משנה תורה\Legislative Review/ achieved through Common law Sanhedrin Courts

https://api.follow.it/track-rss-story-click/v3/M8X-A1uQfqXPRBrWhiodx7JXeTvhTWzl

Prof. Sam Lehman-Wilzig’s work on judicial activism in Jewish history and law! It’s a fascinating topic that intersects tradition, governance, and interpretation.

The oral tradition was central to Jewish law for centuries before any written texts emerged. Amazing Prof. Wilzig fails to address the kabbalah of Rabbi Akiva’s פרדס logic system which defines the Oral Torah as codified in both the T’NaCH and Talmud! A herd of rampaging elephants in the China Closet totally ignored!

Just as great an over-sight: the Prof.’s confusion over the essential priority of prophetic mussar over history when learning the T’NaCH and how this Primary Source defines the k’vanna of both Talmudic Aggadah and Gaonic Midrash stories which serve as a primary commentary to the Aggadah.

The Judges of the Great Sanhedrin had the power to authorize or deny a “voluntary war” initiated by the King based upon the Common Law משנה תורה Legislative Review powers of the Court over the king. Their role extended beyond mere legal interpretation; they influenced national decisions.

משנה תורה = Legislative Review. Hence in ancient T’NaCH legalism “theoritically” a Great Sanhedrin court could declare a statute law imposed by the king as an unconstitutional violation of Torah Constitutional Law. This power of משנה תורה emphatically influenced any and all Tribal statute laws of the 12 Tribes of Israel which formed the Republic alliance or brit between the Tribes of Yaacov. Theoretically both the first and second Jewish commonwealths witnessed the organization of government rule through the establishment of a Jewish Republic. Emphasis placed upon “theoretically” because king Shlomo tried the Capital Crimes Case of the two prostitute mothers before his own Court and not before a Great Sanhedrin Common law Court!

The ongoing debate about judicial activism in Israel echoes historical tensions. The government’s attempts at “Judicial Reform” aim to limit the Supreme Court’s authority. The Torah as the Written Constitution of the Republic. The Talmud as the model to re-establish lateral, NOT vertical Common Law Sanhedrin courtrooms.

Rabbi Akiva’s פרדס (Pardes) logic system indeed plays a crucial role in understanding the Oral Torah. Both the T’NaCH Aggadic mussar common law & the Talmud halacha common law stand upon the wisdom of making valid comparisons of different Case studies. Both compilations of mussar & halachic ritual discussions, debates, etc. defines this unique oral Torah tradition.

The 4 part פרדס totally different that the 3 part syllogism or bi-polar dialectics – each of the logic sysems develeped by Goyim serve to interpret Greek and Roman statute law, whereas פרדס interprets only T’NaCH and Talmud common law. Both the logic and law of Goyim legalisms share no common ground with Torah legalism which defines faith as the pursuit of Justice. And justice defined in its turn as: fair compensation of damages imposed by lateral Judicial common law courtrooms.

פרדס logic compares to the Confederate Flag: the Stars and Bars. Where דרוש פשט form a זיוג and רמז סוד form a crossing זיוג. The loom like fabric of T’NaCH/Talmudic common law has its warp/weft Aggada\Halacha threads.

Assimilated Jewish statute halachic codes divorce the Gemara from its home Mishna. The purpose of a sugia of Gemara, to learn to other Primary בנין אב sources both T’NaCH and Talmudic. That’s how Jewish common law learns. The comparison of precedents compares to the Front/Top\Side perspectives by which a 2 dimensional blue print permits the skilled workman the ability to see a 3 dimensional complex idea from a two dimension piece of paper.

טיפש פשט by stark contrast worships words read from books with a strictly literal/physical understanding. An example of such bird-brained stupidity, the idea that שם ומלכות literally means the Inefible Name which the lips of Man cannot pronounce and kingship.

The kabbalah of פרדס depth analysis, this wisdom understands pronouncing the Name through the בנין אב of blowing the Shofar on Rosh HaShanna. While the lungs blow air the spirit within the Yatzir Tov of the heart dedicate Divine Spirits. Tefillah a matter of the heart which requires the k’vanna, as defined through שם ומלכות. Herein defines the oath sworn by Yaacov by which he cut a brit for the generations of his chosen Cohen seed to inherit the oath sworn lands.

The wisdom of making valid comparisons—drawing parallels between different texts, contexts, and situations— the essential definition of classic Jewish common law. It allows for nuanced interpretations, as opposed to literal word translation worship of words. The Aggadic mussar woven into Halachic ritualist discussions, this legal fabric has the power to breath life into the souls of the Jewish people.

Greek logic which organizes into strict catagories simply does not correctly align with Torah common law legalism. Syllogistic or dialectical or mathematic logic formats which shape and define Goyim civilizations utterly alien and unknown to the Framers of both the T’NaCH and Talmud literature. Faith defined as the pursuit of justice wherein Sanhedrin courtrooms impose fair compensation of damages inflict by party A upon party B, completely unknown to Goyim logic formats.

The current discussions around judicial reform in Israel echo historical tensions regarding the balance of power between the judiciary and the legislature. The Torah serves as a Written Constitution highlights the ongoing importance of these ancient texts in shaping modern legal frameworks of משנה תורה ‘Legislative Review’ Common law. The process of making valid comparisons among different texts and cases, indeed the chief cornerstone of Jewish common law. This approach fosters the wisdom of development of a nuanced understanding; which allows for dynamic interpretations that transcend silly, strictly literal reading of texts. Hence the idea: Goyim read their bibles while Jews learn our Torah.

This article seeks to raise several fascinating points about how the unique character of Jewish legal reasoning, grounded in textual comparison and the pursuit of justice, and how it sharply differs from Greco-Roman and other non-Jewish legal frameworks. The ongoing debates in Israel around judicial reform and the balance of power between the courts and the elected government clearly reflect these historical tensions.

The analogy to the Confederate flag, representing the interwoven threads of Aggadah and Halakha, effectively illustrates the complex and interconnected nature of Jewish legal reasoning, a complexity lost when Pardes – ignored. The prioritization of prophetic mussar (ethical teachings) in understanding Tanakh is another crucial element missed. Prophetic mussar provides the ethical framework and underlying principles that inform the interpretation of both Halakha (Jewish law) and Aggadah (narrative and homiletical material). By neglecting this foundational element, the Professor fails to grasp the ethical and moral underpinnings of Jewish law, reducing it to a purely legalistic system. The kavanah (intention) behind Aggadic and Midrashic narratives is intrinsically linked to the prophetic mussar, providing a deeper understanding of their legal and ethical implications. This omission leads to an incomplete and potentially distorted understanding of the development and application of Jewish law.

The Sanhedrin’s power to authorize or deny “voluntary wars” initiated by the king, based on its common law legislative review powers (משנה תורה), is crucial. This demonstrates the Sanhedrin’s role extended beyond mere legal interpretation; it actively shaped national policy. This highlights the dynamic interplay between law, governance, and interpretation within the Jewish tradition, a dynamic that is central to understanding judicial activism in its historical context.

The current debate surrounding judicial reform in Israel directly reflects these historical tensions. The government’s attempts to limit the Supreme Court’s authority echo past struggles over the balance of power between the judiciary and the executive. The framing of the Torah as a written constitution and the Talmud as a model for re-establishing lateral Sanhedrin courtrooms underscores the ongoing relevance of these historical precedents in contemporary discussions.

This “insightful” comparison of Pardes logic with Greek syllogistic or dialectical logic highlights a fundamental difference in legal reasoning. The emphasis on comparison and analogy in Jewish legal thought, as opposed to the categorical and deductive approaches of Greek logic, utterly crucial to understand the fundamental error made by the Rambam’s code of halacha. This difference is not merely academic; it shapes the very nature of Jewish law and its application. It explains the reasons for the Jewish Civil War which witness mass population transfers consequent to Jewish legal anarchy. The concept of “faith as the pursuit of justice,” with Sanhedrin courts providing fair compensation for damages, a distinctly Jewish legal concept, foreign to the legal systems of Gentile civilizations. This fundamental difference underscores the limitations of applying Western legal theories to the analysis of Jewish law.

In conclusion, while Professor Lehman-Wilzig’s work may offer valuable insights, its significant omissions regarding Pardes hermeneutics and the primacy of prophetic mussar weaken its overall analysis. A comprehensive understanding of Jewish judicial activism requires a deeper engagement with these foundational aspects of Jewish legal thought.

Identity Politics

Torah as contrasted by Goyim Philosophers

The concept of פשט does not make a literal reading of texts. Making a literal reading of Torah qualifies as טיפש פשט. An example of טיפש פשט: “Rather, פשט refers to the straightforward, contextual interpretation of sacred texts, especially within the context of the Torah and other Jewish scriptures.” The entire Book of בראשית teaches טהור זמן גרמא מצוות. Do you know what this type of Av mitzva means, contrasted by toldot positive and negative Torah commandments?

NO Torah commandment: to believe in God. Why? Because all avoda zarah belief systems begin with the self-centered EGO I. But my EGO I did not Create God. Yet Christian and Muslim theologies and Creeds … their EGO I in fact creates Gods! The Xtian EGO I creates the Trinity. The Muslim EGO I creates strict monotheism! Bunk.

Tefillah NOT prayer. A person swears a Torah oath through שם ומלכות in תפילה. Prayer has nothing to do with swearing a Torah oath. Hence the two as different as oil and water. The פשט of the opening Creation story in ספר בראשית, the introduction of the concept that doing tohor time oriented commandments can Create the Universe from nothing. For example: the mitzva as told when Yaacov wrestled with the Angel of Esau and became crippled. This mitzva of the gid ha’nasheh, the tearing of the sciatic nerve teaches the mussar of Esau greeting Yaacov with a kiss rather than plunging a sword within Yaacov’s gut!

Tefillah and Shabbat and Acts of kindness and charity, like for example burying the dead or visiting the sick etc all these cases, they qualify as tohor time oriented commandments and NOT positive commandments. Why? Because positive commandments do not require prophetic mussar k’vanna when a person does any positive Torah “toldot” commandment. Whereas Av tohor time oriented commandments, require prophetic mussar as the foundational k’vanna פשט – otherwise known as מלכות.

The idea of טיפש פשט or bird brain stupidity ironically also translates as מלכות or kingship. Whereas Av tohor time oriented commandments understands מלכות as the prophetic mussar פשט which defines the parameters of the k’vanna of Torah spirits אל רחום חנון וכו; also known as the revelation of the 13 tohor spirits – Oral Torah middot system of logic.

Prophetic Mussar and K’vanna: The concept of prophetic mussar (ethical guidance) as foundational k’vanna (intention) for Av tohor time-oriented commandments an intriguing Torah vision. It emphasizes that fulfilling these mitzvot goes beyond mere rote Shulkan Aruch robotic ritual actions; it requires inner alignment with Divine tohor middot spirits. The term מלכות (kingship) takes on deeper significance when understood in this context. As opposed to the טיפש פשט literal translation of “KING”.

The concept of prophetic mussar as the foundational k’vanna for Av tohor time-oriented commandments – indeed profound. It highlights the importance of not just performing mitzvot (commandments) mechanically, but doing so with a deep, intentional alignment with Divine tohor spirits revealed to Moshe Rabbeinu 40 days after the sin of the Golden Calf on Yom Kippur. This inner alignment of tohor middot spirits, transforms the mitzva act into a meaningful spiritual revelation.

The term מלכות (kingship) in this context, underscores the idea of Divine sovereignty within our Yatzir Tov, contrasted by our Evil I Self-worship infatuation, emotionally immature inclination. By integrating prophetic ethical guidance (mussar) into our intentions (k’vanna), individuals can elevate their observance of mitzvot, making each act a reflection of Divine kingship Av tohor middot spirits achieved through tohor time oriented commandments.

This approach encourages a holistic view of religious practice, where the external actions qualify as but the bark of a tree, deeply connected to internal spiritual k’vanna; ethical living constitutes as the fruit of this same tree. A beautiful way to infuse everyday actions with profound spiritual significance.

Hegel, the German philosopher, had a distinctive approach to truth. He believed that truth emerges through a dynamic process of thesis, antithesis, and synthesis. Essentially, opposing ideas clash, leading to a higher synthesis—a richer understanding that transcends the initial contradictions. Torah, by contrast, emphasizes a journey—a path of prophetic ethical living and spiritual growth. Each person’s unique path (destiny walk) contributes to a larger truth, and no single party can dictate it to another.

Bertrand Russell, a British philosopher and logician, made significant contributions to formal logic and mathematical analysis. His work influenced fields like philosophy of language, epistemology (philosophy that examines the nature, origin, and limits of knowledge), and the foundations of mathematics. Russell’s rigorous approach to reasoning sought to establish precise rules for making a valid logical inference (a דיוק in rabbinic logic), using mathematical tools to analyze language and thought. Essentially, he aimed to create a logical framework that applied across various domains.

Oral Torah logic focuses only upon the realm of Torah common law precedent comparisons. A precedent in Hebrew: בנין אב.
Hegel’s truth involves deriving a synthesis which emerges from opposing concepts. Torah’s truth a path toward ethical behavioral refinement, how a person behaves/conducts business with both family and people.

Russell’s work focused on formal logic and mathematical rigor. Aristotelian logic, the foundational system of deductive reasoning which has dominated Western Civilizations starting with the Renaissance which emerged following the Muslim invasion of Spain and the rediscovery of the concealed ancient Greek ideas that so threatened the early Church that it preferred Dark Ages beliefs in God, Devil and witches over rational reason.

The heart of Aristotelian logic, his syllogisms. Major Premise: A general statement or principle. Minor Premise: A specific statement related to the major premise. Conclusion: An inference drawn from the major and minor premises. Classic rabbinic logic learns from כלל פרט או פרט כלל. Modern literature requires that a thesis statement has qualifying particulars which support the premise of the thesis statement.

Hegel’s dialectical approach indeed invites us to see truth as a dynamic process. The clash of opposing ideas—thesis and antithesis—leads to synthesis, which transcends initial contradictions. It’s like the unfolding of a philosophical dance, where each step contributes to a richer understanding.

In the context of Torah, this resonates with the idea that truth dynamic and not static; it evolves as we engage with ethical living and spiritual growth. Each person’s unique path (destiny walk) adds to this collective truth, and no single party, whether past or present generations can monopolize it. In Hebrew this collective error that places earlier generations upon a pedestal known through the טיפש פשט of ירידות הדורות. The correct interpretation for ירידות הדורות: domino effect based upon the fact that throwing a rock into a pond produces a ripple impact.

When we apply Russellian clarity to religious concepts, we dissect their logical structure. For example, analyzing the premises behind ethical commandments can reveal deeper insights into their implications. In rabbinic logic, the principle of כלל פרט או פרט כלל (general to specific or specific to general) allows for nuanced interpretation. It recognizes that truth simply not always straightforward; context matters, and particulars absolutely required to refine our understanding of the general idea.

Modern literature, too, appreciates the importance of qualifying particulars. A well-crafted thesis statement gains strength when supported by specific evidence or examples. The anti-thesis of this idea: the Church ‘Blood Libel’ made virtually every Easter, followed by violent pogroms. An accusation does not qualify as proof. Hence a general thesis statement requires multiple specifics which validate the general thesis “accusation”.

Spanish Jewish philosophers utterly assimilated and embraced the rediscovered ancient Greek philosophies of both Plato, Aristotle and others. The Kuzari, poet Judah Halevi conducts a religious debate with the king of the Khazars.

The Khazar king, curious about the tenets of Judaism, seeks instruction from the rabbi, comparing it with Christianity and Islam.

This issue whether the Kuzari claim concerning the conversion of the king of Khazar to Judaism utterly not important. The Kuzari attempt to differentiate the Jewish people during the height of the Xtian crusades totally collapses. Why? Judah Halevi’s logic based upon ancient Greek logic rather than rabbi Akiva’s kabbalah פרדס logic discipline of Common law based upon precedents!

The Kuzari’s Av tumah avoda zarah impact on subsequent Jewish thought – profound. It shaped debates within the Haskalah (Jewish Enlightenment) movement. Its ideas and style played a role in shaping intellectual discourse during the Haskalah. It also influenced the rise of anti-rationalist Kabbalah.

The Kuzari, originally written in Arabic. Judah ben Saul ibn Tibbon’s 12th-century Hebrew translation particularly well-known.

The Kuzari Principle an “empirical generalization” concerning certain national traditions such as the Pesach story expressed through the Haggadah. The Kuzari’s emphasis upon history rather than mussar planted the foundation for Historical Judaism. Otherwise known as Conservative Judaism.

The encounter with Greek philosophy—especially through the works of Plato and Aristotle—shaped medieval Jewish intellectual life. The tension between embracing Hellenistic ideas – avoda zarah, and maintaining Jewish cultural identity, as expressed through the dedication of lighting the Hannuka lights – the central Jewish Civil War during this period. Some scholars, like assimilated Maimonides, sought to harmonize Greek philosophy with Jewish common law logic.

The Crusades, a time of extreme Jewish upheaval. The Kuzari’s arguments reflect the urgency of asserting Jewish identity crisis concerning our cultural identity in the face of external pressures to assimilate. Interestingly, the Kuzari’s anti-philosophical stance also contributed to the rise of Zohar and Ari Kabbalah—the divergent mystical traditions that incorporated ancient Greek philosophy through and through. The Ari Kabbalah failed to grasp the Creation story as teaching Av tohor time oriented commandments as the critical theme of the Book of בראשית.

Judah ben Saul ibn Tibbon’s Hebrew translation of the Kuzari ensured its accessibility to subsequent generations. Ibn Tibbon’s work as a translator simply crucial in transmitting philosophical and scientific knowledge from Arabic into Hebrew. This fundamental error of thought, that Torah common law a simple translation could duplicate has plagued all generations of Torah scholarship thereafter. Torah common law learns by means of precedents. Learning through comparative precedents defines both Aggadic research and Halachic research. The Rambam’s Yad HaZakah translated and organized halacha into Greek and Roman statute law classifications of subject matter!

This Av tumah avoda zarah assimilation represents a disaster on par with king Shlomo’s building a wood and stone assimilated Catholic like Cathedral rather than establishment of lateral common law Sanhedrin courtroom across his kingdom – the real Beit Ha’Mikdash which king David and the prophet Natan commanded. Both this and that undermined Torah faith as the pursuit of justice in the land of Israel.

Maimonides, in particular, grappled with assimilated avoda zarah Av tumah tension. His works, such as the Guide for the Perplexed, sought to harmonize Aristotelian thought with “Jewish theology”?!. His rationalist approach aimed to bridge these worlds of Greek Philosophy with Jewish common law converted unto Greek/Roman statute law!

Torah’s legal system doesn’t merely rely on translation; it evolves through case law, precedent, and employing Gemarah halachot to re-interpret the original k’vanna of the language of its Home Mishna. The true “house of God” lies not at all in wood & stone, but rather in the ethical and legal fabric of a just society. A just legal system, kindness, and ethical behavior create sacred spaces. The true “house of God”, built not through wood & stone like the idols mocked by the prophets, but rather in the hearts and actions of those who seek justice and compassion.

Justice pursue

How does Zionism separate Judaism from Christianity & Islam? The Torah Constitutional Republic stands upon Justice

Arabs employ a load of rhetoric to justify their Nazi racism. They label Zionism as European colonialism, Zionism as a Crusader state, regardless that Ben Gurion and Menachem Begin made war on Britain following the 2nd White Paper which betrayed the Balfour Declaration agreement of 1917. There biggest propaganda lie to justify their Nazi racism: stolen Palestinian lands. Regardless that Palestine existed as a Post WWI League of Nations award of the Ottoman empire spoils of war to the British and French! That the moment Britain returned the League mandate protectorate back to the UN, coupled with the declaration of Independence by the Jewish state named Israel, Palestine as a UN mandate territory ceased to exist.

Nazi racism not limited to Arab & Muslims. The UN GAR slandered Israel by the slogan: Zionism is Racism. Furthermore the UN refuses to recognize Israel as an Independent nation in the Middle East. This Apartheid UN Nazi racism applied strictly and only to the Jews of the Jewish state of Israel. No different than the Dreyfus Affair antisemites who rejected the idea of Jewish equality to French citizenship in the 1880s & the Russian pogroms which expelled millions of Jews during this same time.

During World War II, some Arab leaders, notably Hajj Amin al-Husseini, the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, collaborated with Nazi Germany. Al-Husseini sought to align Arab nationalist aspirations with Nazi goals, particularly against British colonial rule and Jewish immigration to Palestine. He broadcast anti-Jewish propaganda and called for Arab uprisings against the Allies, framing the struggle in terms of a shared opposition to Jewish influence

The slogan “Zionism is Racism,” adopted by the UN General Assembly in 1975 and later revoked in 1991, reflects the intense and polarized views on this issue. The concept of dhimmi status in Islamic history and the theological views within Christianity regarding Jews have also played significant roles in shaping attitudes towards Israel. The intersection of religion, politics, and history makes this a highly sensitive and multifaceted post Shoah topic. The assertion that Arab opposition to Zionism is solely rooted in a rejection of Jewish self-determination a defining point of contention.

The Arab wars of 1948 and 1967, a sensitive and complex topic. Both conflicts centered on the Jewish people and their right to exist in the Middle East. The Nazi Shoah driven by a genocidal ideology explicitly seeking the extermination of the Jewish people. Arab leaders during the 1948 and 1967 wars aimed to prevent the establishment and existence of the State of Israel, using military action to achieve their goals. Some attempt to justify racist Arab Nazism as but merely rhetoric propaganda. But post Shoah, merely 3 years later, Jewry did not at the time possess the pleasant luxury to minimize the declarations publicly made by Nasser and other Arab leaders which Goyim blithely make after the Arabs suffered defeat. The 3 Nos Khartoum Resolution definitively proves that Israel has an obligation to take racist Arab Nazism at face value.

Zionism advocates for Jewish self-determination, many Arabs view the establishment of Israel as a denial of their own rights to self-determination, particularly for Palestinians. Arabs never referred to themselves as “Palestinians” during the entire period of the British mandate. Palestine ceased to exist as a UN protectorate the moment when David Ben Gurion declared Jewish national Independence. Just prior to this declaration of independence 2/3rds of the member states of the UN validated the Jewish right to self determination. Arab propaganda concerning human rights ignores the extermination of Jews in East Jerusalem by Jordan. The Jordanian use of Jewish grave stone for construction purposes. The destruction of Jewish synagogues like the Ramban synagogue in East Jerusalem.

The term Palestinian did not gain prominence particularly after the establishment of the State of Israel in 1948. The KGB and Arafat introduced this propaganda in 1964. Under the leadership of Egyptian born Yasser Arafat, the concept of a distinct Palestinian national identity crystalized. This period marked a significant shift in how the Arab population in Israel and abroad began to articulate their national aspirations. The KGB and other Soviet influences did play a role in shaping narratives around Palestinian identity during the Cold War. Supporting the Palestinian cause, part of broader geopolitical strategies against Western powers and their allies.

Opportunistic Arab leaders employed Arab displacement refugee status as a propaganda ploy. Arab countries expelled more Jewish refugees from virtually all Arab countries than the post war Arab refugees who fled primarily upon the orders of their own Arab leaders. Arab propaganda argues that with the establishment of the Jewish state terminated Zionism. Zionist Israelis argue that as long as Arab states reject Jewish equal rights to self determination in the Middle East, that the vision of Zionism lives and thrives.

Individuals like Sari Nusseibeh and Hanan Ashrawi actively working toward mutual recognition and understanding between Palestinians and Israelis. Their efforts to bridge divides and promote dialogue represent an essential beginning for fostering some type of reconciliation in a complex and longstanding conflict where Israelis (especially after Oct7th 2023 abhor and totally distrust Arab refugee populations) trust one another less that the distance that we can spit against a strong wind.

Sari Nusseibeh, a Palestinian philosopher and former president of Al-Quds University, has consistently advocated for non Intifada coexistence. His willingness to engage with local audiences in Arabic underscores the importance of reaching people where they live within the borders of Israel; using their native language to convey messages of hope and understanding.

Hanan Ashrawi, a prominent Palestinian politician and “human rights activist”, has never denounced Arab feudalism where the elite bask rich from international aid and view the Arab common man as but wards of the UN. The criminal abuses of Arafat’s post Oslo PA rule she never publicly condemned, despite her resignation when Arafat refused to fire corrupt ministers. The total lack of accountability much less transparency resulted in the electoral victory of Hamas in Gaza in the 2006 one and only general election, it definitively proves that Arab civilizations remain stuck in a barbaric feudalism dungeon mentality.

From the rise of Islam during the lifetime of Muhammad and his followers, Arabs have viewed Jews as a dhimmi sub-class of ruled conquered people. For Israel to rule as an Independent nation in the Middle East, this compares to the Christian theology which preached for millenniums that Christ killer Jews cursed with the mark of Cain and forced by the curse of God to wander the Earth as stateless refugee populations. Hence Christian nations which make up a large portion of the UN likewise view Zionism as an abomination to the Will of God!

Nazi racism which hates and detests Zionism serves as solid proof that both Arabs and Christians worship other Gods. The Gods worshipped by these to huge religions compare to the Gods worshipped by the Hindu religion. The worship of these Gods violates the 2nd Sinai Commandment.

The essence of the 2nd Sinai commandment stands upon the commandment which strictly forbids the adoption of the customs, practices, and beliefs from other nations (often referred to as “Goyim” in Hebrew) that fundamentally reject the revelation of the Torah at Sinai. In other words, the purpose of the 2nd Sinai commandment, to maintain the distinctiveness of the Jewish culture & faith by not assimilating unto other alien foreign cultures. An obvious corollary, the Torah strictly forbids the intermarriage with Goyim. A huge yatzir ha’rah among all generations of Jews throughout our history as the chosen Cohen people. Goyim have absolutely no idea of the Cohen spirituality which differentiates between tohor vs. tumah spirits. Both of which live within the hearts of bnai brit Israel.

Christian theology, makes a theological focus upon the prohibition of graven images or idols. This interpretation emphasizes monotheism and the rejection of idolatry. The logical flaw of this Ego I self inflated bubble importance, monotheism negates the second commandment; if their lives only one God, as the Muslim theology dictates, then no reason for the 2nd Sinai commandment. Furthermore, such self-centered Ego I evil eye theology ignores completely the 10 plagues by which the 1st Commandment Name (no where written in either the Christian bible or Muslim koran) judged the Gods worshipped by both Par’o and the Egyptians. It ignores the oath sworn at the brit of Gilgal by which Jehoshua cut an oath brit, that just as did the Spirit Name of the 1st Sinai Commandment judge the Gods of Egypt, so too the Spirit Name would judge the Gods worshipped by the multiple kings and nations within the land of Canaan. The koran and Arafat promoted a propaganda of ‘Greater Israel’. The League of Nations Palestine mandate, awarded to the British, therefore included the lands of present day Jordan, Iraq and Kuwait as part and parcel of the Palestine mandate territories. Therefore the Arab propaganda rhetoric concerning ‘stolen Arab Palestinian land’ – as false as camel milk as kosher as bacon.

This error compares to the perversion of reading the Torah as a history rather than grasping the prophetic visions of mussar; which all prophets command mussar to purify a persons attributes in how that person behaves to both his family and people. Limiting the 2nd Sinai commandment to graven idols and monotheism an oil vs water error only equalled by reading the T’NaCH as actual physical history rather than a prophetic mussar that purifies middot/attributes. And like self-determination applies equally to all living generations of the Jewish people!

Both Christianity and Islam fundamentally and absolutely require a physical historical Jesus. Despite the prophet Balaam’s prophesy that God is not a man. Muhammad elevated the false messiah fictional character Jesus, Roman revisionist history (on par with the Czarist secret police: forgery known as: The Protocols of Elders of Zion), to being a prophet. Yet Muhammad throughout the entire book of the koran failed to define his rhetoric word, repeated over and again from bow to stern: prophet. Muhammad did not know that the Torah defines: prophet, as a person who commands mussar! A fundamental day and night error which exposes the rhetoric of the koran as false.

The Talmud compares to a loom with its warp & weft opposing threads. The Talmud has halacha opposed by aggadah. The kabbalah of Oral Torah logic, as defined by the teachings of rabbi Akiva, this logic system format affixes דרוש\פשט to the prophetic mussar of the T’NaCH Primary sources – as the basis to understand the stories as told in both Aggadah its Midrashic primary commentaries.

Halachic portions of the Talmud align with the רמז\סוד Oral Torah logic system taught in the kabbalah of Rabbi Akiva’s פרדס. This logic system in sharp contrast to the Greek syllogism logic format developed by Aristotle. Rabbi Akiva’s logic format, rooted strictly and only in the study of Torah common law, this logic system weaves the threads of prophetic mussar into the opposing threads of halachic ritualistic practices. Greek logic has absolutely no interest what so ever in understanding T’NaCH/Talmud common law. When Jews during Hanukkah bench after eating a meal, we remember that the Syrian Greeks attempted to cause Israel to abandon and forget the פרדס Oral Torah logic system as taught through the kabbalah of rabbi Akiva’s פרדס system of logic. The Romans murdered rabbi Akiva to achieve the exact same objective.

Greek and Roman statute laws stand in stark contrast with T’NaCH/Talmud common law. Greek logic reduces complex ideas to rigid syllogisms; it give zero understanding of how to make a depth analysis of prophetic mussar common law halachot k’vanna. The two opposing logic systems as distant from one another as oil vs. water. A distinction comparable to learning the 2nd Sinai commandment – not to assimilate and intermarry vs. not to bow down to 3 dimensional idols. This latter avoda zarah directly compares to the limitations made by the Scientific method which requires empirical evidence; or reading the T’NaCH as actual historical events way back when, a long long time ago vs. learning the k’vanna of prophetic mussar as this mussar rebukes a person to enrich and refine his Yatzir middot; how he behaves toward family members and people.

The huge abyss which separates the avoda zarah practices of both Christianity and Islam summarized succinctly by how the Torah vs. how the Christian bible and Muslim koran defines the key term: FAITH. The Torah defines faith as the pursuit of judicial Common law Sanhedrin justice, starting with Moshe standing before the Court of Paro over the matter of beating Hebrew slaves over the matter of not meeting an assigned quota of brick production. Followed by the mussar rebuke of Yetro the father in law of Moshe, that he alone could not actualize justice among all his nation. Christianity and Islam stand on the opposing side of this huge abyss. They both define faith as belief precisely in how their theologians define the creed, personal beliefs in this or that God.

In Judaism, the focus on prophetic mussar (ethical guidance) and the importance of k’vanna (mussar attribute refinement of defined tohor middot) in fulfilling commandments highlights a deep, introspective approach to religious practice. This contrasts with the more historical and literal – meaning flat 2 dimensional interpretations which define Christianity and Islam. The classic example of such shallow nonsense: God created the world in 6 days and rested on the 7th sterile biblical literalism. The distinction between halacha (ritual common law) and aggadah (mussar common law) in the Talmud, and the use of different logic systems, such as Rabbi Akiva’s kabbalistic approach versus Greek syllogism, further illustrate the unique methodologies within Jewish thought.

Justice Justice Pursue

How does Zionism separate Judaism from Christianity & Islam? The Torah Constitutional Republic stands upon Justice

Arabs employ a load of rhetoric to justify their Nazi racism. They label Zionism as European colonialism, Zionism as a Crusader state, regardless that Ben Gurion and Menachem Begin made war on Britain following the 2nd White Paper which betrayed the Balfour Declaration agreement of 1917. There biggest propaganda lie to justify their Nazi racism: stolen Palestinian lands. Regardless that Palestine existed as a Post WWI League of Nations award of the Ottoman empire spoils of war to the British and French! That the moment Britain returned the League mandate protectorate back to the UN, coupled with the declaration of Independence by the Jewish state named Israel, Palestine as a UN mandate territory ceased to exist.

Nazi racism not limited to Arab & Muslims. The UN GAR slandered Israel by the slogan: Zionism is Racism. Furthermore the UN refuses to recognize Israel as an Independent nation in the Middle East. This Apartheid UN Nazi racism applied strictly and only to the Jews of the Jewish state of Israel. No different than the Dreyfus Affair antisemites who rejected the idea of Jewish equality to French citizenship in the 1880s & the Russian pogroms which expelled millions of Jews during this same time.

During World War II, some Arab leaders, notably Hajj Amin al-Husseini, the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, collaborated with Nazi Germany. Al-Husseini sought to align Arab nationalist aspirations with Nazi goals, particularly against British colonial rule and Jewish immigration to Palestine. He broadcast anti-Jewish propaganda and called for Arab uprisings against the Allies, framing the struggle in terms of a shared opposition to Jewish influence

The slogan “Zionism is Racism,” adopted by the UN General Assembly in 1975 and later revoked in 1991, reflects the intense and polarized views on this issue. The concept of dhimmi status in Islamic history and the theological views within Christianity regarding Jews have also played significant roles in shaping attitudes towards Israel. The intersection of religion, politics, and history makes this a highly sensitive and multifaceted post Shoah topic. The assertion that Arab opposition to Zionism is solely rooted in a rejection of Jewish self-determination a defining point of contention.

The Arab wars of 1948 and 1967, a sensitive and complex topic. Both conflicts centered on the Jewish people and their right to exist in the Middle East. The Nazi Shoah driven by a genocidal ideology explicitly seeking the extermination of the Jewish people. Arab leaders during the 1948 and 1967 wars aimed to prevent the establishment and existence of the State of Israel, using military action to achieve their goals. Some attempt to justify racist Arab Nazism as but merely rhetoric propaganda. But post Shoah, merely 3 years later, Jewry did not at the time possess the pleasant luxury to minimize the declarations publicly made by Nasser and other Arab leaders which Goyim blithely make after the Arabs suffered defeat. The 3 Nos Khartoum Resolution definitively proves that Israel has an obligation to take racist Arab Nazism at face value.

Zionism advocates for Jewish self-determination, many Arabs view the establishment of Israel as a denial of their own rights to self-determination, particularly for Palestinians. Arabs never referred to themselves as “Palestinians” during the entire period of the British mandate. Palestine ceased to exist as a UN protectorate the moment when David Ben Gurion declared Jewish national Independence. Just prior to this declaration of independence 2/3rds of the member states of the UN validated the Jewish right to self determination. Arab propaganda concerning human rights ignores the extermination of Jews in East Jerusalem by Jordan. The Jordanian use of Jewish grave stone for construction purposes. The destruction of Jewish synagogues like the Ramban synagogue in East Jerusalem.

The term Palestinian did not gain prominence particularly after the establishment of the State of Israel in 1948. The KGB and Arafat introduced this propaganda in 1964. Under the leadership of Egyptian born Yasser Arafat, the concept of a distinct Palestinian national identity crystalized. This period marked a significant shift in how the Arab population in Israel and abroad began to articulate their national aspirations. The KGB and other Soviet influences did play a role in shaping narratives around Palestinian identity during the Cold War. Supporting the Palestinian cause, part of broader geopolitical strategies against Western powers and their allies.

Opportunistic Arab leaders employed Arab displacement refugee status as a propaganda ploy. Arab countries expelled more Jewish refugees from virtually all Arab countries than the post war Arab refugees who fled primarily upon the orders of their own Arab leaders. Arab propaganda argues that with the establishment of the Jewish state terminated Zionism. Zionist Israelis argue that as long as Arab states reject Jewish equal rights to self determination in the Middle East, that the vision of Zionism lives and thrives.

Individuals like Sari Nusseibeh and Hanan Ashrawi actively working toward mutual recognition and understanding between Palestinians and Israelis. Their efforts to bridge divides and promote dialogue represent an essential beginning for fostering some type of reconciliation in a complex and longstanding conflict where Israelis (especially after Oct7th 2023 abhor and totally distrust Arab refugee populations) trust one another less that the distance that we can spit against a strong wind.

Sari Nusseibeh, a Palestinian philosopher and former president of Al-Quds University, has consistently advocated for non Intifada coexistence. His willingness to engage with local audiences in Arabic underscores the importance of reaching people where they live within the borders of Israel; using their native language to convey messages of hope and understanding.

Hanan Ashrawi, a prominent Palestinian politician and “human rights activist”, has never denounced Arab feudalism where the elite bask rich from international aid and view the Arab common man as but wards of the UN. The criminal abuses of Arafat’s post Oslo PA rule she never publicly condemned, despite her resignation when Arafat refused to fire corrupt ministers. The total lack of accountability much less transparency resulted in the electoral victory of Hamas in Gaza in the 2006 one and only general election, it definitively proves that Arab civilizations remain stuck in a barbaric feudalism dungeon mentality.

From the rise of Islam during the lifetime of Muhammad and his followers, Arabs have viewed Jews as a dhimmi sub-class of ruled conquered people. For Israel to rule as an Independent nation in the Middle East, this compares to the Christian theology which preached for millenniums that Christ killer Jews cursed with the mark of Cain and forced by the curse of God to wander the Earth as stateless refugee populations. Hence Christian nations which make up a large portion of the UN likewise view Zionism as an abomination to the Will of God!

Nazi racism which hates and detests Zionism serves as solid proof that both Arabs and Christians worship other Gods. The Gods worshipped by these to huge religions compare to the Gods worshipped by the Hindu religion. The worship of these Gods violates the 2nd Sinai Commandment.

The essence of the 2nd Sinai commandment stands upon the commandment which strictly forbids the adoption of the customs, practices, and beliefs from other nations (often referred to as “Goyim” in Hebrew) that fundamentally reject the revelation of the Torah at Sinai. In other words, the purpose of the 2nd Sinai commandment, to maintain the distinctiveness of the Jewish culture & faith by not assimilating unto other alien foreign cultures. An obvious corollary, the Torah strictly forbids the intermarriage with Goyim. A huge yatzir ha’rah among all generations of Jews throughout our history as the chosen Cohen people. Goyim have absolutely no idea of the Cohen spirituality which differentiates between tohor vs. tumah spirits. Both of which live within the hearts of bnai brit Israel.

Christian theology, makes a theological focus upon the prohibition of graven images or idols. This interpretation emphasizes monotheism and the rejection of idolatry. The logical flaw of this Ego I self inflated bubble importance, monotheism negates the second commandment; if their lives only one God, as the Muslim theology dictates, then no reason for the 2nd Sinai commandment. Furthermore, such self-centered Ego I evil eye theology ignores completely the 10 plagues by which the 1st Commandment Name (no where written in either the Christian bible or Muslim koran) judged the Gods worshipped by both Par’o and the Egyptians. It ignores the oath sworn at the brit of Gilgal by which Jehoshua cut an oath brit, that just as did the Spirit Name of the 1st Sinai Commandment judge the Gods of Egypt, so too the Spirit Name would judge the Gods worshipped by the multiple kings and nations within the land of Canaan. The koran and Arafat promoted a propaganda of ‘Greater Israel’. The League of Nations Palestine mandate, awarded to the British, therefore included the lands of present day Jordan, Iraq and Kuwait as part and parcel of the Palestine mandate territories. Therefore the Arab propaganda rhetoric concerning ‘stolen Arab Palestinian land’ – as false as camel milk as kosher as bacon.

This error compares to the perversion of reading the Torah as a history rather than grasping the prophetic visions of mussar; which all prophets command mussar to purify a persons attributes in how that person behaves to both his family and people. Limiting the 2nd Sinai commandment to graven idols and monotheism an oil vs water error only equalled by reading the T’NaCH as actual physical history rather than a prophetic mussar that purifies middot/attributes. And like self-determination applies equally to all living generations of the Jewish people!

Both Christianity and Islam fundamentally and absolutely require a physical historical Jesus. Despite the prophet Balaam’s prophesy that God is not a man. Muhammad elevated the false messiah fictional character Jesus, Roman revisionist history (on par with the Czarist secret police: forgery known as: The Protocols of Elders of Zion), to being a prophet. Yet Muhammad throughout the entire book of the koran failed to define his rhetoric word, repeated over and again from bow to stern: prophet. Muhammad did not know that the Torah defines: prophet, as a person who commands mussar! A fundamental day and night error which exposes the rhetoric of the koran as false.

The Talmud compares to a loom with its warp & weft opposing threads. The Talmud has halacha opposed by aggadah. The kabbalah of Oral Torah logic, as defined by the teachings of rabbi Akiva, this logic system format affixes דרוש\פשט to the prophetic mussar of the T’NaCH Primary sources – as the basis to understand the stories as told in both Aggadah its Midrashic primary commentaries.

Halachic portions of the Talmud align with the רמז\סוד Oral Torah logic system taught in the kabbalah of Rabbi Akiva’s פרדס. This logic system in sharp contrast to the Greek syllogism logic format developed by Aristotle. Rabbi Akiva’s logic format, rooted strictly and only in the study of Torah common law, this logic system weaves the threads of prophetic mussar into the opposing threads of halachic ritualistic practices. Greek logic has absolutely no interest what so ever in understanding T’NaCH/Talmud common law. When Jews during Hanukkah bench after eating a meal, we remember that the Syrian Greeks attempted to cause Israel to abandon and forget the פרדס Oral Torah logic system as taught through the kabbalah of rabbi Akiva’s פרדס system of logic. The Romans murdered rabbi Akiva to achieve the exact same objective.

Greek and Roman statute laws stand in stark contrast with T’NaCH/Talmud common law. Greek logic reduces complex ideas to rigid syllogisms; it give zero understanding of how to make a depth analysis of prophetic mussar common law halachot k’vanna. The two opposing logic systems as distant from one another as oil vs. water. A distinction comparable to learning the 2nd Sinai commandment – not to assimilate and intermarry vs. not to bow down to 3 dimensional idols. This latter avoda zarah directly compares to the limitations made by the Scientific method which requires empirical evidence; or reading the T’NaCH as actual historical events way back when, a long long time ago vs. learning the k’vanna of prophetic mussar as this mussar rebukes a person to enrich and refine his Yatzir middot; how he behaves toward family members and people.

The huge abyss which separates the avoda zarah practices of both Christianity and Islam summarized succinctly by how the Torah vs. how the Christian bible and Muslim koran defines the key term: FAITH. The Torah defines faith as the pursuit of judicial Common law Sanhedrin justice, starting with Moshe standing before the Court of Paro over the matter of beating Hebrew slaves over the matter of not meeting an assigned quota of brick production. Followed by the mussar rebuke of Yetro the father in law of Moshe, that he alone could not actualize justice among all his nation. Christianity and Islam stand on the opposing side of this huge abyss. They both define faith as belief precisely in how their theologians define the creed, personal beliefs in this or that God.

In Judaism, the focus on prophetic mussar (ethical guidance) and the importance of k’vanna (mussar attribute refinement of defined tohor middot) in fulfilling commandments highlights a deep, introspective approach to religious practice. This contrasts with the more historical and literal – meaning flat 2 dimensional interpretations which define Christianity and Islam. The classic example of such shallow nonsense: God created the world in 6 days and rested on the 7th sterile biblical literalism. The distinction between halacha (ritual common law) and aggadah (mussar common law) in the Talmud, and the use of different logic systems, such as Rabbi Akiva’s kabbalistic approach versus Greek syllogism, further illustrate the unique methodologies within Jewish thought.

A Constitutional Republic stands upon Justice

How does Zionism separate Judaism from Christianity & Islam? The Torah Constitutional Republic stands upon Justice

Arabs employ a load of rhetoric to justify their Nazi racism. They label Zionism as European colonialism, Zionism as a Crusader state, regardless that Ben Gurion and Menachem Begin made war on Britain following the 2nd White Paper which betrayed the Balfour Declaration agreement of 1917. There biggest propaganda lie to justify their Nazi racism: stolen Palestinian lands. Regardless that Palestine existed as a Post WWI League of Nations award of the Ottoman empire spoils of war to the British and French! That the moment Britain returned the League mandate protectorate back to the UN, coupled with the declaration of Independence by the Jewish state named Israel, Palestine as a UN mandate territory ceased to exist.

Nazi racism not limited to Arab & Muslims. The UN GAR slandered Israel by the slogan: Zionism is Racism. Furthermore the UN refuses to recognize Israel as an Independent nation in the Middle East. This Apartheid UN Nazi racism applied strictly and only to the Jews of the Jewish state of Israel. No different than the Dreyfus Affair antisemites who rejected the idea of Jewish equality to French citizenship in the 1880s & the Russian pogroms which expelled millions of Jews during this same time.

During World War II, some Arab leaders, notably Hajj Amin al-Husseini, the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, collaborated with Nazi Germany. Al-Husseini sought to align Arab nationalist aspirations with Nazi goals, particularly against British colonial rule and Jewish immigration to Palestine. He broadcast anti-Jewish propaganda and called for Arab uprisings against the Allies, framing the struggle in terms of a shared opposition to Jewish influence

The slogan “Zionism is Racism,” adopted by the UN General Assembly in 1975 and later revoked in 1991, reflects the intense and polarized views on this issue. The concept of dhimmi status in Islamic history and the theological views within Christianity regarding Jews have also played significant roles in shaping attitudes towards Israel. The intersection of religion, politics, and history makes this a highly sensitive and multifaceted post Shoah topic. The assertion that Arab opposition to Zionism is solely rooted in a rejection of Jewish self-determination a defining point of contention.

The Arab wars of 1948 and 1967, a sensitive and complex topic. Both conflicts centered on the Jewish people and their right to exist in the Middle East. The Nazi Shoah driven by a genocidal ideology explicitly seeking the extermination of the Jewish people. Arab leaders during the 1948 and 1967 wars aimed to prevent the establishment and existence of the State of Israel, using military action to achieve their goals. Some attempt to justify racist Arab Nazism as but merely rhetoric propaganda. But post Shoah, merely 3 years later, Jewry did not at the time possess the pleasant luxury to minimize the declarations publicly made by Nasser and other Arab leaders which Goyim blithely make after the Arabs suffered defeat. The 3 Nos Khartoum Resolution definitively proves that Israel has an obligation to take racist Arab Nazism at face value.

Zionism advocates for Jewish self-determination, many Arabs view the establishment of Israel as a denial of their own rights to self-determination, particularly for Palestinians. Arabs never referred to themselves as “Palestinians” during the entire period of the British mandate. Palestine ceased to exist as a UN protectorate the moment when David Ben Gurion declared Jewish national Independence. Just prior to this declaration of independence 2/3rds of the member states of the UN validated the Jewish right to self determination. Arab propaganda concerning human rights ignores the extermination of Jews in East Jerusalem by Jordan. The Jordanian use of Jewish grave stone for construction purposes. The destruction of Jewish synagogues like the Ramban synagogue in East Jerusalem.

The term Palestinian did not gain prominence particularly after the establishment of the State of Israel in 1948. The KGB and Arafat introduced this propaganda in 1964. Under the leadership of Egyptian born Yasser Arafat, the concept of a distinct Palestinian national identity crystalized. This period marked a significant shift in how the Arab population in Israel and abroad began to articulate their national aspirations. The KGB and other Soviet influences did play a role in shaping narratives around Palestinian identity during the Cold War. Supporting the Palestinian cause, part of broader geopolitical strategies against Western powers and their allies.

Opportunistic Arab leaders employed Arab displacement refugee status as a propaganda ploy. Arab countries expelled more Jewish refugees from virtually all Arab countries than the post war Arab refugees who fled primarily upon the orders of their own Arab leaders. Arab propaganda argues that with the establishment of the Jewish state terminated Zionism. Zionist Israelis argue that as long as Arab states reject Jewish equal rights to self determination in the Middle East, that the vision of Zionism lives and thrives.

Individuals like Sari Nusseibeh and Hanan Ashrawi actively working toward mutual recognition and understanding between Palestinians and Israelis. Their efforts to bridge divides and promote dialogue represent an essential beginning for fostering some type of reconciliation in a complex and longstanding conflict where Israelis (especially after Oct7th 2023 abhor and totally distrust Arab refugee populations) trust one another less that the distance that we can spit against a strong wind.

Sari Nusseibeh, a Palestinian philosopher and former president of Al-Quds University, has consistently advocated for non Intifada coexistence. His willingness to engage with local audiences in Arabic underscores the importance of reaching people where they live within the borders of Israel; using their native language to convey messages of hope and understanding.

Hanan Ashrawi, a prominent Palestinian politician and “human rights activist”, has never denounced Arab feudalism where the elite bask rich from international aid and view the Arab common man as but wards of the UN. The criminal abuses of Arafat’s post Oslo PA rule she never publicly condemned, despite her resignation when Arafat refused to fire corrupt ministers. The total lack of accountability much less transparency resulted in the electoral victory of Hamas in Gaza in the 2006 one and only general election, it definitively proves that Arab civilizations remain stuck in a barbaric feudalism dungeon mentality.

From the rise of Islam during the lifetime of Muhammad and his followers, Arabs have viewed Jews as a dhimmi sub-class of ruled conquered people. For Israel to rule as an Independent nation in the Middle East, this compares to the Christian theology which preached for millenniums that Christ killer Jews cursed with the mark of Cain and forced by the curse of God to wander the Earth as stateless refugee populations. Hence Christian nations which make up a large portion of the UN likewise view Zionism as an abomination to the Will of God!

Nazi racism which hates and detests Zionism serves as solid proof that both Arabs and Christians worship other Gods. The Gods worshipped by these to huge religions compare to the Gods worshipped by the Hindu religion. The worship of these Gods violates the 2nd Sinai Commandment.

The essence of the 2nd Sinai commandment stands upon the commandment which strictly forbids the adoption of the customs, practices, and beliefs from other nations (often referred to as “Goyim” in Hebrew) that fundamentally reject the revelation of the Torah at Sinai. In other words, the purpose of the 2nd Sinai commandment, to maintain the distinctiveness of the Jewish culture & faith by not assimilating unto other alien foreign cultures. An obvious corollary, the Torah strictly forbids the intermarriage with Goyim. A huge yatzir ha’rah among all generations of Jews throughout our history as the chosen Cohen people. Goyim have absolutely no idea of the Cohen spirituality which differentiates between tohor vs. tumah spirits. Both of which live within the hearts of bnai brit Israel.

Christian theology, makes a theological focus upon the prohibition of graven images or idols. This interpretation emphasizes monotheism and the rejection of idolatry. The logical flaw of this Ego I self inflated bubble importance, monotheism negates the second commandment; if their lives only one God, as the Muslim theology dictates, then no reason for the 2nd Sinai commandment. Furthermore, such self-centered Ego I evil eye theology ignores completely the 10 plagues by which the 1st Commandment Name (no where written in either the Christian bible or Muslim koran) judged the Gods worshipped by both Par’o and the Egyptians. It ignores the oath sworn at the brit of Gilgal by which Jehoshua cut an oath brit, that just as did the Spirit Name of the 1st Sinai Commandment judge the Gods of Egypt, so too the Spirit Name would judge the Gods worshipped by the multiple kings and nations within the land of Canaan. The koran and Arafat promoted a propaganda of ‘Greater Israel’. The League of Nations Palestine mandate, awarded to the British, therefore included the lands of present day Jordan, Iraq and Kuwait as part and parcel of the Palestine mandate territories. Therefore the Arab propaganda rhetoric concerning ‘stolen Arab Palestinian land’ – as false as camel milk as kosher as bacon.

This error compares to the perversion of reading the Torah as a history rather than grasping the prophetic visions of mussar; which all prophets command mussar to purify a persons attributes in how that person behaves to both his family and people. Limiting the 2nd Sinai commandment to graven idols and monotheism an oil vs water error only equalled by reading the T’NaCH as actual physical history rather than a prophetic mussar that purifies middot/attributes. And like self-determination applies equally to all living generations of the Jewish people!

Both Christianity and Islam fundamentally and absolutely require a physical historical Jesus. Despite the prophet Balaam’s prophesy that God is not a man. Muhammad elevated the false messiah fictional character Jesus, Roman revisionist history (on par with the Czarist secret police: forgery known as: The Protocols of Elders of Zion), to being a prophet. Yet Muhammad throughout the entire book of the koran failed to define his rhetoric word, repeated over and again from bow to stern: prophet. Muhammad did not know that the Torah defines: prophet, as a person who commands mussar! A fundamental day and night error which exposes the rhetoric of the koran as false.

The Talmud compares to a loom with its warp & weft opposing threads. The Talmud has halacha opposed by aggadah. The kabbalah of Oral Torah logic, as defined by the teachings of rabbi Akiva, this logic system format affixes דרוש\פשט to the prophetic mussar of the T’NaCH Primary sources – as the basis to understand the stories as told in both Aggadah its Midrashic primary commentaries.

Halachic portions of the Talmud align with the רמז\סוד Oral Torah logic system taught in the kabbalah of Rabbi Akiva’s פרדס. This logic system in sharp contrast to the Greek syllogism logic format developed by Aristotle. Rabbi Akiva’s logic format, rooted strictly and only in the study of Torah common law, this logic system weaves the threads of prophetic mussar into the opposing threads of halachic ritualistic practices. Greek logic has absolutely no interest what so ever in understanding T’NaCH/Talmud common law. When Jews during Hanukkah bench after eating a meal, we remember that the Syrian Greeks attempted to cause Israel to abandon and forget the פרדס Oral Torah logic system as taught through the kabbalah of rabbi Akiva’s פרדס system of logic. The Romans murdered rabbi Akiva to achieve the exact same objective.

Greek and Roman statute laws stand in stark contrast with T’NaCH/Talmud common law. Greek logic reduces complex ideas to rigid syllogisms; it give zero understanding of how to make a depth analysis of prophetic mussar common law halachot k’vanna. The two opposing logic systems as distant from one another as oil vs. water. A distinction comparable to learning the 2nd Sinai commandment – not to assimilate and intermarry vs. not to bow down to 3 dimensional idols. This latter avoda zarah directly compares to the limitations made by the Scientific method which requires empirical evidence; or reading the T’NaCH as actual historical events way back when, a long long time ago vs. learning the k’vanna of prophetic mussar as this mussar rebukes a person to enrich and refine his Yatzir middot; how he behaves toward family members and people.

The huge abyss which separates the avoda zarah practices of both Christianity and Islam summarized succinctly by how the Torah vs. how the Christian bible and Muslim koran defines the key term: FAITH. The Torah defines faith as the pursuit of judicial Common law Sanhedrin justice, starting with Moshe standing before the Court of Paro over the matter of beating Hebrew slaves over the matter of not meeting an assigned quota of brick production. Followed by the mussar rebuke of Yetro the father in law of Moshe, that he alone could not actualize justice among all his nation. Christianity and Islam stand on the opposing side of this huge abyss. They both define faith as belief precisely in how their theologians define the creed, personal beliefs in this or that God.

In Judaism, the focus on prophetic mussar (ethical guidance) and the importance of k’vanna (mussar attribute refinement of defined tohor middot) in fulfilling commandments highlights a deep, introspective approach to religious practice. This contrasts with the more historical and literal – meaning flat 2 dimensional interpretations which define Christianity and Islam. The classic example of such shallow nonsense: God created the world in 6 days and rested on the 7th sterile biblical literalism. The distinction between halacha (ritual common law) and aggadah (mussar common law) in the Talmud, and the use of different logic systems, such as Rabbi Akiva’s kabbalistic approach versus Greek syllogism, further illustrate the unique methodologies within Jewish thought.

The Torah Constitutional Republic stands upon Justice

How does Zionism separate Judaism from Christianity & Islam? The Torah Constitutional Republic stands upon Justice

Arabs employ a load of rhetoric to justify their Nazi racism. They label Zionism as European colonialism, Zionism as a Crusader state, regardless that Ben Gurion and Menachem Begin made war on Britain following the 2nd White Paper which betrayed the Balfour Declaration agreement of 1917. There biggest propaganda lie to justify their Nazi racism: stolen Palestinian lands. Regardless that Palestine existed as a Post WWI League of Nations award of the Ottoman empire spoils of war to the British and French! That the moment Britain returned the League mandate protectorate back to the UN, coupled with the declaration of Independence by the Jewish state named Israel, Palestine as a UN mandate territory ceased to exist.

Nazi racism not limited to Arab & Muslims. The UN GAR slandered Israel by the slogan: Zionism is Racism. Furthermore the UN refuses to recognize Israel as an Independent nation in the Middle East. This Apartheid UN Nazi racism applied strictly and only to the Jews of the Jewish state of Israel. No different than the Dreyfus Affair antisemites who rejected the idea of Jewish equality to French citizenship in the 1880s & the Russian pogroms which expelled millions of Jews during this same time.

During World War II, some Arab leaders, notably Hajj Amin al-Husseini, the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, collaborated with Nazi Germany. Al-Husseini sought to align Arab nationalist aspirations with Nazi goals, particularly against British colonial rule and Jewish immigration to Palestine. He broadcast anti-Jewish propaganda and called for Arab uprisings against the Allies, framing the struggle in terms of a shared opposition to Jewish influence

The slogan “Zionism is Racism,” adopted by the UN General Assembly in 1975 and later revoked in 1991, reflects the intense and polarized views on this issue. The concept of dhimmi status in Islamic history and the theological views within Christianity regarding Jews have also played significant roles in shaping attitudes towards Israel. The intersection of religion, politics, and history makes this a highly sensitive and multifaceted post Shoah topic. The assertion that Arab opposition to Zionism is solely rooted in a rejection of Jewish self-determination a defining point of contention.

The Arab wars of 1948 and 1967, a sensitive and complex topic. Both conflicts centered on the Jewish people and their right to exist in the Middle East. The Nazi Shoah driven by a genocidal ideology explicitly seeking the extermination of the Jewish people. Arab leaders during the 1948 and 1967 wars aimed to prevent the establishment and existence of the State of Israel, using military action to achieve their goals. Some attempt to justify racist Arab Nazism as but merely rhetoric propaganda. But post Shoah, merely 3 years later, Jewry did not at the time possess the pleasant luxury to minimize the declarations publicly made by Nasser and other Arab leaders which Goyim blithely make after the Arabs suffered defeat. The 3 Nos Khartoum Resolution definitively proves that Israel has an obligation to take racist Arab Nazism at face value.

Zionism advocates for Jewish self-determination, many Arabs view the establishment of Israel as a denial of their own rights to self-determination, particularly for Palestinians. Arabs never referred to themselves as “Palestinians” during the entire period of the British mandate. Palestine ceased to exist as a UN protectorate the moment when David Ben Gurion declared Jewish national Independence. Just prior to this declaration of independence 2/3rds of the member states of the UN validated the Jewish right to self determination. Arab propaganda concerning human rights ignores the extermination of Jews in East Jerusalem by Jordan. The Jordanian use of Jewish grave stone for construction purposes. The destruction of Jewish synagogues like the Ramban synagogue in East Jerusalem.

The term Palestinian did not gain prominence particularly after the establishment of the State of Israel in 1948. The KGB and Arafat introduced this propaganda in 1964. Under the leadership of Egyptian born Yasser Arafat, the concept of a distinct Palestinian national identity crystalized. This period marked a significant shift in how the Arab population in Israel and abroad began to articulate their national aspirations. The KGB and other Soviet influences did play a role in shaping narratives around Palestinian identity during the Cold War. Supporting the Palestinian cause, part of broader geopolitical strategies against Western powers and their allies.

Opportunistic Arab leaders employed Arab displacement refugee status as a propaganda ploy. Arab countries expelled more Jewish refugees from virtually all Arab countries than the post war Arab refugees who fled primarily upon the orders of their own Arab leaders. Arab propaganda argues that with the establishment of the Jewish state terminated Zionism. Zionist Israelis argue that as long as Arab states reject Jewish equal rights to self determination in the Middle East, that the vision of Zionism lives and thrives.

Individuals like Sari Nusseibeh and Hanan Ashrawi actively working toward mutual recognition and understanding between Palestinians and Israelis. Their efforts to bridge divides and promote dialogue represent an essential beginning for fostering some type of reconciliation in a complex and longstanding conflict where Israelis (especially after Oct7th 2023 abhor and totally distrust Arab refugee populations) trust one another less that the distance that we can spit against a strong wind.

Sari Nusseibeh, a Palestinian philosopher and former president of Al-Quds University, has consistently advocated for non Intifada coexistence. His willingness to engage with local audiences in Arabic underscores the importance of reaching people where they live within the borders of Israel; using their native language to convey messages of hope and understanding.

Hanan Ashrawi, a prominent Palestinian politician and “human rights activist”, has never denounced Arab feudalism where the elite bask rich from international aid and view the Arab common man as but wards of the UN. The criminal abuses of Arafat’s post Oslo PA rule she never publicly condemned, despite her resignation when Arafat refused to fire corrupt ministers. The total lack of accountability much less transparency resulted in the electoral victory of Hamas in Gaza in the 2006 one and only general election, it definitively proves that Arab civilizations remain stuck in a barbaric feudalism dungeon mentality.

From the rise of Islam during the lifetime of Muhammad and his followers, Arabs have viewed Jews as a dhimmi sub-class of ruled conquered people. For Israel to rule as an Independent nation in the Middle East, this compares to the Christian theology which preached for millenniums that Christ killer Jews cursed with the mark of Cain and forced by the curse of God to wander the Earth as stateless refugee populations. Hence Christian nations which make up a large portion of the UN likewise view Zionism as an abomination to the Will of God!

Nazi racism which hates and detests Zionism serves as solid proof that both Arabs and Christians worship other Gods. The Gods worshipped by these to huge religions compare to the Gods worshipped by the Hindu religion. The worship of these Gods violates the 2nd Sinai Commandment.

The essence of the 2nd Sinai commandment stands upon the commandment which strictly forbids the adoption of the customs, practices, and beliefs from other nations (often referred to as “Goyim” in Hebrew) that fundamentally reject the revelation of the Torah at Sinai. In other words, the purpose of the 2nd Sinai commandment, to maintain the distinctiveness of the Jewish culture & faith by not assimilating unto other alien foreign cultures. An obvious corollary, the Torah strictly forbids the intermarriage with Goyim. A huge yatzir ha’rah among all generations of Jews throughout our history as the chosen Cohen people. Goyim have absolutely no idea of the Cohen spirituality which differentiates between tohor vs. tumah spirits. Both of which live within the hearts of bnai brit Israel.

Christian theology, makes a theological focus upon the prohibition of graven images or idols. This interpretation emphasizes monotheism and the rejection of idolatry. The logical flaw of this Ego I self inflated bubble importance, monotheism negates the second commandment; if their lives only one God, as the Muslim theology dictates, then no reason for the 2nd Sinai commandment. Furthermore, such self-centered Ego I evil eye theology ignores completely the 10 plagues by which the 1st Commandment Name (no where written in either the Christian bible or Muslim koran) judged the Gods worshipped by both Par’o and the Egyptians. It ignores the oath sworn at the brit of Gilgal by which Jehoshua cut an oath brit, that just as did the Spirit Name of the 1st Sinai Commandment judge the Gods of Egypt, so too the Spirit Name would judge the Gods worshipped by the multiple kings and nations within the land of Canaan. The koran and Arafat promoted a propaganda of ‘Greater Israel’. The League of Nations Palestine mandate, awarded to the British, therefore included the lands of present day Jordan, Iraq and Kuwait as part and parcel of the Palestine mandate territories. Therefore the Arab propaganda rhetoric concerning ‘stolen Arab Palestinian land’ – as false as camel milk as kosher as bacon.

This error compares to the perversion of reading the Torah as a history rather than grasping the prophetic visions of mussar; which all prophets command mussar to purify a persons attributes in how that person behaves to both his family and people. Limiting the 2nd Sinai commandment to graven idols and monotheism an oil vs water error only equalled by reading the T’NaCH as actual physical history rather than a prophetic mussar that purifies middot/attributes. And like self-determination applies equally to all living generations of the Jewish people!

Both Christianity and Islam fundamentally and absolutely require a physical historical Jesus. Despite the prophet Balaam’s prophesy that God is not a man. Muhammad elevated the false messiah fictional character Jesus, Roman revisionist history (on par with the Czarist secret police: forgery known as: The Protocols of Elders of Zion), to being a prophet. Yet Muhammad throughout the entire book of the koran failed to define his rhetoric word, repeated over and again from bow to stern: prophet. Muhammad did not know that the Torah defines: prophet, as a person who commands mussar! A fundamental day and night error which exposes the rhetoric of the koran as false.

The Talmud compares to a loom with its warp & weft opposing threads. The Talmud has halacha opposed by aggadah. The kabbalah of Oral Torah logic, as defined by the teachings of rabbi Akiva, this logic system format affixes דרוש\פשט to the prophetic mussar of the T’NaCH Primary sources – as the basis to understand the stories as told in both Aggadah its Midrashic primary commentaries.

Halachic portions of the Talmud align with the רמז\סוד Oral Torah logic system taught in the kabbalah of Rabbi Akiva’s פרדס. This logic system in sharp contrast to the Greek syllogism logic format developed by Aristotle. Rabbi Akiva’s logic format, rooted strictly and only in the study of Torah common law, this logic system weaves the threads of prophetic mussar into the opposing threads of halachic ritualistic practices. Greek logic has absolutely no interest what so ever in understanding T’NaCH/Talmud common law. When Jews during Hanukkah bench after eating a meal, we remember that the Syrian Greeks attempted to cause Israel to abandon and forget the פרדס Oral Torah logic system as taught through the kabbalah of rabbi Akiva’s פרדס system of logic. The Romans murdered rabbi Akiva to achieve the exact same objective.

Greek and Roman statute laws stand in stark contrast with T’NaCH/Talmud common law. Greek logic reduces complex ideas to rigid syllogisms; it give zero understanding of how to make a depth analysis of prophetic mussar common law halachot k’vanna. The two opposing logic systems as distant from one another as oil vs. water. A distinction comparable to learning the 2nd Sinai commandment – not to assimilate and intermarry vs. not to bow down to 3 dimensional idols. This latter avoda zarah directly compares to the limitations made by the Scientific method which requires empirical evidence; or reading the T’NaCH as actual historical events way back when, a long long time ago vs. learning the k’vanna of prophetic mussar as this mussar rebukes a person to enrich and refine his Yatzir middot; how he behaves toward family members and people.

The huge abyss which separates the avoda zarah practices of both Christianity and Islam summarized succinctly by how the Torah vs. how the Christian bible and Muslim koran defines the key term: FAITH. The Torah defines faith as the pursuit of judicial Common law Sanhedrin justice, starting with Moshe standing before the Court of Paro over the matter of beating Hebrew slaves over the matter of not meeting an assigned quota of brick production. Followed by the mussar rebuke of Yetro the father in law of Moshe, that he alone could not actualize justice among all his nation. Christianity and Islam stand on the opposing side of this huge abyss. They both define faith as belief precisely in how their theologians define the creed, personal beliefs in this or that God.

In Judaism, the focus on prophetic mussar (ethical guidance) and the importance of k’vanna (mussar attribute refinement of defined tohor middot) in fulfilling commandments highlights a deep, introspective approach to religious practice. This contrasts with the more historical and literal – meaning flat 2 dimensional interpretations which define Christianity and Islam. The classic example of such shallow nonsense: God created the world in 6 days and rested on the 7th sterile biblical literalism. The distinction between halacha (ritual common law) and aggadah (mussar common law) in the Talmud, and the use of different logic systems, such as Rabbi Akiva’s kabbalistic approach versus Greek syllogism, further illustrate the unique methodologies within Jewish thought.

The Torah Republic stands upon Justice.

How does Zionism separate Judaism from Christianity & Islam?

Arabs employ a load of rhetoric to justify their Nazi racism. They label Zionism as European colonialism, Zionism as a Crusader state, regardless that Ben Gurion and Menachem Begin made war on Britain following the 2nd White Paper which betrayed the Balfour Declaration agreement of 1917. There biggest propaganda lie to justify their Nazi racism: stolen Palestinian lands. Regardless that Palestine existed as a Post WWI League of Nations award of the Ottoman empire spoils of war to the British and French! That the moment Britain returned the League mandate protectorate back to the UN, coupled with the declaration of Independence by the Jewish state named Israel, Palestine as a UN mandate territory ceased to exist.

Nazi racism not limited to Arab & Muslims. The UN GAR slandered Israel by the slogan: Zionism is Racism. Furthermore the UN refuses to recognize Israel as an Independent nation in the Middle East. This Apartheid UN Nazi racism applied strictly and only to the Jews of the Jewish state of Israel. No different than the Dreyfus Affair antisemites who rejected the idea of Jewish equality to French citizenship in the 1880s & the Russian pogroms which expelled millions of Jews during this same time.

During World War II, some Arab leaders, notably Hajj Amin al-Husseini, the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, collaborated with Nazi Germany. Al-Husseini sought to align Arab nationalist aspirations with Nazi goals, particularly against British colonial rule and Jewish immigration to Palestine. He broadcast anti-Jewish propaganda and called for Arab uprisings against the Allies, framing the struggle in terms of a shared opposition to Jewish influence

The slogan “Zionism is Racism,” adopted by the UN General Assembly in 1975 and later revoked in 1991, reflects the intense and polarized views on this issue. The concept of dhimmi status in Islamic history and the theological views within Christianity regarding Jews have also played significant roles in shaping attitudes towards Israel. The intersection of religion, politics, and history makes this a highly sensitive and multifaceted post Shoah topic. The assertion that Arab opposition to Zionism is solely rooted in a rejection of Jewish self-determination a defining point of contention.

The Arab wars of 1948 and 1967, a sensitive and complex topic. Both conflicts centered on the Jewish people and their right to exist in the Middle East. The Nazi Shoah driven by a genocidal ideology explicitly seeking the extermination of the Jewish people. Arab leaders during the 1948 and 1967 wars aimed to prevent the establishment and existence of the State of Israel, using military action to achieve their goals. Some attempt to justify racist Arab Nazism as but merely rhetoric propaganda. But post Shoah, merely 3 years later, Jewry did not at the time possess the pleasant luxury to minimize the declarations publicly made by Nasser and other Arab leaders which Goyim blithely make after the Arabs suffered defeat. The 3 Nos Khartoum Resolution definitively proves that Israel has an obligation to take racist Arab Nazism at face value.

Zionism advocates for Jewish self-determination, many Arabs view the establishment of Israel as a denial of their own rights to self-determination, particularly for Palestinians. Arabs never referred to themselves as “Palestinians” during the entire period of the British mandate. Palestine ceased to exist as a UN protectorate the moment when David Ben Gurion declared Jewish national Independence. Just prior to this declaration of independence 2/3rds of the member states of the UN validated the Jewish right to self determination. Arab propaganda concerning human rights ignores the extermination of Jews in East Jerusalem by Jordan. The Jordanian use of Jewish grave stone for construction purposes. The destruction of Jewish synagogues like the Ramban synagogue in East Jerusalem.

The term Palestinian did not gain prominence particularly after the establishment of the State of Israel in 1948. The KGB and Arafat introduced this propaganda in 1964. Under the leadership of Egyptian born Yasser Arafat, the concept of a distinct Palestinian national identity crystalized. This period marked a significant shift in how the Arab population in Israel and abroad began to articulate their national aspirations. The KGB and other Soviet influences did play a role in shaping narratives around Palestinian identity during the Cold War. Supporting the Palestinian cause, part of broader geopolitical strategies against Western powers and their allies.

Opportunistic Arab leaders employed Arab displacement refugee status as a propaganda ploy. Arab countries expelled more Jewish refugees from virtually all Arab countries than the post war Arab refugees who fled primarily upon the orders of their own Arab leaders. Arab propaganda argues that with the establishment of the Jewish state terminated Zionism. Zionist Israelis argue that as long as Arab states reject Jewish equal rights to self determination in the Middle East, that the vision of Zionism lives and thrives.

Individuals like Sari Nusseibeh and Hanan Ashrawi actively working toward mutual recognition and understanding between Palestinians and Israelis. Their efforts to bridge divides and promote dialogue represent an essential beginning for fostering some type of reconciliation in a complex and longstanding conflict where Israelis (especially after Oct7th 2023 abhor and totally distrust Arab refugee populations) trust one another less that the distance that we can spit against a strong wind.

Sari Nusseibeh, a Palestinian philosopher and former president of Al-Quds University, has consistently advocated for non Intifada coexistence. His willingness to engage with local audiences in Arabic underscores the importance of reaching people where they live within the borders of Israel; using their native language to convey messages of hope and understanding.

Hanan Ashrawi, a prominent Palestinian politician and “human rights activist”, has never denounced Arab feudalism where the elite bask rich from international aid and view the Arab common man as but wards of the UN. The criminal abuses of Arafat’s post Oslo PA rule she never publicly condemned, despite her resignation when Arafat refused to fire corrupt ministers. The total lack of accountability much less transparency resulted in the electoral victory of Hamas in Gaza in the 2006 one and only general election, it definitively proves that Arab civilizations remain stuck in a barbaric feudalism dungeon mentality.

From the rise of Islam during the lifetime of Muhammad and his followers, Arabs have viewed Jews as a dhimmi sub-class of ruled conquered people. For Israel to rule as an Independent nation in the Middle East, this compares to the Christian theology which preached for millenniums that Christ killer Jews cursed with the mark of Cain and forced by the curse of God to wander the Earth as stateless refugee populations. Hence Christian nations which make up a large portion of the UN likewise view Zionism as an abomination to the Will of God!

Nazi racism which hates and detests Zionism serves as solid proof that both Arabs and Christians worship other Gods. The Gods worshipped by these to huge religions compare to the Gods worshipped by the Hindu religion. The worship of these Gods violates the 2nd Sinai Commandment.

The essence of the 2nd Sinai commandment stands upon the commandment which strictly forbids the adoption of the customs, practices, and beliefs from other nations (often referred to as “Goyim” in Hebrew) that fundamentally reject the revelation of the Torah at Sinai. In other words, the purpose of the 2nd Sinai commandment, to maintain the distinctiveness of the Jewish culture & faith by not assimilating unto other alien foreign cultures. An obvious corollary, the Torah strictly forbids the intermarriage with Goyim. A huge yatzir ha’rah among all generations of Jews throughout our history as the chosen Cohen people. Goyim have absolutely no idea of the Cohen spirituality which differentiates between tohor vs. tumah spirits. Both of which live within the hearts of bnai brit Israel.

Christian theology, makes a theological focus upon the prohibition of graven images or idols. This interpretation emphasizes monotheism and the rejection of idolatry. The logical flaw of this Ego I self inflated bubble importance, monotheism negates the second commandment; if their lives only one God, as the Muslim theology dictates, then no reason for the 2nd Sinai commandment. Furthermore, such self-centered Ego I evil eye theology ignores completely the 10 plagues by which the 1st Commandment Name (no where written in either the Christian bible or Muslim koran) judged the Gods worshipped by both Par’o and the Egyptians. It ignores the oath sworn at the brit of Gilgal by which Jehoshua cut an oath brit, that just as did the Spirit Name of the 1st Sinai Commandment judge the Gods of Egypt, so too the Spirit Name would judge the Gods worshipped by the multiple kings and nations within the land of Canaan. The koran and Arafat promoted a propaganda of ‘Greater Israel’. The League of Nations Palestine mandate, awarded to the British, therefore included the lands of present day Jordan, Iraq and Kuwait as part and parcel of the Palestine mandate territories. Therefore the Arab propaganda rhetoric concerning ‘stolen Arab Palestinian land’ – as false as camel milk as kosher as bacon.

This error compares to the perversion of reading the Torah as a history rather than grasping the prophetic visions of mussar; which all prophets command mussar to purify a persons attributes in how that person behaves to both his family and people. Limiting the 2nd Sinai commandment to graven idols and monotheism an oil vs water error only equalled by reading the T’NaCH as actual physical history rather than a prophetic mussar that purifies middot/attributes. And like self-determination applies equally to all living generations of the Jewish people!

Both Christianity and Islam fundamentally and absolutely require a physical historical Jesus. Despite the prophet Balaam’s prophesy that God is not a man. Muhammad elevated the false messiah fictional character Jesus, Roman revisionist history (on par with the Czarist secret police: forgery known as: The Protocols of Elders of Zion), to being a prophet. Yet Muhammad throughout the entire book of the koran failed to define his rhetoric word, repeated over and again from bow to stern: prophet. Muhammad did not know that the Torah defines: prophet, as a person who commands mussar! A fundamental day and night error which exposes the rhetoric of the koran as false.

The Talmud compares to a loom with its warp & weft opposing threads. The Talmud has halacha opposed by aggadah. The kabbalah of Oral Torah logic, as defined by the teachings of rabbi Akiva, this logic system format affixes דרוש\פשט to the prophetic mussar of the T’NaCH Primary sources – as the basis to understand the stories as told in both Aggadah its Midrashic primary commentaries.

Halachic portions of the Talmud align with the רמז\סוד Oral Torah logic system taught in the kabbalah of Rabbi Akiva’s פרדס. This logic system in sharp contrast to the Greek syllogism logic format developed by Aristotle. Rabbi Akiva’s logic format, rooted strictly and only in the study of Torah common law, this logic system weaves the threads of prophetic mussar into the opposing threads of halachic ritualistic practices. Greek logic has absolutely no interest what so ever in understanding T’NaCH/Talmud common law. When Jews during Hanukkah bench after eating a meal, we remember that the Syrian Greeks attempted to cause Israel to abandon and forget the פרדס Oral Torah logic system as taught through the kabbalah of rabbi Akiva’s פרדס system of logic. The Romans murdered rabbi Akiva to achieve the exact same objective.

Greek and Roman statute laws stand in stark contrast with T’NaCH/Talmud common law. Greek logic reduces complex ideas to rigid syllogisms; it give zero understanding of how to make a depth analysis of prophetic mussar common law halachot k’vanna. The two opposing logic systems as distant from one another as oil vs. water. A distinction comparable to learning the 2nd Sinai commandment – not to assimilate and intermarry vs. not to bow down to 3 dimensional idols. This latter avoda zarah directly compares to the limitations made by the Scientific method which requires empirical evidence; or reading the T’NaCH as actual historical events way back when, a long long time ago vs. learning the k’vanna of prophetic mussar as this mussar rebukes a person to enrich and refine his Yatzir middot; how he behaves toward family members and people.

The huge abyss which separates the avoda zarah practices of both Christianity and Islam summarized succinctly by how the Torah vs. how the Christian bible and Muslim koran defines the key term: FAITH. The Torah defines faith as the pursuit of judicial Common law Sanhedrin justice, starting with Moshe standing before the Court of Paro over the matter of beating Hebrew slaves over the matter of not meeting an assigned quota of brick production. Followed by the mussar rebuke of Yetro the father in law of Moshe, that he alone could not actualize justice among all his nation. Christianity and Islam stand on the opposing side of this huge abyss. They both define faith as belief precisely in how their theologians define the creed, personal beliefs in this or that God.

In Judaism, the focus on prophetic mussar (ethical guidance) and the importance of k’vanna (mussar attribute refinement of defined tohor middot) in fulfilling commandments highlights a deep, introspective approach to religious practice. This contrasts with the more historical and literal – meaning flat 2 dimensional interpretations which define Christianity and Islam. The classic example of such shallow nonsense: God created the world in 6 days and rested on the 7th sterile biblical literalism. The distinction between halacha (ritual common law) and aggadah (mussar common law) in the Talmud, and the use of different logic systems, such as Rabbi Akiva’s kabbalistic approach versus Greek syllogism, further illustrate the unique methodologies within Jewish thought.

The Constitutional Republic and Common Law Courtrooms

How does Zionism separate Judaism from Christianity & Islam?

Arabs employ a load of rhetoric to justify their Nazi racism. They label Zionism as European colonialism, Zionism as a Crusader state, regardless that Ben Gurion and Menachem Begin made war on Britain following the 2nd White Paper which betrayed the Balfour Declaration agreement of 1917. There biggest propaganda lie to justify their Nazi racism: stolen Palestinian lands. Regardless that Palestine existed as a Post WWI League of Nations award of the Ottoman empire spoils of war to the British and French! That the moment Britain returned the League mandate protectorate back to the UN, coupled with the declaration of Independence by the Jewish state named Israel, Palestine as a UN mandate territory ceased to exist.

Nazi racism not limited to Arab & Muslims. The UN GAR slandered Israel by the slogan: Zionism is Racism. Furthermore the UN refuses to recognize Israel as an Independent nation in the Middle East. This Apartheid UN Nazi racism applied strictly and only to the Jews of the Jewish state of Israel. No different than the Dreyfus Affair antisemites who rejected the idea of Jewish equality to French citizenship in the 1880s & the Russian pogroms which expelled millions of Jews during this same time.

During World War II, some Arab leaders, notably Hajj Amin al-Husseini, the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, collaborated with Nazi Germany. Al-Husseini sought to align Arab nationalist aspirations with Nazi goals, particularly against British colonial rule and Jewish immigration to Palestine. He broadcast anti-Jewish propaganda and called for Arab uprisings against the Allies, framing the struggle in terms of a shared opposition to Jewish influence

The slogan “Zionism is Racism,” adopted by the UN General Assembly in 1975 and later revoked in 1991, reflects the intense and polarized views on this issue. The concept of dhimmi status in Islamic history and the theological views within Christianity regarding Jews have also played significant roles in shaping attitudes towards Israel. The intersection of religion, politics, and history makes this a highly sensitive and multifaceted post Shoah topic. The assertion that Arab opposition to Zionism is solely rooted in a rejection of Jewish self-determination a defining point of contention.

The Arab wars of 1948 and 1967, a sensitive and complex topic. Both conflicts centered on the Jewish people and their right to exist in the Middle East. The Nazi Shoah driven by a genocidal ideology explicitly seeking the extermination of the Jewish people. Arab leaders during the 1948 and 1967 wars aimed to prevent the establishment and existence of the State of Israel, using military action to achieve their goals. Some attempt to justify racist Arab Nazism as but merely rhetoric propaganda. But post Shoah, merely 3 years later, Jewry did not at the time possess the pleasant luxury to minimize the declarations publicly made by Nasser and other Arab leaders which Goyim blithely make after the Arabs suffered defeat. The 3 Nos Khartoum Resolution definitively proves that Israel has an obligation to take racist Arab Nazism at face value.

Zionism advocates for Jewish self-determination, many Arabs view the establishment of Israel as a denial of their own rights to self-determination, particularly for Palestinians. Arabs never referred to themselves as “Palestinians” during the entire period of the British mandate. Palestine ceased to exist as a UN protectorate the moment when David Ben Gurion declared Jewish national Independence. Just prior to this declaration of independence 2/3rds of the member states of the UN validated the Jewish right to self determination. Arab propaganda concerning human rights ignores the extermination of Jews in East Jerusalem by Jordan. The Jordanian use of Jewish grave stone for construction purposes. The destruction of Jewish synagogues like the Ramban synagogue in East Jerusalem.

The term Palestinian did not gain prominence particularly after the establishment of the State of Israel in 1948. The KGB and Arafat introduced this propaganda in 1964. Under the leadership of Egyptian born Yasser Arafat, the concept of a distinct Palestinian national identity crystalized. This period marked a significant shift in how the Arab population in Israel and abroad began to articulate their national aspirations. The KGB and other Soviet influences did play a role in shaping narratives around Palestinian identity during the Cold War. Supporting the Palestinian cause, part of broader geopolitical strategies against Western powers and their allies.

Opportunistic Arab leaders employed Arab displacement refugee status as a propaganda ploy. Arab countries expelled more Jewish refugees from virtually all Arab countries than the post war Arab refugees who fled primarily upon the orders of their own Arab leaders. Arab propaganda argues that with the establishment of the Jewish state terminated Zionism. Zionist Israelis argue that as long as Arab states reject Jewish equal rights to self determination in the Middle East, that the vision of Zionism lives and thrives.

Individuals like Sari Nusseibeh and Hanan Ashrawi actively working toward mutual recognition and understanding between Palestinians and Israelis. Their efforts to bridge divides and promote dialogue represent an essential beginning for fostering some type of reconciliation in a complex and longstanding conflict where Israelis (especially after Oct7th 2023 abhor and totally distrust Arab refugee populations) trust one another less that the distance that we can spit against a strong wind.

Sari Nusseibeh, a Palestinian philosopher and former president of Al-Quds University, has consistently advocated for non Intifada coexistence. His willingness to engage with local audiences in Arabic underscores the importance of reaching people where they live within the borders of Israel; using their native language to convey messages of hope and understanding.

Hanan Ashrawi, a prominent Palestinian politician and “human rights activist”, has never denounced Arab feudalism where the elite bask rich from international aid and view the Arab common man as but wards of the UN. The criminal abuses of Arafat’s post Oslo PA rule she never publicly condemned, despite her resignation when Arafat refused to fire corrupt ministers. The total lack of accountability much less transparency resulted in the electoral victory of Hamas in Gaza in the 2006 one and only general election, it definitively proves that Arab civilizations remain stuck in a barbaric feudalism dungeon mentality.

From the rise of Islam during the lifetime of Muhammad and his followers, Arabs have viewed Jews as a dhimmi sub-class of ruled conquered people. For Israel to rule as an Independent nation in the Middle East, this compares to the Christian theology which preached for millenniums that Christ killer Jews cursed with the mark of Cain and forced by the curse of God to wander the Earth as stateless refugee populations. Hence Christian nations which make up a large portion of the UN likewise view Zionism as an abomination to the Will of God!

Nazi racism which hates and detests Zionism serves as solid proof that both Arabs and Christians worship other Gods. The Gods worshipped by these to huge religions compare to the Gods worshipped by the Hindu religion. The worship of these Gods violates the 2nd Sinai Commandment.

The essence of the 2nd Sinai commandment stands upon the commandment which strictly forbids the adoption of the customs, practices, and beliefs from other nations (often referred to as “Goyim” in Hebrew) that fundamentally reject the revelation of the Torah at Sinai. In other words, the purpose of the 2nd Sinai commandment, to maintain the distinctiveness of the Jewish culture & faith by not assimilating unto other alien foreign cultures. An obvious corollary, the Torah strictly forbids the intermarriage with Goyim. A huge yatzir ha’rah among all generations of Jews throughout our history as the chosen Cohen people. Goyim have absolutely no idea of the Cohen spirituality which differentiates between tohor vs. tumah spirits. Both of which live within the hearts of bnai brit Israel.

Christian theology, makes a theological focus upon the prohibition of graven images or idols. This interpretation emphasizes monotheism and the rejection of idolatry. The logical flaw of this Ego I self inflated bubble importance, monotheism negates the second commandment; if their lives only one God, as the Muslim theology dictates, then no reason for the 2nd Sinai commandment. Furthermore, such self-centered Ego I evil eye theology ignores completely the 10 plagues by which the 1st Commandment Name (no where written in either the Christian bible or Muslim koran) judged the Gods worshipped by both Par’o and the Egyptians. It ignores the oath sworn at the brit of Gilgal by which Jehoshua cut an oath brit, that just as did the Spirit Name of the 1st Sinai Commandment judge the Gods of Egypt, so too the Spirit Name would judge the Gods worshipped by the multiple kings and nations within the land of Canaan. The koran and Arafat promoted a propaganda of ‘Greater Israel’. The League of Nations Palestine mandate, awarded to the British, therefore included the lands of present day Jordan, Iraq and Kuwait as part and parcel of the Palestine mandate territories. Therefore the Arab propaganda rhetoric concerning ‘stolen Arab Palestinian land’ – as false as camel milk as kosher as bacon.

This error compares to the perversion of reading the Torah as a history rather than grasping the prophetic visions of mussar; which all prophets command mussar to purify a persons attributes in how that person behaves to both his family and people. Limiting the 2nd Sinai commandment to graven idols and monotheism an oil vs water error only equalled by reading the T’NaCH as actual physical history rather than a prophetic mussar that purifies middot/attributes. And like self-determination applies equally to all living generations of the Jewish people!

Both Christianity and Islam fundamentally and absolutely require a physical historical Jesus. Despite the prophet Balaam’s prophesy that God is not a man. Muhammad elevated the false messiah fictional character Jesus, Roman revisionist history (on par with the Czarist secret police: forgery known as: The Protocols of Elders of Zion), to being a prophet. Yet Muhammad throughout the entire book of the koran failed to define his rhetoric word, repeated over and again from bow to stern: prophet. Muhammad did not know that the Torah defines: prophet, as a person who commands mussar! A fundamental day and night error which exposes the rhetoric of the koran as false.

The Talmud compares to a loom with its warp & weft opposing threads. The Talmud has halacha opposed by aggadah. The kabbalah of Oral Torah logic, as defined by the teachings of rabbi Akiva, this logic system format affixes דרוש\פשט to the prophetic mussar of the T’NaCH Primary sources – as the basis to understand the stories as told in both Aggadah its Midrashic primary commentaries.

Halachic portions of the Talmud align with the רמז\סוד Oral Torah logic system taught in the kabbalah of Rabbi Akiva’s פרדס. This logic system in sharp contrast to the Greek syllogism logic format developed by Aristotle. Rabbi Akiva’s logic format, rooted strictly and only in the study of Torah common law, this logic system weaves the threads of prophetic mussar into the opposing threads of halachic ritualistic practices. Greek logic has absolutely no interest what so ever in understanding T’NaCH/Talmud common law. When Jews during Hanukkah bench after eating a meal, we remember that the Syrian Greeks attempted to cause Israel to abandon and forget the פרדס Oral Torah logic system as taught through the kabbalah of rabbi Akiva’s פרדס system of logic. The Romans murdered rabbi Akiva to achieve the exact same objective.

Greek and Roman statute laws stand in stark contrast with T’NaCH/Talmud common law. Greek logic reduces complex ideas to rigid syllogisms; it give zero understanding of how to make a depth analysis of prophetic mussar common law halachot k’vanna. The two opposing logic systems as distant from one another as oil vs. water. A distinction comparable to learning the 2nd Sinai commandment – not to assimilate and intermarry vs. not to bow down to 3 dimensional idols. This latter avoda zarah directly compares to the limitations made by the Scientific method which requires empirical evidence; or reading the T’NaCH as actual historical events way back when, a long long time ago vs. learning the k’vanna of prophetic mussar as this mussar rebukes a person to enrich and refine his Yatzir middot; how he behaves toward family members and people.

The huge abyss which separates the avoda zarah practices of both Christianity and Islam summarized succinctly by how the Torah vs. how the Christian bible and Muslim koran defines the key term: FAITH. The Torah defines faith as the pursuit of judicial Common law Sanhedrin justice, starting with Moshe standing before the Court of Paro over the matter of beating Hebrew slaves over the matter of not meeting an assigned quota of brick production. Followed by the mussar rebuke of Yetro the father in law of Moshe, that he alone could not actualize justice among all his nation. Christianity and Islam stand on the opposing side of this huge abyss. They both define faith as belief precisely in how their theologians define the creed, personal beliefs in this or that God.

In Judaism, the focus on prophetic mussar (ethical guidance) and the importance of k’vanna (mussar attribute refinement of defined tohor middot) in fulfilling commandments highlights a deep, introspective approach to religious practice. This contrasts with the more historical and literal – meaning flat 2 dimensional interpretations which define Christianity and Islam. The classic example of such shallow nonsense: God created the world in 6 days and rested on the 7th sterile biblical literalism. The distinction between halacha (ritual common law) and aggadah (mussar common law) in the Talmud, and the use of different logic systems, such as Rabbi Akiva’s kabbalistic approach versus Greek syllogism, further illustrate the unique methodologies within Jewish thought.