דתנן בז’ “דרכים” בודקין את הזב. ניתני ז’ משום דקא בעי למיתני “דרך” ואשכחן דרך דאיקרי לשון זכר דכתיב (דברים כה) בדרך אחד יצאו אליך ובז’ דרכים ינוסו לפניך. אי הכי קשו קראי אהדדי. (שמות יח) והודעת להם את הדרך ילכו בה

As the Gemara common law brought the precedent of the Mishna of זבין, so too the Torah – the basis of Sinai common law compares one verse against another. The study of both requires a כלל\פרט discipline. Both p’sukim learned within the larger context of their “containment force” sugya and then to compare that sugia through פרדס דרוש to some other similar sugia which instructs the same prophetic mussar. Its this disciplined wisdom of learning wherein the down stream generations can themselves make an aliyah from a תולדות קום ועשה מצוה לאב תהור זימן גרמא מצווה.

Common law requires down stream generations to do their own research. Torah wisdom does not compare to the Harry Potter New Testament fiction wherein Xtian read their pathetic bible translations for entertainment. The דרוש wisdom of searching the T’NaCH for precedents, specifically mussar precedents, serves that the basis יסוד of the kabbalah of פרדס. This “בראשית” of how to correctly learn the Talmud, a wisdom which requires down stream generations to learn the T’NaCH לשמה. Meaning, it requires that later generations count the שם השם in a cyclic revolving 13 middot repetition, as found throughout the literature of the T’NaCH. This pre-amble of דרוש wisdom serves as the “beginning” of Torah wisdom.

This wisdom permits the generations to compare one sugya of T’NaCH with other similar sugyot of T’NaCH based on the foundation that both sugyot share the exact same שם השם number count common denominator between one sugya compared to other precedent sugyot; having counted the שם השם systematically employing the model of the 13 middot revelation at Horev which affixes the middot of אל רחום וחנון וכו to the שם השם throughout the literature of the T’NaCH Torah and NaCH. The Holy Writings, they serve by comparison as the Gemara to the Mishna. Hence the Holy Writings rely upon the middot of rabbi Yishmael to serve as precedents which, in their turn, they interpret facet interpretations of the intent of the language of the Prophets – like the Gemara makes a משנה תורה reinterpretation by reviewing the original language of the Mishna viewed from an entirely different perspective.

Herein defines how to correctly learn and study the language of both the T’NaCH, Talmud, and Midrashim literature. Just that simple, no fancy dance’n. This sh’itta separates the Baali Tosafot commentary on the Talmud from the Rambam assimilated Xtian bible thumping Jimmy Swaggart sex whore trash. The post Rambam Civil War rabbis cannot scream “I have Sinned”. Off the path Orthodox Judaism – prior to the Shoah, slandered Zionism’s efforts to achieve Jewish self determination in Mandate Palestine. That Wilderness Generation rejected making Aliyah to the land, after the off the path Orthodox רשע spies melted the heart of their generation! A good name reputation/fear of heaven\ compares to a balloon floating over a field of cactus.

The study of T’NaCH and Talmudic common law, not like the off the path Orthodox Yeshivot who demand study this or that Reshon and slit pilpul hairs between opinions made by folks a 1000 or more years after the sealing of the Gemara by rabbis Ashi and Ravina! T’NaCH and Talmud – Common Law NOT statute law, with its cults of personalities!

פרדס inductive reasoning denounces the lie, that later generations cannot dispute opinions held by earlier generations! No one generation holds a lock & key over פרדס logic. Our Sages sealed the T’NaCH, Mishna, Gemara, and Siddur – that all generations share the same exact masoret. The Talmud codification permits the generations to study פרדס logic as expressed through every Mishna, wherein its Gemara commentary learns the k’vanna of the faceted language of each and every Mishna by way of comparative precedent cases. The genius of פרדס logic, it permits downstream generations to compare one sugya to other similar sugyot! Just that simple. No fancy dance’n. Precedents do not come from Reshonim sources as the Tur and Beit Yosef confuse. Precedents come from other Primary Sources – only. Herein defines Torah common law.

Moshe said to Yitro: יבא אלי העם לדרש אלהים. As a loom has its warp & weft threads … Talmud has its Aggadah and Halacha. דרוש ופשט affix to the Aggadic learning of the T’NaCH prophetic mussar. רמז וסוד explore the depth of halachic ritualism. These warp\weft threads weave the culture and customs, the minchagim and traditions of the chosen Cohen sons and daughters of the Avot for all generations unto eternity. The av tumah death of assimilation and intermarriage makes a כרת like as did the Wilderness generation which has no portion in the world to come. Israel only accepted the first two commandments at the Sinai revelation prior to the translation sin of the Golden Calf.

Tacharat HaBeit – Purity of the Home, commonly associated with the specific case of קידושין touching the relationship between Husband and Wife. The baal both requires and depends upon his wife to check her vaginal discharge expanded from 7 to 11 days without any spots. But this specific model equally applies to how the Courts weigh and judge Torts and Capital Crimes as well. Our Gemarah shall now bring a בנין אב from ספר דברים\משנה תורה, which can elevate a קום ועשה מצוה – שלא צריך כוונה להזמן גרמא אב מצוה שנזקוק כוונה. The House of Aaron anointed “Moshiach” by Moshe Rabbeinu on the condition that both he and his sons agree to only approach their “avodat HaShem”\public service/ in a tohor state wherein the spirits within their hearts; (Yatzir Ha’Tov dominate tohor over the spirits of their Yatzir Ha’Raw tumah).

The so called 10 Commandments, repeated twice in the Torah serves as precedents to “remember” the crushing cruel oppression of Egyptian slavery. Torah teaches common law, does not compare to the Protocols of the Elders of Zionism-New Testament substitute theology counterfeit fiction story of messiah Harry Potter.

The p’suk שמות: יח:כ contained within the larger פרק: יח:א – כז. Herein stands a פרט\כלל. Recall that Moshe Rabbeinu’s first born son Gershom worshipped avoda zarah; assimilation and intermarriage the 2nd Commandment Torah curse, applicable to all down stream generations. The rabbis of the “Golden Age” of Spain abandoned and forgot the sacred dedication of the lights of Hanukkah – to interpret the Written Torah through פרדס inductive logic בלבד. In this sense the lights of Hanukkah compares to Islam’s strict Tawhid monotheism; no other logic system permitted to interpret the כוונה of the Written Torah other than פרדס inductive reasoning. Rambam’s reliance upon Greek syllogism deductive logic directly compares to the confession made by preacher Swaggart after caught with a whore in a hotel room — the buckets of tears of Tammy Faye Bakker. A fraud false דרך, once exposed – Baal believed no more.

An exact דברים בנין אב for (שמות יח) והודעת להם את הדרך ילכו בה … and that’s – משנה תורה כא:י כג: ג. Israel came out of Egypt with the explicit purpose to conquer the lands of Canaan. Zionism stands on the foundation: Jews have equal rights to achieve self-determination in the Middle East. In 1948 and again in 1967 all Arab countries, no different from the kingdoms of Canaan, who stood united in their opposition for the 12 Tribes of Israel war aims to achieve national self-determination and Independence. The UN fraud of “Land for Peace” or the European divide and conquer imperialism “Two State Solution”, no different than the counterfeit Protocols of the Elders of Zionism New Testament false messiah Roman forgery.

Baptizing the Rambam’s assimilated/perverted statute law code – this directly compares to the din of בן סורר ומורה איננו שמע בקול אביו ובקול אמו. The Book of D’varim conclusively states that Torah common law not Greek/Roman statute law. Converting Torah common law to Roman statute law utterly dishonors our fore-fathers. Despite the need of scattered Jewish g’lut communities for a simplified version of halachic observances, the Rambam breach the faith of the B’HaG and Rif common law codifications. He failed to provide his Gemara sources for his טיפש פשט simplification of halacha. The Rambam translation of halachic language does not in any way, shape, fashion, or form, assist down stream generations to learn Talmudic common law. In point of fact, he declared that his code had effectively replaced the Talmud altogether.

Rambam’s arguments concerning the Talmud being archaic after publication of his work serves as a ‘predicate-anidate’ to similar arguments made much later by Reform rabbis. The Reform movement hopped onto the Rambam band-wagon, they sought to align Jewish practice with contemporary society e.g. assimilation and inter-marriage, no different than the curse of Spanish Jewry. Both perspectives advocate for a thoughtful approach to tradition, emphasizing the need for relevance in changing contexts. The rediscovery of the concealed ancient Greek philosophies discovered consequent to the Arab invasion of Spain, the Spanish rabbinic leadership blew out the Hanukkah lights. Herein explains why a majority of the rabbis in France, specifically in Paris, n 1232 declared a נידוי ban upon the Rambam, in agreement with the Spanish Court of Rabbeinu Yonah.

Rambam supporters prevailed, and thereafter imposed revisionist history which sought to limit the dispute between the Rambam and the Rabbeinu Yona. Yeshivot do not instruct concerning the conflict over common law vs statute law. Instead post the Rambam Civil War rabbinic authorities whitewash the “dispute” by not encouraging students to study philosophy. Rabbinic studies of T’NaCH limit research strictly and only to פשט. The study of the Talmud branches either into pilpul studies which examine minute distinctions between different commentaries. Yeshiva students taught basically to read the Talmud, dof Yomi for example, and study the halachic codes to learn a more in-depth analysis of halacha. This modern style of education, it resembles to a Man who sleeps with multiple mistresses, which he conceals from his wife! That’s the Torah mitzva of קידושין?

Safer D’varim directly addresses unethical conduct in marital relations. It’s mussar defines the path walk wherein the Torah understands the mitzva דאורייתא of קידושין. Yet the commentary addicted Yeshivot, beyond worshipping words, fail to grasp the prophetic mussar of the Torah mitzva of קידושין. It takes work to “love” a woman whose stories you have already heard a thousand times before. When a rancher brings a bull to a cow in heat, he does not repeat the breeding over and again with the same cow. קידושין all about raising bnai brit children and educating those children in the tenets of the oath brit faith. קידושין does not in any way compare to breeding cows or goats. A man should he lose the trust of his wife, a balloon once popped very hard to blow up again.

The sugiah which contains דברים כה:יח, contains the prophetic mussar touching Amalek. Why does antisemitism explode upon very generation of Jews who have ever lived? The answer to this riddle rests not upon Goyim who hate Jews. Rather Jews who hate Jews. יראת אלהים not a spirit nor a wisdom that a man can acquire through rote learning. How many men pursue their goals and dreams utterly oblivious to their good name reputations? The curse of Amalek antisemitism afflicts all generations of Israel because we worship other Gods. When the chosen Cohen people have no more knowledge of the culture and customs which define the unique Cohen identity of self; when Jews pursue the customs and practices of Goyim societies – none of which ever accepted the revelation of the Torah at Sinai touching the Chosen Cohen People; clearly such av tumah Jews cause the Torah curse of Amalek to plague our people like as did the hard heart of Par’o responsible for the 10 plagues. Just that simple. No fancy dance’n.

Have argued that the Book of בראשית introduces not only the Avot but rather the Av tohor time-oriented commandments a משל\נמשל logical distinction. That the Books שמות ויקרא ובמדבר – they introduce תולדות קום ועשה ושב ולא תעשה מצוות שלא צריך כוונה. While the closing 5th Book of the Torah introduces the Common law name משנה תורה. That in point of fact Rabbi Yechuda HaNasi named his Mishna based upon the Mishna Torah second name of the Book of D’varim.

The “Av” Mishna of ברכות introduces ק”ש as tefillah דאורייתא as a time-oriented commandment known as acceptance of the yoke of the kingdom of heaven. Hence a person who does not recognize time-oriented commandments does not accept the yoke of the kingdom of heaven through the Torah mitzva of tefillah. Rabbi Yechuda’s common law Mishna stands upon precedents. The very name Mishna stands upon the D’varim precedent of Mishna Torah. Rabbi Yechuda’s Mishna a record of the judicial rulings of Sanhedrin courtrooms.
___________________________________________________
___________________________________________________
___________________________________________________

The Torah curse of g’lut, Jews lose the wisdom how to observe and obey the Torah commandments – specifically Av tohor time-oriented commandments-לשמה. This most essential commandment, the Rambam’s Sefer Ha’Mitzvot totally ignored. The Rambam organized the Torah commandments – limited strictly to the language of the Torah itself alone. The B’HaG, a last generation Gaon scholar, rejected this fatal erroneous premise which the Rambam’s assimilated Greek deductive logic arrogantly assumed as an obvious precondition of what separates דאורייתא כנגד דרבנן מצוות.

The RambaN, in his work מלחמת השם, harshly, No, bitterly criticized the Baal HaMaor who opposed the fossilization of the Talmud into a codified code of ritual halacha. The Baal HaMaor understood that both Talmud and T’NaCH, both משנה תורה\Common law legal systems. That rigid codes of ritual religious law changed judicial common law unto religious ritual observance.

Converting Talmudic halacha into a legal code, as did both the Rif and post Rambam – Rosh, directly threatened the study of T’NaCH/Talmud משנה תורה\Common Law legal jurisprudence which judged upon legal scales how to make fair restitution of damages inflicted by one upon another Jew. The Baal HaMaor correctly perceived this inherited threat. The RambaN fundamentally failed to grasp the gulf of avoda zara which separates tohor spirits from tumah spirits within the two conflicting Yatzirot within the heart. No different than the משל of Yaacov vs. Esua wrestling within the womb of Rivka.

Rabbi Yechuda HaNasi interpreted the k’vanna of tefillah דאורייתא – the mitzva of tefillah – as expressed through the Written Torah language of קריא שמע. The Rambam in his 5th positive commandment declared the mitzva of tefillah as a mitzva דאורייתא just as had the Code of Commandments of the B’HaG’s introduction to his הלכות גדולות. The Rambam mocked the B’HaG opinion wherein he ruled Talmudic mitzvot דרבנן as mitzvot דאורייתא. And yet the Rambam, like the B’HaG, ruled in his Sefer Ha’Mitzvot introduction to his own halachic codification Yad HaZakah, that tefillah constituted and qualified as a mitzva from the Torah. The RambaN criticized the RambaM, he clearly proved that the language of “tefillah”, refers to the Shemone Esrei. And the latter tefillah, as clear as the Sun in the sky on a cloudless day, a mitzva דרבנן.

Both the RambaM and the RambaN utterly failed to discern the opening Av Mishna of ברכות which opens with קריא שמע ערבית as opposed to ק”ש שחרית. What defines the k’vanna of acceptance of the Yoke of the Kingdom of Heaven?

Kre’a Shma – tefillah from the Torah itself. The Gemara of ברכות debates whether the blessings which surround the ק”ש, if they expressed a mitzva from the Torah, specifically remembering the freedom from Egyptian slavery, or the ק”ש עצם language itself – constituted the actual mitzva from the Torah of tefillah: acceptance of the yoke of the kingdom of heaven as a tohor time-oriented commandment.

The language of the Gemara assumes that the down stream generations understand – that this debate addresses the mitzva דאורייתא vs. דרבנן as addressing the mitzva of tefillah itself … framed through kre’a shma vs Shemone Esrei compared to kre’a shma vs. the blessings which surround the kre’a shma. The Gemara did not explicitly declare that their debate concerning the valuation of the merits of the blessings which surround the ק”ש or the mitzva of ק”ש alone itself … the mitzva of accepting the yoke of the kingdom of Heaven … defined the substance of an Av tohor time oriented commandment do cause the Cohen inheritance to pass down from generation to generation only by way of tohor time-oriented commandments. Only this Av Torah commandment continuously creates יש מאין תמיד מעשה בראשית the chosen Cohen people from NOTHING.

This subtle מאי נפקא מינא\רב חסד required distinction, the language of the Gemara required that all down stream generations learn through making the required logical דיוק/inference of reasoning! In the Gemara debate over the blessings vs the actual ק”ש, never did it explicitly mention — NOT time-oriented commandments which require prophetic mussar as its כוונה, NOR tefillah as either דאורייתא או דרבנן which framed the substance of the Gemara debate in ברכות in the first place. This fundamental מאי נפקא מינא רב חסד middah distinction separates Av tohor time-oriented commandments from תולדות positive and negative commandments (as located in the Books שמות ויקרא ובמדבר).

The Rambam halachic statute law assimilated codification translated Aramaic into Hebrew. The Rambam simply a glorified translator. But his service does it resemble תרגום אונקלוס translation of the Torah into Aramaic, based upon the need that Jews now spoke the Aramaic of the Assyrian empire as their mother tongue? Or does the Rambam pervert פרדס קבלה inductive reasoning unto a Greek/Roman logic of syllogism deductive reasoning which stands upon the order of statute law? This latter possibility, its the מאי נפקא מינא רב חסד which separates the service of תרגום אונקלוס from the Av tumah avoda zarah of the Rambam’s treif halachot. This tohor midda separates the tohor Yatzir HaTov from the tumah Yatzir HaRaw within the heart. ב’ ראשית stands as the Torah precedent by which this opinion exudes its confidence.

Not simple. Both the RambaM and the RambaN disgracefully permitted their Yatzir HaRaw to dominate. They failed to make the required logical דיוק and discern that the Gemara מחלקת concerning the “value” of the blessings around the ק”ש as opposed to the עצם language of the ק”ש, that this dispute debated both time-oriented Av commandments vs. תולדות positive commandments which do not require k’vanna; what defines the mitzva of תפילה דאורייתא כנגד דרבנן, applies equally to the blessing which surround the ק”ש.

The Gemara openly rules that the blessings that surround ק”ש as rabbinic blessings. But critically it does not rule out that these blessings equally qualify as tohor time-oriented Av commandments from the Torah itself! A fundamental מאי נפקא מינא דיוק, which – post the RambaM Civil War rabbis – failed to learn the Talmud as a Common law legal system of courtroom justice but perverted their Talmudic study instead to search for Reshon halachic rulings within the Gemara language itself! A fundamental error of Av tumah avoda zarah! Reshonim Talmudic scholarship NEVER qualifies as Primary source material. Rav Ashi and Ravina sealed the Talmud, making it along with the Mishna T’NaCH and Siddur as the sealed Primary Sources of all generations of the chosen Cohen people.

In the millennium years, or there about since the Rambam vs. RambaN debate over the former’s 5th positive commandment of tefillah, all down stream generations, not a single commentary or super-commentary written upon the works of these Reshonim Talmudic scholarship, caught much less so corrected, the fundamental assimilated errors made by the Reshonim scholars “addicted” to the heroin of Greek syllogism logic!

Reshonim Jews themselves blew out the lights of Hanukkah and forgot the Oral Torah! Never once even a single Jewish commentary on any Reshon halachic codification, which corrected the Av tumah drift away from פרדס inductive logic unto syllogism deductive logic; T’NaCH/Talmudic משנה תורה-Common law perversion unto Greek\Roman Statute law. This failure exposes the boot-licker flattering later generations who virtually worship the Reshonim as Gods. An avoda zarah on par with the earliest generations naming the stars as Baal Gods or Jesus or Allah as Gods! Assimilation – copying the culture and customs practiced by Goyim civilizations which never accepted the revelation of the Torah at Sinai, as much an Av tumah avoda zarah as the translation of the שם השם לשמה switched to the substitute of the word התרגום את המילה – אלהים.

אלהים a term that refers to Sanhedrin justices of the court! Translating the רוח הקודש שם השם to the “word” אלהים – defines the sin of the Golden Calf for all generations. Torah commands prophetic mussar. It does not tell a silly Pie in the Sky story of history that declares: a long long time ago Aaron cast gold into a fire and pulled out a Golden Calf – children’s story.

T’NaCH and Talmudic common law learns by means of authoritative Primary Source comparative precedents. Herein defines how the four part פרדס inductive reasoning logic discerns itself from the Greek syllogism deductive reasoning logic espoused by both Plato and Aristotle!

All down stream generations of Yeshiva students fail to learn the B’HaG, Rif, Rosh as a common law courtroom legalism! All commentaries written on the above tohor halachic codifications as well as the tumah avoda zarah codes written by the Rambam, the Tur, and the Shulkan Aruch codes, they read rather than compare through comparing logical inductive reasoning cases of halacha. Rather they follow and obey the logic discipline established by Greek philosophy rather than Pardes logic as taught through the kabbalah of Rabbis Akiva, Yishmael and HaGalieli. The latter Tannaim authorities established rules wherein students can learn inductive reasoning logic skills as a wisdom.

Post the Rambam Civil War, the lights of Hanukkah blown out by the Reshonim generations themselves. G’lut Jewry cursed – they forgot the Oral Torah revelation at Horev. Every Hanukkah when down stream Jews bench ברכת המזון, these “orthodox Jews” ritually read & repeat empty words, words which breath no Yatzir HaTov prophetic mussar as their k’vanna. Printed words which simply tells the history of the time when the Tzeddukim and ערב רב Amalek Jews forgot the Oral Torah! Oblivious that ברכת המזון like ק”ש an Av tohor time oriented commandment which requires k’vanna! Reading words regardless as found in a bencher or a Siddur – amounts to Pie in the Sky – bull shit. Why? Because reading words changes an Av tohor time-oriented commandment to a תולדות קום ועשה מצוה.

K’vanna requires the Grey Matter of remembering Torah rebukes; the Divine Name אל עליון pleads: remember the rebuke of the Golden Calf; permit the Torah brit inheritance to pass down unto my future but as yet unborn generations as the brit definition of Avram’s chosen Cohen seed! Recall that a son of Moshe Rabbeinu worshipped avoda zarah! Whereas both myself and my future born seed, we remember that Av tohor time-oriented mitzvot require k’vanna, and not a simple word translation; reading or worshipping of words. The Muslim Koran mocks our g’lut disgrace as “the People of the Book”, because Jews often wear the Catholic Nun “habit” of worshipping words; like Hassidic Jews who wear furry hats and dress in long black gowns during the hot summer seasons. Easily confused for being no different than from Amish XtianSS who ride in ass pulled wooden hubbed wagons.

Yeshiva students today read the pages of the Talmud, no different from Xtians who read their bible mistranslations. Common law learns through comparative Case/Rule precedents and not by translating the Talmud into simple Hebrew as did the Rambam’s pathetic and utterly disgusting Yad! The purpose of the study of Gemara, to make a משנה תורה upon both the language of the Gemara sugya itself; and then to follow this precedent comparison which permits the down stream generations to view the Talmud from a completely different “precedent” perspective … BUT to then likewise re-interpret the עצם language of the Mishna itself, as viewed from a completely different Primary Source other Gemara perspective. This causes the T’NaCH and Talmud to shine like the facets of a diamond!

As stated above, the RambaN harshly criticized the Baal HaMaor’s criticism wherein he rebuked the Rif code. The RambaN sided with the Rif over the need to provide scattered g’lut Jewry, during the darkest days of the Xtian Dark Ages of feudalism, where virtually all travel ceased due to road robber terrorism and the collapse of the Roman road system. Scattered Jewish communities desperately required a simplified book of Halachic observances to maintain some minimum of continued observance of Jewish ritual established customs, and culture. On this point, the RambaN and even the RambaM — absolutely correct. Propaganda – believable because it tells half-truths.

The Rambam code an absolute perverted abomination. He arrogantly declared that through his code of halacha, Jews in g’lut no longer required to learn the discipline and rigors of Talmudic reasoning. The Rambam confused religious ritual observance as central to the purpose of the Talmud. WRONG. The Framers of the Talmud wrote this text to serve as a model for the time when Jews reconquered our Homeland and sought to restore common law Sanhedrin Federal Courts legal jurisprudence. This day vs. night distinction, which the Rambam code openly raped and perverted; comparable to the sin of Ham who sexually molested his naked drunken father Noach!

Cursed Be Canaan a servant of servants may his seed forever be. This Torah curse equally applies to the Rambam. The latter guilty of the Jewish Civil Wars that cursed the Jewish people after publication of his Yad Chazakah abomination of avoda zarah in about 1185. The Rabbeinu Tam died before publication of this av tuma avoda zarah. Compare the case of the Son of Moshe Rabbeinu; he did not worship avoda zarah because he thought himself as a rebel who rejected the honor of Moshe! Rambam considered by many as another Moshe Rabbeinu! This disgraceful error warns all Jews of the absolute need to develop their מאי נפקא מינא רב חסד tohor middot breathed within their Yatzir HaTov spirits within their own hearts!

Shalom a verb that stands upon the foundation of trust. Peace simply a noun name/label. The tohor time oriented commandment of Shabbat serves as the basis of the Torah vision of time oriented Av commandments. The Order of the 5 Books of the Torah – בראשית – Introduces not only “literally” the Avot: Avraham, Yitzak, and Yaacov but this יסוד Book of the Torah introduces Av tohor time-oriented commandments. The Creation story introduces the concept of time: day one day two etc. The opening word בראשית יש ברית אש, ראש בית, ב’ ראשית – these words within words of בראשית known as a רמז. The rabbis inherited the Oral Torah masoret/tradition from the P’rushim which the Romans referred to by the Greek name Pharisees, as expressed in the Protocols of the Elders of Zionism New Testament Roman forgery. Prior to the Jewish revolt which culminated in the destruction of Herod’s Temple abomination, Judean society fractured into polarized sects. Rabbis Akiva and Yishmael taught the Oral Torah kabbalah handed down from the P’rushim known as פרדס logic. A four-part inductive reasoning dynamic logic. The ancient Greek philosophers by contrast developed a far simpler static three-part deductive logic known as syllogism. Inductive reasoning vs. deductive reasoning — the difference between calculus dynamic variables vs. rigid algebra. The lights of Chanukkah remembers a Civil War wherein the P’rushim sought to not forget the Oral Torah whereas the Tzeddukim/Sadducees in Greek\favored turning Jerusalem into a Greek style polis/city state; and replacing simplified Greek deductive logic over Oral Torah inductive logic. The next three Books of the Torah שמות, ויקרא, במדבר introduces תולדות precedent commandments; which do not require prophetic mussar as their כוונה as opposed to the time-oriented mitzvot introduced in the Book of בראשית these mitzvot absolutely require prophetic mussar as their דבר שבלב כוונה. Herein split the Rambam’s Sefer Ha’Mitzvot vs. the B’HaG’s Book of commandments. Rambam organized the Torah commandments based upon a literal limitation of commandments located within the Torah. The B’HaG by contrast views all halachot within the Talmud as possible to elevate these rabbinic commandments to Torah time-oriented commandments through prophetic mussar. The B’HaG learned the Talmud, as well as the T’NaCH as a common law legal system. The latter makes by means of בניני אבות\precedents learns prophetic mussar. The Talmud divided into two opposing threads similar to that of a loom. Aggadah vs Halacha. The Aggadah makes a drosh back to learn T’NaCH prophetic mussar based upon interpreting the language of a passage of T’NaCH by comparing it to a similar prophetic mussar precedent – something like the two sights of a rifle permits a person to shoot with accuracy down range. Torah in context of the modern world: Can Jews reestablish the Written Torah as the Constitution of our 12 Tribes Republic. This Constitution gives a mandate to lateral Sanhedrin common law courtroom to define Torah faith through צדק צדק תרדוף – Justice Justice pursue. This vision of faith radically different from Baal to JeZeus to Allah avoda zarah wherein Man names the Names of Gods like Adam named the names of animals. When the Jews came out of the g’lut of Babylonian exile, they took as their “baggage” proper names given to Angels. During the Davidic kingdom 1st Commonwealth Republic the NaCH does not refer to Angels by direct names. Goyim Avoda Zarah takes this to its logical conclusion. Its theologies names Gods; the Nicene Creed created the Trinity and the theology of the Koran created a strict Monotheism. The latter directly violates and profanes the 2nd Sinai Commandment: Do not worship other Gods.

Just as Baal worshipers prioritized wealth and earthly gains, JeZeus warns the rich about the perils of reliance on material wealth. But whereas the Books of the NaCH Prophets prioritizes pursuit of righteous judicial courtroom justice, not so the plagiarized gospel (Protocols of the Elders of Zionism) Roman forgery.

The Gospels plagiarize the T’NaCH. A classic example the 40 day fast of JeZeus in the Sinai desert. Which attempts to duplicate the revelation of the Torah at Sinai and Elijah’s fleeing to the wilderness away from the wrath of the foreign Queen of Israel after the public slaughter of the prophets of Baal.

Such plagiarism seeks to prove that JeZeus “fulfilled” the words of the prophets. Ignorant and oblivious to the simple fact that prophets do not predict the future as does witchcraft but rather commands prophetic mussar applicable – across the board – to all generations of the Chosen Cohen people for all eternity. The gospel counterfeit thus compares to the Czar secret police “Protocols of the Elders of Zionism”.

Such replacement theology defines the Av tumah avoda zarah sin of the Golden Calf wherein the ערב רב assimilated and intermarried Israelites who came out of Egyptian slavery lacked all יראת אלהים, and hence these mixed multitudes who define the eternal war against Amalek Jews named their Golden Calf אלהים similar to which the NT and Koran gave new Names to their theologically created Gods.

This analogy which compares the New Testament to Baal, suggests that the creation of new theological constructs (such as the Christian understanding of God), akin to the Israelites assimilating pagan practices during their time in the wilderness. The cultural assimilation of Jews throughout the generations, and its impact on the perversion religious belief which prioritizes belief in theologically constructed Gods rather than the pursuit of judicial common law justice wherein the courts enforce fair compensation of damages inflicted by one Party upon another Party. Av tuma avoda zarah always prioritizes belief in Gods above the importance of righteous judicial common law courtrooms.

The NT forgery lacks all clarity concerning Torah common law courtrooms. For example, the Apostle Paul failed to discern the fundamental differences between Torah common law courts from Roman statute law Senate legislation, when he told followers of the new religion that “they were not under the law”.

But its within the gospel forgeries themselves where the distinction between the P’rushim vs the Tzeddukim (Greek translation: Pharisees vs Sadducees) becomes obvious. The P’rushim, historically exemplified in the Hanukkah Civil War/Independence War against the Syrian Greek kingdom. The lights of Hanukkah remember the oath dedication not to interpret the Torah other than through the Oral Torah revelation at Horev. The kabbalah handed down from rabbi Akiva explains the revelation of the Oral Torah at Horev – 40 days after the sin of the Golden Calf. Wherein on Yom Kippur HaShem confirmed the seed of the Avot as the chosen Cohen people. This defining Central main theme of the Torah revelation at Sinai, the NT forgery totally ignores in favor of the prioritization of its false messiah narrative.

Rabbi Akiva’s kabbalah known as פרדס inductive logic, day and night different from the Greek logic format introduced by Plato and Aristotle syllogism deductive logic. The NT Protocols of the Elders of Zionism Roman forgery makes no reference what so ever to the Hanaukkah civil war fought over whether Jews would interpret the Written Torah through the Oral Torah פרדס logic or forget the memory of the Oral Torah all together. The Tzeddukim “Banana Republic assimilated Jewish boot lickers of the Greek Syrian king sought to turn Jerusalem into another Greek City State model.

This most critical distinction between Oral Torah inductive reasoning vs. Greek/Roman deductive reasoning – the crux of the Hanukkah Civil War – the NT Protocols of the Elders of Zionism Roman forgery totally ignored. Consequently following Constantine’s seizure of the emperor crown, the Church banned the ancient Greek books which plunged Europe into the Dark Ages till the Arabs invaded and conquered Spain in around 900CE and rediscovered the ancient Greek deductive reasoning which plunged the Jewish world into another Civil War. In this latter day Jewish Civil War the Tzeddukim assimilated rabbis embraced Greek static syllogism logic and utterly abandoned the chosen path of Oral Torah judicial common law based upon Case/Din comparisons to similar but different judicial rulings which defines the dynamic פרדס logic system expressed in both T’NaCH and Talmudic common law.

The rediscovery of ancient Greek philosophy terminated the European Dark Ages. The Church, secure its its supreme unrivaled authority, now openly embraced Ancient Greek literature which so threatened the Church some 5 Centuries in the past. The NT forgery makes absolutely no reference whatsoever to the Hanukkah Civil War wherein the kabbalah of פרדס logic the Greek Tzeddukim boot lickers sought to cause Israel to forget the Oral Torah. Every Hanukkah when Jews bench the After-meal blessing we remember the cowardice of the נידוי Tzeddukim ערב רב Jewish sons of Amalek.
_______________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________
A response made to an Xtian believer who validates inter-racial marriage among Xtians

timmieblaze quoting 1 Corinthians 1:18-25, the entire machloket between the oath brit which creates the Chosen Cohen people through the holiness of Av tohor time-oriented commandments vs the Pauline “grafted” propaganda. If a person seeks to convert, that ger must accept the entire Torah, just as did Israel at Sinai. Yet Paul substituted Baal JeZeus in the stead of the Torah pursuit of righteous common law Sanhedrin justice which commits to pursue fair restitution of damages inflicted by bnai brit Jews upon other bnai brit Jews.

Paul’s rhetoric inverts prophetic logic: he substitutes mystical “belief in the crucified god” for mishpat and tzedek as the core of divine wisdom. By dismissing reasoned argument and textual law as “worldly wisdom,” he severed theology from judicial accountability – that’s Baal worship Av tumah avoda zarah – the violation of the 2nd Sinai commandment. Just that simple.

Quoting the NT serves only as a pretence which ignores all together why Jews view the NT as simply an extension of Baal worship avoda zarah which strives to replace the brit din with emotional faith in a much later Nicene Creed Trinity God. Sorry dogmatic confession does not replace judicial common law courts which have a Torah Constitutional mandate to make a Legislative review over the New Testament. The Oral Torah rules that the New Testament simply a modified version of Baal worship.

Universal love shares no common ground with brit am segulah. Just that simple. No fancy dance’n. Faith – the pursuit of righteous justice NOT belief in some much later Nicene Creed church dictate.

In summation, the Torah Constitution establishes brit Israel as the chosen Cohen people. Yom Tov Yom Kippur substantiates and serves as a legal precedent. Paul, a Jewish agent provocateur sent to undermine and promote Civil War in Rome Italy just as the Roman Protocols of the Elders of Zionism forgery sought to promote Civil War among and between the different sects within Jewish society during the latter days of the 2nd Judean Republic. The Baal gospel avoda zarah seeks to blow out the previous Jewish Civil War wherein the P’rushim prevailed and dedicated the lights of Hanukkah for the generations of the chosen Cohen people to interpret the Torah strictly and only through the kabbalah as taught by rabbis Akiva and Yishmael’s inductive logic reasoning. The Baal new testament makes no mention of logic. Not the four part inductive Oral Torah logic nor the three part deductive philosophy promoted by Plato and Aristotle.

The metaphor of grafting, particularly found in Romans 11, has no Torah precedent. The Talmud mesechta Avoda Zarah and other locations across the Talmud and Midrashim teach that both Esau and Yishmael rejected the Torah. The revelation of the Torah at Sinai therefore reveals a local God rather than some kind of Universal God as the Baal New Testament/Koran preaches.

The sophomoric translation of Isaiah 49:6 states: It is too light a thing that you should be my servant to raise up the tribes of Jacob and to restore the preserved of Israel; I will also give you as a light to the nations, that my salvation may reach to the end of the earth. While these word for word translation of Isaiah 56:6,7 – read totally out of its larger sugyah context states: And the foreigners who join themselves to the Lord, to minister to Him, to love the name of the Lord, and to be His servants… these I will bring to my holy mountain, and make them joyful in my house of prayer; their burnt offerings and their sacrifices will be accepted on my altar; for my house shall be called a house of prayer for all nations.

An utterly idiotic translation because tefillah does not mean prayer! A korban dedicated upon the altar in Zion Jerusalem simply not a barbeque unto Heaven but rather a sworn Torah oath made before a Torah altar. Such Torah oaths require שם ומלכות. The sophomoric translations fails to convey these crucial yet subtle distinctions.

Another corrupt reading of the Hebrew T’NaCH Isaiah 60:3. And nations shall come to your light, and kings to the brightness of your rising. This p’suk makes reference to the 7 branch menorah within the Mishkan. The “light” of this Menorah: the 6 Yom Tov + Shabbat dedications of the Soul Divine Names dedicated on these 7 holy times.

Zechariah 8:22 divorced from its larger context reads Many peoples and strong nations shall come to seek the Lord of hosts in Jerusalem and to entreat the favor of the Lord. Prophet command mussar. To study prophetic mussar requires Oral Torah logic. Specifically in all the examples listed above the כלל פרט kabbalah taught by rabbi Yishmael. The church baal worship rejects the revelation of the Oral Torah inductive reasoning. Paul’s “grafting metaphor” ignores the laws of gere tzeddick. Torah has no faith in any Universal God.