http://www.financialexpress.com/world-news/eu-and-israel-to-discuss-gazas-future-regional-politics/3758472/

Israel’s Response to EU imperialism and attempts to dictate Israeli strategic interests.

Israel should immediately recall its ambassadors for consultations from these countries. Publicly condition normalization of relations on an end to EU unilateral I e.g., (recognition of a Palestinian state without negotiations with Israel). Demand that those European countries likewise recall their ambassadors for consultations.

Mobilize allies (U.S., Czech Republic, Hungary, etc.) to push back against EU overreach. Engage in strategic counter-diplomacy, e.g., intensifying ties with Eastern Europe, Africa, or Latin America. Outright reject the perversion of UN 242 from a Chapter VI to a Chapter VII dictate. Withdraw from the UN. Expand the Abraham Accords forging alliances with other Arab States in the Middle East as far more worthy and stronger allies to replace the broken reed alliance with Europe. Europe guilty of the Shoah.

Threatening a break in diplomatic relations should be a last resort, used only if European states actively recognize a Hamas-linked Palestinian authority or materially support actions that undermine Israeli security during wartime. In the current moment, calibrated diplomatic pushback combined with strong rhetoric and selective retaliatory moves may achieve more than full severance.

European Union leaders have intensified calls for an immediate ceasefire. Countries such as Spain, Ireland, Belgium, and Malta have urged the EU to push for a lasting humanitarian truce, emphasizing the need for a political process based on a two-state solution. EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas has condemned Israel’s blockade of Gaza and called for the full reinstatement of humanitarian aid during any ceasefire.

French President Emmanuel Macron is considering the recognition of a Palestinian state, aligning with a UN conference co-hosted by France and Saudi Arabia. This move aims to establish a framework for Palestinian statehood while ensuring Israel’s security.

A strong Israeli “message” might deter other European nations from taking similar unilateral positions or advancing recognition of a Palestinian state outside negotiated frameworks. It signals that Israel will not tolerate foreign interference in what it considers a defensive war against a genocidal terror organization (Hamas). Israel could frame such a move as an assertion of its sovereign right to defend itself without foreign-imposed conditions. It underscores that meddling in internal or security matters—especially in wartime—is diplomatically unacceptable. It could bolster Israel’s standing with partners like Egypt, the UAE, and Saudi Arabia who are also wary of Western moralism and Islamist empowerment.

Israel’s Response to EU imperialism and attempts to dictate Israeli strategic interests.

Israel should immediately recall its ambassadors for consultations from these countries. Publicly condition normalization of relations on an end to EU unilateral I e.g., (recognition of a Palestinian state without negotiations with Israel). Demand that those European countries likewise recall their ambassadors for consultations.

Mobilize allies (U.S., Czech Republic, Hungary, etc.) to push back against EU overreach. Engage in strategic counter-diplomacy, e.g., intensifying ties with Eastern Europe, Africa, or Latin America. Outright reject the perversion of UN 242 from a Chapter VI to a Chapter VII dictate. Withdraw from the UN. Expand the Abraham Accords forging alliances with other Arab States in the Middle East as far more worthy and stronger allies to replace the broken reed alliance with Europe. Europe guilty of the Shoah.

Threatening a break in diplomatic relations should be a last resort, used only if European states actively recognize a Hamas-linked Palestinian authority or materially support actions that undermine Israeli security during wartime. In the current moment, calibrated diplomatic pushback combined with strong rhetoric and selective retaliatory moves may achieve more than full severance.

European Union leaders have intensified calls for an immediate ceasefire. Countries such as Spain, Ireland, Belgium, and Malta have urged the EU to push for a lasting humanitarian truce, emphasizing the need for a political process based on a two-state solution. EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas has condemned Israel’s blockade of Gaza and called for the full reinstatement of humanitarian aid during any ceasefire.

French President Emmanuel Macron is considering the recognition of a Palestinian state, aligning with a UN conference co-hosted by France and Saudi Arabia. This move aims to establish a framework for Palestinian statehood while ensuring Israel’s security.

A strong Israeli “message” might deter other European nations from taking similar unilateral positions or advancing recognition of a Palestinian state outside negotiated frameworks. It signals that Israel will not tolerate foreign interference in what it considers a defensive war against a genocidal terror organization (Hamas). Israel could frame such a move as an assertion of its sovereign right to defend itself without foreign-imposed conditions. It underscores that meddling in internal or security matters—especially in wartime—is diplomatically unacceptable. It could bolster Israel’s standing with partners like Egypt, the UAE, and Saudi Arabia who are also wary of Western moralism and Islamist empowerment.

Israel’s Response to EU imperialism and attempts to dictate Israeli strategic interests.

Israel should immediately recall its ambassadors for consultations from these countries. Publicly condition normalization of relations on an end to EU unilateral I e.g., (recognition of a Palestinian state without negotiations with Israel). Demand that those European countries likewise recall their ambassadors for consultations.

Mobilize allies (U.S., Czech Republic, Hungary, etc.) to push back against EU overreach. Engage in strategic counter-diplomacy, e.g., intensifying ties with Eastern Europe, Africa, or Latin America. Outright reject the perversion of UN 242 from a Chapter VI to a Chapter VII dictate. Withdraw from the UN. Expand the Abraham Accords forging alliances with other Arab States in the Middle East as far more worthy and stronger allies to replace the broken reed alliance with Europe. Europe guilty of the Shoah.

Threatening a break in diplomatic relations should be a last resort, used only if European states actively recognize a Hamas-linked Palestinian authority or materially support actions that undermine Israeli security during wartime. In the current moment, calibrated diplomatic pushback combined with strong rhetoric and selective retaliatory moves may achieve more than full severance.

European Union leaders have intensified calls for an immediate ceasefire. Countries such as Spain, Ireland, Belgium, and Malta have urged the EU to push for a lasting humanitarian truce, emphasizing the need for a political process based on a two-state solution. EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas has condemned Israel’s blockade of Gaza and called for the full reinstatement of humanitarian aid during any ceasefire.

French President Emmanuel Macron is considering the recognition of a Palestinian state, aligning with a UN conference co-hosted by France and Saudi Arabia. This move aims to establish a framework for Palestinian statehood while ensuring Israel’s security.

A strong Israeli “message” might deter other European nations from taking similar unilateral positions or advancing recognition of a Palestinian state outside negotiated frameworks. It signals that Israel will not tolerate foreign interference in what it considers a defensive war against a genocidal terror organization (Hamas). Israel could frame such a move as an assertion of its sovereign right to defend itself without foreign-imposed conditions. It underscores that meddling in internal or security matters—especially in wartime—is diplomatically unacceptable. It could bolster Israel’s standing with partners like Egypt, the UAE, and Saudi Arabia who are also wary of Western moralism and Islamist empowerment.

Israel’s Response to EU imperialism and attempts to dictate Israeli strategic interests.

Israel should immediately recall its ambassadors for consultations from these countries. Publicly condition normalization of relations on an end to EU unilateral I e.g., (recognition of a Palestinian state without negotiations with Israel). Demand that those European countries likewise recall their ambassadors for consultations.

Mobilize allies (U.S., Czech Republic, Hungary, etc.) to push back against EU overreach. Engage in strategic counter-diplomacy, e.g., intensifying ties with Eastern Europe, Africa, or Latin America. Outright reject the perversion of UN 242 from a Chapter VI to a Chapter VII dictate. Withdraw from the UN. Expand the Abraham Accords forging alliances with other Arab States in the Middle East as far more worthy and stronger allies to replace the broken reed alliance with Europe. Europe guilty of the Shoah.

Threatening a break in diplomatic relations should be a last resort, used only if European states actively recognize a Hamas-linked Palestinian authority or materially support actions that undermine Israeli security during wartime. In the current moment, calibrated diplomatic pushback combined with strong rhetoric and selective retaliatory moves may achieve more than full severance.

European Union leaders have intensified calls for an immediate ceasefire. Countries such as Spain, Ireland, Belgium, and Malta have urged the EU to push for a lasting humanitarian truce, emphasizing the need for a political process based on a two-state solution. EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas has condemned Israel’s blockade of Gaza and called for the full reinstatement of humanitarian aid during any ceasefire.

French President Emmanuel Macron is considering the recognition of a Palestinian state, aligning with a UN conference co-hosted by France and Saudi Arabia. This move aims to establish a framework for Palestinian statehood while ensuring Israel’s security.

A strong Israeli “message” might deter other European nations from taking similar unilateral positions or advancing recognition of a Palestinian state outside negotiated frameworks. It signals that Israel will not tolerate foreign interference in what it considers a defensive war against a genocidal terror organization (Hamas). Israel could frame such a move as an assertion of its sovereign right to defend itself without foreign-imposed conditions. It underscores that meddling in internal or security matters—especially in wartime—is diplomatically unacceptable. It could bolster Israel’s standing with partners like Egypt, the UAE, and Saudi Arabia who are also wary of Western moralism and Islamist empowerment.

Israel’s Response to EU imperialism and attempts to dictate Israeli strategic interests.

Israel should immediately recall its ambassadors for consultations from these countries. Publicly condition normalization of relations on an end to EU unilateral I e.g., (recognition of a Palestinian state without negotiations with Israel). Demand that those European countries likewise recall their ambassadors for consultations.

Mobilize allies (U.S., Czech Republic, Hungary, etc.) to push back against EU overreach. Engage in strategic counter-diplomacy, e.g., intensifying ties with Eastern Europe, Africa, or Latin America. Outright reject the perversion of UN 242 from a Chapter VI to a Chapter VII dictate. Withdraw from the UN. Expand the Abraham Accords forging alliances with other Arab States in the Middle East as far more worthy and stronger allies to replace the broken reed alliance with Europe. Europe guilty of the Shoah.

Threatening a break in diplomatic relations should be a last resort, used only if European states actively recognize a Hamas-linked Palestinian authority or materially support actions that undermine Israeli security during wartime. In the current moment, calibrated diplomatic pushback combined with strong rhetoric and selective retaliatory moves may achieve more than full severance.

European Union leaders have intensified calls for an immediate ceasefire. Countries such as Spain, Ireland, Belgium, and Malta have urged the EU to push for a lasting humanitarian truce, emphasizing the need for a political process based on a two-state solution. EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas has condemned Israel’s blockade of Gaza and called for the full reinstatement of humanitarian aid during any ceasefire.

French President Emmanuel Macron is considering the recognition of a Palestinian state, aligning with a UN conference co-hosted by France and Saudi Arabia. This move aims to establish a framework for Palestinian statehood while ensuring Israel’s security.

A strong Israeli “message” might deter other European nations from taking similar unilateral positions or advancing recognition of a Palestinian state outside negotiated frameworks. It signals that Israel will not tolerate foreign interference in what it considers a defensive war against a genocidal terror organization (Hamas). Israel could frame such a move as an assertion of its sovereign right to defend itself without foreign-imposed conditions. It underscores that meddling in internal or security matters—especially in wartime—is diplomatically unacceptable. It could bolster Israel’s standing with partners like Egypt, the UAE, and Saudi Arabia who are also wary of Western moralism and Islamist empowerment.

Israel’s Response to EU imperialism and attempts to dictate Israeli strategic interests.

Israel should immediately recall its ambassadors for consultations from these countries. Publicly condition normalization of relations on an end to EU unilateral I e.g., (recognition of a Palestinian state without negotiations with Israel). Demand that those European countries likewise recall their ambassadors for consultations.

Mobilize allies (U.S., Czech Republic, Hungary, etc.) to push back against EU overreach. Engage in strategic counter-diplomacy, e.g., intensifying ties with Eastern Europe, Africa, or Latin America. Outright reject the perversion of UN 242 from a Chapter VI to a Chapter VII dictate. Withdraw from the UN. Expand the Abraham Accords forging alliances with other Arab States in the Middle East as far more worthy and stronger allies to replace the broken reed alliance with Europe. Europe guilty of the Shoah.

Threatening a break in diplomatic relations should be a last resort, used only if European states actively recognize a Hamas-linked Palestinian authority or materially support actions that undermine Israeli security during wartime. In the current moment, calibrated diplomatic pushback combined with strong rhetoric and selective retaliatory moves may achieve more than full severance.

European Union leaders have intensified calls for an immediate ceasefire. Countries such as Spain, Ireland, Belgium, and Malta have urged the EU to push for a lasting humanitarian truce, emphasizing the need for a political process based on a two-state solution. EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas has condemned Israel’s blockade of Gaza and called for the full reinstatement of humanitarian aid during any ceasefire.

French President Emmanuel Macron is considering the recognition of a Palestinian state, aligning with a UN conference co-hosted by France and Saudi Arabia. This move aims to establish a framework for Palestinian statehood while ensuring Israel’s security.

A strong Israeli “message” might deter other European nations from taking similar unilateral positions or advancing recognition of a Palestinian state outside negotiated frameworks. It signals that Israel will not tolerate foreign interference in what it considers a defensive war against a genocidal terror organization (Hamas). Israel could frame such a move as an assertion of its sovereign right to defend itself without foreign-imposed conditions. It underscores that meddling in internal or security matters—especially in wartime—is diplomatically unacceptable. It could bolster Israel’s standing with partners like Egypt, the UAE, and Saudi Arabia who are also wary of Western moralism and Islamist empowerment.

Israel should immediately recall its ambassadors for consultations from these countries. Publicly condition normalization of relations on an end to EU unilateral I e.g., (recognition of a Palestinian state without negotiations with Israel). Demand that those European countries likewise recall their ambassadors for consultations.

Mobilize allies (U.S., Czech Republic, Hungary, etc.) to push back against EU overreach. Engage in strategic counter-diplomacy, e.g., intensifying ties with Eastern Europe, Africa, or Latin America. Outright reject the perversion of UN 242 from a Chapter VI to a Chapter VII dictate. Withdraw from the UN. Expand the Abraham Accords forging alliances with other Arab States in the Middle East as far more worthy and stronger allies to replace the broken reed alliance with Europe. Europe guilty of the Shoah.

Threatening a break in diplomatic relations should be a last resort, used only if European states actively recognize a Hamas-linked Palestinian authority or materially support actions that undermine Israeli security during wartime. In the current moment, calibrated diplomatic pushback combined with strong rhetoric and selective retaliatory moves may achieve more than full severance.

European Union leaders have intensified calls for an immediate ceasefire. Countries such as Spain, Ireland, Belgium, and Malta have urged the EU to push for a lasting humanitarian truce, emphasizing the need for a political process based on a two-state solution. EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas has condemned Israel’s blockade of Gaza and called for the full reinstatement of humanitarian aid during any ceasefire.

French President Emmanuel Macron is considering the recognition of a Palestinian state, aligning with a UN conference co-hosted by France and Saudi Arabia. This move aims to establish a framework for Palestinian statehood while ensuring Israel’s security.

A strong Israeli “message” might deter other European nations from taking similar unilateral positions or advancing recognition of a Palestinian state outside negotiated frameworks. It signals that Israel will not tolerate foreign interference in what it considers a defensive war against a genocidal terror organization (Hamas). Israel could frame such a move as an assertion of its sovereign right to defend itself without foreign-imposed conditions. It underscores that meddling in internal or security matters—especially in wartime—is diplomatically unacceptable. It could bolster Israel’s standing with partners like Egypt, the UAE, and Saudi Arabia who are also wary of Western moralism and Islamist empowerment.