Elon Musk communicates with both rational and subliminal techniques. Musk speaks in a brilliant calm manner. Notice the sparkles in the backdrop while he spoke. Musk said it best: “Connect the dots”. Hence the sparkling dots suggests the subliminal idea of “connect the dots”.

Elon Musk Explains Why John Bolton’s Secret Files Will Destroy Middle Class…ttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uiefJUh_hHE

The “Charlie Kirk syndrome” where the Democratic Left continually makes ad hominem personal attacks wherein Trump was continually condemned. Trump supporters call this irrational stream of ad hominem attacks: Trump Derangement Syndrome. This “Charlie Kirk syndrome” wherein foreign countries condemn Israel exclusively. The foundation of this irrational bigotry which exclusively condemns Israel, its genesis began with the post Six Day War UN Security Council Resolution 242 promoted by Britain and France. Remember these 2nd tier European powers attempted to seize the Suez Canal in the 1956 War.

Chapter VI UN Resolution 242 only recommends “occupied territories”. But the 1964 PLO charter only referred to “occupied territory” as ’48 Israel. The PLO Charter did not condemn Jordanian rule over – what the UN itself condemned in 1950 – their illegally seized “West Bank”. The PLO Charter did not condemn Egypt rule over Gaza in the PLO Charter. Yet the British and French “inserted” into 242 the language of “illegal occupied territories” in the lands of Samaria and Gaza!
Channel 4 Confronts Naftali Bennet on UN’s Israel Genocide Claims, Then Gets Exposed On Live Tv!
The question posed upon Bennet assumes that the two-state solution, the only option acceptable according to “international law”. This assumption its own unique ad hominem personal attack against the Jewish state by the same nations in thee UN who opposed the establishment of the Jewish state. Recall in 1939 the Chamberlain government betrayed the League of Nations Palestine Mandate with its infamous White Paper which sealed the Shoah fate of European Jewry.

Proof that land for peace – inherently flawed as a political basis of negotiations … Olmert offered Arafat East Jerusalem and 98% of Samaria and all of Gaza as a Palestinian state and Arafat rejected the offer. This shocked President Clinton. To this day he remains flabbergasted by Arafat’s refusal to accept such an incredibly stupid peace proposal made by an utterly incompetent and criminal Prime Minister – who later went to prison!

Arabs reject the 1917 Balfour Declaration, which served as the 1922 League of Nations Palestine Mandate. Balfour serves as the definition of political Zionism. Arabs states universally reject whom they perceive as dhimmi Jews equal rights to achieve self-determination in the Middle East. UN Resolution 3379 – Zionism is Racism – stands in stark contrast to the 1917 Balfour Declaration. Hence the “Land for Peace, Two-State Solution” nonsense amounts to utter poppycock.

National foreign leaders who promote this rhetoric fraud – clear and present enemies of the Jewish state and Israeli National independence. English and French imperialism in UN 242 attempted to divide Jerusalem as the post WWII Allies divided Berlin and the two Germanys. A two-state solution produced the Korean War, the Vietnam War and the first Iraq war, commonly known as the Gulf War. The two-state solution produced the political instability which defines the Indian/Pakistan wars.

Bottom line, foreign governments do not determine through dictate the strategic interests of the Jewish state. They do not determine the international borders of the Jewish state. They do not determine the Capital City of the Jewish state. Yet the vast majority of UN member states refuse to recognize Jerusalem as the Capital of the Jewish State. These same hostile state routinely condemn Israel in one-sided UN condemnations of the Jewish state.

Why does generation followed by many generations thereafter continually make blood libel slanders against the Jewish people? Tumah middot spirits breath within the Yatzir Ha’Raw within the hearts of Goyim in every generations. Consequently Goyim behave like dogs who continually return and eat their own vomit. Herein the explanation why virtually every generation of Goyim ever living always repeat blood libel slanders made against the Jews which defies all rational explanation.

The Arab Israeli conflict not limited to strong emotions any more than to the absurd notion: “Land for Peace” propaganda rhetoric utter nonsense. The Human spirit wars tohor vs tuma spirits within the Human heart. Goyim hatred of Jews without cause exposes the tumah spirits which dominate the hearts of Goyim national leaders and the common man on the streets – from generation to generation to eternity.

By incorporating the concepts of tohor and tuma in this political discussion its my hope that the readers can “connect the dots” and perceive complex, abstract ideas on more that simple rational thought reasoning processes. A child does not understand the rebuke made by an adult that the child must behave in a more mature manner. Yet before that child can grow to become a Man, he must weigh reality seen through multiple and many lenses of perspective.

The Legacy Media PANICS and BEGS FOR MERCY After Charlie Kirk Murder! | Elon Musk

Charlie Kirk attempted to have open discussions and paid for it with his life. Charlie Kirk got shot for attempting to hold open conversations with opposing “others”. The UN genocide declaration against Israel without any mention to thee Oct 7th massacre absolutely no different.

Perhaps the time has come to burn the UN at the stake for the crime of witchcraft.

Dems PANIC as Tyler Robinson’s Social Media History Got LEAKED | Elon Musk

Someone needs to perform an exorcism upon Tucker Carlson

Tuma middot spirits which infect the Yatzir Ha’raw within the heart, they compare to the tendency of a dog which returns and eats its own vomit. Once a public disgrace occurs, later generations have this exact same “spirit inclination within their hearts”, to repeat the disgrace over and over and over again and again.

Radical ideologies can incite violence or extreme actions. The blood libels have permanently left a stain upon the reputation of the Church which the Shoah utterly confirmed. Carlson’s promotion of wild speculations which condemns Jews, without evidence, of the Charlie Kirk assassination resembles the efforts of the Czar secret police forgery: the Protocols of the Elders of Zion which aroused the Russian pogroms against the Jews of Russia.

Carlson risks damaging his reputation engaging with or promoting antisemitic slander speculations concerning the guilt of Charlie Kirk’s assassination has cracked the threshold of credibility. He has removed himself as a credible News person. He has degraded his News status to that of Yellow Journalism. Similar to the UN unilateral GA declaration which condemns Israel of genocide in Gaza. No different than the trash slander of UN Resolution 3379: Zionism is Racism.

By speculating about Jewish involvement in the assassination of Charlie Kirk without evidence, Carlson risks perpetuating harmful stereotypes and conspiracy theories. This can contribute to a culture of anti-Semitism, echoing historical patterns of scapegoating. Carlson has sacrificed journalistic integrity for sensationalism. Carlson’s approach prioritizes sensationalism over factual reporting. This degradation of Lame Stream Media journalism produced the 4 year Russia-Gate Hoax, and the current UN GA condemnation of Israeli genocide in Gaza.

Interesting. The Saudis & Pakistan have cut a mutual defense treaty. Pakistan has fought several wars with India. The Saudis have never fought a war with Israel. But have a long standing proxy war that pits the Saudis and Persians through the Houthis.

Pakistan and Saudi Arabia Sign Mutual Defense Pact | #shorts #shortvideo – YouTube

Obtuse British Press. Dumb ASS

“Hamas Must Surrender Power or War Never Ends” | Daniel Rubenstein on Al Arabiya (19 Aug 2025)

Notice how this “Western Military Expert” ignores how the UN gossip slander declaration of genocide in Gaza. This GA Resolution so resembles the gossip slander of UN Resolution 3379 – Zionism is Racism. UN gossip fails to address the Oct 7th Hamas attack on Israel! While quoting Hamas casualty figures, as if they represented the Gospels, the gossip UN ignores that 23,000 killed – Hamas soldiers!

How this “military expert” unilaterally promotes a European “dictate” – Two-State Solution – when neither Israelis nor Arabs agree to this foreign preposterous idea! Arabs reject Jewish equal rights to self-determination in the region. Arafat during the Clinton Administration rejected a Palestinian state with East Jerusalem as its Capital and 98% of Samaria!

The Balfour Declaration of 1917 and the League of Nation Palestine Mandate of 1922, together with the UN GA vote where two-thirds of all UN member States recognized the Jewish right to achieve self-determination. UN General Assembly Resolution 181 on November 29, 1947, passed with a two-thirds majority acknowledged that Jews have equal rights to achieve self-determination in the Middle East. All Arab countries unilaterally rejected UN 181. On the following day when David Ben Gurion declared Jewish National Independence on May 14, 1948, five Arab —Egypt, Jordan, Syria, Lebanon, and Iraq—Armies invaded Israel. These Arab Armies “Nakba” – they failed to complete the European Shoah of the Jews and throw them into the Sea.

Post the Israeli victory in its ’48 Independence War, and how much more so its ’67 second Independence War victory, UN 181 which called for a two-State solution ceased to have any political relevance – other than projectionist revisionist history promoted by the imperialist European States who seek a divide and conquer imperialism.

The Charter of the PLO, written in 1964 did not declare Jordanian Samaria/West Bank nor Egyptian Gaza as “Occupied”. That PLO Charter only called the lands of ’48 Israel as “Occupied Territories”. Therefore the gossip UN slander which continuously makes its blood libel slander and declares recaptured Samaria and Gaza as “Occupied Territory”, this UN gossip slander – no different than the Church blood libel and host desecration slanders made throughout the Middle Ages prior to the annual Easter pogroms.

Post Shoah Europe lost its ability to impose another “Final Solution” upon the Jewish People. Never Again, effectively means that Israel rejects any European influence in determining the strategic interests of the Jewish state. The News caster quite correctly and properly spanks the bottom of this “military expert” till he bled through his nose.

‘No Evidence Of This!’ | UN Inquiry Says Israel Has Carried Out Genocide

To former European great powers. Your basking in the Sun as imperialist states has past. Old Farts, get out of the way.

Rubio Warns: Israel Will Respond to Any Country Recognizing Palestine | #shorts #shortvideo
The Commission proposed halting parts of its trade deal over Gaza war, #news #breakingnews#newstoday
Saudi Arabia Cuts All Ties with Israel | #shorts #shortvideo
Von der Leyen announces suspension of EU payments and trade partnership with Israel

קידושין

The language “גופא”, the Gemara employs to indicate that discussion returns to Primary priority topic, as opposed to a secondary point of discussion. Our Gemara jumps directly into the פרדס\י”ג מידות Oral Torah wisdom skill of shooting a bearing azimuth, to make a reference direction, typically true north. Commonly used in navigation, surveying, and mapping to describe the orientation of a line or path. The 8th middah of the Oral Torah revelation – אמת – interpreted to mean “Path”. Halacha, as a significant defining term expressed throughout the Talmud likewise understood to mean “Path”.

The study of Talmudic common, prioritizes the “journey” rather than the “destination”. By stark and absolute contrast, the statute halachic codes made famous by the Yad, Tur, and Shulkan Aruch codes prioritize the “destination” over the “journey”; halacha takes on a meaning all its own. Whereas halacha employed within the pages of the Sha’s, so to speak, has no legs of its own to walk. The “משל” statute law halachic codes, they compare to a fiat based economy rather than a gold or silver commodity based economy.

This גופא, represents a subtle shift which post the Rambam Civil War rabbinic authorities utterly fail to either acknowledge or recognize. Our Gemara:
דף יא. גופא. אמר רב יהודה אמר רב אסי כל כסף האמור בתורה צורי ושל דבריהם כסף מדינה The term צורי (tzuri) in this context, denotes gold or silver. The Mishnaic economy during this time period of Roman occupation, an agricultural commodity based currency. Post Nixon, by contrast, the US currency became a fiat based “war time” economy. Governments commonly turn to fiat “monopoly money” currency to pay a ballooning national debt, especially during some “war time” (לאו דוקא) economic crisis.

Lincoln switched to the greenback to pay for the Civil War. This critical precedent later Wilson used as a spring board to restore the 3rd National central bank “Federal Reserve”. The latter institution inserted the US into both European Civil Wars commonly referred to as WWI & WWII. The bureaucratic Federal Reserve has no accountability to the American People. It compares to the US Intelligence Agencies: FBI, CIA, NSA during the first Trump Administration.

This 1913 newly established “National Bank”, unilaterally made huge loans to England and France to finance their war against the German “Huns”. In 1915 the German sinking of the Lusitania aroused public indignation across America. But Wilson primarily based his decision to join the Allied alliance based upon the exorbitant loans which the Federal Reserve unilaterally awarded to England and France. Wilson abandoned the advice given by Washington, in his Farewell Address in 1796, not to make “entangling alliances” with Europe.

Lusitania sinking in 1915, the consequence of unrestricted German submarine warfare, aroused the indignation of American public opinion. But had America joined the Central Powers alliance in 1917 England and France most certainly would have invalidated their debt – Federal Reserve unilateral and not authorized by Congress – loans.

This debt prompted England and France to impose the crushing terms which define the Versailles treaty. England and France demanded war reparations from defeated Germany. Wilson’s National Bank thereafter issued loans to the post-war German government to pay the Allied victors imposed war reparations. This bank duplicated the folly that post Civil War Congress initiated following the American Civil War. Congress restricted the currency of the Greenback by one-third. This decision restricted wealth into the “Robber Baron” monopoly class hands.

Post the fall of Wall Street, Wilson’s National Bank made the exact same error and severely restricted the flow of currency. This error, the root cause of the Great Depression. Consequent to the Great Depression, Wilson’s National Bank, refused to issue further loans to Germany. This set off a catastrophic domino effect that witnessed the rise of Hitler’s Nazi Party which overthrew the Weimar Republic. Wilson’s National Bank made a fundamental shift in the cultures and customs practiced by the American people and Federal Governments. Like, for example, the British East India Company’s monopoly on tea, which resulted in the Boston Tea Party.

Once the Federal Government entered into the European fold of Central European economic “tradition” of Governments establishing Corporate monopolies, initiated likewise by the post Civil War ‘radical republicans’ in Congress, whose policies established the ‘Robber Baron’ monopoly class. This shift in “tradition” away from State intra-State trade autonomy, caused an American economic switch from Adam Smith’s lesafair economics to FDR’s John Maynard Keynes – Central Bank socialist economic central planning fiat currency. FDR made owning gold illegal.

Have made a digression from the גופא of this common law commentary to the Talmud in an attempt to differentiate “tradition” between T’NaCH\Talmudic Court-based Judicial Common Law to “tradition” of the Yad, Tur, Shulkan Aruch statute halachic religious ritual legalism. This issue raises … who determines the culture and customs practiced by the chosen Cohen people; can our generation achieve Zionist self-determination and restore the Torah as the Written Constitution of our Republic of 12 Tribes in the Middle East; which includes the Talmud as the working model for our lateral common law Sanhedrin court Federal system; the Sanhedrin, mandated with the Constitutional power of Legislative Review over state and Federal government statute laws?

גופא – דתני האיש מקדש משום דקא בעי למיתני כסף וכסף מנ”ל? (דברים כב) כי יקח איש אישה. וכתיב התם (בראשית כג) נתתי כסף השדה קח ממני. וקיחה איקרי קנין.

Our Gemara now shoots an azimuth bearing. We have returned to our opening paragraph. Talmud directly weaves warp/weft threads to produce the “garments” of the Cohen priestly service within the Mishkan. This משל directly ties into the Book of שמות. What shapes and determines the Cohen “tradition” of practiced culture and custom – this the underlying study of the entire Talmud. Whereas statute law Judaism prioritizes religion, the Torah defines faith as צדק צדק תרדוף – judicial justice which strives to fairly compensate damages inflicted by Party A upon Party B.

The building of Jewish families, the bedrock whereby the chosen Cohen people live from generation to generation. A man marries a woman with the core obligation to produce children and educate these children in the oath brit alliance cut by Avraham Yitzak and Yaacov. This tohor time-oriented Av commandment defines the essence of the Book of בראשית.

Rabbinic Judaism changed the “tradition” of tohor time-oriented Av commandments to a subsidiary class of Torah commandments which require k’vanna. Some undefined term(s), understood as “concentration”; or for example, attention paid to the literal meaning of words printed in the Siddur. This error duplicates the avoda zara of both “daughter religions” vis-a-vis the revelation of the שם השם in the first Sinai commandment.

Statute law directly compares to translating the Divine Spirit Name to Words. The difference between directly viewing a beautiful sun-set and a camera picture taken of that beautiful sun-set. Exceptionally difficult for words to express the subtle distinction between shades of the same colors. The obvious difference between a painted work of art vs. a print of that painted work of art.

How much more so the Divine Spirit Name revelation at Sinai, expressed in the opening first commandment. Substituting word translations for Divine Spirits, like the 13 middot of the Horev revelation, herein defines the treif tumah Av tumah avoda zarah – the Sin of the Golden Calf – which defines the 2nd Sinai commandment, together and along with the precedent negative commandments which forbid 1. assimilation 2. intermarriage.

Oral Torah פרדס logic employs positive and negative Torah commandments as בניני אבות-precedents to interpret the mussar k’vanna of Av tohor time-oriented primary Torah commandments, which create the עולם הבא of the chosen Cohen people יש מאין – תמיד מעשה בראשית. This latter phrase repeated twice within the opening blessing of tefillah דאורייתא ק”ש.

Greek culture developed philosophy. Hebrew culture spins around the central axis of “Big Picture” ideas. The two cultures – day and night, oil and water — different. The ‘Golden Age’ of Spanish Jewry witnessed the Samaritan, Tzeddukim, Karaim assimilation avoda zarah of Jews wherein our rabbinic leaders functioned as the tip of the spear-head wherein they murdered the Judges of the Great Sanhedrin to worship the Golden Calf.

Brit does not correctly translate as covenant. Brit correctly understood – as a sworn alliance. Its now Elul: the King is in the fields. T’shuva requires that Jews remember/יום הזכרון the oaths wherein the Avot did the tohor time oriented commandment which continually creates the chosen Cohen people יש מאין.

The mitzva of קידושין serves as a בנין אב-precedent that interprets the k’vanna of the Av tohor time-oriented commandment – brit cut between the pieces. K’vanna requires prophetic mussar as its יסוד. This k’vanna separates the Priority Av tohor time-oriented commandments from the secondary positive & negative Torah & Talmudic mitzvot — which do not require k’vanna.

Reading words from a book simply does not compare to the discipline of shooting בנין אב bearing azimuths. Consequently, translating T’NaCH or Talmud, worse than an utter waste of time. People read these “books”, but fail to study common law. Common law/Oral Torah – no book can write down or contain. Why? Because the study of common law depends upon comparing similar Case/Rule precedents. The sages “wrote” the Oral Torah into the T’NaCH and Talmud. But a scholar must make the precedent search – not the printed book. The Talmud only functions as a guide. You can lead a donkey to the trough, but you cannot make that ass drink.

דכתיב (שם מט) השדה אשר קנה אברהם אי נמי (ירמיה לב) שדות בכסף יקנו — תני האשה נקנית.

Our Gemara jumps through a lot of hoops of T’NaCH kabbalah. The ass reads and moves ahead to follow the Gemara train of thought. The donkey stops and weighs the prophetic mussar contained by these Aggadic sources derived from T’NaCH Primary Sources. From my experiences in Yeshiva, the vast majority of Yeshiva asses do not make a common law study of T’NaCH nor Talmud primary sources. At best, they rely upon g’lut commentaries written over a thousand years later.

How utterly pathetic. Worse, the rabbis of these Yeshivot fail to demand that their students study common law. They too have fallen into the trap of assuming that the purpose of the Talmud – to shape and define religious halachic observance rather than training our youth to pursue righteous judicial justice within the borders of the oath-sworn brit lands of our Republic.

The disgrace that rabbis fail to discern the Life-death/blessing-curse distinction which forever separates the Torah blessing of living as the chosen Cohen people in ארץ ישראל from the Torah curse of enduring the judicial oppression of Par’o and his court system which defines the entire history of Jewry in alien foreign lands which culminated with the Shoah. The Yeshiva rabbis compare to brown-nose boot-licker syphilitic-syphicants.

They do not teach Yeshiva students how to study the Torah לשמה. They do not teach פרדס\י”ג מידות Oral Torah logic. They pervert the T’NaCH and Talmud into children’s bedtime stories. Their belief system of statute halachic religious law has taken Jews completely off the דרך. Hence, no different from the Wilderness generation, they refused to encourage a mass aliyah to the Palestine Mandate before the British slammed the door shut with their 2nd White Paper.

Their moral cowardice provoked the Torah Shoah curse, just as the Wilderness Generation has no portion in the World to Come. Prophetic mussar, if easy to swallow, the generations of Israel would not have murdered the prophets. How many times did Israel seek the death of Moshe? Prophetic mussar has a bite worse than any other predator on the Planet Earth.

To grow and mature the seeds of prophetic mussar within the Yatzir Ha’Tov within the heart defines the purpose of the revelation of the Torah, expressed through the wisdom of the NaCH, Talmud, Midrashim, and Siddur. Hence the translation of mussar as “rebuke” as brain-dead idiotic as to translate t’shuva, unilaterally determined as repentance! Treif translations suck. Just that simple. No fancy dance’n.

Learning how to live as the time-oriented commandment created – Cohen people – requires more than simply a primary first grade education that instructs children how to read. T’NaCH & Talmud codified into books. To quote Snape of Harry Potter: “Obviously.” But the wisdom kabbalah of Oral Torah פרדס\י”ג מידות logic requires the patience and skill of making precedent bearing interpretations which translate Mishnaic living reality to Gemara contour maps, herein separates the pursuit of dynamic judicial justice from static dogma of religious halachic statute law.

The study of Jewish common law requires independent research. Just that simple. No fancy dance’n. Worlds separate the donkey from the ass. The latter, clearly a pejorative metaphor comparable how Torah common law perceives the Xtian/Islamic counterfeit Protocols of the Elders of Zion religions – ‘by their fruits you shall know them’. The Yad, Tur, and Aruch statute halachic codes follow the path trodden by these two gross counterfeit religions.

EU News: What a complete Joke

Gaza War Defends ‘Western Values’: Israel’s Herzog
The French Government Has COLLAPSED: Macron Given 7 Days to Resign!

Moldova is a small country that gained independence from the Soviet Union in 1991. Transnistria is a breakaway region that declared independence but is not recognized by most countries, including Moldova. The region has a significant Russian military presence and has been a point of tension between Moldova and Russia.

Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelensky has been vocal about the need to counter Russian influence in Eastern Europe, which may involve strategic considerations regarding Moldova and Transnistria. The claim that NATO and Ukraine might be planning provocations in Transnistria to destabilize Moldova and thwart peace efforts between Trump and Putin suggests a belief in a broader strategy to counter Russian influence. However, such claims exposed skewed one sided propaganda rhetoric that has an agenda.

The geopolitical landscape the EU “Union” with the crisis across Germany, France, and Britain far more worthy of attention. The narrative that NATO and Ukraine are destabilizing Moldova can be seen as part of a larger discourse that seeks to frame Western actions in a negative light. The EU/British issues far overshadow the Russian/Ukraine war and how much more so piss-ant Moldova, Transnistria. Hungary threatens its own Britexit.

The EU is grappling with significant internal challenges, including economic disparities, political fragmentation, and differing national interests. Issues such as migration, economic recovery post-COVID-19, and energy security far greater pressing concerns that in point of fact merit a focused attention from silly insignificant external threats. The notion of a “Britexit” or further distancing from the EU, particularly in light of Hungary’s threats, underscores the fragility of European unity. Hungary’s stance on various EU policies has raised questions about the cohesion of the bloc and its ability to respond collectively to external challenges.

The French national debt compares to the debt of 1789! The rise of rightwing nationalist “country FIRST”, Trump like movements in several EU countries has led to increased political fragmentation. These movements often capitalize on economic anxieties, immigration concerns, and a desire for greater national sovereignty, leading to increased political fragmentation within the EU.

The ongoing migration crisis stooge career politicians and Parties can no longer ignore. Illegal immigration floods swept the Biden Administration out of power. Despite Biden functioning as the Scarecrow in movie “The Wizard of Oz”. The attempt to turn to ‘Green Energy’ or Germany’s dependence upon Russian oil has exposed a disaster. The perception of ineffective governance can lead to significant electoral consequences, as seen in various elections. How would the EU “union” respond to the US pulling out of NATO? Obviously this question simply speculation. But the NATO alliance directly compares to the fragility of the EU union.

The fall of the EU would create a securiity vacuum across Europe, comparable to post WWII Europe immediately after the conclusion of WWII. The collapse of the EU would shatter an integrated European defense policy. Europeans countries have a growing distrust of Brussels, a European Army how much more so! European “collective defense capabilities” an utter joke – comparable to Obama as a US President. The Russian-Ukraine War has definitively proven that Russia does not compare to the Stalin Russian Army which defeated the Nazis and captured Berlin.

Many European countries exhibit growing distrust of Brussels, viewing it as a bureaucratic entity that often prioritizes its agenda over national interests. Never in all Europe’s collective history has a United States of Europe as a “Republic” ever existed.

קידושין

The opening Av Mishna of קידושין – האשה נקנית, previously shot a bearing through the fixed known points of the opening and closing of the first sugya:
האשה נקנית מאי שנא (שהוא דומה למאי נפקא מינא? זה אחד מן הי”ג מידות תורה שבעל פה – שנקרא רב חסד.) הכא דתני האשה נקנית ומ”ש התם דתני האיש מקדש.
And compared this fixed point upon my Gemara “Map” to a point which concludes, my error with the closing fixed point of the 2nd sugya of this “Map” Gemara:

מיבמה שאינה יוצאה בגט יוצאה בחליצה

However, made a mistake, the end of the first sugya of this Gemara on dof .ג wherein the Gemara brings the fixed point location “on the Map” of:

זו אחת מן הדרכים ששוו גיטי נשים לשחרורי עבדים ניתני דברים אלא כל היכא דאיכא פלוגתא תני דרכים וכל היכא דליכא פלוגתא תני דברים. דיקא נמי דקתני סיפא ר”א אומר אתרוג שוה לאילן לכל דבר ש”מ.

Now a virgin girl acquired through קידושין simply does not compare not to divorce nor to Yibbum – as concludes the 2nd point on the “Map” of the 2nd sugya of our Gemara. The issue in question: what exactly does the Mishna language נקנית refer to? The point of zero disputes the language of the Chumash concerning the acquisition of both slaves and Yibbum widows. The dispute, which בנין אב sh’itta precedent does the Court accept to make an inductive reasoned conclusion – “interpretation”.

A common law court – by definition – both the defense and prosecuting attorney submit precedent briefs which support how their respective sh’itta interprets the language of the Torah. The “acquisition” through קידושין of a virgin young woman, does not compare to how slaves acquire their freedom or widows “acquired” by the brother of their deceased husband.

So why compare the Case/Rule cases of either this or that to the our case of the acquisition of a young virgin girl? Herein defines the opening thesis statement question which our Gemara makes on this the Av Mishna of קידושין.

The scholarship and inductive reasoning required to “shoot a bearing” in Talmudic common law, simply a completely different wisdom than that of reading a novel word for word. Herein the explanation why the translations made upon both the T’NaCH and Talmud – utterly worthless sophomoric undergraduate inferior learning.

The opening מאי נפקא מינא to האיש מקדש likewise contrasts rather than compares. A man simply not a woman any more than a virgin “compares” to a widow or a divorcee or a slave. The study of any literature requires sharpening the skills of “comparison and contrast”. English literature 101. Our Gemara compares to a topographical military map that has elevation rings. By shooting a bearing azimuth, likened to the employ of a compass in orienteering. T’NaCH\Talmudic common law examines precedent cases to other precedent cases in order to reach a conclusive judicial ruling of the case currently heard before the Court.

The Talmud language likewise compares to the warp/weft of a loom. Wherein the rabbis weave the fabric of culture and custom which defines the society of the chosen Cohen people. It’s this very scholarship – defining the culture and customs of the chosen Cohen people – which defines the sum total of the entire T’NaCH/Talmudic literature in one sentence.

Contrast the 2nd Sinai commandment – avoda zara. The Koran prioritized the theological creed known as Monotheism. Whereas the Torah language of the ערב רב openingly acknowledges, especially through the Av metaphor, sin of the Golden Calf, that assimilated Jews, no different than from Goyim, both this and that worship other Gods. Intermarriage contrasts with קידושין.

The Torah oath brit alliance has blessing vs. curse; life vs. death. Keep the terms of the sworn alliance and live as the chosen Cohen people through the Av commandments known as time-oriented mitzvot, within the borders of the nation of the Cohen people inside the Middle East. קידושין, like shabbat or Moshiach, a tohor time-oriented Torah commandments.

The Rambam views Kiddushin as a rabbinic enactment rather than a direct commandment from the Torah. He emphasizes that while the Torah provides the framework for marriage, the specific act of Kiddushin, established through rabbinic authority. He reads the Torah exactly like Xtians “read” their sophomoric bible translations. His Yad attempts to Translate the Talmudic halachot into Hebrew! His utter and total ignorance of פרדס inductive reasoning, his avoda zara replacement theology substituted the Order which Aristotle’s deductive syllogism mandates.

The downstream generations of rabbis failed to understand this gross error and correct it; despite the rebuke made by the Rosh common law halachic code! The mussar of the Rosh, who followed the vision of the B’HaG\Rif/Tosafot model, rabbinic orthodox Judaism totally refused to hear. Swept under the rug, the decree of נידוי – not simply limited to the court of Rabbeinu Yonah in Spain – as the post Rambam Civil War rabbis falsely teaches Yeshiva students! But far more significant, the Rashi\Baali Tosafot common law school in France. In 1232 the rabbis of Paris imposed the ban of נידוי upon the assimilated perversions written by the Rambam Karaite.

Both this and that “literalist-טיפש פשט” heretics, both read the T’NaCH or Talmud from a strictly literalist perspective. A simple glance of his Sefer HaMitzvot, which excludes the Torah commandment of קידושין exposes the crud Av tuma avoda zarah which the Rambam perversion worships. Jews who “obey” halacha as determined by the “cross-dress” Rambam code, walk off the path of the Chosen Cohen oath brit alliance faith – to actively pursue judicial justice which dedicates to make fair compensation of damages inflicted by Party A upon Party B among our chosen Cohen People – who have the burden to rule our brit lands – unlike how Par’o, and his court which judicially oppressed g’lut Israel.

However, the Rashi opening likewise failed to prioritize the central issue of Torah נקנית. The Baali Tosafot delves into the Torah subject of acquisitions and points out that it does not specify, “virgin”. This seems false to me. The Rivka Torah precedent, emphasized her virginity. Rivka serves as the Torah precedent-model for our Av Mishna and its Gemara here. Non the less the commentary of the Tosafot makes a similar “Map” bearing sh’itta as did my commentary. This sharply contrasts with the Rashi dictionary like definition approach to Talmudic scholarship.

The opening Rosh fails to emphasize the contrast between a virgin girl to Avraham’s plot of burial lands. Acquisition of a virgin girl for marriage simply does not compare to the Case of Avraham burying Sarah following the horror of the Akedah. The dismal failure of rabbinic downstream commentaries to connect this Av Mishna to 1. the resurrection of the dead, connected to the death of Sarah. This story serves as a tremendous Torah event. Why?

The mitzva from the Torah of קידושין, a man acquires the נפש עולם הבא of his wife through the future born children which he baal intends through the mitzva of קידושין. Hence this mitzva, directly linked to the brit cut between the pieces wherein childless Avram cut a brit that time-oriented Torah commandments eternally create יש מאין the Chosen Cohen seed of the Avot. This Cohen seed, not conceived through sex and sperm or genetics or race but only through Av tohor time-oriented Torah commandments.

The Samaritans, Tzeddukim, Karaim – one and all fail to learn Torah common law. Hence they deny the mitzva of the resurrection from the dead found in the language of the Written Torah. Rambam, no different that he too excludes the Torah commandment of קידושין from the Torah! Great and mighty empires have risen and fallen, but the chosen Cohen seed of the Avot live unto all generations! How? Through tohor time-oriented Av Torah commandments which require prophetic mussar as their internal k’vanna.

The Opening first two words of our Mishna holds a Torah commandment “BIG PICTURE” vision. Alas the famous commentators could not see the forest through the trees. It seems to me that every Av Mishna throughout Rabbi Yechuda’s common law Sha’s directly plugs into Torah commandments. ברכות opens with kr’ea shma as tefillah דאורייתא. Shabbat distinguishes between the עשר דיבורות in שמות ודברים.

The chiddushim of the Sha’s Mishna on the Chumash requires immediate address. The contrast between the Chumash and the Talmud a day vs. night obvious distinction. Hence this begs the question, how does the one express the other? The subject of קידושין way down the list of the B’HaG mitzvot דאורייתא priorities. The comparison to Avram acquiring a burial plot with money, what connection to a rabbinic commandment? Hence קידושין like all other “rabbinic” mitzvot, when elevated to tohor time-oriented commandments – their status achieves the aliyah to ארץ ישראל-mitzvot from the Torah! Just as the resurrection from the dead, a mitzva of the Torah – as a tohor time-oriented commandment! How?

The precedent of Avram’s stern mussar to HaShem – “I have no children to inherit my Name”. The cycle of life & death common to all man-kind. What makes the brit cut between the pieces unique? The Torah vision known as time-oriented commandments which both the NT and Koran ignore like they do the revelation of the first commandment Sinai Name – the greatest commandment in the whole of the Torah. The commandment to love God and Man merely a פרט ולא הכלל. This gross fundamental error proves the NT as a Protocols of the Elders of Zion – an utter fraud.

The דאורייתא of the time-oriented mitzva of Moshiach dedicates the Yatzir Ha’Tov spirits of middot to pursue righteous judicial courtroom common law justices within the borders of brit ארץ ישראל. The Pauline “original sin of Adam’s fall from the Garden”, compares to how the “prophet” Natan foisted Shabbatai Tzvi (1626–1676) as a false messiah. The genesis of that avoda zara error, Jews lacked clarity that Parshat שופטים ושוטרים in the Book of דברים understands the latter as prophet “policemen” enforcers of judicial courtroom rulings. Prophets, as agents of the Sanhedrin courts empowered through Torah constitutional mandate to anoint and depose kings! No Sanhedrin court has jurisdiction in g’lut. Hence the theological narishkeit vomited by Natan – not prophetic, most definitely not mussar.

A Torah prophet commands mussar to all generations of the chosen Cohen seed of the Avot. Chag יום הזכרון – a call through the sounding of the shofar for Jews to remember the oaths which the Avot swore a brit with HaShem to father the chosen Cohen seed for eternity. The language eternity implies the language: “resurrection from the dead” by means of a logical דיוק/inference.
____________________________________
____________________________________
[[[ The term kinyan in this context reflects sanctification (hekdesh) — not legal possession (reshut). That’s a key Talmudic distinction upheld in both sugyot and later halachic development.]]] The verb choice language of the Mishna, compares to the required explanation how a korban does not exist as a “barbeque offered up to Heaven”. Both terms of kiddushin and korban make a dedication of “holiness”, through the root verb of ק-ד-ש. Hence just as a the precedent of קידושין serves as a בנין אב which makes a depth analysis interpretation of the “brit cut between the pieces” — made in response to Avram’s complaint “What can you give me, I have no children”, so too all later korbanot dedicated at the Mishkan require swearing a Torah oath. To do this requires swearing a blessing which contains שם ומלכות. Saying Tehillem prayers by contrast, far less “holy” because they do not swear a Torah oath which requires שם ומלכות.

[[[You assert Kiddushin is not daorayta — aligning with Rambam’s supposed “Karaite” misstep — but this, respectfully, misrepresents both Rambam and the structure of Torah law.]]] Incorrect. I דוקא rebuke the Rambam who makes a literal reading of the language of the Chumash (the 5 Books of Torah) wherein he rules the mitzva of kiddushin a rabbinic commandment. I compared this mitzva of kiddushin to the time-oriented Torah commandments of Shabbat and Moshiach. Both Torah commandments not rabbinic commandments.

[[[ But Rambam, in all his philosophical articulation, was never guilty of that. His use of Aristotelian language was functional, not theological. His Yad HaChazaka is an attempt to organize law, not supplant the chiyuv of Mussar or prophetic command. If anything, he created a bridge for minds of his generation to see the inner harmony of halacha.]]] The Rambam replaced the kabbalah of rabbi Akiva/Yishmael’s פרדס\י”ג מידות inductive reasoning which compares a Case/Rule Mishnaic judicial ruling to lower court Baraitot wherein the Gemara employs פרדס וי”ג מידות comparisons of Case/Rule cases “compared” to similar but different Case\Rule cases. The Rambam code organizes his halachic rulings into statute halachic categories. He therein switched Mishnaic/Gemara common law unto Greek/Roman statute law. A direct Torah violation of דברים 12:30-31.

The summation of the entire Talmud – to one sentence: to shape and determine culture and customs practiced by the chosen Cohen people, the Rambam code directly and flagrantly violated. פרדס logic simply not a Greek/Roman syllogism logic any more than Day is Night or Night is Day.

The Hilchot of the Rambam Yad, systematically categorizes Jewish law into 14 books, each addressing different aspects of halacha – based upon the Order attained through Greek deductive reasoning.

This systematic organization of Hilchot into egg-crate/\shoe-boxed – categories sets the Yad completely apart from the B’HaG, Rif, Rosh Hilchot, organized around Mishnaic language. The Order of the Rambam Hilchot uprooted and destroyed all Talmudic points of reference where-from the Talmud, this much later Reshon made his Halachic rulings.

All the commentaries written on the Yad directly address this fundamental flaw. However, the damage already done. Quoting a Gemara source as does for example Karo’s כסף משנה, fails to make the required משנה תורה which makes a re-interpretation of the language of the Mishna which that Gemara comments upon. To correctly understand how to validate the invalid Yad, necessary to affix a Rambam halachic ruling to a similar B’HaG, Rif, or Rosh ruling wherein the latter scholars open, as does my commentary here, back to the language of the Mishna itself.