‘Knock this off!’: Turley warns SCOTUS ‘could not be more clear’ with this ruling
Category: Uncategorized
Gaza War News:
Israel has commenced the first stages of a military operation aimed at taking control of Gaza City. IDF spokesperson Brig. Gen. Effie Defrin confirmed that preliminary operations had begun and that Israeli forces are holding positions on the outskirts of Gaza City. Reservist mobilization: Around 60,000 reservists have been called up in preparation for the anticipated offensive.
Evacuation warnings: Israel has issued instructions to hospitals, medical personnel, and humanitarian organizations to evacuate Gaza City and relocate southward, in preparation for the offensive. Displacement & shelling: Shelling has intensified in neighborhoods like Sabra, Tuffah, Shuja’iyya, Zeitoun, and Jabalia—leading to thousands of residents fleeing, though no large-scale evacuation of the entire city has been confirmed.
No full-scale evacuation yet: While warnings and preliminary movements are underway, there is no confirmed, organized evacuation of Gaza City’s civilian population en masse. Many residents reportedly remain in place, citing a lack of safe areas for relocation. Operation has started, but is not a completed “invasion”: The offensive is in its earliest stages. Forces are operating on the periphery; ground invasion into the heart of the city has not yet occurred.
Pay Back is a bitch.
The European Barbarians once again behave like DOGS, this white trash of Europe once again barks and behaves as DOGS, who returns and eats their own guilty Shoah vomit.
“Propaganda CLAPTRAP” White House ATTACKS BBC Coverage Of Gaza War
Europe Backs The Wrong Horse & Israel Will SHOW Them All!
I Was Wrong About Israel: What I Learned on the Ground – YouTube
Europe does not determine the Capital of Israel ie UN Resolutions 2334 base upon 242, 338, and 446! Europe does not determine the international borders of the Jewish State. The Rome Treaty which established the ICC at the Hague has zero jurisdiction over Israel, Russia, or the US. Why? Because no nation of the above mentioned signed on to the Rome Treaty.
Netanyahu vs. Macron & Starmer — French President Emmanuel Macron (July 2025) announced France would recognize a Palestinian state at the UN General Assembly. In response, Netanyahu publicly denounced the move, calling it “rewarding terror” and saying it “risks creating another Iranian proxy … not to live in peace beside [Israel]”. He and other Israeli ministers labeled the decision as a threat to Israel’s security and sovereignty.
French President Macron (August 2025) later denounced Netanyahu’s claim that recognition was fueling antisemitism in France, calling the accusation “abject” and “erroneous”. Similarly, UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer (mid-2025) stated that the UK would recognize a Palestinian state unless Israel took steps to end the crisis in Gaza. Netanyahu lambasted this stance, again denouncing it as weakening Israel—which threatened that acknowledging Palestine would embolden terrorism.
Golda Meir (PM 1969) — Meir famously stated in a 1969 Sunday Times interview: “There was no such thing as Palestinians.” This comment was a denial of Palestinian national identity—not a critique of foreign leaders for recognizing a Palestinian state—but it does represent a public, even provocative declaration on the subject.
Ariel Sharon (early 2000s) — In 2004, Sharon suggested that French Jews should emigrate to Israel, citing growing antisemitism in France. French officials condemned the remarks, but these comments were directed at French domestic conditions—not a response to French recognition of Palestine. In 2003, Ariel Sharon expressed that a demilitarized Palestinian entity might be acceptable under certain conditions—but there’s no record of him publicly denouncing other leaders for their recognitions.
What’s News on the Russia-Gate Scandal directly implicating Obama and Clinton and corrupt Intelligence bureaucraps?
Tulsi Gabbard, now serving as Director of National Intelligence (DNI) under President Trump, has indeed escalated claims alleging a conspiracy by Obama-era intelligence officials—including Barack Obama himself, James Comey, James Clapper, and John Brennan—to delegitimize Trump’s 2016 victory.
She released declassified documents, referred these individuals to the Department of Justice, and prompted the creation of a Justice Department “strike force” to examine her allegations. Widely respected bipartisan investigations—including Senate Intelligence Committee findings—affirm that Russia indeed interfered in the 2016 election (though not to the extent of altering vote counts). These findings do not support Gabbard’s assertion of a fabricated narrative.
Gabbard articulated serious allegations against Obama-era officials and took official actions—declassification and DOJ referrals.
Lebanon News: The Radical Change in the Balance of Power in the Middle East consequent to the Oct7th Abomination War.
Lebanon has begun disarming non-state armed groups, specifically starting with Palestinian factions in camps such as Burj al-Barajneh, as part of a broader push to ensure weapons are held only by six official state security agencies. Additionally, Lebanon’s cabinet has approved the objectives of a U.S.-backed plan to disarm Hezbollah by the end of 2025, tasking the army to oversee this transition.
In response, Hezbollah has outright rejected the plan, with its deputy leader Naim Kassem denouncing it as serving Israeli interests and warning against its implementation. Lebanon’s president has strongly rebuffed Iranian interference, emphasizing national sovereignty and rejecting foreign meddling—remarks delivered during a meeting with a senior Iranian official. Reports also indicate that Iran appears anxious about the implications of Hezbollah’s potential disarmament, viewing it as a major strategic setback to its regional influence.
UNIFIL continues to operate across southern Lebanon, with its current mandate extended through August 31, 2025. The Security Council is debating a new resolution that not only aims to extend the mission, but also signals an eventual withdrawal of UNIFIL—contingent on the Lebanese government achieving full control over its territory and so long as a comprehensive political solution is in place.
UNIFIL has experienced dangerous incidents in recent years: Israeli tanks forcibly entering UN positions, multiple attacks on watchtowers, and injuring or endangering peacekeepers. Locally, some communities have pushed back against UNIFIL patrols, especially when they occur without Lebanese Armed Forces (LAF) accompaniment, fueling tensions.
A tragic incident on August 9, 2025, killed six Lebanese soldiers during munitions dismantling at a Hezbollah-linked depot, underscoring the persistent danger in the area. Its future beyond August hinges on Security Council deliberations and Lebanon’s ability to assume full security responsibilities.
Despite a legislative ban by Israel that came into effect on January 30, 2025, targeting UNRWA’s operations in Israeli territory including East Jerusalem, UNRWA continues to provide essential aid in Gaza, the West Bank, and among refugee camps across the region. The agency has lost access to its Jerusalem headquarters, and many of its international staff have been forced to leave; yet, local staff remain on the ground delivering services under increasingly hostile conditions.
Israel’s ban and accusations of UNRWA’s alleged ties to Hamas (including dismissals of some staff) have had far-reaching effects—diplomatic, legal, and operational. The agency remains under scrutiny, including court cases in the U.S. Still delivering critical services across Gaza and the West Bank, despite bans and evacuation of international staff.
Netanyahu and his government are using the possibility of halting security cooperation as a diplomatic lever against proposed UK recognition of Palestine. And earlier in the year, Netanyahu did launch a sharply critical public attack on Starmer and other Western leaders.
Prior to the Oct7th Abomination War a Constitutional Crisis over the power of the Supreme Court of Israel exploded and threatened the continuation of the Knesset Government in Jerusalem. Currently Israel has no Constitution. But based upon the 1917 and ’22 Balfour Declaration and Palestine mandate which defines Zionism as the Jewish right to self-determination in the Middle East … self-determination defined as the Jewish right to establish a Constitutional government in our own country.
Shabbat Reay
Prophecy The concept of a prophet is central to the Torah reading this week. But what exactly is a prophet? And what is a prophet’s role? The Hebrew word for a prophet is…
___________________________________________
___________________________________________
Prophets serve as the “police” of the Sanhedrin common law lateral courts. These courts mandated with משנה תורה, interpreted to mean — “Legislative Review”. For example: Samuel, Nathan, Ahijah, Elijah, Hosea – major and minor prophets – Anointed and/or deposed Kings. This Torah constitutional mandate of Sanhedrin common law\משנה תורה courtrooms based upon the Book of D’varim having the second Name of משנה תורה.
Legislative Review radically different and set apart from British Common law courtrooms. The latter cannot void a law passed by Parliament. Parliamentary “statute law” defines the Constitution of England. Hence no common law British court has the power to overturn any law passed by Parliament. Not so Sanhedrin common law courts. Any law imposed by any tribal leader within the 12 Tribes of the Israelite Republic and even statute laws imposed by a king of Yechuda or Israel, the Great Sanhedrin common law lateral courts possess the Constitutional mandate of משנה תורה to void and overturn.
Addressing the Av Mishna of קידושין
The Mishna of קידושין does not simply record dialectical disputes as a form of “preserving judicial disputes.” It functions like a court record. Beit Hillel serves as the Tort judge defense attorney. Whereas Beit Shammai functions as the prosecuting attorney. Now this distinction – significant because it distinguishes lateral common law courts from vertical Goyim courtrooms.
Great Britain operates Common law court rooms just as does Talmudic common law! However, in the case of the British Courts, all statute laws imposed by the British Parliament in London – they define the British Constitution. As such, no common law British courtroom can over-turn any statute law passed by Parliament. Torah common law, known as משנה תורה operates completely differently – despite being a common law courtroom which absolutely requires earlier court room judicial rulings as precedents. Both court systems stand on this shared foundation of common law.
None-the-less ספר דברים mandates “Legislative Review”, a critical interpretation of the intent of משנה תורה. Torah Sanhedrin common law courts have the Torah Constitutional mandate to over-rule any government statute law imposed by any of the 12 Tribes of the Republic or the Central Government of king David. A Torah prophet serves as an agent of the Great Sanhedrin Court. As such prophets can anoint a man from any tribe of Israel – KING.
And Great Sanhedrin Court prophets can remove any king from Office. As the prophet Shmuel did with king Shaul. This fundamental distinction of Torah Great Sanhedrin courtroom powers of “Legislative Review” differentiates Torah lateral courts from Goyim vertical courts. The latter court the State pays the salary of the judges and the prosecuting attorneys. As such a court case pits פלוני vs. the State. The Torah refers to the state paying the salaries of Judges and prosecuting attorneys as “bribes”. צדק צדק תרדוף absolutely abhors bribery; it qualifies as an example of Av tuma avoda zarah?
This abstract term defines the 2nd Sinai commandment. Do not copy the culture and customs practiced by the Goyim and do not marry foreign women who reject the revelation of the Torah at Sinai. Judicial justice serves as the כתר Av tohor time-oriented commandment which stands upon תמיד מעשה בראשית. The kabbalah that doing tohor time-oriented commandments creates the chosen cohen people from nothing. Hence the Torah begins with בראשית. Mesechta ברכות teaches that the world was created for the sake of the Jewish people. Who exactly qualifies as the Jewish people? The chosen seed of Avraham Yitzak and Yaacov – the chosen Cohen people.
Obviously, Cohen, Levi, Israel – לאו דוקא terms of reference. A precedent proof, the din that tefillah stands in the stead of korbanot. Amalek – antisemites – continually refer to the Jewish people as a race. The Nazis referred to Jews as “the inferior Race”. Jewish inheritance determined from the mother. However, the central obligation of קידושין, as a pre-condition of marriage, upon the father to educate his children in the oath brit/alliance faith.
Our Mishna compares to ברכות which opens with kre’a shma ערבית, just as the Av Mishna of קידושין opens with האשה. The vertical courtrooms of Goyim jurisprudence the prosecuting attorney prioritized over the defense attorney. But the model of Sanhedrin courts the reverse. The Halacha follows after Hillel!
The Xtian Bible and Muslim Koran both fail to acknowledge that Torah prophets serve as the “police” of the Sanhedrin courts! Hence neither Muhammad nor JeZeus could qualify as prophets. This מאי נפקא מינא distinction equally applies to the acquisition of a wife. The Baal acquires his soul through marriage. The qualifications for serving as a judge in a Jewish court (Beit Din) includes personal attributes and life experiences that are deemed important for this role.
The Talmud suggests that an unmarried man is generally considered less fit to serve as a judge. This is because marriage is seen as a significant life experience that contributes to a person’s maturity and understanding of family dynamics, which can be relevant in legal matters. Similarly, the absence of children can also be viewed as a factor that affects a person’s qualifications.
Having children is believed to provide additional insights into the responsibilities and challenges of family life, which can inform a judge’s decisions. The underlying principle is that judges should possess a deep understanding of human nature and the complexities of life, which are often gained through personal experiences such as marriage and parenthood.
What specifically does a man acquire through wife and family? Answer: Fear of Heaven. A Sanhedrin Judge by definition has an excellent Good Name reputation.
Rejecting Religious Rhetoric as False.
______________________________
Rubies Corner’s Blog·rubiescorner.wordpress.com·
Did I Tell You?
I finished my Bible, and now I am reading it again. I have a goal for this year, so I don’t hesitate to pick up my Bible and read for awhile. Since I just finished, I am starting over….
______________________________
______________________________
You could try learning the Hebrew T’NaCH – a radically different collection of books – rather than reading your Xtian bible translations. The Hebrew T’NaCH has translations, it even includes the non Jewish chapters and verses which so completely pervert the Xtian bible sophomoric translations. What difference does Order make? God vs Dog.
The T’NaCH organized into sugyot (translated as sub-chapters). What difference does this make? The fundamental basis of the Hebrew T’NaCH stands upon a fundamental question. Does a person learn this literature לשמה או לא לשמה? To quote Shakespeare: To be or not to be — That is the question.
Sophomoric bible translations never once bring the Name revealed in the opening Sinai commandment. Because the Xtian church does not accept the revelation of the Torah at Sinai, it worships their own versions of the Golden Calf. טיפש פשט – translated as bird brained – makes literal translations of abstract obstruse ideas of mussar. This latter term, mussar, it defines the meaning of the word “prophesy”. Prophets command mussar. Meaning that this prophetic mussar applies to all generations of bnai brit who ever walk the face of the Earth.
Prophets do not predict the future as the Roman counterfeit new testament: “fulfill the words of the prophets” falsely proclaims. The Torah refers to this concept of “prophesy” which it describes through the “prophet” Bil’aam; that prophet practiced כשוף – witchcraft or sorcery, practices that involve magical or supernatural powers; engaging in Av tuma avoda zarah – forbidden or occult practices forbidden by the 2nd Sinai commandment.
The Roman forgery known as the new testament employs a lot of Greek rhetoric. Greek rhetoric: undefined critical terms upon which a religious or political witch “hangs” all subsequent ideas. Obama in the 2008 election employed the witchcraft rhetoric of “CHANGE”. The key term that won two Presidential elections for him. Problem: never in eight years did he ever once make any attempt to define this magical term “CHANGE”. The Arab false prophet Muhammad did the exact same thing in his Koran.
The word “prophet” repeated over and again and again. Never once does the Koran ever define the abstract obstruse term “prophet”. The new testament projects a definition of the term prophet, as mentioned above, that duplicates the Torah concept of witchcraft – predicting the future. The Hebrew T’NaCH defines prophesy as “MUSSAR”; prophets do not predict the future but rather their mussar applies equally to all generations. The outcome of this critical T’NaCH definition of this absolutely critical term “prophet” … T’NaCH commands prophetic mussar but it does NOT teach history. This subtle shift requires a bit of time to sink in once consciousness.
Another example of religious rhetoric which the new testament forgery employs, the Apostle Paul, its concept of 1. You are not under the Law. 2. Original Sin of Adam, guilt complex employed to serve as the pretext for the death and resurrection of JeZeus. 1. The rhetoric of “law”; T’NaCH defines “law” as Judicial courtroom judgments – as law. Whereas Roman law exists as rules and regulations imposed by Caesar or the Roman Senate. Paul’s rhetoric “not under the law” fails to differentiate between judicial common law vs. legislative statute law. Hence Xtians “read” their bible sophomoric translations oblivious that T’NaCH instructs judicial common law through a Case/Rule style. This latter type of “law” stands upon the foundation of earlier judicial courtroom “precedent” rulings. Statute law has not such requirement which would force a person to write a ‘legal brief’ and present possible similar and related court room ruling made prior to the current case heard before the Court. The subtle distinction that comes out of making a comparison of similar Case/Rule judicial judgments – the revelation of the Oral Torah at Horev which rabbi Akiva’s kabbalah defines as פרדס p’shat remiz drosh sod.
This logic system format radically different from Aristotle’s 3 part Syllogism. Akiva’s logic format – inductive reason; whereas Aristotle’s methodology deductive reasoning. Both systems of logic have their strengths and weaknesses. But Paul’s religious rhetoric: “You are not under the Law”, obliterated any and all distinctions which separate common law from statute law and inductive logic from deductive logic.
The other Pauline term of religious rhetoric: Original Sin. It implies that humanity inherits guilt from Adam’s transgression. The church amplified this concept into a Fire and brimstone Heaven/Hell God/Satan polarity, which later developed into Calvin’s doctrine of complete Human depravity. Based upon the presumption of Paul’s “Original Sin”. Meaning: that the will of fallen Man enslaved in bondage to sin, and individuals cannot exercise free will as their “Moses” liberator who leads the enslaved church to salvation. Herein the requirement for the resurrection of JeZeus. Central to Calvin’s theology, the doctrine of predestination, defines his religious rhetoric. This Golden Calf replacement theology subsumes the Torah Central theme of “the Chosen Cohen People who do service to HaShem through the dedication of tohor middot” to the replacement church which believes in a false messiah JeZeus. The latter term refers to the 13 Attributes which became revealed to Moshe on Yom Kippur 40 days after the sin of the Golden Calf wherein the ערב רב/mixed multitudes replaced the Divine Presence Spirit Name with the word אלהים. The 13 attributes, they define the revelation of the Written Torah at Sinai. How?
These 13 “middot” (translated as measurements) breath as living Spirits from within the Yatzir Ha’Tov within the heart. Air comes from the lungs but tohor spirits come from the heart. Hence the Talmud refers to tefillah as a “matter of the heart”. Whereas the book of the gospel John declares that the Logos/word – not just a spoken word but also a principle of order and knowledge. It refers to JeZeus as the pre-existent divine being. Logos/word rhetoric salad asserts “the Word was God” which establishes the belief in the full divinity of JeZeus.
The revelation of the Golden Calf rejects substitute theology as the definition of Av tuma (evil inclination spirits within the heart called Yatrir Ha’Rah) of avoda zarah (often mistranslated as idolatry). Therefore then how does the Hebrew T’NaCH “study” rather than simply read Common law (משנה תורה)? The first book of בראשית introduces Av tohor mitzvot – known as time-oriented commandments. The next three books of the Written Torah introduce secondary commandments (תולדות) which function as legal precedents. The last 5th book of the Torah (משנה תורה) confirms the mandate of judicial common law as ‘Legislative Review’. Meaning the common law Sanhedrin courts have not only a veto over lower government statute laws but can entirely re-write the lower government statute law and present them now as Torah common laws.
In short, Paul’s religious rhetoric of “Original Sin” supplanted the main Torah theme of exile/g’lut as expressed through Adam’s expusion from the Garden, Noach’s Ark, the enslavement of Israel in Egypt, and the 40 year Wilderness story.
Conflict Resolution 