https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e5oQgIt8JeM Argentine ‘Arrogant Parasites’: President Javier Milei TORCHES ‘Useless’ UN. He sharply criticized the UN at the General Assembly, arguing that it has failed to uphold its own resolutions on the Falkland Islands, known in Argentina as the Malvinas. He challenged British-licensed oil development in the disputed area and pledged to avoid preventive regulation of artificial intelligence.
The Balfour Declaration the crowning achievement of Herzl’s “Political Zionism”. The coward British 1939 shattered the Palestine Mandate. M. Begin lead the charge and blew up the British central military headquarters in Jerusalem at the King David Hotel and the spineless immoral bastards fled – they returned the Mandate back to the UN.
We have discuss 181 & 194 in depth. “1 + 1 = 2 applies in international law as well”,,, a completely unsupported empty declaration; a empty bottle of coke does not compare in value to an unopened bottle of coke. The UN gossip society a vain empty society of lies. Likewise we have already addressed the 4th Geneva Convention in depth. As have we discussed the basis of international law rests solidly upon State strategic alliances with other nation-states, Treaties and Wars. No sense repeating this over again.
Human dignity is not an equation in which the suffering of one person legitimizes the suffering of another. Pie in the sky rhetoric. Hindu idea of Karma says otherwise. The Hindu Gods far more living than the dead Gods worshipped by the barbarians living in Europe and Muslim countries. Europeans – their blood history of oppression and genocide – they do not have the good name reputation to impose a definition of Justice upon Israeli who post Shoah swore the Oath NEVER AGAIN. The Justice of Par’o = to the justice of both Europe and Islam — Church & Mosque ideas of justice stink = both sets of barbarian cowards condemn Israel of genocide post the Oct7th 2023 massacre whose ratio of murdered Israelis to our population compares to some 16 – 9/11s.
Hitler’s Muslim Allies: German Army and Waffen-SS Islamic Volunteers 1941–1945 is a 2025 military-history book by Antonio J. Muñoz, published by Frontline Books. It is 256 pages and focuses on Muslim volunteers who served Nazi Germany during World War II. Germany recruited Muslim volunteers from the Balkans, North Africa, the Middle East, the Caucasus, and Muslim regions of the Soviet Union. Arab volunteers who joined German Army units between 1941 and 1945: the Bosnian Muslim 13th Waffen Mountain Division of the SS, commonly known as Handschar, including its recruitment, combat history, and dissolution. Nazi Germany pursued Muslim cooperation for strategic reasons and recruited tens of thousands of Muslims. The book, investigates the specialized military study, particularly useful for readers interested in unit organization, recruitment, uniforms, and lesser-known campaigns. A useful companion work is David Motadel’s Islam and Nazi Germany’s War, which provides a broader political and institutional history of Nazi efforts to cultivate alliances with Muslim populations and leaders.
The Farhud pogrom, a two-day pogrom in Baghdad on June 1–2, 1941, during which pro-Axis Iraqi forces, nationalist militants, and mobs killed roughly 128–180 Jews, injured hundreds, raped women, and looted or damaged around 1,500 Jewish homes and businesses. A clear political and ideological alignment between Iraq’s pro-German faction and some of Hitler’s objectives. Rashid Ali al-Gaylani’s April 1941 coup sought Axis support to remove British influence. His government was backed by pro-German army officers, while the former Mufti of Jerusalem, Amin al-Husseini, helped promote anti-British and antisemitic propaganda. Nazi propaganda had already been disseminated in Iraq, including Arabic broadcasts and an Arabic version of Mein Kampf. The Farhud pogrom, nevertheless marked a major turning point.
It severely damaged Iraqi Jews’ sense of security, and further discriminatory measures followed after 1941. The mass departure of Iraqi Jews occurred mainly later, especially in 1950–1951, rather than through a single forced transfer in 1941. Determining whether the Farhud should be classified as part of the Holocaust remains debated, partly because it occurred outside Nazi-occupied Europe. The core subject of Nazi Germany’s war against Jews – genocide in its most systematic form. While the recruitment of Muslim volunteers (as discussed in Muñoz’s book) was a strategic military and propaganda effort, it was secondary to the Nazi regime’s primary ideological goal: the annihilation of the Jewish people. Hitler’s ideology, outlined in Mein Kampf, viewed Jews as an existential racial threat; not merely anti-Semitism but a belief in racial hygiene that demanded the physical elimination of Jews.
By 1941–1942, Nazi policy shifted from persecution and forced emigration to systematic mass murder. This resulted in the establishment of extermination camps (such as Auschwitz-Birkenau, Treblinka, and Sobibor) where Jews from across Europe were murdered using industrial methods (gas chambers). The scope of this genocide, not limited only to Jews. Roma, disabled persons, Soviet POWs, deformed or mentally ill and political opponents and whom ever the Nazis perceived as a threat to the purity of the German race included. The Farhud (June 1–2, 1941) pogrom in Baghdad directly compares to the Nazi-organized pogrom against Jews in Germany, Austria, and the Sudetenland on November 9–10, 1938 – Kristallnacht.
It contrasts with the later attempts by 5 Arab Armies in 1948 and by the Nasser coalition in 1967 to complete the Nazi Shoah. Although the Nazis did not directly carry out the Farhud, they actively worked to foster anti-Jewish sentiment in the Middle East to undermine British colonial influence. The Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, who fled to Berlin in 1941, collaborated closely with the Nazi regime. He participated in anti-Jewish propaganda broadcasts and helped recruit Muslim SS volunteers (such as the Handschar Division). Nazi agents distributed anti-Jewish literature (including an Arabic translation of Mein Kampf) and used radio broadcasts to incite hatred against Jews and Jews in British-Palestine. This propaganda helped create an environment where events like the Farhud pogrom could occur.
Alliance (the actual definition of the Torah word ברית) as detailed in Muñoz’s book often included facilitating anti-Jewish violence, later crystalized into an attempt to “throw the Jews into the Sea” which Israeli victories prevented in the two National Independence War which so offends the British and European divide and conquer two state solution. Post Nakba Allah Arab defeats wherein revisionist history attempts to conceal the consequences of “what if the Arabs Armies prevailed in either ’48 or ’67 Wars?” With unilateral declarations which deny Arab intent linked to the recent Shoah contrasts with the UN and ICJ and ICC attempts to condemn Israel for the crime of genocide – revisionist history and blood libel Apartheid slander – which share a common foundation with British/French UN 242 revisionist history.
Benny Morris: The Birth of the Palestinian Refugee Problem, 1947–1949. Challenges the post ’48 traditional narrative concerning the Arab refugee problem consequent to the Nakba Allah defeat. Arab socialism became enhanced when secular Arabs perceived Nakba Allah as a dead God. However, Morrris – his later development – recognizes that the expulsion of dhimmi Arabs never made in a vacuum. Arab state refusal to repatriate dhimmi Arab refugees remains a constant as seen through the Oct 7th Abomination war.
Kapo Ilan Pappé, a classic Jew hater. His opinions promote a Arab agenda like as do virtually all UN Resolutions. Critics, including Morris, argue that his political commitments sometimes shape his selection and interpretation of evidence. Avi Shlaim: A classic New Historian and revisionist scholar. His work challenged conventional accounts of Israel’s relations with Jordan and the Arab states, particularly the idea that Israel consistently sought peace while Arab leaders uniformly rejected it.
Eugene Rogan: A historian of the modern Middle East, especially the Arab provinces of the Ottoman Empire and the Arab experience of World War I. He is sometimes grouped with revisionist or critical scholarship because of his attention to Arab perspectives, but he is not usually classified as one of the core Israeli New Historians in the same way as Morris, Shlaim, and kapo Pappé. Post Shoah Israelis do not simply poo poo “throw the Jews into the Sea” as do Popes Priests & Goyim guilty of the Shoah by ignoring these crimes. The UN gossip voting blocks together with Russia’s strong alliance with Assad Syria. That powerful nations oppose the rise of Israeli international influence in shaping the balance of power across the Middle East – consistent with classic international politics throughout Human history.
When weighing Xtian war crimes against humanity and comparing Muslim war crimes against humanity FALSE to make a shallow two dimensional Newspaper-like reactionary learning of history of crimes DIVORCED from the earlier generations of that “criminal generation” compared primarily with earlier generations of that same people in earlier generations. People have cultural habits which share a “ratio” with past and similar ‘errors of wickedness’. Clearly the Shoah crime committed by the generation of European barbarians shares a ratio relationship with the barbarity of the Crusades Inquisitions etc etc etc. The guilt of one generations NOT limited to only ONE generation.
The same ratio comparison of generations crimes against humanity applies equally to ALL PEOPLES in ALL generations. This Torah vision applies directly to the 10 times that Israel “tested” our commitment to the Torah which culminated in the decree that the generation who stood at Sinai. The 11th chapter of the Mishna Sanhedrin records a prosecutor/defense dispute between rabbi Eliezer and rabbi Akiva his greatest talmid. In Baba Batra the oven of Rabbi Eliezer where he called a Bat-Kol from heaven as proof of his ruling that the debated oven was kosher. The sages place him into נידוי because post Sinai תורה לא בשמים היא. Rabbi Akiva argues that the Wilderness generation אין להם חלק בעולם הבא; meaning the failure of this 10th “TEST” separated that generation from the generation which conquered Canaan through the leadership of the prophet Yehoshua the talmid of Moshe Rabbeinu.
עולם הבא an Oral Torah interpretation of the k’vanna of the brit cut between the pieces. Clearly Goyim av tumah avoda zarah theologies which prioritize faith belief in their theologically created and defined Gods have completely divergent different and otherwise ideas touching their belief in the world to come. Fundamentally Torah common law not a belief system; justice – fair restitution of damages inflicted by the guilty upon the Jewish victims among our brit people alliance between the 12 Tribes defines our vision of faith which day and night differs from Yovel liberty for the 12 Tribes achieved through the faith of justice from cursed g’lut Jewry (based upon the Wilderness generation precedent) incapable of doing Yovel liberty through Sanhedrin courtroom rulings which restore fair restitution of damages as the ideal tiqqun how to “HEAL” hatred without cause among and between our Peoples and Tribes!
Karet cuts a bnai brit person off from the chosen Cohen seed fathered by Avraham Yitzak and Yaacov. O’lam Ha’bah refers to the brit Avram swore between the pieces wherein the Torah learns the vision of brit O’lam Ha’Bah; hence this brit does not apply to any Goyim. A טיפש פשט literally ass-u-me(s) Cohen restricted to the House of Aaron. As tefillah stands in the stead of korbanot and an obligation upon the entire house of Israel so too the “Cohen nation”/”O’lam Ha’Ba applicable only to the 12 Tribes of Israel who accept to this day the revelation of the Torah at Sinai.
“כרת הברית requires an oath alliance lishmah” defines the k’vanna of the 1st Sinai commandment applicable only to the 12 Tribes within the borders of the oath sworn land inheritance. G’lut Jewry suffers the din of כרת in g’lut — they lose the wisdom to do mitzvot לשמה because Egypt – referred to in the 1st Sinai commandment – לאו דוקא.
The din of 39 lashes atones for the curse of karet; a Torah wisdom pertaining to the oath לשמה the Avot swore to Father the chosen Cohen people. Hence the expression כרת ברית you quoted only a טיפש פשט attempts to restrict this fundamental wisdom/abstract time-oriented Av commandment with a simple word translation “to cut/make a covenant”. The כרת הברית requires the Torah obligation to swear an oath alliance לשמה . Swearing a Torah oath לא לשמה amounts to avoda zarah. La’van swore an oath in the Name of his Gods when he and Yaacov swore an oath alliance which his descendent Bil’aam profaned when the king of Moav hired him to curse Israel.
Yosef Karo, living in the Cohen inherited brit land, supported the Safed attempt to renew semikhah, to restore Sanhedrin judicial authority to make possible the application of laws—including malkot—whose halakhic function includes atonement in cases otherwise liable to karet.
Hebrew University does not have a reputation for producing profound Torah scholars. A Hebrew University scholar did produce a major, original commentary on the Talmud comparable in ambition and detailed engagement with earlier commentators: David Weiss Halivni’s Mekorot u-Mesorot; however, his learning failed to teach how פרדס together with the 7 middot of Hillel, 10 middot of Akiva, 13 middot of Yishmael, and 32 middot of Ha’Galilee interpret the warp/weft ratio of halachacha כנגד aggadah employed to define the culture and customs together with the T’NaCH prophetic mussar required to make an aliya of toldot mitzvot which do not require k’vanna to Av tohor wisdom-time oriented commandments first introduced as the most important Torah theme of משנה תורה\common law.
T’NaCH commands mussar common law k’vannot which the O’lam ha’Bah generations grow this אל mussar rebuke within their Yatzir Ha’Tov hearts. Hence the מלאך named Yaacov ישראל ‘servant of the rebuke’. Yitzak validated the blessing given to Yaacov through his deception, however based upon the blessing he gave to Esav, he sternly rebuked Yaacov. Impossible for Goyim to grow prophetic mussar within their hearts because they assume Torah prophets served as witches who predict the future, as expressed repeatedly throughout the counterfeit gospels ‘fulfilled the words of the prophets’.
Yom Kippur סמוך to Chag Sukkot מלאכה a Torah wisdom which creates through oaths sworn לשמה – possible only in the borders of the oath sworn land inheritance of the chosen Cohen people, the כפרה of the sealing of יום הזכרון distinguishes the ‘living blood’ of the goat brought within the פרכת\כפר from the splattered blood of the goat עון פשע וחטא of the goat cast off the cliff. The Shemone Esrei does not include the ודוי דרבנן anywhere within the עצם language of this תפילה דרבנן because the ודוי דאורייתא makes a fundamental הבדלה which separates and distinguishes between the ודוי sworn upon the דם חי of the korban brought before the פרכת from the blood of the goat cast off the cliff; a separation\gulf as wide as tohor from tuma.
Chag Sukkot most essentially learns from the laying of S’chach. The בנין אב Torah precedent learns from the אוהל/tent of the Mishkan Sinai revelation. The wisdom-time oriented commandments/תמיד מעשה בראשית create מלאכים which the Cohen nation can send to make war against the enemies of Israel. Moshe Rabbeinu sent as a מלאך unto Egypt to judge the Gods of Par’o; Yehoshua crosses the river Jordan as a מלאך to judge the Gods worshipped by the kingdoms of Canaan. Wisdom-time oriented commandments only sanctify the House of Israel because only the 12 Tribes accept the revelation of the Torah at Sinai.
The k’vanna of shaking the 4 species in 6 dimensional directions while standing under the “Tent” of created by the s’chach duplicates the כסוי בה of the mitzva of tzitzit; the נשמל of the Mishkan Sinai revelation of prophetic mussar teaches that standing under the “tent” of the Mishkan לאו דוקא, makes an aliya of תולדות מצוות which do not require k’vanna to Av tohor wisdom-time oriented commandments which absolutely require כוונה.
Should … outa … pie in the sky speculations smell like fresh laid dog shit with powerful fire-crackers stuck in those poops ready to explode when young children and immature irrational teenagers emotionally walk by within range. Carter’s book Palestine: Peace Not Apartheid page 190 “Utilizing their political and military dominance, they are imposing a system of partial withdrawal, encapsulation, and apartheid on the Muslim and Christian citizens of the occupied territories. The driving purpose for the forced separation of the two peoples is unlike that in South Africa—not racism, but the acquisition of land. There has been a determined and remarkably effective effort to isolate settlers from Palestinians…” UN Charter’s prohibition on acquiring territory by force, a constitutive legal fiction, dolled up as “international law”.
The modern ‘blood libel’ analogy goes far beyond the specific slander aimed at Jews in the Middle Ages. But the hatred then and today a constant as proven through repeated riots across the US and European Universities after Oct7th 2023 massacre of Israelis. Any attempt to pigeon-hole “Blood libel” limited to the criminal European church’s whose post Shoah reputation – Dead as a doornail – conceals a hostile UN agenda against Israel.
Substantial evidence for the charge that parts of the UN system, specifically UNWRA schools and text-books, have treated Israel exceptionally. For example, one tally reports that the General Assembly adopted 14 resolutions focused on Israel in 2023, compared with eight focused on the rest of the world, and another reports 17 on Israel versus seven on all other countries in 2024.
The League of Nations was established after World War I through the Treaty of Versailles in1920. The United Nations was created during and immediately after World War II, with the UN Charter signed in 1945. The post–World War I settlement imposed severe terms on Germany: territorial losses, military restrictions, reparations, demilitarization of the Rhineland, and the controversial “war guilt” clause. These conditions fostered humiliation, resentment, economic and political instability, and helped the Nazis gain support. The “settlement” also created weaknesses that the League of Nations could not overcome—especially the absence of the United States.
Great Power interests compare by analogy to Apartheid South Africa. League and UN Bias toward maintaining a Roman/Byzantine Palestine sharply contrasts with all the African countries who have cast off European colonialist names and renamed their countries. No African country has kept any name impose upon them by the Romans/Byzantine empires – yet the demand to keep “Palestine” a shining contradiction.
After the Muslim conquest, Arabic-speaking governments used the related term Filastin. Its boundaries and political meaning changed repeatedly, but the name remained in geographic and religious use. Arab nations lost the wars of ’48 and ’67 yet the UN promotes “West Bank” over Israeli Samaria. Hogwash declarations which poo poo the UN’s preference as primarily legal and diplomatic rather than archaeological – amounts to revisionist history based upon 3379 and 2334 precedents — neither Resolution qualifies as neutral. Jordan in 1948 captured East Jerusalem and Samaria during the war. The armistice merely formalized the ceasefire line. Jordan defeated in ’67, yet the block head UN continues the “West Bank” which erases “Samaria”!
The 2334 language of “no legal validity”, that legal interpretation of sovereignty, occupation and Jewish settlements stands in stark opposition to Jordan’s 1948-67 which the UN indifference effectively recognized as legitimate sovereignty, as did the 1964 PLO charter! Only “Britain and Pakistan” refused to denounce Jordan’s annexation. The 1956 War conclusively proved that both London and Paris – their long imperialist empire traditions directly influenced the post ’67 242 Resolution. To argue that ‘West Bank’ as illegal occupied territory in point of fact serves the known imperialist interests of London and Paris, based upon the 1939 White Paper. The Chamberlain betrayal compares to limiting “Blood Libel” to the criminal church hundreds of years in the past! British imperial self-serving interests defines its concentration camps established in the Boer War and Jallianwala Bagh India massacre.
While Arab states condemned Jordan’s annexation in 1950, the UN member states never thereafter pursued this UN condemnation with further condemnations. This ‘Blood Libel’ analogy calls the UN, as an institution – dominated by the Great Powers – a lie. Wherein the UN portrayed through propaganda as neutral. Asymmetry of attention and condemnation defines it as a gossip society, rather than a legitimate neutral body ideal for nations to conduct diplomacy.
The narrow point of “Blood Libel” restricted to the evil dead Church — fails to recognize that UN 3379 & 2334 precedents emphatically do not speak the language of diplomacy. This analogy, that an institution presenting itself as an impartial authority can use morally loaded language while selectively applying scrutiny. Resolution 3379 did not speak in neutral diplomatic terms: it characterized Zionism itself as racism. Resolution 2334, framed in legal language, but “no legal validity” also a categorical political judgment, not merely a descriptive geographic label. Their language therefore supports the argument that UN discourse can transform contested political positions into supposedly objective moral or legal conclusions.
The choice of language: West Bank over Samaria qualifies as a UN Trojan Horse. The P-5 all prioritize strategic control/dominance over the balance of power in any given region of the world. The precedent of the ’56 Suez Crisis tersely summarizes their their lack of concern for the lives of “inferior” peoples, compares to slave ships throwing their slaves into the Sea when threatened by hostile naval boarding. Subjective primary interests shaped their delegates narratives whom London & Paris send to the UN. Obviously Obama starkly contrasts with the America First interests of President Trump. The UN may be a forum for diplomacy, but its record does not justify treating its language as presumptively neutral or its enforcement as consistently principled.
Torah common law/משנה תורה on the reading of Yom Kippur employs the language of משח concerning the House of Aaron. The NaCH and Talmud absolutely require Yovel freedom for the 12 Tribes and Sanhedrin משנה תורה legislative review over the statute laws passed by the 12 Tribes of the Republic. David never established Sanhedrin common law over the 12 Tribes. Aaron and his House anointed as “moshiach” to dedicate through the משל of korbanot צדק צדק תרדוף – Sanhedrin common law courtroom justice which sanctifies fair restitution of damages as the basis of Moshe taking Israel out of Egypt and purpose for Yehoshua conquering the land of Canaan. Moshiach has a Torah primary source in Moshe anointing the House of Aaron. The Dead Sea Scrolls (e.g., Community Rule 9:11) anticipate a Priest-Messiah superior to a King-Messiah. Attempts to validate the NT through Goyim who reject the revelation of the Torah proves zero. JeZeus had no Tribal Yichus based upon the gospel contradictions of pregnancy to another out of wedlock; a Greek Zeus father of Hercules precedent.
The fundamental flaw in the Rambam’s statute law King as “Judge” not a “Legislator” Hilchot Melachim 3:1 & 3:10… the Torah only directly mandates Sanhedrin courts. The subject of “king” a בדיעבד subject when it addresses copying the ways, customs and manners of the Goyim. The Yom Kippur Torah reading states this explicitly. Hilchot Melachim 1:4 falsely declares appointing a king as a positive commandment. דברים יז:טה makes the request for a king, according to Rashi as asking for a tyrant! Also שמואל א ח:ז clearly a Torah curse, comparable to the rains falling in the wrong season! The mitzva of Moshiach learns from מעשה בראשית the Av mussar theme of the entire Torah. בראשית introduces the נמשל of wisdom-time oriented commandments through the משל of Creation. Contrast the NT which violates this essential prophetic mussar, by teaching of a historical man rather than mussar applicable to all generations of Israel, as expressed through the burden: A) to establish Yovel liberty for the 12 Tribes of the Republic “through” צדק צדק תרדוף” judicial justice – the k’vanna of the mitzva of Moshiach.
Legal bodies frequently mask great-power politics and block-voting dynamics under the guise of “universal international law,” applying strictures to sovereign democracies while ignoring the explicit, unrevoked covenants of genocidal actors. The profound asymmetry in how international forums apply legal doctrines, historical memory, and accountability mechanisms reveals deep institutional double standards. The refusal of international bodies to address the systemic expulsion of nearly a million Jewish refugees from Arab lands—while laser-focused on selective, weaponized interpretations of Palestinian displacement—underscores a persistent historical blind spot. States act from self-interest, alliances, and security needs—not as puppets of a “global domination” Satanic-cabal.
The UN Charter resembles both the US Constitution and British Acts of Parliament which become the Constitution of Britain. Major ever repeating “dogs returning to eat their own vomit” … themes of the treif “Synagogue of Satan”. First and foremost – a modern conspiracy theory regarding Jewish global domination which regurgitates classic Xtian and Muslm replacement theologies where in JeZeus replaces the revelation of לשמה in the first Sinai commandment and Yishmael replaces Yitzak as the Father of the Chosen Cohen seed of the Avot as remembered in the לשמה t’shuva on Yom Kippur wherein Moshe Rabbeinu imposes t’shuva לשמה – יום הזכרון upon the local God of Sinai.
Hocus pocus “historical framing” voodoo – within international forums routinely suffers from selective amnesia. While post-1948 mechanisms (such as UN Resolution 194) were weaponized exclusively around Palestinian displacement, the simultaneous, violent expulsion and dispossession of nearly a full million Jewish refugees from Arab lands—beginning with the Farhud in Iraq in 1941—were systematically ignored by the very international bodies quick to cast moral reproaches. Furthermore, no UN condemnation of repeated Arab attempts at actual sworn dedications to genocide the Jews in ’48, ’67 & post Oct 7th 2023 exposes the one-sided nature of the ICJ SA accusation against Israel.
Many scholars of the NT book of Revelation’s argue that John of Patmos – the author of that book of Xtian mysticism which stands in the shadow of the mystic Book of Daniel. Church leaders addicted to blood libel slanders repeated over and again throughout history. Employed as Xtian wishful conspiracy speculations to justify brutal pogroms and forced population transfers of Jewish Stateless refugee populations! Catholic UN likewise employs the slander, hence blood libel comparison, of “international law” void of War and treaties as the historic foundation of “international law” rather than the post WWII UN gossip society which promotes groupy-block voting in the GA and SC great power imperialism; not the place for the SC to declare or morally rebuke Israel who defeated Nassers’ attempt to throw the Jews into the Sea.
Andrew Carrington Hitchcock, author of the modern book The Synagogue of Satan: The Secret History of Jewish World Domination, published by RiverCrest Publishing in the mid-2000s. stands in the shadows of the Czarist secret police book: Protocols of the Elders of Zion. Post WWII the Great Power creation of the United Nations, supported by FDR’s replacement President Truman, stands in stark contrast to Senator Long who lead the opposition in the Senate, which fundamentally rejected the League of Nations. President Truman employed the UN Chapter VII vote, to justify a “Police Action” which by-passed the Constitutional authority of Congress to declare war.
The “treif” history, meaning the repetitive propaganda which unilaterally condemns Jews by mob lynching parties – these classic post Bar Kochba disaster – wherein Rome and other nations thereafter unilaterally changed the name of Judea to Syria-Palestine, defines the Central European imperialism UN dominated theme, which relies on the aggressive application of replacement theories as expressed through both the NT and Koran – the best examples: the UN insistence upon “West Bank” reflective of the evil shadow cast by the coward Chamberlain 1939 White Paper; guilty of repudiation of the Balfour Declaration which defines the intent of Herzl’s “Political Zionism”.
Catholic United Nation “replacement theology\international law” – Pie in the Sky – replaces the defunct and totally post Shoah discredited JeZeus Church & Nakba Allah – Dead Gods with its ”international law” canard. Compare Hitchcock’s work which effectively updates the Czarist secret police’s fabrications for a modern audience, maintaining the “Synagogue of Satan” label not as a biblical inquiry, but as a slander for a perceived global conspiracy; South African accusation of genocide supported by the ICC! As the Protocols of the Elders of Zion a well-documented Czarist secret police fabrication, plagiarized largely from a 19th-century French political satire against Napoleon III so too and how much more so the ICC has zero jurisdiction over Israel or Russia or the US due to their refusal to recognize the Rome Treaty. The ICJ most fundamentally not the ICC, and neither one “subservient” to the other. They exist as separate organs with different mandates: the ICJ settles disputes between states under the Genocide Convention. that the ICJ case judges a state-vs-state convention dispute, never an Arab Palestinian state in all recorded Human History.
Pre & Post-Shoah, millions of Jewish refugees faced displacement from Europe, the Middle East, and virtuall all Arab countries. Justice defined as fair restitution of damages inflicted. Jews robbed murdered and raped lost roughly five times the property of post ’67 Israel. Consequent to decades of British evil eye Mandate restrictions and Arab forced populations transfers starting in 1941 Iraq, & rejection of the Peel Commission partition\UN 181. Yet the post Oct 7th 2023 reactionary UN evil eye condemns the leaders of Israel as “War Criminals”! And mobs across Europe and the US declare “From the River to the Sea Palestine must be free” utterly oblivious of where the river and where the Sea! Justice has nothing with emotion laden lynch mob blood libel slander.
The טיפש פשט literalism which attempts to separate the ICJ from the ICC utterly pathetic. As the saying goes: “Follow the money”. Just as a dog employs its superior nose to follow a trail, so too State interests shape great power politic efforts to dominate the balance of power in any given region of the Planet Earth throughout Human history. Treaties and signed alliance between nation states shape “international law” not decrees that Gaza rule by Hamas, (a rejector of the Oslo Accords) regardless part of the PA! Hamas slaughtered the PA and expelled its supporters from Gaza and Arafat failed to amend his 1964\1968 PLO Charter which he obligated the PA to do upon signing the Oslo Accords.
That Brazil and Belgium support the South African slander of Israel – all these countries have a long history of anti Israel policy interests like SA has a reputation of Apartheid! Israel has an alliance with the US the ICC arrest warrants simply a fart of hot air. President Truman’s police action in Korea set the stage for LBJ’s police action in Vietnam. The disgrace of that first American defeat in war witnessed Congress passage of the War Powers Act!
In the 2016 GOP debates candidate Trump mocked the Bush family for their stupidity. In the 2024 GOP debates Vivek Ramaswamy openly supported and agreed with President Trump’s mockery of the Bush betrayal of “No nation building” invasion of Iraq and vile Patriot Act. Currently the Communist Labor PM of Britain supported by France and a host of other European countries whose imperialism seeks to impose – outside of the UN SC itself – a foreign two state solution! In short, the UN gossip society has not mandate/protectorate over Israel post 1948 Independence.
The GA 181 recommendation cannot bind Israel unilaterally, and “unilateral acceptance = binding obligation” not a doctrine in international law. Unilateral acts can create obligations but only where the state manifests clear intent to be bound — and Israel’s own position since 1948, that it accepted 181 as a title to statehood, not as a permanent boundary or settlement scheme. Rejection by all Arab countries that dhimmi Jews do not merit 181 self-determination without mutual consent there is no pacta sunt servanda. An obligation that binds one belligerent while its opponent repudiated the same instrument with no consequence is not law, it’s leverage. UN 194 fails to address Jewish refugees violently expelled, starting in Iraq in 1941.
The GA 181 recommendation cannot bind Israel unilaterally, and “unilateral acceptance = binding obligation” not a doctrine in international law. Unilateral acts can create obligations but only where the state manifests clear intent to be bound — and Israel’s own position since 1948, that it accepted 181 as a title to statehood, not as a permanent boundary or settlement scheme. Rejection by all Arab countries that dhimmi Jews do not merit 181 self-determination without mutual consent there is no pacta sunt servanda. An obligation that binds one belligerent while its opponent repudiated the same instrument with no consequence is not law, it’s leverage.
UN 194 unenforced and asymmetrically enforced. It totally ignores Jewish refugees violently expelled, starting in Iraq in 1941. This makes 194 actually harsher on the UN, because void implies the instrument died while asymmetry implies 194 kept alive only against one side. UN resolutions 181 a lapsed recommendation whose continued citation against Israel exposes selective propaganda; 194 unenforced and institutionally one-sided, continued citation selective. The South Africa–Israel proceedings have no connection with the ICC over-reach case or as a criminal conviction. The ICJ weighs a state-to-state dispute under the Genocide Convention, while the ICC separately investigates alleged crimes by individuals under a contested territorial-jurisdiction theory.
