MSNBC Changes Its Name to MS NOW

As of August 18, 2025, MSNBC will officially change its name to My Source News Opinion World, abbreviated as MS NOW. This significant rebranding is part of a broader corporate restructuring following NBC Universal’s decision to spin off several cable networks, including MSNBC, into a new company called Versant.

The rebranding of MSNBC to MS NOW is not directly attributed to the Russia-Gate controversy, but it does reflect broader shifts in the media landscape and the network’s evolving identity. While the name change to MS NOW is part of a corporate restructuring and an effort to establish a distinct identity, it also signals a desire to move beyond past controversies and focus on future content and audience engagement. The network aims to redefine itself in a rapidly changing media environment, rather than being solely defined by its past coverage of Trump and Russia-Gate.

While the Russia-Gate saga played a role in shaping MSNBC’s identity and audience during Trump’s first term, the decision to rebrand is more about the network’s strategic direction and independence following its spin-off from NBC Universal. The Russia-Gate controversy has been a contentious topic, particularly regarding how various media outlets, including MSNBC and its prominent host Rachel Maddow, covered the investigation into alleged Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. presidential election. During the Russia-Gate saga, she focused on various aspects of the investigation, including connections between the Trump campaign and Russian officials.

The Mueller Report, released in 2019, concluded that while there were numerous contacts between the Trump campaign and Russian operatives, the investigation did not establish that the campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference efforts. The characterization of Rachel Maddow’s promotion of the Russia-Gate narrative as a “hoax” reflects a polarized political landscape where interpretations of media coverage can vary widely. Media overreach, Trump 2.0 has exposed. Political journalism promoted by a Pravda press corporate established monopoly – that ship has sailed.

The characterization of media outlets, including MSNBC and figures like Rachel Maddow, as part of a “Pravda press” reflects a growing sentiment among some groups that mainstream media serves specific political agendas rather than providing unbiased reporting. This perception contributes to the polarization of public opinion and distrust in traditional news sources. The consolidation of media ownership has raised concerns about the diversity of viewpoints presented in the news. Critics argue that corporate interests can shape narratives, leading to a lack of accountability and a focus on sensationalism over substantive reporting. This has led to calls for more independent journalism that prioritizes transparency and integrity.

The Lame Stream Legacy Media – Fake News – dead in the water. The rise of alternative media platforms and independent journalists presents opportunities for diverse perspectives but also challenges regarding credibility and reliability. The call for a more balanced and accountable media is increasingly relevant in this context.

Streaming media outlets like Google You Tube attract far larger News viewing audience than does Cable Television. Streaming platforms like YouTube have attracted a larger and more diverse audience compared to traditional cable news channels. This is largely due to the accessibility of online content, allowing viewers to watch news on-demand and from various sources. YouTube and similar platforms enable greater interaction between content creators and viewers. Users can comment, share, and engage with news stories in real-time, fostering a sense of community and participation that traditional cable news often lacks.

Streaming platforms offer a wide range of news content, from professional journalism to independent reporting and commentary. This diversity allows viewers to choose sources that align with their interests and perspectives, contributing to a more personalized news experience. Many viewers are moving away from cable subscriptions due to high costs. Streaming services often provide free or lower-cost options, making news more accessible to a broader audience. Younger generations, in particular, are more inclined to consume news through digital platforms rather than traditional cable. This trend is reshaping how news organizations approach content delivery, often prioritizing online engagement and social media presence.

While streaming platforms provide diverse viewpoints, they also face challenges related to misinformation and the spread of unverified content. News organizations must navigate these issues to maintain credibility and trust with their audiences. Face Book, once the biggest player has seen its market share collapse after it together with Twitter threw the 2020 elections by censoring the Hunter Biden laptop scandal and Hillery Clinton’s treason.

The platforms’ decisions to limit the spread of this Hunter Biden laptop story constituted censorship and influenced public perception of both Biden and President Trump as Presidential candidates. Following the election and the controversies surrounding content moderation, Facebook has experienced fluctuations in user engagement and market share. Some users have expressed dissatisfaction with perceived biases in content moderation, leading to calls for alternatives and contributing to a decline in trust. The actions taken by social media platforms during the election have contributed to increased polarization among users. Supporters of former President Donald Trump and other critics argue that the platforms unfairly targeted conservative viewpoints.

The controversies surrounding social media’s role in the election have led to increased scrutiny from lawmakers and regulators. Discussions about potential regulations to address issues of censorship, misinformation, and the power of tech companies have gained momentum. As trust in traditional social media platforms has waned, some users have migrated to alternative platforms that promote themselves as free speech advocates. This shift reflects a broader trend of users.

The narrative surrounding the Hunter Biden laptop story has had a profound impact on public perception, influencing how voters viewed both Joe Biden and Donald Trump as presidential candidates. The narrative surrounding this story became a focal point for discussions about media bias and the role of social media in shaping political narratives.

Following the election, platforms like Facebook have seen fluctuations in user engagement and market share. Many users have voiced their dissatisfaction with perceived biases in content moderation, which has led to a decline in trust. This dissatisfaction has prompted some users to seek alternatives, contributing to a shift in the social media landscape. The actions taken by social media platforms during the election have exacerbated polarization among users. Supporters of Donald Trump and other critics argue that conservative viewpoints were unfairly targeted, leading to a perception of bias that further divides users along political lines.

In response to these controversies, lawmakers and regulators have increased their scrutiny of social media’s role in elections. There is a growing discussion about potential regulations aimed at addressing issues of censorship, misinformation, and the significant power held by tech companies. This scrutiny reflects a broader concern about the influence of social media on democratic processes. As trust in traditional social media platforms declines, many users are migrating to alternative platforms that advocate for free speech. This trend indicates a significant shift in user behavior, as individuals vote with their feet and seek spaces that align more closely with their contempt for content moderation and censorship which rapes Free Speech.

The Lame Stream Media concealment of the mental health of President Biden and the flavor of ice cream he likes soft ball questions has aroused a strong sense among the American people that the Corporate Government established monopolies have betrayed American Constitutional Rights.

Critics argue that the Lame-stream media often downplays or conceals information that could influence public perception. This has led to a growing sentiment among some Americans that the media is not fulfilling its role as an independent watchdog, but rather acting in alignment with corporate interests. The perception that corporate entities, including media organizations, have employed their lobbies to have the government to establish protected monopolies – far from limited to Obama-care corruption – raises concerns about the integrity of democratic processes. Many individuals feel that these government established & protected government monopolies prioritize profits over the public good, leading to a betrayal of American Constitutional Rights. This sentiment, particularly strong among those who believe that the media should provide unbiased information and hold public figures accountable.

As a result of these perceptions, there is a growing erosion of trust in both the media and government institutions e.g. corporate protected monopolies, first and foremost Wilson’s 1913 Federal Reserve. Many Americans feel that their rights to access truthful information and engage in open discourse are being compromised. This distrust results in increased polarization which rips the fabric of our society as a nation. A sense of disconnection from the political process, makes Americans distrust the bought and paid for political process that “styles” itself as a “Democracy”.

In light of these concerns, there are calls for greater accountability from both media organizations and government Corporate protected monopoly entities. Advocates argue for the need to ensure that media coverage is fair, transparent, and representative of diverse viewpoints. Rather than a propaganda vomit of emotional opinions and superficial over reactions.

Additionally, there is a push for regulations that address the influence of corporate interests on public discourse and democratic processes. The ongoing discussions about media representation, corporate influence, and the protection of constitutional rights will continue to shape the political landscape and public sentiment in the United States. Addressing these issues is crucial for restoring trust and ensuring a healthy Republic, wherein the State Legislatures determine what Federal Senators and Congress-persons present as bills before Congress.

Jewish counter to pro Arab western University propaganda. The British French imperialism which promotes their post ‘Final Solution’ – Two-State Solution. Repulsively expressed through UN imperialism 242 and 338. The told lie: Arab Israeli War based upon a dispute over land. Bunk. A complete and total lie. Arab countries hostile to the Jewish state absolutely and totally reject the 1917 Balfour Declaration which served as the foundation of the League of Nations Palestine Mandate of 1922.

British Journalist Just Ended The “Palestinian” Debate FOREVER! – YouTube

The Time has come to shutter the UN. Wilson’s Pie in the Sky notions of Peace not just rejected by London and Paris after WWI, but also by Senator Long and the US Senate which rejected that the US join the League of Nations.

PA Pundits - International

PA Pundits International

PA Pundits – International·papundits.wordpress.com·

UN Plastics Treaty Collapses

From the team at CFACT ~
The United Nations adjourned its plastics summit in Geneva, Switzerland, with no …
____________________________________
____________________________________
The UN a tits on a boar hog utterly useless nonsense institution. Both the League of Nations and the UN failed from day one because neither “World government” has accountability of its corrupt bureaucraps.

In situations where there are significant conflicts of interest among stakeholders, achieving compliance with environmental agreements, such as those aimed at reducing plastic pollution, becomes exceedingly difficult. Without the ability to impose penalties or sanctions, compliance relies heavily on voluntary participation and goodwill among nations. Only have to examine UN Human Rights Commissions to see how it become a perverted joke on matters of Human Rights.

The comparison to the UN Human Rights Commissions highlights a broader issue in international governance where enforcement mechanisms are often weak or nonexistent. Without robust enforcement mechanisms, such as penalties or sanctions, there is little incentive for countries to comply with agreements. This can lead to a lack of accountability and a perception that violations will go unpunished.

The inability to enforce compliance can erode trust among nations, making future negotiations more challenging. If countries perceive that others are not held accountable, they may be less likely to commit to new agreements. The perception that international bodies are ineffective can lead to public disillusionment with global governance. This can diminish support for international cooperation on critical issues like climate change and plastic pollution.

The absence of strong accountability mechanisms within organizations like the UN can lead to perceptions of ineffectiveness. When member states can act without fear of repercussions, it undermines the credibility of international agreements. Concerns about bureaucratic inefficiency and corruption can further erode trust in these institutions. When stakeholders believe that decisions are influenced by self-interest rather than collective good, it diminishes the legitimacy of the organization. Without enforceable penalties, countries may prioritize their national interests over global commitments, leading to inconsistent adherence to agreements.

Countries, like Israel, feel that others are not held accountable for their actions, they may be less inclined to engage in future negotiations or agreements. Nation states should all together not rely upon the international market place of international diplomacy to conduct their alliance interests with other nation states. Only face to face alliances, following the model of the Rome Treaty which established the International Court of the Hague should merit nation state respect and honor.

International diplomacy stands upon cutting alliances and shared interests between nation states. Public forums which permit nations to air their propaganda accomplishes absolutely nothing. International diplomacy compares to a Man and woman building a family together. Whereas UN propaganda forums compare to a public whore house.

Effective international diplomacy relies on building strong, trust-based relationships between nations. Just as a successful family requires communication, understanding, and shared goals, so too does international diplomacy thrive on mutual respect and collaboration. Alliances formed on shared interests and values can lead to more effective cooperation. When nations work together towards common goals, they can address global challenges more effectively, whether in security, trade, or environmental issues.

Public forums, such as the UN, invarably devolve into platforms of propaganda rather than constructive dialogue. This leads to a perception that these gatherings exist more about posturing than genuine problem-solving. Nation States who do not share diplomatic relations with other countries “international law” should directly bar them from using the UN as a public forum to vent their spleen of hatred toward enemy states. To reform the UN requires that only states sharing embassies and ambassadors have the right to publicly criticize other nation state governments through the medium of UN Resolutions. Diplomacy simply not a popularity contest and how much more so a beauty contest where contestants strut around in bikinis – like chickens with their heads cut off.

The UN international whore-house promotes political venereal diseases and mental insanity – like as suffered by George III during the American Revolution. States with established embassies and ambassadors should have the right to publicly criticize other nation states. This would clearly lead to a more accountable and respectful UN environment. This approach forces nations to engage in diplomacy rather than resorting to public UN denunciations and Resolutions of condemnation. Implementing accountability measures for nations that misuse public forums for propaganda an absolute basic fundamental which the UN currently publicly prostitutes.

Banning Chapter VI UN General Assembly or even Security Council Resolutions of Condemnation: this worthless destructive condition within the UN Charter – merits immediate erasure. The UN simply not in the business of determining the international borders of member nation states, and how much more so the Capital Cities of their country. UN member states have no authority to promote revolution or Civil War in the domestic affairs of other UN member states. The Korean War an international disgrace and disaster. The UN Charter of Chapter VII dictates and direct threats of war has no place in the UN founding Charter.

This decision made by President Trump to seize Federal control over Washington DC compares to Putin’s seizure of Cremea and parts of Eastern Ukraine.

Mohenjo

James’ World 2

Mohenjo·jtm71.com

Trump Administration Backs Off New Attempt to Widen Control of D.C. Police

Click the link below the picture . Facing a lawsuit and pointed questions from a federal judge, the Trump administration agreed on Friday to pull back its attempt to take direct control over the District of Columbia police department by installing a Trump administration official to run the agency. The legal fight, which prompted an […]

_______________________________________
________________________________________
The situation in Washington, D.C. illustrates the intricate challenges of navigating federal and local governance in a politically diverse environment. The Trump administration’s attempts to exert control over local law enforcement and influence policy reflect ongoing tensions that complicate the prospect of transforming D.C. into a GOP-controlled city. The dynamics of local governance, electoral demographics, and congressional oversight will play crucial roles in shaping the future political landscape of the capital.
________________________________________
________________________________________

Initially, President Trump had placed the Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) under federal control and ordered the deployment of National Guard troops, citing a surge in crime. However, after negotiations with local officials and a federal judge’s intervention, the administration agreed to allow the current police chief, Pamela Smith, to remain in charge. A federal judge indicated that the administration’s move would be blocked unless it complied with local governance laws, leading to a negotiated deal. While Smith will maintain day-to-day control, the administration will still exert influence, particularly regarding immigration enforcement policies. The situation reflects ongoing tensions between the Trump administration and local D.C. governance, particularly in a predominantly Democratic city.

Transforming Washington, D.C. into a GOP-controlled city would be a complex and challenging process. Congress retains ultimate oversight, something like Russia has seized control over Crimea and parts of Eastern Ukraine. The Trump Administration clearly seeks to exert influence, particularly regarding immigration enforcement policies, in Washington DC.

The Trump administration’s initial move to place the Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) under federal control and deploy National Guard troops was a response to rising crime rates. Transforming Washington, D.C. into a GOP-controlled city is complicated by its predominantly Democratic electorate. The local government, including the mayor and city council, is largely Democratic, making it difficult for the GOP to gain significant traction.

Congress retains ultimate oversight over D.C., which complicates any efforts to shift the political balance. This oversight can be likened to the way Russia has exerted control over Crimea and parts of Eastern Ukraine, where external influence overrides local governance.

The situation in Washington, D.C. illustrates the challenges of navigating federal and local governance, particularly in a politically diverse environment. The Trump administration’s attempts to exert control over local law enforcement and influence policy reflect ongoing tensions that complicate the prospect of transforming D.C. into a GOP-controlled city. The dynamics of local governance, electoral demographics, and congressional oversight will play crucial roles in shaping the future political landscape of the capital.

The comparison between the GOP’s strategic interests in Washington, D.C., and Russia’s actions in Ukraine indeed illustrates the intricate nature of political power dynamics and control. This desire is rooted in the need to shape national policies that align with Republican values. The GOP aims to implement policies that reflect conservative principles, such as lower taxes and reduced government regulation. This includes advocating for law enforcement practices that resonate with conservative values.

Both the GOP and Russia are engaged in efforts to consolidate power and influence, albeit in very different contexts. The GOP’s focus is on domestic policy and governance, while Russia’s actions are rooted in international relations and territorial control. The complexities of political power dynamics are evident in both the GOP’s strategic interests in Washington, D.C., and Russia’s actions in Ukraine. While the contexts differ significantly, the underlying themes of influence, control, and the pursuit of strategic interests are common to both scenarios. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for analyzing contemporary political landscapes and the interactions between domestic and international actors.

Russia’s actions in Crimea and Eastern Ukraine are rooted in territorial control and international relations, showcasing a different but parallel pursuit of influence. Both the GOP and Russia are engaged in efforts to shape their respective political landscapes, driven by the underlying themes of influence, control, and the pursuit of strategic interests. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for analyzing contemporary political landscapes and the interactions between domestic and international actors.

The intricate challenges of navigating federal and local governance in Washington, D.C. reflect broader themes in political power dynamics, making it a significant case study in the complexities of governance and influence.

Nancy Pelosi on the Chinese Intelligence pay roll.

Nancy Pelosi Tries to DESTROY Tulsi Gabbard on Live TV – You Won’t BELIEVE What Happened Next
Obama Finally Breaks His Silence on Treason Accusations— and He’s TERRIFIED!
Trump’s FBI just DECLASSIFIED the UNEDENIABLE PROOF.
Liberal media’s most unhinged voices are being vanquished: Rob Finnerty – YouTube
Joe Rogan on CORRUPT Nancy Pelosi – YouTube
Joe Rogan Reacts to DESPERATE Hillary Clinton

The Revisionist History Fraud the post WWII United Nations, which makes a public pedophile debauchery of the League of Nations Palestine Mandate based upon the 1917 Balfour Declaration.

KaustubhaReflections

KaustubhaReflections

The Trial of Aung San Suu Kyi: From Icon to Inmate

KaustubhaReflections·kaustubhareflections.com

“In politics, there are no permanent enemies, and no permanent friends—only permanent interests.” — Winston Churchill. Or perhaps just Bhola again, rearranging the furniture of wisdom while…
___________________________________
___________________________________
I hate Winston Churchill. He authored the 1st While Paper in 1923 which proved that London had no intention to respect the 1917 Balfour Declaration upon which the League of Nations based its 1922 Palestine Mandate. In 1939 the Two-State Solution coward PM Chamberlain following the disgrace to surrendering the Czech Republic to Hitler in ’38, then passed the 2nd White Paper which determined an international decision starting with FDR’s US to close all international borders to Jews seeking to flee from the European Nazi sub-human barbarians. Europe has a reputation for back stabbing treachery. De Gaul betrayed its alliance with Israel just prior to the outbreak of the June 1967 war wherein President Nasser of Egypt swore that in this war the Arabs would complete the Nazi Shoah genocide of the Jews. Prior to the outbreak of that war Tel Aviv ordered the digging of mass graves!

Neutral England and France did not long maintain their “neutrality”. The UN forced a cease fire after only 6 Days of fighting. The countries of the Middle East – all of which – only recently attained their “political independence as nation state” had not stomach for a long drawn out war. Israel, just for an example, its population – about 2.5 million people. Our economy could ill afford a million soldiers fighting at the front for more than just a few days.

Post war just as England and France attempted and failed to seize the Suez Canal – and therein dominate the balance of power across the Middle East, so too and how much more so after Stalin and Ike told those 2nd rate European powers to peddle their papers elsewhere, (with LBJ tied down in Vietnam) Britain and France attempted a revisionist history at the UN with their UN SC Resolution 242 which sought to pretend that the Arabs did not disastrously lose the 6 Day War.

LBJ raped the leadership of President Eisenhower ’56 agreement cut with PM David Ben Gurion wherein Israel agreed to return the captured Sinai Desert back to Egypt in return of the US reducing the Great Power status of both England (who won WWII) and arrogant France (who lost WWII). LBJ permitted both London and France to once again pretend themselves to be Great Powers who possessed the power to dominate the balance of power in the Middle East.

The huge distinction of character between Ike an LBJ compares to the stark contrast between Obama (who passed UN SC Resolution 2334 which utterly negated the Israeli victory in the June 6th Six Day War), with that of the integrity of Donald John Trump who established the Abraham Accords which utterly negated the British and French 242 and later post ’73 UN 338 Resolutions of revisionist history.

In 1948 Israel won its political and National Independence as a nation. Regardless, the UN continually attempt to make revisionist history and pretends, to this very day, that it has the rightful authority to determine the Capital City of Israel and its international borders! Bunk. Utter and complete horseradish. Israel, as an independent nation, the wars it fights and either wins or loses with its closest and immediate neighbor nation states – the outcome of these fought wars – they and only they determine the international borders Israel shares with Egypt, Jordan, Syria, and Lebanon.

And here’s the rub. Second rate pretend “Great Powers” rape the UN in order to impose revisionist history upon the tiny Jewish state of Israel. In the Oct 7th Abomination War, South Africa’s revisionist history pretends that it has the moral mandate to declare Israel guilty of duplicating the Nazi Shoah genocide of Gaza Arabs. No nation ever accused post Dec7th 1941 Pearl Harbor America of committing genocide or starving the populations of the Japanese or the Nazis during WWII. Israel drops leaflet warnings to the general populations of an area within a town before actually bombing the region. The US made 1000 plane raids over Tokyo and Dresden; and dropped two atomic bombs. Yet South Africa and the ICC Rome treaty court of the Hague accuses Israel of committing genocide?!

Second rate pretend ‘Great Powers’ rape the UN and use this forum which permits nations to conduct public diplomacy together, these charlatan frauds ‘Great Powers’, they without shame attempt to re-write history in their own bloated Ego image. The UN permits nations in the General Assembly and even sitting in the expanded Security Council to condemn Israel who do not even have diplomatic relations with the Jewish state. Bunk. That’s not public diplomacy, but rather political rhetoric propaganda on an imaginary World Government scale!
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
The Revisionist History Fraud the post WWII United Nations, which makes a public pedophile …

chet8757

chetyarbrough.com

Interesting. I agree with your view of Ike. I think his Presidency is under appreciated. I disagree with your assessment of Trump. I think his transactional view of life is too tied to his ego. How much money you have is no measure of human value. If one is poor, it is always their fault in one who measures wealth as a marker for what is good or bad in a person.Wealth is power to do good and harm. A transactional view of life is as likely to do harm as good—a great risk for a Democracy. Trump is a danger to America and Israel.
________________________________________________________________________
Cannot speak of President Trumps’ domestic policies, except from an outsiders perspective. Prior to the Covid-19 plague employment for minorities blacks and mexicans in particular reached record breaking success. Its the minority populations who generally qualify as distressed populations. The proof to the pudding – in the eating; record high voting numbers of blacks and mexicans voted for Trump.

Trumps’ Foreign policy I feel confident upon. In this article I shared with you I showed how the US European alliance had skewed and dominated US foreign policies strategies and perspectives.

IKE having fought in WWII, hardly a supporter of Europe dominating US strategic policies. The US pulled Britain & Frances cookies out of the fire and not the reverse!

Hence IKE used the 1956 Suez Crisis as an opportunity to smack down the top tier status of arrogant Limeys and Frogs.

LBJ reverted back to the Truman era European approach. IKE despised Truman. Truman’s foreign policy stood on two legs. 1. The Marshal Plan 2. The Containment Policy. The former Aid in exchange of US military bases stationed in foreign countries, resulted in US military bases in over 155 countries according to Ron Paul when he chaired some US foreign policy Congressional Committee. Consequently I trust his opinion as an authoritative Primary Source. The latter leg, shaped the Two-State Solution which so utterly dominated LBJ’s foreign policy, as well as President Truman his predecessor. The two-state solution dominated the Korean and Vietnam Wars!

This British foreign policy of imposing two states – a Xtian NT kingdom divided against itself old and utterly bankrupt corrupt idea. This foreign policy defined how the Roman ruled their empire.

Its important not to focus upon personalities steering the boat but rather the course taking by the ship of State. Trump Derangement Syndrome seems bat shit crazy in my estimation. The Democrats have lost the helm direction of the ship of State precisely over their rabid anti-Trump insanity.

Utterly abhor and detest Obama as President. And based upon what Tulsi Gabbard and others have revealed the corruption post ’16 elections the worst scandal in US History. And that’s saying a lot. Recall that Trump ran on the slogan of cleaning up the Washington SWAMP and the Heads of the FBI, CIA, NSA worked in conjunction with CNN NBC CBS and ABC!!! I hope that Trump breaks this Government established media monopoly on the order of Teddy ‘Big Stick’ Roosevelt.

Trump succeeded through the Abraham Accords. This IKE like Foreign policy slapped down the EU/UN alliance. Recall Trump rebuked the EU over its contributions to the NATO alliance in his first term. This policy goes hand in glove with Washington and Jefferson absolute distrust of making strategic alliances with Europe.

The foundation of the US decision to hitch its wagon to Western Europe began with the Wilson Government to made the Government Central Bank monopoly of private banking/Federal Reserve. He slipped this clear refutation of President Andrew Jackson’s closure of the 2nd National Bank in 1825 with only 3 people sitting in Congress prior to Xmas!!!! What a disgrace!

The New government private banking Central Bank monopoly butt fucked the American economy. Its duplicated the European tradition of Central Governments establishing Corporate Monopolies. Recall the US revolutionaries throwing.

The British empire sought to break the Chinese Tea monopoly, dominated by the Qing Dynasty. The British East India Company was initially interested in tea for its popularity in Britain. British officials discovered that the climate in regions like Assam and Darjeeling was suitable for tea cultivation.

As a matter of perspective, the British likewise developed a stain of long stand cotton in Egypt in 1864. Hence England did not join the Confederacy attempt. British textile industries absolutely relied upon Southern long stand cotton prior to Egypt developing a stain of long stand cotton in 1864.

English tea monopoly in India, such as the Assam Company (founded in 1839), were established to manage tea production and export. These companies controlled the entire supply chain, from cultivation to export, effectively creating a monopoly over Indian tea. The establishment of the English tea monopoly in India had lasting effects on the economy, society, and culture, shaping the tea industry as we know it today. This same fact equally applies to Wilson’s government established monopoly known as the Federal Reserve in 1913.

The US joined the British and French alliance during WWI & WWII consequent to huge loans which the non elected Federal Reserve unilaterally decided to give to the governments of London and Paris!

Post WWII Europe stood exhausted and utterly bankrupt. Hence IKE in the Suez Crisis immediately slapped the British and French down. Israel’s government of Ben Gurion agreed to return the captured Sinai with no Egyptian compensation for damages in return for IKE removing England and France as top tier ‘Great Powers’ in the Middle East.

LBJ, tied down in Vietnam, permitted London and Paris to write UN Resolution 242. This UN Resolution serves as the foundation of all hostile UN Condemnations of Israel to this very day! Obama’s UN Resolution 2334 sucked the butt’s of England and France. What an absolute disgrace!

President Trump’s Abraham Accords directly compares to the policies of IKE during the Suez Crisis of ’56. British and French divide and rule hostile imperialism argues that peace in the Middle East depends upon dhimmi stateless Arab refugee populations scattered across the face of the Middle East! President Trump slapped the European hogwash straight across their fat jowls! He argues that peace in the Middle East first and foremost must come from independent nation states in the Middle East making shalom with Israel. And NOT carving up Israel into two hostile states like as did the post WWII Allies did with Germany!! Trump argues its simply not the place of the “international community” rhetoric propaganda to determine NOT the Capital of Israel NOR the international borders of the Jewish state. NO the Arab states who make peace with Israel, like as did both Egypt and Jordan, these peace treaties, THEY and THEY alone determine the international borders of the Jewish state.

As of late many countries in the “fraud” international community of nations, have taken up the kudgel to unilaterally recognize an independent Gaza following the Oct 7th abomination. President Trump rejects this arrogance with complete utter revulsion. Reward Arab terrorists for the Oct7th surprise attack upon Israel? You fool foreign countries have utterly lost your rational minds!

Therefore, based upon this general comparison of US foreign policy based upon the roots of the US as an independent nation, I support and approve of President Trumps leadership.

Domestically the 37 Trillion dollar debt takes America straight back to the 1860-65 Civil War. Doge closure of fat corrupt Federal “carpet bagger” bureaucracies – which in ’16 Trump referred to as “The Swamp”, this policy argues that the States of the Union have the Rights (based upon the Commerce Clause of the US Constitution) to bureaucratically regulate all intra-State trade and commerce independent from Big Brother carpet bagger Federal bureaucraps.