According to Rambam’s statute legal perversion of the Talmud, there exists 8 rungs in charity. The highest is when you help a man to help himself. Utter BUNK

In Ketubot 50a–52b, Bava Batra 8b–9a, and Peah 1:1, the emphasis is on sustaining mishpachah (the family unit) and communal equilibrium, not on abstract virtue-signaling generosity. Rambam’s eight madregot of tzedakah (Hilchot Matnot Aniyim 10:7–14) canonized into Roman statute law an utter perversion. bears primary legal responsibility to ensure his household’s economic and spiritual wholeness. Only once that brit-level duty is fulfilled does communal tzedakah arise as a function of din, not piety.

Charity starts with the family building up the children to achieve their destiny potential. All other charity secondary to this according to the Talmud. Talmudic common-law (Mishnah/Gemara; practical halakhic sugyot): treats tzedakah and the obligations to the poor as legal duties embedded in family, agricultural, and communal law (pe’ah, leket, shikcha, obligations to support dependents; limits on how much one may give so as not to impoverish oneself; communal distribution systems). Representative texts: Ketubot 50a (limits/support obligations), Bava Batra 8b (communal trusteeship / distribution and priorities), Mishnah Peah 1:1 (institutional obligations).

Rambam: writes a normative ethical taxonomy of “better/worse” modes of giving (a guide to virtue). This is a philosophical ordering. Talmud: organizes obligations through concrete rules, institutions, precedent and adjudication. The Talmud’s concern is who is legally obligated, how much, and through what mechanism (family duty, communal funds, agricultural gifts), not ranking the moral purity of different acts in abstraction. See Peah 1:1 and Bava Batra 8b for institutional obligations.

Talmudic rule: the primary obligation is to secure one’s household. Gemara: one may not impoverish himself; there is a limit (classical reading: ~20% of assets) and first duty is toward family/children. Ketubot 50a is the locus for limits and household responsibility.

Rambam’s presentation: His eight-step ladder is silent about the legal limits and the priority-rule in many of its theses — because it focuses on how to give rather than who must be supported first. See Rambam, Matnot Aniyim ch.7–10. Divergence: readers who take Rambam’s ladder as the operating legal standard may understate the Talmud’s binding rule: charity does not begin by impoverishing your family; sustaining the family is primary law (not merely “a higher spiritual rung”).

פאה לקט שכחה — the Talmud contains numerous institutional mechanisms, (obligatory agricultural provisions), communal pushka and appointed trustees, shared distribution responsibilities. Rambam’s ladder: emphasizes the individual act (anonymous gift, cheerfully given, giving before asked, etc.), and thus frames the mitzvah in private ethical terms. That individualizing move can obscure the Talmud’s systemic mechanisms meant to ensure minimums for the needy as a matter of communal justice and public law.

Talmud: certainly values preserving dignity, and there are halakhic protections that aim to avoid humiliating the poor; but the Talmud’s solutions are often practical (arrangements in distribution, deputized agents, institutional allocations) rather than a single abstract ranking. The Talmud’s emphasis is prevention of public humiliation through how institutions operate (cf. Bava Batra discussions of distribution).

Rambam elevates a moral metric (anonymity) as a permanent ranking principle; the Talmud treats dignity as one factor among many that must be balanced with legal duties, priority rules, and communal needs.

While the Talmud clearly favors measures that restore livelihood (the spirit is present in many places), its corpus structures specific legal provisions (estate, inheritance, communal support, mechanisms for distribution, thresholds) rather than a single teleological ranking. Moreover, for many recipients (widows, orphans, those deprived of property rights), the law provides obligatory communal support — not merely advice to “help them become self-sufficient.” See Peah and related Mishnaic laws that make certain support compulsory.

Rambam universalizes the ideal of self-sufficiency as the apex; the Talmud ensures social minima by legal mechanisms even where self-sufficiency isn’t immediately attainable. Talmud: offers many case-based precedents that settle conflicts (how much to allocate from communal funds, who must be supported, who may be removed from rolls, etc.). These precedents produce concrete obligations and contested adjudications in beit din. Bava Batra and Ketubot contain numerous such adjudicative materials. Rambam’s ladder cannot replace the Talmud’s case law when adjudicating disputes about distribution, percentage limits, or family rights.

Talmud (Ketubot 50a): sets legal limits and treats household support as central — practical legal guardrails to prevent self-impoverishment. Rambam (Matnot Aniyim ch.10): ranks modes of giving ethically but does not replace the jurisprudential rule about limiting one’s donations to preserve household obligations.

Rambam: codifies communal apparatus elsewhere (ch.9) but his eight-step presentation reads primarily as an ethical ladder for the individual — this can be read to underplay the fully juridical, institutional nature of tzedakah as the Talmud treats it. Talmud / practice: communal funds, appointed trustees, and agricultural obligations (pe’ah/leket) are legal institutions for redistribution — the law builds structures so charity is guaranteed and dignified. See Peah 1:1 and the institutional material reflected in Bava Batra.

European revisionist history crap attempts to re-write the Hamas total defeat in the Oct 7th Abomination War

A two year war started by Hamas and lost by Hamas. Nothing “secret”. “Silent occupation and exploitation – utter rubbish! Israel withdrew from Gaza in 2005. The next year the people of Gaza elected Hamas as their Government. Your revisionist history an utter vomit disgrace. What Ronny P. Sasmita writes – nothing but revisionist history. Hamas has lost this war. Its rule over Gaza – OVER. In 2006 Israel granted Gaza independence. Post the Gaza Abomination War Independence will not again be given as an Israeli gift. Unlike the previous conflicts Hamas initiated, the UN did not impose a cease fire in this war – which Hamas has totally lost. President Trump comes to Israel on the Israeli calendar when Hamas attacked Israel on Oct 7th 2023 on the 8th Day of Chag Sukkot know as Shemini Atzeret. Trump hopes to expand the Abraham Accords to include many other Arab countries who recognize the Jewish state with a Peace Treaty. If a majority of Arab States recognize Israel this will force the disgraced UN to include Israel within the Middle East region of States. This revisionist history of “occupation” a disgraceful lie. In 1964 when Arafat the opportunist embraced the name “Palestine”. Palestine as a UN mandate territory ceased to exist in 1948. During the British Palestine Mandate 1922 to 1947 Arabs of the region refused to refer to themselves as “Palestinians”. Why? Because the League of Nations awarded the Palestine Mandate to the British based upon the 1917 Balfour Declaration wherein Britain obligated itself to establish a Jewish national home in the Middle East. All Arab Israeli wars ever fought since 1948 fought over Arab refusal to recognize Jews equal rights to achieve self-determination in the Middle East. The post June War of 1967 … 3 No’s of Khartoum prove conclusively that Arabs states till Sadat refused to recognize Israel’s equal rights to self-determination in the Middle East. Basem Naim speaks Pie in the Sky revisionist history as well. Never existed a Palestinian State, despite the UN revisionist history otherwise. Europe has no say whatsoever in determining the borders of Israel or its National Capital in the whole of Jerusalem. Jared Kushner established the Abraham Accords during President Trump’s first term as President of the US. Stateless dhimmy Arab refugees have no rights. Stop with the revisionist history.

What does the Torah intend to teach through the metaphor of sacrifices? Clearly not some artificial barbeque to heaven.

Sacrifices not some barbeque to heaven. The NT JeZeus metaphor attempted forced comparison serves as the perfect false messiah metaphor; sacrifice fails to address that torture on a cross shares no common ground with an oath sworn upon an altar – any more than does marriage vows sworn at the altar!

Brain-dead, bird brained utterly false comparison any and all attempts to rape JeZeus death upon the cross as a Torah sacrifice. Sacrifices most essentially requires & entails a defined sworn-oath dedication which fundamentally requires שם ומלכות. The house of Aaron (dedicated/moshiach\anointed) … upon this Torah model the prophet Shmuel anointed first a man from the tribe of Binyomin and later a man from the tribe of Yechuda.

Just any Israel can do the mitzva of shabbat, any Israel can do the mitzva of Moshiach! The Protocols of the Elders of Zion forgery NT fraud substitute – a foreign false messiah theology. The mitzva of Moshiach, a tohor time oriented Torah commandment. The false church does not know any thing about Torah common law vs Roman statute law.

The specific of King David’s failure to rule Israel through righteous judicial common law justice, most specifically addressed in the matter of Bat Sheva’s husband, designates the mitzva of Moshiach; as a holy mitzva dedication through swearing a Torah oath, to pursue Sanhedrin courtroom common law justice – which strives to make fair compensation of damages which Party A inflicts upon Party B. The NT fraud represents substitute avoda zarah Av tumah abomination of faith which perverts faith unto belief in JeZeus as God rather that the righteous pursuit of judicial common law justice among the bnai brit Chosen Cohen people of Israel.

Just another example of DemoCRAP lawfare corruption.

Navarro REVEALS who’s at the center of deep state DOJ, FBI targeting Trump Joe Rogan Reacts to GUILTY OBAMA ______________________________________________________________________________________________________The FBI during the Biden lawfare Administration got involved in a hostile investigation concerning Tom Homan, who served as first term Trumps White House Border Czar. Allegations have surfaced that Homan accepted a $50,000 bribe from undercover FBI agents. In September 2024, Homan reportedly accepted a bag containing $50,000 during an undercover operation. The agents, posing as businessmen, sought Homan’s assistance in securing federal contracts related to border security.

House Democrats are actively pursuing answers regarding the investigation’s closure and have criticized the Biden administration for lacking transparency. They question the timeline of events and the processes surrounding Homan’s appointment despite the allegations. A nonprofit organization named Democracy Forward has filed a lawsuit against the DOJ and FBI for failing to release footage related to the bribery case.

They argue that this withholding violates the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) and demand expedited access to the relevant recordings. Several former Trump officials have publicly supported Homan, asserting that he is being unfairly targeted. They argue that the allegations are part of a broader witch hunt against those who served in the Trump administration. Homan himself has reiterated his stance that he did nothing illegal, asserting his commitment to integrity during his time as the White House Border Czar.

Trump allies have shifted the focus to the Biden administration’s handling of the investigation, criticizing it for alleged lack of transparency and questioning the motivations behind the investigation’s initial closure. The Trump camp has called for transparency in the investigation processes, emphasizing the need for accountability from the Biden administration regarding how such cases are handled.

How & Why the idea of healing meditation?

Emotions incite reactional “knee jerk” “non brain thought out” actions. The art of developing empathy simply does not depend upon feeling pity for someone or some thing. Men tend to stop maturing emotionally at about Age 16. Emotional retards till they get married and they encounter and live with a woman who bounces off the walls every time she experiences her bleeding period! And then come the ensuing children consequent to the marriage!

At that moment or thereabout enlightenment shines upon Mankind and they come to realize their disability of being an emotional retard. Only this revelation pushes a boy to grow into a Man. Meditation spins around the central axis of Chi directed through the exhale at some targeted audience; something like Yaacov sending a מלאך unto the Army lead by Esau; or HaShem sending Moshe as his מלאך sent unto Par’o and Egypt commanding that the Chosen Cohen People rejoice in their liberation from oppressive judicial corruption/slavery.
The inhaled breath during meditation focuses awareness of feeling through the 3rd eye. Indian meditation techniques refer to this 3rd eye awareness as “mindfulness”. Trauma at youth causes repression of emotions — removed from conscious contemplations. These subsumed emotions result in non-conscious reactionary behavior patterns. Something like a child witnessing or experiencing his father beating his mother or himself repeatedly. Later in life as an adult this same child tends to duplicate family violence which he\she experienced in his youth as a child.

Hence the central axis of 3rd eye meditation tends to strive during the interval wherein a person in-hales breath within their lungs, for that person to strive to uncover a repressed emotional trauma experienced during his youthful childhood life experiences with family members and friends. Contrast the exhale blowing of the Chi energy directed into a meridian point expressed, for example, through giving a Shiatsu Massage. A person breaths the Chi energy into the exact meridian point of a specific meridian line. Whereas the next exhaled breath might make the explosion of its Chi spirit energy directed as some opposing (think bi-polar battery) meridian point/line. Such a message aims to release emotional powers which amplify physical message manipulations of the muscles of the client message patient.

חג שמח

A blessing requires שם ומלכות. Whenever you say the blessing of שהחינו, this blessing requires the kvanna of intending to dedicate time oriented commandments rather than secondary תולדות קום ועשה ושב ולא תעשה מצוות. The 4 species shaken in the 6 domains, validates that the Shekina not limited to merely 3 physical dimensions. Torah commands mussar NOT history. Why? Because mussar equally applies to all generations of Jews who ever walk upon the face of this Earth. History by contrast places a dead generation upon a pedestal and worships them as idols. The utter narishkeit that the later generations cannot dispute with the ideas and visions expressed by the earlier generations rather than the interpretation of domino effect that major decisions made by earlier generations impact later down stream generations. The Kennedy assassination compares to the killing of Louis XVIth by cutting off his head!

The concept of שם requires יראת שמים – the Divine Presence רוח הקודש שם השם לשמה not a word translation. The sin of the Golden Calf the assimilated and intermarried Israelites to Egyptians referred to the 1st Commandment שם השם Shekinah by the word translation of אלוהים despite the Torah warning that nothing in the Heavens Seas or Earth comparable to the spirit Name of HaShem. The Xtian bible and Muslim koran Av tumah abominations of avoda zarah worship their own versions of the Golden Calf word translations of the רוח הקודש שם השם לשמה. Adonai a word translation not the Shekinah Name!

K’vanna requires Aggadic prophetic mussar. Divorcing Halacha from Aggadic Talmudic Primary Sources an utter bone headed error that’s brain dead stupid טיפש פשט. Yaacov sent a מלאך to Esau. HaShem sent a מלאך to Paro and Egypt! The time oriented mitzva of Sukkot sends a מלאך of some tohor Oral Torah Horev Revelation of the Oral Torah – מלך – in the 6 domains multiple Universes.