Understanding Shotrim/police in the Context of Prophets: Prophets in ancient Israel, such as Samuel, were instrumental in anointing kings (e.g., Saul and David) and had the authority to remove them when they strayed from God’s commandments. This role underscores their significant influence in governance and leadership. While Shotrim typically refers to the enforcers of the Sanhedrin’s rulings, the term can also encompass a broader understanding of those who uphold the law and moral order, which includes the prophetic role. Prophets, as Shotrim, enforce divine law and moral standards, guiding the people and leaders in their adherence to God’s will. The connection between prophets and Shotrim highlights the integration of spiritual and legal authority in ancient Israel. Prophets not only provided spiritual guidance but also played a crucial role in the political landscape, influencing the leadership and direction of the nation.
Author: moshe kerr
Now the Intelligence bureaucraps heads on the chopping block. May these Intelligence chief of Obama some behave like chickens with their heads chopped off.
Gaza War News:
Israel has commenced the first stages of a military operation aimed at taking control of Gaza City. IDF spokesperson Brig. Gen. Effie Defrin confirmed that preliminary operations had begun and that Israeli forces are holding positions on the outskirts of Gaza City. Reservist mobilization: Around 60,000 reservists have been called up in preparation for the anticipated offensive.
Evacuation warnings: Israel has issued instructions to hospitals, medical personnel, and humanitarian organizations to evacuate Gaza City and relocate southward, in preparation for the offensive. Displacement & shelling: Shelling has intensified in neighborhoods like Sabra, Tuffah, Shuja’iyya, Zeitoun, and Jabalia—leading to thousands of residents fleeing, though no large-scale evacuation of the entire city has been confirmed.
No full-scale evacuation yet: While warnings and preliminary movements are underway, there is no confirmed, organized evacuation of Gaza City’s civilian population en masse. Many residents reportedly remain in place, citing a lack of safe areas for relocation. Operation has started, but is not a completed “invasion”: The offensive is in its earliest stages. Forces are operating on the periphery; ground invasion into the heart of the city has not yet occurred.
Pay Back is a bitch.
The European Barbarians once again behave like DOGS, this white trash of Europe once again barks and behaves as DOGS, who returns and eats their own guilty Shoah vomit.
“Propaganda CLAPTRAP” White House ATTACKS BBC Coverage Of Gaza War
Europe Backs The Wrong Horse & Israel Will SHOW Them All!
I Was Wrong About Israel: What I Learned on the Ground – YouTube
Europe does not determine the Capital of Israel ie UN Resolutions 2334 base upon 242, 338, and 446! Europe does not determine the international borders of the Jewish State. The Rome Treaty which established the ICC at the Hague has zero jurisdiction over Israel, Russia, or the US. Why? Because no nation of the above mentioned signed on to the Rome Treaty.
Netanyahu vs. Macron & Starmer — French President Emmanuel Macron (July 2025) announced France would recognize a Palestinian state at the UN General Assembly. In response, Netanyahu publicly denounced the move, calling it “rewarding terror” and saying it “risks creating another Iranian proxy … not to live in peace beside [Israel]”. He and other Israeli ministers labeled the decision as a threat to Israel’s security and sovereignty.
French President Macron (August 2025) later denounced Netanyahu’s claim that recognition was fueling antisemitism in France, calling the accusation “abject” and “erroneous”. Similarly, UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer (mid-2025) stated that the UK would recognize a Palestinian state unless Israel took steps to end the crisis in Gaza. Netanyahu lambasted this stance, again denouncing it as weakening Israel—which threatened that acknowledging Palestine would embolden terrorism.
Golda Meir (PM 1969) — Meir famously stated in a 1969 Sunday Times interview: “There was no such thing as Palestinians.” This comment was a denial of Palestinian national identity—not a critique of foreign leaders for recognizing a Palestinian state—but it does represent a public, even provocative declaration on the subject.
Ariel Sharon (early 2000s) — In 2004, Sharon suggested that French Jews should emigrate to Israel, citing growing antisemitism in France. French officials condemned the remarks, but these comments were directed at French domestic conditions—not a response to French recognition of Palestine. In 2003, Ariel Sharon expressed that a demilitarized Palestinian entity might be acceptable under certain conditions—but there’s no record of him publicly denouncing other leaders for their recognitions.
What’s News on the Russia-Gate Scandal directly implicating Obama and Clinton and corrupt Intelligence bureaucraps?
Tulsi Gabbard, now serving as Director of National Intelligence (DNI) under President Trump, has indeed escalated claims alleging a conspiracy by Obama-era intelligence officials—including Barack Obama himself, James Comey, James Clapper, and John Brennan—to delegitimize Trump’s 2016 victory.
She released declassified documents, referred these individuals to the Department of Justice, and prompted the creation of a Justice Department “strike force” to examine her allegations. Widely respected bipartisan investigations—including Senate Intelligence Committee findings—affirm that Russia indeed interfered in the 2016 election (though not to the extent of altering vote counts). These findings do not support Gabbard’s assertion of a fabricated narrative.
Gabbard articulated serious allegations against Obama-era officials and took official actions—declassification and DOJ referrals.
Lebanon News: The Radical Change in the Balance of Power in the Middle East consequent to the Oct7th Abomination War.
Lebanon has begun disarming non-state armed groups, specifically starting with Palestinian factions in camps such as Burj al-Barajneh, as part of a broader push to ensure weapons are held only by six official state security agencies. Additionally, Lebanon’s cabinet has approved the objectives of a U.S.-backed plan to disarm Hezbollah by the end of 2025, tasking the army to oversee this transition.
In response, Hezbollah has outright rejected the plan, with its deputy leader Naim Kassem denouncing it as serving Israeli interests and warning against its implementation. Lebanon’s president has strongly rebuffed Iranian interference, emphasizing national sovereignty and rejecting foreign meddling—remarks delivered during a meeting with a senior Iranian official. Reports also indicate that Iran appears anxious about the implications of Hezbollah’s potential disarmament, viewing it as a major strategic setback to its regional influence.
UNIFIL continues to operate across southern Lebanon, with its current mandate extended through August 31, 2025. The Security Council is debating a new resolution that not only aims to extend the mission, but also signals an eventual withdrawal of UNIFIL—contingent on the Lebanese government achieving full control over its territory and so long as a comprehensive political solution is in place.
UNIFIL has experienced dangerous incidents in recent years: Israeli tanks forcibly entering UN positions, multiple attacks on watchtowers, and injuring or endangering peacekeepers. Locally, some communities have pushed back against UNIFIL patrols, especially when they occur without Lebanese Armed Forces (LAF) accompaniment, fueling tensions.
A tragic incident on August 9, 2025, killed six Lebanese soldiers during munitions dismantling at a Hezbollah-linked depot, underscoring the persistent danger in the area. Its future beyond August hinges on Security Council deliberations and Lebanon’s ability to assume full security responsibilities.
Despite a legislative ban by Israel that came into effect on January 30, 2025, targeting UNRWA’s operations in Israeli territory including East Jerusalem, UNRWA continues to provide essential aid in Gaza, the West Bank, and among refugee camps across the region. The agency has lost access to its Jerusalem headquarters, and many of its international staff have been forced to leave; yet, local staff remain on the ground delivering services under increasingly hostile conditions.
Israel’s ban and accusations of UNRWA’s alleged ties to Hamas (including dismissals of some staff) have had far-reaching effects—diplomatic, legal, and operational. The agency remains under scrutiny, including court cases in the U.S. Still delivering critical services across Gaza and the West Bank, despite bans and evacuation of international staff.
Netanyahu and his government are using the possibility of halting security cooperation as a diplomatic lever against proposed UK recognition of Palestine. And earlier in the year, Netanyahu did launch a sharply critical public attack on Starmer and other Western leaders.
Prior to the Oct7th Abomination War a Constitutional Crisis over the power of the Supreme Court of Israel exploded and threatened the continuation of the Knesset Government in Jerusalem. Currently Israel has no Constitution. But based upon the 1917 and ’22 Balfour Declaration and Palestine mandate which defines Zionism as the Jewish right to self-determination in the Middle East … self-determination defined as the Jewish right to establish a Constitutional government in our own country.
Shabbat Reay
Prophecy The concept of a prophet is central to the Torah reading this week. But what exactly is a prophet? And what is a prophet’s role? The Hebrew word for a prophet is…
___________________________________________
___________________________________________
Prophets serve as the “police” of the Sanhedrin common law lateral courts. These courts mandated with משנה תורה, interpreted to mean — “Legislative Review”. For example: Samuel, Nathan, Ahijah, Elijah, Hosea – major and minor prophets – Anointed and/or deposed Kings. This Torah constitutional mandate of Sanhedrin common law\משנה תורה courtrooms based upon the Book of D’varim having the second Name of משנה תורה.
Legislative Review radically different and set apart from British Common law courtrooms. The latter cannot void a law passed by Parliament. Parliamentary “statute law” defines the Constitution of England. Hence no common law British court has the power to overturn any law passed by Parliament. Not so Sanhedrin common law courts. Any law imposed by any tribal leader within the 12 Tribes of the Israelite Republic and even statute laws imposed by a king of Yechuda or Israel, the Great Sanhedrin common law lateral courts possess the Constitutional mandate of משנה תורה to void and overturn.
Addressing the Av Mishna of קידושין
The Mishna of קידושין does not simply record dialectical disputes as a form of “preserving judicial disputes.” It functions like a court record. Beit Hillel serves as the Tort judge defense attorney. Whereas Beit Shammai functions as the prosecuting attorney. Now this distinction – significant because it distinguishes lateral common law courts from vertical Goyim courtrooms.
Great Britain operates Common law court rooms just as does Talmudic common law! However, in the case of the British Courts, all statute laws imposed by the British Parliament in London – they define the British Constitution. As such, no common law British courtroom can over-turn any statute law passed by Parliament. Torah common law, known as משנה תורה operates completely differently – despite being a common law courtroom which absolutely requires earlier court room judicial rulings as precedents. Both court systems stand on this shared foundation of common law.
None-the-less ספר דברים mandates “Legislative Review”, a critical interpretation of the intent of משנה תורה. Torah Sanhedrin common law courts have the Torah Constitutional mandate to over-rule any government statute law imposed by any of the 12 Tribes of the Republic or the Central Government of king David. A Torah prophet serves as an agent of the Great Sanhedrin Court. As such prophets can anoint a man from any tribe of Israel – KING.
And Great Sanhedrin Court prophets can remove any king from Office. As the prophet Shmuel did with king Shaul. This fundamental distinction of Torah Great Sanhedrin courtroom powers of “Legislative Review” differentiates Torah lateral courts from Goyim vertical courts. The latter court the State pays the salary of the judges and the prosecuting attorneys. As such a court case pits פלוני vs. the State. The Torah refers to the state paying the salaries of Judges and prosecuting attorneys as “bribes”. צדק צדק תרדוף absolutely abhors bribery; it qualifies as an example of Av tuma avoda zarah?
This abstract term defines the 2nd Sinai commandment. Do not copy the culture and customs practiced by the Goyim and do not marry foreign women who reject the revelation of the Torah at Sinai. Judicial justice serves as the כתר Av tohor time-oriented commandment which stands upon תמיד מעשה בראשית. The kabbalah that doing tohor time-oriented commandments creates the chosen cohen people from nothing. Hence the Torah begins with בראשית. Mesechta ברכות teaches that the world was created for the sake of the Jewish people. Who exactly qualifies as the Jewish people? The chosen seed of Avraham Yitzak and Yaacov – the chosen Cohen people.
Obviously, Cohen, Levi, Israel – לאו דוקא terms of reference. A precedent proof, the din that tefillah stands in the stead of korbanot. Amalek – antisemites – continually refer to the Jewish people as a race. The Nazis referred to Jews as “the inferior Race”. Jewish inheritance determined from the mother. However, the central obligation of קידושין, as a pre-condition of marriage, upon the father to educate his children in the oath brit/alliance faith.
Our Mishna compares to ברכות which opens with kre’a shma ערבית, just as the Av Mishna of קידושין opens with האשה. The vertical courtrooms of Goyim jurisprudence the prosecuting attorney prioritized over the defense attorney. But the model of Sanhedrin courts the reverse. The Halacha follows after Hillel!
The Xtian Bible and Muslim Koran both fail to acknowledge that Torah prophets serve as the “police” of the Sanhedrin courts! Hence neither Muhammad nor JeZeus could qualify as prophets. This מאי נפקא מינא distinction equally applies to the acquisition of a wife. The Baal acquires his soul through marriage. The qualifications for serving as a judge in a Jewish court (Beit Din) includes personal attributes and life experiences that are deemed important for this role.
The Talmud suggests that an unmarried man is generally considered less fit to serve as a judge. This is because marriage is seen as a significant life experience that contributes to a person’s maturity and understanding of family dynamics, which can be relevant in legal matters. Similarly, the absence of children can also be viewed as a factor that affects a person’s qualifications.
Having children is believed to provide additional insights into the responsibilities and challenges of family life, which can inform a judge’s decisions. The underlying principle is that judges should possess a deep understanding of human nature and the complexities of life, which are often gained through personal experiences such as marriage and parenthood.
What specifically does a man acquire through wife and family? Answer: Fear of Heaven. A Sanhedrin Judge by definition has an excellent Good Name reputation.
Conflict Resolution 