Category: Uncategorized

Why does the new testament state that the P’rushim turned the temple courtyard into marketplace?

The P’rushim guardians of the revelation of the Oral Torah at Horev; this key masoret they passed down to the rabbis who wrote the Mishna, Gemara, Siddur, and Midrashim ((The Yerushalmi wrote that 427 prophets wrote the Shemone Esrei. There exist 427 words of the 18 blessings of the Shemone Esrei!)).

The concept of ירידות הדורות defined as “domino effect” or “ripple effect”. King Shlomo, just as did his son when he travelled to Sh’Cem, did not listen to Natan the prophet! Natan rejected building a copy cat duplication of a Catholic Cathedral on mount Zion! Avoda Zara might worship wood and stone as Gods but the prophets despised this golden calf substitute theology introduced by Yerovam.

Just as Gulliver’s Travels book of satire mocked the kings of England and France, so too did Mark Twain’s nigger Jim mocked king Shlomo as a complete fool and utter ass. The Book of Kings, written with the concealed intent of political satire, an entertaining idea. A twist upon how Orthodox Jews read their T’NaCH through the lenses of טיפש פשט! Utterly oblivious to the sharp cutting humor of Samuel Langhorne Clemens (1835–1910)! The term “twain” in the context of measuring the depth of a river, an old nautical term that means “two.”

P’rushshim logic requires making the דיוק, similar to the bi-polar logic of Hegel dialectics. A logical inference flips the language upon its head, so to speak, and weighs the opposite. Something like the 3 letter root ק ד ש, serves as the basis for Holy and Prostitute. The Talmud employs the metaphor: 70 faces to the Torah, in this identical sense. Rabbeinu Tam’s common law commentary to the Talmud jumps off the dof of Gemara in search of some other בנין אב/precedent. However, the Baali Tosafot common law commentary — the opposite of the Rambam, Tur statute law which organized halacha into the Greek and Roman custom of subject matter/Aristotle statute law of deductive logic — did not, after viewing the sugya of Gemara from an outside source different perspective, re-introduce this different face to re-interpret the language of how to understand the depth of Mishnaic k’vanna. A serious flaw in the common law commentary of the Baali Tosafots criticism of Rashi’s commentary to the Talmud.

Masechet Sanhedrin, Masechet Yoma, Masechet Zevachim, Masechet Shekalim, Masechet Middot all acknowledge that the Lishkat HaGazit resided within the heart of the Temple. דיוק, which served as the primary avodat HaShem vs which served as the secondary avodat HaShem?! Just as Rechav’am rejected the elder’s advice so too king Shlomo rejected the prophet Natan’s advice not to pursue and copy the Goyim abomination, which worshipped their Gods through wood and stone massive cathedral constructions! Shlomo’s avoda zara began with the construction his temple abomination.

The Capital Crime Case of the two prostitutes, the one accidental killing of her new born child – tried in king Shlomo’s court and not before a small Sanhedrin Capital Crimes Court! The Book of kings states that Shlomo’s foreign wives turned his heart to worship avoda zarah. דיוק at the beginning of his reign king Shlomo worshipped avoda zarah. צדק צדק תרדוף defines the faith of establishing judicial common law courtrooms! The Torah mitzva of the cities of refuge, specifically extended the jurisdiction of the Sanhedrin to conquered new territories. The Yerushalmi dispute between six sages 3 for and 3 against over whether king David established a small sanhedrin in conquered Damascus.

Hence according to the prophets, HaShem never commanded Israel to copy and much less build a massive cathedral worship of avoda zarah. Assimilation and intermarriage with Goyim defines the k’vanna of the 2nd Sinai commandment. ירידות הדורות, not that later generations status inferior to the previous ones. Rather that a respected leader, king Shlomo for example, makes a tremendous error and worships avoda zara, and all the later generations continue down this same path. A domino effect upon all down stream generations! Hence why not use the Herod’s Temple as a common market place?

So Why Did the New Testament Blame the P’rushim?

Because to replace Judaism, Xtianity had to delegitimize: The Oral Torah; The legitimacy of Rabbinic authority; The oath brit legal system (brit mishpat).

By blaming the P’rushim for the Temple’s desecration, the Gospels create an allegorical rupture: Jesus becomes the “true Temple,” and the Jewish court system becomes obsolete. This revisionist history distorts history, based upon the premise that the winners write the history books..

Shlomo and Avodah Zarah: A Pattern of Domino Effect

My emphasis of Shlomo’s error — building a grand Temple and marrying foreign wives — attempts to perhaps make a profound internal critique within Tanakh itself. The Book of Kings becomes, through my interpretation, a kind of biblical satire akin to Mark Twain’s irony — exposing the dangers of political-religious spectacle and assimilation masked as piety.

Yerovam’s calves, Shlomo’s Temple, and later Herod’s expansion, all depicted as golden calf substitutes — architectural avodah zarah.

Hence, the commercialization of the Temple during the fictional Jesus’s day — under Roman-Herodian rule — not a Pharisaic deviation, but a continuation of this assimilationist, imperial spectacle worship which began with Shlomo and culminated in Herod’s architectural vanity project.

Contrast: Pharisaic Sanctity vs. Roman-Temple Corruption

As noted, Masechet Middot, Shekalim, Sanhedrin, and Yoma all detail the sacred architecture, roles, and jurisdiction of the Lishkat HaGazit Great Sanhedrin within the Temple — the Torah-based legal heart which eclipsed the Temple itself. The P’rushim, inheritors of the Sinaitic Masorah, viewed the Beit HaMikdash merely as a building which housed the court of divine justice (mishpat). A spectacle or market, which sold animals used to make barbeques to heaven, simply a Sunday afternoon football game popular with the masses.

The required application of דיוק — legal and logical inferences — exposes how the New Testament’s narrative flips the truth on its head: the very group who preserved the kedushah of Torah, now blamed for profaning it.

New Testament Polemic and Rewriting of the Temple Narrative

The New Testament blames the Temple authorities, frequently conflating Kohanim, P’rushim, and “scribes” (soferim) as a singular corrupt group. However, this represents a rhetorical distortion. Historically: The P’rushim battled with the Temple administrators. The Tzedukim (Sadducees), who rejected the Oral Torah and aligned with Roman power and priestly elitism, controlled the Temple bureaucracy, especially during the Second Temple period. The money changers and sellers operated under the authority of the priesthood, often controlled by Rome-appointed kohanim (e.g., the House of Hanan/Annas).

Thus, blaming the P’rushim for the commercialization of the Temple courtyard, simple revisionist history. Utterly inaccurate but theologically necessary for the New Testament’s super-sessionist agenda. The new testament attempt to redirect moral and prophetic critique away from Roman imperialism and toward internal Jewish traditions, especially Oral Torah, with a hostile objective – aimed to discredit Pharisaic halakha (which would become Rabbinic Judaism); Legitimize the destruction of the Temple as divine punishment; and lastly to position Jesus as the new Temple/High Priest/sacrifice, displacing Jewish institutions.

If the Pharisees were so religious, why did they use God’s temple as a marketplace?

Mitch Cohen on Quora writes: Other responders to this question have explained that no Jews, including no Pharisees, used the Temple or its proximity outside as a marketplace.

But let’s suppose they did. Has the question-poser asked why a Catholic church has donation boxes and sells pamphlets and candles WITHIN the church building?

Bunk on the Catholic avoda zara. The P’rushim guardians of the revelation of the Oral Torah at Horev; this key masoret they passed down to the rabbis who wrote the Mishna, Gemara, Siddur, and Midrashim ((The Yerushalmi wrote that 427 prophets wrote the Shemone Esrei. There exist 427 words of the 18 blessings of the Shemone Esrei!)).

The concept of ירידות הדורות defined as “domino effect” or “ripple effect”. King Shlomo, just as did his son when he travelled to Sh’Cem, did not listen to Natan the prophet! Natan rejected building a copy cat duplication of a Catholic Cathedral on mount Zion! Avoda Zara might worship wood and stone as Gods but the prophets despised this golden calf substitute theology introduced by Yerovam.

Just as Gulliver’s Travels book of satire mocked the kings of England and France, so too did Mark Twain’s nigger Jim mocked king Shlomo as a complete fool and utter ass. The Book of Kings, written with the concealed intent of political satire, an entertaining idea. A twist upon how Orthodox Jews read their T’NaCH through the lenses of טיפש פשט! Utterly oblivious to the sharp cutting humor of Samuel Langhorne Clemens (1835–1910)! The term “twain” in the context of measuring the depth of a river, an old nautical term that means “two.”

P’rushshim logic requires making the דיוק, similar to the bi-polar logic of Hegel dialectics. A logical inference flips the language upon its head, so to speak, and weighs the opposite. Something like the 3 letter root ק ד ש, serves as the basis for Holy and Prostitute. The Talmud employs the metaphor: 70 faces to the Torah, in this identical sense. Rabbeinu Tam’s common law commentary to the Talmud jumps off the dof of Gemara in search of some other בנין אב/precedent. However, the Baali Tosafot common law commentary — the opposite of the Rambam, Tur statute law which organized halacha into the Greek and Roman custom of subject matter/Aristotle statute law of deductive logic — did not, after viewing the sugya of Gemara from an outside source different perspective, re-introduce this different face to re-interpret the language of how to understand the depth of Mishnaic k’vanna. A serious flaw in the common law commentary of the Baali Tosafots criticism of Rashi’s commentary to the Talmud.

Masechet Sanhedrin, Masechet Yoma, Masechet Zevachim, Masechet Shekalim, Masechet Middot all acknowledge that the Lishkat HaGazit resided within the heart of the Temple. דיוק, which served as the primary avodat HaShem vs which served as the secondary avodat HaShem?! Just as Rechav’am rejected the elder’s advice so too king Shlomo rejected the prophet Natan’s advice not to pursue and copy the Goyim abomination, which worshipped their Gods through wood and stone massive cathedral constructions! Shlomo’s avoda zara began with the construction his temple abomination.

The Capital Crime Case of the two prostitutes, the one accidental killing of her new born child – tried in king Shlomo’s court and not before a small Sanhedrin Capital Crimes Court! The Book of kings states that Shlomo’s foreign wives turned his heart to worship avoda zarah. דיוק at the beginning of his reign king Shlomo worshipped avoda zarah. צדק צדק תרדוף defines the faith of establishing judicial common law courtrooms! The Torah mitzva of the cities of refuge, specifically extended the jurisdiction of the Sanhedrin to conquered new territories. The Yerushalmi dispute between six sages 3 for and 3 against over whether king David established a small sanhedrin in conquered Damascus.

Hence according to the prophets, HaShem never commanded Israel to copy and much less build a massive cathedral worship of avoda zarah. Assimilation and intermarriage with Goyim defines the k’vanna of the 2nd Sinai commandment. ירידות הדורות, not that later generations status inferior to the previous ones. Rather that a respected leader, king Shlomo for example, makes a tremendous error and worships avoda zara, and all the later generations continue down this same path. A domino effect upon all down stream generations! Hence why not use the Herod’s Temple as a common market place?

Oppressive injustice where the judges accept bribes – herein defines g’lut exile.

4168.) Job 21

Job 21 — Job’s Seventh Speech: A Response to Zophar

The problem of the prosperity of the wicked.  Important to understand that the T’NaCH has 3 divisions.  The Holy Writings serve the identical role that the Gemara makes a case/din commentary to the Mishna.  The T’NaCH, like the Mishna, both instruct משנה תורה common law.  Meaning, a person does not read T’NaCH or Mishna as if it were a novel or some work of fiction read for pleasure.  Rather, the Holy Writings within the T’NaCH, they function as the בניני אבות\precedents by which scholars learn and interpret the mussar k’vanna of the NaCH prophets.  In their turn the NaCH Prophets serve as precedents to interpret the mussar k’vanna of the Book of דברים or משנה תורה which means “common law”.  The Book of D’varim serves the role of Gemara to the other 4 Books of the Written Torah/Mishna.

It’s this precise sh’itta – methodology of learning – by which a person can study the Torah, NaCH, Holy Writings, Mishna, and Gemara and Midrashim as ONE Common Law Constitutional Basic Law of the Jewish Cohen Peoples’ Republic.  The purpose of this common law legal system, to affix and establish the culture, customs, even minhagim of the chosen Cohen people throughout the generations our people walk upon the face of this Earth.  Therefore, avoda zarah, understood as the arousal of the Yetzer Hara which pursues tuma middot spirits within the hearts of the Jewish people.  Specifically, as expressed through the sex drive: to copy, embrace, and assimilate to non Cohen cultures, customs and practices – specifically through intermarriage with Goyim who reject the revelation of the Torah at Sinai.
Herein concludes this preamble to the Book of Job.

__________________________________________________________________________________

The Jewish people in Israel have a custom learned from the Goyim to stand in a moment of silence as a way to remember national tragedies.  This behavior compares to war against Moav and Bila’am where Israelis captured vessels made by these Goyim who reject the revelation of the Torah at Sinai.  Moshe instituted that Israel purify these Goyim made vessels and garments by plunging them through water and fire.  Any figure of a Goyim god required removal.  Therefore it seems to me that the same applies to standing in a moment of silence.  Jews should learn from the precedent of ליום הזיכרון Rosh HaShanna.  

This Yom Tov, affixed to the Neshama Name of אל dedicated during every 3rd day of the week.  Tefillah a matter of the heart.  The lungs blow air, but the heart blows spirits.  On the 3rd day of the week, the Neshama spirit of אל – dedicated when a man calls Adonai with his lips.  This Yom Tov, Yom HaDin upon the Brit remembers the rebuke of the sin of the Golden Calf.  When the assimilated Jewish ערב רב attempted to replace missing Moshe with a Calf replacement theology.  Replacement theologies the essence of all avoda zarah rather than simply graven images.  The new testament, koran, book of mormon, and scientology all represent replacement theology avoda zara.

The t’shuva made on Rosh HaShanna not the t’shuva made on Yom Kippur.  The latter recalls the Divine t’shuva which annulled the vow to make from Moshe the chosen Cohen people to replace the oath sworn to the Avot.  Hence the two Yom Tov book ends of t’shuva to one another.  (The siren just sounded remembering the fallen soldiers killed in the wars Israel has fought to establish and maintain our national independence as the Cohen nation in the Middle East.  Standing during the siren blast, focused within my heart to remember the oath sworn by Avram at the brit cut between the pieces; the oath of Yitzak sworn at the climax of the Akedah; and the oath sworn by Yaacov when Yitzak caused him and not Esau to inherit the oath britot which create the chosen Cohen people from nothing in all generations through Av tohor time oriented Torah commandments – as applicable in this case, the wailing of the siren to remember our fallen soldiers.  Elevating an action which does not require k’vanna, like positive and negative Torah commandments to an Av tohor time oriented Torah commandment – the essence of breathing Torah life from generation to generation.)

The Book of Job depicts a fictional story of g’lut aggadah.  Hence this Book serves as the Gemara commentary made upon the NaCH prophet Yirmiyahu-Mishna.  The study of common law precedents therefore compares Yirmiyahu 12:1-3 to Job 21.  The logic of פרדס learns NaCH prophets through the 13 Horev Oral Torah middot.  Hence the T’NaCH has the name – Kabbalah.  Just as the Gemara learns the Mishna by means of comparative precedent, so too NaCH prophets learned through בנייני אבות precedents.  The Talmud serves as the authoritative codification of Oral Torah common law.  

A disciplined study of the Talmud, based upon how Rabbeinu Tam learns, requires making a search, not found on the dof of Gemara, of other similar precedents.  The Baalei Tosafot a common law commentary to the Talmud.  The commentary of Rashi, primarily a dictionary of terms explained and defined – called p’shat.  Rashi p’shat on the Talmud does not compare nor resemble Rashi’s common law commentary he made on the Chumash.  Why did Rashi switch his sh’itta of learning?!  Answer: the hatred of the church toward the Talmud.  Rashi feared that if he wrote, like Rabbeinu Tam, a common law commentary to the Talmud – the church priests might grasp the wisdom, how to correctly study the Oral Torah as common law.

Church violence and repression against the Cohen Jewish people forced Rashi to teach Torah learning wisdom, as a secret and concealed kabbalah.   In like manner the sages split how to study the Talmud, whether to prioritize judicial common law interpretation of separate unique case/law vs. codifying halacha into rigid and fixed legal classifications and simplified codes of religious ritual observances.  The difference between the opposing sh’ittot dynamic judicial interpretive laws vs. static religious ritual rote laws.  The latter prioritization prevailed, the opposite of what occurred during the civil war remembered through the Hanukkah lights.

The church threw Jews into ghetto gulags throughout the Middle Ages of European barbarism.  The 30 years war almost obliterated the population of Germany.  Catholic vs Protestant barbarism perhaps inspired the Cossack barbarism which resulted in the mass slaughter of Jews who fled the Pope’s ghetto gulag UN-like-Bull, only to wind-up slaughtered by Cossack barbarians, whose vicious mobs crossed the flat plains of Ukraine and joined the chaotic Polish political anarchy, which withered the Cossack revolt unto its ultimate defeat.  The plains of the Ukraine – ideal for Cossack cavalry horsemanship skills.  Poland – carved up by vicious great power imperialism – another matter altogether different.

The Book of Job depicts the bitter realities which daily confronted life as a stateless refugee who has no political or social rights – like the Palestinian dhimmi Arab populations today.  Jewish g’lut travails, like a woman giving birth, throughout their vain attempts to harmoniously live within European lands – they never in 2000 years received nor witnessed fair judicial justices for damages inflicted upon them by church controlled governments and mobs.  Job’s cry for justice reflects Israel, beaten by the officers of Par’o who withheld the straw they require to meet their quota, tally of bricks – Shemot 5:6–19.

A בנין אב precedent for Yirmeyahu 12:1-3…6:22-30.  Compare employing the inductive logic of פרדס, Job 21 also to D’varim 16:21,22.  Now compare the inductive kabbalah פרדס wisdom B’reishit 5:28 -6:4.  The reputation of those giants – an utterly evil reputation to this day.

From the depth of the death camp ashes Jewish souls arise

In the shadow of mountains, where the ancients once trod,
The tribal God of Israel speaks, a voice like a rod.
“Listen, O nations, to the truth I proclaim,
For the gods you have fashioned bear not my name.

Christianity’s cross, a symbol of strife,
Claims my covenant, yet distorts the true life.
You worship the son, yet forget the decree,
That I am the One, the eternal, the free.

Islam, with fervor, calls to the skies,
Yet in your devotion, my essence you disguise.
You bow to the Prophet, a messenger true,
But the heart of my promise is lost in the view.

Avoda zarah, the falsehood you cling,
In temples of worship, where praises you sing.
You’ve built up your idols, your doctrines of man,
While I am the God who created the plan.

I am not a reflection of your fractured belief,
Nor a pawn in your battles, your struggles, your grief.
For I am the One who led you through night,
The fire in the desert, the pillar of light.

Your paths may diverge, but the truth remains clear,
In the depths of your hearts, my presence is near.
Reject the divisions, the walls that you raise,
For I am the God of unending praise.

So cast off the chains of your borrowed disdain,
Embrace the oneness, let go of the pain.
For in unity’s light, my spirit will soar,
And the tribal God of Israel will be worshipped once more.”

Why does T’NaCH Judaism absolutely flat out reject Greek metaphysics while Xtianity and Islam behave as a whore in heat and passionately embrace Monotheism?

In Hebrew heart spelled as לב. However the Torah, also known as the Chumash, (Chamesh is the #5 and the Torah contains 5 Books), the Torah spells heart as לבב. Out tradition teaches that two opposing spirit inclinations live within the heart, hence the two ב’s in heart. The tohor Yatzir vs the tumah Yatzir. The word Yatzir interpreted by me as meaning “spirit”. Spirituality in Hebrew Ruachneus. The root of this word ruach like as in רוח הקודש which the Xtian theologians declared as the 3rd part of their Trinity God. LOL Ya can’t make this wacko stuff up! A spirit not a word. The gospel of John totally missed the boat when he declared “and the word is God”. LOL

Mishna Chagigah 2:1 teaches the mussar: “Anyone who gazes at four things, it would have been better for him had he never been born: what is above, what is below, what is before, and what is after.” Greeks love their metaphysics/witchcraft. The Greeks addiction to philosophy and metaphysics Jews totally rejected in the Hanukkah revolt against the Syrian Greeks with their philosopher Aristotle. Greek metaphysic explores questions of existence, the nature of the universe, and the divine. In contrast, the Mishna, a complete and total rejection of Greek philosophy, emphasizes a more practical approach to life and spirituality, focusing on ethical behavior and the observance of commandments. The Mishna totally abhors and rejects speculative metaphysics concerning the nature of the Gods.

The Mishna’s teaching in Chagigah 2:1 reflects a broader Jewish perspective that prioritizes practical ethics and the observance of commandments over speculative inquiry into metaphysical questions. This approach is rooted in the belief that human beings should focus on their actions and responsibilities in the world rather than getting lost in abstract philosophical debates that may lead to confusion or despair.

Greek culture shaped and dominated Roman culture on par with how Roman legions conquered Greek militarily. Xtianity strongly favors the theology known as monotheism today. Monotheism an exact representation of inquiry into metaphysical questions. The T’NaCH literature commonly addresses foreign peoples’ belief in their Gods. Yet both Xtianity and Islam pretend that the T’NaCH commands belief in One Universal God. When in point of fact mesechta Avoda Zarah opens with teaching that early on prior to Noach man kind had rejected the brit faith as taught by Avraham Yitzak and Yaacov.

The Xtian bible compares to the gospel metaphor of a wolf dressed in sheep clothing. The idea of Old Testament vs New Testament serves as a subtle jab of both replacement theology and revisionist history. Traditional T’NaCH Judaism utterly rejects monotheism which highlight both Xtian and Muslim belief systems. Islam’s Tawhid monotheism rejects the Xtian Nicene Creed Trinity metaphysics. Its koran serves as the Muslim replacement theology which rejects both the Hebrew T’NaCH and the Xtian new testament.

T’NaCH classic Judaism does not restrict belief of other Gods to graven image idols as both Xtianity and Islam translate Hebrew “avoda zarah”. T’NaCH Judaism emphasizes the God of the Jews as a local tribal God. This God worship through the oath brit between the chosen Cohen people – alone.

The priests and pastors both declare that the church has replace Christ-killer Cain-Israel and the new chosen people. Muslims reject the new testament and declare Muhammad as the final prophet. The language “God of Israel” describes a local tribal God. Israel originally the 12 Tribes who conquered Canaan and forged a Jewish Republic of Tribes. Israel only has an oath brit with the God that took us out of Egypt. But to declare the metaphysics of “Monotheism”, this absurd notion fit only for the insane asylums.

T’NaCH Judaism established the Mishna, Gemarah, Talmud. It never developed a metaphysical theology concerning the Gods. Rather T’NaCH Judaism addresses only Jewish common law jurisprudence. That’s it and nothing more. Brit does not correctly translate into covenant. Both Xtian and Islamic theology attempts to superimpose their substitute super-sessionist covenant and erase the oath brit of the T’NaCH. T’NaCH Judaism has a very narrow focus. Torah common law and prophetic mussar function as the defining characteristic of Jewish thought. The avoda zarah of Xtianity and Islam knows nothing not of the one or the other. T’NaCH Judaism rejects, emphatically rejects Greek metaphysical or theological speculations which attempt to define the Gods limited to such absurd notions as monotheism, Trinity or Tawhid.

Greek metaphysics: not about the ‘nature of God’… that’s revisionist history. rather about the ‘nature of the Gods’. Greek philosophical thought, particularly in the works of philosophers like Plato and Aristotle, engaged with questions about the divine, the nature of reality, and the relationship between the gods and the world. In ancient Greek thought, the gods were often seen as anthropomorphic beings with human-like traits, emotions, and behaviors. Philosophers explored the nature of these gods, their interactions with humanity, and their roles in the cosmos. This exploration included discussions about the divine hierarchy, the nature of divinity, and the relationship between the gods and the material world.

Greek metaphysics encompassed a wide range of inquiries, including the nature of existence, causality, and the fundamental principles that govern the universe. While some philosophers sought to understand a singular, ultimate reality (as in the case of Aristotle’s “Unmoved Mover”), much of the discourse involved multiple deities and their attributes.

T’NaCH Judaism rejects Greek metaphysics which delves into the nature of the Gods. Xtianity and Islam limit their metaphysics to Monotheism. Two different ways to say the word potato. T’NaCH Judaism teaches Jewish common law and nothing more. Jews have no covenant with the Gods of either Xtianity or Islam. This practical approach, indeed a defining characteristic of Judaism, emphasizing the importance of law and communal responsibility.

Emphasizing the focus on law and prophetic mussar, this key priority advocates and encourages non Jewish recognition of the unique aspects of Jewish thought, which does not align with the metaphysical or theological constructs of other faiths – specifically the Greek metaphysics encapsulated in the religions of Xtianity and Islamic theologies.

Discerning between like from like, defines “Understanding”. For example: the differences between Zen Buddhism and Daoism. The latter revolves around the central axis of Chi, whereas the former did not develop the concept of Chi. T’NaCH Judaism absolutely rejects Greek metaphysic theology, as remembered and celebrated every time Jews light the Hanukkah lights. Whereas both Xtianity and Islam avidly and passionately embraced the cultural assimilation to ancient Greek philosophy.

What ultimately defines Torah faith?

A simple כלל: Monotheism invalidates, profanes, the 2nd Sinai commandment not to worship other Gods. The first two Sinai commandments, their k’vanna defined by the 611 commandments thereafter.

Love that’s a very abstract term. Do not support Greek rhetoric which promotes that people should rely upon their fuzzy logic to interpret the intent of word meanings. Obama declared “CHANGE” for 8 years! It drove me crazy that he got away with such shallow phoney baloney.

Xtian theology interprets agape as a selfless, unconditional, sacrificial love. As opposed to eros (romantic/sexual love); philia (friendship/brotherly love) or storge (familial affection). The Jewish tradition totally and completely different. Every year Jews light the Hanukkah lights. Where we commit to interpret our common law legal system through inductive common law legal precedents. This Jewish logic primarily inductive reason whereas Greek logic essentially deductive reasoning. Japanese and Chinese traditional medicine would refer to these two opposing reasoning methods as Yin vs. Yang. Jews understand and interpret love as “ownership”. A person does not “love” that which he/she does not actually own.

In Deuteronomy 6:5 — “You shall love the LORD your God with all your heart, soul, and might” — the Hebrew word is “ahavah”, which carries a sense of attachment, commitment. In a word: ownership. A theif sells stolen good for pennies for the dollar. Whereas the Talmud teaches that a persons’ property, actually contains a portion of that persons’ soul.

How does a Man/Woman “own” God? This question the Talmud never asks. Why? Because the Torah defines faith question as the pursuit of justice. Justice directly tied to judicial common law court rooms! Xtianity defines faith as belief in the theology that Jesus is the Son of God. Hence for Xtians agape love makes perfect sense. Whereas for Jews agape love amounts to pie in the sky utter non sense Greek rhetoric propaganda used to control the mob democracy masses of Athens.

Classic jurisprudence of common law practiced by Jews relies upon legal precedents to interpret the intent of prophetic mussar rebukes. A precedent for love being the Case/Rule of the legalities of marriage. The precedent for marriage learns from the Case/Rule of Avram cutting an oath alliance at the brit between the pieces. Recall Avram had no children. Hence that significant oath alliance established the idea of the Chosen Cohen people. Hence Jewish marriage, known as kiddushin (Hebrew verbs usually 3-letter roots ק-ד-ש, the foundation of the term kiddushin means ‘holy’.

The Hebrew inductive reasoning resembles Hegel dialectic reasoning. Both learn from the opposite meanings. In this case “prostitute” – also contains the root letters ק-ד-ש. So how does a man “acquire” his wife? Tradition says a man “acquires” his wife through money, a contractual obligation, (something like writing a check) and sex. So what separates an acquired wife from a prostitute or slave? Both types of chattel property acquired through some kind of business transaction. Therefore a man loves his wife, in Jewish tradition by acquiring her Nefesh O’lam Ha’bah (her world to come soul). What does that even mean? Answer: the husband/baal acquires Title to the children which this union will in the future produce.

When childless Avram cut the oath alliance cut between the pieces — he acquired his future born Cohen children unto all generations of eternity! So too when a Jews marries a woman and follows the tradition known as “kiddushin”, he acquires ownership/title to the children born unto the future of this marriage. Jewish legal tradition, particularly as it is found in the Talmud, is built on inductive reasoning. This means that, rather than deriving legal principles from a set of abstract rules or deductions (as in Greek deductive reasoning), Jewish law develops through case law—or precedents—which evolve based on interpretations of prior rulings and scriptural exegesis.

In this context, the legal system and principles of Jewish law are continually evolving, adapting based on what earlier sages and courts have established. In many ways, **Jewish legal reasoning mirrors the common law system found in the West, where precedents (case law) influence future decisions.

For example, prophetic rebukes (such as those from Mussar teachings) often challenge individuals to live ethically and justly, but the interpretation of these ethical commands is done inductively through legal reasoning. This means that Jewish jurisprudence often interprets moral commandments (such as love, marriage, or justice) in light of historical cases and real-world applications, which the Talmud defines as ritual halachic mitzvot.

Jewish law doesn’t work from a top-down system of abstract principles, as is often seen in deductive reasoning (e.g., Greek philosophy or formal logic). Instead, Jewish legal tradition follows inductive reasoning, where legal principles are built over time through interpretation, application, and adaptation of existing laws, precedents, and scriptural exegesis.

This inductive nature of Jewish law is what allows it to adapt to different circumstances and challenges, without losing sight of its foundational texts, such as the Torah and the Talmud. In this way, Jewish legal scholars (the Rishonim, Acharonim, and modern scholars) do not simply apply static rules but interpret them based on real-life cases and evolving societal needs. Hence the difference between Greek deductive logic vs. Jewish inductive logic – the difference between static engineering required to build a bridge which spans a river; to dynamic engineering required to understand the mathematics required to determine the orbit of a rocket launched from the Earth to fly to the moon.

Euclid’s plane geometry a static logic. Deductive reasoning begins with a set of fundamental axioms or universal truths and applies them to derive specific conclusions. This reasoning process known as a syllogism 3 part way of thinking. Jewish inductive reason compares to Newtons fluxions/derivatives of the late 17th century. For example how does a Jew slaughter an animal? Answer this Jew requires “fear of heaven”. Meaning that this butcher does not slaughter cattle primarily for profit but rather he has chosen the profession of slaughtering cattle to build his good name reputation. How to correctly slaughter requires knowledge. But knowledge how to slaughter plays a secondary role to the dedication of a Jews to protect his good name reputation. This latter primary driving force known as “fear of heaven”. Hence an atheist and a observant Jew both have knowledge how to correctly slaughter an animal. Yet the atheist animal slaughter considered treif/unfit which the observant Jew animal slaughter considered kosher/fit.

By integrating moral character and spiritual intention into every action, Jewish law transcends the mechanical application of rules and becomes a guide for ethical living. Thus, the dynamic nature of Jewish law, similar to the application of fluxions, requires ongoing adaptation and real-time moral interpretation—ensuring that the law remains relevant, spiritually grounded, and contextually appropriate to each situation. This crucial distinction defines Av tohor time oriented Torah commandments – which require k’vanna. Lower order positive and negative commandments, as found in the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th Books of the Torah – do not require K’vanna. However a Jew can learns these secondary Torah commandments by using them as precedents to derive the prophetic mussar intent/k’vanna of a mitzva, as i did in the matter of both kiddushin and ritual slaughter of animals, to elevate a commandment which does not require k’vanna to an Av tohor time oriented Torah commandment which does require the k’vanna of prophetic mussar.

A critical in understanding how Jewish law connects moral character, spiritual intention, and everyday actions with Talmudic halachic religious ritualism. The intention behind every mitzvah or action can elevate it from a mere ritualistic task to an act that transforms the individual spiritually. This transformation known as תמיד מעשה בראשית/the continual act of creation. Meaning its the observance of Av tohor time oriented commandments which create from nothing, in all generations the chosen Cohen “children” by which Avram swore a oath alliance with HaShem at the brit cut between the pieces.

Hence the day night distinction between faith vs faith. Xtianity and Islam refer to the son of God or the prophet of Allah as “in the past”. Whereas Torah refers to the righteous pursuit of judicial common law justice which strives to dedicate court restoration of fair damages which Party A damaged Party B, as a faith lived in all future generations unto eternity. Hence the Torah revelation of the 2nd Sinai commandment understood as avoda zarah or foreign worship.

Judaism’s focus on justice as a living faith is a key distinction that shapes its understanding of religion and ethics. The Torah teaches that true worship of God is not merely about rituals or beliefs but about how one lives in the world, specifically through justice and ethical action. The court system and the role of judges in Jewish law are seen as a reflection of the divine will. When the Torah speaks about justice, it is not just referring to the abstract or philosophical notion of fairness; it is about the actual application of law to right the wrongs between people. This is central to the idea that faith in Judaism is future-oriented—it is about how faith is lived in the world, especially as it relates to the restoration of fairness, and the restoration of damages when one party harms another.

The judicial model in Judaism, rooted in Torah law and common law principles, is an expression of faith in action. It’s about the living pursuit of justice and ensuring that the actions of one individual toward another are corrected and made right. This process is not just about compensation or punishment; it is a spiritual act, where the repair of relationships and the restoration of justice is seen as a reflection of divine order in the world.

Idolatry, as defined in the Torah, is not just the physical act of worshipping statues but includes the spiritual act of replacing the living God with any substitute. This is significant because, in Jewish thought, avoda zara can also be understood as the elevation of any created thing—whether an idea, ideology, or figure (e.g., a past event or person)—above the living God and the eternal pursuit of justice as defined in the Torah.

Xtian and Islamic faith often look to past revelations, and in this sense, can be seen as grounding faith in something “fixed in time”, whereas Judaism focuses on a living faith that is expressed in the future-oriented pursuit of justice and righteousness in everyday life. Idolatry in this context could be understood as elevating any specific past event or historical figure to the level of ultimate truth, instead of viewing the divine law (as revealed in the Torah) as a continuous, living force that shapes the future and the ongoing actions of the individual.

In Judaism, faith is always evolving in its relationship to both God and humanity. The Torah, rather than being a closed book focused on a singular moment in history, is seen as a dynamic text that guides the future. Through the observance of mitzvot and the pursuit of justice, Jews engage in an ongoing act of creation that continually aligns them with the divine will. Thus, Judaism views the living faith as an active pursuit of moral perfection, expressed in the legal system, ethical actions, and the dedication to creating a just and holy society.

In this way, Judaism’s faith is about living the law in every generation, not as something set in the past but as an ever-present and active process of restoration, justice, and creation. This stands in contrast to the other Abrahamic religions, which may define faith more in terms of belief in specific past revelations or figures.

In Judaism, faith is not bound by a historical moment or figure but is about living in accordance with God’s commandments and the pursuit of justice through everyday actions. The Second Commandment’s prohibition of idolatry (avoda zara) reinforces this point by emphasizing that no past event or figure should take the place of the ongoing, living pursuit of justice as dictated by God’s law. In this way, the Torah reveals a faith lived out in all future generations, not by focusing on a past event or revelation but by actively participating in the process of repairing the world and ensuring justice in all aspects of life. Hence the Torah described as “A mountain hanging by a hair”, Baba Kama (55a). What “hair” dangles the “mountain” in the air, like the string of a yo-yo? Doing mitzvot לשמה – the first commandment of the Sinai revelation.

The Torah, then, is not just a record of divine commands but an eternal guide for how to act justly in every situation, and the performance of mitzvot, when done Lishma (((With a dedicated tohor middot of the Horev Oral Torah revelation of the 13 middot, the k’vanna of all Torah oaths and blessings: known as מלכות or kingship.))), ensures that this guide is alive and effective in the world. This is what keeps the mountain hanging by a hair—the connection between human action and divine will—always intact.

Why does the UN continue the Catholic and Protestant Church Middle Ages clap-trap which dictated and monopolized who can read and how readers can interpret the Bible?

A question about Gaza: If these Arab refugees – according to UNWRA – how can Europe and Obama equate Israel and Palestine as equal States? Buggery and whoredom parade in church robes — the UN’s anti-Israel saints revealed as Nazi whores at the altar.

1. Impact on Palestinians lives – a non starter b/c Palestinian refugees have no more rights than did Jewish refugees in ghetto gulags. Palestinian suffering, a weaponized inheritance through UNWRA, while Jewish post WWII refugee suffering utterly erased. 2. Two-State Solution viability only valid if 242 and 2334 valid Resolutions. You have not shown how either qualify as valid UN Resolutions. Since both exist as Chapter VI and not Chapter VII, neither qualify as international law. In fact both compare to the invalid 3379 Resolution; both qualify as revisionist history which pretends to turn the clock back where Arabs accept and embrace UN 181. 3. Role of International Aid. A strong point, such “aid” by UNWRA compares to the British opium trade forced upon China during the 19th Century. 4. International Law and Norms: The UN Chapter VI Resolutions does not write nor enforces “international law”. Only treaties signed by Independent States forge international law. A Chapter VII Resolution which demanded North Korea withdraw back to the 38th parallel – herein constitutes “international law”.

The US, especially under President Trump, but even under President Biden, an ally of the Jewish state! UN Resolution 3379, for example has nothing to do with the failure of the UN to force the Arab voting blocks to recognize Israel as a member-State of the Middle East – not an Apartheid policy?

Only Israel treated in this manner. UN Human Rights Council Resolution 7/1, often referred to as item #7, addresses the situation of human rights in the occupied Palestinian territories, specifically focusing on Israel’s actions. This resolution mandates that the UN Human Rights Council conduct an annual investigation into Israeli violations of human rights in these territories. Only Israel targeted in this disproportionate manner. That’s not Apartheid at the UN?

Have introduced two examples of “Nazi like” behavior. In 2018, under President Trump, the U.S. announced its withdrawal from the UNHRC, citing concerns about the council’s effectiveness and its alleged bias. The U.S. government has also called for reforms within the council to improve its credibility and effectiveness in addressing human rights issues globally. Nations that hold no diplomatic relations with Israel should not have the UN Right to publicly condemn Israel. Not in the Human Rights Council nor in the UN General Assembly.

This makes the US completely relevant to the strong emotional objection: “enough of this Nazi like propaganda”. The issue of recognition of Israel by Arab nations and the dynamics of voting blocs in the United Nations and other international forums … The U.S. has historically supported Israel and has encouraged Arab nations to normalize relations with it.

Arab nations have often cited Resolution 242 as a basis for their refusal to recognize Israel, arguing that it requires Israel to withdraw from all occupied territories, including the West Bank, Gaza Strip, and East Jerusalem, as a prerequisite for peace. Britain and France, the main architects behind the writing of the Chapter VI language of UN Resolution 242. Only Chapter VII UN Resolutions qualify as “international law”. Propaganda blurs Chapter VI suggestions (comparable to a bill presented unto Congress) with Chapter VII laws passed by Congress. Therefore this EU Voting block sides with the Arab refusal not to recognize Israel as part of the Middle East voting block of nations. Consequently the invalid UN Resolution 242 and 2334 both function as morality politics so utterly corrupt that it would make a prostitute in church blush.

Recall that LBJ – preoccupied by the Vietnam War, compares to Putin in the Ukraine today. The Trump Abraham Accords challenges the validity of UN 242 together with its top-priority status, established by Britain and French hostile propaganda. These fallen empires long to restore their political domination over the Middle Eastern trading routes. European imperialism as a strategic policy, exposed by the Suez Crisis of the 1956 War.

The Abraham Accords represent a significant shift in Middle Eastern diplomacy, it rejects the biased slant of British/French 242. The Abraham Accords 180°, a total rejection of the invalid 242/2334 – 3379 UN racism. President Trump established normalization agreements between Israel and several Arab nations, including the United Arab Emirates (UAE) and Bahrain. These accords, serve as a opposing departure from the traditional Arab consensus that condemned normalization with Israel. Which made any peace treaty with Israel, absolutely contingent upon progress in resolving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, particularly in relation to the false principles outlined in UN Security Council Resolution 242.

The U.S., under Trump’s leadership, positioned the Accords as a way to foster cooperation among nations in the Middle East, potentially leading to broader peace initiatives. Most Arab states view the Trump Accords as undermining British and French written 242, just as both the US and USSR rejected British/French imperialism to seize the Suez Canal from Nasser’s Egypt.

Contrast the Trump Abraham Accords against corrupt Obama’s UN Resolution 2334. President Trump prioritizes Arab states recognition of Israel as the top priority. Whereas corrupt Obama’s 2334 prioritizes Israeli recognition of a Palestinian state and Eastern Jerusalem as its Capital as the top priority, to achieve peace in the Middle East. Hence UN Resolutions 242 & 2334 compare to the contempt expressed by Tweedle Dee & Tweedle Dumb nursery rhyme and how it frames both the UN and Obama into the same picture.

The Trump administration’s approach, seen as pragmatic. It prioritizes establishment of diplomatic relations between nation states – over the historical and legal frameworks that have traditional 242, 2334, 3379 invalid and utterly corrupt UN Resolutions which have shaped the Israeli-Palestinian conflict prior to the leadership of President Trump.

UN Resolution 2334 emphasizes the need for a negotiated settlement that recognizes Palestinian statehood, including East Jerusalem as its capital. The resolution reaffirms the 242 international consensus that a two-state solution absolutely essential for lasting peace. Obama thus treated Israel as a UN protectorate territory, wherein imaginary (chapter VI) “International Law”, Resolutions 242, 2334, 3379 – not only invalidates Balfour Treaty Zionism but determines the borders and Capital of the Jewish State, as if Israel remained a 1947 UN protectorate territory whose fate the Peel Commission determined.

But the Abraham Accords flipped the narrative. President Trump now demands that Arab states permit Israel to join the Middle East voting block in the UN and disband the UN Human Rights Council on par with the corrupt UNWRA – which buggered the Palestinian refugee crisis and perverted it into a permanent hereditary UN established homosexual perversion. The Arab majority States rejection of the Abraham Accords establishes an Arab EU alliance against both the US & Israel based upon UN 242 & Obama’s 2334 Global Alliance.

Arabs Palestinians exist as refugees according to UNWRA. But based upon the three century Jewish gulag ghetto experience, refugees have no “Rights”. Yet according to the terms of UN propaganda, the perverted concept of “Palestinian rights” amazingly encompasses a range of issues: including the right to self-determination, the right to return to their homes, and the right to live in dignity and security; such rights neither the Catholic nor Protestant dominated governments accorded to Jewish refugee populations in the 2000+ years which culminated in the Shoah. The “heroin” of Arab propaganda injected into the veins of the anti-Israel UN voting blocks, utterly condemns the Jewish state especially since the Nakba ’48 defeat.

These imaginary rights, recognized by and through various “international” legal frameworks and UN Resolutions – with a morality as dubious as a whore in church, include UN General Assembly resolutions and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights! The plights of Jews for 2000+ years, where Jewish refugee populations received no rights, serves as the basis & model for Palestinians rights today? Buggery!

Arab states in 1948 flat out rejected Jewish rights to self-determination, the foundation of Zionism based upon the Balfour Declaration. Like priests who entered synagogues and preached conversion to Jews, Arab scream: “Palestinian Rights!” And the Papal Bull UN bias declares its unilateral support for these absolute Palestinian rights … in the face of pre-Shoah Jews whom “international law” ignored their rights.

Israel excluded from the Arab Middle East voting block, and UN HRC item #7 continually denounces the illegal occupation of Palestinian lands. No Palestinian state ever established by either Egypt in Gaza or Jordan in the West Bank. Therefore, “Enough of this Nazi-like propaganda”.

All Arab states rejected the legitimacy of the Jewish state in 1948. Post ’67 came the famous Khartoum Resolution Three No’s. The phrase “Nazi-like propaganda” serves as a strong and charged declaration that reflects the Jewish People of Israel’s deep frustration and anger regarding the narratives surrounding the Israeli-Palestinian conflict foisted by the press upon shallow reactionary audiences across the world. This public blood libel slander has its consequences.

When Israel declared independence on May 14, 1948, on that same exact day, Arab Armies the newly born state of Israel. Jews of the Middle East fought and won our first war of National Independence. Arab war cries of “throw the Jews into the Sea”, and “Finish the Final Solution”, pushed Jews back against a wall. Arab stated absolutely rejected the establishment of a Jewish state in their self-proclaimed “Arab land”.

Hence Arab voting blocks refuse to recognize Israel as a state in the Middle East! This exploded into the Arab-Israeli War of 1948, followed up with the 2nd Israeli War of Independence in 1967. This Nazi-like racial Arab hatred of dhimmi Jews resulted in significant displacements of more Jewish refugees expelled from Arab countries than Arab refugees, who fled based upon the orders issued by the States of the 5 invading Arab Armies.

Yet UN General Assembly and Human Rights Commission propaganda continually condemns Israel over the horrors Arab refugees experience, but never – not even once – demands that the 22 Arab countries repatriate their Arab refugee populations as did Israel with our Jewish refugees of ’48. The Apartheid UN recognition of Palestine as a UN member reflects an utter racist Nazi like superior race jargon, used repeatedly against the inferior Jewish state/UN protectorate territory revisionist history.

The UN under Obama’s watch recognized Palestine as a non-member observer state status. This directly compares to the influence of the Vatican in the UN. In point of fact, the UN serves as a secular medieval Vatican Papal Bull. Rome ordered that Jews of Europe, thrown and expelled into ghetto gulags for 3 Centuries. Morality politics defines both the UN today and the Catholic Church during the Middle Ages.

The UN, like the Vatican in the past, strives through rhetoric propaganda Resolutions to impose moral judgments, or decisions & declarations – that have significant consequences directed and targeted against specific Jewish groups: Israelis. In this condemned category; the Jewish people have a long history. Directly subjugated by the Catholic church, prior to the Protestant Reformation. Therefore the concept of “morality politics”, Jews understand that it refers to the ways in which moral arguments & rhetoric, used by Jew haters to shape political decisions and policies. Had Arab Armies prevailed in either ’48 or ’67 the Arabs would have unilaterally expelled the Jews from the Middle East and the UN would express its silence like crickets singing in the night.

In the context of the UN and the so called, ever repeated Israeli-Palestinian propaganda conflict, this ever repeated hate rhetoric &/or narratives, compare to gasoline thrown onto a pre-existing fire. They serve to inflame emotions, arousing demands for justice, palestinian rights, and other non-specified “historical grievances” invoked as evidence of a strong ‘international’, meaning UN, bias against the Jewish people. The recent University marches across the US and Europe: From the River to the Sea Palestine will be free. Shallow reactionary liberty and flower children, utterly shocked when the Trump Administration deported the leaders of these pogrom-like riots across US Universities.

The Obama 2334 revisionist history racism, which equates, as does UN Resolution 242, Israel and Palestine as “equal States”; utter Nazi-like propaganda, used to justify the 1939 invasion of Poland. 242’s calls for a negotiated settlement to the “conflict”, stands upon the corrupt foundation that the Jewish state and the Palestinian state stands as equals. That the Jewish state has a conflict with Arab refugee populations any more than Jordan on Black September had a “conflict” with Palestinian refugee populations. Utter UN racism! A State vs. refugees – not a “conflict” because refugees do not have a standing Army as does a nation state.

The Jewish state does not compare to the mobs of Palestinian refugees who – based upon Jews living in European ghetto gulags – had no rights. 242 calls for the withdrawal of Israeli armed forces from territories occupied during the “conflict”. As if the June War pitted Palestinian Armies against Jewish Armies! This pius UN Resolution, dressed in the white robes of righteousness, utterly ignores the historical fact that Poland and Russia both partition of Prussia between themselves, post WWII.

The UN, the EU, and Arab states continue their long tradition of using “morality politics” to persecute the Jewish people. Resolutions like: 242 & 2334, Item 7, and Palestine’s observer status, serve as primary modern tools of UN racial bias against the Jewish state. Trump’s Abraham Accords serves as the first major breach in this utterly corrupt UN system since 1967. The Abraham Accords have exposed the naked racism butt of Obama’s policies which sought reimpose the old antisemitic paradigm of the Catholic and Protestant Dark Ages – monopoly over who reads and interprets the Bible. A Nazi-faced whore defiles the altar — the true face of the UN’s pious anti-Israel moralists exposed in filth and betrayal.

A question about Gaza: If these Arab refugees – according to UNWRA – how can Europe and Obama equate Israel and Palestine as equal States? Buggery and whoredom parade in church robes — the UN’s anti-Israel saints revealed as Nazi whores at the altar.

1. Impact on Palestinians lives – a non starter b/c Palestinian refugees have no more rights than did Jewish refugees in ghetto gulags. Palestinian suffering, a weaponized inheritance through UNWRA, while Jewish post WWII refugee suffering utterly erased. 2. Two-State Solution viability only valid if 242 and 2334 valid Resolutions. You have not shown how either qualify as valid UN Resolutions. Since both exist as Chapter VI and not Chapter VII, neither qualify as international law. In fact both compare to the invalid 3379 Resolution; both qualify as revisionist history which pretends to turn the clock back where Arabs accept and embrace UN 181. 3. Role of International Aid. A strong point, such “aid” by UNWRA compares to the British opium trade forced upon China during the 19th Century. 4. International Law and Norms: The UN Chapter VI Resolutions does not write nor enforces “international law”. Only treaties signed by Independent States forge international law. A Chapter VII Resolution which demanded North Korea withdraw back to the 38th parallel – herein constitutes “international law”.

The US, especially under President Trump, but even under President Biden, an ally of the Jewish state! UN Resolution 3379, for example has nothing to do with the failure of the UN to force the Arab voting blocks to recognize Israel as a member-State of the Middle East – not an Apartheid policy?

Only Israel treated in this manner. UN Human Rights Council Resolution 7/1, often referred to as item #7, addresses the situation of human rights in the occupied Palestinian territories, specifically focusing on Israel’s actions. This resolution mandates that the UN Human Rights Council conduct an annual investigation into Israeli violations of human rights in these territories. Only Israel targeted in this disproportionate manner. That’s not Apartheid at the UN?

Have introduced two examples of “Nazi like” behavior. In 2018, under President Trump, the U.S. announced its withdrawal from the UNHRC, citing concerns about the council’s effectiveness and its alleged bias. The U.S. government has also called for reforms within the council to improve its credibility and effectiveness in addressing human rights issues globally. Nations that hold no diplomatic relations with Israel should not have the UN Right to publicly condemn Israel. Not in the Human Rights Council nor in the UN General Assembly.

This makes the US completely relevant to the strong emotional objection: “enough of this Nazi like propaganda”. The issue of recognition of Israel by Arab nations and the dynamics of voting blocs in the United Nations and other international forums … The U.S. has historically supported Israel and has encouraged Arab nations to normalize relations with it.

Arab nations have often cited Resolution 242 as a basis for their refusal to recognize Israel, arguing that it requires Israel to withdraw from all occupied territories, including the West Bank, Gaza Strip, and East Jerusalem, as a prerequisite for peace. Britain and France, the main architects behind the writing of the Chapter VI language of UN Resolution 242. Only Chapter VII UN Resolutions qualify as “international law”. Propaganda blurs Chapter VI suggestions (comparable to a bill presented unto Congress) with Chapter VII laws passed by Congress. Therefore this EU Voting block sides with the Arab refusal not to recognize Israel as part of the Middle East voting block of nations. Consequently the invalid UN Resolution 242 and 2334 both function as morality politics so utterly corrupt that it would make a prostitute in church blush.

Recall that LBJ – preoccupied by the Vietnam War, compares to Putin in the Ukraine today. The Trump Abraham Accords challenges the validity of UN 242 together with its top-priority status, established by Britain and French hostile propaganda. These fallen empires long to restore their political domination over the Middle Eastern trading routes. European imperialism as a strategic policy, exposed by the Suez Crisis of the 1956 War.

The Abraham Accords represent a significant shift in Middle Eastern diplomacy, it rejects the biased slant of British/French 242. The Abraham Accords 180°, a total rejection of the invalid 242/2334 – 3379 UN racism. President Trump established normalization agreements between Israel and several Arab nations, including the United Arab Emirates (UAE) and Bahrain. These accords, serve as a opposing departure from the traditional Arab consensus that condemned normalization with Israel. Which made any peace treaty with Israel, absolutely contingent upon progress in resolving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, particularly in relation to the false principles outlined in UN Security Council Resolution 242.

The U.S., under Trump’s leadership, positioned the Accords as a way to foster cooperation among nations in the Middle East, potentially leading to broader peace initiatives. Most Arab states view the Trump Accords as undermining British and French written 242, just as both the US and USSR rejected British/French imperialism to seize the Suez Canal from Nasser’s Egypt.

Contrast the Trump Abraham Accords against corrupt Obama’s UN Resolution 2334. President Trump prioritizes Arab states recognition of Israel as the top priority. Whereas corrupt Obama’s 2334 prioritizes Israeli recognition of a Palestinian state and Eastern Jerusalem as its Capital as the top priority, to achieve peace in the Middle East. Hence UN Resolutions 242 & 2334 compare to the contempt expressed by Tweedle Dee & Tweedle Dumb nursery rhyme and how it frames both the UN and Obama into the same picture.

The Trump administration’s approach, seen as pragmatic. It prioritizes establishment of diplomatic relations between nation states – over the historical and legal frameworks that have traditional 242, 2334, 3379 invalid and utterly corrupt UN Resolutions which have shaped the Israeli-Palestinian conflict prior to the leadership of President Trump.

UN Resolution 2334 emphasizes the need for a negotiated settlement that recognizes Palestinian statehood, including East Jerusalem as its capital. The resolution reaffirms the 242 international consensus that a two-state solution absolutely essential for lasting peace. Obama thus treated Israel as a UN protectorate territory, wherein imaginary (chapter VI) “International Law”, Resolutions 242, 2334, 3379 – not only invalidates Balfour Treaty Zionism but determines the borders and Capital of the Jewish State, as if Israel remained a 1947 UN protectorate territory whose fate the Peel Commission determined.

But the Abraham Accords flipped the narrative. President Trump now demands that Arab states permit Israel to join the Middle East voting block in the UN and disband the UN Human Rights Council on par with the corrupt UNWRA – which buggered the Palestinian refugee crisis and perverted it into a permanent hereditary UN established homosexual perversion. The Arab majority States rejection of the Abraham Accords establishes an Arab EU alliance against both the US & Israel based upon UN 242 & Obama’s 2334 Global Alliance.

Arabs Palestinians exist as refugees according to UNWRA. But based upon the three century Jewish gulag ghetto experience, refugees have no “Rights”. Yet according to the terms of UN propaganda, the perverted concept of “Palestinian rights” amazingly encompasses a range of issues: including the right to self-determination, the right to return to their homes, and the right to live in dignity and security; such rights neither the Catholic nor Protestant dominated governments accorded to Jewish refugee populations in the 2000+ years which culminated in the Shoah. The “heroin” of Arab propaganda injected into the veins of the anti-Israel UN voting blocks, utterly condemns the Jewish state especially since the Nakba ’48 defeat.

These imaginary rights, recognized by and through various “international” legal frameworks and UN Resolutions – with a morality as dubious as a whore in church, include UN General Assembly resolutions and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights! The plights of Jews for 2000+ years, where Jewish refugee populations received no rights, serves as the basis & model for Palestinians rights today? Buggery!

Arab states in 1948 flat out rejected Jewish rights to self-determination, the foundation of Zionism based upon the Balfour Declaration. Like priests who entered synagogues and preached conversion to Jews, Arab scream: “Palestinian Rights!” And the Papal Bull UN bias declares its unilateral support for these absolute Palestinian rights … in the face of pre-Shoah Jews whom “international law” ignored their rights.

Israel excluded from the Arab Middle East voting block, and UN HRC item #7 continually denounces the illegal occupation of Palestinian lands. No Palestinian state ever established by either Egypt in Gaza or Jordan in the West Bank. Therefore, “Enough of this Nazi-like propaganda”.

All Arab states rejected the legitimacy of the Jewish state in 1948. Post ’67 came the famous Khartoum Resolution Three No’s. The phrase “Nazi-like propaganda” serves as a strong and charged declaration that reflects the Jewish People of Israel’s deep frustration and anger regarding the narratives surrounding the Israeli-Palestinian conflict foisted by the press upon shallow reactionary audiences across the world. This public blood libel slander has its consequences.

When Israel declared independence on May 14, 1948, on that same exact day, Arab Armies the newly born state of Israel. Jews of the Middle East fought and won our first war of National Independence. Arab war cries of “throw the Jews into the Sea”, and “Finish the Final Solution”, pushed Jews back against a wall. Arab stated absolutely rejected the establishment of a Jewish state in their self-proclaimed “Arab land”.

Hence Arab voting blocks refuse to recognize Israel as a state in the Middle East! This exploded into the Arab-Israeli War of 1948, followed up with the 2nd Israeli War of Independence in 1967. This Nazi-like racial Arab hatred of dhimmi Jews resulted in significant displacements of more Jewish refugees expelled from Arab countries than Arab refugees, who fled based upon the orders issued by the States of the 5 invading Arab Armies.

Yet UN General Assembly and Human Rights Commission propaganda continually condemns Israel over the horrors Arab refugees experience, but never – not even once – demands that the 22 Arab countries repatriate their Arab refugee populations as did Israel with our Jewish refugees of ’48. The Apartheid UN recognition of Palestine as a UN member reflects an utter racist Nazi like superior race jargon, used repeatedly against the inferior Jewish state/UN protectorate territory revisionist history.

The UN under Obama’s watch recognized Palestine as a non-member observer state status. This directly compares to the influence of the Vatican in the UN. In point of fact, the UN serves as a secular medieval Vatican Papal Bull. Rome ordered that Jews of Europe, thrown and expelled into ghetto gulags for 3 Centuries. Morality politics defines both the UN today and the Catholic Church during the Middle Ages.

The UN, like the Vatican in the past, strives through rhetoric propaganda Resolutions to impose moral judgments, or decisions & declarations – that have significant consequences directed and targeted against specific Jewish groups: Israelis. In this condemned category; the Jewish people have a long history. Directly subjugated by the Catholic church, prior to the Protestant Reformation. Therefore the concept of “morality politics”, Jews understand that it refers to the ways in which moral arguments & rhetoric, used by Jew haters to shape political decisions and policies. Had Arab Armies prevailed in either ’48 or ’67 the Arabs would have unilaterally expelled the Jews from the Middle East and the UN would express its silence like crickets singing in the night.

In the context of the UN and the so called, ever repeated Israeli-Palestinian propaganda conflict, this ever repeated hate rhetoric &/or narratives, compare to gasoline thrown onto a pre-existing fire. They serve to inflame emotions, arousing demands for justice, palestinian rights, and other non-specified “historical grievances” invoked as evidence of a strong ‘international’, meaning UN, bias against the Jewish people. The recent University marches across the US and Europe: From the River to the Sea Palestine will be free. Shallow reactionary liberty and flower children, utterly shocked when the Trump Administration deported the leaders of these pogrom-like riots across US Universities.

The Obama 2334 revisionist history racism, which equates, as does UN Resolution 242, Israel and Palestine as “equal States”; utter Nazi-like propaganda, used to justify the 1939 invasion of Poland. 242’s calls for a negotiated settlement to the “conflict”, stands upon the corrupt foundation that the Jewish state and the Palestinian state stands as equals. That the Jewish state has a conflict with Arab refugee populations any more than Jordan on Black September had a “conflict” with Palestinian refugee populations. Utter UN racism! A State vs. refugees – not a “conflict” because refugees do not have a standing Army as does a nation state.

The Jewish state does not compare to the mobs of Palestinian refugees who – based upon Jews living in European ghetto gulags – had no rights. 242 calls for the withdrawal of Israeli armed forces from territories occupied during the “conflict”. As if the June War pitted Palestinian Armies against Jewish Armies! This pius UN Resolution, dressed in the white robes of righteousness, utterly ignores the historical fact that Poland and Russia both partition of Prussia between themselves, post WWII.

The UN, the EU, and Arab states continue their long tradition of using “morality politics” to persecute the Jewish people. Resolutions like: 242 & 2334, Item 7, and Palestine’s observer status, serve as primary modern tools of UN racial bias against the Jewish state. Trump’s Abraham Accords serves as the first major breach in this utterly corrupt UN system since 1967. The Abraham Accords have exposed the naked racism butt of Obama’s policies which sought reimpose the old antisemitic paradigm of the Catholic and Protestant Dark Ages – monopoly over who reads and interprets the Bible. A Nazi-faced whore defiles the altar — the true face of the UN’s pious anti-Israel moralists exposed in filth and betrayal.

Having a debate on Quora. I’d like to share it with you folks here on Word Press.

The US, especially under President Trump, but even under President Biden, an ally of the Jewish state! That you would assume otherwise of the OP speaks more about your bias than anything else. UN Resolution 3379, for example has nothing to do with the failure of the UN to force the Arab voting blocks to recognize Israel as a member-State of the Middle East – not an Apartheid policy? Only Israel treated in this manner.

UN Human Rights Council Resolution 7/1, often referred to as item #7, addresses the situation of human rights in the occupied Palestinian territories, specifically focusing on Israel’s actions. This resolution mandates that the UN Human Rights Council conduct an annual investigation into alleged violations of human rights in these territories. Only Israel targeted in this disproportionate manner. That’s not Apartheid at the UN? Have introduced two examples of “Nazi like” behavior. Which serve as proof that you Mitch speak only out of your butt.

In 2018, under President Trump, the U.S. announced its withdrawal from the UNHRC, citing concerns about the council’s effectiveness and its alleged bias. The U.S. government has also called for reforms within the council to improve its credibility and effectiveness in addressing human rights issues globally. Nations that hold no diplomatic relations with Israel should not have the UN Right to publicly condemn Israel. Not in the Human Rights Council nor in the UN General Assembly.

This makes the US completely relevant to this OP’s declaration “enough of this Nazi like propaganda”. The issue of recognition of Israel by Arab nations and the dynamics of voting blocs in the United Nations and other international forums … The U.S. has historically supported Israel and has encouraged Arab nations to normalize relations with it. Hence for you to declare, as if your an authority on the subject, the intent of the OP as you did in your opening dumb-ass declaration, again only exposes your silly ass.

Arab nations have often cited Resolution 242 as a basis for their refusal to recognize Israel, arguing that it requires Israel to withdraw from all occupied territories, including the West Bank, Gaza Strip, and East Jerusalem, as a prerequisite for peace. Britain and France, the main architects behind the writing of the Chapter 6 language of UN Resolution 242. Therefore this EU Voting block sides with the Arab refusal not to recognize Israel as part of the Middle East voting block of nations. Recall that LBJ preoccupied by the Vietnam War, compares to Putin in the Ukraine today.

The Trump Abraham Accords challenges the UN 242 priority established by Britain and French propaganda. European imperialism as a strategic policy exposed in the Suez Crisis of the 1956 War.

The Abraham Accords represent a significant shift in Middle Eastern diplomacy, as they established normalization agreements between Israel and several Arab nations, including the United Arab Emirates (UAE) and Bahrain. These accords, seen as a departure from the traditional Arab consensus that normalization with Israel, absolutely contingent upon progress in resolving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, particularly in relation to the principles outlined in UN Security Council Resolution 242.

The U.S., under Trump’s leadership, positioned the Accords as a way to foster cooperation among nations in the Middle East, potentially leading to broader peace initiatives. Must Arab states view the Trump Accords as undermining British and French written 242? An obvious YES, rhetorical question.

Contrast the Trump Abraham Accords against Obama’s UN Resolution 2334. Trump prioritizes Arab states recognition of Israel as the top priority. Whereas Obama’s 2334 prioritizes Israeli recognition of a Palestinian state and Eastern Jerusalem as its Capital as the top priority to achieve peace in the Middle East. Hence UN Resolutions 242 & 2334 compare to Tweedle Dee & Tweedle Dumb of UN Nazi like propaganda.

The Trump administration’s approach, seen as pragmatic, prioritizing immediate diplomatic relations – over the historical and legal frameworks that have traditionally governed the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. UN Resolution 2334 emphasizes the need for a negotiated settlement that recognizes Palestinian statehood, including East Jerusalem as its capital. The resolution reaffirms the 242 international consensus that a two-state solution utterly essential for lasting peace.

Obama treats Israel as a UN protectorate territory, wherein imaginary “International Law” determines the borders and Capital of the Jewish State. Hence Israel now, based upon the Abraham Accords, can demand that Arab states permit Israel to join the Middle East voting block in the UN and all together disband the UN Human Rights Council on par with the UNWRA – which makes the Palestinian refugee crisis a permanent hereditary UN established conflict.

The Arab majority States rejection of the Abraham Accords establishes an Arab EU alliance against Israel based upon UN 242 & Obama’s 2334. Arabs Palestinians exist as refugees according to UNWRA. Refugees have no “Palestinian Rights”.

The concept of “Palestinian rights” encompasses a range of issues, including the right to self-determination, the right to return to their homes, and the right to live in dignity and security, the heroin of Arab propaganda against the Jewish state since the Nakba defeat. These rights are recognized in various international legal frameworks and resolutions, including UN General Assembly resolutions and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

The plights of Jews for 2000+ years where Jewish refugee populations had no rights serves as the basis & model for Palestinians rights today. Arab states in 1948 flat out rejected the Israeli right to self-determination, the foundation of Zionism based upon the Balfour Declaration. Yet the UN bias declares its unilateral support for Palestinian rights, in the face of Israel excluded from the Arab Middle East voting block and UN HRC item #7? Hence “Enough of this Nazi-like propaganda”.

All Arab states rejected the legitimacy of the Jewish state in 1948. Post ’67 came the famous Khartoum Resolution Three No’s. The phrase “Nazi-like propaganda” serves as a strong and charged declaration that reflects the OP’s deep frustration and anger regarding the narratives surrounding the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

When Israel declared independence on May 14, 1948, it encountered same day military intervention by neighboring Arab states, which rejected the establishment of a Jewish state in what they considered “Arab land”. Hence Arab voting blocks refuse to recognize Israel as a state in the Middle East!

This led to the Arab-Israeli War of 1948, resulting in significant displacement of more Jewish refugees expelled from Arab countries than Arab refugees, who fled based upon the orders issued by the States of the 5 invading Arab Armies. Yet UN propaganda continually condemns Israel over these Arab refugees and never demands that the 22 Arab countries repatriate their Arab refugee populations as did Israel with the Jewish refugees of ’48.

The Apartheid UN recognition of Palestine as a UN member reflects an utter racist Nazi like superior race jargon, used repeatedly against the Jewish state. The UN under Obama’s watch recognized Palestine as a non-member observer state status. This directly compares to the influence of the Vatican in the UN.

The UN serves as a secular Papal Bull which ordered that Jews of Europe thrown into ghetto gulags for 3 Centuries. Morality politics defines both the UN today and the Catholic Church during the Middle Ages.

The UN, like the Vatican in the past, may impose moral judgments or decisions & declarations – that have significant consequences for specific groups, in this condemned category; the Jewish people directly impacted by the Catholic church prior to the Protestant Reformation. The concept of “morality politics” refers to the ways in which moral arguments rhetoric used to shape political decisions and policies. In the context of the UN and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, different rhetoric narratives inflame emotions arousing demanding: justice, palestinian rights, and other non-specified “historical grievances” invoked as evidence of a strong ‘international’, meaning UN, bias against the Jewish people.

The Obama 2334 racism, which equates, as does UN Resolution 242, Israel and Palestine as “equal states”, utter Nazi like propaganda used to justify the invasion of Poland in 1939.

242’s calls for a negotiated settlement to the “conflict”, stands upon the corrupt foundation that the Jewish state and the Palestinian state stands as equals. Utter UN racism! The Jewish state does not compare to the mobs of Palestinian refugees who – based upon Jews living in European ghetto gulags – have no rights.

242 calls for the withdrawal of Israeli armed forces from territories occupied during the “conflict” yet ignores the Polish and Russian partition of Prussia post WWII.

The UN, the EU, and Arab states continue their long tradition of using “morality politics” to persecute the Jewish people. Resolutions like: 242 & 2334, Item 7, and Palestine’s observer status, serve as primary modern tools of UN racial bias against the Jewish state.

Trump’s Abraham Accords serves as the first major breach in that corrupt UN system since 1967, and they expose Obama’s policies as reinforcing the old antisemitic paradigm.