The Gaza War complexities

The conflict in Ukraine has led to one of the largest refugee crises in Europe since World War II, with millions fleeing to neighboring countries. In contrast, while Gaza has seen significant displacement, the scale is different due Egyptian and Jordan both closing their borders to Gaza Arab refugee populations. Egypt and Jordan, which share borders with Gaza, have historically been reluctant to open their borders to large numbers of Palestinian refugees. This has resulted in significant challenges for those displaced by conflict in Gaza, as they often have limited options for safe relocation.

In the case of Gaza, concerns about security, political stability, and the potential for increased tensions in host countries play a significant role in border policies. 1970 Black September where the king of Jordan expelled Arafat’s PLO unto Lebanon triggered the Lebanese Civil War. After Iraq invaded Kuwait, the Palestinian refugee population there side with the invading Iraqis.

Egypt and Jordan’s reluctance to open their borders to Gazan refugees stems from concerns about security and the potential for increased internal domestic tensions which threaten to rip the fabric of both nations civilizations. The fear of destabilizing their own political situations plays a significant role in their border policies. As a result of these border policies, Gazans facing displacement due to conflict have limited options for safe relocation. This exacerbates the humanitarian crisis, as many are trapped in a conflict zone with restricted access to essential services and aid.

It looks like President Trump shall reverse the progressive Wilson alliance made through Federal Reserve secret massive loans given to England and France that forced the US to forge an alliance with both countries in WWI and WWII. Hopefully President Trump will close down the 3rd National Bank – the Federal Reserve – and restore Jacksonian free banking and gold standard back to the United States revolutionary rejection of British dominance over the US economy.

Keir Starmer LOSES IT After Donald Trump Exposes Him

There is ongoing speculation about Keir Starmer’s ability to lead the Labour Party effectively, especially in light of challenges such as economic issues and public dissatisfaction. Some reports suggest that if he does not improve the party’s standing, questions about his leadership may arise. The Labour Party is facing significant challenges, including potential losses in upcoming elections and internal dissent regarding policies. This has led to discussions about the possibility of a leadership change if Starmer cannot navigate these issues successfully. Opinion polls indicate that Starmer’s government is struggling to impress the public, which adds to the pressure on his leadership.

There have been significant protests in the UK, particularly against the government’s handling of asylum seekers, which has led to public demonstrations across various cities. These protests indicate a growing discontent among the populace, contributing to a sense of political unrest. Keir Starmer, as Prime Minister, is facing criticism and challenges related to his leadership and the Labour Party’s position on various issues, including the protests. The political climate is charged, with discussions about his ability to manage dissent within his party and the public.

King Charles has been involved in discussions regarding the unrest and has called for unity in the face of the challenges posed by the protests. His role as a neutral monarch adds a layer of complexity to the political dynamics, especially during times of crisis.

TRUMP TEARS INTO FRANCE HYPOCRISY 🇫🇷 #donaldtrump #trump #shorts

Greg Sheridan calling out the Albanese government for “monumental failures” in foreign policy. Greg Sheridan is an Australian journalist and author known for his work in foreign affairs and international relations. He has been a prominent figure in Australian media, particularly as the foreign editor for The Australian newspaper. Sheridan has written extensively on topics such as geopolitics, defense, and Australia’s role in global affairs.

In addition to his journalism, he has authored several books that explore themes related to international relations and Australia’s strategic interests. His insights often reflect a deep understanding of the complexities of global politics, particularly in the Asia-Pacific region.

Sheridan specifically mentioned that Australia now has “zero influence” with Israel, indicating a significant concern about the government’s ability to maintain strong diplomatic relations. This critique reflects broader discussions about Australia’s foreign policy direction under the Albanese administration, particularly in relation to its alliances and international standing. Overall, Sheridan’s comments highlight a growing sentiment of dissatisfaction with the current government’s handling of foreign relations, particularly in the context of Australia’s historical ties with allies like the United States and Israel.

Benjamin Netanyahu has accused Sir Keir Starmer of rewarding Hamas with his plans to recognize a Palestinian state. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has publicly criticized the Albanese government’s decision to recognize a Palestinian state unless certain conditions are met. He described this move as rewarding “Hamas’s monstrous terrorism.”

Netanyahu’s comments were made during a podcast appearance, where he expressed strong disapproval of the UK government’s stance, particularly in light of the ongoing conflict and violence perpetrated by Hamas. In his remarks, Netanyahu emphasized that recognizing a Palestinian state under the current circumstances would be tantamount to rewarding a group that has committed severe acts of pogrom like terrorism against Israel.

Gaza War News

Egypt has deployed additional troops along its border with Gaza amid rising tensions and concerns about the humanitarian impact of the ongoing conflict. Reports indicate that approximately 40,000 soldiers have been mobilized in North Sinai, which is nearly double the number permitted under the 1979 Egypt-Israel peace treaty. This deployment follows direct orders from President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi and is described as being in a heightened state of alert. Egyptian propaganda declares that Cairo worried about the potential for Israel to occupy Gaza City, which could lead to a mass exodus of Palestinians toward the Egyptian border. The Egyptian military has reportedly deployed armored vehicles, air defense systems, and special forces to key locations near the border, including Rafah and Sheikh Zuweid. This a far cry from a division of heavy tanks and artillery. Egyptian officials have communicated to Israel that these military measures are purely defensive, aimed at securing the border amid escalating tensions. This situation is evolving, and Egypt’s military posture reflects its commitment to preventing any forced displacement of Palestinians into its territory.

The utter and total bankruptcy of European church theology has made this dead religion stink like a rotting corps in the Mid Summer day’s oppressive heat.

Barth argued that God reveals Himself primarily through Jesus Christ and the Scriptures. He emphasized that human understanding of God must come from divine revelation rather than human reason or experience. The horrors of the Nazi Shoah revealed that Goyim worship air and no God. Jesus and his Father in Heaven – as dead as a door nail.

Barth’s obtuse theology distinguished between the “Word of God” (Jesus Christ) and the “words of men” (human interpretations). He believed that true theology must focus on the former, asserting that any human attempt to understand God must be grounded in the revelation of Christ. What utter pie in the sky religious rhetoric nonsense. The bible sophomoric translations of the Hebrew T’NaCH — all written by men. Most of whom had absolutely no or very little knowledge of Hebrew and Aramaic – the original language of the Hebrew T’NaCH.

None of the sophomoric bible Xtian translators new the difference between T’NaCH and Talmudic common law from Roman statute law. None of these absolute ignoramuses understood the difference between Rabbi Akiva’s kabbalah of פרדס inductive reasoning from Aristotle’s deductive syllogism reasoning! The two divergent logic formats day and night different. Yet uneducated Xtian translators of their so called “Word of God” bibles as ignorant as bees on the rump of a braying ass.

Barth often contrasted the Pauline utter religious rhetoric theological nonsense of “Human sinfulness (Original Sin of Adam) with God’s grace. Never does his empty religious rhetoric ever question how grace as a Godly attribute revealed to Moshe at Horev distinguishes itself from Mercy or Great Chessed or Truth ect other attributes revealed to Moshe at Horev 40 days after the Sin of the Golden Calf.

Barth’s theology of a Universal God argues that this God owns absolute sovereignty, wholly transcendent. Which completely ignores the Jewish Tribal God revealed only to Israel at Sinai, which the Xtian and Muslim religions utterly rejected that revelation, which understands HaShem as a local tribal God of the Hebrew Chosen Cohen people alone. Outside of Judea/Israel HaShem as a local tribal God has absolutely no sovereignty transcendent rule.

Hence outside of the oath sworn lands no one can worship HaShem לשמה; this represents the Torah curse imposed upon g’lut/exiled Jews. And Goyim who never accepted the revelation of the Torah at Sinai – how much more so! Central to Barth’s theology is the belief that all theological reflection must be centered on Christ. This narishkeit exposes Av tumah avoda zarah; Torah defines faith as the righteous pursuit of judicial justice wherein the Sanhedrin common law courts strive to make fair compensation of damages inflicted by Party A upon Party B.

Av tumah avoda zarah promote theological creed rhetoric which dictates what believers must believe in this or that or some other God. Bonhoeffer’s political stance against the Nazis is admirable — he resisted a church that bent its knee to Hitler. But the substance of his theology remained trapped within the very Christian framework of Barth’s bankrupt and void theology. Barth and Bonhoeffer both anchor “truth” in Christology, a theological rhetoric divorced from judicial justice or covenantal precedent. Both preserve Pauline substitution theology (sin/grace, Christ as “Word of God”), which replaces Torah’s oath alliance revelation with mythic universality.

Neither ever engaged in Torah common law precedent vs. Roman statute law — nor did they recognize the practical, courtroom-based definition of faith as צדק צדק תרדוף. Bonhoeffer opposed Nazism, but he did so with bankrupt theological tools. His “religionless Christianity” or “cost of discipleship” never escaped Barth’s fundamental error: mistaking a theological creed for covenantal justice. Even resistance to Nazi tyranny in German Protestant circles still operated inside the false logic of avoda zarah. They never questioned the Pauline framework that itself fed centuries of Jew-hatred, pogroms, blood libels, and ultimately the Shoah.

Its now the month of Elul. The Jewish saying: The King is in the field. T’shuva requires remembering the sin of the Golden Calf and how HaShem threatened to break the sworn oath alliance cut with Avraham Yitzak and Yaacov.

Understanding Shotrim/police in the Context of Prophets: Prophets in ancient Israel, such as Samuel, were instrumental in anointing kings (e.g., Saul and David) and had the authority to remove them when they strayed from God’s commandments. This role underscores their significant influence in governance and leadership. While Shotrim typically refers to the enforcers of the Sanhedrin’s rulings, the term can also encompass a broader understanding of those who uphold the law and moral order, which includes the prophetic role. Prophets, as Shotrim, enforce divine law and moral standards, guiding the people and leaders in their adherence to God’s will. The connection between prophets and Shotrim highlights the integration of spiritual and legal authority in ancient Israel. Prophets not only provided spiritual guidance but also played a crucial role in the political landscape, influencing the leadership and direction of the nation.

Gaza War News:

Israel has commenced the first stages of a military operation aimed at taking control of Gaza City. IDF spokesperson Brig. Gen. Effie Defrin confirmed that preliminary operations had begun and that Israeli forces are holding positions on the outskirts of Gaza City. Reservist mobilization: Around 60,000 reservists have been called up in preparation for the anticipated offensive.

Evacuation warnings: Israel has issued instructions to hospitals, medical personnel, and humanitarian organizations to evacuate Gaza City and relocate southward, in preparation for the offensive. Displacement & shelling: Shelling has intensified in neighborhoods like Sabra, Tuffah, Shuja’iyya, Zeitoun, and Jabalia—leading to thousands of residents fleeing, though no large-scale evacuation of the entire city has been confirmed.

No full-scale evacuation yet: While warnings and preliminary movements are underway, there is no confirmed, organized evacuation of Gaza City’s civilian population en masse. Many residents reportedly remain in place, citing a lack of safe areas for relocation. Operation has started, but is not a completed “invasion”: The offensive is in its earliest stages. Forces are operating on the periphery; ground invasion into the heart of the city has not yet occurred.

The European Barbarians once again behave like DOGS, this white trash of Europe once again barks and behaves as DOGS, who returns and eats their own guilty Shoah vomit.

“Propaganda CLAPTRAP” White House ATTACKS BBC Coverage Of Gaza War
Europe Backs The Wrong Horse & Israel Will SHOW Them All!
I Was Wrong About Israel: What I Learned on the Ground – YouTube
Europe does not determine the Capital of Israel ie UN Resolutions 2334 base upon 242, 338, and 446! Europe does not determine the international borders of the Jewish State. The Rome Treaty which established the ICC at the Hague has zero jurisdiction over Israel, Russia, or the US. Why? Because no nation of the above mentioned signed on to the Rome Treaty.

Netanyahu vs. Macron & Starmer — French President Emmanuel Macron (July 2025) announced France would recognize a Palestinian state at the UN General Assembly. In response, Netanyahu publicly denounced the move, calling it “rewarding terror” and saying it “risks creating another Iranian proxy … not to live in peace beside [Israel]”. He and other Israeli ministers labeled the decision as a threat to Israel’s security and sovereignty.

French President Macron (August 2025) later denounced Netanyahu’s claim that recognition was fueling antisemitism in France, calling the accusation “abject” and “erroneous”. Similarly, UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer (mid-2025) stated that the UK would recognize a Palestinian state unless Israel took steps to end the crisis in Gaza. Netanyahu lambasted this stance, again denouncing it as weakening Israel—which threatened that acknowledging Palestine would embolden terrorism.

Golda Meir (PM 1969) — Meir famously stated in a 1969 Sunday Times interview: “There was no such thing as Palestinians.” This comment was a denial of Palestinian national identity—not a critique of foreign leaders for recognizing a Palestinian state—but it does represent a public, even provocative declaration on the subject.

Ariel Sharon (early 2000s) — In 2004, Sharon suggested that French Jews should emigrate to Israel, citing growing antisemitism in France. French officials condemned the remarks, but these comments were directed at French domestic conditions—not a response to French recognition of Palestine. In 2003, Ariel Sharon expressed that a demilitarized Palestinian entity might be acceptable under certain conditions—but there’s no record of him publicly denouncing other leaders for their recognitions.

What’s News on the Russia-Gate Scandal directly implicating Obama and Clinton and corrupt Intelligence bureaucraps?

Tulsi Gabbard, now serving as Director of National Intelligence (DNI) under President Trump, has indeed escalated claims alleging a conspiracy by Obama-era intelligence officials—including Barack Obama himself, James Comey, James Clapper, and John Brennan—to delegitimize Trump’s 2016 victory.

She released declassified documents, referred these individuals to the Department of Justice, and prompted the creation of a Justice Department “strike force” to examine her allegations. Widely respected bipartisan investigations—including Senate Intelligence Committee findings—affirm that Russia indeed interfered in the 2016 election (though not to the extent of altering vote counts). These findings do not support Gabbard’s assertion of a fabricated narrative.

Gabbard articulated serious allegations against Obama-era officials and took official actions—declassification and DOJ referrals.