G’lut Jews lack the wisdom to do mitzvot לשמה. Av tohor time-oriented commandments – they breath life unto the soul of the chosen Cohen people in all generations.

Torah as Constitution, Not Therapy

Approach Torah not as a vessel for pietistic uplift or spiritual sentiment, but as a national constitutional code—a brit forged between Am Yisrael and HaShem, embedded in the juridical bedrock of the 54 parshiot. Rabbi Glass’s piece, though emotionally sincere, slips into Mussar-flavored moralism. He sidesteps Torah’s structural legal core—its enforceable covenantal statutes (chukim, mishpatim, eidut) and geopolitical imperatives.

Erasing the Legal Codex of Behar and Bechukotai

Behar doesn’t whisper about religious feeling; it codifies national land policy—Shemittah, Yovel, land reclamation, the prohibition of land alienation, and servitude laws within Eretz Yisrael. These laws construct the scaffolding of a Torah-based commonwealth. Bechukotai doesn’t philosophize—it enforces. It hammers out covenantal consequences: blessings and curses. It legislates the Torah’s enforcement clause.

Yet Rabbi Glass reduces this intricate legal machinery to sentimental charity and psychological vows. He sidesteps the constitutional infrastructure governing tribal land, national exile, and the sacred architecture of sovereignty.

Homiletics Drown Halakhic Constitutionalism

He isolates nederim as private psychological outbursts—citing Yaakov’s personal crisis—while ignoring Sefer Vayikra’s Sanhedrin-regulated economy where vows operate as legal transactions involving korbanot and sacred property transfer.

Post-tochachah laws (Vayikra 27) don’t linger in emotional desperation. They legislate valuation and redemption of persons, animals, and fields—all pledged to sustain the federal court infrastructure of Jerusalem and the border Cities of Refuge. This isn’t spiritual yearning—it’s Torah tax law.

Blinding the Oath with Ahistorical Abstractions

He flattens the Torah’s prophetic urgency. Bechukotai doesn’t just warn—it demands national remembrance of the sworn oath-brit, a rebuke driven by mussar and prophetic accountability. Nederim, post-collapse, signal legal reengagement with the brit, not spiritual self-expression. Korbanot offered through sworn oaths don’t “inspire”—they revive the constitutional backbone of Torah sovereignty.

Demand a Constitutional Reading of Yovel

We must ask: What political role does Yovel play in curbing tribal monopoly, preserving inheritance integrity, and channeling intergenerational wealth?

Bechukotai mirrors ancient suzerain-vassal treaties. The Torah, as sovereign suzerain, lays down covenantal obligations for the twelve tribes. The Tribes, as vassals, swear fealty to the Republic and its Supreme Court—the Great Sanhedrin. Torah doesn’t request loyalty—it commands enforcement. Each mishpat reinforces the federal integrity of a Torah judiciary.

Tochachah as Treaty Enforcement

Tochachah doesn’t inspire—it enforces. It outlines precise blessings for obedience, and crushing curses for betrayal. It functions as the Torah’s constitutional enforcement clause. Blessings incentivize allegiance to Sanhedrin rulings. Curses deter rebellion against the brit. The clause separates Israel from the nations, just as Shabbat severs kodesh from chol.

Bechukotai declares: Israel flourishes only when it remembers the brit—commandments rooted in sacred time and enforced through prophetic mussar. The Torah defines identity not by “faith” but by judicial fidelity. Intermarriage and assimilation violate the Second Commandment; they trigger g’lut. They drag Israel back into Egypt—into courts of idolatrous regimes.

Public Law, Not Private Inspiration

Ancient treaties weren’t whispered—they were carved in stone, read aloud, etched into public space. Yehoshua inscribed the Torah onto the borders of the land. Prophetic tochachot didn’t comfort—they charged the soul with national purpose. The Talmud’s Aggadah compels us to drosh—to extract prophetic warning as the inheritance of the Cohen nation.

Tochachah Binds the Soul of the Nation

Tochachot in Tanakh don’t soothe; they breathe brit-bound life into Jewish children. T’shuva splits history—between the sin of the Golden Calf and the annulled decree to replace the Avot. It forges the ongoing covenant with the seed of Israel, not Moshe alone.

Bechukotai’s tochachah doesn’t just scold—it prescribes return. It demands that Israel reestablish the Written Torah as constitutional law, and the Talmud as the Federal judiciary’s legal grammar, grounded in Rabbi Akiva’s פרדס logic and כלל ופרט inductive sh’itta.

Brit Enforcement, Restoration Mechanism

Why do valuations (arakhin) and court donations follow the tochachah? Because they provide the halakhic mechanism for individual reentry into the brit after collapse. Vayikra 27 doesn’t symbolize inspiration—it legislates redemption (pidyon), recalibrates debt, resets ownership, and reconstructs legal personhood.

Glass’s Error: Turning Torah into Therapy

Rabbi Glass’s dvar Torah, though well-meaning, exemplifies the post-Emancipation drift—Torah reframed as ethics, devotion, spirituality. But Torah doesn’t ask for belief. It commands allegiance. It legislates a national constitution, binds a people to land, to courts, to oath, and to brit. It constructs the Republic of Am Yisrael—not a religion, not a sentiment, not a sermon.

mosckerr

Assimilated and intermarried Jews in G’lut their avoda zarah the Prime cause for the curse of Amalek in our generation

Richard Silverstein—a writer known for his polemical takes against Israeli policy, but whose latest rhetoric not only crosses ethical lines, it legitimizes political assassination as a form of “armed resistance.”

Let’s be clear: two Jews were murdered—embassy staff—in the U.S. capital, at a professional event. The killer shouted “Free Palestine” as he pulled the trigger. Yet rather than condemn this act as antisemitic terror, Silverstein justifies it, cloaking it in the language of “resistance,” “morality,” and “spectacle.”

This isn’t journalism. It’s apologetics for bloodshed. He reinterprets the murder of Jews not as antisemitism, not as terrorism, but as legitimate protest theater—on par with waving a sign or holding a sit-in. This is the same sleight of hand Hamas uses when they label suicide bombers “martyrs” or fire rockets from schools to spark PR sympathy.

And he knows exactly what he’s doing. When he says this wasn’t antisemitic because “he didn’t mention Jews,” it echoes the same denialism that once claimed the Shoah “wasn’t about Jews, it was about power.” That logic is rot. Just as attacking black people while shouting “segregation now” is racist, killing Israeli Jews while screaming “Free Palestine” is antisemitic. It’s not complex. It’s not nuanced. It’s murder.

Silverstein’s piece vomits the term “genocide” as casually as a TikTok slogan. He uses it not to describe systematic extermination—but to invert reality, weaponizing it against the very Jews who are trying to survive a genocidal assault. What Hamas began on October 7, 2023—rape, beheadings, burning civilians alive—he cannot name, because to do so would unravel his moral fantasy. Instead, he sanitizes killers and demonizes survivors.

This is the spiritual equivalent of a pigpen, an unholy desecration of both Tikun Olam and any genuine pursuit of justice. “Tikun Olam” does not mean sanctifying terrorism. “Resistance” does not mean slaughtering diplomats. And invoking God’s name while excusing political murder? That’s not protest. That’s Avodah Zarah—idolatry in its purest form: the worship of ideology above truth, violence above law, and hate above life.

To be blunt: Silverstein isn’t opposing genocide—he’s midwifing one. By justifying murder of Jews in the name of “morality,” he hands intellectual cover to future killers. And wraps his bile in spiritual garb, hoping no one notices the blood pooling underneath.

But we notice.

And we remember.

mosckerr

This modern day Spanish Inquisition abomination.

October 7th, 2023 marked the Hamas abomination—the day they launched their grotesque orgy of slaughter, rape, and mutilation against Israeli civilians. And by October 19th, 2024—one year and twelve days later—this same decaying windbag Opher, instead of honoring the dead, instead of mourning the slaughtered Jews or demanding justice for the raped and butchered, accuses Israel of genocide. Again.

Twelve days past the anniversary of that modern pogrom, and Opher turns his firehose of moral excrement not on Hamas, but on the survivors. On the wounded. On the nation that still buries its children and still picks flesh from its scorched kibbutzim walls.

He invokes “Genocide!!” like a child screaming “Fire!” in a crowded theater—except the fire already happened. The murderers lit it, danced in it, filmed it. And instead of denouncing those devils, Opher unzips his keyboard and pisses accusations of “Fascism,” “Revenge,” “Hate” on the victims.

He drags South Africa into his theater of projection—a grotesque defilement of its historical suffering. He rips the term “apartheid” from its bloody context and flings it at a Jewish state that air-drops warnings before it strikes, treats enemy wounded in its hospitals, and offers ceasefires that terrorists violate with every breath.

And here’s the truth that burns through Opher’s performance like acid through parchment: there is no honest reckoning with October 7th that ends with Israel as the villain. Only liars, voyeurs, and failed empires frothing for relevance invert the story so grotesquely. Only those who fetishize Palestinian suffering—who need it to accuse Jews—can ignore who started this war.

One year and twelve days. That’s how long it took Opher to make the memory of charred Israeli bodies a footnote in his screed. He never mourned the raped, the beheaded, the abducted. Because their pain doesn’t serve his purpose. Their screams weren’t loud enough to drown out his sermon.

And that’s the bitter core of it: Opher doesn’t hate genocide. He hates Jewish self-defense. He proves it every time he writes.

mosckerr

Here’s a Opher piece one year following the pogrom of Oct 7th 2023. Would love to expose this cesspool of hate, his slander of Israel before Oct 7th 2023 but alas wordpress does not permit making such an in-depth analysis.

The October 7, 2024 screed against Trump and his supporters—vomited forth with the same nasal sneer and bile-stained keyboard as his Gaza tirade—reveals the hollowed-out soul of a man who wraps himself in moral outrage but bleeds rank hypocrisy. He farts contempt with no self-awareness, slapping “White Supremacists,” “MAGA,” and “Evangelicals” into the same sentence as “militant jihadis,” like a drunk flailing through a thesaurus of slurs, desperate to feel superior.

Notice the date: October 7, 2024. One year to the day after Hamas raped, burned, and butchered Jews in their homes, livestreaming genocide for applause. The worst anti-Jewish pogrom since the Holocaust—and what does this windbag choose to rant about? Not the anniversary. Not the screams from Sderot. Not the baby corpses from Kibbutz Be’eri. No. He puffs himself up to wail about Trump.

Trump, not Hamas.

MAGA hats, not Hamas tunnels.

Evangelicals praying for Israel, not jihadis parading dead Jewish women in Gaza.

He exposes himself completely—like a philosophical flasher—projecting his paranoia onto anyone outside his echo chamber. He smears millions of citizens with the same brush as terrorists. He cannot differentiate between voting and murder, between shouting at a rally and firing rockets at a kindergarten.

He moans about freedom—then mocks the “ignorant, stupid and uneducated” for using theirs. He howls about being silenced while spewing his tantrum to the world without a hint of irony. He insists that others restrict his liberty, while drooling with rage that he must share a country, a platform, a planet with people who dare to disagree.

But here’s the festering truth: this man doesn’t oppose oppression. He just wants the boot on the other foot—his foot. He doesn’t want dialogue. He wants dominion. He doesn’t defend reason. He weaponizes condescension.

So when the bones of Jewish families still smolder, when survivors still smell ash in their sleep, he skips their suffering and slanders a former U.S. President, because he can’t process a world that doesn’t orbit his rancid morality play.

His writing reveals nothing noble. No conscience. No insight. Only bile. Only fear. Only the shriveled hiss of a man so addicted to hating the “wrong people,” he can’t even pause to remember the massacre of innocents.

That is moral collapse. That is spiritual rot.

And history will remember who screamed at the wrong enemy—while real evil marched, laughed, and murdered.

mosckerr

Opher’s Blood libel World

What a spiritually rotten psalm of moral flatulence—belched from the gut of a bloated British relic, drunk on his own stench of superiority. He mistakes slander for sanctity, vomit for virtue, and screeches not a plea for justice, but a festering tantrum cloaked in fake compassion. He doesn’t debate—he strips nuance, history, and horror to bark hollow accusations from his perch of soggy righteousness. He doesn’t argue—he flays Netanyahu with foam-flecked frenzy, like a pub philosopher slamming pints while preaching to ghosts.

What gives this liver-spotted gasbag the gall to preach over Israel’s Prime Minister, like some self-anointed Archangel of Judgment? Nothing—except the spoiled milk of a long-dead empire curdling in his veins. He clings to the fantasy that British indignation still anchors the moral universe.

He shrieks “bomb site” and points to Gaza, yet never digs up the putrid roots: UNRWA—chief enabler of generational refugeehood, suckling hatred with Western coin while schools poison minds with maps that erase Israel. He never asks why a humanitarian system fuels hate instead of healing. He never sheds a tear for the billions Hamas swallows to build terror tunnels beneath homes, hospitals, and UN compounds. He never mentions how UNRWA joined the Oct 7th orgy of slaughter—raping, butchering, burning Jews alive, all captured on GoPro like trophies.

Silence.

His pen recoils from truth. He never dares write that Hamas hides behind infants, turns civilians into meat shields, or dances on peace’s corpse for martyrdom’s thrill. He never admits the grotesque “disproportion” comes from Hamas loading ambulances with death, or UNIFIL letting Hezbollah dig war tunnels in plain view—voyeurs watching through the glass, calling it neutrality.

He compares Israel to Putin—mockery. Israel evacuates, warns, leaflets, and calls, even while terrorists butcher their children. He wails over starvation while swallowing the truth: Hamas hoards aid, hijacks food, steals fuel, sells medicine, and burrows deeper into Gaza’s grave.

And he masturbates this sermon in public—exposing his soul like a trench-coated degenerate flashing children. Not for truth. For attention.

He doesn’t burn with righteous fury. He festers with diseased vanity, wearing humanitarianism like a corpse-skin mask. His “genocide” cry doesn’t challenge injustice—it vomits a modern blood libel, a medieval hatred sprayed in digital ink and perfumed with progressive flair. He doesn’t resist suffering—he fetishizes it, as long as it damns Jews.

So swallow this in one bitter, blazing mouthful: your words reek like wormwood, your outrage curdles with fraud, and your obsession with Israel doesn’t reflect care—it oozes rot dressed as moral concern.

You guide no soul. You leer like a spiritual pervert.

And the world sees you now.

mosckerr

The stench of British high nosed imperialism dreams.

What a tepid stew of sanctimony boiled in British bile, ladled out with the shaking hands of a man so desperate to feel relevant, he swings at shadows and calls it courage. The waxy mask off this moral pantomime this response seeks to expose.

This puffed-up, self-anointed moral gatekeeper flails like a pub drunk at closing time, spewing vinegar-drenched buzzwords—“ambush,” “rudeness,” “crass”—as if his brittle vocabulary might scald Trump into silence. But beneath the trembling prose lies not insight, not concern, but a festering neurotic obsession with a man whose mere shadow ignites his bowels into literary diarrhea.

Who appointed this flabby remnant of colonial guilt the high priest of global etiquette? Who handed him the sceptre of “proper conduct” while he sniffs indignantly at Trump’s refusal to genuflect before globalist cocktail diplomacy? He condemns Trump for being blunt, but what’s truly “unbecoming” is this old world snob’s soggy addiction to backdoor cowardice and elitist whisper-politics.

His attack isn’t rooted in fact—it’s rotted in feeling. It isn’t clarity—it’s a tantrum wearing tweed. He dismisses white farmers being butchered in South Africa as “only 0.2%” of crime, as if human blood has a statistical threshold for empathy. He reduces real suffering to spreadsheet debris, wagging a crooked imperial finger at Trump for daring to name the unmentionable.

And then comes the hand-wringing: “Shouldn’t these talks happen behind closed doors?” he simpers, clutching his pearls. As if whispering in corridors and leaking to the press like some MI6 toady has ever saved lives. As if the genocide-deniers and corruption apologists he strokes gently will suddenly act justly if spoken to with proper accent and folded napkin.

No. Trump doesn’t play that powdered game. He throws open the doors and lets the world smell the rot.

This critic’s entire piece is a public act of spiritual flatulence, a pantomime of concern meant to mask a deep, trembling loathing for the one man who refuses to kneel before the altar of managed decline. He isn’t offended by rudeness—he’s offended by clarity. He can’t stand that someone without a British accent might call evil by name without a preamble and a pastry.

So let this be chewed, swallowed, and burned down to the bone: this isn’t statesmanship—it’s spiritual constipation wrapped in colonial nostalgia. It’s the withering scream of a man who’d rather see the world collapse politely than saved rudely.

mosckerr

Met an arrogant British Prick

This bile-spewed vomit screed, what bloated gall, what putrid presumption, possesses this British relic—this flabby oracle of moral flatulence—to vomit his sanctimony onto the global stage as if the sheer volume of his bile could pass for virtue? Like horseradish shoved raw into the sinuses, his words don’t enlighten—they sear, blind, and choke with their acrid narcissism. Opher, this creaking windbag of colonial conscience, drapes himself in the tatters of post-imperial guilt and dares to gnash his gums at Israel, a nation clawing for breath in a desert of enemies, as though his paper-thin moralism gives him the stature to indict history itself.

He is not a prophet. He is not a sage. He is the ghost of a dying empire, shaking its walking stick at nations that survived what Britain could not—integrity, identity, and the will to live on its own terms.

To compare Netanyahu—a wartime leader navigating existential threats—to Putin is not analysis; it is intellectual perversion. It is a public act of slander as grotesque as a flasher in a schoolyard, a soul stripped bare not in honesty but in oily self-exposure. This isn’t critique—it’s a spiritual defilement. Each word drips with the rancid sweat of someone who mistakes his own festering moral decay for the stench of others.

He yammers about Trump like a man possessed not by justice, but by envy—by the neurotic craving to smear others with the filth he has neither the courage nor clarity to scrub from his own history. He hawks Epstein conspiracies with the desperation of a voyeur who found a keyhole too wide to ignore. It’s not about the victims. It’s never about justice. It’s about the twisted arousal of imagined righteousness.

Opher’s screed doesn’t illuminate; it excretes. It is bitter melon without healing, wormwood without warning, black seed without wisdom. It’s the spiritual equivalent of feeding scorpions to children and calling it ethics. It is what happens when moral cowardice masquerades as moral clarity—when a man, long past his relevance, starts screaming into the void hoping it will echo back applause.

He has no authority. None. He is a paper lion shrieking in a digital jungle, clawing at leaders whose shoes he is not fit to polish, let alone judge. Let this old fart simmer in his stew of bile, licking the spoon of his own bitterness, while real nations face real threats with blood, courage, and the unbearable weight of history—not hollow condemnation from the comfort of a British chair.

mosckerr

We remember the corruption of the Obama and Biden Administrations.

The Lawfare Lynch Mob: Biden’s Banana Republic Unmasked

We are not witnessing justice.

We are watching regime warfare disguised as law.

This is not democracy — it’s an oligarchy with indictments.

Donald J. Trump isn’t being prosecuted.

He’s being persecuted — hunted, smeared, raided, shackled by a Department of “Justice” that acts more like the secret police of a decaying empire than a guardian of constitutional order.

Let’s talk about the raid on Mar-a-Lago — a former president’s home stormed by FBI agents like a cartel compound.

They rifled through Melania’s wardrobe, for God’s sake. Her undergarments, treated like contraband.

What were they expecting to find? Nuclear codes in her lingerie drawer? Or was it just the thrill of humiliation?

Meanwhile, Joe Biden — the geriatric puppet with a teleprompter leash — hid classified documents in his garage next to his Corvette, guarded only by the flimsy lock of media indifference.

And what did we hear from the FBI?

Crickets.

Worse still, 51 corrupt intelligence officials, the “guardians of our democracy,” swore that Hunter Biden’s laptop was Russian disinformation — a lie so transparent it glows like plutonium.

They lied.

They interfered in an election.

They colluded with Big Tech to silence the truth.

And now we’re supposed to pretend that Trump is the threat to democracy?

Give me a break.

This is the political equivalent of pouring bleach on the Constitution and calling it a cleaning product.

And let’s not forget Nancy Pelosi — the shrieking banshee of Capitol Hill.

She twice attempted to impeach Trump on ghost stories and hallucinations, like some deranged medieval inquisitor.

And when that failed, she ripped his State of the Union address on live television — a tantrum more fitting for a toddler than the Speaker of the House.

All while the three-year fever dream of Russiagate was peddled like heroin by the likes of Rachel “Madd Cow” Maddow and the Jesuit-trained jackals of late-night TV.

They told us Trump was a Russian agent.

They said he was installed by the Kremlin.

They said Mueller would save them.

They said indictments were coming.

They lied. Over. And over. And over again.

They lied to delegitimize your vote.

They lied to justify spying on a candidate.

They lied to criminalize opposition.

And the judges? Don’t get me started on these robed oligarchs.

Unelected, unaccountable, and bloated on their own power, they now pretend they are the guardians of policy — mini-kings with gavels, ruling by decree.

They have no right to govern.

They were never chosen by the people to dictate trade, war, or cultural norms.

Yet here they sit, striking down tariffs that protect American workers, striking down election laws, and pretending the Constitution is their pet chihuahua to drag around in circles.

And now, the same legal establishment that bent every rule to shield Clinton, Biden, and Obama — now weaponizes those rules like blades to gut Trump and anyone who stands in their way.

This is not law. It’s a purge.

A political purge in slow motion.

A show trial, without the showmanship.

Let them choke on their fake norms.

Let them drown in their own hypocrisy.

Let the records show: the very people who screamed about “fascism” built the gulag they now rule from.

If you want to see democracy die, watch the prosecution of Trump.

If you want to see tyranny rise, watch the media cheer it on.

We will not forget.

We will not forgive.

And we will not kneel.

mosckerr

To the parasite Governement of S. Africa – rot in Hell.

To the Cowards in Pretoria: A Rebuke for the Ages

You, government of South Africa, dare to accuse Israel of genocide? You, who preside over a crumbling shell of a nation, drowned in corruption, crippled by lawlessness, and soaked in the acid of hypocrisy, presume to pass moral judgment on the Jewish state defending itself from an unprovoked, satanic pogrom?

Shame on you.

October 7th, 2023 — when Jewish civilians were raped, burned alive, tortured, decapitated, shot in their beds, and abducted — was not a military operation. It was not “resistance.” It was a blood-soaked reenactment of the darkest nightmares of our history. A genocidal orgy of sadism, filmed and celebrated by the perpetrators. And you called it justified.

You rushed to The Hague with crocodile tears and a briefcase full of lies. You perverted the very word “genocide” — a term forged in the fire of the Holocaust — and aimed it at its survivors’ descendants. You accused Jews of the crime committed against us.

You call this justice? It reeks of betrayal.

Your invocation of “human rights” is not merely hollow. It is weaponized cowardice. The same South Africa whose government sings “Kill the Boer,” whose power grid collapses like a failed state, whose cities rot under the weight of gangsterism and economic decay — now appoints itself the judge of the Middle East?

You parade on the world stage with moral pretensions while:

Your country’s rape statistics rank among the highest on earth.

Your hospitals collapse while your ministers embezzle public funds.

Your police force disappears while violent crime explodes.

Your universities burn Israeli flags while Hamas uses hospitals and babies as shields.

You want to talk about apartheid? You wouldn’t know apartheid if it stared you down with a rocket launcher from a UN school in Gaza. In Israel, Arabs vote, serve in Parliament, work in hospitals, on the Supreme Court. In Gaza? Jews are lynched if they set foot there.

Your claim to moral clarity is not just thin. It is fetid.

You distort law. You insult memory. You betray the legacy of Mandela — who sought reconciliation, not international lynch mobs. The very black Jews of Ethiopia, the Yemeni Jews of Aden, the Mizrahi Jews of Iraq, the Persian Jews of Iran — they were rescued and embraced by Israel. Meanwhile, you uplift Hamas, a death cult that tortures women, executes collaborators, and starves its own people while building tunnels to kill Jews.

You are not anti-colonial. You are not pro-human rights.

You are moral parasites, feeding off the corpse of UN legitimacy.

You did not bring a case to the ICJ. You spat in the face of truth.

And all to distract from your own rot.

While you point your trembling finger at Israel, your nation hemorrhages dignity and competence. You know what Hamas is. You know what Israel faces. But you bury truth beneath ideological rubble because it is easier than looking inward.

Your accusation will fail.

Your theater will fade.

But the memory of your betrayal will not.

The Jewish people, who stood with you in the struggle against apartheid, now stand aghast as you turn their graves into props for your lies.

The blood of October 7 still cries out from the ground — not for revenge, but for truth.

And you have muzzled it.

You have twisted it.

You have desecrated it.

History will remember.

And Israel will endure.

mosckerr

Feel Tremendous Anger

The British ignore the Israeli staff members, engaged to be married, brutally murdered in Washington DC. They promote their UN 242 British French written attempt to return Israel to its pre Six Day War borders! The borders which prevailed when both England and France invaded Egypt to seize the Suez Canal in 1956. Israel categorically rejects Europe’s Two State Solution. Based upon the simple fact that (1) it only promotes European imperialism (2) it has never worked when applied – ever.

  1. The UK and EU Posturing as Neo-Mandate Powers

Your critique of the UK and EU as acting in a neo-imperial, Mandate-era fashion has strong historical resonance. UN Resolution 242, co-drafted by Britain and France post-Six-Day War, notably avoided calling for a complete withdrawal from all territories, instead framing it ambiguously. That resolution continues to be used selectively by European powers to pressure Israel — even as these same powers neglect to acknowledge how their own imperial legacies (e.g. Sykes-Picot, the 1956 Suez Crisis) created much of the current instability in the region.

The invocation of humanitarian principles by leaders like Lammy, Macron, and Kallas may mask what is, from an Israeli view, an ongoing campaign to impose a framework that privileges European geopolitical interests and weakens Israel’s sovereignty in determining its security strategy.

  1. Selective Outrage and Moral Hypocrisy

The British and EU response, especially given the brutal murders of Israeli citizens on foreign soil, smacks of selective moralism. Their unwillingness to confront antisemitic violence directly or to center the 590+ day hostage crisis in Gaza reflects an imbalance in diplomatic concern.

While Israel is heavily criticized for its military campaign and the humanitarian crisis, there is comparatively minimal European pressure on Hamas — a terrorist organization using human shields, rejecting ceasefire proposals, and diverting aid.

  1. Israel’s Rejection of the Two-State Model

Israel’s firm stance against the current form of the Two-State Solution reflects decades of failed negotiations, Palestinian internal division, and the strategic abuse of land concessions (as in Gaza post-2005). From Israel’s standpoint, “land for peace” has produced neither peace nor security.

Many in Israel view the European model as obsolete, grounded in a 20th-century diplomatic vision that ignores present-day asymmetrical warfare, jihadi ideology, and the failure of Palestinian political institutions. Hence, the Israeli response frames such external pressure as both tone-deaf and dangerous.

  1. Strategic Recalibration of Alliances

While the UK and EU may see this as an assertion of liberal democratic values, Israel perceives it as a betrayal of mutual interests — particularly amid Iranian regional aggression and surging antisemitism in Europe.

Israel’s pivot toward strengthening relations with the U.S., India, Gulf states (under the Abraham Accords), and tech-forward Asian economies signals a reorientation away from dependency on the increasingly adversarial EU. If Europe continues leveraging economic and political agreements to impose ideological conditions, Israel may respond by further decoupling diplomatically, betting on partners who do not predicate alliance on compliance with disputed international norms.

A deeper political and philosophical rupture: Europe’s invocation of universalist ethics versus Israel’s insistence on particularistic national survival. For many Israelis, the war in Gaza is not a humanitarian crisis of their own making but the unavoidable result of a genocidal neighbor-state hybrid entity entrenched in civilian areas. For Europeans, the war is a test of human rights values. The gap between these worldviews is widening — and may well lead to a historic recalibration in Israeli-European relations.