Who is a Jew, halacha requires a Jewish mother or ger tzeddik. Who is not a Jew? Neither Xtians nor Muslims nor Hindus nor Japanese nor Koreans etc are Jewish. The framers of the Talmud wrote a “model” for Jewish courts within the borders the oath sworn land of the Jewish people. Torah defines faith, based upon the 1st commandment as the righteous pursuit of justice.
G’lut Jews during the horrors of the Dark Ages desperately required a simple fix to maintain their cultural identity. Hence Jewish scholars made the Talmud into a simplified religious code, different from Catholic dogmatism but achieving the same purpose. Catholics stand distinctly apart from Protestants. Just as Mormons unique from the other two Xtian faiths. No different than Jews during the Middle Ages who converted Talmudic court room legal models unto religions belief systems amount only to foreign statute law.
Such “Ger Toshav” codes have no equality with T’NaCH and Talmudic mandated judicial common law courts. למשל – a “Ger Toshav” no more Jewish, any more than a camel kosher but a pig treif. The false prophet Muhammed cannot make a silk purse from a camel milk; Napoleon has no power to convene a Sanhedrin court in France.
Sanhedrin courts only exist during times of Jewish Independence, no different than the Yovel. No Yovel prevailed throughout the entire period of the second temple. In like manner the Sanhedrin courts during foreign rule, despite their physical shadow/form existence did not have the נמשל/substance to actually exist; akin to a dead body which lacks a living soul. King Shlomo built a Temple but never established Federal Sanhedrin common law courts. Therefore, Shlomo’s construction of his copy-cat Cathedral/Temple, a treif precedent which fails to grasp the mitzva of Moshiach; on par with the Koran calling camel halal.
The Mesechta Chullin tells an aggada of a bird whose kashrut status esteemed in doubt; akin to the Shomronim, Tzeddukim, Karaim etc, who “converted” from fear of lions or some other inquisition torture. The Talmud refers to such doubtful Jews as Canaanim, based upon the Torah precedent which separates ger toshav Goyim from na’creeim/Shomronim who declare themselves as the real inheritors to the Torah chosen Cohen people. Substitute theology, like defines the Pauline grafted opinion.
The Talmudic term “Canaani” has nothing to do with the extinct Canaanites. The Book of Ezra clearly separated the Shomronim/Canaani from the Jewish people who returned from the g’lut of Bavil. Post sealing of the Shas Reshon opinion which equates 7 mitzvot (Gemara language) “bnai noach” as applicable to all Goyim in all lands, equal to saying the (Gemara language) “Canaani” refers to the extinct Canaanits.
The Torah in the Book of D’varim identifies two types of Goyim living in the land of Canaan: Ger Toshav and Na’Creeim. The Talmudic 7 mitzvot affixes to the ger toshav, permitting them the right to sue a Jew for damages in a court of law. Whereas NaCree refers to the Canaani in the Mishna of Baba Kama; stateless refugees enjoy no legal rights any more than wet-back illegals protected by the American Bill of Rights. Only Israel accepts the revelation of the Torah at Sinai. Canaani do not accept the revelation of the Torah at Sinai.
The famous post sealing of the Shas Bavli Reshon opinion who declares gere toshav expansive to Goyim living in all lands fails to grasp that the aggadic story of Noach instructs the mussar of g’lut. Furthermore his error likewise fails to make the former expansive to equally include Canaani inclusive of both Xtians and Muslims. Just as the first Sinai commandment excludes the Golden Calf, so too both Allah and Jesus profane the 2nd Sinai commandment.
This: Who is a Jew question, therefore only addresses doubtful cases not obvious cases; don’t need a dog to sniff drug with a pound of dope spread exposed upon an open table. Herein the נמשל of the aggadic story touching the doubtful kosher bird. In the modern Jewish State, 1948 Arabs awarded citizenship, despite being not Jewish. Whereas post ’67 Palestinians not recognized as citizens because they behave like the classic Shomronim/Canaani who substitute themselves as the ‘Real Jew’. All peoples who duplicate this duplicity throughout the Ages – not Jewish.
Talmud not a religious text. Middle Ages need for a simplified code no more “Oral Torah” than the gospels or Koran. As the Protocols of the Elders of Zion – historically documented forgeries used to promote antisemitism, and they do not reflect Jewish thought or halacha … neither does the NT nor Koran.
The Talmud a codification of 13 tohor middot as “codified” in the Torah and Naviim, 7,10,13 middot applicable to halacha while the 32 middot affixed to the far more complex aggada drosh precedents which search the T’NaCH for common law mussar precedents. This revelation of middot defines the revelation of Oral Torah פרדס inductive logic, akin to morse code communicates ideas through dots and dashes. Statute halachic codes do not stand on these middot “morris code” system which defines Talmudic common law inductive NOT deductive logic.
Moshe orally heard ה’ ה’ אל רחום וחנון וכו middot. The Hillel Akiva Yishmael and Yossi set of middot – dispersed in a morris code like sequence in each and every sugya of Gemara communicate a logic language akin to staw required to make brick under the tyrrany of Par’o. The Torah commanment: remember Egypt.
Just as Israel received the Torah in g’lut wilderness, to establish this Torah as the Constitution of the conquerred Canaan Republic which mandates Federal Sanhedrin lateral common law courts across all tribes of the Republic; today post ’48 and ’67 no different.
The first commandment understands the g’lut of Egypt as לאו דוקא. The blessing/curse Life\Death first and second commandments define the whole of the Torah revelation at Sinai. Jews in g’lut curse incapable to keep mitzvot לשמה. Just as g’lut Jews lack the power to establish Sanhedrin Capital Crime courts while living under foreign rule in the land. Hence during the entire Beit Shnee period the Yovel never kept דאורייתא. Israel received the revelation of the Torah at Sinai not Egypt. In similar vein the בראשית Divine Names אל שדי אלהים אל האל וכו validate HaShem in the Heavens whereas the revelation of the Torah at Sinai לא בשמים היא. The Mishkan/Shekinah a matter of the heart through the dedication of tohor middot to shape and mature social behavior with our people in order to pursue righteous justice as our brit faith within the sworn land inheritance. The Avot brit to the land of Canaan not inclusive of the lands of Esau לאו דוקא. A ברכה day and night different than a תהלים שבח. To make a Torah blessing requires שם ומלכות. Blowing the shofar the model for שם, dedication of tohor middot the model for מלכות. To swear a brit learns from ברית אש. The fire of the brit – Torah oaths with dedicate/korban\ Torah middot לשמה.
Shem = shofar model … how? The רוח הקודש שם השם not a Golden Calf word translation substitute. Hence Abba Shaul taught that a person who pronounces the Name according to the grammer of its letters has no portion in the world to come. False oaths the cause of the floods in the days of Noach. נמשל the Ark instructs the din of g’lut just as the expulsion of Adam from the garden and Israel in Egypt etc. Bottom line: if Jews cannot solve the “riddle” and discern the k’vanna of אל מן רחום מן חנון וכו then Jews cannot but only follow the Yatzir Ha’Ra within their hearts.
The הבדלה between air blown from the lungs and Yatzir Ha-Tov tohor spirits from the heart as different than מלאכה from עבודה. Religious Jews fail to grasp that the Torah commands not to do מלאכה on the day of Shabbat in order to dedicate doing מלאכה on the 6 Days of shabbat. Shabbat not simply one day but every day of the week. Mussar development requires growing the k’vaana of torah rebukes within one’s heart making these ideas original chiddushim rather than in one ear and out the other.
מלאכה means time-oriented wisdom commandments which require k’vanna -prophetic mussar. עבודה means precedent toldot commandments which do not require k’vanna but when learned as Tora precedent in order to define the k’vanna of a tohor midda then this משנה תורה common law raises both Torah toldot commandments together with Talmudic halachot unto Av tohor wisdom time-oriented commandments דאורייתא. Herein explains how the B’HaG learns.
Time only a משל, its the נמשל of Torah wisdom upon this axis alone does the “top” spin. מלאכה affixed to tohor middot. Hence the Talmud “morris code” employs rabbinic middot to interpret דאורייתא middot k’vanna by arranging them in a unique sequence of middot, no different than does morris code.
Bibi first entered the stage of Israeli theatrics during the Shamir government. He served as the spokes person for the Israeli government during the 1st grass-roots Intifada revolt which exploded inside Israeli Samaria following PM Begin’s invasion of Lebanon to expel Arafat’s PLO from that country in an attempt to restore the shattered balance of power in Lebanon obliterated after the ‘Black September’ expulsion of the PLO from Jordan in 1970. And under the Sharon government Bibi revolutionized the Israeli economy away from Ben Gurion’s socialist policies. This makes Bibi a true successor of M. Begin.
A bit of Lebanese history: post WWI France received as its spoils of war of the dismembered Ottoman Empire’s ‘Greater Syria’ portion – which included the territories of both Lebanon and Syria; while Britain digested the League of Nations division of spoils known as the “Palestine Mandated territories” which based itself primarily upon the 1917 Balfour Declaration. The League of Nations division of Lebanon and Syria ‘Greater Syria’ based itself upon the Sykes-Picot Agreement of 1916 –which secretly delineated British and French spheres of influence in the Middle East. President Woodrow Wilson publicly opposed secret treaties and advocated for self-determination, which conflicted with the arrangements laid out in the Sykes-Picot Agreement. Tend to agree with both London’s and Paris’s disdain for Wilson.
Democratic Senator Huey P. Long from Louisiana did indeed oppose the Senate’s confirmation of the treaty for the United States to join the League of Nations. He expressed concerns that the League could entangle the U.S. in foreign conflicts and undermine national sovereignty. His opposition was emblematic of a wider resistance among various senators, reflecting apprehensions about international commitments that could lead to involvement in overseas conflicts contrary to American interests. Hence I particularly support Trump’s Gaza Peace Board which excludes the UN Britain France and Russia ‘Quartet’, whose post Six Day War imperialism has so dominated the Middle East balance of power. Both IKE and Stalen reduced the ‘Great Power’ status of London and Paris following their attempt to seize the Suez Canal from Nassers’ Egypt.
Hence “neutral Paris and London” prior to the 6 day war jumped at the chance to write the UN SC Resolution 242, because it restored their ‘Great Power’ status/domination of the Balance of Power across the Middle East by framing “Land for Peace” Two-State Solution. This disgusting imperialism treated Israel as if it had never won its National Independence not in 1948 nor again in 1967. Both Wars Arab leaders swore they would throw the Jews into the Sea and complete the Nazi Shoah. 242 framed the Arab/Israeli War simply as a land dispute. It ignored pre-State UN GA Resolution 181, (Introduced by an enraged Britain following the Irgun bombing of the King David Hotel in Jerusalem on July 22, 1946.), on November 29, 1947. All recently Independent Arab countries from British and French colonialism opposed UN GA 181. Egypt effectively secured Independence from British control in 1922. Both Iraq and Kuwait – administered by Britain but managed separately from the territories of the Palestine Mandate. Iraq gained Independence in 1932. Britain aimed to secure its influence in the Persian Gulf, especially in light of the oil resources discovered in the region. Controlling Kuwait allowed Britain to maintain supremely strategic naval routes, which were essential for its empire and trade networks.
I moved to Israel prior to the outbreak of the first Gulf War, where Saddam – the former Client State of the US during the Iran/Iraq War – sought to restore Kuwait as part of its original territory. British Great Power imperialism loved the ‘two state solution’. It employed this divide and conquer policy in the division of India from Pakistan. Similarities between Truman’s “Containment Policy” and Britain’s “divide and conquer” strategy in terms of maintaining influence and balance of power. The British did indeed promote tensions in the Arab-Jewish conflict over Palestine and likewise maintained influence by separating Kuwait from Iraq, whose imperialism President Bush both 1 and 2 supported. Post-WWII, the U.S. supported the United Nations Partition Plan (UN Resolution 181) for a two-state solution in Palestine. And promoted the political rhetoric that reflected a strange mutant strategic interest, in its vision of how best to foster stability, and establishing Israel as a democratic ally in the region, rather than solely employing the classic “divide and conquer” to dominate the balance of power.
The U.S. support for resolutions like UN 242 and UN 338, which aimed to address the Arab-Israeli conflict, (compare & contrast – alongside the leadership positions established through President Trump’s Abraham Accords – exposes and reveals a complex evolution in U.S. foreign policy rather than a slavish Bush 1 & 2 slavish ‘Cat N’ the Hat’ adherence to earlier British models like UN 181. UN Resolution 242 called for the withdrawal of Israeli armed forces from territories occupied during the conflict. LBJ tied down in Vietnam, permitted British and French to write this divide and conquer Resolution which sharply contrasts with the Ike/Stalin expulsion of London as a Great Power in the Middle East after 1956. Both London and France frantically have attempted to promote revisionist history and shove the released “Jewish genie” back into its pre-Shoah g’lut refugee status.
Ben Gurion regarded British policies, particularly the 2nd White Paper, as a significant factor that not only betrayed the Jewish community’s aspirations but also undermined their safety during a critical period. He emphasized that this betrayal fostered deep distrust of British intentions in the region. He criticized how various European governments failed to oppose Nazi policies or intervene effectively, thereby enabling the horrors of the Shoah. The Evian Conference (1938) and the imposition of ghettos by churches and states during various historical periods – both reflect significant socio-political responses to Jewish populations which originally inspired Herzl to write: The Jewish State. The British and French “Jewish Problem”, post Shoah has caused Israelis to swear “Never Again”. Never Again shall any European State dictate ‘Final Solutions’ for their “Jewish Problem”. Hence Israel fundamentally despises the Rome Agreement which established the ICC.
Resolution 338 both Britain and France expressed strategic interests that “US” UN Resolution 338: primarily fails to recognize their ‘divide and conquer’ imperialism – its lack of explicit recognition of the Palestinian cause. Instead, the resolution centers on the cessation of hostilities between Israel and Arab states. The Trump Abraham Accords further steered US Middle East policy away from 242. The Gaza Peace Board excludes the UN, Russia, Britain and France. Since Donald Trump resumed the presidency, the diplomatic landscape among the United States, United Kingdom, and the European Union has undergone a profound transformation. Especially since the Obama/Hillary Russia-Gate scandal and the Pelosi/Biden attempt to bring the Ukraine into the NATO alliance, which triggered the Russian invasion. And PM Starmer’s open opposition to Trump in the 2024 elections. Then came the Oct 7th Abomination war followed by the 12 Day War.
I love Bibi’s vision and leadership. And if he runs again in the coming elections my family admires and respects his leadership.
The USS Liberty incident remains one of the most contentious episodes in US-Israeli history. The attack resulted in the tragic loss of 34 American lives and injuries to 171 others, which is inherently condemnable regardless of intent. The USS Liberty was not officially a CIA spy ship, but it was a naval technical research ship operated by the United States Navy. It was involved in gathering intelligence, including signals intelligence (SIGINT). The USS Liberty was a US Navy technical research ship (AGTR-5) equipped for signals intelligence (SIGINT) collection, not officially a CIA vessel but operating under the National Security Agency’s direction for electronic eavesdropping. On June 8, 1967—during the height of the Six-Day War between Israel and a coalition of Arab states (Egypt, Jordan, and Syria)—Israeli Air Force jets and torpedo boats attacked the ship off the Sinai Peninsula. The assault lasted about an hour, involving strafing, napalm, and torpedoes.
Israel immediately apologized, paid $3.3 million in compensation to families of the deceased and $3.5 million for injuries (equivalent to about $50 million today), and the US government accepted this as a tragic error. No evidence from these probes supported deliberate intent to target a US ally. However, survivors and some analysts have long disputed this, alleging it was intentional—perhaps to prevent the US from intercepting Israeli communications or to draw America into the war against Egypt. The presence of Soviet intelligence vessels in the area, capable of intercepting signals, heightened Israeli concerns that any US-collected data might indirectly aid Arab forces. The Liberty incident was a one-off event, not a prolonged war.
Prior to the out break of the June war, France served as the main military supplier of the Israeli military? President Charles de Gaulle decided to break the military alliance with Israel primarily due to a combination of geopolitical, strategic, and ideological factors that evolved during the early to mid-1960s. The comparison of Lyndon B. Johnson’s predicament during the Vietnam War to Vladimir Putin’s situation in Ukraine highlights significant parallels in terms of military engagement, political challenges, and international ramifications.
Both Tucker Carlson and Candace Owens have recently highlighted the Liberty attack in ways that frame it as intentional and evidence of Israeli betrayal or undue influence over the US, often in broader critiques of US aid to Israel. These discussions occurred well after their births (Carlson in 1969, Owens in 1989), so they’re engaging with history retrospectively.
Owens interviewed USS Liberty survivor Phil Tourney on her show, calling the attack “demonic” and the US political response a “stain on American history.” She emphasized alleged cover-ups and Israeli deceit, linking it to broader conspiracies about Israeli control over the US (e.g., suggesting Israel was involved in JFK’s assassination or had foreknowledge of 9/11). Her episode garnered millions of views, and she’s reshared it on anniversaries and Veterans Day. Debunkings argue she promotes falsehoods and one-sided narratives, ignoring evidence of mistaken identity.
In podcasts, videos, and social media, Carlson has described the attack as “clearly targeted on purpose” by Israel, questioning why it’s “shameful” or forbidden to discuss it openly. He dedicated significant airtime to it, endorsing conspiracy theories (e.g., a “false flag” to frame Egypt) and calling it “evil.” He tied it to modern US-Israel relations, suggesting Americans “put up with” such actions from a supported ally. Fact-checks have labeled his claims as misinformation, noting they contradict official findings.
The perception of the United States as an ally by Israeli leadership during the USS Liberty incident quite complex, influenced by historical events and the context of the Six-Day War. Previous U.S. Pressure: In 1956, during the Suez Crisis, the Eisenhower Administration pressured Israel to withdraw from the Sinai Peninsula after its military victory over Egypt. This creates a backdrop of mistrust, as Israel may have felt that U.S. intervention could undermine its military objectives and security interests.
Their rhetoric often portrays Israel as an ungrateful or manipulative ally, emphasizing “betrayal” without fully contextualizing Israel’s wartime desperation or the US’s own intelligence activities. By the time of the Six-Day War, Israel was concerned about the military buildup of Arab states, particularly Egypt. The environment was charged, with Israel perceiving immediate threats to its existence. The USS Liberty was attacked by Israeli forces on June 8, 1967. During the USS Liberty attack, some Israeli leaders may have viewed the U.S. less as an ally and more as a potential threat, particularly if they believed U.S. intelligence was enabling Egypt to mount a strategic counter against Israeli forces.
The presence of a Soviet spy ship capable of intercepting communications further complicated the situation. Israel might have been concerned that U.S. intelligence would be relayed to Egypt, jeopardizing their military operations. With Nasser’s declared military objective to “throw the Jews into the Sea”, post Shoah Israel perhaps feared the U.S. as a potential adversary in that specific moment, rather than as a supportive ally. Both ignore survivor testimonies or wartime fog of war complexities. Israel’s actions in 1967 were shaped by genuine threats, based upon the Israeli government digging mass graves due to their fear of another human disaster. In point of fact, the June war qualifies as the 2nd Israeli Independence War. Had Israel suffered a similar defeat Jews have no doubts that the Arabs would have joyfully slaughtered Jewish populations.
While the official name remains the Six-Day War, this framing mass Jewish genocide resonates in historical discourse as a second existential battle for statehood, following the 1948 War of Independence. For instance, some analyses describe it as a “miracle” that averted another similar Shoah disaster, with Israelis digging graves “just in case of catastrophe” while racing to develop defensive measures. Post Oct 7th 2023 likewise evoked mass Jewish Shoah trauma. Akin to Russia’s trauma of being invaded twice through the plains of the Ukraine by Napoleon and Hitler.
The comparison between Tucker Carlson’s condemnation of the USS Liberty incident and the historical “Christ Killer” slander against Jews has significant implications, particularly in the realms of rhetoric, historical context, and perceptions of betrayal. Before the war, Israel’s military reliance on France and its unique geopolitical context shaped its strategies. Carlson’s perspective might invoke a sense of betrayal by not recognizing the complexities of Israel’s earlier reliance on different alliances. Carlson seems to frame Israel as having betrayed the U.S. without accounting for the nuanced historical relationship between the two nations before the Six-Day War. His characterization therefore grossly oversimplify Israel’s security environment and the evolution of its foreign relations.
Christ Killer Slander: This slander has historically been tied to harmful stereotypes and scapegoating of the Jewish community, contributing to centuries of anti-Semitism. Carlson’s condemnation, while not directly anti-Semitic, might invoke a narrative that engages with themes of betrayal and loyalty, potentially feeding into lingering prejudices. By equating Israel’s actions during the USS Liberty incident as a failure\betrayal of the US “ally”, Carlson’s rhetoric resonates with historical antisemitic tropes that slanders Jews – such as the slander Jews poisoned the wells; Jews murder Xtian babies and use their blood to bake matza; or the Czar secret police publication of the “Protocols of the Elders of Zion” forgery used to justify brutal pogroms which forced millions of Jews to flee Russia and Eastern Europe.
The mitzva to remember Amalek a complex wisdom commandment. דברים כה:יח – ולא ירא אלהים falsely understood as referring to Amalek. חסדי אומות העולם quoted out of context religious rhetoric. Bring a Primary source sealed masoret which defines this quote from 105a. To start with how does this Gemara interpret the language of the Mishna it comments upon? Rambam’s statute law introduces a religious post Shas halacha rather than obeys the intent of the Shas framers for the Talmud to serve as the model for Torah common law courts when the Jewish people reconquer and rule our homelands once again. Statute law – like Rambam’s code – not T’NaCH\Talmudic common law. Religious halachic decrees do not compare to courtroom judicial rulings based upon prior judicial precedents.
זוהר חלק ג׳, רס״ב–רס״ג — הזוהר מתאר שהערב רב לא היו בתוך ענני הכבוד, ולכן הם היו הראשונים שעמלק פגע בהם הזוהר מתאר שהערב רב לא היו בתוך ענני הכבוד, ולכן הם היו הראשונים שעמלק פגע בהם
מדרש תנחומא, כי תצא, סימן ט’: המדרש אומר שעמלק פגע ב“מי שהיו מחוץ לענני הכבוד מפרשים רבים (בעיקר מקובלים) מסבירים שהערב רב היו מחוץ לעננים
The issue not that the חסידי אומות have a portion in the world to come. Rather Amalek has no portion in the world to come. Therefore, the language: לא יראת אלהים cannot refer to Amalek but only to the ערב רב. Because the key word “אתה” … ולא ירא אלהים”. Totally disagree with the common תיפש פשט reading. Torah commands mussar. Mussar does not apply to Amalek because Amalek by definition “has no shame”. Therefore ולא יראת אלהים follows the instruction of the Zohar and Midrash.
Amalek rejects the revelation of the Torah at Sinai. For the Torah to say אין להם יראת אלהים – utterly pointless and vain. The blessing/curse-life\death brit defines the intent of the first 2 Sinai commandments. What defines ערב רב? The T’NaCH sources of Kings and Ezra affix the tuma Yatzir as 1. clinging to the customs of Goyim who reject the revelation of the Torah at Sinai – like Amalek. 2. Intermarriage with Goyim who reject the revelation of the Torah at Sina. Like as told in the Pinchas killing of the Head of the Tribe of Shimon. The Book of Ezra supports this interpretation which defines the k’vanna of the 2nd Sinai commandment. Isaiah mocks the absolute stupidity of using wood to heat ones’ home cook ones’ food and carve an idol.
The Xtian 30 Year War reads the 2nd Sinai commandment limited to physical idols – the central dispute between Catholics and Protestants. Both sects of Xtianity an utter Torah abomination. The 2nd Sinai commandment not a simple טיפש פשט literal reading any more than the Creation story of בראשית. Debates over how the Universe created the Mishna explicitly denounces; those who contemplate that which is above, below, or behind them – better that they were never born. The Creation story instructs prophetic mussar; Torah teach by way of משל\נמשל. The Creation story introduces Av tohor time-oriented commandment as the Av commandment of the Torah! The toldot commandment introduced in שמות ויקרא ובמדבר – positive and negative commandments which do not require k’vanna. דברים also named משנה תורה because unlike the Rambam code misnamed משנה תורה, the 6 Orders of Rabbi Yechuda’s Mishna – court Common law judicial ruling, NOT legislative/cult of personality religious decrees. The Rambam statute law code therefore does NOT define the מילה משנה תורה but rather the Mishna defines this 2nd Name for the Book of דברים.
Just as rabbi Akiva instruct: the wilderness generation has no portion in the world to come, so too the ערב רב curse of “antisemitism plague” consequent to Jewish assimilation and intermarriage – has no portion in the world to come. Prophetic mussar does not apply to Goyim. Despite both Moshe and later Yona sent to foreign lands, both commanded mussar to Israel and not Goyim because Goyim have no portion in the world to come. This brings us back to righteous gentiles as an except to this general statement. Righteous gentiles not gere toshav. The Rambam erroneous posok which teaches that bnai noach = all Goyim — false. The Torah defines “goyim” as גר תושב ונכריים. Sanhedrin refers to ger toshav while Baba Kama refers to Goyim who converted from fear of lions. Talmud never goes out of the parameters established by the Torah – based upon the first commandment. Torah judicial law courts only have jurisdiction within the boundaries of conquered Canaan. G’lut Jews remain in “Egypt”. Clearly the word “Egypt” לא דוקא.
The phrase “חסידי אומות העולם יש להם חלק לעולם הבא” explicitly stated in Tosefta Sanhedrin 13:2, which serves as a foundational source often referenced in Gemara discussions. The Tosefta reads: חסידי אומות העולם יש להם חלק לעולם הבא. Balaam by contrast equated with figures like Cushan-Rishathaim and Laban, symbolizing persistent evil against Israel.
A central dispute arises between Rabbi Eliezer and Rabbi Yehoshua on Tehillim (Psalms) 9:18: “לשאולה רשעים ישובו כל גוים שכחי אלהים” … Rabbi Yehoshua: The verse implies only wicked Goyim (“those who forget God”) – excluded; meaning righteous Goyim—who fear God and act justly—do have a share. This aligns with the Tosefta’s explicit statement, inferring that Balaam, has no share, but “other Goyim” do.
Amalek, as a force of tumah, exploits this vulnerability, attacking “the hindmost” (Devarim 25:18)—interpreted as those spiritually “cooling off” from Torah commitment. The Zohar frames this as a cosmic battle: Amalek represents the sitra achra, preying on those not enveloped in divine chesed. עיין ravkooktorah.org
Rabbi Levi opens with Tehillim 9:6, it compares Amalek’s assault to jumping into a boiling tub: No nation dared attack Israel post-Exodus due to divine awe, but Amalek “cooled” that fear by striking first, targeting the weak stragglers. Therefore the mitzva to ‘remember Amalek’ commands the mussar of the Torah curse labeled today as “antisemitism”.
Amalek as Torah curse: Blessing or Curse defines the first two Sinai commandments. Goyim do not accept the revelation of the Torah; not Amalek, nor any other Goyim outside of ger tzeddik. The Torah, for example, does not apply the phrase ולא ירא אלהים to either Par’o or Sodom.
The ברכה/קללה system – directed at ישראל alone – not at nations outside the Sinai brit. Therefore, the mitzva to make war upon Amalek from generation to generation the Rambam ruling – utterly false this mitzva not dependent upon Amalek ceasing to be Amalek. This mitzva a Torah obligation and a רשות. King Shaul failed to kill the king of Amalek and lost the anointment of Moshiach! Amalek stands upon the Torah commandment to remember Egypt. The 10 plagues judged the Gods of Egypt. Amalek a recurring “plague” upon the Jewish people – akin to the 10 plagues which forced Par’o to release Israel from slavery.
What triggers Torah curses? Jewish assimilation and intermarriage – these two pre-conditions – they define the k’vanna of the 2nd Sinai commandment. Avraham validated in בראשית כ:יא that יראת אלהים does not exist with Goyim comparable to both Sodomites and Amalekites examples. This verse further supports that the prophetic mussar of the Torah – touching Amalek – a mitzva applicable to Jews only. For Jews to accept the blessing/curse Sinai brit they must develop יראת שמים as the יסוד of faith.
The verse ותיראן המילדת את האלהים – שמות א:יז supports the Torah which validates that certain Goyim have a portion in the world to come. The three stories of Adam, Noach, and Avram introduce the curse concept of g’lut, along with the Egyptian story of slavery and the Wilderness generation and later prophetic visions of g’lut. Both T’NaCH & Talmud do not teach history. Rather both command mussar. Noacide law according to Rambam false, because violation of the 7 mitzvot qualifies as a Capital Crime which requires a Sanhedrin court to judge that case.
The jurisdiction of Sanhedrin courts together with their prophets police Sanhedrin enforcers – restricted only to the conquered lands of Canaan. Prophets such as Moshe and Yona sent to g’lut exiles. Proof both Par’o and the king of Assyria – there “repentance” not the same as t’shuva, which requires that the bnai brit “remember” the oath sworn by the Avot. Rosh HaShanna and Yom Kippur emphasize t’shuva as remembering this “forgotten” Torah, like as do the lights of Hanukkah.
The Torah brit of blessing/curse defines the k’vanna of the first and second Sinai commandments. Therefore, impossible to learn the פרט mitzva – to war against Amalek – as outside these כלל commandments. Prior to the Sin of the Golden Calf Israel only accepted these first two Torah commandments – before they demanded that Moshe rise up and receive the rest of the Torah, lest they die. Bottom line: Oral Torah interprets Written Torah as the basis of judicial common law throughout the generations.
The concept of 7 mitzvot applies only to ger toshav persons because the Torah only designates two types of Goyim living in the oath lands: Ger Toshav and NaCreem\Shomronim. A ger toshav who violates the 7 mitzvot does not face Divine judgment from Heaven but Sanhedrin judgment on this earth. Post Sinai revelation of the Name HaShem, תורה לא בשמים היא. Amelak immediately attacked after Israel left Egypt due to the curse of the ערב רב. This Torah curse defines the k’vanna of the Sinai 2nd commandment.
The blessing/curse brit in the משנה תורה makes a “legislative review” based upon the opening first two commandment revelation. Mesechta Baba Kama refers to the סוד language of “mountain hanging by a hair” as a reference to the first two Commandments encompassing all other Torah commandments. The Sages teach that their does not exist in Torah common law any valid deductive fixation of Torah verses. פרדס Oral Torah inductive\dynamic rather than foreign Greek deductive\static logic. The sin of the Golden Calf falls within the כלל of the revelation of the Torah at Sinai; it learns this Torah revelation as viewed through the lenses of its opposite דיוק Torah revelation.
Torah logic stands upon making דיוקים/inferences. The Golden Calf לאו דוקא no different from Egypt as the Av case of g’lut. The concept of “providence” lies outside; Torah courts only judge Cases based upon the evidence presented to the court. “Providence” exists as speculation on par with the Mishnaic command for a Man not to think about matters above, below, or behind him. Ger Toshav a term introduced in the משנה תורה-דברים.
The phrase “הרי הן כהררים התלויים בשערה”, commonly used to illustrate concepts in halacha. While this metaphor often appears in discussions about Shabbat and Yom Tov, clearly not exclusive to only these topics. A recurring Torah theme: do the toldot follow the Avot asked by both mesechtot Shabbat and Baba Kama – based upon the introduction of Av wisdom commandments introduced in the Book of בראשית as opposed to toldot commandments introduced in the Books of שמות ויקרא ובמדבר. The closing Book of the Torah משנה תורה-דברים defines the Torah revelation of “law” as common law as distinct from statute law. Rabbi Yechuda HaNassi based his Mishna upon the name of the Book of דברים\משנה תורה.
Torah commands in the language of Man: it instructs through משל\נמשל. Devarim 28 Life/Death brit does not exclude Goyim from life in the world to come. The aggadah of mesechta Sanhedrin refers directly with Goyim populations who volunteer or choose to live within the borders of the lands of Canaan together with the bnai brit chosen people. Obviously, Goyim living outside of the borders of Canaan have the freedom to choose to pursue justice and live moral lives. Just as the Torah does not deny Goyim belief in their Gods. So too Torah does not deny that righteous Goyim have a portion in the world to come. But the mitzva of Amalek does not address this issue. Amalek “hates” the revelation of the Torah. Amalek loves oppression, theft, incest, and judicial bribery of justices.
The Av commandment of Shabbat, (Av meaning great) a wisdom commandment/time-oriented mitzva. It’s mussar instructs the concept of “domains”. The 6 Mishnaic Orders learn from the four Shabbat “domains” which function as precedents to understand the intent of Rabbi Yechuda’s Shas. The precedent of shaking the 4 species in 6 directions, another precedent – which refers to domains. The four species on sukkot, they compare to the four arch types of children on Pesach night. Etrog/wise; Lulav/child who does not know to ask. (The Talmud instructs: train your lips to say: I do not know.); Hadas/Simple child and Arov/Evil child. The concept of “domains” and “personality types” remembers how the so called 10 commandments serve as precedent to remember the slavery of Egypt.
The Av\\toldot Torah concept not literally a technical legal taxonomy limited to 39 melachot and Avot nezikin! Rather, the revelation of the Torah at Sinai introduces Av commandments in בראשית and toldot commandment in the next three Books of the Written Torah. משנה תורה\דברים as a common law judicial system stands upon בניני אבות/precedents. Herein defines the role of secondary Torah commandments which in and of themselves do not require k’vanna.
However, by weaving secondary Torah commandments as precedents to interpret the k’vanna of other Torah commandments … both this and that become Av Torah commandments. The Rambam code in no way shape or form affixes halachot as precedents to interpret the k’vanna of the language of the Mishna. This expunges his halachic opinions as valid. Halacha does not stand upon its own two feet any more that post sealing of the Shas Reshonim commentaries. Quoting a Reshon comment divorced from the Gemara/Mishna common law precedent relationship – false. מלאכה – a wisdom. עבודה – does not require wisdom. Hence Shabbat forbids doing “wisdom” on that day in order to dedicate to do wisdom throughout the week.
The mitzva of Shabbat therefore inclusive of the entire week rather than a separated single day. Shabbat serves as an Av precedent; while its domains limited to four: Private, Public, Karmelit, Makom patur – domains as a concept לאו דאקא, not limited only to legal geography טיפש פשט. The purpose of aggadah to make a drosh to interpret prophetic mussar k’vaana. The loom: warp\weft weaves prophetic mussar as the k’vanna of doing halachic ritual commandments.
Why? To raise these secondary Torah & rabbinic commandment to Av wisdom time-oriented mitzvot from the Torah. Herein defines how the B’HaG interprets the revelation of the Torah at Sinai. Why the commandment to תמחה את זכר עמלק? Assimilation and intermarriage define the “kapo” Jewish ערב רב. Just as the ערב רב worshipped the Golden Calf so too the ערב רב – Jewish assimilation and intermarriage with Goyim causes the plague of antisemitism throughout the Ages. The Torah refers to this curse by introducing the story of Amalek.
The Mishna code: constructs a Case/Din judicial common law system. The Rambam code “baptizes” pursuit of justice as Torah faith unto belief in a Universal God; hence both Xtianity and Islam exist as “sister religions”. His code further changes judicial common law – restricted to the lands of Canaan unto religions statute dogmatism applicable to all lands as well as Canaan. This violates the first two Torah commandments. Only Israel accepts the Torah at Sinai. Therefore, HaShem a local tribal god and not a Universal Monotheistic God. The Rambam code therefore qualifies as “false prophet” theology which seeks to seduce Israel to worship other Gods. Halacha in g’lut adapts to meet the crisis of the times.
During the Dark Ages where international trade and communication died, g’lut Jewry needed a simple fix to maintain a distinct Cohen/Jewish identity. Cursed to endure among Goyim cultures and hostile lands, Jews existed as stateless refugee populations scattered like leaves blown in a wind-storm. But the common law B’HaG and Rif and still later Rosh codes radically differ from the Rambam perversion. They do not divorce Gemara halachic precedents from their home Mishna! The Rambam code obliterated Talmudic common law precedent interpretations of witnesses into Roman statute law rigid decrees. Just as did Rome obliterated the 2nd Jewish Republic of Judea and slaughtered perhaps half of all Jews living in Judea!
The distinction of מלאכה from עבודה, NT Greek does not discern between skilled “work” from unskilled “work”. This fact has nothing to do with Greek philosophy. The super-commentaries written on the Rambam code fail to link his halachic rulings to a B’hag, Rif, Rosh identical halachic ruling affixed to a specific Mishna. Hence all the commentaries written to correct the central flaw of the Rambam code failed to learn halacha as common law precedents to interpret the language of a specific Mishna as viewed from different perspectives!
If antisemitism caused by assimilation and intermarriage, periods of extreme persecution when ghetto Jewish communities highly observant and endogamous? G’lut by Torah definition a curse. Amalek by Torah definition a curse. The floods of Noach mesechta Sanhedrin interprets as the curse of swearing false oaths. This interpretation fits well with the Blessing/Curse direct connection made to the opening first to Sinai commandments.
The דיוק of mesechta Baba Kama 4 avot nezikim separates Tam from Muad damagers. The latter like Amalek inflicted damages with k’vanna. The רמז – words within words בראשית — אש ברית. The fire of the brit – false oaths. Hence not 4 avot nezikim but rather 8 avot nezikim. ערב רב Jews damage Israel with k’vaana; their choice to abandon Jewish cultural practices and customs, to embrace foreign identities and intermarriage results in avoda zara like as happened to king Shlomo. שמות יב:לח ושמות רבה יח:ד explicitly the curse of the ערב רב.
Consider it a bad Omen to assume a “short war”. Trump a wise man, and he knows the error made under IKE’s CIA which installed the Shah itself rather than permit the People of Iran to overthrow and replace Mossadegh, who had nationalized the Iranian oil industry. This government change involved the US alliance with Britain. Three years later during the 1956 Suez Canal attempt by Britain and France those 2nd tier powers attempted to dominate the Middle East without the blessing of the US.
Both the US and Stalin informed both 2nd tier powers to “Get Out”. Hence in the June 1967 War with LBJ tied down and “occupied” with Vietnam – akin to Russia in the Ukraine today – Britain & France wrote UN Resolution 242 with the intent to restore their domination over the balance of Power in the Middle East. They succeeded, till President Trump’s Abraham Accords and recognition of Jerusalem as Israel’s Capital once again expelled the imperialist dreams of both countries. Hence today, the Gaza Peace Board excludes Russia, the EU, Britain and the UN – previously known as the “Quartet” which imposed tremendous pressure upon Israel to surrender to their two-State solution dictate. That dictate produced the disastrous Oslo Accords and the 2005 unilateral withdrawal from Gaza by PM Shamir which resulted in the Second Intifada, also known as the Al-Aqsa Intifada, and the Oct 7th 2023 Abomination War.
Please may the זימן גרמא מצוה של הבדלה sent מלאכים to bless the US-Israeli support for the Iranian People to cast the 1979 Islamic Revolution upon the dung heaps of history where it may rot in the stink of the defunct USSR empire, French & British dead empires, the Nazi, Maoist Communist empire and the Pol Pot monster who stands in the shadow of Ottoman guilt over the Armenian Genocide. A Torah oath curse upon the Av tuma avoda zara of Amalek-ערב רב.
Research suggests shared anti-colonial themes with Palestinian struggles, but direct parallels are interpretive; Sands focused on political status in UK prisons, not territorial sovereignty like Palestinian claims.
Bobby Sands, a member of the Provisional Irish Republican Army (IRA), died on May 5, 1981. As an Israeli who condemns the illegal occupation of Northern Ireland by the British, I made a 6 Day support hunger strike, Shabbat to Shabbat no food and no water. Years later, while learning in Yeshiva made a second Shabbat to Shabbat hunger strike in protest against the Rabin ‘peace plan’. The British/French Two State “Solution” directly compares to the Nazi “Final Solution”. Never Again! Post Shoah oath sworn by Israeli Jews to ever again permit Europeans to dictate Jewish Problem solutions.
Bobby Sand’s hunger strike unto death, emblematic of the fight against perceived oppression and injustice. His refusal of food, a potent act of defiance, underscored the desperation of those within the Northern Irish prison system. Sands and his fellow strikers sought recognition not merely as criminals as British propaganda promoted, but as political prisoners fighting against colonial rule.
Bobby Sands and other hunger strikers in Northern Ireland framed their struggle for political recognition and autonomy in terms similar to the language used regarding “occupied territories,” drawing parallels between their situation and that of Palestinians in areas like Samaria and Gaza. This comparison is often seen as part of broader narratives around occupation and resistance in both contexts.
Common law stands upon open debate between the precedents brought by the prosecution and defense attorney judicial brief. Obviously all precedents do not exactly duplicate the current case heard before the court. The Bobby Sands IRA opposition to British “nationalization” of Northern Ireland compares to the UN condemnation of Jordan’ss “nationalization” of the West Bank in 1950.
The comparison to UN anti Israel Resolutions started with the genesis of post June 1967 War, where France prior to the outbreak of that war made a arms embargo against Israel, and England declared its neutrality. Yet both countries, once obvious that the Arabs had lost demanded an immediate cease fire! The cease-fire that ended hostilities, primarily enforced by the United Nations through diplomatic pressure. The UN Security Council did not impose a Cease-Fire after 6 Days of War, comparable to the British propaganda which white-washed Sands as merely a “criminal”.
The red-herring propaganda which depicts PLO\PA/Hamas\Islamic Jihad etc etc etc “struggles”, as most essentially related to land rights and statehood — completely and utterly false. Arafat’s rejection of Clinton’s “peace” conclusively proved that the PLO then and now view Jews as a dhimmi sub-class, that has no rights to self-determination. The famous Three-NOs post June War functions as a strong precedent when coupled with the Hamas multiple wars against Israel — post their election victory where the slaughtered and expelled Arafat’s PA. Hamas not only invalidated Arafat’s absurd claim that the PLO functioned as the sole representative of the Palestinian people, which virtually all Quartet media press propaganda organs promoted as false. But Hamas. in conjunction with Arafat initiation of the 2nd Intafada distinctly proves that a Palestinian state “objections to the Jewish State rhetoric”, merely fig leaf to conceal Arab embracement of the Nazi Shoah ideals. Just as the Nazi defeat uprooted Hitlers’ Fascist Germany so too and how much more so the Arab countries whose schools promote pro Nazi literature taught to their children by “neutral” UNWRA criminals likewise invalidate any and all post defeat Arab claims to any Israel lands captured through wars which Arab states themselves promoted with the aim to throw the Jews into the Sea.
Clearly the domestic politics of the PA and Hamas or Islamic Jihad differ from one another. Just as do the policies of Sunni Arabi differ from Shiite Iran. But the hatred of the continued existence of the Jewish state, at least in the minds of Israelis who have witnessed bus bombings of children school buses merits deep consideration. Israeli strategic foreign policy views Saudi Arabia as the chief cornerstone of the acceptance of Israel by Arab countries as viable partners in the community of Middle Eastern states. This vision remains as the key Israeli foreign policy to integrate the Jewish state into the Middle East. The Saudi kingdom holds tremendous respect among the other OPEC states. Just as Nasser in his day cast a huge influence among other regional Arab state powers.
Equating the Quartet two-state solution to the Nazi Final Solution clearly political hyperbole; comparable to South Africa’s blood libel slander accusation of genocide before the UN. Any and all foul attempts to slander Israel by unilateral equivocations which declare Israeli guilt equal to the Nuremberg conviction of Nazi arch fiends of Humanity – hyperbole without humor or shame! To grasp the seriousness of this propaganda disgrace, requires context and precedents. The ’48 cease fire lines left an exposed Jewish state with a narrow 9 mile waste-line enticement for further invasions with the goal to throw the Jews into the Sea. All Arab-Israeli “extermination-wars” fought on multiple fronts. Hitler condemned the Kaiser’s defeat due to a two front war! Syrian control over the Golan Heights permitted Syrian bombardments of Tiberias Galilee between 1948 to 1967. Just as Russia, by precedent, experienced huge trauma from two Western European invasions through the plains of the Ukraine, so too the European collective guilt for ‘Final Solution’ has permanent consequences which evoked the Torah oath: “Never Again”!
Jordanian defilement of Jewish grave-stones coupled with destruction of ancient Jewish synagogues in ’48 captured East Jerusalem has permanent consequences. Israeli victories in wars against multiple Arab countries has enforced the Will of our people to embrace the strategy of Patton. Patton’s rebuke of Montgomery: “We should be fighting on the continent, not on this island,” emphasized the strategy of fighting wars on enemy territory.
The UN/Quartet appeasement of Arab hostility repeatedly expressed through the treatment of Israel as a protectorate territory rather than an Independent State who twice won its National Independence through Wars. These foreign imperialist powers not only promote the lie that the UN “created Israel”, they seek to dominate and control the balance of power across the Middle East! They pretend to this very day that ‘they’ determine the national borders of the Jewish state and where Jews in Israel can establish our Capital City. Only Israel among all UN member States excluded as a recognized member of their own region! This UN Apartheid racism – stinks.
Hamas’s charter catagorically rejects Israel’s existence, viewing it as illegal occupation. No different from the PLO charter which declares only ’48 Israel and not the UN condemned illegal Jordanian nationalization of the “West Bank” as occupied territory. The post 1922 Mandate which the League awarded as “spoils of war” to the British, witnessed the almost immediate British separation of Trans-Jordan from its “Palestine Mandate” at the Jordan river.
Furthermore, Arafat’s initiation of the 2nd Intifada on the heals of the Oslo Accords further supports Israeli fundamental distrust of “Palestinian war propaganda”. Israelis, like myself, we tend to the view: that Arabs learn to lie and steal straight from their mothers’ milk; comparable to the ‘Quartet’ language of peace. Merely pie in the sky – empty noun/rhetoric. The verb shalom stands upon the foundation of trust. Repeated attempts by foreign states outside the Region, to dictate and/or dominate the Arab Israel dispute/narrative; examples such as: the continuous stream of UN anti-Israel condemnations, forces Jerusalem to view declarations made by foreign states which share no common border with the Jewish state as extremely suspect.
An obvious over-simplified political argument: “All Arab/Israeli Wars” fought not over “borders” but rather Arab absolute rejection of dhimmi Jews possession of equal rights to achieve self-determination in the Middle East. Classically wars fought between nations determine the international borders of nation-states. The Arab/Israeli conflict not a black & white single issue conflict. The 1917 Balfour Declaration and the 1922 League of Nations Mandate awarded to post WWI Britain, based upon the central premise to establish a Jewish National Home in Palestine; the Arab reaction condemned both it and later UN Resolution 181 as an affront to Arab pride – akin to machismo masculine roles in Latin American societies. None the less, it seems to me that the פרט Oct 7th 2023 Abomination War, serves to define the כלל “All Arab/Israeli Wars”. The ’73 War Sadat fought to restore Arab pride following the over whelming Israeli victory in 1967 brought as witness.
Zionist Jews immediately denounced this first 1922\23 White Paper, no different than how the Arabs viewed UN 181. But the British betrayal of Chamberlain’s Nazi Appeasement policies which later betrayed both the Czech Republic in 1938, and a year later imposed a blockade of Palestine to prevent Jews the avenue to escape from the Nazis have permanently stained Jewish trust in European states – especially post Shoah. This 2nd White Paper, its tremendous impact upon Washington political decision. Similar to how US Presidents supports UN 242 and 338 Resolutions until President Trump! Contrast the open door policy where pre WWI Washington invited Jewish refugees fleeing from the death spiral collapse of Czarist Autocracy of 3 Centuries duration (about equal to the ghetto gulags the Catholic Church imposed upon Western European Jewry) to FDR’s decision to close the borders of the US to prevent Jewish refugees to flee from the Nazis. His Administration focused upon the immediate war effort, and Depression economic strain as justifications. Who could have imagined the horrors of European moral depravity defined by the gospel: by their fruits you shall known them.
The post-June 1967 War context, where France’s arms embargo and Britain’s neutrality shifted following the Arab defeat, highlights attempts by these two defeated former ‘Great Powers’ to re-impose their domination over the balance of power in the Middle East following their post 1956 failed attempt to seize control of Nasser’s Suez Canal!
UN resolutions as a form of perceived “apartheid” illustrates a sentiment that resonates with many who feel marginalized in discussions about their national identity. The insistence that foreign powers dictate borders and political statuses — provoke significant anger and resentment, particularly in the context of a nation that has fought for its existence through multiple Wars consequent to British imperialism which promoted from day ONE of their British “Palestine Mandate” a divide & conquer “gospel” which likewise exploded in multiple wars fought between the India Pakistan British Two-State Solution/imperialism.
All Arab/Israeli Wars fought over Arab rejection of the Balfour Declaration/League – Palestine Mandate. Arab countries view “dhimmi Jews” on par with failed Crusader States of the Middle Ages! Britain nor France ever a “neutral power” in Middle East and North African Sahel-MENA, despite the collapse of both empires across the world. Their colonial ambitions shaped many of the political and social structures that persist today. The ongoing interventions and pressures from these nations often manifest in support for certain regimes or factions, solidifying their roles as active players rather than neutral observers. This involvement has contributed to entrenched conflicts, making it challenging for the region to achieve self-determination. Hence Britain and the later EU share an open alliance against the continued existence of the Jewish State.
During the Oct7th 2023 Abomination War, both countries sided with the South African blood libel slander which falsely accuses Israel of genocide. Contrast the British guilt during the invasion of Iraq that killed some 650,000 Iraqis and resulted in millions of wounded which threw Iraq and later Libya into utter chaos and anarchy.
French imperialism stand out through the criminal war crimes in both Algeria and Vietnam! Accusations made against Israel accusing it of genocide/Nazism exposed the repeated racial anti-Jew Christ Killer themes which culminated in the European Shoah slaughter of 75% of Western European Jewry in less than three years of Europe’s 2nd General Civil War of the 20th Century.
The leadership of President Trump’s Abraham Accords achieved in his first Administration and his Gaza Peace Board reject British and French imperialism which initiated their Two State Solution UN 242, 338, etc “dictates”; wherein the UN Frames the Two State Solution as the only viable way to achieve peace in the Middle East political rhetoric propaganda. Post the Oct7th Hamas defeat the UN, Britain, France, Russia, “Quartet” excluded from the Board of Peace. While Saudi Arabia sits together with Israel on this board of Peace! This accomplishment represents a radical and total rejection of the post ’67 attempts by these hostile imperialist 2nd rate powers to dictate terms imposed upon the Jewish state which seek to return Jewish international border to the post ’48 cease fire lines.
Debates among historians who often frame the Middle East conflict viewed through the lenses of statehood and territorial sovereignty while ignoring that States have interests rather than friendships, invalidates post war “historical” comments made by foreign peoples not directly touched by the wars fought. Something akin to an American citizen condemning Putin’s war to prevent the Ukraine joining the NATO alliance completely oblivious due to a shallow reactionary understanding that Russia permanently shaped by two European invasions of Russia through the flat plains of the Ukraine. Reactionary ignorance on this scale resembles the Cuban missile crisis during the Kennedy Administration.
The UN and ICC open condemnation of Israel for genocide exposes foreign state hostile diplomacy of “genocide” compared to the Nazi Shoah. As the trivialization of the Shoah, 80 years after these war crimes against humanity. No different from how Turkish diplomacy minimizes the Armenian Genocide.
The Arab propaganda which emphasizes the false pie in the sky claim of “focus on ending occupation and achieving statehood” hides and conceals the cold hard FACT – post the 1948 Independence War the League of Nations AND UN Protectorate of Palestine ceased to exist. Furthermore, this Arab lie conceals that the Ottoman empire referred to this region of its empire as: “Greater Syria”; the Sick Man of Europe being bankrupt relied upon European cartographers to make maps of 19th Century Ottoman ‘Greater Syria’. During the entire British mandate, all Arabs unilaterally rejected the Balfour foundation of the League Palestine mandate. In point of FACT, Arabs cannot even pronounce the letter P of this foreign European word!
Arab “Filastin” embraces the defunct Roman imperialism which changed Judea unto the European word “Palestine”. The renaming of Judea to Palestine by both Greek and Roman European empires exactly matches the interests of Arab propaganda today. Had Ben Gurion named the new Jewish State Palestine, the Palestine Post would not be the Jerusalem Post today!
The UN partition plan – 181 rejected consequent to all Arab state refusal. Modern revisionist history by Quartet hostile powers and Arab states “acceptance” of 181 – utter pie in the sky non sense. Israeli Independence permanently terminated the influence of 181. 1948 simply not 2026 not for Arab Israeli disputes nor any other country in the annuls of history. Arab and Quartet attempts to “internationalize” the Arab/Israeli dispute only expose their State interests of imperialism.
Conflict Resolution 