination of Israeli strategic national interests, waving its bogus flag “promote peace”, simply conceals foreign great power efforts which reject the radical change in the balance of power in the Middle East, the result of Israeli military victories.
Calls for withdrawal of Israeli armed forces from “territories occupied during the wars” – an utter fraud great power hat trick deception! The so called UN – Nations “efforts to find a peaceful solution” amounts to excuses by thieves to rob the Jewish state of its national security having defendable international borders.
Australia has never condemned the UN – Nations. Israel accuses the UN – Nations of establishing their own policy Apartheid against Israel; which singles out Israel as the only member which the UN – Nations flatly refuses to recognize as a nation state within the region of the Middle East. This Apartheid racism has forced Israel to piggy-back as a temporary EU member in order that Israel might chair UN – Nations committees.
Israel’s unique Apartheid status within the United Nations, its ghetto treatment as a “contentious” member state, more than simply “highly problematic”. It exemplifies a racist policy of apartheid — at least in a political and diplomatic sense. This issue isn’t about the exclusive separation of Israel as the only state to face ‘contentious relationships’ in the UN, but about the specific, consistent, and highly political manner in which Israel forced to endure unjust and unequal abuse from other states, particularly in terms of its right to participate in key roles as a full member of the Middle Eastern community, and have its sovereign status respected. No other nation has the so called “International Community” challenged the validity of its National Capital.
Israel’s treatment since it joined the UN as a member nation in 1949, forced to stomach the disgrace within this biased organization; its consistent exclusion from certain roles and responsibilities. From the beginning of its existence, Israel has faced opposition from a large portion of the Arab world and Muslim-majority countries that have refused to recognize it as a legitimate state. These states, both in the UN General Assembly and in other UN bodies, have blocked Israel’s participation in various forums, committees, and initiatives. While other countries with controversial political situations still find ways to take leadership positions, Israel has had to fight for recognition and equality in the system.
In the UN system, countries – grouped by regions – when it comes to selecting committee chairs or positions of power, like seats in the Security Council or the Human Rights Council. The Middle East the only region in the World which excludes Israel as country of that region, as part of that region. Arab states reject the Zionist entity as a Crusader State. Not because of Israel’s geographic location or lack of a right to participate, but due to their political opposition, their refusal to accept a permanent Jewish dhimmi status, and refuse to surrender as absurd that Jews have equal rights to achieve self-determination in the Middle East. Hence Arab and Muslim voting blocks in the UN refer to Israel as the Zionist entity! This kind of Apartheid exclusion doesn’t happen with any other member state. Even states with complex geopolitical situations, like North Korea or Syria, are still granted the right to participate in committees, vote, and hold leadership positions within UN frameworks.
Israel a “full member” of the UN. Regardless of this fact, Israel banned to chair any UN committees, until it became more formally associated with European Union bloc. This exclusion, not based on performance or any objective criteria of competence, but solely rooted in the persistent political and ideological Apartheid policy of opposition by Arab and Muslim voting blocks that dominate the UN. No other country in the UN endures such political Apartheid exclusion from leadership roles, so blatant and consistent. Yet no ally of the Jewish state has denounced this obvious UN, Dreyfus Affair racism.
Israel flat-out rejects post its 2 Wars of Independence, ’48 and ’67 to establish the “Green Line” as its permanent international borders. Israel simply not a UN protectorate territory. The Quartet 2-State solution stinks of Nazi ‘Final Solution’. Post Shoah Europe does not shape nor influence Israeli strategic interests; Israel condemns to this day the British cowardly 1939 White Paper betrayal which influenced FDR to close the borders of America to Jews attempting to escape from Hitler’s genocide.
Diplomacy involves finding common ground, and Israel shares no common ground not with the EU nor with Australia. Imposition of political revisionism favors returning Israel to indefensible borders and the Quartet powers dominating the Middle East. Twice Arab leaders threatened, both in ’48 and ’67, to complete the Nazi genocide and throw the Jews into the Sea. Failure by UN – Nations Resolutions to address this cold-hard fact invalidates the neutrality of the UN, just as pre-Wars British and French neutrality but post-Wars British and French overbearing attempts to dictate peace terms based upon the presumption that Arab states won both wars.
The term “apartheid” has been used by some critics of Israel to describe its treatment of Palestinians, especially in the West Bank and Gaza Strip. However, Israel vehemently rejects this characterization, arguing that it provides full civil rights to its Arab citizens (who make up about 20% of the population).
Guilty European and Arab states have forged an alliance which projects and promotes and attempts to foist their repeated attempts of Jewish genocide upon the Jews themselves. This trash propaganda directly compares to the slander “the Jews poisoned the wells”, and Church “Blood Libels” repeated prior to every Easter for a millennium or more! Jews carry the scares and trauma of European and Arab barbarism whereby dhimmi Jewish refugee populations had no political or social rights.
The propaganda of “apartheid” in the context of Israel’s treatment of Palestinians is part of a broader international debate on the legitimacy of the occupation and the viability of a two-state solution. This trash-talk compares to the WWI Allies slander of Germany, calling the German People “The Huns”. These criminal lies produced the fruits of Adolf Hitler!
The British ’39 White Paper betrayed the Balfour Declaration. Just that simple. Israel’s refusal to accept the international community’s proposed solutions (such as the two-state solution or pre-1967 borders) perceived as a rejection of the same international forces that failed to protect the Jewish people throughout 2000+ years, which culminated in the Shoah and the Allies refusal to bomb the rail-lines leading to Auschwitz!
That Australia recognizes Jerusalem as the Capital of the Jewish state, only exposes the pimp/whore relationship between it and the US. President Trump exercised tremendous leadership and moral courage to move the US embassy to Jerusalem. That PM Morrison basks in the huge shadow cast by President Trump, while much appreciated, Australia has shown no national backbone in forging a political and economic alliance with Israel.
Calls for Israel to return to pre-1967 borders or to accept a two-state solution an abomination to Israelis. Given the repeated existential Arab threats/wars, such biased posturing by “friendly nations”, with friends like these, who needs enemies. Israel’s rejection of the Green Line as its permanent border expresses Israeli diplomacy which requires security, not dependent on international guarantees but on realities which its military strength achieved.
Mandate Palestine ceased to exist in 1948. The UN condemned Jordan’s annexation of Samaria as illegal in 1950. Jordan never established a Palestinian state between 1950 to 1967. The propaganda of post war ’67 of the “West Bank” as bogus as the 1964 Arafat call for the Palestinian State!
Netanyahu: Countering the Attack on Israel’s Legitimacy – YouTube
Is the “Dreyfus Affair”, just a cheap publicity stunt? Why should Israel presume that a political alliance with Australia ever existed?
Australia maintained a neutral stance during the 1967 Six-Day War and the 1973 Yom Kippur War. Australia supported post wars UN Resolutions 242 and 338 written by British and French imperialism in the Middle East! Demands that Israel return to its ’48 Armistice battle lines amounts to revisionist history and supports EU imperialism in the Middle East which seeks to force Israel to return to a weak political pawn controlled by Great Power strategic interests; as if Israel exists as a UN pre-Independence War protectorate territory of the UN-nations.
UN – Nations political rhetoric propaganda that its interference in determination of Israeli strategic national interests, waving its bogus flag “promote peace”, simply conceals foreign great power efforts which reject the radical change in the balance of power in the Middle East, the result of Israeli military victories.
Calls for withdrawal of Israeli armed forces from “territories occupied during the wars” – an utter fraud great power hat trick deception! The so called UN – Nations “efforts to find a peaceful solution” amounts to excuses by thieves to rob the Jewish state of its national security having defendable international borders.
Conflict Resolution 