If the foundation flawed, the entire building must come down. The Roman new testament counterfeit fundamentally erroneous. Regardless the pigs ear of the Catholic Church or the opposing pigs ear of the Protestant Church, no silk purse possible to make from either treif pig ears.

Prominent leader of the Protestant Reformation in Switzerland during the 16th century, specifically in Zurich. Zwingli’s teachings emphasized the authority of Scripture, yet failed to move beyond sophomoric translations made by Catholic bible scholars. He did not encourage people to learn the original Hebrew T’NaCH. His opposition to the Catholic reliance upon saint worship and employment of images truly a minor issue seeing that he failed to examine the T’NaCH as a Hebrew and Aramaic text. Hence Swiss Protestantism all show and no go just like Catholic practices. Only he masturbated with his opposing hand.

Failure to engage in the original Hebrew/Aramaic texts amounts to tits on a boar hog undergraduate scholarship. He failed to address the Nicene perversion which employed theology to create a Trinity God belief system as the standard of faith RATHER than the Torah definition of faith as righteous Justice pursue! The retarded Protestant Reformation compares to a child born XXX or XXY chromosome mutation.

The emphasis on original texts, such as the Hebrew Bible (Tanakh) and the complexities of early Christian doctrine, is a significant aspect of theological scholarship and debate, which Zwingli theology utterly failed to explore and grasp. The Protestant revolt – its failure to address the Central Nicene Council utter perversion of faith, comparable to the fictional mythology of Mary’s virgin birth abomination which directly imported Zeus as the father of Hercules.

The Nicene Creed negates the revelation that nothing in the Heavens, Seas, or Earth compares to God. The Nicene Creed, established in 325 CE, was intended to unify Christian belief regarding the nature of Christ and the Trinity, affirming the divinity of Jesus and his relationship to God the Father. It ignored the T’NaCH text which openly declared that “God is not a Man”. Furthermore, the Protestant Reformation utterly failed to address the elephant locked inside the China Closet…the mitzva of Moshiach — an Oral Torah commandment. Oral Torah expressed as T’NaCH prophetic mussar common law. The bible translations all universally failed to turn to the language of the T’NaCH to define the critical terms within the language of the T’NaCH itself. The term prophet does not mean a seer who foresees the future. Seers who claimed to foresee the future the T’NaCH referred to them as ‘false prophets’. The gospel narrative wherein it makes the claim that Jesus fulfilled the words of the prophets defines the T’NaCH definition of ”false prophesy”.

Translations, let’s start with the opening word of בראשית – Genesis. בראשית contains within its 6 letters ברית אש, ראש בית, and ב’ ראשית. The latter serves as a בנין אב/precedent (Torah being a common law legalism which the new testament forgery failed to grasp.) for the Yatzir Ha’Tov vs. the Yatzir Ha’Ra within the heart; comparable to the struggle between Esau and Yaacov in the womb of Rivka. Yet when the students of JeZeus asked him to teach them how to pray? JeZeus failed to understand that Torah tefillah, which learns from kre’a shma precedent, a matter of the heart.

Meaning a person dedicates holy to HaShem tohor middot which quicken the Yatzir Ha’Tov within the heart and not the tuma middot of the Yatzir Ha’Ra within the heart. JeZeus falsely instructed that his Father God lived in the Heavens rather than within the Heart as the brit sworn between the opposing cut in half pieces internalized the dedication of tohor middot as the expression of the revelation of the 13 tohor middot revealed first to Moshe at Horev ‘ה’ ה’ אל רחום וחנון וכו. Just as HaShem a spirit and not a word so too all these 13 middot – spirits and not word translations. The Yatzir Ha’Ra learns from the sin of the Golden Calf wherein the ערב רב, who lacked fear of אלהים, translated the revelation of the Name contained within the first Sinai commandment, the definition of observance of all Torah commandments לשמה או לא לשמה – something like Shakespeare’s: To be or not To be – that is the question! JeZeus falsely taught his students that prayer directed to some Father God who lived in the Heavens – no different than Father Zeus.

Worse the counterfeit new testament Roman forgery failed to grasp that the opening Book of בראשית introduces the subject of the “creation” of the chosen Cohen people through the dedication of tohor time oriented commandments; like as specifically found in tefillah such as the mitzva of kre’a shma. Tefillah separates and discerns between Yatzir vs. Yatzir like the mitzva of shabbat discerns between Shabbat & Chol, between מלאכה from עבודה. Therefore the false messiah god JeZeus – totally ignorant in how to pray and how to keep shabbat.

False the Koran’s Tawhid Monotheism most certainly does not align with the revelation of the Tribal God of Sinai. Both Xtianity and Islam teach the trief theological declaration of God as a Universal God. The Talmud teaches that only Israel accepted the revelation of the Torah at Sinai. Therefore the revelation of the Torah at Sinai revealed a local Tribal God rather than a Universal God who lives in the Heavens like as Zeus and Jesus.

The Torah story of Israel in Egyptian slavery, it recognizes that other Gods live. The priests of Par’o called upon their Gods to turn water into blood – as a powerful example that the Torah rejects the Xtian and Muslim theology of Monotheism. Therefore since both religions demand from their followers to worship different Gods and both religions do not obey the commandment to obey the Torah לשמה ie first Sinai commandments as the basis of all tohor time-oriented Avot commandments which defines the revelation of the Torah at Sinai. Therefore both JeZeus and Muhammad = false prophets.

Mishnah
The Torah reveals a localized understanding of God, specifically as the God of Israel, and rejects the notion of a universal deity as presented in Christianity and Islam. This understanding is foundational to the Jewish faith and is articulated through the commandments given at Sinai.
Gemara
Challenge 1:

Is it not written in the Torah that HaShem is the Creator of the heavens and the earth, implying a universal aspect to His nature? The Torah employs the language in the act of Creation אלהים.

Resolution:

While the Torah does declare HaShem as the Creator, but rather אלהים, this does not necessitate a universal worship of Him by all nations. The specific Torah oath alliance made with Israel at Sinai establishes a unique relationship, indicating that while HaShem inclusive with אלהים as the Creator, The Sinai revelation of השם within the first commandment serves as the foundation for all the Torah commandments thereafter. The revelation of the Torah at Sinai directed specifically to the chosen Cohen people alone.

Challenge 2:

But did not the prophets, such as Isaiah, proclaim that all nations will eventually recognize the one true God? Resolution:

Indeed, the prophets speak of a future recognition of HaShem by all nations, when these nations recognize Israel as the Chosen Cohen seed of Avraham, Yitzak, and Yaacov. Neither the new testament forgery nor the koran validate Israel as the chosen Cohen seed of the Avot. The koran replaces Yishmael for Yitzak at the Akadah. The prophetic vision of Goyim acceptance of Israel as the chosen Cohen people hardly qualifies as the exalted theologies of belief in One God.

Challenge 3:

How can one assert that the existence of other gods is acknowledged in the Torah, as seen in the plagues of Egypt, without undermining the principle of monotheism? Resolution: The Torah acknowledges the existence of other gods in the context of idolatry and the challenges faced by the Israelites, whose Yatzir Ha’Ra incites them to assimilate and intermarry with Goyim who do not accept the revelation of the Torah at Sinai. Hence the sages teach that the mother determines the Jewishness of the child, based upon the Torah negative commandment for the chosen Cohen people not to marry Goyim women. Therefore among Cohonim the father determines the status of Cohen children and not the mother. The Torah commandment to remember the redemption from Egyptian slavery, who demonstrates His power wherein the 10 plagues judges the Gods of Egypt. This Torah narrative reinforces the concept that while other Gods may be worshipped, they ultimately powerless comparable to an idol carved from the wood of a tree. That same wood used to heat ones’ house and cook ones’ food!

Challenge 4:

If the Torah is meant solely for Israel, how do we reconcile the commandment to be a “light unto the nations”? Resolution: The commandment to be a “light unto the nations” does not imply that the Torah’s laws apply universally but rather that Israel’s adherence to the commandments serves as a model of ethical and moral behavior. This role is to inspire other nations to recognize the wisdom of the Torah – held with respect and awe – rather than kicking the door of the Sukkah because its too hot.

Challenge 5:

What of the teachings of Jesus and Muhammad, who both claimed to fulfill the prophecies of the Hebrew Scriptures? Resolution: The definitions of prophecy in the Tanakh emphasize moral and ethical guidance rather than mere foretelling of events. Therefore, the claims of Jesus and Muhammad to fulfill the prophecies, their teachings diverge from the core principles of the Torah, do not align with the true prophetic tradition. The revelation of the Torah presents HaShem as humbly as a localized deity for Israel, supported by the text of the Torah, the prophetic literature, and the historical context of the Avraham Yitzak and Yaacov oath alliances.

Ignatius of Antioch (c. 35-107 CE), emphasized the idea of the New Covenant as superseding the Old Covenant, suggesting that the laws of the Torah were no longer binding on Christians. He viewed the Jewish law as a precursor to the grace found in Christ. In his letters, Ignatius often contrasts the “old” and “new” covenants, implying that the teachings of Jesus fulfill and replace the Torah. This interpretation overlooks the ongoing significance of the Yom Kippur remembered Sin of the Golden Calf replacement theology wherein HaShem made the sanctification of His Name by doing t’shuva and where HaShem annulled the vow made to Moshe to make of his seed the chosen Cohen people rather than the oaths sworn to Avraham Yitzak and Yaacov.

Justin Martyr (c. 100-165 CE), argued that the Jewish people had failed to recognize the true meaning of the Scriptures and that the Church had inherited the promises made to Israel. He claimed that the Church was the “new Israel.” In his “Dialogue with Trypho,” Justin asserts that the prophecies concerning the Messiah are fulfilled in Jesus, thereby suggesting that the oath alliance sworn at Sinai utterly irrelevant for Xtians. This theology utterly rejects the revelation of the Torah at Sinai, replaced by the Romen new testament forgery.

Augustine of Hippo (354-430 CE), likewise embraced the sin of the Golden Calf “replacement theology,” which posits that the Church has replaced Israel as the chosen people of God. He viewed the Old Testament as primarily a historical account that pointed to the New Testament. Clearly this theology failed to distinguish that the prophets instructed Israel through prophetic mussar – applicable to all generations of the Chosen Cohen people. In “City of God,” Augustine argues that the Jewish people are no longer the recipients of God’s promises, which misinterprets the enduring nature of the Sinai oath brit alliance which Chag Yom Kippur remembers that even HaShem cannot profane a Torah oath.

Islamic Jurisprudence and its Quranic Interpretation. Islamic teachings often present the Quran as a final revelation that supersedes previous scriptures, including the Torah. This perspective implies that the Sinai revelation accepted by the Israelites – no longer applicable. Verses such as Surah Al-Ma’idah (5:44-48) suggest that the Quran confirms previous scriptures but also asserts its authority over them. This interpretation can lead to the view that the Sinai covenant is obsolete, which contrasts with Jewish beliefs about the eternal nature of sworn Torah oaths.

Hadith Literature, emphasizes that the Jewish and Christian communities have deviated from the true path, suggesting that their interpretations of the covenant are flawed. This leads to a dismissal of the significance of the Sinai covenant in Jewish tradition. Islamic Legal Theory (Fiqh) often emphasizes the Quran and Hadith as the primary sources of law. This marginalization of the ethical teachings found in the Torah simply a different Gold Calf replacement theology. The interpretations of post-Sinai covenantal concepts by early Church Fathers and in Islamic jurisprudence reflect significant theological shifts that diverge from the original intent and understanding of the Sinai sworn oath alliances.

To contrast the distortions of the Trinity, the virgin birth, and universal monotheism with Torah halachic examples, we can examine how each of these concepts diverges from the principles established in the halachic-mussar tradition. This approach will highlight the foundational teachings of Judaism and their implications for understanding God, prophecy, and ethical behavior. The concept of the Trinity posits that God exists as three distinct persons (Father, Son, and Holy Spirit) in one essence. This theological construct is central to Xtian belief but is not found in Jewish thought. The Shema (Deuteronomy 6:4) declares, “Hear, O Israel: The Lord our God, the Lord is One.” Where the word One does not declare Monotheism but rather that the 3 sworn oaths made by Avraham, Yitzak, and Yaacov “remembered” and One within the Yatzir Ha’Tov of the chosen Cohen peoples’ hearts. Both T’NaCH common law prophetic mussar and Talmudic common law halachic ritual practices fundamentally abhor avoda zarah as Av tumah spirits which profane the heart through the median of the Yatzir Ha’Ra.

The virgin birth of Jesus is a key doctrine in Xtianity, asserting that Jesus was conceived by the Holy Spirit and born of the Virgin Mary, thus emphasizing the replacement Trinity theology. The concept of a virgin birth undermines the traditional understanding of familial and tribal connections, which are crucial for the re-establishment of the Tribal Republic remembered through the First Commonwealth. The laws of family purity (Taharat HaMishpacha) and the significance of marital relations in Jewish life highlight the importance of human relationships in the context of procreation. The notion of a virgin birth aligns with the Greek mythology and the birth of Hercules a Greek Man-God.

The idea of universal monotheism, as presented in both Xtianity and Islam, suggests that all people are called to worship one God, directly declaring the specific oath Chosen Cohen People brit alliance, that this Torah relationship – no longer relevant. The Sinai covenant (Exodus 19:5-6) establishes a unique relationship between God and the people of Israel, designating them as a “kingdom of priests and a holy nation.” This covenant is specific and particularistic, emphasizing the responsibilities and obligations of the Jewish people. The concept of the Noachide laws refers strictly and only to Goyim known as ‘Gere Toshav’/temporary residents. The 7 mitzvot bnai noach do not apply to Goyim living outside the borders of Judea. Further proof that the Torah revelation has no connection what so ever with the tuma avoda zara of some Universal monotheistic God. The assimilated Rambam perversion of Talmudic common law to Greek/Roman statute law, that treif assimilated Jew embraced the belief in a Universal God. Hence he ruled that the 7 mitzvot apply to all Goyim. But both the court of Rabbeinu Yonah in Spain and the Baali Tosafot in France, specfically in the year 1232, 28 years after this רשע died, agreed with the court of Rabbeinu Yonah and placed the ban of נידוי upon the Rambam.

War News Day 4: Syria agrees to open its air space for Israeli defense. Hezbollah has yet to show support for Iran. Wow.

IRAN NUCLEAR SITE DESTROYED, US FORCES DEPLOY TO MIDDLE EAST! Breaking War News W/ The Enforcer 1208

Summary overview of DM Dunlop’s sources in “History of the Jewish Khazars”. By ChatGPT, on 16 June 2025.

Douglas M. Dunlop’s The History of the Jewish Khazars (Princeton, 1954) is grounded almost entirely in earlier medieval chronicles and geographies—he himself notes that “there is little new in the way of sources” beyond what 10th–12th‑century writers already preserved. Broadly, his evidence falls into five categories

The Khazar Khaganate was a significant power in Eastern Europe and the Caucasus from the 7th to the 10th centuries. By the time Ivan IV (Ivan the Terrible) came to power in the 16th century, the Khazar Khaganate had already declined and effectively ceased to exist as a political entity. The Khazars were known for their role in trade and their unique position as a multi-ethnic empire that included various groups, including Jews, Turks, and Slavs. The decline of the Khazar Khaganate was largely due to the rise of neighboring powers, such as the Kievan Rus and the Byzantine Empire, as well as internal strife.
_______________________________________________

This “Khazar hypothesis,” suggests that a significant portion of the Jewish population in Eastern Europe descended from the Khazars, a Turkic people who converted to Judaism in the medieval period. Most scholars agree that the Jewish diaspora, particularly in Europe, has roots that trace back to ancient Jewish populations in the Levant, rather than primarily to the Khazars.

Anti-Semitic narratives and its lack of strong supporting evidence best describe the “khazar hypothesis”. An absurd notion akin to the conspiracy theory of “Lizard People”.

The “Khazar hypothesis” oversimplifies the complex history of Jewish populations – used repeatedly with the intent to slander the Jewish people – on par with the ‘Blood libels’ during the Middle Ages employed to justify Easter pogroms. Speculative revisionist history by definition tends to distort historical facts and promote unfounded narratives. Basically gossip sucks.

Crude ignorant misunderstanding, prejudice, and the desire to simplify complex histories into more digestible, yet inaccurate, stories. Such propaganda spread of misinformation functions to reinforce negative stereotypes. The opposite of credible scholarship, informed dialogue and vile contemptable harmful myths.

The Khazar Khaganate existed from the 7th to the 10th centuries, reaching its peak in the 8th and 9th centuries. It was located in the region that includes parts of modern-day southern Russia, western Kazakhstan, and eastern Ukraine, strategically positioned along trade routes between Europe and Asia. Notable for their conversion to Judaism, which occurred in the 8th or 9th century, making them unique among the Turkic peoples.

The “Khazar hypothesis” implies that Jews in Eastern Europe not truly descended from the ancient Israelites but rather from a Turkic people. The Khazar hypothesis emerged in the 19th century, during a time of rising nationalism and racial theories in Europe. Some proponents sought to redefine Jewish identity in a way that could undermine Jewish claims to land and heritage, particularly in the context of Zionism. The analogy to conspiracy theories, such as those involving “Lizard People,” highlights how unfounded narratives can be used to create fear and suspicion. Both rely on sensationalism and a lack of credible evidence, often distorting reality to fit a particular agenda.

The use of the Khazar hypothesis in anti-Semitic discourse can be seen as a form of historical revisionism, where facts are manipulated or oversimplified to serve a particular ideological purpose. This worthless theory of slander ignores the rich history of French and German Ashkenazi Jewish scholarship contributed by Rashi, the Baali Tosafot, and the Rosh halachic commentary to the Talmud. It totally ignores the impact of the Talmud, both Yerushalmi and Bavli upon the Jewish people in both shaping and forming Jewish culture and customs which define Jewish identity to this very day.

Rashi (Rabbi Shlomo Yitzhaki): Rashi was a medieval French rabbi and commentator whose works on the Torah and Talmud are foundational in Jewish education. His commentaries, serve as the basis of Yeshiva education to this day. Ba’alei Tosafot: This group of medieval Jewish scholars, primarily from France and Germany, contributed to Talmudic commentary and legal discussions. Their works, known as the Tosafot, provide critical analysis and interpretation of Talmudic common law vs. the assimilated post re-discovery of the Ancient Greek philosophical schools of logic published by Arab scholars following the Arab invasion of Spain in the 8th Century.

The Rosh (Rabbi Asher ben Jehiel), a prominent halachic authority whose commentary on the Talmud and legal decisions rejected the perversion of the Rambam’s statute law – Greek and Roman egg-crate like perversion of Talmudic common law Gemara as a commentary which compares different Case/Rule halachot as the primary commentary to interpret the language of Rabbi Yechuda’s Mishna, published in 210 CE. The Rosh despised the codification of halacha into a code of law that followed and embraced Roman statute law imposed by Caesar! The Romans expelled and destroyed the Jewish kingdom which ruled Judea! The idea of copying Talmudic judicial common law unto Roman bureaucratic decrees of laws based upon authority figures which replace Caesar – an utter abomination of avoda zarah.

The Khazar hypothesis, when used to undermine the historical continuity and contributions of Jewish communities, fails to recognize this rich tapestry of scholarship and cultural heritage. Talmudic common law a living, dynamic system rather than a static code as both the heretical Rambam code and later Khazar hypothesis over-write and totally ignore. The continuity and resilience of Jewish identity throughout history not influenced, much less shaped by the Turkish Khazar kingdom.

The Rambam statute legal halachic code and the Khazar blood libel slander, both ignore the kabbalah influence of rabbi Akiva’s פרדס four part logic system which explains how to rationally interpret the k’vanna of the Name of HaShem revealed in the first Sinai commandment – the greatest commandment of the entire Torah revelation. The resilience of Jewish identity throughout history deeply connected to the teachings of both the T’NaCH & Talmud, these two Primary Sources of Jewish scholarship have most contributed to Jewish later scholarship across generations.

Rabbi Akiva the key and central influencer which caused rabbi Yechuda Ha’Nasi to write his 6 part Mishna codification of common law Sanhedrin legal judicial rulings. His four-part logic system serves as the basis by which the Gemara commentary to the Mishna organized into a “Warp/Weft” Loom like structure organized around halachic opposed by aggadic threads of thought. Rabbi Akiva’s פרדס logic format rejected out-right the Greek three-part logic format introduced by Aristotle when Alexander the Great conquered the Persian empire before the current common Era! The concept of k’vanna in relation to the Name of HaShem, crucial to understand the concept of Torah tohor time oriented Av commandments from the Torah starting from the Book of בראשית.

The Tanakh (Hebrew Bible) and the Talmud, the two primary sources that have shaped Jewish thought, law, and identity throughout history. They provide the foundational texts for Jewish education and practice. The teachings contained within these texts have been instrumental in guiding Jewish communities across generations, fostering a deep connection to prophetic mussar and judicial common law – both often referred to under the heading of “Tradition”. The Torah defines faith as: the pursuit of judicial righteous court room common law justice which makes a fair restoration of damages inflicted by Party A upon Party B among the Jewish people.

War News of the latter part of day 3 of the war. Iran did not shoot down any of its two Israeli F-35s which Iranian propaganda claimed. A nephew on the side of my wife’s family suffered material damages to his house.

Missiles Hit Israeli Cities
Netanyahu makes SHOCKING claim about Trump assassination attempts, his own
New Footage Confirms Israel’s HUGE Losses
Did Iran ACTUALLY Shoot Down Israel’s F-35I? Plus BREAKING NEWS! – YouTube

Day 3 War News: Denmark & Greece & India declare their neutrality, meaning they guard Israel’s back like tits on a boar hog. France declares that Iran has the right to self-defense! Following the 6 Day Way Israel permanently learned that the Vichy government in Paris merits as much trust as a whore asking for repentance in church.

Iranian Leaders FLEE The Country As Israel Is About To Go Full Attack Mode! – YouTube
“We’re Finishing Them!” Naftali Bennett Sends UNAPOLOGETIC Message To Keir Starmer After Iran Attack

How Israeli Commandos Hit Deep in Iran
If You Support Ukraine, Israel Iran Could CHANGE Everything

BREAKING: Iran DETECTS Radiation Leak At Nuclear Facility; Tehran UNDER MASS Attack | Enforcer News

🚨 BREAKING: Israel HUNTS Down Khamenei As Multiple KILLED In Haifa
🚨 BREAKING: Israel Wipes Out IRGC Leaders As Iranians Celebrate

Hezbollah has officially surrendered to Israel and publicly declared that it will not join the war on the side of Iran.

Iran Ballistic missile hits Palestinian village in Haifa. Tehran in a state of chaos, anarchy, and burning. Iran’s Supreme Leader being hunted down. Tehran in a state of ruins. The initial stages of present day Gaza. It appears that the main leader of the Houthis – eliminated. Iranian Air Force appears utterly obliterated and destroyed. This has yet to be confirmed. US now actively involved, President Trump orders the US military bases in Iraq to shoot down Iranian ballistic missiles fired toward Israel.

The fall of the Assad dictatorship in Syria. The obliteration of Hezbollah in Lebanon. The total destruction of Hamas in Gaza. The capitation of the Houthi regime in Yemen. These Middle East countries no longer poses a threat to the Jewish State. The British and French governments in response chose to sever diplomatic relations with Israel, and make alliance with Russia and China. The Jewish State reciprocates this tit for tat political provocation. Israel, protected by the American veto, ignores the UN ultimatum based upon Chapter VII of its Charter. A Zionist victory comparable to the defeat of the Arab armies in the ’67 Six Day War. Israel subsequently withdraws from the EU UN voting block of nations and increases its trade and diplomatic cooperation with the United States at the total degradation of Israel EU/British trade. As of the 2nd day of the Iran/Israel War, Jerusalem enjoys complete Air Superiority over the skies of Tehran.