The Eagle and the Scimitar

The “League of the Crescent” seeks to destroy an emergent “Mountain Republic”. The “Republic of the Covenant” intervenes to prevent ethnic annihilation and redraws the map of the region. The League of the Crescent crosses the border into the Mountain Republic, based upon the assumption that within a few days to a couple of weeks that it could conquer these hapless people. It invasion Armies deploys a million-man Army which includes drones, armour, and naval blockades etc. Something like the Russian opening invasion of the Ukraine.

The dictator of the “League of the Crescent”, a vain man who surrounds himself with compliant and fearful Yes-men boot lickers. These flatterers, similar to false prophets predict a glorious short war. They justify the invasion as but merely a “security operation”, aimed to crush Kurdish-style arrogant pretensions to achieve National Independence. The League of the Crescent, in this sense resembles Main Land Communist China vs. the Island of Tiawan.

The Supreme Leader assured that this short war people shall remember something like the June 1967 Six Day War or the Israeli 12 Day War against Iran. The Great Leader of the League of the Crescent guaranteed that the Republic of the Covenant would not intervene in the incursion due to the swiftness of this short, “tiny war”. Alas the Great Leader failed to account for the secret Intelligence services of the Republic of the Covenant, know as the Poosang.

The Great Leader of the League of the Crescent, pampered within his palace of marble and mirrors. He perceived himself as a genius, greater than Saddam Hussein! He rejoiced and celebrated the expected ‘Good News’ of the total surrender of the Mountain Republic. His News Outlets of propaganda declared sweeping military victories and advances deep into the heart of the Mountain Republic. Alas due to the horrors of war his spy satellites had mysteriously gone blind. The forward tip of the spear battalions had gone mute – due to the rules of military silence.

This quiet on the “All Western Front”, concealed the operations of the Poosang which engaged the forces of the League of the Crescent before their grand alliance tanks even crossed the Mountain Republic borders. The Great Leader cursed those damned mountains for the black-out and radio silence.

For years the Poosang spies had slept inside the veins and arteries pumped blood in the heart of the League of the Cresent. With their ears on the rail-lines the Poosang instituted “Echo Protocols” which effectively controlled the hardware which guided all his drones and military computers. Every encrypted field device, every general’s wrist comm, every staff officer’s tablet the Poosang had broken all the secret codes, comparable to the Nazi Enigma code machine.

Across twenty-six command centers, simultaneous detonations silenced the League’s General Staff. The admirals aboard the flagship Hawk of the Faithful vanished into a white flash that rose like dawn over the sea. In airbases, pilots never reached their cockpits; in bunkers, the emergency systems themselves turned executioner. The Poosang called it Operation Mirrorfall. No bullet fired, no soldier seen — only the reflection of arrogance devoured by its own circuitry.

In the Palace, the Great Leader’s personal console — a custom device made by his most trusted engineers — suddenly displayed a message written in flawless Crescent script: “The Covenant remembers the mountains. The Covenant watches.” Before his guards could react, a faint pulse passed through the room — like the sigh of a thousand invisible wings. The mirrors around him cracked. The throne of the Crescent fell silent.

By dawn, the League’s capital had lost its voice. No orders, no command. Only confusion — and the hum of unseen drones hovering high above the city’s minarets, marking targets with the light of judgment. The war that was to last two weeks ended in two days. The balance of Power in this critical region of the world had permanently shifted – like that of a powerful Earthquake.

The Republic of the Covenant, like both the 6 Day and 12 Day Wars achieves total Air Dominance over the Skies of an earlier decapitated dictator. Its famous MacBauch tanks sweep across those lands and chaos and anarchy which prevailed following that dictator’s escape to the land of furry Vadka drinking boors. That dictator consoled his exile unto his new homeland with his dream to live in the ideal socialist republic of absolute dictatorship.

Before the International World Government could impose or intervene the Army of the Republic of the Covenant had for the third time conquered “New Rome” glorified under Emperor Caracalla of 3rd Century Roman empire days long dead, now given the ritual Tahnik Shahadah Aqiqah Ghusl Name of Kurdistan. The Kurds rejoiced having finally attained their National Independence as a free Nation by burning the Megale Ekklesia to the ground and throwing its stones into the Sea as cursed hated objects wherein barbarian idolaters worshipped their theologically created Gods.

Later, following a day of absolute rejoicing came the hard work of making Kurdistan a viable and stable nation state. The victors of total war forced a two-state solution similar to what the WWII Allies did upon divided Germany and Berlin. The League of the Crescent populations forced out of the lands of the Mountain Republic. Both nations made a mass population transfer and exchange, akin to what India and Pakistan or the German native populations forcibly expelled from Prussia Poland and Russia.

The skies over the Crescent were clear — not by weather, but by conquest.

The Republic of the Covenant’s air fleet, unmatched since the wars of old, swept through the heavens like the six-winged seraphim of Isaiah’s vision. The League’s remaining aircraft never rose; their hangars became molten graves beneath precision light.

Below, the MacBauch divisions advanced — steel leviathans guided by silent operators who read the war like scripture. The dictator, once master of the League of the Crescent, fled eastward to the land of vodka-drinking dreamers, seeking refuge among those who called tyranny an “ideal republic.” In his exile, he still rehearsed speeches to ghosts — declaring himself leader of a nation that no longer existed.

By the time the International World Government convened its emergency session, the war — already history — Consummatum est. The ancient imperial city once rebuilt and renamed a dozen times by a dozen conquerors. But this time the conquest was final. The city was given a new covenantal name: Kurdistan, the “Mountain Republic fulfilled.”

Its citizens poured into the streets, not as subjects but as free men and women. They toppled the old monuments of theology and empire. The Great Church of Megale Ekklesia, symbol of centuries of domination, was dismantled stone by stone, its marble cast into the sea — a ritual cleansing of idolatry and empire alike.

The Republic of the Covenant, aware that chaos follows liberation, imposed order with an iron patience. A new border was drawn, not with feather pen of a Pie in the Sky “International Law” world government but through borders established as spoils of war. For the first time in a thousand years, the Mountains spoke their own tongue again. And though the world condemned the Covenant’s methods, it also watched in awe — for no one could deny that, once again, history had bowed to the will of the Republic of the Covenant.

Along the highways, caravans moved in opposite directions. The Crescent settlers departed with the dust of their cities on their feet, escorted by soldiers of the Covenant who offered neither cruelty nor comfort. From the northern valleys, displaced tribes returned singing old songs that had not been heard for centuries. The twin columns passed each other without words, like tides obeying the pull of a hidden moon. In the marketplaces of Kurdistan, new alphabets appeared on the signs. Children recited them as though discovering light.

At night, the elders gathered around fires on rooftops and told stories the League had forbidden, naming villages by their true, ancient names. The stars above the mountains seemed sharper, as though the sky had waited for this speech to return. Yet beneath the songs and rebuilding there lingered a hush — the silence of people learning to trust freedom after generations of command. Every dawn carried the scent of both promise and remembrance. The mountains had their voice again, but the world still listened, wondering whether that voice would become a song or a storm.

The Tribunal of Nations convenes hearings accusing the Covenant of “war crimes” and “population transfer.” The Covenant’s ambassadors must defend their actions before a hypocritical world body that by rote mantra again and again ignores the Shoah – the basis for the formation of this unworthy “Tribunal of Nations”.

Modern Judaism with the rise of the Jewish modern state/national Independence.

Shalom a verb that stands upon the foundation of trust. Peace simply a noun name/label. The tohor time oriented commandment of Shabbat serves as the basis of the Torah vision of time oriented Av commandments. The Order of the 5 Books of the Torah – בראשית – Introduces not only “literally” the Avot: Avraham, Yitzak, and Yaacov but this יסוד Book of the Torah introduces Av tohor time-oriented commandments. The Creation story introduces the concept of time: day one day two etc. The opening word בראשית יש ברית אש, ראש בית, ב’ ראשית – these words within words of בראשית known as a רמז. The rabbis inherited the Oral Torah masoret/tradition from the P’rushim which the Romans referred to by the Greek name Pharisees, as expressed in the Protocols of the Elders of Zionism New Testament Roman forgery. Prior to the Jewish revolt which culminated in the destruction of Herod’s Temple abomination, Judean society fractured into polarized sects. Rabbis Akiva and Yishmael taught the Oral Torah kabbalah handed down from the P’rushim known as פרדס logic. A four-part inductive reasoning dynamic logic. The ancient Greek philosophers by contrast developed a far simpler static three-part deductive logic known as syllogism. Inductive reasoning vs. deductive reasoning — the difference between calculus dynamic variables vs. rigid algebra. The lights of Chanukkah remembers a Civil War wherein the P’rushim sought to not forget the Oral Torah whereas the Tzeddukim/Sadducees in Greek\favored turning Jerusalem into a Greek style polis/city state; and replacing simplified Greek deductive logic over Oral Torah inductive logic. The next three Books of the Torah שמות, ויקרא, במדבר introduces תולדות precedent commandments; which do not require prophetic mussar as their כוונה as opposed to the time-oriented mitzvot introduced in the Book of בראשית these mitzvot absolutely require prophetic mussar as their דבר שבלב כוונה. Herein split the Rambam’s Sefer Ha’Mitzvot vs. the B’HaG’s Book of commandments. Rambam organized the Torah commandments based upon a literal limitation of commandments located within the Torah. The B’HaG by contrast views all halachot within the Talmud as possible to elevate these rabbinic commandments to Torah time-oriented commandments through prophetic mussar. The B’HaG learned the Talmud, as well as the T’NaCH as a common law legal system. The latter makes by means of בניני אבות\precedents learns prophetic mussar. The Talmud divided into two opposing threads similar to that of a loom. Aggadah vs Halacha. The Aggadah makes a drosh back to learn T’NaCH prophetic mussar based upon interpreting the language of a passage of T’NaCH by comparing it to a similar prophetic mussar precedent – something like the two sights of a rifle permits a person to shoot with accuracy down range. Torah in context of the modern world: Can Jews reestablish the Written Torah as the Constitution of our 12 Tribes Republic. This Constitution gives a mandate to lateral Sanhedrin common law courtroom to define Torah faith through צדק צדק תרדוף – Justice Justice pursue. This vision of faith radically different from Baal to JeZeus to Allah avoda zarah wherein Man names the Names of Gods like Adam named the names of animals. When the Jews came out of the g’lut of Babylonian exile, they took as their “baggage” proper names given to Angels. During the Davidic kingdom 1st Commonwealth Republic the NaCH does not refer to Angels by direct names. Goyim Avoda Zarah takes this to its logical conclusion. Its theologies names Gods; the Nicene Creed created the Trinity and the theology of the Koran created a strict Monotheism. The latter directly violates and profanes the 2nd Sinai Commandment: Do not worship other Gods.

The Introduction of Prophetic mussar rather than Higher Criticism history speculations.

This 2nd Parsha of the Book of בראשית, Parshat Noach. The opening two Parshaot serve as an introduction of the Torah which formally begins with the 3rd Parsha – the introduction of Avraham the father of the chosen Cohen people. What do the opening first two Parshaot of בראשית introduce? This fundamentally basic question – it defines these two Parshaot.

Notice that the Torah introduces the Name אלהים rather than the שם השם לשמה. Herein serves as an introduction to the 7th Oral Torah middah רב חסד, which the Talmud interprets to mean as מאי נפקא מינא? The 7th Oral Torah attribute spirit distinguishes – something like as does the קידוש\הבדלה of shabbat the distinction between Av tohor time-oriented commandments from positive commandments. A fundamental מאי נפקא מינא wherein the Talmud discerns that the former Av Torah commandments require “k’vanna (an as yet undefined term which fundamentally requires definition) whereas the latter Torah mitzvot do not require k’vanna/כוונה.

The aggadic mussar story of the Book of בראשית, not at all challenged by the late 19th Century German Higher Criticism. The catastrophic events of the World Wars prompted a reevaluation of Enlightenment ideals, including the objectivity and rationality that underpinned Higher Critical methods. Scholars began to question the biases inherent in historical analysis. Post Shoah no more get out of jail free for Xtianity, with its Nazi rat-lines to prevent the execution of justice upon Nazi war criminals.

Fear of Heaven shapes the reputation of both Man in general and religious institutions in particular. The alliance between Lutheranism and Nazism during the Nazi regime in Germany presents a complex and troubling history which ultimately undermined late 19th Century German Higher Criticism. That both Catholic and Protestant Xtianity aided and assisted the Nazis. Pope Pius XII failed to even protest the Nazi slaughter of Rome’s Jews! Actions speak louder than priests or pastors screaming “Fear God”. The Nazi systematic slaughter of 75% of Western European Jewry while the Xtian church ignored oppression, theft, injustice and genocide permanently destroyed the good name of Xtianity.

Had the church condemned FDR’s decision to embrace Chamberlain’s White Paper and bar European refugees entrance to America perhaps the charge that the Xtian church lacks Fear of Heaven, would not stick to all eternity thereafter. Fear of Heaven, means protecting the Good Name reputation – just that simple. Post Shoah, Hitler and his Nazi SS mafia permanently destroyed the Good Name reputation of all branches of Xtianity; starting with German Protestant ‘Higher Criticism. Higher Criticism, which began to deconstruct traditional interpretations tied to authoritarian and nationalistic ideologies.

Perhaps the Talmud did not clarify crystal clear when Goyim abandoned all together the Brit faith and ipso facto worshipped other Gods. The בראשית aggadic mussar story therefore opens with אלהים כלל rather than the שם השם לשמה פרט. Why did HaShem accept the korban of young Hev’el and reject the Cohen First-born son Cain’s korban? The Torah revelation validate both types of korbanot! The Torah contains the רמז word ברית אש\בראשית. Just as the dispute between the two sons of Adam equally reflected in the רמז word ב’ ראשית. Rabbi Yechuda Ha’Nasi interprets the language of kre’a shma בכל לבבך\כם based upon the Torah precedent: ב’ ראשית, two opposing Yatzirot struggle within the heart like as did Esau and Yaacov wrestled within the womb of Rivka.

Therefore, when exactly did the Goyim reject the ברית אש\בראשית? Concerning the two korbanot dedicated by the two opposing sons of Adam, Hevel’s korban accepted because his k’vanna dedicated the korban through the Torah oath (שם ומלכות) in the Name of the Creation oath brit. Cain’s korban rejected because his korban lacked k’vanna. Hence the distinction between Av tohor time-oriented commandments which require k’vanna from positive תולדות commandments which do not require k’vanna. Do the תולדות follow the Avot? This defining מאי נפקא מינא detail both mesechtot Shabbat and Baba Kama ask – this very question! Clearly the distinction in the case of the two opposing “Yatzirot” of Adam: Doing mitzvot stam does not follow doing mitzvot with the k’vanna of “oath brit”.

ולשת גם הוא ילד בן ויקרא את שמו אנוש אז הוחל לקרא בשם השם.

Following the murder of Hevel, Chava the wife of Adam gave birth to a third son. This third son, who did he follow? The masoret of murdered Hevel or the masoret of Cain? Touching Enosh, the Tanna Targum Onkelos writes: בכן ביומוהי חלו בני אנשא מלצלאה בשמא דהשם. Rashi, an early major Reshon, interprets – אז הוחל. לשון חולין, לקרת את שמות האדם ואת שמות העצבים בשמו של הקדוש ברוך רבים. הוא, לעשותן אלילים ולקרותן אלהות

Recall that the HaShem permitted Adam to call the created animals names in the last p’suk prior to the third aliya to the Torah. But the first born cohen son of שת, the son born after Cain murder Hevel. The Targum employs the verb מלצלאה בשמא דהשם. They prayed to HaShem. Whereas the Rashi explanation the 2nd generation אנוש, comparable to Chava’s: ותאמר האשה אל הנחש מפרי עץ הגן נאכל ומפרי העץ אשר בתוך הגן אמר אלהים לא תאכלו ממנו ולא תגעו בן פן תמתון. Chava added on to the original commandment as did the 2nd generation of Adam, Enosh, who started naming the stars with Divine Names. Just as the snake deceived Chava so to later down stream generations did a ירידות הדורות domino effect and stared worshipping other אלהים. This action of avoda zarah created Man created Gods in the image of Man.

Mesechta Sanhedrin asks the famous question: What caused the Flood disaster in the days of Noach? Answer ברית אש, the fire of the brit sworn oaths (שם ומלכות); the generation of Noach made false oaths! A Torah oath has the power to create through tohor time-oriented Av Torah commandments מלאכים; a Torah oath fundamentally requires שם ומלכות. But only Av tumah avoda zarah assumes that man can create Gods by means of swearing a Torah oath. This tumah yatzir/Yatzir Ha’Raw within the heart literally reads בראשית ברא אלהים. Attempts to create Gods יש מאין profanes ברית אש\בראשית. Herein the מאי נפקא מינא which distinguishes tohor middot from tumah middot; the Divine service of the chosen Cohen people forever separates Shabbat from Chol, זמן גרמא מצוות מן תולדות מצוות.

Its the discernment of fine distinctions which separates like from like which defines the concept of “understanding”. Upon this יסוד breathes the Divine Spirit רב חסד. This middah discerns time-oriented commandments which require k’vanna from תולדות commandments which do not require k’vanna. HaShem accepted the korban of 2nd born Hevel because he dedicated the korban לשם ברית. HaShem rejected the korban of Adam’s first born son Cain, because he dedicated his korban – as a reactionary barbeque unto Heaven. A fundamental מאי נפקא מינא.

The concepts discussed this text concerning Prophetic Mussar vs. Higher Criticism – likened to strategic elements in American football, where the interplay of different philosophies and techniques shapes the game’s outcomes. The interpretation of religious texts, particularly the T’NaCH and Talmud, through the lens of Protestant Higher Criticism highlights a significant divide similar to competing teams in sports. This comparison illustrates how differing interpretations can create rival perspectives akin to the dynamics observed in competitive sports.

The ethical conflicts discussed, like the rejection of Cain’s offering, resemble the moral decisions players and coaches face during the game. Decisions made in split seconds can have far-reaching implications, just as ethical considerations shape spiritual narratives. The tensions between different interpretations of faith parallel heated rivalries in American football, where teams vie for dominance based on different strategies—some focusing on offense (like allowing emotional decisions to guide Korban choices), while others emphasize defense (like the analytical approach of Higher Criticism, showing how such a path leads to a 4th down punt or worse a fumble or interception.)

Protestant Higher Criticism perceives the T’NaCH as a historical document rather than instruction which teaches mussar as it applies to the generations. The former compare to placing an idol upon a plinth pedestal and worshipping this superior theologically created being – as a God. Both Xtianity and Islam do exactly this with their treatment and behavior toward Jesus and Muhammad. Recall when western magazines mocked Muhammad and Muslims physically attacked both institutions and persons. Salman Rushdie’s “The Satanic Verses” declared blasphemous by many in the Muslim community which resulted in Rushdie hiding for his life. The Salem witch trials, between February 1692 and May 1693. The Puritans, held strong beliefs in the supernatural. They viewed the world as a battleground between God and the Devil, leading to fears of witches as instruments of evil.

Both this and that absolutely insist that Jesus and Muhammad lived as historical persons. Protestant Higher Criticism denounced the Hebrew T’NaCH as a fraud. They declared that multiple authors actually wrote the Torah and say the book of Isaiah over the span of centuries. This idea that “scholarship” must interpret T’NaCH literature as physical and historical rather than as mussar rebukes equally applicable to all persons in all generations separates Traditional Judaism from Conservative and Reform Judaism which likewise views the T’NaCH as primarily historical documents.

Hence how a person interprets the T’NaCH and Talmud pits two or more sets of opposing teams. The same equally applies scholarly disputes within the Talmud itself. Publication of the Rambam’s Yad Hazakah exploded into a Jewish Civil War whose impact destroyed generations of Jews even after Napoleon freed Western European Jews from the Catholic ghetto gulags of three Centuries. The Rambam Civil War pits judicial Talmudic common law against assimilated Greek/Roman statute laws. Four part פרדס inductive logic against three part Syllogism deductive logic. Just as sports teams build their programs around acquiring the best talented players, so to T’NaCH and Talmudic scholarship disputed and fought over down through the millennium.

The violent reactions to perceived blasphemy, such as attacks following disrespect towards religious figures (Muhammad, Jesus), parallel heated rivalries in sports, where fans quite often react vehemently against perceived slights to their teams or athletes in both American and European football. Competing interpretations of sacred texts create a dialogue similar to rival teams focusing on their strengths and weaknesses. The debate over Talmudic interpretation—judicial common law vs. foreign legislative statute law—resembles the endless strategizing that teams engage in to outmaneuver their opponents.

The tension between interpretations of the T’NaCH and Talmud can be likened to rivalry in sports, where competing teams navigate through a complex landscape of strategies, beliefs, and interpretations. Just as sports teams flourish through their scholar-like understanding of gameplay and competition, religious communities develop their unique culture, customs, identities and philosophies around the interpretation of sacred texts—creating a dynamic and ongoing dialogue, in fact – quite similar to violent conflict between the fans in the world of sports. A rich tapestry of beliefs and practices that, while distinct, often results in far wider fan clashes inside and outside both arenas and society. Violence influences wider cultural and social dynamics across American and European societies which inherit hatred which equals the Sunni Shiite rivalry which divides Arab and Muslim civilizations.

Hail to the Chief! Trump Trump Trump, Victory oh so sweet.

Supreme Court’s Decision on Section II of the Voting Rights Act

The Supreme Court has effectively shut down Section II of the Voting Rights Act, a crucial provision that has protected minority voters from racial discrimination in elections. This decision arises from a recent case, Louisiana v. Callais, where the court is reviewing whether Section II remains constitutional. The implications of this ruling are significant and could reshape electoral representation across the United States.

Background on Section II of the Voting Rights Act

Section II prohibits voting practices that result in the dilution of minority voting power. It has historically allowed voters to challenge electoral practices that discriminate against racial minorities. This section has helped ensure that voting districts are drawn in a way that provides fair representation for communities of color.

The Voting Rights Act, signed into law in 1965, marked a monumental shift in protecting voting rights, particularly for African Americans and other minorities, by eliminating discriminatory practices such as literacy tests and poll taxes.

Implications of the Ruling

The Supreme Court’s inclination to restrict or eliminate Section II poses serious concerns:

Islamic Worship Compared to Baal Worship and Its Theological Implications. Both Monotheism and Polytheism profane the First & Second Sinai commandments. Strict monotheism as Islam declares profanes the 2nd Sinai commandment and all the Books of the NaCH, which validates the Av tumah worship of other Gods. Sinai as Oath Law. Not any Theology which creates Gods.

The assertion that Islam operates similarly to Baal worship alongside Christianity raises substantial theological discussions regarding the essence of divinity in these faiths. Both Islam and Christianity can be critiqued for adopting practices seen as disconnected from earlier biblical traditions. The post-Shoah critique highlights the inadequacy of modern biblical translations and the tragic consequences faced by various branches of Xtianity. The post-Shoah critique highlights the inadequacy of modern biblical translations and the tragic consequences faced by various branches of Xtianity. Islam cut an alliance with Nazism during WWII and thereafter when the Arabs attempted to complete the Nazi Shoah in both 1948 and again in 1967.

Leaders, such as Grand Mufti Muhammad Amin al-Husseini, sought to oppose British colonial rule and perceived Jewish influence in League of Nations 1922 Palestine Mandate as European colonialism. The Lutheran Church in Germany expressed support for Nazi ideology, seeing it as compatible with nationalist sentiments. FDR supported the 1939 White Paper by closing off American Ports to European Jewish refugees. No Xtian denominational leader denounced FDR’s decision.

Lutheran leaders supported Nazi policies based upon the writings of Martin Luther himself. The closure of American ports to European Jewish refugees effectively restricted escape routes at a crucial time leading up to the Shoah. The lack of denouncement from major Christian denominational leaders regarding FDR’s policies indicates complex relationships between faith, politics, and social justice. For the opportunistic Church, whether Pope Pius XII permitting the Nazi slaughter of all the Jews of Rome or Protestant denominations in America who prioritized national interests over humanitarian principles, the bankruptcy of Xtain faith – total and complete.

Monotheism collapses all nations under one universal deity. Erases the oath-based distinction between Israel’s God and others. Violates על פני — the prohibition against universalizing HaShem. Islamic tawḥīd claims absolute unity of Allah as Creator of all peoples. The Torah’s second commandment forbids worship “על פני” — literally, “in My Presence,” meaning before or instead of the Name revealed at Sinai.

By rejecting HaShem’s particular Name and covenantal peoplehood, tawḥīd, together with the Nicene Creed Trinity, both theological creeds endorse a universalization of God which annuls the oath alliance cut with the Chosen Cohen people created continually through Av tohor time-oriented Commandments as defined through the first Book of the Torah בראשית. Thus, even though Islam rejects idolatry in the physical sense, it commits avoda zarah in the juridical sense — transferring divine authority from the local brit haaretz (oath-land) to a universal god divorced from the oath sworn to the Avot to create יש מאין the chosen Cohen people throughout all generations.

Tanakh recognizes that other nations have their own deities and courts — “כי כל העמים ילכו איש בשם אלהיו, ואנחנו נלך בשם ה׳ אלהינו לעולם ועד” (Micah 4:5). Goyim worship, by definition, other Gods. Neither the NT nor Koran ever once bring the שם השם לשמה. Therefore Islam’s tawhid approximates Baal kingship; Xtianity’s Trinity too exposed as pagan syncretism, substitute theology.

The First and Second Dibrot the ultimate constitutional clauses: they create an exclusive legal allegiance (שם ומלכות) for the chosen Cohen people. These two commandments shape and establish Torah common law as jurisdictional; who exercises sovereign law over the Cohen people and their oath brit land. Collapsing all nations under one universal Allah erases Israel’s Sinai brit Name and oath-land; it replaces particular brit obligations, specifically to pursue judicial common law justice, with abstract, cosmopolitan deity-claims of faith(also violates the second commandment by removing the “על פני” juridical boundary). Post Shoah Arab propaganda and UN Resolution 2334 openly ignore Jewish rule during the first and second Commonwealths.

At root, avoda zarah is not the worship of idols but the misplacement of sovereignty. When divine law is detached from its oath-based Name and judicial system, worship itself becomes alien service. Islam’s tawḥīd and Christianity’s Trinity thus both constitute juridical heresies: the former by erasing all distinctions (universal monarchy), the latter by introducing an ontological multiplicity (divine oligarchy). Both produce the same consequence: a moral universe without brit justice. No church or mosque has ever stood before a Sanhedrin-like court to restore the damages of centuries of bloodshed. That absence marks their worship as alien.

Weigh the Five Solas through the Lens of Protestant Reformation consequent to the 30 Year War. More Europeans died in that blood bath, comparatively matched till the horrors of WWI. Xtianity has a very long history of utter barbarism and moral depravity.

1. Sola rejects the autocracy of the Pope and his opposing Protestant Ministers. Sola Scriptura challenged the Catholic Church’s authority and tradition as co-equal to Scripture. Post Shoah the sophomoric bible translations proven to be tits on a boar hog. All branches of Xtianity refuted, disgraced, and killed by the Shoah.

2. Sola Fide replaced a works-based righteousness with faith as the sole criterion. Pie in the sky. Faith according to the language of the Written Torah – pursuit of judicial Sanhedrin courtroom common law justice which sanctifies the restoration of damages inflicted upon other(s) in order to restore trust among the Jewish people. The av tumah avoda zarah substitute theology where “faith in God” substitutes and replace fair resolution of damages inflicted – an utter av tumah abomination of avoda zarah.

3. Sola Gratia emphasizes salvation as a divine gift rather than a human achievement. According to the Torah the 5th Oral Torah middah/attribute a broad based tohor dedication inclusive of patience, discernment of ones’ own destiny walk. The false translation of חנון as ”grace”, as false as the translation of brit into covenant.

To swear a Torah brit requires making a Torah oath through שם ומלכות. The NT never once includes the Name of the first Sinai commandment. Kingship refers to “direction”. A person dedicates a tohor middah, say חנון לשמה to influence his future behavioral actions with family, friends, and neighbors in the future. For example following the brit cut between the pieces where Avraham cut a brit (oath alliance) with HaShem (a local god NOT a Universal God), Avraham understood his destiny walk before El Shaddai through brit melah/circumcision.

The Apostle Paul declared that circumcision – no longer the destiny walk before El Shaddai. But based upon the 2nd Sinai Commandment, clearly the Apostle Paul worshipped some other God. The Nicene Council defined the God worshipped by Paul as a mysterious Trinity God. Uncircumcised Xtians did not walk down the say destiny path as Jews. Their idolatry of Grace rejected the oblication upon courts of law to make fair restitution of damages. No European courtroom ever forced the Church fathers – Catholic or Protestant – to stand before the bar for war crimes.

4. Solus Christus asserts Christ’s exclusive mediatorship, negating the intercession of saints. Solus Christus asserts Christ’s exclusive mediatorship, negating the intercession of saints. This substitute theology replaces Avraham, Yitzak, and Yaacov as the fathers of the chosen Cohen people and replaces it with a false messiah which ignores the Moshiach dedication to rule the oath sworn land with righteous judicial justice. This doctrine declares that the Xtian church has succeeded Israel in God’s Grace destiny plan. Yet fails to address the Name of the local god revealed in the first Sinai commandment.

The Oral Torah commandment of Moshiach interprets the Written Torah, based upon the positive commandment precedents that Moshe anointed the House of Aaron with oil, and Aaron anoints korbanot with oil. This anointing with oil constitutes as the mitzva of Moshiach. It begs the Oral Torah question? Anointed for what specific sanctification לשמה? The Oral Torah interprets the mitzva of Moshiach to mean anointed to rule the oath sworn lands with judicial justice. Clearly the NT destiny walk diverges from the Jewish Cohen people destiny walk.

5. Soli Deo Gloria shifts focus from church institutions to God’s glory in all aspects of life. God’s glory understood a God as a Universal God. This patent av tumah avoda zarah rejects the first Sinai Commandment, wherein only the 12 Tribes of Israel accepted the Torah revelation. Sinai defines this “glory לשמה. The divergent destiny path taken by the Church – both Catholic and Protestant – directly comparable to the path of Baal worship. Under this more ancient av tumah avoda zarah Baal also referred this God as king.

Why Jews view the Xtian New Testament as no different than the worship of Baal.

Just as Baal worshipers prioritized wealth and earthly gains, JeZeus warns the rich about the perils of reliance on material wealth. But whereas the Books of the NaCH Prophets prioritizes pursuit of righteous judicial courtroom justice, not so the plagiarized gospel (Protocols of the Elders of Zionism) Roman forgery.

The Gospels plagiarize the T’NaCH. A classic example the 40 day fast of JeZeus in the Sinai desert. Which attempts to duplicate the revelation of the Torah at Sinai and Elijah’s fleeing to the wilderness away from the wrath of the foreign Queen of Israel after the public slaughter of the prophets of Baal.

Such plagiarism seeks to prove that JeZeus “fulfilled” the words of the prophets. Ignorant and oblivious to the simple fact that prophets do not predict the future as does witchcraft but rather commands prophetic mussar applicable – across the board – to all generations of the Chosen Cohen people for all eternity. The gospel counterfeit thus compares to the Czar secret police “Protocols of the Elders of Zionism”.

Such replacement theology defines the Av tumah avoda zarah sin of the Golden Calf wherein the ערב רב assimilated and intermarried Israelites who came out of Egyptian slavery lacked all יראת אלהים, and hence these mixed multitudes who define the eternal war against Amalek Jews named their Golden Calf אלהים similar to which the NT and Koran gave new Names to their theologically created Gods.

This analogy which compares the New Testament to Baal, suggests that the creation of new theological constructs (such as the Christian understanding of God), akin to the Israelites assimilating pagan practices during their time in the wilderness. The cultural assimilation of Jews throughout the generations, and its impact on the perversion religious belief which prioritizes belief in theologically constructed Gods rather than the pursuit of judicial common law justice wherein the courts enforce fair compensation of damages inflicted by one Party upon another Party. Av tuma avoda zarah always prioritizes belief in Gods above the importance of righteous judicial common law courtrooms.

The NT forgery lacks all clarity concerning Torah common law courtrooms. For example, the Apostle Paul failed to discern the fundamental differences between Torah common law courts from Roman statute law Senate legislation, when he told followers of the new religion that “they were not under the law”.

But its within the gospel forgeries themselves where the distinction between the P’rushim vs the Tzeddukim (Greek translation: Pharisees vs Sadducees) becomes obvious. The P’rushim, historically exemplified in the Hanukkah Civil War/Independence War against the Syrian Greek kingdom. The lights of Hanukkah remember the oath dedication not to interpret the Torah other than through the Oral Torah revelation at Horev. The kabbalah handed down from rabbi Akiva explains the revelation of the Oral Torah at Horev – 40 days after the sin of the Golden Calf. Wherein on Yom Kippur HaShem confirmed the seed of the Avot as the chosen Cohen people. This defining Central main theme of the Torah revelation at Sinai, the NT forgery totally ignores in favor of the prioritization of its false messiah narrative.

Rabbi Akiva’s kabbalah known as פרדס inductive logic, day and night different from the Greek logic format introduced by Plato and Aristotle syllogism deductive logic. The NT Protocols of the Elders of Zionism Roman forgery makes no reference what so ever to the Hanaukkah civil war fought over whether Jews would interpret the Written Torah through the Oral Torah פרדס logic or forget the memory of the Oral Torah all together. The Tzeddukim “Banana Republic assimilated Jewish boot lickers of the Greek Syrian king sought to turn Jerusalem into another Greek City State model.

This most critical distinction between Oral Torah inductive reasoning vs. Greek/Roman deductive reasoning – the crux of the Hanukkah Civil War – the NT Protocols of the Elders of Zionism Roman forgery totally ignored. Consequently following Constantine’s seizure of the emperor crown, the Church banned the ancient Greek books which plunged Europe into the Dark Ages till the Arabs invaded and conquered Spain in around 900CE and rediscovered the ancient Greek deductive reasoning which plunged the Jewish world into another Civil War. In this latter day Jewish Civil War the Tzeddukim assimilated rabbis embraced Greek static syllogism logic and utterly abandoned the chosen path of Oral Torah judicial common law based upon Case/Din comparisons to similar but different judicial rulings which defines the dynamic פרדס logic system expressed in both T’NaCH and Talmudic common law.

The rediscovery of ancient Greek philosophy terminated the European Dark Ages. The Church, secure its its supreme unrivaled authority, now openly embraced Ancient Greek literature which so threatened the Church some 5 Centuries in the past. The NT forgery makes absolutely no reference whatsoever to the Hanukkah Civil War wherein the kabbalah of פרדס logic the Greek Tzeddukim boot lickers sought to cause Israel to forget the Oral Torah. Every Hanukkah when Jews bench the After-meal blessing we remember the cowardice of the נידוי Tzeddukim ערב רב Jewish sons of Amalek.
_______________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________
A response made to an Xtian believer who validates inter-racial marriage among Xtians

timmieblaze quoting 1 Corinthians 1:18-25, the entire machloket between the oath brit which creates the Chosen Cohen people through the holiness of Av tohor time-oriented commandments vs the Pauline “grafted” propaganda. If a person seeks to convert, that ger must accept the entire Torah, just as did Israel at Sinai. Yet Paul substituted Baal JeZeus in the stead of the Torah pursuit of righteous common law Sanhedrin justice which commits to pursue fair restitution of damages inflicted by bnai brit Jews upon other bnai brit Jews.

Paul’s rhetoric inverts prophetic logic: he substitutes mystical “belief in the crucified god” for mishpat and tzedek as the core of divine wisdom. By dismissing reasoned argument and textual law as “worldly wisdom,” he severed theology from judicial accountability – that’s Baal worship Av tumah avoda zarah – the violation of the 2nd Sinai commandment. Just that simple.

Quoting the NT serves only as a pretence which ignores all together why Jews view the NT as simply an extension of Baal worship avoda zarah which strives to replace the brit din with emotional faith in a much later Nicene Creed Trinity God. Sorry dogmatic confession does not replace judicial common law courts which have a Torah Constitutional mandate to make a Legislative review over the New Testament. The Oral Torah rules that the New Testament simply a modified version of Baal worship.

Universal love shares no common ground with brit am segulah. Just that simple. No fancy dance’n. Faith – the pursuit of righteous justice NOT belief in some much later Nicene Creed church dictate.

In summation, the Torah Constitution establishes brit Israel as the chosen Cohen people. Yom Tov Yom Kippur substantiates and serves as a legal precedent. Paul, a Jewish agent provocateur sent to undermine and promote Civil War in Rome Italy just as the Roman Protocols of the Elders of Zionism forgery sought to promote Civil War among and between the different sects within Jewish society during the latter days of the 2nd Judean Republic. The Baal gospel avoda zarah seeks to blow out the previous Jewish Civil War wherein the P’rushim prevailed and dedicated the lights of Hanukkah for the generations of the chosen Cohen people to interpret the Torah strictly and only through the kabbalah as taught by rabbis Akiva and Yishmael’s inductive logic reasoning. The Baal new testament makes no mention of logic. Not the four part inductive Oral Torah logic nor the three part deductive philosophy promoted by Plato and Aristotle.

The metaphor of grafting, particularly found in Romans 11, has no Torah precedent. The Talmud mesechta Avoda Zarah and other locations across the Talmud and Midrashim teach that both Esau and Yishmael rejected the Torah. The revelation of the Torah at Sinai therefore reveals a local God rather than some kind of Universal God as the Baal New Testament/Koran preaches.

The sophomoric translation of Isaiah 49:6 states: It is too light a thing that you should be my servant to raise up the tribes of Jacob and to restore the preserved of Israel; I will also give you as a light to the nations, that my salvation may reach to the end of the earth. While these word for word translation of Isaiah 56:6,7 – read totally out of its larger sugyah context states: And the foreigners who join themselves to the Lord, to minister to Him, to love the name of the Lord, and to be His servants… these I will bring to my holy mountain, and make them joyful in my house of prayer; their burnt offerings and their sacrifices will be accepted on my altar; for my house shall be called a house of prayer for all nations.

An utterly idiotic translation because tefillah does not mean prayer! A korban dedicated upon the altar in Zion Jerusalem simply not a barbeque unto Heaven but rather a sworn Torah oath made before a Torah altar. Such Torah oaths require שם ומלכות. The sophomoric translations fails to convey these crucial yet subtle distinctions.

Another corrupt reading of the Hebrew T’NaCH Isaiah 60:3. And nations shall come to your light, and kings to the brightness of your rising. This p’suk makes reference to the 7 branch menorah within the Mishkan. The “light” of this Menorah: the 6 Yom Tov + Shabbat dedications of the Soul Divine Names dedicated on these 7 holy times.

Zechariah 8:22 divorced from its larger context reads Many peoples and strong nations shall come to seek the Lord of hosts in Jerusalem and to entreat the favor of the Lord. Prophet command mussar. To study prophetic mussar requires Oral Torah logic. Specifically in all the examples listed above the כלל פרט kabbalah taught by rabbi Yishmael. The church baal worship rejects the revelation of the Oral Torah inductive reasoning. Paul’s “grafting metaphor” ignores the laws of gere tzeddick. Torah has no faith in any Universal God.

Post the Oct 7th 2023 Abomination War

Israel’s recent diplomatic posture reflects a sharp pivot away from traditional UN frameworks — particularly Resolutions 242 and 338 — and toward the Abraham Accords as its preferred basis for regional peace.

Rejection of UN Resolutions 242 & 338: These resolutions have long underpinned the two-state solution framework, supported by the UN, EU, and Arab League. They directly violate direct negotiations between Israel and Arab states in favor of revisionist history which declares that Israel remains a UN Protectorate territory ruled by international committee ie UN Resolutions.

The Abraham Accords represent a complete break from land-for-peace diplomacy. Israeli diplomacy prioritizes that Arab countries must fundamentally validate the objective of Zionism: Jewish equal rights to achieve self-determination as the 1922 League of Nations Palestine Mandate and the 1948 UN Resolution 181, including the 2/3rds majority of Member states, this UN Resolution permanently rejects any further UN attempt to impose diplomatic solutions through UN Committee Proxy. Israeli Independence fundamentally rejects any UN diplomatic role in determination of Israeli strategic and tactical diplomatic decisions.

The Abraham Accords, signed in 2020 with UAE, Bahrain, Morocco, and Sudan: prioritizes a central focus upon economic, security, and diplomatic normalization without requiring territorial concessions. Clear proof that shalom – quite possible without UN mediation or Palestinian dhimmy Arab non State preconditions. Arabs lost the 1948 and 1967 Wars. Full Stop. No revisionist history of these cold hard facts permitted. UN Resolutions 242, 338 etc represent UN Revisionist history which pretends that Israel lost these two wars to the Arab states hostile rejection of Zionism, as expressed in UN Resolution 3379: Zionism is Racism, and the infamous  Khartoum Resolution 3 No’s.

Israel has increasingly criticized European states — especially London and Paris — for treating it as if it remained under a colonial UN mandate status, implying a lack of sovereignty. Furthermore, the long term objective of the Abraham Peace Accords: that a majority of Arab countries across the Middle East and North Africa recognize Israel, with the Primary objective of forcing the UN itself to publicly recognize Israel as a country within the Middle East community of Nations. Israel rejects the UN Apartheid policy which excludes Israel as a member State of the Middle East voting block of nations within the UN itself.

UN Resolutions which calls for recognitin of Palestinian statehood furthermore violates the Oslo Accords. Israel a fully sovereign nation, not subject to UN trusteeship. European pressure, specifically addressed through EU participation in UN SC & GA Resolution “committee votes”, Israel interprets as “Colonial-style interference.

Post the Oct 7th 2023 Abomination War, the ‘Game Over’ Israeli response to the recent UN GA vote supported by former West European or Nato allied states which demanded that Israel terminate its “unlawful presence” in Palestinian territories ignores the PLO 1964 Charter which did not refer to “occupied territories” as inclusive of either the Jordanian West Bank or the Egyptian Gaza. Therefore UN 242 & 338 rewrites and ignores the PLO charter of Yasser Arafat’s PLO while it recognizes the Oslo PA as an Indepedent Palestinian State!

Israeli diplomatic doctrine openly rejects the legacy of UN-imposed frameworks and repositions the Abraham Accords as the legitimate foundation for shalom. Shalom, unlike the noun Peace, a verb which requires trust. Peace as a noun only promotes the slight of hand propaganda rhetoric and nothing of real substance.

UN Resolutions 242 & 338, historically central to the two-state solution, viewed by Israel as tools of revisionist diplomacy that undermine its sovereignty. They falsely imply, Israel lost the 1948 and 1967 wars and remains under international trusteeship — a notion Israel categorically rejects.

Israel interprets these resolutions as relics of a UN system that seeks to impose outcomes via committee votes rather than direct negotiation. As such, they maintain UN Apartheid policies which adamentaly refuse to validate Zionism established through the League of Nations 1922 Palestine Mandate, based upon the Balfour Declaration signed between Israel and Britain. Since the British defeat in the 1956 War, Britain lost its status as a Great Power. Both Britain and France should not sit on the UN Secority Council as permanent members with veto powers. France lost WWII.

Israel requires direct face to face negotiations with any and all Arab Countries, based upon the latter’s recognition of political Zionism: Jewish equal rights to achieve self-determination in the Middle East and North Africa.

Arab states must recognize Jewish self-determination as rooted in the 1922 League of Nations Mandate and UN Resolution 181 (1947). Full regional integration of Israel into the Middle East diplomatic bloc, forcing UN recognition of Israel as a legitimate regional Middle East State actor.

All UN Resolutions demanding Israel withdraw from “unlawful presence” in Palestinian territories are seen as illegitimate. Israel’s “Game Over” response signals a final break with European and UN diplomatic frameworks.

London, Paris, and EU allies are accused of treating Israel as a UN mandate territory, perpetuating colonial-style interference. UN recognition of Palestinian statehood bypasses the Oslo framework, which requires bilateral negotiation.

PLO Charter (1964): Did not claim West Bank or Gaza — undermining the historical basis for current UN territorial claims made against Israel. UN Resolution 3379: “Zionism is Racism” (revoked in 1991) remains a symbolic grievance in Israeli diplomatic memory. ‘Game Over’ – Israel demands that Britain and France lose their Great Power status as permanent UN Security Council members with veto powers. British/EU imperialism\colonialism, Israel categorically rejects. England betrayed the League of Nations Palestine Mandate trust when it passed the White Paper in 1939. France lost WWII, and both countries lost the 1956 Suez War. Solid proof that neither country qualifies as a great power. Furthermore Israel as a nuclear power, based upon UN hostility to the existence of political Zionism and the Jewish state, requires permanent member status on the Security Council inclusive of veto powers.

Parshat Noach explained

Rabbis have preached the equivalent of Jesus’s 2nd coming bull shit — known as ירידות הדורות for no less than 1500 years which culminated in the Shoah. Reactionary nonsense. The Talmud addresses the subject of Noach and the Ark by focusing upon “False Oaths”. The phrase “because of this corruption” directly compares to modern day Joan of Arc, Gretta Thornburg, climate change, Covid-19 – hysteria with her latest condemnation against Israel over the Hamas surprise attack made on Oct7th 2023 on Shemene Atzeret.

G’lut Jewish thoughts concerning social corruption fail to address the Elephant in the China Closet: 1. Jewish assimilation 2. Jewish intermarriage with Goyim. Both negative commandments define the k’vanna of the 2nd Sinai commandment! Kavanah refers to raising positive and negative תולדות מצוות which do not require k’vanna to Av tohor time-oriented commandments which do require k’vanna. Its this distinction of k’vanna which sharply contrasts with Parshat Noach with its curse of false oaths. False oaths caused the Floods of Noach! Remembering the oaths sworn by the Avot, what does remembering the specifics of these Avot oaths accomplish visa-vis g’lut Israel based upon HaShem sending a M’lach ie Moshe to Egypt?

תלדות מצוות קום ועשה ושב ולא תעשה מצוות emphatically do not require k’vanna. Only a bird-brained טיפש פשט makes a literal translation of “time-oriented commandments” strictly limited to time rather than k’vanna. The latter prophetic mussar as expressed through Aggadah scholarship throughout the Talmud. G’lut Jews do not know nor remember the oaths sworn by the Avot whose “time-oriented commandments, which require שם ומלכות, create the chosen Cohen people throughout the generations in compliance with the oath brit HaShem swore in return to the Avot directly binding the oath sworn lands as the eternal inheritance of the Chosen Cohen People.

The term “time-oriented commandments” do not limit understanding to mere chronology, but rather encompass a deeper appreciation the תמיד מעשה בראשית spiritual creation and re-birth of the chosen Cohen people in all generations bnai brit Israel walks before our God. Parshat Noach serves as a permanent reminder that Goyim from the start rejected the oath brit faith. For this reason the Torah employs the term אלהים. Even when the Torah introduces the שם השם, according to Rashi – Goyim employed this Divine Name to call upon their Av tumah avoda zarah Gods.

Goyim theologies and Creeds create Gods. Hence the Torah introduces the Yatzir Ha’Raw within the heart by opening the Torah with בראשית ברא אלהים rather than שם השם בראשית ברא. The holiness of Torah commandments possesses the spiritual sanctity of creating Malachim. Yaacov sent a malach to his brother Esau. HaShem sent a malach unto Par’o in Egypt. The opening blessing of kre’a shma and the repetition of the Shemone Esrei emphasizes the time oriented commandment sanctity of creating malachim through the service of time oriented Av Torah –rather than toldot commandments.

The difference between אלהים vs. שם השם the different spirits which separate the Yatzir HaRaw from the Yatzir Ha’Tov within the oath brit Cohen peoples’ hearts. The 2nd Sinai commandment emphasizes that the Yatzir Ha’Raw worships other Gods. Monotheism as a Av tuma avoda zarah creation of a foreign Universal God for all Humanity, absolutely a abomination against the 2nd Sinai commandment which validates the tumah spirit which drives the Yatzir HaRaw within the heart of Man to worship other Gods.

Observance of stam commandments do not possess the holiness to create from nothing malachim. Only tohor Av time oriented Torah commandments breath this Torah holiness power. Prophets employ malachim especially during times of war. The story of Bil’aam and his attempt to curse Israel, to cause Israel to fall in defeat before our enemy Moav in battle – defines the reason why the Torah refers to the Goy Bil’aam as a prophet.

Par’o, the Gods of Canaan conquered by Jehoshua the prophet, the God of Baal worshipped by the Philistines – these three examples separate the word אלהים from the Divine Presence Spirit Name שם השם. Hence the ערב רב assimilated and intermarried to Egyptians – these corrupt g’lut Israelites – they referred to the Golden Calf by the word אלהים. A fundamental error to assume that the one word interchanges with the Holy Spirit Divine Sinai first commandment Name.

In like manner the distinction between brit and covenant. The latter the Goyim of the Protocols of the Elders of Zionism New Testament and Arab Koran – both av tumah avoda zarah create new Gods JeZeus and Allah – אלהים. Time oriented Av Torah commandments swear a Torah oath through שם ומלאך as messengers of blessing or curse/life or death לשמה.

The Name אלהים when employed through tohor spirits represents the dedicated Chyyah soul –dedicated to HaShem לשמה on Yom Kippur. Divine Names never to be interchanged with the שם השם any more than malachim confused and associated with being equal and part of the שם השם. Doing so defines the direct genesis error of avoda zarah, where Man confused the stars and planets of the Milky War as lessor Gods; and later worshipped them as Gods in their own right.

The Israelite assimilated ערב רב had not developed יראת אלהים. Consequently, just as king Shlomo failed to pursue righteous judicial Sanhedrin courtroom justice during his entire reign as king, and he both copied the customs manners and ways practiced by Goyim who bankrupt the treasury of their respective nations by building, through slave labor, Pyramid Temple Cathedrals as well as marry alien foreign women who reject the revelation of the Torah at Sinai.

Brit vs. Covenant just as far apart as שם השם from אלהים and the creation of malachim through tohor time oriented commandments by prophets of the chosen Cohen people during times of war. The time oriented malachim created through this unique Av type Torah commandment, they serve as ambassadors to plant Torah curses within the Yatzir Ha’Raw of the hearts of the enemies of Israel who come to war against the chosen Cohen people. Like as the לשון הרע of the 10 spies melted the hearts of Israel to conquer the lands of Canaan.

Tohor time oriented Av commandments create malachim יש מאין מדור לדור. G’lut Jewry cursed with the Torah curse that they have lost the wisdom how to do mitzvot לשמה. Hence the Books of Torah commandments like the puke Rambam book of commandments limits Torah commandments to a bird brained טיפש פשט literal reading of the words of the Torah!

Similar to how the Av tuma avoda zarah church makes a literal reading of the Genesis creation story! Both this and that Av tuma avoda zarah totally miss the boat; and worship other Gods as a direct consequence. The Rambam puke worships a Universal Monotheistic God created through Xtian and Arab avoda zarah New Testament and Koran theology – books of tuma. The puke Rambam confuses 7 mitzvot “bnai Noach” as inclusive of all humanity, rather than the temporary residents – Gere Toshav – who resides within the borders of Sanhedrin judicial authority. No Sanhedrin court has a Torah mandate to put a “bnai noach” living in foreign lands to death for violating one of the 7 mitzvot bnai noach as defined in the Aggada of mesechta Sanhedrin!

The phrase “pie in the sky” typically refers to unrealistic or overly optimistic ideas or promises that are unlikely to be fulfilled. In this context, the Harry Potter New Testament – Protocols of the Elders of Zion forgery. Post Shoah no Get out of Jail Free for the dead god JeZeus.

The New Testament “plagiarism” to the Torah at Sinai. Same applies to the Koran Protocols of the Elders of Zionism; UN General Assembly Resolution 3379: Zionism is Racism.