Author: moshe kerr

Why all the block voting one-sided UN Resolutions which condemn Israeli settlements in Samaria and Gaza – simply a sack of shit?

International Law did not simply poof appear Abracadabra out of the blue. Modern diplomacy “diplomatic relations and embassies” started with the Italian states (Renaissance Venice and others) prior to the unification of Italy in the 1860s! Post War Waterloo – Treaty of Paris: the product of Congress of Vienna and the Vienna settlement system, just as important than the creation of the UN post WWII because its stands upon the Magna Carta and 1648 Peace of Westphalia. Whereas the UN primarily stands upon Wilson’s last peace-point! Despite the US never joining the League because the Senate under the leadership of Senator Long opposed that treaty.

“Treaty”, the UN too a “treaty”, no different than the “Treaty of Paris in 1815!!! The UN did not invent international obligations; rather simply, the UN just another major treaty-based framework like earlier settlements. The UN itself, a treaty-based framework. It did not invent international obligations; its post WWII “creation”, simply a new institutional layer, like icing on a cake, on top of older treaty settlement traditions—much like the major postwar settlements that came before it.

Propaganda such as UN 2334 declares pre-existing Arab Palestinian borders and therefore the 4th Geneva Convention: the principle of uti possidetis (preserving existing borders) to a specific, prolonged conflict, an utter sack of shit! Palestine ceased to exist the moment Israel declared its National Independence. Uti Possidetis used primarily in decolonization contexts (e.g., Africa in the 1960s, South America in the 19th century) to say that newly independent states should inherit the administrative borders they had under the colonial power to prevent chaos.

The post war UN 242 promotes the canard prohibition of the acquisition of territory by war! What a load of shit. This revisionist history ignores Alsace–Lorraine, British illegal settlements in Ireland, and the robbing of Prussia post WWII – together with its forced mass population transfers of 10s of millions of German natives inhabitants of Prussia, Czech, and Hungry much like Nakba distorts the plight of post war Arab refugees and ignores the far greater number of Jewish exiles expelled by force from Arab countries post the defeat of Allah and Arabs.

UN 2334 claims: preventing the transfer of an occupying power’s civilian population into territory that is legally “occupied” because the previous sovereign status – disputed. Disputed by whom? Not the original PLO Charter! Nor the 1950 UN condemnation of Jordan annexation of Samaria! Nor the 1923 British separation of Trans-Jordan from its “Palestine mandate” land at the Jordan river. Palestine ceased to exist with the fall of the Roman empire! That Czar means Caesar a psychotic European insanity.

Its simply not the place of the UN to view the Nakba defeat of Allah and Arabs post ’67 as creating a new “occupied territory” status. What extinguished the previous inhabitants rights in Samaria as opposed to Arab ’48 citizenship in Israel? The repeated Arab demand, like a dog returning to eat its own vomit, to throw the Jews into the Sea! Herein, defines Oct 7th 2023 and Yerusalem demand that Hamas and UNWRA have to go. No different than President Trump who declares today that the Mullahs of Iran cannot attain nuclear weapons.

The Geneva Convention Article 49, Paragraph 6: Explicitly states: “The Occupying Power shall not deport or transfer parts of its own civilian population into the territory it occupies.” Jordan post ’48 the Occupying Power of Samaria and Egypt the Occupying Power of Gaza. The UN 1950 condemnation of Jordan’s “West Bank” annexation, even the king of Jordan has repudiated! Israel not a UN protectorate territory post ’48. The UN has no authority to declare Samaria and Gaza as “occupied” lands! Regardless of the judicial fraud of the ICJ and ICC nonsense.

Post Shoah Israel swore a oath “NEVER AGAIN” only Jewish courts shall judge Israelis. The “courts” of Europe and Islamic lands amount to a tits on a boar hog hoax on the order of the British Star Courts and the Courts of Par’o in the days of Moshe & Aaron! Dhimmi Arab refugee populations LOST their right to self determination after all Arab states Nakba of Allah and repeated defeats in wars – they started to complete the Nazi genocide of Jews! Furthermore, Arab states have unilaterally failed to repatriate their dhimmi Arab refugees like as did Israel’s 850,000 Jewish refuges expelled from Arab countries in 1948.

The total UN block voting great power domination which permitted defeated France to sit as a permanent member with veto powers as corrupt as a whore in church who promotes Sunday SALE prices! Post ’67 Nakba: both Allah and Arabs totally defeated. UN 242 compares to the post war Arab 3 NO’s – both as dead as a door-nail like belief in JeZeus in European Capitals today! No middle ground for “throw the Jews into the Sea” dhimmi ’67 Arab refugees. Just like no middle ground for UNWRA and Hamas post the Oct 7th 2023 Abomination War.

The UN does not dictate the international law narrative. The rights of dhimmi Arab refugees never repatriated by any Arab country proves the UNWRA as a total abomination. Post ’64 Palestinians as dhimmi refugee populations have no rights in any Arab or Muslim country – all of whom reject the obligation to repatriate Arab refugees! The load of shit that the UN pretend that Israel obligated to do what no Arab country has ever done, proves the UN simply a sack of block voting great power domination of the balance of power in the Middle East sack of shit.

The concept of סמוכים in the Talmud

The 9th sugya of קידושין begins on dof .ו — with ת”ר and concludes on the same page with תיקו. This sugya prioritizes halachic precedents by which it “reviews” the language of the Mishna from unique witness perspectives – comparable to a Sanhedrin court who hears witness testimony on the New Moon. The framers of this sugya employ zero of these hermeneutic rules (middot). Consequently, based upon the T’NaCH precedent: when a specific sugya of NaCH has no שם השם contained within that specific sugya of NaCH prophets, then that sugya exists as a continuation of the privious NaCH sugya middot דאורייתא. The T’NaCH דאורייתא sh’itta of middot precedents the Talmud middot דרבנן likewise follow the דאורייתא middot model. Hence both T’NaCH middot דאורייתא and Talmud middot דרבנן share an אב\תולדות relationship which models the אב טהור חכמה מצוות and קום ועשה ושב ולא תעשה תולדות commandment relationships by which Torah Law qualifies as משנה תורה – common law. The previous sugya stands upon a כלל\פרט inductive logical reasoning.

The classic middot of 7, 10, 13 middot ideally suited to interpret halachic warp vertical threads. Whereas the 32 middot ideally suited to interpret the aggadic horizontal weft threads of the Talmudic text “LOOM”. Just as both T’NaCH and Siddur stand on סמוכים, so too the 9th sugya סמוך to the 8th sugya of our Gemara. A fundamental error made by the much later religious statute law halachic codifications – their arbitrary organization of halachot into religious ritual subjects uproots and destroys Talmudic judicial common law future ideal – when Jews slauhgter the Romans and reconquer Yovel liberty for the 12 Tribes and establish the Torah constitutional mandate of Sanhedrin Capital and Torts common law courtrooms.

The fundamental error made by assimilated g’lut Jewry, their av tuma avoda zara worship of other Gods, treats statute law ritual halacha as binding in and of its own right. G’lut לא לשמה Jews worship halacha as the will of God! תורה לא בשמים היא. G’lut Jews have no power nor liberty. Hence just as when David fled unto g’lut and “worshipped other Gods” so too all g’lut Jews throughout history. The basis of rabbinic סמוכים follows דאורייתא סמוכים; weigh the Ashkenazi against the Sephardi Order of פסוקי דזמרה – where סמוכים elevates a שבח unto a שם מלכות ברוכה. The precise Order of the פסוקי דזמרה not central because whether before or after the שם ומלכות blessing, סמוכים\structural juxtaposition/ transforms this lower order כמו תהלים שבח unto a שם ומלכות שבועה ברכה.

Consequently the g’lut narishkeit of davening the Siddur according to the טיפש פשט simple meaning of words as false as the assumption that a Goy can read his bible translations and understand T’NaCH common law. The latter inductive Oral Torah reason-logic learns through making comparative precedents! צדק צדק תרדוף does not correctly translate into become a Frumm religious fanatic who wears outfits of 3 centuries past! סמוכים defines the purpose of the שחרית blessings around the קריא שמע which affixes תפילה דאורייתא to תפילה דרבנן by means of סמוכים; just as do the latter blessings within the Shemone Esrei stand סמוך to the first opening blessing אלהי אברהם – מלכות. Herein explains the השם אלהינו השם in the קריא שמע. Only the revelation of the 13 tohor דאורייתא middot duplicates the k’vanna of accepting tohor middot לשמה as the ‘yoke of the kingdom of heaven’ דאורייתא תפילה שבלב.

Prof. Menachem Elon (1923-2013) sat as a justice of the Israeli Suprem Court (1977-93) and later as Deputy President (1988-93). He also served as the head of the Jewish Law Institute at Hebrew University in Jerusalem. He contrasted Case Law/Common Law (Torah She’be’al Peh) aganst Statutory Law (post-Talmudic codes like the Mishneh Torah or Shulchan Aruch).

The סמוכים works like this: היה מדבר עם האשה על עסקי גיטה וקידושיה……ת”ר הרי את אשתי… איבעיא. The 8th sugya Rabbi Yose and Rabbi Yehuda מדבר עמה על עסקי גיטה וקידושיה … understands that wisdom Torah commandments require k’vanna, just as the korban of Cain rejected together with the barbeque to heaven made by the two eldest sons of Aaron. Torah wisdom fundamentally separates the holiness of commandments similar to blessing discerned from praises.

The תיקו addresses the limitations of inductive פרט כלל logic. The 8th sugya learned the כלל – עסוקין באותו עניין – if a couple discuss קידושין, like a shidduch date and she accepts from him money without saying a word – מקודשת. The 9th sugya addresses a similar פרט question:  What if he does not remain silent, but .., מיוחדת לי, עזרתי, צלעתי, תפושתי … speaks using non-standard, ambiguous expressions?

Human speech introduces potential contradictions; any married couple will attest to this reality. While the language צלעתי, עצורתי etc meets the כלל the unconventional language rather than known standard הרי את מקודשת לי – introduces doubt as to his purpose, which lowers the זמן גרמא מצוה to a קום ועשה מצוה.

In a deductive statutory model, a word either fits a predefined definition or it does not. In the Talmudic common-law model, the court must evaluate how a reasonable listener\witness interprets the interaction. Our current sugya accepts the language of לקוחתי מהו, due to דברים כד:א – כי יקח. But all other cases of doubt raised invalid as sanctifying time-oriented commandments. Toldoth commandments and halachot stand upon hazakah presumptions but wisdom Torah commandments require בית מיחוש.

פרק א’ קידושין — סוגיה ח

This halachic sugya begins on ה: אמר שמואל בקידושין נתן לה כסף ושוה כסף and goes to the top of דף ו. שילח את עצמו. It prioritizes a basic fundamental, hence not stated fact: just as Avram swore an oath to cut a brit at the brit cut between the pieces – Sarai did not cut an oath brit there. So too in the mitzva of קידושין the obligation rests upon the man and not the woman. Hence the Torah states “כי יקח” and not שיקח את עצמו which the Mishnaic language האשה נקנית amplifies.

Reversing the syntax invalidates the legal mechanism regardless of intent. Rav Pappa asks Abaye whether Shmuel holds that ידיים שאין מוכיחות (incomplete/ambiguous statements) qualify as valid yadayim. The Gemara resolves that in Kiddushin, unless its time-oriented wisdom k’vanna requires some explicit or anchored by prior discussion (“עסוקין באותו עניין”), forbidden simply to assume syntax conclusions. It seems to me, that syntax requires some type of containment כלל; learning a specific פרט within the context of a larger paragraph or T’NaCH sugya.

Statute law violates this Oral Torah logic which interpret the k’vanna of Torah commandments. The famous Codes: Yad, Tur, & Shulkan Aruch copy the style of Roman statute law rather than the Talmudic common law sh’itta; they function as a coping mechanism.

G’lut Jewry endured extreme oppression under both church and mosque boots. Kar’o witnessed the opening of the first ghetto gulags which caused a population transfer, Jews fleed the Pope\Par’o judicial oppression to Poland and Ukraine lands.

לא לשמה גלות statute law fails to grasp לשמה משנה תורה Sanhedrin common law courts requires Yovel liberty for all 12 tribes of the Republic. Jews required to reconquer our homeland & establish לשמה – Yovel liberty for all 12 Tribes. The k’vanna of sanctifying Chag Pesach through removing חמץ from the house & brit melah! The latter time-oriented commandment separates the wheat from the chaff – Yishmael from Yitzak – the term ברית like the Name revealed in the 1st Sinai commandment never employed in the Koran. Translations of words from one culture to another – by definition a false prophet Muhammad error. Prophets command mussar only to the generations of Israel. Prophets never speak in Goyim tongues for targeted Goyim audiences. Because neither Esav nor Yishmael ever accepted the revelation of the Torah!

Since Jordan a separate country, this requires a Sanhedrin Court to designate the Yichus inheritance of the 12 Tribal borders; for example Gaza as the land of Reuven and the Golan as the land of Gad etc. Our Gemara employs the language אין כאן בית מיחוש. G’lut Jewry cannot determine tribal Yichus just as no g’lut Jew can sanctify the mitzva of Moshiach, any more than a woman dressed in men’s trousers can therein choose her sex! אין כאן בית מיחוש – no room for calculation/error or mistake here.

Nazir 2a–2b: “מהו דתימא… קמ”ל” duplicates the רבוי מיעט logic of rabbi Akiva. The language employed in that Av Mishna: כל כינויי נזירות כנזירות stands upon the יסוד of “איש איש”, “כי יפליא”, “איש כי יזיר” as they address the Nazirite vow. This בנין אב second source precedent places a limitation upon a larger assumption.

This case weighs the individual’s subjective k’vanna as primary; hence both mitzvot in this context time-oriented commandments which require k’vanna. Specifically cutting an oath brit requires taking responsibility for ones’ actions. Hence the Torah has blessing vs curse לשמה vs לא לשמה, life vs death. The cutting of a קידושין brit establishes the “nuclear” family of the Jewish people. Hence the Book of בראשית opens with stories of married couples from start to finish.

The Talmud does not stand “divorced” from the T’NaCH as the Goyim insist. The Xtians declare their NT has replaced the law; their man/God saves from sin. This addition to the expulsion of Adam blots out the din of g’lut לשמה. Muhammad’s last prophet and Jews corrupted the Torah no different from the Xtian “Old Testament” perversion.

Oral Torah interprets how the generations can make an aliya of mitzvot from תולדות commandments which do no require k’vanna to time-oriented commandments which require k’vanna לשמה. G’lut statute law halachic codes by definition לא לשמה תולדות halachot. Hence many Reshonim learn the mitzva of קידושין as a rabbinic commandment. 

The precedent קמ”ל functions as a מיעט which similarly ‘chops down the cherry tree’ that Yadayim – excluded from the מהו דתימא larger assumption. Hence, the קמ”ל prevents the ribui from devolving into lawless subjective assumption(s). Statute law codes have no such legal boundaries. Hence neither the Yad nor the Shulkan Aruch ever interpreted a baal MIshna based upon Gemara halachic precedents.

Yeshivot do not instruct their talmidim to compare & contrast כלל ופרט – כי יקח weighed against the opposing רבוי מיעוט\מהו דתימא…קמ”ל. The latter requires context to validate the nedar – תפוס בשערו; just as קידושין requires עסוקין באותו עניין.

Statute law halachic codes prioritize religious ritual observances as the substance of faith in God. Consequently, even a g’lut rebbe can sanctify the mitzva of Moshiach while in g’lut! Rambam’s egg-crate book of commandments focuses upon bi-polar תולדות מצוות. His code destroyed the warp/weft garment of T’NaCH\Talmudic common law; he usurped the name משנה תורה like JeZeus saves from sin! Impossible not to have the consequences of g’lut, without either avoda zara or hatred without cause. Hence g’lut Jewry routinely comes to Israel and declares that Israelis too live in g’lut because no messiah has built a house of wood and stone פסל- פסול. Moshe did not take Israel out of Egypt in order to build a Catholic Cathedral! 

Based upon his Guide, clear as the Sun in the Heavens on a cloudless day that the Rambam embraced the organization of Greek static deductive reasoning. He did not possess clarity how the weft Aggadic portions of the Talmud amplify and complete the warp Halachic opinions brought in the Gemara serve their “baal” Mishna. Weaving the culture and customs practiced by the chosen Cohen people לשמה requires both opposing threads; his flat two-dimensional halacha turned Torah Constitutional mandated Sanhedrin common law courts into denuded religious ritualism which has no k ‘vanna; where prophetic mussar shapes the Yatzir Tov tohor middot within the heart. 

The Jewish People bear full responsibility for the Torah curse of Amalek – understood through the ערב רב which lacked ‘יראת אלהים’, as the basis for the Golden Calf interpretation of the 2nd Sinai Commandment. The Torah curse of g’lut has its Amalek antisemitism consequences.

The Torah brit obligation of Blessing Curse defines Amalek antisemitism throughout the 2000+ years of לא לשמה cursed Jewish g’lut. Jewish assimilation to foreign cultures customs and manners, coupled with intermarriage defines the wisdom k’vanna of the 2nd Sinai commandment. Goyim simply the reactionary consequences of g’lut Jewry worshipping Av tuma avoda zarah.

When an institution claims a monopoly on ultimate truth, governance undergoes a fundamental shift. Legal status tied directly to ideological alignment. Populations divided into a caste system: orthodox (the inner circle), the tolerated/subjugated: dhimmi stateless Jewish refugees – European land restriction during an Agricultural based economy where crops produced national wealth.

The legal apparatuses designed to root out “heresy” established administrative precedents for state surveillance, ideological tribunals, and mandatory public alignment. Laid the deep cultural and institutional groundwork upon which 19th-century “scientific” racial anti-Semitism built and stands upon to this day. The failure to intervene during catastrophic moral crises often stems from cold geopolitical calculation rather than mere ignorance. While Leo Tolstoy denounced the horrific 1903 Kishinev pogrom and CS Lewis explicitly condemned Nazi racism and Hitler’s persecution of the Jews as early as 1933 in his private correspondence and published works (such as The Pilgrim’s Regress); arguing that Western civilization owed its fundamental moral concepts directly to Israel – their rebukes had little or no effect.

When secular political ideologies—such as totalitarian collectivism or radical ethno-nationalism—adopt the totalizing, non-negotiable structures of dogmatic belief, they replicate the same mechanisms of forced conformity, purging of “heretics,” and mass violence. The structure of dogmatic belief—whether religious or secular—creates a template for totalitarianism, where “heresy” (dissent or difference) justifies purification, segregation, and mass violence.

Religious institutions, when fused with state power, transform theological categories into tools of governance: Michel Foucault argued that power operates through “regimes of truth”, where institutions define what qualifies as “normal” or “deviant.” Reinhold Niebuhr held that religious absolutism, when unchecked by humility, can justify violence as “moral necessity.” Elie Wiesel stated that the Shoah, not just a failure of humanity but a failure of theology—when God’s silence was interpreted as permission for evil; effectively saying “Where was JeZeus during the Shoah or Allah during the ’48 & ’67 Nakba — Nietzsche ‘God is Dead’ philosophy which denounced the whole of both religious institutional belief in their “idol” Gods.

Both Stalinism, Nazism, and Maoism made absolute claims possessing a monopoly on truth. The Nazis converted “historical truth” unto “racial purity”, effectively defines the premise: Thought Crimes of heresy – from the Church concealing the ancient Greek polytheistic texts of philosophy to Pol Pot, Pinochet dictatorships consequent to Kissinger/Nixon great power imperialism. The modern Surveillance State simply replaces confession booths and kapo informants. Orwell’s 1984 directly addresses the concept of “thought crimes”. Dehumanized Jews as “Christ-killers” (John Chrysostom’s homilies), economic scapegoating (usury laws, guild exclusions), eschatological violence (Crusades, blood libels) etc. By these fruits produced later generations of hatred without cause.

Martin Luther’s On the Jews and Their Lies (1543), often cited as a precursor to Nazi rhetoric. Xtian anti-Judaism created a cultural template model which later morphed into Hitlers’ modern bureaucratic efficiency and pseudoscientific racism. Bolshevism, Nazism, and even post WWII UN – replicate religious structures. All had their “sacred texts, despised heretics such as Stalin’s “kulaks”, and public show trials to purge the Party! The Soviet gulag and Boar War concentration camps set the stage for Auschwitz.

The Inquisition served as a classic—purifying the body politic of “corruption” or “contagion;” similar to the Black Plague slander: “the Jews poisoned the wells”…ideological purity codes double as mechanisms for wealth extraction and state consolidation reappears whenever totalizing political systems operate without institutional checks. Religion used for power coercion, segregation, expulsions, and mass violence; forced conformity; violence framed as “truth” … Xtianity a 2000+ year thought crime against Humanity which reached apex crisis during the Inquisition, 30 Years War, and the Shoah…religious doctrine + centralized power + incentives to remove rivals + fear of revolutionary unrest against the corrupt status quo by peasants enslaved by church authorities who employed their cheap labor to build gross Cathedral abominations of church or mosque injustice against dhimmin minority populations.

Religious truth-claims repeatedly functioned as an authorized language of governance: when clergy/faith movements merged with centralized state or imperial power, theological categories used to define who belonged, who disloyal, and who could be removed—making coercion, segregation, expulsions, and mass violence easier to justify as moral necessity. The comparison to Bolshevik theology vs Menshevik and Social Revolutionaries counter “theology” smells similar to church heresy stench – such as the slaughter of French Huguenots! The war crimes of the Crusades which slaughtered almost all the Jews in Germany, coupled with the Blood-slander almost every Easter which resulted in pogroms and mass population transfers which post WWII so hardily condemns today!

Thought-Crimes against Humanity defined through church and mosque theological creeds at the point of a sword. The slaughter of Indian populations across the New World & Pacific by missionaries working with their great power Armies; which plundered South American civilizations such as the Aztec and Inca. The American First Amendment and French ‘Rights of Man’ fundamentally abhorred church + state, or missionary + empire slavery of feudal peasant populations. Citizen Rights + people living in cities rather than upon feudal villages defines the industrial revolution. Church and mosque forced conformity inquisition purity…race, expulsion/segregation, mass violence—control over the “Pravda-press”; salvation “monopoly” defines the 2000+ years of church/mosques thought crimes against Humanity.

The theology of Luther and Calvin compare to the Great Schism between the Orthodox and Catholic church – both of which claimed inheritance to the revived Roman Empire; the post WWII attempt to stamp “Palestine” upon Judea a harsh example of thought crimes against Humanity. The Shoah, the most powerful example of the Dreyfus Trial racism which infects the disease inherited by Europeans expressed through Church thought crimes. Church and Mosque religious theological fanaticism across medieval and early modern Eurasia and the colonial world, religious truth-claims repeatedly became tools of centralized power, enabling coercion of dissent, forced conformity of minorities, and conquest justified as moral necessity.

Religious institutions and imperial/state power merged, authorities used theology to delegitimize rivals and define outsiders as threats, making violence and forced conformity easier to authorize and carry out. Guilds in medieval Europe enforced by courts, armies, and property systems, belief and religious identity the primary weapons where religious doctrine functioned as an ideological weapon at the point of a sword. The annual Easter pogroms, taxation without representation, denuded Jews of all their wealth prior to forced mass population transfers England in 1290, France 1306, Germanic kingdoms; the fruits of crushing Par’o like judicial corruption and injustice produced the ghetto gulags of three Centuries duration and the mass population Jewish retreat to the Ukraine and Poland which thereafter witnessed the brutal Cossack revolts!

Neither the Dreyfus Trial nor the later Shoah occurred in a political vacuum. Attempts to declare the Shoah a Nazi crime ignores the 1939 White Paper and FDR’s closure of the Golden Medina to Jews attempts to flee. The contrast between the FDR policy and pre-WWI welcome of Jewish refugees from the Pale of Russia a day and night difference.

The Allied refusal to bomb the rail lines leading to the death camps coupled with the Red Army stopping its advance in sight of the Warsaw Ghetto revolt and the post War rat-lines and complicity of Pope Pius XII and Prostestant Luthern Church pro Nazi alignment against the Communists cannot stand exiled and excluded from the contexts of the Big Picture of European historical barbarism.

Nature/Nurture – genetics did not cause the Shoah. Rather the guilt rests upon the environmental cultural history of European and Muslim great power politics throughout the Ages passed down from generation to generations – straight from their mothers’ milk. Hannah Arendt’s banality of evil (ordinary people, indoctrinated by systems) support’s the “mother’s milk” cultural-historical conditioning metaphor.

Can faith in God be redeemed? Emphatically NO. Can Herzl’s dream of a Jewish State which righteously pursues righteous judicial justice among the Jewish people within the borders of our homeland, despite Jews being just like Goyim – only more so, define the definition of faith affixed to Sanhedrin common law Federal Courts which practice legislative review over the tribal economic autonomy and statute law Parliament in Jerusalem prosper? Emphatically YES. Why? Because this defines the vision of Zionist self determination.

ICC Khan, a bald faced liar.

Attempts by NT Greek to equate the two culturally different terms as a word for word targum false. Aramaic far closer to Hebrew than Greek. To declare that agape accurately defines אהבה stripped of all surrounding T’NaCH contexts – expressed through Torah commandments and still later through rabbinic halachot behaves like a terrorist who hijacks an aircraft and flies it into a building, like as happened on 9/11 2001.

Goyim like dogs who chase their tails. Sophomoric translations never define abstract terms. Greek term agape\ἀγάπη has no cognate connection what so ever with the Hebrew verb אהבה. The latter, defined according to the Talmud: acquisition of a purchase requires a transfer of ownership, commonly referred to as משיכה—i.e., without the act of pulling/drawing the item into his possession—as possible with movable properties.

In matters of tohor spirits/middot – the משיכה actively entails the study of T’NaCH aggadic mussar and how that prophetic “rebuke” applies to ritual halachic practices which define Jewish culture and customs. For example: קידושין, this wisdom time-oriented av Torah commandment requires k’vanna which distinguishes the acquisition of a wife from the completely different acquisition of a slave or in the case of Yechuda & Tamar – a prostitute.

Classic Jewish apologetics regarding the NT propaganda replacement theology through Greek and Latin translations: that the “container/form” (the word) – kept, but the substance\tohor spirit k’vanna (the content) replaced. Defining ahavah solely through the lens of agape, an av tuma category error/avoda zarah. The NT forgery, starting with its Harry Potter false messiah Job-like imaginary man and crystalized through the writings of Paul not only replace faith as the pursuit of justice among the bnai brit people in the land of Canaan inheritance with belief in some Universal Monotheistic God in heaven; this effectively replaces the responsibility to pursue justice among the Jewish people with JeZeus atones for the original sin of Adam!

The blessing/curse oath sworn brit cut between the Avot with אל שדי Yitzak inherited from Avraham and Yaacove inherited from Yitzak requires an עיין טוב. The צר עיין רע of the NT forgery, written over a thousand years later, during the anarchy whereby the Romans renamed Judea unto Palestine distinguished between the two similar but different verbs in the first and second blessings of tefillah דאורייתא קריא שמע…ושוננתם כנגד ולמדתם; the first paragraph verb refers to Torah blessings expressed through the faith of the righteous pursuit of justice among our people.

Whereas the 2nd verb refers to לא לשמה where g’lut Jews do mitzvot consequent to being driven to foreign lands as exiled refugees stripped of both dignity and rights; g’lut Jewry goes through the motions of keeping mitzvot so that they can “remember” should they or their children return and conquer the homeland, to establish Yovel freedom for all 12 Tribes of Israel. Hence the 2nd paragraph employs the verb ולמדתם. Rashi: דברים: יא:יח, brings the precedent of Sifre: Keeping mitzvot in exile serves in part as a preservation mechanism—maintaining the identity, customs, and readiness of the people so that the practices remain intact upon return to the homeland.

The NT directly compares to a metzora\leper who worships av tuma theology which dictates belief in some foreign alien Universal God, as defined by church fathers or mosque sheiks! After Miram spoke לשון הרע, she became publicly disgraced till she became tohor again. Av tuma witchcraft as expressed through the gospels: “fulfill the words of the prophets” has no תקון. Torah prophets, starting with Moshe Rabbeinu command mussar. The Goy mystic Bilaam employed witchcraft to predict the future akin to the priests of Par’o who turned water into blood.

The propaganda rhetoric whereby Goyim routinely slander Israel today, post the Oct 7th 2023 massacre of over 1200 Israelis on Chag Sheme Atzeret and the Red Cross who never made the least bit of an attempt to visit – not in the two years of חמס captivity. Arabs raped and tortured, these stolen prisoners, yet both the UN and ICC court condemn the Israeli PM as a war criminal. Despite later proven that the chief ICC accuser himself, guilty of molesting women and forced to resign in disgrace! Goyim simply have no shame; hence the rebuke: ‘by their fruits you shall know them’ sticks to them as does the Shoah evil reputation has permanently destroyed the ‘Good Name’ reputations of both church and mosque. Whose people lack the faith to even ask: where was JeZeus during the Shoah … where was Allah during the ’48 and ’67 Nakba?

Vietnam: the Achilles’ heel of the US military to this day.

Hồ Chí Minh, so to speak, introduced Mao Zedong’s Peoples’ War strategy to French imperialist colonial forces which greatly contributed to the French defeat at the Battle of Điện Biên Phủ in 1954. This strategy: much like Washington’s surprise attack when he crossed the Delaware river, and the Tet Offensive which caused Walter Cronkite to declare that America had lost the war. Hanoi understood that defeating the U.S. required targeting domestic political will rather than winning tactical firepower engagements.

Hanoi’s strategy wasn’t to preserve troops, but to leverage an asymmetry of resolve. As Hồ Chí Minh famously warned the French in 1946: “You can kill ten of my men for every one I kill of yours, but even at those odds, you will lose and I will win.” They absorbed catastrophic tactical losses (such as the near-destruction of local VC cadres during the 1968 Tet Offensive) because their goal was to wear down American political willpower. Consequently the strategy of Peoples’ War primarily a doctrine mainly about revolution/war-making and undermining the opponent’s political will to fight. When CBS anchor Walter Cronkite declared the conflict a bloody stalemate, LBJ famously remarked, “If I’ve lost Walter, I’ve lost the American public”, directly prompting his decision not to seek re-election.

LBJ tended manage critical US tactical and strategic decision from the White House; perhaps a consequence of Truman firing general MacArthur. Fearing a repeat scenario where US ground troops crossing the 17th Parallel into North Vietnam might draw China (or the USSR) directly into a nuclear-era war, LBJ instituted strict operational constraints. LBJ and civilian advisors manually selected bombing targets over lunch, often overruling military commanders. US ground troops essentially restricted to operating within South Vietnam, forcing General William Westmorland into a search-and-destroy war of attrition against an enemy that held safe havens in North Vietnam, Laos, and Cambodia.

General Westmorland’s US troops primarily fought North Vietnamese limited to South Vietnam. Unlike MacArthur’s the Korean war (June 1950 – July 1953); When Nixon took office, he expanded air strikes into Cambodia to interdict these supply routes.  This covert campaign eventually spilled out into a full regional conflict while failing to sever the infiltration network permanently. Nixon’s illegal bombing of both Laos and Cambodia, a concealed invasion essentially limited to carpet bombing of the Hồ Chí Minh trail. Despite deployment of a huge number of American soldiers, Washington treated South Vietnam on par with a Banana Republic. While South Vietnam (the Republic of Vietnam) suffered from severe internal corruption, political instability, and heavy dependency on US aid, its collapse, upon American withdrawal, did not immediately occur. Nixon like later Biden left huge amounts of military equipment in southern Vietnam and the permanent bitter taste of defeat scared the American psyche.

The strategy of Peoples’ War prioritizes political-propaganda over military conflict against superior military forces and equipment. While it perhaps weighed Vietnamese birthrate averages, in order to prolong the conflict; these calculations not primary considerations. The strategy of Peoples’ War: to promote Civil Unrest within American society as a whole; Early in the war, combat units – heavily composed of working-class and minority service members. Later once student deferments curtailed and white middle-class your drafted, opposition transformed from fringe protests into widespread anti-war activism across suburban America.

In May 1970 at Kent State University, the Ohio National Guard shot and killed four protestors. This exposed the extent of the profound anti-war sentiments. The moral both among the troops – resulted in fracking of Officers; coupled with a powerful opposition at home by the late 60’s. Famously expressed through Jane Fonda pics taken with anti-aircraft Vietnamese guns; she produced radio broadcasts from Hanoi criticizing U.S. actions and urging servicemembers to return home, as part of the controversy around her trip.

The success of the Peoples’ War strategy has shaped and influenced guerrilla conflicts to this day.

The PM of Israel speaks @the UN today. UN General Assembly resolutions are non-binding political declarations driven by block-voting dynamics, not impartial judicial rulings. The attempt to treat the 1949 Armistice Lines (the “Green Line”) as sacrosanct international borders ignores both the text of the agreements and foundational principles of international law.

Its exceptionally easy to tell the bias of News Organizations whose Headlines read “Internationally Isolated”.  The media’s reliance on headlines like “internationally isolated” highlights a fundamental misunderstanding—or deliberate blurring—of how international law actually works. It conflates political block voting in the United Nations General Assembly with binding legal authority, substituting diplomatic posturing for established legal doctrine. The block voting of the UN does not determine Israeli strategic interests.  Post October 7th, 2023 … the UN blood libel vote which declared the PM a ‘war criminal’, amounts to the charge of ‘baby killers’ ‘Jews poisoned the wells’ mob slanders wherein disgraced European countries all across Europe condemn Jews based upon church interest lies.

The 1949 Armistice Agreements: The armistice agreements signed between Israel and its neighbors (Jordan, Syria, Egypt, Lebanon) explicitly stated that the ceasefire lines existed purely as military lines, not permanent political or territorial boundaries. The Israeli-Jordanian agreement specifically noted that the lines were drawn without prejudice to future territorial settlements. In international law, newly independent states inherit the administrative boundaries of the preceding sovereign entity (in this case, the British Mandate) upon independence, unless agreed otherwise. Because no sovereign state existed in the West Bank or Gaza prior to 1948, the 1949 lines never possessed international border status.

The French version of 242 deliberately included “the” as its definitive article before “territories”. French imperialism which broke pre-war its alliance with Israel and imposed a weapons embargo against the Jewish state invalidates post war French hostile “neutrality”; in May 1967, de Gaulle explicitly warned Israeli Foreign Minister Abba Eban against striking first. When Israel did launch its preemptive strike, de Gaulle used it to execute a full strategic rupture  the diplomatic arm of France’s newly minted “Arab Policy” (politique arabe); which every bit duplicates Chamberlains ‘White Paper’ betrayal. In November 1967—the exact month Resolution 242 was drafted—de Gaulle held a press conference infamously describing the Jewish people as “an elite people, self-sure and domineering” (“un peuple d’élite, sûr de lui-même et dominateur”), signaling an official end to the Franco-Israeli special relationship.

At the Security Council in November 1967, French Ambassador Armand Bérard actively aligned France with Soviet and Arab diplomatic positions demanding an unconditional, 100% Israeli withdrawal to the 1949 lines. By insisting on the definite phrasing “des territoires occupés” in the French text, France created a legal hook that its diplomats and former colonies could cite to back Arab demands, while claiming to maintain a “neutral, rules-based” stance. France’s hostile shift only highlights how diplomatic texts are routinely weaponized for regional influence.

UN SC Resolution 2334 duplicates the Chamberlain White Paper disgrace. Post the June War of 1967 UN declarations pretend that ’48 Arab-Israel cease fire lines separated Israeli lands from Palestinian lands. This blood libel compares to the ICC lie that it has jurisdiction to try the Israeli PM, despite Israel’s rejection of both the Rome Agreement and the ICC attempts to ignore the terms of the Oslo Accords which established PA autonomy in Samaria in Area A and some portions of Area B; and completely ignores the Hamas election victory following Arafat’s 2nd Intifada disaster – which resulted in the death of Arafat forced to flee to France to treat a dying man. Under international law, the Oslo PA entity cannot grant a court powers it does not possess itself. The Oslo Accords (specifically Oslo II, Article IX), the Palestinian Authority – given territorial and administrative authority over Areas A and B, but explicitly excluded from criminal jurisdiction over Israeli citizens.

Simply restated: Israel, like Russia and the US not a state party to the Rome Statute. For the ICC to bypass national sovereignty, it requires either a UN Security Council referral or valid delegation of territorial jurisdiction from a sovereign state—neither of which applies here. Sudan (Omar al-Bashir): While the ICC issued arrest warrants for al-Bashir (including genocide counts), but he was not transferred to the ICC and the case did not result in an ICC conviction. The ICC record does not show ICC genocide convictions for leaders from countries that “rejected” the treaty (as in: the ICC tried the leader to conviction). The 1994 Rwanda genocide never tried before an ICC because Rwanda too never signed the Rome Treaty. The ICC has no war crimes conviction of a leader of any country that rejects the Rome treaty.

The 1939 White Paper invalidated the British mandate of 1922. Post War the lie of White Paper lie, that London would establish a Arab Palestinian state with a Jewish minority populations, ceased to exist the moment the British returned the Palestine protectorate back to the UN. The League of Nations itself never condemned the separation of Trans-Jordan at the Jordan river; but all UN member nations, except disgraced Britain and Two-State Pakistan, condemned in 1950 Jordan’s illegal annexation of Samaria. When PM David Ben Gurion named the new nation – Israel, Jewish self-determination categorically rejected the post Bar Kochba Roman attempt to erase the memory of Judea from off the map. Post the Nakba defeat of both Allah and all Arab Armies repeated attempts to complete the Nazi European Shoah in the Middle East, the nation of Israel cast the Roman imperialism of “Palestine-Syria” upon the dung heaps of history. UN slander attempts post ’67 to limit the international borders of Israel to the ’48 cease-fire lines and declare the West Bank and Gaza Palestinian territory – no different from the Chamberlain White Paper – both fall outside the authority of the 1922 Palestine Mandate.

The British Mandate history matters. As does the evolution of international instruments post the destruction of the Roman empire. Post ’67 UN framing treats the defunct League mandate following Chamberlain ‘White Paper’ lines, and subsequent territorial claims in a ways that conveniently supports a Calvinist predetermined theology rather than anything remotely approaching legal analysis. Israel’s post Shoah founding – grounded in Jewish self-determination, and post-1948 political and security developments—along with repeated regional rejection of negotiated resolutions—such as the famous 3-NOS—have shaped the conflict in ways UN rhetoric propaganda totally ignores. But actions have their consequences. The attack on Pearl Harbor resulted in atomic bombs dropped on Japanese cities. Likewise the attack on Oct 7th, 2023 Israeli self determination seeks to force a mass population transfer and establish the yichus tribal territory of Reuven. A complete rejection of Arafat’s ‘Greater Israel’ propaganda.

Arab rejection of UN GA 181 and defeat in to genocide wars to throw the Jews into the Sea, terminated dhimmi Arab refugee rights to self-determination within the post ’67 cease-fire lines. Nasser’s pre-war promise to complete the Nazi genocide in Europe separates the ’48 Independence War from the Six Day War. Furthermore, the PLO Charter of 1964 limits “occupied Palestinian territory” only to 1948 Israel. The failure of any Arab state to repatriate their Arab dhimmi Arab refugees populations, by giving those refugee populations citizenship coupled with the UNWRA abomination which made Arab refugee status transferable to later born generations — definitively proves the UN block voting attempts to slander Israel on par with UN GA 3379!